Table of Contents
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration Nos. 333-205992 and 333-205992-01
PROSPECTUS
$1,300,000,000
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-1
Issuing Entity
Central Index Key Number: 0001720749
| Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC Depositor Central Index Key Number: 0001182534 |
VW Credit, Inc. Sponsor, Originator and Servicer Central Index Key Number: 0000833733 |
| • | The notes are payable solely from the assets of the issuing entity, which consist primarily of motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts and/or installment loans that are secured by new and used automobiles, minivans and sport utility vehicles and funds on deposit in the reserve account. |
| • | The issuing entity will pay interest and principal on the notes on the 20th day of each month, or, if the 20th is not a business day, the next business day, starting on August 20, 2018. |
| • | Credit enhancement for the notes offered hereby will consist of a reserve account with an initial deposit of $1,340,210.50, overcollateralization (in addition to the yield supplement overcollateralization amount) and the yield supplement overcollateralization amount. |
| • | The issuing entity will issue the notes described in the table above. The issuing entity will also issue a certificate that represents a fractional undivided interest in the issuing entity, will not bear interest, and is not being offered hereby. |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these notes or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
| J.P. Morgan | Deutsche Bank Securities | RBC Capital Markets | ||||||
| Citigroup | Credit Agricole Securities | SOCIETE GENERALE | TD Securities | Wells Fargo Securities | ||||
The date of this prospectus is June 27, 2018
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 35 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 46 | ||||
| 48 | ||||
| 49 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 56 | ||||
| 61 | ||||
| 63 | ||||
| Static Pool Information About Certain Previous Securitizations |
63 | |||
| 63 | ||||
| 64 | ||||
i
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
| Page | ||||
| 65 | ||||
| 65 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 72 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 74 | ||||
| 75 | ||||
| 76 | ||||
| Sale and Assignment of Receivables and Related Security Interests |
76 | |||
| 77 | ||||
| 79 | ||||
| 81 | ||||
| 81 | ||||
| 82 | ||||
| 82 | ||||
| 83 | ||||
| 84 | ||||
| 84 | ||||
| 86 | ||||
| 86 | ||||
| 87 | ||||
| 88 | ||||
| Indemnification of the Indenture Trustee and the Owner Trustee |
89 | |||
| 90 | ||||
| 92 | ||||
| 93 | ||||
| 94 | ||||
| 94 | ||||
| 94 | ||||
| 95 | ||||
| 96 | ||||
| 96 | ||||
| 96 | ||||
| 97 | ||||
| 98 | ||||
| 99 | ||||
| 99 | ||||
| 101 | ||||
| 101 | ||||
| 101 | ||||
| 101 | ||||
ii
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
| Page | ||||
| 102 | ||||
| 104 | ||||
| 104 | ||||
| 105 | ||||
| 105 | ||||
| 106 | ||||
| 107 | ||||
| 108 | ||||
| 111 | ||||
| 111 | ||||
| 112 | ||||
| 112 | ||||
| 112 | ||||
| Requirements for Certain European Regulated Investors and Affiliates |
112 | |||
| 113 | ||||
| 119 | ||||
| 120 | ||||
| CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
120 | |||
| 123 | ||||
| 124 | ||||
| 125 | ||||
| 126 | ||||
| 126 | ||||
| 127 | ||||
| 131 | ||||
| APPENDIX A STATIC POOL INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN PREVIOUS SECURITIZATIONS |
A-1 | |||
iii
Table of Contents
The capitalized terms used in this prospectus, unless defined elsewhere in this prospectus, have the meanings set forth in the glossary at the end of this prospectus.
WHERE TO FIND INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus provides information about the issuing entity and the notes offered by this prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or information expressly incorporated by reference into this prospectus, including all appendices hereto. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with other or different information. If you receive any other information, you should not rely on it. We are not offering the notes in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. We do not claim that the information in this prospectus is accurate on any date other than the date stated on the front cover page.
We have started with two introductory sections in this prospectus describing the notes and the issuing entity in abbreviated form, followed by a more complete description of the terms of the offering of the notes. The introductory sections are:
| • | Summary of Terms—provides important information concerning the amounts and the payment terms of each class of notes and gives a brief introduction to the key structural features of the issuing entity; and |
| • | Risk Factors—describes briefly some of the risks to investors in the notes. |
We include cross-references in this prospectus to captions where you can find additional related information. You can find the page numbers on which these captions are located under the Table of Contents in this prospectus. You can also find a listing of the pages where the principal terms are defined under “Index of Principal Terms” beginning on page 131 of this prospectus.
If you have received a copy of this prospectus in electronic format, and if the legal prospectus delivery period has not expired, you may obtain at no cost a paper copy of this prospectus from the depositor or from the underwriters.
In this prospectus, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC, as depositor, has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to the notes. This prospectus is a part of our registration statement. This prospectus does not contain all of the information in our registration statement. For further information, please see our registration statement and the accompanying exhibits which we have filed with the SEC. This prospectus summarizes certain contracts and/or other documents. For further information, please see the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Annual reports on Form 10-K, distribution reports on Form 10-D, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports will be prepared, signed and filed with the SEC by the depositor or the servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. You can obtain copies of the registration statement free of charge upon written request to VW Credit, Inc., 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171. In addition, you can obtain copies of the registration statement from the SEC upon payment of the prescribed charges, or you can examine the registration statement free of charge at the SEC’s offices. Reports and other information filed with the SEC can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. Copies of the material can be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington D.C., 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at prescribed rates. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains a site on the World Wide Web at http//www.sec.gov at which users can view and download copies of reports, proxy and information
1
Table of Contents
statements and other information filed electronically through the EDGAR system. Our SEC filings may be located by using the SEC Central Index Key (CIK) for the depositor, 0001182534. For purposes of any electronic version of this prospectus, the preceding uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference only. We have taken steps to ensure that this URL was inactive at the time we created any electronic version of this prospectus.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” information we file with the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus. Information that we file later with the SEC will automatically update the information in this prospectus. In all cases, you should rely on the most recently filed information rather than contradictory information included in this prospectus. Information that will be incorporated by reference will be filed under the name of the issuing entity.
As a recipient of this prospectus, you may request a copy of any document we incorporate by reference, except exhibits to the documents (unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference), at no cost, by writing us at Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC, 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171 or calling us at (703) 364-7000.
REPORTS TO NOTEHOLDERS
After the notes are issued, unaudited monthly servicing reports containing information concerning the issuing entity, the notes and the receivables will be prepared by VW Credit, Inc. (“VW Credit”) and sent on behalf of the issuing entity to the indenture trustee, who will forward the same to Cede & Co., as nominee of the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”).
Owners of the notes may receive the reports by submitting a written request to the indenture trustee. In the written request you must state that you are an owner of notes and you must include payment for expenses associated with the distribution of the reports. The indenture trustee will also make such reports (and, at its option, any additional files containing the same information in an alternative format) available to noteholders each month via its Internet website, which is presently located at www.sf.citidirect.com. The indenture trustee will forward a hard copy of the reports to each noteholder promptly after it becomes aware that the reports are not accessible on its Internet website. Assistance in using this Internet website may be obtained by calling the indenture trustee’s customer service desk at (888) 855-9695. The indenture trustee is obligated to notify the noteholders in writing of any changes in the address or means of access to the Internet website where the reports are accessible.
The reports do not constitute financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. VW Credit, the depositor and the issuing entity do not intend to send any of their financial reports to the beneficial owners of the notes. The issuing entity will file with the SEC all required annual reports on Form 10-K, distribution reports on Form 10-D and current reports on Form 8-K. Those reports will be filed with the SEC under the name “Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-1” and file number 333-205992-01.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY BE COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM TO PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO CARRY ON A REGULATED ACTIVITY (“AUTHORIZED PERSONS”) UNDER THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, AS AMENDED (THE “FSMA”) OR TO PERSONS OTHERWISE HAVING PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFYING AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS UNDER ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005, AS AMENDED (THE “ORDER”), OR TO PERSONS WHO FALL WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2)(A)-(D) (AS HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.) OF THE ORDER OR TO ANY OTHER PERSON TO WHOM THIS PROSPECTUS MAY OTHERWISE LAWFULLY BE COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED.
2
Table of Contents
NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR THE NOTES ARE OR WILL BE AVAILABLE TO OTHER CATEGORIES OF PERSONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND NO ONE FALLING OUTSIDE SUCH CATEGORIES IS ENTITLED TO RELY ON, AND THEY MUST NOT ACT ON, ANY INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS. THE COMMUNICATION OF THIS PROSPECTUS TO ANY PERSON IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OTHER THAN PERSONS IN THE CATEGORIES STATED ABOVE IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY CONTRAVENE THE FSMA.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (AS DEFINED BELOW). THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFERS OF NOTES IN ANY MEMBER STATE OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA WHICH HAS IMPLEMENTED THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (EACH, A “RELEVANT MEMBER STATE”) WILL BE MADE ONLY TO A PERSON OR LEGAL ENTITY QUALIFYING AS A QUALIFIED INVESTOR (AS DEFINED IN THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (AS DEFINED BELOW). ACCORDINGLY, ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN A RELEVANT MEMBER STATE OF NOTES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY DO SO TO ONE OR MORE QUALIFIED INVESTORS. NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS HAS AUTHORIZED, NOR DO THEY AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF NOTES TO ANY PERSON OR LEGAL ENTITY THAT DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A QUALIFIED INVESTOR. THE EXPRESSION “PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE” MEANS DIRECTIVE 2003/71/EC (AS AMENDED, INCLUDING BY DIRECTIVE 2010/73/EU), AND INCLUDES ANY RELEVANT IMPLEMENTING MEASURE IN THE RELEVANT MEMBER STATE.
THE NOTES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA. FOR THESE PURPOSES, A RETAIL INVESTOR MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF: (I) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); OR (II) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE 2002/92/EC (AS AMENDED), WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR (III) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE. CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 (THE “PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA HAS BEEN PREPARED, AND THEREFORE, OFFERING OR SELLING THE NOTES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE PRIIPS REGULATION.
3
Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF STRUCTURE AND FLOW OF FUNDS
This structural summary briefly describes certain major structural components, the relationship among the parties, the flow of funds and certain other material features of the transaction. This structural summary does not contain all of the information that you need to consider in making your investment decision. You should carefully read this entire prospectus to understand all the terms of this offering.
Structural Diagram
| (1) | All or a portion of one or more classes of notes may be initially retained by the depositor or an affiliate thereof. |
4
Table of Contents
Flow of Funds(1)
(Prior to an Acceleration after an Event of Default)
| (1) | For more information regarding priority of payments, see “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments.” |
5
Table of Contents
This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you need to consider in making your investment decision. This summary provides an overview of certain information to aid your understanding. You should carefully read this entire prospectus to understand all of the terms of the offering.
6
Table of Contents
7
Table of Contents
8
Table of Contents
9
Table of Contents
10
Table of Contents
11
Table of Contents
12
Table of Contents
13
Table of Contents
14
Table of Contents
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. Before you decide to invest, we recommend that you carefully consider the following risk factors.
| An economic downturn may adversely affect the performance of the receivables, which could result in losses on your notes. | An economic downturn may adversely affect the performance of the receivables. High unemployment and a general reduction in the availability of credit may lead to increased delinquencies and defaults by obligors, as well as decreased consumer demand for automobiles and reduced vehicle prices, which could increase the amount of a loss in the event of a default by an obligor. If an economic downturn is experienced for a prolonged period of time, delinquencies and losses on the receivables could increase, which could result in losses on your notes.
A deterioration in economic conditions could adversely affect the ability and willingness of obligors to meet their payment obligations under the receivables. The economic conditions could deteriorate in connection with an economic recession or due to events such as rising oil prices, housing price declines, terrorist events, extreme weather conditions or an increase of obligors’ payment obligations under other indebtedness incurred by the obligors. As a result, you may experience payment delays and losses on your notes. An improvement in economic conditions could result in prepayments by the obligors of their payment obligations under the receivables. As a result, you may receive principal payments of your notes earlier than anticipated. No prediction or assurance can be made as to the effect of an economic downturn or economic growth on the rate of delinquencies, prepayments and/or losses on the receivables. | |
| The return on your notes could be reduced by shortfalls due to extreme weather conditions and natural disasters. | Extreme weather conditions could cause substantial business disruptions, economic losses, unemployment and/or an economic downturn. As a result, the related obligors’ ability to make payments on the notes could be adversely affected. The issuing entity’s ability to make payments on the notes could be adversely affected if the related obligors were unable to make timely payments. | |
| The geographic concentration of the obligors in the receivables pool and varying economic circumstances may increase the risk of losses or reduce the return on your notes. | The concentration of the receivables in specific geographic areas may increase the risk of loss. A deterioration in economic conditions in the states where obligors reside could adversely affect the ability and willingness of obligors to meet their payment obligations under the receivables and may consequently affect the delinquency, loss and repossession experience of the issuing entity with respect to the receivables. As a result, you may experience payment delays or losses on your notes. An improvement in economic conditions could result in prepayments by the obligors of their payment obligations under the receivables. As a result, you may receive principal payments of your notes earlier than anticipated. No prediction can be made and no assurance can be given as to the effect of an economic downturn or economic growth on the rate of delinquencies, prepayments and/or losses on the receivables. See “—Returns on your investments may be reduced by prepayments on the receivables, events of default, optional redemption of the notes or repurchases of receivables from the issuing entity” below. As of the cut-off date, based on the billing addresses of the obligors, 16.56%, 8.29%, 8.06%, 5.99% and 5.81% of the net pool balance of the receivables were located in California, Florida, Texas, New York and Illinois, respectively. No other state accounts for more | |
15
Table of Contents
| than 5.00% of the net pool balance of the receivables as of the cut-off date. Economic factors such as unemployment, interest rates, the price of gasoline, the rate of inflation and consumer perceptions of the economy may affect the rate of prepayment and defaults on the receivables. Further, the effect of natural disasters, such as hurricanes and floods, on the performance of the receivables, is unclear, but there may be a significant adverse effect on general economic conditions, consumer confidence and general market liquidity. Because of the concentration of the obligors in certain states, any adverse economic factors or natural disasters in those states may have a greater effect on the performance of the notes than if the concentration did not exist.
Additionally, during periods of economic slowdown or recession, delinquencies, defaults, repossessions and losses generally increase. These periods may also be accompanied by decreased consumer demand for SUVs or other vehicles and declining values of automobiles securing outstanding automobile loan contracts, which weakens collateral coverage and increases the amount of a loss in the event of default by an obligor. Significant increases in the inventory of used automobiles, especially during periods of economic slowdown or recession, may also depress the prices at which repossessed automobiles may be sold or delay the timing of these sales, which may delay and reduce the amount of recoveries and increase net credit losses. All of these factors could result in losses on your notes. | ||
| Credit scores and historical loss experience may not accurately predict the likelihood of losses on the receivables. | Information regarding credit scores for the obligors obtained at the time of acquisition from the originating dealer of their contracts is presented in “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus. A credit score purports only to be a measurement of the relative degree of risk a borrower represents to a lender, i.e., that a borrower with a higher score is statistically expected to be less likely to default in payment than a borrower with a lower score. Neither the depositor, the sponsor nor any other party makes any representations or warranties as to any obligor’s current credit score or the actual performance of any motor vehicle receivable or that a particular credit score should be relied upon as a basis for an expectation that a receivable will be paid in accordance with its terms.
Additionally, historical loss and delinquency information set forth in this prospectus under “The Receivables Pool” was affected by several variables, including general economic conditions and market interest rates, that are likely to differ in the future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the net loss experience calculated and presented in this prospectus with respect to VW Credit’s managed portfolio of contracts will reflect actual experience with respect to the receivables in the receivables pool. There can be no assurance that the future delinquency or loss experience of the servicer with respect to the receivables will be better or worse than that set forth in this prospectus with respect to VW Credit’s managed portfolio. | |
| Your share of possible losses may not be proportional. | Principal payments on the notes generally will be made to the holders of the notes sequentially so that no principal will be paid on any class of notes until each class of notes with an earlier final scheduled payment date has been paid in full. As a result, a class of notes with a later maturity may absorb more losses than a class of notes with an earlier maturity. | |
16
Table of Contents
| Risk of loss or delay in payment may result from delays in the transfer of servicing due to the servicing fee structure. | Because the servicing fee is structured as a percentage of the net pool balance of the receivables, the amount of the servicing fee payable to the servicer may be considered insufficient by potential replacement servicers if servicing is required to be transferred at a time when much of the net pool balance of the receivables has been repaid. Due to the reduction in servicing fee as described in the foregoing sentence, it may be difficult to find a replacement servicer. Consequently, the time it takes to effect the transfer of servicing to a replacement servicer under such circumstances may result in delays and/or reductions in the interest and principal payments on your notes. | |
| You may suffer losses due to receivables with low contract rates. | The receivables pool includes receivables that have contract rates that are lower than the interest rates on your notes. Interest paid on the higher contract rate receivables compensates for the lower contract rate receivables to the extent such interest is paid by the issuing entity as principal on your notes and additional overcollateralization is created. Excessive prepayments on the higher contract rate receivables may adversely impact your notes by reducing the interest payments available. | |
| Prepayments, potential losses and a change in the order of priority of principal payments may result from an event of default under the indenture. | An event of default under the indenture may result in payments on your notes being accelerated. As a result:
• you may suffer losses on your notes if the assets of the issuing entity are insufficient to pay the amounts owed on your notes;
• payments on your notes may be delayed until more senior classes of notes are repaid; and
• your notes may be repaid earlier than scheduled, which may require you to reinvest your principal at a lower rate of return. | |
| Lack of liquidity in the secondary market may adversely affect the ability to sell your notes. | Recent and, in some cases, continuing events in the global financial markets, including the failure, acquisition or government seizure of several major financial institutions, the establishment of government bailout programs for financial institutions, problems related to subprime mortgages and other financial assets, the de-valuation of various assets in secondary markets, the forced sale of asset-backed and other securities as a result of the de-leveraging of structured investment vehicles, hedge funds, financial institutions and other entities, the lowering of rates on certain asset-backed securities and the current uncertainty surrounding the future of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union, have caused a significant reduction in liquidity in the secondary market for asset-backed securities. This period of illiquidity may continue, and even worsen, and may adversely affect the value of your notes. As a result of the foregoing, you may not be able to sell your notes when you want to do so or you may not be able to obtain the price you wish to receive. See “Risk Factors—The absence of a secondary market for the notes could limit your ability to resell your notes” in this prospectus. | |
17
Table of Contents
| The rate of depreciation of certain financed vehicles could exceed the amortization of the outstanding principal amount of the related receivables, which may result in losses. | There can be no assurance at any time that the value of any financed vehicle will be greater than the outstanding principal amount of the related receivable. For example, new vehicles normally experience an immediate decline in value after purchase because they are no longer considered new. As a result, it is highly likely that the principal amount of a receivable will exceed the value of the related financed vehicle during the early years of a receivable’s term. The lack of any significant equity in their vehicles may make it more likely that those obligors will default in their payment obligations if their personal financial conditions change. Defaults during these earlier years are likely to result in losses because the proceeds of repossession of the related financed vehicle are less likely to pay the full amount of interest and principal owed on the related receivable. Further, the frequency and amount of losses may be greater for receivables with longer terms, because these receivables tend to have a somewhat greater frequency of delinquencies and defaults and because the slower rate of amortization of the principal balance of a longer term receivable may result in a longer period during which the value of the related financed vehicle is less than the remaining principal balance of the receivable. Additionally, although the frequency of delinquencies and defaults tends to be greater for receivables secured by used vehicles, loss severity tends to be greater with respect to receivables secured by new vehicles because of the higher rate of depreciation described above. | |
| Declines in the value of used vehicles may result in losses on the notes. | The prices for used vehicles have generally declined over the last year and may decline further. The pricing of used vehicles is affected by the supply and demand for those vehicles, which, in turn, is affected by consumer tastes, economic factors (including the price of gasoline), the introduction and pricing of new vehicle models, the volume of vehicles whose lease terms are expiring and other factors, including the impact of vehicle recalls or the discontinuation of vehicle models or brands. Decisions by a manufacturer with respect to new vehicle production, pricing and incentives may reduce used vehicle prices, particularly those for the same or similar models. Further, the insolvency of a manufacturer may negatively affect used vehicle prices for vehicles manufactured by that company. The imposition of increased tariffs on imported vehicles may also affect the pricing and availability of both new and used vehicles. An increase in supply or a decrease in the demand for used vehicles may impact the resale value of the financed vehicles securing the receivables. Decreases in the value of those vehicles may, in turn, reduce the incentive of obligors to make payments on the receivables and decrease the proceeds realized by the issuing entity from repossessions of financed vehicles which could result in losses on your notes. In any of the foregoing cases, the delinquency and net loss figures shown in the tables appearing under “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus might be a less reliable indicator of the rates of delinquencies, repossessions and losses that could occur on the receivables than would otherwise be the case. | |
| Retention of some or all of one or more classes of notes by the depositor or an affiliate of the depositor may reduce the liquidity of such notes. | Some or all of one or more classes of notes may be retained or purchased by the depositor or an affiliate of the depositor. Accordingly, the market for such a retained class of notes may be less liquid than would otherwise be the case. In addition, if any retained notes are subsequently sold in the secondary market, demand and market price for notes of that class already in the market could be adversely affected. Additionally, if any retained notes are subsequently sold in the secondary market, the voting | |
18
Table of Contents
| power of the noteholders of the outstanding notes may be diluted. | ||
| Federal financial regulatory reform could have a significant impact on the servicer, the sponsor, the depositor or the issuing entity and could adversely affect the timing and amount of payments on your notes. | On July 21, 2010 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was enacted. Although the Dodd-Frank Act itself took effect on July 22, 2010, many of its provisions had delayed implementation dates or required implementing regulations to be issued. A number of these implementing regulations still have not been issued. The Dodd-Frank Act is extensive and significant legislation that, among other things:
• created a framework for the liquidation of certain bank holding companies and other nonbank financial companies, determined to be “covered financial companies”, in the event such a company is in default or in danger of default and the resolution of such a company under other applicable law would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States, and also for the liquidation of certain of their respective subsidiaries, defined as “covered subsidiaries”, in the event such a subsidiary also determined to be a “covered financial company” because it is, among other things, in default or in danger of default and the liquidation of such subsidiary would avoid or mitigate serious adverse effects on the financial stability or economic conditions of the United States;
• created a new framework for the regulation of over-the-counter derivatives activities;
• expanded the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets activities by the SEC; and
• created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), an agency responsible for, among other things, administering and enforcing the laws and regulations for consumer financial products and services and conducting examinations of large banks and their affiliates for purposes of assessing compliance with the requirements of consumer financial laws.
The CFPB has supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over certain non-depository institutions, including those entities that are larger participants of a market for consumer financial products or services as defined by the rule. As of August 31, 2015 VW Credit is subject to the CFPB’s supervision with respect to VW Credit’s compliance with applicable consumer protection laws.
The Dodd-Frank Act also increased the regulation of the securitization markets. For example, it gives broader powers to the SEC to regulate credit rating agencies and adopt regulations governing these organizations and their activities.
Compliance with the implementing regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act or the oversight of the SEC or other government entities, as applicable, may impose costs on, create operational constraints for, or place limits on pricing with respect to finance companies such as VW Credit. Many provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are required to be implemented through rulemaking by the appropriate federal regulatory agencies. Some of these implementing rules still have not been issued. As such, in many respects, the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act | |
19
Table of Contents
| and its effects on the financial markets and their participants will not be fully known for an extended period of time. In particular, no assurance can be given that these new requirements imposed, or to be imposed after implementing regulations are issued, by the Dodd-Frank Act will not have a significant impact on the servicing of the receivables, and on the regulation and supervision of the servicer, the sponsor, the administrator, the depositor, the issuing entity and/or their respective affiliates.
In addition, no assurances can be given that the framework for the liquidation of “covered financial companies” or their “covered subsidiaries” would not apply to VW Credit or its affiliates, including the issuing entity and the depositor, or, if it were to apply, would not result in a repudiation of any of the transaction documents where further performance is required or an automatic stay or similar power preventing the indenture trustee or other transaction parties from exercising their rights. This repudiation power could also affect certain transfers of receivables pursuant to the transaction documents as described in “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Certain Matters Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency—Dodd-Frank Orderly Liquidation Framework—FDIC’s Repudiation Power Under OLA” in this prospectus. Application of this framework could materially adversely affect the timing and amount of payments of principal and interest on your notes. | ||
| Recent changes to U.S. tax law could adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of the sponsor, the depositor, the issuing entity or their affiliates. | New U.S. federal tax laws were recently enacted that provide for significant changes to U.S. tax law, some of which could have an adverse impact on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the sponsor, the depositor, the issuing entity or their affiliates, or an adverse impact on you. The new rules are complex and lack developed administrative guidance; thus, the impact of certain aspects of its provisions on the sponsor, the depositor, the issuing entity or their affiliates, or on you, is currently unclear. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the possible effects of the new rules on this investment. | |
| Repurchase obligations are limited. | The depositor will be obligated to repurchase from the issuing entity, and VW Credit will be obligated to repurchase from the depositor, a receivable if there is a breach of the representations or warranties regarding the eligibility of such receivable (and such breach is not cured and materially and adversely affects the interest of the issuing entity or the noteholders in such receivable). Any inaccuracy in the representations or warranties will be deemed not to constitute a breach if such inaccuracy does not affect the ability of the issuing entity to receive or retain payment in full on the receivable. The depositor and VW Credit will represent that each receivable is secured by a financed vehicle and that each receivable has been originated or acquired by VW Credit. The issuing entity, the depositor and VW Credit will make warranties with respect to the perfection and priority of the security interests in the financed vehicles other than any statutory liens arising on or after the closing date which may have priority even over perfected security interests in the financed vehicles. While the depositor and VW Credit are obligated to remove or repurchase any receivable if there is a breach of any of their respective representations and warranties regarding the eligibility of such receivable (and if such breach is not cured and materially and adversely affects the interest of the issuing entity or the noteholders in such receivable), there can be no assurance given that any | |
20
Table of Contents
| entity will financially be in a position to fund its repurchase obligation. In particular, the depositor has limited assets and is likely not to have sufficient resources to repurchase a receivable if VW Credit fails to repurchase such receivable from the depositor. | ||
| The ratings of the notes may be withdrawn or lowered, or the notes may receive an unsolicited rating, which may have an adverse effect on the liquidity or the market price of the notes. | Ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold the notes. Rather, ratings are an assessment by the applicable rating agency of the likelihood that any interest on the notes will be paid on a timely basis and that a note will be paid in full by its final scheduled payment date. Ratings do not consider to what extent the notes will be subject to prepayment or that the principal of any note will be paid prior to its final scheduled payment date, nor do the ratings consider the prices of the notes or their suitability to a particular investor. A rating agency may revise or withdraw the ratings at any time in its sole discretion, including as a result of a failure by the sponsor to comply with its obligation to post information provided to the Hired Agencies on a website that is accessible by a rating agency that is not a Hired Agency. The ratings of any notes may be lowered by a rating agency (including the Hired Agencies) following the initial issuance of the notes as a result of losses on the related receivables in excess of the levels contemplated by a rating agency at the time of its initial rating analysis. Neither the depositor nor the sponsor nor any of their respective affiliates will have any obligation to replace or supplement any credit support, or to take any other action to maintain any ratings of the notes.
Accordingly, there is no assurance that the ratings assigned to any note on the date on which the note is originally issued will not be lowered or withdrawn by any rating agency at any time thereafter. If any rating with respect to the notes is revised or withdrawn, the liquidity or the market value of your note may be adversely affected.
It is possible that other rating agencies not hired by the sponsor may provide an unsolicited rating that differs from (or is lower than) the rating provided by the Hired Agencies. As of the date of this prospectus, the depositor was not aware of the existence of any unsolicited rating provided (or to be provided at a future time) by any rating agency not hired to rate the transaction. However, there can be no assurance that an unsolicited rating will not be issued prior to or after the closing date, and none of the sponsor, the depositor nor any underwriter is obligated to inform investors (or potential investors) in the notes if an unsolicited rating is issued after the date of this prospectus. Consequently, if you intend to purchase any notes, you should monitor whether an unsolicited rating of the notes has been issued by a non-hired rating agency and should consult with your financial and legal advisors regarding the impact of an unsolicited rating on a class of notes. If any non-hired rating agency provides an unsolicited rating that differs from (or is lower than) the rating provided by the Hired Agencies, the liquidity or the market value of your note may be adversely affected. | |
| Potential rating agency conflict of interest and regulatory scrutiny. | The Hired Agencies have been hired by the sponsor to provide their ratings on the notes. We note that a rating agency may have a conflict of interest where, as is the case with the ratings of the notes by the Hired Agencies, the sponsor or the issuer of a security pays the fee charged by the rating agency for its rating services. Furthermore, rating agencies, including the Hired Agencies, have been and may continue to be under | |
21
Table of Contents
| scrutiny by federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies for their roles in the financial crisis and such scrutiny and any actions such legislative and regulatory bodies may take as a result thereof may also have an adverse effect on the market value of the notes and your ability to resell your notes. | ||
| The issuing entity will issue floating rate notes, but the issuing entity will not enter into any interest rate hedge agreements and you may suffer losses on your notes if interest rates rise. | The receivables sold to the issuing entity on the closing date will provide for level monthly payments, while the Class A-2-B notes will bear interest at a floating rate based on a spread over one-month LIBOR. Even though the issuing entity will issue the Class A-2-B notes as floating rate notes, it will not enter into any interest rate swap or cap agreements in connection with the issuance of the Class A-2-B notes.
If the floating rate payable by the issuing entity in respect of the Class A-2-B notes increases to the point where the amount of interest and principal due on the notes, together with other fees and expenses payable by the issuing entity, exceeds the amount of collections and other funds available to the issuing entity to make such payments, the issuing entity may not have sufficient funds to make payments on the notes, including the Class A-2-B notes. If the issuing entity does not have sufficient funds to make payments, you may experience delays or reductions in the interest and principal payments on your notes.
The issuing entity will make payments on the Class A-2-B notes out of its generally available funds—not solely from funds that are dedicated to the Class A-2-B notes. Therefore, an increase in one-month LIBOR would reduce the amounts available for distribution to holders of all notes, not just the holders of the Class A-2-B notes. | |
| Negative LIBOR rates would reduce the rate of interest on the Class A-2-B notes. | The interest rate to be borne by the Class A-2-B notes is based on a spread over one-month LIBOR. The London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, serves as a global benchmark for home mortgages, student loans and what various issuers pay to borrow money.
Changes in one-month LIBOR will affect the rate at which the Class A-2-B notes accrue interest and the amount of interest payments on the Class A-2-B notes. To the extent that one-month LIBOR decreases below 0.00% for any interest period, the rate at which the Class A-2-B notes accrue interest for such interest period will be reduced by the amount by which one-month LIBOR is negative; provided that the interest rate on the Class A-2-B notes for any interest period will not be less than 0.00%. A negative one-month LIBOR rate could result in the interest rate applied to the Class A-2-B notes decreasing to 0.00% for the related interest period. | |
| Uncertainty about the future of the LIBOR industry may have an adverse impact on the Class A-2-B notes. | No assurance can be provided that LIBOR accurately represents the offered rate applicable to loans in U.S. dollars for a one-month period between leading European banks or that LIBOR’s prominence as a benchmark interest rate will be preserved. LIBOR rates (“ICE LIBOR”) are calculated and published for various currencies and periods by the benchmark’s administrator, ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), which is regulated for such purposes by the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).
It is uncertain whether ICE LIBOR will continue to be calculated and published on the same (or a similar) basis to that currently in effect, or at | |
22
Table of Contents
| all. In particular, in a speech on July 27, 2017, Mr. Andrew Bailey, the Chief Executive of the FCA, indicated that the FCA expects, by no later than the end of 2021, to cease taking steps aimed at ensuring the continuing availability of ICE LIBOR in its current form. The announcement was stated to be aimed at encouraging market participants to use other benchmarks or reference rates in place of ICE LIBOR. On November 24, 2017, the FCA announced that the panel banks that submit information to IBA, as administrator of ICE LIBOR, have undertaken to continue to do so until the end of 2021. If IBA continues to calculate and publish ICE LIBOR up to the end of 2021, and if it does so after that time, there can be no certainty as to the basis on which it will do so. These FCA announcements and any change to the basis on which ICE LIBOR is calculated and published (or its ceasing to be published) could cause or contribute to market volatility and could affect the market value and/or liquidity of the Class A-2-B Notes.
If a published LIBOR rate is unavailable and banks are not providing quotations, the rate of interest applicable for an interest period on the Class A-2-B Notes will be the same as in effect for the preceding interest period, and such rate could remain the rate of interest on the Class A-2-B Notes for the remaining life of the Class A-2-B Notes. | ||
| You may experience a loss if defaults on the receivables and related losses exceed the available credit enhancement. | The issuing entity does not have, nor is it permitted or expected to have, any significant assets or sources of funds other than the receivables together with credit enhancement and available funds in certain accounts. The notes represent obligations solely of the issuing entity and will not be insured or guaranteed by any entity. Accordingly, you will rely primarily upon collections on the receivables owned by the issuing entity and, to the extent available, any credit enhancement for the issuing entity, including amounts on deposit in the reserve account. Funds on deposit in the reserve account will cover shortfalls due to delinquencies and losses on the receivables up to some level. However, if delinquencies and losses create shortfalls which exceed the available credit enhancement, you may experience delays in payments due to you and you could suffer a loss. You will have no claim to any amounts properly distributed to the depositor or others from time to time. | |
| Returns on your investments may be reduced by prepayments on the receivables, events of default, optional redemption of the notes or repurchases of receivables from the issuing entity. | You may receive payments on your notes earlier than you expected for the reasons set forth below. You may not be able to invest the amounts paid to you earlier than you expected at a rate of return that is equal to or greater than the rate of return on your notes.
• The rate of return of principal is uncertain. The amount of distributions of principal of your notes and the time when you receive those distributions depend on the amount in which and times at which obligors make principal payments on the receivables. Those principal payments may be regularly scheduled payments or unscheduled payments resulting from prepayments or defaults of the receivables. Additionally, if the originator, the depositor or the servicer is required to repurchase receivables from the issuing entity because of a breach of a representation, warranty or covenant, as applicable, payment of principal on the notes will be accelerated.
• You may be unable to reinvest distributions in comparable investments. The occurrence of an optional redemption or event of default resulting in acceleration may require repayment of the notes | |
23
Table of Contents
| prior to the expected principal payment date for the notes. Asset backed securities, like the notes, usually produce a faster return of principal to investors if market interest rates fall below the interest rates on the receivables and produce a slower return of principal when market interest rates are above the interest rates on the receivables. As a result, you are likely to receive more money to reinvest at a time when other investments generally are producing a lower yield than that on your notes, and are likely to receive less money to reinvest when other investments generally are producing a higher yield than that on your notes. You will bear the risk that the timing and amount of distributions on your notes will prevent you from attaining your desired yield.
• An early redemption of the notes from an optional redemption will shorten the life of your investment which may reduce your yield to maturity. If the receivables are sold upon exercise of a “clean-up call” by the servicer, the issuing entity will redeem the notes and you will receive the remaining principal amount of your notes plus any other amounts due to noteholders, such as accrued interest through the related payment date. Because your notes will no longer be outstanding, you will not receive the additional interest payments or other distributions that you would have received had the notes remained outstanding. If you bought your notes at par or at a premium, your yield to maturity will be lower than it would have been if the optional redemption had not been exercised. | ||
| The failure to make principal payments on any notes will generally not result in an event of default under the indenture until the applicable final scheduled payment date. | The amount of principal required to be paid on a note prior to the applicable final scheduled payment date generally will be limited to amounts available for those purposes. Therefore, the failure to pay principal of a note generally will not result in an event of default under the indenture until the applicable final scheduled payment date for the applicable notes. | |
| The issuing entity’s interest in the receivables could be defeated because the contracts will not be delivered to the issuing entity. | The servicer, as custodian of the receivables, will maintain possession of the original contracts for each of the receivables and the original contracts will not be segregated or marked as belonging to the issuing entity. If the servicer sells or pledges and delivers the original contracts for the receivables to another party, in violation of its contractual obligations, this party could acquire an interest in the receivable having a priority over the issuing entity’s interest.
In addition, another person could acquire an interest in a receivable that is superior to the issuing entity’s interest in the receivable if the receivable is evidenced by an electronic contract and the servicer loses, or never obtains, control over the authoritative copy of the contract and another party purchases the receivable evidenced by the contract without knowledge of the issuing entity’s interest. If the servicer loses, or never obtains, control over the contract through fraud, forgery, negligence or error, or as a result of a computer virus or a hacker’s actions or otherwise, a person other than the issuing entity may be able to modify or duplicate the authoritative copy of the contract.
As a result of any of the above events, the issuing entity may not have a perfected security interest in the receivables. The possibility that the issuing entity may not have a perfected security interest in the | |
24
Table of Contents
| receivables may affect the issuing entity’s ability to repossess and sell the underlying financed vehicles. Therefore, you may be subject to delays in payment and may incur losses on your investment in the notes.
Furthermore, if the servicer, as custodian of the receivables, becomes the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding, competing claims to ownership or security interests in the receivables could arise. These claims, even if unsuccessful, could result in delays in payments on the notes. If successful, these claims could result in losses or delays in payments to you or an acceleration of the repayment of the notes. | ||
| The issuing entity’s security interest in the financed vehicles will not be noted on the certificates of title, which may cause losses on your notes. | Upon the origination of a receivable, the originator or its predecessor in interest or affiliate, as applicable, takes a security interest in the financed vehicle by placing a lien on the title to the financed vehicle. In connection with each sale of receivables to the depositor, the originator will assign its security interests in the financed vehicles to the depositor, who will further assign them to the issuing entity. Finally, the issuing entity will pledge its interest in the financed vehicles as collateral for the notes. The lien certificates or certificates of title relating to the financed vehicles will not be amended or reissued to identify the issuing entity as the new secured party. In the absence of an amendment or reissuance, the issuing entity may not have a perfected security interest in the financed vehicles securing the receivables in some states. The depositor, the originator or another entity may be obligated to repurchase any receivable sold to the issuing entity which did not have a perfected security interest in the name of the originator or an affiliate, as applicable, in the financed vehicle.
The depositor, the servicer, the originator or another entity may be required to purchase or repurchase, as applicable, any receivable sold to the issuing entity as to which it failed to obtain or maintain a perfected security interest in the financed vehicle securing the receivable. All of these purchases and repurchases are limited to breaches that materially and adversely affect the interests of the noteholders in the receivable and are subject to the expiration of a cure period. If the issuing entity has failed to obtain or maintain a perfected security interest in a financed vehicle, its security interest would be subordinate to, among others, a bankruptcy trustee of the obligor, a subsequent purchaser of the financed vehicle or a holder of a perfected security interest in the financed vehicle or a bankruptcy trustee of such holder. If the issuing entity elects to attempt to repossess the related financed vehicle, it might not be able to realize any liquidation proceeds on the financed vehicle and, as a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment in the notes. | |
| Failure to comply with consumer protection laws could result in a loss. | Federal and state consumer protection laws impose requirements on retail installment sale contracts and installment loans such as the receivables. The failure by VW Credit to comply with these requirements may give rise to liabilities on the part of the issuing entity. The originator will represent and warrant that each receivable complies with applicable law in all material respects. If that representation and warranty relating to any receivable proves incorrect, materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders and is not timely cured, VW Credit will be required to repurchase the noncompliant receivable from the depositor, and the depositor will be required to repurchase such noncompliant receivable from the issuing entity. To the extent that the originator fails to make such a repurchase, | |
25
Table of Contents
| or to the extent that a court holds the issuing entity liable for violating consumer protection laws regardless of such a repurchase, a failure to comply with consumer protection laws could result in required payments by the issuing entity. If sufficient funds are not available to make both payments to obligors and on your notes, you may suffer a loss on your investment in the notes.
On December 14, 2017, the Department of Defense (the “DoD”) published interpretive guidance under the Military Lending Act (the “MLA”) that motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts that include ancillary products (for example, guaranteed asset protection, credit life, and similar credit products) may need to comply with the requirements of the MLA, and will not qualify under an MLA exemption for credit transactions to finance the purchase of motor vehicles. The DoD has recently submitted revisions to the guidance for publication in the Federal Register; however, the content and effective date of these revisions is unknown at this time. The MLA provides protections to active-duty members of the military and certain family members, including a limit on the Military Annual Percentage Rate of 36%, delivery of certain required disclosures before origination and a prohibition on arbitration agreements. Financial services industry groups are continuing to seek further clarification of the DoD interpretation of the rule implementing the MLA. Although not expected to be material at this time, if the recent DoD interpretation remains unchanged, certain of the issuing entity’s receivables may be covered by the MLA. To the extent that the MLA applies to any of the issuing entity’s receivables and such receivables do not comply with the applicable MLA requirements, those receivables could be unenforceable. This could impact the cashflows available for the issuing entity. Under some circumstances, the unenforceability of a receivable could result in a repurchase obligation of VW Credit and the depositor, respectively.
For a discussion of federal and state consumer protection laws which may affect the receivables, you should refer to “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Consumer Protection Law” in this prospectus. | ||
| A depositor or sponsor bankruptcy could delay or limit payments to you. | Following a bankruptcy or insolvency of the sponsor or the depositor, a court could conclude that the receivables are owned by the sponsor or the depositor, instead of the issuing entity. This conclusion could be either because the transfer of the receivables from VW Credit to the depositor or from the depositor to the issuing entity was not a true sale or because the court concluded that the depositor or the issuing entity should be treated as the same entity as the sponsor or the depositor for bankruptcy purposes. VW Credit will not treat the sale of receivables to the depositor as a sale for generally accepted accounting principle purposes, and this fact could make a court more likely to reach that conclusion than if such sale were treated as a sale by VW Credit for generally accepted accounting principle purposes. If this were to occur, you could experience delays in payments due to you or you may not ultimately receive all amounts due to you as a result of:
• the automatic stay, which prevents a secured creditor from exercising remedies against a debtor in bankruptcy without permission from the court, and provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code that permit substitution of collateral in limited circumstances; | |
26
Table of Contents
|
• tax or government liens on the sponsor’s or depositor’s property (that arose prior to the transfer of the receivables to the issuing entity) having a prior claim on collections before the collections are used to make payments on the notes; or
• the fact that the issuing entity and the indenture trustee may not have a perfected security interest in any cash collections of the receivables held by the servicer at the time that a bankruptcy proceeding begins.
For a discussion of how a bankruptcy proceeding of the sponsor or the depositor may affect the issuing entity and the notes, you should refer to “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Certain Matters Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency” in this prospectus. | ||
| The originator, the servicer and the depositor have limited obligations to the issuing entity and will not make payments on the notes. | The originator, the servicer, the depositor and their affiliates are not obligated to make any payments to you on your notes. The originator, the servicer, the depositor and their affiliates do not guarantee payments on the receivables or your notes. However, the originator and the depositor make representations and warranties about certain characteristics of the receivables.
If a representation or warranty made by the originator or the depositor with respect to a receivable is untrue, then the originator or the depositor may be required to repurchase that receivable. If the originator or the depositor fails to repurchase that receivable, you might experience delays and/or reductions in payments on the notes. In addition, in some circumstances, the servicer may be required to purchase receivables. If the servicer fails to purchase receivables, you might experience delays and/or reductions in payments on your notes. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Representations and Warranties; Remedies” in this prospectus. | |
| Interests of other persons in the receivables and financed vehicles could be superior to the issuing entity’s interest, which may result in reduced payments on your notes. | The issuing entity could lose the priority of its security interest in a financed vehicle due to, among other things, liens for repairs or storage of a financed vehicle or for unpaid taxes of an obligor. Neither the servicer nor the originator will have any obligation to purchase or repurchase, respectively, a receivable if these liens result in the loss of the priority of the security interest in the financed vehicle after the cut-off date. Generally, no action will be taken to perfect the rights of the issuing entity in proceeds of any insurance policies covering individual financed vehicles or obligors. Therefore, the rights of a third party with an interest in the proceeds could prevail against the rights of the issuing entity prior to the time the proceeds are deposited by the servicer into an account controlled by the indenture trustee. See “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Security Interests in the Financed Vehicles” in this prospectus. | |
| You must rely for repayment only upon the issuing entity’s assets, which may not be sufficient to make full payments on your notes. | Your notes are secured solely by the assets of the issuing entity. Your notes will not represent an interest in or obligation of VW Credit, the depositor or any other person. VW Credit and the depositor may have a limited obligation to repurchase some receivables under some circumstances as described in this prospectus. Distributions on any class of notes will depend solely on the amount of and timing of payments and other collections in respect of the receivables and any credit enhancement for the notes specified in this prospectus. We cannot assure you that these amounts, together with other payments and collections in | |
27
Table of Contents
| respect of the receivables, will be sufficient to make full and timely distributions on your notes. The notes and the receivables will not be insured or guaranteed, in whole or in part, by the United States or any governmental entity. | ||
| You may experience a loss or a delay in receiving payments on the notes if the assets of the issuing entity are liquidated. | If certain events of default under the indenture occur and the notes are accelerated, the indenture trustee may liquidate the assets of the issuing entity. If a liquidation occurs close to the date when any class otherwise would have been paid in full, repayment of that class might be delayed while liquidation of the assets is occurring. The issuing entity cannot predict the length of time that will be required for liquidation of the assets of the issuing entity to be completed. In addition, liquidation proceeds may not be sufficient to repay the notes in full. Even if liquidation proceeds are sufficient to repay the notes in full, any liquidation that causes the outstanding principal balance of a class of notes to be paid before the related final scheduled payment date will involve the prepayment risks described under “—Returns on your investments may be reduced by prepayments on the receivables, events of default, optional redemption of the notes or repurchases of receivables from the issuing entity” in this prospectus. | |
| Inadequate insurance on financed vehicles may cause losses on your investment. | Each retail installment sale contract requires the obligor to obtain and maintain physical damage insurance on the financed vehicle with VW Credit named as the loss payee. The obligors select their own insurers to provide the required coverage, so the specific terms and conditions of their insurance policies vary.
Although VW Credit typically assures that the obligor’s insurance requirement is satisfied at the inception of a contract, VW Credit is not obligated to monitor whether an obligor continues to satisfy its insurance requirement after the contract is acquired by VW Credit. In the event insurance coverage is not maintained by obligors, then insurance recoveries may not be available in the event of losses or damages to financed vehicles included in the pool, and you could suffer a loss on your investment. | |
| The servicer’s commingling of funds with its own funds could result in a loss. | Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, VW Credit, as the servicer, may be able to commingle funds relating to a transaction such as collections from the loans and proceeds from the disposition of any repossessed financed vehicles with its own funds during each collection period and may make a single deposit to the collection account on each payment date. Commingled funds may be used or invested by the servicer at its own risk and for its own benefit. If the servicer were unable to remit those funds or the servicer were to become a debtor under any insolvency laws, delays or reductions in distributions to you may occur. | |
| Extensions and deferrals of payments on receivables could increase the average life of the notes. | In some circumstances, the servicer may permit an extension on payments due on receivables on a case-by-case basis. In addition, the servicer may from time to time offer obligors an opportunity to defer payments. Any of these extensions or deferrals may extend the maturity of the receivables and increase the weighted average life of the notes. The weighted average life and yield on your notes may be adversely affected by extensions and deferrals on the receivables. However, the servicer will be required to purchase a receivable from the issuing entity if it extends the term of the receivable beyond the last day of the | |
28
Table of Contents
| collection period prior to the final scheduled payment date for the latest maturing class of notes. | ||
| Prepayments on contracts may affect the average life of the notes. | If an obligor on a simple interest contract makes a payment on the contract ahead of schedule, the weighted average life of the notes could be affected. This is because the additional scheduled payments will be treated as a principal prepayment and applied to reduce the principal balance of the related contract and the obligor will generally not be required to make any scheduled payments during the period for which it has paid ahead. During this prepayment period, interest will continue to accrue on the principal balance of the contract, as reduced by the application of the additional scheduled payments, but the obligor’s contract would not be considered delinquent. While the servicer may elect to make interest advances during this period, no principal advances will be made. Furthermore, when the obligor resumes the required payments, the payments so paid may be insufficient to cover the interest that has accrued since the last payment by the obligor. This situation will continue until the regularly scheduled payments are once again sufficient to cover all accrued interest and to reduce the principal balance of the contract.
The payment by the issuing entity of the prepaid principal amount on the notes will generally shorten the weighted average life of the notes. However, depending on the length of time during which a prepaid contract is not amortizing as described above, the weighted average life of the notes may be extended. | |
| The return on your notes could be reduced by shortfalls due to application of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. | The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and similar state legislation may limit the interest payable on a receivable during an obligor’s period of active military duty, including reservists or national guard members. This legislation could adversely affect the ability of the servicer to collect full amounts of interest on a receivable as well as to foreclose on an affected receivable during and, in certain circumstances, after the obligor’s period of active military duty. This legislation may thus result in delays and losses in payments to holders of the notes. See “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Servicemembers Civil Relief Act” in this prospectus. | |
| Changes to federal or state bankruptcy or debtor relief laws may impede collection efforts or alter the timing and amount of collections, which may result in acceleration of or reduction in payment on your notes. | If an obligor sought protection under federal or state bankruptcy or debtor relief laws, a court could reduce or discharge completely the obligor’s obligations to repay amounts due on its receivable. As a result, that receivable would be written off as uncollectible. You could suffer a loss if no funds are available from credit enhancement or other sources and finance charge amounts allocated to the notes are insufficient to cover the applicable default amount. | |
| The absence of a secondary market for the notes could limit your ability to resell your notes. | If you want to sell your notes you must locate a purchaser that is willing to purchase those notes. The underwriters intend to make a secondary market for the notes. The underwriters will do so by offering to buy the notes from investors that wish to sell. However, the underwriters will not be obligated to make offers to buy the notes and may stop making offers at any time. In addition, the prices offered, if any, may not reflect prices that other potential purchasers would be willing to pay, were they to be given the opportunity. There have been times in the past where there have been very few buyers of asset-backed securities, and there may be these times again in the future. As a result, you may not be able to sell | |
29
Table of Contents
| your notes when you want to do so or you may not be able to obtain the price that you wish to receive. | ||
| Because the notes are in book-entry form, your rights can only be exercised indirectly. | Because the notes will initially be issued in book-entry form, you will be required to hold your interest in your notes through The Depository Trust Company in the United States, or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank S.A./NV as operator of the Euroclear System in Europe or Asia. Transfers of interests in the notes within The Depository Trust Company, Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank/S.A./NV as operator of the Euroclear System must be made in accordance with the usual rules and operating procedures of those systems. So long as the notes are in book-entry form, you will not be entitled to receive a definitive note representing your interest. The notes will remain in book-entry form except in the limited circumstances described under the caption “The Notes—Definitive Notes” in this prospectus. Unless and until the notes cease to be held in book-entry form, the related transaction parties will not recognize you as a holder of the related notes.
As a result, you will only be able to exercise the rights as a noteholder indirectly through The Depository Trust Company (if in the United States) and its participating organizations, or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme and Euroclear Bank S.A./NV as operator of the Euroclear System (in Europe or Asia) and their participating organizations. Holding the notes in book-entry form could also limit your ability to pledge or transfer your notes to persons or entities that do not participate in The Depository Trust Company, Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank S.A./NV as operator of the Euroclear System. In addition, having the notes in book-entry form may reduce their liquidity in the secondary market since certain potential investors may be unwilling to purchase securities for which they cannot obtain physical notes. | |
| Interest on and principal of the notes will be paid by the issuing entity to The Depository Trust Company as the record holder of those notes while they are held in book-entry form. The Depository Trust Company will credit payments received from the issuing entity to the accounts of its participants which, in turn, will credit those amounts to noteholders either directly or indirectly through indirect participants. This process may delay your receipt of principal and interest payments from the issuing entity. | ||
| Adverse events with respect to VW Credit or its affiliates or third party providers to whom VW Credit outsources its activities could affect the timing of payments on your notes or have other adverse effects on your notes. | Adverse events with respect to VW Credit or any of its affiliates or a third party provider to whom VW Credit outsources its activities could result in servicing disruptions or reduce the market value of your notes. For example, in the event of a termination and replacement of VW Credit as the servicer, there may be some disruption of the collection activity with respect to delinquent loans and therefore delinquencies and credit losses could increase. Similarly, if VW Credit becomes unable to repurchase any receivables which do not comply with representations and warranties about the receivables made by VW Credit in the related transfer agreement (for example, representations relating to the compliance of the receivables with applicable laws), then investors could suffer losses. In addition, adverse corporate developments with respect to servicers of asset-backed securities or their affiliates have in some cases also resulted in a reduction in the market value of the related asset- | |
30
Table of Contents
| backed securities. For example, VW Credit is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Volkswagen AG. Although Volkswagen AG is not guaranteeing the obligations of the issuing entity, if Volkswagen AG ceased to manufacture vehicles or support the sale of vehicles or if Volkswagen AG faced financial or operational difficulties or issued recall notices with respect to vehicles it manufactured, such events may reduce the market value of the notes and/or reduce the market value of Volkswagen and Audi vehicles, and ultimately the amount realized on any Volkswagen or Audi vehicle repossessed following an obligor’s default under the related receivable. | ||
| The notes may not be a suitable investment for you. | The notes are not a suitable investment for you if you require a regular or predictable schedule of payments or payment on any specific date. The notes are complex investments that should be considered only by investors who, either alone or with their financial, tax and legal advisors, have the expertise to analyze the prepayment, reinvestment, default and market risks, the tax consequences of an investment in the notes and the interaction of these factors. | |
| Adverse legal or regulatory developments with respect to VW Credit or its affiliates could have an adverse effect on your notes. | The sponsor and its affiliates (including Volkswagen AG, the sponsor’s ultimate parent) are party to, or are periodically otherwise involved in, reviews, investigations, examinations and proceedings (both formal and informal), and information-gathering requests, by government and self-regulatory agencies, including the CFPB, the DOJ, the SEC, and various state authorities. Examinations can include various focal points, such as fair lending, servicing of accounts, and evaluations of compliance management systems. The findings of these examinations may result in the repurchase of receivables. See “The Sponsor–Recent Developments–Legal and Regulatory.”
Volkswagen AG is party to other legal actions and investigations in and outside the United States, and further regulatory proceedings, environmental, consumer, product-related and investor claims could be raised against Volkswagen AG in the future in various jurisdictions worldwide. These proceedings and actions and publicity surrounding them could have an adverse effect on your notes, even in circumstances where neither we nor the sponsor is a party to or otherwise involved in the proceedings or other actions. For example, regulatory and legal actions against Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen Group of America”), the sponsor or other affiliates of the sponsor related to the manufacture and sale of Affected Vehicles may result in reputational damage to Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America, as well as to the “Volkswagen” and “Audi” brands. The pricing of used vehicles is affected by the supply and demand for those vehicles. If the demand for used Volkswagen or Audi vehicles decreases as a result of the issues arising after the Notices of Violation, related regulatory or legal actions or other factors, the resale value of the vehicles related to the receivables may also decrease. As a result, the amount of liquidation proceeds received upon a default may decrease. Further, these and any other reviews, investigations, examinations and proceedings (whether formal or informal) and/or information-gathering requests that the sponsor or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates are involved in, or may become involved in, may result in adverse consequences to the sponsor including, without limitation, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other actions and | |
31
Table of Contents
| may affect the ability of the sponsor or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates to perform its duties under the transaction documents. | ||
| The servicer’s discretion over the servicing of the receivables may impact the amount and timing of funds available to make payments on the notes. | The servicer is obligated to service the receivables in accordance with its customary practices. The servicer has discretion in servicing the receivables including the ability to grant payment extensions and to determine the timing and method of collection and liquidation procedures. In addition, the servicer’s customary practices may change from time to time and those changes could reduce collections on the receivables. Although the servicer’s customary practices at any time will apply to all receivables serviced by the servicer, without regard to whether a receivable has been sold to the issuing entity, the servicer is not obligated to maximize collections from receivables. Consequently, the manner in which the servicer exercises its serving discretion or changes its customary practices could have an impact on the amount and timing of collections on the receivables, which may impact the amount and timing of funds available to make payments on the notes. | |
| Vehicle recalls may have an adverse effect on the receivables and your notes. | From time to time, automobile manufacturers or their suppliers may discover an element in a vehicle which might possibly affect the safety or other features of the vehicle, including compliance with applicable safety or emissions standards. In such cases the manufacturer in consultation with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration may recall the affected vehicles for repair or other necessary service. In certain cases, such a recall may give rise to the obligor having the right to rescind or terminate its contract or an obligation of the related vehicle manufacturer to repurchase the related recalled vehicle. In addition, recalls or other service campaigns could cause a temporary suspension of sales of the affected vehicles, which may cause a delay of the timing of the sales in the used car markets. Recalls or other service campaigns, including as a result of a particular model to comply with applicable safety or emission standards, may also cause a decrease in demand for used recalled vehicles, which may cause a decline in values of those vehicles. Declines in values of used vehicles could cause an increase in credit losses. If any of these events materially affect collections on the receivables securing your notes, you may experience delays in payments or principal losses on your notes if the available credit enhancement has been exhausted. | |
32
Table of Contents
The depositor will use the net proceeds from the offering of the notes to:
| • | purchase the receivables from VW Credit, Inc. (which we sometimes refer to as “VW Credit”); and |
| • | make the initial deposit into the reserve account. |
Any remaining amounts will be added to the depositor’s general funds and may be dividended to VW Credit, as the sole equity member of the depositor.
The depositor or its affiliates will use the proceeds of the net offering of the notes for general corporate purposes. The depositor or its affiliates will not use the net proceeds of the offering of the notes to pay any “warehouse” debt secured by the receivables prior to their transfer to the issuing entity. Payment of any expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of the receivables will be made by the depositor or its affiliates directly, rather than out of offering proceeds.
The “issuing entity”, Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-1 is a statutory trust formed on October 16, 2017 under the laws of the State of Delaware by the depositor for the purpose of owning the receivables and issuing the notes. The trust agreement was amended and restated as of January 10, 2018. The issuing entity will be established and operated pursuant to a trust agreement. VW Credit will be the “administrator” of the issuing entity. The depositor will be the initial holder of the issuing entity’s certificate.
The issuing entity will engage in only the following activities:
| • | issuing the notes and the certificate; |
| • | making payments on the notes and distributions on the certificate; |
| • | selling, transferring and exchanging the notes and the certificate to the depositor; |
| • | acquiring, holding and managing the receivables and other assets of the issuing entity; |
| • | making deposits to and withdrawals from the trust accounts; |
| • | paying the organizational, start-up and transactional expenses of the issuing entity; |
| • | pledging the receivables and other assets of the issuing entity pursuant to the indenture; |
| • | entering into and performing its obligations under the transfer agreements to which it is a party; and |
| • | taking any action necessary, suitable or convenient to fulfill the role of the issuing entity in connection with the foregoing activities or engaging in other activities as may be required in connection with conservation of the assets of the issuing entity and the making of payments on the notes and distributions on the certificate. |
The depositor or its affiliate may retain all or a portion of a class or classes of notes for its own account. Some or all of such retained notes may be resold by the depositor or its affiliate at any time on or after the closing date in one or more negotiated transactions at varying prices to be determined at the time of sale. Notes owned by the issuing entity, the depositor and their respective affiliates will be entitled to all benefits afforded to the notes except that they generally will not be deemed outstanding for the purpose of making requests, demands, authorizations, directions, notices, consents or other actions under the transaction documents.
33
Table of Contents
Capitalization and Liabilities of the Issuing Entity
The following table illustrates the expected capitalization and/or liabilities of the issuing entity as of the closing date(1):
| Class A-1 Notes |
$ | 307,000,000.00 | ||
| Class A-2-A Notes |
$ | 420,000,000.00 | ||
| Class A-2-B Notes |
$ | 100,000,000.00 | ||
| Class A-3 Notes |
$ | 369,000,000.00 | ||
| Class A-4 Notes |
$ | 104,000,000.00 | ||
| Overcollateralization |
$ | 40,210,498.92 | ||
| Yield Supplement Overcollateralization Amount |
$ | 104,720,886.52 | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Total |
$ | 1,444,931,385.44 |
The following table illustrates the expected assets of the issuing entity as of the closing date:
| Receivables |
$ | 1,444,931,385.44 | ||
| Initial Reserve Account Balance |
$ | 1,340,210.50 | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Total |
$ | 1,446,271,595.94 |
| (1) | All or a portion of one or more classes of notes may be initially retained by the depositor or an affiliate thereof. |
The issuing entity will also issue a certificate, which is not offered by this prospectus, and initially will be held by the depositor. On each payment date, the holder of the certificate will be entitled to any funds remaining on that payment date after all deposits and distributions of higher priority, as described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments”.
The issuing entity’s fiscal year ends on December 31st.
The issuing entity’s trust agreement, including its permissible activities, may be amended in accordance with the procedures described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Amendment Provisions” in this prospectus.
The issuing entity’s principal offices are in Wilmington, Delaware, in care of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, as owner trustee, at the address listed in “The Trustees—The Owner Trustee” below.
For a description of the roles and responsibilities of the indenture trustee, see “Description of the Transaction Documents—The Owner Trustee and the Indenture Trustee” in the prospectus and “The Trustees—The Indenture Trustee” in this prospectus.
The notes will be collateralized by the issuing entity property. The primary assets of the issuing entity will be the receivables, which are amounts owed by individuals under motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts or installment loans with respect to new or used automobiles, minivans or sport utility vehicles originated by VW Credit.
The property of the issuing entity (the “issuing entity property”) will consist of all the right, title and interest of the issuing entity in and to:
| • | the receivables acquired by the issuing entity from the depositor on the closing date and payments made on the receivables after the cut-off date; |
| • | the receivable files; |
34
Table of Contents
| • | the security interests in the financed vehicles; |
| • | any proceeds from (1) claims on any theft and physical damage insurance policy maintained by an obligor under a receivable providing coverage against loss or damage to or theft of the related financed vehicle or (2) claims on any credit life or credit disability insurance maintained by an obligor in connection with any receivable; |
| • | any other property securing the receivables; |
| • | all rights of VW Credit under agreements with dealers relating to receivables; |
| • | the rights of the issuing entity to funds on deposit in the reserve account, the collection account and the principal distribution account and any other accounts established pursuant to the indenture or sale and servicing agreement, and all cash, investment property and other property from time to time credited thereto and all proceeds thereof (including investment earnings, net of losses and investment expenses, on amounts on deposit); |
| • | rights of the issuing entity under the sale and servicing agreement and the administration agreement and of the depositor, as buyer, under the purchase agreement; and |
| • | the proceeds of any and all of the above. |
The issuing entity will pledge the issuing entity property to the indenture trustee under the indenture.
Pursuant to the indenture, the issuing entity will covenant that it will not, among other things:
| • | except as expressly permitted by the indenture, the sale and servicing agreement, the trust agreement, the administration agreement or the other transaction documents, sell, transfer, exchange or otherwise dispose of any of its assets; |
| • | claim any credit on or make any deduction from the principal and interest payable in respect of the notes (other than amounts withheld under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), or applicable state law) or assert any claim against any present or former holder of the notes because of the payment of taxes levied or assessed upon any part of the issuing entity property; |
| • | dissolve or liquidate in whole or in part; |
| • | merge or consolidate with, or transfer substantially all of its assets to, any other person; |
| • | permit the validity or effectiveness of the indenture to be impaired, or permit the lien of the indenture to be amended, hypothecated, subordinated, terminated or discharged, or permit any person to be released from any covenants or obligations with respect to the notes except as may be expressly permitted thereby; |
| • | permit any lien, charge, excise, claim, security interest, mortgage or other encumbrance (except certain permitted encumbrances) to be created on or extend to or otherwise arise upon or burden the assets of the issuing entity or any part thereof, or any interest therein or the proceeds thereof; or |
| • | incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness other than indebtedness incurred in accordance with the transaction documents. |
35
Table of Contents
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware (“DBTCD”) is the “owner trustee” of the issuing entity under the trust agreement. DBTCD is a Delaware banking corporation and an affiliate of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, a New York banking corporation, which provides support services on its behalf in this transaction. The principal offices of DBTCD are located at 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE 19805. The owner trustee’s liability in connection with the issuance and sale of the notes is limited solely to the express obligations of the owner trustee set forth in the trust agreement. The depositor and its affiliates may maintain normal commercial banking or investment banking relations with the owner trustee and its affiliates. The servicer will be responsible for paying the owner trustee’s fees and expenses and for indemnifying the owner trustee against specified losses, liabilities or expenses incurred by the owner trustee in connection with the transaction documents. To the extent these fees and expenses and indemnification amounts are not paid by the servicer, they will be payable out of Available Funds as described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” and “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default” in this prospectus.
DBTCD has served and currently is serving as owner trustee for numerous asset-backed securitization transactions (with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas providing administrative support), including acting as owner trustee on various auto loan and auto lease securitization transactions. While the structure and receivable type of the transaction referred to in the preceding sentence may differ among these transactions, DBTCD and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas on its behalf, is experienced in administering transactions of this kind.
DBTCD is subject to various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. DBTCD does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings is material to noteholders.
For a description of the roles and responsibilities of the owner trustee, see “Description of the Transaction Documents—The Owner Trustee and the Indenture Trustee” in this prospectus.
Citibank, N.A., a national banking association and wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Citibank”), is the “indenture trustee” under the indenture for the benefit of the noteholders. Citibank performs as indenture trustee through the Agency and Trust line of business, a part of Issuer Services.
Citibank has primary corporate trust offices located in both New York and London. Citibank is a leading provider of corporate trust services offering a full range of agency, fiduciary, tender and exchange, depositary and escrow services. As of the end of the first quarter of 2018, Citibank’s Agency and Trust group manages in excess of $5.8 trillion in fixed income and equity investments on behalf of over 2,700 corporations worldwide. Since 1987, Citibank Agency and Trust has provided corporate trust services for asset-backed securities containing pool assets consisting of airplane leases, auto loans and leases, boat loans, commercial loans, commodities, credit cards, durable goods, equipment leases, foreign securities, funding agreement backed note programs, truck loans, utilities, student loans and commercial and residential mortgages. As of the end of the first quarter of 2018, Citibank acts as indenture trustee and/or paying agent for approximately 218 various asset backed trusts supported by either auto loans or leases or equipment loans or leases.
In the ordinary course of business, Citibank is involved in a number of legal proceedings, including in connection with its role as trustee of certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) transactions. Certain of these Citibank as trustee-related matters are disclosed herein.
On June 18, 2014, a civil action was filed against Citibank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York by a group of investors in 48 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, asserting claims for purported violations of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “Trust Indenture Act”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on Citibank’s alleged failure to perform its duties as trustee
36
Table of Contents
for the 48 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, plaintiffs sought leave to withdraw this action. On the same day, a smaller subset of similar plaintiff investors in 27 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, filed a new civil action against Citibank in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting similar claims as the prior action filed in state court. In January 2015, the court closed plaintiffs’ original state court action. On September 8, 2015, the federal court dismissed all claims as to 24 of the 27 trusts and allowed certain of the claims to proceed as to the other three trusts. Subsequently, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims with respect to two of the three trusts. On April 7, 2017, Citibank filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs filed its consolidated opposition brief and cross motion for partial summary judgment on May 22, 2017. Briefing on those motions was completed on August 4, 2017. On March 22, 2018, the court granted Citibank’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety, denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and ordered the clerk to close the case. On April 20, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal.
On November 24, 2015, the same investors that brought the federal case brought a new civil action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York related to 25 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee. This case includes the 24 trusts previously dismissed in the federal action, and one additional trust. The investors assert claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of New York’s Streit Act (the “Streit Act”). Following oral argument on Citibank’s motion to dismiss, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on August 5, 2016. On June 27, 2017, the state court issued a decision, dismissing the event of default claims, mortgage-file-related claims, the fiduciary duty claims, and the conflict of interest claims. The decision sustained certain breach of contract claims including the claim alleging discovery of breaches of representations and warranties, a claim related to robo-signing, and the implied covenant of good faith claim. Citibank appealed the lower court’s decision and on January 16, 2018, the Appellate Division, First Department dismissed the claims related to robo-signing and the implied covenant of good faith, but allowed plaintiffs’ claim alleging discovery of breaches of representations and warranties to proceed.
On August 19, 2015, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver for a failed financial institution filed a civil action against Citibank in the Southern District of New York. This action relates to one private-label RMBS trust for which Citibank formerly served as trustee. FDIC asserts claims for breach of contract, violation of the Streit Act, and violation of the Trust Indenture Act. Citibank jointly briefed a motion to dismiss with The Bank of New York Mellon and U.S. Bank, N.A., entities that have also been sued by FDIC in their capacity as trustee, and these cases have all been consolidated in front of Judge Carter. On September 30, 2016, the Court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On October 14, 2016, FDIC filed a motion for reargument or relief from judgment from the Court’s dismissal order. On July 11, 2017, Judge Carter ruled on the motion for reconsideration regarding his dismissal of the action. He denied reconsideration of his decision on standing, but granted leave to amend the complaint by October 9, 2017. The FDIC subsequently requested an extension of time to file its amended complaint, which was granted. The FDIC filed its amended complaint on December 8, 2017. Defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on March 13, 2018. On April 18, 2018, plaintiff filed its opposition.
There can be no assurances as to the outcome of litigation or the possible impact of litigation on Citibank or the RMBS trusts. However, Citibank denies liability and continues to vigorously defend against these litigations. Furthermore, neither the above-disclosed litigations nor any other pending legal proceeding involving Citibank will materially affect Citibank’s ability to perform its duties as indenture trustee under the indenture for this transaction.
You may contact the indenture trustee at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Agency & Trust, or by calling (800) 422-2066. The indenture trustee’s duties are limited to those duties specifically set forth in the indenture. The depositor and its affiliates may maintain normal commercial and investment banking relations with the indenture trustee and its affiliates. The servicer will be responsible for paying the indenture trustee’s fees and for indemnifying the indenture trustee against specified losses, liabilities or expenses incurred by the indenture trustee in connection with the transaction documents. To the extent these fees and indemnification amounts are not paid by the servicer, they will be payable out of Available Funds as described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” and “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default” in this prospectus.
37
Table of Contents
For a description of the roles and responsibilities of the indenture trustee, see “The Trustees—The Indenture Trustee” and “Description of the Transaction Documents—The Owner Trustee and the Indenture Trustee” and “Description of the Transaction Documents” in this prospectus.
The “depositor”, Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC, a wholly owned special purpose subsidiary of VW Credit, was formed on August 9, 2002 as a Delaware limited liability company named Volkswagen Auto Lease Underwritten Funding, LLC. On December 15, 2006, Volkswagen Auto Lease Underwritten Funding, LLC changed its name to Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC. The principal place of business of the depositor is at 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171. You may also reach the depositor by telephone at (703) 364-7000. The depositor was formed to purchase, accept capital contributions of or otherwise acquire beneficial interests in portfolios of motor vehicle leases and the related leased vehicles, motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts and motor vehicle loans; to own, sell, and assign the receivables and to issue and sell one or more securities. Since its inception, the depositor has been engaged in these activities solely as (i) the purchaser of receivables and beneficial interests in vehicle lease portfolios from VW Credit pursuant to purchase agreements, (ii) the depositor of receivables and beneficial interests in vehicle lease and loan portfolios to securitization trusts pursuant to sale and servicing agreements or sale agreements, (iii) the depositor that formed various securitization trusts pursuant to trust agreements and (iv) the entity that executed underwriting agreements and purchase agreements in connection with issuances of asset-backed securities.
VW Credit was incorporated in the State of Delaware in April 1981 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen Group of America”). Volkswagen Group of America is a wholly owned subsidiary of Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (“Volkswagen AG”). The principal activity of VW Credit is acting as a finance subsidiary of Volkswagen Group of America, including purchasing retail installment sale contracts, installment loans and leases from Volkswagen and Audi dealers. VW Credit offers and services a wide range of automobile-related financial products, including wholesale floorplan financing and retail auto loan and lease financing.
The principal place of business of VW Credit is at 2200 Ferdinand Porsche Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171. You may also reach VW Credit by telephone at (703) 364-7000. VW Credit will act as the “servicer”.
VW Credit securitized its first portfolio of motor vehicle loans in 1988 and last sponsored a motor vehicle loan securitization in conjunction with a public offering of asset-backed securities in 2014. VW Credit’s experience in and overall procedures for originating or acquiring receivables is described in “The Originator—Pool Underwriting” in this prospectus. No public securitizations sponsored by VW Credit have defaulted or experienced an early amortization triggering event.
VW Credit has participated in the structuring of the transaction described in this prospectus and has originated the receivables to be assigned to the issuing entity. VW Credit is responsible for servicing the receivables included in the receivables pool as described below. VW Credit is also the administrator of the issuing entity.
Recent Developments—Legal and Regulatory
The sponsor and its affiliates (including Volkswagen AG) are party to, or are periodically otherwise involved in, reviews, investigations, and proceedings (both formal and informal), and information-gathering requests, by government and self-regulatory agencies, including the CFPB, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and various state authorities. On September 18, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) publicly announced in a “Notice of Violation” that irregularities in relation to nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions had been discovered in emissions tests on certain vehicles of the sponsor’s ultimate parent, Volkswagen AG, with type 2.0 liter diesel engines in the United States. In this context, Volkswagen AG announced that noticeable discrepancies between the figures achieved in testing and in actual road use had been identified in around eleven million vehicles worldwide with type EA 189 diesel engines.
38
Table of Contents
On November 2, 2015, the EPA issued a “Notice of Violation” alleging that irregularities had also been discovered in the software installed in type V6 3.0 liter vehicles sold in the United States (2.0 liter and 3.0 liter vehicles together, “Affected Vehicles”). The financed vehicles related to the receivables to be transferred to the issuing entity do not include any Affected Vehicles.
Following the Notice of Violation, Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., and certain affiliates (collectively, “Volkswagen”) have been party to or have otherwise been involved in multiple criminal and regulatory investigations and legal actions related to the Affected Vehicles, including lawsuits by the EPA, the DOJ, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), California Air Resources Board (the “CARB”) and the attorneys general of numerous states, as well as several private civil lawsuits brought by owners and lessees of Affected Vehicles and dealers.
In June 2016, Volkswagen reached settlement agreements with the DOJ on behalf of the EPA and the State of California on behalf of the CARB and the California Attorney General, (ii) the FTC, and (iii) the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (the “PSC”). These settlement agreements resolved certain civil claims made in relation to affected diesel vehicles with 2.0 liter TDI engines from the Volkswagen Passenger Cars and Audi brands in the United States and affected diesel vehicles with 3.0 liter TDI engines from the Volkswagen Passenger Cars, Audi and Porsche brands. Volkswagen AG and certain affiliates also entered into a First Partial Consent Decree with the DOJ, EPA, CARB and the California Attorney General, which was lodged with the court on June 28, 2016. On October 18, 2016, a fairness hearing on whether final approval should be granted was held, and on October 25, 2016, the court granted final approval of the settlement agreements and the partial consent order.
The settlement agreements with respect to the four-cylinder 2.0 liter TDI diesel engine vehicles and the Generation 1 six-cylinder 3.0 liter TDI diesel engine vehicles provide affected customers with, inter alia, the option of a buyback, a trade-in (for 3.0 liter vehicles only), a free emissions modification of the vehicles (if the modification is approved by the EPA and CARB) or – for leased vehicles – early lease termination. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, Volkswagen will also make additional cash payments to affected current owners or lessees as well as certain former owners or lessees. For Generation 2 3.0 liter TDI vehicles, Volkswagen will provide affected consumers with a free emissions compliant repair of the vehicles plus a cash payment. Volkswagen AG also agreed to support environmental programs. Volkswagen AG will pay $2.7 billion over three years into an environmental trust, managed by a trustee appointed by the court, to offset excess nitrogen oxide (N0x) emissions. Volkswagen AG will also invest a total of $2.0 billion over ten years in zero emissions vehicle infrastructure as well as corresponding access and awareness initiatives.
Several thousand consumers have opted out of the settlement agreements, and many of these consumers have filed civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages for fraud and violations of state consumer protection acts. A large number of those lawsuits have been filed in Virginia. The Virginia state court has set trial dates for five trials involving four cylinder vehicles with the first trial scheduled to begin in October 2018.
Volkswagen also entered into a separate Partial Consent Decree with CARB and the California Attorney General resolving certain claims under California unfair competition, false advertising, and consumer protection laws related to both the 2.0 liter and 3.0 liter TDI vehicles, which was lodged with the court on July 7, 2016. Under the terms of the agreement, Volkswagen AG agreed to pay California $86 million. The court entered judgment on the Partial Consent Decree on September 1, 2016 and the $86 million payment was made on September 28, 2016.
On December 20, 2016, Volkswagen entered into a Second Partial Consent Decree, subject to court approval, with the DOJ, EPA, CARB and the California Attorney General that resolved claims for injunctive relief under the Clean Air Act and California environmental, consumer protection and false advertising laws related to the 3.0 liter TDI vehicles. Under the terms of this Consent Decree, Volkswagen agreed to implement a buyback and lease termination program for Generation 1 3.0 liter TDI vehicles and a free emissions recall and modification program for Generation 2 3.0 liter TDI vehicles, and to pay $225 million into the environmental mitigation trust that has been established pursuant to the First Partial Consent Decree. The Second Partial Consent Decree was lodged with the court on December 20, 2016 and approved on May 17, 2017.
In addition, on December 20, 2016, Volkswagen entered into an additional, concurrent California Second Partial Consent Decree, subject to court approval, with CARB and the California Attorney General that resolved
39
Table of Contents
claims for injunctive relief under California environmental, consumer protection and false advertising laws related to the 3.0 liter TDI vehicles. Under the terms of this Consent Decree, Volkswagen agreed to provide additional injunctive relief to California, including the implementation of a “Green City” initiative and the introduction of three new Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) models in California by 2020, as well as a $25 million payment to CARB to support the availability of BEVs in California.
On January 11, 2017, Volkswagen entered into a Third Partial Consent Decree with the DOJ and EPA that resolved claims for civil penalties and injunctive relief under the Clean Air Act related to the 2.0 liter and 3.0 liter TDI vehicles. Volkswagen agreed to pay $1.45 billion (plus any accrued interest) to resolve the civil penalty and injunctive relief claims under the Clean Air Act, as well as the customs claims of the United States Customs and Border Protection. Under the Third Partial Consent Decree, the injunctive relief includes monitoring, auditing and compliance obligations. This Consent Decree, which was subject to public comment, was lodged with the court on January 11, 2017 and approved on April 13, 2017. Also on January 11, 2017, Volkswagen entered into a settlement agreement with the DOJ to resolve any claims under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and agreed to pay $50 million (plus any accrued interest), specifically denying any liability and expressly disputing any claims.
On July 21, 2017, the federal court in the multidistrict litigation in California approved the Third California Partial Consent Decree, in which Volkswagen agreed with the California Attorney General and CARB to pay $153.8 million in civil penalties and cost reimbursements. These penalties covered California environmental penalties for both the 2.0 liter and 3.0 liter TDI vehicles. An agreement in principle had been reached on January 11, 2017.
Volkswagen AG has also entered into agreements to resolve U.S. federal criminal liability relating to the diesel issue and to resolve civil penalties and injunctive relief under the Clean Air Act and other civil claims relating to the diesel issue. The coordinated resolutions involve four settlements, including a plea agreement between Volkswagen AG and the DoJ that is accompanied by a published Statement of Facts, acknowledged by Volkswagen AG, which lays out relevant facts. As part of its plea agreement, Volkswagen AG has pleaded guilty to three felony counts under United States law – including conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice and using false statements to import cars into the United States—and has been sentenced to three years’ probation. The plea agreement provides, inter alia, for payment of a criminal fine of U.S.$2.8 billion and the appointment of an independent monitor for a period of three years who will assess and oversee the compliance with the terms of the resolutions. Larry D. Thompson was appointed as the independent monitor in April 2017. Mr. Thompson submitted his initial review report under the plea agreement in March 2018. Volkswagen AG, AUDI AG and other Volkswagen affiliates have further agreed to pay a combined civil penalty of U.S.$1.45 billion to resolve U.S. federal environmental and customs-related claims in the United States. Furthermore, Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. have agreed to pay a smaller civil penalty to the DoJ to settle other potential claims arising under Federal statute. DoJ investigations into the conduct of various individuals who may be responsible for criminal violations relating to the diesel issue remain ongoing. Volkswagen is required to cooperate with these investigations. In the event of non- compliance with the terms of the plea agreement, Volkswagen could face further penalties and prosecution.
In May 2018, the DOJ unsealed charges in Detroit against, among others, former Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn, which had been filed under seal in March 2018. Mr. Winterkorn is charged with a conspiracy to defraud the United States, to commit wire fraud, and to violate the Clean Air Act from at least May 2006 through at least November 2015, as well as three counts of wire fraud.
Volkswagen has also reached separate settlement agreements with the attorneys general of most U.S. states to resolve existing or potential consumer protection, unfair trade practices claims, and/or state environmental law claims. Certain states still have pending consumer protection, unfair trade practices and state environmental law claims against Volkswagen. Investigations by various U.S. regulatory and other government authorities, including in areas relating to securities, tax and financing, are ongoing. For example, the SEC has requested information regarding potential violations of securities laws, in connection with issuances of asset-backed securities sponsored by the sponsor, as a result of nondisclosure of certain Volkswagen diesel vehicles’ noncompliance with emission standards. In January 2017, the SEC informed Volkswagen, including the sponsor, that it had issued a formal order of investigation; the investigation is ongoing. Volkswagen and the sponsor are cooperating with the SEC.
40
Table of Contents
On January 31, 2017, Volkswagen entered into a settlement agreement with private plaintiffs represented by the PSC in the multidistrict litigation pending in California, and a consent order with the FTC. These agreements resolved certain civil claims made in relation to affected diesel vehicles with 3.0 liter TDI engines from the Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche brands in the United States. On February 14, 2017, the court preliminarily approved the settlement agreement with private plaintiffs. On May 11, 2017, the court held a fairness hearing on whether approval should be granted and on May 17, 2017, the court granted final approval of the settlement agreement and the partial stipulated consent order.
Under the settlements, consumers’ options and compensation will depend on whether their vehicles are classified as Generation 1 or Generation 2. Generation 1 (model years 2009-2012) consumers will have the option of a buyback, early lease termination, trade-in, or a free emissions modification, provided that EPA and CARB approve the modification. Additionally, Generation 1 owners and lessees, as well as certain former owners and lessees, will be eligible to receive cash payments.
Generation 2 (model years 2013-2016) consumers will receive a free emissions-compliant repair to bring the vehicles into compliance with the emissions standards to which they were originally certified, as well as cash payments. Volkswagen AG has received approval from the EPA and CARB for emissions-compliant repairs within the time limits set out in the settlement agreement. Volkswagen AG will also make cash payments to certain former Generation 2 owners or lessees.
In September 2016, Volkswagen AG announced that it had finalized an agreement to resolve the claims of Volkswagen branded franchise dealers in the United States relating to TDI vehicles and other matters asserted concerning the value of the franchise. The settlement agreement includes a cash payment of up to $1.208 billion, and additional benefits to resolve alleged past, current, and future claims of losses in franchise value. On January 18, 2017, a fairness hearing on whether final approval should be granted was held, and on January 23, 2017, the court granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
Additionally, in the United States, some putative class actions, some individual customers’ lawsuits and some state or municipal claims have been filed in state courts.
Volkswagen AG reached separate agreements with the attorneys general of 45 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, to resolve their existing or potential consumer protection and unfair trade practices claims—in connection with both 2.0 liter TDI and 3.0 liter TDI vehicles in the United States—for a settlement amount of $622 million. Three states did not join these settlements and still have consumer claims outstanding: New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Vermont. Volkswagen AG has also reached separate agreements with the attorneys general of thirteen U.S. states (Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia) to resolve their existing or potential future claims for civil penalties and injunctive relief for alleged violations of environmental laws for a settlement amount of 207 million. The attorneys general of ten other U.S. states (Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas) and some municipalities have also filed suits in state and federal courts against Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and certain affiliates, seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief for alleged violations of environmental laws. Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas participated in the state settlements described above with respect to consumer protection and unfair trade practices claims, but those settlements did not include claims for environmental penalties. The environmental claims of two other states—Alabama and Wyoming—have been dismissed as preempted by federal law. Alabama has appealed this dismissal.
In addition to the lawsuits described above, for which provisions have been recognized, a putative class action has been filed on behalf of purchasers of Volkswagen AG American Depositary Receipts, alleging a drop in price purportedly resulting from the matters described in the EPA’s “Notices of Violation”. A putative class action has also been filed on behalf of purchasers of certain U.S. Dollar-denominated Volkswagen bonds, alleging that these bonds were trading at artificially inflated prices due to Volkswagen’s alleged misstatements and that the value of these bonds declined after the EPA issued its “Notices of Violation”.
These lawsuits have also been consolidated in the federal multidistrict litigation proceeding in the State of California described above. Volkswagen is of the opinion that it duly complied with its capital market obligations.
41
Table of Contents
Therefore, no provisions have been recognized. In addition, contingent liabilities have not been disclosed as they currently cannot be measured.
Since November 2016, Volkswagen has been responding to information requests from the EPA and CARB related to automatic transmissions in certain vehicles. In addition, approximately fourteen putative class actions have been filed against AUDI and certain affiliates alleging that defendants concealed the existence of these “defeat devices” in Audi brand vehicles with automatic transmissions. These putative class actions have been transferred to the federal multidistrict litigation proceeding in the State of California. On October 12, 2017, plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint, and defendants filed a motion to dismiss on December 11, 2017, which has been fully briefed. On April 19, 2018, the court approved the stipulation of the parties to postpone a hearing previously scheduled for May 11, 2018. On December 22, 2017, a mass action on behalf of approximately 75 individual plaintiffs was filed in a California state court alleging similar claims with respect to the existence of “defeat devices” in Audi brand vehicles with automatic transmissions. This case was removed to the Northern District of California on January 25, 2018. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand the matter back to state court and all briefing has been completed. A hearing date has not been scheduled and the matter has been stayed. In Canada, two similar putative class actions have been filed in Ontario and Quebec provincial courts against Audi AG, Volkswagen AG and U.S. and Canadian affiliates. Both the Canadian actions are in the pre-certification stage. In the Ontario matter, the hearing on the class certification motion is scheduled for March 29, 2019.
Outside the United States, Volkswagen also reached agreements with regard to the implementation of technical measures with numerous authorities.
In Canada, which has the same NOx emissions limits as the United States, civil consumer claims and regulatory investigations have been initiated for vehicles with 2.0 liter and 3.0 liter diesel engines. In December 2016, and subject to court approval that was granted in April 2017, Volkswagen AG and other Volkswagen Group companies reached a class action settlement in Canada with consumers relating to 2.0 liter diesel vehicles which, inter alia, provides eligible owners and lessees with cash payments and, if applicable, the option of: a free emissions modification of their vehicle if approved by U.S. regulators – as Canada has the same NOx limits as the United States, a buyback, a trade-in or – for leased vehicles – early lease termination. Concurrently with the announcement of the class settlement in December 2016, Volkswagen Group Canada also agreed with the Commissioner of Competition in Canada to a civil resolution of its regulatory inquiry into consumer protection issues as to 2.0 liter diesel vehicles. In June 2017, Volkswagen Group Canada reached an agreement, without court process and on confidential terms, with its Volkswagen-branded franchise dealers to resolve issues related to the diesel emissions matter. In January 2018, and subject to court approval that was granted in April 2018, Volkswagen AG and other Volkswagen Group companies reached a consumer settlement in Canada involving 3.0 liter diesel vehicles. For Generation 1 3.0 liter diesel vehicles, the settlement provides affected consumers with, inter alia, the option of a buyback, a trade-in, a free emissions modification of their vehicle as approved by U.S. regulators – as Canada has the same NOx limits as the U.S. or, in the case of leased vehicles, an early lease termination. For Generation 2 3.0 liter diesel vehicles, consumers who complete a free emissions compliant repair as approved by U.S. regulators for their vehicles, are entitled to also receive a cash payment under the terms of the settlement. Concurrently with the announcement of the 3.0 liter class settlement in January 2018, Volkswagen Group Canada and the Canadian Commissioner of Competition reached a civil resolution related to consumer protection issues relating to 3.0 liter diesel vehicles. As to pending matters in Canada, a criminal enforcement related investigation by the federal environmental regulator is ongoing as to Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group Canada. Additionally, in the case of one provincial environmental regulator in Canada, Volkswagen AG was charged in September 2017 with a quasi-criminal offense alleging that the company caused or permitted the operation of model year 2010-2014 Volkswagen and Audi 2.0 liter diesel vehicles that did not comply with prescribed emission standards. This matter has been put over to September 27, 2018 pending ongoing evidence disclosure and, at which time, a continuing pretrial court conference is scheduled. No trial date has been set in the matter. Moreover, putative class action and joinder lawsuits by consumers, and a certified environmental class action on behalf of residents, remain pending in certain provincial courts in Canada.
In some countries criminal investigations/misdemeanor proceedings (for example, by the public prosecutor’s offices in Braunschweig and Munich, Germany) have been opened. On June 13, 2018, the Braunschweig public prosecutor issued an administrative order against Volkswagen AG in the context of the diesel issue. According to the findings of the investigation, monitoring duties had been breached in the Powertrain
42
Table of Contents
Development department in the context of vehicle tests and these breaches were concurrent causes of 10.7 million vehicles with the diesel engines of the types EA 288 (Gen3), in the United States and in Canada, and EA 189, world-wide, being advertised, sold to customers, and placed on the market with an alleged impermissible software function in the period between mid-2007 and 2015. The administrative order provides for a fine of €1 billion in total, consisting of the maximum penalty as legally provided for of €5 million and the disgorgement of economic benefits in the amount of €995 million. Volkswagen AG has accepted the fine and it will not appeal it.
In connection with the diesel issue, in September 2015, Volkswagen AG filed a criminal complaint in Germany against unknown individuals as did AUDI AG. Volkswagen AG and AUDI AG are cooperating with all responsible authorities in the scope of reviewing the incidents. The public prosecutor’s office in Braunschweig has also initiated investigations against one current and two former Volkswagen AG management board members regarding their possible involvement in potential market manipulation in connection with the diesel issue. The Stuttgart public prosecutor’s office also confirmed that it is investigating, among others, the former CEO of Volkswagen AG in his capacity as member of the management board of Porsche SE, regarding his possible involvement in potential market manipulation in connection with this same issue. Moreover, the Stuttgart public prosecutor’s office has commenced a criminal investigation into the diesel issue against one board member and two employees of Porsche AG on suspicion of fraud and illegal advertising. Furthermore, the public prosecutor’s office in Munich II opened a criminal investigation in connection with the alleged anomalies in the NOx emissions of certain Audi vehicles with diesel engines in the United States and Europe.
On June 11, 2018, Rupert Stadler, the head of Volkswagen AG’s Audi brand was named as a suspect in the Munich II public prosecutor’s investigation together with Bernd Martens, Audi’s head of purchasing. Both are being investigated for, inter alia, fraud relating to sales of diesel cars. Rupert Stadler was arrested on June 18, 2018, and is being held in custody.
In November 2015, Volkswagen also reported that internal indicators had caused concerns that there might have been irregularities in determining carbon dioxide (“CO2”) figures for type approval of around 800,000 vehicles and, as a result, the CO2 values and therefore the fuel consumption data published for some vehicle models might have been stated incorrectly. Subsequent measurements performed in coordination with the relevant authorities showed that those concerns of possible irregularities in the CO2 figures for type approval proved to be not correct. Hence, the negative impact on Volkswagen’s earnings of EUR 2 billion that had originally been expected in relation to this aspect of the CO2 issue was not confirmed. However the public prosecutor’s office in Braunschweig is investigating these circumstances.
There are additional regulatory, criminal and civil proceedings in several jurisdictions worldwide, particularly in South Korea, but also including Andorra, Argentina, Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. These proceedings are primarily product and investor-related and include individual and collective actions. Further claims can be expected.
Customers and/or environmental associations in the affected markets have filed civil lawsuits against Volkswagen AG, other Volkswagen Group companies and non-Volkswagen Group importers and dealers involved in the sales process. In addition, it is possible that importers and dealers could assert claims against Volkswagen, for example through recourse claims. Further lawsuits are possible.
Product related class action proceedings against Volkswagen AG and other Volkswagen Group companies are pending in various countries such as Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Israel, Italy, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The class action proceedings are lawsuits aimed among other things at asserting damages or, as is the case in the Netherlands, at a declaratory judgment that customers are entitled to damages. With the exception of Brazil, where there has already been a non-binding judgment in the first instance, the amount of these damages cannot yet be quantified more precisely due to the early stage of the proceedings.
In South Korea various mass proceedings are pending (in some of these individual lawsuits several hundred litigants have been aggregated). These lawsuits have been filed to assert damages and to rescind the purchase contract including repayment of the purchase price. Furthermore, individual lawsuits and similar proceedings are
43
Table of Contents
pending against Volkswagen AG and other Volkswagen Group companies in numerous countries, particularly in Germany and the United States, but also including Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Austria.
Most of these proceedings – with the exception of the class action in Brazil – are in the early stages and it is difficult to assess their prospects of success, the allegations and the claimants’ precise causes of action. However, should these actions be resolved in favor of the claimants, they could result in significant civil damages, fines, the imposition of penalties, sanctions, injunctions and other consequences.
On November 29, 2017, Volkswagen AG was served with an action brought by the U.S. law firm Hausfeld on behalf of Financialright GmbH, asserting allegedly assigned claims by German customers regarding 15,374 affected vehicles. This action seeks payment of around €358 million in damages, while offering the return of the purchased vehicles. In addition, on January 31, 2018, Volkswagen AG was served with a further action filed by the Hausfeld law firm (dated December 29, 2017) on behalf of Financialright GmbH asserting allegedly assigned claims by an additional 2,004 customers. The 2,004 customers are exclusively customers who have concluded their sales or leasing contracts in Switzerland. Financialright GmbH requests a declaratory judgment that Volkswagen AG is obligated to compensate the respective customers for damages resulting from the use of the switching logic and—if applicable—for the damages resulting from “the software update”. The plaintiff quantifies the amount in dispute of the claim (calculated from an alleged average “reduction in value” of the vehicles) at approximately €800,000. On April 25, 2018, Volkswagen AG was served with Hausfeld’s latest action on behalf of Financialright GmbH. This latest action seeks damages based on purportedly assigned claims of approximately 6,000 customers from Slovenia, with a total amount of approximately EUR 48 million. In addition, the Swiss Foundation for Consumer Protection (Stiftung für Konsumentenschutz) filed a claim for damages against Volkswagen AG in December 2017 based on allegedly assigned claims of some 6,000 customers, indicating the amount in dispute at approximately CHF 30 million.
Evaluating known information and making reliable estimates for provisions is a continuous process. Estimating provisions and contingent liabilities and assessing additional legal risks is subject to great uncertainty due to the ongoing nature of the extensive investigations and proceedings, the risk of new or expanded proceedings, and the complexities of the various negotiations and continuing regulatory approval processes with the relevant authorities. Furthermore, new information not known to Volkswagen’s management board at present may surface, requiring further revaluation of the amounts estimated. Considerable further financial charges may be incurred and further substantial provisions may be necessary as the issues and legal risks, fines and penalties crystallize.
Volkswagen is working intensively to eliminate the emissions level deviations through technical improvements and is cooperating with the relevant agencies. A final decision has not been made regarding all necessary technical remedies for the affected vehicles. In particular, Volkswagen is continuing discussions with the EPA and the CARB concerning technical solutions for the U.S. (and, by extension, Canadian) market. The buyback/retrofit program for vehicles in the United States, which is part of the settlements in North America, is proving to be more technically complex and time consuming than anticipated. For example, on September 7, 2017, the EPA and CARB rejected the proposed emissions modifications for 2.0 liter Generation 2 diesel vehicles with manual transmissions. Similarly, on November 9, 2017, the EPA and CARB withdrew their previous approval of the proposed emissions modification for approximately 2,800 2.0 liter model year 2009 Generation 1 vehicles in the U.S. on the grounds that these vehicles require a mechatronic hardware change before the previously approved emissions modification can be installed. A revised emissions modification for these Generation 1 diesel vehicles was subsequently approved on December 28, 2017. Where emissions modifications have been approved by U.S. regulators, similar emissions recall programs to those in the U.S. have been developed for Canada. On May 18, 2018, the EPA and CARB approved an emissions modification for 3.0 liter Generation 1.1 diesel vehicles. An emissions modification has not yet been approved for 3.0 liter Generation 1.2 diesel vehicles. Volkswagen continues to work with the U.S. regulators on obtaining approval for technical solutions for these diesel vehicles in the United States and Canada. In the case of 2.0 liter Generation 2 diesel vehicles with manual transmissions, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. has withdrawn its intent to seek approval of an emissions modification. Because no repair is available for these 2.0 liter Generation 2 manual transmission vehicles, consumers in the U.S. who owned or leased these vehicles as of June 28, 2016 have the option to participate in the settlement and receive a buyback or early lease termination or opt out of the settlement between May 1, 2018 and June 1, 2018. Because no repair will likewise be available in Canada, consumers in possession of these vehicles have the option to participate in the Canadian settlement and receive a buyback, trade-in or early lease termination or, if they have not already made a
44
Table of Contents
claim or received benefits, opt out of the settlement between June 15, 2018 and August 15, 2018. Even if not covered under a settlement, Volkswagen may be required to repurchase any other 2.0 liter Generation 2 diesel vehicles with manual transmissions and any other vehicles sold in the United States, Canada and elsewhere. This could lead to further significant costs. For example, in Canada, as agreed with the federal environmental regulator, in the event that owners or lessees are not eligible to surrender their manual transmission 2.0 liter Generation 2 diesel vehicles under the Canadian settlement, Volkswagen Group Canada will be reaching out to them to discuss next steps. Furthermore, if the technical solutions implemented by Volkswagen in order to rectify the diesel issue are not implemented in a timely or effective manner or have an undisclosed negative effect on the performance, fuel consumption or resale value of the affected vehicles, regulatory proceedings and/or customer claims for damages could be brought in the future.
For many months, AUDI AG has been checking all diesel concepts for possible discrepancies and retrofit potentials. A systematic review process for all engine and gear variants has been underway since 2016. On July 21, 2017, AUDI AG offered a software-based retrofit program for up to 850,000 vehicles with V6 and V8 TDI engines meeting the Euro 5 and Euro 6 emission standards in Europe and other markets except the United States and Canada. This will be done in close cooperation with the authorities, especially the German Federal Ministry of Transport and the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, the “KBA”). The retrofit package comprises voluntary measures and, to a small extent, measures directed by the authorities; these are measures which were proposed by AUDI AG itself, reported to and taken up by the KBA and formally ordered by the latter. The tests for the voluntary measures and those which have been formally ordered have already reached an advanced stage, but have not yet been completed. Therefore, additional measures cannot be excluded. The measures formally ordered by the KBA so far involved different models of the AUDI, Volkswagen and Porsche brand with a V6 or V8 TDI engine meeting the Euro 6 emission standard, for which the KBA categorized certain emission strategies as an unlawful defeat device. Should additional measures become necessary as a result of the investigations by AUDI AG and the consultations with the KBA, AUDI AG will implement these as part of or in addition to the retrofit program. This is the case for a software update for 83,000 Audi A6 and A7 models worldwide with 3.0 liter TDI Generation 2evo engines for which measures have been formally ordered by the KBA. Furthermore on April 4, 2018, the Korean Ministry of Environment has ordered a recall after it has categorized (i) certain emissions strategies in the engine control software of various AUDI, Volkswagen and Porsche brand diesel vehicles with a V6 or V8 engine and the Euro 6 emissions classification, and (ii) the Dynamic Shift Program (DSP) in the gearbox control in some AUDI vehicle models, as prohibited defeat devices. In addition, AUDI is responding to requests from the U.S. authorities for information regarding automatic gearboxes in certain vehicles. Further field measures with financial consequences can therefore not be ruled out completely at this time.
In addition to ongoing, extensive investigations by governmental authorities in various jurisdictions worldwide (the most significant of which are in Europe, the United States and South Korea), further investigations (including in relation to areas carved out of the plea agreement with the U.S. authorities, such as tax and securities laws) could be launched in the future and existing investigations could be expanded. Furthermore, there could be pending or threatened claims against Volkswagen of which Volkswagen’s management is not yet aware. Ongoing and future investigations may result in further legal actions being taken against Volkswagen or some of its employees. These actions could include the following: additional assessments of substantial criminal and civil fines as well as forfeiture of gains; the imposition of penalties, sanctions, injunctions against future conduct; the loss of vehicle type certifications; and sales stops and business restrictions. The timing of the release of new information on the investigations and the maximum amount of penalties that may be imposed cannot be reliably determined at present. New information may arise at any time, including after the offer, sale and delivery of the notes.
Moreover, private and institutional investors from Germany and other jurisdictions (including the U.S. and Canada) are pursuing claims seeking significant damages against Volkswagen AG for allegedly omitting or delaying the immediate publication of price sensitive insider information relating to the diesel issue, and making wrongful financial reporting or false or misleading statements, as well as, in some cases, alleging tort and prospectus liability claims. The claims relate to Volkswagen AG’s shares, American depositary receipts and other securities, including bonds, issued by Volkswagen Group companies, as well as third-party securities. In Canada, a class action filed in Quebec provincial court has been authorized as to claims relating to Volkswagen AG’s shares and American Depositary Receipts, and, in a similar class action in the Province of Ontario, a class certification hearing is scheduled in July 2018. Further investor claims could be brought.
45
Table of Contents
Any of the above-described negative developments could result in substantial additional costs and have a material adverse effect on Volkswagen’s business, financial position, results of operations, and reputation, as well as on the prices of its securities, including the notes.
See “Risk Factors—Adverse legal or regulatory developments with respect to VW Credit or its affiliates could have an adverse effect on your notes” in this prospectus.
Pursuant to Regulation RR, VW Credit, as sponsor, is required to retain an economic interest in the credit risk of the receivables, either directly or through a majority-owned affiliate. VW Credit intends to satisfy this obligation through the retention by the depositor, its wholly-owned affiliate, of an “eligible horizontal residual interest” in an amount equal to at least 5% of the fair value, as of the closing date, of all of the notes and the certificate issued by the issuing entity on the closing date. Pursuant to Regulation RR, the depositor is required to retain the “eligible horizontal residual interest” and may not transfer (except to VW Credit or another majority-owned affiliate of VW Credit) such interest until the latest of two years after the Closing Date, the date the net pool balance is 33% or less of the initial net pool balance, or the date the aggregate principal amount the notes is 33% or less of the original principal amount of the notes. VW Credit, the depositor and their affiliates may not hedge or finance the “eligible horizontal residual interest” during this period except as permitted under applicable law. The depositor may transfer all or any portion of the “eligible horizontal residual interest” to VW Credit or another majority-owned affiliate of VW Credit on or after the closing date.
The residual interest retained by the depositor is structured to be an “eligible horizontal residual interest” and will take the form of the issuing entity’s certificate. VW Credit expects the certificate to have an approximate fair value, as of the closing date, of $105,205,692.67, which is approximately 7.49% of the fair value, as of the closing date, of all of the notes and the certificate issued by the issuing entity on the closing date. The certificate represents a 100% beneficial interest in the issuing entity.
The expected fair value of the notes and the certificate is summarized below:
| Class |
Fair Value (in dollars) |
Fair Value (as a percentage) |
||||||
| Class A-1 |
$ | 307,000,000.00 | 21.85 | % | ||||
|
Class A-2-A |
$ | 420,000,000.00 | 29.89 | % | ||||
|
Class A-2-B |
$ | 100,000,000.00 | 7.12 | % | ||||
| Class A-3 |
$ | 369,000,000.00 | 26.26 | % | ||||
| Class A-4 |
$ | 104,000,000.00 | 7.40 | % | ||||
| Certificate |
$ | 105,205,692.67 | 7.49 | % | ||||
| Total |
$ | 1,405,205,692.67 | 100.00 | % | ||||
VW Credit and the depositor will use a fair value measurement framework under generally accepted accounting principles to calculate the fair value of the notes and certificate. The fair value of the notes will be assumed to be equal to the initial principal amount of the notes. An internal valuation model using discounted cash flow analysis will be used to calculate fair value of the certificate.
The fair value measurement framework will consider various inputs including (i) quoted prices for identical instruments, (ii) quoted prices for similar instruments, (iii) current economic conditions, including interest rates and yield curves, (iv) experience with similar receivables in VW Credit’s managed retail portfolio and prior securitized pools, including prepayments, net losses and recoveries based on information for receivables similar to the receivables sold to the issuing entity on the closing date, and (v) management judgment about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the instrument.
The fair value of the notes is assumed to be equal to the initial principal amount of the notes, or par. This reflects the fact that the interest rates of the notes will be as follows:
46
Table of Contents
| Class |
Interest Rate | |||
| Class A-1 |
2.42428 | % | ||
|
Class A-2-A |
2.81 | % | ||
|
Class A-2-B |
LIBOR + 0.18 | % | ||
| Class A-3 |
3.02 | % | ||
| Class A-4 |
3.15 | % | ||
To calculate the fair value of the certificate, VW Credit used an internal valuation model. This model projects future interest and principal payments of the pool of receivables, the interest and principal payments on the notes, and any other fees and expenses payable by the issuing entity. The resulting cash flows to the certificate are discounted to present value based on a discount rate that reflects the credit exposure to these cash flows. In completing these calculations, VW Credit made the following assumptions:
| • | interest accrues on the notes at the rates described above and in determining the interest payments on the Class A-2-B notes, one-month LIBOR is assumed to reset consistent with the applicable forward rate curve as of June 15, 2018; |
| • | except as otherwise described in this section, principal and interest cash flows for the receivables are calculated using the assumptions as described in “Weighted Average Life of the Notes;” |
| • | receivables prepay at a 1.30% ABS rate based on amortization resulting from voluntary prepayments; |
| • | cumulative net losses on the receivables, as a percentage of the initial net pool balance, will be at the levels set forth in the chart below at the end of each month: |
| Month |
Cumulative Net Losses (as a percentage of the initial net pool balance) |
Month |
Cumulative Net Losses (as a percentage of the initial net pool balance) |
Month |
Cumulative Net Losses (as a percentage of the initial net pool balance) | |||||
| 1 |
0.00% | 17 | 0.50% | 33 | 0.85% | |||||
| 2 |
0.00% | 18 | 0.53% | 34 | 0.87% | |||||
| 3 |
0.00% | 19 | 0.55% | 35 | 0.88% | |||||
| 4 |
0.04% | 20 | 0.58% | 36 | 0.90% | |||||
| 5 |
0.08% | 21 | 0.61% | 37 | 0.91% | |||||
| 6 |
0.12% | 22 | 0.64% | 38 | 0.92% | |||||
| 7 |
0.16% | 23 | 0.67% | 39 | 0.93% | |||||
| 8 |
0.19% | 24 | 0.70% | 40 | 0.93% | |||||
| 9 |
0.23% | 25 | 0.72% | 41 | 0.94% | |||||
| 10 |
0.27% | 26 | 0.73% | 42 | 0.95% | |||||
| 11 |
0.31% | 27 | 0.75% | 43 | 0.96% | |||||
| 12 |
0.35% | 28 | 0.77% | 44 | 0.97% | |||||
| 13 |
0.38% | 29 | 0.78% | 45 | 0.98% | |||||
| 14 |
0.41% | 30 | 0.80% | 46 | 0.98% | |||||
| 15 |
0.44% | 31 | 0.82% | 47 | 0.99% | |||||
| 16 |
0.47% | 32 | 0.83% | 48 | 1.00% |
| • | certificate cash flows are discounted at 10.0%; and |
| • | the servicer will exercise its opportunity to purchase the receivables at the earliest payment date it is permitted to do so. |
VW Credit developed these inputs and assumptions by considering the following factors:
47
Table of Contents
| • | ABS rate—estimated considering the composition of the receivables, the performance of VW Credit’s prior securitized pools and more recent originations, |
| • | Cumulative net loss rate—estimated using assumptions for both the magnitude of lifetime cumulative net losses and the shape of the cumulative net loss curve. The lifetime cumulative net loss assumption was developed considering the composition of the receivables, the performance of VW Credit’s prior securitized pools and more recent originations, trends in used vehicle values, economic conditions, and the cumulative net loss assumptions of the Hired Agencies. The shape of the cumulative net loss curve is based on a historical average of VW Credit’s prior securitized pools and more recent originations. Default and recovery rate estimates are included in the cumulative net loss assumption, and |
| • | Discount rate applicable to the residual cash flows—estimated to reflect the credit exposure to the residual cash flows. Due to the lack of an actively traded market in residual interests, the discount rate was derived from both quantitative factors, such as prevailing market rates of return for similar instruments, and qualitative factors that consider the subordinate nature of the first-loss exposure. |
VW Credit believes that the inputs and assumptions described above include the inputs and assumptions that could have a material impact on the fair value calculation or a prospective noteholder’s ability to evaluate the fair value calculation. The fair value of the notes and the certificate was calculated based on the assumptions described above. You should be sure you understand these assumptions when considering the fair value calculation.
The methodology above was used to determine the estimated fair value of the eligible horizontal residual interest retained on the closing date by the depositor. In accordance with Regulation RR, within a reasonable time after the closing date, VW Credit will disclose the actual fair value of the eligible horizontal residual interest retained based on the final pricing information and bond structure, as well as the fair value of the eligible horizontal residual interest required to be retained under Regulation RR. In addition, to the extent the valuation methodology used with respect to the eligible horizontal residual interest actually retained, or any of the key inputs and assumptions used therein, differ materially from those set forth above, we will disclose those material differences. These disclosures will be made on Form 10-D filed under the CIK number of the issuing entity.
In addition, the depositor may retain some or all of one or more of the classes of notes.
As described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” and “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default” below, payments to certificateholders on any payment date are subordinated to all payments of principal and interest on the notes by the issuing entity. In accordance with the requirements for an “eligible horizontal residual interest” under Regulation RR, on any payment date on which the issuing entity has insufficient funds to make all of the distributions described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments”, any resulting shortfall will, through operation of the priority of payments, reduce amounts payable to the certificateholders prior to any reduction in the amounts payable for interest on, or principal of, any class of notes. The material terms of the notes are described in this prospectus under “The Notes,” and the other material terms of the certificates are described in this prospectus under “The Issuing Entity—Capitalization and Liabilities of the Issuing Entity.”
The following is a description of the origination, underwriting and servicing of motor vehicle receivables by the originator as of the date of this prospectus.
The originator originates or acquires receivables through a variety of origination channels across a wide spectrum of credit quality obligors. VW Credit will act as servicer for all receivables to be sold to the issuing entity on the closing date.
The originator purchases retail installment sale contracts and installment loans, secured by automobiles or other motor vehicles, through dealerships throughout the United States. Additionally, VW Credit may utilize direct
48
Table of Contents
marketing to offer automobile financing directly to consumers. The originator’s direct marketed products may include financing for the purchase of new and used vehicles, as well as refinancing of existing motor vehicle loans. The originator customizes product features, such as interest rate, loan amount, and loan terms, enabling it to lend to customers with a wide range of credit profiles.
VW Credit’s underwriting standards emphasize the prospective obligor’s willingness and ability to repay the amounts when due on the contract, as well as the asset value of the motor vehicle to be financed. Contracts that are purchased must comply with VW Credit’s underwriting standards and other requirements under existing agreements between VW Credit and dealers. VW Credit’s underwriting, servicing and collection activities are conducted principally at processing centers located in Libertyville, Illinois and Hillsboro, Oregon.
Each applicant for a retail installment sale contract is required to complete a credit application. Applications submitted to VW Credit include the following information about the applicant:
| • | residential information; |
| • | source and amount of monthly income; |
| • | monthly mortgage or rent payment; |
| • | social security number; and |
| • | other personal and financial information. |
Dealers submit applications together with information about the proposed terms of the retail installment sale contract to VW Credit through website based systems. VW Credit generally obtains a credit report on the applicant from a national credit bureau selected based upon VW Credit’s assessment of which credit bureau provides the most accurate and complete credit reports in the applicant’s geographic area. In a limited number of cases, a credit report is not available because an applicant does not have an established credit history. If an individual applicant has sufficient recent credit history, the credit bureau data includes the applicant’s credit risk score, often referred to as a “credit bureau score” or a FICO® score, which is generated using statistical models created by Fair Isaac Corporation. The credit bureau score measures the likelihood an applicant will repay an obligation as expected. Credit scores are the primary factors used as measuring devices to indicate the degree of risk on contracts offered to VW Credit by dealers.
VW Credit also evaluates each application using a proprietary credit scoring algorithm developed by a third party credit scoring company for VW Credit and referred to as a scorecard. The scorecard is used to assess the creditworthiness of an applicant using the credit bureau data to assign the applicant a proprietary credit score.
Credit applications are evaluated when received and are either automatically approved, automatically rejected or forwarded for review by a VW Credit credit analyst based on VW Credit’s electronic decisioning model. The model uses the VW Credit-derived credit score, the applicant’s credit bureau score, and a set of business rules designed to identify certain credit-related items such as loan-to-value ratio, affordability measures (e.g., payment-to-income ratio) and collateral type and quality. The model also identifies incomplete or inconsistent data such as an address or social security number mismatch, which is often caused by incorrect data entry but could possibly be a sign of fraud. In some cases, an application is not automatically rejected but does not meet the criteria for automatic approval, either because of incomplete or inconsistent information or because one or more credit-related terms is not within prescribed automatic approval levels. In such cases, a credit analyst evaluates the application to make a purchase decision using the company’s written underwriting guidelines. The credit analyst considers the same information included in the electronic decisioning model and may weigh other factors, such as the prospective purchaser’s prior experience with VW Credit, credit bureau data, collateral information and valuation and payment and debt ratios. If data entry or inconsistent information is the reason an application did not receive automatic approval, the credit analyst will contact the dealer if necessary to verify the data in question and to make corrections
49
Table of Contents
if necessary or obtain proof of the inconsistent data. For less creditworthy applicants, or if there is a discrepancy in the information provided by the applicant, the credit analyst may verify the identity, employment, income, residency and other applicant information using VW Credit’s established procedures before the decision is made. Based on the credit analyst’s assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each application, the analyst will then either approve the application, reject the application or forward the application for review by a VW Credit credit analyst with higher approval authority. The credit analyst may condition approval on the addition of a qualified co-applicant or guarantor or on changes to the financing terms, such as a higher cash down payment or a less expensive vehicle being financed. If an application is forwarded to a credit analyst with higher approval authority, that credit analyst will undertake a similar review of the findings with the initial credit analyst.
Of the receivables to be sold to the issuing entity on the closing date, 38,303 receivables, having an aggregate principal balance of approximately $804,476,666.15 (approximately 55.68% of the net pool balance as of the cut-off date) were automatically approved, while 30,993 receivables, having an aggregate principal balance of approximately $640,454,719.29 (approximately 44.32% of the net pool balance as of the cut-off date) were evaluated and approved by a VW Credit credit analyst with appropriate authority in accordance with VW Credit’s written underwriting guidelines. None of the receivables in the pool were originated with exceptions to VW Credit’s written underwriting guidelines, nor were any receivables in the pool approved after being automatically rejected by the electronic decisioning model.
VW Credit uses risk-based pricing that includes a tiered system of interest rates and advance rates representing the varying degrees of risk assigned to different ranges of credit risk. If VW Credit considers an applicant to be relatively less creditworthy and, as a result, a greater risk, VW Credit will assign the applicant a higher interest rate and lower permissible advance rates. VW Credit makes its final credit decision based upon its assessment of the degree of credit risk with respect to each applicant.
VW Credit regularly reviews and analyzes its portfolio of receivables to evaluate the effectiveness of its underwriting guidelines and purchasing criteria. If external economic factors, credit loss or delinquency experience, market conditions or other factors change, VW Credit may adjust its underwriting guidelines and purchasing criteria in order to change the asset quality of its portfolio or to achieve other goals and objectives.
VW Credit will be the servicer. VW Credit offers indirect automotive consumer loan and lease financing and direct dealer financing through (and to) approximately 950 dealers in the United States that sell Volkswagen and/or Audi vehicles. VW Credit has been directly servicing motor vehicle receivables since 1996. Prior to 1996, receivables originated by VW Credit were serviced through a third party servicer. VW Credit’s auto loan asset-backed securitization program was first used in a term securitization in 1988. After the 1988 term securitization, VW Credit began securitizing auto loans again in 2003.
So long as VW Credit is the servicer, it will also act as custodian of the receivables and will maintain possession of the receivables as the issuing entity’s and the indenture trustee’s agent. The servicer, among other things, will manage, service, administer and make collections on the receivables in accordance with its customary servicing practices, using the degree of skill and attention that the servicer exercises with respect to all comparable motor vehicle receivables that it services for itself or others. The servicer is permitted to delegate some or all of its duties to its affiliates or specific duties to sub-contractors who are in the business of performing such duties, although the servicer will remain liable for the performance of any duties that it delegates to another entity.
The servicer will have full power and authority to do any and all things in connection with such managing, servicing, administration and collection that it may deem necessary or desirable. The servicer will make reasonable efforts to collect all payments called for under the terms and provisions of the receivables as and when the same become due in accordance with its customary servicing practices.
VW Credit has made adjustments to its customary servicing practices over time, particularly in the areas of collections timing, collections intensity, repossession timing and business processes and workflow. Most of these adjustments are introduced on a limited and controlled trial basis and are implemented program-wide after VW Credit determines that those adjustments will result in an overall improvement in servicing and collections.
50
Table of Contents
The servicer will, in accordance with its customary servicing practices, take such steps as are necessary to maintain perfection of the security interest created by each receivable in the related financed vehicle. The issuing entity will authorize the servicer to take such steps as are necessary to re-perfect such security interest on behalf of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee in the event of the relocation of a financed vehicle or for any other reason.
Under the sale and servicing agreement, the servicer covenants not to release the financed vehicle securing each receivable from the security interest granted by that receivable in whole or in part, except as required by applicable law or court order or in the event of payment in full by or on behalf of the related obligor or payment in full less a deficiency which the servicer would not attempt to collect in accordance with its customary servicing practices or in connection with repossession or except as may be required by an insurer in order to receive proceeds from any insurance policy covering that financed vehicle. If this covenant is breached, under the sale and servicing agreement, the servicer will be required to repurchase the related receivable if such breach materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in the related receivable. In addition, if the servicer extends the date for final payment by the obligor on any receivable beyond the last day of the collection period prior to the final scheduled payment date for the latest maturing class of notes or reduces the contract rate or outstanding principal balance with respect to any receivable other than as required by applicable law or court order, under the sale and servicing agreement the servicer will be required to repurchase the related receivable, if such change in the receivable would materially and adversely affect the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in such receivable.
The servicer, in its capacity as custodian, will hold the receivable files for the benefit of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee. In performing its duties as custodian, the servicer will act in accordance with its customary servicing practices. The servicer will promptly report to the issuing entity and the indenture trustee any failure on its part to hold a material portion of the receivable files and maintain its accounts, records, and computer systems as provided by the sale and servicing agreement and promptly take appropriate action to remedy any such failure. The servicer may, in accordance with its customary servicing practices, (i) maintain all or a portion of the receivable files in electronic form and (ii) maintain custody of all or any portion of the receivable files with one or more of its agents or designees.
Additionally, under the sale and servicing agreement the servicer and its affiliates may engage in any marketing practice or promotion or any sale of any products, goods or services to obligors with respect to the receivables so long as such practices, promotions or sales are offered to obligors of comparable motor vehicle receivables serviced by the servicer for itself and others, whether or not such practices, promotions or sales might result in a decrease in the aggregate amount of payments on the receivables, prepayments or faster or slower timing of the payment of the receivables, provided, however, that if the servicer (i) extends the date for final payment by the obligor of any receivable beyond the last day of the collection period prior to the final scheduled payment date for the latest maturing class of notes or (ii) reduces the contract date or outstanding principal balance with respect to any receivable other than as required by applicable law or court order, it will promptly purchase such receivable. The servicer may refinance any receivable and deposit the full outstanding principal balance of such receivable into the collection account. The receivable created by such refinancing shall not be property of the issuing entity. The servicer and its affiliates may also sell insurance or debt cancellation products, including products which result in the cancellation of some or all of the amount of a receivable upon the death or disability of the obligor or any casualty with respect to the financed vehicle.
The servicer, in its sole discretion, may in accordance with its customary servicing practices sell any receivable’s deficiency balance. Net proceeds of any such sale allocable to the receivable will constitute Liquidation Proceeds, and the sole right of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee with respect to any such sold receivables will be to receive such Liquidation Proceeds. Upon such sale, the servicer will mark its computer records indicating that any such receivable sold no longer belongs to the issuing entity. The servicer is authorized to take any and all actions necessary or appropriate on behalf of the issuing entity to evidence the sale of the receivable free from any lien or other interest of the issuing entity or the indenture trustee.
51
Table of Contents
Collection and Repossession Procedures
The customer billing process is generally initiated by the mailing of invoices on a monthly basis. Monthly payments are received at a lockbox account, mailed directly to VW Credit, or are paid electronically, including through direct debit or telephonic payment systems. Customers may enroll in a variety of recurring and one-time automated clearinghouse programs that debit funds directly from their bank accounts. As payments are received, they are electronically transferred to VW Credit and processed through VW Credit’s servicing system for the application of payments to the appropriate accounts.
VW Credit measures delinquency by the number of days elapsed from the date a payment is due under the installment contract. VW Credit considers an account delinquent if more than 25% of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. VW Credit utilizes behavioral scoring to drive contact strategies for delinquent accounts. VW Credit generally mails a notice to the purchaser between 2 and 28 days delinquent and initiates telephone contact requesting payment between 2 and 45 days delinquent. VW Credit improves its collection efficiency through the use of technology such as automatic dialing, predictive dialing and behavioral scoring of loan accounts. If the delinquent loan cannot be brought current or completely collected within 60 to 90 days, VW Credit generally assigns the vehicle to a repossession agent and attempts to repossess the related vehicle. VW Credit holds repossessed vehicles in inventory to comply with any applicable statutory requirements for reinstatement or redemption and then sells or otherwise disposes of the vehicles. VW Credit’s current policy is to generally charge-off a loan contract on the earlier of (1) the date on which the proceeds of sale of the vehicle are applied to the loan contract and (2) the month in which the loan contract reaches its 120th day of delinquency if the loan has been assigned to a repossession agent for 45 days. Deficiencies remaining after repossession and sale of the vehicle or after the full charge-off of the installment contract may be sold or pursued by or on behalf of VW Credit to the extent practicable and legally permitted. See “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Deficiency Judgments and Excess Proceeds” in this prospectus.
The servicer will use commercially reasonable efforts, consistent with its customary servicing practices, to repossess or otherwise convert the ownership of the financed vehicle securing any receivable as to which the servicer had determined eventual payment in full is unlikely unless it determines in its sole discretion that repossession will not increase the liquidation proceeds by an amount greater than the expense of such repossession or that the proceeds ultimately recoverable with respect to such receivable would be increased by forbearance. The servicer will follow such customary servicing practices as it deems necessary or advisable, which may include reasonable efforts to realize upon any recourse to any dealer and selling the financed vehicle at public or private sale. The foregoing will be subject to the provision that, in any case in which the financed vehicle has suffered damage, the servicer will not be required to expend funds in connection with the repair or the repossession of such financed vehicle unless it determines in its sole discretion that such repair and/or repossession will increase the liquidation proceeds by an amount greater than the amount of such expenses.
VW Credit’s underwriting and collection standards are reviewed by its Retail Credit Committee. Any change in VW Credit’s underwriting and collection standards requires prior approval from the Retail Credit Committee.
VW Credit will grant extensions or deferments of retail installment sale contracts in accordance with its customary servicing procedures and the sale and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Modifications of Receivables” in this prospectus.
None of VW Credit’s term securitization transactions have experienced early amortizations, servicer defaults or events of default. Neither VW Credit nor any issuing entity can guarantee that there will not be any early amortizations, servicer defaults or events of default in the future.
52
Table of Contents
Each retail installment sale contract requires the purchaser to obtain and maintain physical damage insurance on the purchased vehicle. VW Credit’s dealer agreements include a requirement that the dealer provide VW Credit with written evidence that the purchaser has physical damage insurance which meets the requirements of the related contract at the inception of the receivable; nevertheless, there can be no assurance that each purchased vehicle will continue to be covered by physical damage insurance for the entire term of the related contract. VW Credit does not monitor insurance after the contract is acquired by VW Credit. The amount of insurance required by the related contracts is at least equal to the amount required by applicable state law, subject to customary deductibles. VW Credit requires the policy to name VW Credit as loss payee with respect to physical damage.
VW Credit does not require purchasers to carry credit disability, credit life, credit health or other similar insurance coverage which provides for payments to be made on the receivable on behalf of purchasers in the event of disability or death. To the extent that the purchaser obtains any of these insurance coverages, payments received on that coverage may, if permitted by applicable law, be applied to payments on the related receivable to the extent that the purchaser’s beneficiary chooses to do so.
AFFILIATIONS AND CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS
The issuing entity, the depositor and VW Credit, as servicer, as sponsor and as administrator, are affiliates. Neither the indenture trustee nor the owner trustee is an affiliate of any of the foregoing parties, but Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, the owner trustee, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., one of the underwriters, are affiliates and Citibank, N.A., the indenture trustee, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, are affiliates. Additionally, neither the indenture trustee nor the owner trustee is an affiliate of the other. Finally, the asset representations reviewer is not an affiliate of any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the administrator, the issuing entity, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee.
THE ASSET REPRESENTATIONS REVIEWER
Clayton Fixed Income Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Clayton”), has been appointed as asset representations reviewer pursuant to an agreement between the issuing entity, the servicer and the asset representations reviewer. Clayton is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Radian Group, Inc. (NYSE: RDN). Clayton and its affiliates have provided independent due diligence loan review and servicer oversight services since 1989.
Clayton and its affiliates are providers of targeted due diligence reviews of securitized assets and policies and procedures of originators and servicers to assess compliance with representations and warranties, regulatory and legal requirements, investor guidelines and settlement agreements. Clayton and its affiliates have performed over 12 million loan reviews and provided ongoing services to over $2 trillion of securitization transactions on behalf of investors, sponsors, issuers and originators, including government sponsored enterprises and other governmental agencies. These services have been performed primarily on residential mortgage loan and residential mortgage-backed securities transactions, although Clayton and its affiliates have also performed these services for transactions involving auto loans, credit cards, commercial mortgage loans, student loans, timeshare loans and boat and recreational vehicle loans. Clayton has been engaged as the asset representations reviewer on more than 150 auto and equipment loan, lease and dealer floorplan and credit card securitization transactions since 2015.
The asset representations reviewer is not, and will not be, affiliated with the sponsor, the depositor, the servicer, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee or any of their affiliates, nor has the asset representations reviewer been hired by the sponsor or an underwriter to perform pre-closing due diligence work on the receivables. If the asset representations reviewer is merged into or becomes an affiliate of the sponsor, the depositor, the servicer, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee or any person hired by the sponsor or an underwriter to perform pre-closing due diligence work on the receivables, the asset representations reviewer will promptly resign and the servicer will appoint a successor asset representations reviewer. In addition, the asset representations reviewer will promptly resign and the servicer will appoint a successor asset representations reviewer, if either (i) the asset representations reviewer no longer meets the eligibility requirements included in the asset representations review agreement or (ii) the asset representations reviewer has determined that the performance of its duties under the asset representations review agreement is no longer permissible under applicable law. The servicer may remove the asset
53
Table of Contents
representations reviewer if the asset representations reviewer, (i) no longer meets the eligibility requirements included in the asset representations review agreement, (ii) breaches any of its representations, warranties, covenants or obligations in the asset representations review agreement or (iii) is subject to a bankruptcy event.
Following the resignation or removal of the asset representations reviewer, the servicer will engage a successor asset representations reviewer who meets certain eligibility requirements included in the asset representations review agreement. No resignation or removal of the asset representations reviewer will be effective until a successor asset representations reviewer has accepted its appointment and agreed to perform the obligations of the asset representations reviewer.
If the asset representations reviewer has resigned, been removed, replaced or substituted, or if a successor asset representations reviewer has been appointed, the issuing entity will disclose on the Form 10-D filed after the collection period in which the event occurred, the date of the event and the circumstances surrounding the resignation, removal, replacement, substitution, or appointment, as applicable. The predecessor asset representations reviewer shall pay the expenses associated with the required resignation of the asset representations reviewer and the appointment of a successor asset representations reviewer.
The asset representations reviewer will be responsible for reviewing the Subject Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties made by the sponsor and the depositor on the receivables if the conditions described below under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Asset Representations Review” are satisfied. Under the asset representations review agreement, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to be paid the fees and expenses set forth under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Fees and Expenses” in this prospectus. The asset representations reviewer is required to perform only those duties specifically required of it under the asset representations review agreement, as described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Asset Representations Review” in this prospectus. The asset representations reviewer’s liability in connection with the asset representations review is limited solely to the express obligations of the asset representations reviewer set forth in the asset representations review agreement. The asset representations reviewer will not be liable for any action taken, or not taken, in good faith under the asset representations review agreement or for errors in judgment, however the asset representations reviewer will be liable for its own willful misconduct, bad faith, breach of the asset representations review agreement or negligence in performing its obligations under the asset representations review agreement. The servicer is required under the asset representations review agreement to provide the asset representations reviewer access to the review materials. The asset representations reviewer will be required to keep all information about the receivables obtained by it in confidence and may not disclose that information other than as required by the terms of the asset representations review agreement and applicable law.
The characteristics set forth in this section are based on the pool of receivables as of the cut-off date.
Characteristics of the Receivables
The receivables sold to the issuing entity on the closing date will be selected for inclusion in the pool based upon the satisfaction of several criteria. In addition, each of VW Credit and the depositor will make certain representations and warranties about the receivables, which if breached, could result in VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, being required to repurchase the related receivables.
As of the cut-off date, each receivable to be acquired by the issuing entity on the closing date:
| • | had an original term to maturity of 12 months to 72 months; |
| • | had a maturity of no later than December 30, 2023; |
| • | had a remaining principal balance of at least $1,000.44; |
| • | had a contract rate of not less than 0.00%; |
54
Table of Contents
| • | was not more than 30 days past due; and |
| • | satisfied the Eligibility Representations described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Representations and Warranties” in this prospectus. |
Receivables are originated in either tangible or electronic form. As of the cut-off date, approximately 1.36% of the receivables in the pool were originated as electronic contracts.
Interest on all of the receivables is calculated using the Simple Interest Method. See “Glossary” in this prospectus.
As of the cut-off date, the weighted average FICO®(1) score of the receivables as of origination of the related receivables is 774. The FICO® score of an obligor is calculated as of the origination of the related receivable in the manner described in “The Originator—Pool Underwriting” in this prospectus. A FICO® score is a measurement determined by Fair Isaac Corporation using information collected by the major credit bureaus to assess credit risk. Data from an independent credit reporting agency, such as FICO® score, is one of several factors that may be used by the originator in its credit scoring system to assess the credit risk associated with each applicant, see “The Originator—Pool Underwriting” in this prospectus. Additionally, FICO® scores are based on independent third party information, the accuracy of which cannot be verified. FICO® scores should not necessarily be relied upon as a meaningful predictor of the performance of the receivables. In addition, FICO® scores may change over time, depending on the conduct of the obligor and changes in credit score technology and therefore, an obligor’s FICO® score at any time in the future may be higher or lower than the obligor’s FICO® score as of origination of the related receivable. See “Risk Factors—Credit scores and historical loss experience may not accurately predict the likelihood of losses on the receivables” in this prospectus.
Payment of any expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of the receivables will be made by the depositor or its affiliates directly, rather than out of the offering proceeds.
There are no material direct or contingent claims that parties other than the secured parties under the indenture have regarding any receivables.
Each receivable will be selected using selection procedures that were not known or intended by VW Credit to be adverse to the depositor. VW Credit excluded from both pools of receivables any receivables in respect of which VW Credit’s systems indicated that the vehicle model corresponded to a vehicle subject to a stop sale as of the cut-off date.
| (1) | FICO® is a federally registered trademark of Fair Isaac Corporation. |
55
Table of Contents
The composition, distribution by remaining term, distribution by contract rate, distribution by FICO® score, distribution by original term, distribution by seasoning, geographic distribution by state of the billing address of the obligor and distribution by vehicle type, in each case of the receivables as of the cut-off date are set forth in the tables below.
Composition of the Receivables Pool
As of the Cut-off Date
| Number of Receivables |
69,296 | |||
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
$ | 1,444,931,385.44 | ||
| Outstanding Principal Balance |
||||
| Average |
$ | 20,851.58 | ||
| Minimum |
$ | 1,000.44 | ||
| Maximum |
$ | 97,140.05 | ||
| Contract Rate |
||||
| Weighted Average(1) |
3.33 | % | ||
| Minimum |
0.00 | % | ||
| Maximum |
18.99 | % | ||
| Original Term (Months) |
||||
| Weighted Average(1) |
63.87 | |||
| Minimum |
12 | |||
| Maximum |
72 | |||
| Remaining Term (Months) |
||||
| Weighted Average(1) |
52.06 | |||
| Minimum |
3 | |||
| Maximum |
66 | |||
| Percentage By Principal Balance of New Vehicles |
71.85 | % | ||
| Percentage By Principal Balance of Used Vehicles |
28.15 | % | ||
| Percentage By Principal Balance of Volkswagen Vehicles |
61.16 | % | ||
| Percentage By Principal Balance of Audi Vehicles |
38.84 | % | ||
| FICO® Score(2)(3) |
||||
| Weighted Average(1)(3) |
774 | |||
| Minimum(3) |
600 | |||
| Maximum(3) |
900 |
| (1) | Weighted by principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
| (2) | FICO® is a federally registered trademark of Fair Isaac Corporation. |
| (3) | FICO® scores are calculated as of origination of the related receivables. |
56
Table of Contents
Distribution of the Receivables by Remaining Term
As of the Cut-off Date
| Remaining Term Range |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| 6 months or less |
1,214 | 1.75 | % | $ | 3,281,983.15 | 0.23 | % | |||||||||
| 7 months to 12 months |
1,248 | 1.80 | 6,106,263.87 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||
| 13 months to 18 months |
1,501 | 2.17 | 11,323,508.52 | 0.78 | ||||||||||||
| 19 months to 24 months |
1,164 | 1.68 | 12,479,576.83 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||
| 25 months to 30 months |
1,919 | 2.77 | 25,360,693.18 | 1.76 | ||||||||||||
| 31 months to 36 months |
3,499 | 5.05 | 50,774,552.60 | 3.51 | ||||||||||||
| 37 months to 42 months |
6,514 | 9.40 | 109,347,476.91 | 7.57 | ||||||||||||
| 43 months to 48 months |
10,005 | 14.44 | 188,534,867.87 | 13.05 | ||||||||||||
| 49 months to 54 months |
14,828 | 21.40 | 328,748,840.08 | 22.75 | ||||||||||||
| 55 months to 60 months |
16,598 | 23.95 | 411,113,588.21 | 28.45 | ||||||||||||
| 61 months to 66 months |
10,806 | 15.59 | 297,860,034.22 | 20.61 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
Distribution of the Receivables by Contract Rate
As of the Cut-off Date
| Contract Rate Range |
Number of Receivables |
Percent
of Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| 0.00% to 0.99% |
9,168 | 13.23 | % | $ | 145,672,697.12 | 10.08 | % | |||||||||
| 1.00% to 1.99% |
12,059 | 17.40 | 224,136,860.15 | 15.51 | ||||||||||||
| 2.00% to 2.99% |
18,715 | 27.01 | 394,546,210.48 | 27.31 | ||||||||||||
| 3.00% to 3.99% |
17,634 | 25.45 | 427,471,007.76 | 29.58 | ||||||||||||
| 4.00% to 4.99% |
5,196 | 7.50 | 115,471,751.84 | 7.99 | ||||||||||||
| 5.00% to 5.99% |
2,232 | 3.22 | 46,872,654.73 | 3.24 | ||||||||||||
| 6.00% to 6.99% |
1,026 | 1.48 | 23,923,385.72 | 1.66 | ||||||||||||
| 7.00% to 7.99% |
1,162 | 1.68 | 24,563,677.25 | 1.70 | ||||||||||||
| 8.00% to 8.99% |
587 | 0.85 | 12,195,852.77 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||
| 9.00% to 9.99% |
323 | 0.47 | 7,171,678.71 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||
| 10.00% to 10.99% |
339 | 0.49 | 7,426,826.10 | 0.51 | ||||||||||||
| 11.00% to 11.99% |
223 | 0.32 | 3,852,927.16 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||
| 12.00% to 12.99% |
153 | 0.22 | 2,467,448.25 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||
| 13.00% to 13.99% |
157 | 0.23 | 3,112,027.83 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||
| 14.00% to 14.99% |
150 | 0.22 | 2,838,535.87 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| 15.00% to 15.99% |
75 | 0.11 | 1,294,061.70 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
| 16.00% to 16.99% |
50 | 0.07 | 1,029,705.41 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
| 17.00% to 17.99% |
41 | 0.06 | 801,847.51 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||
| 18.00% to 18.99% |
6 | 0.01 | 82,229.08 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
57
Table of Contents
Distribution of the Receivables by FICO® Score
As of the Cut-off Date
|
FICO® Score Range(2) |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| 600 to 660 |
3,323 | 4.80 | % | $ | 68,384,700.84 | 4.73 | % | |||||||||
| 661 to 700 |
7,500 | 10.82 | 152,586,098.52 | 10.56 | ||||||||||||
| 701 to 750 |
15,896 | 22.94 | 326,260,975.76 | 22.58 | ||||||||||||
| 751 to 800 |
15,970 | 23.05 | 324,462,136.73 | 22.46 | ||||||||||||
| 801 to 880 |
25,470 | 36.76 | 547,461,642.67 | 37.89 | ||||||||||||
| 881 to 900 |
1,137 | 1.64 | 25,775,830.92 | 1.78 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
| (2) | FICO® scores are calculated as of the origination of the related receivables. |
58
Table of Contents
Geographic Distribution of the Receivables by State
As of the Cut-off Date
| State(1) |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(2) |
Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance(2) |
||||||||||||
| Alabama |
333 | 0.48 | % | $ | 8,035,878.83 | 0.56 | % | |||||||||
| Alaska |
62 | 0.09 | 1,596,748.07 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||
| Arizona |
1,496 | 2.16 | 30,634,051.02 | 2.12 | ||||||||||||
| Arkansas |
226 | 0.33 | 5,756,284.36 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||
| California |
11,070 | 15.97 | 239,302,438.63 | 16.56 | ||||||||||||
| Colorado |
991 | 1.43 | 22,850,747.08 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||
| Connecticut |
1,683 | 2.43 | 31,008,915.60 | 2.15 | ||||||||||||
| Delaware |
173 | 0.25 | 3,298,454.36 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
| District of Columbia |
244 | 0.35 | 4,817,274.49 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||
| Florida |
5,841 | 8.43 | 119,813,306.55 | 8.29 | ||||||||||||
| Georgia |
2,645 | 3.82 | 55,625,166.98 | 3.85 | ||||||||||||
| Hawaii |
224 | 0.32 | 5,014,785.94 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
| Idaho |
129 | 0.19 | 2,937,719.41 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| Illinois |
4,004 | 5.78 | 83,957,401.95 | 5.81 | ||||||||||||
| Indiana |
935 | 1.35 | 19,173,241.30 | 1.33 | ||||||||||||
| Iowa |
394 | 0.57 | 8,382,264.18 | 0.58 | ||||||||||||
| Kansas |
416 | 0.60 | 8,448,884.88 | 0.58 | ||||||||||||
| Kentucky |
514 | 0.74 | 10,121,345.63 | 0.70 | ||||||||||||
| Louisiana |
818 | 1.18 | 20,904,904.24 | 1.45 | ||||||||||||
| Maine |
353 | 0.51 | 6,390,121.64 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||
| Michigan |
1,084 | 1.56 | 22,802,095.52 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||
| Minnesota |
1,805 | 2.60 | 35,343,012.42 | 2.45 | ||||||||||||
| Mississippi |
261 | 0.38 | 6,816,480.98 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||
| Missouri |
602 | 0.87 | 12,313,449.95 | 0.85 | ||||||||||||
| Montana |
127 | 0.18 | 2,887,399.51 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| Nebraska |
355 | 0.51 | 6,798,901.65 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||
| Nevada |
921 | 1.33 | 20,215,428.12 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||
| New Hampshire |
509 | 0.73 | 9,132,973.78 | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
| New Jersey |
3,033 | 4.38 | 63,620,624.37 | 4.40 | ||||||||||||
| New Mexico |
232 | 0.33 | 4,503,261.33 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||
| New York |
4,474 | 6.46 | 86,479,147.86 | 5.99 | ||||||||||||
| North Carolina |
2,238 | 3.23 | 46,214,369.44 | 3.20 | ||||||||||||
| North Dakota |
72 | 0.10 | 1,558,187.60 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||
| Ohio |
1,864 | 2.69 | 36,406,719.45 | 2.52 | ||||||||||||
| Oklahoma |
361 | 0.52 | 8,531,176.71 | 0.59 | ||||||||||||
| Oregon |
766 | 1.11 | 17,254,726.52 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania |
3,610 | 5.21 | 61,959,027.15 | 4.29 | ||||||||||||
| Rhode Island |
355 | 0.51 | 6,009,449.25 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||
| South Carolina |
1,136 | 1.64 | 21,928,712.98 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||
| South Dakota |
119 | 0.17 | 2,447,021.43 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||
| Tennessee |
981 | 1.42 | 21,649,614.33 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||
| Texas |
4,995 | 7.21 | 116,438,810.53 | 8.06 | ||||||||||||
| Utah |
524 | 0.76 | 12,439,629.83 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||
| Vermont |
283 | 0.41 | 5,485,233.69 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
| Virginia |
2,416 | 3.49 | 52,615,442.56 | 3.64 | ||||||||||||
| Washington |
1,877 | 2.71 | 41,958,558.28 | 2.90 | ||||||||||||
| West Virginia |
181 | 0.26 | 3,884,631.74 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||
| Wisconsin |
1,499 | 2.16 | 27,619,610.72 | 1.91 | ||||||||||||
| Wyoming |
65 | 0.09 | 1,547,752.60 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Based on the billing address of the obligor on the receivables. |
| (2) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
59
Table of Contents
Distribution of the Receivables by Original Term
As of the Cut-off Date
| Original Term Range |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| 12 months to 18 months |
97 | 0.14 | % | $ | 793,612.49 | 0.05 | % | |||||||||
| 19 months to 24 months |
275 | 0.40 | 3,301,653.03 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
| 25 months to 30 months |
19 | 0.03 | 210,651.70 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
| 31 months to 36 months |
1,899 | 2.74 | 27,573,930.12 | 1.91 | ||||||||||||
| 37 months to 42 months |
91 | 0.13 | 1,305,847.26 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
| 43 months to 48 months |
3,306 | 4.77 | 56,002,460.26 | 3.88 | ||||||||||||
| 49 months to 54 months |
169 | 0.24 | 3,173,203.98 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||
| 55 months to 60 months |
34,009 | 49.08 | 677,547,368.75 | 46.89 | ||||||||||||
| 61 months to 66 months |
5,547 | 8.00 | 158,466,626.60 | 10.97 | ||||||||||||
| 67 months to 72 months |
23,884 | 34.47 | 516,556,031.25 | 35.75 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
Distribution of the Receivables by Seasoning
As of the Cut-off Date
| Seasoning Range |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| 6 months or less |
16,188 | 23.36 | % | $ | 419,601,953.31 | 29.04 | % | |||||||||
| 7 months to 12 months |
22,728 | 32.80 | 527,323,991.78 | 36.49 | ||||||||||||
| 13 months to 18 months |
12,867 | 18.57 | 256,692,465.11 | 17.77 | ||||||||||||
| 19 months to 24 months |
8,603 | 12.41 | 147,839,486.28 | 10.23 | ||||||||||||
| 25 months to 30 months |
3,639 | 5.25 | 54,439,355.62 | 3.77 | ||||||||||||
| 31 months to 36 months |
1,218 | 1.76 | 16,093,615.63 | 1.11 | ||||||||||||
| 37 months to 42 months |
555 | 0.80 | 6,057,179.91 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||
| 43 months to 48 months |
269 | 0.39 | 2,327,037.71 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||
| 49 months to 54 months |
708 | 1.02 | 4,092,242.51 | 0.28 | ||||||||||||
| 55 months to 60 months |
1,667 | 2.41 | 7,720,531.20 | 0.53 | ||||||||||||
| 61 months to 66 months |
854 | 1.23 | 2,743,526.38 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
60
Table of Contents
Distribution of the Receivables by Vehicle Type
As of the Cut-off Date
| Vehicle Type |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of
Total Number of Receivables(1) |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance(1) |
||||||||||||
| Car |
48,150 | 69.48 | % | $ | 864,651,753.76 | 59.84 | % | |||||||||
| SUV |
21,076 | 30.41 | 579,293,199.24 | 40.09 | ||||||||||||
| Minivan |
70 | 0.10 | 986,432.44 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
69,296 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,444,931,385.44 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. |
Delinquencies, Net Credit Loss and Repossession Experience
The following tables provide information relating to delinquency, credit loss and repossession experience for each period indicated with respect to all motor vehicle receivables serviced by VW Credit. This information includes the experience with respect to all motor vehicle receivables serviced as of each respective date or during each listed period. The following statistics include motor vehicle receivables with a variety of payment and other characteristics that may not correspond to the motor vehicle receivables in the receivables pool. In addition, motor vehicle receivables with an original term greater than 60 months and the relative percentage of used vehicles in VW Credit’s portfolio has increased over time, which has resulted in a higher percentage of longer term loans and loans financing used vehicles being held by the issuing entity than was present in VW Credit’s motor vehicle receivables servicing portfolio as of the dates and for the periods indicated. As a result, there can be no assurance that the delinquency and credit loss experience with respect to the motor vehicle receivables in the receivables pool will correspond to the delinquency and credit loss experience of VW Credit’s motor vehicle receivables servicing portfolio set forth in the following tables.
VW Credit Managed Retail Portfolio
Delinquency Experience(1)(2)(4)
(dollars in thousands)
| At March 31, | At December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Principal Amount Outstanding |
$8,912,013 | $8,231,276 | $8,608,546 | $9,024,822 | $9,870,243 | $10,046,594 | $9,901,822 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables Outstanding |
518,383 | 507,934 | 509,751 | 563,911 | 589,048 | 592,460 | 578,392 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Units | % | Units | % | Units | % | Units | % | Units | % | Units | % | Units | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Delinquencies(2)(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31-60 days |
4,258 | 0.82 | % | 3,912 | 0.77 | % | 4,504 | 0.88 | % | 5,875 | 1.04 | % | 4,718 | 0.80 | % | 3,954 | 0.67 | % | 4,448 | 0.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61-90 days |
928 | 0.18 | % | 1,013 | 0.20 | % | 1,378 | 0.27 | % | 1,618 | 0.29 | % | 1,302 | 0.22 | % | 843 | 0.14 | % | 928 | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91-120 days |
261 | 0.05 | % | 305 | 0.06 | % | 322 | 0.06 | % | 569 | 0.10 | % | 267 | 0.05 | % | 196 | 0.03 | % | 211 | 0.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 121 or more days |
242 | 0.05 | % | 210 | 0.04 | % | 192 | 0.04 | % | 374 | 0.07 | % | 102 | 0.02 | % | 131 | 0.02 | % | 221 | 0.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total 30+ Delinquencies |
5,689 | 1.10 | % | 5,440 | 1.07 | % | 6,396 | 1.25 | % | 8,436 | 1.50 | % | 6,389 | 1.08 | % | 5,124 | 0.86 | % | 5,808 | 1.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Data presented in the table is based upon retail balances for new and used vehicles financed by VW Credit, including those that have been sold but are serviced by VW Credit. |
| (2) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. |
| (3) | VW Credit generally charges off a receivable on the earlier of (a) the date on which proceeds from the sale of the vehicle securing that receivable are applied to the contract and (b) the month in which the receivable reaches its 120th day of delinquency if the contract has been assigned to a repossession agent for 60 days. |
| (4) | Balances and percentages may not add to total due to rounding. |
61
Table of Contents
VW Credit Managed Retail Portfolio
Net Credit Loss and Repossession Experience(1)
(dollars in thousands)
| At or for the 3 months ended March 31, |
At or for the twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Principal Amount Outstanding |
$ | 8,912,013 | $ | 8,231,276 | $ | 8,608,546 | $ | 9,024,822 | $ | 9,870,243 | $ | 10,046,594 | $ | 9,901,822 | ||||||||||||||
| Average Principal Amount Outstanding(2) |
$ | 8,828,683 | $ | 8,512,390 | $ | 8,393,206 | $ | 9,375,551 | $ | 9,927,857 | $ | 10,002,544 | $ | 9,908,382 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables Outstanding |
518,383 | 507,934 | 509,751 | 563,911 | 589,048 | 592,460 | 578,392 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Number of
Receivables |
515,604 | 528,876 | 510,082 | 577,359 | 591,873 | 586,858 | 574,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables Repossessed |
1,182 | 1,036 | 3,828 | 3,196 | 3,178 | 3,105 | 3,452 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables Repossessed as a percent of the Average Number of Receivables Outstanding(2) |
0.92 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Charge-Offs(3)(4) |
$ | 21,574 | $ | 21,251 | $ | 71,108 | $ | 55,168 | $ | 52,195 | $ | 40,118 | $ | 18,373 | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries(3) |
$ | 5,082 | $ | 4,963 | $ | 20,509 | $ | 20,011 | $ | 15,039 | $ | 13,010 | $ | 5,760 | ||||||||||||||
| Net Losses(5) |
$ | 16,493 | $ | 16,288 | $ | 50,599 | $ | 35,156 | $ | 37,156 | $ | 27,108 | $ | 12,613 | ||||||||||||||
| Net Losses as a percent of Average Principal Amount Outstanding |
0.75 | % | 0.77 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Data presented in the table is based upon Retail Balances for new and used vehicles financed by VW Credit, including those that have been sold but are serviced by VW Credit. |
| (2) | Averages are computed by taking a simple average of the month end outstanding amounts for each period presented. |
| (3) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to retail contracts previously charged off. |
| (4) | Charge-offs generally represent the total aggregate net outstanding balance of the retail contracts determined to be uncollectible in the period less proceeds from the disposition of related retail vehicles, other than recoveries described in Note (5) below. |
| (5) | Net Losses generally represent the total aggregate net outstanding balance of receivables determined to be uncollectible during the period less proceeds from the disposition of related vehicles, including net amounts received from customers. |
In addition to the payment and other characteristics of a pool of receivables, delinquencies and credit losses are also affected by a number of social and economic factors, including changes in interest rates and unemployment levels, and there can be no assurance as to the level of future total delinquencies or the severity of future credit losses as a result of these factors. Accordingly, the delinquency and credit loss experience of the receivables may differ from those shown in the foregoing tables.
See “The Originator—Pool Underwriting” in this prospectus for additional information.
62
Table of Contents
Delinquency Experience Regarding the Pool of Receivables
The following tables set forth the delinquency experience regarding the pool of receivables. The servicer considers a receivable delinquent when an obligor fails to make more than 25% of a scheduled payment by the related due date. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. As of the cut-off date, none of the receivables in either pool were more than 30 days delinquent or have experienced a loss, and as of the cut-off date, none of the receivables in either pool sold to the issuing entity on the closing date will be more than 30 days delinquent or have experienced a loss.
| Historical Delinquency Status |
Number of Receivables |
Percent of Total Number of Receivables |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Percent of Total Outstanding Principal Balance |
||||||||||||
| Delinquent no more than once for 31-60 days(1) |
1,227 | 1.77 | % | $ | 22,864,517.97 | 1.58 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquent more than once for 31-60 days but never for 61 days or more |
596 | 0.86 | % | $ | 10,238,167.45 | 0.71 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquent at least once for 61 days or more |
315 | 0.45 | % | $ | 5,326,289.60 | 0.37 | % | |||||||||
| (1) | Delinquent no more than once for 31-60 days represent accounts that were delinquent one time but never exceeded 60 days past due. |
Static Pool Information About Certain Previous Securitizations
Appendix A, which is incorporated by reference into this prospectus sets forth in tabular and graphic format static pool information about prior securitized pools of retail installment sale contracts and installment loans that were sponsored by VW Credit in the last eight years, including those receivables acquired and securitized by Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC, that were included in the Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2010-1, 2011-1, 2012-1, 2012-2, 2013-1, 2013-2, 2014-1 and 2014-2 transactions. Static pool information consists of cumulative credit losses, delinquency and prepayment data for prior securitized pools and summary information for the original characteristics of the prior pools. The term “securitized pool” refers to the securitized pool of receivables as of the related cut-off date. The characteristics of the securitized pools included in Appendix A vary from the characteristics of the receivables in this transaction.
The characteristics of receivables included in the static pool data discussed above, as well as the social, economic and other conditions existing at the time when those receivables were originated and repaid, may vary materially from the characteristics of the receivables in this transaction and the social, economic and other conditions existing at the time when the receivables in this transaction were originated and those that will exist in the future when the receivables in the current transaction are required to be repaid. Additionally, since VW Credit’s underwriting standards and procedures have remained stable over time, it is VW Credit’s belief that the prior securitized pools are generally comparable to the pool of receivables described in this prospectus, however the pool of receivables described in this prospectus (i) has a higher weighted average FICO® score, (ii) has a higher weighted average seasoning, (iii) has a lower weighted average remaining term, and (iv) includes a higher percentage by principal balance of Audi vehicles, in each case, than prior securitized pools. As a result, there can be no assurance that the static pool data referred to above will correspond to or be an accurate predictor of the performance of this receivables securitization transaction.
In connection with the offering of the notes, the depositor has performed a review of the receivables in the pool and the disclosure regarding those receivables required to be included in this prospectus by Item 1111 of Regulation AB (such disclosure, the “Rule 193 Information”). This review was designed and effected to provide the depositor with reasonable assurance that the Rule 193 Information is accurate in all material respects.
As part of the review, VW Credit identified the Rule 193 Information to be covered and identified the review procedures for each portion of the Rule 193 Information. Descriptions consisting of factual information were reviewed and approved by VW Credit’s responsible personnel to ensure the accuracy of such descriptions. VW Credit also reviewed the Rule 193 Information consisting of descriptions of portions of the transaction documents
63
Table of Contents
and compared that Rule 193 Information to the transaction documents to ensure the descriptions were accurate. Members of VW Credit’s capital markets group also consulted with internal regulatory personnel and counsel, as well as external counsel, with respect to the description of the legal and regulatory provisions that may materially and adversely affect the performance of the receivables or payments on the notes.
In addition, VW Credit also performed a review of the receivables in the pool to confirm that those receivables satisfied the criteria set forth under “The Receivables Pool—Characteristics of the Receivables” in this prospectus. The first aspect of that review tested the accuracy of the individual receivables data contained in VW Credit’s data tape. The data tape is an electronic record maintained by VW Credit, which includes certain attributes of the receivables. VW Credit selected a random sample of 175 receivable files to confirm 16 data points such as FICO® score, contract rate and original term conformed to the applicable information on the data tape. A second aspect of that review consisted of a comparison of the statistical information contained under “The Receivables Pool” to data in, or derived from, the data tape. There was one receivable with one attribute related to the contract loan amount that did not match VW Credit’s system, which led to one exception. The exception was immaterial. Statistical information relating to the receivables in the pools was recalculated using the applicable information on the data tape. In addition to this review, VW Credit performs periodic internal control reviews and internal audits of various processes, including its origination and reporting system processes.
Portions of the review of legal matters and the review of statistical information were performed with the assistance of third parties engaged by the depositor. The depositor determined the nature, extent and timing of the review and the sufficiency of the assistance provided by the third parties for purposes of its review. The depositor had ultimate authority and control over, and assumes all responsibility for, the review and the findings and conclusions of the review. The depositor attributes all finding and conclusions of the review to itself.
After undertaking the review described above, the depositor has found and concluded that it has reasonable assurance that the Rule 193 Information in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects.
The issuing entity has provided asset-level information regarding the pool of receivables that will be owned by the issuing entity as of the closing date (the “asset-level data”) as an exhibit to a Form ABS-EE that was filed by the issuing entity by the date of the filing of this prospectus, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The asset-level data comprises each of the of the data points required with respect to automobile loans identified on Schedule AL to Regulation AB and generally includes, with respect to each receivable, the related asset number, the reporting period covered, general information about the receivable, information regarding the related financed vehicle, information about the related obligor, information about activity on the receivable and information about modifications of the receivable since it was origination. In addition, the issuing entity will provide updated asset-level data with respect to the receivables each month as an exhibit to the monthly distribution reports filed with the SEC on Form 10-D.
64
Table of Contents
No assets securitized by VW Credit were the subject of a demand to repurchase or replace for breach of the representations and warranties during the three year period ending March 31, 2018. Please refer to Form ABS-15G filed by VW Credit on February 13, 2018 for additional information. The CIK number of VW Credit is 0000833733.
WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE OF THE NOTES
The weighted average life of the notes will generally be influenced by the rate at which the outstanding principal balances of the receivables are paid, which payments may be in the form of scheduled payments or prepayments. Each receivable is prepayable in full by the obligor at any time. Full and partial prepayments on motor vehicle receivables included in the issuing entity property will be paid or distributed to the noteholders on the next payment date following the collection period in which they are received. To the extent that any receivable included in the issuing entity property is prepaid in full, whether by the obligor, or as the result of a purchase by the servicer or a repurchase by the originator or otherwise, the actual weighted average life of the receivables included in the issuing entity property will be shorter than a weighted average life calculation based on the assumptions that payments will be made on schedule and that no prepayments will be made. Weighted average life means the average amount of time until the entire principal amount of a receivable is repaid. Full prepayments may also result from liquidations due to default, receipt of proceeds from theft, physical damage, credit life or credit disability insurance policies, repurchases by the depositor as a result of the failure of a receivable to meet the Eligibility Representations or as a result of a breach of covenants with respect to the receivables or purchases made by the servicer as a result of a breach of a covenant made by it related to its servicing duties in the transaction documents. In addition, early retirement of the notes may be effected at the option of the servicer to purchase the remaining receivables as described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Optional Redemption” in this prospectus.
The rate of full prepayments by obligors on the receivables may be influenced by a variety of economic, social and other factors. These factors include the unemployment rate, servicing decisions, seasoning of loans, destruction of vehicles by accident, loss of vehicles due to theft, sales of vehicles, market interest rates, the availability of alternative financing and restrictions on the obligor’s ability to sell or transfer the financed vehicle securing a receivable without the consent of the servicer. Any full prepayments or partial prepayments applied immediately will reduce the average life of the receivables.
The originator can make no prediction as to the actual prepayment rates that will be experienced on the receivables included in the issuing entity property in either stable or changing interest rate environments. Noteholders will bear all reinvestment risk resulting from the rate of prepayment of the receivables included in the issuing entity property.
The following information is provided solely to illustrate the effect of prepayments of the receivables on the unpaid principal amounts of the notes and the weighted average life of the notes under the assumptions stated below, and is not a prediction of the prepayment rates that might actually be experienced with respect to the receivables.
Prepayments on motor vehicle receivables can be measured against prepayment standards or models. The model used in this prospectus, the absolute prepayment model, or “ABS”, assumes a rate of prepayment each month which is related to the original number of receivables in a pool of receivables. ABS also assumes that all of the receivables in a pool are the same size, that all of those receivables amortize at the same rate, and that for every month that any individual receivable is outstanding, payments on that particular receivable will either be made as scheduled or the receivable will be prepaid in full. For example, in a pool of receivables originally containing 10,000 receivables, if a 1% ABS were used, that would mean that 100 receivables would prepay in full each month. The percentage of prepayments that is assumed for ABS is not a historical description of prepayment experience on pools of receivables or a prediction of the anticipated rate of prepayment on the pool of receivables involved in this transaction or on any pool of motor vehicle receivables. You should not assume that the actual rate of prepayments on the receivables will be in any way related to the percentage of prepayments that was assumed for ABS.
The tables below which are captioned “Percent of the Initial Outstanding Balance at Various ABS Percentages” (the “ABS Tables”) are based on ABS and were prepared using the following assumptions:
65
Table of Contents
| • | the issuing entity holds 6 pools of receivables with the following characteristics: |
| Pool |
Outstanding Principal Balance |
Gross Contract Rate | Original Term to Maturity (in Months) |
Remaining Term to Maturity (in Months) |
||||||||||||
| 1 |
$ | 9,388,247.02 | 2.291 | % | 57 | 8 | ||||||||||
| 2 |
$ | 23,803,085.35 | 2.576 | % | 52 | 19 | ||||||||||
| 3 |
$ | 76,135,245.78 | 2.714 | % | 52 | 32 | ||||||||||
| 4 |
$ | 297,882,344.78 | 2.724 | % | 61 | 44 | ||||||||||
| 5 |
$ | 739,862,428.29 | 3.293 | % | 64 | 55 | ||||||||||
| 6 |
$ | 297,860,034.22 | 4.268 | % | 71 | 63 | ||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 1,444,931,385.44 | ||||||||||||||
| • | all prepayments on the receivables each month are made in full at the specified constant percentage of ABS and there are no defaults, losses or repurchases; |
| • | interest accrues on the notes at the following coupon rates: Class A-1 notes, 2.40000%; Class A-2-A notes, 3.02%; Class A-2-B notes, 2.28494%; Class A-3 notes, 3.32%; and Class A-4 notes, 3.44%; |
| • | each scheduled payment on the receivables is made on the last day of each month commencing in June 2018 and each month has 30 days; |
| • | the original outstanding balance of the Class A-2 notes is allocated to the Class A-2-A notes in the amount of $260,000,000 and to the Class A-2-B notes in the amount of $260,000,000; |
| • | the original outstanding balance of the Class A-1 notes will be $307,000,000, of the Class A-3 notes will be $369,000,000 and of the Class A-4 notes will be $104,000,000; |
| • | payments on the notes are paid in cash on each payment date commencing August 20, 2018, and on the 20th calendar day of each subsequent month whether or not that day is a business day; |
| • | the notes are purchased on July 3, 2018; |
| • | the Class A-1 notes and the Class A-2-B notes will be paid interest on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed during the period for which interest is payable and a 360-day year; |
| • | the Class A-2-A notes, the Class A-3 notes and the Class A-4 notes will be paid interest on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months; |
| • | the scheduled payment for each receivable was calculated on the basis of the characteristics described in the ABS Tables and in such a way that each receivable would amortize in a manner that would be sufficient to repay the receivable balance of that receivable by its indicated remaining term to maturity; |
| • | except as indicated in the tables, the clean-up call option to redeem the notes will be exercised at the earliest opportunity; |
| • | the initial amount of overcollateralization will be $40,210,498.92, or approximately 3.00% of the adjusted pool balance as of the closing date; |
| • | the owner trustee fees, indenture trustee fees and asset representations reviewer fees are zero; |
| • | the servicing fee will be 1.00% per annum and the servicing fee for the first payment date will be an amount equal to the product of (1) 1.00%, (2) one-sixth and (3) the net pool balance of the receivables as of the cut-off date; and |
| • | the cut-off date is May 31, 2018. |
66
Table of Contents
The ABS Tables were created relying on the assumptions listed above. The tables indicate the percentages of the original outstanding balances of each class of notes that would be outstanding after each of the listed payment dates if certain percentages of ABS are assumed. The ABS Tables also indicate the corresponding weighted average lives of each class of notes if the same percentages of ABS are assumed. The assumptions used to construct the ABS Tables are hypothetical and have been provided only to give a general sense of how the principal cash flows might behave under various prepayment scenarios. The actual characteristics and performance of the receivables may differ materially from the assumptions used to construct the ABS Tables.
As used in the ABS Tables, the “weighted average life” of a class of notes is determined by:
| • | multiplying the amount of each principal payment on a note by the number of years from the date of the issuance of the note to the related payment date; |
| • | adding the results; and |
| • | dividing the sum by the related original outstanding balance of the note. |
Percent of the Initial Outstanding Balance at Various ABS Percentages, Class A-1 Notes
| Payment Date |
0.00% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.30% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2018 |
84.29 | 79.48 | 74.00 | 70.30 | 67.59 | 64.59 | 58.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2018 |
76.36 | 69.30 | 61.26 | 55.83 | 51.87 | 47.51 | 39.41 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2018 |
68.39 | 59.17 | 48.69 | 41.62 | 36.49 | 30.86 | 21.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2018 |
60.37 | 49.09 | 36.29 | 27.67 | 21.43 | 14.62 | 3.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2018 |
52.30 | 39.07 | 24.06 | 13.98 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2019 |
44.19 | 29.09 | 12.00 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2019 |
36.02 | 19.17 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2019 |
28.20 | 9.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2019 |
20.33 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2019 |
12.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2019 |
4.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2019 |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call |
0.54 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity |
0.54 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
67
Table of Contents
Percent of the Initial Outstanding Balance at Various ABS Percentages, Class A-2 Notes
| Payment Date |
0.00% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.30% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.30 | 91.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 95.46 | 90.22 | 81.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 92.55 | 87.15 | 81.40 | 71.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 93.35 | 85.09 | 79.16 | 72.85 | 62.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 86.72 | 77.76 | 71.34 | 64.50 | 53.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2019 |
100.00 | 94.58 | 80.18 | 70.58 | 63.70 | 56.37 | 44.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2019 |
100.00 | 89.05 | 73.74 | 63.54 | 56.22 | 48.45 | 35.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2019 |
97.89 | 83.56 | 67.40 | 56.63 | 48.93 | 40.74 | 27.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2019 |
93.14 | 78.10 | 61.15 | 49.87 | 41.81 | 33.24 | 19.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2019 |
88.35 | 72.67 | 55.01 | 43.26 | 34.86 | 25.95 | 11.46 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2019 |
83.54 | 67.26 | 48.95 | 36.79 | 28.10 | 18.88 | 3.92 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2019 |
78.69 | 61.89 | 43.00 | 30.46 | 21.51 | 12.03 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2019 |
73.82 | 56.55 | 37.14 | 24.28 | 15.10 | 5.39 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2020 |
68.93 | 51.24 | 31.39 | 18.24 | 8.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2020 |
64.24 | 46.17 | 25.90 | 12.48 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2020 |
59.54 | 41.14 | 20.51 | 6.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2020 |
54.80 | 36.13 | 15.21 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2020 |
50.04 | 31.16 | 10.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2020 |
45.24 | 26.21 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2020 |
40.42 | 21.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2020 |
35.57 | 16.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2020 |
30.69 | 11.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2020 |
25.79 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2020 |
20.85 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2020 |
15.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2021 |
10.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2021 |
5.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2021 |
1.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2021 |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call |
1.92 | 1.63 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 0.88 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity |
1.92 | 1.63 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 0.88 | |||||||||||||||||||||
68
Table of Contents
Percent of the Initial Outstanding Balance at Various ABS Percentages, Class A-3 Notes
| Payment Date |
0.00% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.30% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 95.28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 87.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 98.54 | 77.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 91.37 | 68.38 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 95.97 | 82.91 | 59.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 89.39 | 74.73 | 51.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 94.40 | 81.64 | 66.83 | 42.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 88.24 | 74.12 | 59.22 | 35.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 99.83 | 81.02 | 66.85 | 51.90 | 27.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 93.94 | 73.99 | 59.82 | 44.88 | 20.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 87.07 | 67.17 | 53.04 | 38.14 | 14.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 80.33 | 60.54 | 46.49 | 31.69 | 7.89 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 73.74 | 54.11 | 40.20 | 25.54 | 1.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2020 |
100.00 | 95.96 | 67.28 | 47.89 | 34.14 | 19.68 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2021 |
100.00 | 90.00 | 60.96 | 41.86 | 28.34 | 14.11 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2021 |
100.00 | 83.31 | 54.78 | 36.04 | 22.79 | 8.85 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2021 |
100.00 | 77.20 | 49.13 | 30.71 | 17.68 | 3.98 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2021 |
95.35 | 71.14 | 43.61 | 25.56 | 12.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2021 |
89.35 | 65.12 | 38.22 | 20.59 | 8.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2021 |
82.75 | 59.13 | 32.95 | 15.80 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2021 |
76.10 | 53.19 | 27.81 | 11.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2021 |
69.42 | 47.29 | 22.79 | 6.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2021 |
62.70 | 41.43 | 17.91 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2021 |
55.95 | 35.61 | 13.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2021 |
49.16 | 29.83 | 8.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2021 |
42.34 | 24.10 | 4.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2022 |
35.48 | 18.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2022 |
28.59 | 12.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2022 |
23.59 | 8.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2022 |
18.57 | 4.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2022 |
13.51 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2022 |
8.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2022 |
3.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2022 |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call |
3.43 | 3.15 | 2.78 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 2.14 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity |
3.43 | 3.15 | 2.78 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 2.14 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||
69
Table of Contents
Percent of the Initial Outstanding Balance at Various ABS Percentages, Class A-4 Notes
| Payment Date |
0.00% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.30% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2018 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2019 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2020 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 87.45 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 97.80 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 98.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 94.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2021 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2022 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 98.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2022 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2022 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2022 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2022 |
100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2022 |
100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2022 |
100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2022 |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call |
4.13 | 3.96 | 3.63 | 3.38 | 3.13 | 2.88 | 2.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity |
4.37 | 4.22 | 3.94 | 3.66 | 3.42 | 3.14 | 2.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||
70
Table of Contents
NOTE FACTORS AND POOL INFORMATION
Each month the servicer will compute a Note Factor.
The “Note Factor” will be a six-digit decimal figure equal to the outstanding balance of the notes at the end of the preceding collection period divided by the original balance of the notes as of the closing date. The Note Factor will be 1.000000 as of the closing date; thereafter, the Note Factor will decline to reflect reductions in the outstanding balance of the notes. As a noteholder, your share of the principal balance of the notes is the product of (1) the original denomination of your note and (2) the Note Factor.
The noteholders of record will receive monthly reports from the indenture trustee concerning payments received on the receivables, the note balance, the Note Factor, and other relevant information. If the notes are issued in book-entry form, then The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) (or its successors) will supply these reports to noteholders in accordance with its procedures. Since owners of beneficial interests in a global note will not be recognized as noteholders, DTC will not forward monthly reports to those owners. Copies of monthly reports may be obtained by owners of beneficial interests in a global note by a request in writing addressed to the trustee or indenture trustee, as applicable. Noteholders of record during any calendar year will be furnished information for tax reporting purposes not later than the latest date permitted by applicable law. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Statements to Noteholders” in this prospectus.
The following information summarizes material provisions of the notes and related provisions in the indenture. The following summary supplements the description of the general terms and provisions of the notes and the indenture set forth in this prospectus, to which you should refer.
The notes will be issued pursuant to the terms of the indenture to be dated as of the closing date between the issuing entity and the indenture trustee for the benefit of the noteholders. We will file a copy of the indenture with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) concurrently with or prior to the time we file this prospectus with the SEC. Holders of the notes will have the right to receive payments made with respect to the receivables and other assets in the issuing entity property and certain rights and benefits available to the indenture trustee under the indenture.
All payments required to be made on the notes will be made monthly on each payment date, which will be the 20th day of each month or, if that day is not a business day, then the next business day beginning August 20, 2018.
The indenture trustee will distribute principal and interest on each payment date to holders in whose names the notes were registered on the latest record date.
The original outstanding balance, interest rate and final scheduled payment date for the notes offered hereby are set forth on the cover page to this prospectus.
Distributions to the certificateholder will be subordinated to distributions of principal of and interest on the notes to the extent described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” in this prospectus.
Each class of notes offered by this prospectus will be available only in book-entry form except in the limited circumstances described under “The Notes—Definitive Notes” in this prospectus. All notes will be held in book-entry form by DTC in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Investors’ interests in the notes will be represented through financial institutions acting on their behalf as direct and indirect participants in DTC. Investors
71
Table of Contents
may hold their notes through DTC, Clearstream Banking Luxembourg S.A. (“Clearstream”), or Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (“Euroclear”), which will hold positions on behalf of their customers or participants either directly or indirectly through their respective depositories, which in turn will hold such positions in accounts as DTC participants. The notes will be traded as home market instruments in both the U.S. domestic and European markets. Initial settlement and all secondary trades will settle in same-day funds.
Investors electing to hold their notes through DTC will follow the settlement practices applicable to U.S. corporate debt obligations. Investors electing to hold global notes through Clearstream or Euroclear accounts will follow the settlement procedures applicable to conventional eurobonds, except that there will be no temporary global notes and no “lock-up” or restricted period.
Actions of noteholders under the indenture will be taken by DTC upon instructions from its participants and all payments, notices, reports and statements to be delivered to noteholders will be delivered to DTC or its nominee as the registered holder of the book-entry notes for distribution to holders of book-entry notes in accordance with DTC’s procedures.
Investors should review the procedures of DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear for clearing, settlement and withholding tax procedures applicable to their purchase of the notes.
The notes will be issued in fully registered, certificated form to owners of beneficial interests in a global note or their nominees rather than to DTC or its nominee, only if:
| • | the administrator advises the indenture trustee in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to properly discharge its responsibilities as depository with respect to the notes, and the indenture trustee or the administrator is unable to locate a qualified successor; |
| • | the administrator, at its option, advises the indenture trustee in writing that it elects to terminate the book-entry system through DTC; or |
| • | after an event of default, beneficial owners representing in the aggregate at least a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the notes, advise the indenture trustee through DTC (or its successor) in writing that the continuation of a book-entry system through DTC (or its successor) is no longer in the best interest of those owners. |
Payments or distributions of principal of, and interest on, the notes will be made by a paying agent directly to holders of notes in definitive registered form in accordance with the procedures set forth in this prospectus and the indenture, the sale and servicing agreement or the trust agreement. Payments or distributions on each payment date and on the final scheduled payment date will be made to holders in whose names the definitive notes were registered on the record date. Payments or distributions will be made by check mailed to the address of each noteholder as it appears on the register maintained by the indenture trustee or by other means to the extent provided in this prospectus. The final payment or distribution on any note, whether notes in definitive registered form or notes registered in the name of Cede & Co., however, will be made only upon presentation and surrender of the note at the office or agency specified in the notice of final payment or distribution to noteholders.
Notes in definitive registered form will be transferable and exchangeable at the offices of the issuing entity or indenture trustee, or at the offices of a registrar named in a notice delivered to holders of notes in definitive registered form. No service charge will be imposed for any registration of transfer or exchange, but the issuing entity may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed in connection therewith.
72
Table of Contents
Notes Owned by Transaction Parties
In determining whether noteholders holding the requisite note balance have given any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent, vote or waiver under any transaction document, notes owned by the issuing entity, the depositor, any certificateholder, the servicer, the administrator or any of their respective affiliates will be disregarded and deemed not to be “outstanding” unless all of the notes are then owned by the issuing entity, the depositor, any certificateholder, the servicer, the administrator or any of their respective affiliates. In determining whether the indenture trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent, vote or waiver, only notes that a responsible officer of the indenture trustee knows to be so owned will be so disregarded. Notes that have been pledged in good faith may be regarded as “outstanding” if the pledgee of those notes establishes to the satisfaction of the indenture trustee that the pledgee has the right to act with respect to those notes and that the pledgee is not the issuing entity, the depositor, any certificateholder, the servicer, the administrator or any of their respective affiliates.
If definitive notes are issued in the limited circumstances set forth above, or if the indenture trustee is not the registrar for the notes, the issuing entity will furnish or cause to be furnished to the indenture trustee a list of the names and addresses of the noteholders:
| • | as of each record date, within five days of that record date; and |
| • | within 30 days after receipt by the issuing entity of a written request from the indenture trustee for that list, as of not more than ten days before that list is furnished. |
The owner of a beneficial interest in a note or, to the extent definitive notes have been issued, a noteholder (collectively, “investors”) may send a request to the depositor at any time notifying the depositor that the investor would like to communicate with other investors with respect to an exercise of their rights under the terms of the transaction documents. If the requesting investor is not a noteholder as reflected on the note register, the depositor may require that the requesting investor provide a certification from the requesting investor that it is, in fact, a beneficial owner of notes, as well as additional documentation reasonably satisfactory to the depositor, such as a trade confirmation, account statement, letter from a broker or dealer or another similar document (collectively, the “verification documents”). So long as the issuing entity is filing monthly distribution reports on Form 10-D under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended, the “Exchange Act”), the issuing entity will include in each such Form 10-D disclosure regarding any request received during the related Collection Period from an investor to communicate with other investors related to the investors exercising their rights under the terms of the transaction documents. The disclosure in the Form 10-D regarding the request to communicate will include the name of the investor making the request, the date the request was received, a statement to the effect that the issuing entity has received a request from the investor, stating that the investor is interested in communicating with other investors with regard to the possible exercise of rights under the transaction documents and a description of the method other investors may use to contact the requesting investor. VW Credit and the depositor will be responsible for any expenses incurred in connection with the filing of such disclosure and the reimbursement of any costs incurred by the indenture trustee in connection with the preparation thereof.
Neither the trust agreement nor the indenture will provide for the holding of annual or other meetings of noteholders.
The offered notes will be issued in the minimum denomination of $100,000 and in integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof on or about the closing date in book-entry form through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company, Clearstream and the Euroclear System against payment in immediately available funds.
73
Table of Contents
Interest on the unpaid outstanding balance of each class of notes will accrue at the applicable interest rate listed on the cover of this prospectus and will be payable monthly on each payment date. Interest will accrue during each interest period at the applicable interest rate (a) for the Class A-1 notes and the floating rate notes, from and including the prior payment date (or from and including the closing date in the case of the first interest period) to but excluding the following payment date or (b) for each other class of notes, from and including the 20th day of the calendar month preceding each payment date (or from and including the closing date in the case of the first interest period) to but excluding the 20th day of the month in which that payment date occurs.
Interest will accrue and will be calculated on the various classes of notes as follows:
| • | Actual/360. Interest on the Class A-1 notes and the Class A-2-B notes will be calculated on the basis of actual days elapsed during the applicable interest period, but assuming a 360-day year. This means that the interest due on each payment date for the Class A-1 notes and the Class A-2-B notes will be the product of (i) the outstanding principal balance on the Class A-1 notes and the Class A-2-B notes before giving effect to any payments made on that payment date, (ii) the applicable interest rate and (iii) the actual number of days from and including the previous payment date (or, in the case of the first payment date, from and including the closing date) to but excluding the current payment date, divided by 360. |
| • | 30/360. Interest on the Class A-2-A notes, the Class A-3 notes, and the Class A-4 notes will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. This means that the interest due on each payment date for the Class A-2-A notes, the Class A-3 notes, and the Class A-4 notes will be the product of (i) the outstanding principal balance of the related class of notes before giving effect to any payments made on that payment date, (ii) the applicable interest rate and (iii) 30 (or in the case of the first payment date, the number of days from and including the closing date to but excluding August 20, 2018 (assuming a 30 day calendar month)), divided by 360. |
| • | Interest Accrual Periods. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal balance of each class of notes (a) with respect to the Class A-1 notes and the floating rate notes, from and including the prior payment date (or in the case of the first payment date, the closing date) to but excluding that payment date or (b) with respect to the Class A-2-A notes, the Class A-3 notes and the Class A-4 notes, from and including the 20th day of the calendar month preceding a payment date (or in the case of first payment date, from and including the closing date) to but excluding the 20th day of the month in which that payment date occurs. Interest accrued as of any payment date but not paid on that payment date will be payable on the next payment date, together with interest on such amount at the applicable interest rate (to the extent lawful). |
Interest on each note will be paid to the person in whose name that note is registered on the record date. If the notes are issued as book-entry notes, then the “record date” is the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the applicable payment date. If the notes are issued as definitive notes, then the “record date” is the close of business on the last business day of the calendar month immediately preceding the calendar month in which the applicable payment date occurs. (The holders of record of the notes are referred to as “noteholders” in this prospectus.) The final interest payment on each class of notes is due on the earlier of (a) the payment date (including any redemption date) on which the principal amount of that class of notes is reduced to zero or (b) the applicable final scheduled payment date for that class of notes. In this transaction, a “business day” will be any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in the states of Delaware, Michigan, Virginia, New York or in the state in which the corporate trust office of the indenture trustee is located, are authorized or obligated by law, executive order or government decree to be closed.
A failure to pay the interest due on the notes on any payment date that continues for a period of five business days or more will result in an event of default. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Events of Default” in this prospectus.
74
Table of Contents
If the sum of LIBOR and the applicable spread set forth on the front cover of this prospectus is less than 0.00% for any interest period, then the interest rate for the floating rate notes for such interest period will be deemed to be 0.00%.
On each payment date, except as described below, the Principal Distribution Amount will be applied to make principal payments on the notes. Prior to acceleration of the notes after an event of default, principal payments will be applied to the notes in sequential priority so that no principal payments will be made on any class of notes until all notes with an earlier final scheduled payment date have been paid in full. Thus, on each payment date, the Principal Distribution Amount will be applied to the notes as follows:
| • | first, to the Class A-1 notes, until the Class A-1 notes are paid in full; |
| • | second, pro rata to the Class A-2-A notes and the Class A-2-B notes, until the Class A-2-A notes and the Class A-2-B notes are paid in full; |
| • | third, to the Class A-3 notes, until the Class A-3 notes are paid in full; and |
| • | fourth, to the Class A-4 notes, until the Class A-4 notes are paid in full. |
At any time that the outstanding balances of the notes have been declared due and payable following the occurrence of an event of default under the indenture, principal payments will be made first to the Class A-1 noteholders until the Class A-1 notes are paid in full, and then ratably to all other noteholders on each payment date, based on the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes (other than the Class A-1 notes), until all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture or all notes have been paid in full, including all amounts held on deposit in the reserve account.
To the extent not previously paid, the outstanding amount of notes will be payable in full on the payment date specified below (each, a “final scheduled payment date”):
| • | for the Class A-1 notes, July 2019 payment date; |
| • | for the Class A-2 notes, July 2021 payment date; |
| • | for the Class A-3 notes, November 2022 payment date; and |
| • | for the Class A-4 notes, July 2024 payment date. |
Failure to pay the full principal amount of the notes by the applicable final scheduled payment date or redemption date will be an event of default under the indenture.
75
Table of Contents
Payments of Principal on each Payment Date
(other than Payment Dates after the Notes Have Been Accelerated
Following the Occurrence of an Event of Default)
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
The information in this section summarizes material provisions of the “purchase agreement” entered into between VW Credit and the depositor, the “sale and servicing agreement” entered into among the depositor, the servicer, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee and the “indenture” entered into between the issuing entity and the indenture trustee. We sometimes refer to these agreements collectively as the “transfer agreements.” This section also summarizes the “administration agreement” entered into among the issuing entity, VW Credit, as administrator, and the indenture trustee, the “asset representations review agreement” entered into among the issuing entity, the servicer and the asset representations reviewer and the “ trust agreement” entered into between the depositor and the owner trustee. We sometimes refer to the transfer agreements, together with the administration agreement, the asset representations review agreement and the trust agreement as the “transaction documents.”
We will file a copy of the actual transaction documents with the SEC concurrently with or prior to the time we file this prospectus with the SEC and forms of the transaction documents have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
This is not a complete description of the transaction documents, and the summaries of the transaction documents in this prospectus are subject to all of the provisions of the transaction documents.
Sale and Assignment of Receivables and Related Security Interests
Under the purchase agreement, VW Credit will transfer, assign, set over, sell and otherwise convey to the depositor, without recourse, all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the receivables, Collections after the cut-off date, the receivable files and the related security relating to those receivables. The purchase agreement will create a first priority ownership/security interest in that property in favor of the depositor.
Under the sale and servicing agreement, the depositor will sell, transfer, assign and otherwise convey to the issuing entity, without recourse, all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the receivables, Collections after the
76
Table of Contents
cut-off date, the receivable files and the related security relating to those receivables and related property. Each receivable will be identified in a schedule delivered in connection with the execution of the sale and servicing agreement and the purchase agreement. The sale and servicing agreement will create a first priority ownership/security interest in that property in favor of the issuing entity.
Under the indenture, the issuing entity will pledge all of its right, title and interest in and to the issuing entity property to the indenture trustee. The terms of the indenture create a first priority perfected security interest in the issuing entity property in favor of the indenture trustee for the benefit of the noteholders. Neither the owner trustee nor the indenture trustee will independently verify the existence and qualification of any receivables. The issuing entity or indenture trustee will, concurrently with the sale, contribution and/or assignment of the receivables to the issuing entity, execute, authenticate and deliver the notes.
Representations and Warranties; Remedies
VW Credit, pursuant to the purchase agreement, and the depositor, pursuant to the sale and servicing agreement, will make the Eligibility Representations (defined below) with respect to each receivable. As of the cut-off date, VW Credit and the depositor will represent and warrant that each receivable satisfies the following “Eligibility Representations”:
| • | be fully executed by the obligor thereto; |
| • | been either (a) originated by a dealer located in the United States to finance the sale by a dealer of the related financed vehicle and been purchased by the originator or (b) originated or acquired by the originator; |
| • | as of the closing date, be secured by a first priority perfected security interest in the financed vehicle in favor of the originator, as secured party, or all necessary actions have been commenced that would result in a first priority validly perfected security interest in the financed vehicle in favor of the originator, as secured party; |
| • | contains provisions that permit the repossession and sale of the financed vehicle upon a default under the receivable by the obligor; |
| • | provided, at origination, for level monthly payments which fully amortize the initial outstanding principal balance over the original term; provided, that the amount of the first and last payments may be different but in no event more than three times the level monthly payment; |
| • | be secured by a new or used automobile, minivan or sport utility vehicle; |
| • | be a Simple Interest Receivable with a contract rate of no less than 0.00% and the contract rate is accurately stated in the schedule of receivables provided by VW Credit pursuant to the purchase agreement; |
| • | (a) had an original term to maturity of not more than 72 months and not less than 12 months; (b) has a remaining term to maturity of 3 months or more; and (c) has a scheduled maturity date not later than December 30, 2023; |
| • | be denominated in dollars and have an outstanding principal balance of greater than or equal to $1,000.44; |
| • | be not more than 30 days past due; |
| • | not be noted in the records of VW Credit or the servicer as being the subject of any pending bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding; |
77
Table of Contents
| • | not be subject to a force-placed insurance policy on the related financed vehicle; |
| • | complied, at the time it was originated or made, in all material respects with all requirements of law in effect at that time and applicable to such receivable; |
| • | constitutes the legal and binding payment obligation in writing of the obligor, enforceable by the holder thereof in all material respects, subject as to enforcement, to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation or other laws and equitable principles, consumer protection laws and the Relief Act; |
| • | neither VW Credit’s nor the servicer’s records related to such receivable indicate that the receivable has been satisfied, subordinated or rescinded or that the related financed vehicle been released from the lien granted by the receivable in whole or in part; |
| • | except for payment delinquencies continuing for a period of not more than 30 days, the records of the servicer do not disclose that any default, breach, violation or event permitting acceleration under the terms of the receivable existed as of the cut-off date or that any continuing condition that with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default, breach, violation or event permitting acceleration under the terms of the receivable had arisen as of the cut-off date; |
| • | requires the obligor thereunder to insure the financed vehicle under a physical damage insurance policy; |
| • | the obligor is not the United States of America or any state thereof or any local government, or any agency, department, political subdivision or instrumentality of the United States of America or any state thereof or any local government; |
| • | the terms of such receivable do not prohibit the sale, transfer or assignment of such receivable or the grant of a security interest in such receivable under the indenture; |
| • | immediately prior to the transfers and assignments (a) by VW Credit to the depositor and (b) by the depositor to the issuing entity, the transferring party had good and marketable title to such receivable free and clear of all liens (except any permitted liens), and, immediately upon the transfer thereof to the transferee, the transferring party had good and marketable title to such receivable, free and clear of all liens except any permitted liens; |
| • | there is only one original executed copy of each “tangible record” constituting or forming a part of such receivable that is tangible chattel paper and a single “authoritative copy” (as such term is used in Section 9-105 of the UCC) of each electronic record constituting or forming a part of such receivable that is electronic chattel paper; and the receivable files that constitute or evidence such receivable do not have any marks or notations indicating that the receivable has been pledged, assigned or otherwise conveyed (a) by VW Credit to any person other than the depositor and (b) by the depositor to any person other than the issuing entity; |
| • | the electronic records of VW Credit and the servicer related to such receivable do not reflect any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim or defense, or of the same being asserted or threatened, in writing by any obligor with respect to such receivable; and |
| • | the related financed vehicle shall not have been repossessed. |
If the depositor or VW Credit discovers a breach of any of the Eligibility Representations with respect to any receivable at the time such Eligibility Representations were made which breach materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in such receivables, the party discovering that breach will give prompt written notice of that breach to the other parties to the related transfer agreement; provided, that delivery of the monthly servicer’s certificate will be deemed to constitute prompt notice by VW Credit, the depositor and the
78
Table of Contents
issuing entity of that breach; provided, further, that the failure to give that notice will not affect any obligation of VW Credit or the depositor under the related transfer agreement. Any inaccuracy in the Eligibility Representations will be deemed not to constitute a breach if such inaccuracy does not affect the ability of the issuing entity to receive or retain payment in full on the receivable. The indenture trustee will not be obligated to investigate the facts stated in a servicer’s certificate for purposes of the second preceding sentence. If the breach materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in the related receivable, then the depositor or VW Credit will either (a) correct or cure that breach or (b) repurchase that receivable from the issuing entity, in either case on or before the payment date following the end of the collection period which includes the 60th day (or if the depositor or VW Credit elects, an earlier date) after the date the depositor or VW Credit became aware or was notified of that breach. The issuing entity or the indenture trustee (in its discretion or at the direction of an investor) may notify VW Credit or the depositor of a breach by delivering written notice to VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, identifying the receivable and the related breach of an Eligibility Representation. Any such purchase by VW Credit or the depositor will be at a repurchase price equal to the outstanding principal balance of that receivable plus accrued interest. In consideration for that repurchase, the repurchasing party will pay (or will cause to be paid) the repurchase price by depositing the repurchase price into the collection account on the date of repurchase. The repurchase obligation will constitute the sole remedy available to the noteholders or the issuing entity for the failure of a receivable to meet any of the Eligibility Representations.
An investor wishing to direct the indenture trustee to request a repurchase as described above may do so as described below under “—Request to Repurchase and Dispute Resolution.”
Asset Representations ReviewAs discussed above under “—Representations and Warranties; Remedies,” each of VW Credit and the depositor will make the Eligibility Representations regarding the receivables. The asset representations reviewer will be responsible for performing a review of certain receivables for compliance with the Eligibility Representations when the following asset review conditions (the “Review Conditions”) have been satisfied:
| • | The Delinquency Percentage for any payment date exceeds the Delinquency Trigger, as described below under “—Delinquency Trigger”; and |
| • | The investors have voted to direct a review of the applicable Subject Receivables pursuant to the process described below under “—Asset Review Voting”. |
If the Review Conditions are satisfied (the first date on which the Review Conditions are satisfied is referred to as the “Review Satisfaction Date”), then, pursuant to the direction described below under “—Asset Review Voting” the asset representations reviewer will review the Subject Receivables (as defined below) for compliance with the Eligibility Representations as described below under “—Asset Review”.
Delinquency Trigger
On or prior to each payment date, the servicer will calculate the Delinquency Percentage for the related collection period. The “Delinquency Percentage” for each payment date and the related collection period is an amount equal to the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of (i) the aggregate Principal Balance of all 61-Day Delinquent Receivables as of the last day of that collection period to (ii) the Pool Balance as of the last day of that collection period. “61-Day Delinquent Receivables” means, as of any date of determination, all receivables (other than repurchased receivables and Defaulted Receivables) that are 61 or more days delinquent as of such date (or, if such date is not the last day of a collection period, as of the last day of the collection period immediately preceding such date), as determined in accordance with the servicer’s customary servicing practices. The “Delinquency Trigger” for any payment date and the related collection period is 4.48%.
VW Credit developed the Delinquency Trigger from an analysis of the historical 61 day or more delinquency rate over the life of VW Credit’s other public securitization transactions since 2007. VW Credit then applied a multiple of 7 to the highest delinquency percentage observed. The multiple derived from this analysis corresponds generally to the multiple of expected cumulative net losses that the notes are expected to be able to withstand before realizing their first dollar loss and is intended to account for future volatility and stressed economic conditions.
79
Table of Contents
For prior pools of retail installment sale contracts that were securitized by VW Credit since 2007, the percentage of receivables that have been 61 or more days delinquent have ranged from 0.00% to 0.64%. The following chart shows the percentage of receivables 61 or more days delinquent in VW Credit’s prior securitized pools of retail installment sale contracts for the periods shown. For more information regarding 61 day or more delinquent asset statistics for certain of VW Credit’s prior securitized pools of retail installment sale contracts, see “Appendix A—Static Pool Information Regarding Certain Previous Securitizations” in this prospectus.
“Subject Receivables” means, for any Asset Review, all receivables which are, as of the Review Satisfaction Date, 60 or more days delinquent as of such date (or, if such date is not the last day of a collection period, as of the last day of the collection period immediately preceding such date), as determined in accordance with the servicer’s customary servicing practices. However, any receivable which becomes a repurchased receivable or is paid off after the Review Satisfaction Date will no longer be a Subject Receivable.
Asset Review Voting
The monthly distribution report filed by the issuing entity on Form 10-D will disclose if the Delinquency Percentage on any payment date exceeds the Delinquency Trigger. Investors holding at least 5% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes (the “Instituting Noteholders”) may then elect to initiate a vote to determine whether the asset representations reviewer will conduct the review described under “—Asset Review” below by giving written notice to the indenture trustee of their desire to institute such a vote. If any of the Instituting Noteholders is not a noteholder as reflected on the note register, the indenture trustee may require that investor to provide verification documents to confirm that the investor that it is, in fact, a beneficial owner of notes. Any such vote shall be (i) initiated no later than 90 days from the filing of the Form 10-D that discloses that the Delinquency Trigger was breached and (ii) completed no later than 150 days from the filing of the Form 10-D that discloses that the Delinquency Trigger was breached. VW Credit will be responsible for any expenses incurred in connection with
80
Table of Contents
such disclosure, the voting process and reimbursing any expenses incurred by the indenture trustee in connection therewith.
If the Instituting Noteholders initiate a vote as described in the preceding paragraph, the indenture trustee will submit the matter to a vote of all noteholders through DTC (if the notes are then held through DTC) and the issuing entity will notify investors via the Form 10-D for the related collection period for which a vote has been called. Under the current voting procedures of DTC, DTC (as the holder of record for the notes) transfers the right to vote with respect to securities to the DTC participants that hold record date positions via an omnibus proxy. DTC notifies its participants holding positions in the security of their entitlement to vote. DTC participants are responsible for distribution of information to their customers, including any ultimate beneficial owners of interests in the notes. See “Risk Factors—Because the notes are in book-entry form, your rights can only be exercised indirectly.” The indenture trustee may set a record date for purposes of determining the identity of investors entitled to vote in accordance with Section 316(c) of the Trust Indenture Act.
The “Noteholder Direction” will be deemed to have occurred if investors representing at least a majority of the voting investors vote in favor of directing an asset review by the asset representations reviewer. The sponsor, the depositor and the issuing entity are required under the sale and servicing agreement to cooperate with the indenture trustee to facilitate the voting process. Following the completion of the voting process, the next Form 10-D filed by the issuing entity will disclose whether or not a Noteholder Direction has occurred.
Within five business days of the Noteholder Direction, the indenture trustee will send a notice to VW Credit, the depositor, the servicer and the asset representations reviewer directing the asset representations reviewer to conduct an Asset Review and specifying the applicable Review Satisfaction Date. Within 10 business days of receipt of such notice, the servicer will provide the asset representations reviewer, with a copy to the indenture trustee, a list of the Subject Receivables.
Fees and Expenses for Asset Review
As described under “Fees and Expenses”, the asset representations reviewer will be paid an annual fee of $5,000 from the servicer in accordance with the asset representations review agreement. However, that annual fee does not include the fees and expenses of the asset representations reviewer in connection with an asset review of the Subject Receivables. Under the asset representations review agreement, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to receive a fee of $200 for each Subject Receivable for which an Asset Review is started. The servicer will reimburse the asset representations reviewer for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the asset representations reviewer in connection with its review of the Subject Receivables. All fees payable to, and expenses incurred by, the asset representations reviewer in connection with the Asset Review (the “Review Expenses”) will be payable by the servicer and, to the extent the Review Expenses remain unpaid after 30 calendar days, they will be payable out of amounts on deposit in the Collection Account as described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” in this prospectus.
The asset representations reviewer will perform a review of the Subject Receivables for compliance with the Eligibility Representations (an “Asset Review”) in accordance with such procedures as set forth in the asset representations review agreement.
Under the asset representations review agreement, the asset representations reviewer is required to complete its review of the Subject Receivables by the 60th day after receipt of review materials related to the Subject Receivables. However, if review materials are missing or insufficient for the asset representations reviewer to perform any test, the asset representations reviewer will request that the servicer provide an updated copy of that review material and the review period will be extended for an additional 30 days. Upon completion of its review, the asset representations reviewer will provide a report to the indenture trustee, the servicer and the issuing entity of the findings and conclusions of the review of the Subject Receivables, and that report will be included with the Form 10-D filed by the issuing entity with respect to the collection period in which the asset representations reviewer’s report is provided.
81
Table of Contents
The asset representations reviewer will only be responsible for determining whether there was noncompliance with any Eligibility Representation with respect to any Subject Receivable, and will not determine whether such noncompliance gives rise to an obligation to repurchase the related Subject Receivable. If the asset representations reviewer determines that there was such noncompliance, the sponsor and the depositor will determine whether the sponsor or the depositor, as applicable, would be required to make a repurchase. In conducting this investigation, VW Credit and the depositor, as applicable, will refer to the information available to it, including the asset representations reviewer’s report. If VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, determines that there has been a breach of an Eligibility Representation that materially and adversely affects the interest of the issuing entity or the noteholders in the related receivable and such breach cannot be corrected or cured, VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, will be obligated to repurchase the related receivable as described under “—Representations and Warranties; Remedies.”
Indemnification of the Asset Representations Reviewer
Under the asset representations review agreement, the servicer will indemnify the asset representations reviewer against any and all loss, liability or expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by the asset representations reviewer in connection with its administration of, and the performance of its duties under, the asset representations review agreement. However, the servicer will not reimburse any expense or indemnify against any loss, liability or expense incurred by the asset representations reviewer arising out of or resulting from the asset representations reviewer’s own willful misfeasance, bad faith, negligence or breach of the asset representations review agreement. To the extent that any such indemnities are not otherwise satisfied, they will be paid from Available Funds as described below under “—Priority of Payments”.
Requests to Repurchase and Dispute Resolution
If the depositor, the issuing entity or the indenture trustee (at the direction of an investor) (each, a “requesting party”) requests that VW Credit or the depositor repurchase any receivable due to a breach of an Eligibility Representation as described under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Representations and Warranties; Remedies” in this prospectus and the repurchase request has not been fulfilled or otherwise resolved to the reasonable satisfaction of the requesting party within 180 days of the receipt of notice of the request by VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, the requesting party may refer the matter, at its discretion, to either mediation or arbitration. An investor wishing to direct the indenture trustee to request a repurchase as described above may contact the indenture trustee in writing with the details of the purported breach of an Eligibility Representation and the related receivable. If the requesting investor is not a noteholder as reflected on the note register, each written notice from such requesting investor will be accompanied by verification documents to confirm that the requesting investor is, in fact, a beneficial owner of notes. VW Credit and the depositor will be responsible for reimbursing the indenture trustee for any expenses incurred in connection with such verification. VW Credit will inform the requesting party in writing upon a determination by VW Credit that a receivable subject to a demand to repurchase will be repurchased and the monthly distribution report filed by the issuing entity on Form 10-D for the collection period in which such receivables were repurchased will include disclosure of such repurchase. A failure of VW Credit to inform the requesting party that a receivable subject to a demand will be repurchased within 180 days of the receipt of notice of the request shall be deemed to be a determination by VW Credit that no repurchase of that receivable due to a breach of an Eligibility Representation is required. Additionally, VW Credit will file Form ABS-15G disclosing the status of repurchase demands on a periodic basis as required by applicable law.
Although the indenture trustee may request that VW Credit repurchase a receivable due to a breach of an Eligibility Representation, nothing in the transaction documents requires the indenture trustee to exercise this discretion and the transaction documents do not provide any requirements regarding what factors the indenture trustee should consider when determining whether to exercise its discretion to request a repurchase. Consequently, it is likely that the requesting party will be the indenture trustee acting at the direction of an investor. If more than one investor directs the indenture trustee in connection with a request to repurchase, the indenture trustee will act at the direction of the investors holding a majority of the outstanding note balance of the notes held by such directing investors.
If a Subject Receivable that was reviewed by the asset representations reviewer during an Asset Review is the subject of a dispute resolution proceeding, the asset representations reviewer will participate in the dispute
82
Table of Contents
resolution proceeding on request of a party to the proceeding. The reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of the asset representations reviewer for its participation in any dispute resolution proceeding will be considered expenses of the requesting party for the dispute resolution and will be paid by a party to the dispute resolution as determined by the mediator or arbitrator for the dispute resolution, and if such expenses are not paid within 90 days after the end of the proceeding, will be payable by the servicer.
If the requesting party selects mediation, the mediation will be administered by a nationally recognized arbitration and mediation association selected by the requesting party. The fees and expenses of the mediation will be allocated as mutually agreed by the parties as part of the mediation. The mediator will be appointed from a list of neutrals maintained by the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”).
If the requesting party selects arbitration, the arbitration will be administered by a nationally recognized arbitration and mediation association jointly selected by the parties (or, if the parties are unable to agree on an association, by the AAA). The arbitrator will be appointed from a list of neutrals maintained by the AAA. In its final determination, the arbitrator will determine and award the costs of the arbitration (including the fees of the arbitrator, cost of any record or transcript of the arbitration and administrative fees) and reasonable attorneys’ fees to the parties as determined by the arbitrator in its reasonable discretion. The arbitrator will not have the power to award punitive damages or consequential damages in any arbitration conducted by it, and VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, will not be required to pay more than the applicable repurchase amount with respect to any receivable which VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, is required to repurchase.
Any mediation and arbitration described above will be held in New York, New York (or, such other location as the parties mutually agree upon) and will be subject to certain confidentiality restrictions (which will not limit disclosures required by applicable law) and additional terms set forth in the sale and servicing agreement. A requesting party may not initiate a mediation or arbitration as described above with respect to a receivable that is, or has been, the subject of an ongoing or previous mediation or arbitration (whether by that requesting party or another requesting party) but will have the right, subject to a determination by the parties to the existing mediation or arbitration that the joinder would not prejudice the rights of the participants to the existing mediation or arbitration or unduly delay such proceeding, to join an existing mediation or arbitration with respect to that receivable if the mediation or arbitration has not yet concluded.
Collection and Other Servicing Procedures
The servicer will make reasonable efforts to collect all payments called for under the terms and provisions of the receivables as and when the same become due in accordance with its customary servicing practices. Currently, the servicer uses fiscal months rather than calendar months. Each fiscal month is either four or five weeks and generally begins on a Sunday and ends on a Saturday. The servicer uses fiscal months rather than calendar months to assure that each month ends on a weekend, which facilitates an easier internal end of month accounting cut-off. Because the fiscal month does not precisely correspond to the calendar month, a particular fiscal month (for example, the June fiscal month) may include one or more days of the preceding calendar month (for example, a few days of May) at the beginning of the fiscal month and/or a few days of the next calendar month (for example, a few days of July). Fiscal months are determined from time to time by the servicer. Each “collection period” will be the period commencing on the first day of each fiscal month of the servicer and ending on the last day of such fiscal month (or in the case of the initial collection period, the period commencing on the close of business on the cut-off date and ending on July 31, 2018). The servicer may elect in the future to have its fiscal months coincide with calendar months. It is expected that there generally will be a greater amount of Collections received and paid in the aggregate to investors on a payment date relating to a five week collection period than a payment date relating to a four week collection period.
The servicer may in its discretion waive any late payment charge or any other fees that may be collected in the ordinary course of servicing a receivable. Subject to the purchase obligation described in “—Modifications of Receivables” below, the servicer and its affiliates may engage in any marketing practice or promotion or any sale of any products, goods or services to obligors with respect to the receivables so long as such practices, promotions or sales are offered to obligors of comparable motor vehicle receivables serviced by the servicer for itself and others, whether or not such practices, promotions or sales might result in a decrease in the aggregate amount of payments on the receivables, prepayments or faster or slower timing of the payment of the receivables. Additionally, the
83
Table of Contents
servicer may refinance any receivable by accepting a new promissory note from the related obligor and depositing the full outstanding principal balance of such receivable into the collection account. The receivable created by such refinancing shall not be property of the issuing entity. The servicer and its affiliates may also sell insurance or debt cancellation products, including products which result in the cancellation of some or all of the amount of a receivable upon the death or disability of the related obligor or any casualty with respect to the financed vehicle.
Unless required by law or court order, the servicer will not release the financed vehicle securing each such receivable from the security interest granted by such receivable in whole or in part except in the event of payment in full by or on behalf of the obligor thereunder or payment in full less a deficiency which the servicer would not attempt to collect in accordance with its customary servicing practices or in connection with repossession or except as may be required by an insurer in order to receive proceeds from any insurance policy covering such financed vehicle.
Upon discovery of a breach of certain servicing covenants set forth in the sale and servicing agreement which materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in a receivable, the party discovering that breach will give prompt written notice of that breach to the other parties to the sale and servicing agreement; provided, that delivery of the monthly servicer’s certificate will be deemed to constitute prompt notice by the servicer and the issuing entity of that breach; provided, further, that the failure to give that notice will not affect any obligation of the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement. The indenture trustee will not be obligated to investigate the facts stated in a servicer’s certificate for purposes of the preceding sentence. If the breach materially and adversely affects the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in the related receivable, then the servicer will either (a) correct or cure that breach or (b) purchase that receivable from the issuing entity, in either case on or before the payment date following the end of the collection period which includes the 60th day after the date the servicer became aware or was notified of that breach. Such breach will be deemed not to have a material and adverse effect if such breach does not affect the ability of the issuing entity to receive and retain timely payment in full on such receivable. Any such purchase by the servicer will be at a purchase price equal to the outstanding principal balance of that receivable plus accrued interest. In consideration for that purchase, the servicer will pay (or will cause to be paid ) to the issuing entity the purchase price by depositing the purchase price into the collection account on the date of purchase. The purchase obligation will constitute the sole remedy available to the noteholders or the issuing entity for a breach by the servicer of the related servicing covenants under the sale and servicing agreement.
VW Credit will be the administrator under the administration agreement. The administrator will perform all of its duties as administrator under the transaction documents and certain duties and obligations of the issuing entity and the owner trustee under certain transaction documents to which the issuing entity is a party (except those duties and obligations of the owner trustee under the trust agreement related to Regulation AB). However, except as otherwise provided in such documents, the administrator will have no obligation to make any payment required to be made by the issuing entity under any such document. The administrator will monitor the performance of the issuing entity and the owner trustee and will advise the issuing entity and the owner trustee when action is necessary to comply with the issuing entity’s and the owner trustee’s duties and obligations under such documents. In furtherance of the foregoing, the administrator will take all appropriate action that is the duty of the issuing entity to take pursuant to such documents.
As compensation for the performance of the administrator, the administrator will be entitled to receive $30,000 annually, which shall be solely an obligation of the servicer.
The issuing entity will have the following bank accounts, which initially will be maintained at and will be maintained in the name of the indenture trustee on behalf of the noteholders:
| • | the collection account; |
84
Table of Contents
| • | the principal distribution account; and |
| • | the reserve account. |
The Collection Account
Under the sale and servicing agreement, unless the monthly remittance condition described below is not satisfied, VW Credit as servicer will remit Collections it receives on the receivables to the collection account on the following payment date or, if the collection account is not maintained at the indenture trustee, then on the business day preceding each payment date (so long as the monthly remittance condition is met). However, if the monthly remittance condition is not satisfied, the servicer will be required to deposit an amount equal to all Collections into the collection account within two business days after identification. The “monthly remittance condition” will be satisfied if (i) VW Credit is the servicer, (ii) no servicer replacement event has occurred and is continuing and (iii) either (x) VW Credit has a short-term debt rating of at least A-1 from S&P and F-1 from Fitch or (y) an entity with such ratings has guaranteed the obligations of VW Credit under the sale and servicing agreement. The servicer may also remit Collections to the collection account on any other alternate remittance schedule (but not later than the related payment date) if the Rating Agency Condition is satisfied with respect to such alternate remittance schedule. Pending deposit into the collection account, Collections may be commingled and used by the servicer at its own risk and are not required to be segregated from its own funds. Currently, the monthly remittance condition is not satisfied.
On each payment date, the indenture trustee will withdraw from the reserve account and deposit into the collection account any amount of funds required under the sale and servicing agreement to be withdrawn from the reserve account and distributed on that payment date.
Principal Distribution Account
On each payment date, the indenture trustee will make payments from amounts deposited in the principal distribution account on that date in the order of priority described above under “The Notes—Payments of Principal.”
Reserve Account
The servicer will establish the reserve account in the name of the indenture trustee for the benefit of the noteholders. To the extent that Collections on the receivables and amounts on deposit in the reserve account are insufficient, the noteholders will have no recourse to the assets of the certificateholder, the depositor or servicer as a source of payment.
The reserve account initially will be funded by a deposit from proceeds of the offering of the notes on the closing date in an amount equal to 0.10% of the Adjusted Pool Balance as of the closing date of the receivables.
As of any payment date, the amount of funds actually on deposit in the reserve account may, in certain circumstances, be less than the Specified Reserve Account Balance. On each payment date, the issuing entity will, to the extent available, deposit the amount, if any, necessary to cause the amount of funds on deposit in the reserve account to equal the Specified Reserve Account Balance to the extent set forth below under “—Priority of Payments.”
Amounts on deposit in the collection account, the principal distribution account and the reserve account will be invested by the indenture trustee at the direction of the servicer in Permitted Investments selected by the servicer. Permitted Investments are limited to obligations or securities that mature on or before the next payment date.
The amount of funds on deposit in the reserve account may decrease on each payment date by withdrawals of funds to cover shortfalls in the amounts required to be distributed pursuant to clauses first through fifth under “—Priority of Payments” below.
85
Table of Contents
If the amount of funds on deposit in the reserve account on any payment date, after giving effect to all deposits and withdrawals from the reserve account on that payment date, is greater than the Specified Reserve Account Balance for that payment date, then the indenture trustee will deposit the amount of the excess into the collection account and the excess will then be distributed as part of Available Funds for that payment date for distribution as specified under “—Priority of Payments” below.
In addition, on any payment date if the sum of the amount in the reserve account and the amount of remaining Available Funds after payment of the amounts set forth in clauses first through fifth under “—Priority of Payments” would be sufficient to pay in full the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all of the outstanding notes, then the indenture trustee will, if instructed by the servicer, withdraw all amounts from the reserve account for distribution as part of Available Funds for that payment date.
On each payment date, the servicer may, in its sole discretion, deposit into the collection account an advance in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) any shortfall in the amounts available to make the payments described in clauses first through fifth of the payment waterfall described below and (2) the aggregate scheduled monthly payments due on the receivables but not received during and prior to the related collection period (an “advance”).
However, the servicer will not be obligated to make any such advances. No advances will be made with respect to Defaulted Receivables. In making advances, the servicer will assist in maintaining a regular flow of payments on the receivables, rather than guarantee or insure against losses. Accordingly, all advances will be reimbursable to the servicer, without interest (from Available Funds, including Collections on the receivables pool), prior to any distributions on the notes. See “—Priority of Payments” below.
On each payment date, except after acceleration of the notes after an event of default under the indenture, the indenture trustee will make the following deposits and distributions (in accordance with the servicer’s instructions delivered pursuant to the sale and servicing agreement), to the extent of the Available Funds then on deposit in the collection account with respect to the collection period preceding that payment date—including funds, if any, deposited into the collection account from the reserve account and any advance made by the servicer—in the following order of priority (which we sometimes refer to as the “payment waterfall”):
| (1) | first, to the servicer (or any predecessor servicer, if applicable), for reimbursement of all outstanding advances; |
| (2) | second, to the servicer, the servicing fee and all unpaid servicing fees with respect to prior periods; |
| (3) | third, pro rata, to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee and the asset representations reviewer, fees and expenses (including indemnification amounts) due and owing under the trust agreement, the indenture and the asset representations review agreement, as applicable, which have not been previously paid, provided, that the amounts payable pursuant to this clause will be limited to $275,000 per annum in the aggregate; |
| (4) | fourth, to the noteholders, the accrued note interest, which is the sum of (a) the aggregate amount of interest due and accrued for the related interest period on each class of the notes at the respective interest rate for that class on the respective note balances as of the previous payment date or the closing date, as the case may be (after giving effect to all payments of principal to the noteholders on or prior to such preceding payment date); and (b) the excess, if any, of the amount of interest due and payable to the noteholders on the preceding payment date over the amounts actually paid to the noteholders on the preceding payment date, plus interest on any such shortfall at the respective interest rates on each class of the notes for the related interest period (to the extent permitted by law); provided, that if there are not sufficient funds available to pay the entire |
86
Table of Contents
| amount of accrued note interest, the amounts available will be applied to the payment of such interest on the notes on a pro rata basis based on the amount of interest owing; |
| (5) | fifth, to the principal distribution account for distribution pursuant to “The Notes—Payments of Principal” above, the Principal Distribution Amount; |
| (6) | sixth, to the reserve account, any additional amounts required to increase the amount on deposit in the reserve account up to the specified reserve account balance; |
| (7) | seventh, pro rata, to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee and the asset representations reviewer, all amounts due pursuant to clause third above to the extent not paid in such clause; and |
| (8) | eighth, to or at the direction of the certificateholder, any funds remaining. |
Upon and after any distribution to the certificateholder of any amounts, the noteholders will not have any rights in, or claims to, those amounts. On each payment date, after all deposits and distributions of higher priority as described above, the certificateholder will be entitled to any funds remaining on that payment date.
If the sum of the amounts required to be distributed pursuant to clauses first through fifth above exceeds the sum of Available Funds and servicer advances for that payment date, the indenture trustee will withdraw from the reserve account and deposit in the collection account for distribution in accordance with the payment waterfall an amount equal to the lesser of the funds in the reserve account and the shortfall.
The fees and expenses paid or payable from Available Funds are set forth in the table below. Those fees and expenses are paid on each payment date as described above under “—Priority of Payments”.
| Type of Fee |
Amount of Fee |
Party Receiving Fee |
Priority in Distribution | |||
| Servicing Fee(1) | Product of (a) one-twelfth (or, in the case of the first payment date, one-sixth), (b) 1.00% and (c) the net pool balance of the receivables as of the first day of the related collection period (or as of the cut-off date, in the case of the first payment date) | servicer | Payable prior to payment of interest and principal on the notes. | |||
| Unpaid Indenture Trustee Compensation or Indemnification Payments(1) | $3,000 as compensation for its services on a per annum basis, plus reasonable expenses and any indemnification amounts due under the transaction documents to the extent not paid under the transaction documents(2) | indenture trustee |
Payable following payment of the Servicing Fee.(3) | |||
| Unpaid Owner Trustee Compensation or Indemnification Payments(1) | $3,000 as compensation for its services on a per annum basis, plus reasonable expenses and any indemnification amounts due under the transaction documents to the extent not paid under the transaction documents(2) | owner trustee | Payable following payment of the Servicing Fee.(3) | |||
87
Table of Contents
| Type of Fee |
Amount of Fee |
Party Receiving Fee |
Priority in Distribution | |||
| Unpaid Asset Representations Reviewer Fees(1) | $5,000 as compensation for its services on a per annum basis, plus reasonable expenses and any indemnification amounts due under the transaction documents to the extent not paid under the transaction documents | asset representations reviewer |
Payable following payment of the Servicing Fee.(3) | |||
| Asset Review Expenses | $200 for each receivable reviewed in connection with an Asset Review plus reasonable expenses incurred in connection with an Asset Review, in each case, to the extent not paid under the transaction documents | asset representations reviewer |
Payable following payment of the Servicing Fee.(3) | |||
| (1) | VW Credit, as the servicer pursuant to the sale and servicing agreement, is required to pay the fees, expenses and indemnity payments of the indenture trustee, the owner trustee and the asset representations reviewer. However, to the extent that the servicer fails to make these payments, the fees, expenses and indemnity payments will be paid out of Available Funds in accordance with the payment waterfall to the extent they have not been previously paid when due. |
| (2) | The fees and expenses described above do not change upon an event of default although actual expenses incurred may be higher after an event of default. |
| (3) | Following an event of default and acceleration of the notes (which has not been rescinded), these amounts will be paid prior to payments to the servicer as described in “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default.” |
In addition to the fees and expenses set forth above, VW Credit and the depositor will incur certain other fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of the notes, which will not be payable out of Available Funds or other assets of the issuing entity. An estimate of these expenses in connection with the offering of the notes is set forth below:
| Registration Fee |
$ | 161,850 | ||
| Blue Sky Fees and Expenses |
$ | 0 | ||
| Printing Fees and Expenses |
$ | 42,000 | ||
| Trustees’ Fees and Expenses |
$ | 5,000 | ||
| Legal Fees and Expense |
$ | 375,000 | ||
| Rating Agencies’ Fees |
$ | 450,000 | ||
| Miscellaneous |
$ | 150,000 | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Total |
$ | 1,183,850 | ||
|
|
|
The Owner Trustee and the Indenture Trustee
Generally, prior to an event of default (and with respect to the owner trustee both prior to and after an event of default), the owner trustee and indenture trustee will be required to perform only those duties specifically required of them under the sale and servicing agreement, trust agreement, administration agreement or indenture, as applicable. Generally, those duties are limited to the receipt of the various certificates, reports or other instruments required to be furnished to the owner trustee or indenture trustee under the sale and servicing agreement, trust agreement, administration agreement, or indenture, as applicable, and the making of payments or distributions to noteholders in the amounts specified in reports provided by the servicer.
Each of the owner trustee and indenture trustee, and any of their respective affiliates, may hold securities in their own names. In addition, for the purpose of meeting the legal requirements of local jurisdictions, each of the owner trustee and indenture trustee, in some circumstances, acting jointly with the depositor and the administrator, respectively, will have the power to appoint co-trustees or separate trustees of all or any part of the issuing entity property. In the event of the appointment of co-trustees or separate trustees, all rights, powers, duties and obligations conferred or imposed upon the owner trustee or indenture trustee by the transaction documents will be conferred or imposed upon the owner trustee or indenture trustee and the separate trustee or co-trustee jointly, or, in any jurisdiction in which the owner trustee or indenture trustee is incompetent or unqualified to perform specified acts,
88
Table of Contents
singly upon the separate trustee or co-trustee who will exercise and perform any rights, powers, duties and obligations solely at the direction of the owner trustee or indenture trustee.
The indenture trustee may resign at any time, in which event the issuing entity will be obligated to appoint a successor indenture trustee. The issuing entity will remove the indenture trustee if, among other things, the indenture trustee ceases to be eligible to continue as such under the indenture or if the indenture trustee becomes insolvent. In such circumstances, the issuing entity will be obligated to appoint a successor indenture trustee. In addition, the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the notes, may remove the indenture trustee without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the indenture trustee and the issuing entity and may appoint a successor indenture trustee. Any resignation or removal of the indenture trustee and appointment of a successor indenture trustee does not become effective until acceptance of the appointment by the successor indenture trustee and payment of all fees and expenses owed to the outgoing indenture trustee.
The owner trustee may resign at any time, in which event the depositor and the administrator, acting jointly, will be obligated to appoint a successor owner trustee. The depositor or the administrator may remove the owner trustee if, among other things, the owner trustee ceases to be eligible to continue as such under the trust agreement or if the owner trustee becomes insolvent. In such circumstances, the depositor and the administrator, acting jointly, will be obligated to appoint a successor owner trustee. Any resignation or removal of the owner trustee and appointment of a successor owner trustee does not become effective until acceptance of the appointment by the successor owner trustee and payment of all fees and expenses owed to the outgoing owner trustee.
Before the indenture trustee acts or refrains from acting, it may require an officer’s certificate or an opinion of counsel, as applicable, and the indenture trustee will not be liable for any action it takes, suffers or omits to take in good faith in reliance on such officer’s certificate or opinion of counsel. Further, the indenture trustee will not be liable for any action it takes or omits to take in good faith which it reasonably believes to be authorized or within discretion or rights or powers conferred upon it by the indenture; provided, however, that the indenture trustee’s conduct does not constitute willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith. The indenture trustee will not be relieved from liability for its own negligent action, its own negligent failure to act or its own willful misconduct, except to the limited extent as set forth in the indenture. In no event will the indenture trustee be responsible or liable for special, indirect, punitive or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever (including, but not limited to, loss of profit) irrespective of whether the indenture trustee has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action.
The owner trustee will not be personally liable or accountable under any of the transaction documents under any circumstances notwithstanding anything in the transaction documents to the contrary, except for its own willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence and, among other things, for taxes, fees or other charges on, based on or measured by, any fees, commissions or compensation received by the owner trustee. The owner trustee will not be personally liable for special, consequential or punitive damages, however styled, including, without limitation, lost profits.
In no event will the owner trustee have any responsibility to monitor compliance with or enforce compliance with the credit risk retention requirements for asset-backed securities or other rules or regulations relating to risk retention.
Indemnification of the Indenture Trustee and the Owner Trustee
Under the indenture, the issuing entity will agree to cause the servicer to indemnify the indenture trustee for any loss, liability or expense (including reasonable attorney’s fees) incurred without willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith on the part of the indenture trustee in connection with the administration of the trust or trusts under the indenture or the performance of its duties as indenture trustee, including, with certain limitations, the costs and expenses of defending itself against any claim in connection with the exercise or performance of any of its powers or duties under the indenture. To the extent that any such indemnities are not otherwise paid by the servicer, they will be paid from Available Funds as described above under “—Priority of Payments” and below under “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default.”
89
Table of Contents
Under the trust agreement, the depositor will cause the servicer and the issuing entity to indemnify the owner trustee from and against any and all loss, liability, expense, tax, penalty or claim (including reasonable legal fees and expenses) of any kind and nature whatsoever which may at any time be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the owner trustee in any way relating to or arising out of the trust agreement, the other transaction documents, the issuing entity property, the administration of the issuing entity property or the action or inaction of the owner trustee. However, none of the depositor, the issuing entity nor the servicer will be liable for or required to indemnify the owner trustee from and against any of the foregoing expenses arising or resulting from (i) the owner trustee’s own willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence, (ii) the inaccuracy of certain of the owner trustee’s representations and warranties, (iii) liabilities arising from the failure of the owner trustee to perform certain obligations or (iv) taxes, fees or other charges on, based on or measured by, any fees, commissions or compensation received by the owner trustee. To the extent that any such indemnities are not otherwise paid by the servicer, they will be paid from Available Funds as described above under “—Priority of Payments” and below under “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default.”
On each payment date the indenture trustee will forward (or make available on its website) to each noteholder a statement (prepared by the servicer) setting forth for that payment date and the related collection period, the following information (to the extent applicable):
| • | the aggregate amount being paid on such payment date in respect of interest on and principal of each class of notes; |
| • | the outstanding principal balance for each class of notes in each case after giving effect to payments on such payment date; |
| • | the amount on deposit in the reserve account and the specified reserve account balance, each as of the beginning and end of the related collection period, (ii) the amount deposited in the reserve account in respect of such payment date, if any, (iii) the reserve account draw amount and the reserve account excess amount, if any, to be withdrawn from the reserve account on such payment date, (iv) the balance on deposit in the reserve account on such payment date after giving effect to withdrawals therefrom and deposits thereto in respect of such payment date and (v) the change in such balance from the immediately preceding payment date; |
| • | the principal distribution amount for such payment date; |
| • | the net pool balance and the Note Factor as of the close of business on the last day of the preceding collection period; |
| • | the number of, and aggregate amount of monthly principal and interest payments due on, the related receivables which are delinquent as of the end of the related collection period; |
| • | the amount of the servicing fee to be paid to the servicer with respect to the related collection period and the amount of any unpaid servicing fees; |
| • | the amount of the noteholders’ interest carryover shortfall, if any, on such payment date and the change in such amounts from the preceding payment date; |
| • | the aggregate repurchase price with respect to repurchased receivables paid by (i) the servicer and (ii) the depositor with respect to the related collection period; |
| • | the amount of advances, if any, on such payment date; |
| • | the amount of Collections for the related collection period; |
90
Table of Contents
| • | the aggregate amount of proceeds received by the servicer, net of reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses, in respect of a receivable which is a Defaulted Receivable; |
| • | the number and outstanding of balance of receivables for which the related financed vehicle has been repossessed; |
| • | the amount remaining of any yield supplement overcollateralization amount, credit, or liquidity enhancement, if applicable; |
| • | the Delinquency Percentage for the related collection period; and |
| • | the Delinquency Trigger for such payment date. |
The indenture trustee will make the above listed statements available via the indenture trustee’s internet website. The indenture trustee’s internet website shall be initially located at “www.sf.citidirect.com” or at such other address as will be specified by the indenture trustee from time to time in writing to the noteholders, the servicer, the issuing entity or any paying agent. The indenture trustee will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the indenture. The indenture trustee will notify the noteholders in writing of any changes in the address of or means of access to the internet website where the statements are accessible.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year during the term of the issuing entity, but not later than the latest date permitted by applicable law, the indenture trustee or paying agent will furnish information required by law to complete federal and state income tax returns to each person who on any record date during the calendar year was a registered noteholder. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus.
91
Table of Contents
Yield Supplement Overcollateralization Amount
As of the closing date, the yield supplement overcollateralization amount will equal $104,720,886.52, which is approximately 7.81% of the Adjusted Pool Balance as of the closing date. The yield supplement overcollateralization amount will decline on each payment date. It is intended to compensate for the low contract rates on some of the receivables and is in addition to the overcollateralization referred to in “Summary of Terms—Credit Enhancement—Overcollateralization”.
With respect to any payment date, the “yield supplement overcollateralization amount” is the amount specified below with respect to that payment date:
| Yield Supplement Overcollateralization Amount |
||||||||
| Payment Date |
Required Rate of 6.85% | Required Rate of 6.35% | ||||||
| Closing Date |
$ | 104,720,886.52 | $ | 91,512,428.33 | ||||
| August 2018 |
$ | 97,192,960.78 | $ | 84,890,627.57 | ||||
| September 2018 |
$ | 93,533,789.70 | $ | 81,673,396.44 | ||||
| October 2018 |
$ | 89,945,255.48 | $ | 78,519,260.09 | ||||
| November 2018 |
$ | 86,427,291.73 | $ | 75,428,118.37 | ||||
| December 2018 |
$ | 82,979,816.96 | $ | 72,399,858.89 | ||||
| January 2019 |
$ | 79,602,661.98 | $ | 69,434,290.36 | ||||
| February 2019 |
$ | 76,295,522.82 | $ | 66,531,101.39 | ||||
| March 2019 |
$ | 73,058,240.09 | $ | 63,690,109.75 | ||||
| April 2019 |
$ | 69,890,986.92 | $ | 60,911,435.79 | ||||
| May 2019 |
$ | 66,794,047.70 | $ | 58,195,303.88 | ||||
| June 2019 |
$ | 63,767,701.99 | $ | 55,541,931.85 | ||||
| July 2019 |
$ | 60,812,161.53 | $ | 52,951,476.01 | ||||
| August 2019 |
$ | 57,927,662.26 | $ | 50,424,114.91 | ||||
| September 2019 |
$ | 55,114,299.73 | $ | 47,959,898.97 | ||||
| October 2019 |
$ | 52,372,004.53 | $ | 45,558,722.90 | ||||
| November 2019 |
$ | 49,700,946.26 | $ | 43,220,701.80 | ||||
| December 2019 |
$ | 47,101,339.43 | $ | 40,945,990.73 | ||||
| January 2020 |
$ | 44,573,334.74 | $ | 38,734,691.18 | ||||
| February 2020 |
$ | 42,117,088.34 | $ | 36,586,912.97 | ||||
| March 2020 |
$ | 39,732,847.62 | $ | 34,502,844.69 | ||||
| April 2020 |
$ | 37,420,946.83 | $ | 32,482,751.62 | ||||
| May 2020 |
$ | 35,181,656.27 | $ | 30,526,841.28 | ||||
| June 2020 |
$ | 33,015,214.92 | $ | 28,635,292.95 | ||||
| July 2020 |
$ | 30,921,909.59 | $ | 26,808,326.72 | ||||
| August 2020 |
$ | 28,901,877.27 | $ | 25,046,030.27 | ||||
| September 2020 |
$ | 26,955,310.08 | $ | 23,348,540.47 | ||||
| October 2020 |
$ | 25,082,346.75 | $ | 21,715,944.35 | ||||
| November 2020 |
$ | 23,283,057.89 | $ | 20,148,269.57 | ||||
| December 2020 |
$ | 21,557,526.75 | $ | 18,645,554.98 | ||||
| January 2021 |
$ | 19,905,779.43 | $ | 17,207,791.36 | ||||
| February 2021 |
$ | 18,327,619.42 | $ | 15,834,776.68 | ||||
| March 2021 |
$ | 16,822,928.28 | $ | 14,526,379.54 | ||||
| April 2021 |
$ | 15,391,552.72 | $ | 13,282,438.11 | ||||
| May 2021 |
$ | 14,033,089.41 | $ | 12,102,566.31 | ||||
| June 2021 |
$ | 12,747,264.87 | $ | 10,986,490.59 | ||||
| July 2021 |
$ | 11,533,656.00 | $ | 9,933,800.34 | ||||
| August 2021 |
$ | 10,391,776.40 | $ | 8,944,025.99 | ||||
| September 2021 |
$ | 9,320,752.19 | $ | 8,016,343.88 | ||||
92
Table of Contents
| Yield Supplement Overcollateralization Amount |
||||||||
| Payment Date |
Required Rate of 6.85% | Required Rate of 6.35% | ||||||
| October 2021 |
$ | 8,319,031.61 | $ | 7,149,313.19 | ||||
| November 2021 |
$ | 7,385,066.57 | $ | 6,341,506.03 | ||||
| December 2021 |
$ | 6,518,022.45 | $ | 5,592,146.35 | ||||
| January 2022 |
$ | 5,716,947.23 | $ | 4,900,360.14 | ||||
| February 2022 |
$ | 4,980,243.91 | $ | 4,264,710.96 | ||||
| March 2022 |
$ | 4,306,288.30 | $ | 3,683,745.07 | ||||
| April 2022 |
$ | 3,693,399.44 | $ | 3,155,947.77 | ||||
| May 2022 |
$ | 3,139,262.32 | $ | 2,679,241.28 | ||||
| June 2022 |
$ | 2,642,078.77 | $ | 2,252,018.19 | ||||
| July 2022 |
$ | 2,200,169.33 | $ | 1,872,781.49 | ||||
| August 2022 |
$ | 1,811,082.23 | $ | 1,539,358.41 | ||||
| September 2022 |
$ | 1,472,019.20 | $ | 1,249,262.13 | ||||
| October 2022 |
$ | 1,179,551.85 | $ | 999,433.24 | ||||
| November 2022 |
$ | 930,203.34 | $ | 786,789.81 | ||||
| December 2022 |
$ | 721,010.46 | $ | 608,715.92 | ||||
| January 2023 |
$ | 549,030.35 | $ | 462,628.17 | ||||
| February 2023 |
$ | 410,158.95 | $ | 344,939.48 | ||||
| March 2023 |
$ | 299,867.05 | $ | 251,712.68 | ||||
| April 2023 |
$ | 213,196.55 | $ | 178,628.16 | ||||
| May 2023 |
$ | 145,088.66 | $ | 121,301.45 | ||||
| June 2023 |
$ | 93,366.96 | $ | 77,863.89 | ||||
| July 2023 |
$ | 56,326.90 | $ | 46,855.09 | ||||
| August 2023 |
$ | 31,224.95 | $ | 25,915.51 | ||||
| September 2023 |
$ | 15,226.94 | $ | 12,608.99 | ||||
| October 2023 |
$ | 6,114.37 | $ | 5,056.02 | ||||
| November 2023 |
$ | 1,561.51 | $ | 1,289.39 | ||||
| December 2023 |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
The yield supplement overcollateralization amount for each payment date is equal to the sum of the amount for each receivable equal to the excess, if any, of (x) the scheduled payments due on the receivable for each future collection period discounted to present value as of the end of the preceding collection period at the contract rate of that receivable over (y) the scheduled payments due on the receivable for each future collection period discounted to present value as of the end of the preceding collection period at a discount rate equal to the greater of the contract rate of that receivable and the Required Rate. “Required Rate” means (i) with respect to any payment date on or prior to the payment date on which the outstanding principal amount of the Class A-2-B notes is reduced to zero, 6.85%, and (ii) with respect to any payment date after the date on which the outstanding principal amount of the Class A-2-B Notes is reduced to zero, 6.35%. For purposes of the preceding definition, future scheduled payments on the receivables are assumed to be made on their scheduled due dates without any delay, defaults or prepayments.
If VW Credit, as servicer, exercises its optional clean-up call to purchase the assets of the issuing entity (other than the reserve account) on any payment date when the net pool balance of the receivables as of the last day of the related collection period has declined to 10% or less of the net pool balance as of the cut-off date, then the outstanding notes will be redeemed in whole, but not in part, on the payment date on which VW Credit exercises this option. The purchase price will be equal to the outstanding principal balance of all the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon (after giving effect to all distributions for that payment date in accordance with “—Priority of Payments” above) up to but excluding that payment date at the applicable interest rate.
Additionally, each of the notes is subject to redemption in whole, but not in part, on any payment date on which the sum of the amounts in the reserve account and the remaining Available Funds after the payments under clauses first through fifth set forth in “—Priority of Payments” above would be sufficient to pay in full the aggregate unpaid note balance of all of the outstanding notes as determined by the servicer. On such payment date, (i) the indenture trustee upon written direction from the servicer shall transfer all amounts on deposit in the reserve account to the collection account and (ii) the outstanding notes shall be redeemed in whole, but not in part.
93
Table of Contents
If the notes are to be redeemed pursuant to this section, the administrator or the issuing entity will provide at least 20 days’ prior notice of the redemption to the indenture trustee and the owner trustee and the indenture trustee will provide prompt (but not later than 10 days) notice thereof to the noteholders.
It is expected that at the time this clean-up call option becomes available to the servicer, only the Class A-4 notes will be outstanding.
Servicing Compensation and Expenses
The servicer will be entitled to receive a servicing fee for each collection period. The “servicing fee” for any payment date will be an amount equal to the product of (1) one-twelfth (or, in the case of the first payment date, one-sixth), (2) 1.00% and (3) the net pool balance of the receivables as of the first day of the related collection period (or as of the initial cut-off date, in the case of the first payment date). As additional compensation, the servicer will be entitled to retain all Supplemental Servicing Fees. In addition, the servicer will be entitled to receive all investment earnings (net of investment losses and expenses) from the investment of funds in the collection account and the principal distribution account. The servicing fee, together with any portion of the servicing fee that remains unpaid from prior payment dates, will be payable on each payment date from funds on deposit in the collection account with respect to the collection period preceding that payment date, including funds, if any, deposited into the collection account from the reserve account and any advances made by the servicer. The servicer will pay all expenses (apart from certain expenses incurred in connection with liquidating a financed vehicle related to a receivable, such as auction, painting, repair or refurbishment expenses in respect of that financed vehicle) incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities (including any fees and expenses of the indenture trustee and of the owner trustee) and generally will not be entitled to reimbursement of those expenses. The servicer will have no responsibility, however, to pay any losses with respect to the receivables.
Pursuant to the sale and servicing agreement, the servicer may grant extensions, rebates, deferrals, amendments, modifications or adjustments on a receivable in accordance with its customary servicing practices; provided, however, that if the servicer (1) extends the date for final payment by the obligor of any receivable beyond the last day of the collection period prior to the latest final scheduled payment date for any notes or (2) reduces the contract rate or outstanding principal balance of any receivable other than as required by applicable law (including, without limitation, by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act) or court order, then the servicer will be required to purchase that receivable from the issuing entity if such change in the receivable would materially and adversely affect the interests of the issuing entity or the noteholders in such receivable.
The following events constitute “servicer replacement events” under the sale and servicing agreement:
| • | any failure by the servicer to deliver or cause to be delivered any required payment to the indenture trustee for distribution to the noteholders, which failure continues unremedied for ten business days after discovery thereof by a responsible officer of the servicer or receipt by the servicer of written notice thereof from the indenture trustee or noteholders evidencing a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes; |
| • | any failure by the servicer to duly observe or perform in any material respect any other of its covenants or agreements in the sale and servicing agreement, which failure materially and adversely affects the rights of the issuing entity or the noteholders, and which continues unremedied for 90 days after discovery thereof by a responsible officer of the servicer or receipt by the servicer of written notice thereof from the indenture trustee or the noteholders evidencing a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes; |
| • | any representation or warranty of the servicer made in any transaction document to which the servicer is a party or by which it is bound or any certificate delivered pursuant to the sale and servicing |
94
Table of Contents
| agreement proves to have been incorrect in any material respect when made, which failure materially and adversely affects the rights of the issuing entity or the noteholders, and which failure continues unremedied for 90 days after discovery thereof by a responsible officer of the servicer or receipt by the servicer of written notice thereof from the indenture trustee or the noteholders evidencing a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes (it being understood that any repurchase of a receivable by VW Credit pursuant to the purchase agreement or the depositor or the servicer pursuant to the sale and servicing agreement shall be deemed to remedy any incorrect representation or warranty with respect to such receivable); or |
| • | the occurrence of certain events (which, if involuntary, remain unstayed for more than 90 consecutive days) of bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or liquidation of the servicer. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a delay in or failure of performance referred to under the first three bullet points above for a period of 120 days will not constitute a servicer replacement event if that delay or failure was caused by force majeure or other similar occurrence.
The existence or occurrence of any “material instance of noncompliance” (within the meaning of Item 1122 of Regulation AB) shall not create any presumption that any event under the first three bullet points above has occurred.
If the commencement of a bankruptcy or similar case or proceeding were the only servicer replacement event, and a bankruptcy trustee or similar official has been appointed for the servicer, the trustee or such official may have the power to prevent the servicer’s removal.
Removal or Replacement of the Servicer
If a servicer replacement event has occurred and is continuing, the indenture trustee, acting at the direction of noteholders evidencing at least 66 2⁄3% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes, will terminate all of the servicing rights and obligations of the servicer with respect to the receivables. The indenture trustee will effect that termination by delivering notice to the servicer, the owner trustee, the issuing entity, the administrator and the noteholders. Any successor servicer must be an established institution having a net worth of not less than $100,000,000 and whose regular business includes the servicing of comparable motor vehicle receivables having an aggregate outstanding principal balance of not less than $50,000,000.
VW Credit, as servicer, may not resign from its servicing obligations and duties except upon determination that the performance of its duties as servicer is no longer permissible under applicable law. Except as set forth below, no such resignation will become effective until a successor servicer has assumed the obligations and duties of VW Credit, as servicer, and provided in writing the information reasonably requested by the depositor to comply with its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act with respect to a replacement servicer. The servicer may, at any time without notice or consent, delegate (a) any or all of its duties (including, without limitation, its duties as custodian) under the transaction documents to any of its affiliates or (b) specific duties to sub-contractors who are in the business of performing similar duties. However, no delegation to affiliates or sub-contractors will release the servicer from its duties under the sale and servicing agreement, and the servicer will remain obligated and liable to the issuing entity and the indenture trustee for those duties as if the servicer alone were performing those duties.
Upon the servicer’s receipt of notice of termination, the predecessor servicer will continue to perform its functions as servicer only until the date specified in that termination notice or, if no date is specified therein, until receipt of that notice. If a successor servicer has not been appointed at the time when the predecessor servicer ceases to act as servicer of the receivables, the indenture trustee without further action will automatically be appointed the successor servicer. However, if the indenture trustee is legally unable or is unwilling to act as servicer, the indenture trustee will appoint (or petition a court to appoint) a successor servicer.
Upon appointment of a successor servicer, the successor servicer will assume all of the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the servicer with respect to the receivables (other than the obligations of the predecessor servicer that survive its termination as servicer, including indemnification obligations against certain events arising
95
Table of Contents
before its replacement). In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding for the servicer, a bankruptcy trustee or similar official may have the power to prevent the indenture trustee, the owner trustee or the noteholders from effecting a transfer of servicing to a successor servicer.
Waiver of Past Servicer Replacement Events
The holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes may waive any servicer replacement event.
The occurrence and continuation of any one of the following events (whatever the reason for such event of default and whether it shall be voluntary or involuntary or be effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body) will be an “event of default” under the indenture:
| • | a default in the payment of any interest on any note when the same becomes due and payable, and that default continues for a period of five business days; |
| • | a default in the payment of principal of any note at the related final scheduled payment date or the redemption date; |
| • | any failure by the issuing entity to duly observe or perform in any material respect any of its material covenants or agreements in the indenture, which failure materially and adversely affects the interests of the noteholders, and which failure continues unremedied for 90 days after receipt by the issuing entity of written notice thereof from the indenture trustee or noteholders evidencing at least a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes (and such written notice must specify the related failure, require it to be remedied and state that such notice is a “Notice of Default”); |
| • | any representation or warranty of the issuing entity made in the indenture proves to have been incorrect in any material respect when made, which failure materially and adversely affects the interests of the noteholders, and which failure continues unremedied for 90 days after receipt by the issuing entity of written notice thereof from the indenture trustee or noteholders evidencing at least a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes (and such written notice must specify the related failure, require it to be remedied and state that such notice is a “Notice of Default”); or |
| • | the occurrence of certain events (which, if involuntary, remain unstayed for a period of 90 consecutive days) of bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or liquidation (such events, “bankruptcy events”) of the issuing entity. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a delay in or failure of performance referred to under the first four bullet points above for a period of 120 days will not constitute an event of default if that delay or failure was caused by force majeure or other similar occurrence.
The amount of principal required to be paid to noteholders under the indenture, however, generally will be limited to amounts available to make such payments in accordance with the priority of payments. Thus, the failure to pay principal on a class of notes due to a lack of amounts available to make such a payment will not result in the occurrence of an event of default until the final scheduled payment date for that class of notes.
Upon the occurrence and continuation of any event of default (other than an event of default resulting from a bankruptcy event of the issuing entity), the indenture trustee may or if directed by the noteholders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding note principal balance of the outstanding notes will, declare the notes to be immediately due and payable by a notice in writing to the issuing entity. Upon the occurrence of an event of default resulting
96
Table of Contents
from a bankruptcy event of the issuing entity, the notes will automatically be accelerated, and all accrued and unpaid interest on and principal of the notes will be due and payable without any declaration or other act by the indenture trustee or the noteholders.
If the notes have become due and payable following an event of default, the indenture trustee may institute proceedings to collect amounts due, exercise remedies as a secured party (including foreclosure or sale of the issuing entity property) or elect to maintain the receivables and the other issuing entity property and, if the indenture trustee elects to maintain such possession, it will apply the proceeds from the receivables and the other issuing entity property in the manner described below under “—Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default”. However, the indenture trustee is prohibited from selling or liquidating the receivables and the other issuing entity property following an event of default unless:
| • | the holders of 100% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes consent to such sale or liquidation; |
| • | the proceeds of such sale or liquidation are sufficient to pay in full the principal of and the accrued interest on all outstanding notes; or |
| • | the default relates to the failure to pay interest or principal when due (a “payment default”), the indenture trustee determines that the Collections on the receivables will not be sufficient on an ongoing basis to make all payments on the notes as those payments would have become due if the notes had not been declared due and payable, and the indenture trustee obtains the consent of the holders of 66 2⁄3% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes. |
In addition, if the event of default does not relate to a payment default or a bankruptcy event of the issuing entity, the indenture trustee is prohibited from selling or liquidating the receivables and the other issuing entity property unless the holders of 100% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes consent to a sale or the proceeds of a sale are sufficient to pay in full the principal of and the accrued interest on the outstanding notes.
The indenture trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the indenture or to institute, conduct or defend any litigation under the indenture or in relation to the indenture or to honor the request or direction of any of the noteholders unless such noteholders shall have offered to the indenture trustee reasonable security or indemnity satisfactory to the indenture trustee against the reasonable costs, expenses, disbursements, advances and liabilities that might be incurred by it, its agents and its counsel in complying with such request or direction. Subject to the provisions for indemnification and certain limitations contained in the indenture, the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the indenture trustee, and the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes may, prior to the acceleration of the notes following an event of default, waive any event of default, except a default in payment of principal of or interest on any of the notes, a default in respect of a covenant or provision of the indenture that cannot be modified without the consent of the holders of 100% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes or a default arising from a bankruptcy event of the issuing entity.
Priority of Payments May Change Upon an Event of Default
Following the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default under the indenture which has resulted in an acceleration of the notes, the priority of payments changes (including payments of principal on the notes). On each payment date after an event of default and acceleration of the notes, payments will be made from all funds (including all amounts held on deposit in the reserve account) available to the issuing entity (net of liquidation costs associated with the sale of the trust estate) in the following order of priority:
| (1) | first, pro rata, to the indenture trustee and the owner trustee, any accrued and unpaid fees and reasonable expenses (including indemnification amounts) permitted under the trust agreement and the indenture, as applicable, which have not been previously paid; |
97
Table of Contents
| (2) | second, to the asset representations reviewer, any accrued and unpaid fees and reasonable expenses (including indemnification amounts) permitted under the asset representations review agreement which have not been previously paid, provided, that the amounts payable pursuant to this clause will be limited to $250,000 per annum in the aggregate; |
| (3) | third, to the servicer (or any predecessor servicer, if applicable), for reimbursement of all outstanding advances; |
| (4) | fourth, to the servicer, the servicing fee and all unpaid servicing fees with respect to prior periods; |
| (5) | fifth, to the noteholders, the accrued note interest; provided that if there are not sufficient funds available to pay the entire amount of the accrued note interest, the amount available will be applied to the payment of such interest on each class of notes on a pro rata basis based on the amount of interest payable to each class of notes; |
| (6) | sixth, to the Class A-1 noteholders in respect of principal thereof, until the Class A-1 notes have been paid in full; |
| (7) | seventh, to the Class A-2-A noteholders, Class A-2-B noteholders, the Class A-3 noteholders, and the Class A-4 noteholders in respect of principal thereof, pro rata (based on the outstanding principal balance of each class of outstanding notes on such payment date), until all classes of the notes have been paid in full; |
| (8) | eighth, pro rata, to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee and the asset representations reviewer, any accrued and unpaid fees, reasonable expenses and indemnity payments not previously paid; and |
| (9) | ninth, any remaining funds to or at the direction of the certificateholder. |
Following the occurrence of any event of default under the indenture which has not resulted in an acceleration of the notes, the issuing entity will continue to pay interest and principal on the notes on each payment date in the manner set forth under “—Priority of Payments” above, until the notes are accelerated following the occurrence of an event of default.
No holder of any note will have any right to institute any proceeding, judicial or otherwise, with respect to the indenture, or for the appointment of a receiver or trustee, or for any other remedy under the indenture, unless (i) such holder has previously given written notice to the indenture trustee of a continuing event of default; (ii) the holders of not less than 25% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes have made written request to the indenture trustee to institute such proceeding in respect of such event of default in its own name as the indenture trustee under the indenture; (iii) such holder or holders have offered to the indenture trustee indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred in complying with such request; (iv) the indenture trustee for 60 days after its receipt of such notice, request and offer of indemnity has failed to institute such proceedings; and (v) no direction inconsistent with such written request has been given to the indenture trustee during such 60-day period by the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes.
No noteholder or group of noteholders will have any right in any manner whatever by virtue of, or by availing of, any provision of the indenture to affect, disturb or prejudice the rights of any other noteholders or to obtain or to seek to obtain priority or preference over any other noteholders or to enforce any right under the indenture, except, in each case, to the extent and in the manner provided for in the indenture. In the event the indenture trustee shall receive conflicting or inconsistent requests and indemnity from two or more groups of noteholders, each representing less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding
98
Table of Contents
notes, the indenture trustee in its sole discretion may determine what action, if any, shall be taken, notwithstanding any other provisions of the indenture.
No noteholder will have any right to vote except as provided pursuant to the indenture and the notes, nor any right in any manner to otherwise control the operation and management of the issuing entity. However, in connection with any action as to which noteholders are entitled to vote or consent under the indenture and the notes, the issuing entity may set a record date for purposes of determining the identity of noteholders entitled to vote or consent in accordance with Section 316(c) of the Trust Indenture Act.
The sale and servicing agreement provides for delivery by the servicer, on or before March 30 of each calendar year, to the issuing entity, a report regarding its assessment of compliance during the preceding fiscal year with all applicable servicing criteria set forth in relevant SEC regulations for asset-backed securities transactions that are backed by the same types of assets as the receivables. In addition, on or before March 30 of each calendar year, a firm of independent registered public accountants (who may also render other services to the servicer, the depositor or their respective affiliates) will furnish to the issuing entity, with a copy to the servicer, the depositor and the indenture trustee, a report that expresses an opinion, or states that an opinion cannot be expressed, concerning the servicer’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
The servicer will also give the issuing entity, indenture trustee, administrator and each Hired Agency notice of any servicer replacement event.
The indenture will require the issuing entity to deliver annually to the indenture trustee a written officer’s statement as to the fulfillment of its obligations under the indenture, which among other things, will state that to the best of the officer’s knowledge, the issuing entity has complied in all material respects with all conditions and covenants under the indenture throughout that year, or, if there has been a default in the compliance of any condition or covenant, specifying each default know to that officer and the nature and status of that default.
For so long as the issuing entity is required to report under the Exchange Act, an annual report on Form 10-K will be filed with the SEC within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year. The annual report will contain the statements and reports discussed in the first paragraph of this section.
(a) The trust agreement, the purchase agreement and the asset representations review agreement generally may be amended by the parties thereto without the consent of the noteholders or any other person, (b) the sale and servicing agreement may be amended by the depositor and the servicer without the consent of the noteholders or any other person and (c) the administration agreement may be amended by the administrator without the consent of the noteholders or any other person, in each case, if one of the following documents specified in clauses (i) and (ii) below is delivered to the indenture trustee by VW Credit, the depositor, the servicer or the administrator, as applicable, or clause (iii) below is satisfied:
(i) an opinion of counsel to the effect that such amendment will not materially and adversely affect the interests of the noteholders;
(ii) an officer’s certificate to the effect that such amendment will not materially and adversely affect the interests of the noteholders; or
(iii) the Rating Agency Condition is satisfied with respect to such amendment and VW Credit, the depositor, the servicer or the administrator, as applicable, notifies the indenture trustee in writing that the Rating Agency Condition is satisfied with respect to such amendment.
Any amendment to the transaction documents (excluding the indenture) also may be made by the parties thereto with the consent of the noteholders holding not less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding balance of
99
Table of Contents
the notes; provided, that the sale and servicing agreement may not be amended if that amendment would (i) reduce the interest rate or principal amount of any note or change or delay the final scheduled payment date of any note, in each case, without the consent of the applicable noteholder or (ii) reduce the percentage of the aggregate outstanding amount of the notes, the holders of which are required to consent to any matter without the consent of the holders of at least the percentage of the aggregate outstanding amount of the notes which were required to consent to such matter before giving effect to such amendment.
The issuing entity and the indenture trustee, when authorized by an issuing entity order, may enter into supplemental indentures, without obtaining the consent of the noteholders for the purpose of, among other things, adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the indenture or for the purpose of modifying in any manner the rights of the noteholders under the indenture; provided that (i) either (x) the Rating Agency Condition has been satisfied or (y) the action will not, as evidenced by an officer’s certificate or an opinion of counsel delivered to the indenture trustee, materially and adversely affect the interests of the noteholders; and (ii) such action shall not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel delivered to the indenture trustee, (x) affect the treatment of the notes as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (y) be deemed to cause a taxable exchange of the notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The issuing entity and the indenture trustee, when authorized by an issuing entity order, may, with prior notice to the Hired Agencies and with the consent of the noteholders of not less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes, execute a supplemental indenture for the purpose of adding provisions to, changing in any manner or eliminating any provisions of, the indenture, or modifying (except as provided below) in any manner the rights of the noteholders under the indenture; provided, that no such supplemental indenture will without the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected thereby:
| • | change the final scheduled payment date of any note or reduce the principal amount thereof, the interest rate thereon or the redemption price with respect thereto or change any place of payment where, or the coin or currency in which, any note or any interest thereon is payable; |
| • | impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of the provisions of the indenture regarding payment; |
| • | impair the right of the noteholders to institute suit for the enforcement of principal and interest payments on the notes that such noteholders own; |
| • | reduce the percentage of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes, the consent of the holders of which is required for any supplemental indenture or the consent of the holders of which is required for any waiver of compliance with certain provisions of the indenture or of certain defaults thereunder and their consequences as provided for in the indenture; |
| • | modify or alter the provisions of the indenture regarding the voting of notes held by the issuing entity, any other obligor on the notes, the depositor or an affiliate of any of them; |
| • | reduce the percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the outstanding notes, the consent of the holders of which is required to direct the indenture trustee to sell or liquidate the issuing entity property if the proceeds of the sale would be insufficient to pay the principal amount of and accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding notes; |
| • | decrease the percentage of the aggregate principal amount of the notes required to amend the sections of the indenture which specify the applicable percentage of aggregate principal amount of the notes necessary to amend the indenture or the other transaction documents; |
| • | provide that additional provisions of the indenture or the other transaction documents may be modified or waived without the consent of the holder of each outstanding note affected thereby; |
100
Table of Contents
| • | affect the calculation of the amount of interest on or principal of any note payable on any payment date (including the calculation of any of the individual components of such calculation) or to affect the rights of noteholders to the benefit of any provisions for the mandatory redemption of the notes; or |
| • | permit the creation of any lien ranking prior to or on a parity with the lien of the indenture with respect to any part of the issuing entity property or, except as otherwise permitted or contemplated in the transaction documents, terminate the lien of the indenture on any property at any time or deprive the holder of any note of the security afforded by the lien of the indenture. |
No amendment or supplemental indenture will be effective which affects the rights, protections or duties of the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, as applicable, without the prior written consent of the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, respectively.
Indenture Trustee’s Annual Report
If required by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, the indenture trustee will be required to mail each year to all noteholders a brief report setting forth the following:
| • | its eligibility and qualification to continue as indenture trustee under the indenture; |
| • | information regarding a conflicting interest of the indenture trustee; |
| • | if the indenture requires the indenture trustee to make advances, the character and amount of any advances made by it under the indenture; |
| • | any change to the amount, interest rate and maturity date of any indebtedness owing by the issuing entity to the indenture trustee in its individual capacity; |
| • | any change to the property and funds physically held by the indenture trustee in its capacity as indenture trustee; |
| • | any release, or release and substitution, of property subject to the lien of the indenture that has not been previously reported; |
| • | any additional issue of notes that has not been previously reported; and |
| • | any action taken by it that materially affects the notes or the issuing entity property and that has not been previously reported. |
Satisfaction and Discharge of Indenture
The indenture will be discharged with respect to the collateral securing the notes upon the delivery to the indenture trustee for cancellation of all the notes or, subject to specified limitations, upon deposit with the indenture trustee of funds sufficient for the payment in full of principal of and accrued interest on notes.
MATERIAL LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE RECEIVABLES
The transfer of the receivables by the originator to the depositor, and by the depositor to the issuing entity, and the pledge thereof to an indenture trustee, if any, the perfection of the security interests in the receivables and the enforcement of rights to realize on the related financed vehicles as collateral for the receivables are subject to a number of federal and state laws, including the Uniform Commercial Code and certificate of title acts as in effect in various states. The servicer and the depositor will take the actions described below to perfect the rights of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee in the receivables.
101
Table of Contents
Under the sale and servicing agreement or indenture, as applicable, the servicer or a subservicer may be appointed by the issuing entity or indenture trustee to act as the custodian of the receivables. The servicer or a subservicer, as the custodian, will have possession of the original contracts giving rise to the receivables. To the extent any of the receivables arise under or are evidenced by contracts in electronic form (such electronic contracts, together with the original contracts in tangible form, collectively “chattel paper”), the servicer or subservicer, as the custodian, will have printed copies of the electronic contracts and the capability of accessing the electronic information. While neither the original contracts nor the printed copies of electronic contracts giving rise to the receivables will be marked to indicate the ownership interest thereof by the issuing entity, and neither the custodian nor the indenture trustee will have “control” of the authoritative copy of those contracts that are in electronic form, appropriate UCC-1 financing statements reflecting the transfer and assignment of the receivables by the originator to the depositor and by the depositor to the issuing entity, and the pledge thereof to an indenture trustee will be filed to perfect that interest and give notice of the issuing entity’s ownership interest in, and the indenture trustee’s security interest in, the receivables and related chattel paper. If, through inadvertence or otherwise, any of the receivables were sold or pledged to another party who purchased (including a pledgee) the receivables in good faith in the ordinary course of its business and took possession of the original contracts in tangible form or “control” of the authoritative copy of the contracts in electronic form giving rise to the receivables, the purchaser would acquire an interest in the receivables superior to the interests of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee if the purchaser acquired the receivables for new value and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the issuing entity or the indenture trustee, which could cause investors to suffer losses on their notes.
Generally, the rights held by assignees of the receivables, including without limitation the issuing entity and the indenture trustee, will be subject to:
| • | all the terms of the contracts related to or evidencing the receivable; and any defense or claim in recoupment arising from the transaction that gave rise to the contracts; and |
| • | any other defense or claim of the obligor against the assignor of such receivable which accrues before the obligor receives notification of the assignment. |
Because none of the originator, the depositor or the issuing entity is obligated to give the obligors notice of the assignment of any of the receivables, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee, if any, will be subject to defenses or claims of the obligor against the assignor even if such claims are unrelated to the receivable.
VW Credit typically takes physical possession of the signed original retail installment sale contracts to assure that it has priority in its rights under the receivables against the dealers and their respective creditors. Under the UCC, a purchaser of chattel paper who takes physical possession or obtains control of the chattel paper has priority over a trustee in bankruptcy for the seller and the seller’s creditors in the event of the seller’s bankruptcy if the purchaser purchased the chattel paper in good faith in the ordinary course of its business, giving new value and without knowledge that its purchase violates the rights of the seller’s creditors. If a retail installment contract is amended and the purchaser does not or is unable to take physical possession of the signed original amendment there is a risk that creditors of the selling dealer could have priority over the issuer’s rights in the contract.
Security Interests in the Financed Vehicles
Obtaining Security Interests in Financed Vehicles. In all states in which the receivables have been originated, motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts and/or installment loans such as the receivables evidence the credit sale or refinancing of automobiles, light-duty trucks and/or other types of motor vehicles. The receivables also constitute personal property security agreements and include grants of security interests in the vehicles under the applicable Uniform Commercial Code. Perfection of security interests in the vehicles is generally governed by the motor vehicle registration laws of the state in which the vehicle is located. In most states, a security interest in an automobile, a light-duty truck and/or another type of motor vehicle is perfected by obtaining the certificate of title to the financed vehicle or the notation of the secured party’s lien on the vehicle’s certificate of title. However, in California and in certain other states, certificates of title and the notation of the related lien may be maintained solely in the electronic records of the applicable department of motor vehicles or the analogous state office. As a result, any reference to a certificate of title in this prospectus includes certificates of title maintained in physical form and electronic form which may also be held by third-party servicers. In some states, certificates of title maintained in
102
Table of Contents
physical form are held by the obligor and not the lienholder or a third-party servicer. The originator will warrant to the depositor that it has taken all steps necessary to obtain a perfected first priority security interest with respect to all financed vehicles securing the receivables. If the originator fails, because of clerical errors or otherwise, to effect or maintain the notation of the security interest on the certificate of title relating to a financed vehicle, the issuing entity may not have a perfected first priority security interest in that financed vehicle.
If the originator did not take the steps necessary to cause its security interest to be perfected as described above until more than 30 days after the date the related obligor granted such security interest, and the related obligor was insolvent on the date such steps were taken, the perfection of such security interest may be avoided as a preferential transfer under bankruptcy law if the obligor under the related receivable becomes the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding commenced within 90 days of the date of such perfection, in which case the originator, and subsequently, the depositor, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee, if any, may be treated as an unsecured creditor of such obligor.
Perfection of Security Interests in Financed Vehicles. The originator will sell the receivables and assign its security interest in each financed vehicle to the depositor. The depositor will sell the receivables and assign the security interest in each financed vehicle to the issuing entity. However, because of the administrative burden and expense of retitling, the servicer, the depositor and the issuing entity will not amend any certificate of title to identify the issuing entity as the new secured party on the certificates of title relating to the financed vehicles. Accordingly, the originator will continue to be named as the secured party on the certificates of title relating to the financed vehicles. In most states, assignments such as those under the purchase agreement and the sale and servicing agreement relating to the issuing entity are an effective conveyance of the security interests in the financed vehicles without amendment of the lien noted on the related certificate of title, and the new secured party succeeds to the assignor’s rights as the secured party. However, a risk exists in not identifying the issuing entity as the new secured party on the certificate of title because, through fraud or negligence, the security interest of the issuing entity could be released or another person could obtain a security interest in the applicable vehicle that is higher in priority than the interest of the issuing entity.
In the absence of fraud, forgery or neglect by the financed vehicle owner or administrative error by state recording officials, notation of the lien of the originator generally will be sufficient to protect the issuing entity against the rights of subsequent purchasers of a financed vehicle or subsequent lenders who take a security interest in a financed vehicle. If there are any financed vehicles as to which the originator has failed to perfect the security interest assigned to the issuing entity, that security interest would be subordinate to, among others, subsequent purchasers of the financed vehicles and holders of perfected security interests.
Under the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in most states, if a security interest in a financed vehicle is perfected by any method under the laws of one state, and the financed vehicle is then moved to another state and titled in that other state, the security interest that was perfected under the laws of the original state remains perfected as against all persons other than a purchaser of the vehicle for value for as long as the security interest would have been perfected under the law of the original state. However, a security interest in a financed vehicle that is covered by a certificate of title from the original state becomes unperfected as against a purchaser of that financed vehicle for value and is deemed never to have been perfected as against that purchaser if the security interest in that financed vehicle is not perfected under the laws of that other state within four months after the financed vehicle became covered by a certificate of title from the other state. A majority of states requires surrender of a certificate of title to re-register a vehicle. Therefore, the servicer will provide the department of motor vehicles or other appropriate state or county agency of the state of relocation with the certificate of title so that the owner can effect the re-registration. If the financed vehicle owner moves to a state that provides for notation of a lien on the certificate of title to perfect the security interests in the financed vehicle, absent clerical errors or fraud, the originator would receive notice of surrender of the certificate of title if its lien is noted thereon. Accordingly, the secured party will have notice and the opportunity to re-perfect the security interest in the financed vehicle in the state of relocation. If the financed vehicle owner moves to a state which does not require surrender of a certificate of title for registration of a motor vehicle, re-registration could defeat perfection. In the ordinary course of servicing its portfolio of motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts and/or installment loans, the servicer takes steps to effect re-perfection upon receipt of notice of registration or information from the obligor as to relocation. Similarly, when an obligor under a receivable sells a financed vehicle, the servicer must provide the owner with the certificate of title, or the servicer will receive notice as a result of its lien noted thereon and accordingly will have an opportunity to require satisfaction of the
103
Table of Contents
related receivable before release of the lien. Under each sale and servicing agreement, the servicer will, in accordance with its customary servicing practices, take such steps as are necessary to maintain perfection of the security interest created by each receivable in the related financed vehicle. Each issuing entity will authorize the servicer to take such steps as are necessary to re-perfect the security interest on behalf of the issuing entity and the indenture trustee in the event of the relocation of a financed vehicle or for any other reason.
The requirements for the creation, perfection, transfer and release of liens in financed vehicles generally are governed by state law, and these requirements vary on a state-by-state basis. Failure to comply with these detailed requirements could result in liability to the trust or the release of the lien on the vehicle or other adverse consequences. For example, the State of New York recently passed legislation allowing a dealer of used motor vehicles to have the lien of a prior lienholder in a motor vehicle released, and to have a new certificate of title with respect to that motor vehicle reissued without the notation of the prior lienholder’s lien, upon submission to the Commissioner of the New York Department of Motor Vehicles of evidence that the prior lien has been satisfied without any signature or formal release by the prior lienholder. It is possible that, as a result of fraud, forgery, negligence or error, a lien on a financed vehicle could be released without prior payment in full of the receivable.
Under the laws of most states, statutory liens such as liens for unpaid taxes, liens for towing, storage and repairs performed on a motor vehicle, motor vehicle accident liens and liens arising under various state and federal criminal statutes take priority over a perfected security interest in a financed vehicle. Under the Internal Revenue Code, federal tax liens that are filed have priority over a subsequently perfected lien of a secured party. In addition, certain states grant priority to state tax liens over a prior perfected lien of a secured party. The laws of most states and federal law permit the confiscation of motor vehicles by governmental authorities under some circumstances if used in or acquired with the proceeds of unlawful activities, which may result in the loss of a secured party’s perfected security interest in a confiscated vehicle. With respect to each issuing entity, the depositor will represent in each receivables sale and servicing agreement that, as of the initial issuance of the notes of, no state or federal liens exist with respect to any financed vehicle securing payment on any related receivable. However, liens could arise, or a confiscation could occur, at any time during the term of a receivable. It is possible that no notice will be given to the servicer in the event that a lien arises or a confiscation occurs, and any lien arising or confiscation occurring after the closing date would not give rise to the originator’s repurchase obligations under the purchase agreement.
In the event of a default by an obligor, the holder of the related motor vehicle retail installment sale contract and/or installment loan has all the remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code, except as specifically limited by other state laws. Among the Uniform Commercial Code remedies, the secured party has the right to repossess a financed vehicle by self-help means, unless that means would constitute a breach of the peace under applicable state law or is otherwise limited by applicable state law. Unless a financed vehicle is voluntarily surrendered, self-help repossession is accomplished simply by retaking possession of the financed vehicle. In cases where the obligor objects or raises a defense to repossession, or if otherwise required by applicable state law, a court order must be obtained from the appropriate state court, and the financed vehicle must then be recovered in accordance with that order. In some jurisdictions, the secured party is required to notify the obligor of the default and the intent to repossess the collateral and to give the obligor a time period within which to cure the default prior to repossession. Generally, this right to cure may only be exercised on a limited number of occasions during the term of the related receivable. Other jurisdictions permit repossession without prior notice if it can be accomplished without a breach of the peace (although in some states, a course of conduct in which the creditor has accepted late payments has been held to create a right by the obligor to receive prior notice). In some states, after the financed vehicle has been repossessed, the obligor may reinstate the related receivable by paying the delinquent installments and other amounts due.
Notice of Sale; Redemption Rights
In the event of a default by the obligor, some jurisdictions require that the obligor be notified of the default and be given a time period within which the obligor may cure the default prior to repossession. Generally, this right of reinstatement may be exercised on a limited number of occasions in any one year period.
104
Table of Contents
The Uniform Commercial Code and other state laws require the secured party to provide the obligor with reasonable notice concerning the disposition of the collateral including, among other things, the date, time and place of any public sale and/or the date after which any private sale of the collateral may be held and certain additional information if the collateral constitutes consumer goods. In addition, some states also impose substantive timing requirements on the sale of repossessed vehicles and/or various substantive timing and content requirements relating to those notices. In some states, after a financed vehicle has been repossessed, the obligor may reinstate the account by paying the delinquent installments and other amounts due, in which case the financed vehicle is returned to the obligor. The obligor has the right to redeem the collateral prior to actual sale or entry by the secured party into a contract for sale of the collateral by paying the secured party the unpaid outstanding principal balance of the obligation, accrued interest thereon, reasonable expenses for repossessing, holding and preparing the collateral for disposition and arranging for its sale, plus, in some jurisdictions, reasonable attorneys’ fees and legal expenses.
Deficiency Judgments and Excess Proceeds
The proceeds of resale of the repossessed vehicles generally will be applied first to the expenses of resale and repossession and then to the satisfaction of the indebtedness. While some states impose prohibitions or limitations on deficiency judgments if the net proceeds from resale do not cover the full amount of the indebtedness, a deficiency judgment can be sought in those states that do not prohibit or limit those judgments. However, the deficiency judgment would be a personal judgment against the obligor for the shortfall, and a defaulting obligor can be expected to have very little capital or sources of income available following repossession. Therefore, in many cases, it may not be useful to seek a deficiency judgment or, if one is obtained, it may be settled at a significant discount. In addition to the notice requirement, the Uniform Commercial Code requires that every aspect of the sale or other disposition, including the method, manner, time, place and terms, be “commercially reasonable.” In the case of consumer goods, some courts have held that when a sale is not “commercially reasonable,” the secured party loses its right to a deficiency judgment. Generally, in the case of collateral that does not constitute consumer goods, the Uniform Commercial Code provides that when a sale is not “commercially reasonable,” the secured party may retain its right to at least a portion of the deficiency judgment.
The Uniform Commercial Code also permits the debtor or other interested party to recover for any loss caused by noncompliance with the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code. In particular, if the collateral is consumer goods, the Uniform Commercial Code grants the debtor the right to recover in any event an amount not less than the credit service charge plus 10% of the principal amount of the debt. In addition, prior to a sale, the Uniform Commercial Code permits the debtor or other interested person to prohibit or restrain on appropriate terms the secured party from disposing of the collateral if it is established that the secured party is not proceeding in accordance with the “default” provisions under the Uniform Commercial Code.
Occasionally, after resale of a repossessed vehicle and payment of all expenses and indebtedness, there is a surplus of funds. In that case, the Uniform Commercial Code requires the creditor to remit the surplus to any holder of a subordinate lien with respect to the vehicle or if no subordinate lienholder exists, the Uniform Commercial Code requires the creditor to remit the surplus to the obligor.
Numerous federal and state consumer protection laws and related regulations impose substantial requirements upon lenders and servicers involved in consumer finance, including requirements regarding the adequate disclosure of contract terms and limitations on contract terms, collection practices and creditor remedies. These laws include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Regulations B and Z, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“Relief Act”), state adoptions of the National Consumer Act and the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, state motor vehicle retail installment sale acts, consumer lending laws, unfair or deceptive practices acts including requirements regarding the adequate disclosure of contract terms and limitations on contract terms, collection practices and creditor remedies and other similar laws. Many states have adopted “lemon laws” which provide redress to consumers who purchase a vehicle that remains out of compliance with its manufacturer’s warranty after a specified number of attempts to correct a problem or a specified time period. Also, state laws impose finance charge ceilings and other restrictions on consumer transactions and require contract disclosures in
105
Table of Contents
addition to those required under federal law. VW Credit is subject to supervision and examination by a number of state regulatory agencies and the CFPB, who oversee compliance with these federal and state consumer protection laws. These requirements impose specific statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions. In some cases, this liability could affect an assignee’s ability to enforce consumer finance contracts such as the receivables described above.
With respect to used vehicles, the Federal Trade Commission’s Rule on Sale of Used Vehicles (the “FTC Rule”) requires all sellers of used vehicles to prepare, complete and display a “Buyers’ Guide” which explains the warranty coverage for such vehicles. The Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and state lemon laws may impose further obligations on motor vehicle dealers. Holders of the receivables may have liability for claims and defenses under those statutes, the FTC Rule and similar state statutes.
The so-called “Holder-in-Due-Course” rule of the Federal Trade Commission (the “HDC Rule”) has the effect of subjecting any assignee of the seller in a consumer credit transaction, and related creditors and their assignees, to all claims and defenses which the obligor in the transaction could assert against the seller. Liability under the HDC Rule is limited to the amounts paid by the obligor under the receivable, and the holder of the receivable may also be unable to collect any balance remaining due thereunder from the obligor. The HDC Rule is generally duplicated by the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, other state statutes or the common law in some states. Liability of assignees for claims under state consumer protection laws may differ though and some state laws could impose greater liability on assignees than the HDC Rule.
To the extent the receivables constitute retail installment sale contracts, those receivables will be subject to the requirements of the HDC Rule. Accordingly, each issuing entity, as holder of the related receivables, will be subject to any claims or defenses that the purchaser of the applicable financed vehicle may assert against the seller of the financed vehicle. As to each obligor, those claims under the HDC Rule are limited to a maximum liability equal to the amounts paid by the obligor on the related receivable. The originator will represent in the purchase agreement that each of the receivables complied at the time it was originated or made in all material respects with all requirements of law in effect at that time and applicable to such receivable.
Any shortfalls or losses arising in connection with the matters described in the three preceding paragraphs, to the extent not covered by amounts payable to the noteholders from amounts available under a credit enhancement mechanism, could result in losses to noteholders.
Courts have applied general equitable principles to secured parties pursuing repossession and litigation involving deficiency balances. These equitable principles may have the effect of relieving an obligor from some or all of the legal consequences of a default.
In several cases, consumers have asserted that the self-help remedies of secured parties under the Uniform Commercial Code and related laws violate the due process protections provided under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Courts have generally upheld the notice provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code and related laws as reasonable or have found that the repossession and resale by the creditor do not involve sufficient state action to afford constitutional protection to obligors.
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
Under the terms of the Relief Act, a borrower who enters military service after the origination of such obligor’s receivable (including a borrower who was in reserve status and is called to active duty after origination of the receivable), may not be charged interest (including fees and charges) above an annual rate of 6% during the period of such obligor’s active duty status, unless a court orders otherwise upon application of the lender. Interest at a rate in excess of 6% that would otherwise have been incurred but for the Relief Act is forgiven. The Relief Act applies to obligors who are servicemembers and includes members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, Reserves (when such enlisted person is called to active duty), Coast Guard, officers of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, officers of the U.S. Public Health Service assigned to duty with the Army or Navy and certain other persons as specified in the Relief Act. Because the Relief Act applies to obligors who enter military service (including reservists who are called to active duty) after origination of the related receivable, no information can be provided as to the number of receivables that may be affected by the Relief Act. In addition,
106
Table of Contents
increased military operations that may increase the number of citizens who are in active military service, including persons in reserve or national guard status who have been called or will be called to active duty. Application of the Relief Act would adversely affect, for an indeterminate period of time, the ability of the servicer to collect full amounts of interest on certain of the receivables. Any shortfall in interest collections resulting from the application of the Relief Act or similar legislation or regulations which would not be recoverable from the related receivables, would result in a reduction of the amounts distributable to the noteholders. In addition, the Relief Act imposes limitations that would impair the ability of the servicer to foreclose on an affected receivable during the obligor’s period of active duty status, and, under certain circumstances, during an additional three month period thereafter. Also, the laws of some states impose similar limitations during the related obligor’s period of active duty status and, under certain circumstances, during an additional period thereafter as specified under the laws of those states. Thus, in the event that the Relief Act or similar state legislation or regulations applies to any receivable which goes into default, there may be delays in payment and losses on your notes. Any other interest shortfalls, deferrals or forgiveness of payments on the receivables resulting from the application of the Relief Act or similar state legislation or regulations may result in delays in payments or losses on your notes.
Any shortfalls or losses arising in connection with the matters described above, to the extent not covered by amounts payable to the noteholders from amounts available under a credit enhancement mechanism, could result in losses to noteholders.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The CFPB is responsible for implementing and enforcing various federal consumer protection laws and supervising certain depository institutions and non-depository institutions offering financial products and services to consumers, including indirect automobile loans and retail automobile leases. VW Credit is subject to the CFPB’s enforcement authority. The CFPB has supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over certain non-depository institutions, including those entities that are larger participants of a market for consumer financial products or services, as defined by rule. In June 2015, the CFPB issued a final rule defining which non-depository institutions would be considered larger participants of a market for automobile financing. Under the definitions included in the final rule, VW Credit is considered a larger participant and is subject to the supervisory and examination authority of the CFPB. Expanded CFPB jurisdiction over VW Credit’s business will likely increase compliance costs and regulatory risks. The CFPB has been conducting fair lending examinations of automobile lenders, including VW Credit, and their dealer markup and compensation policies. Furthermore, we understand that the CFPB has also been investigating certain automobile lending practices, including the sale of extended warranties, credit insurance and other add-on products. If any of these practices were found to violate the Equal Credit Opportunity Act or other laws, we or the sponsor could be obligated to repurchase from the issuing entity any receivable that fails to comply with law. In addition, the sponsor or the issuing entity could also possibly be subject to claims by the obligors on those contracts, and any relief granted by a court could potentially adversely affect the issuing entity. For additional discussion of how a failure to comply with consumer protection laws may impact the issuing entity, the receivables or your investment in the securities, see “Risk Factors—Failure to comply with consumer protection laws could result in a loss” in this prospectus.
VW Credit may also periodically perform reviews of its lending policies and analyses of both dealer-specific and portfolio-wide loan pricing data for potential disparities resulting from dealer markup and compensation policies. Depending upon the results of these reviews and analyses or any regulatory agency actions, VW Credit or any other applicable originator may consider taking, or may be required to take, corrective actions, which could include reductions to the interest rates on the applicable automobile loans. Corrective actions could be taken by VW Credit without the occurrence of any violation of law. If VW Credit, as servicer, were to voluntarily reduce the interest rate on any automobile loan, it may be required under the applicable transaction documents to repurchase the affected receivables; however, under some circumstances the servicer would not be required under the applicable transaction documents to repurchase the affected receivables. See “Description of the Transaction Documents—Collection and Other Servicing Procedures” in this prospectus for a discussion of the purchase obligations of the servicer.
107
Table of Contents
Certain Matters Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency
General. The depositor has been structured as a limited purpose entity and will engage only in activities permitted by its organizational documents. Under the depositor’s organizational documents, the depositor is limited in its ability to file a voluntary petition under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) or any similar applicable state law. There can be no assurance, however, that the depositor, or the originator, will not become insolvent and file a voluntary petition under the Bankruptcy Code or any similar applicable state law or become subject to a conservatorship or receivership, as may be applicable in the future.
The voluntary or involuntary petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code or any similar applicable state law or the establishment of a conservatorship or receivership, as may be applicable, with respect to the originator should not necessarily result in a similar voluntary application with respect to the depositor. The depositor has taken certain steps in structuring the transactions contemplated hereby that are intended to make it unlikely that any voluntary or involuntary petition for relief by the originator under applicable insolvency laws will result in the consolidation pursuant to such insolvency laws or the establishment of a conservatorship or receivership, of the assets and liabilities of the depositor with those of the originator. These steps include the organization of the depositor as a limited purpose entity pursuant to its limited liability company agreement or trust agreement containing certain limitations (including restrictions on the limited nature of depositor’s business and on its ability to commence a voluntary case or proceeding under any insolvency law without an affirmative vote of all of its directors, including independent directors).
The originator and the depositor believe that, subject to certain assumptions (including the assumption that the books and records relating to the assets and liabilities of the originator will at all times be maintained separately from those relating to the assets and liabilities of the depositor, the depositor will prepare its own balance sheets and financial statements and there will be no commingling of the assets of the originator with those of the depositor) the assets and liabilities of the depositor should not be substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the originator in the event of a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the originator; and the transfer of receivables by the originator should constitute an absolute transfer, and, therefore, such receivables would not be property of the originator in the event of the filing of an application for relief by or against the originator under the Bankruptcy Code. See “Material Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Certain Matters Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency—Dodd-Frank Orderly Liquidation Framework” in this prospectus.
On the closing date, Mayer Brown LLP, special counsel to the depositor, will deliver an opinion based on a reasoned analysis of analogous case law (although there is no precedent based on directly similar facts) to the effect that, subject to certain facts, assumptions and qualifications specified therein, under present reported decisional authority and applicable statutes to federal bankruptcy cases, if the originator were to become a debtor in a case under the United States Bankruptcy Code, a court having jurisdiction over such case (the “bankruptcy court”) would:
| • | determine that the transfer of receivables pursuant to the purchase agreement constitutes a sale of such receivables to the depositor by the originator, as opposed to a loan, such that (1) the receivables would not be property of the originator’s bankruptcy estate under Section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (2) Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not operate to stay payments by the servicer of collections on the receivables in accordance with the applicable transaction documents; and/or |
| • | not order substantive consolidation of the assets and liabilities of the originator, on the one hand, and those of the depositor or the issuing entity, on the other hand. |
If, however, a bankruptcy court for the originator or a creditor of the originator were to take the view that the originator and the depositor should be substantively consolidated or that the transfer of the receivables from the originator to the depositor should be recharacterized as a pledge of such receivables, then you may experience delays and/or shortfalls in payments on the notes.
108
Table of Contents
Dodd-Frank Orderly Liquidation Framework
General. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, gives the FDIC authority to act as receiver of bank holding companies, financial companies and their respective subsidiaries in specific situations under the “Orderly Liquidation Authority” (“OLA”) as described in more detail below. The OLA provisions were effective on July 22, 2010. The proceedings, standards, powers of the receiver and many other substantive provisions of OLA differ from those of the Bankruptcy Code in several respects. In addition, because the legislation remains subject to clarification through FDIC regulations and has yet to be applied by the FDIC in any receivership, it is unclear exactly what impact these provisions will have on any particular company, including VW Credit, the depositor or a particular issuing entity, or their respective creditors.
Potential Applicability to VW Credit, the depositor and issuing entities. There is uncertainty about which companies will be subject to OLA rather than the Bankruptcy Code. For a company to become subject to OLA, the Secretary of the Treasury (in consultation with the President of the United States) must determine, among other things, that the company is in default or in danger of default, the failure of such company and its resolution under the Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States, no viable private sector alternative is available to prevent the default of the company and an OLA proceeding would mitigate these adverse effects.
The issuing entity or the depositor could also potentially be subject to the provisions of OLA as a “covered subsidiary” of VW Credit. For an issuing entity or the depositor to be subject to receivership under OLA as a covered subsidiary of VW Credit (1) the FDIC would have to be appointed as receiver for VW Credit under OLA as described above, and (2) the FDIC and the Secretary of the Treasury would have to jointly determine that (a) the issuing entity or the depositor is in default or in danger of default, (b) the liquidation of that covered subsidiary would avoid or mitigate serious adverse effects on the financial stability or economic conditions of the United States and (c) such appointment would facilitate the orderly liquidation of VW Credit.
There can be no assurance that the Secretary of the Treasury would not determine that the failure of VW Credit or any potential covered subsidiary thereof would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States. In addition, no assurance can be given that OLA would not apply to VW Credit, the depositor or the issuing entity or, if it were to apply, that the timing and amounts of payments to the noteholders would not be less favorable than under the Bankruptcy Code.
FDIC’s Repudiation Power Under OLA. If the FDIC were appointed receiver of VW Credit or of a covered subsidiary under OLA, the FDIC would have various powers under OLA, including the power to repudiate any contract to which VW Credit or a covered subsidiary was a party, if the FDIC determined that performance of the contract was burdensome and that repudiation would promote the orderly administration of VW Credit’s or such covered subsidiary’s affairs. In January 2011, the Acting General Counsel of the FDIC issued an advisory opinion respecting, among other things, its intended application of the FDIC’s repudiation power under OLA. In that advisory opinion, the Acting General Counsel stated that nothing in the Dodd-Frank Act changes the existing law governing the separate existence of separate entities under other applicable law. As a result, the Acting General Counsel was of the opinion that the FDIC as receiver for a covered financial company, which could include VW Credit or its subsidiaries (including the depositor or the issuing entity), cannot repudiate a contract or lease unless it has been appointed as receiver for an entity that is a party to that contract or lease or the separate existence of that entity may be disregarded under other applicable law. In addition, the Acting General Counsel was of the opinion that until such time as the FDIC Board of Directors adopts a regulation further addressing the application of Section 210(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, if the FDIC were to become receiver for a covered financial company, which could include VW Credit or its subsidiaries (including the depositor or the issuing entity), the FDIC will not, in the exercise of its authority under Section 210(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, reclaim, recover, or recharacterize as property of that covered financial company or the receivership assets transferred by that covered financial company prior to the end of the applicable transition period of a regulation provided that such transfer satisfies the conditions for the exclusion of such assets from the property of the estate of that covered financial company under the Bankruptcy Code. Although this advisory opinion does not bind the FDIC or its Board of Directors, and could be modified or withdrawn in the future, the advisory opinion also states that the Acting General Counsel will recommend that the FDIC Board of Directors incorporate a transition period of 90 days for any provisions in any further regulations
109
Table of Contents
affecting the statutory power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts. To the extent any future regulations or subsequent FDIC actions in an OLA proceeding involving VW Credit or its subsidiaries (including the depositor or your issuing entity), are contrary to this advisory opinion, payment or distributions of principal and interest on the notes issued by the issuing entity could be delayed or reduced.
We will structure the transfers of receivables under the purchase agreement and the sale and servicing agreement with the intent that they would be treated as legal true sales under applicable state law. If the transfers are so treated, based on the Acting General Counsel of the FDIC’s advisory opinion rendered in January 2011 and other applicable law, VW Credit believes that the FDIC would not be able to recover the receivables transferred under the purchase agreement and the sale and servicing agreement using its repudiation power. However, if those transfers were not respected as legal true sales, then the depositor under the purchase agreement would be treated as having made a loan to VW Credit, and the issuing entity under the sale and servicing agreement would be treated as having made a loan to the depositor, in each case secured by the transferred receivables. The FDIC, as receiver, generally has the power to repudiate secured loans and then recover the collateral after paying actual direct compensatory damages to the lenders as described below. If VW Credit or the depositor were placed in receivership under OLA, the FDIC could assert that VW Credit or the depositor, as applicable, effectively still owned the transferred receivables because the transfers by VW Credit to the depositor or by the depositor to the issuing entity were not true sales. In such case, the FDIC could repudiate that transfer of receivables and the issuing entity would have a secured claim for actual direct compensatory damages as described below. Furthermore, if the issuing entity were placed in receivership under OLA, this repudiation power would extend to the notes issued by the issuing entity. In such event, the noteholders would have a secured claim in the receivership of the issuing entity. The amount of damages that the FDIC would be required to pay would be limited to “actual direct compensatory damages” determined as of the date of the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. There is no general statutory definition of “actual direct compensatory damages” in this context, but the term does not include damages for lost profits or opportunity. However, under OLA, in the case of any debt for borrowed money, actual direct compensatory damages is no less than the amount lent plus accrued interest plus any accreted original issue discount as of the date the FDIC was appointed receiver and, to the extent that an allowed secured claim is secured by property the value of which is greater than the amount of such claim and any accrued interest through the date of repudiation or disaffirmance, such accrued interest.
Regardless of whether the transfers under the purchase agreement and the sale and servicing agreement are respected as legal true sales, as receiver for VW Credit or a covered subsidiary the FDIC could:
| • | require the issuing entity, as assignee of VW Credit and the depositor, to go through an administrative claims procedure to establish its rights to payments collected on the related receivables; |
| • | if an issuing entity were a covered subsidiary, require the indenture trustee for the notes to go through an administrative claims procedure to establish its rights to payments on the notes; |
| • | request a stay of proceedings to liquidate claims or otherwise enforce contractual and legal remedies against VW Credit or a covered subsidiary (including the issuing entity); |
| • | repudiate VW Credit’s ongoing servicing obligations under a servicing agreement, such as its duty to collect and remit payments or otherwise service the receivables; or |
| • | prior to any such repudiation of the sale and servicing agreement, prevent any of the indenture trustee or the noteholders from appointing a successor servicer. |
There are also statutory prohibitions on (1) any attachment or execution being issued by any court upon assets in the possession of the FDIC, as receiver, (2) any property in the possession of the FDIC, as receiver, being subject to levy, attachment, garnishment, foreclosure or sale without the consent of the FDIC, and (3) any person exercising any right or power to terminate, accelerate or declare a default under any contract to which VW Credit or a covered subsidiary (including any issuing entity) that is subject to OLA is a party, or to obtain possession of or exercise control over any property of VW Credit or any covered subsidiary or affect any contractual rights of VW Credit or a covered subsidiary (including any issuing entity) that is subject to OLA, without the consent of the FDIC for 90 days after appointment of FDIC as receiver. The requirement to obtain the FDIC’s consent before taking
110
Table of Contents
these actions relating to a covered company’s contracts or property is comparable to the “automatic stay” in bankruptcy.
If the FDIC, as receiver for VW Credit, the depositor or the issuing entity, were to take any of the actions described above, payments and/or distributions of principal and interest on the notes issued by the issuing entity would be delayed and may be reduced.
FDIC’s Avoidance Power Under OLA. The proceedings, standards and many substantive provisions of OLA relating to preferential transfers differ from those of the Bankruptcy Code. If VW Credit or any of its affiliates were to become subject to OLA, there is an interpretation under OLA that previous transfers of receivables by VW Credit or those affiliates perfected for purposes of state law and the Bankruptcy Code could nevertheless be avoided as preferential transfers.
In December 2010, the Acting General Counsel of the FDIC issued an advisory opinion providing an interpretation of OLA which concludes that the treatment of preferential transfers under OLA was intended to be consistent with, and should be interpreted in a manner consistent with, the related provisions under the Bankruptcy Code. In addition, on July 6, 2011, the FDIC issued a final rule that, among other things, codified the Acting General Counsel’s interpretation. Based on the final rule, a transfer of the receivables perfected by the filing of a Uniform Commercial Code financing statement against VW Credit, the depositor and the issuing entity as provided in the purchase agreement and sale and servicing agreement would not be avoidable by the FDIC as a preference under OLA due to any inconsistencies between OLA and the Bankruptcy Code in defining when a transfer has occurred under the preferential transfer provisions of OLA. To the extent subsequent FDIC actions in an OLA proceeding are contrary to the final rule, payment or distributions of principal and interest on the notes issued by the issuing entity could be delayed or reduced.
The originator will make representations and warranties in the transaction documents that each receivable complies with all requirements of law in all material respects. If any representation and warranty proves to be incorrect with respect to any receivable, has certain material and adverse effects and is not timely cured, the originator will be required under the transaction documents to repurchase the affected receivables. Any inaccuracy in the representations or warranties will be deemed not to constitute a breach if such inaccuracy does not affect the ability of the issuing entity to receive or retain payment in full on the receivable. VW Credit is subject from time to time to litigation alleging that the receivables or its lending practices do not comply with applicable law. The commencement of any such litigation generally would not result in a breach of any of the originator’s representations or warranties.
In addition to the laws limiting or prohibiting deficiency judgments, numerous other statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Code and similar state laws, may interfere with or affect the ability of a secured party to realize upon collateral or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, if an obligor commences bankruptcy proceedings, a bankruptcy court may prevent a creditor from repossessing a vehicle, and, as part of the rehabilitation plan, reduce the amount of the secured indebtedness to the market value of the vehicle at the time of filing of the bankruptcy petition, as determined by the bankruptcy court, leaving the creditor as a general unsecured creditor for the remainder of the indebtedness. A bankruptcy court may also reduce the monthly payments due under a receivable or change the rate of interest and time of repayment of the receivable.
State and local government bodies across the United States generally have the power to create licensing and permit requirements. It is possible that an issuing entity could fail to have some required licenses or permits. In that event, the issuing entity could be subject to liability or other adverse consequences.
Any shortfalls or losses arising in connection with the matters described above, to the extent not covered by amounts payable to the noteholders from amounts available under a credit enhancement mechanism, could result in losses to noteholders.
111
Table of Contents
The Class A-1 notes will be structured to be “eligible securities” for purchase by money market funds as defined in paragraph (a)(11) of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). There are a number of other requirements under Rule 2a-7 that must be satisfied prior to the purchase of any security, and it is the responsibility solely of the investor and its advisor to satisfy those requirements.
Certain Investment Considerations
The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” as defined in the final regulations issued December 10, 2013 implementing the statutory provision known as the “Volcker Rule” (Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act).
Requirements for Certain European Regulated Investors and Affiliates
Articles 404-410 of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 26, 2013, known as the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), place certain conditions on investments in asset-backed securities by credit institutions and investment firms (together referred to as “institutions”) regulated in European Union (EU) member states and in other countries in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and by certain affiliates of those institutions. Articles 404-410 of CRR are supplemented by regulatory technical standards contained in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 625/2014 of March 13, 2014 and by implementing technical standards contained in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 602/2014 of June 4, 2014, which provide greater detail on the interpretation and implementation of those Articles. CRR has direct effect in EU member states and is implemented by national legislation or rulemaking in the other EEA countries.
CRR Article 405 requires an institution not to invest in any securitization position (as defined in CRR) unless the sponsor, originator or original lender has disclosed to investors that it will retain, on an ongoing basis, a material net economic interest of not less than 5 percent in the securitization transaction. Prior to investing in a securitization position, and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the regulated institution must also be able to demonstrate that it has a comprehensive and thorough understanding of the securitization transaction and its structural features by satisfying the due diligence requirements and ongoing monitoring obligations of CRR Article 406. Under CRR Article 407, an institution that fails to comply with the requirements of CRR Article 405 or 406 will be subject to an additional regulatory capital charge.
Risk retention and due diligence requirements similar to those in CRR Articles 405 and 406 apply to alternative investment fund managers that are required to become authorized under EU Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (the “AIFMD”), pursuant to Article 17 of the AIFMD and Chapter III, Section 5 of Commission Delegated Regulation 231/2013 supplementing the AIFMD, and to insurance and reinsurance companies subject to regulation under EU Directive 2009/138/EC, as amended (“Solvency II”), pursuant to Article 135(2) of Solvency II and Articles 254-257 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Solvency II (those requirements, together with those described above under the CRR, the “Existing EU Retention Rules”). Similar requirements are expected to apply in future to the same types and additional types of EEA-regulated institutional investors pursuant to the Securitization Regulation referred to below (together with the Existing EU Retention Rules, “EU Retention Rules”). The Existing EU Retention Rules for different types of regulated investors are not identical to those in CRR Articles 405 and 406, and, in particular, additional due diligence obligations apply to alternative investment fund managers and to insurance and reinsurance companies.
Prospective investors should also be aware that new EU Retention Rules will apply, in place of the Existing EU Retention Rules, to securitizations in respect of which the relevant securities are issued on or after January 1,
112
Table of Contents
2019. The principal EU Regulation to implement the new EU Retention Rules and establish a general framework for securitization (the “Securitization Regulation”) was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union as Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of December 12, 2017. On and after January 1, 2019, the EU Retention Rules in the Securitization Regulation will apply to the types of regulated investors covered by the Existing EU Retention Rules and also to (a) certain investment companies authorised in accordance with Directive 2009/65/EC, and managing companies as defined in that Directive (together, “UCITS”), and (b) institutions for occupational retirement provision falling within the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/2341 (subject to certain exceptions), and certain investment managers and authorised entities appointed by such institutions (together, “IORPs”). There will be material differences between those new EU Retention Rules and the Existing EU Retention Rules, and certain aspects of the new EU Retention Requirements are to be specified in new regulatory technical standards which have not yet been adopted or published in final form. With regard to securitizations in respect of which the relevant securities are issued before January 1, 2019 (“Pre-2019 Securitizations”), investors that are subject to the Existing EU Retention Rules will continue to be subject to the risk retention and due diligence requirements of the Existing EU Retention Rules, including on and after that date (unless there is a refinancing or issuance of further securities on or after that date). The Securitization Regulation makes no express provision as to the application of any requirements of the Existing EU Retention Rules, or of the new EU Retention Rules in the Securitization Regulation, to UCITS or IORPs that hold or acquire any interest in respect of a Pre-2019 Securitization and, accordingly, it is not clear what requirements (if any) will be applicable to those investors. Prospective investors are themselves responsible for monitoring and assessing changes to the EU Retention Rules and their regulatory capital requirements.
None of the originator, the depositor nor any of their respective affiliates is obligated to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization described in this prospectus for purposes of the EU Retention Rules or to provide any additional information that may be required to enable a credit institution, investment firm, alternative investment fund manager or other investor to satisfy the due diligence and monitoring requirements of any EU Retention Rules.
Failure by an investor or investment manager to comply with any applicable EU Retention Rules with respect to an investment in the notes offered by this prospectus may result in the imposition of a penalty regulatory capital charge on that investment or of other regulatory sanctions. EU Retention Rules and any other changes to the regulation or regulatory treatment of the notes for some or all investors may negatively impact the regulatory position of affected investors and investment managers and have an adverse impact on the value and liquidity of the notes offered by this prospectus. Prospective investors should analyze their own regulatory position, and are encouraged to consult with their own investment and legal advisors, regarding application of and compliance with any applicable EU Retention Rules or other applicable regulations and the suitability of the offered notes for investment.
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Set forth below is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the notes. This discussion is based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), existing and proposed Treasury Regulations thereunder, current administrative rulings, judicial decisions and other applicable authorities. To the extent that the following summary relates to matters of law or legal conclusions with respect thereto, such summary represents the opinion of Mayer Brown LLP, Special Tax Counsel for each issuing entity, subject to the qualifications set forth in this section. There are no cases or Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings on similar transactions involving both debt and equity interests issued by an issuing entity with terms similar to those of the notes. As a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reached in this prospectus, and no ruling from the IRS has been or will be sought on any of the issues discussed below. Furthermore, legislative, judicial or administrative changes may occur, perhaps with retroactive effect, which could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set forth in the prospectus as well as the tax consequences to noteholders.
This discussion is not a complete analysis of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences and does not address any tax consequences arising under any state, local or non-U.S. tax laws, any income tax treaties, or any other U.S. federal income tax laws, including U.S. federal estate and gift tax laws. The following discussion also does not purport to deal with all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to the noteholders in
113
Table of Contents
light of their personal investment circumstances nor, except for limited discussions of particular topics, to holders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including:
| • | financial institutions; |
| • | broker-dealers; |
| • | life insurance companies; |
| • | tax-exempt organizations; |
| • | persons that hold the notes as a position in a “straddle” or as part of a synthetic security or “hedge,” “conversion transaction” or other integrated investment; |
| • | persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; and |
| • | investors in pass-through entities. |
Rather, this information is directed to prospective purchasers who are unrelated to the depositor and who purchase notes at their issue price in the initial distribution thereof, and who hold the notes as “capital assets” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. We suggest that prospective investors consult with their tax advisors as to the federal, state, local, foreign and any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the notes.
The following discussion addresses notes which the depositor, the servicer and the noteholders will agree to treat as indebtedness secured by the receivables. On the closing date, Special Tax Counsel will deliver an opinion stating that, subject to certain qualifications, assumptions and representations, based on the terms of the notes, the transactions relating to the receivables as set forth herein and the applicable provisions of the issuing entity’s formation document and related documents, the notes, to the extent beneficially owned by a person other than the issuing entity or its affiliates, will be characterized as indebtedness for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the issuing entity will not be classified as an association taxable as a corporation or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. The tax opinion of Special Tax Counsel with respect to the issuing entity will be subject to certain assumptions, conditions and qualifications as described in detail below. Noteholders should be aware that, as of the closing date, no transaction closely comparable to that contemplated herein has been the subject of any judicial decision, Treasury Regulation or IRS revenue ruling. Although Special Tax Counsel will issue a tax opinion to the effect described above, the IRS may successfully take a contrary position and the tax opinions are not binding on the IRS or on any court. The following discussion assumes the notes are characterized as indebtedness for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of this discussion, references to a “holder” are to the beneficial owner of a note. The term “U.S. Holder” means a holder of a note that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual citizen or resident of the U.S., (ii) a corporation (or other entity subject to U.S. federal income taxation as a corporation) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, or (iii) an estate or trust treated as a U.S. person under Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code. The term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a holder of a note other than a U.S. Holder or an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Special rules, not addressed in this discussion, may apply to persons purchasing notes through entities or arrangements treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as partnerships, and any such partnership purchasing notes and persons purchasing notes through such a partnership should consult their own tax advisors in that regard.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders of the Notes
Treatment of Stated Interest. It is anticipated that no class of notes offered hereunder will be issued with more than a de minimis amount (i.e., 1/4% of the principal amount of a class of notes multiplied by its weighted average life to maturity) of original issue discount (“OID”). In such case, the stated interest on a note will be taxable to a U.S. Holder as ordinary income when received or accrued in accordance with the noteholder’s regular
114
Table of Contents
method of tax accounting. Interest received on a note may constitute “investment income” for purposes of some limitations of the Code concerning the deductibility of investment interest expense.
Original Issue Discount. In general, OID is the excess of the stated redemption price at maturity of a debt instrument over its issue price, unless that excess falls within a statutorily defined de minimis exception. A note’s stated redemption price at maturity is the aggregate of all payments required to be made under the note through maturity except qualified stated interest. Qualified stated interest is generally interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or property, other than debt instruments of the issuing entity, at fixed intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the instrument at specified rates. The issue price will be the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes are sold, excluding sales to bond holders, brokers or similar persons acting as underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers.
In the case of notes issued with de minimis OID, generally, a portion of such OID is taken into income upon each principal payment on the note. Such portion equals the de minimis OID times a fraction whose numerator is the amount of principal payment made and whose denominator is the stated principal amount of the note. Such income generally is capital gain.
If the notes offered hereunder are in fact issued at a greater than de minimis discount or are treated as having been issued with OID under the Treasury Regulations, a U.S. Holder would be required to include OID in income as interest over the term of the note under a constant yield method. In general, OID must be included in income in advance of the receipt of cash representing that income. Thus, each cash distribution would be treated as an amount already included in income, to the extent OID has accrued as of the date of the interest distribution and is not allocated to prior distributions, or as a repayment of principal. This treatment would have no significant effect on U.S. Holders using the accrual method of accounting. However, a U.S. Holder using the cash method of accounting may be required to report income on the notes in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to that income.
In the case of a debt instrument (such as a note) as to which the repayment of principal may be accelerated as a result of the prepayment of other obligations securing the debt instrument, under Section 1272(a)(6) of the Code, the periodic accrual of OID is determined by taking into account (i) a reasonable prepayment assumption in accruing OID (generally, the assumption used to price the debt offering) and (ii) adjustments in the accrual of OID when prepayments do not conform to the prepayment assumption, and regulations could be adopted applying those provisions to the notes. It is unclear whether those provisions would be applicable to the notes in the absence of such regulations or whether use of a reasonable prepayment assumption may be required or permitted without reliance on these rules. If this provision applies to the notes, the amount of OID that will accrue in any given “accrual period” may either increase or decrease depending upon the actual prepayment rate. In the absence of such regulations (or statutory or other administrative clarification), any information reports or returns to the IRS and the U.S. Holders regarding OID, if any, will be based on the assumption that the receivables will prepay at a rate based on the assumption used in pricing the notes offered hereunder. However, no representation will be made regarding the prepayment rate of the receivables. See “Weighted Average Life of the Notes” in this prospectus. Accordingly, we suggest prospective investors to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the impact of any prepayments under the receivables (and the OID rules) if the notes offered hereunder are issued with OID.
A holder of a Short-Term Note which has a fixed maturity date not more than one year from the issue date of that note will generally not be required to include OID on the Short-Term Note in income as it accrues, provided the holder of the note is not an accrual method taxpayer, a bank, a broker or dealer that holds the note as inventory, a regulated investment company or common trust fund, or the beneficial owner of pass-through entities specified in the Code, or provided the holder does not hold the instrument as part of a hedging transaction, or as a stripped bond or stripped coupon. Instead, the holder of a Short-Term Note would include the OID accrued on the note in gross income upon a sale or exchange of the note or at maturity, or if the note is payable in installments, as principal is paid thereon. A holder of a Short-Term Note would be required to defer deductions for any interest expense on an obligation incurred to purchase or carry the note to the extent it exceeds the sum of the interest income, if any, and OID accrued on the note. However, a holder may elect to include OID in income as it accrues on all obligations having a maturity of one year or less held by the holder in that taxable year or thereafter, in which case the deferral rule of the preceding sentence will not apply. For purposes of this paragraph, OID accrues on a Short-Term Note on a ratable, straight-line basis, unless the holder irrevocably elects, under regulations to be issued by the Treasury
115
Table of Contents
Department, to apply a constant interest method to such obligation, using the holder’s yield to maturity and daily compounding.
If the notes are not issued with OID but a holder purchases a note at a discount greater than the de minimis amount set forth above, such discount will be market discount. Generally, a portion of each principal payment will be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the accrued market discount not previously recognized as income. Gain on sale of such note is treated as ordinary income to the extent of the accrued but not previously recognized market discount. Market discount generally accrues ratably, absent an election to base accrual on a constant yield to maturity basis. A holder who purchases a note at a premium will be subject to the “bond premium amortization” rules of the Code.
Disposition of Notes. If a U.S. Holder sells a note, the holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the note. The adjusted tax basis of the note to a particular U.S. Holder will equal the holder’s cost for the note, increased by any OID and market discount previously included by the noteholder in income from the note and decreased by any bond premium previously amortized and any principal payments previously received by the noteholder on the note. Any gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the note was held as a capital asset, except for gain representing accrued interest or accrued market discount not previously included in income. Capital gain or loss will be long-term if the note was held by the holder for more than one year and otherwise will be short-term. Any capital losses realized generally may be used by a corporate taxpayer only to offset capital gains, and by an individual taxpayer only to the extent of capital gains plus $3,000 of other income.
Potential Acceleration of Income. An accrual method taxpayer that prepares an “applicable financial statement” (as defined in Section 451 of the Internal Revenue Code, which includes any GAAP financial statement, Form 10-K annual statement, audited financial statement or a financial statement filed with any federal agency for non-tax purposes) generally would be required to include certain items of income such as OID and possibly de minimis OID and market discount in gross income no later than the time such amounts are reflected on such a financial statement. (The application of this rule to income of a debt instrument with OID is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.) This could result in an acceleration of income recognition for income items differing from the above description, although the precise application of this rule is unclear at this time.
Net Investment Income. Certain non-corporate U.S. Holders will be subject to a 3.8 percent tax, in addition to regular tax on income and gains, on some or all of their “net investment income,” which generally will include interest, original issue discount and market discount realized on a note and any net gain recognized upon a disposition of a note. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of this tax in respect of their notes.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. The issuing entity will be required to report annually to the IRS, and to each noteholder of record, the amount of interest paid on the notes, and the amount of interest withheld for U.S. federal income taxes, if any, for each calendar year, except as to exempt holders which are, generally, corporations, tax-exempt organizations, qualified pension and profit-sharing trusts, individual retirement accounts or nonresident aliens who provide certification as to their status. Each U.S. Holder will be required to provide to the issuing entity, under penalties of perjury, IRS Form W-9 or other similar form containing the holder’s name, address, correct federal taxpayer identification number and a statement that the holder is not subject to backup withholding. If a nonexempt noteholder fails to provide the required certification, the issuing entity will be required to withhold at the currently applicable rate from interest otherwise payable to the holder, and remit the withheld amount to the IRS as a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the backup withholding and information reporting rules to their particular circumstances.
Because the depositor will not treat the issuing entity as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation, and will treat all notes as indebtedness for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the depositor will not comply with the tax reporting requirements that would apply under any alternative characterizations of the issuing entity.
116
Table of Contents
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders
If interest paid to or accrued by a Non-U.S. Holder is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder (or under certain tax treaties is not attributable to a United States permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder), the interest generally will be considered “portfolio interest”, and generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, as long as the Non-U.S. Holder:
| • | is not actually or constructively a “10 percent shareholder” of the issuing entity or the depositor, including a holder of 10 percent of the applicable outstanding certificates, or a “controlled foreign corporation” with respect to which the issuing entity or the depositor is a “related person” within the meaning of the Code, and |
| • | provides an appropriate statement on IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E signed under penalties of perjury, certifying that the Non-U.S. Holder is a Foreign Person and providing that Non-U.S. Holder’s name and address. If the information provided in this statement changes, the Non-U.S. Holder must so inform the issuing entity within 30 days of change. |
If the interest were not portfolio interest or if applicable certification requirements were not satisfied, then the interest would be subject to U.S. federal income and withholding tax at a rate of 30 percent unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the application of the withholding and information reporting regulations to their particular circumstances.
Any capital gain realized on the sale, redemption, retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a Non-U.S. Holder will be exempt from U.S. federal income and withholding tax, provided that:
| • | the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder (or under certain tax treaties is not attributable to a United States permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder); and |
| • | in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is an individual, the Non-U.S. Holder is not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year. |
If the interest, gain or income on a note held by a Non-U.S. Holder is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder (and under certain tax treaties is attributable to a United States permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder), the holder, although exempt from the withholding tax previously discussed if an appropriate statement is furnished, generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the interest, gain or income at regular federal income tax rates. In addition, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to the currently applicable rate of its “effectively connected earnings and profits” within the meaning of the Code for the taxable year, as adjusted for specified items, unless it qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable tax treaty.
FATCA. Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code (commonly known as (“FATCA”)) impose additional reporting requirements on certain Foreign Persons, including certain foreign financial institutions and non-financial foreign entities. Such Foreign Persons must comply with information gathering and reporting rules with respect to their U.S. account holders and investors, and, in the case of certain foreign financial institutions, may be required to enter into agreements with the IRS or comply with an applicable intergovernmental agreement pursuant to which such foreign financial institution must gather and report certain information to the IRS or to the tax authority in its country of residence and withhold U.S. tax from certain payments made by it. Such Foreign Persons that fail to comply with the FATCA requirements will be subject to a 30% withholding tax on U.S. source payments, including interest and original issue discount, and, beginning January 1, 2019, on gross proceeds from the sale of any equity or debt instruments of U.S. issuers. Such withholding could apply to payments regardless of whether they are made to such Foreign Person in its capacity as a holder of a note or in a capacity of holding a note for the account of another.
117
Table of Contents
The issuing entity will not pay additional amounts in respect of FATCA withholding tax. Accordingly, if a noteholder (or possibly an intermediary through which a noteholder holds its notes) is subject to FATCA withholding, the noteholder will receive significantly less than the amount that the noteholder would have otherwise received with respect to the notes. Certain countries have entered into, and other countries are expected to enter into, agreements with the U.S. to facilitate the type of information reporting required under FATCA. While the existence of such agreements will not eliminate the risk that notes will be subject to the withholding described above, these agreements are expected to reduce the risk of the withholding for investors in (or indirectly holding notes through financial institutions in) those countries. It is suggested that prospective investors consult their own tax advisors on how these rules may apply to payments they receive under the notes.
Tax Regulations for Related-Party Note Acquisitions
The United States Department of the Treasury and the IRS recently issued Treasury Regulations under Section 385 of the Code that address the debt or equity treatment of instruments held by certain parties related to the issuing entity. In particular, in certain circumstances, a note that otherwise would be treated as debt is treated as stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes during periods in which the note is held by an applicable related party (meaning a member of an “expanded group” that includes the issuing entity (or its owner(s)), generally based on a group of corporations or controlled partnerships connected through 80% direct or indirect ownership links). Under these Treasury Regulations, any notes treated as stock under these rules could result in adverse tax consequences to such related party Holder, including that U.S. federal withholding taxes could apply to distributions on the notes. If the issuing entity were to become liable for any such withholding or failure to so withhold, the resulting impositions could reduce the cash flow that would otherwise be available to make payments on all notes. In addition, when a recharacterized note is acquired by a beneficial owner that is not an applicable related party, that note is generally treated as reissued for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus may have tax characteristics differing from notes of the same class that were not previously held by a related party. The issuing entity does not intend to separately track any such notes. As a result of considerations arising from these rules, prospective investors should be aware that, if they purchase notes, they may be restricted in certain circumstances from investing in certificates through certain affiliates covered by these Treasury Regulations that are generally United States persons for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The issuing entity does not expect that these Treasury Regulations will apply to any of the notes. However, these Treasury Regulations are complex and have not been applied by the IRS or any court. In addition, the IRS has reserved certain portions of the Treasury Regulations pending its further consideration. Prospective investors should note that the Treasury Regulations are complex and we urge you to consult your tax advisors regarding the possible effects of the new rules.
Possible Alternative Treatments of the Notes and the Issuing Entity
Although, as discussed above, it is the opinion of Special Tax Counsel that the notes will be characterized as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the IRS may take a contrary position. If the IRS were to contend successfully that any class of notes were not debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such notes might be treated as equity interests in the issuing entity. As a result, even if the depositor or other single person was the sole certificateholder of the issuing entity, the issuing entity would be considered to have multiple equity owners and might be classified for U.S. federal income tax purposes as an association taxable as a corporation or as a partnership. (Additionally, even if all the notes were treated as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but there is more than one person (and all such persons are not treated as the same person for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding a certificate (or interest therein), the issuing entity may be considered to have multiple equity owners and might be classified for U.S. federal income tax purposes as an association taxable as a corporation or as a partnership.)
A partnership is generally not subject to an entity level tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes, while an association or corporation is subject to an entity level tax. If the issuing entity were treated as a partnership (which most likely would not be treated as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation) and one or more classes of notes were treated as equity interests in that partnership, each item of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit generated through the ownership of the receivables by the partnership would be passed through to the partners, including the affected holders, according to their respective interests therein. Under current law, the income reportable by noteholders as partners in such a partnership could differ from the income reportable by the noteholders as holders of debt. Generally, such differences are not expected to be material; however, certain
118
Table of Contents
noteholders may have adverse tax consequences. For example, cash basis noteholders might be required to report income when it accrues to the partnership rather than when it is received by the noteholders. Payments on the recharacterized notes would likely be treated as “guaranteed payments” within the meaning of Section 707 of the Code, in which case the amount and timing of income to a U.S. Holder would generally not be expected to materially differ from that which would be the case were the notes not recharacterized. On the other hand, if payments are not treated as “guaranteed payments”, note that U.S. Holders would be taxed on the partnership income regardless of when distributions are made to them and are not entitled to deduct miscellaneous itemized deductions that are not allocable to a trade or business (which may include their share of partnership expenses) for the tax years 2018-2025. In addition, to the extent partnership expenses are treated as allocable to a trade or business, the amount or value of interest expense deductions available to the holders of recharacterized notes with respect to the issuing entity’s interest expense may be limited under the rules of Section 163(j) of the Code. Any income allocated to a noteholder that is a tax-exempt entity may constitute unrelated business taxable income because all or a portion of the issuing entity’s taxable income may be considered debt-financed. The receipt of unrelated business taxable income by a tax-exempt noteholder could give rise to additional tax liability to such tax-exempt holder. Depending on the circumstances, a noteholder that is a Foreign Person might be required to file a United States individual or corporate income tax return, as the case may be, and it is possible that (i) such person may be subject to (x) withholding of tax on purchase price paid to it in the event of a disposition of the note (treated as a partnership interest) and (y) tax (and withholding) on its allocable interest at regular U.S. rates and, in the case of a corporation, a 30% branch profits tax rate (unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty) or (ii) gross income allocated to such person may be subject to 30% withholding tax (i.e., unreduced by any interest deductions or other expenses) unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty.
If the issuing entity is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, new audit rules would generally apply to the issuing entity. Under the new rules, unless an entity elects otherwise, taxes arising from audit adjustments are required to be paid by the entity rather than by its partners or members. The parties responsible for the tax administration of the issuing entity described herein will have the authority to utilize, and intend to utilize, any exceptions available under the new provisions (including any changes) and IRS regulations so that the issuing entity’s members, to the fullest extent possible, rather than the issuing entity itself, will be liable for any taxes arising from audit adjustments to the issuing entity’s taxable income if the issuing entity is treated as a partnership. It is unclear to what extent these elections will be available to the issuing entity and how any such elections may affect the procedural rules available to challenge any audit adjustment that would otherwise be available in the absence of any such elections. Prospective investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the possible effect of the new rules.
If, alternatively, the issuing entity were treated as either an association taxable as a corporation or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation, the issuing entity would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at corporate tax rates on its taxable income generated by ownership of the receivables. Moreover, distributions by the issuing entity to all or some of the noteholders would probably not be deductible in computing the issuing entity’s taxable income and all or part of the distributions to noteholders would probably be treated as dividends. Such an entity-level tax could result in reduced distributions to noteholders and adversely affect the issuing entity’s ability to make payments of principal and interest with respect to the notes. To the extent distributions on such notes were treated as dividends, a non-U.S. Holder would generally be subject to tax (and withholding) on the gross amount of such dividends at a rate of 30% unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable income tax treaty.
STATE AND LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
The discussion above does not address the tax consequences of purchase, ownership or disposition of the notes under any state or local tax law. We encourage prospective investors to consult with their own tax advisors regarding state and local tax consequences.
The above discussion does not address the tax treatment of the issuing entity, notes, or noteholders under any state or local tax laws. The activities to be undertaken by the servicer in servicing and collecting the receivables will take place throughout the United States and, therefore, many different tax regimes potentially apply to different portions of these transactions. Additionally, it is possible a state may assert its right to impose tax on the issuing entity with respect to its income related to receivables collected from customers located in such state and/or require that a noteholder treated as an equity-owner (including non-resident holders) file state income tax returns with the
119
Table of Contents
state pertaining to receivables collected from customers located in such state (and may require withholding on related income). Prospective investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the state and local tax treatment of the issuing entity as well as any state and local tax considerations for them of purchasing, holding and disposing of notes or membership interests.
TAX SHELTER DISCLOSURE AND INVESTOR LIST REQUIREMENTS
Treasury Regulations directed at “potentially abusive” tax shelter activity can apply to transactions not conventionally regarded as tax shelters. These regulations require taxpayers to report certain information on IRS Form 8886 if they participate in a “reportable transaction” and to retain certain information relating to such transactions. Organizers and sellers of the transaction are required to maintain records including investor lists containing identifying information and to furnish those records to the IRS upon demand. A transaction may be a “reportable transaction” based upon any of several indicia, one or more of which may be present with respect to your investment in the notes. You may be required to report your investment in the notes even if your notes are treated as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Significant penalties can be imposed for failure to comply with these disclosure and investor list requirements. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to their investment.
We suggest prospective investors consult with their tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to your investment in the notes, and should be aware that the transferor and other participants in the transaction intend to comply with such disclosure and investor list requirement as each participant in its own discretion determines apply to them with respect to this transaction.
CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Subject to the following discussion, the notes may be acquired with the assets of an “employee benefit plan” as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), that is subject to Title I of ERISA, a “plan” as defined in and subject to Section 4975 of the Code, or an entity deemed to hold plan assets of the foregoing (each, a “benefit plan investor”), as well as by governmental plans (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA) and church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA) (collectively, with benefit plan investors, “Plans”). Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code prohibit benefit plan investors from engaging in certain transactions with persons that are “parties in interest” under ERISA or “disqualified persons” under the Code with respect to such benefit plan investor. A violation of these “prohibited transaction” rules may result in an excise tax or other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Code for such persons or the fiduciaries of such benefit plan investor. In addition, Title I of ERISA requires fiduciaries of a benefit plan investor subject to ERISA to make investments that are prudent, diversified and in accordance with the governing plan documents. Additionally, governmental plans, although not subject to the fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, may be subject to similar restrictions under applicable state, local or other law (“Similar Law”). Governmental and certain church plans are also subject to the prohibited transaction rules in Section 503(b) of the Code.
Certain transactions involving the issuing entity might be deemed to constitute prohibited transactions under ERISA and the Code with respect to a benefit plan investor that acquired notes if assets of the issuing entity were deemed to be assets of the benefit plan investor. Under a regulation issued by the U.S. Department of Labor, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (the “regulation”), the assets of the issuing entity would be treated as plan assets of a benefit plan investor for the purposes of ERISA and the Code only if the benefit plan investor acquired an “equity interest” in the issuing entity and none of the exceptions to plan assets contained in the regulation were applicable. An equity interest is defined under the regulation as an interest other than an instrument which is treated as indebtedness under applicable local law and which has no substantial equity features. Although there is little guidance on the subject, it is anticipated that, at the time of their issuance, the notes should be treated as indebtedness of the issuing entity without substantial equity features for purposes of the regulation. This determination is based upon the traditional debt features of the notes, including the reasonable expectation of purchasers of notes that the notes will be repaid when due, traditional default remedies, as well as on the absence of conversion rights, warrants and other typical equity features. The debt treatment of the notes for ERISA purposes could change subsequent to their issuance if the issuing entity incurs losses. This risk of recharacterization is enhanced for notes that are subordinated to other classes of securities. In the event of a withdrawal or downgrade to below investment grade of the rating of the notes or a characterization of the notes as other than indebtedness under
120
Table of Contents
applicable local law, the subsequent acquisition of the notes or interests therein by a benefit plan investor or other employee benefit plan that is subject to Similar Law is prohibited.
However, without regard to whether the notes are treated as an equity interest in the issuing entity for purposes of the regulation, the acquisition or holding of notes by or on behalf of a benefit plan investor could be considered to give rise to a prohibited transaction if the issuing entity, the depositor, the originator, the servicer, the administrator, the underwriters, the owner trustee, the indenture trustee or any of their affiliates is or becomes a party in interest or a disqualified person with respect to such benefit plan investors. Certain exemptions from the prohibited transaction rules could be applicable to the acquisition and holding of notes by a benefit plan investor depending on the type and circumstances of the plan fiduciary making the decision to acquire such notes and the relationship of the party in interest or disqualified person to the benefit plan investor. Included among these exemptions are: Section 408(b)(17) of ERISA and Section 4975(d)(20) of the Code for certain transactions between a benefit plan investor and persons who are parties in interest or disqualified persons solely by reason of providing services to the benefit plan investor or being affiliated with such service providers; Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 96-23, regarding transactions effected by “in-house asset managers;” PTCE 95-60, regarding investments by insurance company general accounts; PTCE 91-38, regarding investments by bank collective investment funds; PTCE 90-1, regarding investments by insurance company pooled separate accounts; and PTCE 84-14, regarding transactions effected by “qualified professional asset managers.” Even if the conditions specified in one or more of these exemptions are met, the scope of the relief provided by these exemptions might or might not cover all acts which might be construed as prohibited transactions. There can be no assurance that any of these, or any other exemption, will be available with respect to any particular transaction involving the notes, and prospective purchasers that are benefit plan investors should consult with their legal advisors regarding the applicability of any such exemption.
As described in this prospectus, the issuing entity, the depositor, the originator, the servicer, the administrator, the underwriters and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Transaction Parties”) may receive fees or other compensation as a result of a Plan’s acquisition of the notes. Accordingly, none of the Transaction Parties are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice, or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity, in connection with the acquisition of any of the notes by any Plan.
By acquiring a note (or interest therein), each purchaser or transferee (and if the purchaser or transferee is a Plan, its fiduciary) will be deemed to represent and warrant that either (a) it is not acquiring and will not hold such note (or interest therein) with the assets of a benefit plan investor or a Plan that is subject to Similar Law or (b)(i) such note is rated at least “BBB-” or its equivalent by a nationally recognized statistical rating agency at the time of purchase or transfer and (ii) its acquisition and holding of the note (or interest therein) will not give rise to a nonexempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or a violation of any Similar Law.
In addition, each purchaser and transferee of a note (or interest therein) that is a benefit plan investor and any fiduciary purchasing the note (or interest therein) on behalf of a benefit plan investor (“Plan Fiduciary”) is deemed to represent and warrant by its acquisition of the notes that the decision to acquire such note (or interest therein) has been made by the Plan Fiduciary, and that the Plan Fiduciary is an “independent fiduciary with financial expertise” as described in 29 C.F.R. Sec. 2510.3-21(c)(1). Specifically, this requires the benefit plan investor and the Plan Fiduciary to represent and warrant that:
| • | The Plan Fiduciary is independent of the Transaction Parties, and the Plan Fiduciary either: |
| • | is a bank as defined in Section 202 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), or similar institution that is regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a U.S. state or U.S. federal agency; |
| • | is an insurance carrier which is qualified under the laws of more than one U.S. state to perform the services of managing, acquiring or disposing of assets of an employee benefit plan described in Section 3(3) of ERISA or any plan described in Section 4975(e)(1)(A) of the Code; |
121
Table of Contents
| • | is an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, or, if not registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act by reason of paragraph (1) of Section 203A of the Advisers Act, is registered as an investment adviser under the laws of the U.S. state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business; |
| • | is a broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act; or |
| • | holds, or has under its management or control, total assets of at least $50 million (provided that this clause (e) shall not be satisfied if the Plan Fiduciary is an individual directing his or her own individual retirement account or plan account or relative of such individual). |
| • | The Plan Fiduciary is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with respect to particular transactions and investment strategies, including the acquisition by the benefit plan investor of the notes. |
| • | The Plan Fiduciary is a “fiduciary” with respect to the benefit plan investor within the meaning of Section 3(21) of ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code, or both, and is responsible for exercising independent judgment in evaluating the benefit plan investor’s acquisition of the notes. |
| • | None of the Transaction Parties has exercised any authority to cause the benefit plan investor to invest in the notes or to negotiate the terms of the benefit plan investor’s investment in the notes. |
| • | The Plan Fiduciary has been informed by the Transaction Parties: |
| • | that none of the Transaction Parties are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity, and that no such entity has given investment advice or otherwise made a recommendation, in connection with the benefit plan investor’s acquisition of the notes; and |
| • | of the existence and nature of the Transaction Parties financial interests in the benefit plan investor’s acquisition of the notes, as described in this prospectus. |
A Plan Fiduciary or other Plan fiduciary considering the acquisition of notes (or interest therein) should consult its legal advisors regarding the matters discussed above and other applicable legal requirements.
The sale of notes (or interest therein) to a Plan is in no respect a representation that this investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by Plans generally or for any particular Plan, or that this investment is appropriate for Plans generally or any particular Plan.
122
Table of Contents
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement relating to the notes, the depositor has agreed to sell and the underwriters named below have severally but not jointly agreed to purchase the principal amount of the notes set forth opposite its name below:
| Underwriter |
Class A-1 Notes(1) |
Class A-2-A Notes(1) |
Class A-2-B Notes(1) |
Class A-3 Notes(1) |
Class A-4 Notes(1) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| J.P. Morgan Securities LLC |
$ | 153,500,000 | $ | 210,000,000 | $ | 50,000,000 | $ | 184,500,000 | $ | 52,000,000 | $ | 650,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
$ | 61,400,000 | $ | 84,000,000 | $ | 20,000,000 | $ | 73,800,000 | $ | 20,800,000 | $ | 260,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| RBC Capital Markets, LLC |
$ | 61,400,000 | $ | 84,000,000 | $ | 20,000,000 | $ | 73,800,000 | $ | 20,800,000 | $ | 260,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
$ | 6,140,000 | $ | 8,400,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 2,080,000 | $ | 26,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. |
$ | 6,140,000 | $ | 8,400,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 2,080,000 | $ | 26,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| SG Americas Securities, LLC |
$ | 6,140,000 | $ | 8,400,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 2,080,000 | $ | 26,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| TD Securities (USA) LLC |
$ | 6,140,000 | $ | 8,400,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 2,080,000 | $ | 26,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
$ | 6,140,000 | $ | 8,400,000 | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 7,380,000 | $ | 2,080,000 | $ | 26,000,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 307,000,000 | $ | 420,000,000 | $ | 100,000,000 | $ | 369,000,000 | $ | 104,000,000 | $ | 1,300,000,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | All or a portion of one or more classes of notes may be initially retained by the depositor or an affiliate thereof. |
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters are subject to certain conditions precedent and that the underwriters will be obligated to purchase all the notes if any are purchased. The underwriting agreement provides that, in the event of a default by an underwriter, in certain circumstances the purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.
The depositor has been advised by the underwriters that the underwriters propose to offer the notes to the public initially at the offering prices set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and to certain dealers at these prices less the concessions and reallowance discounts set forth below:
| Class |
Selling Concession |
Reallowance Discount |
||||||
| Class A-1 Notes |
0.072 | % | 0.036 | % | ||||
| Class A-2-A Notes |
0.090 | % | 0.045 | % | ||||
| Class A-2-B Notes |
0.090 | % | 0.045 | % | ||||
| Class A-3 Notes |
0.132 | % | 0.066 | % | ||||
| Class A-4 Notes |
0.181 | % | 0.091 | % | ||||
If all of the classes of notes are not sold at the initial offering price, the underwriters may change the offering price and other selling terms. After the initial public offering, the underwriters may change the public offering price and selling concessions and reallowance discounts to dealers.
The depositor and VW Credit have agreed, jointly and severally, to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including civil liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or to contribute to payments which the underwriters may be required to make in respect thereto. In the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and may, therefore, be unenforceable.
Until the distribution of the notes is completed, rules of the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriters and certain selling group members to bid for and purchase the notes. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters are permitted to engage in certain transactions that stabilize the prices of the notes. Such transactions consist of bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of such notes.
The underwriters may engage in over-allotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids with respect to the notes in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
123
Table of Contents
Over-allotment transactions involve syndicate sales in excess of the offering size, which creates a syndicate short position. Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the notes so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum. Syndicate coverage transactions involve purchases of the notes in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the notes originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a syndicate covering transaction. These over-allotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may cause the prices of the notes to be higher than they would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions. Neither the depositor nor any of the underwriters will represent that they will engage in any of these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.
It is expected that delivery of the notes will be made against payment therefor on or about the closing date. Rule 15c6-1 of the SEC under the Exchange Act generally requires trades in the secondary market to settle in three business days, unless the parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade notes on the date hereof will be required, by virtue of the fact that the notes initially will settle more than three business days after the date hereof, to specify an alternate settlement cycle at the time of any such trade to prevent a failed settlement. It is suggested that purchasers of notes who wish to trade notes on the date hereof consult their own advisors.
Upon receipt of a request by an investor who has received an electronic prospectus from an underwriter or a request by that investor’s representative within the period during which there is an obligation to deliver a prospectus, VW Credit, the depositor or the underwriters will promptly deliver, or cause to be delivered, without charge, a paper copy of this prospectus.
In the ordinary course of its business one or more of the underwriters and affiliates have provided, and in the future may provide other investment banking and commercial banking services to the depositor, the servicer, the issuing entity and their affiliates. An affiliate of one of the underwriters is the owner trustee and an affiliate of another underwriter is the indenture trustee.
The indenture trustee, on behalf of the issuing entity and at the direction of the servicer, may from time to time invest the funds in accounts and Permitted Investments acquired from the underwriters or their affiliates.
The notes are new issues of securities with no established trading market. The underwriters tell us that they intend to make a market in the notes as permitted by applicable laws and regulations. However, the underwriters are not obligated to make a market in the notes and any such market-making may be discontinued at any time at the sole discretion of the underwriters. Accordingly, we give no assurance regarding the liquidity of, or trading markets for, the notes.
The depositor will receive aggregate proceeds of approximately $1,297,667,874.90 from the sale of the notes (representing approximately 99.82061% of the initial note balance of the notes) after paying the aggregate underwriting discount of $2,274,280.00 on the notes. Additional offering expenses are estimated to be $1,183,850.
Certain of the offered notes initially may be retained by the depositor or an affiliate of the depositor (the “Retained Notes”). Any Retained Notes will not be sold to the underwriters under the underwriting agreement. Retained Notes may be subsequently sold from time to time to purchasers directly by the depositor or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents who may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the depositor or the purchasers of the Retained Notes. If the Retained Notes are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the depositor will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The Retained Notes may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, prevailing market prices at the time of sale, varying prices determined at the time of sale or negotiated prices.
Each underwriter has severally represented to and agreed with the issuing entity that:
124
Table of Contents
| • | it will not offer or sell any notes within the United States, its territories or possessions or to persons who are citizens thereof or residents therein, except in transactions that are not prohibited by any securities, bank regulatory or other applicable law that applies to such underwriter; and |
| • | it will not offer or sell any notes in any other country, its territories or possessions or to persons who are citizens thereof or residents therein, except in transactions that are not prohibited by any applicable securities law. |
Each underwriter has further severally represented to and agreed with the issuing entity that:
| • | it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom, as amended (“FSMA”)) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of any notes in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuing entity or the depositor; and |
| • | it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to any notes in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. |
Each underwriter has further represented and agreed that it has not offered, sold or otherwise made available and will not offer, sell or otherwise make available any notes to any retail investor in the European Economic Area. For the purposes of this provision:
| • | the expression “retail investor” means a person who is one (or more) of the following: (i) a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II, (ii) a customer within the meaning of Directive 2002/92/EC (as amended), where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II or (iii) not a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive; and |
| • | the expression “offer” includes the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the notes to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the notes. |
This prospectus, including information included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, may contain certain forward-looking statements. In addition, certain statements made in future SEC filings by the issuing entity or the depositor, in press releases and in oral and written statements made by or with the issuing entity’s or the depositor’s approval may constitute forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information relating to, among other things, continued and increased business competition, an increase in delinquencies (including increases due to worsening of economic conditions), changes in demographics, changes in local, regional or national business, economic, political and social conditions, regulatory and accounting initiatives, changes in customer preferences, and costs of integrating new businesses and technologies, many of which are beyond the control of VW Credit, the issuing entity or the depositor. Forward-looking statements also include statements using words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “hope,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or similar expressions. The issuing entity and the depositor have based these forward-looking statements on their current plans, estimates and projections, and you should not unduly rely on them.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risks discussed below. Future performance and actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond the ability of VW Credit, the issuing entity or the depositor to control or predict. The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus speak only as of the date stated on the cover of this prospectus. The issuing entity
125
Table of Contents
and the depositor undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Other than as described under “The Sponsor—Recent Developments—Legal and Regulatory” in this prospectus, there are no legal or governmental proceedings pending, or to the knowledge of the sponsor, contemplated, against the sponsor, depositor, issuing entity, servicer or originator, or of which any property of the foregoing is the subject, that are material to noteholders.
Each of the owner trustee and the indenture trustee has represented to the issuing entity that it is not a party to any current legal proceedings that are not already described in this prospectus, nor is its management aware of any legal proceedings threatened against it that, if determined adversely to such party, would be expected to be material to investors.
Certain legal matters relating to the notes will be passed upon for the servicer and the depositor by Kevin M. McDonald, Esq., Attorney for VW Credit. Certain other legal matters with respect to the notes, including U.S. federal income tax matters, will be passed upon for the servicer and the depositor by Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Mayer Brown LLP has from time to time represented VW Credit and its affiliates in other transactions. Sidley Austin LLP will act as counsel for the underwriters. Sidley Austin LLP represents VW Credit’s affiliates in other matters.
126
Table of Contents
“Adjusted Pool Balance” means (a) as of the closing date, an amount equal to (x) the net pool balance as of the cut-off date minus (y) the yield supplement overcollateralization amount for the closing date and (b) for any payment date an amount equal to (x) the net pool balance at the end of the collection period preceding that payment date minus (y) the yield supplement overcollateralization amount for that payment date.
“Available Funds” means, for any payment date and the related collection period, if any, an amount equal to the sum of the following amounts: (i) all Collections received by the servicer during such collection period, (ii) the sum of the repurchase prices deposited in the collection account with respect to each receivable that will be purchased by VW Credit, the depositor or the servicer on that payment date, and (iii) any amounts in the reserve account in excess of the Specified Reserve Account Balance.
“Collections” means, with respect to any receivable and to the extent received by the servicer after the cut-off date, (i) any monthly payment by or on behalf of the obligor under that receivable, (ii) any full or partial prepayment of that receivable, (iii) all Liquidation Proceeds and (iv) any other amounts received by the servicer which, in accordance with the customary servicing practices, would customarily be applied to the payment of accrued interest or to reduce the outstanding principal balance of that receivable; provided, however, that the term Collections in no event will include (1) for any payment date, any amounts in respect of any receivable the repurchase price of which has been included in the Available Funds on that payment date or a prior payment date, (2) any Supplemental Servicing Fees or (3) rebates of premiums with respect to the cancellation or termination of any insurance policy, extended warranty or service contract that was not financed by that receivable.
“Defaulted Receivable” means, with respect to any collection period, any receivable as to which (a) any payment is past due 90 or more days or (b) the date on which the related vehicle has been repossessed. The outstanding principal balance of any receivable that becomes a “Defaulted Receivable” will be deemed to be zero as of the date it becomes a “Defaulted Receivable”.
“Financial Institution” means any securities clearing organization, bank or other financial institution that holds customers’ securities in the ordinary course of its trade or business.
“Fitch” means Fitch Ratings, Inc., or any successor that is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.
“Foreign Person” means any person other than (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or partnership organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is includable in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust, if a United States court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one (1) or more U.S. Persons has the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or if it has made a valid election under U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a domestic trust.
“LIBOR” means, with respect to any interest period, the London interbank offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars having a maturity of one month commencing on the related LIBOR Determination Date which appears on Bloomberg Screen BTMM Page (or any successor page) as of 11:00 a.m., London time, on such LIBOR Determination Date; provided, however, that for the first interest period, LIBOR shall mean an interpolated rate for deposits based on London interbank offered rates for deposits in U.S. dollars for a period that corresponds to the actual number of days in the first interest period. If the rates used to determine LIBOR do not appear on the Bloomberg Screen BBAM Page, the rates for that day will be determined on the basis of the rates at which deposits in U.S. dollars, having a maturity of one month and in a principal balance of not less than U.S. $1,000,000 are offered at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, on such LIBOR Determination Date to prime banks in the London interbank market by the reference banks. The indenture trustee will request the principal London office of each of such reference banks to provide a quotation of its rate. If at least two such quotations are provided, the rate for that day will be the arithmetic mean to the nearest 1/100,000 of 1.00% (0.0000001), with five one-millionths of a percentage point rounded upward, of all such quotations. If fewer than two such quotations are provided, the rate for that day will be the arithmetic mean to the nearest 1/100,000 of 1.00% (0.0000001), with five one-millionths of a percentage point rounded upward, of the offered per annum rates that one or more leading banks in New York City,
127
Table of Contents
selected by the depositor, are quoting as of approximately 11:00 a.m., New York City time, on such LIBOR Determination Date to leading European banks for United States dollar deposits for that maturity; provided that if the banks selected as aforesaid are not quoting as mentioned in this sentence, LIBOR in effect for the applicable interest period will be LIBOR in effect for the previous interest period. The reference banks are the four major banks in the London interbank market selected by the depositor.
“LIBOR Determination Date” means the second London Business Day prior to the closing date with respect to the first payment date and, as to each subsequent payment date, the second London Business Day prior to the immediately preceding payment date.
“Liquidation Proceeds” means, with respect to any receivable, (a) insurance proceeds received by the servicer with respect to any insurance policies relating to the related financed vehicle or maintained by the obligor in connection with a receivable, (b) amounts received by the servicer in connection with that receivable pursuant to the exercise of rights under that receivable and (c) the monies collected by the servicer (from whatever source, including proceeds of a sale of the related financed vehicle, a deficiency balance recovered from the related obligor after the charge-off of that receivable or as a result of any recourse against the related dealer, if any) on that receivable other than any monthly payments by or on behalf of the obligors thereunder or any full or partial prepayment of such receivable, in each case net of any expenses (including, without limitation, any auction, painting, repair or refurbishment expenses in respect of the related financed vehicle) incurred by the servicer in connection therewith and any payments required by law to be remitted to the related obligor; provided, however, that the repurchase price for any receivable purchased by VW Credit, the depositor or the servicer will not constitute Liquidation Proceeds.
“London Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or day on which banking institutions in London, England are authorized or obligated by law or government decree to be closed.
“Permitted Investments” means (i) evidences of indebtedness, maturing within thirty (30) days after the date of loan thereof, issued by, or guaranteed by the full faith and credit of, the federal government of the USA, (ii) repurchase agreements with banking institutions or broker-dealers registered under the Exchange Act which are fully secured by obligations of the kind specified in clause (i), (iii) money market funds (a) rated not lower than the highest rating category from S&P and the highest rating category from Fitch or (b) which are otherwise acceptable to each Hired Agency, as evidenced by, except with respect to Fitch, a letter from that Hired Agency to the issuing entity or the indenture trustee, (iv) commercial paper (including commercial paper of any affiliate of the depositor, the servicer, the indenture trustee or the owner trustee) rated, at the time of investment or contractual commitment to invest therein, at least “F1+” (or the equivalent) by Fitch and at least “A-1+” by S&P (or the equivalent) or (v) such other investments acceptable to each Hired Agency, as evidenced by a letter from such rating agency to the issuing entity or the indenture trustee.
“Prepayment Assumption” means the method used to assume the anticipated rate of prepayments in pricing a debt instrument.
“Principal Distribution Amount” will mean for any payment date, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the Adjusted Pool Balance as of the end of the collection period preceding the related collection period, or as of the cut-off date, in the case of the first collection period, over (ii) the Adjusted Pool Balance as of the end of the related collection period, together with any portion of the Principal Distribution Amount that was to be distributed as such on any prior payment date but was not so distributed because sufficient funds were not available to make such distribution; provided, however, that if the sum of the amounts in the reserve account and the remaining Available Funds after the payments under clauses first through fifth under “Description of the Transaction Documents—Priority of Payments” on that payment date would be sufficient to pay in full the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all of the outstanding notes and the servicer specifies in the servicer’s certificate that amounts on deposit in the reserve account will be used to the extent necessary to pay all outstanding notes, then the Principal Distribution Amount for such payment date will mean an amount equal to the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the outstanding notes; and provided, further, that the Principal Distribution Amount on and after the final scheduled payment date of any class of notes will not be less than the amount that is necessary to reduce the aggregate outstanding principal balance of that class of notes to zero.
128
Table of Contents
“Rating Agency Condition” means, with respect to any event or circumstance and each Hired Agency, either (a) written confirmation (which may be in the form of a letter, a press release or other publication, or a change in such Hired Agency’s published ratings criteria to this effect) by that Hired Agency that the occurrence of that event or circumstance will not cause such Hired Agency to downgrade, qualify or withdraw its rating assigned to any of the notes, or (b) that such Hired Agency has been given notice of that event or circumstance at least ten days prior to the occurrence of that event or circumstance (or, if ten days’ advance notice is impracticable, as much advance notice as is practicable) and such Hired Agency shall not have issued any written notice that the occurrence of that event or circumstance will itself cause such Hired Agency to downgrade, qualify or withdraw its rating assigned to the notes. In the event that Fitch is a Hired Agency, Fitch will be given notice of any event or circumstance in accordance with clause (b) of the preceding sentence. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Hired Agency has any duty to review any notice given with respect to any event, and it is understood that such Hired Agency may not actually review notices received by it prior to or after the expiration of the ten (10) day period described in (b) above. Further, each Hired Agency retains the right to downgrade, qualify or withdraw its rating assigned to all or any of the notes at any time in its sole judgment even if the Rating Agency Condition with respect to an event had been previously satisfied pursuant to clause (a) or clause (b) above.
“Regulation” means the United States Department of Labor regulation (29 C.F.R. Section 2510.3-101) concerning the definition of what constitutes the assets of an employee benefit plan or an individual retirement account subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
“SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Short-Term Note” means any note that has a fixed maturity date of not more than one year from the issue date of that note.
“Simple Interest Method” means the method of calculating interest due on a receivable on a daily basis based on the actual outstanding principal balance of the receivable on that date.
“Simple Interest Receivables” means receivables pursuant to which the payments due from the obligors during any month are allocated between interest, principal and other charges based on the actual date on which a payment is received and for which interest is calculated using the Simple Interest Method. For these receivables, the obligor’s payment is first applied to interest accrued as of the actual due date and then the remaining payment is applied to the unpaid outstanding principal balance and then to other charges. Accordingly, if an obligor pays the fixed monthly installment in advance of the due date, the portion of the payment allocable to interest for that period since the preceding payment will be less than it would be if the payment were made on the due date, and the portion of the payment allocable to reduce the outstanding principal balance will be correspondingly greater. Conversely, if an obligor pays the fixed monthly installment after its due date, the portion of the payment allocable to interest for the period since the preceding payment will be greater than it would be if the payment were made on the due date, and the portion of the payment allocable to reduce the outstanding principal balance will be correspondingly smaller. When necessary, an adjustment is made at the maturity of the receivable to the scheduled final payment to reflect the larger or smaller, as the case may be, allocations of payments to interest or principal under the receivable as a result of early or late payments, as the case may be. Late payments, or early payments, on a Simple Interest Receivable may result in the obligor making a greater—or smaller—number of payments than originally scheduled. The amount of additional payments required to pay the outstanding principal balance in full generally will not exceed the amount of an originally scheduled payment. If an obligor elects to prepay a Simple Interest Receivable in full, the obligor will not receive a rebate attributable to unearned finance charges. Instead, the obligor is required to pay finance charges only to, but not including, the date of prepayment. The amount of finance charges on a Simple Interest Receivable that would have accrued from and after the date of prepayment if all monthly payments had been made as scheduled will generally be greater than the rebate on a Scheduled Interest Receivable that provides for a Rule of 78s rebate, and will generally be equal to the rebate on a Scheduled Interest Receivable that provides for a simple interest rebate, as is described in the following paragraph.
“Specified Reserve Account Balance” means, as of the closing date, $1,340,210.50, and for any payment date, the lesser of $6,701,052.49 and the aggregate outstanding balance of the notes after giving effect to all payments of principal on that payment date.
129
Table of Contents
“Special Tax Counsel” means Mayer Brown LLP, as special tax counsel to the depositor.
“S&P” S&P Global Ratings, or any successor that is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.
“Supplemental Servicing Fees” means any and all (i) late fees, (ii) extension fees, (iii) non-sufficient funds charges and (iv) any and all other administrative fees or similar charges allowed by applicable law with respect to any receivable.
130
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
132
Table of Contents
STATIC POOL INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN PREVIOUS SECURITIZATIONS
Characteristics of the Receivables
The retail installment sale contracts and installment loans in each of VW Credit, Inc.’s securitized portfolios consisted of receivables originated by a dealer in accordance with its customary servicing practices in effect at the time of origination in accordance with the underwriting procedures in effect at such time, and assigned to the applicable issuing entity on the applicable closing date. As of the relevant cut-off date, the retail installment sale contracts and installment loans in the securitized portfolios consisted of the characteristics provided below.
A-1
Table of Contents
Original Pool Characteristics as of Cut-off Date
| Loan Securitization |
VALET 2010-1 | VALET 2011-1 | VALET 2012-1 | VALET 2012-2 | ||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
January 28, 2010 | March 30, 2011 | January 26, 2012 | October 11, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off Date |
December 26, 2009 | February 26, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | September 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables |
68,438 | 72,760 | 56,817 | 58,267 | ||||||||||||
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
$ | 1,534,786,068.73 | $ | 1,668,863,510.39 | $ | 1,351,498,765.89 | $ | 1,320,690,169.55 | ||||||||
| Outstanding Principal Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| Average |
$ | 22,425.93 | $ | 22,936.55 | $ | 23,786.87 | $ | 22,666.18 | ||||||||
| Minimum |
$ | 1,000.75 | $ | 1,004.00 | $ | 1,021.91 | $ | 1,001.69 | ||||||||
| Maximum |
$ | 97,819.54 | $ | 146,841.71 | $ | 244,506.17 | $ | 104,820.33 | ||||||||
| Contract Rate |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
3.94 | % | 3.00 | % | 3.15 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||||
| Minimum |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| Maximum |
14.43 | % | 13.81 | % | 12.47 | % | 12.52 | % | ||||||||
| Weighted Average Original Term (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
60.7 | 62.3 | 62.5 | 63.2 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Remaining Term (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
54.3 | 57.2 | 57.9 | 58.4 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
72 | 72 | 71 | 72 | ||||||||||||
| Seasoning (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
6.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
68 | 66 | 60 | 70 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of New Vehicles |
76.35 | % | 75.50 | % | 73.39 | % | 75.08 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Used Vehicles |
23.65 | % | 24.50 | % | 26.61 | % | 24.92 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Volkswagen Vehicles |
69.16 | % | 73.83 | % | 69.10 | % | 73.14 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Audi Vehicles |
30.84 | % | 26.17 | % | 30.90 | % | 26.86 | % | ||||||||
| FICO® Score(2)(3) |
||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average FICO® Score(1) |
750 | 753 | 758 | 764 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum(3) |
600 | 600 | 600 | 601 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum(3) |
886 | 886 | 900 | 900 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Weighted by outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
| (2) | FICO® is a federally registered trademark of Fair, Isaac & Company |
| (3) | FICO® scores are calculated excluding accounts for which no FICO® score is available at the origination of the related receivable. |
A-2
Table of Contents
| Loan Securitization |
VALET 2013-1 | VALET 2013-2 | VALET 2014-1 | VALET 2014-2 | ||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
February 27, 2013 | November 13, 2013 | April 30, 2014 | October 22, 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off Date |
January 26, 2013 | September 28, 2013 | March 1, 2014 | September 27, 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Number of Receivables |
54,217 | 65,070 | 54,727 | 46,738 | ||||||||||||
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
$ | 1,321,370,744.97 | $ | 1,594,182,494.00 | $ | 1,334,566,845.00 | $ | 1,074,364,168.57 | ||||||||
| Outstanding Principal Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| Average |
$ | 24,371.89 | $ | 24,499.50 | $ | 24,385.89 | $ | 22,986.95 | ||||||||
| Minimum |
$ | 4.00 | $ | 1,999.98 | $ | 1.86 | $ | 2,394.67 | ||||||||
| Maximum |
$ | 219,504.94 | $ | 99,563.10 | $ | 99,917.16 | $ | 99,571.08 | ||||||||
| Contract Rate |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
2.54 | % | 2.55 | % | 2.44 | % | 2.38 | % | ||||||||
| Minimum |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| Maximum |
12.01 | % | 10.99 | % | 10.99 | % | 13.94 | % | ||||||||
| Weighted Average Original Term (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
63.8 | 64.1 | 64.2 | 65.0 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
12 | 12 | 12 | 18 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Remaining Term (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
57.6 | 56.9 | 58.0 | 56.6 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
2 | 5 | 10 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
71 | 71 | 71 | 72 | ||||||||||||
| Seasoning (Months) |
||||||||||||||||
| Average(1) |
6.2 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum |
36 | 54 | 62 | 60 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of New Vehicles |
72.96 | % | 71.06 | % | 70.02 | % | 72.33 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Used Vehicles |
27.04 | % | 28.94 | % | 29.98 | % | 27.67 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Volkswagen Vehicles |
66.02 | % | 66.16 | % | 68.57 | % | 70.58 | % | ||||||||
| Percentage of Principal Balance of Audi Vehicles |
33.98 | % | 33.84 | % | 31.43 | % | 29.42 | % | ||||||||
| FICO® Score(2)(3) |
||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average FICO® Score(1) |
763 | 762 | 763 | 762 | ||||||||||||
| Minimum(3) |
600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | ||||||||||||
| Maximum(3) |
900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Weighted by outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
| (2) | FICO® is a federally registered trademark of Fair, Isaac & Company |
| (3) | FICO® scores are calculated excluding accounts for which no FICO® score is available at the origination of the related receivable. |
A-3
Table of Contents
Distribution of Receivables as of Cut-off Date
| Loan Securitization |
VALET 2010-1 | VALET 2011-1 | VALET 2012-1 | VALET 2012-2 | ||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
January 28, 2010 | March 30, 2011 | January 26, 2012 | October 11, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off Date |
December 26, 2009 | February 26, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | September 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| By Original Term(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| 12 months—18 months |
0.03 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.03 | % | ||||||||
| 19 months—24 months |
0.57 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.29 | % | ||||||||
| 25 months—30 months |
0.03 | % | 1.34 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| 31 months—36 months |
11.89 | % | 3.79 | % | 4.29 | % | 3.03 | % | ||||||||
| 37 months—42 months |
0.00 | % | 1.35 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| 43 months—48 months |
5.43 | % | 3.58 | % | 4.77 | % | 3.86 | % | ||||||||
| 49 months—54 months |
0.09 | % | 13.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| 55 months—60 months |
39.20 | % | 41.04 | % | 42.93 | % | 43.98 | % | ||||||||
| 61 months—66 months |
10.89 | % | 23.65 | % | 22.89 | % | 22.10 | % | ||||||||
| 67 months—72 months |
31.86 | % | 11.49 | % | 24.46 | % | 26.49 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By Remaining Term(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| 6 months or less |
0.05 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.19 | % | ||||||||
| 7 months—12 months |
0.03 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| 13 months—18 months |
0.36 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.78 | % | ||||||||
| 19 months—24 months |
0.44 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| 25 months—30 months |
8.33 | % | 1.34 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
| 31 months—36 months |
3.57 | % | 3.79 | % | 3.38 | % | 2.52 | % | ||||||||
| 37 months—42 months |
3.65 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.89 | % | ||||||||
| 43 months—48 months |
2.09 | % | 3.58 | % | 3.84 | % | 3.11 | % | ||||||||
| 49 months—54 months |
25.44 | % | 13.12 | % | 9.01 | % | 9.71 | % | ||||||||
| 55 months—60 months |
27.16 | % | 41.04 | % | 43.67 | % | 43.42 | % | ||||||||
| 61 months—66 months |
16.57 | % | 23.65 | % | 23.10 | % | 23.16 | % | ||||||||
| 67 months—72 months |
12.31 | % | 11.49 | % | 14.51 | % | 15.15 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By Contract Rate(1) |
||||||||||||||||
| 0.00%—0.99% |
26.20 | % | 25.34 | % | 13.21 | % | 22.68 | % | ||||||||
| 1.00%—1.99% |
5.22 | % | 13.67 | % | 22.45 | % | 24.63 | % | ||||||||
| 2.00%—2.99% |
6.80 | % | 15.10 | % | 19.14 | % | 22.01 | % | ||||||||
| 3.00%—3.99% |
11.19 | % | 15.84 | % | 18.94 | % | 15.64 | % | ||||||||
| 4.00%—4.99% |
14.73 | % | 12.49 | % | 11.82 | % | 7.97 | % | ||||||||
| 5.00%—5.99% |
12.89 | % | 7.99 | % | 6.97 | % | 3.83 | % | ||||||||
| 6.00%—6.99% |
10.66 | % | 4.27 | % | 3.65 | % | 1.87 | % | ||||||||
| 7.00%—7.99% |
5.30 | % | 2.28 | % | 1.87 | % | 0.61 | % | ||||||||
| 8.00%—8.99% |
3.22 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.32 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| 9.00%—9.99% |
2.12 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| 10.00%—10.99% |
1.11 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| 11.00%—11.99% |
0.39 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| 12.00%—12.99% |
0.12 | % | 0.04 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| 13.00%—13.99% |
0.04 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| 14.00%—14.99% |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By State, States Representing More than 5%(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| California |
14.99 | % | 16.13 | % | 16.99 | % | 16.62 | % | ||||||||
| New York |
5.22 | % | 6.16 | % | 6.52 | % | 5.78 | % | ||||||||
| Texas |
9.14 | % | 7.54 | % | 8.66 | % | 9.24 | % | ||||||||
| Pennsylvania |
5.05 | % | (3) | (3) | (3) | |||||||||||
| New Jersey |
5.45 | % | 5.01 | % | (3) | (3) | ||||||||||
| Illinois |
6.34 | % | 5.62 | % | 5.07 | % | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
| Florida |
8.33 | % | 7.29 | % | 7.90 | % | 7.03 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
54.51 | % | 47.76 | % | 45.15 | % | 44.06 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Balances and percentages may not add to total due to rounding. |
| (2) | As a percent of total outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
| (3) | This state accounted for less than 5% of the outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
A-4
Table of Contents
| Loan Securitization |
VALET 2013-1 | VALET 2013-2 | VALET 2014-1 | VALET 2014-2 | ||||||||||||
| Closing Date |
February 27, 2013 | November 13, 2013 | April 30, 2014 | October 22, 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off Date |
January 26, 2013 | September 28, 2013 | March 1, 2014 | September 27, 2014 | ||||||||||||
| By Original Term(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| 12 months—18 months |
0.03 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| 19 months—24 months |
0.24 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| 25 months—30 months |
0.01 | % | 0.03 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| 31 months—36 months |
3.12 | % | 4.06 | % | 3.15 | % | 2.20 | % | ||||||||
| 37 months—42 months |
0.03 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.05 | % | ||||||||
| 43 months—48 months |
3.62 | % | 3.83 | % | 3.42 | % | 2.62 | % | ||||||||
| 49 months—54 months |
0.14 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| 55 months—60 months |
38.90 | % | 31.51 | % | 37.62 | % | 37.38 | % | ||||||||
| 61 months—66 months |
23.17 | % | 26.54 | % | 19.26 | % | 15.87 | % | ||||||||
| 67 months—72 months |
30.73 | % | 33.59 | % | 36.05 | % | 41.58 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By Remaining Term(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| 6 months or less |
0.00 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| 7 months—12 months |
0.02 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.04 | % | ||||||||
| 13 months—18 months |
0.10 | % | 0.09 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| 19 months—24 months |
0.15 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| 25 months—30 months |
1.09 | % | 2.42 | % | 1.25 | % | 0.63 | % | ||||||||
| 31 months—36 months |
2.05 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.75 | % | ||||||||
| 37 months—42 months |
1.44 | % | 1.95 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.73 | % | ||||||||
| 43 months—48 months |
2.49 | % | 5.67 | % | 4.72 | % | 13.39 | % | ||||||||
| 49 months—54 months |
21.33 | % | 20.50 | % | 16.61 | % | 19.05 | % | ||||||||
| 55 months—60 months |
35.91 | % | 31.27 | % | 34.77 | % | 27.76 | % | ||||||||
| 61 months—66 months |
21.98 | % | 22.55 | % | 19.43 | % | 15.75 | % | ||||||||
| 67 months—72 months |
13.42 | % | 13.46 | % | 19.27 | % | 18.32 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By Contract Rate(1) |
||||||||||||||||
| 0.00%—0.99% |
22.10 | % | 22.78 | % | 26.97 | % | 30.87 | % | ||||||||
| 1.00%—1.99% |
21.89 | % | 23.31 | % | 23.47 | % | 19.57 | % | ||||||||
| 2.00%—2.99% |
22.85 | % | 22.68 | % | 21.69 | % | 19.35 | % | ||||||||
| 3.00%—3.99% |
16.99 | % | 16.39 | % | 14.79 | % | 15.55 | % | ||||||||
| 4.00%—4.99% |
9.08 | % | 8.05 | % | 6.52 | % | 7.09 | % | ||||||||
| 5.00%—5.99% |
3.67 | % | 3.38 | % | 2.98 | % | 3.05 | % | ||||||||
| 6.00%—6.99% |
1.66 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.85 | % | ||||||||
| 7.00%—7.99% |
0.86 | % | 0.88 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.07 | % | ||||||||
| 8.00%—8.99% |
0.66 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.95 | % | ||||||||
| 9.00%—9.99% |
0.17 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| 10.00%—10.99% |
0.06 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.17 | % | ||||||||
| 11.00%—11.99% |
0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.11 | % | ||||||||
| 12.00%—12.99% |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| 13.00%—13.99% |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| 14.00%—14.99% |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| By State, States Representing More than 5%(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
| California |
16.86 | % | 17.22 | % | 18.61 | % | 16.45 | % | ||||||||
| New York |
5.89 | % | 5.70 | % | 6.53 | % | 5.76 | % | ||||||||
| Texas |
9.25 | % | 10.09 | % | 10.49 | % | 8.90 | % | ||||||||
| Pennsylvania |
(3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | ||||||||||||
| New Jersey |
(3) | (3) | (3) | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
| Illinois |
5.38 | % | 5.24 | % | 5.92 | % | (3) | |||||||||
| Florida |
7.35 | % | 7.32 | % | 8.13 | % | 7.69 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total |
44.73 | % | 45.57 | % | 49.68 | % | 44.13 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Balances and percentages may not add to total due to rounding. |
| (2) | As a percent of total outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
| (3) | This state accounted for less than 5% of the outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date. |
A-5
Table of Contents
Prepayment Speed Information
Set forth below is prepayment speed information relating to VW Credit, Inc.’s securitized portfolios of retail installment sale contracts and installment loans. Prepayment speed information is present in the chart below for each securitization transaction for as long as such securitization transaction remains outstanding. For more information regarding prepayment speeds, you should refer to “Weighted Average Life of the Notes” in this prospectus.
VALET 2010-1 to VALET 2014-2(1)
| Period |
VALET 2010-1 |
VALET 2011-1 |
VALET 2012-1 |
VALET 2012-2 |
VALET 2013-1 |
VALET 2013-2 |
VALET 2014-1 |
VALET 2014-2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 |
0.79 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.70 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 |
0.72 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.84 | % | 1.28 | % | 0.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 |
0.73 | % | 0.79 | % | 1.03 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.97 | % | 0.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 |
1.02 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 |
0.81 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.82 | % | 1.41 | % | 0.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 |
0.87 | % | 0.89 | % | 1.06 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 7 |
1.13 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.16 | % | 0.91 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 8 |
1.03 | % | 0.91 | % | 1.29 | % | 0.86 | % | 0.93 | % | 1.39 | % | 0.94 | % | 1.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 |
1.06 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.98 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.02 | % | 1.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 |
1.20 | % | 1.21 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.45 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 11 |
0.95 | % | 1.03 | % | 1.12 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.94 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 12 |
1.14 | % | 0.90 | % | 1.03 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 13 |
1.06 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.03 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 14 |
0.98 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.95 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 15 |
1.17 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.02 | % | 1.23 | % | 0.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 16 |
1.35 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.22 | % | 0.91 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 17 |
1.19 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 18 |
1.23 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.28 | % | 0.99 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 19 |
1.47 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 20 |
1.33 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 21 |
1.53 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 22 |
1.28 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 23 |
1.30 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 24 |
1.44 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 25 |
1.33 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 26 |
1.16 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 27 |
1.56 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 28 |
1.28 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 29 |
1.38 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.20 | % | 2.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 30 |
1.48 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.18 | % | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 31 |
1.33 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 32 |
1.47 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 33 |
1.34 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 34 |
1.29 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 35 |
1.35 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 36 |
1.20 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.87 | % | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 37 |
1.24 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 38 |
1.21 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 39 |
1.36 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 40 |
1.23 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 41 |
1.32 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 42 |
1.25 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 43 |
1.18 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 44 |
1.33 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 45 |
1.07 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | The “Prepayment Amount” is defined as the non-scheduled amortization of the pool of receivables for the applicable period. This includes voluntary prepayments, voluntary early payoffs, payments from third parties, repurchases, aggregate amount of Defaulted Receivables and servicer advances. This Prepayment Amount is converted into a monthly Single Month Mortality Rate “SMM” expressed as a percentage which is the Prepayment Amount divided by the previous month’s actual month-end aggregate net pool balance less the scheduled payments made during the month. The “Prepayment Speeds” shown in the chart are derived by converting the SMM into the ABS Speed by dividing (a) the SMM by (b) the sum of (i) one and (ii) the SMM multiplied by the age of the pool, in months, minus one. The age of the pool is assumed to be the weighted average age of the pool at cut-off date plus the number of months since the cut-off date. |
A-6
Table of Contents
Prepayment Speed
Set forth below is historical minimum, maximum and average prepayment speed information based on one month ABS speed aggregated for all included securitization transactions for each month following each such securitization transaction’s issuance for as long as such securitization transaction remains outstanding. For more information regarding the prepayment assumption model, you should refer to “Weighted Average Life of the Notes” in this prospectus.
| (1) | Investors are encouraged to carefully review the table under “—Prepayment Speed Information” above, which contains the underlying historical data used in preparing the above graph. The data used to complete the information reflected with respect to later months is based on less than all transactions listed because more recently issued transactions will only be reflected to the extent of their current number of months outstanding and earlier issued transactions may have amortized more quickly than the number of months reflected on the above graph. |
| (2) | Pool characteristics will vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction and investors are encouraged to carefully review the characteristics of the receivables for each securitization transaction represented in the above graph beginning on page A-2 of this prospectus under “Original Pool Characteristics as of Cut-off Date.” Performance may also vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction, and there can be no assurance that the performance of any prior securitization transaction will correspond to or be an accurate predictor of the performance of the receivables. |
| (3) | Period average for each month is based on the sum of the actual ABS prepayment speeds for all transactions outstanding in such month divided by the total number of transactions outstanding in such month. |
A-7
Table of Contents
Delinquency Experience
Set forth below is delinquency information relating to VW Credit, Inc.’s securitized portfolios of retail installment sale contracts and installment loans for new and used automobiles presented on a monthly basis.
VALET 2010-1(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| January 2010 |
$ | 1,489,119,249.63 | $ | 3,939,897.50 | 0.26 | % | $ | 363,333.41 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2010 |
$ | 1,450,002,178.47 | $ | 4,064,497.47 | 0.28 | % | $ | 653,396.75 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2010 |
$ | 1,410,942,148.64 | $ | 5,664,632.64 | 0.40 | % | $ | 584,901.93 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2010 |
$ | 1,362,891,415.63 | $ | 4,865,755.07 | 0.36 | % | $ | 914,816.61 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2010 |
$ | 1,324,960,800.16 | $ | 4,811,714.60 | 0.36 | % | $ | 1,133,712.71 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2010 |
$ | 1,287,220,256.02 | $ | 5,786,410.20 | 0.45 | % | $ | 701,180.00 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2010 |
$ | 1,239,582,764.10 | $ | 6,107,503.43 | 0.49 | % | $ | 1,266,543.89 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2010 |
$ | 1,200,570,446.14 | $ | 6,434,911.08 | 0.54 | % | $ | 1,597,213.52 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2010 |
$ | 1,161,809,984.75 | $ | 7,072,309.42 | 0.61 | % | $ | 1,393,848.91 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2010 |
$ | 1,115,359,170.80 | $ | 6,788,954.18 | 0.61 | % | $ | 1,390,959.46 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2010 |
$ | 1,079,614,847.02 | $ | 7,134,804.17 | 0.66 | % | $ | 1,410,834.41 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2010 |
$ | 1,036,566,221.40 | $ | 7,035,777.89 | 0.68 | % | $ | 1,336,518.98 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2011 |
$ | 1,000,205,449.95 | $ | 7,241,048.09 | 0.72 | % | $ | 1,300,129.94 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2011 |
$ | 964,669,755.47 | $ | 5,653,885.17 | 0.59 | % | $ | 1,337,746.51 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2011 |
$ | 925,908,206.26 | $ | 5,500,794.98 | 0.59 | % | $ | 741,425.64 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2011 |
$ | 881,431,390.54 | $ | 5,604,743.71 | 0.64 | % | $ | 1,188,378.58 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2011 |
$ | 845,427,636.01 | $ | 6,405,417.86 | 0.76 | % | $ | 1,090,645.88 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2011 |
$ | 810,349,981.04 | $ | 6,264,786.47 | 0.77 | % | $ | 1,317,834.09 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2011 |
$ | 766,779,185.00 | $ | 6,381,559.96 | 0.83 | % | $ | 1,298,860.28 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2011 |
$ | 731,724,908.14 | $ | 6,328,262.15 | 0.86 | % | $ | 1,388,652.59 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2011 |
$ | 689,397,738.25 | $ | 6,343,173.98 | 0.92 | % | $ | 1,243,875.92 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2011 |
$ | 656,889,796.89 | $ | 6,488,305.83 | 0.99 | % | $ | 1,056,431.12 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2011 |
$ | 625,055,103.44 | $ | 6,712,541.39 | 1.07 | % | $ | 1,212,829.07 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2011 |
$ | 587,262,853.67 | $ | 6,410,391.52 | 1.09 | % | $ | 1,395,516.34 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 556,370,177.95 | $ | 6,167,024.48 | 1.11 | % | $ | 844,682.06 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 528,364,533.12 | $ | 5,119,554.46 | 0.97 | % | $ | 1,122,337.61 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 490,459,352.76 | $ | 4,885,869.85 | 1.00 | % | $ | 713,763.03 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 463,420,559.66 | $ | 4,535,381.06 | 0.98 | % | $ | 794,533.99 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 435,838,251.05 | $ | 4,157,518.89 | 0.95 | % | $ | 709,742.44 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 405,372,021.57 | $ | 4,302,991.88 | 1.06 | % | $ | 722,849.01 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 381,913,139.38 | $ | 4,091,279.30 | 1.07 | % | $ | 736,671.25 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 354,241,594.55 | $ | 4,354,497.18 | 1.23 | % | $ | 772,149.27 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 332,698,710.01 | $ | 4,435,241.76 | 1.33 | % | $ | 766,262.24 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 312,153,335.85 | $ | 4,220,324.34 | 1.35 | % | $ | 524,848.60 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 289,237,817.19 | $ | 4,649,448.98 | 1.61 | % | $ | 845,853.83 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 271,622,395.01 | $ | 4,107,463.29 | 1.51 | % | $ | 810,530.91 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 253,924,086.37 | $ | 3,844,539.64 | 1.51 | % | $ | 628,750.19 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 237,016,128.72 | $ | 3,147,652.66 | 1.33 | % | $ | 527,634.43 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 215,619,850.77 | $ | 2,922,997.19 | 1.36 | % | $ | 375,070.62 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 200,052,573.84 | $ | 2,590,558.90 | 1.29 | % | $ | 289,843.20 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 181,977,382.27 | $ | 2,780,719.75 | 1.53 | % | $ | 466,622.11 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 167,587,545.59 | $ | 2,614,875.34 | 1.56 | % | $ | 426,400.21 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 154,480,029.61 | $ | 2,387,297.59 | 1.55 | % | $ | 413,585.66 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 138,765,878.31 | $ | 2,573,399.47 | 1.85 | % | $ | 416,048.08 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-8
Table of Contents
VALET 2011-1(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| March 2011 |
$ | 1,626,586,376.87 | $ | 2,485,056.74 | 0.15 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2011 |
$ | 1,578,765,959.30 | $ | 2,888,809.70 | 0.18 | % | $ | 633,359.78 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2011 |
$ | 1,537,857,954.08 | $ | 3,656,989.00 | 0.24 | % | $ | 491,367.39 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2011 |
$ | 1,500,559,708.98 | $ | 4,164,788.19 | 0.28 | % | $ | 726,494.57 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2011 |
$ | 1,450,788,952.36 | $ | 4,269,142.21 | 0.29 | % | $ | 896,207.76 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2011 |
$ | 1,410,858,810.33 | $ | 5,112,059.00 | 0.36 | % | $ | 937,857.35 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2011 |
$ | 1,360,632,331.49 | $ | 5,343,219.45 | 0.39 | % | $ | 923,298.45 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2011 |
$ | 1,321,137,975.20 | $ | 5,705,767.92 | 0.43 | % | $ | 646,938.36 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2011 |
$ | 1,283,014,274.32 | $ | 6,800,334.74 | 0.53 | % | $ | 807,556.12 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2011 |
$ | 1,234,314,910.73 | $ | 7,309,505.35 | 0.59 | % | $ | 1,143,203.46 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 1,195,127,259.61 | $ | 6,582,269.24 | 0.55 | % | $ | 1,482,524.22 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 1,158,174,868.68 | $ | 5,351,356.37 | 0.46 | % | $ | 755,829.60 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 1,107,288,496.15 | $ | 5,601,087.44 | 0.51 | % | $ | 804,261.13 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 1,068,652,662.31 | $ | 5,618,548.46 | 0.53 | % | $ | 793,276.63 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 1,029,467,411.11 | $ | 5,701,610.62 | 0.55 | % | $ | 1,071,341.60 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 983,412,918.34 | $ | 5,944,348.46 | 0.60 | % | $ | 843,525.70 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 945,524,833.43 | $ | 6,376,231.38 | 0.67 | % | $ | 1,300,318.65 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 898,629,187.26 | $ | 5,769,575.44 | 0.64 | % | $ | 1,250,670.15 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 862,504,705.05 | $ | 6,281,302.67 | 0.73 | % | $ | 1,143,574.15 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 826,768,368.89 | $ | 5,619,080.72 | 0.68 | % | $ | 1,162,598.59 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 785,889,190.74 | $ | 5,787,144.22 | 0.74 | % | $ | 1,082,433.89 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 752,515,263.59 | $ | 5,779,199.75 | 0.77 | % | $ | 1,267,017.68 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 719,830,132.37 | $ | 5,347,514.65 | 0.74 | % | $ | 1,161,485.92 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 688,361,643.04 | $ | 4,722,647.79 | 0.69 | % | $ | 811,560.11 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 647,047,163.13 | $ | 4,643,063.10 | 0.72 | % | $ | 639,755.99 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 616,310,856.51 | $ | 4,523,154.82 | 0.73 | % | $ | 638,903.18 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 579,938,777.02 | $ | 4,744,157.76 | 0.82 | % | $ | 557,517.95 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 549,667,635.02 | $ | 4,635,300.39 | 0.84 | % | $ | 661,845.82 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 521,075,528.52 | $ | 4,090,901.60 | 0.79 | % | $ | 746,828.09 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 486,506,673.49 | $ | 4,315,605.43 | 0.89 | % | $ | 694,038.48 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 460,200,432.98 | $ | 4,143,452.73 | 0.90 | % | $ | 863,942.18 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 435,109,616.22 | $ | 3,822,467.22 | 0.88 | % | $ | 718,594.77 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 406,184,712.58 | $ | 4,355,956.98 | 1.07 | % | $ | 970,545.01 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 383,779,529.14 | $ | 4,605,551.38 | 1.20 | % | $ | 814,680.33 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 357,214,823.69 | $ | 4,016,325.91 | 1.12 | % | $ | 737,557.16 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 335,921,868.54 | $ | 3,422,995.94 | 1.02 | % | $ | 620,830.80 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 313,642,232.87 | $ | 2,494,274.23 | 0.80 | % | $ | 415,857.54 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 293,932,816.47 | $ | 2,760,524.77 | 0.94 | % | $ | 369,287.40 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 270,851,413.33 | $ | 2,727,266.61 | 1.01 | % | $ | 324,825.04 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 251,846,264.87 | $ | 2,798,292.39 | 1.11 | % | $ | 446,355.23 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 233,560,441.83 | $ | 2,443,324.90 | 1.05 | % | $ | 402,678.14 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 212,468,272.76 | $ | 2,478,422.60 | 1.17 | % | $ | 425,049.38 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 196,188,201.44 | $ | 2,461,314.60 | 1.25 | % | $ | 320,339.45 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 177,095,764.72 | $ | 2,420,912.26 | 1.37 | % | $ | 210,040.53 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 162,757,423.40 | $ | 2,024,928.62 | 1.24 | % | $ | 365,085.84 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-9
Table of Contents
VALET 2012-1(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 1,320,320,426.75 | $ | 2,756,279.61 | 0.21 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 1,289,021,899.50 | $ | 2,260,394.05 | 0.18 | % | $ | 465,340.65 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 1,247,198,305.04 | $ | 2,591,605.93 | 0.21 | % | $ | 330,171.12 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 1,216,079,509.87 | $ | 2,947,465.14 | 0.24 | % | $ | 418,587.61 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 1,183,171,800.72 | $ | 2,701,655.98 | 0.23 | % | $ | 613,627.00 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 1,144,181,183.03 | $ | 2,944,048.10 | 0.26 | % | $ | 526,327.64 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 1,111,109,613.03 | $ | 4,406,123.43 | 0.40 | % | $ | 500,549.91 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 1,070,153,889.09 | $ | 4,097,228.04 | 0.38 | % | $ | 747,922.77 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 1,038,544,570.12 | $ | 4,657,949.63 | 0.45 | % | $ | 801,865.23 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 1,007,593,498.48 | $ | 4,248,729.04 | 0.42 | % | $ | 808,722.39 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 970,546,646.85 | $ | 5,041,768.58 | 0.52 | % | $ | 1,156,384.24 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 940,382,338.13 | $ | 5,309,946.09 | 0.56 | % | $ | 1,090,428.75 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 908,969,758.94 | $ | 4,864,090.00 | 0.54 | % | $ | 967,031.72 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 878,178,848.21 | $ | 4,688,240.46 | 0.53 | % | $ | 739,725.72 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 837,229,928.55 | $ | 4,287,927.82 | 0.51 | % | $ | 628,485.19 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 805,937,602.05 | $ | 4,748,035.16 | 0.59 | % | $ | 561,179.20 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 768,680,828.63 | $ | 3,962,719.76 | 0.52 | % | $ | 854,211.66 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 737,834,696.90 | $ | 4,340,621.53 | 0.59 | % | $ | 927,549.83 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 707,606,277.50 | $ | 4,282,478.68 | 0.61 | % | $ | 718,921.03 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 671,892,263.54 | $ | 4,238,107.68 | 0.63 | % | $ | 1,021,126.05 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 643,515,662.89 | $ | 4,660,106.05 | 0.72 | % | $ | 1,046,843.76 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 616,316,694.03 | $ | 4,518,199.14 | 0.73 | % | $ | 934,869.19 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 584,592,130.34 | $ | 4,545,160.82 | 0.78 | % | $ | 1,049,111.92 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 559,761,007.28 | $ | 4,935,619.89 | 0.88 | % | $ | 807,387.30 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 528,802,113.52 | $ | 4,883,264.08 | 0.92 | % | $ | 908,395.56 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 503,831,786.24 | $ | 4,531,617.61 | 0.90 | % | $ | 630,833.59 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 477,695,022.82 | $ | 3,114,713.35 | 0.65 | % | $ | 619,784.95 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 453,693,675.13 | $ | 3,954,572.44 | 0.87 | % | $ | 546,835.47 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 425,791,311.14 | $ | 3,765,839.54 | 0.88 | % | $ | 606,581.56 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 402,997,667.01 | $ | 3,352,514.02 | 0.83 | % | $ | 802,380.30 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 380,865,912.28 | $ | 3,346,500.37 | 0.88 | % | $ | 567,086.96 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 355,069,840.83 | $ | 3,771,492.09 | 1.06 | % | $ | 700,903.23 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 335,154,288.63 | $ | 3,110,395.56 | 0.93 | % | $ | 493,251.59 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 312,305,456.62 | $ | 3,433,477.60 | 1.10 | % | $ | 484,604.92 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 294,836,939.57 | $ | 2,957,040.74 | 1.00 | % | $ | 569,775.55 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 278,178,933.74 | $ | 2,934,965.96 | 1.06 | % | $ | 569,696.71 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 257,826,885.59 | $ | 3,144,996.26 | 1.22 | % | $ | 539,386.84 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 241,601,991.69 | $ | 2,386,557.29 | 0.99 | % | $ | 450,878.79 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 225,429,762.53 | $ | 1,720,848.28 | 0.76 | % | $ | 469,046.88 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 210,000,506.48 | $ | 2,325,742.58 | 1.11 | % | $ | 285,190.12 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 191,796,960.00 | $ | 2,351,967.06 | 1.23 | % | $ | 529,401.67 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 177,548,909.08 | $ | 2,410,512.93 | 1.36 | % | $ | 361,365.22 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 161,370,718.11 | $ | 2,754,478.13 | 1.71 | % | $ | 360,381.77 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 148,510,777.55 | $ | 2,556,030.69 | 1.72 | % | $ | 361,816.28 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 136,530,274.98 | $ | 2,283,381.22 | 1.67 | % | $ | 431,980.48 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 122,271,518.13 | $ | 2,291,801.59 | 1.87 | % | $ | 339,105.42 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-10
Table of Contents
VALET 2012-2(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 1,290,562,816.86 | $ | 2,260,668.22 | 0.18 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 1,259,043,864.79 | $ | 2,290,641.56 | 0.18 | % | $ | 288,034.64 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 1,221,974,030.54 | $ | 2,579,677.91 | 0.21 | % | $ | 325,545.10 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 1,191,814,518.54 | $ | 2,814,240.94 | 0.24 | % | $ | 335,135.23 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 1,162,533,000.16 | $ | 3,053,609.36 | 0.26 | % | $ | 429,851.64 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 1,132,795,683.67 | $ | 3,072,321.61 | 0.27 | % | $ | 478,892.54 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 1,092,160,464.67 | $ | 2,950,712.17 | 0.27 | % | $ | 295,789.48 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 1,061,631,495.27 | $ | 2,741,156.06 | 0.26 | % | $ | 428,666.17 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 1,024,452,656.78 | $ | 2,695,188.74 | 0.26 | % | $ | 274,048.87 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 993,625,973.49 | $ | 2,991,557.63 | 0.30 | % | $ | 396,395.03 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 963,278,983.03 | $ | 3,352,175.66 | 0.35 | % | $ | 405,465.91 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 926,471,499.12 | $ | 3,324,060.49 | 0.36 | % | $ | 645,784.29 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 897,472,679.52 | $ | 3,358,650.32 | 0.37 | % | $ | 717,678.31 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 868,592,423.80 | $ | 3,655,242.50 | 0.42 | % | $ | 415,872.56 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 833,883,581.75 | $ | 3,377,071.79 | 0.40 | % | $ | 600,059.66 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 807,398,337.83 | $ | 4,139,333.81 | 0.51 | % | $ | 541,506.83 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 773,471,782.12 | $ | 3,686,352.16 | 0.48 | % | $ | 501,098.69 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 746,207,547.14 | $ | 2,926,895.54 | 0.39 | % | $ | 452,374.53 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 716,919,938.57 | $ | 2,401,979.33 | 0.34 | % | $ | 384,154.48 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 688,623,699.83 | $ | 3,154,400.15 | 0.46 | % | $ | 380,114.56 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 655,243,411.23 | $ | 3,012,147.90 | 0.46 | % | $ | 310,302.62 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 628,531,576.95 | $ | 2,778,246.35 | 0.44 | % | $ | 648,478.60 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 602,579,333.43 | $ | 3,262,815.68 | 0.54 | % | $ | 425,351.92 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 570,817,463.92 | $ | 3,302,874.25 | 0.58 | % | $ | 493,601.17 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 546,420,629.43 | $ | 2,982,949.95 | 0.55 | % | $ | 602,233.14 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 518,054,536.63 | $ | 2,984,338.05 | 0.58 | % | $ | 482,430.26 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 495,974,880.88 | $ | 3,099,380.63 | 0.62 | % | $ | 376,524.73 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 473,446,690.49 | $ | 3,058,282.05 | 0.65 | % | $ | 622,812.67 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 446,148,489.41 | $ | 3,256,655.30 | 0.73 | % | $ | 515,546.01 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 424,606,327.36 | $ | 2,298,672.77 | 0.54 | % | $ | 514,924.75 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 401,734,959.88 | $ | 2,393,987.16 | 0.60 | % | $ | 299,184.84 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 380,104,320.70 | $ | 2,566,137.28 | 0.68 | % | $ | 375,073.10 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 355,652,852.18 | $ | 2,422,807.50 | 0.68 | % | $ | 374,737.86 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 335,506,240.50 | $ | 2,790,857.34 | 0.83 | % | $ | 344,493.61 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 311,889,322.54 | $ | 3,182,424.95 | 1.02 | % | $ | 690,893.01 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 294,295,595.84 | $ | 3,728,831.14 | 1.27 | % | $ | 570,372.01 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 276,550,613.42 | $ | 2,782,748.29 | 1.01 | % | $ | 781,364.29 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 256,501,569.86 | $ | 2,632,306.04 | 1.03 | % | $ | 458,810.10 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 241,257,361.77 | $ | 2,525,731.65 | 1.05 | % | $ | 603,469.65 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 225,891,858.36 | $ | 2,457,369.47 | 1.09 | % | $ | 583,503.40 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 207,914,132.04 | $ | 1,991,036.61 | 0.96 | % | $ | 542,666.12 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 193,736,574.71 | $ | 1,439,830.48 | 0.74 | % | $ | 326,018.14 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 179,257,270.01 | $ | 1,263,858.48 | 0.71 | % | $ | 247,816.67 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 162,882,558.09 | $ | 1,128,764.99 | 0.69 | % | $ | 308,661.99 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 150,493,219.33 | $ | 1,334,462.14 | 0.89 | % | $ | 242,984.56 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 137,056,390.16 | $ | 1,627,178.07 | 1.19 | % | $ | 304,884.42 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 125,264,233.18 | $ | 1,856,255.78 | 1.48 | % | $ | 273,694.31 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-11
Table of Contents
VALET 2013-1(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 –90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 1,289,587,845.24 | $ | 2,399,733.60 | 0.19 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 1,247,649,233.32 | $ | 2,682,060.89 | 0.21 | % | $ | 433,015.56 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 1,215,025,950.55 | $ | 2,432,955.69 | 0.20 | % | $ | 286,663.78 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 1,175,039,046.94 | $ | 2,335,890.84 | 0.20 | % | $ | 431,288.65 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 1,142,606,146.69 | $ | 3,206,138.50 | 0.28 | % | $ | 249,161.33 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 1,111,051,004.21 | $ | 2,808,392.75 | 0.25 | % | $ | 568,372.71 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 1,071,687,467.01 | $ | 3,386,877.35 | 0.32 | % | $ | 473,232.86 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 1,040,512,471.25 | $ | 3,354,385.49 | 0.32 | % | $ | 936,061.87 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 1,008,792,060.89 | $ | 3,693,285.69 | 0.37 | % | $ | 588,213.07 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 971,469,168.22 | $ | 4,003,697.75 | 0.41 | % | $ | 868,577.56 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 942,182,859.49 | $ | 4,197,974.01 | 0.45 | % | $ | 876,821.21 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 905,840,392.07 | $ | 4,365,884.16 | 0.48 | % | $ | 860,957.77 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 875,442,030.38 | $ | 3,973,931.91 | 0.45 | % | $ | 841,743.63 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 842,866,614.13 | $ | 2,838,031.04 | 0.34 | % | $ | 749,423.00 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 812,990,729.23 | $ | 3,445,506.03 | 0.42 | % | $ | 462,785.84 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 775,197,034.84 | $ | 3,855,933.22 | 0.50 | % | $ | 778,465.92 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 744,997,305.29 | $ | 4,136,134.41 | 0.56 | % | $ | 560,369.09 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 715,512,548.69 | $ | 3,834,874.33 | 0.54 | % | $ | 762,143.37 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 680,991,314.70 | $ | 3,689,517.75 | 0.54 | % | $ | 900,320.69 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 652,975,013.43 | $ | 3,960,301.19 | 0.61 | % | $ | 856,223.10 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 620,022,821.65 | $ | 3,355,527.53 | 0.54 | % | $ | 820,655.36 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 594,677,295.33 | $ | 3,111,622.72 | 0.52 | % | $ | 868,946.43 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 569,462,931.84 | $ | 3,679,709.83 | 0.65 | % | $ | 605,841.95 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 539,110,144.07 | $ | 3,203,333.46 | 0.59 | % | $ | 576,733.98 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 514,585,387.13 | $ | 2,825,473.39 | 0.55 | % | $ | 423,337.77 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 490,094,859.22 | $ | 2,142,708.92 | 0.44 | % | $ | 449,608.80 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 465,341,190.78 | $ | 2,807,839.73 | 0.60 | % | $ | 454,709.35 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 437,006,069.46 | $ | 2,654,908.14 | 0.61 | % | $ | 395,262.08 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 414,118,959.60 | $ | 3,271,008.51 | 0.79 | % | $ | 583,009.46 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 386,715,318.18 | $ | 3,600,559.13 | 0.93 | % | $ | 889,149.04 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 366,216,244.03 | $ | 3,512,074.40 | 0.96 | % | $ | 816,577.85 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 345,969,460.02 | $ | 3,060,961.79 | 0.88 | % | $ | 777,135.13 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 322,213,416.06 | $ | 2,802,811.24 | 0.87 | % | $ | 584,863.04 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 304,489,272.98 | $ | 3,254,845.62 | 1.07 | % | $ | 555,614.04 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 287,278,184.47 | $ | 2,591,878.72 | 0.90 | % | $ | 647,758.67 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 266,454,737.38 | $ | 2,503,841.20 | 0.94 | % | $ | 450,665.25 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 249,924,977.92 | $ | 1,909,590.78 | 0.76 | % | $ | 407,976.97 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 233,454,244.77 | $ | 1,476,446.90 | 0.63 | % | $ | 385,443.00 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 214,623,176.66 | $ | 1,545,012.55 | 0.72 | % | $ | 286,183.63 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 200,394,189.93 | $ | 1,307,566.19 | 0.65 | % | $ | 288,957.29 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 184,711,423.44 | $ | 1,775,587.27 | 0.96 | % | $ | 324,851.35 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 171,146,585.78 | $ | 2,050,973.51 | 1.20 | % | $ | 510,914.00 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 156,428,270.31 | $ | 1,773,385.17 | 1.13 | % | $ | 469,389.69 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 143,311,895.69 | $ | 1,687,096.81 | 1.18 | % | $ | 319,842.09 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 130,987,313.75 | $ | 1,676,530.57 | 1.28 | % | $ | 342,278.81 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-12
Table of Contents
VALET 2013-2(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 1,556,559,437.83 | $ | 2,255,053.41 | 0.14 | % | $ | 88,000.59 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 1,511,368,812.81 | $ | 2,775,799.45 | 0.18 | % | $ | 662,305.84 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 1,475,253,746.39 | $ | 4,283,736.90 | 0.29 | % | $ | 423,287.92 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 1,429,505,316.52 | $ | 3,804,814.95 | 0.27 | % | $ | 818,527.87 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 1,391,054,880.89 | $ | 3,584,065.35 | 0.26 | % | $ | 508,123.61 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 1,349,606,006.82 | $ | 3,634,674.18 | 0.27 | % | $ | 506,188.51 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 1,310,719,411.73 | $ | 3,822,632.37 | 0.29 | % | $ | 468,192.11 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 1,263,684,625.07 | $ | 4,010,553.23 | 0.32 | % | $ | 429,827.72 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 1,224,176,639.17 | $ | 4,581,626.68 | 0.37 | % | $ | 682,390.71 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 1,185,677,793.16 | $ | 4,657,651.95 | 0.39 | % | $ | 809,271.12 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 1,137,249,071.48 | $ | 5,673,906.38 | 0.50 | % | $ | 852,363.05 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 1,099,359,777.39 | $ | 5,322,392.82 | 0.48 | % | $ | 1,071,663.22 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 1,054,919,212.01 | $ | 5,651,040.12 | 0.54 | % | $ | 868,072.91 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 1,019,520,833.82 | $ | 5,014,125.19 | 0.49 | % | $ | 1,370,943.68 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 985,064,482.85 | $ | 5,019,658.40 | 0.51 | % | $ | 1,076,494.25 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 941,465,286.51 | $ | 5,859,390.09 | 0.62 | % | $ | 959,782.73 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 905,413,433.86 | $ | 4,327,546.02 | 0.48 | % | $ | 1,266,339.99 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 867,372,077.54 | $ | 3,928,414.81 | 0.45 | % | $ | 605,935.93 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 825,682,366.92 | $ | 4,570,446.17 | 0.55 | % | $ | 667,388.93 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 788,533,786.25 | $ | 4,496,038.84 | 0.57 | % | $ | 932,211.62 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 754,076,199.28 | $ | 5,620,612.65 | 0.75 | % | $ | 724,849.19 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 713,407,925.96 | $ | 6,072,897.66 | 0.85 | % | $ | 1,243,606.23 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 681,966,413.72 | $ | 6,423,619.34 | 0.94 | % | $ | 993,815.44 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 650,273,473.74 | $ | 4,673,825.54 | 0.72 | % | $ | 1,706,148.16 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 612,393,681.09 | $ | 5,621,770.05 | 0.92 | % | $ | 786,897.81 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 584,694,912.58 | $ | 5,328,117.05 | 0.91 | % | $ | 1,056,548.66 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 557,344,823.41 | $ | 4,903,822.26 | 0.88 | % | $ | 1,365,312.45 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 523,823,361.77 | $ | 4,599,070.12 | 0.88 | % | $ | 1,011,041.37 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 497,621,822.83 | $ | 3,417,409.83 | 0.69 | % | $ | 805,290.41 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 471,950,141.53 | $ | 2,898,425.85 | 0.61 | % | $ | 635,721.17 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 442,015,368.72 | $ | 2,758,321.73 | 0.62 | % | $ | 740,400.23 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 419,042,548.57 | $ | 2,646,884.53 | 0.63 | % | $ | 701,172.12 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 393,319,915.72 | $ | 2,965,439.98 | 0.75 | % | $ | 672,844.97 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 370,972,095.40 | $ | 3,961,596.45 | 1.07 | % | $ | 810,171.74 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 347,396,075.66 | $ | 3,726,557.99 | 1.07 | % | $ | 1,065,250.81 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 325,573,637.13 | $ | 3,305,113.34 | 1.02 | % | $ | 1,021,849.59 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 305,250,298.64 | $ | 3,387,022.20 | 1.11 | % | $ | 758,727.03 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 286,092,503.65 | $ | 3,198,577.19 | 1.12 | % | $ | 1,000,170.05 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 266,306,478.43 | $ | 3,377,349.02 | 1.27 | % | $ | 1,081,577.36 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 239,783,257.18 | $ | 3,661,279.02 | 1.53 | % | $ | 1,032,175.46 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 210,751,891.25 | $ | 2,298,732.33 | 1.09 | % | $ | 684,922.51 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 184,382,615.24 | $ | 2,342,178.02 | 1.27 | % | $ | 319,677.86 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 167,441,580.28 | $ | 1,946,531.39 | 1.16 | % | $ | 357,378.24 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 150,839,191.44 | $ | 1,726,317.63 | 1.14 | % | $ | 460,487.20 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-13
Table of Contents
VALET 2014-1(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 1,266,619,282.19 | $ | 2,038,648.33 | 0.16 | % | $ | 280,430.39 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 1,226,958,958.89 | $ | 2,288,522.62 | 0.19 | % | $ | 304,615.04 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 1,193,863,659.80 | $ | 2,531,349.50 | 0.21 | % | $ | 331,499.90 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 1,160,840,888.85 | $ | 3,090,821.16 | 0.27 | % | $ | 361,768.55 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 1,120,470,628.30 | $ | 3,208,540.33 | 0.29 | % | $ | 516,946.71 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 1,089,299,310.08 | $ | 2,723,781.29 | 0.25 | % | $ | 793,940.15 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 1,049,742,408.41 | $ | 3,063,720.09 | 0.29 | % | $ | 532,422.71 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 1,019,540,260.73 | $ | 2,893,979.68 | 0.28 | % | $ | 725,321.19 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 988,484,119.64 | $ | 3,337,725.86 | 0.34 | % | $ | 756,994.74 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 950,746,177.43 | $ | 3,204,417.91 | 0.34 | % | $ | 664,021.94 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 919,020,388.47 | $ | 3,028,749.61 | 0.33 | % | $ | 567,988.52 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 887,873,637.51 | $ | 2,938,257.61 | 0.33 | % | $ | 380,739.33 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 857,606,806.94 | $ | 3,976,491.25 | 0.46 | % | $ | 487,459.12 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 819,657,195.42 | $ | 3,945,184.92 | 0.48 | % | $ | 504,770.77 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 788,884,975.68 | $ | 4,430,258.18 | 0.56 | % | $ | 866,777.28 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 752,279,428.34 | $ | 5,135,681.91 | 0.68 | % | $ | 780,783.13 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 724,039,996.39 | $ | 5,187,907.79 | 0.72 | % | $ | 879,737.89 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 695,110,847.10 | $ | 4,883,110.46 | 0.70 | % | $ | 1,109,638.48 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 661,006,039.92 | $ | 3,803,604.60 | 0.58 | % | $ | 873,924.31 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 635,149,768.47 | $ | 4,284,371.63 | 0.67 | % | $ | 1,092,623.95 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 610,157,886.47 | $ | 3,814,115.00 | 0.63 | % | $ | 1,158,970.58 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 578,817,069.58 | $ | 3,584,512.44 | 0.62 | % | $ | 977,129.78 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 554,738,875.32 | $ | 2,987,928.15 | 0.54 | % | $ | 786,517.79 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 527,194,657.72 | $ | 2,571,206.00 | 0.49 | % | $ | 516,401.49 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 501,971,284.80 | $ | 2,575,884.39 | 0.51 | % | $ | 517,349.06 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 479,922,054.38 | $ | 2,532,252.85 | 0.53 | % | $ | 705,732.71 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 455,333,470.34 | $ | 3,306,785.71 | 0.73 | % | $ | 516,238.64 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 433,516,604.25 | $ | 4,018,367.28 | 0.93 | % | $ | 639,647.35 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 410,494,578.14 | $ | 3,435,481.73 | 0.84 | % | $ | 1,103,271.90 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 389,023,415.45 | $ | 3,366,294.22 | 0.87 | % | $ | 786,953.73 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 369,222,234.38 | $ | 3,608,655.32 | 0.98 | % | $ | 970,613.21 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 349,967,185.37 | $ | 3,590,162.46 | 1.03 | % | $ | 912,179.74 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 330,796,574.27 | $ | 3,835,283.95 | 1.16 | % | $ | 972,441.55 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 300,317,233.56 | $ | 3,292,981.08 | 1.10 | % | $ | 1,178,788.74 | 0.39 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 264,009,815.11 | $ | 2,589,988.03 | 0.98 | % | $ | 637,975.20 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 230,991,653.86 | $ | 1,861,497.93 | 0.81 | % | $ | 425,204.29 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 212,009,840.49 | $ | 1,538,458.24 | 0.73 | % | $ | 384,049.15 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 194,061,706.83 | $ | 1,673,694.62 | 0.86 | % | $ | 433,118.69 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2017 |
$ | 178,302,207.29 | $ | 1,778,457.61 | 1.00 | % | $ | 366,151.98 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2017 |
$ | 164,058,750.50 | $ | 1,685,844.67 | 1.03 | % | $ | 485,647.10 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2017 |
$ | 150,406,144.55 | $ | 1,673,014.59 | 1.11 | % | $ | 358,893.30 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2017 |
$ | 137,868,205.84 | $ | 1,443,808.59 | 1.05 | % | $ | 298,143.16 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2017 |
$ | 125,794,940.51 | $ | 1,499,281.30 | 1.19 | % | $ | 303,311.48 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-14
Table of Contents
VALET 2014-2(1)(2)
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance |
31 – 60 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
61 – 90 Days Delinquent |
% of Ending Pool Balance |
||||||||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 1,040,931,145.75 | $ | 2,105,146.24 | 0.20 | % | $ | 18,772.27 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 1,014,965,530.07 | $ | 1,969,642.95 | 0.19 | % | $ | 521,124.57 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 988,937,304.73 | $ | 3,020,575.49 | 0.31 | % | $ | 506,298.23 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 956,515,740.45 | $ | 2,875,111.83 | 0.30 | % | $ | 682,629.11 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 929,772,739.51 | $ | 2,449,076.89 | 0.26 | % | $ | 479,720.73 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 901,777,621.56 | $ | 2,147,890.72 | 0.24 | % | $ | 255,681.24 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 875,012,753.34 | $ | 3,108,599.87 | 0.36 | % | $ | 327,394.20 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 840,994,756.89 | $ | 3,760,172.64 | 0.45 | % | $ | 504,441.86 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 814,839,290.03 | $ | 4,577,530.84 | 0.56 | % | $ | 716,682.35 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 782,934,968.66 | $ | 4,446,308.68 | 0.57 | % | $ | 597,065.05 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 758,258,880.12 | $ | 4,527,306.64 | 0.60 | % | $ | 886,602.21 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 732,260,296.47 | $ | 4,817,225.86 | 0.66 | % | $ | 868,038.20 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 701,759,686.66 | $ | 4,315,919.25 | 0.62 | % | $ | 580,291.73 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 677,137,074.79 | $ | 4,259,773.48 | 0.63 | % | $ | 799,549.34 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 654,405,992.35 | $ | 4,385,053.74 | 0.67 | % | $ | 1,144,825.86 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 626,811,503.63 | $ | 4,348,236.93 | 0.69 | % | $ | 634,294.43 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 604,377,719.43 | $ | 3,149,459.19 | 0.52 | % | $ | 776,991.90 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 581,387,655.01 | $ | 2,640,524.87 | 0.45 | % | $ | 688,014.00 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 554,941,600.75 | $ | 2,911,511.74 | 0.52 | % | $ | 692,973.20 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 533,910,306.63 | $ | 2,968,347.11 | 0.56 | % | $ | 721,242.02 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 510,257,452.41 | $ | 3,356,312.21 | 0.66 | % | $ | 818,990.54 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 489,262,024.80 | $ | 3,682,710.28 | 0.75 | % | $ | 811,936.75 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 466,914,422.64 | $ | 3,701,327.74 | 0.79 | % | $ | 852,119.02 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 446,037,239.59 | $ | 3,668,920.51 | 0.82 | % | $ | 1,052,209.03 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 426,574,276.00 | $ | 3,341,186.54 | 0.78 | % | $ | 1,277,854.55 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 407,433,299.07 | $ | 3,400,204.55 | 0.83 | % | $ | 1,043,486.77 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 388,088,123.91 | $ | 3,849,680.75 | 0.99 | % | $ | 1,388,615.63 | 0.36 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 356,245,285.93 | $ | 4,111,953.60 | 1.15 | % | $ | 1,338,198.59 | 0.38 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 317,615,046.97 | $ | 3,334,154.39 | 1.05 | % | $ | 912,232.08 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 281,291,120.24 | $ | 2,492,039.14 | 0.89 | % | $ | 482,983.29 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 260,016,064.62 | $ | 2,290,375.10 | 0.88 | % | $ | 339,889.45 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 240,854,979.45 | $ | 1,936,535.01 | 0.80 | % | $ | 433,150.12 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| June 2017 |
$ | 224,592,618.44 | $ | 2,195,372.68 | 0.98 | % | $ | 464,234.62 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||
| July 2017 |
$ | 209,183,539.89 | $ | 2,115,817.42 | 1.01 | % | $ | 452,424.91 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||
| August 2017 |
$ | 194,208,147.75 | $ | 1,913,204.14 | 0.99 | % | $ | 367,097.73 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
| September 2017 |
$ | 181,036,335.81 | $ | 1,730,709.73 | 0.96 | % | $ | 298,528.51 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||
| October 2017 |
$ | 167,719,740.90 | $ | 1,499,228.47 | 0.89 | % | $ | 444,879.57 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||||
| November 2017 |
$ | 156,036,519.11 | $ | 1,294,071.80 | 0.83 | % | $ | 444,670.24 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
| December 2017 |
$ | 144,739,993.41 | $ | 1,299,625.26 | 0.90 | % | $ | 286,271.95 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
| January 2018 |
$ | 132,692,501.18 | $ | 1,228,470.54 | 0.93 | % | $ | 377,534.66 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||
| February 2018 |
$ | 122,369,488.58 | $ | 1,028,328.51 | 0.84 | % | $ | 321,884.30 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||
| March 2018 |
$ | 111,692,996.28 | $ | 893,412.79 | 0.80 | % | $ | 113,343.95 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
| April 2018 |
$ | 101,640,554.37 | $ | 909,725.18 | 0.90 | % | $ | 180,592.89 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | A receivable is charged off when it becomes a Defaulted Receivable, and Defaulted Receivables are not reflected in the table. |
A-15
Table of Contents
31-60 Day Delinquencies as a Percentage of Ending Pool Balance(1)(2)
61-90 Day Delinquencies as a Percentage of Ending Pool Balance(1)(2)
A-16
Table of Contents
| (1) | An account is considered delinquent if 25% or more of the scheduled monthly payment is past due. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. |
| (2) | Investors are encouraged to carefully review the information set forth under “—Delinquency Experience” beginning on page A-8 of this prospectus, which contains the underlying historical data used in preparing the above graphs. Pool characteristics will vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction and investors are encouraged to carefully review the characteristics of the receivables for each securitization transaction represented in the above graph beginning on page A-2 of this prospectus under “Original Pool Characteristics as of Cut-off Date.” Performance may also vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction, and there can be no assurance that the performance of any prior securitization transaction will correspond to or be an accurate predictor of the performance of the receivables. |
A-17
Table of Contents
Credit Loss Experience
Set forth below is credit loss information relating to VW Credit, Inc.’s securitized portfolios of retail installment sale contracts and installment loans for new and used automobiles presented on a monthly basis.
VALET 2010-1
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,534,786,068.73
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged-off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| January 2010 |
$ | 106,785.82 | $ | 1,157.14 | $ | 105,628.68 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| February 2010 |
$ | 384,113.68 | $ | — | $ | 384,113.68 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||
| March 2010 |
$ | 898,122.00 | $ | 120,124.43 | $ | 777,997.57 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||
| April 2010 |
$ | 1,246,908.90 | $ | 361,894.17 | $ | 885,014.73 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
| May 2010 |
$ | 905,604.24 | $ | 348,952.09 | $ | 556,652.15 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| June 2010 |
$ | 1,216,061.59 | $ | 504,890.17 | $ | 711,171.42 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||
| July 2010 |
$ | 1,068,019.58 | $ | 490,083.89 | $ | 577,935.69 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
| August 2010 |
$ | 903,035.56 | $ | 566,422.61 | $ | 336,612.95 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||
| September 2010 |
$ | 1,207,229.40 | $ | 451,524.60 | $ | 755,704.80 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| October 2010 |
$ | 1,654,820.79 | $ | 631,496.50 | $ | 1,023,324.29 | 0.40 | % | ||||||||
| November 2010 |
$ | 1,211,888.27 | $ | 569,351.41 | $ | 642,536.86 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| December 2010 |
$ | 1,640,217.53 | $ | 759,580.16 | $ | 880,637.37 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| January 2011 |
$ | 1,101,066.69 | $ | 572,602.38 | $ | 528,464.31 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||
| February 2011 |
$ | 1,043,236.23 | $ | 637,411.03 | $ | 405,825.20 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
| March 2011 |
$ | 932,156.91 | $ | 872,348.98 | $ | 59,807.93 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
| April 2011 |
$ | 985,345.74 | $ | 710,891.75 | $ | 274,453.99 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| May 2011 |
$ | 776,238.27 | $ | 526,082.58 | $ | 250,155.69 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| June 2011 |
$ | 816,253.93 | $ | 424,486.21 | $ | 391,767.72 | 0.62 | % | ||||||||
| July 2011 |
$ | 1,198,036.51 | $ | 585,757.76 | $ | 612,278.75 | 0.66 | % | ||||||||
| August 2011 |
$ | 947,103.19 | $ | 328,594.01 | $ | 618,509.18 | 0.70 | % | ||||||||
| September 2011 |
$ | 840,549.13 | $ | 528,690.95 | $ | 311,858.18 | 0.72 | % | ||||||||
| October 2011 |
$ | 849,534.65 | $ | 608,021.69 | $ | 241,512.96 | 0.74 | % | ||||||||
| November 2011 |
$ | 577,438.28 | $ | 396,707.34 | $ | 180,730.94 | 0.75 | % | ||||||||
| December 2011 |
$ | 818,383.28 | $ | 458,282.15 | $ | 360,101.13 | 0.77 | % | ||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 928,008.48 | $ | 255,492.14 | $ | 672,516.34 | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 491,761.56 | $ | 571,848.58 | $ | (80,087.02 | ) | 0.81 | % | |||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 789,082.81 | $ | 756,344.37 | $ | 32,738.44 | 0.81 | % | ||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 552,628.65 | $ | 461,267.61 | $ | 91,361.04 | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 597,436.02 | $ | 301,817.07 | $ | 295,618.95 | 0.84 | % | ||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 299,337.16 | $ | 329,768.48 | $ | (30,431.32 | ) | 0.84 | % | |||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 374,960.76 | $ | 350,961.79 | $ | 23,998.97 | 0.84 | % | ||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 453,175.25 | $ | 321,617.34 | $ | 131,557.91 | 0.85 | % | ||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 455,584.57 | $ | 284,491.93 | $ | 171,092.64 | 0.86 | % | ||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 527,788.29 | $ | 308,231.94 | $ | 219,556.35 | 0.87 | % | ||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 299,615.02 | $ | 371,009.55 | $ | (71,394.53 | ) | 0.87 | % | |||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 423,434.23 | $ | 312,860.52 | $ | 110,573.71 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 313,571.37 | $ | 251,449.11 | $ | 62,122.26 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 336,093.58 | $ | 305,837.05 | $ | 30,256.53 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 216,936.83 | $ | 298,904.37 | $ | (81,967.54 | ) | 0.88 | % | |||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 253,187.98 | $ | 224,445.77 | $ | 28,742.21 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 171,707.93 | $ | 262,299.71 | $ | (90,591.78 | ) | 0.87 | % | |||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 213,548.28 | $ | 188,988.73 | $ | 24,559.55 | 0.87 | % | ||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 176,256.55 | $ | 172,629.17 | $ | 3,627.38 | 0.87 | % | ||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 225,273.46 | $ | 227,925.18 | $ | (2,651.72 | ) | 0.87 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-18
Table of Contents
VALET 2011-1
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,668,863,510.39
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged-off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| March 2011 |
$ | 155,907.81 | $ | — | $ | 155,907.81 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| April 2011 |
$ | 137,076.95 | $ | 42,735.95 | $ | 94,341.00 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| May 2011 |
$ | 529,490.09 | $ | 23,944.76 | $ | 505,545.33 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||
| June 2011 |
$ | 964,008.63 | $ | 214,296.22 | $ | 749,712.41 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| July 2011 |
$ | 675,525.29 | $ | 383,648.52 | $ | 291,876.77 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||
| August 2011 |
$ | 775,430.78 | $ | 401,706.23 | $ | 373,724.55 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| September 2011 |
$ | 1,121,374.53 | $ | 370,263.58 | $ | 751,110.95 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| October 2011 |
$ | 443,736.21 | $ | 300,392.97 | $ | 143,343.24 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| November 2011 |
$ | 860,427.15 | $ | 402,475.55 | $ | 457,951.60 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| December 2011 |
$ | 946,867.24 | $ | 500,471.43 | $ | 446,395.81 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 781,808.37 | $ | 457,456.26 | $ | 324,352.11 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 772,349.32 | $ | 413,593.89 | $ | 358,755.43 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 704,287.75 | $ | 388,577.93 | $ | 315,709.82 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 519,019.53 | $ | 381,297.50 | $ | 137,722.03 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 579,275.61 | $ | 532,064.65 | $ | 47,210.96 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 778,021.99 | $ | 248,509.65 | $ | 529,512.34 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 275,638.83 | $ | 236,573.20 | $ | 39,065.63 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 969,181.89 | $ | 297,088.59 | $ | 672,093.30 | 0.38 | % | ||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 847,935.65 | $ | 238,680.53 | $ | 609,255.12 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 544,731.60 | $ | 590,809.12 | $ | (46,077.52 | ) | 0.42 | % | |||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 652,838.73 | $ | 463,387.43 | $ | 189,451.30 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 430,007.18 | $ | 314,629.92 | $ | 115,377.26 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 480,038.16 | $ | 266,554.02 | $ | 213,484.14 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 421,462.90 | $ | 306,091.72 | $ | 115,371.18 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 587,101.69 | $ | 356,804.25 | $ | 230,297.44 | 0.47 | % | ||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 425,882.55 | $ | 290,637.24 | $ | 135,245.31 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 431,732.18 | $ | 236,511.88 | $ | 195,220.30 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 354,899.38 | $ | 262,450.12 | $ | 92,449.26 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 356,799.04 | $ | 253,886.54 | $ | 102,912.50 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 453,506.14 | $ | 225,443.55 | $ | 228,062.59 | 0.51 | % | ||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 235,851.47 | $ | 171,451.14 | $ | 64,400.33 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 297,910.00 | $ | 173,600.89 | $ | 124,309.11 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 311,381.95 | $ | 179,784.02 | $ | 131,597.93 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 471,184.09 | $ | 112,231.99 | $ | 358,952.10 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 559,499.23 | $ | 221,880.38 | $ | 337,618.85 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 276,731.30 | $ | 230,564.90 | $ | 46,166.40 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 271,597.83 | $ | 216,060.56 | $ | 55,537.27 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 174,725.00 | $ | 56,041.35 | $ | 118,683.65 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 283,029.90 | $ | 254,598.97 | $ | 28,430.93 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 80,326.07 | $ | 134,658.21 | $ | (54,332.14 | ) | 0.59 | % | |||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 226,468.09 | $ | 144,258.94 | $ | 82,209.15 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 186,613.64 | $ | 190,027.01 | $ | (3,413.37 | ) | 0.59 | % | |||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 107,867.85 | $ | 153,941.35 | $ | (46,073.50 | ) | 0.59 | % | |||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 147,171.79 | $ | 144,142.70 | $ | 3,029.09 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 71,509.24 | $ | 123,399.82 | $ | (51,890.58 | ) | 0.59 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-19
Table of Contents
VALET 2012-1
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,351,498,765.89
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged-off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| January 2012 |
$ | 366,744.98 | $ | — | $ | 366,744.98 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| February 2012 |
$ | 90,840.10 | $ | 51,082.48 | $ | 39,757.62 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||
| March 2012 |
$ | 505,759.92 | $ | 142,745.92 | $ | 363,014.00 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| April 2012 |
$ | 284,437.10 | $ | 176,906.42 | $ | 107,530.68 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| May 2012 |
$ | 365,862.79 | $ | 217,157.91 | $ | 148,704.88 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||
| June 2012 |
$ | 321,986.83 | $ | 128,940.65 | $ | 193,046.18 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| July 2012 |
$ | 349,042.34 | $ | 112,853.12 | $ | 236,189.22 | 0.11 | % | ||||||||
| August 2012 |
$ | 615,352.16 | $ | 247,455.90 | $ | 367,896.26 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 549,483.74 | $ | 150,040.28 | $ | 399,443.46 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 691,191.12 | $ | 228,646.48 | $ | 462,544.64 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 522,169.60 | $ | 257,742.18 | $ | 264,427.42 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 605,910.51 | $ | 324,742.89 | $ | 281,167.62 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 519,755.58 | $ | 262,322.16 | $ | 257,433.42 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 804,026.66 | $ | 281,071.69 | $ | 522,954.97 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 633,306.06 | $ | 428,980.62 | $ | 204,325.44 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 520,377.08 | $ | 389,499.80 | $ | 130,877.28 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 428,476.85 | $ | 345,339.29 | $ | 83,137.56 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 372,291.05 | $ | 220,588.40 | $ | 151,702.65 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 592,320.34 | $ | 219,102.10 | $ | 373,218.24 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 406,780.28 | $ | 210,175.86 | $ | 196,604.42 | 0.38 | % | ||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 494,738.16 | $ | 156,420.98 | $ | 338,317.18 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 489,606.45 | $ | 206,149.26 | $ | 283,457.19 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 617,191.68 | $ | 351,673.02 | $ | 265,518.66 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 654,649.17 | $ | 154,766.87 | $ | 499,882.30 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 431,198.00 | $ | 306,330.94 | $ | 124,867.06 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 353,413.07 | $ | 229,476.28 | $ | 123,936.79 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 155,120.66 | $ | 214,182.83 | $ | (59,062.17 | ) | 0.50 | % | |||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 345,510.69 | $ | 150,753.47 | $ | 194,757.22 | 0.51 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 364,988.04 | $ | 264,430.11 | $ | 100,557.93 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 292,377.49 | $ | 267,307.29 | $ | 25,070.20 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 313,837.48 | $ | 128,800.07 | $ | 185,037.41 | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 379,886.51 | $ | 112,582.32 | $ | 267,304.19 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 248,626.43 | $ | 139,637.56 | $ | 108,988.87 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 245,260.61 | $ | 228,661.29 | $ | 16,599.32 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 259,451.89 | $ | 137,034.64 | $ | 122,417.25 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 168,741.16 | $ | 137,023.73 | $ | 31,717.43 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 228,423.15 | $ | 80,590.15 | $ | 147,833.00 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 184,682.00 | $ | 87,627.04 | $ | 97,054.96 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 167,584.10 | $ | 187,769.41 | $ | (20,185.31 | ) | 0.59 | % | |||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 181,854.50 | $ | 138,047.69 | $ | 43,806.81 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 213,097.15 | $ | 204,650.15 | $ | 8,447.00 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 184,628.84 | $ | 105,679.57 | $ | 78,949.27 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 119,723.72 | $ | 155,295.15 | $ | (35,571.43 | ) | 0.60 | % | |||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 136,565.89 | $ | 59,379.86 | $ | 77,186.03 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 104,410.00 | $ | 96,154.71 | $ | 8,255.29 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 178,048.80 | $ | 107,472.93 | $ | 70,575.87 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-20
Table of Contents
VALET 2012-2
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,320,690,169.55
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged-off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| September 2012 |
$ | 58,380.05 | $ | — | $ | 58,380.05 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| October 2012 |
$ | 89,391.77 | $ | 468.46 | $ | 88,923.31 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| November 2012 |
$ | 349,418.63 | $ | 28,403.81 | $ | 321,014.82 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||
| December 2012 |
$ | 223,296.85 | $ | 57,782.01 | $ | 165,514.84 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||
| January 2013 |
$ | 148,455.27 | $ | 118,755.36 | $ | 29,699.91 | 0.05 | % | ||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 404,208.38 | $ | 160,301.08 | $ | 243,907.30 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 409,009.30 | $ | 148,160.13 | $ | 260,849.17 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 352,563.10 | $ | 173,395.99 | $ | 179,167.11 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 467,405.24 | $ | 182,176.57 | $ | 285,228.67 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 277,391.76 | $ | 255,003.44 | $ | 22,388.32 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 309,420.09 | $ | 89,938.18 | $ | 219,481.91 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 393,098.43 | $ | 255,571.04 | $ | 137,527.39 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 555,868.49 | $ | 190,427.09 | $ | 365,441.40 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 434,454.15 | $ | 181,537.31 | $ | 252,916.84 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 345,937.12 | $ | 266,304.21 | $ | 79,632.91 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 279,004.51 | $ | 166,896.77 | $ | 112,107.74 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 375,801.63 | $ | 202,667.28 | $ | 173,134.35 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 227,127.74 | $ | 166,052.98 | $ | 61,074.76 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 182,981.85 | $ | 183,396.56 | $ | (414.71 | ) | 0.23 | % | |||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 349,263.17 | $ | 98,716.79 | $ | 250,546.38 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 240,413.07 | $ | 189,293.66 | $ | 51,119.41 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 166,705.14 | $ | 113,154.42 | $ | 53,550.72 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 354,853.86 | $ | 81,354.33 | $ | 273,499.53 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 337,930.45 | $ | 103,713.83 | $ | 234,216.62 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 235,335.85 | $ | 103,808.50 | $ | 131,527.35 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 313,573.17 | $ | 173,122.39 | $ | 140,450.78 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 204,591.34 | $ | 115,904.20 | $ | 88,687.14 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 187,407.85 | $ | 111,509.89 | $ | 75,897.96 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 277,171.47 | $ | 114,954.83 | $ | 162,216.64 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 239,659.49 | $ | 126,055.55 | $ | 113,603.94 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 152,267.04 | $ | 117,302.19 | $ | 34,964.85 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 103,052.86 | $ | 90,392.93 | $ | 12,659.93 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 260,226.11 | $ | 148,736.76 | $ | 111,489.35 | 0.36 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 119,668.92 | $ | 51,351.08 | $ | 68,317.84 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 107,625.62 | $ | 102,714.78 | $ | 4,910.84 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 283,399.58 | $ | 42,589.59 | $ | 240,809.99 | 0.39 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 164,665.28 | $ | 45,303.55 | $ | 119,361.73 | 0.40 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 231,151.05 | $ | 84,583.21 | $ | 146,567.84 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 114,991.41 | $ | 67,214.66 | $ | 47,776.75 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 207,103.37 | $ | 101,425.23 | $ | 105,678.14 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 238,425.39 | $ | 81,766.76 | $ | 156,658.63 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 154,876.53 | $ | 62,197.30 | $ | 92,679.23 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 84,661.40 | $ | 84,916.79 | $ | (255.39 | ) | 0.44 | % | |||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 98,630.62 | $ | 116,198.02 | $ | (17,567.40 | ) | 0.44 | % | |||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 100,779.27 | $ | 57,036.34 | $ | 43,742.93 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 71,637.57 | $ | 63,541.95 | $ | 8,095.62 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 98,078.32 | $ | 77,371.94 | $ | 20,706.38 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-21
Table of Contents
VALET 2013-1
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,321,370,744.97
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged-off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| February 2013 |
$ | 39,400.92 | $ | — | $ | 39,400.92 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| March 2013 |
$ | 149,046.09 | $ | — | $ | 149,046.09 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| April 2013 |
$ | 371,191.15 | $ | 81,123.99 | $ | 290,067.16 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||
| May 2013 |
$ | 348,336.00 | $ | 55,714.80 | $ | 292,621.20 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| June 2013 |
$ | 442,322.24 | $ | 149,818.75 | $ | 292,503.49 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||
| July 2013 |
$ | 217,706.70 | $ | 132,561.55 | $ | 85,145.15 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| August 2013 |
$ | 427,619.22 | $ | 202,162.12 | $ | 225,457.10 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||
| September 2013 |
$ | 326,922.40 | $ | 136,819.92 | $ | 190,102.48 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 475,679.48 | $ | 147,307.17 | $ | 328,372.31 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 458,537.23 | $ | 258,601.04 | $ | 199,936.19 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 529,479.11 | $ | 218,798.77 | $ | 310,680.34 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 634,345.59 | $ | 208,650.72 | $ | 425,694.87 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 763,234.21 | $ | 163,721.76 | $ | 599,512.45 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 353,961.10 | $ | 369,147.26 | $ | (15,186.16 | ) | 0.26 | % | |||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 404,177.19 | $ | 250,352.34 | $ | 153,824.85 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 531,252.15 | $ | 226,623.75 | $ | 304,628.40 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 202,795.58 | $ | 238,485.91 | $ | (35,690.33 | ) | 0.29 | % | |||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 418,522.20 | $ | 194,320.01 | $ | 224,202.19 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 526,192.85 | $ | 280,167.59 | $ | 246,025.26 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 528,061.63 | $ | 156,499.81 | $ | 371,561.82 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 594,930.23 | $ | 252,584.25 | $ | 342,345.98 | 0.38 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 392,558.75 | $ | 270,091.99 | $ | 122,466.76 | 0.39 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 281,445.97 | $ | 203,138.29 | $ | 78,307.68 | 0.40 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 392,428.42 | $ | 224,836.49 | $ | 167,591.93 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 247,079.80 | $ | 245,940.56 | $ | 1,139.24 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 231,779.20 | $ | 167,969.74 | $ | 63,809.46 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 190,670.52 | $ | 201,405.98 | $ | (10,735.46 | ) | 0.41 | % | |||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 227,806.29 | $ | 93,197.70 | $ | 134,608.59 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 204,665.35 | $ | 141,624.72 | $ | 63,040.63 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 256,612.62 | $ | 130,224.29 | $ | 126,388.33 | 0.44 | % | ||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 315,024.46 | $ | 103,484.87 | $ | 211,539.59 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 414,397.01 | $ | 81,452.47 | $ | 332,944.54 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 307,141.42 | $ | 106,680.52 | $ | 200,505.90 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 163,404.58 | $ | 107,144.97 | $ | 56,259.61 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 281,476.47 | $ | 105,616.32 | $ | 175,860.15 | 0.51 | % | ||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 299,547.69 | $ | 108,107.68 | $ | 191,440.01 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 62,767.15 | $ | 111,506.40 | $ | (48,739.25 | ) | 0.52 | % | |||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 125,228.75 | $ | 116,090.26 | $ | 9,138.49 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 188,950.15 | $ | 65,799.75 | $ | 123,150.40 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 113,859.29 | $ | 145,358.57 | $ | (31,499.28 | ) | 0.53 | % | |||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 65,531.45 | $ | 69,491.18 | $ | (3,959.73 | ) | 0.53 | % | |||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 142,600.89 | $ | 20,473.85 | $ | 122,127.04 | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 224,634.82 | $ | 102,062.06 | $ | 122,572.76 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 152,698.55 | $ | 99,707.49 | $ | 52,991.06 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 111,544.68 | $ | 97,232.03 | $ | 14,312.65 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-22
Table of Contents
VALET 2013-2
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,594,182,494
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged- off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| October 2013 |
$ | 25,148.34 | $ | — | $ | 25,148.34 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| November 2013 |
$ | 405,522.45 | $ | 139,256.09 | $ | 266,266.36 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
| December 2013 |
$ | 621,630.43 | $ | 14,149.43 | $ | 607,481.00 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| January 2014 |
$ | 705,320.32 | $ | 169,039.65 | $ | 536,280.67 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| February 2014 |
$ | 334,245.30 | $ | 195,116.22 | $ | 139,129.08 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||
| March 2014 |
$ | 191,124.18 | $ | 384,674.26 | $ | (193,550.08 | ) | 0.09 | % | |||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 596,687.01 | $ | 46,087.85 | $ | 550,599.16 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 556,640.37 | $ | 217,491.99 | $ | 339,148.38 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 322,541.52 | $ | 265,411.47 | $ | 57,130.05 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 380,518.46 | $ | 227,818.36 | $ | 152,703.85 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 596,775.71 | $ | 250,172.87 | $ | 346,602.84 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 510,430.02 | $ | 183,527.81 | $ | 326,902.21 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 798,722.65 | $ | 265,492.64 | $ | 533,230.01 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 474,729.90 | $ | 254,626.65 | $ | 220,103.25 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 649,862.00 | $ | 183,062.51 | $ | 466,799.49 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 842,736.06 | $ | 241,796.39 | $ | 600,939.67 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 601,295.71 | $ | 224,901.10 | $ | 376,394.61 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 757,620.43 | $ | 242,793.07 | $ | 514,827.36 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 395,461.53 | $ | 309,460.00 | $ | 86,001.53 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 566,831.94 | $ | 302,629.55 | $ | 264,202.39 | 0.39 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 464,157.13 | $ | 208,602.57 | $ | 255,554.56 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 542,863.86 | $ | 300,604.37 | $ | 242,259.49 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 567,372.97 | $ | 98,134.15 | $ | 469,238.82 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 313,843.91 | $ | 245,682.12 | $ | 68,161.79 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 729,189.55 | $ | 126,989.76 | $ | 602,199.79 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 342,042.23 | $ | 232,341.22 | $ | 109,701.01 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 440,928.90 | $ | 164,344.17 | $ | 276,584.73 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 661,530.12 | $ | 163,044.28 | $ | 498,485.84 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 453,436.89 | $ | 152,137.99 | $ | 301,298.90 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 216,960.53 | $ | 185,070.80 | $ | 31,889.73 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 378,986.39 | $ | 195,464.33 | $ | 183,522.06 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 239,728.22 | $ | 174,637.33 | $ | 65,090.89 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 249,387.48 | $ | 165,304.45 | $ | 84,083.03 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 371,118.12 | $ | 273,506.40 | $ | 97,611.72 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 273,829.57 | $ | 134,188.97 | $ | 139,640.60 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 475,194.62 | $ | 246,688.16 | $ | 228,506.46 | 0.62 | % | ||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 426,816.96 | $ | 182,059.47 | $ | 244,757.49 | 0.63 | % | ||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 270,907.00 | $ | 146,307.24 | $ | 124,599.76 | 0.64 | % | ||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 396,860.29 | $ | 654,399.48 | $ | (257,539.19 | ) | 0.63 | % | |||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 466,783.78 | $ | 221,034.43 | $ | 245,749.35 | 0.64 | % | ||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 300,870.27 | $ | 327,259.22 | $ | (26,388.95 | ) | 0.64 | % | |||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 199,171.09 | $ | 373,521.18 | $ | (174,350.09 | ) | 0.63 | % | |||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 116,956.62 | $ | 257,061.49 | $ | (140,104.87 | ) | 0.62 | % | |||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 129,307.65 | $ | 222,430.52 | $ | (93,122.87 | ) | 0.61 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-23
Table of Contents
VALET 2014-1
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,334,566,845
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged- off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| April 2014 |
$ | 113,309.59 | $ | 11,969.91 | $ | 101,339.68 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| May 2014 |
$ | 363,091.37 | $ | 44,846.18 | $ | 318,245.19 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||
| June 2014 |
$ | 540,450.86 | $ | 78,295.08 | $ | 462,155.78 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||
| July 2014 |
$ | 275,482.39 | $ | 101,131.46 | $ | 174,350.93 | 0.08 | % | ||||||||
| August 2014 |
$ | 291,701.14 | $ | 192,745.19 | $ | 98,955.95 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
| September 2014 |
$ | 240,851.06 | $ | 122,183.90 | $ | 118,667.16 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 674,611.81 | $ | 213,758.71 | $ | 460,853.10 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 412,593.49 | $ | 201,327.34 | $ | 211,266.15 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 516,730.08 | $ | 169,336.03 | $ | 347,394.05 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 520,756.78 | $ | 126,218.26 | $ | 394,538.52 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 471,991.03 | $ | 143,279.76 | $ | 328,711.27 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 463,627.55 | $ | 214,648.27 | $ | 248,979.28 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 302,541.54 | $ | 215,700.50 | $ | 86,841.04 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 644,063.61 | $ | 184,104.73 | $ | 459,958.88 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 291,139.43 | $ | 164,604.60 | $ | 126,534.83 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 597,782.78 | $ | 199,221.45 | $ | 398,561.33 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 328,744.37 | $ | 129,840.52 | $ | 198,903.85 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 340,382.50 | $ | 103,712.42 | $ | 236,670.08 | 0.36 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 514,992.75 | $ | 92,569.50 | $ | 422,423.25 | 0.39 | % | ||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 444,127.44 | $ | 133,904.36 | $ | 310,223.08 | 0.41 | % | ||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 522,427.83 | $ | 66,147.60 | $ | 456,280.23 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 593,017.01 | $ | 170,496.08 | $ | 422,520.93 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 403,268.60 | $ | 117,077.32 | $ | 286,191.28 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 360,981.12 | $ | 94,094.53 | $ | 266,886.59 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 230,265.62 | $ | 227,978.39 | $ | 2,287.23 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 299,288.50 | $ | 62,275.46 | $ | 237,013.04 | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 336,068.14 | $ | 124,246.09 | $ | 211,822.05 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 489,490.91 | $ | 342,782.74 | $ | 146,708.17 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 361,168.88 | $ | 176,152.38 | $ | 185,016.50 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 535,592.76 | $ | 289,898.62 | $ | 245,694.14 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 443,191.38 | $ | 180,884.40 | $ | 262,306.98 | 0.62 | % | ||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 675,621.11 | $ | 343,021.01 | $ | 332,600.10 | 0.64 | % | ||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 569,591.60 | $ | 771,797.40 | $ | (202,205.80 | ) | 0.63 | % | |||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 459,832.78 | $ | 433,315.32 | $ | 26,517.46 | 0.63 | % | ||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 429,288.62 | $ | 311,273.18 | $ | 118,015.44 | 0.64 | % | ||||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 272,986.11 | $ | 467,592.17 | $ | (194,606.06 | ) | 0.62 | % | |||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 229,982.72 | $ | 259,260.01 | $ | (29,277.29 | ) | 0.62 | % | |||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 209,328.87 | $ | 229,173.39 | $ | (19,844.52 | ) | 0.62 | % | |||||||
| June 2017 |
$ | 98,171.83 | $ | 243,171.21 | $ | (144,999.38 | ) | 0.61 | % | |||||||
| July 2017 |
$ | 113,940.43 | $ | 130,347.27 | $ | (16,406.84 | ) | 0.61 | % | |||||||
| August 2017 |
$ | 190,675.17 | $ | 133,985.74 | $ | 56,689.43 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||
| September 2017 |
$ | 126,804.68 | $ | 200,040.78 | $ | (73,236.10 | ) | 0.61 | % | |||||||
| October 2017 |
$ | 142,136.97 | $ | 172,772.31 | $ | (30,635.34 | ) | 0.60 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-24
Table of Contents
VALET 2014-2
Original Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance $1,074,364,169
| Aggregate Outstanding Principal Balance on Charged- off Receivables |
Recoveries(1) | Net Charge-off | Cumulative Net Losses(2) as % of Original Outstanding Principal Balance |
|||||||||||||
| October 2014 |
$ | 154,385.05 | $ | 350.00 | $ | 154,035.05 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
| November 2014 |
$ | 211,975.58 | $ | 36,730.28 | $ | 175,245.30 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||
| December 2014 |
$ | 422,640.12 | $ | 84,781.83 | $ | 337,858.29 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||
| January 2015 |
$ | 641,389.70 | $ | 60,187.31 | $ | 581,202.39 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
| February 2015 |
$ | 448,997.52 | $ | 121,712.88 | $ | 327,284.64 | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
| March 2015 |
$ | 501,630.63 | $ | 216,568.85 | $ | 285,061.78 | 0.17 | % | ||||||||
| April 2015 |
$ | 195,620.86 | $ | 196,806.81 | $ | (1,185.95 | ) | 0.17 | % | |||||||
| May 2015 |
$ | 412,385.45 | $ | 206,628.82 | $ | 205,756.63 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||
| June 2015 |
$ | 275,962.56 | $ | 75,219.35 | $ | 200,743.21 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
| July 2015 |
$ | 617,294.49 | $ | 153,123.86 | $ | 464,170.63 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||
| August 2015 |
$ | 335,619.66 | $ | 139,079.70 | $ | 196,539.96 | 0.27 | % | ||||||||
| September 2015 |
$ | 374,496.03 | $ | 179,249.90 | $ | 195,246.13 | 0.29 | % | ||||||||
| October 2015 |
$ | 535,906.66 | $ | 138,647.76 | $ | 397,258.90 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||
| November 2015 |
$ | 400,321.14 | $ | 111,757.05 | $ | 288,564.09 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
| December 2015 |
$ | 377,298.85 | $ | 54,769.46 | $ | 322,529.39 | 0.38 | % | ||||||||
| January 2016 |
$ | 573,511.13 | $ | 112,245.51 | $ | 461,265.62 | 0.43 | % | ||||||||
| February 2016 |
$ | 311,539.20 | $ | 93,096.71 | $ | 218,442.49 | 0.45 | % | ||||||||
| March 2016 |
$ | 428,295.18 | $ | 160,028.19 | $ | 268,266.99 | 0.47 | % | ||||||||
| April 2016 |
$ | 523,309.41 | $ | 94,757.06 | $ | 428,552.35 | 0.51 | % | ||||||||
| May 2016 |
$ | 357,259.56 | $ | 63,961.75 | $ | 293,297.81 | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
| June 2016 |
$ | 457,327.43 | $ | 143,233.46 | $ | 314,093.97 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||
| July 2016 |
$ | 447,957.55 | $ | 203,143.38 | $ | 244,814.17 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||
| August 2016 |
$ | 627,831.03 | $ | 246,270.94 | $ | 381,560.09 | 0.63 | % | ||||||||
| September 2016 |
$ | 405,907.56 | $ | 224,338.44 | $ | 181,569.12 | 0.64 | % | ||||||||
| October 2016 |
$ | 378,853.78 | $ | 305,061.26 | $ | 73,792.52 | 0.65 | % | ||||||||
| November 2016 |
$ | 646,062.25 | $ | 273,231.63 | $ | 372,830.62 | 0.69 | % | ||||||||
| December 2016 |
$ | 540,583.63 | $ | 952,787.20 | $ | (412,203.57 | ) | 0.65 | % | |||||||
| January 2017 |
$ | 592,720.44 | $ | 341,281.05 | $ | 251,439.39 | 0.67 | % | ||||||||
| February 2017 |
$ | 479,522.74 | $ | 308,085.68 | $ | 171,437.06 | 0.69 | % | ||||||||
| March 2017 |
$ | 408,506.95 | $ | 339,758.44 | $ | 68,748.51 | 0.69 | % | ||||||||
| April 2017 |
$ | 228,710.98 | $ | 302,138.23 | $ | (73,427.25 | ) | 0.69 | % | |||||||
| May 2017 |
$ | 287,961.77 | $ | 219,198.60 | $ | 68,763.17 | 0.69 | % | ||||||||
| June 2017 |
$ | 249,672.44 | $ | 272,972.30 | $ | (23,299.86 | ) | 0.69 | % | |||||||
| July 2017 |
$ | 251,562.14 | $ | 176,278.16 | $ | 75,283.98 | 0.70 | % | ||||||||
| August 2017 |
$ | 228,181.19 | $ | 168,740.91 | $ | 59,440.28 | 0.70 | % | ||||||||
| September 2017 |
$ | 162,005.14 | $ | 494,360.65 | $ | (332,355.51 | ) | 0.67 | % | |||||||
| October 2017 |
$ | 191,671.46 | $ | 224,833.95 | $ | (33,162.49 | ) | 0.67 | % | |||||||
| November 2017 |
$ | 237,378.83 | $ | 361,806.81 | $ | (124,427.98 | ) | 0.66 | % | |||||||
| December 2017 |
$ | 166,819.30 | $ | 277,555.85 | $ | (110,736.55 | ) | 0.65 | % | |||||||
| January 2018 |
$ | 251,728.23 | $ | 257,175.21 | $ | (5,446.98 | ) | 0.65 | % | |||||||
| February 2018 |
$ | 124,367.23 | $ | 115,296.09 | $ | 9,071.14 | 0.65 | % | ||||||||
| March 2018 |
$ | 133,634.89 | $ | 182,144.58 | $ | (48,509.69 | ) | 0.64 | % | |||||||
| April 2018 |
$ | 65,669.40 | $ | 150,395.70 | $ | (84,726.30 | ) | 0.64 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Recoveries generally include the net amounts received with respect to a retail contract previously charged off. |
| (2) | Cumulative net losses generally represent the excess of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all defaulted receivables that became defaulted receivables during the period over (b) aggregate liquidation proceeds and recoveries for all defaulted receivables for that period. |
A-25
Table of Contents
Cumulative Net Losses as a Percentage of Original Outstanding Principal Balance(1)
| (1) | Investors are encouraged to carefully review the information set forth under “—Credit Loss Experience” beginning on page A-17 of this prospectus which contains the underlying historical data used in preparing the above graph. Pool characteristics will vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction and investors are encouraged to carefully review the characteristics of the receivables for each securitization transaction represented in the above graph beginning on page A-2 of this prospectus under “Original Pool Characteristics as of Cut-off Date.” Performance may also vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction, and there can be no assurance that the performance of any prior securitization transaction will correspond to or be an accurate predictor of the performance of the receivables. |
A-26
Table of Contents
No dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the depositor, the servicer or the underwriters. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the notes offered hereby to anyone in any jurisdiction in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create an implication that information herein or therein is correct as of any time since the date of this prospectus.
Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2018-1
Issuing Entity
| Class A-1 Notes | $307,000,000 | |
| Class A-2-A Notes | $420,000,000 | |
| Class A-2-B Notes | $100,000,000 | |
| Class A-3 Notes | $369,000,000 | |
| Class A-4 Notes | $104,000,000 |
Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC
Depositor
VW Credit, Inc.
Sponsor, Originator and Servicer
PROSPECTUS
| J.P. Morgan | Deutsche Bank Securities | RBC Capital Markets | ||||||
| Citigroup | Credit Agricole Securities | SOCIETE GENERALE | TD Securities | Wells Fargo Securities | ||||
Until September 25, 2018, all dealers effecting transactions in the notes, whether or not participating in this distribution, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.