EX-10 14 ch339817.txt EXHIBIT 10.5 Exhibit 10.5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) ) USDC No. 01 C 7255 COMDISCO, INC. ) USBC No. 01 B 24795 et al., ) ) Hon. David H. Coar ) Debtors. ) AGREED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(c)(2), appellant Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Comdisco, Inc. et al. (the "Creditors Committee") and appellees Comdisco, Inc., et al. (the "Debtors" or "Comdisco"), the parties to this appeal (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby move this Court as follows: 1. This appeal arises from a dispute regarding the Debtors' assumption of the pre-petition employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") of the Debtors' chief executive officer, Mr. Norman P. Blake, Jr. (the "Executive"), a copy of which is found at Tab 6 in the record on appeal (the "Record"). On August 30, 2001, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered an order approving the Debtors' assumption of the Employment Agreement (the "Bankruptcy Court Order"). Paragraph 3 of the Bankruptcy Court Order, which is found at tab 11 in the Record, incorporated an agreement between the Debtors and the Executive to cap the Executive's total compensation under both the incentive and severance provisions of the Employment Agreement, including without limitation ss.ss. 2 and 4 of the Employment Agreement, to a maximum of $9.6 million in the aggregate. 2. The Parties, in a good faith effort to resolve this dispute, have agreed to settle and compromise this appeal by agreeing to limit the Executive's total compensation under both the incentive and severance provisions of the Employment Agreement, including without limitation ss.ss. 2 and 4 of the Employment Agreement, to a maximum of $7.25 million in the aggregate. The Parties have not agreed to modify, and have not modified, any other provision or term of the Employment Agreement or Bankruptcy Court Order. 3. The Parties attach hereto an Agreed Order for Dismissal With Prejudice incorporating the Parties' settlement and resolving this matter in full. 4. The Parties therefore request that this Court enter the Agreed Order dismissing this appeal with prejudice pursuant to the terms set forth therein. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, the Parties respectfully request that this Court grant this Agreed Motion and enter the Agreed Order dismissing the above-captioned appeal with prejudice. Dated: March 7, 2002 Respectfully submitted, /s/ William J. Barrett /s/ Christina M. Tchen --------------------------------- --------------------------------- William J. Barrett Christina M. Tchen Melissa B. Glass Matthew R. Kipp GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS Ryan J. Rohlfsen 321 North Clark Street SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, Chicago, IL 60610-4795 MEAGHER & FLOM (ILLINOIS) (312) 644-3000 333 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2100 Chicago, Illinois 60606-1285 Attorneys for Appellants (312) 407-0700 Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Attorneys for Appellees Comdisco, of Comdisco, Inc. et al. Inc., et al., Debtors and Debtors-in- Possession IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) ) USDC No. 01 C 7255 COMDISCO, INC. ) USBC No. 01 B 24795 et al., ) ) Hon. David H. Coar ) Debtors. ) AGREED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE This matter having come before the Court on the parties' Agreed Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice, dated March 7, 2002, of appellant Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Comdisco, Inc. et al. (the "Creditors Committee") and appellees Comdisco, Inc., et al. (the "Debtors" or "Comdisco"); and the Court having reviewed the Agreed Motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. The Agreed Motion be, and it hereby is, GRANTED. 2. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, the Employment Agreement is hereby modified such that the total maximum compensation that the Debtors' chief executive officer, Mr. Norman P. Blake, Jr., can receive under both the incentive and severance provisions of the Employment Agreement, including without limitation ss.ss. 2 and 4 of the Employment Agreement, shall not exceed $7.25 million in the aggregate. No other terms of the Employment Agreement, or the order of the Bankruptcy Court below, are modified or altered. 3. This appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered: Dated: March 14, 2002 /s/ David H. Coar ---------------------------- HONORABLE DAVID H. COAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE