10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2012

OR

[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from  to

Commission File Number: 000-51772

Cardica, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	94-3287832
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
900 Saginaw Drive
Redwood City, California	94063
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(650) 364-9975

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [x] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  [  ] Accelerated filer  [  ] Non-accelerated filer  [  ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes [  ] No [x]

On February 6, 2013, there were 36,964,005 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Cardica, Inc. outstanding.

CARDICA, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.   Financial Statements
a. Condensed Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012	3
b. Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	4
c. Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	5
d. Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	6
e. Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	7
Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures	21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors	21
Item 6.    Exhibits	40
SIGNATURES	41

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CARDICA, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2012				June 30, 2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,826		$	8,472
Short-term investments		2,835			6,173
Accounts receivable		443			299
Inventories		999			576
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		204			214
Total current assets		8,307			15,734
Property and equipment, net		3,087			2,304
Restricted cash		104			104
Total assets	$	11,498		$	18,142
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,046		$	862
Accrued compensation		510			410
Other liabilities		490			408
Current portion of deferred revenue		612			738
Total current liabilities		2,658			2,418
Deferred revenue, net of current portion		1,610			1,652
Note payable		2,655			2,532
Other non-current liabilities		177			180
Total liabilities		7,100			6,782
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized: no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 65,000,000 shares authorized: 36,956,005 and 36,511,388 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively		37			37
Additional paid-in capital		150,714			149,348
Treasury stock at cost (66,227 shares at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012)		(596	)		(596	)
Accumulated comprehensive loss		(1	)		(5	)
Accumulated deficit		(145,756	)		(137,424	)
Total stockholders' equity		4,398			11,360
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	11,498		$	18,142

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.

3

CARDICA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended December 31,						Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net revenue:
Product sales, net	$	773		$	811		$	1,555		$	1,578
License and development revenue		84			84			168			168
Royalty revenue		17			17			36			36
Total net revenue		874			912			1,759			1,782
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of product sales		968			1,078			1,600			1,905
Research and development		2,274			1,482			4,826			3,039
Selling, general and administrative		1,712			1,483			3,447			3,024
Total operating costs and expenses		4,954			4,043			9,873			7,968
Loss from operations		(4,080	)		(3,131	)		(8,114	)		(6,186	)
Interest income		4			2			9			3
Interest expense		(114	)		(56	)		(225	)		(56	)
Other expense, net		(2	)		(1	)		(2	)		(2	)
Net loss	$	(4,192	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.

4

CARDICA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended December 31,						Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net loss	$	(4,192	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Other comprehensive gain:
Change in unrealized gain on investments		3			2			4			—
Comprehensive loss	$	(4,189	)	$	(3,184	)	$	(8,328	)	$	(6,241	)

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.

5

CARDICA, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		445			366
Stock-based compensation expense		549			325
Non cash interest expense		123			30
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(144	)		5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10			(153	)
Inventories		(423	)		313
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		263			617
Accrued compensation		100			(71	)
Deferred revenue		(168	)		1,443
Net cash used in operating activities		(7,577	)		(3,366	)
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,228	)		(1,753	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		6,734			2,012
Purchases of short-term investments		(3,392	)		(2,925	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,114			(2,666	)
Financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock		817			1,009
Net proceeds from issuances of notes payable		—			2,390
Net cash provided by financing activities		817			3,399
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(4,646	)		(2,633	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		8,472			7,832
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,826		$	5,199
Supplemental Information
Interest paid	$	100		$	27

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements.

6

 CARDICA, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

         Cardica, Inc. (“Cardica” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on October 15, 1997, as Vascular Innovations, Inc. On November 26, 2001, the Company changed its name to Cardica, Inc.  Historically, the Company’s business focused on the design, manufacture and marketing of proprietary automated anastomotic systems used by cardiac surgeons to perform coronary bypass surgery. The Company has expanded its business by including the development of an endoscopic microcutter product line intended for use by thoracic, bariatric, colorectal, pediatric and general surgeons.

The Company is developing a microcutter product line based on its proprietary “staple-on-a-strip” technology, which expands its commercial opportunity into additional surgical markets.  The Company’s planned microcutter product line consists of the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 30, a cartridge based microcutter device with a 5 millimeter shaft diameter and a 30 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 45, a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a 8 millimeter shaft and a 45 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 30, a true multi-fire endolinear stapling device, the MicroCutter FLEXCHANGE™ 30, a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a flexible shaft to facilitate endoscopic procedures requiring cutting and stapling, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 45, a planned multi-fire endolinear microcutter device with a 45 millimeter staple line, and the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 60, a planned cutting and stapling device specifically designed for the bariatric and thoracic surgery markets. The Company estimates these planned devices will expand its commercial opportunity to approximately 1.4 million additional procedures annually in the United States, involving, the Company estimates, over 4 million staple cartridge deployments, 3 million of which the Company believes are deployed in laparoscopic procedures.

   In March 2012, the Company completed the design verification for and applied Conformité Européenne, or the CE Mark, to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  As the Company has gained more experience with its microcutter products, the Company believes that the cartridge-based design of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 permitted it to commercially launch this product more quickly than its planned initial multi-fire product, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30. The Company believes that the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 is differentiated in the market in which it is currently commercially available compared to currently marketed staplers due to its significantly reduced size and ability to articulate up to 80 degrees.  The Company intends to expand its microcutter product line with the development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and only then consider continuation of development of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, but in light of its limited financial resources, the Company has limited development of other potential products in its planned microcutter product line.

   The Company initiated first-in-man use of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, with the CE Mark, in Europe in July 2011, and in November 2011, began enrolling patients in a European clinical trial.  The Company suspended its clinical trial of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 in Europe in December 2011, and recommenced enrollment in the clinical trial with its MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in July 2012.  Prior to recommencing the clinical trial of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the Company introduced this product to surgeons in Europe to validate the adequate function of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  On December 26, 2012, the Company commercially launched its first shipment to its distributor in Europe.  The Company will continue to make enhancements and improvements to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 based on feedback from surgeons.

Need for Additional Capital

The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $145.8 million through December 31, 2012, and negative cash flows from operating activities and expects to incur losses for the next several years. Management plans to continue to finance the Company’s operations with equity or debt issuances or through collaboration arrangements. There is no guarantee that such funding will be available to the Company on acceptable terms, or at all, or that such funding will be received in a timely manner, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its development or commercialization programs. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to reduce its expenditures without materially and adversely affecting the business.

        The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

7

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of Cardica have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of balances and results have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period.

The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2012.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP generally requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) title or rights have transferred; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company uses contracts and customer purchase orders to determine the existence of an arrangement. The Company uses contractual terms, shipping documents and third-party proof of delivery to verify that title or rights have transferred. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based upon the terms of the agreement associated with the transaction. To determine whether collection is probable, the Company assesses a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, then the recognition of revenue is deferred until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment.

The Company records product sales net of estimated product returns and discounts from the list prices for its products. The amounts of product returns and the discount amounts have not been material to date. The Company includes shipping and handling costs in cost of product sales.

Payments that are contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone are recognized in their entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved, subject to satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria at that time.  Revenue generated from license fees and performing development services is recognized when it is earned and non-refundable upon receipt of payments, over the period of performance, or upon incurrence of the related development expenses in accordance with contractual terms, based on the actual costs incurred to date plus overhead costs for certain project activities. Amounts paid but not yet earned on a project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as the related development expenses plus overhead costs for certain project activities are incurred.

Inventories

        Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of all inventories, including materials, work-in-process and finished goods, by comparing the cost of inventory to expected selling prices to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required.  Inventory that is obsolete or in excess of forecasted usage is written down to its estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions.  Reduced demand may result in the need for inventory write-downs in the near term. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of product sales and establish a lower cost basis for the inventory.

NOTE 2 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common Stock

On February 8, 2012, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with Wedbush Securities Inc. (“Wedbush”) relating to the offering, issuance and sale of an aggregate of 9,091,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share.  On February 13, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 9,091,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $1.65 per share. Net proceeds from the financing to the Company were $13.9 million.

8

On August 3, 2011, the Company entered into the At The Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “ATM Agreement”) with McNicoll, Lewis & Vlak LLC (“MLV”), which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, the Company may issue and sell up to $10.0 million of the Company’s common stock through MLV as the Company’s sales agent over the term of the ATM Agreement. The ATM Agreement provides that the offering of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (1) the sale of all common stock subject to the ATM Agreement, (2) August 2, 2014, and (3) termination of the ATM Agreement which may be effected by either MLV or the Company at any time upon 10 days’ notice to the other party. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had received net proceeds of $0.7 million from the sale of an aggregate of 445,593 shares of common stock through MLV.

On December 14, 2010, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Aspire Capital”), which provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, Aspire Capital was committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $10.0 million of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Purchase Shares”) over the term of the Purchase Agreement at purchase prices determined in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on any trading day on which the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $1.00 per share, the Company had the right, in its sole discretion, to present Aspire Capital with a purchase notice, directing Aspire Capital to purchase up to a certain number of shares dependent upon the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price per Purchase Share would be equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest sale price of the Company’s common stock on the purchase date or (ii) the arithmetic average of the three lowest closing sale prices for the Company’s common stock during the twelve consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the purchase date.

The Purchase Agreement provided that the Company may not issue and sell more than 4,930,747 shares of the Company’s common stock, including the 295,567 commitment shares issued to Aspire Capital, under the Purchase Agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had received $4.4 million from the sale of an aggregate of 1,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (excluding the 295,567 commitment shares) to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.  During the six months ended December 31, 2012, the Company did not issue any shares under the Purchase Agreement.  The Purchase Agreement has expired and as a result, the Company is no longer entitled to sell to Aspire Capital any further shares of its common stock. 

Stock-Based Compensation

        Included in the statement of operations are the following non-cash stock-based compensation expenses (in thousands):

	Three months ended December 31,				Six months ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of product sales	$	26	$	25	$	51	$	37
Research and development		74		51		138		91
Selling, general and administrative		206		113		360		197
Total	$	306	$	189	$	549	$	325

NOTE 3 - NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period less the weighted-average unvested common shares subject to repurchase, and without consideration of potential common shares.  Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, less the weighted-average unvested common shares subject to repurchase, plus dilutive potential common shares for the period determined using the treasury-stock method.  For purposes of this calculation, options and warrants to purchase stock and unvested restricted stock awards are considered to be potential common shares and are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three months ended December 31,						Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(4,192	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Less: Weighted-average unvested restricted stock		—			—			—			—
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)

9

        The following table sets forth the outstanding securities not included in the diluted net loss per common share calculation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, because their effect would be antidilutive (in thousands):

	As of December 31,
	2012		2011
Options to purchase common stock		4,468		3,893
Unvested restricted stock awards		74		37
Warrants		3,991		4,646
Total		8,533		8,576

NOTE 4 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements,”defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 -	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 -	Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 -	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company does not have any liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis have been segregated into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date. These assets measured at fair value are summarized below (in thousands):

	As of December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	2,674	$	—	$	—	$	2,674
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		1,836		—		1,836
Commercial papers				999				999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—		—
Total assets at fair value	$	2,674	$	2,835	$	—	$	5,509

	As of June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	6,805	$	—	$	—	$	6,805
Commercial papers		—		500		—		500
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		4,243		—		4,243
Commercial papers		—		999		—		999
Certificates of deposit		—		931		—		931
Total assets at fair value	$	6,805	$	6,673	$	—	$	13,478

10

Funds held in money market instruments are included in Level 1 as their fair values are based on market prices/quotes for identical assets in active markets.

Corporate debt securities, federal agency bonds and certificates of deposits are valued primarily using market prices/quotes for similar assets and/or other sources of observable information and are included in Level 2. These inputs include market prices for comparable securities, bid/ask quotes, interest rate yields, and prepayment spreads.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s material current financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value, including its trade accounts receivable and accounts payable, were reported at their current carrying values which approximate fair value given the short-term nature of these instruments with maturity dates of less than one year. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s note payable was reported at current carrying value which approximates fair value based on Level 3 measurement involving discounted cash flows and the estimated market rate of borrowing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to the Company’s.

NOTE 5 – SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company held investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, with maturity dates of less than one year.

The Company’s short-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of December 31, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	1,837	$	—	$	(1	)	$	1,836
Commercial papers		999		—		—			999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—			—
Total	$	2,836	$	—	$	(1	)	$	2,835

	As of June 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	4,246	$	—	$	(3	)	$	4,243
Commercial papers		1,000		—		(1	)		999
Certificates of deposit		932		—		(1	)		931
Total	$	6,178	$	—	$	(5	)	$	6,173

NOTE 6 - INVENTORIES

        Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31, 2012		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	467	$	170
Work in progress		216		128
Finished goods		316		278
Total	$	999	$	576

11

NOTE 7 – DISTRIBUTION, LICENSE, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION AGREEMENTS

Century

On September 2, 2011, the Company signed a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Century Medical, Inc. (“Century”) with respect to distribution of the Company’s planned microcutter products in Japan.  Under the terms of a secured note purchase agreement, Century agreed to loan the Company an aggregate of up to $4.0 million, with principal due five years after the first draw by the Company under the agreement, subject to certain conditions.   Under this facility, the Company received $2.0 million on September 30, 2011, and the remaining $2.0 million on December 27, 2011. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due.  In return for the loan commitment, the Company granted Century distribution rights to the Company’s planned microcutter product line in Japan, and a right of first negotiation for distribution rights in Japan to future products. Century will be responsible for securing regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health in Japan for the microcutter product line. After approval for marketing in Japan, the Company would sell microcutter units to Century, who would then sell the microcutter devices to their customers in Japan.

Proceeds from the note and granting the distribution rights were allocated to the note based on their aggregate fair value of $2.4 million at the dates of receipt.  This fair value was determined by discounting cash flows using a discount rate of 18%, which the Company estimated was a market rate of borrowing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to the Company’s. The remainder of the proceeds of $1.6 million was recognized as debt issuance discount and was allocated to the value of the distribution rights granted to Century under the Distribution Agreement and is included in deferred revenue. The deferred revenue will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Distribution Agreement, beginning upon the first sale by Century of microcutter products in Japan.

Intuitive Surgical

 On August 16, 2010, the Company entered into a license agreement with Intuitive Surgical (the “License Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company granted to Intuitive Surgical a worldwide, sublicenseable, exclusive license to use the Company’s intellectual property in the robotics field in diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures, but excluding vascular anastomosis applications, for an upfront license fee of $9.0 million. The Company is also eligible to receive a contingent payment related to achieving a certain sales volume, as well as single-digit royalties on sales by Intuitive Surgical, its affiliates or its sublicensees of specified products covered by the Company’s patent rights, if any. Each party has the right to terminate the License Agreement in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy. Following any termination of the License Agreement, the licenses granted to Intuitive Surgical will continue, and except in the case of termination for the Company’s uncured material breach or insolvency, Intuitive Surgical’s payment obligations will continue as well. Under the License Agreement, Intuitive Surgical has rights to improvements in the Company’s technology and intellectual property over a specified period of time.

The Company determined that there were two substantive deliverables under the License Agreement representing separate units of accounting: license rights to technology that existed as of August 16, 2010, and license rights to technology that may be developed over the following three years. The $9.0 million upfront license payment and $1.0 million premium on the $3.0 million purchase of the Company’s common stock by Intuitive Surgical in connection with the License Agreement were aggregated and allocated to the two units of accounting based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables. The relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables were determined using a probability weighted expected return model with significant inputs relating to the nature of potential future outcomes and the probability of occurrence of future outcomes. Based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables, $9.0 million of the total consideration of $10.0 million was allocated to the license rights to technology that existed as of August 16, 2010, that has been recognized as revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2010, and $1.0 million was allocated to technology that may be developed over the following three years that is being recognized as revenue ratably over that three year period. In total, the revenue recognized for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, related to this arrangement was $168,000 and $168,000, respectively, and, as of December 31, 2012, $209,000 had been recorded as deferred revenue related to this arrangement.

Cook Incorporated

In June 2007, the Company entered into, and in September 2007 and in June 2009 amended, a license, development and commercialization agreement with Cook Incorporated, to develop and commercialize a specialized device, which the Company refers to as  the PFO Device, designed to close holes in the heart from genetic heart defects known as patent foramen ovales (“PFOs”). Under the agreement, Cook funded certain development activities and the Company and Cook jointly developed the PFO Device.  The Company’s significant deliverables under the arrangement were the license rights and the associated development activities.  These deliverables were determined to represent one unit of accounting as there was no stand-alone value to the license rights. If developed, Cook would receive an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale and import the PFO Device. The Company did not record any license and development revenue under this agreement for the six months ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.  Amounts paid but not yet earned on the project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as the related development expenses for certain project activities are incurred.  A total of $403,000 under this agreement had been recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012.  On January 6, 2010, the Company and Cook mutually agreed to suspend work on the PFO project and, accordingly, the Company does not anticipate receiving any additional payments or recording any additional revenue related to this agreement in the foreseeable future.

12

NOTE 8 – NOTE PAYABLE

In connection with the Distribution Agreement with Century, the Company entered into a secured note purchase agreement and a related security agreement pursuant to which Century agreed to loan to the Company up to an aggregate of $4.0 million (see Note 7, Distribution, License, Development and Commercialization Agreements).  Under this facility, the Company received $2.0 million on September 30, 2011, and the remaining $2.0 million on December 27, 2011. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due. The debt issuance discount of approximately $1.6 million is reflected as a reduction in long-term debt and is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method. The note is secured by a substantial portion of the Company's assets, including the Company’s intellectual property related to the PAS-Port® Proximal Anastomosis System, but excluding all other intellectual property.

 NOTE 9 – AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT

On November 11, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment to its facility lease (the “Lease Amendment”). Pursuant to the Lease Amendment, the term of the lease was extended by four years, through August 31, 2015, and the Company was granted an improvement allowance of $148,070 to be used in connection with the construction of alterations and refurbishment of improvements in the premises, which was used and reimbursed in November 2011, and January 2012.  The leasehold improvement allowance will be recorded as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In addition, under the Lease Amendment, the Company was granted an option to further extend the lease for a period of two years beyond August 31, 2015 (the “Option Term”), with the annual rent payable by the Company during the Option Term to be equal to the annual rent for comparable buildings, as described in the Lease Amendment. Under the operating lease, the Company is required to maintain a letter of credit with a restricted cash balance at the Company’s bank. A certificate of deposit of $100,000 was recorded as restricted cash in the condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, related to the letter of credit.

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s non-cancelable operating leases having initial terms of a year or more as of  December 31, 2012, including the Lease Amendment, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal year ending June 30,	Operating Leases
	$
2013 (remaining six months)		313
2014		649
2015		690
2016		118
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,770

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenue, sufficiency of cash resources or other financial items, any statement of the plans and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or licensing or collaborative arrangements, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A below, and for the reasons described elsewhere in this report. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this report are made as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or reasons why actual results might differ.

13

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our financial statements and related notes included in Part I, Item 1  of this report, and with our financial statements and related notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2012.

Overview

Historically, our business focused on the design, manufacture and marketing of proprietary automated anastomotic systems used by cardiac surgeons to perform coronary bypass surgery. We have expanded our business on the development of an endoscopic microcutter product line intended for use by thoracic, bariatric, colorectal, pediatric and general surgeons.

We are developing our microcutter product line based on our proprietary “staple-on-a-strip” technology, which expands our commercial opportunity into additional surgical markets.  Our planned microcutter product line consists of the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 30, a cartridge based microcutter device with a 5 millimeter shaft diameter and a 30 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 45, a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a 8 millimeter shaft and a 45 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 30, a true multi-fire endolinear stapling device, the MicroCutter FLEXCHANGE™ 30 a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a flexible shaft to facilitate endoscopic procedures requiring cutting and stapling, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 45, a planned multi-fire endolinear microcutter device with a 45 millimeter staple line, and the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 60, a planned cutting and stapling device specifically designed for the bariatric and thoracic surgery markets. We estimate these planned devices expand our commercial opportunity to approximately 1.4 million additional procedures annually in the United States, involving, we estimate, over 4 million staple cartridge deployments, 3 million of which we believe are deployed in laparoscopic procedures.

In March 2012, we completed the design verification for and applied Conformité Européenne, or the CE Mark, to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  As we have gained more experience with our microcutter products, we believe that the cartridge-based design of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 permitted us to commercially launch this product more quickly than our planned initial multi-fire product, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30.  We believe that the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 is differentiated in the market in which it is currently commercially available compared to currently marketed staplers due to its significantly reduced size and ability to articulate up to 80 degrees.  We intend to expand our microcutter product line with the development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and only then consider continuation of development of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, but, in light of our limited financial resources, we have limited development of other potential products in our planned microcutter product line.

  We initiated first-in-man use of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, with the CE Mark, in Europe in July 2011, and in November 2011, began enrolling patients in a European clinical trial.  We suspended our clinical trial of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 in Europe in December 2011, and recommenced enrollment of the clinical trial with our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in July 2012.  Prior to recommencing the clinical trial of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, we introduced this product to surgeons in Europe to validate the adequate function of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  On December 26, 2012, we commercially launched our first shipment to our distributor in Europe.  We will continue to make enhancements and improvements to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 based on feedback from surgeons.
 

We have been advised by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, that the FDA will require clinical data related to the staple design used in the planned microcutter product line as part of a 510(k) submission for clearance of the products in our planned microcutter product line for marketing and sale in the United States.  We recommenced the clinical trial with the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe in July 2012, and we intend to enroll patients who are undergoing certain types of gastrointestinal surgical procedures. The number of gastrointestinal procedures and specific applications that can be performed with the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, is limited to certain tissue thicknesses.  We plan to complete enrollment in the clinical trial and required patient followup according to the protocol in the second quarter of calendar year 2013. If the results of the trial are favorable, we anticipate that we would submit a 510(k) to the FDA in the third quarter of calendar 2013.  While we cannot predict when or if the FDA will clear our 510(k) submission or what such clearance will cover, we anticipate that the earliest that any such clearance could be obtained would be in the fourth quarter of calendar 2013.

Our C-Port® Distal Anastomosis Systems, or C-Port systems, are sold in the United States and Europe. The C-Port systems are used to perform a distal anastomosis, which is the connection between a bypass graft vessel and the target coronary artery. As of December 31, 2012, more than 13,500 C-Port systems had been sold in the United States and Europe. We also currently sell our PAS-Port® Proximal Anastomosis System, or PAS-Port system, in the United States, Europe and Japan. The PAS-Port system is used to perform a proximal anastomosis, which is the connection of a bypass graft vessel to the aorta or other source of blood. As of December 31, 2012, more than 30,500 PAS-Port systems had been sold in the United States, Europe and Japan.

14

We use independent distributors and manufacturers’ representatives to augment a small core direct sales team for our C-Port and PAS-Port system in the United States to contain sales costs while continuing to serve our customers and potential customers for our automated anastomosis product line.

For the six months ended December 31, 2012, we generated net revenue of $1.8 million, including $24,000 from commercial sales of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and $168,000 of license and development revenue, and incurred a net loss of $8.3 million.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant net losses, and we expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We have not generated significant revenue from sales of any of the microcutter products that we are developing. To date, our C-Port and PAS-Port systems have had limited commercial adoption, and sales have not met the levels that we had anticipated. Revenue from product sales and license and development payments were not sufficient to support the operation of our business as we had planned.  If we fail to obtain broader commercial adoption of our products or to achieve commercial adoption of our microcutter products, we may be required to delay, further reduce the scope of or eliminate our commercialization efforts with respect to one or more of our products or one or more of our research and development programs.

On February 13, 2012, we completed the sale of 9,091,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $1.65 per share. Net proceeds from the financing to us were $13.9 million.  As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $6.7 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and $4.0 million of debt principal outstanding.  We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs to enable us to conduct our business substantially as currently conducted through March 31, 2013, excluding the repayment of $4.0 million debt principal outstanding. We would be able to extend this time period to the extent that we decrease our planned expenditures, or raise capital.  The audit report on our financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2012, included an explanatory paragraph highlighting the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We have based our estimate as to the sufficiency of our cash resources on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, including assumptions with respect to the level of revenue from product sales and the cost of product development, and we could exhaust our available financial resources sooner than we currently expect.  The sufficiency of our current cash resources and our need for additional capital, and the timing thereof, will depend on many factors, including the extent of our ongoing research and development programs and related costs, including costs related to the continued development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30,  the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and additional potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line, our ability to enter into additional license, development and/or collaboration agreements with respect to our technology, and the terms thereof, market acceptance and adoption of our current products or future products that we may commercialize, our level of revenues, costs associated with our sales and marketing initiatives and manufacturing activities, costs and timing of obtaining and maintaining FDA, and other regulatory clearances or approvals for our products and potential additional products, securing, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights and the costs thereof, and the effects of competing technological and market developments.

We may seek to sell equity or debt securities, obtain a credit facility, enter into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties or divest one or more of our commercialized products or products in development. The sale of equity or convertible debt securities could result in significant dilution to our stockholders, particularly in light of the prices at which our common stock has been recently trading. In addition, if we raise additional funds through the sale of equity securities, new investors could have rights superior to our existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those associated with our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. Any product development, licensing, distribution or sale agreements that we enter into may require us to relinquish valuable rights, including with respect to commercialized products or products in development that we would otherwise seek to commercialize or develop ourselves. We may not be able to obtain sufficient additional financing or enter into a strategic transaction in a timely manner, or at all. Our need to raise capital may require us to accept terms that may harm our business or be disadvantageous to our current stockholders.

Agreements with Century

On September 2, 2011, we signed a distribution agreement, or the Distribution Agreement, with Century Medical, Inc., or Century with respect to distribution of our planned microcutter products in Japan.  Under the terms of a secured note purchase agreement, Century agreed to loan us an aggregate of up to $4.0 million, with principal due on September 30, 2016, under the agreement, subject to certain conditions.   Under this facility, we received $2.0 million on September 30, 2011, and the remaining $2.0 million on December 27, 2011. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due. In return for the loan commitment, we granted Century distribution rights to our planned microcutter product line in Japan, and a right of first negotiation for distribution rights in Japan to future products. Century will be responsible for securing regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health in Japan for the microcutter product line. After approval for marketing in Japan, we would sell microcutter units to Century, who would then sell the microcutter devices to their customers in Japan.

15

Proceeds from the note and granting the distribution rights were allocated to the note based on their aggregate fair value of $2.4 million at the dates of receipt.  This fair value was determined by discounting cash flows using a discount rate of 18%, which we estimated was a market rate of borrowing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to ours. The remainder of the proceeds of $1.6 million was recognized as debt issuance discount and was allocated to the value of the distribution rights granted to Century under the Distribution Agreement and is included in deferred revenue. The deferred revenue will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Distribution Agreement, beginning upon the first sale by Century of microcutter products in Japan.

Agreements with Intuitive Surgical

On August 16, 2010, we entered into a license agreement, or License Agreement, with Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., or Intuitive Surgical, pursuant to which we granted to Intuitive Surgical a worldwide, sublicenseable, exclusive license to use our intellectual property in the robotics field in diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures, but excluding vascular anastomosis applications, for an upfront license fee of $9.0 million. We are also eligible to receive a contingent payment if sales of any products incorporating our patent rights achieve a specified level of net sales within a specified period after the date of the License Agreement, as well as single-digit royalties on sales by Intuitive Surgical, its affiliates or its sublicensees of specified stapler and clip applier products covered by our patent rights as well as on sales of certain other products covered by our patent rights that may be developed in the future, if any.  Each party has the right to terminate the License Agreement in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy.  Following any termination of the License Agreement, the licenses granted to Intuitive Surgical will continue, and, except in the case of termination for our uncured material breach or insolvency, Intuitive Surgical’s payment obligations will continue as well.  Under the License Agreement, Intuitive Surgical has rights to improvements in our technology and intellectual property over a specified period of time.

In addition, on the same date, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Intuitive Surgical pursuant to which Intuitive Surgical paid $3.0 million to purchase from us an aggregate of 1,249,541 shares of our common stock, or the Stock Issuance.The net proceeds recorded to stockholders’ equity based upon the fair value of our common stock on August 16, 2010, were approximately $2.0 million after offering expenses.  From the premium paid of $1.0 million and the upfront license fee payment of $9.0 million, $168,000 and $168,000 have been recorded as license and development revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $209,000 has been recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2012.  There were no underwriters or placement agents involved with the Stock Issuance, and no underwriting discounts or commissions or similar fees were payable in connection with the Stock Issuance.

Agreement with Aspire Capital

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, we had a right to sell to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Purchase Agreement up to $10.0 million of our common stock at a maximum of 300,000 shares per day based on the trading price of our common stock. In consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, concurrently with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we issued to Aspire Capital 295,567 shares of our common stock as a commitment fee, or the Commitment Shares. As of December 31, 2012, a total of 1,645,567 shares of common stock (including the 295,567 Commitment Shares) had been issued to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and $4.4 million of capital had been raised through the sale of 1,350,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $3.23 per share. The Purchase Agreement has expired and as a result, we are no longer entitled to sell to Aspire Capital any further shares of our common stock.

Agreement with MLV

Subject to the terms and conditions of the ATM Agreement, we may issue and sell up to $10.0 million of our common stock through MLV as our sales agent.  The extent to which we rely on sales of common stock under the ATM Agreement as a source of funding will depend on a number of factors, including the prevailing market price of our common stock and the extent to which we are able to secure working capital from other sources.  The ATM Agreement provides that the offering of shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (1) the sale of all common stock subject to the ATM Agreement, (2) August 2, 2014, and (3) termination of the ATM Agreement.  As of December 31, 2012, we received net proceeds of $0.7 million from the sale of an aggregate of 445,593 shares of common stock through MLV. We are subject to limitations on the amount that we may sell under our shelf registration statement, and therefore that we may sell pursuant to the ATM Agreement.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

16

There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and significant judgments and estimates as set forth in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2012.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

        Net Revenue. Total net revenue was $874,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $912,000 for the same period in 2011. Product sales decreased by $38,000, or 5%, to $773,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $811,000 for the same period in 2011. The decrease in product sales for the three months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to lower PAS-Port system sales, offset in part by our first commercial sales of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 of $24,000.

License and development revenue from our agreement with Intuitive Surgical and royalty revenue were unchanged compared to the prior period in 2011.

        For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, sales to Century accounted for approximately 24% and 25%, respectively, of our total product sales.  In addition, sales to Mercy Hospital of Buffalo accounted for approximately 10% of our total product sales for the three months ended December 31, 2012, and less than 10% of our total product sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011.

        Cost of Product Sales. Cost of product sales consists primarily of material, labor and overhead costs. Cost of product sales decreased by $110,000, or 10%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease in cost of product sales resulted primarily from an allocation of overhead to Research and Development for work performed on our microcutter product line which was previously absorbed solely by production of PAS-Port and C-Port systems, partially offset by increased overhead spending.  We recorded an inventory valuation adjustment to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value by $189,000 in the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $63,000 for the same period in 2011, primarily due to our higher inventory costs for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30. We released $3,200 of excess and obsolete inventory reserves as a result of units sold in the three months ended December 31, 2012.

Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense relates primarily to the development of our microcutter product line and largely consists of personnel costs within our product development, regulatory and clinical groups and the costs for tooling used to facilitate research and development. Research and development expense increased by $0.8 million, or 53%, to $2.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to an increase in clinical expenses and material purchases of $481,000 and an increase in depreciation expenses of $135,000, mainly related to microcutter program development activites.  There were also increases in salaries and benefits of $111,000 due primarily to an increase in the number of personnel and increase in facility related expenses of $60,000.

        We anticipate that research and development expenses will decrease in absolute terms in future periods as costs are shifted to cost of sales and the clinical trial is completed.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $229,000, or 15%, to $1.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense in the three months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits of $79,000, increased stock-based compensation charges of $94,000 and an increase in consulting and professional service expenses of $78,000 due to microcutter activities.

        We expect selling, general and administrative expense to increase slightly in absolute terms in future periods as we continue to expand our sales and marketing effort to commercialize the microcutter products in Europe.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $114,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $56,000 for the same period in 2011. The increase in interest expense was due to the interest, including the accretion of debt discount, on our note payable to Century, which we issued in September and December 2011.  We expect interest expense to increase in future periods as the notes payable to Century are scheduled to mature on September 30, 2016, and the debt discount is accreted using the effective interest method.

17

Comparison of the six month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

        Net Revenue. Total net revenue of $1.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012, and for the same period in 2011. Product sales was $1.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012, and for the same period in 2011. The product sales for the six months ended December 31, 2012, included our first commercial sales of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 of $24,000.  

License and development revenue from our agreement with Intuitive Surgical and royalty revenue were unchanged compared to the prior period in 2011.

        For the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, sales to Century accounted for approximately 32% and 29%, respectively, of our total product sales.

        Cost of Product Sales. Cost of product sales decreased by $305,000, or 16%, to $1.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease in cost of product sales resulted primarily from an allocation of overhead to Research and Development for work performed on our microcutter product line which was previously absorbed solely by production of PAS-Port and C-Port systems, partially offset by increased overhead spending.  We recorded an inventory valuation adjustment to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value by $194,000 in the six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $128,000 for the same period in 2011, primarily due to our higher inventory costs for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30. We released $6,300 of excess and obsolete inventory reserves as a result of units sold in the six months ended December 31, 2012.

Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense increased by $1.8 million, or 59%, to $4.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $3.0 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to an increase in clinical expenses and material purchases of $972,000 and an increase in depreciation expenses of $252,000, mainly related to the microcutter program development activities.  In addition, we had an increase in salaries and benefits of $208,000 due primarily to an increase in the number of personnel and increase facility related expenses of $149,000.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $423,000, or 14%, to $3.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $3.0 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense in the six months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits of $122,000, higher stock-based compensation charges of $163,000 and an increase in professional services expenses of $188,000 due to microcutter activities.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $225,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to $56,000 for the same period in 2011. The increase in interest expense was due to the interest accretion of debt discount on our notes payable to Century, which we issued in September and December 2011.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

        As of December 31, 2012, except for a real estate operating lease for our headquarters in Redwood City, California, expiring in August 2015, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2012, our accumulated deficit was $145.8 million and we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $6.7 million. We currently invest some of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in money market funds, corporate debt securities and commercial papers. Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through private sales of convertible preferred stock, long-term note payable, public and private sales of common stock, warrants to purchase common stock, and license or collaboration agreements.

On February 8, 2012, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Wedbush Securities, Inc., or Wedbush, relating to the offering, issuance and sale of an aggregate of 9,091,000 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share. On February 13, 2012, we completed the sale of 9,091,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $1.65 per share. Net proceeds from the financing to us were $13.9 million.

On September 2, 2011, we entered into a distribution agreement, or the Distribution Agreement, with Century Medical, Inc., or Century, with respect to distribution of our planned microcutter products in Japan.  Additionally, under the terms of a secured note purchase agreement, Century agreed to loan us an aggregate of up to $4.0 million, with principal due on September 30, 2016, subject to certain conditions. In return for the loan commitment, we granted Century distribution rights to our planned microcutter product line in Japan, and a right of first negotiation for distribution rights in Japan to future products. Century will be responsible for securing regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health in Japan for the microcutter product line. After approval for marketing in Japan, we would sell microcutter units to Century, who would then sell the microcutter devices to their customers in Japan.

18

We have drawn the full $4.0 million available to us under the secured note purchase agreement. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due. Proceeds from the note and granting the distribution rights were allocated to the note based on their aggregate fair value of $2.4 million at the dates of receipt.  This fair value was determined by discounting cash flows using a discount rate of 18%, which we estimated approximated a market rate of return on debt financing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to us. The remainder of the proceeds of $1.6 million was allocated to the value of the distribution rights granted to Century under the Distribution Agreement and is included in deferred revenue. The deferred revenue will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Distribution Agreement, beginning upon the first sale by Century of the microcutter products in Japan.

On August 3, 2011, we entered into the ATM Agreement with MLV, which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, we may issue and sell up to $10.0 million of our common stock through MLV as our sales agent over the term of the ATM Agreement. The ATM Agreement provides that the offering of shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (1) the sale of all common stock subject to the ATM Agreement, (2) August 2, 2014 and (3) termination of the ATM Agreement which may be effected by either MLV or us at any time upon 10 days’ notice to the other party.  As of December 31, 2012, we had received net proceeds of $0.8 million from the placement of an aggregate of 445,593 shares of common stock through MLV.

On December 14, 2010, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, which provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, Aspire Capital was committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $10.0 million of shares of our common stock over the term of the Purchase Agreement at purchase prices determined in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. In consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, we issued to Aspire Capital 295,567 shares of our common stock as a commitment fee, or the Commitment Shares. As of December 31, 2012, we have received $4.4 million from the sale of a total of 1,350,000 shares of common stock (excluding the 295,567 Commitment Shares) to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.  The Purchase Agreement has expired and as a result, we are no longer entitled to sell to Aspire Capital any further shares of our common stock.  

Summary cash flow data is as follows (in thousands):

	Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(7,577	)	$	(3,366	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,114			(2,666	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		817			3,399

        Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $7.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The use of cash for the six months ended December 31, 2012, was primarily attributable to our  investments in bringing our microcutter products to market, including clinical trials and research and development activities, which were significantly more than the sales of our automated anastomotic systems used by cardiac surgeons to perform coronary bypass.

        Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended December 31, 2012, was $2.1 million, compared to the net cash used in investing activities of $2.7 million for the same period in 2011. Net cash provided by investing activities in the six months ended December 31, 2012, reflects net proceeds from the net sales of short term investments of $3.3 million, offset against purchases of property and equipment of $1.2 million, mainly to support for our microcutter development activities.

        Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $0.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended December 31, 2012, consisted of the net proceeds of $0.7 million received from the sale of shares of common stock to MLV and approximately $0.1 million proceeds from the exercise of stock options which was also used to fund for our microcutter development activities.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs to enable us to conduct our business substantially as currently conducted through March 31, 2013, excluding the repayment of the $4.0 million debt principal outstanding. We would be able to extend this time period to the extent that we decrease our planned expenditures, or raise capital. We have based our estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, including assumptions with respect to the level of revenue from product sales, and the cost of product development, including the cost and timing of our European clinical trial and the process for obtaining FDA approval for the commercial use of our microcutter products in the United States,and we could exhaust our available financial resources sooner than we currently expect.

19

The sufficiency of our current cash resources and our need for additional capital, and the timing thereof, will depend upon numerous factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

● European market acceptance of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 which we launched in the last quarter of calendar year 2012;

● the extent of our ongoing development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, including alterations and post-commercialization improvements in connection with our European clinical trial based on early adopter experience with this newly commercial product;

● the extent of our ongoing research and development programs and related costs, including costs related to the continued development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and additional potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line;

● our ability to enter into additional license, development and/or collaboration agreements with respect to our technology, and the terms thereof;

● market acceptance and adoption of our current products or future products that we may commercialize;

● our level of revenues;

● costs associated with our sales and marketing initiatives and manufacturing activities;

● costs and timing of obtaining and maintaining FDA and other regulatory clearances and approvals for our products and potential additional products;

● securing, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights and the costs thereof;

● the extent to which we access, or fail to access, capital in any equity or debt transaction; and

● the effects of competing technological and market developments.

While we initiated first-in-man use of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, with the CE Mark, in Europe in July 2011, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 did not perform satisfactorily in a small number of deployments in tissue thicknesses that could be considered the upper range typically compatible with the size of staple used in the procedures, and we suspended our clinical trial and the use of this product to make modifications to address these issues.  We have shifted our development priority to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, to which we applied the CE Mark in March 2012, following the completion of design verification and commercially launched in Europe on December 26, 2012. We intend to continue to make enhancements and improvements to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and develop XCHANGE 45 before continuing our efforts to develop the MicroCutter XPRESS 30. We cannot predict when, if ever, we will generate significant commercial revenue from the sale of either of these products or any other potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line.  Because we do not anticipate that we will generate sufficient product sales to achieve profitability for the foreseeable future, if at all, we need to raise substantial additional capital to finance our operations in the future.  Until we can generate significant continuing revenue, if ever, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements, as well as through interest income earned on cash balances. To raise capital, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities, obtain a credit facility or enter into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties or divest one or more of our commercialized products or products in development.  However, we cannot be certain that additional funding of any kind will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in significant dilution to our stockholders, particularly in light of the prices at which our common stock has been recently trading. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those associated with our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. Any product development, licensing, distribution or sale agreements that we enter into may require us to relinquish valuable rights, including with respect to commercialized products or products in development that we would otherwise seek to commercialize or develop ourselves. We may not be able to obtain sufficient additional funding or enter into a strategic transaction in a timely manner. Our need to raise capital may require us to accept terms that may harm our business or be disadvantageous to our current stockholders. If adequate funds are not available or revenue from product sales do not increase, we would be required to reduce our workforce, delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our commercialization efforts with respect to one or more of our products or one or more of our research and development programs in advance of March 31, 2013, to ensure that we have sufficient capital to meet our obligations and continue on a path designed to preserve stockholder value.

20

Contractual Obligations

Our future contractual obligations at December 31, 2012, were as follows (in thousands):

Contractual Obligations:	Total		1/1/2013 - 6/30/2013		7/1/2013 - 6/30/2015		7/1/2015 - 6/30/2017
Operating lease obligations	$	1,770	$	313	$	1,339	$	118
Note payable, including interest		4,750		100		400		4,250
Total	$	6,520	$	413	$	1,739	$	4,368

        This compares to our future contractual obligations as of June 30, 2012, of $6.9 million.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        During the six months ended December 31, 2012, there were no material changes to our market risk disclosures as set forth in “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2012.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

       Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective as of December 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

        A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within an organization have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met and, as set forth above, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system were met. We continue to implement, improve and refine our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

        We have identified the following risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also significantly impair our business operations. Although we have revised the text of some of the risk factors set forth below, the underlying risks have not changes materially from the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, other than the ones that we have marked with an asterisk (*).

Risks Related to Our Finances and Capital Requirements

*We require substantial additional capital and may be unable to raise capital, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or commercialization efforts and could cause us to cease operations. We cannot be certain that funds will be available and, if they are not available, we may not be able to continue as a going concern which may result in actions that could adversely impact our stockholders.

21

Our development efforts have consumed substantial capital to date. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $6.7 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and $4.0 million of debt principal outstanding. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs to enable us to conduct our business substantially as currently conducted through March 31, 2013, excluding the repayment of the $4.0 million debt principal outstanding. We may be able to extend this time period to the extent that we decrease our planned expenditures, or raise capital. Our Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital has expired, and so we no longer have the ability to raise additional capital under that agreement. We have based our estimate as to the sufficiency of our cash resources on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, including assumptions with respect to the level of revenue from product sales, and the cost of product development, including the cost and timing of our ongoing clinical trial and the process for obtaining FDA clearance for the commercial use of our microcutter products in the United States,and we could exhaust our available financial resources sooner than we currently expect.

        The sufficiency of our current cash resources and our need for additional capital, and the timing thereof, will depend upon numerous factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

● European market acceptance of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, which we launched in the last quarter of calendar year 2012;

● the extent of our ongoing development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, including alterations and post-commercialization improvements in connection with our European clinical trial based on early adopter experience with this newly commercial product;

● the extent of our ongoing research and development programs and related costs, including costs related to the continued development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and additional potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line;

● our ability to enter into additional license, development and/or collaboration agreements with respect to our technology, and the terms thereof;

● market acceptance and adoption of our current products or future products that we may commercialize;

● our level of revenues;

● costs associated with our sales and marketing initiatives and manufacturing activities;

● costs and timing of obtaining and maintaining FDA and other regulatory clearances and approvals for our products and potential additional products;

● securing, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights and the costs thereof;

● the extent to which we access, or fail to access, capital in any equity or debt transaction; and

● the effects of competing technological and market developments.

Because we do not anticipate that we will generate sufficient product sales to achieve profitability for the foreseeable future, if at all, we need to raise substantial additional capital to finance our operations in the future. To raise capital, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities, obtain a credit facility or enter into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties or divest one or more of our commercialized products or products in development. However, we cannot be certain that additional funding of any kind will be available on acceptable terms, or at all.  If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those associated with our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. Any product development, licensing, distribution or sale agreements that we enter into may require us to relinquish valuable rights, including with respect to commercialized products or products in development that we would otherwise seek to commercialize or develop ourselves. We may not be able to obtain sufficient additional funding or enter into a strategic transaction in a timely manner. Our need to raise capital may require us to accept terms that may harm our business or be disadvantageous to our current stockholders. If adequate funds are not available or revenue from product sales do not increase, we would be required to further reduce our workforce, delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our commercialization efforts with respect to one or more of our products or one or more of our research and development programs. Failure to raise additional capital may result in our ceasing to be publicly traded or ceasing operations.

22

*The sale of our common stock may cause substantial dilution to our existing stockholders, and the sale of the shares of common stock issued could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

We will need to raise additional capital, and sales of our common stock, may result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, or anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity−related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales and will cause dilution. Further, due to the size of our market capitalization, we are limited in our ability to raise capital under our shelf registration statement, which may force us to raise capital, if needed and not available under our shelf registration statement, to raise capital in private placements, which may not be on terms as favorable to us as those that we could obtain in a public offering under our shelf registration statement, which could cause further dilution.

*We have a history of net losses, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future, and we are unable to predict the extent of future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all.

We have incurred annual net losses since our inception in October 1997.  As of December 31, 2012, our accumulated deficit was approximately $145.8 million.  We expect to incur substantial additional losses until we can achieve significant commercial sales of our products, which depend upon a number of factors, including increased commercial sales of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems, as well as our newly commercially launched MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, commercial sales and market adoption of our other planned microcutter products in Europe and receipt of regulatory clearance or approval, commercial launch and market adoption of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and planned microcutter products in the United States.

Our ability to become and remain profitable depends upon our ability to generate significantly higher product sales. Our ability to generate significant and sustained revenue depends upon a number of factors, including:

● achievement of broad acceptance for our current products or future products that we may commercialize;

● achievement of U.S. regulatory clearance or approval for additional products; and

● successful sales, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of our products.

Through December 31, 2012, we have generated only $24,000 of revenue from the initial European commercial sales of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  Sales of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems have not met the levels that we had anticipated, and to date our systems have had limited commercial adoption.  Sales of our products and license and development activities generated revenues of only $1.8 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2012, and $3.7 million, $13.2 million and $4.0 million for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We do not anticipate that we will generate significantly higher product sales for the foreseeable future.

Our cost of product sales was 103% of our net product sales for the six month period ended December 31, 2012, and 111% and 86% of our net product sales for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively. We expect higher cost relative to product sales for the foreseeable future due to costs associated with commercializing, and post-commercialization improvements to our microcutter product line. If, over the long term, we are unable to reduce our cost of producing goods and expenses relative to our net revenue, we may not achieve profitability even if we are able to generate significant product sales.  Our failure to achieve and sustain profitability would negatively impact the market price of our common stock.

Existing lenders may have rights to our assets that are senior to our stockholders.

An existing arrangement with our current lender Century under which, as of December 31, 2012, $4.0 million of principal is outstanding allows or may allow this creditor to liquidate our assets, which may include our intellectual property rights, if we are in default or breach of our debt obligations for a continued period of time. The proceeds of any sale or liquidation of our assets under these circumstances would be applied first to repay any of our debt obligations. After satisfaction of our debt obligations, we could have little or no proceeds left to distribute to the holders of our capital stock.

*Our quarterly operating results and stock price may fluctuate significantly.

We expect our operating results to be subject to quarterly fluctuations. The revenue we generate and our operating results will be affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

● European market acceptance of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, which we launched in the last quarter of calendar year 2012;

● the extent of our ongoing development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, including alterations and post-commercialization improvements in connection with our European clinical trial based on early adopter experience with this newly commercial product;

● the extent of our ongoing research and development programs and related costs, including costs related to the continued development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and additional potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line;

23

● our ability to enter into additional license, development and/or collaboration agreements with respect to our technology, and the terms thereof;

● market acceptance and adoption of our current products or future products that we may commercialize;

● our level of revenues;

● costs associated with our sales and marketing initiatives and manufacturing activities;

● costs and timing of obtaining and maintaining FDA and other regulatory clearances and approvals for our products and potential additional products;

● securing, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights and the costs thereof;

● the extent to which we access, or fail to access, capital in any equity or debt transaction; and

● the effects of competing technological and market developments.

Quarterly fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our stock to fluctuate substantially.

Risks Related to Our Business

*We are dependent upon the success of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems to generate revenue in the near term, and we have U.S. regulatory clearance for our C-Port and PAS-Port systems only.  Sales of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems have not met the levels that we had anticipated and if we are unable to successfully commercialize our products, in particular, our microcutter product line, in the United States, our ability to generate revenue will be significantly delayed or halted, and our business will be harmed.

We have expended significant time, money and effort in the development the C-Port systems and the PAS-Port system. If we are not successful in increasing commercial adoption of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems, we may never generate substantial revenue, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected, and we may be forced to cease operations. We commenced sales of our C-Port xA system in December 2006 (after introduction of our original C-Port system in January 2006) and our C-Port Flex A in April 2007.  We commenced U.S. sales of our PAS-Port system in September 2008. We anticipate that our ability to increase our revenue significantly will depend on the continued adoption of our current PAS-Port and C-Port systems in the United States and EU market acceptance of our microcutter products.

*We are dependent upon the commercial success of our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe which, if not successful, could prevent us from successfully commercializing our other microcutter products.

We have expended significant time, money and effort in the development of our microcutter product line and, in particular, our MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, and have only recently commercially launched the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe.  If we are not successful in achieving clinical adoption of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe, we may never generate substantial revenue from this product line, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected, and we may be forced to cease operations.  Although we generated our first commercial revenues from the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in December 2012, of $24,000, we expect that we will need to continue to make enhancements and improvements to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 as early adopters in Europe use the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  We anticipate that our ability to increase our revenue significantly will depend on the continued adoption of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe.  The success, if any, of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in the United States (if regulatory clearance is obtained), and our future microcutter products, may depend upon the commercial success of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe.   We cannot predict when, if ever, we will generate significant commercial revenue from the sale of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 or any other potential products in our anticipated microcutter product line.

*We may not be successful in our efforts to expand our product portfolio, and our failure to do so could cause our business and prospects to suffer.

We completed the design verification for and applied the CE Mark to the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  While we initiated first-in-man use of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, with the CE Mark, in Europe in July 2011, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 did not perform satisfactorily in a small number of deployments in tissue thicknesses that could be considered the upper range typically compatible with the size of staples used in the procedures, and we suspended our clinical trial and the use of this product to make modifications to address these issues. The MicroCutter XPRESS 30 requires further design modifications which we are delaying until completion of development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45. We have suspended development of other potential products in our planned microcutter product line until the development and commercialization of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 have been completed.  Significant additional research and development and financial resources will be required to continue the development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and other products in this planned product line into commercially viable products and to obtain necessary regulatory clearances to commercialize the devices. We cannot assure you that our development efforts will be successful or that they will be completed within our publicly stated anticipated timelines, and we may never be successful in developing a viable product for the markets intended to be addressed by the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 or other potential microcutter products. Further, even if we do successfully develop any of these microcutter products, we may not be successful in commercializing them for any number of reasons, including failure or delays in obtaining regulatory clearances, or if surgeons do not perceive the benefits of these products to be significantly greater than current established products.  We may also face additional competition from generic microcutter products similar to currently commercially available products following expiration of patents on our competitors’ products, which we believe will begin in 2013.  Our failure to successfully develop and commercialize the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and/or other microcutter products would have a material adverse effect on our business, growth prospects and ability to raise additional capital.

24

*Our products may never gain any significant degree of market acceptance, and a lack of market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on our business.

To date, our anastomosis products have not gained, and we cannot assure you that our anastomosis products or any other products that we may develop will gain, any significant degree of market acceptance among physicians or patients. We believe that recommendations by physicians will be essential for market acceptance of our products; however, we cannot assure you that significant recommendations will be obtained. Physicians will not recommend our products unless they conclude, based on clinical data and other factors, that the products represent a safe and acceptable alternative to other available options. In particular, physicians may elect not to recommend using our anastomosis products in surgical procedures until such time, if ever, as we successfully demonstrate with long-term data that our products result in patency rates comparable to or better than those achieved with hand-sewn anastomoses, and we resolve any technical limitations that may arise.  Further, if physicians have negative experiences with our anastomosis products in surgical procedures, whether due to the fault of our anastomosis products or the physician, the adoption of these products could be negatively impacted.

Assuming that we receive FDA clearance for one or more of our microcutter products, a number of factors will influence our ability to gain clinical adoption. In many surgical specialties, the use of laparoscopic and open surgical stapling devices is routine in clinical practice and an accepted standard of care. Two large companies, Johnson & Johnson and Covidien, dominate the market for surgical stapling devices. For our products to be clinically adopted, they must show benefits that are significant enough for surgeons to communicate their preference and to overcome any constraints on their hospitals’ ability to purchase competing products, such as purchasing contracts, to buy one of our stapling products to replace a competing device. In addition to this obstacle, our microcutter products must demonstrate the degree of reliability that surgeons have experienced with products that they have been using for years. Market acceptance of our products also depends on our ability to demonstrate consistent quality and safety of our products. Further, if physicians are not able to use our microcutter products properly, or use them on tissue thicknesses for which they are not designed, adoption of our microcutter products may be negatively impacted.  Our anticipated limited human clinical data with respect to the use of any microcutter products that we may commercialize is likely to negatively impact the rate and extent of clinical adoption of the products. Any future recalls may impact physicians’ and hospitals’ perception of our products.

*Our products require training to use, and if physicians are not willing to undergo that training, or if they undergo the training but do not use our products properly, or for other reasons, our products may not gain any significant degree of market acceptance, and a lack of market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Widespread use of our products will require the training of numerous physicians, and the time required to complete training could result in a delay or dampening of market acceptance. Even if the safety and efficacy of our products is established, physicians may use our products improperly due to unfamiliarity with the products, or may use the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 on tissues with thicknesses greater than the specifications for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  If this were to happen, the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 may not function as desired for the physicians and could be reported as a problem with the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 rather than the physicians using it improperly, which could damage the reputation of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and cause other physicians to consider the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 to be not a safe product.  Further, physicians may elect not to use our products for a number of other reasons beyond our control, including inadequate or no reimbursement from health care payors, physicians’ reluctance to use products that have not been proven through time in the market, the introduction of competing devices by our competitors and pricing for our products. Failure of our products to achieve any significant market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our PAS-Port and C-Port systems and future products may face future development and regulatory difficulties and data from our European clinical trial may not be sufficient for clearance by the FDA of our anticipated MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 510(k) submission, or if clearance of our anticipated 510(k) submission is obtained, the indications for use may be limited, which would prevent, delay or limit the commercial introduction of our microcutter products in the United States.

        Even though the current generations of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems have received U.S. regulatory clearance, the FDA may still impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses or marketing of these products or ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-clearance studies. The FDA permits commercial distribution of most new medical devices only after the device has received 510(k) clearance or is the subject of an approved PMA.  Any of our future products, including the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and planned products in our microcutter product line and any future generations of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems, may not obtain regulatory clearances required for marketing or may face these types of restrictions or requirements, particularly as the FDA is considering revising its 510(k) clearance system to, in certain cases, require human clinical data and to prohibit the combination of multiple predicate devices as the basis for a 510(k).  

We have been advised by the FDA that it will require clinical data related to the staple design as part of a 510(k) submission for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and our other planned products.  We recommenced enrolling patients in the clinical trial with the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe in July 2012, and anticipate that the results of the clinical trial will be available in the second quarter of calendar 2013, and if the results are favorable, we anticipate that we will submit a 510(k) submission to the FDA in the third quarter of calendar 2013.  It is possible that the FDA will require data from a larger or different group of patients than the patients that we are enrolling in our clinical trial, or will reject the choice of design and controls used in our clinical trial.  Additionally, it is possible that the FDA could take the position that the use of surgical staplers in a foreign country represents a standard of care that is not consistent with use in the U.S. and thus the results of the trial are not relevant to our submission.

25

The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA, can be costly and time consuming, and there can be no assurance that such clearances or approvals will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. We rely substantially on the premarket notification process for FDA clearance under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.  This provision allows many medical devices to avoid human clinical trials if the product is “substantially equivalent” to another device already on the market.  Premarket notification requires a new device to be compared for safety, effectiveness and technological characteristics to another device (or multiple devices) already on the market.  A successful 510(k) submission results in FDA clearance for commercialization.  In 2011, an Istitute of Medicine panel recommended that this 510(k) process be significantly revised to be more restrictive.  While the IOM report is non-binding, we do not know if or when the FDA will act on this recommendation.  If we can no longer use the 510(k) pathway in the future, we may be required to perform clinical trials for our new products in order to obtain clearance or approval for commercialization.  If so, our development costs will increase substantially, and the likelihood of approval for some of our products may be reduced.  The PMA approval process is more costly, lengthy and uncertain than the 510(k) clearance process and requires the development and submission of clinical studies supporting the safety and effectiveness of the device. Product modifications may also require the submission of a new 510(k) clearance or the approval of a PMA before the modified product can be marketed. Any products or product enhancements that we develop that require regulatory clearance or approval, including the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, may not be cleared or approved on the timelines that we currently anticipate, if approved at all. Any new products or any product enhancements that we develop may not be subject to the shorter 510(k) clearance process, but may instead be subject to the more lengthy PMA requirements. Additionally, even if 510(k) or other regulatory clearance is granted for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 or any other potential product, the approved indications for use may be limited, and the FDA may require additional animal or human clinical data prior to any potential approval of additional indications. In particular, we anticipate that if 510(k) clearance is granted for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the initially approved indications for use would be limited to only certain gastrointestinal surgical procedures due to our focus initially on one staple size, which will limit the use of our microcutter products for use only with certain tissue thicknesses, and that the FDA would require additional data prior to any potential approval for additional surgical procedures.

The European Union, or EU, requires that manufacturers of medical products obtain the right to affix the CE Mark to their products before selling them in member countries of the EU. We have received CE Mark certification for the two initial microcutter surgical cutting and stapling devices that we have developed. To maintain authorization to apply the CE Mark to future devices within the microcutter product line, we are subject to annual surveillance audits and periodic re-certification audits. If we modify the intended use of new products (relative to predicate products) or change the indication for use or develop new products in the future, we may need to apply for permission to affix the CE Mark to such products. We do not know whether we will be able to obtain permission to affix the CE Mark to new or modified products or whether we will continue to meet the quality and safety standards required to maintain the authorization that we have received. If we are unable to maintain authorization to affix the CE Mark to microcutter products, we will not be able to sell these products in member countries of the EU, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Regulatory agencies subject a product, its manufacturer and the manufacturer’s facilities to continual review, regulation and periodic inspections. If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product, our collaborators or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market. Our products will also be subject to ongoing FDA requirements for the labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information on the product. If our products fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may impose any of the following sanctions:

● warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

● customer notifications, repair, replacement, refunds, recall or seizure of our products;

● operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

● delay in processing marketing applications for new products or modifications to existing products;

● withdrawing approvals that have already been granted; and

● criminal prosecution.

26

        To market any products internationally, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding safety and efficacy. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries might differ from that required to obtain FDA clearance or approval. The regulatory approval process in other countries may include all of the risks detailed above regarding FDA clearance or approval. Regulatory approval in one country does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may negatively impact the regulatory process in others. Failure to obtain regulatory approval in other countries or any delay or setback in obtaining such approval could have the same adverse effects detailed above regarding FDA clearance or approval, including the risk that our products may not be approved for use under all of the circumstances requested, which could limit the uses of our products and adversely impact potential product sales, and that such clearance or approval may require costly, post-marketing follow-up studies. If we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.

We may be subject to fines, penalties or injunctions if we are determined to be promoting the use of our products for unapproved or “off-label” uses.

In relation to our products that have received FDA clearance or approval, our promotional materials and training methods regarding physicians need to comply with FDA and other applicable laws and regulations. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials or training constitutes promotion of an unapproved use, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and/or criminal penalties. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they consider our promotional or training materials to constitute promotion of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement. In that event, our reputation could be damaged and adoption of our products would be impaired.

If we do not achieve our projected development goals in the time frames we announce and expect, the commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed and, as a result, our stock price may decline.

        From time to time, we may estimate and publicly announce the timing anticipated for the accomplishment of various clinical, regulatory and other product development goals, which we sometimes refer to as milestones. These milestones may include submissions for and receipt of clearances or approvals from regulatory authorities, other clinical and regulatory events or the launch of new products. These estimates are based on a variety of assumptions. The actual timing of these milestones can vary dramatically compared to our estimates, in some cases for reasons beyond our control. If we do not meet milestones as publicly announced, the commercialization of our products may be delayed and, as a result, our stock price may decline.

Our manufacturing facilities, and those of our suppliers, must comply with applicable regulatory requirements. Failure of our manufacturing facilities to comply with quality requirements would harm our business and our results of operations.

Our manufacturing facilities and processes are subject to periodic inspections and audits by various federal, state and foreign regulatory agencies. For example, our facilities have been inspected by State of California regulatory authorities pursuant to granting a California Device Manufacturing License and by the FDA. Additionally, to market products in Europe, we are required to maintain International Standards Organization, or ISO 13485:2003 certification and are subject to periodic surveillance audits. We are currently ISO 13485:2003 certified; however, our failure to maintain necessary regulatory compliance and permits for our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products.

Additionally, our manufacturing processes and, in some cases, those of our suppliers, are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which covers the procedures and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of our products, including the PAS-Port and C-Port systems and the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and the MicroCutter XPRESS 30. We are also subject to similar state requirements and licenses. In addition, we must engage in extensive record keeping and reporting and must make available our manufacturing facilities and records for periodic inspections by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries. If we are given notice of significant violations in a QSR inspection, our operations could be disrupted and our manufacturing interrupted. Failure to take adequate corrective action in response to an adverse QSR inspection could result in, among other things, a shut-down of our manufacturing operations, significant fines, suspension of product distribution or other operating restrictions, seizures or recalls of our devices and criminal prosecutions, any of which would cause our business to suffer. Furthermore, our key component suppliers may not currently be or may not continue to be in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, which may result in manufacturing delays for our products and cause our revenue to decline.

        We may also be required to recall our products due to manufacturing supply defects. If we issue recalls of our products in the future, our revenue and business could be harmed.

27

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into and maintain arrangements with third parties to market and sell our products, our business may be harmed.

We have limited experience as a company in the sale, marketing and distribution of our products. Century is responsible for marketing and commercialization of cardiac and microcutter products in Japan. To promote our current and future products in the United States and Europe, we must develop our sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. Competition for qualified sales personnel is intense. Developing a sales force is expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. We may be unable to establish and manage an effective sales force in a timely or cost-effective manner, if at all, and any sales force we do establish may not be capable of generating sufficient demand for our products. We have entered into arrangements with third parties to perform sales and marketing services, which may result in lower product sales than if we directly marketed and sold our products. We expect to rely on third-party distributors for substantially all of our international sales. If we are unable to establish adequate sales and marketing capabilities, independently or with others, we may not be able to generate significant revenue and may not become profitable. For our microcutter products, we will have to compete for sales and acceptance of our products against two large companies, Johnson & Johnson and Covidien, with large sales forces and dominant market positions.

Lack of third-party coverage and reimbursement for our products could delay or limit their adoption.

We may experience limited sales growth resulting from limitations on reimbursements made to purchasers of our products by third-party payors, and we cannot assure you that our sales will not be impeded and our business harmed if third-party payors fail to provide reimbursement that hospitals view as adequate.

In the United States, our products are and will continue to be purchased primarily by medical institutions, which then bill various third-party payors, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, which administer the Medicare program, and other government programs and private insurance plans, for the health care services provided to their patients. The process involved in applying for coverage and incremental reimbursement from CMS is lengthy and expensive. Under current CMS reimbursement policies, CMS offers a process to obtain add-on payment for a new medical technology when the existing Diagnosis-Related Group, or DRG, prospective payment rate is inadequate. To obtain add-on payment, a technology must be considered “new,” demonstrate substantial improvement in care and exceed certain payment thresholds. Add-on payments are made for no less than two years and no more than three years. We must demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of our technology to the FDA in addition to CMS requirements before add-on payments can be made. Further, Medicare coverage is based on our ability to demonstrate the treatment is “reasonable and necessary” for Medicare beneficiaries. In November 2006, CMS denied our request for an add-on payment with respect to our C-Port systems. According to CMS, we met the “new” criteria and exceeded the payment threshold but did not in their view demonstrate substantial improvement in care. Even if our products receive FDA and other regulatory clearance or approval, they may not be granted coverage and reimbursement in the foreseeable future, if at all. Moreover, many private payors look to CMS in setting their reimbursement policies and amounts. If CMS or other agencies limit coverage or decrease or limit reimbursement payments for doctors and hospitals, this may affect coverage and reimbursement determinations by many private payors.

We cannot assure you that CMS will provide coverage and reimbursement for our products. If a medical device does not receive incremental reimbursement from CMS, then a medical institution would have to absorb the cost of our products as part of the cost of the procedure in which the products are used. Acute care hospitals are now generally reimbursed by CMS for inpatient operating costs under a Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment system. Under the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment system, acute care hospitals receive a fixed payment amount for each covered hospitalized patient based upon the DRG to which the inpatient stay is assigned, regardless of the actual cost of the services provided. At this time, we do not know the extent to which medical institutions would consider insurers’ payment levels adequate to cover the cost of our products. Failure by hospitals and physicians to receive an amount that they consider to be adequate reimbursement for procedures in which our products are used could deter them from purchasing our products and limit our revenue growth. In addition, pre-determined DRG payments may decline over time, which could deter medical institutions from purchasing our products. If medical institutions are unable to justify the costs of our products, they may refuse to purchase them, which would significantly harm our business.

We have limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of our microcutter products, PAS-Port and C-Port systems. Any data that is generated in the future may not be positive or consistent with our existing data, which would affect market acceptance and the rate at which our devices are adopted.

The success of our microcutter products depends on their acceptance by the surgical community as safe and effective.  Even if the data collected from future clinical studies or clinical experience indicates positive results, each surgeon’s actual experience with our devices outside the clinical study setting may vary. Clinical studies conducted with our initial microcutter may involve procedures performed by thoracic, bariatric, colorectal and general surgeons who are technically proficient, high-volume surgeons. Consequently, both short- and long-term results reported in these studies may be significantly more favorable than typical results of practicing surgeons, which could negatively impact rates of adoption of the microcutter if launched.  In addition, any adverse experiences of surgeons using the microcutter products, or adverse outcomes to patients, may deter surgeons from using our products and negatively impact product adoption.

28

The C-Port and PAS-Port systems are innovative products, and our success depends upon their acceptance by the medical community as safe and effective. An important factor upon which the efficacy of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems will be measured is long-term data regarding the duration of patency, or openness, of the artery or the graft vessel. Equally important will be physicians’ perceptions of the safety of our products. Our technology is relatively new in cardiac bypass surgery, and the results of short-term clinical experience of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems do not necessarily predict long-term clinical benefit. We believe that physicians will compare long-term patency for the C-Port and PAS-Port devices against alternative procedures, such as hand-sewn anastomoses. If the long-term rates of patency do not meet physicians’ expectations, or if physicians find our devices unsafe, the C-Port and PAS-Port systems may not become widely adopted and physicians may recommend alternative treatments for their patients. In addition, any adverse experiences of physicians using the C-Port and PAS-Port systems, or adverse outcomes to patients, may deter physicians from using our products and negatively impact product adoption.

As a condition of its U.S market clearance, the C-Port system is subject to a mandatory Post Market Surveillance order under Section 522 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (which we refer to as the 522 order) to demonstrate graft patency outcomes and technical failure rate in a clinical study.  Should the FDA decide that the C-Port system does not perform as anticipated, or if the FDA identifies new concerns related to the safety and effectiveness of the product, or if the FDA determines that the requirements of the 522 order are otherwise unmet, we may be required to withdraw the C-Port system from the market and may be subject to other enforcement action, which could harm our business.

Our C-Port and PAS-Port systems were designed for use with venous grafts. In addition, we have studied the use of the C-Port systems with venous grafts and arterial grafts. Using the C-Port systems with arterial grafts may not yield patency rates or material adverse cardiac event rates comparable to those found in our clinical trials using venous grafts, which could negatively affect market acceptance of our C-Port systems. In addition, the clips and staples deployed by our products are made of 316L medical-grade stainless steel, to which some patients are allergic. These allergies, especially if not previously diagnosed or unknown, may result in adverse reactions that negatively affect the patency of the anastomoses or the healing of the implants and may therefore adversely affect outcomes, particularly when compared to anastomoses performed with other materials, such as sutures. Additionally, in the event a surgeon, during the course of surgery, determines that it is necessary to convert to a hand-sewn anastomosis and to remove an anastomosis created by one of our products, the removal of the implants may result in more damage to the target vessel (such as the aorta or coronary artery) than would typically be encountered during removal of a hand-sewn anastomosis. Moreover, the removal may damage the target vessel to an extent that could further complicate construction of a replacement hand-sewn or automated anastomosis, which could be detrimental to patient outcome. These or other issues, if experienced, could limit physician adoption of our products.

Even if the data collected from future clinical studies or clinical experience indicates positive results, each physician’s actual experience with our devices outside the clinical study setting may vary. Clinical studies conducted with the C-Port and PAS-Port systems have involved procedures performed by physicians who are technically proficient, high-volume users of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems. Consequently, both short- and long-term results reported in these studies may be significantly more favorable than typical results of practicing physicians, which could negatively impact rates of adoption of the C-Port and PAS-Port systems.

Any clinical trials that we may conduct may not begin on time, or at all, and may not be completed on schedule, or at all.

        The commencement or completion of any clinical trials that we may conduct may be delayed or halted for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

● the FDA or other regulatory authorities suspend or place on hold a clinical trial, or do not approve a clinical trial protocol or a clinical trial;

● the data and safety monitoring committee of a clinical trial recommends that a trial be placed on hold or suspended;

● patients do not enroll in clinical trials at the rate we expect;

● patients are not followed-up at the rate we expect;

● clinical trial sites decide not to participate or cease participation in a clinical trial;

● patients experience adverse side effects or events related to our products;

● patients die or suffer adverse medical effects during a clinical trial for a variety of reasons, which may not be related to our product candidates, including the advanced stage of their disease and other medical problems;

29

● third-party clinical investigators do not perform our clinical trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol and good clinical practices, or other third-party organizations do not perform data collection and analysis in a timely or accurate manner;

● regulatory inspections of our clinical trials or manufacturing facilities may, among other things, require us to undertake corrective action or suspend or terminate our clinical trials if investigators find us not to be in compliance with regulatory requirements;

● third-party suppliers fail to provide us with critical components that conform to design and performance specifications;

● the failure of our manufacturing processes to produce finished products that conform to design and performance specifications;

● changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions;

● the interim results of the clinical trial are inconclusive or negative;

● pre-clinical or clinical data is interpreted by third parties in different ways; or

● our trial design, although approved, is inadequate to demonstrate safety and/or efficacy.

We have been advised by the FDA, that the FDA will require clinical data related to the staple design used in the planned microcutter product line as part of a 510(k) submission for the products in our planned microcutter product line.  The extent of the clinical data to be required by the FDA is currently unknown and, accordingly, the current timing and path towards 510(k) clearance for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and, therefore, any marketing of the proposed products in U.S., are likewise unknown.  Any delays in our ability to obtain 510(k) clearance of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 beyond our current expectations could materially harm our ability to generate additional revenue from these proposed products and our business as a whole.

Clinical trials sometimes experience delays related to outcomes experienced during the course of the trials, which may result in a material delay in the trial and could lead to more significant delays or other effects in future trials. For example, we suspended our clinical trial of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 in Europe because, during the clinical trial, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 did not perform satisfactorily in a small number of deployments in tissue thicknesses that could be considered the upper range typically compatible with the size of staple used in the procedures. We believe that we have identified the causes for the unsatisfactory deployments, which will require modifications to the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, and we will consider continuation of development of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 after completing development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45.

Clinical trials may require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and completion of patient follow-up in clinical trials depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites and the eligibility criteria for the study and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures to assess the safety and effectiveness of our product candidates, or they may be persuaded to participate in contemporaneous trials of competitive products. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a study may cause an increase in costs and delays or result in the failure of the trial.

Our clinical trial costs will increase if we have material delays in our clinical trials or if we need to perform more or larger clinical trials than planned. Adverse events during a clinical trial could cause us to repeat a trial, terminate a trial or cancel an entire program.

If the third parties on whom we rely to conduct our clinical trials do not perform as contractually required or expected, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates.

        We do not have the ability to independently conduct clinical trials for our product candidates, and we must rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories, to conduct our clinical trials. In addition, we rely on third parties to assist with our pre-clinical development of product candidates. Furthermore, our third-party clinical trial investigators may be delayed in conducting our clinical trials for reasons outside of their control, such as changes in regulations, delays in enrollment, and the like. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, if these third parties need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for other reasons, any clinical trials that we may conduct may be extended, delayed, suspended or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis, if at all.

30

Because one customer accounts for a substantial portion of our product sales, the loss of this significant customer would cause a substantial decline in our revenue.

        We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales to Century, our distributor in Japan. The loss of Century as a customer would cause a decrease in revenue and, consequently, an increase in net loss. For the six month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, sales to Century accounted for approximately 32% and 29%, respectively, of our total product sales. For fiscal years 2012 and 2011, sales to Century accounted for approximately 32% and 22%, respectively, of our total product sales. We expect that Century will continue to account for a substantial portion of our sales in the near term. As a result, if we lose Century as a customer, our revenue and net loss would be adversely affected. In addition, customers that have accounted for significant revenue in the past may not generate revenue in any future period. The failure to obtain new significant customers or additional orders from existing customers will materially affect our operating results.

If our competitors have products that are approved in advance of ours, marketed more effectively or demonstrated to be more effective than ours, our commercial opportunity will be reduced or eliminated and our business will be harmed.

Although we have commercially launched the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe, we have only generated minimal revenues from this launch through December 31, 2012. The MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 and other planned products in the microcutter product line, if they receive regulatory clearance and are successfully launched, would compete in the market for stapling and cutting devices against laparoscopic stapling and sealing devices currently marketed around the world. We believe the principal competitive factors in the market for laparoscopic staplers include:

● reduced product size;

● ease of use;

● product quality and reliability;

● multi-fire capability;

● device cost-effectiveness;

● degree of articulation;

● surgeon relationships; and

● sales and marketing capabilities.

Two large competitors, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, part of Johnson & Johnson, and Covidien currently control over 80% of this market, and their products constitute the standard of care in this market. Other large competitors in the laparoscopic device market include Stryker Endoscopy and Olympus, which acquired another competitor, Gyrus Medical. Ethicon Endo-Surgery and Covidien, which acquired a small competitor, Power Medical, each have large direct sales forces in the United States and have been the largest participants in the market for single use disposable laparoscopic stapling devices for many years. Competing against large established competitors with significant resources may make establishing a market for any products that we develop difficult which would have a material adverse effect on our business.  Further, we may also face additional competition from generic microcutter products similar to currently commercially available products following expiration of patents on our competitors’ products, which we believe will begin in 2013.

The market for anastomotic solutions and cardiac bypass products is competitive. Competitors include a variety of public and private companies that currently offer or are developing cardiac surgery products generally and automated anastomotic systems specifically that would compete directly with ours.

        We believe that the primary competitive factors in the market for medical devices used in the treatment of coronary artery disease include:

● improved patient outcomes;

● access to and acceptance by leading physicians;

31

● product quality and reliability;

● ease of use;

● device cost-effectiveness;

● training and support;

● novelty;

● physician relationships; and

● sales and marketing capabilities.

        We may be unable to compete successfully on the basis of any one or more of these factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        A number of different technologies exist or are under development for performing anastomoses, including sutures, mechanical anastomotic devices, suture-based anastomotic devices and shunting devices. Currently, substantially all anastomoses are performed with sutures and, for the foreseeable future we believe that sutures will continue to be the principal alternative to our anastomotic products. Sutures are far less expensive than our automated anastomotic products, and other anastomotic devices may be less expensive than our own. Surgeons, who have been using sutures for their entire careers, may be reluctant to consider alternative technologies, despite potential advantages. Any resistance to change among practitioners could delay or hinder market acceptance of our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Cardiovascular diseases may also be treated by other methods that do not require anastomoses, including, interventional techniques such as balloon angioplasty with or without the use of stents, pharmaceuticals, atherectomy catheters and lasers. Several of these alternative treatments are widely accepted in the medical community and have a long history of use. In addition, technological advances with other therapies for cardiovascular disease, such as drugs, or future innovations in cardiac surgery techniques could make other methods of treating these diseases more effective or lower cost than bypass procedures. For example, the number of bypass procedures in the United States and other major markets has declined in recent years and is expected to decline in the years ahead because competing treatments are, in many cases, far less invasive and provide acceptable clinical outcomes. Many companies working on treatments that do not require anastomoses may have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and technical resources and experience than we have. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, pre-clinical testing, clinical trials, obtaining regulatory clearance or approval and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Our competitors may succeed in developing technologies and therapies that are more effective, better tolerated or less costly than any that we are developing or that would render our product candidates obsolete and noncompetitive. Our competitors may succeed in obtaining clearance or approval from the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities for their products sooner than we do for ours. We will also face competition from these third parties in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient enrollment for clinical trials and in acquiring and in-licensing technologies and products complementary to our programs or advantageous to our business.

We are dependent upon a number of key suppliers, including single source suppliers, the loss of which would materially harm our business.

        We use or rely upon sole source suppliers for certain components and services used in manufacturing our products, and we utilize materials and components supplied by third parties with which we do not have any long-term contracts. In recent years, many suppliers have ceased supplying materials for use in implantable medical devices. We cannot assure you that materials required by us will not be restricted or that we will be able to obtain sufficient quantities of such materials or services in the future. Moreover, the continued use by us of materials manufactured by third parties could subject us to liability exposure. Because we do not have long-term contracts, none of our suppliers is required to provide us with any guaranteed minimum production levels.

        We cannot quickly replace suppliers or establish additional new suppliers for some of our components, particularly due to both the complex nature of the manufacturing process used by our suppliers and the time and effort that may be required to obtain FDA clearance or approval or other regulatory approval to use materials from alternative suppliers. Any significant supply interruption or capacity constraints affecting our facilities or those of our suppliers would have a material adverse effect on our ability to manufacture our products and, therefore, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

32

We have limited manufacturing experience and may encounter difficulties in increasing production to provide an adequate supply to customers.

        To date, our manufacturing activities have consisted primarily of producing moderate quantities of our products for use in clinical studies and for commercial sales in Japan, Europe and the United States. Production in increased commercial quantities will require us to expand our manufacturing capabilities and to hire and train additional personnel. We may encounter difficulties in increasing our manufacturing capacity and in manufacturing larger commercial quantities, including:

● maintaining product yields;

● maintaining quality control and assurance;

● providing component and service availability;

● maintaining adequate control policies and procedures; and

● hiring and retaining qualified personnel.

        Difficulties encountered in increasing our manufacturing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        The manufacture of our products is a complex and costly operation involving a number of separate processes and components. Any shipment delays could harm perception of our products and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

         In addition, the current unit costs for our products, based on limited manufacturing volumes, are very high, and it will be necessary to achieve economies of scale to become profitable. Certain of our manufacturing processes are labor intensive, and achieving significant cost reductions will depend in part upon reducing the time required to complete these processes. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve cost reductions in the manufacture of our products and, without these cost reductions, our business may never achieve profitability.

        We have considered, and will continue to consider as appropriate, manufacturing in-house certain components currently provided by third parties, as well as implementing new production processes. Manufacturing yields or costs may be adversely affected by the transition to in-house production or to new production processes, when and if these efforts are undertaken, which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

*If we fail to retain key personnel, or to retain our executive management team, we may be unable to successfully develop or commercialize our products.

Our business and future operating results depend significantly on the continued contributions of our key technical personnel and senior management, and in particular our co-founder, CEO and President, Bernard Hausen, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Hausen speaks German, has many relationships valuable to our company with physicians in Europe, and is the primary contact for our company with many of the physicians using our microcutter products in Europe.  These services and individuals, and in particular Dr. Hausen, would be difficult or impossible to replace and none of these individuals is subject to a post-employment non-competition agreement. While we are subject to certain severance obligations to Dr. Hausen, either he or we may terminate his employment at any time and for any lawful reason or for no reason.  Additionally, although we have key-person life insurance in the amount of $3.0 million on the life of Dr. Hausen, we cannot assure you that this amount would fully compensate us for the loss of Dr. Hausen's services. The loss of key employees, the failure of any key employee to perform or our inability to attract and retain skilled employees, as needed, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        As of December 31, 2012, we had 63 employees. Our business and future operating results depend significantly on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, manufacturing, technical, marketing, sales and support personnel for our operations. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. We will need to maintain an appropriate level of managerial, operational, financial and other resources to manage and fund our operations and clinical trials, continue our research and development activities and commercialize our products, and we expect our past reductions in force will impair our ability to maintain or increase our product sales. It is possible that our management and scientific personnel, systems and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to maintain future operating activities, and we may be required to effect additional reductions in force.

33

We may in the future be a party to patent litigation and administrative proceedings that could be costly and could interfere with our ability to sell our products.

        The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights, and companies in the industry have used intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage. We may become a party to patent infringement claims and litigation or interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to determine the priority of inventions. The defense and prosecution of these matters are both costly and time consuming. Additionally, we may need to commence proceedings against others to enforce our patents, to protect our trade secrets or know-how or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. These proceedings would result in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort by our technical and management personnel.

        We are aware of patents issued to third parties that contain subject matter related to our technology. We cannot assure you that these or other third parties will not assert that our products and systems infringe the claims in their patents or seek to expand their patent claims to cover aspects of our products and systems. An adverse determination in litigation or interference proceedings to which we may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities or require us to seek licenses. In addition, if we are found to willfully infringe third-party patents, we could be required to pay treble damages in addition to other penalties. Although patent and intellectual property disputes in the medical device area have often been settled through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated with these arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties. We may be unable to obtain necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all. If we do not obtain necessary licenses, we may be required to redesign our products to avoid infringement, and it may not be possible to do so effectively. Adverse determinations in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling the C-Port or PAS-Port systems or any other product we may develop, which would have a significant adverse impact on our business.

Intellectual property rights may not provide adequate protection, which may permit third parties to compete against us more effectively.

        We rely upon patents, trade secret laws and confidentiality agreements to protect our technology and products. Our pending patent applications may not issue as patents or, if issued, may not issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. Any patents we have obtained or will obtain in the future might be invalidated or circumvented by third parties. If any challenges are successful, competitors might be able to market products and use manufacturing processes that are substantially similar to ours. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by consultants, vendors or former or current employees, despite the existence generally of confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions. Monitoring unauthorized use and disclosure of our intellectual property is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be adequate. In addition, the laws of many foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. To the extent that our intellectual property protection is inadequate, we are exposed to a greater risk of direct competition. In addition, competitors could purchase any of our products and attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts or design around our protected technology. If our intellectual property is not adequately protected against competitors' products and methods, our competitive position could be adversely affected, as could our business.

        We also rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We require our employees, consultants and advisors to execute appropriate confidentiality and assignment-of-inventions agreements with us. These agreements typically provide that all materials and confidential information developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual's relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances and that all inventions arising out of the individual's relationship with us shall be our exclusive property. These agreements may be breached, and in some instances, we may not have an appropriate remedy available for breach of the agreements. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques, reverse engineer our information and techniques, or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology.

Our products face the risk of technological obsolescence, which, if realized, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        The medical device industry is characterized by rapid and significant technological change. There can be no assurance that third parties will not succeed in developing or marketing technologies and products that are more effective than ours or that would render our technology and products obsolete or noncompetitive. Additionally, new, less invasive surgical procedures and medications could be developed that replace or reduce the importance of current procedures that use or could use our products. Accordingly, our success will depend in part upon our ability to respond quickly to medical and technological changes through the development and introduction of new products. The relative speed with which we can develop products, complete clinical testing and regulatory clearance or approval processes, train physicians in the use of our products, and supply commercial quantities of products to the market are expected to be important competitive factors. Product development involves a high degree of risk, and we cannot assure you that our new product development efforts will result in any commercially successful products. We have experienced delays in completing the development and commercialization of our planned products, and there can be no assurance that these delays will not continue or recur in the future. Any delays could result in a loss of market acceptance and market share.

34

We are subject to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and, if we are unable to fully comply with such laws, could face substantial penalties.

        Our operations are affected by various broad state and federal healthcare fraud and abuse laws, including the federal healthcare program Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits any person from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing or arranging for an item or service, for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Foreign sales of our products are also subject to similar fraud and abuse laws, including application of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. If our operations, including any consulting arrangements we may enter into with physicians who use our products, are found to be in violation of these laws, we or our officers may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, including large monetary penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment and exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid program participation. If enforcement action were to occur, our business and financial condition would be harmed.

We could be exposed to significant product liability claims, which could be time consuming and costly to defend, divert management attention, and adversely impact our ability to obtain and maintain insurance coverage. The expense and potential unavailability of insurance coverage for our company or our customers could adversely affect our ability to sell our products, which would adversely affect our business.

The testing, manufacture, marketing, and sale of our products involve an inherent risk that product liability claims will be asserted against us. Additionally, we are currently training physicians in the United States on the use of our C-Port and PAS-Port systems and in Europe for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  During training, patients may be harmed, which could also lead to product liability claims. Product liability claims or other claims related to our products, or their off-label use, regardless of their merits or outcomes, could harm our reputation in the industry, reduce our product sales, lead to significant legal fees, and result in the diversion of management’s attention from managing our business.

        Although we maintain product liability insurance in the amount of $10,000,000, we may not have sufficient insurance coverage to fully cover the costs of any claim or any ultimate damages we might be required to pay. We may not be able to obtain insurance in amounts or scope sufficient to provide us with adequate coverage against all potential liabilities. Any product liability claims brought against us, with or without merit, could increase our product liability insurance rates or prevent us from securing continuing coverage. Product liability claims in excess of our insurance coverage would be paid out of cash reserves, harming our financial condition and adversely affecting our operating results.

Some of our customers and prospective customers may have difficulty in procuring or maintaining liability insurance to cover their operations and use of the C-Port or PAS-Port systems or the microcutter product line. Medical malpractice carriers are withdrawing coverage in certain states or substantially increasing premiums. If this trend continues or worsens, our customers may discontinue using the C-Port or PAS-Port systems and potential customers may opt against purchasing the C-Port or PAS-Port systems due to the cost or inability to procure insurance coverage.

We sell our systems internationally and are subject to various risks relating to these international activities, which could adversely affect our revenue.

        To date, a substantial portion of our cardiac product sales has been attributable to sales in international markets. By doing business in international markets, we are exposed to risks separate and distinct from those we face in our domestic operations. Our international business may be adversely affected by changing economic conditions in foreign countries. Because most of our sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, if the value of the U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies, our products could become more costly to the international customer and, therefore, less competitive in international markets, which could affect our results of operations. Engaging in international business inherently involves a number of other difficulties and risks, including:

● export restrictions and controls relating to technology;

● the availability and level of reimbursement within prevailing foreign healthcare payment systems;

● pricing pressure that we may experience internationally;

● required compliance with existing and changing foreign regulatory requirements and laws;

● laws and business practices favoring local companies;

● longer payment cycles;

● difficulties in enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through certain foreign legal systems;

35

● political and economic instability;

● potentially adverse tax consequences, tariffs and other trade barriers;

● international terrorism and anti-American sentiment;

● difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; and

● difficulties in enforcing intellectual property rights.

        Our exposure to each of these risks may increase our costs, impair our ability to market and sell our products and require significant management attention. We cannot assure you that one or more of these factors will not harm our business.

Our operations are currently conducted at a single location that may be at risk from earthquakes, terror attacks or other disasters.

        We currently conduct all of our manufacturing, development and management activities at a single location in Redwood City, California, near known earthquake fault zones. We have taken precautions to safeguard our facilities, including insurance, health and safety protocols, and off-site storage of computer data. However, any future natural disaster, such as an earthquake, or a terrorist attack, could cause substantial delays in our operations, damage or destroy our equipment or inventory and cause us to incur additional expenses. A disaster could seriously harm our business and results of operations. Our insurance does not cover earthquakes and floods and may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case.

If we use hazardous materials in a manner that causes injury, we may be liable for damages.

        Our research and development and manufacturing activities involve the use of hazardous materials. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of accidental injury or contamination from the use, storage, handling or disposal of these materials. We do not carry specific hazardous waste insurance coverage, and our property and casualty and general liability insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for damages and fines arising from hazardous waste exposure or contamination. Accordingly, in the event of contamination or injury, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines in an amount exceeding our resources, and our clinical trials or regulatory clearances or approvals could be suspended or terminated.

Changes in tax structures may negatively impact our future results of operations and our industry in general, which could harm our business and the value of our stock.

Beginning in 2013, U.S. health care law reforms under the 2010 Affordable Health Care Act will impose a new 2.3% excise tax on certain medical technology companies regardless of whether the companies are profitable.  Industry advocates anticipate the new tax will negatively impact innovation and U.S. competitiveness.  Despite the 2013 implementation date, the tax may already be having an adverse impact on U.S. medical device research and development investment activity and job creation, and may force affected companies to consider cutting manufacturing operations, research and development, and employment levels.  These new taxes may also adversely impact patient access to new and innovative medical technologies such as those we manufacture and develop.  If any of these risks materializes, then our business may be harmed and the value of our common stock could decline.  We cannot assure you that the Affordable Care Act, as currently enacted or as amended in the future, will not adversely affect our business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative or administrative changes relating to healthcare reform will affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

*The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile, and the value of an investment in our common stock may decline.

      An active and liquid trading market for our common stock may not develop or be sustained.  Factors that could cause volatility in the market price of our common stock include, but are not limited to:

● completion of development and commercial launch of our microcutter products, and the timing thereof;

● perceptions that we may not be able to raise capital as needed, or that investors will be substantially diluted if we do raise capital;

● market acceptance and adoption of our products;

36

● regulatory clearance or approvals of or other regulatory developments with respect to our products;

● volume and timing of orders for our products;

● changes in earnings estimates, investors' perceptions, recommendations by securities analysts or our failure to achieve analysts' earnings estimates;

● quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations;

● general market conditions and other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors;

● the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;

● announcements related to patents issued to us or our competitors and to litigation; and

● developments in our industry.

        In addition, the stock prices of many companies in the medical device industry have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. These factors may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The ownership of our common stock is highly concentrated, and your interests may conflict with the interests of our existing stockholders.

        Our executive officers and directors and their affiliates, together with other stockholders that own 5% or more of our outstanding common stock, beneficially owned approximately 20% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2012. Accordingly, these stockholders have significant influence over the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval and continue to have significant influence over our operations. The interests of these stockholders may be different than the interests of other stockholders on these matters. This concentration of ownership could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce the price of our common stock.

Evolving regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure will result in additional expenses and continuing uncertainty.

        Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and The NASDAQ Stock Market rules are creating uncertainty for public companies. We are presently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to new and proposed rules and cannot predict or estimate the amount of the additional compliance costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by courts and regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Maintaining appropriate standards of corporate governance and public disclosure will result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from product-generating and revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In addition, if we fail to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business and reputation may be harmed.

Our future operating results may be below securities analysts' or investors' expectations, which could cause our stock price to decline.

        The revenue and income potential of our products and our business model are unproven, and we may be unable to generate significant revenue or grow at the rate expected by securities analysts or investors. In addition, our costs may be higher than we, securities analysts or investors expect. If we fail to generate sufficient revenue or our costs are higher than we expect, our results of operations will suffer, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. Our results of operations will depend upon numerous factors, including:

● completion of development and commercial launch of our microcutter products, and the timing thereof;

● FDA or other regulatory clearance or approval of our products;

37

● demand for our products;

● the performance of third-party contract manufacturers and component suppliers;

● our ability to develop sales and marketing capabilities;

● our ability to develop, introduce and market new or enhanced versions of our products on a timely basis; and

● our ability to obtain and protect proprietary rights.

        Our operating results in any particular period may not be a reliable indication of our future performance. In some future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors.  If this occurs, the price of our common stock will likely decline.

Anti-takeover defenses that we have in place could prevent or frustrate attempts to change our direction or management.

        Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may make it more difficult for or prevent a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:

● limit who may call a special meeting of stockholders;

● establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings;

● prohibit cumulative voting in the election of our directors, which would otherwise permit less than a majority of stockholders to elect directors;

● prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and

● provide our board of directors with the ability to designate the terms of and issue a new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.

        In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally prohibits us from engaging in any business combination with certain persons who own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or any of our associates or affiliates who at any time in the past three years have owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive our stockholders of the opportunity to sell their shares to potential acquirors at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.

We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management's attention and harm our business.

        The stock market in general, the NASDAQ Global Market and the market for medical device companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Further, the market prices of securities of medical device companies have been particularly volatile. These broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. We may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management's attention and resources, which could materially harm our financial condition and results of operations.

We have never paid dividends on our capital stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

        We have paid no cash dividends on any of our classes of capital stock to date, and we currently intend to retain our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain to our stockholders for the foreseeable future.

38

*If our stock price declines, our common stock may be subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Global Market.

In November 2012, we received notice from the NASDAQ Global Market that we did not meet the continued listing requirements for listing our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market because for 30 consecutive business days the market value of our common stock had been below $50,000,000.  Although in January 2013, our stock price increased and we received a letter from Nasdaq stating that the we had regained compliance with the listing rule and that matter was closed, we cannot guarantee that our stock price will remain sufficiently high to continue to meet the listing requirements.  If our stock price drops again our common stock may once again not meet the continued listing requirements for listing our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market, and our common stock could be delisted from that market if we do not regain compliance within 180 days of any new notice received from Nasdaq.

39

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description.
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. Ö
3.2	Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. (1)
3.3	Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. (2)
3.4	Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (5)
3.5	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cardica, Inc. (3)
4.1	Form of Warrant dated September 30, 2009. (4)
10.1	Cardica, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. (6)
31.1	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1*	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
Ö	Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-129497, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2005, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference.
*	The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cardica, Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.
(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2012.
(6)	Incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 16, 2012.

40

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Cardica, Inc.
Date: February 8, 2013	/s/ Bernard A. Hausen
	Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.
	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 8, 2013	/s/ Robert Y. Newell
	Robert Y. Newell
	Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

41

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.	Description.
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. Ö
3.2	Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. (1)
3.3	Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cardica, Inc. (2)
3.4	Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (5)
3.5	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cardica, Inc. (3)
4.1	Form of Warrant dated September 30, 2009. (4)
10.1	Cardica, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. (6)
31.1	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1*	Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
Ö	Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-129497, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2005, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference.
*	The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cardica, Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.
(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2012.
(6)	Incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, File No. 000-51772, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 16, 2012.

42

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Cardica, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 8, 2013	/s/ Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.
	Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Y. Newell, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Cardica, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 8, 2013	/s/ Robert Y. Newell
	Robert Y. Newell Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Cardica, Inc. (the "Company"), and Robert Y. Newell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2012, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 8th day of February, 2013.

/s/ Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.	/s/ Robert Y. Newell
Bernard A. Hausen, M.D., Ph.D.	Robert Y. Newell
Chief Executive Officer	Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cardica, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

XML

Note 9 - Amended Lease Agreement (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Nov. 11, 2010
Leasehold Improvements, Gross			$ 148,070
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents	104,000	104,000
Building [Member]
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents	$ 100,000	$ 100,000

XML

Note 2 - Stockholders' Equity (Detail) - Non-cash Stock-based Compensation (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Employee Service Share-based Compensation	$ 306	$ 189	$ 549	$ 325
Cost of Sales [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation	26	25	51	37
Research and Development Expense [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation	74	51	138	91
Selling and Marketing Expense [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation	$ 206	$ 113	$ 360	$ 197

XML

Note 3 - Net Loss Per Share

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

NOTE 3 - NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period less the weighted-average unvested common shares subject to repurchase, and without consideration of potential common shares.  Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, less the weighted-average unvested common shares subject to repurchase, plus dilutive potential common shares for the period determined using the treasury-stock method.  For purposes of this calculation, options and warrants to purchase stock and unvested restricted stock awards are considered to be potential common shares and are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three months ended December 31,						Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(4,192	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Less: Weighted-average unvested restricted stock		—			—			—			—
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)

        The following table sets forth the outstanding securities not included in the diluted net loss per common share calculation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, because their effect would be antidilutive (in thousands):

	As of December 31,
	2012		2011
Options to purchase common stock		4,468		3,893
Unvested restricted stock awards		74		37
Warrants		3,991		4,646
Total		8,533		8,576

XML

Note 5 - Short-Term Investments (Detail) - Short-Term Investments (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Available-for-sale securities:
Amortized Cost	$ 2,836	$ 6,178
Gross Unrealized Losses	(1)	(5)
Fair Value	2,835	6,173
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:
Amortized Cost	1,837	4,246
Gross Unrealized Losses	(1)	(3)
Fair Value	1,836	4,243
Commercial Paper [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:
Amortized Cost	999	1,000
Gross Unrealized Gains	0
Gross Unrealized Losses	0	(1)
Fair Value	999	999
Certificates of Deposit [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:
Amortized Cost		932
Gross Unrealized Losses		(1)
Fair Value		$ 931

XML

Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements (Detail) - Fair Value Measurements (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments	$ 2,835	$ 6,173
Total assets at fair value	5,509	13,478
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents	2,674	6,805
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Short-term investments:
Total assets at fair value	2,674	6,805
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments	1,836	4,243
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Commercial Paper [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments	999	999
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Certificates of Deposit [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments		931
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Commercial Paper [Member]
Cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents		500
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Short-term investments:
Total assets at fair value	2,835	6,673
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments	1,836	4,243
Commercial Paper [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments	999	999
Certificates of Deposit [Member]
Short-term investments:
Short-term investments		931
Money Market Funds [Member]
Cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents	2,674	6,805
Commercial Paper [Member]
Cash equivalents:
Cash equivalents		$ 500

XML

Note 6 - Inventories (Detail) - Inventories (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Raw materials	$ 467	$ 170
Work in progress	216	128
Finished goods	316	278
Total	$ 999	$ 576

XML

Note 7 - Distribution, License, Development and Commercialization Agreements (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	60 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Dec. 27, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Aug. 16, 2010	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012 Intuitive Surgical [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Intuitive Surgical [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Cook Incorporated [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Cook Incorporated [Member]
Proceeds from Secured Notes Payable	$ 2,000,000	$ 2,000,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate During Period					5.00%
Notes Payable, Related Parties					4,000,000
Notes Payable, Fair Value Disclosure		2,400,000
Assumption for Fair Value of Assets or Liabilities that relate to Transferor's Continuing Involvement, Discount Rate					18.00%
Debt Instrument, Unamortized Discount		1,600,000
Licenses Revenue				9,000,000				168,000	168,000
Common Stock Premium				1,000,000
Common Stock, Value, Issued			3,000,000			37,000	37,000
Noncash or Part Noncash Divestiture, Amount of Consideration Received			10,000,000
Deferred Revenue, Noncurrent				1,000,000		1,610,000	1,652,000
Deferred Revenue, Current						$ 612,000	$ 738,000	$ 209,000		$ 403,000	$ 403,000

XML

Note 2 - Stockholders' Equity

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Stockholders' Equity Note Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 2 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common Stock

On February 8, 2012, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with Wedbush Securities Inc. (“Wedbush”) relating to the offering, issuance and sale of an aggregate of 9,091,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share.  On February 13, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 9,091,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $1.65 per share. Net proceeds from the financing to the Company were $13.9 million.

On August 3, 2011, the Company entered into the At The Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “ATM Agreement”) with McNicoll, Lewis & Vlak LLC (“MLV”), which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, the Company may issue and sell up to $10.0 million of the Company’s common stock through MLV as the Company’s sales agent over the term of the ATM Agreement. The ATM Agreement provides that the offering of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the ATM Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (1) the sale of all common stock subject to the ATM Agreement, (2) August 2, 2014, and (3) termination of the ATM Agreement which may be effected by either MLV or the Company at any time upon 10 days’ notice to the other party. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had received net proceeds of $0.7 million from the sale of an aggregate of 445,593 shares of common stock through MLV.

On December 14, 2010, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Aspire Capital”), which provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, Aspire Capital was committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $10.0 million of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Purchase Shares”) over the term of the Purchase Agreement at purchase prices determined in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on any trading day on which the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $1.00 per share, the Company had the right, in its sole discretion, to present Aspire Capital with a purchase notice, directing Aspire Capital to purchase up to a certain number of shares dependent upon the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price per Purchase Share would be equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest sale price of the Company’s common stock on the purchase date or (ii) the arithmetic average of the three lowest closing sale prices for the Company’s common stock during the twelve consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the purchase date.

The Purchase Agreement provided that the Company may not issue and sell more than 4,930,747 shares of the Company’s common stock, including the 295,567 commitment shares issued to Aspire Capital, under the Purchase Agreement. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had received $4.4 million from the sale of an aggregate of 1,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (excluding the 295,567 commitment shares) to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.  During the six months ended December 31, 2012, the Company did not issue any shares under the Purchase Agreement.  The Purchase Agreement has expired and as a result, the Company is no longer entitled to sell to Aspire Capital any further shares of its common stock. 

Stock-Based Compensation

        Included in the statement of operations are the following non-cash stock-based compensation expenses (in thousands):

	Three months ended December 31,				Six months ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of product sales	$	26	$	25	$	51	$	37
Research and development		74		51		138		91
Selling, general and administrative		206		113		360		197
Total	$	306	$	189	$	549	$	325

XML

Note 8 - Note Payable (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	0 Months Ended		60 Months Ended	0 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 27, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 27, 2011 Century Medical [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Century Medical [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Century Medical [Member]
Proceeds from Secured Notes Payable	$ 2.0	$ 2.0		$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 4.0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate During Period			5.00%
Debt Instrument, Face Amount						4.0
Debt Instrument, Unamortized Discount		$ 1.6				$ 1.6

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,826	$ 8,472
Short-term investments	2,835	6,173
Accounts receivable	443	299
Inventories	999	576
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	204	214
Total current assets	8,307	15,734
Property and equipment, net	3,087	2,304
Restricted cash	104	104
Total assets	11,498	18,142
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,046	862
Accrued compensation	510	410
Other liabilities	490	408
Current portion of deferred revenue	612	738
Total current liabilities	2,658	2,418
Deferred revenue, net of current portion	1,610	1,652
Note payable	2,655	2,532
Other non-current liabilities	177	180
Total liabilities	7,100	6,782
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized: no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012	0	0
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 65,000,000 shares authorized: 36,956,005 and 36,511,388 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively	37	37
Additional paid-in capital	150,714	149,348
Treasury stock at cost (66,227 shares at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012)	(596)	(596)
Accumulated comprehensive loss	(1)	(5)
Accumulated deficit	(145,756)	(137,424)
Total stockholders' equity	4,398	11,360
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 11,498	$ 18,142

XML

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Operating activities:
Net loss	$ (8,332)	$ (6,241)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	445	366
Stock-based compensation expense	549	325
Non cash interest expense	123	30
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(144)	5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10	(153)
Inventories	(423)	313
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	263	617
Accrued compensation	100	(71)
Deferred revenue	(168)	1,443
Net cash used in operating activities	(7,577)	(3,366)
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,228)	(1,753)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments	6,734	2,012
Purchases of short-term investments	(3,392)	(2,925)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	2,114	(2,666)
Financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock	817	1,009
Net proceeds from issuances of notes payable		2,390
Net cash provided by financing activities	817	3,399
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(4,646)	(2,633)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	8,472	7,832
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	3,826	5,199
Supplemental Information
Interest paid	$ 100	$ 27

XML

Note 9 - Amended Lease Agreement (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases [Table Text Block]

Fiscal year ending June 30,	Operating Leases
	$
2013 (remaining six months)		313
2014		649
2015		690
2016		118
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,770

XML

Note 2 - Stockholders' Equity (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	0 Months Ended	6 Months Ended					27 Months Ended
	Feb. 13, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012 Common Stock Issued To MLV [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Commitment Shares Issued To Aspire Capital [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Common Stock Issued To Aspire Capital, Value [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Common Stock Issued To Aspire Capital, Shares [Member]
Common Stock, Shares, Issued	9,091,000	36,956,005		36,511,388	445,593	295,567		1,350,000
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001		$ 0.001
Sale of Stock, Price Per Share (in Dollars per share)	$ 1.65
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock (in Dollars)	$ 13,900	$ 817	$ 1,009				$ 4,400

XML

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

         Cardica, Inc. (“Cardica” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on October 15, 1997, as Vascular Innovations, Inc. On November 26, 2001, the Company changed its name to Cardica, Inc.  Historically, the Company’s business focused on the design, manufacture and marketing of proprietary automated anastomotic systems used by cardiac surgeons to perform coronary bypass surgery. The Company has expanded its business by including the development of an endoscopic microcutter product line intended for use by thoracic, bariatric, colorectal, pediatric and general surgeons.

The Company is developing a microcutter product line based on its proprietary “staple-on-a-strip” technology, which expands its commercial opportunity into additional surgical markets.  The Company’s planned microcutter product line consists of the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 30, a cartridge based microcutter device with a 5 millimeter shaft diameter and a 30 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XCHANGE™ 45, a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a 8 millimeter shaft and a 45 millimeter staple line, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 30, a true multi-fire endolinear stapling device, the MicroCutter FLEXCHANGE™ 30, a planned cartridge based microcutter device with a flexible shaft to facilitate endoscopic procedures requiring cutting and stapling, the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 45, a planned multi-fire endolinear microcutter device with a 45 millimeter staple line, and the MicroCutter XPRESS™ 60, a planned cutting and stapling device specifically designed for the bariatric and thoracic surgery markets. The Company estimates these planned devices will expand its commercial opportunity to approximately 1.4 million additional procedures annually in the United States, involving, the Company estimates, over 4 million staple cartridge deployments, 3 million of which the Company believes are deployed in laparoscopic procedures.

   In March 2012, the Company completed the design verification for and applied Conformité Européenne, or the CE Mark, to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  As the Company has gained more experience with its microcutter products, the Company believes that the cartridge-based design of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 permitted it to commercially launch this product more quickly than its planned initial multi-fire product, the MicroCutter XPRESS 30. The Company believes that the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 is differentiated in the market in which it is currently commercially available compared to currently marketed staplers due to its significantly reduced size and ability to articulate up to 80 degrees.  The Company intends to expand its microcutter product line with the development of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 45 and only then consider continuation of development of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, but in light of its limited financial resources, the Company has limited development of other potential products in its planned microcutter product line.

   The Company initiated first-in-man use of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30, with the CE Mark, in Europe in July 2011, and in November 2011, began enrolling patients in a European clinical trial.  The Company suspended its clinical trial of the MicroCutter XPRESS 30 in Europe in December 2011, and recommenced enrollment in the clinical trial with its MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in July 2012.  Prior to recommencing the clinical trial of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, the Company introduced this product to surgeons in Europe to validate the adequate function of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30.  On December 26, 2012, the Company commercially launched its first shipment to its distributor in Europe.  The Company will continue to make enhancements and improvements to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 based on feedback from surgeons.

Need for Additional Capital

The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $145.8 million through December 31, 2012, and negative cash flows from operating activities and expects to incur losses for the next several years. Management plans to continue to finance the Company’s operations with equity or debt issuances or through collaboration arrangements. There is no guarantee that such funding will be available to the Company on acceptable terms, or at all, or that such funding will be received in a timely manner, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its development or commercialization programs. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to reduce its expenditures without materially and adversely affecting the business.

        The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of Cardica have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of balances and results have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period.

The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2012.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP generally requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) title or rights have transferred; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company uses contracts and customer purchase orders to determine the existence of an arrangement. The Company uses contractual terms, shipping documents and third-party proof of delivery to verify that title or rights have transferred. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based upon the terms of the agreement associated with the transaction. To determine whether collection is probable, the Company assesses a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, then the recognition of revenue is deferred until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment.

The Company records product sales net of estimated product returns and discounts from the list prices for its products. The amounts of product returns and the discount amounts have not been material to date. The Company includes shipping and handling costs in cost of product sales.

Payments that are contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone are recognized in their entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved, subject to satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria at that time.  Revenue generated from license fees and performing development services is recognized when it is earned and non-refundable upon receipt of payments, over the period of performance, or upon incurrence of the related development expenses in accordance with contractual terms, based on the actual costs incurred to date plus overhead costs for certain project activities. Amounts paid but not yet earned on a project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as the related development expenses plus overhead costs for certain project activities are incurred.

Inventories

        Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of all inventories, including materials, work-in-process and finished goods, by comparing the cost of inventory to expected selling prices to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required.  Inventory that is obsolete or in excess of forecasted usage is written down to its estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions.  Reduced demand may result in the need for inventory write-downs in the near term. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of product sales and establish a lower cost basis for the inventory.

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Preferred stock, par value (in Dollars per share) (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in Shares)	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	0	0
Common stock, par value (in Dollars per share) (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	65,000,000	65,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in Shares)	36,956,005	36,511,388
Common stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	36,956,005	36,511,388
Treasury stock shares (in Shares)	66,227	66,227

XML

Note 2 - Stockholders' Equity (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Table Text Block]

	Three months ended December 31,				Six months ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of product sales	$	26	$	25	$	51	$	37
Research and development		74		51		138		91
Selling, general and administrative		206		113		360		197
Total	$	306	$	189	$	549	$	325

XML

Document And Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Feb. 06, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	CARDICA INC
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--06-30
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		36,964,005
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0001178104
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

Note 3 - Net Loss Per Share (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

	Three months ended December 31,						Six months ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(4,192	)	$	(3,186	)	$	(8,332	)	$	(6,241	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Less: Weighted-average unvested restricted stock		—			—			—			—
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share		36,951			27,095			36,837			26,950
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)

Schedule of Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Table Text Block]

	As of December 31,
	2012		2011
Options to purchase common stock		4,468		3,893
Unvested restricted stock awards		74		37
Warrants		3,991		4,646
Total		8,533		8,576

XML

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Net revenue:
Product sales, net	$ 773	$ 811	$ 1,555	$ 1,578
License and development revenue	84	84	168	168
Royalty revenue	17	17	36	36
Total net revenue	874	912	1,759	1,782
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of product sales	968	1,078	1,600	1,905
Research and development	2,274	1,482	4,826	3,039
Selling, general and administrative	1,712	1,483	3,447	3,024
Total operating costs and expenses	4,954	4,043	9,873	7,968
Loss from operations	(4,080)	(3,131)	(8,114)	(6,186)
Interest income	4	2	9	3
Interest expense	(114)	(56)	(225)	(56)
Other expense, net	(2)	(1)	(2)	(2)
Net loss	$ (4,192)	$ (3,186)	$ (8,332)	$ (6,241)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share (in Dollars per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.12)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.23)
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share (in Shares)	36,951	27,095	36,837	26,950

XML

Note 6 - Inventories

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Inventory Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 6 - INVENTORIES

        Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31, 2012		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	467	$	170
Work in progress		216		128
Finished goods		316		278
Total	$	999	$	576

XML

Note 5 - Short-Term Investments

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments [Text Block]

NOTE 5 – SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company held investments in marketable securities as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, with maturity dates of less than one year.

The Company’s short-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of December 31, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	1,837	$	—	$	(1	)	$	1,836
Commercial papers		999		—		—			999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—			—
Total	$	2,836	$	—	$	(1	)	$	2,835

	As of June 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	4,246	$	—	$	(3	)	$	4,243
Commercial papers		1,000		—		(1	)		999
Certificates of deposit		932		—		(1	)		931
Total	$	6,178	$	—	$	(5	)	$	6,173

XML

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		133 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent (in Dollars)	$ (4,192)	$ (3,186)	$ (8,332)	$ (6,241)	$ (145,800)

XML

Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]

	As of December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	2,674	$	—	$	—	$	2,674
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		1,836		—		1,836
Commercial papers				999				999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—		—
Total assets at fair value	$	2,674	$	2,835	$	—	$	5,509

	As of June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	6,805	$	—	$	—	$	6,805
Commercial papers		—		500		—		500
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		4,243		—		4,243
Commercial papers		—		999		—		999
Certificates of deposit		—		931		—		931
Total assets at fair value	$	6,805	$	6,673	$	—	$	13,478

XML

Note 9 - Amended Lease Agreement

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Operating Leases of Lessee Disclosure [Table Text Block]

 NOTE 9 – AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT

On November 11, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment to its facility lease (the “Lease Amendment”). Pursuant to the Lease Amendment, the term of the lease was extended by four years, through August 31, 2015, and the Company was granted an improvement allowance of $148,070 to be used in connection with the construction of alterations and refurbishment of improvements in the premises, which was used and reimbursed in November 2011, and January 2012.  The leasehold improvement allowance will be recorded as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In addition, under the Lease Amendment, the Company was granted an option to further extend the lease for a period of two years beyond August 31, 2015 (the “Option Term”), with the annual rent payable by the Company during the Option Term to be equal to the annual rent for comparable buildings, as described in the Lease Amendment. Under the operating lease, the Company is required to maintain a letter of credit with a restricted cash balance at the Company’s bank. A certificate of deposit of $100,000 was recorded as restricted cash in the condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, related to the letter of credit.

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s non-cancelable operating leases having initial terms of a year or more as of  December 31, 2012, including the Lease Amendment, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal year ending June 30,	Operating Leases
	$
2013 (remaining six months)		313
2014		649
2015		690
2016		118
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,770

XML

Note 7 - Distribution, License, Development and Commercialization Agreements

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 7 – DISTRIBUTION, LICENSE, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION AGREEMENTS

Century

On September 2, 2011, the Company signed a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Century Medical, Inc. (“Century”) with respect to distribution of the Company’s planned microcutter products in Japan.  Under the terms of a secured note purchase agreement, Century agreed to loan the Company an aggregate of up to $4.0 million, with principal due five years after the first draw by the Company under the agreement, subject to certain conditions.   Under this facility, the Company received $2.0 million on September 30, 2011, and the remaining $2.0 million on December 27, 2011. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due.  In return for the loan commitment, the Company granted Century distribution rights to the Company’s planned microcutter product line in Japan, and a right of first negotiation for distribution rights in Japan to future products. Century will be responsible for securing regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health in Japan for the microcutter product line. After approval for marketing in Japan, the Company would sell microcutter units to Century, who would then sell the microcutter devices to their customers in Japan.

Proceeds from the note and granting the distribution rights were allocated to the note based on their aggregate fair value of $2.4 million at the dates of receipt.  This fair value was determined by discounting cash flows using a discount rate of 18%, which the Company estimated was a market rate of borrowing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to the Company’s. The remainder of the proceeds of $1.6 million was recognized as debt issuance discount and was allocated to the value of the distribution rights granted to Century under the Distribution Agreement and is included in deferred revenue. The deferred revenue will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Distribution Agreement, beginning upon the first sale by Century of microcutter products in Japan.

Intuitive Surgical

 On August 16, 2010, the Company entered into a license agreement with Intuitive Surgical (the “License Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company granted to Intuitive Surgical a worldwide, sublicenseable, exclusive license to use the Company’s intellectual property in the robotics field in diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures, but excluding vascular anastomosis applications, for an upfront license fee of $9.0 million. The Company is also eligible to receive a contingent payment related to achieving a certain sales volume, as well as single-digit royalties on sales by Intuitive Surgical, its affiliates or its sublicensees of specified products covered by the Company’s patent rights, if any. Each party has the right to terminate the License Agreement in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy. Following any termination of the License Agreement, the licenses granted to Intuitive Surgical will continue, and except in the case of termination for the Company’s uncured material breach or insolvency, Intuitive Surgical’s payment obligations will continue as well. Under the License Agreement, Intuitive Surgical has rights to improvements in the Company’s technology and intellectual property over a specified period of time.

The Company determined that there were two substantive deliverables under the License Agreement representing separate units of accounting: license rights to technology that existed as of August 16, 2010, and license rights to technology that may be developed over the following three years. The $9.0 million upfront license payment and $1.0 million premium on the $3.0 million purchase of the Company’s common stock by Intuitive Surgical in connection with the License Agreement were aggregated and allocated to the two units of accounting based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables. The relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables were determined using a probability weighted expected return model with significant inputs relating to the nature of potential future outcomes and the probability of occurrence of future outcomes. Based upon the relative estimated selling prices of the deliverables, $9.0 million of the total consideration of $10.0 million was allocated to the license rights to technology that existed as of August 16, 2010, that has been recognized as revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2010, and $1.0 million was allocated to technology that may be developed over the following three years that is being recognized as revenue ratably over that three year period. In total, the revenue recognized for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, related to this arrangement was $168,000 and $168,000, respectively, and, as of December 31, 2012, $209,000 had been recorded as deferred revenue related to this arrangement.

Cook Incorporated

In June 2007, the Company entered into, and in September 2007 and in June 2009 amended, a license, development and commercialization agreement with Cook Incorporated, to develop and commercialize a specialized device, which the Company refers to as  the PFO Device, designed to close holes in the heart from genetic heart defects known as patent foramen ovales (“PFOs”). Under the agreement, Cook funded certain development activities and the Company and Cook jointly developed the PFO Device.  The Company’s significant deliverables under the arrangement were the license rights and the associated development activities.  These deliverables were determined to represent one unit of accounting as there was no stand-alone value to the license rights. If developed, Cook would receive an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale and import the PFO Device. The Company did not record any license and development revenue under this agreement for the six months ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.  Amounts paid but not yet earned on the project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as the related development expenses for certain project activities are incurred.  A total of $403,000 under this agreement had been recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012.  On January 6, 2010, the Company and Cook mutually agreed to suspend work on the PFO project and, accordingly, the Company does not anticipate receiving any additional payments or recording any additional revenue related to this agreement in the foreseeable future.

XML

Note 8 - Note Payable

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 8 – NOTE PAYABLE

In connection with the Distribution Agreement with Century, the Company entered into a secured note purchase agreement and a related security agreement pursuant to which Century agreed to loan to the Company up to an aggregate of $4.0 million (see Note 7, Distribution, License, Development and Commercialization Agreements).  Under this facility, the Company received $2.0 million on September 30, 2011, and the remaining $2.0 million on December 27, 2011. The note bears 5% annual interest which is payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of March, June, September and December of each year through September 30, 2016, the maturity date when the total $4.0 million of principal becomes due. The debt issuance discount of approximately $1.6 million is reflected as a reduction in long-term debt and is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method. The note is secured by a substantial portion of the Company's assets, including the Company’s intellectual property related to the PAS-Port® Proximal Anastomosis System, but excluding all other intellectual property.

XML

Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP generally requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) title or rights have transferred; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company uses contracts and customer purchase orders to determine the existence of an arrangement. The Company uses contractual terms, shipping documents and third-party proof of delivery to verify that title or rights have transferred. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based upon the terms of the agreement associated with the transaction. To determine whether collection is probable, the Company assesses a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, then the recognition of revenue is deferred until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment.

The Company records product sales net of estimated product returns and discounts from the list prices for its products. The amounts of product returns and the discount amounts have not been material to date. The Company includes shipping and handling costs in cost of product sales.

Payments that are contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone are recognized in their entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved, subject to satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria at that time.  Revenue generated from license fees and performing development services is recognized when it is earned and non-refundable upon receipt of payments, over the period of performance, or upon incurrence of the related development expenses in accordance with contractual terms, based on the actual costs incurred to date plus overhead costs for certain project activities. Amounts paid but not yet earned on a project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as the related development expenses plus overhead costs for certain project activities are incurred.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventories

        Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of all inventories, including materials, work-in-process and finished goods, by comparing the cost of inventory to expected selling prices to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required.  Inventory that is obsolete or in excess of forecasted usage is written down to its estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions.  Reduced demand may result in the need for inventory write-downs in the near term. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of product sales and establish a lower cost basis for the inventory.

XML

Note 9 - Amended Lease Agreement (Detail) - Future Minimum Lease Payments (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
2013 (remaining six months)	$ 313
2014	649
2015	690
2016	118
Total minimum lease payments	$ 1,770

XML

Note 6 - Inventories (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Inventory, Current [Table Text Block]

	December 31, 2012		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	467	$	170
Work in progress		216		128
Finished goods		316		278
Total	$	999	$	576

XML

Note 3 - Net Loss Per Share (Detail) - Computation of Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		133 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012
Net loss (in Dollars)	$ (4,192)	$ (3,186)	$ (8,332)	$ (6,241)	$ (145,800)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	36,951	27,095	36,837	26,950
Less: Weighted-average unvested restricted stock	0	0
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share	36,951	27,095	36,837	26,950
Basic and diluted net loss per common share (in Dollars per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.12)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.23)

XML

Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Net loss	$ (4,192)	$ (3,186)	$ (8,332)	$ (6,241)
Other comprehensive gain:
Change in unrealized gain on investments	3	2	4
Comprehensive loss	$ (4,189)	$ (3,184)	$ (8,328)	$ (6,241)

XML

Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 4 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements,”defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 -	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 -	Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 -	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company does not have any liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis have been segregated into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date. These assets measured at fair value are summarized below (in thousands):

	As of December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	2,674	$	—	$	—	$	2,674
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		1,836		—		1,836
Commercial papers				999				999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—		—
Total assets at fair value	$	2,674	$	2,835	$	—	$	5,509

	As of June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	6,805	$	—	$	—	$	6,805
Commercial papers		—		500		—		500
Short-term investments:
Corporate debt securities		—		4,243		—		4,243
Commercial papers		—		999		—		999
Certificates of deposit		—		931		—		931
Total assets at fair value	$	6,805	$	6,673	$	—	$	13,478

Funds held in money market instruments are included in Level 1 as their fair values are based on market prices/quotes for identical assets in active markets.

Corporate debt securities, federal agency bonds and certificates of deposits are valued primarily using market prices/quotes for similar assets and/or other sources of observable information and are included in Level 2. These inputs include market prices for comparable securities, bid/ask quotes, interest rate yields, and prepayment spreads.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s material current financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value, including its trade accounts receivable and accounts payable, were reported at their current carrying values which approximate fair value given the short-term nature of these instruments with maturity dates of less than one year. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s note payable was reported at current carrying value which approximates fair value based on Level 3 measurement involving discounted cash flows and the estimated market rate of borrowing that could be obtained by companies with credit risk similar to the Company’s.

XML

Note 3 - Net Loss Per Share (Detail) - Outstanding Securities Excluded from Net Income In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Antidilutive Securities	8,533	8,576
Stock Options [Member]
Antidilutive Securities	4,468	3,893
Restricted Stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities	74	37
Warrant [Member]
Antidilutive Securities	3,991	4,646

XML

Note 5 - Short-Term Investments (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments [Table Text Block]

	As of December 31, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	1,837	$	—	$	(1	)	$	1,836
Commercial papers		999		—		—			999
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—			—
Total	$	2,836	$	—	$	(1	)	$	2,835

	As of June 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	4,246	$	—	$	(3	)	$	4,243
Commercial papers		1,000		—		(1	)		999
Certificates of deposit		932		—		(1	)		931
Total	$	6,178	$	—	$	(5	)	$	6,173