Eaton Vance
California Municipal Bond Fund
June 30, 2019
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
Tax-Exempt Investments — 171.3%
Security | Principal Amount (000’s omitted) |
Value | ||||||
Education — 18.3% |
| |||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Claremont McKenna College), 5.00%, 1/1/27 |
$ | 770 | $ | 772,247 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvey Mudd College), 5.25%, 12/1/31 |
645 | 705,340 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvey Mudd College), 5.25%, 12/1/36 |
1,100 | 1,196,316 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/30 |
1,755 | 1,773,726 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), Green Bonds, 5.00%, 10/1/43 |
2,105 | 2,530,631 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), Green Bonds, 5.00%, 10/1/48 |
3,000 | 3,576,090 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), 5.00%, 10/1/46(1) |
6,600 | 7,707,678 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of the Pacific), 5.00%, 11/1/30 |
1,790 | 1,937,675 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.00%, 10/1/31 |
1,385 | 1,490,149 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.00%, 10/1/35 |
945 | 1,015,270 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/26 |
2,270 | 2,460,589 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/27 |
2,820 | 3,054,173 | ||||||
California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/28 |
2,970 | 3,213,867 | ||||||
California State University, 5.00%, 11/1/41(1) |
9,550 | 11,212,655 | ||||||
University of California, 5.00%, 5/15/46(1) |
12,050 | 14,077,533 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 56,723,939 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Electric Utilities — 1.8% |
| |||||||
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Power System Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/42(1) |
$ | 2,000 | $ | 2,397,180 | ||||
Southern California Public Power Authority, (Tieton Hydropower), 5.00%, 7/1/35 |
1,890 | 1,955,810 | ||||||
Vernon, Electric System Revenue, 5.125%, 8/1/21 |
1,130 | 1,134,011 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 5,487,001 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Escrowed/Prerefunded — 11.6% |
| |||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (California Institute of Technology), Prerefunded to 11/1/19, 5.00%, 11/1/39(1) |
$ | 10,000 | $ | 10,128,500 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), Prerefunded to 2/1/20, 5.00%, 2/1/29 |
285 | 291,478 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of San Francisco), Prerefunded to 10/1/21, 6.125%, 10/1/36 |
390 | 433,466 | ||||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of San Francisco), Prerefunded to 10/1/21, 6.125%, 10/1/36 |
375 | 416,351 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Prerefunded to 8/15/19, 5.00%, 8/15/39 |
5,905 | 5,931,691 | ||||||
Foothill-De Anza Community College District, Prerefunded to 8/1/21, 5.00%, 8/1/36(1) |
10,000 | 10,815,000 | ||||||
San Diego Community College District, (Election of 2002), Prerefunded to 8/1/21, 5.00%, 8/1/32 |
2,095 | 2,265,742 | ||||||
San Diego Community College District, (Election of 2006), Prerefunded to 8/1/21, 5.00%, 8/1/31 |
3,000 | 3,244,500 |
1
Security | Principal Amount (000’s omitted) |
Value | ||||||
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Revenue, Prerefunded to 7/1/22, 5.00%, 7/1/36(1) |
$ | 1,690 | $ | 1,884,857 | ||||
Vernon, Electric System Revenue, Prerefunded to 8/1/19, 5.125%, 8/1/21 |
520 | 521,638 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 35,933,223 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
General Obligations — 57.0% |
| |||||||
Alameda City Unified School District, (Election of 2014), 5.00%, 8/1/42(1) |
$ | 1,675 | $ | 2,010,653 | ||||
Berryessa Union School District, (Election of 2014), 5.00%, 8/1/40(1) |
7,450 | 8,881,518 | ||||||
Burbank Unified School District, (Election of 2013), 4.00%, 8/1/31(1) |
6,900 | 7,440,822 | ||||||
Cabrillo Unified School District, (Election of 2018), 5.00%, 8/1/48 |
5,000 | 5,823,450 | ||||||
California, 5.50%, 11/1/35 |
5,900 | 6,221,550 | ||||||
Campbell Union High School District, (Election of 2016), 5.00%, 8/1/36(1) |
11,250 | 13,482,562 | ||||||
Contra Costa Community College District, (Election of 2006), 5.00%, 8/1/38(1) |
9,750 | 10,994,490 | ||||||
Desert Community College District, 5.00%, 8/1/36(1) |
7,500 | 8,905,200 | ||||||
El Camino Community College District, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 8/1/48(1) |
10,000 | 12,190,300 | ||||||
La Canada Unified School District, (Election of 2017), 5.00%, 8/1/47(1) |
3,375 | 4,148,145 | ||||||
Long Beach Unified School District, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/41(1) |
1,500 | 1,779,180 | ||||||
Old Adobe Union School District, (Election of 2018), 5.00%, 8/1/48 |
3,415 | 3,977,416 | ||||||
Oxnard Union High School District, (Election of 2018), 5.00%, 8/1/42(1) |
3,000 | 3,536,880 | ||||||
Palo Alto, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/40 |
1,850 | 1,922,779 | ||||||
Palo Alto, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/40(1) |
7,020 | 7,296,167 | ||||||
Palomar Community College District, 5.00%, 8/1/44(1) |
10,000 | 11,627,600 | ||||||
Redding School District, (Election of 2018), 5.00%, 8/1/48 |
2,645 | 3,076,876 | ||||||
San Bernardino Community College District, 4.00%, 8/1/27(1) |
5,775 | 6,373,868 | ||||||
San Bruno Park School District, (Election of 2018), 5.00%, 8/1/48 |
2,500 | 2,904,675 | ||||||
San Diego Unified School District, (Election of 2012), 5.00%, 7/1/47(1) |
4,000 | 4,758,800 | ||||||
San Jose Unified School District, (Election of 2012), 4.00%, 8/1/42(1) |
12,000 | 13,179,240 | ||||||
San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, (Election of 2010), 5.00%, 8/1/37(1) |
4,975 | 5,479,863 | ||||||
Santa Monica Community College District, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/44(1) |
7,500 | 8,600,625 | ||||||
Santa Rosa High School District, (Election of 2014), 5.00%, 8/1/41 |
3,495 | 4,150,557 | ||||||
Torrance Unified School District, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/35 |
7,500 | 8,538,450 | ||||||
Ventura County Community College District, 5.00%, 8/1/30(1) |
8,000 | 9,576,080 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 176,877,746 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hospital — 17.0% |
| |||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Adventist Health System/West), 4.00%, 3/1/39 |
$ | 5,000 | $ | 5,310,650 | ||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.25%, 3/1/27 |
1,750 | 1,857,888 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.25%, 3/1/28 |
550 | 584,001 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (City of Hope), 5.00%, 11/15/32 |
2,130 | 2,354,864 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (City of Hope), 5.00%, 11/15/35 |
3,040 | 3,351,509 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/33 |
5,080 | 5,727,852 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/37 |
2,380 | 2,676,643 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 11/15/46(1) |
3,000 | 3,514,680 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.00%, 11/15/46 |
8,000 | 9,372,480 | ||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 8/15/31(1) |
5,000 | 5,399,750 | ||||||
California Public Finance Authority, (Sharp HealthCare), 5.00%, 8/1/47(1) |
1,250 | 1,479,100 | ||||||
California Public Finance Authority, (Sharp HealthCare), 5.00%, 8/1/47 |
8,445 | 9,992,800 | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Cottage Health System), 5.25%, 11/1/30 |
1,000 | 1,049,580 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 52,671,797 | |||||||
|
|
2
Security | Principal Amount (000’s omitted) |
Value | ||||||
Housing — 1.9% |
| |||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (University of California, Irvine East Campus Apartments, Phase IV-A-CHF-Irvine, LLC), 5.00%, 5/15/47 |
$ | 5,000 | $ | 5,814,500 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 5,814,500 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Insured – Electric Utilities — 3.2% |
| |||||||
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/34 |
$ | 4,875 | $ | 5,282,891 | ||||
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.25%, 7/1/24 |
4,000 | 4,570,400 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 9,853,291 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Insured – Escrowed/Prerefunded — 2.8% |
| |||||||
Clovis Unified School District, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/1/20 |
$ | 3,130 | $ | 3,086,806 | ||||
Palm Springs Unified School District, (Election of 2008), (AGC), Prerefunded to 8/1/19, 5.00%, 8/1/33 |
5,750 | 5,767,768 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 8,854,574 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Insured – General Obligations — 16.8% |
| |||||||
Burbank Unified School District, (Election of 1997), (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/21 |
$ | 4,135 | $ | 4,008,676 | ||||
Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District, (Election of 2016), (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/44 |
3,500 | 4,081,455 | ||||||
Garvey School District, (Election of 2016), (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/45 |
2,440 | 2,852,165 | ||||||
Garvey School District, (Election of 2016), (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/48 |
1,610 | 1,877,421 | ||||||
Grass Valley School District, (Election of 2018), (BAM), 5.00%, 8/1/45 |
3,000 | 3,494,010 | ||||||
Mountain View School District, (Election of 2016), (BAM), 5.00%, 8/1/42 |
1,145 | 1,349,085 | ||||||
Mountain View School District, (Election of 2016), (BAM), 5.00%, 8/1/45 |
1,520 | 1,787,581 | ||||||
San Diego Unified School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 7/1/22 |
2,300 | 2,200,732 | ||||||
San Diego Unified School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 7/1/23 |
5,000 | 4,695,650 | ||||||
San Juan Unified School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/21 |
5,630 | 5,467,068 | ||||||
San Mateo County Community College District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22 |
4,840 | 4,626,314 | ||||||
San Mateo County Community College District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/23 |
4,365 | 4,104,758 | ||||||
San Mateo County Community College District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/25 |
3,955 | 3,578,128 | ||||||
San Mateo Union High School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/21 |
5,240 | 5,089,926 | ||||||
Union Elementary School District, (Election of 1999), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22 |
3,200 | 3,054,880 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 52,267,849 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Insured – Transportation — 0.9% |
| |||||||
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/27 |
$ | 3,520 | $ | 2,865,949 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 2,865,949 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Lease Revenue/Certificates of Participation — 1.1% |
| |||||||
California Public Works Board, 5.00%, 11/1/38 |
$ | 3,045 | $ | 3,443,164 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 3,443,164 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Special Tax Revenue — 12.7% |
| |||||||
Jurupa Public Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/30 |
$ | 625 | $ | 731,169 | ||||
Jurupa Public Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/32 |
625 | 724,100 | ||||||
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, Green Bonds, 5.00%, 7/1/42(1) |
10,250 | 12,302,152 | ||||||
Riverside County Transportation Commission, Sales Tax Revenue, Prerefunded to 6/1/23, 5.25%, 6/1/39(1) |
6,285 | 7,286,703 | ||||||
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 3/1/40(1) |
10,375 | 12,005,328 | ||||||
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/36(1) |
4,560 | 5,047,692 | ||||||
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Revenue, Prerefunded to 7/1/20, 5.00%, 7/1/28 |
1,300 | 1,350,011 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 39,447,155 | |||||||
|
|
3
Security | Principal Amount (000’s omitted) |
Value | ||||||
Transportation — 8.0% |
| |||||||
Long Beach, Harbor Revenue, 5.00%, 5/15/27 |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 2,580,775 | ||||
Long Beach, Harbor Revenue, 5.00%, 5/15/42(1) |
7,500 | 8,691,450 | ||||||
Los Angeles Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/35(1) |
8,560 | 8,833,578 | ||||||
San Francisco City and County Airport Commission, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/35 |
2,825 | 2,910,541 | ||||||
San Jose, Airport Revenue, 5.00%, 3/1/31 |
1,750 | 1,852,217 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 24,868,561 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Water and Sewer — 18.2% |
| |||||||
Beverly Hills Public Financing Authority, Water Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/37(1) |
$ | 5,725 | $ | 6,289,599 | ||||
Eastern Municipal Water District Financing Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/42(1) |
9,000 | 11,061,810 | ||||||
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/39(1) |
10,000 | 11,603,600 | ||||||
Los Angeles, Wastewater System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/43(1) |
7,500 | 8,406,075 | ||||||
Orange County Sanitation District, Wastewater Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/35(1) |
10,000 | 11,685,300 | ||||||
Rancho California Water District Financing Authority, 5.00%, 8/1/46(1) |
2,500 | 2,966,075 | ||||||
San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission, Water Revenue, Green Bonds, 5.00%, 11/1/45(1) |
4,000 | 4,624,401 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
$ | 56,636,860 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total Tax-Exempt
Investments — 171.3% |
|
$ | 531,745,609 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (71.3)% |
|
$ | (221,336,129 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% |
|
$ | 310,409,480 | |||||
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at June 30, 2019, 13.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution or financial guaranty assurance agency ranged from 0.9% to 8.0% of total investments.
(1) | Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds. |
Abbreviations:
4
The Fund did not have any open derivative instruments at June 30, 2019.
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
• | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
• | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
• | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At June 30, 2019, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
Asset Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Investments |
$ | — | $ | 531,745,609 | $ | — | $ | 531,745,609 | ||||||||
Total Investments |
$ | — | $ | 531,745,609 | $ | — | $ | 531,745,609 |
For information on the Fund’s policy regarding the valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to the Fund’s most recent financial statements included in its semiannual or annual report to shareholders.
5