UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 2)

☒

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

☐

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-33675

	RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		84-155336
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

202 6^th Street, Suite 401 Castle Rock, CO		80104
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (303) 794-2000

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock no par value per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(Title of class)		(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company=. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐			Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐			Smaller reporting company ☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate market value of the common stock, no par value, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing sale price of the common stock, no par value per share was approximately $21.9 million.

As of April 13, 2018, the registrant had 13,417,132 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933.

Not applicable.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to Riot Blockchain, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2018 (the “10-K”) is to respond to certain comments made by the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Securities and Exchange Commission”) in a comment letter dated June 15, 2018 (the “Staff Letter”). This Amendment incorporates the statements and clarifications made by the Company to the Staff Letter, namely to Item 1, Item 1A, Item 10 and Item 13 information.

RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

		Page
PART I

Item 1.	Business.	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	32
Item 2.	Properties.	32
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	33
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	33

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	34
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	35
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	35
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	41
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	41
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	42
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	42
Item 9B.	Other Information.	43

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	44
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	48
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	51
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	52
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.	53

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	54

RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms "we", "us", "our", the "Company", "Riot Blockchain, Inc." and "RIOT" mean Riot Blockchain, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other written and oral statements made from time to time by us may contain so-called "forward-looking statements," all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "expects," "anticipates," "plans," "will," "should," "could," "forecasts," "projects," "intends," "estimates," and other words of similar meaning. One can identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements are likely to address our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs. One must carefully consider any such statement and should understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. These factors may include inaccurate assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially.

These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

·	The uncertainty of profitability;

·	High volatility in the value attributable to our business model and assets;

Rapid change in the regulatory and legal environment in which we operate with many unknown future challenges to operating our business in a lawful manner or which will require our business or the businesses in which we invest to be subjected to added costs and/or uncertainty regarding the ability to operate;

·	Risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms; and

·	Other risks and uncertainties related to our business plan and business strategy.

This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are made based on management's beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change, except as may be required under applicable law. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been obtained from industry and other publications that we believe to be reliable, but that are not produced for purposes of securities filings. We have not independently verified any market, industry or similar data presented in this Annual Report and cannot assure you of its accuracy or completeness. Further, we have not reviewed or included data from all sources. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from third-party sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on any such forecasts and other forward-looking information.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Distributed blockchain technology is a decentralized and encrypted ledger that is designed to offer a secure, efficient, verifiable and permanent way of storing records and other information without the need for intermediaries. Digital cryptocurrencies serve multiple purposes. They can serve as a medium of exchange, store of value or unit of account. Examples of cryptocurrencies include: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin. Blockchain technologies are being evaluated for a multitude of industries due to the belief in their ability to have a significant impact in many areas of business, finance, information management and governance

Cryptocurrencies are decentralized digital currencies that enable near instantaneous transfers. Transactions occur via an open source, cryptographic protocol platform which uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority. The network is an online, peer-to-peer network that hosts the public transaction ledger, known as the blockchain, and each cryptocurrency is associated with a source code that comprises the basis for the cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the blockchain. In a cryptocurrency network, every peer has its own copy of the blockchain, which contains records of every historical transaction - effectively containing records of all account balances. Each account is identified solely by its unique public key (making it effectively anonymous) and is secured with its associated private key (kept secret, like a password). The combination of private and public cryptographic keys constitutes a secure digital identity in the form of a digital signature, providing strong control of ownership.

No single entity owns or operates the network. The infrastructure is collectively maintained by a decentralized user base. As the network is decentralized, it does not rely on either governmental authorities or financial institutions to create, transmit or determine the value of the currency units. Rather, the value is determined by market factors, supply of and demand for the units, the prices being set in transfers by mutual agreement or barter among transacting parties, as well as the number of merchants that may accept the cryptocurrency. Since transfers do not require involvement of intermediaries or third parties, there are currently little or no transaction costs in direct peer-to-peer transactions. Units of cryptocurrency can be converted to fiat currencies, such as the US dollar, at rates determined on various exchanges, such as Coinsquare in Canada, Coinbase, Bitsquare, Bitstamp and others. Cryptocurrency prices are quoted on various exchanges and fluctuate with extreme volatility.

We believe cryptocurrencies can offer many advantages over traditional, fiat currencies, although many of these factors also present potential disadvantages and may introduce additional risks, including:

Acting as a fraud deterrent, as cryptocurrencies are digital and cannot be counterfeited or reversed arbitrarily by a sender;

Immediate settlement;

Elimination of counterparty risk;

No trusted intermediary required;

Lower fees;

Identity theft prevention;

Accessible by everyone;

Transactions are verified and protected through a confirmation process, which prevents the problem of double spending;

Decentralized – no central authority (government or financial institution); and

Recognized universally and not bound by government imposed or market exchange rates.

However, cryptocurrencies may not provide all of the benefits they purport to offer at all or at any time.

Bitcoin was first introduced in 2008. Bitcoin is a consensus network that enables a new payment system and a completely digital money. It is the first decentralized peer-to-peer payment network that is powered by its users with no central authority or middlemen. From a user perspective, we believe Bitcoin can be viewed as cash for the Internet. The Bitcoin network shares a public ledger called the "blockchain". This ledger contains every transaction ever processed, allowing a user's computer to verify the validity of each transaction. The authenticity of each transaction is protected by digital signatures corresponding to the sending addresses, allowing all users to have full control over sending bitcoins from their own Bitcoin addresses. In addition, anyone can process transactions using the computing power of specialized hardware and earn a reward in bitcoins for this service. This is often called "mining".

As with many new and emerging technologies, there are potentially significant risks. Businesses (including the Company) which are seeking to develop, promote, adopt, transact or rely upon blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies have no track record and operate within an untested new environment. These risks are not only related to the businesses the Company pursues, but the sector and industry as a whole, as well as the entirety of the concept behind blockchain and cryptocurrency as value. Factors such as access to computer processing capacity, interconnectivity, electricity cost, environmental factors (such as cooling capacity) and location play an important role in "mining," which is the term for using the specialized computers in connection with the blockchain for the creation of new units of cryptocurrency.

The Company, since late 2017, has directed its efforts towards blockchain and cryptocurrency businesses. Specifically, the Company has begun to enter businesses involving cryptocurrencies and intends, in the near, future, to consider entering and evolving businesses related to these types of cryptocurrencies. This strategy represents a departure from the Company's historical mission following several failed efforts to obtain regulatory approval for new drugs and the manufacture and distribution of specialized medical equipment. The Company experienced large accumulated losses from those efforts and determined to control expenses and seek to curtail ongoing losses expected from those efforts which were effectively ended after a new management team and board of directors joined the Company during 2017 and early 2018.

New Business Initiative in Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Mining.

The Company is building a cryptocurrency mining operation, operating specialized computers (also known as "miners") that generate cryptocurrency (primarily Bitcoin). As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned 1,200 miners acquired with the Kairos Global Technology, Inc., ("Kairos") acquisition in November 2017. During February 2018 in two separate transactions the Company acquired an additional 6,800 miners bringing the total miners owned to 8,000. During February 2018, Kairos entered into a lease agreement for approximately a 107,000-square foot facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, which included data center improvements. Upon the execution of the facility lease the Company began consolidating all of its miners at the data center facility. As of March 31, 2018, approximately 3,500 of the miners were installed and operating.

The Company utilizes specialized servers manufactured by Bitmain. Many of these servers are in short supply and the cost of acquisition of servers especially in large quantities, when available, varies widely. The Company has acquired all of its servers from third parties, some of whom were shareholders in the Company as well, and certain of the acquisitions have included access to operating facilities, support and related equipment for which the Company has paid a premium over the listed retail cost from the manufacturers. The Company's current facility in Oklahoma was obtained as part of its overall transaction with Prive. It is expected that this shortage condition may continue and that in order to continue to grow the Company may need to continue to source mining equipment that may become available from third parties. We participate in mining pools wherein groups of miners associate to pool resources and earn cryptocurrency together allocated to each miner according to the "hashing" capacity they contribute to the pool. As it relates to Bitcoin, the hash rate is the speed at which a computer is completing an operation in the Bitcoin code, and hashing capacity would be a miner's total output. A higher hash rate increases the opportunity of solving the next block and receiving the mining reward. Mining pools were established to help limit the variance involved with competing to solve blocks. As more and more miners competed for the limited supply of blocks, individuals found that they were working for months without finding a block and receiving any reward for their mining efforts. To address this variance, miners started organizing into pools to share mining rewards more evenly on a pro rata basis based on total hashing capacity contributed to the mining pool.

Mining Pools

A mining pool is the pooling of resources by miners, who share their processing power over a network and split rewards according to the amount of work they contributed to the probability of finding a block. Mining pools emerged in response to the growing difficulty and available hashing power that competes to discover blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain. Riot participates in mining pools.

The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the workers. Fees are paid to the mining pool operator to cover the costs of maintaining the pool. The pool uses software that coordinates the pool members’ hashing power, identifies new block rewards, records how much work all the participants are doing, and assigns block rewards in-proportion to the participants’ efforts. While we do not pay pool fees directly, pool fees are deducted from amounts we may otherwise earn. Fees (and payouts) fluctuate and historically have been approximately 2% on average.

Mining pools are subject to various risks such as disruption and down time. Riot has software that monitors its pool performance and reward rates to monitor credits for our contributed hashing power. In the event that a pool experiences down time or not yielding returns, our results may be impacted.

Other Activities

In addition to mining, we are seeking to pursue our diversified blockchain and cryptocurrency focused strategy, in part through targeted investments in, and acquisitions of, businesses and assets within the blockchain ecosystem. As of December 31, 2017, we owned approximately 12.9% of goNumerical Ltd., (d/b/a "Coinsquare") which operates a leading Canadian exchange for purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies. We also invested $200,000 in a convertible note of Verady, LLC, which seeks to provide accounting, audit and verification services for blockchain based assets such as cryptocurrencies. We also own approximately 52% of Tess Inc., ("Tess") which is developing TessPay and other blockchain solutions for telecommunications companies. TessPay is a payments ecosystem for component and sub-component supply chain settlements (payments). Subsequent to December 31, 2017, we formed Digital Green Energy Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary, which is seeking to identify environmentally friendly projects with large energy capacity and a cost-effective rate for energy for cryptocurrency mining operations and data center projects.

Logical Brokerage Corp

On March 27, 2018 we acquired 92.5% of Logical Brokerage Corp. ("Logical Brokerage" or “LBC”) for a $600,000 cash payment. Logical Brokerage is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") as an introducing broker and a member of the National Futures Association ("NFA"). Logical Brokerage will in the future do business under the name RIOTX. The Company believes that Logical Brokerage will allow the Company to investigate the establishment of a futures brokerage operation and a U.S. digital currency exchange operating lawfully in several states, and a futures brokerage operation, although there can be no assurance the Company will be successful. Neither the CFTC nor the NFA regulate spot-market digital currency exchanges or activity, although the CFTC's jurisdiction is implicated when there is fraud or manipulation involving a virtual currency traded in interstate commerce.

On June 6, 2018 SEC Chairman Jay Clayton stated in a press interview that “Bitcoin” is not a security. This statement was closely followed by William Hinman, Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, who issued a statement on June 14, 2018 that “Ethereum” is also not a security. In light of similarities, we believe that the SEC will evaluate Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin and may similarly conclude these cryptocurrencies are not securities. At the present time, Logical Brokerage is in the planning stage, and its plan of operation is not complete as it pursues regulatory authorization to perform exchange-type functions for digital assets. However, the Company will initially consider serving as an exchange for Bitcoin and Ethereum which as noted, the SEC has stated do not meet the United States Supreme Court Howey-test definition of security at this time. If the SEC takes a similar position the Company will consider evaluating the inclusion of Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin. Any future activities will necessarily be evaluated on a case by case basis as criteria are developed to evaluate digital assets seeking to utilize the platform and client certification processes.

The Company only mines Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Litecoin, which may be considered for Logical Brokerage. TessPay’s proposed tokens are not presently being considered and do not presently exist while TessPay is developing its business. At the present time the inclusion of additional digital assets have not been addressed by the Company and when addressed will be the subject of review which would include evaluating whether additional digital assets that seek to be registered for sale on the exchange would be permitted, whether activities will require further licensing or regulation by Logical Brokerage, and future interpretations by regulators in order to comply with applicable rules and regulation in effect from time to time.

Business Profile and Risks

The decision to pursue blockchain and digital currency businesses exposes the Company to risks associated with a new and untested strategic direction. The prices of digital currencies have varied wildly in recent periods and reflects "bubble" type volatility, meaning that high prices may have little or no merit, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation and media reporting. The results of the Company's mining operations are expected to be reported under the fair value method of accounting under present accounting rules and the nature of its affairs may require it to become registered as an investment company, if the cryptocurrency we own, acquire or mine were to be deemed an investment security by the SEC, although we do not believe any of the cryptocurrencies we own, acquire or mine are securities. We do not believe that we are engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, and we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged in those activities. As of December 31, 2017, we do not believe we are an inadvertent investment company, however resolution of pending comments received from the SEC have not been concluded and this issue has not been resolved by SEC rules or regulations. For us, any grace period would be unknown until these issues are resolved or the SEC issues rules and regulations concerning cryptocurrency treatment. If so required, we may take actions to cause the investment securities held by us to be less than 40% of our total assets, which may include acquiring assets with our cash and cryptocurrency on hand or liquidating our investment securities or cryptocurrency.

Competition

In cryptocurrency mining, companies, individuals and groups generate units of cryptocurrency through mining. Miners can range from individual enthusiasts to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. Miners may organize themselves in mining pools. A mining pool is created when cryptocurrency miners pool their processing power over a network and mine transactions together. Rewards are then distributed proportionately to each miner based on the work power contributed. Mining pools became popular when mining difficulty increased. Mining pools allow miners to pool their resources so they can generate blocks quickly and receive rewards (i.e., fractions or units of cryptocurrency) on a consistent basis instead of mining alone where rewards may not be received for long periods. The Company currently participates in mining pools and may decide to invest in mining pools. The Company competes or may in the future compete with other companies that focus all or a portion of their activities on owning or operating cryptocurrency exchanges, developing programming for the blockchain, and mining activities. At present, the information concerning the activities of these enterprises is not readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include "bitcoin.org" and "blockchain.info"; however, the reliability of that information cannot be assured.

Competition Generally

Several public companies, such as the following, may be considered to compete with us, although we believe there is no company, including the following, which offers the same scope of activities as we do.

Overstock.com Inc

Bitcoin Investment Trust

Blockchain Mining Ltd

DMG Blockchain Solutions

Hashchain Technology Inc

Hive Blockchain Technologies Inc

Hut 8 Mining Corp

MGT Capital Investments Inc

Logical Brokerage Competition

We believe there are several companies operating digital currency exchange operations in the United States that will be competitors to Logical Brokerage and more potential competitors are expected to emerge. Little information is known about these companies inasmuch as they are privately owned and reliable information about their size and operations is not known. The current known competitors include:

Gemini

Coinbase

Itbit

Kraken

Poloniex / Circle

Bittrex

Bitstamp

Binance

Houbi

Of the competitors we believe Overstock is among the best known as an e-retailer. Overstock has been investing in blockchain and cryptocurrency startups for several years through Medici Ventures, its wholly-owned subsidiary according to public reports by Overstock. Medici has more than a dozen portfolio companies, including tZero. T Zero is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Overstock.com that focuses on the development and commercialization of financial technology (“fintech”) with blockchain technology. In doing so, tZero hopes to bring greater efficiency and transparency to capital markets. On April 8, 2018 tZero, the blockchain subsidiary of Overstock.com, announced the release of a demo version of the prototype of its security token trading software which demonstrates how security tokens may be traded on the platform. tZero’s trading platform has been developed to compete with traditional stock exchanges by integrating cryptographically-secured distributed ledgers with existing market processes to reduce settlement time and costs, and increase transparency and efficiency. tZero has not set a launch date.

Products and Services

Cryptocurrency Mining – Riot operates a facility that hosts cryptocurrency mining equipment for the sole purpose of mining cryptocurrencies (primarily Bitcoin, as well as Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash). We are working to expand the capabilities at our existing facility and anticipate seeking to establish additional mining facilities. Also, in the future, Riot may leverage our expertise to offer managed services for other mining sites. We do not offer outside parties the ability to purchase cloud mining "as a service" or hosted mining services. Our facility and mining platform are operating with the primary intent of accumulating bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. We may sell cryptocurrency holdings for fiat currency from time to time. When fully deployed, our mining operation in Oklahoma will host 8,000 ASIC miners utilizing approximately 12 megawatts of power supplied to our leased facility. The estimated hashing rate generated from our mining operation is expected to be over 110 PH/s upon full deployment. This is an estimate only and actual outputs of the mine is subject to changes in the difficulty rates associated with the bitcoin network and other conditions that impact our mining output.

Cryptocurrency Exchange – Riot may in the future offer exchange services intended for use by retail and institutional investors. Riot is actively investigating the launch of an exchange that would provide secure and regulatory compliant access to services which exchange digital currencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash. This exchange may pursue offering additional investment products in the future, such as futures and securitized token trading. Any availability of these offerings would be determined based on regulatory requirements and guidance and market conditions.

Logical Brokerage as a Cryptocurrency Exchange

Logical Brokerage Corp (LBC) is presently registered as an Introducing Broker with the NFA and CFTC, (NFA#0458756). LBC has no customers and has done no business since it was acquired on March 23, 2018. LBC now has the dba of RIOTX. LBC is a 92.5% owned subsidiary of RIOT Blockchain Inc. LBC, under the dba RIOTX, is investigating the launch of a licensed cryptocurrency exchange in the United States focused on retail clients. Through multiple trusted and vetted third parties, LBC intends to offer retail clients the opportunity to safely buy and sell a variety of crypto`currencies. These would initially consist of Bitcoin, Bitcoin cash, Ethereum, and Litecoin.

LBC may in the future offer futures trading to qualified customers, but presently has no plans to do so. LBC presently has no plans to offer securitized token trading or participate in initial coin offerings in any way.

LBC intends to investigate proper licensing and suitability to be able to serve customers in all states except Wyoming and Hawaii. LBC intends to use vetted and licensed third-party companies for several features, including the latest identification and geo-location technology to ensure trading is limited to participants from states in which the Company may offer its services.

LBC has registered with FinCEN as a Money Service Business (“MSB”), MSB# 31000125058756, and has received a Money Transmitter License for the state of Florida, License Number FT230000224, from which operations would be based.

*Note: Neither the CFTC nor the NFA regulate spot-market cryptocurrency transactions.

Performance Metrics – Hashing

Riot operates mining hardware which performs computational operations in support of the blockchain measured in "hash rate" or "hashes per second". The original equipment used for mining bitcoin utilized the Central Processing Unit (CPU) of a computer to mine various forms of cryptocurrency. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining was rapidly replaced by the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced in the mining industry by Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) chips like those found in the Bitmain Antminer S9. These ASIC chips are designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations. The latest equipment utilized in Riot's mining operations performs approximately 13.5 - 14 terahash per second (TH/s) per unit. This is the current state of the art for mining hardware. Riot measures our mining performance and competitive position based on overall hash rate being produced in our mining sites. We believe that our current inventory of Antminer S9 equipment establishes us as being amongst the top public companies in the United States mining cryptocurrency.

Government Regulation

Government Regulation of blockchain and cryptocurrency is largely non-existent at present and is being actively considered by the United States federal government via a number of agencies (SEC, CFTC, Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") of the U.S. Department of the Treasury) and in other countries. State government regulations also may apply to certain activities such as cryptocurrency exchanges (bitlicense, banking and money transmission regulations) and other activities in which we participate or may participate in the future. Other regulatory bodies are governmental or semi-governmental and have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency business (NASDAQ, NYSE, FINRA, state securities commissions). We have received numerous questions through comment letters about our business from the SEC and have sought to respond to all SEC questions, although until satisfactorily resolved, open comments may delay or prevent registration of our securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (as amended) (the "Securities Act") and may require amendment of our filings. We have received several information requests from NASDAQ and are seeking to comply by providing all information that is sought.

Blockchain and cryptocurrency regulations are in a nascent state with agencies investigating businesses and their practices, gathering information, and generally trying to understand the risks and uncertainties in order to protect investors in these businesses and in cryptocurrencies generally. Regulations will certainly increase, in many cases, although it is presently not possible to know how they will increase, how regulations will apply to our businesses, or when they will be effective. For example, in comment letters on our filings with the SEC it appears that the SEC is contemplating whether the inclusion of cryptocurrencies as "securities" is supported under applicable law or if new laws will be required. Various bills have also been proposed in congress for adoption related to our business which may be adopted and have an impact on us. The offer and sale of digital assets in initial coin offerings, which is not an activity we expect to pursue, has been a central focus of recent regulatory inquiries. However, as the regulatory and legal environment evolves, we may become subject to new laws, further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, including for our mining and other activities. Our mining may become subject to regulation under the Securities Act and/or the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"), if the SEC takes the position that our mining of cryptocurrencies constitutes the holding of securities or investment securities, as such terms are understood under such acts. See "Risk Factors".

Government Regulation Relating to the Activities of Logical Brokerage

Exchanges for securities must be registered as a national securities exchange or must be exempt from such registration requirement (e.g., registered broker-dealers operating as alternative trading systems). As a result, we do not currently intend for our planned cryptocurrency exchange operations through our Logical Brokerage subsidiary to allow trading in cryptocurrencies (including cryptocurrencies issued in ICOs) that may be classified as securities. Rather, we anticipate that such operations would, at least initially, facilitate the exchange of digital currencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and potentially Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash. Consistent with recent statements of SEC senior staff members, we do not believe that such digital currencies are securities. This sentiment is echoed in Notice 2014-21 published by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) on March 23, 2018 which calls for digital currency to be treated as property for U.S. federal tax purposes. However, if regulatory changes or interpretations were to require the regulation of Bitcoin or other digital currencies as securities under the U.S. securities laws or if the SEC were to otherwise take the position that digital currencies may only trade on or are otherwise subject to the rules of a national securities exchange unless exempt from such requirements, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps could result in extraordinary expenses or burdens to us or potentially require us to discontinue (or cease pursuing) cryptocurrency exchange operations, which would have an adverse effect on our plans and our business or operations.

Logical Brokerage is a CFTC-registered introducing broker and is subject to oversight by the CFTC and the NFA. The CFTC and NFA do not have functional oversight over cryptocurrency exchanges, but the CFTC has authority to bring enforcement actions arising from perceived fraud and/or manipulation. As a result, we must comply with CFTC and NFA requirements applicable to introducing brokers, including complying with anti-money laundering requirements.

Because Logical Brokerage’s proposed activities will likely constitute a MSB under regulations promulgated by the FinCEN under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, Logical Brokerage has registered with FinCEN as an MSB, is instituting an anti-money laundering program, and is adopting policies and procedures requiring it to make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records. Logical Brokerage Corp (LBC) is presently registered as an Introducing Broker with the NFA and CFTC, NFA#0458756, an MSB # 31000125058756 and a Money Transmitter for the state of Florida, # FT230000224),

Further, it is likely that Logical Brokerage’s proposed activities will constitute "money transmitter" activities or be otherwise regulated (e.g., by New York under its so-called “Bitlicense” regime) under one or more state laws. As a result, Logical Brokerage will seek appropriate licenses or otherwise register with appropriate state regulators and comply with state regulations that may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, cyber security, consumer protection, financial and reporting requirements, and maintenance of certain records and other operational requirements, as required. Without a required money transmitter license, we could not engage in money transmitter activities with persons residing in the relevant state (or from such state), or engage in other activities (e.g., custody) requiring another license such as a Bitlicense. Logical Brokerage has already commenced applying for appropriate licenses in Florida and will continue to evaluate or seek to obtain state money transmitter licenses, as necessary, on a state by state basis. In addition, it is possible that other regulations may apply to our currency exchange operations, such as consumer protection laws, however we have not evaluated the impact or requirements of such other laws currently, as we are focused initially on compliance requirements of the various laws described above. Our inability to comply with any rules or regulations or federal or state laws applicable to our planned Logical Brokerage activities, or decision to discontinue to pursue or inability to continue such activities once commenced, would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Intellectual Property

We actively use specific hardware and software for our cryptocurrency mining operation. In certain cases, source code and other software assets may be subject to an open source license, as much technology development underway in this sector is open source. For these works, Riot intends to adhere to the terms of any license agreements that may be in place.

We do not currently own, and do not have any current plans to seek, any patents in connection with our existing and planned blockchain and cryptocurrency related operations. We do expect to rely upon trade secrets, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and expect to license the use of intellectual property rights owned and controlled by others. In addition, we anticipate developing certain proprietary software applications for purposes of our cryptocurrency mining and our planned cryptocurrency exchange operations.

Legacy Business - Animal Health IP

We have an animal health patent portfolio relating to our prior operating activities, which originated under the exclusive license agreement with Washington University in St. Louis ("WU" or “Washington University in St. Louis”), under which we obtained intellectual property rights to WU's patent estate. This extensive portfolio consists of both patents and pending patent applications (approximately 25 patents and numerous patent applications) related to our animal health products that we previously had under development. The term of the WU License Agreement ends upon the expiration of the last patent to expire. Patents in the estate have expiration dates ranging from 2010 to 2019. WU has filed, and continues to expand and extend the patent coverage of the WU technology. We reimburse WU for the costs of such patent filings, namely prosecution and maintenance fees. Additional patents in the animal health portfolio have been filed by us outside of the WU License Agreement.

A patent filing for the recombinant luteinizing hormone technology was submitted in 2004, entitled "Methods and Kits for Maintaining Pregnancy, Treating Follicular Cysts, and Synchronizing Ovulation Using Luteinizing Hormone." This patent family claims methods of administering rLH, the timing of administration, and dosage given in order to increase formation of accessory corpora lutea and maintain pregnancies in treated animals. To date, five foreign patents have been granted for "Methods and Kits for Maintaining Pregnancy, Treating Follicular Cysts, and Synchronizing Ovulation Using Luteinizing Hormone," New Zealand patent 542549 was granted March 12, 2009 (expiring March 2024), Australia 2004218365 was granted May 27, 2010 (expiring March 2024), European patent 1610803 was granted December 15, 2010 (expiring March 2024), Canadian patent 2518268 was granted December 10, 2013 (expiring March 2024) and Brazil was granted May 31, 2016 (expiring March 4, 2026). The patent granted by the European Patent Office and has been validated in the following countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Currently, there are additional foreign patent applications that are in prosecution.

A patent filing for the recombinant bovine follicle stimulating hormone technology was submitted in 2008, entitled "Compositions and Methods Including Expression and Bioactivity of Bovine Follicle Stimulating Hormone." This patent family claims the rbFSH single-chains itself, as well as methods of administering rbFSH, the timing of administration, and dosage given in order to increase reproduction, induce superovulation or increase embryo production in ungulates. The patent family includes filings in the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Thailand and the United States.

The patent has also been filed with the European Patent Office. In October of 2011, the first patent in this family was granted by the European Patent Office (2134165), expiring October 12, 2028. The patent has also been granted in New Zealand (579740), expiring October 1, 2028. Following the grant of the patent in 2011 by the European Patent Office, the patent was validated in the following countries: France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. In August 2013, the patent was granted in the United States (8518881 B2) expiring February 8, 2028, followed in November 2013 by the grant in Australia (2008213567) expiring February 8, 2028.

A patent filing for the equine follicle stimulating hormone technology was filed in 2008, entitled "Activity of Recombinant Equine Follicle Stimulating Hormone." This patent family provides coverage for the single chain eFSH itself, methods of administering reFSH, the timing of administration, and dosage given in order to increase reproductive activity in treated animals. The first patent in the patent family was granted in China in April 2013 (200880123523.8) expiring November 28, 2028. The U.S. Patent for this family was granted in September 2014 (8,835,386) expiring November 28, 2028. The patent was granted for Canada (2,685,437) on June 2, 2015 and will expire February 8, 2028. Currently, there are additional foreign patent applications that are in prosecution.

The Company's animal health intellectual property has been licensed under the long-term agreement Ceva agreement under which the licensee is developing drugs for commercial use in non-human mammals.

Research and Development

We are actively conducting research and development into advanced methods of managing cryptocurrency mining operations at scale. This includes monitoring software, management tools, and programmable hardware components for gathering data and the configuration of mining equipment. At the core of this work is an investment into software development around at scale management of the Bitmain "Antminer" family of systems. These devices have an application interface that is accessible to users for the purposes of automation, monitoring and software maintenance. The existing software that is provided directly from the manufacturer is not designed for the scale or size of our operation. Our team of engineers have been developing source code designed to support thousands of individual mining devices. The mining operations rely on this technology to streamline our daily system management, provide near real time reporting of faults and deliver configuration updates to the entire fleet of miners. We have also adapted these technologies to leverage cloud computing in order to offer access to these tools across a global footprint of mining sites.

Employees

As of March 31, 2018, we had nine employees, all of whom are full-time. In addition, Tess, of which we own 52%, had 13 full time employees as of March 31, 2018. We believe our employee relations to be good. Currently, our activities rely on the services of consultants and operators of data centers under support agreements to maintain our servers and for other activities.

Since entering the blockchain industry in October 2017, we have terminated all of our employees related to our historical businesses with the exception of certain accounting personnel.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 202 6^th Street, Suite 401, Castle Rock, CO 80104, where our legacy life sciences businesses were located and the location where our records are kept and the principal business address for our accounting staff. Our principal operating location commencing in 2018, is the newly leased 107,000-square foot data center facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. We were incorporated on July 24, 2000 in the state of Colorado under the name AspenBio, Inc., which was subsequently changed to AspenBio Pharma, Inc. In December 2012, we changed our name to Venaxis, Inc., in 2016 we changed our name to Bioptix, Inc., and effective October 19, 2017 we changed our name to Riot Blockchain, Inc. Our website address is www.riotblockchain.com. Our telephone number is (303) 794-2000.

Available Information

You can access, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports as filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These documents may also be accessed on our website: www.riotblockchain.com. These documents are placed on our website as soon as is reasonably practicable after their filing with the SEC. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, the website is not part of this Annual Report. These documents may also be found at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. — RISK FACTORS

An investment in the Company's common stock involves a high degree of risk, and an investor should only purchase the Company's securities if he or she can afford to suffer the loss of his or her entire investment. In determining whether to purchase the Company's common stock, an investor should carefully consider all of the material risks described below, together with the other information contained in this report and the Company's other public filings before making a decision to purchase the Company's securities. In addition to the risks discussed below, other risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, perhaps materially. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and actual results and events may differ substantially from those discussed or highlighted in those forward-looking statements. See also "Forward-Looking Statements."

General Risks

We have a history of operating losses, and we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability; we have recently shifted to an entirely new business and may not be successful in this new business.

We are not profitable and have incurred losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and these losses could increase as we continue to work to develop our business. We were previously engaged in veterinary and life science‑oriented businesses and were not successful in those businesses. In late 2017, we determined to instead pursue a blockchain and digital currency‑related business, initially through investments in existing companies. Our initial efforts in this new business will focus primarily on bitcoin mining and the establishment of a cryptocurrency exchange and a futures brokerage operation. Currently, however, our only operations are at our bitcoin mining facility ("mine") in Oklahoma, and that mine is still in a relatively early stage of development. Our current strategy is new and unproven, is in an industry that is itself new and evolving, and is subject to the risks discussed below. This strategy, like our prior ones, may not be successful, and we may never become profitable. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods.

Our costs are growing rapidly, which could seriously harm our business or increase our losses.

Our mining operations are costly, and we expect our expenses, including those related to acquisitions, to grow in the future. This expense growth will continue as we broaden our network of computers to mine ("miners"), as we develop and implement an exchange feature, which will require more computing infrastructure, and as we hire additional employees to support potential future growth. Our costs will be based on development growth of operations and may not be offset by a corresponding growth of our revenue. We plan to continue to invest in our infrastructure to take advantage of various opportunities, potentially in countries and in activities where we do not expect significant short-term monetization, if any. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate, and our investments to make our business more efficient may not succeed and may outpace monetization efforts. In addition, we expect to incur marketing and other operating expenses to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive. Increases in our costs without a corresponding increase in our revenue would increase our losses and could seriously harm our business and financial performance.

We may be unable to raise additional capital needed to grow our business.

We will likely continue to operate at a loss, at least until our business becomes established, and we expect to need to raise additional capital to expand our operations and pursue our growth strategies, including potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, and to respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements. We may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could impair our growth and adversely affect our existing operations. If we raise additional equity financing, our shareholders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests, and the per share value of our common stock could decline. Furthermore, if we engage in additional debt financing, the holders of debt would have priority over the holders of common stock, and we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness and take other actions that would otherwise be in the interests of our shareholders, forcing us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios.

Unfavorable general economic conditions in the U.S. and globally can adversely affect our business and our ability to obtain future financing.

Our business could be materially adversely affected by unfavorable general economic conditions, including effects of weak domestic and world economies. Future volatility and disruption in worldwide capital and credit markets and any declines in economic conditions in the U.S., Europe or in other parts of the world could adversely impact our business and results of operations, particularly if the availability of financing for us is limited.

We have an evolving business model.

As cryptocurrency assets and blockchain technologies become more widely available, we expect the services and products associated with them to evolve. In order to stay current with the industry, our business model may need to evolve as well. From time to time, we may modify aspects of our business model relating to our product mix and service offerings. We cannot offer any assurance that these or any other modifications will be successful or will not result in harm to our business. We may not be able to manage growth effectively, which could damage our reputation, limit our growth and negatively affect our operating results. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

We may acquire other businesses, form joint ventures or make investments in other companies or technologies that could negatively affect our operating results, dilute our shareholders' ownership, increase our debt or cause us to incur significant expense; notwithstanding the foregoing, our growth may depend on our success in uncovering and completing such deals.

We commenced the implementation of our new strategy with our investment in Coinsquare and have made some other investments and acquisitions. Most recently, we acquired Logical Brokerage Corp. to serve as a platform for our planned cryptocurrency exchange. We may pursue, and our growth may depend upon our success in making, other investments in companies and acquisitions of businesses and assets and/or strategic alliances and joint ventures. We have limited experience in acquiring other companies and forming strategic partnerships. We may not be able to find suitable partners or acquisition candidates, and may not be able to complete such transactions on favorable terms, if at all. If we make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into the existing business, and could assume unknown or contingent liabilities.

Any future acquisitions also could result in the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or future write‑offs of intangible assets or goodwill, any of which could have a negative impact on our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. Integration of an acquired company may also disrupt ongoing operations and require management resources that we would otherwise focus on developing the existing business. We may experience losses related to investments in other companies, which could harm our financial condition and results of operations. Further, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, strategic alliance or joint venture.

To finance any acquisitions or joint ventures, we may choose to issue shares of common stock as consideration, which could dilute the ownership of the shareholders. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. If the price of our common stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other companies or fund a joint venture project using stock as consideration.

We may pursue international projects, which could subject us to risks not generally applicable to our U.S. operations.

In the future, we may develop bitcoin mines and pursue other business opportunities in foreign countries. Any international expansion efforts may require us to devote significant management and financial resources, diverting our attention from our U.S. operations, and we may not be successful in those efforts. Potential future operations in foreign countries are subject to a number of particular risks, including:

exposure to local economic conditions;

potential adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign countries with the U.S.;

hostility from local populations;

restrictions and taxes on the withdrawal of foreign investments and earnings;

imposition of government policies and regulations against business and energy usage by foreigners;

foreign investment restrictions or requirements;

limitations on our ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign countries;

lack of protection of intellectual property rights;

regulations prohibiting or restricting the mining or exchange of cryptocurrencies;

conflicts between local laws and U.S. laws;

exposure to currency fluctuations;

withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by our subsidiaries; and

changes in and application of foreign taxation structures.

Any international business operations will also be subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"). The FCPA and similar anti‑corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or generating business. We cannot provide assurance that our internal controls and procedures will protect us from the reckless or criminal acts that may be committed by our employees or third parties with whom we work. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or similar anti-corruption laws in international jurisdictions, criminal or civil penalties could be imposed on us.

We may not be able to compete with other companies, some of whom have greater resources and experience.

We may not be able to compete successfully against present or future competitors. We do not have the resources to compete with larger providers of similar services at this time. The cryptocurrency industry has attracted various high‑profile and well-established operators, some of which have substantially greater liquidity and financial resources than we do. With the limited resources we have available, we may experience great difficulties in building our network of computers and creating an exchange. Competition from existing and future competitors, particularly the many Canadian companies that have access to cheap energy, could result in our inability to secure acquisitions and partnerships that we may need to expand our business. This competition from other entities with greater resources, experience and reputations may result in our failure to maintain or expand our business, as we may never be able to successfully execute our business plan.

The properties included in our mining network may experience damages, including damages that are not covered by insurance.

Our current operational mine in Oklahoma City is, and any future mines we establish will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including:

the presence of construction or repair defects or other structural or building damage;

any noncompliance with or liabilities under applicable environmental, health or safety regulations or requirements or building permit requirements;

any damage resulting from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods and windstorms; and

claims by employees and others for injuries sustained at our properties.

For example, a mine could be rendered inoperational, temporarily or permanently, as a result of a fire or other natural disaster or by a terrorist or other attack on the mine. The security and other measures we take to protect against these risks may not be sufficient. Additionally, our mines could be materially adversely affected by a power outage or loss of access to the electrical grid or loss by the grid of cost-effective sources of electrical power generating capacity. Given the power requirement, it would not be feasible to run miners on back-up power generators in the event of a power outage. Our insurance does not cover any interruption of our mining activities, and may not be adequate to cover the losses we suffer as a result of any of these events. In the event of an uninsured loss, including a loss in excess of insured limits, at any of the mines in our network, such mines may not be adequately repaired in a timely manner or at all and we may lose some or all of the future revenues anticipated to be derived from such mines. The potential impact on our business is currently magnified because we are only operating a single mine.

Our mines are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources and worker health and safety, including laws and regulations governing and creating liability relating to the management, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and other regulated materials and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Our mines are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations that govern certain aspects of their ongoing operations. These laws and regulations control such things as the nature and volume of wastewater discharges, quality of water supply and waste management practices.

If we fail to maintain the value and reputation of our brand, our value is likely to decline.

Our success depends on the value and reputation of our brand. Our name is integral to our business as well as to the implementation of our strategies for expanding business. Maintaining, promoting and positioning our reputation will depend largely on our ability to distinguish ourselves from other public cryptocurrency mining and trading companies and build public trust. We have been adversely affected by recent negative publicity, including a CNBC report aired in February 2018. If we continue to be portrayed negatively in the press, our public image and reputation could be tarnished, which could adversely affect our business and result in continued decreases in our stock price.

Our management team is new; loss of key members of management, or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect our business.

Our success and future growth will depend to a significant degree on the skills and services of our senior management team. The members of our senior management team were all recently hired in connection with our transition to our new business model: our chief executive officer was hired in November 2017, our chief operating officer was hired in January 2018, and our chief financial officer was hired in February 2018, and we need to continue to grow our senior management team. If our senior management team, including any new hires that we may make, fails to work together effectively and to execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business could be harmed. Furthermore, any future changes in our senior management team may be disruptive to our business.

The loss of key members of management could inhibit our growth prospects. Our future success also depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key management and operating personnel. As we continue to develop and expand our operations, we may require personnel with different skills and experiences, and with a sound understanding of our business and the cryptocurrency industry. The market for highly qualified personnel in this industry is very competitive.

We, and some of our current officers, have been named as parties to various lawsuits arising out of, or related to, allegedly false and misleading statements made in prior securities filings, and those lawsuits could adversely affect us, require significant management time and attention, result in significant legal expenses or damages, and cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to suffer.

A number of securities class action complaints and a shareholder derivative action have been filed against us and certain of our current officers and directors [as detailed more fully in Item 3, Legal Proceedings]. Shareholders have filed three class action complaints against us in three states, accusing us of violations of the federal securities laws based on purported material misrepresentations or omissions allegedly made by the Company. Each class action complaint seeks unspecified money damages and other relief on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock between November 13, 2017 and February 15, 2018. The shareholder derivative case alleges similar disclosure violations and seeks unspecified monetary damages and corporate governance reforms. If these matters cannot be resolved expeditiously, management's attention may be diverted to this matter and there can be no assurance that the litigation would be settled. If the current litigation proceeds or if additional claims are filed, the legal and other costs associated with the defense of these actions and their ultimate outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we expect insurance to cover many of the costs associated with defending such litigation, insurance coverage may be insufficient and could require a diversion of our resources. There also may be adverse publicity associated with litigation that could negatively affect customer perception of our business, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable.

We incur significant costs and demands upon management and accounting and finance resources as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies; if we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our ability to operate our business and our reputation.

As an SEC‑reporting company, we are required to, among other things, maintain a system of effective internal control over financial reporting. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Substantial work will continue to be required to further implement, document, assess, test and remediate our system of internal controls. We will also need to retain a new principal accounting officer and other finance and accounting personnel in the future.

If our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, we may be unable to issue our financial statements in a timely manner, we may be unable to obtain the required audit or review of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm in a timely manner or we may be otherwise unable to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the SEC, our common stock listing on the NASDAQ could be suspended or terminated and our stock price could materially suffer. In addition, we or members of our management could be subject to investigation and sanction by the SEC and other regulatory authorities and to shareholder lawsuits, which could impose significant additional costs on us and divert management attention.

We may not be able to utilize our net operating loss carry forwards.

At December 31, 2017, we had net operating loss carry forwards ("NOLs") for income tax purposes of approximately $105 million, expiring through 2037, and our subsidiaries had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $2 million for federal and state tax purposes, which are available to offset future taxable income, if any, expiring through 2037. As of December 31, 2017, a subsidiary had a capital loss carry forward of approximately $1.1 million for federal and state tax purposes, which is available to offset future capital gains, if any, expiring through December 2020. However, we do not know if or when we will have any earnings and capital gains against which we could apply these carry forwards. Furthermore, as a result of changes in the ownership of our common stock, our ability to use our federal NOLs may be limited under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and 383. State NOLs are subject to similar limitations in many cases. As a result, our substantial NOLs may not have any value to us.

In addition, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act), the amount of post 2017 NOLs that we are permitted to deduct in any taxable year is limited to 80% of our taxable income in such year, where taxable income is determined without regard to the NOL deduction itself. The Tax Act generally eliminates the ability to carry back any NOL to prior taxable years, while allowing post 2017 unused NOLs to be carried forward indefinitely. There is a risk that due to changes under the Tax Act, regulatory changes or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities.

We will not be able to successfully execute our business strategy if we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

U.S. companies that have more than 100 shareholders or are publicly traded in the U.S. and are, or hold themselves out as being, engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities are subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. Unless a substantial part of our assets consists of, and a substantial part of our income is derived from, interests in majority-owned subsidiaries and companies that we primarily control, we may be required to register and become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. If bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were to be deemed securities for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we would have difficulty avoiding classification and regulation as an investment company.

If we were deemed to be, and were required to register as, an investment company, we would be forced to comply with substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our ability to borrow, limitations on our capital structure; restrictions on acquisitions of interests in associated companies, prohibitions on transactions with affiliates, restrictions on specific investments, and compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations. If we were forced to comply with the rules and regulations of the Investment Company Act, our operations would significantly change, and we would be prevented from successfully executing our business strategy. To avoid regulation under the Investment Company Act and related SEC rules, we could need to sell bitcoin and other assets which we would otherwise want to retain and could be unable to sell assets which we would otherwise want to sell. In addition, we could be forced to acquire additional, or retain existing, income-generating or loss-generating assets which we would not otherwise have acquired or retained and could need to forgo opportunities to acquire bitcoin and other assets that would benefit our business. If we were forced to sell, buy or retain assets in this manner, we could be prevented from successfully executing our business strategy.

We may be classified as an inadvertent investment company.

We believe that we are not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, and we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged in those activities. However under the Investment Company Act a company may be deemed an investment company under section 3(a)(1)(C) if the value of its investment securities is more than 40% of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on a consolidated basis.

As a result of our investments and our mining activities, including investments in which we do not have a controlling interest, the investment securities we hold could exceed 40% of our total assets, exclusive of cash items and, accordingly, we could determine that we have become an inadvertent investment company. The cryptocurrency we own, acquire or mine may be deemed an investment security by the SEC, although we do not believe any of the cryptocurrencies we own, acquire or mine are securities. An inadvertent investment company can avoid being classified as an investment company if it can rely on one of the exclusions under the 1940 Act. One such exclusion, Rule 3a-2 under the 1940 Act, allows an inadvertent investment company a grace period of one year from the earlier of (a) the date on which an issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer's total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis and (b) the date on which an issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer's total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. As of December 31, 2017, we do not believe we are an inadvertent investment company, however resolution of pending comments received from the SEC have not been concluded and this issue has not been resolved by SEC rules or regulations. For us, any grace period would be unknown until these issues are resolved or the SEC issues rules and regulations concerning cryptocurrency treatment. We may take actions to cause the investment securities held by us to be less than 40% of our total assets, which may include acquiring assets with our cash and cryptocurrency on hand or liquidating our investment securities or cryptocurrency or seeking a no-action letter from the SEC if we are unable to acquire sufficient assets or liquidate sufficient investment securities in a timely manner.

As Rule 3a-2 is available to a company no more than once every three years, and assuming no other exclusion were available to us, we would have to keep within the 40% limit for at least three years after we cease being an inadvertent investment company. This may limit our ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures that could otherwise have a positive impact on our earnings. In any event, we do not intend to become an investment company engaged in the business of investing and trading securities.

Classification as an investment company under the Investment Company Act requires registration with the SEC. If an investment company fails to register, it would have to stop doing almost all business, and its contracts would become voidable. Registration is time consuming and restrictive and would require a restructuring of our operations, and we would be very constrained in the kind of business we could do as a registered investment company. Further, we would become subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and would need to file reports under the Investment Company Act regime. The cost of such compliance would result in the Company incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to register if required would have a materially adverse impact to conduct our operations.

Changes in the U.S. tax and other laws and regulations may adversely affect our business.

The U.S. government may revise tax laws, regulations or official interpretations in ways that could have a significant adverse effect on our business, including modifications that could reduce the profits that we can effectively realize from our international operations, or that could require costly changes to those operations, or the way in which they are structured. For example, the effective tax rates for most U.S. companies reflect the fact that income earned and reinvested outside the U.S. is generally taxed at local rates, which may be much lower than U.S. tax rates. If we expand abroad and there are changes in tax laws, regulations or interpretations that significantly increase the tax rates on non-U.S. income, our effective tax rate could increase and our profits could be reduced. If such increases resulted from our status as a U.S. company, those changes could place us at a disadvantage to our non-U.S. competitors if those competitors remain subject to lower local tax rates.

Recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation known colloquially as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," among other things, makes significant changes to the rules applicable to the taxation of corporations, such as changing the corporate tax rate to a flat 21% rate, modifying the rules regarding limitations on certain deductions for executive compensation, introducing a capital investment deduction in certain circumstances, placing certain limitations on the interest deduction, modifying the rules regarding the usability of certain net operating losses, implementing a minimum tax on the "global intangible low-taxed income" of a "United States shareholder" of a "controlled foreign corporation," modifying certain rules applicable to United States shareholders of controlled foreign corporations, imposing a deemed repatriation tax on certain earnings and adding certain anti-base erosion rules. We are currently in the process of analyzing the effects of this new legislation on us and at this time the ultimate outcome of the new legislation on our business and financial condition is uncertain. It is possible that the application of these new rules may have a material and adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

The Company has received a subpoena from the SEC.

On April 9, 2018, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC requesting certain information from the Company. The Company intends to fully cooperate with the SEC request. The Company has notified its insurance carrier although there can be no assurance that the costs of compliance with the subpoena or any related matters will be eligible for insurance coverage. Nevertheless, response to the subpoena will entail cost and management's attention. The Company believes that many companies engaged in blockchain and cryptocurrency businesses have received subpoenas from the SEC which presents an addtional industry risk. The existence of an investigation of the Company specifically and the industry generally could have a materially adverse effect on the Company, its business or operations, and the industry as a whole.

Our management team is new.

Our management team suffers from limited experience in blockchain, digital assets and cryptocurrency. Inasmuch as the industry is in its infancy and few people would be able to describe themselves as having extensive experience when it comes to cryptocurrency, the Company nevertheless believes blockchain, digital assets and cryptocurrency are an emerging asset class. The Company believes it has attracted persons from a diverse community of entrepreneurs, programmers and others who have embraced a common belief and value system that blockchain based transactions and digital assets including cryptocurrency can evolve into a means to conduct business and effect payments. Our employees and management team possess skillsets aligned with blockchain, digital assets and cryptocurrency, including Christopher Ensey, our Chief Operating Officer, experienced in cybersecurity, and employees who have experience managing and operating large data center sites and employment with Bitcoin computer manufacturing. Should these skills not be compatible with the needs of our business, and we cannot hire qualified personnel or management, the results could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Cryptocurrency-Related Risks

Regulatory changes or actions may alter the nature of an investment in us or restrict the use of cryptocurrencies in a manner that adversely affects our business, prospects or operations.

As cryptocurrencies have grown in both popularity and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently to cryptocurrencies, with certain governments deeming them illegal, and others allowing their use and trade but, in some jurisdictions, such as in the U.S., subject to extensive, and in some cases overlapping, regulatory requirements, as well as unclear and evolving requirements. Ongoing and future regulatory actions may impact our ability to continue to operate, and such actions could affect our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

Our change in our business strategy and name could subject us to increased SEC scrutiny.

We previously were engaged in veterinary‑ and life science‑oriented businesses (as a diagnostics company and then a research tools company), under the name Bioptix. In late 2017, we determined to instead pursue a blockchain and digital currency (specifically bitcoin)‑related business, initially through investments in existing companies. The SEC has announced that it is scrutinizing public companies that change their name or business model in a bid to capitalize upon the hype surrounding blockchain technology, and has suspended trading of certain of such companies. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton warned that it is not acceptable for companies without a meaningful track record in the sector to dabble in blockchain technology, change their name and immediately offer investors securities without providing adequate disclosures about the risks involved. As a result, we could be subject to substantial SEC scrutiny that could require devotion of significant management and other resources and potentially have an adverse impact on the trading of our stock.

The development and acceptance of cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of and transactions in cryptocurrencies is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate.

The use of cryptocurrencies to, among other things, buy and sell goods and services and complete transactions, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry that employs digital assets based upon a computer-generated mathematical and/or cryptographic protocol. The growth of this industry in general, and the use of cryptocurrencies in particular, is subject to a high degree of uncertainty, and the slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of developing protocols may occur and is unpredictable. The factors include, but are not limited to:

continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of cryptocurrencies;

governmental and quasi-governmental regulation of cryptocurrencies and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of the network or similar cryptocurrency systems;

changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;

the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the network;

the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, including new means of using fiat currencies;

the use of the networks supporting cryptocurrencies for developing smart contracts and distributed applications;

general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; and

negative consumer sentiment and perception of bitcoin specifically and cryptocurrencies generally.

Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations of and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors in our securities.

Banks and financial institutions may not provide banking services, or may cut off services, to businesses that provide cryptocurrency-related services or that accept cryptocurrencies as payment, including financial institutions of investors in our securities.

A number of companies that provide bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related services have been unable to find banks or financial institutions that are willing to provide them with bank accounts and other services. Similarly, a number of companies and individuals or businesses associated with cryptocurrencies may have had and may continue to have their existing bank accounts closed or services discontinued with financial institutions. We also may be unable to obtain or maintain these services for our business. The difficulty that many businesses that provide bitcoin and/or derivatives on other cryptocurrency-related services have and may continue to have in finding banks and financial institutions willing to provide them services may be decreasing the usefulness of cryptocurrencies as a payment system and harming public perception of cryptocurrencies, and could decrease their usefulness and harm their public perception in the future. Similarly, the usefulness of cryptocurrencies as a payment system and the public perception of cryptocurrencies could be damaged if banks or financial institutions were to close the accounts of businesses providing bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related services. This could occur as a result of compliance risk, cost, government regulation or public pressure. The risk applies to securities firms, clearance and settlement firms, national stock and derivatives on commodities exchanges, the over‑the‑counter market, and the Depository Trust Company, which, if any of such entities adopts or implements similar policies, rules or regulations, could negatively affect our relationships with financial institutions and impede our ability to convert cryptocurrencies to fiat currencies. Such factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and harm investors.

We may face risks of Internet disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on the price of cryptocurrencies.

A disruption of the Internet may affect the use of cryptocurrencies and subsequently the value of our securities. Generally, cryptocurrencies are dependent upon the Internet. A significant disruption in Internet connectivity could disrupt a currency's network operations until the disruption is resolved and have an adverse effect on the price of cryptocurrencies.

The impact of geopolitical events on the supply and demand for cryptocurrencies is uncertain.

Crises may motivate large-scale purchases of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which could increase the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies rapidly. This may increase the likelihood of a subsequent price decrease as crisis-driven purchasing behavior wanes, adversely affecting the value of our inventory. Such risks are similar to the risks of purchasing commodities in general uncertain times, such as the risk of purchasing, holding or selling gold.

As an alternative to gold currencies that are backed by central governments, cryptocurrencies, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces. How such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical events is largely uncertain but could be harmful to us and investors in our securities. Political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of cryptocurrencies either globally or locally. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or any other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Acceptance and/or widespread use of cryptocurrency is uncertain.

Currently, there is a relatively limited use of any cryptocurrency in the retail and commercial marketplace, thus contributing to price volatility that could adversely affect an investment in our securities. Banks and other established financial institutions may refuse to process funds for cryptocurrency transactions, process wire transfers to or from cryptocurrency exchanges, cryptocurrency-related companies or service providers, or maintain accounts for persons or entities transacting in cryptocurrency. Conversely, a significant portion of cryptocurrency demand is generated by investors seeking a long-term store of value or speculators seeking to profit from the short- or long-term holding of the asset. Price volatility undermines any cryptocurrency's role as a medium of exchange, as retailers are much less likely to accept it as a form of payment. Market capitalization for a cryptocurrency as a medium of exchange and payment method may always be low.

The relative lack of acceptance of cryptocurrencies in the retail and commercial marketplace, or a reduction of such use, limits the ability of end users to use them to pay for goods and services. Such lack of acceptance or decline in acceptances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of bitcoin or any other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Transactional fees may decrease demand for bitcoin and prevent expansion.

As the number of bitcoin awarded for solving a block in a blockchain decreases, the incentive for miners to continue to contribute to the bitcoin network will transition from a set reward to transaction fees. Either the requirement from miners of higher transaction fees in exchange for recording transactions in a blockchain or a software upgrade that automatically charges fees for all transactions may decrease demand for bitcoin and prevent the expansion of the bitcoin network to retail merchants and commercial businesses, resulting in a reduction in the price of bitcoin that could adversely impact an investment in our securities.

In order to incentivize miners to continue to contribute to the bitcoin network, the bitcoin network may either formally or informally transition from a set reward to transaction fees earned upon solving a block. This transition could be accomplished by miners independently electing to record in the blocks they solve only those transactions that include payment of a transaction fee. If transaction fees paid for bitcoin transactions become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to accept bitcoin as a means of payment and existing users may be motivated to switch from bitcoin to another cryptocurrency or to fiat currency. Decreased use and demand for bitcoin may adversely affect its value and result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin and the value of our securities.

We face risks from the lack of clarity in the corporate governance of many cryptocurrency systems.

Lack of clarity in the corporate governance of many cryptocurrency systems may lead to ineffective decision making that slows development or prevents a network from overcoming important obstacles. Governance of many cryptocurrency systems is by voluntary consensus and open competition. To the extent lack of clarity in corporate governance of cryptocurrency systems leads to ineffective decision making that slows development and growth, the value of our securities may be adversely affected.

Political or economic crises may motivate large-scale sales of bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, which could result in a reduction in value and adversely affect us.

As an alternative to fiat currencies that are backed by central governments, digital assets such as bitcoin and ether, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces based upon the desirability of an alternative, decentralized means of buying and selling goods and services, and it is unclear how such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical events. Nevertheless, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of bitcoin, ether and other cryptocurrencies either globally or locally. Large-scale sales of bitcoin and ether or other cryptocurrencies would result in a reduction in their value and could adversely affect us. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use bitcoin, ether, or other cryptocurrencies, participate in blockchains or utilize similar digital assets in one or more countries, the ruling of which would adversely affect us.

Although currently cryptocurrencies generally are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, one or more countries such as China and Russia may take regulatory actions in the future that could severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use these digital assets or to exchange for fiat currency. Such restrictions may adversely affect us. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

There is a lack of liquid markets, and possible manipulation of blockchain/cryptocurrency‑based assets.

Digital assets that are represented and trade on a ledger-based platform may not necessarily benefit from viable trading markets. Stock exchanges have listing requirements, vet issuers, requiring them to be subjected to rigorous listing standards and rules, and monitor investors transacting on such platform for fraud and other improprieties. These conditions may not necessarily be replicated on a distributed ledger platform, depending on the platform's controls and other policies. The more lax a distributed ledger platform is about vetting issuers of digital assets or users that transact on the platform, the higher the potential risk for fraud or the manipulation of digital assets. These factors may decrease liquidity or volume, or increase volatility of digital securities or other assets trading on a ledger-based system, which may adversely affect us. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

Our operations, investment strategies and profitability may be adversely affected by competition from other methods of investing in cryptocurrencies.

We compete with other users and/or companies that are mining cryptocurrencies and other potential financial vehicles, including securities backed by or linked to cryptocurrencies through entities similar to us. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to invest in other financial vehicles, or to invest in cryptocurrencies directly, which could limit the market for our shares and reduce their liquidity. The emergence of other financial vehicles and exchange‑traded funds have been scrutinized by regulators and such scrutiny and negative impressions or conclusions could be applicable to us and impact our ability to successfully pursue our new strategy or operate at all, or to establish or maintain a public market for our securities. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may cause consumers to use alternative distributed ledgers or other alternatives.

The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may cause consumers to use alternative distributed ledgers or an alternative to distributed ledgers altogether. This may adversely affect us and our exposure to various blockchain technologies and prevent us from realizing the anticipated profits from our investments. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

Our operations, investment strategies and profitability may be adversely affected by competition from other methods of investing in cryptocurrencies.

We compete with other users and/or companies that mine cryptocurrencies and other potential financial vehicles, possibly including securities backed by or linked to cryptocurrencies through entities similar to us. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to invest in other financial vehicles, or to invest in cryptocurrencies directly, which could limit the market for our shares and reduce their liquidity.

Our cryptocurrencies may be subject to loss, theft or restriction on access.

There is a risk that some or all of our cryptocurrencies could be lost or stolen. Access to our coins could also be restricted by cybercrime (such as a denial of service attack) against a service at which we maintain a hosted hot wallet. A hot wallet refers to any cryptocurrency wallet that is connected to the Internet. Generally, hot wallets are easier to set up and access, but they are also more susceptible to hackers and other technical vulnerabilities. Cold storage refers to any cryptocurrency wallet that is not connected to the Internet. Cold storage is generally more secure, but is not ideal for quick or regular transactions. We expect to hold the majority of our cryptocurrencies in cold storage to reduce the risk of malfeasance, but this risk cannot be eliminated.

Hackers or malicious actors may launch attacks to steal, compromise or secure cryptocurrencies, such as by attacking the cryptocurrency network source code, exchange servers, third-party platforms, cold and hot storage locations or software, or by other means. We may be in control and possession of one of the more substantial holdings of cryptocurrency. As we increase in size, we may become a more appealing target of hackers, malware, cyber-attacks or other security threats. Any of these events may adversely affect our operations and, consequently, our investments and profitability. The loss or destruction of a private key required to access our digital wallets may be irreversible and we may be denied access for all time to our cryptocurrency holdings or the holdings of others. Our loss of access to our private keys or our experience of a data loss relating to our digital wallets could adversely affect our investments and assets.

Cryptocurrencies are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public and private keys relating to the local or online digital wallet in which they are held, which wallet's public key or address is reflected in the network's public blockchain. We will publish the public key relating to digital wallets in use when we verify the receipt of transfers and disseminate such information into the network, but we will need to safeguard the private keys relating to such digital wallets. To the extent such private keys are lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised, we will be unable to access our cryptocurrency coins and such private keys may not be capable of being restored by any network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store our or our client's cryptocurrencies could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Risks Due to Hacking or Adverse Software Event

In order to minimize risk, Riot has established processes to manage wallets that are associated with our cryptocurrency holdings. There can be no assurances that any processes we have adopted or will adopt in the future are or will be secure or effective, and we would suffer significant and immediate adverse effects if we suffered a loss of our cryptocurrency due to an adverse software or cybersecurity event. Riot utilizes several layers of threat reduction techniques, including: (i) the use of hardware wallets to store sensitive private key information; (ii) performance of transactions offline; and (iii) offline generation and use of private keys.

At present, the Company is evaluating several third-party custodial wallet alternatives, but there can be no assurance Riot will utilize such services, as other new options may develop in the future, and if a custodial wallet is used there can be no assurance that such services will be more secure than those the Company presently employs.

Incorrect or fraudulent coin transactions may be irreversible.

Cryptocurrency transactions are irrevocable and stolen or incorrectly transferred coins may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed or fraudulent coin transactions could adversely affect our investments and assets.

Coin transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the transaction. In theory, cryptocurrency transactions may be reversible with the control or consent of a majority of processing power on the network. Once a transaction has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to a blockchain, an incorrect transfer of a coin or a theft of coin generally will not be reversible and we may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft. It is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, our coins could be transferred in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties, or to uncontrolled accounts. Further, at this time, there is no U.S. or foreign governmental, regulatory, investigative or prosecutorial authority or mechanism through which to bring an action or complaint regarding missing or stolen cryptocurrency. To the extent that we are unable to seek redress for such action, error or theft, such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations of and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us to SDN or blocked persons or cause us to violate provisions of law that did not contemplate distribute ledger technology.

The Office of Financial Assets Control of the US Department of Treasury requires us to comply with its sanction program and not conduct business with persons named on its specially designated nationals ("SDN") list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions we may inadvertently without our knowledge engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC's SDN list. Moreover, federal law prohibits any US person from knowingly or unknowingly possessing any visual depiction commonly known as child pornography. Recent media reports have suggested that persons have imbedded such depictions on one or more blockchains. Because our business requires us to download and retain one or more blockchains to effectuate our ongoing business, it is possible that such digital ledgers contain prohibited depictions. To the extent government enforcement authorities or regulators literally enforce these and other laws and regulations that are impacted by decentralized distributed ledger technology, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and affect the value of our securities.

Cryptocurrencies face significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times.

Cryptocurrencies face significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times, and attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective. Many cryptocurrency networks face significant scaling challenges. For example, cryptocurrencies are limited with respect to how many transactions can occur per second. Participants in the cryptocurrency ecosystem debate potential approaches to increasing the average number of transactions per second that the network can handle and have implemented mechanisms or are researching ways to increase scale, such as increasing the allowable sizes of blocks, and therefore the number of transactions per block, and sharding, which would not require every single transaction to be included in every single miner's or validator's block. However, there is no guarantee that any of the mechanisms in place or being explored for increasing the scale of settlement of cryptocurrency transactions will be effective, or how long they will take to become effective, which could adversely affect an investment in our securities.

The price of coins may be affected by the sale of coins by other vehicles investing in coins or tracking cryptocurrency markets.

The global market for cryptocurrency is characterized by supply constraints that differ from those present in the markets for commodities or other assets such as gold and silver. The mathematical protocols under which certain cryptocurrencies are mined permit the creation of a limited, predetermined amount of currency, while others have no limit established on total supply. To the extent that other vehicles investing in coins or tracking cryptocurrency markets form and come to represent a significant proportion of the demand for coins, large redemptions of the securities of those vehicles and the subsequent sale of coins by such vehicles could negatively affect cryptocurrency prices and therefore affect the value of the inventory we hold. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

There are risks related to shortages, technological obsolescence and difficulty in obtaining hardware.

Our mining operations can only be successful and ultimately profitable if the costs, including hardware and electricity costs, associated with mining a bitcoin are lower than the price of a bitcoin. The increase in interest and demand for cryptocurrencies has led to a shortage of mining hardware as individuals purchase equipment for mining at home and large‑scale mining evolves. Furthermore, we currently exclusively use Bitmain Antminer bitcoin miners, which are the most advanced and powerful bitcoin miners currently available, and expect to need to obtain additional such miners. Reports have been released which indicate that Bitmain adjusts the prices of its miners according to bitcoin prices, so the cost of new machines is unpredictable but could be extremely high. Further, given supply limitations and competition from other industry participants, those miners can be difficult to obtain from Bitmain on a timely basis. As a result, at times, we may obtain Bitmain miners and other hardware from third parties for increased prices, to the extent available. For example, [in November 2017,] in order to facilitate the launch of our mining operations without the potential delay associated with acquiring miners directly from Bitmain, we purchased Bitmain miners at substantially above Bitmain's list prices. Additionally, to keep pace with technologic advances and competition from other bitcoin mining companies, we will need to replace our miners and other equipment from time to time. We may require substantial capital to replace our equipment and face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. Also, because our miners are expected to require replacement in a relatively short amount of time, we expect to depreciate them over only a two-year period for financial reporting purposes, adversely affecting our reported operating results. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the value of our stock.

Our reputation and financial condition may be harmed by system failures, computer viruses and any inability to keep pace with advancements in technology.

The performance and reliability of our miners and our technology is critical to our reputation and our operations. Because we currently only use Bitmain miners, if there are issues with those machines, our entire system could be affected. Any system error or failure may significantly delay response times or even cause our system to fail. Any disruption in our ability to continue mining could result in lower yields and harm our reputation and business. Our system and operations are vulnerable to interruption or malfunction due to certain events beyond our control, including natural disasters, power loss, telecommunication failures, data and other security breaches, break-ins, sabotage, computer viruses, intentional acts of vandalism, and similar events. Any interruption, delay or system failure could result in financial losses, a decrease in share prices and damage to our reputation.

Because there has been limited precedent set for financial accounting of bitcoin and other digital assets, the determination that we have made for how to account for digital assets transactions may be subject to change.

Because there has been limited precedent set for the financial accounting of digital assets and related revenue recognition and no guidance has yet been provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC, it is unclear how companies may in the future be required to account for digital asset transactions and assets and related revenue recognition. A change in regulatory or financial accounting standards could result in the necessity to change our accounting methods and restate our financial statements. Such a restatement could adversely affect the accounting for our newly mined coins and more generally negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations [and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies we hold or expects to acquire for our own account and harm investors].

We must comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations; the effect of any future regulatory change that affects us, our business or any cryptocurrency that we may mine or hold for others is impossible to predict, and such change could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

Regulation of cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges is currently undeveloped and likely to evolve rapidly, vary significantly among international, federal, state and local jurisdictions and is subject to significant uncertainty. Failure by our company to comply with any laws, rules and regulations, some of which may not exist yet or are subject to interpretation and may be subject to change, could result in a variety of adverse consequences, including civil penalties and fines imposed by governmental authorities, including the SEC, the FTC, the FinCEN and one or more state regulatory authorities. Under certain circumstances, such failure by our company could also result in criminal sanctions.

As blockchain networks and blockchain assets have grown in popularity and in market size, governments and regulatory agencies have begun to take interest in, and in some cases regulate, their use and operation to the extent that a government or quasi-governmental agency exerts regulatory authority over a blockchain network or asset upon which our business relies, our business could be adversely affected. Blockchain networks currently face an uncertain regulatory landscape in many jurisdictions. The effect of any future legal or regulatory change is impossible to predict, but such laws, regulations or directives may directly and negatively impact our business.

Governments may in the future curtail or outlaw the acquisition, use or redemption of cryptocurrencies. Ownership of, holding or trading in cryptocurrencies may then be considered illegal and subject to sanction. Governments may also take regulatory action that may increase the cost and/or subject cryptocurrency companies to additional regulation. Judicial determinations may also have an adverse impact on the trading of cryptocurrencies.

On July 25, 2017, the SEC released an investigative report which states that the United States would, in some circumstances, consider the offer and sale of cryptocurrencies pursuant to an initial coin offering ("ICO") subject to federal securities laws. Thereafter, China released statements and took similar actions, but subsequently blocked ICOs and cryptocurrency exchanges. Although we do not currently participate in ICOs, our potential clients and customers related to our cryptocurrency exchange business, if and when we launch such an exchange, may participate in ICOs and these actions may be a prelude to further action that chills widespread acceptance of blockchain and cryptocurrency adoption and have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations. In particular, China is a large market that might indicate larger worldwide trends, so its restrictions related to ICOs and domestic and foreign exchanges may have wider implications for the cryptocurrency industry. Moreover, in the United States some cryptocurrencies that we may wish to offer, such as ether, may have been issued in whole or part as part of an ICO. It is unclear what view the SEC might ultimately take with regard to cryptocurrencies that are of the character of cryptocurrencies if they were initially issued in whole or part as part of an ICO. If the SEC were to deem all cryptocurrencies issued as part of ICOs as securities, we may be required to seek certain licenses we currently are not intending to acquire, and this could have an adverse impact on our operations.

Governments may in the future take regulatory actions that prohibit or severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell, use or trade cryptocurrencies or to exchange cryptocurrencies for fiat currency. Similar actions by governments or regulatory bodies (such as an exchange on which our securities are listed, quoted or traded) could result in restriction of the acquisition, ownership, holding, selling, use or trading in our securities. Such a restriction could result in us liquidating our inventory at unfavorable prices and may adversely affect our shareholders and have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, raise new capital or maintain a securities listing with an exchange (such as our current listing with NASDAQ), which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and harm investors in our securities.

Cryptocurrency Mining-Related Risks

Our future success will depend in large part upon the value of bitcoin; the value of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may be subject to pricing risk and has historically been subject to wide swings.

Our operating results will depend in large part upon the value of bitcoin. Specifically, our revenues from our bitcoin mining operations will be based upon two factors: (1) the number of bitcoins we mine and (2) the value of bitcoin. In addition, our operating results will be directly impacted by changes in the value of bitcoin, because under the value measurement model, both realized and unrealized changes will be reflected in our statement of operations (i.e., we will be marking bitcoin to fair value each quarter). This means that our operating results will be subject to swings based upon increases or decreases in the value of bitcoin. Furthermore, our new strategy initially focuses almost entirely on bitcoin (as opposed to other cryptocurrencies). Further, our current application-specific integrated circuit ("ASIC") machines (which we refer to as "miners") are principally utilized for mining bitcoin and bitcoin cash and cannot mine other cryptocurrencies, such as ether, that are not mined utilizing the "SHA-256 algorithm." If other cryptocurrencies were to achieve acceptance at the expense of bitcoin or bitcoin cash causing the value of bitcoin or bitcoin cash to decline, or bitcoin were to switch its proof of work algorithm from SHA-256 to another algorithm our miners were not specialized for, or the value of bitcoin or bitcoin cash were to decline for other reasons, particularly if such decline were significant or over an extended period of time, our operating results would be adversely affected, and there could be a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations, and harm investors.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency market prices, which have historically been volatile and are impacted by a variety of factors (including those discussed below), are determined primarily using data from various exchanges, over-the-counter markets and derivative platforms. Furthermore, such prices may be subject to factors such as those that impact commodities, more so than business activities, which could be subjected to additional influence from fraudulent or illegitimate actors, real or perceived scarcity, and political, economic, regulatory or other conditions. Pricing may be the result of, and may continue to result in, speculation regarding future appreciation in the value of cryptocurrencies, or our share price, inflating and making their market prices more volatile or creating "bubble"‑type risks.

We may not be able to realize the benefits of forks.

To the extent that a significant majority of users and miners on a cryptocurrency network install software that changes the cryptocurrency network or properties of a cryptocurrency, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new cryptocurrency, the cryptocurrency network would be subject to new protocols and software. However, if less than a significant majority of users and miners on the cryptocurrency network consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" of the network, with one prong running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of the cryptocurrency running in parallel, yet lacking interchangeability. Additionally, it may be unclear following a fork which fork represents the original asset and which is the new asset. Different metrics adopted by industry participants to determine which is the original asset include: wishes of the core developers of a cryptocurrency, blockchains with the greatest amount of hashing power contributed by miners or validators, or blockchains with the longest chain. A fork in the network of a particular cryptocurrency could adversely affect an investment in our securities or our ability to operate.

We may not be able to realize the economic benefit of a fork, either immediately or ever, which could adversely affect an investment in our securities. If we hold a cryptocurrency at the time of a hard fork into two cryptocurrencies, we would be expected to hold an equivalent amount of the old and new assets following the fork. However, we may not be able, or it may not be practical, to secure or realize the economic benefit of the new asset for various reasons. For instance, we may determine that there is no safe or practical way to custody the new asset, that trying to do so may pose an unacceptable risk to our holdings in the old asset, or that the costs of taking possession and/or maintaining ownership of the new cryptocurrency exceed the benefits of owning the new cryptocurrency. Additionally, laws, regulation or other factors may prevent us from benefitting from the new asset even if there is a safe and practical way to custody and secure the new asset.

There is a possibility of cryptocurrency mining algorithms transitioning to proof of stake validation and other mining‑related risks, which could make us less competitive and ultimately adversely affect our business and the value of our stock.

Proof of stake is an alternative method in validating cryptocurrency transactions. Should the algorithm shift from a proof‑of‑work validation method to a proof‑of‑stake method, mining would require less energy and may render any company that maintains advantages in the current climate (for example, from lower‑priced electricity, processing, real estate, or hosting) less competitive. We, as a result of our cryptocurrency mining operations, may be exposed to risk in the future as a result, and may be negatively impacted if a switch to proof of stake validation were to occur. This may additionally have an impact on other various investments of ours, including how it may potentially affect transactional volume on Coinsquare or affect our strategy for investigating the launch of a cryptocurrency exchange in the United States. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

To the extent that the profit margins of bitcoin mining operations are not high, operators of bitcoin mining operations are more likely to immediately sell bitcoins earned by mining in the market, resulting in a reduction in the price of bitcoins that could adversely impact us, and similar actions could affect other cryptocurrencies.

Over the past two years, bitcoin mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first generation ASIC servers. Currently, new processing power is predominantly added by incorporated and unincorporated "professionalized" mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated ASIC machines acquired from ASIC manufacturers. They require the investment of significant capital for the acquisition of this hardware, the leasing of operating space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), incurring of electricity costs and the employment of technicians to operate the mining farms. As a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior miners and have more defined and regular expenses and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to more immediately sell bitcoins earned from mining operations, whereas it is believed that individual miners in past years were more likely to hold newly mined bitcoins for more extended periods. The immediate selling of newly mined bitcoins greatly increases the supply of bitcoins, creating downward pressure on the price of bitcoins.

The extent to which the value of bitcoin mined by a professionalized mining operation exceeds the allocable capital and operating costs determines the profit margin of such operation. A professionalized mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly mined bitcoin rapidly if it is operating at a low profit margin—and it may partially or completely cease operations if its profit margin is negative. In a low‑profit‑margin environment, a higher percentage could be sold more rapidly, thereby potentially reducing bitcoin prices. Lower bitcoin prices could result in further tightening of profit margins, particularly for professionalized mining operations with higher costs and more limited capital reserves, creating a network effect that may further reduce the price of bitcoin until mining operations with higher operating costs become unprofitable and remove mining power. The network effect of reduced profit margins, resulting in greater sales of newly mined bitcoin, could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin that could adversely impact us.

The foregoing risks associated with bitcoin could be equally applicable to other cryptocurrencies, whether existing now or introduced in the future. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of bitcoin and any other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control of more than 50% of the processing power on a cryptocurrency network, such actor or botnet could manipulate blockchains to adversely affect us, which would adversely affect an investment in us or our ability to operate.

If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers) obtains a majority of the processing power dedicated to mining a cryptocurrency, it may be able to alter blockchains on which transactions of cryptocurrency reside and rely by constructing fraudulent blocks or preventing certain transactions from completing in a timely manner, or at all. The malicious actor or botnet could control, exclude or modify the ordering of transactions, though it could not generate new units or transactions using such control. The malicious actor could "double-spend" its own cryptocurrency (i.e., spend the same bitcoin in more than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation of other users' transactions for so long as it maintained control. To the extent that such malicious actor or botnet does not yield its control of the processing power on the network or the cryptocurrency community does not reject the fraudulent blocks as malicious, reversing any changes made to blockchains may not be possible. The foregoing description is not the only means by which the entirety of blockchains or cryptocurrencies may be compromised, but is only an example.

Although there are no known reports of malicious activity or control of blockchains achieved through controlling over 50% of the processing power on the network, it is believed that certain mining pools may have exceeded the 50% threshold in bitcoin. The possible crossing of the 50% threshold indicates a greater risk that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of bitcoin transactions. To the extent that the bitcoin ecosystem, and the administrators of mining pools, do not act to ensure greater decentralization of bitcoin mining processing power, the feasibility of a malicious actor obtaining control of the processing power will increase, which may adversely affect an investment in us. Such lack of controls and responses to such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

Cryptocurrency inventory, including that maintained by or for us, may be exposed to cybersecurity threats and hacks.

As with any computer code generally, flaws in cryptocurrency codes may be exposed by malicious actors. Several errors and defects have been found previously, including those that disabled some functionality for users and exposed users' information. Exploitations of flaws in the source code that allow malicious actors to take or create money have previously occurred. Despite our efforts and processes to prevent breaches, our devices, as well as our servers, computer systems and those of third parties that we use in our operations, are vulnerable to cyber security risks, including cyber-attacks such as viruses and worms, phishing attacks, denial-of-service attacks, physical or electronic break-ins, employee theft or misuse, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our servers and computer systems or those of third parties that we use in our operations. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electrical power. Government regulators may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations, such as ours.

The operation of a bitcoin or other cryptocurrency mine can require massive amounts of electrical power. Further, our mining operations can only be successful and ultimately profitable if the costs, including electrical power costs, associated with mining a bitcoin are lower than the price of a bitcoin. As a result, any mine we establish can only be successful if we can obtain sufficient electrical power for that mine on a cost-effective basis, and our establishment of new mines requires us to find locations at which that is the case. There may be significant competition for suitable mine locations, and government regulators may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations in times of electricity shortage, or may otherwise potentially restrict or prohibit the provision or electricity to mining operations. For example, the board of commissioners of Chelan County Public Utility District in Washington voted to stop reviewing applications for mining facilities following a review of the impact of existing operations. Additionally, our mines could be materially adversely affected by a power outage. Given the power requirement, it would not be feasible to run miners on back-up power generators in the event of a government restriction on electricity or a power outage.

If the award of coins for solving blocks and transaction fees are not sufficiently high, we may not have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease mining operations, which will likely lead to our failure to achieve profitability.

As the number of coins awarded for solving a block in a blockchain decreases, our ability to achieve profitability worsens. Decreased use and demand for coins may adversely affect our incentive to expend processing power to solve blocks. That is, if the award of coins for solving blocks and transaction fees are not sufficiently high, we may not have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease our mining operations. For instance, the current fixed reward for solving a new block on the bitcoin blockchain is twelve‑and‑a‑half bitcoins per block, which decreased from 25 bitcoins in July 2016. It is estimated that it will halve again in about four years. This reduction may result in a reduction in the aggregate hash rate of the bitcoin network as the incentive for miners decreases. Miners ceasing operations would reduce the collective processing power on the network, which would adversely affect the confirmation process for transactions (i.e., temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to a blockchain until the next scheduled adjustment in difficulty for block solutions) and make digital currency networks more vulnerable to a malicious actor or botnet obtaining control in excess of 50 percent of the processing power active on a blockchain, potentially permitting such actor or botnet to manipulate a blockchain in a manner that adversely affects our activities. A reduction in confidence in the confirmation process or processing power of the network could result and be irreversible. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Our dependence on third-party software and personnel may leave us vulnerable to price fluctuations and rapidly changing technology.

Competitive conditions within the cryptocurrency industry require that we use sophisticated technology in the operation of our business. We currently utilize third‑party software applications in our mining operations. Further, we anticipate licensing Coinsquare software to run our planned exchange and that some of our operations may be conducted through collaboration with Coinsquare. The industry for blockchain technology is characterized by rapid technological changes, new product introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards. New technologies, techniques or products could emerge that might offer better performance than the software and other technologies we currently utilize, and we may have to manage transitions to these new technologies to remain competitive. Additionally, it is possible that our dependence on Coinsquare could be adversely affected by potential changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement resulting from the ongoing renegotiations, or that U.S. regulators to which we are subject do not permit us to use third-party software or personnel or severely limit our ability to do so. We may not be successful, generally or relative to our competitors in the cryptocurrency industry, in timely implementing new technology into our systems, or doing so in a cost-effective manner. During the course of implementing any such new technology into our operations, we may experience the system interruptions and failures discussed above. Furthermore, there can be no assurances that we will recognize, in a timely manner or at all, the benefits that we may expect as a result of our implementing new technology into our operations.

Risks Associated with our Exploratory Efforts to Launch a U.S. Cryptocurrency Exchange and Related Businesses

We may not successfully develop, market and launch any cryptocurrency exchange.

We are only in the early stages of investigating and planning the establishment of a cryptocurrency exchange. For a variety of reasons (including but not limited to the regulatory challenges and other risks discussed below), we could suffer significant delays in our efforts to establish such an exchange, and may ultimately not be successful in doing so. We will need to obtain additional management, regulatory compliance and technical expertise and devote substantial time and effort to this project. We also expect to need to raise additional funds (which may be seek by offering direct investments in this business) to pursue development of the exchange, and we may not be successful in raising that capital. It is possible that the launch of our cryptocurrency exchange may never occur, and even if it is successfully developed, it is possible that it will not be accessed or utilized by a large number of users or will otherwise not achieve market acceptance.

If regulatory changes or interpretations require the regulation of bitcoin or other digital assets under the securities laws of the United States or elsewhere, including the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Commodity Exchange Act or similar laws of other jurisdictions and interpretations by the SEC, CFTC, IRS, Department of Treasury or other agencies or authorities, we may be required to register and comply with such regulations, including at a state or local level. To the extent that we decide to continue operations, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps may result in extraordinary expenses or burdens to us.

Regulatory developments, including current and future legislation, SEC rulemaking, interpretations released by a regulatory authority, and/or judicial decisions, may impact the manner in which bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are viewed or treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may not be excluded from the definition of "security" by SEC rulemaking or interpretations which require registration of all transactions, unless another exemption is available, including transacting in bitcoin or cryptocurrencies amongst owners, and require registration of trading platforms as "exchanges" such as Coinsquare or any exchange in which we may establish ourselves. We cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies under the law. If we determine that we cannot, determine that we are not able to, or otherwise fail to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease certain of our operations or be subjected to fines, penalties and other governmental actions. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

We may be required to register as a money services business with the FinCEN and as a money transmitter in states with applicable money transmitter regulations.

To the extent that our activities cause us to be deemed a money services business under the regulations promulgated by the FinCEN under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act, we may be required to comply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate us to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records.

Furthermore, to the extent that our activities cause us to be deemed a "money transmitter" under one or more state laws (e.g., engaging in the business of exchanging virtual for fiat currency or virtual for cryptocurrency) or we are engaged in other business involving digital currency activities that are regulated in any state in which we operate, such as business conducting cryptocurrency business activity in New York and requiring a so-called "Bitlicense," we may be required to seek a license or otherwise register with a state regulator and comply with state regulations that may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, cyber security, consumer protection, financial and reporting requirements, and maintenance of certain records and other operational requirements. Without a required money transmitter license, we could not engage in money transmitter activities with persons residing in the relevant state (or from such state), or engage in other activities (e.g., custody) requiring another license such as a Bitlicense.

We intend to initially obtain state money transmitter licenses, as necessary, on a state by state basis. In addition, it is possible that other regulations may apply to our spot exchange operations. For example, the SEC may take the view that cryptocurrencies may only be traded on or subject to the rules of a national securities exchange unless exempt from such requirements. The process of obtaining the necessary licenses can take an extensive period of time, and as a result we may initially operate our cryptocurrency spot exchange in a limited number of states. There is also a risk that necessary licenses will not be granted and that therefore we will be unable to establish an exchange in particular states, or at all. If we are unable to establish a cryptocurrency exchange (at all or in certain states), or if we are delayed in doing so, such factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

To the extent that we need to register as a money services business or become licensed as a money transmitter or businesses engaged in digital currency business activity, and be subject to associated regulatory obligations, such obligations will cause us to incur additional expenses, possibly affecting an investment in us in a material and adverse manner. In addition, to the extent we are found to have operated without appropriate state or federal licenses, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and affect the value of our securities.

If we are successful in developing a spot exchange for trading cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, we will begin to store, process, and use data, some of which contains personal information. This will subject us to complex and evolving federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, content and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could result in investigations, claims, changes to our business practices, increased cost of operations and declines in user growth, retention, or engagement, any of which could seriously harm our business

If we successfully launch a spot exchange for trading cryptocurrency, we will be subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and other countries that involve matters central to our business, including anti-money laundering, user privacy, security, rights of publicity, data protection, content, intellectual property, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, taxation, and online payment services. These laws can be particularly restrictive in countries outside the United States. Both in the United States and abroad, these laws and regulations constantly evolve and remain subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate. Because we may store, process and use data, some of which contains personal information, we will likely be subject to complex and evolving federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, content and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could result in investigations, claims, changes to our business practices, increased cost of operations and declines in user growth, retention, or engagement, any of which could seriously harm our business. If we do not comply with all of our requirements, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and affect the value of our securities.

Cryptocurrency exchanges and other trading venues (including the Coinsquare exchange, in which we have an ownership interest) are relatively new and, in most cases, largely unregulated, and may therefore may be subject to fraud and failures, including security breaches that may result in a loss of all or some cryptocurrencies.

When cryptocurrency exchanges or other trading venues (whether involving the Coinsquare exchange, in which we currently have an ownership interest, or any exchange or trading venue we establish) are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, such events could result in a reduction in cryptocurrency prices or confidence, impact our success and have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue this new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

Cryptocurrency market prices depend, directly or indirectly, on the prices set on exchanges and other trading venues, which are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated as compared to established, regulated exchanges for securities, derivatives on commodities or currencies. For example, during the past three years, a number of exchanges offering bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have closed due to fraud, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of the closed exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances. While smaller exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization that may provide larger exchanges with some stability, larger exchanges may be more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and "malware" (i.e., software used or programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operations, gather sensitive information or gain access to private computer systems) and may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action. We do not expect any insurance for customer accounts to be available (such as federal deposit insurance) at any time in the future, putting customer accounts at risk of such events. In the event that we face fraud, security failures, operational issues or similar events, such factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations.

Our introducing broker subsidiary is subject to oversight by the CFTC and the NFA.

In connection with our plan to establish a cryptocurrency spot exchange, our recently acquired subsidiary is a CFTC-registered introducing broker and is subject to oversight by the CFTC and the NFA. The CFTC and NFA do not have functional oversight over cryptocurrency spot exchanges, but the CFTC has authority to bring cases based on fraud and manipulation. As a result of this, we must comply with CFTC and NFA requirements applicable to introducing brokers, including complying with anti-money laundering requirements. If we do not fully comply with all such requirements, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and affect the value of our securities.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position could be harmed.

We plan to rely upon trademarks, copyright and trade secret protection (and possibly also patents in the future), as well as non-disclosure agreements and invention assignment agreements with employees, consultants and third parties, to protect all confidential and proprietary information. Significant elements of our intended products and services are based on unpatented trade secrets and know-how that are not publicly disclosed. In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information. The security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and the recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us. If any of our confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed.

We may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may prevent or delay our product development efforts and stop us from commercializing or increase the costs of commercializing the intended products and services.

Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. For example, there could be issued patents of which we are not aware that our products infringe. There also could be patents that we believe we do not infringe, but that we may ultimately be found to infringe. Moreover, patent applications are in some cases maintained in secrecy until patents are issued. The publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature frequently occurs substantially later than the date on which the underlying discoveries were made and patent applications were filed. Because patents can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that our products infringe.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile; you might not be able to sell your shares at or above the price that you paid for them and we may not be able to stop the decline of our stock price.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile, and may be influenced by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control; you might not be able to sell your shares at or above the price that you paid for them. Our shares traded at below $4.00 per share for most of 2017. Then, in October 2017, after we announced our new strategy to become an investor and operator in the blockchain ecosystem (with a particular focus on the bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains, and a strategic investment in Coinsquare) and our related name change to Riot Blockchain, our stock price began to increase rapidly (like that of other companies that made similar announcements), closing at a high of over $38 per share in December 2017. Subsequent to that, our stock price decreased significantly. On April 12, 2018, the closing price of our common stock was $7.47 per share. We believe that this decrease was due in part to negative television reports and other recent bad publicity regarding us, including the CNBC report aired in February 2018. As of the date of this filing, we are still suffering from unfavorable reporting and if we continue to be portrayed negatively in the press, our stock price could be further adversely affected.

In addition, the trading prices of bitcoin have been highly unpredictable, and the trading prices of our common stock has been directly correlated with these fluctuations. Specifically, we have experienced adverse effects on our stock price when the value of bitcoin has fallen, and we anticipate similar outcomes as our worth tracks the general status of cryptocurrency. Furthermore, if the market for bitcoin company stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, operating results or financial condition. That is, our shares are subject to arbitrary pricing factors that are not necessarily associated with traditional factors that influence stock prices or the value of non-cryptocurrency assets such as revenue, cash flows, profitability, growth prospects or business activity levels since the value and price, as determined by the investing public, may be influenced by future anticipated adoption or appreciation in value of cryptocurrencies or blockchains generally, factors over which we have little or no influence or control. The trading price of our stock also might decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us.

In addition, our success, our share price, and the interest in investors and the public in us as an early entrant into the blockchain and cryptocurrency ecosystem may in large part be the result of our early emergence as a publicly traded company in which holders of appreciated cryptocurrency have an opportunity to invest inflated cryptocurrency profits for our shares, which could be perceived as a way to maintain investing exposure to the blockchain and cryptocurrency markets without exposing the investor to the risk in a particular cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency holders have realized exponential value due to large increases in the prices of cryptocurrencies and may seek to lock in cryptocurrency appreciation. Investing in our securities may be perceived as a way to achieve that result, but may not continue in the future. As a result, the value of our securities, and the value of cryptocurrencies generally, may be more likely to fluctuate due to changing investor confidence in future appreciation (or depreciation) in market prices, profits from related or unrelated investments, or holdings of cryptocurrency.

Other factors that could cause volatility in the market price of our common stock include, but are not limited to:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results or those of companies perceived to be similar to us;

actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;

commercial success and market acceptance of blockchain and bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies;

actions by our competitors, such as new business initiatives, acquisitions and divestitures;

strategic transactions undertaken by us;

additions or departures of key personnel;

prevailing economic conditions;

disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;

sales of our common stock by our officers, directors or significant shareholders;

other actions taken by our shareholders

future sales or issuances of equity or debt securities by us;

business disruptions caused by earthquakes, tornadoes or other natural disasters;

issuance of new or changed securities analysts' reports or recommendations regarding us;

legal proceedings involving our company, our industry or both;

changes in market valuations of companies similar to ours;

the prospects of the industry in which we operate;

speculation or reports by the press or investment community with respect to us or our industry in general;

the level of short interest in our stock; and

other risks, uncertainties and factors described in this annual report.

In addition, the stock markets in general have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of the issuer. These broad market fluctuations may negatively impact the price or liquidity of our common stock. When the price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against the issuer, and we have already been impacted in that way. See "--We, and some of our current officers, have been named as parties to various lawsuits arising out of, or related to, allegedly false and misleading statements made in prior securities filings, and those lawsuits could adversely affect us, require significant management time and attention, result in significant legal expenses or damages, and cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to suffer."

We have received a Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard from NASDAQ due to our failure to hold a shareholder meeting, and we must satisfy the requirements of a compliance plan to maintain our status as a NASDAQ-listed company; the risk of being delisted from NASDAQ puts the value of our stock in jeopardy and may negatively affect the liquidity of our stock.

We received a notification from NASDAQ indicating that since we did not hold our annual meeting of shareholders within 12 months of the end of 2016, we no longer comply with the Listing Rules for continued listing. We failed to hold the meeting because we did not have a quorum of shareholders required for a vote. In order to maintain our NASDAQ listing, we must satisfy the requirements of a plan of compliance that we submitted to, and was accepted by, NASDAQ. That plan contemplates, among other things, holding our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders no later than May 15, 2018.

There is no assurance that we will be able to garner a quorum for the reconvened meeting. If no shareholders meeting is then held, we will likely be delisted from NASDAQ. Currently, we are the only NASDAQ-listed company that offers investors the opportunity to indirectly invest in cryptocurrency mining operations, which we believe to be a significant part of our value proposition. If we are delisted from NASDAQ, our value proposition will be adversely affected, the liquidity of our stock would likely be adversely affected and the trading price of our common stock would likely decline.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by whether industry or securities analysts publish research and reports about us, our business, our market or our competitors and, if any analysts do publish such reports, what they publish in those reports. We may not obtain analyst coverage in the future. Any analysts that do cover us may make adverse recommendations regarding our stock, adversely change their recommendations from time to time and/or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors. If analysts who may cover us in the future were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, or if analysts fail to cover us or publish reports about us at all, we could lose (or never gain) visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the stock price of our common stock or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if our operating results do not meet the expectations of the investor community, one or more of the analysts who cover our company may change their recommendations regarding our company and our stock price could decline.

Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, our shareholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our shareholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. There is no assurance that shareholders will be able to sell shares when desired.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company rents certain limited office and storage space under short-term arrangements.

On February 27, 2018 the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Kairos Global Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation, ("Tenant"), entered into a lease agreement (the "Lease") with 7725 Reno #1, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company (the "Landlord"), pursuant to which the Tenant is leasing an approximately 107,600 square foot warehouse located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, including improvements thereon. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, the Initial Term of one year shall terminate on February 15, 2019, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of the Lease. Tenant shall have the right to operate from the premises on a 24 hour/seven day a week basis. Provided Tenant is not in default under the Lease, Tenant shall have four one-year renewal options, subject to increases in base rent as provided in the Lease. At least three months, but no more than six months, prior to the expiration of the initial Lease term or renewal term, as applicable, Tenant shall give Landlord written notice of its intent to exercise the applicable renewal option, which also includes incremental payment for additional electric capacity delivery. If Tenant does not elect to exercise a renewal option, all remaining renewal options, if any, shall terminate.

Base rent for the premises during the first 12 months shall be equal to $55.95/kW per month for a total of 4 Megawatts (MW) of available electrical power, or $223,800 per month. Base rent is calculated based upon the monthly electrical power made available to Tenant within the premises, and not based on Tenant's actual usage. Payment of rent commences immediately. In connection with the Lease, Riot has agreed to guaranty Tenant's failure to make payment of base rent or additional rent pursuant to the Lease. The lease contains an option whereby at the election of the Tenant after the effective date of the Lease, Landlord, at Landlord's expense, agrees to provide additional 12.5 kV transformer equipment to increase the electrical power available for Tenant's use by an additional 2MW. Tenant agrees to pay $55.12/kW for the additional 2MW of power when it is made available and continuing for the remainder of the Initial Term and any Renewal Term(s). Provided that Tenant is not in default under this Lease beyond any applicable notice and cure periods, Tenant may request Landlord to further increase the electrical power available, in increments from 6.01 MW up to 12.0 MW, by giving written notice to Landlord of the requested increase. Landlord, at Landlord's expense, agrees to provide additional 12.5kV electrical transforming equipment to increase the electrical power available for Tenant's use by the additional MW requested by Tenant. Effective as of the date the additional power is made available to Tenant, Base Rent will increase by an amount equivalent to the additional MW requested by Tenant multiplied by $55.12/kW.

On March 26, 2018, Kairos entered into a first amendment to the above lease (the "Lease Amendment"), whereby 7725 Reno agreed to increase the electrical power available for Kairos's use from 6MW to 12MW, and the base rent under the lease was increased to approximately $665,760 per month, effective as of the date when such additional power is available.

The Company believes that its leased facilities are adequate for its near-term needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On February 17, 2018, Creighton Takata filed an action asserting putative class action claims on behalf of the Riot Blockchain, Inc.'s shareholders in the United District Court for the District of New Jersey, Takata v. Riot Blockchain Inc., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-02293. The complaint asserts violations of federal securities laws under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of a putative class of shareholders that purchased Riot Blockchain, Inc. stock from November 13, 2017 through February 15, 2018. The complaint alleges that Riot Blockchain, Inc. and certain of its officers and directors (John O'Rourke and Jeffrey G. McGonegal) made, caused to be made, or failed to correct false and/or misleading statements in press releases and public filings regarding Riot Blockchain, Inc.'s business plan in connection with its cryptocurrency business. The complaint requests damages in unspecified amounts, costs and fees of bringing the action, and other unspecified relief. The company and the individual defendants deny any allegations of wrongdoing and intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.

Two additional, nearly identical complaints were subsequently filed by Richard Roys and Bruce Greenawalt in the United District States Court for the Southern District of Florida (Roys v. Riot Blockchain Inc., et al., Case No. 9:18-cv-80225) and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Greenawalt v. Riot Blockchain Inc., et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00440), respectively. Mr. Roy's complaint also names Barry Honig, an investor in Riot Blockchain, Inc., as a defendant. On March 27, 2018, the court closed the Roys case for administrative purposes. On April 2, 2018, Mr. Greenawalt filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of his action, which the court entered on the same date.

On April 5, 2018, Michael Jackson filed a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, against certain of the Company's officers and directors (John O'Rourke, Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Andrew J. Kaplan, Jason Les and Eric So), as well as against Mr. Honig. The complaint contains similar allegations to those contained in the shareholder class action complaints and seeks recovery for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, abuse of control and gross mismanagement. The complaint seeks unspecific monetary damages and corporate governance changes. The company and the individual defendants deny any allegations of wrongdoing and intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.

On April 9, 2018, the Company received a subpoena requesting document from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We intend to fully cooperate with the SEC inquiry.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "RIOT" (previously traded under the symbol "BIOP" from December 13, 2016 to October 18, 2017 and under the symbol "APPY" from August 28, 2007 to December 12, 2016). The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our shares, on a post-split basis, as reported by www.Nasdaq.com.

Quarter ended	High		Low

March 31, 2016	$	2.70	$	1.62
June 30, 2016	$	4.43	$	2.63
September 30, 2016	$	4.54	$	2.94
December 31, 2016	$	4.40	$	2.31
March 31, 2017	$	4.38	$	3.08
June 30, 2017	$	4.18	$	3.42
September 30, 2017	$	5.16	$	3.48
December 31, 2017	$	38.60	$	6.45

As of April 12, 2018, we had approximately 1,030 holders of record of our common stock.

The closing price of our common stock on April 12, 2018 was $7.47 per share.

On October 2, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved a special cash dividend pursuant to which the holders of the Company's common stock and Series A Preferred Stock, received $1.00 for each share of Common Stock held, including each share of Common Stock that would be issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, on an as converted basis. The cash dividend totaled approximately $9,562,000 with a record date of the close of business on October 13, 2017 and payment date of October 18, 2017. Other than the above special cash dividend, during the last two fiscal years we have not paid any dividend on any class of equity securities. We anticipate that for the foreseeable future all earnings will be retained for use in our business and no cash dividends will be paid to stockholders. Any payment of cash dividends in the future on the Company's common stock will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, current and anticipated cash requirements, plans for expansion, as well as other factors that the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Securities Authorized under Equity Compensation Plans Information

The Company currently has one equity compensation plan, The Riot Blockchain, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"). The Company currently provides stock-based compensation to employees, directors and consultants, under the 2017 Plan, as approved by the Company's shareholders on August 21, 2017. The Company's previous 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, was replaced by the 2017 Plan, with the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan continuing to govern the then outstanding grants and awards for 91,333 options and 157,000 shares of restricted common stock, but no additional grants to be made under that plan. The 2017 Plan was approved reserving 895,000 common shares under the Plan.

The following table provides information about the Company's common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights under the Plan as of December 31, 2017:

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		119,533	$	9.02		329,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—

Total		119,533	$	9.02		329,000

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not required for Smaller Reporting Company.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The discussion and analysis below includes certain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, as described in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that could cause our actual growth, results of operations, performance, financial position and business prospects and opportunities for this fiscal year and the periods that follow to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, those forward-looking statements. See also "Forward-Looking Statements."

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management's plans and basis of presentation:

The Company has experienced recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations. At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximate balances of cash and cash equivalents of $41,652,000, working capital of $41,350,000, total stockholders' equity of $48,869,000 and an accumulated deficit of $139,263,000. To date, the Company has in large part relied on debt and equity financing to fund its operations.

The recently completed Kairos and Tess acquisitions and the Coinsquare investment, as well as our new name, reflect a new focus being pursued by the Company (in addition to the historical legacy veterinary and life science oriented businesses of the Company). The primary focus of the company is its cryptocurrency mining operations currently located in Oklahoma City and potentially establishment of other mining operations around the world, along with the Company's decision to investigate the launch of a cryptocurrency exchange in the United States. The decision to focus on blockchain and digital currency related operations and related risks is a strategic decision by the Company. The Company's strategy is expected to be continuing to pursue new and emerging technologies that will continue to expose the Company to the numerous risks and volatility associated with this sector.

Effective January 14, 2017, the Company adopted a plan to exit the business of BiOptix Diagnostics, Inc. ("BDI"). The decision to adopt this plan was made following an evaluation by the Company's Board of Directors in January 2017 of the estimated results of operations projected during the near to mid-term period for BDI, including consideration of product development required and updated sales forecasts, and estimated additional cash resources required. Accordingly, the historical results of BDI have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented as those results are meaningless and unrelated to the Company's current operations.

The Company expects to continue to incur losses from operations for the near-term and these losses could be significant as we incur costs and expenses associated with our operations and new business development, including potential future acquisitions and the related capital and other costs that may be required for operations, as well as public company and administrative related expenses are incurred. The Company believes that its current working capital position will be sufficient to meet its estimated operating cash needs for at least a year and a day from this filing. The Company is closely monitoring its cash balances, cash needs and expense levels.

Management's strategic plans include the following:

	•	Continuing expansion of cryptocurrency mining operations;
	•	Continuing to evaluate opportunities for investments in the blockchain and digital currency sector;
	•	Exploring other possible strategic options and financing opportunities available to the Company;
	•	Investigating the launch of a digital asset exchange in the United States; and
	•	Evaluating options to monetize, partner or license the Company's assets, including the appendicitis product portfolio.

Revenues

2017 compared to 2016

Following the November 3, 2017 acquisition of Kairos, the Company began deriving revenues which totaled $173,000 for the period ended December 31, 2017, by providing transaction verification services within the digital currency networks for 2017. The previously reported revenues have been reclassified to discontinued operations.

During each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $97,000 of net previously collected license payments under the License Agreement was recognized as revenue. In July 2012, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with Ceva Santé Animale S.A. under which the Company granted the licensee an exclusive royalty-bearing license to the Company's intellectual property and other assets, including patent rights and know-how, relating to recombinant single chain reproductive hormone technology for use in non-human mammals (Company's Animal Health Assets). The net total payments received under this agreement were recorded as deferred revenue and are being recognized as revenue over future periods.See further discussion regarding the License Agreement under the heading "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

Cost of Revenues

2017 compared to 2016

Following the November 3, 2017 acquisition of Kairos, the Company began incurring costs of revenues which totaled $25,000 in 2017, for facilities, utilities, primarily electricity and other direct production costs associated with providing transaction verification services. The previously reported cost of revenues has been reclassified to discontinued operations.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

2017 compared to 2016

Selling, general and administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $7,294,000, which is an approximately $2,882,000, or 65%, increase as compared to $4,411,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016. Compensation related expenses increased by approximately $3,2238,000 in increased stock based compensation due to both increased equity awards and higher value of awards due to the increased share prices in 2017. Legal, accounting and consulting expenses increased by approximately $197,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to additional legal services on various matters, additional consultants engaged in 2017 primarily for IR / PR services and costs associated with a change in audit firms. A decrease in strategic evaluation costs of approximately $386,000 related to the completion of strategic evaluations in 2016.

Research and Development

2017 compared to 2016

Research and development expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $20,000, which is an approximately $229,000, or 92%, decrease as compared to $249,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016. Substantially all of the decrease was due to winding down development and commercialization of the legacy APPY2 and APPY1 human health operations that were suspended in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization

2017 compared to 2016

Depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $891,000, which is an approximately $262,000, or 42%, increase as compared to $629,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2017 included approximately $615,000 associated with the depreciation of servers and related equipment, being depreciated over an estimate two-year useful life, associated with providing transaction verification services associated with the acquired digital currency operations. Amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 also included approximately $535,000 in patent charges.

Other Income and Expense

2017 compared to 2016

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $4,807,000, compared to $30,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The interest expense in the 2017 period primarily related to the accrual of interest on the March 2017 convertible note offering combined with the interest recognized in the period from the accretion of values allocated to the value of the warrants and the beneficial conversion feature computed upon the release of the securities from escrow. Interest in 2016 primarily related to the mortgage loans on the building that were paid off in the first quarter of 2016 upon the building's sale. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized an inducement expense of $174,000, recorded as the estimated inducement value of warrants exercised at a reduced exercise price for a temporary period. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded investment income of approximately $99,000, compared to investment income of $122,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, with the difference resulting from average lower invested balances and lower rates on average investments with shorter maturities.

In 2016, the Company sold its corporate headquarters, land, building and certain fixtures and equipment to a third party at a purchase price of $4,053,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $1,943,000 and generated approximately $1,809,000 in net cash after expenses and mortgage payoffs.

Income Taxes

No income tax benefit was recorded on the loss for the year ended December 31, 2017, as management of the Company was unable to determine that it was more likely than not that such benefit would be realized. At December 31, 2017, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes of approximately $105 million, expiring through 2037. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's subsidiaries had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $2 million for federal and state tax purposes, which are available to offset future taxable income, if any, expiring through 2037. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's subsidiary had a capital loss carry forwards of approximately $1.1 million for federal and state tax purposes, which are available to offset future capital gains, if any, expiring through December 2020.

The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under Section 382 and 383 of the IRC has occurred. The effect of an ownership change would be the imposition of an annual limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards attributable to periods before the change. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL or research and development credit carryforwards before utilization. The tax years 2013 through 2017 remain open to examination by federal agencies and other jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Utilization of the subsidiaries' net operating losses are subject to certain limitations under Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and other limitations under state tax laws.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2017, we had working capital of $41,350,000, which included cash and cash equivalents of $41,652,000. We reported a net loss of $19,971,000, consisting of a net loss from continuing operations of $16,428,000 and a net loss from discontinued operations of $3,543,000, during the year ended December 31, 2017. The net loss from continuing operations included $13,099,000 in non-cash items consisting of an impairment charge of $5,218,000, amortization of debt discount and warrant values to interest of $4,750,000, stock-based compensation totaling $2,590,000, common stock issued for services totaling $1,178,000 and depreciation and amortization totaling $891,000, net of $1,609,000 of deferred income tax benefit and other noncash items totaling $81,000.

In March 2017 and December 2017, the Company completed two private placements, under the Company received total net proceeds after offering expenses of $38,451,000 from the sale of 2,546,113 shares of common stock, including the issuance of 2,546,113 warrants.

In March 2017, the Company also closed on a convertible note financing with certain accredited investors with gross proceeds totaling $4,750,000. The convertible note financing proceeds were held in escrow until their release in August 2017, upon waiver of release conditions by the lead investor.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company negotiated and executed agreements with holders of stock rights (stock options and restricted shares) to have such holders waive their rights to the stock rights in exchange for a one-time cash payment. Under the agreements, a total of 553,911 rights were forfeited for total consideration of $399,513. Of the total paid, $392,007 was charged to stockholders' equity and $7,506 was charged to compensation expense.

In September 2017, the Company acquired a minority interest for $3,000,000 USD in cash, in Coinsquare, which operates a digital crypto-currency exchange platform operating in Canada.

In October 2017, the Company acquired approximately 52% of Tess, which is developing blockchain solutions for telecommunications companies. Under the terms of the purchase agreement the Company invested cash of $320,000 and issued 75,000 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for 2,708,333 shares of common stock of Tess. Accordingly, Tess became a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. Tess is developing TessPay and other blockchain on-line solutions for telecommunications companies. TessPay is a payments ecosystem for component and sub-component supply chain settlements (payments). The preliminary allocation of purchase consideration includes $720,000 as in-process research and development (IPR&D) related to the TessPay project. The valuation considered assumptions consistent with similar projects, including expectation of cash flows expected to commence in late 2018 and future probable cash flows from the Tesspay project, discounted at a present value factor of approximately 60%. As with any new technology, development challenges, technological changes, competitors, create risks that may render the IPR&D not feasible or it may not be financially viable as currently designed. Any of these risks could result in an impairment or a write-off of the capital costs associated with the acquisition of Tess.

On October 2, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved a special cash dividend of approximately $1.00 per common share (including common share equivalents), which was paid on October 18, 2017, and totaled approximately $9,562,000.

In October 2017, the holders of 620,000 warrants issued in the March 2017 private offerings (420,000 from the common stock offering and 200,000 from the convertible note offering), exercised their warrants and were issued 620,000 shares of common stock generating $1,860,000 in cash proceeds.

In January 2018, through a sealed bid auction conducted by the U.S. Marshals Service, the Company acquired 500 bitcoins for approximately $5,625,000.

In February 2018 we entered into separate agreements to acquire a total of 6,800 miners acquired from Prive and BMSS (See Note 14). for total cash consideration of $19,500,000, of which $18,000,000 was paid at closing and $1,500,000 is payable on the earlier of (a) one hundred and eighty (180) days after the closing date or (b) such time when the acquired equipment becomes operational. In connection with the purchase we issued the sellers' 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, of which 200,000 common shares are being held in escrow be released to the sellers upon the Company generating net cash flow (as defined in the purchase agreement) of at least Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) from the acquired equipment.

In February 2018 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Ingenium International LLC to provide consulting services related to the Company's business for a 12-month period from the effective date. Services und the agreement include completion of installation and deployment of 8,000 ASIC cryptocurrency miners; assist in managing and monitoring the operation of the 8,000 cryptocurrency miners on an ongoing basis; promptly respond and troubleshoot any issues as they arise in the management and monitoring of the operations; continue the buildout of up to 40 Megawatts of energy capacity; and make strategic introductions to other cryptocurrency business opportunities and contacts in the sector. In connection with the agreement the Company is obligated to pay the Consultant $4,000,000 for the services.

In February Kairos entered into a lease agreement to lease an approximately 107,600 square foot warehouse located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, including improvements thereon. The initial term is for one year with four one-year renewal options, subject to increases in base rent as provided in the Lease. Initial base rent including power for the facility totals approximately $330,000 per month. In March 26, 2018, Kairos entered into a first amendment to the lease the landlord agreed to increase the electrical power available for Kairos's use from 6MW to 12MW, and the base rent under the lease was increased to approximately $650,000 per month, effective as of the date when such additional power is available.

During February 2018 certain class action suits have been filed against the Company and certain officers and directors. The costs to respond to and defend these actions could be significant and impact the Company's resources and management's time in 2018.

In March 2018, the Company acquired 92.5% of the stock of Logical Brokerage Corp. ("Logical Brokerage"), for a cash purchase price of $600,000. Logical Brokerage, is a futures introducing broker headquartered in Miami, FL and is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, and a member of the National Futures Association, or NFA.

The Company periodically enters into generally short-term consulting agreements. Such commitments at any point in time may be significant, but the agreements typically contain cancellation provisions.

Operating Activities

Net cash consumed by operating activities was $4,440,000, consisting of $3,521,000 from continuing operations and $919,000 from discontinued operations, during the year ended December 31, 2017. Cash was consumed from continuing operations by the loss of $16,428,000, less non-cash items of $13,099,000 in non-cash items consisting of an impairment charge of $5,218,000, amortization of debt discount and warrant values to interest of $4,750,000, stock-based compensation totaling $2,590,000, common stock issued for services totaling $1,178,000 and depreciation and amortization totaling $891,000, net of $1,609,000 of deferred income tax benefit and other noncash items totaling $81,000. Digital currencies increased by $200,000 due to revenue production and fluctuation in digital currency values. Increases in prepaid and other current assets of $41,000 consumed cash, primarily related to normal changes in operating activities. There was a net $49,000 decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to normal changes in operating activities and the payment of a 2016 litigation settlement accrual in early 2017.

Net cash consumed by operating activities was $5,520,000, consisting of $4,447,000 from continuing operations and $1,073,000 from discontinued operations, during the year ended December 31, 2016. Cash was consumed from continuing operations by the loss of $3,158,000, less non-cash expenses of $1,174,000 for stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, and impairment of patent costs, offset by the gain on sale of property and equipment of $1,943,000 and amortization of license fees totaling $97,000. Decreases in prepaid and other current assets of $310,000 provided cash, primarily related to routine changes in operating activities. There was a $734,000 decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the payment of 2015 accrued incentives in early 2016, and a reduction in overall expenses due to the wind-down of the APPY1 activities.

Investing Activities

Net cash inflows from investing activities provided cash of $5,579,000, consisting of $5,575,000 from continuing operations and a cash inflow of $4,000 from discontinued operations, during the year ended December 31, 2017. Sales of marketable securities investments totaling approximately $7,507,000 provided cash. Cash of $3,200,000 was used in the Coinsquare and Verady investments. A $61,000 use of cash was attributable to additional costs incurred from patent filings associated with the legacy animal health business. As part of the Kairos and Tess acquisitions $1,329,000 in cash was acquired.

Net cash inflows from investing activities provided cash of $9,348,000, consisting of $9,367,000 from continuing operations and a cash inflow of $19,000 from discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2016. Sales of marketable securities investments totaling approximately $24,489,000 provided cash, net of marketable securities purchased totaling approximately $16,876,000. A $26,000 use of cash was attributable to additional costs incurred from patent filings. The sale of the land, building and assets generated approximately $1,809,000 in cash.

Financing Activities

Net cash inflows from financing activities provided $34,983,000 from continuing operations, during the year ended December 31, 2017, consisting of net proceeds of $4,750,000 from convertible notes payable, $38,451,000 from the sale of common stock and $2,009,000 from the exercise of warrants and options, net of $273,000 in scheduled payments under debt agreements, and $392,000 consumed from the redemption of equity rights payments. Net cash outflow also included a special cash dividend payment of $9,562,331, consisting of $8,410,648 paid to common shareholders and $1,151,683 paid to holders of Series A Preferred Shares.

Net cash outflows from financing activities consumed $311,000 from continuing operations, during the year ended December 31, 2016 in scheduled payments under debt agreements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include estimates associated with revenue recognition, investments, intangible assets, stock-based compensation and business combinations.

The Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows are impacted by the accounting policies the Company has adopted. In order to get a full understanding of the Company's financial statements, one must have a clear understanding of the accounting policies employed. A summary of the Company's critical accounting policies follows:

Investments: Our investments in equity securities of companies over which we do not have significant influence are accounted for under the cost method. The investment is originally recorded at cost and adjusted for additional contributions or distributions. Management periodically reviews cost-method investments for instances where fair value is less than the carrying amount and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary, the carrying amount of the security is written down to fair value and the resulting loss is charged to operations. We currently do not have investments in which we own 20% to 50% and exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies; therefore we do not account for any investment under the equity method.

Intangible Assets: Intangible assets primarily represent legal costs and filings associated with obtaining patents on the Company's new discoveries. The Company amortizes these costs over the shorter of the legal life of the patent or its estimated economic life using the straight-line method. The Company tests intangible assets and goodwill with finite lives upon significant changes in the Company's business environment. The testing resulted in no patent impairment charges written off during the year ended December 31, 2017 and $535,000 net patent impairment charges written off during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement and that the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable. Our material revenue stream is related to the mining of digital currencies. The Company derives its revenue by providing transaction verification services within the digital currency networks of crypto-currencies, such as Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin, commonly termed "crypto- currency mining." In consideration for these services, the Company receives digital currencies which are recorded as revenue, using the average U. S. dollar spot price of the related crypto-currency on the date of receipt. The coins are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and re–measured at each reporting date. Revaluation gains or losses, as well as gains or losses on sale of Coins are recorded as a component of cost of revenues in the statement of operations. Expenses associated with running the crypto-currency mining business, such as equipment deprecation, rent and electricity cost are recorded as expenses as incurred.

There is currently no specific definitive guidance in U.S. GAAP or alternative accounting frameworks for the accounting for the production and mining of digital currencies and management has exercised significant judgement in determining appropriate accounting treatment for the recognition of revenue for mining of digital currencies. Management has examined various factors surrounding the substance of the Company's operations and the guidance in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, including the stage of completion being the completion and addition of a block to a blockchain and the reliability of the measurement of the digital currency received. In the event authoritative guidance is enacted by the FASB, the Company may be required to change its policies which could result in a change in the Company's financial statements.

Revenue recognition related to the Company's legacy animal health license agreement is based upon the licensee's right to use the technology and the Company's ongoing obligations to maintain and defend the patented rights and comply with the terms of the sub-license agreement whereby the license fees and milestone payments received from the agreement, net of the amounts due to third parties, have been recorded as deferred revenue and are amortized over the term of the license agreement.

Stock-based Compensation: ASC 718, Share-Based Payment, defines the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans and transactions used by the Company to account for its issuances of equity instruments to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value as well as to acquire goods or services from non-employees. Transactions in which the Company issues stock-based compensation to employees, directors and consultants and for goods or services received from non-employees are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. The Company utilizes pricing models in determining the fair values of options and warrants issued as stock-based compensation. These pricing models utilize the market price of the Company's common stock and the exercise price of the option or warrant, as well as time value and volatility factors underlying the positions.

Business Combinations: The Company applies the provisions of ASC 805 in the accounting for acquisitions. ASC 805 requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately apply preliminary value to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, these estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, restructuring liabilities, pre-acquisition contingencies, and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include: future expected cash flows from product sales; customer contracts and acquired technologies; expected costs to develop in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed; and discount rates. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates, or actual results.

Recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements: The Company continually assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability. When it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement affects the Company's financial reporting, the Company undertakes a review to determine the consequences of the change to its financial statements and believes that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company's financial statements properly reflect the change.

We have considered recently issued accounting pronouncements and do not believe the adoption of such pronouncements will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not required for Smaller Reporting Company.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no disagreements between the Company and its independent accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices, or financial statement disclosure.

On January 4, 2018, Riot Blockchain, Inc. (the "Registrant" or the "Company") dismissed EisnerAmper LLP ("EisnerAmper") as its independent registered public accounting firm.

The report of EisnerAmper on the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles. The report did include an explanatory paragraph relating to auditing the adjustments to the 2015 financial statements to retrospectively reflect a reverse stock split effected by the Company.

During the period of EisnerAmper's engagement as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm from February 3, 2017 through January 4, 2018 (the "Engagement Period"), there were no disagreements as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K with EisnerAmper on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of EisnerAmper, would have caused it to make reference in connection with any opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. Further, during the Engagement Period, there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

On January 5, 2018, the Company engaged MNP LLP ("MNP"), an independent registered public accounting firm which is registered with, and governed by the rules of, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as our independent registered public accounting firm. During our two most recent fiscal years through December 31, 2016, and the subsequent interim period through January 4, 2018 neither us nor anyone on our behalf consulted MNP regarding either (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction regarding us, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; or (2) any matter regarding us that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

On February 3, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors appointed EisnerAmper as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm effective February 3, 2017. The decision to appoint EisnerAmper was recommended and approved by our Audit Committee following the Committee's further process to determine our independent registered accounting firm. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the subsequent interim period through February 3, 2017, neither we, nor anyone on our behalf, consulted with EisnerAmper regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and EisnerAmper did not provide any written report or oral advice that Eisner concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any such accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; (iii) any matter that was the subject of a "disagreement" within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K or (iv) any "reportable event" within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective. A system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Exchange Act defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

	•		Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
	•		Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and
	•		Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we determined that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

MANAGEMENT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Executive officers of the Company are elected by the Board of Directors, and serve for a term of one year and until their successors have been elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of the directors and named executive officers of the Company. Further, there is no arrangement or understanding between any director and the Company pursuant to which he or she was selected as a director. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. O’Rourke and Mr. McGonegal had employment agreements in place with the Company with respect to their executive officer positions with the Company.

The following table sets forth names, ages and positions with the Company for all directors and executive officers of the Company:

Name	Age	Position

John R. O'Rourke	32	Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Chairman
Remo Mancini	66	Lead Director
Andrew J. Kaplan	50	Director
Jason Les	32	Director
Robby Chang	40	Chief Financial Officer
Christopher Ensey	37	Chief Operating Officer
Jeffrey G. McGonegal	67	Principal Accounting Officer and Secretary

John R. O'Rourke has been serving as a Director of the Company since January 2017, and has been the Chief Executive Officer since November 2017. Mr. O'Rourke is an analyst and investor who has served as Managing Member of ATG Capital LLC since 2012, an investment fund focused on small and mid-cap growth companies possessing distinct competitive advantages and superior management teams. He received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting with an Honors Citation from the University of Maryland, College Park. Mr. O'Rourke is qualified to serve as a director because of his prior management experience, knowledge of capital markets, experience in public company accounting, finance, and audit matters as well as his experience in board functions as a member of other boards.

Remo Mancini has been a director of the Company since February 2018. Mr. Mancini is a professional corporate director with significant experience at senior levels in both government and the private sector. He served in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Canada (Liberal Party member) from 1975-1993. During this time Mr. Mancini held a number of notable positions including Minister of Revenue, Parliamentary Assistant to the Premier, Official Opposition Party House Leader, and Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee. He combines his experience as a former Canadian and U.S. senior corporate executive, corporate director and former Ontario Cabinet Minister to bring a valuable perspective to business affairs, senior executive management, and corporate governance. This extensive experience in both the public and private sector positions him to lead organizations, offer insightful decisive management guidance, and board leadership. He has served on a number of Boards of both publicly listed and private companies. He has earned the internationally recognized designation of ICD.D and is a graduate of the Directors Education Program offered by the Institute of Corporate Directors and the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management. Mr. Mancini is the owner and President of Sandstone Strategies, established in 2004. Sandstone Strategies is a company wholly-owned by Remo Mancini ICD.D, our director. Sandstone Strategies is not paid any additional compensation by the Company and all compensation payable by the Company to Mr. Mancini for board fees and reimbursements have been paid directly to Sandstone which does not perform any other business services.

Andrew J. Kaplan has been serving as a Director of the Company since May 2017. Mr. Kaplan is a founder of A to B Capital Management, and manages the A to B Capital Special Situations Fund, LP which was launched on January 1, 2009. The fund invests in the small cap sector through private, pre-public and publicly traded companies. In addition, he has been a Vice President of Barry Kaplan Associates for the past 22 years, a leading financial public relations firm for both public and private companies in the US, Canada and abroad. Prior to working at BKA, he had six years' experience working at major investment banks involved in deal structure, mergers and acquisitions and trading. Mr. Kaplan is a member of the Board of Directors of U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) and Coral Gold Resources, Ltd. (CLH.V) and a former member of the Board of PolarityTE, Inc. (COOL) and Naked Brand Group (NAKD). He holds a BSBA from the University of Hartford in Finance and Insurance. Mr. Kaplan is qualified to serve as a director due to his extensive business and management expertise and his extensive knowledge of capital markets.

Jason Les has served as a Director of the Company since November 2017 and also serves on the Advisory Board. He is a certified Bitcoin developer and participates extensively in the Bitcoin development community. Mr. Les is a contributor to open source development for Bitcoin related software and has been selected by various media outlets as a commentator on Bitcoin. Mr. Les is lead technical consultant to CoinCentral.com, a popular Bitcoin and cryptocurrency news source and is a producer of technical Bitcoin education materials. Additionally, he is an active participant in cryptocurrency mining social networks and has operated a personal mining operation for the past 18 months. Mr. Les played professional poker for over ten years where he has been regarded as one of the best in the game and twice selected as the human benchmark to test artificial intelligence in “Man vs Machine” at Carnegie Mellon University. After extensively studying game theory, Mr. Les developed mathematical models that were used to construct an approximation of a Nash equilibrium strategy for poker that was the foundation of his playing prior to transitioning to the Bitcoin industry. During the course of his poker career, Mr. Les first gained interest in Bitcoin in 2013. Mr. Les graduated from U.C. Irvine in 2010 with a B.S. in Information and Computer Science. Mr. Les is qualified as a director based on the fact that he has been active in the cryptocurrency industry and brings technical expertise with regards to cryptocurrency mining, protocol development, and general evaluation of the industry.

Robby Chang has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 2018. On February 27, 2018 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Chang to the position of Chief Financial Officer and to serve as Principal Accounting Officer effective upon completion of the Company's 2017 audit and filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Mr. Chang was employed by Cantor Fitzgerald Canada from 2011-2018 as Managing Director, Senior Analyst, and Head of Metals & Mining. Previously, Mr. Chang held various positions as Institutional Equity Research Analyst and Director, Research and Trading, and Portfolio Manager for several financial companies. While at Cantor Fitzgerald Canada, he provided research coverage in precious metals, base metals, lithium, and uranium. He was recognized by Bloomberg as the "Best Precious Metals Analyst" in Q1 2016. Mr. Chang has been frequently quoted by and has been a regular guest of several media outlets including: Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, and the Wall Street Journal. Mr. Chang has 23 years of experience in the financial services industry including as Director of Research/Portfolio Manager at a Canadian investment firm that managed $3 billion in assets and serving on a five-person multi-strategy hedge fund team for Blair Franklin Capital Partners where he specialized in equity and derivative investments. Mr. Chang holds a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Toronto. While Mr. Chang has not previously served as a chief financial officer of a public company and does not maintain a certified public accounting license or have experience in public accounting which present risks to the Company and requires that we utilize outside services for review and preparation of our financial statements and reports, Mr. Chang brings technical expertise with regards to institutional portfolio investing and relations and valuation skills applicable to comparable non cryptocurrency mining operations which we believe are valuable but necessarily require we incur additional costs associated with regulatory compliance and SEC reporting.

Christopher Ensey has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2018. Mr. Ensey is a cybersecurity specialist with a broad technical background spanning security operations, product development and cloud computing. In 2012, Mr. Ensey founded Dunbar Armored's cybersecurity practice and managed security services division where Mr. Ensey has served as Chief Operating Officer since 2012. In such role, Mr. Ensey led product development, operations and sales globally. Previous roles include Director of Government Security Solutions at SafeNet and Principal Security Strategist & Associate Director at IBM. Mr. Ensey also serves as an advisor and investor to numerous cybersecurity and blockchain startups and has a BS in Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech University.

Jeffrey G. McGonegal became Chief Financial Officer of the Company in June 2003, was appointed Corporate Secretary in January 2010 and served as interim President in December 2004 and January 2005. Under the terms of a Retention Agreement, Mr. McGonegal's continued service as the Company's Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) until April 30, 2018 was contemplated. The Company and Mr. McGonegal desire to modify the Retention Agreement to provide that Mr. McGonegal shall serve solely as the Company's Principal Accounting Officer for purposes of being authorized to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and to provide all certifications required including under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. The term of the Retention Agreement shall continue through April 30, 2018. Thereafter, the Company shall engage Mr. McGonegal as a consultant for a period of the four months during which time he shall be entitled to all benefits previously provided by the Company, but shall be obligated only to provide such reasonable transition related services and duties as are requested by the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time. Mr. McGonegal served from 2003 to January 1, 2011 as Chief Financial Officer of PepperBall Technologies, Inc. Until his resignation in September 2013, Mr. McGonegal served on a limited part-time basis as Senior Vice President — Finance of Cambridge Holdings, Ltd., a small publicly held company with limited business activities. Mr. McGonegal served as Chief Financial Officer of Bactolac Pharmaceutical, Inc., a company (publicly held until September 2006) engaged in manufacturing and marketing of vitamins and nutritional supplements. From 1974 to 1997, Mr. McGonegal was an accountant with BDO Seidman LLP. While at BDO Seidman LLP, Mr. McGonegal served as Managing Partner of the Denver, Colorado office. Until his resignation in March 2012, Mr. McGonegal was elected in 2005 to serve on the board of Imagenetix, Inc., a publicly held company in the nutritional supplements industry. He received a B.A. degree in accounting from Florida State University.

Independence of Directors

Our Board is currently comprised of four members, three of whom are independent directors. Mr. O'Rourke is not an independent director.

The Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, unanimously determined that each of our three non-employee directors is "independent," as such term is defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules ("Stock Market Rules").

The definition of "independent director" included in the Stock Market Rules includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not an employee of the Company, has not engaged in various types of specified business dealings with the Company, and does not have an affiliation with an organization that has had specified business dealings with the Company. Consistent with the Company's Corporate Governance Principles, the Board's determination of independence is made in accordance with the Stock Market Rules, as the Board has not adopted supplemental independence standards. As required by the Stock Market Rules, the Board also has made a subjective determination with respect to each director that such director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company), even if the director otherwise satisfies the objective independence tests included in the definition of an "independent director" included in the Stock Market Rules.

In determining that each individual who served as a member of the Board is independent, the Board considered that, in the ordinary course of business, transactions may occur between the Company and entities with which some of our directors are affiliated. The Board unanimously determined that the relationships discussed below were not material. No unusual discounts or terms were extended.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes that the Company's shareholders are best served if the Board retains the flexibility to adapt its leadership structure to applicable facts and circumstances, which necessarily change over time. Accordingly, the Company's Corporate Governance Principles provide that the Board may combine or separate the roles of the CEO and chairman, as it deems advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The independent directors have concluded that the most effective leadership structure for the Company at the present time is for Mr. O'Rourke to serve as both our CEO and Chairman. The Board made this determination in light of Mr. O'Rourke's experience with the Company, which allows him to bring to the Board a broad and uniquely well-informed perspective on the Company's business, as well as insight into the trends and opportunities that can affect the Company's future. In adopting the structure, the Board also concluded that the strong independent membership of the Board and its standing committees ensures robust and effective communication between the directors and members of management, and that the overall leadership structure is effective in providing the Board with a well-informed and current view of the Company's business that enhances its ability to address strategic considerations, as well as focus on the opportunities and risks that are of greatest importance to the Company and its shareholders. The Board believes this structure has served the Company well.

In February 2018, Remo Mancini was amed to the newly adopted position of Lead Director.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Company's Board plays an active role in risk oversight of the Company. The Board does not have a formal risk management committee, but administers this oversight function through various standing committees of the Board, which are described below. The Audit Committee periodically reviews overall enterprise risk management, in addition to maintaining responsibility for oversight of financial reporting-related risks, including those related to the Company's accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee also reviews reports and considers any material allegations regarding potential violations of the Company's Code of Ethics. The Compensation Committee oversees risks arising from the Company's compensation policies and programs. This Committee has responsibility for evaluating and approving the executive compensation and benefit plans, policies and programs of the Company. The Nominating Committee oversees corporate governance risks and oversees and advises the Board with respect to the Company's policies and practices regarding significant issues of corporate responsibility.

The Board of Directors has a process for shareholders to communicate with directors. Shareholders should write to the President at the Company's mailing address and specifically request that a copy of the letter be distributed to a particular Board member or to all Board members. Where no such specific request is made, the letter will be distributed to Board members if material, in the judgment of the President, to matters on the Board's agenda.

Committees of the Board

Our Board has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. Each of the committees is solely comprised of and chaired by independent directors, each of whom the Board has affirmatively determined is independent pursuant to the Stock Market Rules. Each of the committees operates pursuant to its charter. The committee Charters are reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If appropriate, and in consultation with the chairs of the other committees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee proposes revisions to the charters. The responsibilities of each committee are described in more detail below. The charters for the three committees are available on the Company's website at www.riotblockchain.com by following the link to "Investor Relations" and then to "Governance."

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

	●	appointing; approving the compensation of; overseeing the work of; and assessing the independence, qualifications, and performance of the independent auditor;
	●	reviewing the internal audit function, including its independence, plans, and budget;
	●	approving, in advance, audit and any permissible non-audit services performed by our independent auditor;
	●	reviewing our internal controls with the independent auditor and management;
	●	reviewing the adequacy of our accounting and financial controls as reported by the independent auditor and management;
	●	overseeing our financial compliance system; and
	●	overseeing our major risk exposures regarding our accounting and financial reporting policies, the activities of our internal audit function, and information technology.

The Audi Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 with management of the Company and has discussed with MNP LLP the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the additional independence criteria applicable to audit committee members under SEC rules and the Stock Market Rules. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting forth the authority and responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The Board has affirmatively determined that Remo Mancini meets the qualifications of an Audit Committee financial expert. The Company's Audit Committee currently consists of the following members: Andrew Kaplan, Remo Mancini and Jason Les. Mr. Mancini serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

	●	reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of our officers and directors, including the CEO;
	●	overseeing and administering the Company's executive compensation plans, including equity-based awards;
	●	negotiating and overseeing employment agreements with officers and directors; and
	●	overseeing how the Company's compensation policies and practices may affect the Company's risk management practices and/or risk-taking incentives.

The Board has adopted a written charter setting forth the authority and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee.

When evaluating the compensation of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee evaluates factors including the executive's responsibilities, experience and the competitive marketplace. The Compensation Committee may also invite the senior executives and other members of management to participate in their deliberations, or to provide information to the Compensation Committee for its consideration with respect to such deliberations, except that the Chief Executive Officer may not be present for the deliberation of or the voting on compensation for the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer may, however, be present for the deliberation of or the voting on compensation for any other officer.

The Compensation Committee has authority to retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee did not retain any such advisor for 2017. The Company's Compensation Committee currently consists of the following members: Andrew Kaplan, Remo Mancini and Jason Les. Mr. Les serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the additional independence criteria applicable to compensation committee members under the Stock Market Rules.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, among other things, is responsible for:

	●	reviewing and assessing the development of the executive officers, and considering and making recommendations to the Board regarding promotion and succession issues;
	●	evaluating and reporting to the Board on the performance and effectiveness of the directors, committees, and the Board as a whole;
	●	working with the Board to determine the appropriate and desirable mix of characteristics, skills, expertise, and experience, including diversity considerations, for the full Board and each committee;
	●	annually presenting to the Board a list of individuals recommended to be nominated for election to the Board;
	●	reviewing, evaluating, and recommending changes to the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and committee Charters;
	●	recommending to the Board individuals to be elected to fill vacancies and newly created directorships;
	●	overseeing the Company's compliance program, including the Code of Conduct; and
	●	overseeing and evaluating how the Company's corporate governance and legal and regulatory compliance policies and practices, including leadership, structure, and succession planning, may affect the Company's major risk exposures.

The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting forth the authority and responsibilities of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee. The Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of the following members: Andrew Kaplan, Remo Mancini and Jason Les. Mr. Kaplan serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's directors, executive officers, and shareholders who own more than 10% of the Company's stock to file forms with the SEC to report their ownership of the Company's stock and any changes in ownership. The Company assists its directors and executives by identifying reportable transactions of which it is aware and preparing and filing the forms on their behalf. All persons required to file forms with the SEC must also send copies of the forms to the Company. We have reviewed all forms provided to us. Based on that review and on written information given to us by our executive officers and directors, we believe that all Section 16(a) filings during the past fiscal year were filed on a timely basis and that all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners have fully complied with such requirements during the past fiscal year.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table

This table provides disclosure, for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 for the Named Executive Officers, who are or who were the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.

Named Executive Officer and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)	Stock Awards (5) ($)		Option Awards (6)($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (7)($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)

John R. O'Rourke, Chief Executive Officer and President (1)	2017	60,000		2,322,000	609,842		-		-		2,991,842

Michael M. Beeghley, Chief Executive Officer (former) (2)	2017	9,000		270,000	60,739		-		-		339,739

Stephen T. Lundy,	2017	111,881		62,600	-		-		544,692		719,173
Chief Executive Officer and President (former) (3)	2016	382,525			183,273		191,263		61,098		818,159

Jeffrey G. McGonegal,	2017	272,005		127,800	-		140,000		169,843		709,648
Chief Financial Officer (former) (4)	2016	272,005			89,506		136,003		16,111		513,625

______________________

(1) Effective October 9, 2017, Mr. O’Rourke was named President of the Company at an annual base salary of $120,000 and as of November 3, 2017 to the additional office of Chief Executive Officer, with a revised annual base salary of $300,000. Mr. O’Rourke has also served as a director of the Company since January 6, 2017 and received additional compensation for serving in such role.

(2) Effective April 6, 2017, Mr. Beeghley was named Chief Executive Officer, with a monthly salary of $1,500. Mr. Beeghley also served as a director of the Company since November 30, 2016 and received additional compensation for serving in such role also served as a director of the Company until his resignation on November 3, 2017, as Director and Chief Executive Officer.

(3) Mr. Lundy's annual salary was $382,525 until his separation from the Company as of April 6, 2017. Mr. Lundy also served as a director of the Company; he did not receive additional compensation for serving in such role. Amounts included in "All Other Compensation" include: temporary living and travel accommodations he was provided at a total cost of $19,695 and $42,872 in 2017 and 2016, respectively, coverage under the Company's group medical plan at a total cost of $24,629 and $18,226 in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Also included in "All Other Compensation" for 2017 include: payment of severance and accrued vacation benefits totaling $391,125, and $82,000 paid to Mr. Lundy for his agreement to waive his rights to stock options and unvested restricted common share rights and $27,243 for payoff of a leased vehicle provided to Mr. Lundy under the terms of his separation agreement in 2017. Mr. Lundy resigned as Director, Chief Executive Officer and President on April 6, 2017.

(4) The amounts included in "All Other Compensation" for Mr. McGonegal represent $150,013 paid in 2017 to Mr. McGonegal for his agreement to waive his rights to stock options and unvested restricted common share rights and the amounts paid on his behalf for coverage under the Company's group medical plan at a total cost of $19,830 and $16,111 in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(5) The "Stock Awards" columns reflect Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock awards granted during fiscal years 2017 (none were granted in 2016), computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 for details as to the assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards.

(6) The "Option Awards" columns reflect the grant date fair value for all stock option awards granted under the 2002 Stock Plan or the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan during 2017 and 2016. These amounts are determined in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718 (ASC 718), without regard to any estimate of forfeiture for service vesting. Assumptions used in the calculation of the amounts in these columns for 2017 and 2016 are included in footnote 8 to the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "Annual Report").

(7) The "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column reflects the annual cash bonuses paid on a discretionary basis or earned under the Company's Incentive Plan. The bonus amounts listed were earned for the fiscal year reported, but certain amounts paid in the subsequent year. Amounts for 2017 for Mr. McGonegal reflect the payment of an $80,000 retention bonus amount in connection with the execution of a retention agreement.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table shows the outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2017:

	Option Awards										Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Number of Stock Options Held at Fiscal Year-End (#)		Number of Shares of Restricted Stock Held at Fiscal Year-End (#)

John R. O'Rourke (1)		100,000		-		-		10.00		11-2-2027		440,709		12,516,136		100,000		464,417


Jeffrey G. McGonegal (2)		-		-		-		-		-		22,858		649,167		-		25,000

__________

(1) Includes options to purchase: 100,000 at $10.00 per share granted on November 3, 2017 fully vested as of the date of grant. Also includes 35,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.13, on February 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date, with 14,583 vested and issued as of December 31, 2017. Also includes 30,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.51, on August 21, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date, with 5,000 vested and issued as of December 31, 2017. Also includes 75,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $4.499, on September 27, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date, with 9,375 vested as of December 31, 2017. Also includes 344,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $6.75, on November 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date, with 14,333 vested as of December 31, 2017.

(2) Includes 20,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $4.08, on June 30, 2017, in connection with signing a retention agreement, vesting 100% on April 30, 2018, with none vested as of December 31, 2017. Also includes 5,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $9.24, on October 11, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/7 of such shares per month, starting October 31, 2017, with 2,142 vested as of December 31, 2017.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with, and provides post-employment benefits to, its Named Executive Officers as follows:

John R. O'Rourke, Chief Executive Officer – On November 3, 2017, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. O'Rourke to serve as Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement with Mr. O'Rourke shall have an initial term of two years and provides for (i) a monthly salary of $25,000, (ii) a restricted stock award of 344,000 shares of common stock which shall vest in 24 equal monthly installments beginning one month from the date of issuance and (iii) an option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $10.00.

Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Former Chief Financial Officer – On February 2, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. McGonegal which provides that he serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors unless the agreement is terminated by either party as provided in the agreement. The agreement provides that, in the event that Mr. McGonegal's employment is terminated by the Company for other than cause, or if such employment is terminated by the executive in the event of a change in control, severance payments based upon Mr. McGonegal's salary will be made for six months. In the event of death or disability, severance payments based upon Mr. McGonegal's salary will be made for six months. Effective June 30, 2017, the Company entered into a retention agreement with Mr. McGonegal which superseded the previous employment agreement with Mr. McGonegal. The retention agreement provided for Mr. McGonegal's continued service as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer until April 30, 2018, or unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Retention Agreement at an annual base salary of $272,005. In the event Mr. McGonegal's employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or Mr. McGonegal becomes disabled, he will continue to receive his base salary until April 30, 2018. As part of the retention agreement, among other provisions, Mr. McGonegal agreed to waive his rights to 67,172 outstanding stock options in exchange for a one-time lump-sum payment of $50,000. The Company and Mr. McGonegal desire to modify the Retention Agreement to provide that Mr. McGonegal shall serve solely as the Company's Principal Accounting Officer for purposes of being authorized to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and to provide all certifications required including under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. The term of the Retention Agreement shall continue until April 30, 2018. Thereafter, the Company shall engage Mr. McGonegal as a consultant for a period of four months during which time he shall be entitled to all benefits previously provided by the Company, but shall be obligated only to provide such reasonable transition related services and duties as are requested by the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time.

Post-Employment Benefits

The following table discloses the post-employment termination benefits that would have been received by the Named Executive Officers if a termination event had occurred on December 31, 2017:

Named Executive Officer	Benefit	Termination without Cause ($)	Death or Disability ($)	Change In Control (Single Trigger) ($) (1)	Change In Control (Double Trigger) ($)

John R. O'Rourke	Severance	550,000	-	-	550,000
	Restricted Common Shares	-	-	12,516,136	12,516,136
	Options	-	-	-	-
	Total	550,000	-	12,516,136	13,066,136

Jeffrey G. McGonegal	Severance	90,668	90,668	-	90,668
	Restricted Common Shares	-	-	649,167	649,167
	Options	-	-	-	-
	Total	90,668	90,668	649,167	739,835

__________

(1) Under the Change in Control Policy upon consummation of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan) any unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options held by a Named Executive Officer accelerate and vest upon the consummation of a Change in Control. This column shows the value of unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options that would have been received upon acceleration of unvested equity rights as of December 31, 2017. The closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 2017 was $28.40 per share.

Director Compensation

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the year ended December 31, 2017 to each of our directors, current and former, for services as our director:

Name	Cash Fees ($)		Stock Awards ($) (8)		Option Awards ($)		Total ($)

John R. O'Rourke (1)		12,000		552,343		-		564,343
Andrew J. Kaplan (2)		8,000		80,220		-		88,220
Jason Les (3)		6,000		50,625		-		56,625
Michael M. Beeghley (former) (4)		20,000		584,495		-		604,495
Mike Dai (former) (5)		10,000		234,050		-		244,050
Eric So (former) (6)		2,000		63,675		-		65,675
Michael W. Routh (former) (7)		1,000		62,600		-		63,600

(1) Stock awards include 35,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.13, on February 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 30,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.51, on August 21, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 75,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $4.49, on September 27, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date.

(2) Stock awards include 12,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.76, on May 5, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 10,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.51, on August 21, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date.

(3) Stock awards include 7,500 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $6.75, on November 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date.

(4) Stock awards include 70,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.13, on February 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 40,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.51, on August 21, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 50,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $4.49, on September 27, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Mr. Dai resigned from the Board of Directors as of November 1, 2017.

(5) Stock awards include 20,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.13, on February 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 20,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.51, on August 21, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Also includes 15,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $6.75, on November 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date.

(6) Stock awards include 7,500 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $8.49, on October 20, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. Mr. So resigned from the Board of Directors as of February 16, 2018.

(7) Stock awards include 20,000 restricted common shares awarded at a value of $3.13, on February 3, 2017, vesting monthly at a rate of 1/24 of such shares per month, starting one month after the grant date. On February 7, 2017, Mr. Routh resigned from the Board of Directors and forfeited his 20,000 restricted shares.

(8) The "Stock Awards" columns reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock awards granted during fiscal years 2017 (none were granted in 2016), computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 for details as to the assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information, as of April 24, 2018, based upon 13,417,132 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding common stock by (i) any person know to us to beneficially own more than five (5%) percent; (ii) each of the Company's named executive officers and directors; and (iii) the Company's directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person or a group and the percentage ownership of that person or group, shares of our common stock that the owner has the right to acquire within 60 days after April 24, 2018 are deemed outstanding, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the shareholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned and addresses are c/o Riot Blockchain, Inc., 202 6th Street, Suite 401, Castle Rock, CO 80104.

Name and Address	Number of Shares		Percent
Directors:
John R. O'Rourke (1)		257,221		1.9	%
Jason Les (2)		20,937		*
Andrew J. Kaplan (3)		14,417		*
Remo Mancini (4)		26,250		*
Other Executive Officers:
Robby Chang (5)		7,500		*
Christopher Ensey (6)		25,000		*
Jeffrey G. McGonegal (7)		26,072		*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (7 persons) (8)		377,397		2.7	%

____________________

* Holds less than 1%

(1)	Includes (i) 8,752 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 35,000 shares pursuant to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 Plan") which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of February 3, 2017, (ii) 7,501 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 30,000 shares pursuant to the 2002 Plan which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of August 21, 2017, (iii) 28,127 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 75,000 shares pursuant to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan") which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of September 27, 2017, (iv) 100,341 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 344,000 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of November 3, 2017 and (v) options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share pursuant to the 2017 Plan. Also includes an aggregate of 12,500 shares held by ATG Capital LLC, for which Mr. O'Rourke is the managing member and sole beneficiary and in such capacity holds voting and dispositive power over the securities held by that entity.
(2)	Includes (i) 15,000 shares of common stock, (ii) 2,187 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 7,500 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of November 3, 2017 and (iii) 3,750 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 7,500 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 6 equal monthly installments, beginning on the one month anniversary of March 21, 2018.
(3)	Includes (i) 2,416 shares of common stock, (ii) 4,500 shares vested or to be vested of common stock pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 12,000 shares pursuant to the 2002 Plan which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of May 5, 2017, (iii) 3,751 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 10,000 shares pursuant to the 2002 Plan which vest in 24 equal monthly installments over a two year period, beginning on the one month anniversary of August 21, 2017 and (iv) 3,750 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 7,500 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 6 equal monthly installments, beginning on the one month anniversary of March 21, 2018.
(4)	Represents vested portion of restricted stock grant of 45,000 shares issued February 23, 2018 under the 2017 Plan and 3,750 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 7,500 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 6 equal monthly installments, beginning on the one-month anniversary of March 21, 2018.
(5)	Represents portion of restricted stock grant of 60,000 shares that has vested or will vest within 60 days of March 22, 2018, issued under the 2017 Plan.
(6)	Includes 8,334 shares representing portion of restricted stock grant of 50,000 shares that has vested or will vest within 60 days of April 24, 2018, and 16,666 shares underlying options representing portion of option grant of 50,000 options that has vested or will vest within 60 days of April 24, 2018.
(7)	Includes (i) 1,009 shares of common stock, (ii) 63 shares of common stock held in Mr. McGonegal's IRA (iii) 20,000 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 20,000 shares pursuant to the 2002 Plan which vests as of April 30, 2018 and (iv) 5,000 shares of common stock vested or to be vested pursuant to a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 5,000 shares pursuant to the 2017 Plan which vest in 7 equal monthly installments, beginning on October 31, 2017.
(8)	Includes footnotes (1) through (7).

Securities Authorized Under Equity Compensation Plans Information

The Company currently has one equity compensation plan, the Riot Blockchain, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"). The Company currently provides stock-based compensation to employees, directors and consultants, under the 2017 Plan, as approved by the Company's shareholders on August 21, 2017. The Company's previous 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, was replaced by the 2017 Plan, with the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan continuing to govern the then outstanding grants and awards for 91,333 options and 157,000 shares of restricted common stock, but no additional grants to be made under that plan. The 2017 Plan was approved reserving 895,000 common shares under the 2017 Plan.

The following table provides information about the Company's common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights under the Plan as of December 31, 2017:

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		119,533	$	9.02		329,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—

Total		119,533	$	9.02		329,000

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The Audit Committee has responsibility for reviewing and, if appropriate, for approving any related party transactions that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to applicable SEC rules. This includes current or proposed transactions in which the Company was or is to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds the lower of either $120,000 or 1% of the average of the Company's total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the Company's executive officers, directors, or greater than five percent shareholders, or any members of their immediate families, has a direct or indirect material interest. Apart from any transactions disclosed herein, no such transaction was entered into with any director or executive officer during the last fiscal year. Such transactions will be entered into only if found to be in the best interest of the Company and approved in accordance with the Company's Code of Ethics, which are available on the Company's web site.

As previously reported by us, per Schedules 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain persons reported that they had beneficially owned greater than 10% of the dispositive and voting power of the Company's common stock.

Mr. Barry Honig reported beneficial ownership of approximately 11.2% of the Company's common stock as of January 5, 2017 (based upon 4,503,971 shares outstanding at that time). Pursuant to Schedule 13D/A filed by Mr. Honig on February 12, 2018 Mr. Honig reported that he ceased to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the common stock of the Company on November 28, 2017. Mr. Honig invested $1,750,000 in the March 2017 Convertible Note Private Placement (see Note 7 of the 10-K) and $500,000 in the December 2017 Common Shares Private Placement (see Note 7 of the 10K). GRQ Consultants, Inc., a related party of Mr. Honig, received a cash payment of $50,000 for diligence services in connection with the Company's investment in Coinsquare (see Note 4 of the 10-K).

Ms. Catherine Joanna DeFrancesco reported beneficial ownership of approximately 11.45% of the Company's common stock as of January 10, 2017 (based upon 4,503,971 shares outstanding at that time). Per Schedule 13D/A filed by Ms. DeFrancesco with the SEC, Ms. DeFrancesco reported that she beneficially owned greater than 5% of the dispositive and voting power of the Company's common stock on January 10, 2017. Ms. DeFrancesco reported beneficial ownership of approximately 11.45% of the Company's common stock as of January 10, 2017. Ms. DeFrancesco invested $360,000 in the Company’s December 2017 Common Shares Private Placement (see Note 7 of the 10K).

As previously disclosed, on November 1, 2017, the Company entered into a business combination share exchange agreement (the “Agreement”) with Kairos Global Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Kairos”) and on November 3, 2017, closed on the agreement. Under the Agreement, the shareholders of Kairos agreed to exchange all outstanding shares of Kairos’ common stock to the Company and the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 1,750,001 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) which are convertible into an aggregate of 1,750,001 shares of the Company’s common stock(the “Kairos Transaction”) to such shareholders. The shareholders of Kairos also will also be entitled to a royalty (the “Royalty”) to be paid from cash flow generated from operations, which shall entitle such shareholders to receive 40% of the gross profits generated on a monthly basis until they have received a total of $1,000,000, at which point the royalty is extinguished.

Mr. Honig was a shareholder of Kairos at the time of its acquisition by the Company on November 3, 2017 (see Note 2 of the 10-K). Based upon information provided by Kairos at the closing of the Kairos Transaction, Mr. Honig owned approximately 8.6% of Kairos. Accordingly, Mr. Honig would receive his proportionate allocation of the purchase price shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Royalty described above. As of November 3, 2017 the closing price per share of common stock of the Company as reported on NASDAQ was $6.75 per share. Accordingly, the pro rata consideration received by Mr. Honig in the transaction would have been equal to the value of approximately 150,500 shares of common stock upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock.

Ms. DeFrancesco was a shareholder of Kairos at the time of its acquisition by the Company on November 3, 2017 (see Note 2 of the 10-K). Based upon information provided by Kairos at the closing of the Kairos Transaction Ms. DeFrancesco owned approximately 6.3% of Kairos. Accordingly, Ms. DeFrancesco would receive her proportionate allocation of the purchase price shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Royalty described above. As of November 3, 2017 the closing price per share of common stock of the Company as reported on NASDAQ was $6.75 per share. The pro rata consideration received by Ms. DeFrancesco in the transaction would have been equal to the value of approximately 110,250 shares of common stock upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock.

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock is subject to various restrictions and limitations including as set forth in the Certificate of Designation as well as restrictions and limitations on conversion pursuant to NASDAQ rules prior to shareholder approval of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Information about the independence of our non-employee directors and the composition of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee is set forth in Item 10, "Directors, Named Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance" herein.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Audit Fees: Fees billed for professional services rendered by MNP for the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 were billed in 2018. Fees billed for professional services rendered by EisnerAmper for the audit of the Company's financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the reviews of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-Qs during such fiscal year and the first three quarters of 2017. Audit fees for professional services rendered by MNP, Eisner and GHP Horwath, P.C. (the Company’s prior auditors) for 2017 totaled zero, $237,000 and $31,000, respectively.

Aggregate fees were billed or expected to be billed for services rendered by Eisner and GHP for the years 2017 and 2016 in the following categories and amounts:

	2017		2016

Audit Fees	$	268,000	$	87,000
Audit Related Fees		—		—
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—
Total Fees	$	268,000	$	87,000

Audit fees in 2017 and 2016 relate to the financial statement audits, the quarterly reviews and also include assistance with the filing of Forms 8-K and proxies.

Our principal accountant (through its full-time employees) performed all work regarding the audit of our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year.

The Company's Audit Committee currently has a policy in place that requires its review and pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by its independent auditors. These services requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee may include audit services, audit related services, tax services and other services. All of the services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm were approved by the Company's Audit Committee and prior to performance. The Audit Committee has determined that the payments made to its independent accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors' independence.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) Exhibits

No.

Exhibit

3.1	Articles of Incorporation filed September 20, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2017).

3.2	Amendment to Bylaws effective March 9, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 12, 2018).

3.3	Bylaws effective September 20, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2017).

3.4	Articles of Merger between Bioptix, Inc., and Riot Blockchain, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2017).

4.1	Certificate of Designation of Rights, Powers, Preferences, Privileges and Restrictions of the 2% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Bioptix, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Current Report on From 8-K filed September 25, 2017).

4.2	Amendment to Certificate of Designation of 0% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on From 8-K filed December 21, 2017)

4.3	Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 0% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on From 8-K filed November 3, 2017).

10.1

2017 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Appendix E to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule DEF14A filed July 10, 2017, as amended incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule DEF14A filed March 26, 2018 and Schedule DEFA14A filed April 2, 2018).

10.2	Bioptix, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2016).

10.3	First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated March 26, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 2018).

10.4	Lease Agreement dated as of February 27, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 28, 2018).

10.5	Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2018 by and between Company and Christopher Ensey (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 31, 2018).

10.6	Employment Agreement by and between the Company and John O'Rourke dated as of November 3, 2017. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.7	Executive Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 2018 by and between Company and Robby Chang (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 28, 2018).

10.8	Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 20, 2018 by and between Riot Blockchain Canada Inc. and Jeffrey Vormittag (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 18, 2018).

10.9	Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 7, 2018 by and between Digital Green Energy Corp. and Daniel Stefan Robertson (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 2018).

10.10

Amendment No. 1 to Retention Agreement by and between the Company and Jeff McGonegal dated as of March 27, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 2018).

10.11

Retention Agreement by and Between the Company and Jeff McGonegal dated as of June 30, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 3, 2017)

10.12

Separation Agreement by and between the Company and Michael Beeghley dated as of November 3, 2017. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.13

Separation Agreement by and between the Company and Richard Whitcomb dated as of June 15, 2017- (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2017).

10.14

Separation Agreement by and between the Company and Steve Lundy dated as of April 6, 2017- (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 7, 2017).

10.15

Logical Brokerage Corp. Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 26, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 2018).

10.16

Stockholders Agreement dated March 26, 2018, among Logical Brokerage Corp., Riot Blockchain, Inc. and Mark Bradley Fisher (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 27, 2018).

10.17

Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Company and Prive Technologies LLC dated as of February 15, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2018).

10.18

Form of Escrow Deposit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2018).

10.19

Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Blockchain Mining Supply & Services Ltd and the Company dated February 15, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2018).

10.20

Escrow Agreement by and between Blockchain Mining Supply & Services Ltd. and the Company dated February 15, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2018).

10.21

Ingenium International Consulting Agreement dated as of February 21, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2018).

10.22

Share Exchange Agreement by and among the Company., Kairos Global Technology, Inc., and the shareholders of Kairos Global Technology, Inc. dated as of November 1, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.23

Form of Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Tess Inc. dated as of October 20, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.24

Registration Rights Agreement by and between the Company and Tess Inc. dated as of October 20, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.25

Form of Subscription Agreement by and between the Company and goNumerical Ltd. (Coinsquare) dated as of September 29, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 filed November 13, 2017).

10.26

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (Units) dated as of December 18, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2017).

10.27

Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 18, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2017).

10.28

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of December 18, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2017).

10.29

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated, as of March 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2017).

10.30

Form of Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement (Units) dated as of December 21, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 21, 2017).

10.31

Form of Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 21, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 21, 2017).

10.32

Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2017).

10.33

Form of Escrow Deposit Agreement dated as of March 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2017).

10.34

Form of Escrow Deposit Agreement (Securities) dated as of March 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2017).

10.35

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 15, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, effective March 15, 2017 and filed March 17, 2017).

10.36

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of March 10, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 16, 2017).

10.37

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement dated as of May 30, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 30, 2013).

10.38

Agreement by and between Barry Honig, Catherine DeFrancesco and certain related parties with respect to the Company dated January 18, 2017.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 20, 2017).

10.39

Exclusive License Agreement between Registrant and The Washington University, dated May 1, 2004 as amended (Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed August 5, 2010).

10.40†

Amended and Restated Unanimous Shareholder Agreement dated October 2, 2017, among the Company, goNumerical Ltd., and the other parties named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on From 8-K filed May 25, 2018.

14	Code of Ethics Adopted October 23, 2017. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 25, 2017).

23.1	Consent of MNP LLP (Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on April 17, 2018)

23.2	Consent of EisnerAmper LLP (Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on April 17, 2018)

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) - Certification of Chief Executive Officer *

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) - Certification of Principal Financial Officer. *

32	Section 1350 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

____________________

* Filed herewith.

^† Confidential treatment has been requested for certain confidential portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Exchange Act. In accordance with Rule 24b-2, these confidential portions have been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately with the Commission

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf on June 29, 2018, by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

	/s/ John O'Rourke
	John O'Rourke, Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ Robby Chang
	Robby Chang, Chief Financial Officer

	/s/ Jeffrey G McGonegal
	Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Principal Accounting Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of John O'Rourke and Robby Chang as true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for them and in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, and generally to do all such things in their names and behalf in their capacities as officers and directors to enable the Company to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all requirements of the SEC, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or their or his or her substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant on June 29, 2018 in the capacities indicated.


	/s/ John O'Rourke
	John O'Rourke, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)

	/s/ Robby Chang
	Robby Chang, Chief Financial Officer

	/s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
	Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Principal Financial Officer

	/s/ Remo Mancini
	Remo Mancini, Director

	/s/ Andrew Kaplan
	Andrew Kaplan, Director

	/s/ Jason Les
	Jason Les, Director