10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2006

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-31240

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	84-1611629
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1700 Lincoln Street Denver, Colorado	80203
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (303) 863-7414

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act.

(Check one): Large accelerated filer  x                 Accelerated filer  ¨                 Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act). ¨  Yes    x  No

There were 418,621,260 shares of common stock outstanding on April 21, 2006 (and 30,278,953 exchangeable shares).

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
	(unaudited, in millions except per share)
Revenues
Sales - gold, net	$	1,011		$	836
Sales - copper, net		137			109
		1,148			945
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
Gold		501			468
Copper		65			71
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		142			161
Exploration		33			26
Advanced projects, research and development		21			17
General and administrative		37			31
Other expense, net		14			24
		813			798
Other income (expense)
Other income, net (Note 3)		35			67
Interest expense, net		(20	)		(21	)
		15			46
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense, minority interest and equity income of affiliates		350			193
Income tax expense		(38	)		(53	)
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries		(99	)		(59	)
Equity income of affiliates		—			4
Income from continuing operations		213			85
Loss from discontinued operations (Note 4)		(4	)		(1	)
Net income	$	209		$	84
Income per common share (Note 5)
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.48		$	0.19
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.01	)		—
Net income	$	0.47		$	0.19
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.47		$	0.19
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.01	)		—
Net income	$	0.46		$	0.19
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding		448			446
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding		451			448
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.10		$	0.10

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	At March 31,    2006		At December 31, 2005
	(unaudited, in millions)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	979	$	1,082
Marketable securities and other short-term investments (Note 10)		535		817
Trade receivables		147		94
Accounts receivable		127		136
Inventories (Note 11)		349		320
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 12)		277		255
Deferred stripping costs (Note 2)		––		78
Deferred income tax assets		180		159
Other current assets		115		95
Current assets		2,709		3,036
Property, plant and mine development, net		6,011		5,645
Investments (Note 10)		1,182		955
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 12)		687		603
Deferred stripping costs (Note 2)		––		100
Deferred income tax assets		660		517
Other long-term assets		198		183
Goodwill		2,902		2,879
Assets of operations held for sale (Note 4)		76		74
Total assets	$	14,425	$	13,992
LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 13)	$	202	$	196
Accounts payable		232		232
Employee-related benefits		163		176
Derivative instruments		410		270
Other current liabilities (Note 14)		495		476
Current liabilities		1,502		1,350
Long-term debt (Note 13)		1,705		1,733
Reclamation and remediation liabilities (Note 15)		454		445
Deferred income tax liabilities		509		449
Employee-related benefits		282		273
Other long-term liabilities (Note 14)		303		414
Liabilities of operations held for sale (Note 4)		22		21
Total liabilities		4,777		4,685
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Minority interest in subsidiaries		977		931
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock		669		666
Additional paid-in capital		6,631		6,578
Accumulated other comprehensive income		533		378
Retained earnings		838		754
Total stockholders’ equity		8,671		8,376
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	14,425	$	13,992

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Three Months Ended           March 31,
	2006			2005
	(unaudited, in millions)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	209		$	84
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		142			161
Loss from discontinued operations		4			1
Accretion of accumulated reclamation obligations		7			7
Amortization of deferred stripping costs, net		—			(34	)
Deferred income taxes		(72	)		(7	)
Minority interest expense		99			59
Gain on asset sales, net		(2	)		(38	)
Hedge (gain) loss, net		(9	)		12
Other operating adjustments and write-downs		26			6
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Trade and accounts receivable		(44	)		(30	)
Inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads		(124	)		(13	)
Other assets		(9	)		4
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		25			(19	)
Reclamation liabilities		(12	)		(6	)
Net cash provided from continuing operations		240			187
Net cash (used in) provided from discontinued operations		(5	)		1
Net cash from operations		235			188
Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		(370	)		(229	)
Additions to property, plant and mine development of discontinued operations		—			(13	)
Investments in marketable debt and equity securities		(672	)		(775	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable debt and equity securities		970			546
Acquisition of minority interests (Note 7)		(187	)		—
Proceeds from sale of assets		2			52
Net cash used in investing activities		(257	)		(419	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt, net		—			582
Repayment of debt		(20	)		(15	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(45	)		(45	)
Dividends paid to minority interests		(45	)		(16	)
Proceeds from stock issuance		38			4
Change in restricted cash and other		(8	)		(1	)
Net cash (used in) provided from financing activities		(80	)		509
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(1	)		(2	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(103	)		276
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,082			781
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	979		$	1,057

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”) are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year. These interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with Newmont’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 2, 2006.

References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “CDN$” to Canadian currency, “IDR” to Indonesian currency and “$” to United States currency.

Certain amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005 have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. The Company has reclassified the income statement and cash flow statement amounts for the Golden Grove and Holloway operations from the historical presentation to discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Cash Flows for all periods presented.

(2) RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Deferred Stripping Costs

On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 04-06, “Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry.” EITF Issue No. 04-06 addresses the accounting for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine and refers to these costs as variable production costs that should be included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. As a result, capitalization of post-production stripping costs is appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. The guidance requires application through recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption, with no charge to current earnings for prior periods. The results for prior periods have not been restated. The cumulative effect adjustment reduced opening retained earnings by $81 (net of tax and minority interests) and eliminated the $71 net deferred stripping asset from the balance sheet. Adoption of EITF Issue No. 04-06 will have no impact on the Company’s cash position or net cash from operations.

Prior to 2006 at some of the Company’s mining operations, deferred stripping costs were charged to Costs applicable to sales as gold or copper was produced and sold using the units of production method based on estimated recoverable quantities of proven and probable gold or copper reserves, using a stripping ratio calculated as the ratio of total tons to be moved to total proven and probable ore reserves, which resulted in the recognition of the costs of waste removal activities over the life of the mine as gold or copper was produced. The application of the deferred stripping accounting method generally resulted in an asset (deferred stripping costs), although a liability (advanced stripping costs) arose when the actual stripping ratio incurred to date was less than the expected stripping ratio over the life of the mine. The Advanced stripping costs primarily pertained to the Batu Hijau operation.

Movements in the net deferred stripping cost balance were as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Opening balance	$	71		$	20
Cumulative effect adjustment		(71	)		—
Disposition of Ovacik		—			(4	)
Additions		—			62
Amortization		—			(28	)
Closing balance	$	—		$	50

5

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The deferred and advanced stripping cost balances are presented in the balance sheet in other assets or other liabilities as follows:

	At March 31,    2006		At December 31, 2005
Other Assets:
Current	$	—	$	78
Long-term		—		100
		—		178
Other Liabilities:
Current	$	—	$	14
Long-term		—		93
		—		107
Deferred stripping, net	$	—	$	71

Stock Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with APB 25, no compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. The results for prior periods have not been restated.

As a result of adopting FAS 123R, the Company’s Income from continuing operations and Net income for the first quarter of 2006 is $4 lower ($0.01 per share, basic and diluted) than if we had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB 25 as we did in the comparable prior year period. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, cash retained as a result of tax deductions relating to stock-based compensation was included in operating cash flows, along with other tax cash flows, in accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-15, Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Income Tax Benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a Nonqualified Employee Stock Option. FAS 123R supersedes EITF 00-15, amends FAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows, and requires tax benefits relating to the deductibility of increases in the value of equity instruments issued under share-based compensation arrangements that are not included in Costs applicable to sales (“excess tax benefits”) to be prospectively presented in the Statement of Cash Flows as financing cash inflows. The excess tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercise totaled $5 for the first quarter of 2006.

The Company currently maintains the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (“Stock Plan”), approved by stockholders on April 27, 2005, for executives and eligible employees. Under this Stock Plan, options to purchase shares of stock can be granted with exercise prices not less than fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Fair market value of a share of common stock as of the grant date is the average of the high and low sales prices for a share of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company also maintains prior stock plans, but no longer grants awards under these plans. Options granted under the Company’s stock plans vest over periods ranging from two to four years and are exercisable over a period of time not to exceed 10 years from grant date. At March 31, 2006, 18,808,833 shares were available for future grants under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

The value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected term of the option award and stock price volatility. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those options expected to vest. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded and

6

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

pro forma stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from that reported. No stock option awards were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.

The following table summarizes activity for all stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2006:

	Options Outstanding
	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year	9,433,669		$	35.90
Exercised	(994,994	)	$	57.49
Forfeited and expired	(119,300	)	$	37.56
Outstanding at March 31, 2006	8,319,375		$	35.79
Options exercisable at March 31, 2006	4,933,425		$	35.62

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2006, with exercise prices equal to the fair market value on the date of grant with no restrictions on exercisability after vesting:

	Options Outstanding		Weighted- average Exercise Price		Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted- average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)			Number Exercisable	Weighted- average Exercise Price
$0 to $20	1,479,056	3.2	$	18.63	1,479,056	$	18.63
$20 to $30	1,940,221	5.7		25.97	1,633,931		25.75
$30 to $40	1,155,311	7.9		37.53	179,158		34.72
$40 to $50	3,354,332	8.5		45.33	1,250,825		46.68
$50+	390,455	0.5		76.82	390,455		76.82
Total/average	8,319,375	2.7	$	35.79	4,933,425	$	35.62

As of March 31, 2006, there was $25 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.7 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the first quarter of 2006 and 2005 was $21 and $3, respectively. No stock options vested during the first quarter of 2006.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123R to options granted under our stock option plans in the first quarter of 2005:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Net income, as reported	$	84
Less: Compensation expense determined under the fair value method, net of tax		(5	)
Pro forma net income	$	79
Net income per common share, basic and diluted:
As reported	$	0.19
Pro forma net income	$	0.18

Other Stock-Based Compensation

The Company grants restricted stock to certain employees. Shares of restricted stock are granted upon achievement of certain financial and operating thresholds at fair market value on the grant date. Prior to vesting, these shares of restricted stock are subject to certain restrictions related to ownership and transferability. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends declared on the shares. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, 102,491 and 155,061 shares of restricted stock, respectively, were granted and issued, of which 102,491 and 97,390 shares remained unvested at March 31, 2006 for the 2006 and 2005 grants, respectively. The weighted-average fair market value of the stock grants issued were $58 and $45 in 2006 and 2005,

7

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

respectively. Compensation expense recorded for restricted stock was $nil and $2 for the three months March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The shares of restricted stock vest in equal increments annually over three years.

Restricted stock units also are granted, upon achievement of certain financial and operating thresholds, to employees in certain foreign jurisdictions. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company granted 19,181 restricted stock units at the weighted-average fair market value of $58 per underlying share of the Company’s common stock. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company granted 27,386 restricted stock units at the weighted-average fair market value of $45 per underlying share of the Company’s common stock. Compensation expense recorded for the foreign jurisdiction restricted stock units was $nil for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. These restricted stock units vest in equal increments annually over three years. Upon vesting, the employee is entitled to receive for each restricted stock unit one share of the Company’s common stock.

The Company grants deferred stock awards to certain other employees. The deferred stock awards vest over periods between two and three years. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 there were no deferred stock awards granted by the Company. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 293,004 and 303,002 deferred stock awards, respectively, remained unvested. Compensation expense recorded for deferred stock awards was $2 and $1 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Upon vesting, the employee is entitled to receive the number of shares of the Company’s common stock specified in the deferred stock award.

(3) OTHER INCOME, NET

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Royalty and dividend income	$	29		$	18
Interest income		19			11
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)		3			(4	)
Gain on sale of other assets, net		2			32
Gain on investments, net		1			6
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments		(24	)		2
Other		5			2
	$	35		$	67

(4) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

During June 2005, Newmont announced the pending sale of its Golden Grove copper-zinc operation in Western Australia to Oxiana Limited (“Oxiana”) for proceeds including cash of A$190 and 82 million Oxiana shares. The sale was completed on July 26, 2005.

During the fourth quarter of 2005, Newmont committed to plans to divest its Holloway operation in Canada and an advanced exploration project in Indonesia. Based upon Newmont’s commitment and the initial interest shown by potential purchasers, Newmont expects the sales to be completed in 2006.

Newmont has accounted for the imminent dispositions in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. The Company has reclassified the balance sheet amounts and the income statement results from the historical presentation to Assets and Liabilities of operations held for sale on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and to Loss from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been reclassified for assets held for sale and discontinued operations for all periods presented.

8

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following table details selected financial information included in the Loss from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Sales - gold, net	$	7		$	8
Sales - base metals, net		—			8
	$	7		$	16
Loss from operations (pre-tax)	$	(7	)	$	(3	)
Income tax benefit		3			2
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(4	)	$	(1	)

The major classes of Assets and Liabilities of operations held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:

	At March 31, 2006		At December 31, 2005
Assets:
Accounts receivable	$	1	$	1
Inventories		4		5
Property, plant and mine development		65		65
Other assets		6		3
Total assets of operations held for sale	$	76	$	74
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2	$	2
Reclamation and remediation		3		3
Other liabilities		17		16
Total liabilities of operations held for sale	$	22	$	21

(5) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income per common share was as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006	2005
Basic	448	446
Effect of employee stock-based awards	3	2
Diluted	451	448

Options to purchase 1.2 million and 2.7 million shares of common stock at average exercise prices of $50.15 and $50.71 were outstanding as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average number of common shares because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

9

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

(6) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Net income	$	209		$	84
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities		191			45
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1	)		4
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments		(35	)		(19	)
		155			30
Comprehensive income	$	364		$	114

(7) ACQUISITIONS

In January 2006, Newmont acquired Kenbert Mining’s 15% interest in the Akyem project, bringing its interest in the project to 100%.

On February 27, 2006, Newmont announced that it was proceeding with the development of the Boddington Project in Western Australia with AngloGold Ashanti Limited. Construction of the Boddington Project is expected to cost Newmont approximately $900 to $1,000, with initial production expected in late 2008 or early 2009.

On March 20, 2006, Newmont acquired Newcrest Mining Limited’s 22.22% interest in the Boddington Project in Western Australia, bringing its interest in the project to 2/3, for consideration of $164 plus applicable stamp duty and similar costs.

(8) EMPLOYEE PENSION AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Pension benefit costs, net:
Service cost	$	4		$	3
Interest cost		5			5
Expected return on plan assets		(4	)		(4	)
Amortization of loss		2			2
	$	7		$	6
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Other benefit costs, net:
Service cost	$	2		$	1
Interest cost		1			1
	$	3		$	2

A pension settlement loss of $4 was recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2005.

(9) SALES CONTRACTS, COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, an unrealized loss of $24 and a gain of $2, respectively, were included in Other income, net for the ineffective portion of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. The amount anticipated to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income to income for derivative instruments during the next 12 months is a loss of approximately $78. The maximum period over which hedged forecasted transactions are expected to occur is 5 years.

10

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Newmont had the following contracts at March 31, 2006:

	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date						Fair Value
	2006		2007		Total/ Average		At March 31, 2006			At December 31, 2005
Gold Put Option Contracts ($ denominated):
Ounces (thousands)		61		20		81	$	(3	)	$	(3	)
Average price	$	352	$	397	$	363
Copper Collar Contracts (3) ($ denominated):
Pounds (millions)		298		84		382	$	(385	)(1)	$	(261	)(2)
Average cap price	$	1.36	$	1.41	$	1.37
Average floor price	$	1.10	$	1.10	$	1.10
$/IDR Forward Purchase Contracts (3):
$ (millions)	$	57	$	5	$	62	$	7		$	—
Average rate (IDR/$)	$	10,555	$	9,956	$	10,506
Australian Dollar Zero-Cost Collar Contracts:
$ (millions)	$	69		—	$	69	$	—		$	—
Average cap price ($ per A$1)	$	0.80		—	$	0.80
Average floor price ($ per A$1)	$	0.55		—	$	0.55

⁽¹⁾ The fair value does not include amounts payable ($34) on derivative contracts that have been closed out in March 2006 with the net settlement due in April 2006.

⁽²⁾ The fair value does not include amounts payable ($36) on derivative contracts that had been closed out in December 2005 with the net settlement due and paid in January 2006.

⁽³⁾ 56.25% guaranteed by Newmont.

Provisional Copper and Gold Sales

The Company’s sales based on a provisional sales price contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the concentrates at the forward London Metal Exchange price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, Batu Hijau recorded the following gross revenues before treatment and refining charges, which were subject to final price adjustments at March 31, 2006 and 2005, as follows:

	At March 31,
	2006			2005
Gross revenue subject to final price adjustments
Copper	$	377		$	250
Gold	$	15		$	12
The average final price adjustments realized were as follows:
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Average final price adjustments
Copper		26	%		11	%
Gold		9	%		0	%

Price-Capped Forward Sales Contracts

In 2001, Newmont entered into transactions that closed out certain call options. The options were replaced with a series of forward sales contracts requiring physical delivery of the same quantity of gold over slightly extended future periods. Under the terms of the contracts, Newmont will realize the lower of the spot price on the delivery date or the capped price ranging from $384 per ounce in 2008 to $392 per ounce in 2011. The initial fair value of the forward sales contracts of $54 was recorded as deferred revenue

11

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

and will be included in revenues as delivery occurs. Newmont will next deliver into these contracts in 2008. The forward sales contracts are accounted for as normal sales contracts under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 138 “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities-an Amendment to SFAS No. 133.”

Newmont had the following price-capped forward sales contracts outstanding at March 31, 2006:

	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	2008		2009		2011		Total/ Average
Ounces (thousands)		1,000		600		250		1,850
Average price	$	384	$	381	$	392	$	384

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

In 2001, Newmont entered into contracts to hedge the interest rate risk exposure on a portion of its $275 8 5/8% 2011 notes and its $200 8 3/8% 2005 debentures. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, these transactions resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $nil and $1, respectively. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was $nil at March 31, 2006 and $2 at December 31, 2005.

(10) INVESTMENTS

	At March 31, 2006
			Unrealized
	Cost/Equity Basis		Gain		Loss		Fair/Equity Value
Current:
Marketable Debt Securities:
Auction rate securities	$	488	$	—	$	—	$	488
Marketable Equity Securities:
Other		11		27		—		38
Other investments, at cost		9		—		—		9
	$	508	$	27	$	—	$	535
Long-term:
Marketable Equity Securities:
Canadian Oil Sands Trust	$	241	$	625	$	—	$	866
Gabriel Resources, Ltd.		53		19		—		72
Shore Gold, Inc.		89		13		—		102
Miramar Mining Corporation		27		36		—		63
Other		20		13		—		33
		439		706		—		1,136
Other investments, at cost		10		—		—		10
Investment in Affiliates:
European Gold Refineries		15		—		—		15
AGR Matthey Joint Venture		13		—		—		13
Other		8		—		—		8
		36		—		—		36
	$	485	$	706	$	—	$	1,182

12

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	At December 31, 2005
	Cost/Equity Basis		Unrealized				Fair/Equity Value
			Gain		Loss
Current:
Marketable Debt Securities:
Auction rate securities	$	785	$	—	$	—	$	785
Marketable Equity Securities:
Other		11		12		—		23
Other investments, at cost		9		—		—		9
	$	805	$	12	$	—	$	817
Long-term:
Marketable Equity Securities:
Canadian Oil Sands Trust	$	240	$	410	$	—	$	650
Gabriel Resources, Ltd.		53		29		—		82
Shore Gold, Inc.		89		22		—		111
Miramar Mining Corporation		27		19		—		46
Other		20		8		—		28
		429		488		—		917
Other investments, at cost		10		—		—		10
Investment in Affiliates:
European Gold Refineries		15		—		—		15
AGR Matthey Joint Venture		13		—		—		13
		28		—		—		28
	$	467	$	488	$	—	$	955

(11) INVENTORIES

	At March 31,    2006		At December 31, 2005
In-process	$	67	$	73
Concentrate		14		3
Precious metals		12		5
Materials, supplies and other		256		239
	$	349	$	320

(12) STOCKPILES AND ORE ON LEACH PADS

	At March 31,    2006		At December 31, 2005
Current:
Stockpiles	$	155	$	129
Ore on leach pads		122		126
	$	277	$	255
Long-term:
Stockpiles	$	416	$	404
Ore on leach pads		271		199
	$	687	$	603

13

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

(13) DEBT

	At March 31, 2006				At December 31, 2005
	Current		Non-Current		Current		Non-Current
Sale-leaseback of refractory ore treatment plant	$	21	$	235	$	19	$	256
5 7/8% notes, net of discount		—		597		—		597
8 5/8% debentures, net of discount		—		216		—		218
Newmont Australia 7 5/8% guaranteed notes, net of premium		—		120		—		120
Prepaid forward sales obligation		48		48		48		48
PTNNT project financing facility		87		479		87		479
PTNNT sponsor loan		39		—		39		—
Project financings, capital leases and other		7		10		3		15
	$	202	$	1,705	$	196	$	1,733

Scheduled minimum debt repayments as of March 31, 2006 are $176 for the remainder of 2006, $162 in 2007, $232 in 2008, $114 in 2009, $113 in 2010 and $1,110 thereafter.

(14) OTHER LIABILITIES

	At March 31, 2006		At December 31, 2005
Other current liabilities:
Income and mining taxes	$	102	$	77
Accrued operating costs		95		82
Accrued capital expenditures		80		80
Reclamation and remediation costs		67		63
Interest		60		42
Royalties		23		26
Taxes other than income and mining		20		18
Deferred income tax liabilities		5		5
Deferred revenue		1		17
Advanced stripping costs		—		14
Other		42		52
	$	495	$	476
	At March 31,    2006		At December 31, 2005
Other long-term liabilities:
Income taxes	$	220	$	220
Deferred revenue from the sale of future product		47		47
Derivative instruments		11		30
Advanced stripping costs		—		93
Other		25		24
	$	303	$	414

(15) RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION (ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS)

At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $448 and $431, respectively, were accrued for reclamation obligations relating to mineral properties in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former, primarily historic, mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $73 and $77, respectively, were accrued for such obligations. These amounts are also included in Reclamation and remediation liabilities.

14

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following is a reconciliation of the liability for asset retirement obligations:

	Three Months Ended         March 31,
	2006			2005
Balance at beginning of period	$	508		$	472
Additions, changes in estimates and other		18			—
Liabilities settled		(12	)		(7	)
Disposition of liability		—			(7	)
Accretion expense		7			7
Balance at end of period	$	521		$	465

The current portions of Reclamation and remediation liabilities of $67 and $63 at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, are included in Other current liabilities.

(16) SEGMENT INFORMATION

Financial information relating to Newmont’s segments is as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
	Nevada		Yanacocha		Australia/ New Zealand		Batu Hijau			Other Operations		Total Operations
Sales, net:
Gold	$	288	$	427	$	187	$	39		$	71	$	1,012
Copper	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	137		$	—	$	137
Cost applicable to sales:
Gold	$	206	$	124	$	128	$	15		$	28	$	501
Copper	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	65		$	—	$	65
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Gold	$	36	$	43	$	26	$	4		$	7	$	116
Copper	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	16		$	—	$	16
Other	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	—		$	—	$	1
Exploration	$	6	$	1	$	5	$	—		$	3	$	15
Advanced projects, research and development	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	7	$	10
Other income	$	4	$	4	$	1	$	(20	)	$	6	$	(5	)
Interest expense, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	11		$	—	$	11
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest and equity income of affiliates	$	41	$	258	$	24	$	46		$	3	$	372
Equity income of affiliates	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Capital expenditures	$	154	$	56	$	23	$	63		$	70	$	366
Total assets	$	2,102	$	1,665	$	1,207	$	2,313		$	999	$	8,286

15

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
	Total Operations			Exploration			Merchant Banking		Corporate and Other			Consolidated
Sales, net:
Gold	$	1,012		$	—		$	—	$	(1	)	$	1,011
Copper	$	137		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	137
Cost applicable to sales:
Gold	$	501		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	501
Copper	$	65		$	—		$		$	—		$	65
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Gold	$	116		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	116
Copper	$	16		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	16
Other	$	1		$	1		$	5	$	3		$	10
Exploration	$	15		$	18		$	—	$	—		$	33
Advanced projects, research and development	$	10		$	—		$	5	$	6		$	21
Other income	$	(5	)	$	1		$	30	$	9		$	35
Interest expense, net	$	11		$	—		$	—	$	9		$	20
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest and equity income of affiliates	$	372		$	(19	)	$	18	$	(21	)	$	350
Capital expenditures	$	366		$	—		$	1	$	3		$	370
Total assets from continuing operations	$	8,286		$	1,152		$	2,923	$	1,988		$	14,349
Assets held for sale												$	76
Total assets												$	14,425

16

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
	Nevada			Yanacocha		Australia/ New Zealand		Batu Hijau			Other Operations			Total Operations
Sales, net:
Gold	$	250		$	329	$	188	$	32		$	42		$	841
Copper	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	109		$	—		$	109
Cost applicable to sales:
Gold	$	182		$	111	$	133	$	16		$	26		$	468
Copper	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	71		$	—		$	71
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Gold	$	30		$	47	$	31	$	6		$	6		$	120
Copper	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	26		$	—		$	26
Other	$	—		$	—	$	1	$	—		$	2		$	3
Exploration	$	5		$	1	$	4	$	—		$	1		$	11
Advanced projects, research and development	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	8		$	8
Other income	$	2		$	1	$	—	$	2		$	—		$	5
Interest expense, net	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	10		$	—		$	10
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest and equity income of affiliates	$	27		$	169	$	12	$	13		$	(8	)	$	213
Equity income of affiliates	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Amortization of deferred (advanced) stripping, net	$	(14	)	$	—	$	3	$	(23	)	$	—		$	(34	)
Capital expenditures	$	77		$	46	$	20	$	23		$	58		$	224
Total assets	$	1,674		$	1,291	$	1,040	$	2,121		$	759		$	6,885

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
	Total Operations			Exploration			Merchant Banking		Corporate and Other			Consolidated
Sales, net:
Gold	$	841		$	—		$	—	$	(5	)	$	836
Copper	$	109		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	109
Cost applicable to sales:
Gold	$	468		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	468
Copper	$	71		$	—		$		$	—		$	71
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Gold	$	120		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	120
Copper	$	26		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	26
Other	$	3		$	1		$	7	$	4		$	15
Exploration	$	11		$	15		$	—	$	—		$	26
Advanced projects, research and development	$	8		$	—		$	6	$	3		$	17
Other income	$	5		$	1		$	55	$	6		$	67
Interest expense, net	$	10		$	—		$	—	$	11		$	21
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest and equity income of affiliates	$	213		$	(14	)	$	41	$	(47	)	$	193
Equity income of affiliates	$	—		$	—		$	4	$	—		$	4
Amortization of deferred (advanced) stripping, net	$	(34	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(34	)
Capital expenditures	$	224		$	—		$	—	$	5		$	229
Total assets from continuing operations	$	6,885		$	1,149		$	2,601	$	2,544		$	13,179
Assets held for sale												$	305
Total assets												$	13,484

17

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

(17) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Newmont USA, a 100 percent owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 5 7/8% notes and the revolving credit facilities of Newmont Mining Corporation. The following condensed consolidating financial information is provided for Newmont USA, as guarantor, and for Newmont Mining Corporation, as issuer, as an alternative to providing separate financial statements for the guarantor. The accounts of Newmont Mining Corporation and Newmont USA are presented using the equity method of accounting for investments in subsidiaries.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income	Newmont Mining Corporation			Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Revenues
Sales - gold, net	$	—		$	834		$	177		$	—		$	1,011
Sales - copper, net		—			137			—			—			137
		—			971			177			—			1,148
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
Gold		—			379			124			(2	)		501
Copper		—			65			—			—			65
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		—			112			30			—			142
Exploration		—			25			8			—			33
Advanced projects, research and development		—			9			12			—			21
General and administrative		—			34			2			1			37
Other		—			12			2			—			14
		—			636			178			(1	)		813
Other income (expense)
Other income (expense), net		2			1			32			—			35
Interest income - intercompany		29			13			—			(42	)		—
Interest expense - intercompany		(2	)		—			(40	)		42			—
Interest expense, net		(6	)		(12	)		(2	)		—			(20	)
		23			2			(10	)		—			15
Income from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest and equity income of affiliates		23			337			(11	)		1			350
Income tax (expense) benefit		(3	)		(83	)		48			—			(38	)
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries		—			(99	)		(11	)		11			(99	)
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		189			—			34			(223	)		—
Income from continuing operations		209			155			60			(211	)		213
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(4	)		—			—			(4	)
Net income (loss)	$	209		$	151		$	60		$	(211	)	$	209

18

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income	Newmont Mining Corporation			Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Revenues
Sales - gold, net	$	—		$	659		$	177		$	—		$	836
Sales - copper, net		—			109			—			—			109
		—			768			177			—			945
Costs and expenses
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
Gold		—			343			128			(3	)		468
Copper		—			71			—			—			71
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		—			122			39			—			161
Exploration		—			17			9			—			26
Advanced projects, research and development		—			5			12			—			17
General and administrative		—			26			2			3			31
Other		—			13			11			—			24
		—			597			201			—			798
Other income (expense)
Other income (expense), net		—			45			22			—			67
Interest income - intercompany		31			10			—			(41	)		—
Interest expense - intercompany		(2	)		—			(39	)		41			—
Interest expense, net		(1	)		(18	)		(2	)		—			(21	)
		28			37			(19	)		—			46
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes, minority interest and equity income of affiliates		28			208			(43	)		—			193
Income tax expense		—			(76	)		23			—			(53	)
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries		—			(60	)		(4	)		5			(59	)
Equity income (loss) of affiliates		56			—			19			(71	)		4
Income from continuing operations		84			72			(5	)		(66	)		85
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(4	)		3			—			(1	)
Net income (loss)	$	84		$	68		$	(2	)	$	(66	)	$	84

19

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	At March 31, 2006
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets	Newmont Mining Corporation		Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1	$	872		$	106	$	—		$	979
Marketable securities and other short-term investments		3		505			27		—			535
Trade receivables		—		144			3		—			147
Accounts receivable		1,732		444			647		(2,696	)		127
Inventories		—		306			43		—			349
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		246			31		—			277
Other current assets		4		257			34		—			295
Current assets		1,740		2,774			891		(2,696	)		2,709
Property, plant and mine development, net		—		4,292			1,732		(13	)		6,011
Investments		—		182			1,000		—			1,182
Investments in subsidiaries		5,608		3			4,339		(9,950	)		—
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—		644			43		—			687
Deferred income tax assets		18		488			154		—			660
Other long-term assets		1,662		1,037			109		(2,610	)		198
Goodwill		—		—			2,902		—			2,902
Assets of operations held for sale		—		27			49		—			76
Total assets	$	9,028	$	9,447		$	11,219	$	(15,269	)	$	14,425
Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	—	$	198		$	4	$	—		$	202
Accounts payable		50		2,189			691		(2,698	)		232
Employee related benefits		—		139			24		—			163
Derivative instruments		—		407			3		—			410
Other current liabilities		51		301			145		(2	)		495
Current liabilities		101		3,234			867		(2,700	)		1,502
Long-term debt		597		988			120		—			1,705
Reclamation and remediation liabilities		—		334			120		—			454
Deferred income tax liabilities		53		252			179		25			509
Employee-related benefits		—		261			21		—			282
Other long-term liabilities		260		136			2,640		(2,733	)		303
Liabilities of operations held for sale		—		2			20		—			22
Total liabilities		1,011		5,207			3,967		(5,408	)		4,777
Minority interest in subsidiaries		—		1,018			336		(377	)		977
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock		—		—			61		(61	)		—
Common stock		669		—			—		—			669
Additional paid-in capital		5,977		2,219			5,133		(6,698	)		6,631
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		533		(120	)		401		(281	)		533
Retained earnings		838		1,123			1,321		(2,444	)		838
Total stockholders’ equity		8,017		3,222			6,916		(9,484	)		8,671
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	9,028	$	9,447		$	11,219	$	(15,269	)	$	14,425

20

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	At December 31, 2005
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets	Newmont Mining Corporation			Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1		$	979		$	102	$	—		$	1,082
Marketable securities and other short-term investments		—			794			23		—			817
Trade receivables		—			93			1		—			94
Accounts receivable		1,733			264			557		(2,418	)		136
Inventories		—			278			42		—			320
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—			228			27		—			255
Other current assets		3			284			45		—			332
Current assets		1,737			2,920			797		(2,418	)		3,036
Property, plant and mine development, net		(11	)		4,142			1,514		—			5,645
Investments		—			198			757		—			955
Investments in subsidiaries		5,180			—			4,076		(9,256	)		—
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads		—			566			37		—			603
Deferred income tax assets		12			409			96		—			517
Other long-term assets		1,646			1,056			271		(2,690	)		283
Goodwill		—			—			2,879		—			2,879
Assets of operations held for sale		—			25			49		—			74
Total assets	$	8,564		$	9,316		$	10,476	$	(14,364	)	$	13,992
Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	—		$	195		$	1	$	—		$	196
Accounts payable		50			2,170			397		(2,385	)		232
Employee related benefits		—			152			24		—			176
Derivative instruments		—			267			3		—			270
Other current liabilities		38			300			143		(5	)		476
Current liabilities		88			3,084			568		(2,390	)		1,350
Long-term debt		597			1,012			124		—			1,733
Reclamation and remediation liabilities		—			333			112		—			445
Deferred income tax liabilities		52			232			165		—			449
Employee-related benefits		—			252			21		—			273
Other long-term liabilities		247			245			2,550		(2,628	)		414
Liabilities of operations held for sale		—			1			20		—			21
Total liabilities		984			5,159			3,560		(5,018	)		4,685
Minority interest in subsidiaries		—			971			326		(366	)		931
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock		—			—			61		(61	)		—
Common stock		666			—			—		—			666
Additional paid-in capital		5,782			2,220			5,077		(6,501	)		6,578
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		378			(78	)		229		(151	)		378
Retained earnings		754			1,044			1,223		(2,267	)		754
Total stockholders’ equity		7,580			3,186			6,590		(8,980	)		8,376
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,564		$	9,316		$	10,476	$	(14,364	)	$	13,992

21

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	Newmont Mining Corporation			Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	209		$	151		$	60		$	(211	)	$	209
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities		(195	)		220			(41	)		211			195
Change in operating assets and liabilities		(16	)		(173	)		25			—			(164	)
Net cash provided from continuing operating activities		(2	)		198			44			—			240
Net cash used in discontinued operations		—			(5	)		—			—			(5	)
Net cash from operations		(2	)		193			44			—			235
Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		—			(282	)		(88	)		—			(370	)
Investments in marketable debt and equity securities		—			(671	)		(1	)		—			(672	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable debt and equity securities		—			968			2						970
Acquisition of minority interests		—			—			(187	)		—			(187	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		—			2			—			—			2
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			17			(274	)		—			(257	)
Financing activities:
Net borrowings (repayments)		1			(261	)		240			—			(20	)
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(42	)		—			(3	)		—			(45	)
Dividends paid to minority interests		—			(45	)		—			—			(45	)
Proceeds from stock issuance		38			—			—			—			38
Change in restricted cash and other		5			(13	)		—			—			(8	)
Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities		2			(319	)		237			—			(80	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			2			(3	)		—			(1	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			(107	)		4			—			(103	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1			979			102			—			1,082
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1		$	872		$	106		$	—		$	979

22

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	Newmont Mining Corporation			Newmont USA			Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Newmont Mining Corporation Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	84		$	68		$	(2	)	$	(66	)	$	84
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities		(59	)		151			9			66			167
Change in operating assets and liabilities		2			(57	)		(9	)		—			(64	)
Net cash provided from continuing operations		27			162			(2	)		—			187
Net cash (used in) provided from discontinued operations		—			(1	)		2			—			1
Net cash from operations		27			161			—			—			188
Investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and mine development		—			(160	)		(69	)		—			(229	)
Additions to property, plant and mine development of discontinued operations		—			(2	)		(11	)		—			(13	)
Investments in marketable debt and equity securities		—			(725	)		(50	)		—			(775	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable debt and equity securities		—			538			8			—			546
Investments in affiliates		(46	)		—			—			46			—
Proceeds of asset sales and other		—			33			19			—			52
Net cash used in investing activities		(46	)		(316	)		(103	)		46			(419	)
Financing activities:
Net borrowings		56			461			50			—			567
Dividends paid to common stockholders		(41	)		—			(4	)		—			(45	)
Dividends paid to minority interests		—			(16	)		—			—			(16	)
Proceeds from stock issuance and other		4			—			45			(46	)		3
Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities		19			445			91			(46	)		509
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			(1	)		(1	)		—			(2	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			289			(13	)		—			276
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1			690			90			—			781
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1		$	979		$	77		$	—		$	1,057

(18) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

General

The Company follows SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” in determining its accruals and disclosures with respect to loss contingencies. Accordingly, estimated losses from loss contingencies are accrued by a charge to income when information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable (greater than a 75% probability) that a liability had been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. If a loss contingency is not probable or reasonably estimable, disclosure of the loss contingency is made in the financial statements when it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss may be incurred.

Operating Segments

The Company’s operating segments are identified in Note 16. Except as noted in this paragraph, all of the Company’s commitments and contingencies specifically described in this Note 18 relate to the Corporate and Other reportable segment. The Nevada Operations matters under Newmont USA Limited relate to the Nevada reportable segment. The PT Newmont Minahasa Raya matters relate to the Other Operations reportable segment. The Yanacocha matters relate to the Yanacocha reportable segment. The Newmont Jundee Operations Pty Limited and the Newmont Australia Limited matters relate to the Australia/New Zealand reportable segment.

23

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Environmental Matters

The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures.

Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $448 and $431, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to mineral properties in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” See Note 15.

In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $73 and $77 were accrued for such obligations at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. These amounts are included in Other current liabilities and Reclamation and remediation liabilities. Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 108% greater or 35% lower than the amount accrued at March 31, 2006. The amounts accrued for these matters are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are recorded in Other expense, net in the period estimates are revised.

Details about certain of the more significant matters involved are discussed below.

Dawn Mining Company LLC (“Dawn”)-51% Newmont Owned

Midnite Mine Site. Dawn previously leased an open pit uranium mine, currently inactive, on the Spokane Indian Reservation in the State of Washington. The mine site is subject to regulation by agencies of the U.S. Department of Interior (the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Land Management), as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”).

In 1991, Dawn’s mining lease at the mine was terminated. As a result, Dawn was required to file a formal mine closure and reclamation plan. The Department of Interior commenced an analysis of Dawn’s proposed plan and alternate closure and reclamation plans for the mine. Work on this analysis has been suspended indefinitely. In mid-2000, the mine was included on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). In March 2003, the EPA notified Dawn and Newmont that it had thus far expended $12 on the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study under CERCLA “RI/FS”. In October 2005, the EPA issued the RI/FS on this property in which it indicated a preferred remedy estimated to cost approximately $150. Newmont and Dawn filed comments on the RI/FS with the EPA in January 2006.

On January 28, 2005, the EPA filed a lawsuit against Dawn and Newmont under CERCLA in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. The EPA has asserted that Dawn and Newmont are liable for reclamation or remediation work and costs at the mine. Dawn does not have sufficient funds to pay for the reclamation plan it proposed or for any alternate plan, or for any additional remediation work or costs at the mine. Newmont intends to vigorously contest any claims as to its liability.

Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of this lawsuit or any other action against Dawn or Newmont arising from this matter.

Dawn Mill Site. Dawn also owns a uranium mill site facility, located on private land near Ford, Washington, which is subject to state and federal regulation. In late 1999, Dawn sought and later received state approval for a revised closure plan that expedites the reclamation process at the site. The currently approved plan for the site is guaranteed by Newmont.

Idarado Mining Company (“Idarado”)-80.1% Newmont Owned

In July 1992, Newmont and Idarado signed a consent decree with the State of Colorado (“State”), which was agreed to by the U.S. District Court of Colorado, to settle a lawsuit brought by the State under CERCLA.

24

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Idarado agreed in the consent decree to undertake specified remediation work at its former mining site in the Telluride/Ouray area of Colorado. Remediation work at this property is substantially complete. If the remediation does not achieve specific performance objectives defined in the consent decree, the State may require Idarado to implement supplemental activities at the site, also as defined in the consent decree. Idarado and Newmont obtained a $6 reclamation bond to secure their potential obligations under the consent decree. In addition, Idarado settled natural resources damages and past and future response costs, and agreed to habitat enhancement work under the consent decree. All of this work is substantially complete.

Newmont Capital Limited-100% Newmont Owned

In February 1999, the EPA placed the Lava Cap mine site in Nevada County, California on the National Priorities List under CERCLA. The EPA then initiated a remedial investigation/feasibility study under CERCLA to determine environmental conditions and remediation options at the site.

Newmont Capital, formerly known as Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation, Inc., owned the property for approximately three years from 1984 to 1986 but never mined or conducted exploration at the site. The EPA asserts that Newmont Capital is responsible for clean up costs incurred at the site. Newmont Capital and the EPA have entered into an agreement tolling the statute of limitations until December 31, 2006 to facilitate settlement negotiations with respect to potential claims under CERCLA. Based on Newmont Capital’s limited involvement at Lava Cap, it does not believe it has any liability for environmental conditions at the site, and intends to vigorously defend any formal claims by the EPA. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action arising from this matter.

Newmont USA Limited-100% Newmont Owned

Pinal Creek. Newmont is a defendant in a lawsuit brought on November 5, 1991 in U.S. District Court in Arizona by the Pinal Creek Group, alleging that the company and others are responsible for some portion of costs incurred to address groundwater contamination emanating from copper mining operations located in the area of Globe and Miami, Arizona. Two former subsidiaries of Newmont, Pinto Valley Copper Corporation and Magma Copper Company (now known as BHP Copper Inc.), owned some of the mines in the area between 1983 and 1987. The court has dismissed plaintiffs’ claims seeking to hold Newmont liable for the acts or omissions of its former subsidiaries. Based on information presently available, Newmont believes it has strong defenses to plaintiffs’ remaining claims, including, without limitation, that Newmont’s agents did not participate in any pollution causing activities; that Newmont’s liabilities, if any, were contractually transferred to one of the plaintiffs; that portions of plaintiffs’ claimed damages are not recoverable; and that Newmont’s equitable share of liability, if any, would be immaterial. While Newmont has denied liability and is vigorously defending these claims, we cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of this lawsuit.

Nevada Operations. On November 19, 2002, Great Basin Mine Watch and the Mineral Policy Center (Appellants) filed suit in U.S. District Court in Nevada against the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), challenging and seeking to enjoin the BLM’s July 2002 Record of Decision approving the Company’s amended Plan of Operations covering the Gold Quarry South Layback Project, and the BLM’s September 2002 Record of Decision approving a new Plan of Operations for the Leeville Mine. Appellants sought a declaration that the BLM’s decisions were unlawful and an injunction prohibiting Newmont’s approved activities. Newmont intervened in this action on behalf of the government defendants and filed an answer denying all of Appellants’ claims. In March 2004, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the government and Newmont on all claims, thus ending the U.S. District Court proceedings. In June 2004, Appellants appealed the U.S. District Court’s decision to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. While Newmont believes that this appeal is without merit, an unfavorable outcome could result in additional conditions on operations that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On October 16, 2002, Great Basin Mine Watch filed an appeal with the Nevada State Environmental Commission, challenging the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection’s (NDEP) renewal of the Clean Water Act discharge permit for Newmont’s Gold Quarry Mine. This permit governs the conditions under which Newmont may discharge mine-dewatering water in connection with its ongoing mining operations. Great Basin Mine Watch alleges that the terms of the renewed permit violate the Clean Water Act and Nevada water quality laws. Newmont intervened in this action on behalf of the NDEP. A hearing before the Nevada State Environmental Commission was held in June 2003 in Elko, Nevada. At the end of the hearing, the Commission ruled in favor of NDEP on all claims and affirmed NDEP’s renewal of the Clean Water Act discharge permit. Great Basin Mine Watch appealed this decision in the Nevada District Court in Carson City, Nevada. In September 2004, the Nevada District Court ruled in favor of NDEP on most issues but ruled in favor of Great Basin Mine Watch with respect to certain proposed permit amendments. Newmont and NDEP filed an appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court, seeking to uphold these proposed amendments. The Nevada District Court

25

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

stayed its decision pending this appeal and Gold Quarry continues to operate under its new permit. On April 22, 2006, a panel of the Nevada Supreme Court issued an opinion affirming the new permit in most respects but invalidating certain proposed permit amendments. Newmont intends to seek reconsideration of this ruling before the panel and, if necessary, before the full court. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of this appeal, and an unfavorable outcome could result in additional conditions on operations that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

Grass Valley. On February 3, 2004, the City of Grass Valley, California brought suit against Newmont under CERCLA in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This matter involves an abandoned mine adit on property previously owned by a predecessor of Newmont and currently owned by the City of Grass Valley. The complaint alleges that the adit is discharging metals-bearing water into a stream on the property, in concentrations in excess of current EPA drinking water standards. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likely outcome of this matter.

Gray Eagle Mine Site. By letter dated September 3, 2002, the EPA notified Newmont that the EPA had expended $3 in response costs to address environmental conditions associated with a historic tailings pile located at the Grey Eagle Mine site near Happy Camp, California, and requested that Newmont pay those costs. The EPA has identified four potentially responsible parties, including Newmont. Newmont does not believe it has any liability for environmental conditions at the Grey Eagle Mine site, and intends to vigorously defend any formal claims by the EPA. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action against it arising from this matter.

PT Newmont Minahasa Raya (“PTNMR”)-80% Newmont Owned

In July 2004, a criminal complaint was filed against PTNMR, the Newmont subsidiary that operated the Minahasa mine in Indonesia, alleging environmental pollution relating to submarine tailings placement into nearby Buyat Bay. The Indonesian police detained five PTNMR employees during September and October of 2004. The police investigation and the detention of PTNMR’s employees was declared illegal by the South Jakarta District Court in December 2004, but in March 2005, the Indonesian Supreme Court upheld the legality of the police investigation, and the police turned their evidence over to the local prosecutor. In July 2005, the prosecutor filed an indictment against PTNMR and its President Director, alleging environmental pollution at Buyat Bay. After the court rejected motions to dismiss the proceeding, the prosecutor called its first witnesses in October 2005. The trial is continuing and is expected to conclude later in 2006.

On March 9, 2005, the Indonesian Ministry of the Environment filed a civil lawsuit against PTNMR and its President Director in relation to these allegations, seeking in excess of $100 in monetary damages. In October 2005, PTNMR filed an objection to the court’s jurisdiction, contending that the Government previously agreed to resolve any disputes through out-of-court conciliation or arbitration. The Court upheld PTNMR’s objection and dismissed the case in November 2005. The Government filed a notice of appeal of this ruling. On February 16, 2006, PTNMR and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia signed an agreement settling the civil lawsuit. Under the terms of the agreement, the Government and PTNMR will nominate members to an independent scientific panel that will develop and implement a ten-year environmental monitoring and assessment program to make a definitive, scientific conclusion regarding the condition of Buyat Bay. PTNMR is required to fund specific remedial measures if, as a result of its mining operations, pollution has occurred. The agreement also provides for enhanced community development programs in North Sulawesi. PTNMR will provide initial funding of $12 to cover the cost of the monitoring and community development programs. Over a ten year period, PTNMR will contribute an additional $18. The funds will be managed by an organization governed by interested stakeholders. Accountability for the fund will be ensured through yearly reports that will be made available to the public. The transparency of the scientific panel’s activities will also be assured through annual reports to the public. Pursuant to the agreement, the civil lawsuit against PTNMR has been terminated.

Independent sampling and testing of Buyat Bay water and fish, as well as area residents, conducted by the World Health Organization and the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, confirm that PTNMR has not polluted the Buyat Bay environment, and, therefore, has not adversely affected the fish in Buyat Bay or the health of nearby residents. The Company remains steadfast that it has not caused pollution or health problems and will continue to vigorously defend itself against these allegations. However, Newmont cannot predict the outcome of the criminal proceeding or whether additional legal actions may occur. This matter could adversely affect our ability to operate in Indonesia.

Resurrection Mining Company (“Resurrection”)-100% Newmont Owned

Newmont, Resurrection and other defendants were named in lawsuits filed by the State of Colorado under CERCLA in 1983, which were subsequently consolidated with a lawsuit filed by EPA in 1986. These proceedings sought to compel the defendants to remediate the impacts of pre-existing, historic mining activities near Leadville, Colorado, which date back to the mid-1800s, and which the government agencies claim were causing substantial environmental problems in the area.

26

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

In 1988 and 1989, the EPA issued administrative orders with respect to one area on the site and the defendants have collectively implemented those orders by constructing a water treatment plant, which was placed in operation in early 1992. Remaining remedial work for this area consists of water treatment plant operation and continuing environmental monitoring and maintenance activities. Newmont and Resurrection are currently responsible for 50% of these costs, but their share of such costs could increase in the event other defendants become unable to pay their share of such costs. On August 9, 2005, ASARCO LLC, the party responsible for the other 50% of these costs, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. The company is evaluating the effect that the ASARCO bankruptcy could have on its obligations.

The parties also have entered into a consent decree with respect to the remaining areas at the site, which apportions liabilities and responsibilities for these areas. The EPA approved remedial actions for selected components of Resurrection’s portion of the site, which were initiated in 1995. The EPA has not yet selected the final remedy for the site. Accordingly, Newmont cannot yet determine the full extent or cost of its share of the remedial action that will be required. The government agencies may also seek to recover for damages to natural resources. In March 1999, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to facilitate the settlement of natural resources damages claims under CERCLA for the upper Arkansas River Basin. In January 2004, an MOU report was issued that evaluated the extent of natural resource damages and possible restoration activities that might be required, which Resurrection and other parties could potentially be required to fund.

Other Legal Matters

Minera Yanacocha-51.35% Newmont Owned

Choropampa. In June 2000, a transport contractor of Yanacocha spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles (85 kilometers) southwest of the Yanacocha mine. Elemental mercury is a by-product of gold mining and was sold to a Lima firm for use in medical instruments and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by Yanacocha in response to the incident. In August 2000, Yanacocha paid under protest a fine of 1,740,000 Peruvian soles (approximately $0.5) to the Peruvian government. Yanacocha has entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. As compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident Yanacocha entered into agreements with and provided a variety of public works in the three communities impacted by this incident. Yanacocha cannot predict the likelihood of additional expenditures related to this matter.

Yanacocha, various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Newmont, and other defendants have been named in lawsuits filed by over 1,000 Peruvian citizens in Denver District Court for the State of Colorado. These actions seek compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the elemental mercury spill incident. In February 2005, Yanacocha and the various Newmont defendants answered the complaint in the Denver District Court.

Additional lawsuits relating to the Choropampa incident were filed against Yanacocha in two of the local courts of Cajamarca, Peru, in May 2002 by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant number of the plaintiffs in these lawsuits entered into settlement agreements with Yanacocha prior to filing such claims. The Superior Court of Cajamarca has granted resolutions upholding the validity of certain challenged settlement agreements. The Plaintiffs have appealed these rulings to Peru’s Supreme Court, where they remain pending. In 2005, Yanacocha entered into settlement agreements with approximately 350 additional plaintiffs.

Neither Newmont nor Yanacocha can reasonably predict the final outcome of any of the above-described lawsuits.

Conga. Yanacocha is involved in a dispute with the Provincial Municipality of Celendin regarding the authority of that governmental body to regulate the development of the Minas Conga ore deposit. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Municipality of Celendin enacted an ordinance declaring the area around Conga to be a mining-free reserve and naturally protected area. Yanacocha has challenged this ordinance on the grounds that, under Peruvian law, local governments lack authority to create such areas and deny the rights granted by Yanacocha’s mining concessions. Based on legal precedent established by Peru’s Constitutional Tribunal, it is reasonable to believe that Yanacocha’s mining rights will be upheld.

Minera Yanacocha has carefully evaluated the social issues and dynamics of the communities in and around the area of Conga. Yanacocha has engaged in extensive community and external affairs efforts at this early stage of the Conga project. It is Yanacocha’s current assessment that a significant percentage of the population in the communities immediately surrounding the Conga area support the project and oppose the Celendin ordinance. Yanacocha will continue to engage actively with these communities during the process of permitting the project, and will expand its outreach efforts to communities in the surrounding region. It will continually monitor and evaluate conditions in the area and any resulting impact on Yanacocha’s ability to successfully permit and develop the Conga deposit.

27

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Newmont Australia Limited (“Normandy”)-100% Newmont Owned

In February 1999, Normandy Mining Limited (now known as Newmont Australia Limited) sold certain subsidiary companies in a transaction that resulted in net cash proceeds of A$663. The sale did not give rise to any tax liability to Normandy because of the tax basis that Normandy had in the shares of the subsidiaries and the capital losses available to offset the net gain realized on the sale. This transaction is currently the subject of a review by the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”). The ATO has sought documents from Newmont Australia Limited, the buyer of the subsidiaries and other parties. In December 2003, the ATO issued two draft position papers with respect to its current view of certain proposed tax adjustments required for two of Newmont Australia Limited’s wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries that participated in the transaction. The Company continues to believe that Normandy’s tax treatment was in accordance with the provisions of the relevant tax laws and intends to vigorously defend its position. Newmont Australia Limited cannot reasonably predict what future action the ATO may take in relation to this matter.

Newmont Mining Corporation

On June 8, 2005, UFCW Local 880 – Retail Food Employers Joint Pension Fund filed a putative class action in the federal district court in Colorado purportedly on behalf of purchasers of Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”) publicly traded securities between July 28, 2004 and April 26, 2005. The action names Newmont, Wayne W. Murdy, Pierre Lassonde and Bruce D. Hansen as defendants. Substantially similar purported class actions were filed in the same court on June 15, 2005 by John S. Chapman and on June 20, 2005 by Zoe Myerson. Each of these complaints alleges, among other things, that Newmont and the individual defendants violated certain antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws by failing to disclose alleged operating deficiencies. The complaints seek unspecified monetary damages and other relief. In October, 2005, the court consolidated these cases. While Newmont and its officers who are named defendants deny the claims made and intend to vigorously defend against the claims, we cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of these cases.

On June 14, 2005, June 30, 2005 and July 1, 2005, purported derivative actions were filed, on behalf of Newmont, by Doris Staehr, Frank J. Donio and Jack G. Blaz, respectively, in the federal district court in Colorado against certain of Newmont’s current and former directors and officers. Each action alleges that certain of these defendants breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in insider trading and misappropriation of information, and that all defendants breached their fiduciary duties and engaged in conduct that constituted abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment in connection with, among other things, failing to disclose alleged operating deficiencies and failing to prevent alleged violations of environmental laws in Indonesia. The plaintiffs seek, on behalf of Newmont, among other remedies, all damages sustained by the Company as a result of the allegedly improper conduct. In November 2005, the court consolidated these cases and in December 2005 the court appointed a lead plaintiff. On April 10, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. While Newmont and its officers and directors who are named defendants deny the claims made and intend to vigorously defend against the claims, we cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of these cases.

In a related development, on January 13, 2006, a purported Newmont shareholder sent to the Board of Directors a letter demanding the Company take action against the defendants in the purported derivative actions with respect to the matters alleged in the derivative complaints. The Board has taken the demand under consideration.

Newmont Jundee Operations Pty Ltd (“NYOL”)-100% Newmont Owned

On September 3, 2003, J. Aron & Co. commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Australia) against NYOL, its subsidiaries and the administrator in relation to the completed voluntary administration of the NYOL group. J. Aron & Co., an NYOL creditor, initially sought injunctive relief that was denied by the court on September 8, 2003. On October 30, 2003, J. Aron & Co. filed a statement of claim alleging various deficiencies in the implementation of the voluntary administration process and seeking damages and other relief against NYOL and other parties. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of this lawsuit.

28

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Income Taxes

The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and accordingly it is subject to, and pays annual income taxes under, the various income tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, and others are defined by the general corporate income tax laws of the country. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all required income tax returns and to pay the taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time the Company is subject to a review of its historic income tax filings and in connection with such reviews, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved. As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company has accrued income taxes (and related interest and penalties, if applicable) in the amount of $220, classified in Other long-term liabilities. This amount represents what the Company believes will be the probable outcome of such disputes for all tax years for which additional income taxes can be assessed.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

In a 1993 asset exchange, a wholly-owned subsidiary transferred a coal lease under which the subsidiary had collected advance royalty payments totaling $484. From 1994 to 2018, remaining advance payments under the lease to the transferee total $390. In the event of title failure as stated in the lease, this subsidiary has a primary obligation to refund previously collected payments and has a secondary obligation to refund any of the $390 collected by the transferee, if the transferee fails to meet its refund obligation. The subsidiary has title insurance on the leased coal deposits of $240 covering the secondary obligation. The Company and the subsidiary regard the circumstances entitling the lessee to a refund as remote.

The Company has minimum royalty obligations on one of its producing mines in Nevada for the life of the mine. Amounts paid as a minimum royalty (where production royalties are less than the minimum obligation) in any year are recoverable in future years when the minimum royalty obligation is exceeded. Although the minimum royalty requirement may not be met in a particular year, the Company expects that over the mine life, gold production will be sufficient to meet the minimum royalty requirements. Minimum royalty payments payable are nil for 2006, $9 for 2007, $3 for 2008 and $27 thereafter.

As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company and its affiliates are required to provide surety bonds, bank letters of credit and bank guarantees as financial support for various purposes, including environmental reclamation, exploration permitting, workers compensation programs and other general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, there were $389 and $386, respectively, of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees (excluding the surety bond supporting the prepaid forward transaction described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 2, 2006). The surety bonds, letters of credit and bank guarantees reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to fees competitively determined in the market place. The obligations associated with these instruments are generally related to performance requirements that the Company addresses through its ongoing operations. As the specific requirements are met, the beneficiary of the associated instrument cancels and/or returns the instrument to the issuing entity. Certain of these instruments are associated with operating sites with long-lived assets and will remain outstanding until closure. Generally, bonding requirements associated with environmental regulation are becoming more restrictive. In addition, the surety markets for certain types of environmental bonding used by the Company have become increasingly constrained. The Company, however, believes it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements, through existing or alternative means, as they arise.

Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work with the Indonesian government, beginning in 2005, and continuing through 2010, a portion of each foreign shareholders’ equity interest in the project must be offered for sale to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals. The price at which such interest must be offered for sale to the Indonesian parties is the highest of the then-current replacement cost, the price at which shares of the project company would be accepted for listing on the Jakarta Stock Exchange, or the fair market value of such interest in the project company as a going concern. An Indonesian national currently owns a 20% equity interest in Batu Hijau, which requires the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership to offer a 3% interest in 2006. Pursuant to this provision of the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, it is possible that the ownership interest of the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership in Batu Hijau could be reduced to 49% by the end of 2010.

Newmont is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings related to its business. Except in the above-described proceedings, management does not believe that adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceeding or that amounts that may be required to be paid by reason thereof will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

29

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued

(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

(19)  SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was 10.4. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges represents income from continuing operations before income tax expense, minority interest, equity income (loss) of affiliates and cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, divided by interest expense. Interest expense includes amortization of capitalized interest and the portion of rent expense representative of interest.

30

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks related to Newmont’s operations.

Certain Factors Outside of Our Control May Affect Our Ability to Support the Carrying Value of Goodwill

Our accounting policies and methods of reporting financial conditions, including accounting for goodwill, require certain estimates, assumptions and judgments for which there is no clear authoritative guidance. Management makes such estimates, assumptions and judgments in good faith based on what they believe is the best available information. The Company has received from the Securities and Exchange Commission three letters, dated December 27, 2005, February 17, 2006 and April 5, 2006 requesting additional information and additional disclosure regarding accounting for Exploration Segment goodwill. As of the date of this Report, those comments remain unresolved.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”). References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “CDN$” to Canadian currency, “IDR” to Indonesian currency and “$” to United States currency.

This item should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this quarterly report.

Selected Financial and Operating Results

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
Revenues	$	1,148	$	945
Income from continuing operations	$	213	$	85
Net income	$	209	$	84
Net income per common share, basic
Income from continuing operations	$	0.48	$	0.19
Net income	$	0.47	$	0.19
Consolidated gold ounces sold (thousands)		1,839		1,974
Consolidated copper pounds sold (millions)		81		100
Average price received (1)
Gold (per ounce)	$	555	$	425
Copper (per pound)	$	2.08	$	1.33
Costs applicable to sales (2)
Gold (per ounce)	$	275	$	237
Copper (per pound)	$	0.81	$	0.71

⁽¹⁾ Before treatment and refining charges.

⁽²⁾ Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization.

Consolidated Financial Results

Newmont’s income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $213, or $0.48 per share. Results for the first three months of 2006 compared to 2005 were favorably impacted by higher realized gold and copper prices, partially offset by higher diesel, labor and commodity costs, fewer gold ounces and copper pounds sold and a favorable tax adjustment.

31

Gold sales, net for the three months ended March 31, 2006 increased $175, or 21%, compared to the corresponding period in 2005 as higher realized prices more than offset lower ounces sold. The following analysis summarizes the change in consolidated gold sales revenue:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Consolidated gold sales:
Gross	$	1,014		$	839
Less: Treatment and refining charges		(3	)		(3	)
Net	$	1,011		$	836
Consolidated gold ounces sold (thousands)		1,839			1,974
Average price realized per ounce – gross	$	555		$	425
Average price realized per ounce – net	$	554		$	423

The change in consolidated gold sales is due to:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006 vs. 2005
Change in consolidated ounces sold	$	(64	)
Change in average realized gold price		239
	$	175

Copper sales, net for the three months ended March 31, 2006 increased $28, or 26%, compared to the corresponding period in 2005 as lower sales volumes and higher treatment and refining charges were more than offset by higher realized prices. Realized copper revenues were reduced by $95 and $28 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, from derivative transactions associated with the copper collar contracts. Realized copper revenues were increased by $88 and $11 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, from provisional pricing mark-to-market in copper sales contracts. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a loss of $23 was included in Other income, net for the ineffective portion of copper collar contracts. The following analysis summarizes the change in consolidated copper sales revenue:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Consolidated copper sales:
Gross	$	168		$	133
Less: Treatment and refining charges		(31	)		(24	)
Net	$	137		$	109
Consolidated copper pounds sold (millions)		81			100
Average price realized per pound – gross	$	2.08		$	1.33
Average price realized per pound – net	$	1.70		$	1.09

The change in consolidated copper sales is due to:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006 vs. 2005
Change in consolidated pounds sold	$	(25	)
Change in average realized copper price		60
Change in treatment and refining charges		(7	)
	$	28

32

The following is a summary of net gold and copper sales by operation:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Gold
Nevada, USA	$	288		$	250
Yanacocha, Peru		427			329
Australia/New Zealand:
Tanami, Australia		60			63
Kalgoorlie, Australia		52			50
Jundee, Australia		36			37
Pajingo, Australia		18			19
Martha, New Zealand		21			19
		187			188
Batu Hijau, Indonesia		39			32
Other Operations:
Golden Giant, Canada		19			16
Zarafshan, Uzbekistan		16			15
Kori Kollo, Bolivia		24			3
La Herradura, Mexico		12			8
		71			42
Corporate		(1	)		(5	)
	$	1,011		$	836
Copper
Batu Hijau, Indonesia	$	137		$	109

Costs applicable to sales increased $27, or 5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005, as detailed in the table below. The increase in the first quarter of 2006 is primarily due to increased diesel and other commodity prices, increased labor costs and the adoption of new accounting pronouncements for deferred stripping costs and share-based payments. For a complete discussion regarding variations in operations, see Results of Consolidated Operations below.

The following is a summary of Costs applicable to sales by operation:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
Gold
Nevada, USA	$	206	$	182
Yanacocha, Peru		124		111
Australia/New Zealand:
Tanami, Australia		38		43
Kalgoorlie, Australia		44		38
Jundee, Australia		26		30
Pajingo, Australia		14		15
Martha, New Zealand		6		7
		128		133
Batu Hijau, Indonesia		15		16
Other Operations:
Golden Giant, Canada		8		13
Zarafshan, Uzbekistan		7		7
Kori Kollo, Bolivia		7		2
La Herradura, Mexico		6		4
		28		26
	$	501	$	468
Copper
Batu Hijau, Indonesia	$	65	$	71

Deferred stripping. On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 04-06, “Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry.” Beginning in 2006, stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are included as a component of inventory recognized in Costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. Previously, deferred stripping costs were charged to Costs applicable to sales at some of the Company’s mining operations as gold or copper was produced and sold using the units of production method based on estimated recoverable quantities of proven and probable gold or copper reserves, using a stripping ratio calculated as the ratio of total tons to be moved to total proven and probable ore reserves, which resulted in the recognition of the costs of waste removal activities over the life of the mine as gold or copper was produced.

33

The net deferred stripping amounts included in Costs applicable to sales by operation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were as follows:

Increase (decrease) in Costs applicable to sales:

Gold
Nevada, USA	$	(14	)
Kalgoorlie, Australia		3
Batu Hijau, Indonesia		(5	)
	$	(16	)
Copper
Batu Hijau, Indonesia	$	(18	)

See Recent Accounting Pronouncements, below.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) decreased $19, or 12%, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2005 as detailed in the table below and primarily relates to lower production and inventory increases at Batu Hijau, partially offset by higher capital expenditures. Newmont expects 2006 DD&A to be between $675 and $725.

The following is a summary of Depreciation, depletion and amortization by operation:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
Nevada, USA	$	36	$	30
Yanacocha, Peru		43		47
Australia/New Zealand:
Tanami, Australia		7		9
Kalgoorlie, Australia		6		5
Jundee, Australia		5		6
Pajingo, Australia		5		6
Martha, New Zealand		3		5
Gold		26		31
Other		1		1
		27		32
Batu Hijau, Indonesia
Gold		4		6
Copper		16		26
		20		32
Other Operations:
Golden Giant, Canada		1		3
Zarafshan, Uzbekistan		2		2
Kori Kollo, Bolivia		2		––
La Herradura, Mexico		2		1
Gold		7		6
Other		––		2
		7		8
Other:
Merchant Banking		5		7
Corporate and Other		4		5
		9		12
	$	142	$	161

Exploration increased $7, or 27%, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding period in 2005. The increase was primarily a result of increased spending in North and South America. Newmont expects 2006 Exploration expense to be between $150 and $160.

Advanced projects, research and development increased $4, or 24%, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding period in 2005 and includes spending for the Akyem, Phoenix, Ahafo, Alberta Oil Sands and other projects. Newmont expects 2006 Advanced projects, research and development expenses to be between $50 and $60.

34

General and administrative expenses increased $6 or 19% for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding period in 2005 primarily as a result of increased labor, consulting and contract services fees. Newmont expects 2006 General and administrative expenses to be between $150 and $160.

Other expense, net decreased $10, or 42%, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to the corresponding period in 2005. The three month period ended March 31, 2006 expense is primarily due to legal and other costs incurred in regard to pollution allegations at Minahasa in Indonesia. The expense in the comparable periods in 2005 was primarily attributable to costs incurred to stabilize a waste dump in Nevada, pollution allegations at Minahasa in Indonesia and to settle senior management pension obligations.

Other income, net was $35 and $67 for the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended     March 31,
	2006			2005
Royalty and dividend income	$	29		$	18
Interest income		19			11
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)		3			(4	)
Gain on sale of other assets, net		2			32
Gain on investments, net		1			6
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments		(24	)		2
Other		5			2
	$	35		$	67

Royalty and dividend income increased in 2006 due to higher gold, oil and gas prices and as a result of increased distributions received from the Company’s investment in Canadian Oil Sands Trust.

Interest income increased in the three months due to increased funds available for investment and higher investment yields.

On March 31, 2005, the Minera El Bermejal S. de R.L. de C.V. joint venture, 44% owned by Newmont and 56% owned by Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V., completed the sale of its interest in the Mezcala Gold Deposit for cash proceeds of $70 (Newmont’s share $31). The Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $31.

Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, was a loss of $24 and a gain of $2, respectively, for the ineffective portion of copper collar and interest rate swap derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 approximated the corresponding period in 2005. Increased interest expense due to the issuance of the 5 7/8% notes in March 2005 was offset by increased capitalized interest. Capitalized interest totaled $15 and $6 for the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, as a result of the higher level of capital expenditures in 2006. Newmont expects the 2006 Interest expense, net to be between $95 and $105.

Income tax expense during the first quarter of 2006 was $38 compared to $53 during the first quarter of 2005. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2006 was 11% compared to 27% during the first quarter of 2005. The decrease in tax expense and the estimated effective tax rate in 2006 was reduced from discrete events related to (i) a change in Australian tax law regarding the ability of the Company to change its functional currency for tax reporting purposes, and (ii) the release of valuation allowance relative to the Company’s deferred tax assets attributable to foreign tax credits. This decrease is offset by an increase in pre-tax income and benefits relating to the Australian tax consolidation recorded in 2005. The estimated effective tax rate in 2006 is different from the United States statutory rate of 35% primarily due to (i) U.S. percentage depletion, (ii) income tax benefits associated with the change in Australian tax law, (iii) the valuation allowance release relative to foreign tax credits, and (iv) the effect of different income tax rates in countries where earnings are indefinitely reinvested. The effective tax rate in 2005 is different from the United States statutory rate of 35% primarily due to (i) U.S. percentage depletion, (ii) additional tax benefits associated with the change in Australian tax law regarding the ability of the company to file consolidated income tax returns, and (iii) the valuation allowance release relative to the Company’s deferred tax assets for post-retirement benefit obligations. For a complete discussion of the factors that influence the Company’s effective tax rate, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 2, 2006. Newmont expects the 2006 full year tax rate to be approximately 25% to 29% assuming an average gold price of $550 per ounce.

The Loss from discontinued operations resulted from the classification of the Golden Grove copper-zinc operation in Australia and the Holloway mine in Canada as discontinued operations. The Company reclassified the income statement results from the historical presentation to discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented (see Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

35

Results of Consolidated Operations

	Gold Ounces or Copper Pounds Sold		Costs Applicable to Sales(1)				Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
	2006	2005	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(ounces in thousands)		($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Gold
Nevada	535.0	588.6	$	395	$	309	$	68	$	51
Yanacocha(2) (51.35% owned)	769.9	772.9		161		143		56		61
Australia/New Zealand	333.5	439.3		384		303		79		70
Batu Hijau(2) (52.875% economic interest)	72.8	75.4		208		211		51		83
Other(2)	127.4	97.8		216		261		55		67
Total/Weighted-Average	1,838.6	1,974.0	$	275	$	237	$	64	$	61
	(pounds in millions)		($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper
Batu Hijau(2) (52.875% economic interest)	80.7	100.1	$	0.81	$	0.71	$	0.19	$	0.26

⁽¹⁾ Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization.

⁽²⁾ Consolidated gold ounces or copper pounds sold includes minority interests’ share.

Consolidated gold ounces sold decreased 7% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to decreased throughput and lower grade ores processed in Nevada and Australia/New Zealand, partially offset by increased leach production at Kori Kollo from new leaching that began in the third quarter of 2005.

Consolidated copper pounds sold decreased 19% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to processing 12% fewer tons of ore due to hard ore comprising a significant portion of the mill feed in the quarter and an increase in concentrate inventory at Batu Hijau.

Costs applicable to sales per consolidated gold ounce sold increased 16% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to the decrease in production and higher materials and labor costs in Nevada and Australia/New Zealand. Costs applicable to sales per consolidated copper pound increased 14% in 2006 from 2005, primarily due to the decrease in copper production at Batu Hijau. Costs applicable to sales were also impacted by the change in accounting for open pit waste removal costs. In 2005, $31 of mining costs were deferred and reduced Costs applicable to sales by $8 per ounce of gold and $0.18 per pound of copper sold. Deferral of open pit waste removal cost is no longer permitted during production. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

The Company expects consolidated sales of between 7.7 and 7.9 million ounces of gold in 2006 at Costs applicable to sales of between $280 to $295 per ounce and between 470 and 475 million pounds of copper at Costs applicable to sales of between $0.60 and $0.65 per pound.

Nevada Operations

Nevada gold ounces sold decreased 9% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily a result of a 14% decrease in mill ore grade. The decrease in mill ore grade resulted from mining lower grade ore at the Midas and Deep Post underground mines. Mill throughput was lower resulting from unplanned downtime at Mill 5. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 28%, primarily due to a decrease in ounces produced and increased labor, diesel, cyanide and underground contract service costs. Costs applicable to sales were also impacted by the change in accounting for open pit waste removal costs. In 2005, $14 of mining costs were deferred and reduced Costs applicable to sales by $25 per ounce. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 2.58 and 2.60 million ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $380 and $385 per ounce. During the second quarter of 2006, Costs applicable to sales per ounce are expected to temporarily increase as a result of regularly planned annual maintenance at Mill 6.

Construction of the Phoenix and Leeville projects is nearing completion with the commencement of operations expected during the second quarter of 2006 for Phoenix and the third quarter of 2006 for Leeville. Construction of a 200-megawatt coal-fired power plant is underway. Capital costs are expected to be approximately $450 and completion is targeted for mid-2008.

Non-governmental organizations have brought a series of legal actions relating to the Nevada operations, as described in more detail in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. While Newmont believes that the legal actions are without merit, unfavorable outcomes could result in additional conditions being imposed on the Company’s operations, and such conditions could have a material adverse effect on results of operations or financial position.

36

Yanacocha Operations

First quarter Yanacocha gold ounces sold remained constant as a 25% increase in ore grade and a 19% increase in tons of ore placed were offset by the timing of flows from the leach pads. The increase in ore placed resulted from an increase in tons mined and lower waste removal at the La Quinua and Yanacocha pits. Ore grade also increased at La Quinua as mining accessed higher grade material at the bottom of the pit. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 13% due to the increase in tons mined, increased consumption and prices of commodities and higher labor and royalty costs due to increased gold prices. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 2.58 and 2.62 million ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $185 and $195 per ounce.

During 2004, Peru enacted legislation to establish a sliding scale mining royalty of up to 3% based on the volume of mine production. The royalty is calculated on revenue from sales of product less certain refining and transportation expenses. While the Peruvian royalty became effective during the second quarter of 2004, it does not apply to those projects that had tax stabilization agreements prior to the adoption of the royalty law. Virtually all of Yanacocha’s current production is derived from projects that were stabilized prior to the enactment of the royalty legislation; however, future projects not covered by the tax stabilization agreements will be burdened by this royalty. In addition, presidential, congressional and regional elections are taking place in Peru in 2006, and a new national government will take office in July 2006. It is possible that the new government will attempt to set aside the tax stabilization agreements and impose the mining royalty on projects covered by current tax stabilization agreements.

Although there is a collective bargaining agreement in place at Yanacocha through February 2007, a minority of the union membership staged a three-day strike in April. The strike had no material impact on operations. There can be no assurance that on-going or future disputes will be resolved without disruption to operations.

Australia/New Zealand Operations

	Gold Ounces Sold		Costs Applicable to Sales(1)				Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
	2006	2005	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(in thousands)		($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Tanami	108.6	146.9	$	346	$	291	$	63	$	61
Kalgoorlie (50% owned)	94.0	116.5		465		325		70		39
Jundee	62.2	87.9		425		341		79		74
Pajingo	32.0	43.9		439		348		149		138
Martha	36.7	44.1		176		166		86		107
Total/Weighted-Average	333.5	439.3	$	384	$	303	$	79	$	70

⁽¹⁾ Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization.

Australia/New Zealand operations sold 24% fewer ounces of gold in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to lower grades at Kalgoorlie, Jundee and Martha combined with lower throughput at Tanami and Pajingo. Costs applicable to sales per ounce for the first quarter increased in 2006 from 2005 by 27%, primarily due to the decrease in ounces produced, partially offset by a devaluation of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar. The favorable foreign exchange movements decreased Australia/New Zealand Costs applicable to sales in 2006 from 2005 by approximately $17 per ounce. Costs applicable to sales were also impacted by the change in accounting for open pit waste removal costs. In 2005, $3 of mining costs were amortized and increased Costs applicable to sales by $7 per ounce. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 1.48 and 1.53 million ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $335 and $350 per ounce.

Tanami, Australia. Gold ounces sold decreased 26% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to a 30% decline in mill throughput resulting from the completion of processing Groundrush stockpiles. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 19%, primarily due to lower gold production.

Kalgoorlie, Australia. Gold ounces sold decreased 19% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to a 19% decrease in ore grade milled and a 7% decrease in tons milled. Higher grade ore from Mount Charlotte was processed in 2005 and adverse weather conditions limited mill throughput in 2006. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 43%, primarily due to lower gold production, and increased maintenance, diesel and reagent costs.

Jundee, Australia. Gold ounces sold decreased 29% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to a 12% decrease in tons milled and a 17% decrease in mill ore grade. The decrease in tons milled was attributable to severe weather conditions, flooding and an extended mill shutdown. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 25%, primarily attributable to lower gold production and unplanned maintenance costs.

37

Pajingo, Australia. Gold ounces sold decreased 27% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to a 32% decrease in tons milled. The decrease in tons milled was attributable to ground control issues in Vera South Deeps and access issues at Jandam. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 26% primarily due to lower production.

Martha, New Zealand. Gold ounces sold decreased 17% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily due to a 19% decrease in mill ore grade and a 9% decrease in ore milled, partially offset by higher recovery. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 6%, primarily due to decreased production and higher waste removal.

Batu Hijau Operation

	Gold Ounces or Copper Pounds Sold(1)		Costs Applicable to Sales(2)				Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
	2006	2005	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(ounces in thousands)		($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Gold	72.8	75.4	$	208	$	211	$	51	$	83
	(pounds in millions)		($ per pound)				($ per pound)
Copper	80.7	100.1	$	0.81	$	0.71	$	0.19	$	0.26

⁽¹⁾ Consolidated gold ounces or copper pounds sold includes minority interests’ share (52.875% economic interest).

⁽²⁾ Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization.

Copper sales decreased 19% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005 due to reduced mill tons processed attributable to hard ore and an increase in concentrate inventory. Gold sales decreased 3% as the decrease in mill tons processed and increase in concentrate inventory were offset by a 26% increase in gold ore grade milled. The decrease in copper production resulted in a 14% increase in Costs applicable to sales per pound of copper. Costs applicable to sales were also impacted by the change in accounting for open pit waste removal costs. In 2005, $23 of advanced stripping costs were amortized, reducing Costs applicable to sales by $0.18 per pound of copper and $58 per ounce of gold.

Batu Hijau has revised its mine operating plan to address recurring geotechnical instability of the operation’s east pit wall. Consolidated sales for 2006 are expected to total between 470 and 475 million pounds of copper at Costs applicable to sales of between $0.60 and $0.65 per pound and between 455,000 and 465,000 ounces of gold at Costs applicable to sales of between $155 and $165 per ounce.

Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, beginning in 2005 and continuing through 2010, a portion of the project must be offered for sale to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals, equal to the difference between the following percentages and the percentage of shares already owned by the Indonesian government or Indonesian nationals (if such number is positive): 15%, by the end of 2005; 23%, by the end of 2006; 30%, by the end of 2007; 37%, by the end of 2008; 44%, by the end of 2009; and 51%, by the end of 2010. The price at which such interest must be offered for sale to the Indonesian parties is the highest of the then-current replacement cost, the price at which shares of the project company would be accepted for listing on the Jakarta Stock Exchange, or the fair market value of such interest in the project company as a going concern.

A company owned by an Indonesian national currently owns a 20% interest in Batu Hijau, which required the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership to offer a 3% interest in 2006. An offer to sell a 3% interest was made to the government of Indonesia in the first quarter of 2006, and the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership is awaiting a response to that offer. Pursuant to this provision of the Contract of Work, it is possible that the ownership interest of the Newmont/Sumitomo partnership in Batu Hijau could be reduced by 49% by the end of 2010.

38

Other Operations

	Gold Ounces Sold		Costs Applicable to Sales(1)				Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
	2006	2005	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(in thousands)		($ per ounce)				($ per ounce)
Golden Giant	34.1	37.8	$	223	$	340	$	17	$	73
Zarafshan(2) (50% owned)	29.3	34.2		237		199		78		69
Kori Kollo(3) (88% owned)	43.8	6.9		169		275		49		36
La Herradura (44% owned)	20.2	18.9		274		207		98		61
Total/Weighted-Average	127.4	97.8	$	216	$	261	$	55	$	67

⁽¹⁾ Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization.

⁽²⁾ Joint venture between Newmont and two Uzbekistan government entities, the State Committee for Geology and Mineral Resources (the “State Committee”) and Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat (“Navoi”).

⁽³⁾ Consolidated gold ounces sold includes minority interests’ share.

Golden Giant, Canada. Mining operations at Golden Giant were completed in December 2005. Remnant mining and milling production in the first quarter of 2006 was higher than expected due to additional in-circuit inventory ounces. Remnant production, at significantly reduced levels, is expected through the third quarter of 2006.

Zarafshan, Uzbekistan. Gold ounces sold decreased 14% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005 primarily due to timing of flows from the leach pads. Tons placed on the leach pads increased 18% due to milder weather conditions as compared to the first quarter of 2005. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 19%, primarily a result of the lower production. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 140,000 and 150,000 ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $240 and $250 per ounce.

At a meeting on March 17, 2006, the Company was verbally notified by the Uzbekistan Ministry of Finance that it would like to renegotiate or eliminate Decree 151 during 2006. Decree 151 is a governmental decree that protects the Company from changes in tax laws and provides other financial and operational benefits. The joint venture agreement with the government of Uzbekistan provides that the tax protection and financial and operational benefits provided by Decree 151 are to remain in effect for so long as the joint venture has ongoing operations. The Company does not believe that any amendment to Decree 151 is warranted or appropriate, but based on recent discussions it is reasonably likely that such an amendment will be mandated by the government. The Company cannot predict the final outcome of this matter at this time, but based on the proposals put forth to date, the Company does not currently believe that it will be required to write-down the book value of its interest in the joint venture as a result of the amendment of Decree 151. Nonetheless, depending on the outcome, the amendment or elimination of Decree 151 could adversely affect the results of the joint venture operation.

Kori Kollo, Bolivia. Gold ounces sold increased significantly in the first quarter of 2006 resulting from the placement of additional material from the Kori Kollo pit on the existing leach pad and ore from the Kori Chaca pit on a new leach pad beginning in the third quarter of 2005. Production in the first quarter of 2005 was entirely from residual leaching of an existing leach pad. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 39% from 2005 to 2006 as a result of the increased production. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 110,000 and 120,000 ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $240 and $250 per ounce.

La Herradura, Mexico. Gold ounces sold increased 7% in the first quarter of 2006 from 2005, primarily a result of timing of flows from the leach pads as the grade of ore placed on the leach pads decreased 26%. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased by 32% primarily due to an increase in waste tons mined and increased labor, diesel and other commodity prices. Consolidated gold sales for 2006 are expected to be between 80,000 and 90,000 ounces at Costs applicable to sales of between $215 and $225 per ounce.

Merchant Banking

During the first quarter of 2006, Merchant Banking assisted with completion of the acquisition of an additional 22.22% interest in Boddington and the remaining 15% interest in Akyem bringing the Company’s ownership to 2/3 and 100%, respectively.

Merchant Banking earned $29 and $18 of Royalty and dividend income for the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

The Company’s foreign operations sell their gold and copper production based on U.S. dollar metal prices. Approximately 41% and 36%, of Newmont’s Costs applicable to sales were paid in local currencies during the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. Variations in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar at Newmont’s foreign mining operations

39

decreased Costs applicable to sales by approximately $7 during the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to the corresponding period in 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Provided from Operating Activities

Net cash provided from continuing operations increased 28% for the first quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. Cash flow from operations during 2006 was positively impacted by higher realized gold and copper prices, partially offset by fewer gold ounces and copper pounds sold. Also impacting cash flows from operations during 2006 were higher operating costs, as discussed above in Results of Consolidated Operations, a $44 increase in accounts receivable primarily due to trade receivables at Batu Hijau related to the timing of concentrate shipments and a $124 increase in inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $257 during the first quarter of 2006 compared to $419 during the same period of 2005.

Additions to property, plant and mine development

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
Nevada, USA	$	154	$	77
Yanacocha, Peru		56		46
Australia/New Zealand:
Tanami, Australia		4		3
Kalgoorlie, Australia		3		4
Jundee, Australia		5		5
Pajingo, Australia		3		2
Martha, New Zealand		3		3
Other, Australia		5		3
		23		20
Batu Hijau, Indonesia		63		23
Ghana, West Africa:
Ahafo, Ghana		54		47
Akyem, Ghana		11		3
		65		50
Other Operations:
Kori Kollo, Bolivia		—		7
Zarafshan, Uzbekistan		3		1
La Herradura, Mexico		2		—
		5		8
Merchant Banking		1		—
Corporate and Other		3		5
	$	370	$	229

Capital expenditures for Nevada operations during the first quarter of 2006 and 2005 related to activities for the development of the Leeville, Phoenix, and Power Plant projects, and mine equipment replacement. Yanacocha capital expenditures were for continuing leach pad construction, mine development and mine equipment. Australia/New Zealand capital expenditures for the first three months of 2006 and 2005 resulted from mine development and underground fleet replacement. Expenditures at Batu Hijau primarily included the purchase of additional surface equipment. Capital expenditures at Ahafo resulted from construction and development costs during both periods. Newmont expects to spend approximately $1,400 to $1,600 on capital expenditures in 2006.

Marketable debt securities. The Company had net proceeds of $297 and net investments of $187 from auction rate marketable debt securities during the first three months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company accounts for these investments as short-term available-for-sale marketable debt securities.

Marketable equity securities. During the first three months of 2005, the Company purchased marketable equity securities of Shore Gold Inc. for approximately $42. The Company accounts for this investment as long-term available-for-sale marketable equity securities.

40

Sale of Ovacik. On March 1, 2005, the Ovacik operation, located in western Turkey, was sold to a subsidiary of Koza Davetiye, a listed Turkish conglomerate. Consideration included $20 at closing, $10 during the fourth quarter of 2005 and various deferred payments that could total as much as $15.

Sale of Mezcala. On March 31, 2005, the Mezcala gold deposit was sold for cash proceeds of $31.

Acquisition of minority interests. In January 2006, Newmont acquired Kenbert Mining’s 15% interest in the Akyem project, bringing its interest in the project to 100%. An environmental impact statement was submitted to the Ghana Environmental Protection Agency in August 2005. Once the environmental impact statement is approved, construction is planned to commence along with a detailed review of capital costs and production timing.

On February 27, 2006, Newmont announced that it will proceed with the development of the Boddington Project in Western Australia with AngloGold Ashanti Limited. Construction of the Boddington Project is expected to cost Newmont approximately $900 to $1,000, with initial production expected in late 2008 or early 2009. The project has a current estimated mine life of more than 15 years, with Newmont’s share of annual production expected to be approximately 700,000 ounces for the first five years and average approximately 600,000 ounces over the life of the project.

On March 20, 2006, Newmont acquired Newcrest Mining Limited’s 22.22% interest in the Boddington Project in Western Australia, bringing its interest in the project to 2/3, for consideration of $164 plus applicable stamp duty and similar costs.

Financing Activities

Net cash (used in) provided from financing activities was $(80) and $509 during the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. In March 2005, net proceeds of $582 were received from the issuance of 30-year 5 7/8% Notes.

During the first quarter of 2006, the Company made scheduled debt repayments of approximately $20 related to the sale-leaseback of the refractory ore treatment plant, classified as a capital lease.

Scheduled minimum long-term debt cash repayments as of March 31, 2006 are $176 for the remainder of 2006, $162 in 2007, $232 in 2008, $114 in 2009, $113 in 2010 and $1,110 thereafter. Newmont expects to be able to fund maturities of its debt from cash provided by operating activities or existing cash on hand. Approximately $566 of the total scheduled minimum long-term debt repayments as of March 31, 2006 relate to the project financing facility for Batu Hijau, which is non-recourse to Newmont. Approximately $87 of this facility is classified as a current liability. Additionally, PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara shareholder loans of $39 as of March 31, 2006 from one of its shareholders, Nusa Tenggara Mining Corporation, are payable on demand, subject to the project financing facility subordination terms, and are also non-recourse to Newmont. This amount is also classified as a current liability. In addition, the Company will deliver 161,111 ounces of gold in 2006 and 2007 in connection with the Prepaid forward sales obligation.

On December 19, 2005, Yanacocha filed with the Peruvian securities regulatory authority (CONASEV), for its review and approval, a prospectus to register a $200 bond program in the Peruvian public market. When approved, the registration would make the bond program available for Yanacocha to make up to $200 in issuances over a two-year period. Yanacocha may also consider obtaining funds from other sources, including commercial banks. Any funds generated from the bond program or other debt facilities may be used by Yanacocha for capital expenditures and its general corporate purposes.

In January 2006, the International Finance Corporation approved $125 in project financing for the Ahafo project. The financing is subject to satisfactory final documentation and syndication to commercial banks. The Company expects to close and draw down on the facility prior to mid-year.

As of March 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all required debt covenants and other restrictions related to its long-term debt agreements.

On February 24, 2006, the Company declared regular quarterly dividends totaling $0.10 per common share, paid on March 29, 2006. Additionally, Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited, a subsidiary of the Company, declared regular quarterly dividends on its exchangeable shares totaling CDN$0.1152 per share paid on March 29, 2006. The total paid to common stockholders in the first quarter of 2006 was $45. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company declared regular quarterly dividends totaling $0.10 per common share, as well as dividends on exchangeable shares, for a total paid of $45. The Company also used $45 and $16 to pay dividends to minority interests for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

41

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has the following off-balance sheet arrangements: operating leases and $389 of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees (excluding the surety bond supporting the prepaid forward transaction described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed on March 2, 2006). Newmont also provides a contingent support line of credit to PT Newmont Nusa Tanggara of which Newmont’s pro-rata share is $37. Batu Hijau has sales agreements to sell copper concentrates at market prices as follows (in millions of pounds): 1,317 for the remainder of 2006; 1,361 in 2007; 1,378 in 2008; 1,389 in 2009 and 2010; and 4,167 thereafter. For information regarding these agreements, see Item 3, Provisional Copper and Gold Sales, below.

Environmental

The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $448 and $431, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently producing mineral properties.

In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $73 and $77 were accrued for such obligations at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 108% greater or 35% lower than the amount accrued at March 31, 2006. The amounts accrued for these matters are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are charged to Costs and expenses, other in the period estimates are revised.

For more information on the Company’s reclamation and remediation liabilities, see Notes 15 and 18 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, capital expenditures were approximately $22 and $3, respectively, to comply with environmental regulations. Ongoing costs to comply with environmental regulations have not been a significant component of operating costs.

Newmont spent $2 and $3, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 for environmental obligations related to the former mining sites discussed in Note 18 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three month’s ended March 31, 2006 contained herein.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 04-06, “Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry. “ EITF Issue No. 04-06 addresses the accounting for stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine and refers to these costs as variable production costs that should be included as a component of inventory to be recognized in costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory. As a result, capitalization of post-production stripping costs is appropriate only to the extent product inventory exists at the end of a reporting period. The guidance requires application through recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption, with no charge to current earnings for prior periods. The results for prior periods have not been restated. The cumulative effect adjustment reduced opening retained earnings by $81 (net of tax and minority interest) and eliminated the $71 net deferred stripping balance. Adoption of EITF Issue No. 04-06 had no impact on the Company’s cash position or cash from operations.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. As a result of adopting FAS 123R, the Company’s Income from continuing operations and Net income for the first quarter of 2006 is $4 lower ($0.01 per share, basic and diluted) than if we had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB 25 as we did in the comparable prior year period.

42

Safe Harbor Statement

Certain statements contained in this report (including information incorporated by reference) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under these sections. Our forward-looking statements include, without limitation: (a) statements regarding future earnings, and the sensitivity of earnings to gold and other metal prices; (b) estimates of future mineral production and sales for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (c) estimates of future production costs and other expenses, for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (d) estimates of future cash flows and the sensitivity of cash flows to gold and other metal prices; (e) estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs for specific operations and on a consolidated basis and expectations as to the funding thereof; (f) statements as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of development and other capital costs, financing plans for these deposits, and expected production commencement dates; (g) estimates of future costs and other liabilities for certain environmental matters; (h) estimates of reserves, and statements regarding future exploration results and reserve replacement; (i) statements regarding modifications to Newmont’s hedge positions; (j) statements regarding future transactions relating to portfolio management or rationalization efforts; and (k) projected synergies and costs associated with acquisitions and related matters.

Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected, or implied by those forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements (“cautionary statements”) are disclosed under “Risk Factors” in the Newmont Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as well as in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of these factors are beyond Newmont’s ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Newmont or to persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Newmont disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (dollars in millions, except per ounce and per pound amounts).

Metal Price

Changes in the market price of gold significantly affect Newmont’s profitability and cash flow. Gold prices can fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as demand; forward selling by producers; central bank sales, purchases and lending; investor sentiment; the strength of the U.S. dollar and global mine production levels. Changes in the market price of copper also affect Newmont’s profitability and cash flow from its investment in the Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia. Copper is traded on established international exchanges and copper prices generally reflect market supply and demand, but can also be influenced by speculative trading in the commodity or by currency exchange rates.

43

Newmont had the following contracts at March 31, 2006:

	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date						Fair Value
	2006		2007		Total/ Average		At March 31, 2006			At December 31, 2005
Gold Put Option Contracts ($ denominated):
Ounces (thousands)		61		20		81	$	(3	)	$	(3	)
Average price	$	352	$	397	$	363
Copper Collar Contracts (3) ($ denominated):
Pounds (millions)		298		84		382	$	(385	)(1)	$	(261	)(2)
Average cap price	$	1.36	$	1.41	$	1.37
Average floor price	$	1.10	$	1.10	$	1.10
$/IDR Forward Purchase Contracts (3):
$ (millions)	$	57	$	5	$	62	$	7		$	—
Average rate (IDR/$)	$	10,555	$	9,956	$	10,506
Australian Dollar Zero-Cost Collar Contracts:
$ (millions)	$	69		—	$	69	$	—		$	—
Average cap price ($ per A$1)	$	0.80		—	$	0.80
Average floor price ($ per A$1)	$	0.55		—	$	0.55

⁽¹⁾ The fair value does not include amounts payable ($34) on derivative contracts that have been closed out in March 2006 with the net settlement due in April 2006.

⁽²⁾ The fair value does not include amounts payable ($36) on derivative contracts that had been closed out in December 2005 with the net settlement due and paid in January 2006.

⁽³⁾ 56.25% guaranteed by Newmont.

Provisional Copper and Gold Sales

The Company’s sales based on a provisional sales price contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the concentrates at the forward London Metal Exchange price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, Batu Hijau recorded the following gross revenues before treatment and refining charges, which were subject to final price adjustments at March 31, 2006 and 2005, as follows:

	At March 31,
	2006			2005
Gross revenue subject to final price adjustments
Copper	$	377		$	250
Gold	$	15		$	12
The average final price adjustments realized were as follows:
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Average final price adjustments
Copper		26	%		11	%
Gold		9	%		0	%

Price-Capped Forward Sales Contracts

In 2001, Newmont entered into transactions that closed out certain call options. The options were replaced with a series of forward sales contracts requiring physical delivery of the same quantity of gold over slightly extended future periods. Under the terms of the contracts, Newmont will realize the lower of the spot price on the delivery date or the capped price ranging from $384 per ounce in 2008 to $392 per ounce in 2011. The initial fair value of the forward sales contracts of $54 was recorded as deferred revenue and will be included in revenues as delivery occurs. Newmont will next deliver into these contracts in 2008. The forward sales contracts are accounted for as normal sales contracts under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging

44

Activities” and SFAS No. 138 “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities-an Amendment to SFAS No. 133.”

Newmont had the following price-capped forward sales contracts outstanding at March 31, 2006:

	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	2008		2009		2011		Total/     Average
	($ denominated)
Ounces (thousands)		1,000		600		250		1,850
Average price	$	384	$	381	$	392	$	384

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

In 2001, Newmont entered into contracts to hedge the interest rate risk exposure on a portion of its $275 8 5/8% notes and its $200 8 3/8% debentures. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, these transactions resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $nil and $1, respectively. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was $nil at March 31, 2006 and $2 at December 31, 2005.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

During the fiscal period covered by this report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods.

Even an effective internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations—including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and financial statement preparation.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

45

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Information regarding legal proceedings is contained in Note 18 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 2. ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006	4,424	(1)	$	43.43	—	N/A
February 1, 2006 through February 28, 2006	3,186	(2)	$	60.39	—	N/A
March 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006	—			—	—	N/A

⁽¹⁾ Represents shares forfeited by an employee of previously granted restricted shares of common stock upon termination of employment.

⁽²⁾ Represents shares delivered to the Company from restricted stock held by Company employees upon vesting for purpose of covering the recipients’ tax withholding obligations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

The following matters were voted upon at the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 25, 2006:

a) Election of directors,

b) Ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Newmont’s independent auditors for 2006, and

c) Consider and act upon a Stockholder Proposal regarding Independent Board Chairman.

All matters voted on at the annual meeting were approved, except Proposal #3. The voting results were as follows:

Proposal #1 – Election of Directors.

Name	Votes For	Votes Withheld
Glen A. Barton	339,946,117	3,780,745
Vincent. A. Calarco	339,961,448	3,765,414
Noreen Doyle	339,909,565	3,817,296
Veronica M. Hagen	335,415,695	8,311,167
Michael S. Hamson	339,936,925	3,789,937
Leo I. Higdon, Jr.	337,512,432	6,214,430
Pierre Lassonde	337,640,185	6,076,677
Robert J. Miller	327,190,279	16,536,583
Wayne W. Murdy	337,614,136	6,112,725
Robin A. Plumbridge	338,465,614	5,261,248
John B. Prescott	339,946,216	3,780,645
Donald C. Roth	339,914,966	3,811,896
Seymour Schulich	338,419,769	5,307,093
James V. Taranik	329,747,552	13,979,310

46

Proposal #2 - Ratification of Auditors.

Votes For	340,478,402
Votes Against	572,523
Abstentions	2,675,937

Proposal #3 – Stockholder Proposal regarding Independent Board Chairman.

Votes For	73,688,563
Votes Against	193,342,489
Abstentions	3,629,407
Broker Non-Votes	73,066,403

There were no broker non-votes included in the results of the election of directors or the ratification of auditors.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.

47

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION (Registrant)
Date: April 28, 2006	/s/ RICHARD T. O’BRIEN
	Richard T. O’Brien Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: April 28, 2006	/s/ RUSSELL BALL
	Russell Ball Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

48

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
10.1	Annual Incentive Compensation Payroll Practice, amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, filed herewith.
10.2	Employee Performance Incentive Compensation Payroll Practice, amended and restated effective January 1, 2006, filed herewith.
10.3	Form of Award Agreement used for Executive Officers to grant restricted stock units pursuant to Registrant’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2006.
10.4	Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits. Incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2006.
12.1	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith.
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.
32.1	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.1
32.2	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.1

¹ This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

49

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PAYROLL PRACTICE

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2006

NEWMONT

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PAYROLL PRACTICE

(Effective as of January 1, 2006)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this payroll practice is to provide to those employees of Newmont Mining and its Affiliated Entities that participate in this payroll practice a more direct interest in the success of the operations of Newmont Mining. Employees of Newmont Mining and participating Affiliated Entities will be rewarded in accordance with the terms and conditions described below.

This payroll practice is intended to be a payroll practice described in Department of Labor Regulation Section 2510.3-1(b) and shall not be considered a plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

DEFINITIONS

1.1 “Affiliated Entity(ies)” means any corporation or other entity, now or hereafter formed, that is or shall become affiliated with Newmont Mining, either directly or indirectly, through stock ownership or control, and which is (a) included in the controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of Code Section 1563(a) without regard to Code Section 1563(a)(4) and Code Section 1563(e)(3)(C)) in which Newmont Mining is also included and (b) included in the group of entities (whether or not incorporated) under common control (within the meaning of Code Section 414(c)) in which Newmont Mining is also included.

1.2 “Consolidated Net Cash from Operations” means Newmont Mining’s net cash from operations based on the audited, US GAAP Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows, excluding individual payments or receipts greater than $10 million for unbudgeted liabilities and/or legal settlements, measured against budgeted consolidated net cash from operations per the approved business plan.

1.3 “Board” means the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining or its delegate.

1.4 “Bonus Eligible Earnings” means the total base salary and regular earnings (collectively, “regular earnings”) of the Employee during the calendar year. If an Employee is absent from work because of a work-related injury, the Employee’s “Bonus Eligible Earnings” will be determined by his actual gross base earnings during the calendar year. In the case of a Terminated Eligible Employee who is Disabled, “Bonus Eligible Earnings” will be determined by his actual gross base earnings, including short-term disability pay received during the calendar year, but excluding pay from any other source. If an Employee dies during the calendar year, the “Bonus Eligible Earnings” for such Terminated Eligible Employee will be determined by his actual gross base earnings. If an Employee is on active military duty during a calendar year, the “Bonus Eligible Earnings” will be determined by his actual gross base earnings during

the calendar year, exclusive of any military pay. If an Employee does not receive a W-2, his “Bonus Eligible Earnings” shall be determined on the basis of his actual gross base earnings for the calendar year, or portion thereof, as shown on the payroll records of Newmont Mining or the Participating Employer. In all cases, an Employee’s “Bonus Eligible Earnings” shall be computed before reduction for pre-tax contributions to an employee benefit plan of Newmont Mining pursuant to Section 401(k) or Section 125 of the Code. In the event of a Change of Control, the Bonus Eligible Earnings of each eligible Employee shall be equal to such Employee’s base salary, on an annualized basis, as of the date immediately preceding the Change of Control and, in the case of a Terminated Eligible Employee, such Employee’s base salary for the calendar year through the date of termination of employment.

1.5 “Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(i) The acquisition in one or a series of transactions by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 20% or more of either (x) the then outstanding shares of common stock of Newmont Mining (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”) or (y) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of Newmont Mining entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (i), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change of Control: (A) any acquisition directly from Newmont Mining other than an acquisition by virtue of the exercise of a conversion privilege, unless the security being so converted was itself acquired directly from Newmont Mining, (B) any acquisition by Newmont Mining, (C) any acquisition by any employee benefits plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by Newmont Mining or any corporation controlled by Newmont Mining or (D) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (A), (B) and (C) of paragraph (iii) below; or

(ii) Individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining (“Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election, or nomination for election by Newmont Mining’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining; or

(iii) Consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Newmont Mining or an acquisition of assets of another corporation (a “Business Combination”), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (A) all or substantially all of the

2

individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a corporation or other entity which as a result of such transaction owns Newmont Mining or all or substantially all of Newmont Mining’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries (a “Parent Company”)) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (B) no person or entity (excluding Newmont Mining, any corporation resulting from such Business Combination, any employee benefits plan (or related trust) of Newmont Mining or its Affiliate or any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or, if reference was made to equity ownership of any Parent Company for purposes of determining whether clause (A) above is satisfied in connection with the applicable Business Combination, such Parent Company) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, unless such ownership resulted solely from ownership of securities of Newmont Mining, prior to the Business Combination and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (or, if reference was made to equity ownership of any Parent Company for purposes of determining whether clause (A) above is satisfied in connection with the applicable Business Combination, of the Parent Company) were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining, providing for such Business Combination; or

(iv) Approval by the stockholders of Newmont Mining of a complete liquidation or dissolution of Newmont Mining.

1.6 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

1.7 “Compensation Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Newmont Mining.

1.8 “Consolidated Costs Applicable to Sales” means audited, US GAAP consolidated costs applicable to sales for gold and copper, measured against the budgeted consolidated costs applicable to sales for gold and copper per the approved business plan, on a per gold equivalent ounce basis. Actual copper sales volumes are converted to gold equivalent sales volumes at a rate of 0.0030048 gold equivalent ounces per pound of copper.

1.9 “Corporate Performance Bonus” means the bonus payable to an Employee pursuant to Section III.

3

1.10 “Disability” means a condition such that the salaried Employee has terminated employment with Newmont Mining or Affiliated Entities with a disability and has begun receiving benefits from the Long Term Disability Plan of Newmont or a successor plan.

1.11 “Equity Ounces Sold” means the reported equity ounces of gold sold for the applicable calendar year, measured against the budgeted equity ounces of gold sold per the approved business plan.

1.12 “Economic Performance Driver” means Equity Ounces Sold, Consolidated Net Cash from Operations, Reserve Growth, and Consolidated Costs Applicable to Sales.

1.13 “Employee” means an employee of Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity who satisfied the conditions for this payroll practice and who is not (a) an individual who performs services for Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity under an agreement, contract or arrangement (which may be written or oral) between the employer and the individual or with any other organization that provides the services of the individual to the Employer pursuant to which the individual is initially classified or treated as an independent contractor or whose remuneration for services has not been treated initially as subject to the withholding of federal income tax pursuant to Code § 3401, or who is otherwise treated as an employee of an entity other than Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity, irrespective of whether he or she is treated as an employee of Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity under common-law employment principles or pursuant to the provisions of Code § 414(m), 414(n) or 414(o), even if the individual is subsequently reclassified as a common-law employee as a result of a final decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the settlement of an administrative or judicial proceeding or a determination by the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of the Treasury or the Department of Labor, (b) an individual who is a leased employee, (c) a temporary employee, or (d) an individual covered by a collective bargaining agreement unless otherwise provided for in such agreement.

1.14 “Key Objectives” means the key results expected by the end of the review period for an Employee, as established and administered through Newmont Mining’s performance management system.

1.15 “Newmont Mining” means Newmont Mining Corporation.

1.16 “Participating Employer” means Newmont Mining and any Affiliated Entity that enters into a participation agreement with the Board or its delegate which identifies such entity as a Participating Employer in this payroll practice.

1.17 “Pay Grade” means those jobs sharing a common salary range, as designated by the Board or its delegate.

1.18 “Performance Rating Category” means the numerical category used to classify the performance of each Employee in accordance with Newmont Mining’s performance management system.

4

1.19 “Personal Performance Bonus” means the bonus payable to an Employee based on the individual performance of such Employee, as set forth in Section 4.2.

1.20 “Personal Performance Bonus Factor” means the factor used to determine an Employee’s Personal Performance Bonus, based upon the Performance Rating Category assigned to the Employee, in accordance with Section 4.1.

1.21 “Position(s)” means the defined job(s) held by an Employee during the calendar year.

1.22 “Reserve Growth” means year on year gold reserve growth as reported under SEC Industry Guide 7. This includes reserve additions from acquisitions. This is calculated as a percentage change as follows: current year-end reserves divided by prior year-end reserve less divestitures minus one. [Current year-end reserves/(Prior year-end reserves less divestitures) -1].

1.23 “Terminated Eligible Employee” means an Employee who terminates employment with Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer during the calendar year on account of death, retirement, Disability, or severance. The Vice President of Human Resources of Newmont Mining (or his or her delegate) may, in his/her sole discretion, also designate in writing other Employees who terminate employment during the calendar year under other circumstances as “Terminated Eligible Employees.”

ELIGIBILITY

All Employees of Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer are potentially eligible to receive a bonus payment under this payroll practice, provided (i) they are on the payroll of Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer as of the last day of the calendar year, and at the time of payment, or (ii) they are a Terminated Eligible Employee with respect to such calendar year. Employees who are on short-term disability under the Short-Term Disability Plan of Newmont or a similar or a successor plan or not working because of a work-related injury as of the last day of the calendar year shall be eligible to receive a bonus under clause (i). Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section II, the Compensation Committee or the Vice President of Human Resources (or his or her delegate) may, prior to the end of the calendar year, exclude from eligibility for participation under this payroll practice with respect to the calendar year any Employee or Employees, as he or she may determine in his or her sole discretion.

CORPORATE PERFORMANCE BONUS

3.1 Eligibility for Corporate Performance Bonus Component. For the calendar year, the Corporate Performance Bonus will be determined pursuant to this section for each eligible Employee who is (a) in Pay Grade 109 and above on the last day of the calendar year and at the

5

time the payment is made (or was in such Pay Grade at the time of termination of employment); (b) each eligible Employee who is in Pay Grade 108 and below who is employed by the corporate office (including expatriate assignments) or at a non-operating site location, as determined by the Vice President of Human Resources (or his or her delegate), on the last day of the calendar year and at the time payment is made (or was in such Pay Grade and at such location at the time of termination of employment); and (c) any other employee or class of employees as determined by the Vice President of Human Resources (or his or her delegate). For the calendar year, the performance bonus for each eligible Employee who is in Pay Grade 108 or below on the last day of the calendar year and at the time the payment is made (or was in such Pay Grade at the time of termination of employment) and who is not assigned to the corporate office or at a non-site location, will be determined in accordance with such performance factors, weighting factors and other methods of bonus determination as shall be established for each specific site or region by Newmont Mining for the calendar year, rather than the Corporate Performance Bonus. Each operating site shall develop its own critical performance indicators for this purpose.

3.2 Target Amounts for Economic Performance Drivers. The Compensation Committee shall establish both the targets and the minimum and maximum amounts for each Economic Performance Driver on an annual basis. The target Equity Ounces Sold, the target Consolidated Net Cash from Operations, the target Consolidated Costs Applicable to Sales together with the applicable minimums and maximums for each such Economic Performance Driver, shall be established in United States dollars and cents and the target and minimum and maximum Reserve Growth shall be established as a percentage. Targets will be adjusted for acquisitions or divestitures as approved by the Newmont Board of Directors.

3.3 Actual Performance for Economic Performance Drivers. As soon as possible after the end of each calendar year, the Compensation Committee shall certify the extent to which actual performance met the target amounts for each Economic Performance Driver.

3.4 Aggregate Payout Percentage. An aggregate payout factor (the “Aggregate Payout Percentage”) will be calculated as follows:

(i) Calculating the Performance Percentage for each Economic Performance Driver. For each Economic Performance Driver, actual performance will be compared to the target, minimum and maximum amounts to arrive at a performance percentage (“Performance Percentage”) calculated as follows:

• If the actual amount is less than the minimum amount, the Performance Percentage is zero;

• If the actual amount is equal to the minimum amount, the Performance Percentage is 50%;

• If the actual amount is less than the target amount and greater than the minimum amount, the Performance Percentage is the sum of (A) 50%, plus (B) the product of 50%, times a fraction, the numerator of which is the difference between the

6

actual amount and the minimum amount, and the denominator of which is the difference between the target amount and the minimum amount;

• If the actual amount is equal to the target amount, the Performance Percentage is 100%;

• If the actual amount is greater than the target amount and less than the maximum amount, the Performance Percentage is the sum of (A) 100%, plus (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the difference between the actual amount and the target amount, and the denominator of which is the difference between the maximum amount and the target amount; and

• If the actual amount is greater than or equal to the maximum amount, the Performance Percentage is 200%.

(ii) Calculating the Payout Percentage for each Economic Performance Driver. The payout percentage for each Economic Performance Driver is the product of the Performance Percentage times the applicable weighting factor as listed in Appendix A (“Payout Percentage for each Economic Performance Driver”).

(iii) Calculating the Aggregate Payout Percentage. The Aggregate Payout Percentage is the sum of the Payout Percentages for each Performance Factor.

3.5 Determination of Target Performance Level. An Employee’s Target Performance Level is determined by the Employee’s Pay Grade pursuant to the table in Appendix B.

3.6 Determination of the Corporate Performance Bonus. The Corporate Performance Bonus for each eligible Employee is the product of the Aggregate Payout Percentage, times the Employee’s Target Performance Level, times the Employee’s Bonus Eligible Earnings.

3.7 Terminated Eligible Employees. Terminated Eligible Employees shall be eligible to receive a Corporate Performance Bonus. This bonus will be calculated as follows:

Target Performance Level x Year to Date Bonus Eligible Earnings = Corporate Performance Bonus Payable

3.8 Adjustments. The Compensation Committee may adjust the Performance Percentage or any measure or otherwise increase or decrease the Corporate Performance Bonus otherwise payable in order to reflect changed circumstances or such other matters as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

7

PERSONAL PERFORMANCE BONUS

4.1 Personal Performance Level. At the end of the calendar year, each eligible Employee’s supervisor will evaluate the Employee and rate the Employee’s personal performance level. The Personal Performance Bonus for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining shall be determined by the Compensation Committee. In accordance with Newmont Mining’s performance management system, the supervisor will rate the degree to which the Employee met the key objectives that were established for the Employee and performed in accordance with Newmont’s values during the calendar year. Each Employee will be rated by the Employee’s supervisor in one of Newmont Mining’s Performance Rating Categories. In conjunction with these ratings, Newmont Mining will assign a Personal Performance Bonus Factor for the Employee as listed in Appendix C which Personal Performance Bonus Factor may be greater or smaller than the Personal Performance Bonus Factor set forth in Appendix C as determined in the sole discretion of Newmont Mining.

4.2 Determination of Personal Performance Bonus. Subject to Section 4.3, an eligible Employee’s Personal Performance Bonus is the product of (x) the eligible Employee’s Bonus Eligible Earnings times (y) the Personal Performance Bonus Factor determined pursuant to Section 4.1 and (z) multiplying that product by the applicable percentage from the Target Performance Level, as set forth in Appendix C.

4.3 Terminated Eligible Employees. Terminated Eligible Employees shall be eligible to receive a Personal Performance Bonus based upon an assumed Personal Performance Bonus Factor of 1.0, so that the Terminated Eligible Employees will receive a Personal Performance Bonus at their individual Target Performance Level multiplied by their Bonus Eligible Earnings for the calendar year.

4.4 Ineligible Employees. Eligible Employees whose Personal Performance Bonus Factor (determined pursuant to Section 4.1) is less than .15 shall not be eligible to receive a Personal Performance Bonus.

4.5 Adjustments of Personal Performance Bonus. The Compensation Committee may adjust the Personal Performance Bonus Factor or any measure or otherwise increase the Personal Performance Bonus otherwise payable in order to reflect changed circumstances or such other matters as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

PAYMENT OF BONUS

5.1 Pay Grade. The bonus payable to an eligible Employee who was in more than one Pay Grade during the calendar year shall be calculated on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the amount of time spent by such eligible Employee in each Pay Grade during the calendar year.

8

5.2 Time and Method of Payment. The aggregate of any and all bonuses payable under this payroll practice shall be payable to each eligible Employee (other than Terminated Eligible Employees) in cash as soon as practicable following approval of bonuses by the Compensation Committee. Terminated Eligible Employees shall receive the aggregate of any and all bonuses payable under this payroll practice in cash as soon as practicable following the date of their termination from employment with Newmont Mining or a Participating Employer. All payments and the timing of such payments shall be made in accordance with practices and procedures established by Newmont Mining or the Participating Employer.

5.3 Withholding Taxes. All bonuses payable hereunder shall be subject to the withholding of such amounts as Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity may determine is required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable federal, state, local or foreign law or regulation.

CHANGE OF CONTROL

6.1 In General. In the event of a Change of Control, each eligible Employee (including Terminated Eligible Employees who terminate employment during the calendar year in which the Change of Control occurs) shall become entitled to the payment of a Corporate Performance Bonus and a Personal Performance Bonus, in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

6.2 Calculation of Bonuses. Upon a Change of Control, each eligible Employee, together with each Terminated Eligible Employee, shall become entitled to the payment of (i) a Corporate Performance Bonus calculated on the basis of a Performance Percentage equal to the greater of the actual results attained for the calendar year or the applicable targets for such Calendar year and (ii) a Personal Performance Bonus calculated on the basis of a Personal Performance Bonus Factor equal to the greater of the actual Personal Performance Bonus Factor for the calendar year or a Personal Performance Bonus Factor of 1.0. If a Change of Control occurs prior to the time that the Compensation Committee has established the targets for the calendar year, such percentages shall be based upon the corresponding percentages for the immediately preceding calendar year.

6.3 Payment of Bonuses. The bonuses payable in accordance with the provisions of this Section VI shall be calculated and paid as soon as practicable following the date of the Change of Control. Such payments shall be subject to the withholding of such amounts as Newmont Mining may determine is required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. Upon the completion of such payments, eligible Employees and Terminated Eligible Employees shall have no further right to the payment of any bonus hereunder (other than any bonus payable hereunder with respect to a previous calendar year that has not yet been paid).

9

GENERAL PROVISIONS

7.1 Amount Payable Upon Death of Employee. If an eligible Employee who is entitled to payment hereunder dies after becoming eligible for payment but before receiving full payment of the amount due, or if an eligible Employee dies and becomes a Terminated Eligible Employee, all amounts due shall be paid as soon as practicable after the death of the eligible Employee, in a cash lump sum, to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the eligible Employee to receive life insurance proceeds under Group Life and Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan of Newmont or a successor plan. In the absence of an effective beneficiary designation under said plan, any amount payable hereunder following the death of an eligible Employee shall be paid to the eligible Employee’s estate.

7.2 Right of Offset. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Newmont Mining may, in its sole discretion, apply any bonus payments otherwise due and payable under this payroll practice against any eligible Employee or Terminated Eligible Employee loans outstanding to Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity or other debts of the eligible Employee or Terminated Eligible Employee to Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity. By accepting payments under this payroll practice, the eligible Employee shall consent to the reduction of any compensation paid to the eligible Employee by Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity to the extent the eligible Employee receives an overpayment from this payroll practice.

7.3 Termination. The Board may at any time amend, modify, suspend or terminate this payroll practice; provided, however, that the Compensation Committee may, consistent with its administrative powers, waive or adjust provisions of this payroll practice as it determines necessary from time to time.

7.4 Payments Due Minors or Incapacitated Persons. If any person entitled to a payment under this payroll practice is a minor, or if the Compensation Committee or its delegate determines that any such person is incapacitated by reason of physical or mental disability, whether or not legally adjudicated as an incompetent, the Compensation Committee or its delegate shall have the power to cause the payment becoming due to such person to be made to another for his or her benefit, without responsibility of the Compensation Committee or its delegate, Newmont Mining, or any other person or entity to see to the application of such payment. Payments made pursuant to such power shall operate as a complete discharge of the Compensation Committee, this payroll practice and Newmont Mining.

7.5 Severability. If any section, subsection or specific provision is found to be illegal or invalid for any reason, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this payroll practice, and this payroll practice shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal and invalid provision had never been set forth in this payroll practice.

7.6 No Right to Employment. The establishment of this payroll practice shall not be deemed to confer upon any person any legal right to be employed by, or to be retained in the employ of, Newmont Mining or any Affiliated Entity, or to give any Employee or any person

10

any right to receive any payment whatsoever, except as provided under this Payroll Practice. All Employees shall remain subject to discharge from employment to the same extent as if this payroll practice had never been adopted.

7.7 Transferability. Any bonus payable hereunder is personal to the eligible Employee or Terminated Eligible Employee and may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise disposed of except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

7.8 Successors. This payroll practice shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Newmont Mining, the Participating Employers and the eligible Employees and Terminated Eligible Employees and their respective heirs, representatives and successors.

7.9 Governing Law. This payroll practice and all agreements hereunder shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, unless superseded by federal law.

11

APPENDIX A

	Payout Percentage for each Economic Performance Driver
	Reserve Growth		Consolidated Costs Applicable to Sales		Equity Ounces Sold		Consolidated Net Cash from Operations
Pay Grade 109 and Above, and Pay Grade 108 and below employed by the corporate office (including expatriate assignments) or at a non-site location as determined by the Vice President of Human Resources or his or her delegate	25	%	25	%	25	%	25	%

12

APPENDIX B

Pay Grade	Target Performance Level
E-1	67	%
E-2	45	%
E-3	40	%
E-4	34	%
E-5	30	%
E-6	25	%
109	25	%
107-108	15	%
105-106	10	%
11-104	5	%

13

APPENDIX C

109 and below Performance Rating Category	Personal Performance Bonus Factor
1	0
2	.10
3	.15
4	.50
5	1.0
6	1.15
7	1.25
8	1.35
9	1.50

E/T 6 and above Performance Rating Category	Personal Performance Bonus Factor
0	0
1	.50
2	1.10
3	1.35
4	1.50

Pay Grade	Target Performance Level
E-1	33	%
E-2	25	%
E-3	20	%
E-4	16	%
E-5	15	%
E-6	10	%
109	10	%
107-108	9	%
105-106	6.5	%
103-104	4	%
11-102	0	%

14

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

NEWMONT

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

PAYROLL PRACTICE

(Effective and restated January 1, 2006)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
SECTION I             DEFINITIONS	1
1.1 “Common Stock”	1
1.2 “EPI Bonus”	1
1.3 “Fair Market Value”	1
1.4 “Performance Period”	2
1.5 “Restricted Stock Units”	2
1.6 “Targeted Payout Percentage”	2
SECTION II           ELIGIBILITY	2
SECTION III          EPI BONUS	2
3.1 Determination of EPI Bonus—In General	2
3.2 Determination of EPI Bonus and Payment of EPI Bonus to Terminated Eligible Employees	3
3.3 Form of Payment	3
3.4 Withholding Taxes	3
3.5 Restrictions on Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units	3
SECTION IV          GENERAL PROVISIONS	4

ii

NEWMONT

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

PAYROLL PRACTICE

(Effective as of January 1, 2006)

PURPOSE

The purpose of the payroll practice is to provide to Employees of Newmont Mining and its Affiliated Entities that participate in this payroll practice a more direct interest in the success of the operations of Newmont Mining. Employees of Newmont Mining and participating Affiliated Entities will be rewarded in accordance with the terms and conditions described below.

DEFINITIONS

The capitalized terms used in this payroll practice shall have the same meaning as the capitalized terms in the Annual Incentive Compensation Payroll Practice. In addition, the terms set forth in this Section shall have the meaning set forth below.

1.1 “Common Stock” means the $1.60 par value common stock of Newmont Mining Corporation.

1.2 “EPI Bonus” means the bonus payable to an eligible Employee in the form of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units under this payroll practice with respect to a Performance Period (or portion thereof as provided in Section 3.2), which shall be determined by multiplying the eligible Employee’s Bonus Eligible Earnings by the product of (a) the Targeted Payout Percentage as set forth in Schedule A for the eligible Employee’s grade for the Performance Period (or portion thereof) times (b) the Aggregate Payout Percentage calculated in accordance with Section 3.4 of the Annual Incentive Compensation Payroll Practice. Beginning in 2006, the EPI bonus will begin a three-year look back weighted calculation that will be phased in over a period of two years. In 2006, all EPI Bonus will be calculated and based upon 2006 results, since the look back provision is not retroactive. In 2007, EPI bonus will be calculated using 40% weighting of 2006 results and 60% weighting of 2007 results. In 2008, the three-year weighted EPI bonus calculation will go into effect, and will remain going forward. The three-year weighted EPI bonus calculation is comprised of 20% weighting for the first year (two years ago), 30% weighting for the second year (one year ago), and 50% weighting for the third year (the current year). In addition, the EPI Bonus may be increased based upon the Total Shareholder Return Modifier, as defined and explained in this document. Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units awarded as an EPI Bonus shall have terms and conditions, and shall be subject to such restrictions as defined by the Compensation Committee.

1.3 “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a share of Common Stock as of a given date, the fair market value calculated in accordance with the Newmont Mining stock plan from which such shares are to be issued.

1.4 “Performance Period” means the calendar year over which the Aggregate Performance Percentage shall be calculated for purposes of determining the amount of an EPI Bonus. The Performance Period shall be the calendar year.

1.5 “Total Shareholder Return Modifier” means Newmont’s leverage to gold price as a multiple of total annual return to gold price appreciation. Payout percentage will be in accordance to Schedule B.

1.6 “Restricted Stock Units” means the right to receive Common Stock under terms and conditions defined in a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, as defined by the Compensation Committee.

1.7 “Targeted Payout Percentage” means the percentage of an eligible Employee’s Bonus Eligible Earnings taken into account when calculating the EPI Bonus with respect to a Performance Period, as specified in Schedule A. If the Pay Grade of an eligible Employee changes during a Performance Period, the Targeted Payout Percentage applicable to such eligible Employee shall be prorated based upon the number of days spent in each Pay Grade during the Performance Period.

ELIGIBILITY

All Employees of Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer in an executive grade level are eligible to receive an EPI Bonus under this payroll practice, provided (i) they are on the payroll of Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer as of the last day of the relevant Performance Period, and at the time the award is granted, or (ii) they are a Terminated Eligible Employee with respect to such calendar year. Employees who are on short-term disability under the Short-Term Disability Plan of Newmont or a successor plan or not working because of a work-related injury as of the last day of the Performance Period shall be eligible to receive a bonus under clause (i). Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section II, the Compensation Committee or the Vice President of Human Resources of Newmont Mining (or his or her delegate) may, prior to the end of any Performance Period, exclude from or include in eligibility for participation under this payroll practice with respect to such Performance Period any Employee or Employees.

EPI BONUS

3.1 Determination of EPI Bonus—In General. The EPI Bonus shall be calculated as soon as reasonably practicable after the Compensation Committee determines the Aggregate Payout Percentage, including the eligibility for Total Shareholder Return Modifier award. Following such determination, payment of the EPI Bonus shall be made to the eligible Employees (other than Terminated Eligible Employees) in accordance with the provisions of this Section III as soon as reasonably practicable.

2

3.2 Determination of EPI Bonus and Payment of EPI Bonus to Terminated Eligible Employees. Terminated Eligible Employees shall be entitled to receive an EPI Bonus based upon their Bonus Eligible Earnings for the Performance Period during which their employment with Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer terminates, calculated by using the Targeted Payout Percentage for the Performance Period applicable to the Performance Period during which the eligible Employee terminated employment. Payment shall be made to a Terminated Eligible Employee with respect to a Performance Period in accordance with Section 3.3 as soon as practicable following the date of termination from employment with Newmont Mining and/or a Participating Employer.

3.3 Form of Payment. The amount of EPI Bonuses payable under this Program shall be paid in shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units (payable in whole shares only), which shall be subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 3.5 below. The number of shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units to be issued in payment of an EPI Bonus shall be determined based upon the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date that the Compensation Committee meets and certifies the satisfaction of the material terms of this payroll practice with respect to the payment of the EPI Bonus in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.1. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Compensation Committee or the Vice President of Human Resources of Newmont Mining or his or her delegate may, in its sole discretion, cause all or any portion of any EPI Bonus otherwise payable in shares of Common Stock to be paid in cash, and (ii) if an eligible Employee terminates employment before payment of an EPI Bonus and if all of the eligible Employee’s shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Program are non-forfeitable, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.5, the eligible Employee’s EPI Bonus may be paid in cash if approved by the Vice President of Human Resources of Newmont Mining (or his or her delegate).

3.4 Withholding Taxes. All bonuses payable hereunder shall be subject to the withholding of such amounts as Newmont Mining may determine is required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit any eligible Employee to satisfy the minimum withholding applicable to the portion of the EPI Bonus payable in shares of Common Stock by causing Newmont Mining to withhold the appropriate number of shares of Common Stock from the EPI Bonus otherwise payable and to make the requisite withholding payments on behalf of the eligible Employee.

3.5 Restrictions on Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

(a) Shares of Common Stock issued as payment of the EPI Bonus hereunder shall be restricted. Shares of Common Stock as issued as an EPI Bonus will have a three year vesting period, with one-third of the stock vesting each year on the anniversary of the date of grant.

(b) The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, authorize issuance of Restricted Stock Units in payment of the EPI Bonus.

(c) Shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued under this payroll practice are subject to forfeiture as follows: If an eligible Employee terminates employment prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such shares of Common Stock or Restricted

3

Stock Units were granted to the eligible Employee (the “Grant Date”), all such shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited. If an eligible Employee terminates employment on or after the first anniversary of the Grant Date, but prior to the second anniversary of the Grant Date, the eligible Employee shall forfeit two-thirds of the shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units awarded as a part of such EPI Bonus. If an eligible Employee terminates employment on or after the second anniversary of the Grant Date, the eligible Employee shall forfeit one-third of the shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units awarded as part of such EPI Bonus. If the eligible Employee terminates employment on or after the third anniversary of the Grant Date there are no restrictions.

(d) Shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued hereunder as a part of an EPI Bonus shall not be subject to transfer by the eligible Employee until such time as the Shares have become non-forfeitable in accordance with this Section, at which time such Shares of Common Stock may be freely transferred by the eligible Employee subject to all applicable laws, regulations and Newmont Mining policies.

(e) The Compensation Committee may cause a legend to be placed on the Common Stock certificates issued pursuant to this Program referring to the restrictions provided by this Section and, in addition, may in its sole discretion require one or more of the following methods of enforcing the restrictions: (i) requiring the eligible Employee to keep the stock certificates, duly endorsed, in the custody of Newmont Mining or an Affiliated Entity while the restrictions remain in effect; or (ii) requiring that the stock certificates, duly endorsed, be held in the custody of a third party while the restrictions remain in effect.

(f) Shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued under this payroll practice may be issued pursuant to the provisions of any stock plan of Newmont Mining or as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

(g) Notwithstanding anything contained in this payroll practice to the contrary, this payroll practice shall be administered and operated in accordance with any applicable laws and regulations including but not limited to laws affecting the timing of payment of the EPI Bonus to eligible Employees under this payroll practice. The Compensation Committee or its delegate reserves the right to amend their payroll practice at any time in order for this payroll practice to comply with such laws or regulations.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, require the eligible employee to agree not to make an election pursuant to section 83(b) of the Code as a condition for the receipt of common stock hereunder.

The “General Provisions” section of the Annual Incentive Compensation Payroll Practice shall otherwise apply to this payroll practice.

4

SCHEDULE A

Targeted Payout Percentages

Grade	Payout Percentage
E-1	135	%
E-2	90	%
E-3	75	%
E-4	55	%
E-5	45	%
E-6	35	%

SCHEDULE B

Total Shareholder Return Modifier Payout Percentages

Multiple of Newmont total annual return to gold price appreciation	Payout Percentage
3.0 or greater	25	%
2.00 – 2.99	15	%
1.99 or below	No additional award

EX-12.1

Exhibit 12.1

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Amounts in millions except ratio)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense (1)	$	350
Adjustments:
Fixed charges added to earnings		21
Dividends from equity affiliates		—
Amortization of capitalized interest		3
	$	374
Fixed Charges:
Net interest expense(2)		20
Portion of rental expense representative of interest		1
Fixed charges added to earnings		21
Capitalized interest		15
	$	36
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		10.4

⁽¹⁾ Income from continuing operations before income tax expense, minority interest and equity income of affiliates.

⁽²⁾ Includes interest expense of majority-owned subsidiaries and amortization of debt issuance costs.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Wayne W. Murdy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/    WAYNE W. MURDY

Wayne W. Murdy

Chief Executive Officer

April 28, 2006

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Richard T. O’Brien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/    RICHARD T. O’BRIEN

Richard T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2006

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wayne W. Murdy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/    WAYNE W. MURDY

Wayne W. Murdy

Chief Executive Officer

April 28, 2006

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Richard T. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/    RICHARD T. O’BRIEN

Richard T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2006

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.