Exhibit 99.4

Company Name: Newmont Company Ticker: NEM US Date: 2019-03-04 Event Description: M&A Update Call Market Cap: 18,076.14 Current PX: 33.935 YTD Change($): -.715 YTD Change(%): -2.063 Bloomberg Estimates - EPS Current Quarter: 0.257 Current Year: 1.193 Bloomberg Estimates - Sales Current Quarter: 1823.500 Current Year: 7891.909 Nevada related operations with Barrick. To be clear, the Goldcorp transaction and Nevada JV with Barrick are not (SIC) mutually exclusive. Newmont shareholders can benefit from both. Later in the presentation, Tom will discuss the joint venture in greater detail, but first I'd like to describe the reasons behind the Board's determination that Barrick's proposal is inferior. Turning to slide 5. Barrick's egocentric proposal is designed to transfer value from Newmont shareholders to Barrick. Barrick is approaching a clear production decline and needs Newmont's mines and processing facilities. They have yet to provide guidance beyond 2019 and the best the market has, is analysts' estimates projecting their production declining by 12% from 2018 to 2023. Barrick has described their proposal as an unprecedented value creation opportunity, yet it is inferior to the Newmont Goldcorp transaction. Barrick also has a poor M&A track record. We do not believe their operating model is capable of successfully realizing the value of global M&A, particularly when Barrick is still in the very early days of integrating their own transformational transaction. Barrick's motivation is to be the biggest, and deprive Newmont shareholders of the benefits of the Goldcorp transaction. And while Barrick is going through a time of great change, one of the major factors that hindered Barrick's ability to create value in the past remains the same. Turning to slide 6. John Thornton, is still firmly in control of Barrick. There have been numerous missteps in the exchange ratio chart on the slide speaks for itself to the value destruction overseen by Mr.Thornton. Although Barrick's transaction with Randgold resulted in new management, we have no reason to think that investors should have any more confidence in Barrick's ability to effectively operate a global portfolio. Turning to slide 7. There is no doubt that Mark has been successful as an explorer and a geologist. He entered into a number of great joint ventures that created value for Randgold shareholders. However, the numbers do not lie. As an operator, he has not created shareholder value, and he has yet to prove that he can successfully manage or integrate a global portfolio. Turning to slide 8. We believe that Barrick is attempting to bite off substantially more than they can chew. Barrick's new management has no experience integrating acquisitions. Additionally, prior to assuming his new role at Barrick just two months ago, Mark managed only five assets on one continent. He has never managed a global portfolio like Barrick's, with 24 assets in 15 countries across five continents, let alone the scale or complexity contemplated by Barrick's proposal to total of 37 assets on five continents. Barrick's poor ESG performance is also another risk to value creation. Turning to slide 9. In our industry, ESG performance is an increasingly important element of creating value for our shareholders, attracting investment and maintaining social license with communities. Barrick's ESG performance underperforms with a 60 rating on Sustainalytics. At Newmont, ESG performance is important to us and we're proud of our track record in this regard. We've been named the fourth most transparent company in all of the S&P 500 and we have a 95 sustainalytic score. Newmont has also been the recognized ESG leader in the Metals and Mining sector by the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index for an unprecedented fourth consecutive years. We integrate sustainability into all aspects of our business, because it's the right thing to do for our shareholders and other stakeholders. And like Barrick's proposal, their ESG performance carry significant risks for Newmont shareholders. Turning to slide 10. In addition to the risks I've previously mentioned, Barrick's portfolio includes numerous unfavorable jurisdictions with several ongoing and significant operational and sustainability problems. Barrick's proposal would expose Newmont shareholders to some of the most high-risk jurisdictions in the gold mining industry including the DRC , Tanzania, Mali, and Papua New Guinea, among others. And as we have detailed, Barrick's management team lacks experience integrating and managing a global portfolio. To put it simply, the Goldcorp transaction is superior for Newmont shareholders on all relevant metrics. Turning to slide 11. Newmont Goldcorp offer shareholders superior accretion, share of achievable synergies, a stable and experienced team, share price performance, a track record of delivering results, ESG performance, a long-term Page 2 of 12

Company Name: Newmont Company Ticker: NEM US Date: 2019-03-04 Event Description: M&A Update Call Market Cap: 18,076.14 Current PX: 33.935 YTD Change($): -.715 YTD Change(%): -2.063 Bloomberg Estimates - EPS Current Quarter: 0.257 Current Year: 1.193 Bloomberg Estimates - Sales Current Quarter: 1823.500 Current Year: 7891.909 plan, and a superior portfolio and risk profile. The Goldcorp transaction still allows Newmont and Barrick shareholders to capture the synergies in Nevada through the joint venture we have proposed, while avoiding the significant risks of a hostile takeover attempt. Turning to slide 12. Over the last six years, Newmont has executed on our strategy to position our business for long-term success. With a world-class portfolio of assets, the Goldcorp transaction advances that strategy. Goldcorp has a strong portfolio of world-class assets and world-class jurisdictions, and it appears that Mark agrees. Turning to slide 13. In this email from Mark Bristow to Ian Telfer in May 2017, Mark writes , 'in Goldcorp, you have assembled a strong portfolio of assets located in world class districts'. And he goes on to say, 'this is a testament to the company's assets and potential'. I'll now turn it over on slide 14 to Tom Palmer, to walk through additional details regarding the superior Newmont Goldcorp combination. Tom Palmer, 'President and Chief Operating Officer' Thanks, Gary. As you know, we take a very disciplined approach to the financial targets we put out. When we announced the Goldcorp transaction, we outlined the initial process that we had undertaken to identify $100 million per annum in synergies. This estimate was to be largely achieved through G&A, and did not factor in savings and efficiencies from implementation of our full potential program or all of the benefits of integrating the supply chain of Newmont and Goldcorp. Since announcing the transaction, we have completed a lot of integration planning. This has allowed us to provide even greater clarity around the value we expect to deliver. On top of the initial $100 million, we have identified a further $100 million per annum in supply chain improvements, made up of $90 million in procurement efficiencies and $10 million of inventory and system optimization. As we've shared previously, there is an additional $165 million per annum in value by applying our proven, full potential program to the Goldcorp assets. To put it all together, Newmont Goldcorp has to-date identified a total of $365 million per annum in savings and efficiencies, representing value creation potential of over $4.4 billion using the same timeframe and discount rates applied by Barrick in their estimates. And importantly, the Goldcorp transaction is more accretive to Newmont shareholders. Turning to slide 15, the Goldcorp transaction generates nearly twice the accretion to Newmont's net asset value per share and 2020 cash flow per share even if you give Barrick full credit for their unilateral synergy estimates. The Goldcorp transaction is much more accretive to Newmont shareholders and does not depend on achieving synergies from a management team that lacks global operating and transaction integration experience. In order to provide shareholders with additional information about the value we see in this combination, we are announcing our long-term outlook for Newmont Goldcorp. Turning to slide 16. Here's a look at our combined Newmont Goldcorp production profile for the next seven years through to 2025. We expect to have stable, long-term gold production of around 7 million to 8 million attributable ounces per year, before asset divestments and a detailed look at project optimization and resequencing. The orange dotted line shown here is the estimated gold equivalent ounce production from copper, silver, zinc, and lead, which will deliver an additional $1.5 billion in revenue per year. This profile includes production from our combined existing operations as well as the current and midterm projects. The current projects include Borden, Quecher Main, and the Ahafo mill expansion, and the green layer shows production from midterm projects, which include Tanami expansion 2, Yanacocha Sulfides, Ahafo North, and Coffee. Our average annual attributable development capital to support the current and midterm projects will be approximately $600 million per year. Overall, Newmont Goldcorp's stable asset base and robust project pipeline represents a distinct competitive advantage. Turning to slide 17. We are well positioned for the long-term. As you can see over the next seven years, we anticipate producing 7 million to 8 million attributable ounces of gold annually. All in sustaining costs also steadily improved Page 3 of 12

Company Name: Newmont Company Ticker: NEM US Date: 2019-03-04 Event Description: M&A Update Call Market Cap: 18,076.14 Current PX: 33.935 YTD Change($): -.715 YTD Change(%): -2.063 Bloomberg Estimates - EPS Current Quarter: 0.257 Current Year: 1.193 Bloomberg Estimates - Sales Current Quarter: 1823.500 Current Year: 7891.909 from $945 an ounce in 2019, to $830 an ounce in 2025, and adding again that these figures do not include the impact of potential divestitures and additional project optimization and resequencing. We think a fair question for investors to ask Barrick, is where is their long-term guidance? Turning to slide 18. Both Barrick and Randgold were experiencing declining production leading up to their transaction and their 2019 guidance disappointed the market. Turning to slide 19. Barrick is trying to tell you that "bigger is better". We simply don't agree and believe that competition is good for both the industry and for investors. Our companies' risk profiles are distinctly different, as are our operating models, as well as our jurisdictional and political risks, and our approaches to governance and ESG However, we can still realize the vast majority of the synergies Barrick's proposal --of Barrick's proposal through a JV of Newmont and Barrick's Nevada related operations, working together to deliver that value potential. We simply do not agree that a whole company transaction is in the best interest of Newmont shareholders. However, we recognize that substantial benefits can and should be realized for both Newmont and Barrick shareholders through the Nevada JV There is no reason we shouldn't be able to find a solution that unlocks the value of our respective Nevada operations for both sets of shareholders. Mark Bristow built Randgold on partnerships. 100% of Randgold assets were JV's. Today, two thirds of Barrick Randgold assets are joint ventures. In fact, we have two of them with Barrick. And contrary to recent comments from Barrick's representatives, we have long been open to working constructively with Barrick to achieve potential synergies in Nevada. In fact, we're actually doing work together on the ground today in Western Nevada. We were hopeful that with new management of Barrick, we would have a willing partner to sit down with and come to terms on an agreement. In that regard, we have submitted a term sheet to Barrick today for a JV of our Nevada-based operations and made that term sheet available publicly. Turning to slide 20. The proposed JV is modeled on similar terms to other successful joint ventures including ones that Barrick has with Newmont and Goldcorp. The full terms are available on our website, but to summarize, each priority will contribute all Nevada related assets and liabilities to the joint venture. Newmont would hold an economic interest of 45% and Barrick 55%. This economic split is based on consensus NPVs and an equal split of Barrick's estimated synergies. Governance would include a management committee and technical committee with equal representation, enabling Newmont to provide input and leverage our technical expertise, which is critical to maximizing the benefits of the JV Operational management roles would be jointly agreed upon and they would be responsible for day-to-day operations and decision-making. We currently have two joint ventures with Barrick, one at KCGM and the second at Turquoise Ridge. Having had accountability for KCGM for the past five years and our Nevada operations for the past three years as part of my global portfolio, I know both of these JVs and how well our teams work together on the ground. With this experience, I am very confident that if we allow our operating teams in Nevada to come together with an appropriate level of oversight from the parent companies, that they will work constructively to unlock the synergy value on behalf of our shareholders. This can be done without being exposed to the significant risks of Barrick's proposal. Turning the slide 21. Contrary to what others will tell you, Carlin is a highly complex ore body where geochemistry is more important than gold grade. Consequently, it will take technical expertise and know-how to fully realize potential synergies. When you look at the combination of open pits, underground mines, and processing plants, achieving these synergies is not as simple as tearing down a fence. To confirm, we're ready to sit down with Barrick and quickly finalize an agreement to start realizing the benefits for our shareholders. And the Goldcorp transaction and Nevada JV with Barrick are not (SIC) mutually exclusive. Newmont shareholders can benefit from both. With that, I'll turn it back to Gary on slide 22. Gary J Goldberg, 'Chief Executive Officer' Page 4 of 12

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections and other applicable laws and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Where a forward-looking statement expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition, and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “would,” “estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “target,” “indicative,” “preliminary,” or “potential.” Forward-looking statements in this communication may include, without limitation: (i) statements relating to Newmont’s planned acquisition of Goldcorp (the “proposed transaction”) and the expected terms, timing and closing of the proposed transaction, including receipt of required approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions; (ii) estimates of future production and sales, including expected annual production range; (iii) estimates of future costs applicable to sales and all-in sustaining costs; (iv) expectations regarding accretion; (v) estimates of future capital expenditures; (vi) estimates of future cost reductions, efficiencies and synergies; (vii) expectations regarding future exploration and the development, growth and potential of Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s operations, project pipeline and investments, including, without limitation, project returns, expected average IRR, schedule, decision dates, mine life, commercial start, first production, capital average production, average costs and upside potential; (viii) expectations regarding future investments or divestitures; (ix) expectations of future dividends and returns to stockholders; (x) expectations of future free cash flow generation, liquidity, balance sheet strength and credit ratings; (xi) expectations of future equity and enterprise value; (xii) expectations of future plans and benefits; (xiii) expectations regarding future mineralization, including, without limitation, expectations regarding reserves and resources, grade and recoveries; (xiv) estimates of future closure costs and liabilities; (xv) statements relating to the proposed acquisition of Newmont by Barrick, including potential dilution, synergies and value creation, and (xvi) the possible joint venture in Nevada, including the potential terms and benefits thereof. Estimates or expectations of future events or results are based upon certain assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect. Such assumptions, include, but are not limited to: (i) there being no significant change to current geotechnical, metallurgical, hydrological and other physical conditions; (ii) permitting, development, operations and expansion of Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s operations and projects being consistent with current expectations and mine plans, including, without limitation, receipt of export approvals; (iii) political developments in any jurisdiction in which Newmont and Goldcorp operate being consistent with its current expectations; (iv) certain exchange rate assumptions for the Australian dollar or the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar, as well as other exchange rates being approximately consistent with current levels; (v) certain price assumptions for gold, copper, silver, zinc, lead and oil; (vi) prices for key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (vii) the accuracy of current mineral reserve, mineral resource and mineralized material estimates; and (viii) other planning assumptions. Risks relating to forward-looking statements in regard to the Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s business and future performance may include, but are not limited to, gold and other metals price volatility, currency fluctuations, operational risks, increased production costs and variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, political risk, community relations, conflict resolution governmental regulation and judicial outcomes and other risks. In addition, material risks that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements include: the inherent uncertainty associated with financial or other projections; the prompt and effective integration of Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s businesses and the ability to achieve the anticipated synergies and value-creation contemplated by the proposed transaction; the risk associated with Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s ability to obtain the approval of the proposed transaction by their stockholders required to consummate the proposed transaction and the timing of the closing of the proposed transaction, including the risk that the conditions to the transaction are not satisfied on a timely basis or at all and the failure of the transaction to close for any other reason; the risk that a consent or authorization that may be required for the proposed transaction is not obtained or is obtained subject to conditions that are not anticipated; the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against the parties and others related to the arrangement agreement; unanticipated difficulties or expenditures relating to the transaction, the response of business partners and retention as a result of the announcement and pendency of the transaction; potential volatility in the price of Newmont Common Stock due to the proposed transaction; the anticipated size of the markets and continued demand for Newmont’s and Goldcorp’s resources and the impact of competitive responses to the announcement of the transaction; and the diversion of management time on

transaction-related issues. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors, see Newmont’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as well as the Company’s other SEC filings, available on the SEC website or www.newmont.com, Goldcorp’s most recent annual information form as well as Goldcorp’s other filings made with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available on SEDAR, on the SEC website or www.goldcorp.com. Newmont is not affirming or adopting any statements or reports attributed to Goldcorp (including prior mineral reserve and resource declaration) in this communication or made by Goldcorp outside of this communication. Goldcorp is not affirming or adopting any statements or reports attributed to Newmont (including prior mineral reserve and resource declaration) in this communication or made by Newmont outside of this communication. Newmont and Goldcorp do not undertake any obligation to release publicly revisions to any “forward-looking statement,” including, without limitation, outlook, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this communication, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. Investors should not assume that any lack of update to a previously issued “forward-looking statement” constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Continued reliance on “forward-looking statements” is at investors’ own risk.

Additional Information about the Proposed Transaction and Where to Find It

This communication is not intended to and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to subscribe for or buy or an invitation to purchase or subscribe for any securities or the solicitation of any vote or approval in any jurisdiction, nor shall there be any sale, issuance or transfer of securities in any jurisdiction in contravention of applicable law. This communication is being made in respect of the proposed transaction involving the Company and Goldcorp pursuant to the terms of an Arrangement Agreement by and among the Company and Goldcorp and may be deemed to be soliciting material relating to the proposed transaction. In connection with the proposed transaction, the Company will file a proxy statement relating to a special meeting of its stockholders with the SEC. Additionally, the Company will file other relevant materials in connection with the proposed transaction with the SEC. Security holders of the Company are urged to read the proxy statement regarding the proposed transaction and any other relevant materials carefully in their entirety when they become available before making any voting or investment decision with respect to the proposed transaction because they will contain important information about the proposed transaction and the parties to the transaction. The definitive proxy statement will be mailed to the Company’s stockholders. Stockholders of the Company will be able to obtain a copy of the proxy statement, the filings with the SEC that will be incorporated by reference into the proxy statement as well as other filings containing information about the proposed transaction and the parties to the transaction made by the Company with the SEC free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, on the Company’s website at www.newmont.com/investor-relations/default.aspx or by contacting the Company’s Investor Relations department at jessica.largent@newmont.com or by calling 303-837-5484. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by Goldcorp will be available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Participants in the Proposed Transaction Solicitation

The Company and its directors, its executive officers, members of its management, its employees and other persons, under SEC rules, may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the proposed transaction. Investors and security holders may obtain more detailed information regarding the names, affiliations and interests of certain of the Company’s executive officers and directors in the solicitation by reading the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 21, 2019, its proxy statement relating to its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 9, 2018 and other relevant materials filed with the SEC when they become available. Additional information regarding the interests of such potential participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction will be set forth in the proxy statement filed with the SEC relating to the transaction when it becomes available. Additional information concerning Goldcorp’s executive officers and directors is set forth in its 2017 Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the SEC on March 23, 2018, its management information circular relating to its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018 and other relevant materials filed with the SEC when they become available.