10-K 1 anteon2003.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ----------------------- FORM 10-K (Mark One) [x]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO _____________ Commission File Number: 001-31258 ----------------------- ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 13-3880755 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 3211 Jermantown Road Fairfax, VA 22030-2801 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (703) 246-0200 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None ----------------------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [x] No [x] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 was $549,497,718 (based on the closing price of $27.91 per share on June 30, 2003, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange- Corporate Transactions). For this computation, the registrant excluded the market value of all shares of its common stock reported as beneficially owned by named executive officers and directors of the registrant; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an "affiliate" of the registrant. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |X| There were 35,441,075 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 23, 2004. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the proxy statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Part III FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Form 10-K includes and incorporates by reference forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict," "project," "will" and similar terms and phrases, and may also include references to assumptions. These statements are contained in the sections entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Business" and other sections of this Form 10-K. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: o funded backlog; o estimated remaining contract value; o our expectations regarding the U.S. federal government's procurement budgets and reliance on outsourcing of services; and o our financial condition and liquidity, as well as future cash flows and earnings. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the following: o changes in U.S. federal government procurement laws, regulations, policies and budgets: o the number and type of contracts and task orders awarded to us; o the integration of acquisitions without disruption to our other business activities; o changes in general economic and business conditions; o technological changes; o the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; o competition; o our ability to retain our contracts during any rebidding process; and o the other factors outlined under "Risk Factors." If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated or projected. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect future events or circumstances. 1 RISK FACTORS Risks related to our business U.S. Federal Government Contracting Risks--Our business could be adversely affected by significant changes in the contracting or fiscal policies of the U.S. federal government. We derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the U.S. federal government or subcontracts under U.S. federal government prime contracts, and we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in U.S. federal government programs. Accordingly, changes in U.S. federal government contracting policies could directly affect our financial performance. Among the factors that could materially adversely affect our U.S. federal government contracting business are: o budgetary constraints affecting U.S. federal government spending generally, or specific departments or agencies in particular, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding; o changes in U.S. federal government programs or requirements; o curtailment of the U.S. federal government's use of technology services firms; o the adoption of new laws or regulations; o technological developments; o U.S. federal governmental shutdowns and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; o delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, government information systems, or for other reasons; o competition and consolidation in the information technology industry; and o general economic conditions. These or other factors could cause U.S. federal governmental agencies, or prime contractors where we are acting as a subcontractor, to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts or not to exercise options to renew contracts, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Many of our U.S. federal government customers are subject to stringent budgetary constraints. We have substantial contracts in place with many U.S. federal departments and agencies, and our continued performance under these contracts, or award of additional contracts from these agencies, could be materially adversely affected by spending reductions or budget cutbacks at these agencies. Early Termination of Contracts-- Our U.S. federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time prior to their completion, and if we do not replace them, our operating results may be harmed. We derive substantially all of our revenues from U.S. federal government contracts and subcontracts under U.S. federal government prime contracts that typically are awarded through competitive processes and span one or more base years and one or more option years. The option periods typically cover more than half of the contract's potential duration. U.S. federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods. In addition, our contracts typically also contain provisions permitting a government client to terminate the contract on short notice, with or without cause. A decision not to exercise option periods or to terminate contracts would reduce the profitability of these contracts to us. Upon contract expiration, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, there is frequently a competitive rebidding process and there can be no assurance that we will win any particular bid, or that we will be able to replace business lost upon expiration or completion of a contract. The unexpected termination of one or more of our significant contracts could result in significant revenue shortfalls. The termination or nonrenewal of any of our significant contracts, short-term revenue shortfalls, the imposition of fines or damages or our suspension or debarment from bidding on additional contracts could harm operating results for those periods. 2 Most U.S. federal government contract awards are subject to protest by competitors. If specified legal requirements are satisfied, these protests require the U.S. federal agency to suspend the contractor's performance of the newly awarded contract pending the outcome of the protest. These protests could also result in a requirement to resubmit bids for the contract or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract. Contracts Subject to Audit--Our business could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. We could be required to reimburse the U.S. federal government for costs that we have expended on our contracts and our ability to compete successfully for future contracts could be materially impaired. The Defense Contract Audit Agency, or the "DCAA," and other government agencies routinely audit and investigate government contracts. These agencies review a contractor's performance on its contract, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor's compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor's purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded. Therefore, a DCAA audit could materially affect our competitive position and result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues. If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with the U.S. federal government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the U.S. federal government generally, or any significant agency in the intelligence community or Department of Defense, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies were impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our operating results would be materially harmed. Contract Types and Risks--Our estimates of the time, resources and expenses required to complete our contractual commitments may not be accurate. We enter into three principal types of contracts with the U.S. federal government: time and materials, cost-plus, and fixed price. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 38% were time and materials, 32% of our U.S. federal contracts were cost-plus, and 30% were fixed price (a substantial majority of which were fixed price level of effort). Under time and materials contracts, we are paid for labor at negotiated hourly billing rates and for certain expenses. There is financial risk to us should our costs to perform time and materials contracts exceed the negotiated hourly billing rates. Under cost-plus type contracts, which are subject to a contract ceiling amount, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance based. However, if our costs exceed the contract ceiling, funding has not been received or costs are not allowable under the provisions of the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all such costs. Under fixed price contracts, we are required to perform the contract tasks at a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur, and consequently, any costs in excess of the fixed price are absorbed by us. Fixed price contracts, in comparison to cost-plus contracts, typically offer higher profit opportunities because we bear the risk of cost-overruns and receive the benefit of cost savings. For all contract types, there is risk associated with the assumptions we use to formulate our pricing of the proposed work. In addition, when we serve as a subcontractor under our contracts, we are exposed to the risks of delays in payment from the prime contractor for the services we provide. 3 Risks Under Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracts, GSA Schedule contracts and GWACs--Many of our U.S. federal government customers spend their procurement budgets through Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracts, GSA Schedule contracts and GWACs under which we are required to compete for post-award orders. Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many U.S. federal government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, or "ID/IQ," contracts, General Services Administration, or "GSA," Schedule contracts and other multiple award and/or Government Wide Acquisition Contracts, or "GWAC," vehicles. These contract vehicles have resulted in increased competition and pricing pressure requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under the relevant contract. There can be no assurance that we will continue to increase revenues or otherwise sell successfully under these contract vehicles. Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment could harm our operating results. Government Regulations--We may be liable for penalties under various procurement rules and regulations. Changes in government regulations could harm our operating results. Our defense and U.S. federal civil agency businesses must comply with and are affected by various government regulations. Among the most significant regulations are: o the Federal Acquisition Regulations, and agency regulations supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, which comprehensively regulate the formation, administration and performance of government contracts; o the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations; o the Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based government contracts; and o laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data. These regulations affect how our customers and we can do business and, in some instances, impose added costs on our businesses. In addition, we are subject to industrial security regulations of the Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies that are designed to safeguard against unauthorized persons', including foreigners', access to classified information. If we were to come under foreign ownership, control or influence, our U.S. federal government customers could terminate or decide not to renew our contracts, which could impair our ability to obtain new contracts. Any changes in applicable laws and regulations could also harm our operating results. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions or suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. federal government. Risks Relating to Reductions or Changes in Military and Department of Defense-related Intelligence Agency Expenditures--A decline in the U.S. defense budget may adversely affect our operations. Sales under contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense, including sales under subcontracts having the Department of Defense as the ultimate purchaser, represented approximately 88% and 78% of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, respectively. The U.S. defense budget declined from time to time in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, resulting in a slowing of new program starts, program delays and program cancellations. These reductions caused most defense-related government contractors to experience declining revenues, increased pressure on operating margins and, in some cases, net losses. While spending authorizations for defense-related programs by the government have increased in recent years, and in particular after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, these spending levels may not be sustainable, and future levels of expenditures and authorizations for those programs may decrease, remain constant or shift to programs in areas where we currently provide limited or no services. A change in the U.S. Presidential Administration or in the composition of Congress could also materially affect levels of support for military expenditures. A general significant decline in military expenditures could harm our operating results. 4 We are not able to guarantee that contract orders included in our estimated contract value will result in actual revenues in any particular fiscal period or that the actual revenues from such contracts will equal our estimated contract value. There can be no assurance that any contracts included in our estimated contract value presented in this filing will result in actual revenues in any particular period or that the actual revenues from such contracts will equal our estimated contract value. Further, there can be no assurance that any contract included in our estimated contract value that generates revenue will be profitable. Our estimated contract value consists of funded backlog, which is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services, and unfunded contract value, which is based upon management's estimate of the future potential of our existing contracts (including contract options) to generate revenues. These estimates are based on our experience under such contracts and similar contracts, and we believe such estimates to be reasonable. However, there can be no assurances that all of such estimated contract value will be recognized as revenue. In addition, the U.S. federal government's ability to select multiple winners under ID/IQ contracts and GWACs, as well as its right to compete subsequent task orders among such multiple winners, means that there is no assurance that certain of our existing contracts will result in actual orders. Further, the U.S. federal government enjoys broad rights to unilaterally modify or terminate such contracts and task orders, including the right not to exercise options to extend multi-year contracts through the end of their potential terms. Accordingly, most of our existing contracts and task orders are subject to modification and termination at the U.S. federal government's discretion. In addition, funding for orders from the U.S. federal government is subject to approval on an annual basis by Congress pursuant to the appropriations process. Government Intent to Replace Legacy Systems--Our business will be harmed if government agencies are unwilling to replace or supplement expensive legacy systems. Government agencies have spent substantial resources over an extended period of time to develop computer systems and to train their personnel to use them. These agencies may be reluctant to abandon or supplement these legacy systems with Internet and other advanced technology systems because of the cost of developing them or the additional cost of re-training their personnel. Such reluctance would make it more difficult to acquire new contracts, which would harm our business prospects. Reliance on Subcontractors--We regularly employ subcontractors to assist us in satisfying our contractual obligations. If these subcontractors fail to adequately perform their contractual obligations, our prime contract performance and our ability to obtain future business could be materially and adversely impacted. Our performance of government contracts may involve the issuance of subcontracts to other companies upon which we rely to perform all or a portion of the work we are obligated to deliver to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with subcontractors concerning a number of issues including the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the subcontractor, our decision not to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract, or our hiring of former personnel of a subcontractor. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily deliver on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies and/or perform the agreed-upon services may materially and adversely impact our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor. Further, there is a risk that a subcontractor's technology solution on which certain of our contracts and task orders are dependent could become obsolete or fall out of favor with customers. In extreme cases, such subcontractor performance deficiencies could result in the government terminating our contract for default. A default termination could expose us to liability for excess costs of reprocurement by the government and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and task orders. 5 Dependence on Key Personnel --If we lose our technical personnel or members of senior management, our business may be adversely affected. Our continued success depends in large part on our ability to recruit and retain the technical personnel necessary to serve our clients effectively. Competition for skilled personnel in the information technology and systems engineering services industry is intense and technology service companies often experience high attrition among their skilled employees. Excessive attrition among our technical personnel could increase our costs of performing our contractual obligations, reduce our ability to efficiently satisfy our clients' needs and constrain our future growth. In addition, we must often comply with provisions in U.S. federal government contracts that require employment of persons with specified levels of education, work experience and security clearances. The loss of any significant number of our existing key technical personnel or the inability to attract and retain key technical employees in the future could have a material adverse effect on our ability to win new business and could harm our operating results. There is also a risk that our efforts to hire personnel of our competitors or subcontractors or other persons could lead to claims being asserted against us that our recruitment efforts violate contractual arrangements or are otherwise wrongful. In addition, we believe that the success of our business strategy and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our senior management team, led by Joseph M. Kampf. None of our senior management team has an employment contract with us. If Mr. Kampf or other members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. Security Clearance--If we cannot obtain the necessary security clearances, we may not be able to perform classified work for the government and our revenues may suffer. Certain government contracts require our facilities and some of our employees, to maintain security clearances. If we lose or are unable to obtain required security clearances, the client can terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration. As a result, to the extent we cannot obtain the required security clearances for our employees working on a particular contract, we may not derive the revenue anticipated from the contract, which, if not replaced with revenue from other contracts, could seriously harm our operating results. Security Issues--Security breaches in sensitive government systems could result in the loss of clients and negative publicity. Many of the systems we develop involve managing and protecting information involved in national security and other sensitive government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, could result in negative publicity and could prevent us from having further access to such critically sensitive systems or other similarly sensitive areas for other governmental clients. Client Expectations--We could lose revenues and clients and expose our company to liability if we fail to meet client expectations. We create, implement and maintain technology solutions that are often critical to our clients' operations. If our technology solutions or other applications have significant defects or errors or fail to meet our clients' expectations, we may: o lose future contract opportunities due to receipt of poor past performance evaluations from our customers; o have contracts terminated for default and be liable to our customers for reprocurement costs and other damages; o receive negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain clients; and o suffer claims for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. 6 While many of our contracts limit our liability for damages that may arise from negligent acts, errors, mistakes or omissions in rendering services to our clients, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us from liability for damages if we are sued. Furthermore, our general liability insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of any large claim against us could seriously harm our business. Even if not successful, such claims could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to management. Acquisition Strategy--We intend to pursue future acquisitions which may adversely affect our business if we cannot effectively integrate these new operations. We have completed and substantially integrated six strategic acquisitions since 1997. The U.S. federal government information technology solutions and systems engineering services industry remains fragmented, and we believe that acquisition and consolidation opportunities will continue to present themselves periodically. We intend to continue to selectively review acquisition candidates with a focus on companies with complementary skills or market focus. Our continued success may depend upon our ability to integrate any businesses we may acquire in the future. The integration of such businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties, may absorb significant management attention and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our business. Such difficulties of integration may include the coordination of geographically dispersed organizations, the integration of personnel with disparate business backgrounds and the reconciliation of different corporate cultures. In addition, in certain acquisitions, U.S. federal acquisition regulations may require us to enter into contract novation agreements with the government, a routinely time-consuming process. Government agencies may delay in recognizing us as the successor contractor in these situations, thereby possibly preventing our realization of some of the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions. There can be no assurance that acquired entities will operate profitably, that we will realize anticipated synergies or that these acquisitions will cause our operating performance to improve. Although management regularly engages in discussions with and submits acquisition proposals to acquisition targets, there can be no assurance that suitable acquisition targets will be available in the future on reasonable terms. In addition, to the extent that we complete any additional acquisitions, no assurance can be given that acquisition financing will be available on reasonable terms or at all, that any new businesses will generate revenues or net income comparable to our existing businesses or that such businesses will be integrated successfully or operated profitably. Potential Undisclosed Liabilities Associated with Acquisitions--We may be subject to certain liabilities assumed in connection with our acquisitions that could harm our operating results. We conduct due diligence in connection with each of our acquisitions. In connection with any of our acquisitions, there may be liabilities that we fail to discover or that we inadequately assess in our due diligence efforts. In particular, to the extent that prior owners of any acquired businesses or properties failed to comply with or otherwise violated applicable laws or regulations, or failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to the U.S. federal government or other customers, we, as the successor owner, may be financially responsible for these violations and failures and may suffer reputational harm or otherwise be adversely affected. The discovery of any material liabilities associated with our acquisitions could harm our operating results. Our Employees may Engage in Improper Activities with Adverse Consequences to our Business. As with other government contractors, we are faced with the possibility that our employees may engage in misconduct, fraud or other improper activities that may have adverse consequences to our prospects and results of operations. Misconduct by employees could include failures to comply with U.S. federal government procurement regulations, violation of federal requirements concerning the protection of classified information, improper labor and cost charging to contracts and misappropriation of government or third party property and information. The occurrence of any such employee activities could result in our suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. federal government, as well as the imposition of fines and penalties, which would cause material harm to our business. 7 Risks Associated with International Operations--Our international business exposes us to additional risks including legal regulations and social, political or economic instability that could harm our operating results. In connection with our international operations, (including international operations under U.S. government contracts), we are subject to risks associated with operating in and selling to foreign countries, including: o compliance with the laws of the countries in which we operate; o hyperinflation or political instability in foreign countries; o potential personal injury to our personnel who may be exposed to military conflict or other hostile situations in foreign countries; o imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions or requirements by foreign governments; and o compliance with U.S. arms export control regulations and policies, which govern our ability to supply foreign affiliates and customers. Although our international operations are not currently substantial, to the extent we expand our international operations, these and other risks associated with international operations are likely to increase. Although such risks have not harmed our operating results in the past, no assurance can be given that such risks will not harm our operating results in the future. Risks related to our capital structure Leverage--Our debt could adversely affect our financial health. As of December 31, 2003, our debt was $158.8 million. You should be aware that this level of debt could have important consequences. Below we have identified some of the material potential consequences resulting from this amount of debt. o We may be unable to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes. o Over time, a significant portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the repayment of indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash we have available for other purposes. o Our ability to adjust to changing market conditions may be hampered. We may be more vulnerable in a volatile market. Additional Borrowings Available--Despite current debt levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further increase the risks described above. We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of December 19, 2003, or "Credit Facility," limit, but do not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. As of December 31, 2003, our Credit Facility would have permitted additional borrowings of up to $203.7 million. If new debt is added by us or our subsidiaries, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify. 8 Ability to Service Debt--To service our debt, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. You should be aware that our ability to repay or refinance our debt depends on our successful financial and operating performance. We cannot assure you that our business strategy will succeed or that we will achieve our anticipated financial results. Our financial and operational performance depends upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include: o the current economic and competitive conditions in the information technology industry; o budgetary constraints affecting U.S. federal government spending, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding; o U.S. federal government shutdowns and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; o delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, government information systems, or for other reasons; o any operating difficulties, operating costs or pricing pressures we may experience; o the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that affect us adversely; and o delays in implementing any strategic projects we may have. If our financial performance declines and we are unable to pay our debts, we will be required to pursue one or more alternative strategies, such as selling assets, refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness or selling additional equity capital. Also, certain alternative strategies would require the consent of our senior secured lenders before we engage in any such strategy. Restrictive Debt Covenants--The terms of our Credit Facility impose significant restrictions on our ability and that of our subsidiaries to take certain actions which may have an impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our Credit Facility imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and requires us to meet certain financial tests. These restrictions may significantly limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions, including the following: o incurring or guaranteeing additional debt; o paying dividends or other distributions to our stockholders or redeeming, repurchasing or retiring our capital stock or subordinated obligations; o making investments; o creating liens on our assets; o issuing or selling capital stock of our subsidiaries; o transforming or selling assets currently held by us; o engaging in transactions with affiliates; and o engaging in mergers or consolidations. 9 The failure to comply with any of these covenants would cause a default under our Credit Facility. A default, if not waived, could result in acceleration of our debt, in which case the debt would become immediately due and payable. If this occurs, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if new financing is available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us. Item 1. BUSINESS General We are a leading provider of information technology solutions and systems engineering and integration services to government clients as measured by revenue. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the-art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. We also provide many of our government clients with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. We have broad service competencies that include strengths in intelligence systems, emergency response management, logistics modernization, secure identification and access management solutions, training, platform and weapons systems engineering support, ballistic missile defense, healthcare services and government enterprise solutions. We currently serve over 1,000 U.S. federal government clients in more than 50 government agencies, as well as state and foreign governments. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 88% of our revenues were derived from the Department of Defense, or "DOD," and DOD-related intelligence agencies, and approximately 10% from civilian agencies of the U.S. federal government, of which approximately 3% is derived from the Department of Homeland Security, or "DHS". For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 89% of our revenues were from contracts where we were the lead, or "prime," contractor on our projects. We provide our services under long-term contracts that have a weighted average term of seven years, assuming the exercise of all potential contract options. Additionally, we have contracts with an estimated remaining contract value of $5.6 billion as of December 31, 2003, of which approximately $661.1 million is funded backlog. From January 1996 to December 31, 2003, we increased revenues from $141.8 million to $1.0 billion, at a compound annual growth rate, of approximately 33%. Our revenues grew organically by approximately 16% from 2002 to 2003 and approximately 17% from 2001 to 2002. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. The U.S. Federal Government Technology Services Market The U.S. federal government is the largest single customer for information technology solutions and systems engineering services in the United States. The U.S. federal government technology services market, which includes information technology solutions and system engineering services, is large and growing, with total estimated expenditures of more than $121.7 billion in the U.S. federal government's fiscal year ending September 30, 2004. Government agency budgets for these technology services are forecast to grow more than 5% annually through government fiscal year 2005. Additionally, it is anticipated that technology services spending will grow more than $4.5 billion annually over the next four years in the areas emphasized by the U.S. government's evolving military strategy, including homeland security, missile defense, information security, logistics management, systems modernization, weapon systems design improvements and military personnel training. Defense spending is projected to exceed $375.0 billion in government fiscal year 2004, a 3% increase over government fiscal year 2003. The President's proposed budget for government fiscal year 2005 includes defense spending of $401.7 billion, a 7% increase over government fiscal year 2004, and the largest Department of Defense budget in history in actual dollars. The 2005 Department of Defense spending plan submitted to Congress includes a 30% increase over the next six years. 10 Government Contracts and Contracting The federal technology services procurement environment has evolved in recent years due to statutory and regulatory changes resulting from procurement reform initiatives. U.S. federal government agencies traditionally have procured technology solutions and services through agency-specific contracts awarded to a single contractor. However, the number of procurement contracting methods available to U.S. federal government customers for services procurements has increased substantially. Today, there are three predominant contracting methods through which government agencies procure technology services: traditional single award contracts, GSA Schedule contracts, and ID/IQ contracts. Traditional single award contracts specify the scope of services that will be delivered and the contractor that will provide the specified service. These contracts have been the traditional method for procurement by the U.S. federal government. When an agency has a requirement, interested contractors are solicited, qualified, and then provided with a request for a proposal. The process of qualification, request for proposals and evaluation of bids requires the agency to maintain a large, professional procurement staff and can take a year or more to complete. GSA Schedule contracts are listings of services, products and prices of contractors maintained by the GSA for use throughout the U.S. federal government. In order for a company to provide services under a GSA Schedule contract, the company must be pre-qualified and awarded a contract by GSA. When an agency uses a GSA Schedule contract to meet its requirements, the agency, or the GSA on behalf of the agency, conducts the procurement. The user agency, or the GSA on its behalf, evaluates the user agency's services requirements and initiates a competition limited to GSA Schedule qualified contractors. Use of GSA Schedule contracts is expected to provide the user agency with reduced procurement time and lower procurement costs. ID/IQ contracts are contract forms through which the U.S. federal government creates preferred provider relationships with contractors. These umbrella contracts outline the basic terms and conditions under which the government may order services. An umbrella contract typically is managed by one agency, the sponsoring agency, and is available for use by any agency of the U.S. federal government. The umbrella contracts are competed within the industry and one or more contractors are awarded contracts to be qualified to perform the work. The competitive process for procurement of work to be performed under the contract, called task orders, is limited to the pre-selected contractor(s). If the ID/IQ contract has a single prime contractor, the award of task orders is limited to that single party. If the contract has multiple prime contractors, the award of the task order is competitively determined. Multiple-contractor ID/IQ contracts that are open for any government agency to use for the procurement of services are commonly referred to as GWACs. Due to the lower cost, reduced procurement time, and increased flexibility of GWACs, there has been greater use of GWACs among many agencies for large-scale procurements of technology services. Key Factors Driving Growth There are several key factors which we believe will continue to drive the growth of the U.S. federal technology services market and our business: o Increased Outsourcing. The downsizing of the U.S. federal government workforce, declining availability of information technology management skills among government personnel, and a corresponding growth in the backlog of software maintenance tasks at many government agencies are contributing to an increase in technology outsourcing. According to the Office of Management and Budget, spending on outsourced information technology solutions is projected to grow at a rate substantially faster than overall U.S. federal government information technology expenditures. In government fiscal year 2003, 83% of the U.S. federal government's total information technology solutions spending flowed to contractors. By government fiscal year 2008, this rate of outsourcing is projected to increase to 87% of total information technology spending. o Government Efficiency Initiatives. Political pressures and budgetary constraints are forcing government agencies to improve their processes and services and to operate in a manner more consistent with commercial enterprises. To meet these challenges, government agencies are investing heavily in information technology to improve effectiveness, enhance productivity and deliver new services. 11 o Continued Dependence on Commercial Off-the-Shelf Hardware and Software. The U.S. federal government has increased its use of lower cost, open architecture systems using commercial off-the-shelf, or "COTS," hardware and software, which are rapidly displacing the single purpose, custom systems historically favored by the U.S. federal government. The need for COTS products and COTS integration services is expected to increase as the government seeks to ensure the future compatibility of its systems across agencies. In addition, the continued shortening of software upgrade cycles is expected to increase the demand for the integration of new COTS products. o Increased Spending on National Defense. After years of spending declines, national defense spending is projected to grow substantially over the next five years with the U.S. federal government increasing its commitment to strengthen the nation's security, defense and intelligence capabilities. The U.S. federal government is investing in improved homeland security, greater information systems security, more effective intelligence operations, and new approaches to warfare simulation training. Defense spending is projected to exceed $375.0 billion in government fiscal year 2004, an increase of almost 13% over government fiscal year 2003. The President's proposed budget for 2005 defense spending is $401.7 billion, a 7% increase over the government fiscal year 2004 budget and the largest defense budget in history in actual dollars. o Emphasis on System Modernization. To balance the costs of new initiatives like homeland security with the costs of ongoing military operations, the Department of Defense is emphasizing upgrading existing platforms to next generation technologies rather than procuring completely new systems. For example, rather than replace an entire generation of aircraft and ships, the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy have decided to invest in upgrades, using the latest information technology and weapons systems. To accomplish this in an environment of military personnel reductions, the armed services are increasingly dependent on highly skilled contractors that can provide the full spectrum of services needed to support modernization activities. o Continuing Impact of Procurement Reform. Recent changes in U.S. federal procurement regulations have incorporated commercial buying practices, including preferred supplier relationships in the form of GWACs, into the government's procurement process. These changes have produced lower acquisition costs, faster acquisition cycles, more flexible contract terms, and more stable supplier/customer relationships. U.S. federal expenditures through GWACs has grown significantly over the past three years, and the GSA projects growth in its GWAC and Schedule contracts will average 6% annually over the next four years. Our Capabilities and Services We are a leading provider of information technology solutions to government clients. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. As a total solutions provider, we maintain the comprehensive information technology skills necessary to support the entire lifecycle of our clients' systems, from conceptual development through operational support. We provide requirements definition and analysis, process design or re-engineering, systems engineering and design, networking and communications design, COTS hardware and software evaluation and procurement, custom software and middleware development, system integration and testing, and software maintenance and training services. Depending upon client needs, we may provide total system solutions employing our full set of skills on a single project, or we may provide more targeted, or "bundled," services designed to meet the client's specific requirements. For example, we built, and continuously maintain and upgrade, the National Emergency Management Information System, or "NEMIS," an enterprise wide management information system, for the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, or "FEMA." This system has been procured in three phases: system definition and design, base system development and deployment, and upgrades to incorporate current web technology. 12 We also are a leading provider of systems engineering and integration services to government clients, primarily within the defense community. We provide these defense clients with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage the continuing development of their mission systems, including ships, aircraft, weapons and communications systems. As a solutions provider in this market, we also maintain the comprehensive skills to manage the client's system lifecycle. We provide mission area and threat analyses, research and development management, systems engineering and design acquisition management, systems integration and testing, operations concept planning, systems maintenance and training. For example, we provide threat analysis, operations concept planning and systems integration and testing for certain U.S. Navy systems, including the radar, missile and command and control systems, employed to protect its fleet from ballistic missile attack. Like information technology solutions, these skills may be procured as a comprehensive mission solution, or they may be procured as specially prescribed tasks. Our Service Competencies and Contract Examples The key to our success in both our information technology solutions and systems engineering services businesses is a combination of in-depth customer and mission knowledge, or domain expertise, and comprehensive technical skills. We believe this combination provides long-term, sustainable competitive advantage, performance excellence and customer satisfaction. Accordingly, we have focused our growth strategy on several business areas where the mix of our domain expertise and our end-to-end technical skills provides us with a strong competitive advantage and the opportunity to cross-sell our solutions and services. The following paragraphs briefly describe our service competencies in our information technology and systems engineering and integration services businesses, and provide examples of selected programs in which we utilize these competencies. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Intelligence Systems. We have more than ten years of experience in designing, developing and operating information systems used for intelligence missions. These missions focus on data and imagery collection, as well as information analysis and dissemination of information to the battlefield. An example of our working in this area includes: o Coalition Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System CENTRIXS and CENTRIXS N.A.T.O. Since 1993, through a series of contracts, we have provided services to the U.S., N.A.T.O., and other allied military forces with near-real-time correlated situation and order of battle information for threat analysis, target recommendations, indications and warnings. CENTRIXS is one of the most widely-used command, control, computers, communication and intelligence, systems within the international intelligence community. We provide systems engineering and technical assistance, software development, configuration management, operational support and user training. This program recently has been expanded to include the deployment of new systems to Central Asia and additional system deployments to the coalition countries in the war on terrorism and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Emergency Response Management. We have unique experience in developing information technology systems to support emergency response management requirements. Our expertise includes large-scale system design, development, testing, implementation, training and operational support. Our work in this area includes: o National Emergency Management Information System. Since early 1996, we have supported the development of the NEMIS system for FEMA through a series of contracts and task orders. We believe our support to FEMA will continue to grow with FEMA's increased responsibility as a first responder to disasters and terrorist attacks and as FEMA supports its mission within DHS. NEMIS provides mission critical functionality for FEMA's core mission of disaster response and recovery. This enterprise-wide management information system connects several thousand desktop and mobile terminals/handsets, providing FEMA with a fully mobile, nationwide, rapid response disaster assessment and mitigation system. We continue to provide enhancements to the current system, and we are in the process of expanding our support to this mission area to include an internet-based capability that will integrate with the DHS technology infrastructure. 13 Logistics Modernization. We provide a wide range of logistics management information technology solutions, including process design and re-engineering, technology demonstrations, proof-of-concept systems development, new systems development and existing systems upgrades. Our working logistics modernization includes: o U.S. Air Force Cargo Movement Operations System or "CMOS." We designed and developed this system and have maintained it since 1989. It is used by the Department of Defense Traffic Management Office to provide in-transit visibility of cargo from the shipment originator to its final destination. CMOS allows our client to automate the process of cargo movement throughout DOD bases worldwide. We continue to design and develop enhancements to the system to take advantage of new technology including web-enablement and electronic data interchange applications. o Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative or "JLWI." In March 2000, we entered into the Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative contract. JLWI represents the DOD's efforts focused on facilitating the military's logistics transformation and improving military readiness through business process improvements and the implementation of new and emerging technologies. We are providing process re-engineering, system design, and database integration as we conduct a variety of client directed process and technology experiments and demonstrations. We have developed a proof-of-concept for web enabling the military's legacy logistics systems in order to provide real-time visibility of logistics information on the battlefield, or the "JLWI Shared Data Environment." Third party independent validation and verification of the JLWI Shared Data Environment reflects that it has already gained significant support through its use by units in the U.S. and in overseas locations like Afghanistan and Kuwait. Government Enterprise Solutions. Our supply chain management, software engineering and integration experience allows us to develop large-scale e-commerce applications tailored for the specific needs of the U.S. federal government environment. These applications provide end-users with significantly decreased transaction costs, increased accuracy, reduced cycle times, item price savings, real-time order status and visibility of spending patterns. o U.S. Postal Service E-Buy System. We have been providing lifecycle information technology services to the U.S. Postal Service since 1983. We have developed and implemented an electronic commerce application to serve an estimated 80,000 to 100,000 U.S. Postal Service employees who purchase a wide range of products on the U.S. Postal Service intranet web site. Pre-negotiated supplier catalogs are hosted on an intranet for security and performance. Web-based purchasing provides catalog management capability, multi-catalog searching, self-service ordering, workflow and approval processing and other status and receiving functions. Fulfilling the U.S. Postal Service's requirement to serve up to 100,000 employees required the development of a very robust transaction processing application. o Joint and Service Enterprise Information Technology Support. We have provided Enterprise Information Technology support for numerous Joint and Service Commands, or the "Commands," for the past decade, both in the U.S. and in numerous locations abroad. Our support comprises all functions of the Enterprise including telecommunications engineering, planning and operation, network development, administration and management, software life-cycle support, and business process engineering. Our employees deploy with the Commands during both peacetime operations and war and are making vital contributions to the Commands' capabilities to accomplish their missions. The supported Commands include U.S. Central Command and its Army, Third U.S. Army/ARCENT, and the U.S. Air Force, 9th U.S. Air Force/CENTAF, component commands, U.S. Army Forces Command, the U.S. Army Reserve Command, and the U.S. Army Network Engineering and Technology Command. 14 o Coalition, Joint and Service Training Exercise Support Commands. We have provided mission Exercise Program Support from the individual unit to multi-national coalition level. We plan events that prepare commanders and their staff to measure training proficiency, correct deficiencies, and prepare for wartime missions. We are adept at planning, implementing, and critiquing all aspects of these events to include augmentation with senior mentor and subject matter experts. We have planned every facet of the events to include logistical support, communications system planning and provisioning, and other support functions. These exercises have played a major part in preparation of United States and Coalition Forces to meet the global war on Terrorism, and Operations Iraqi Freedom and DHS missions. Modeling, Simulation and Training. We provide a comprehensive set of information technology solutions and services to our clients, including computer-based training, web-based training, distant learning, interactive electronic technical manuals, performance support systems and organizational assessment methods. We provide service to the following programs: o Program Executive Office Simulation Training and Instrumentation, or "PEO STRI." Since January 2000, we have provided life cycle support for constructive training at fourteen U.S. Army Simulation and Training Command Simulation centers worldwide. We have more than 700 personnel supporting this program at more than 50 sites throughout the United States, Germany, Italy and South Korea. We provide exercise support for computer-driven and manual battle simulations, including planning, coordination, personnel support, instructional aid development, simulation training, database and scenario development and system integrity. We support a variety of mission specific simulations, providing highly qualified professionals who are certified in all aspects of simulation support, to each of the U.S. Army's Battle Simulation Centers. o Military Operations on Urban Terrain, or "MOUT." We have supported the U.S. Army's MOUT program since July 1997. Our support to MOUT primarily focuses on the design and instrumentation of the most advanced MOUT site in the world located at the Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, LA, as well as other sites worldwide. The site allows trainers to continuously observe, control, monitor and record the conduct of training. The system captures every second of a training exercise through the use of nearly 1,000 cameras tied together via a fiber optic backbone and high-speed local area network to the control room. The system is also designed to control targetry and multiple battlefield effects and has the flexibility to support both simulated fire and live fire exercises. We have also developed a mobile version of MOUT to facilitate training in the theater of operation. For example, two Mobile MOUT, or "Mobile MOUT," sites were ordered and delivered for use in Kuwait and Afghanistan in early 2003 to support operations in the global war on terrorism. Secure Identification and Access Management Solutions. Our acquisition of ISI enhances our position in this market and provides us with capabilities in optical memory card technology, which is used primarily for high-capacity portable secure data storage and authentication through multiple biometrics. This capability, combined with our expertise in integrated circuit card technology, which is used primarily for access control and related transaction processing, positions us to capitalize on the growing demand in this market. Both of the secure identification and access control technologies are gaining significant and increased support with U.S. federal agencies, including the DOD, DHS and foreign governments. o Integrated Card Production System. We are the prime contractor for secure identification and border control card solutions for the DHS's Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, or "BCIS." Through a contract with the BCIS, we provide the Permanent Resident Card solution, as well as the Department of State Border Crossing "LaserVisa" Card solution. To date, the U.S. federal government has procured over 20 million secure identification cards through this contract. We are positioned to grow from the expanding budget of DHS, as secure identification and credential card technologies proliferate within DHS and other U.S. federal government agencies. 15 Healthcare Services We deliver information technology solutions in healthcare programs for the Department of Defense, Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps. Our support for medical research includes statistical analysis, data mining of complex medical databases and health surveillance. Our solutions for patient care include diagnostics, image processing, and medical records management. o U.S. Army Medical Department We provide technical, scientific, and administrative support to the Office of the Surgeon General, the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command and the U.S. Army Medical Command and its subordinate activities, laboratories and medical facilities. We have been providing this support since 1989 under several contracts. We support the research, development, acquisition and/or fielding of medical equipment and supplies, drugs, vaccines, diagnostics and advanced information technology. We assist with policy development and implementation, strategic planning, decision-making, information systems design and development, information management, studies and analyses, logistics planning and medical research. These services entered into areas of homeland security, domestic medical preparedness and Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Defense programs. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES Platform and Weapons Systems Engineering Support. We have more than 10 years experience in providing critical systems engineering and technology management services in support of defense platform and weapon systems programs. Our experience encompasses systems engineering and development, mission and threat analysis and acquisition management for the majority of U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force weapon systems. We provide core systems engineering disciplines in support of most major surface ship and submarine programs as well as virtually all Air Force weapon systems. o Secretary of the Air Force Technical and Analytical Support, or "SAFTAS." In December 2000, we entered into a 15-year contract with the U.S. Air Force to provide technical and analytical support to the Headquarters Air Force and Secretary of the Air Force organizations. The contract includes support to the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office, the Under Secretary for Space, and all of the Program Executive Offices which oversee all aircraft, munitions, space and Command, Control, Computer, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance systems. We provide program, budgetary, policy and legislative analysis, information technology services, systems engineering and technical management services for all major Air Force acquisition programs. We believe that this program, as well as similar programs for the U.S. Navy, will continue to experience growth as the Department of Defense plans for billions of dollars of system upgrades over the next decade. o Shipbuilding Engineering Support. For over twenty years, we have provided acquisition management and engineering support to the U.S. Navy's shipbuilding program offices. Today, this includes the AEGIS shipbuilding program, the aircraft carrier program, all submarine programs and the developmental programs, such as the new DDX destroyer, and the Littoral Combatant Ship. We also develop software serving the global ship design industry. In addition to support for the acquisition offices and industry, we provide support for the ships during their in-service phase of the life cycle through multiple contracts. This includes installation support, refurbishment of equipment and provision of new software. o Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Support. We support various DOD laboratories and field activities in the provision of technology, testing, operation of facilities and general research and development, or "R&D," support. Our technologies range from the provision of advanced algorithms for the Virginia class submarines, software for decision support systems, video compression algorithms, advanced sonar concepts and unique software for technology assessment. We operate the Air Force Research Laboratory's Laser Facilities and conduct material testing on their behalf. We operate special test facilities in Annapolis, MD that are nationally unique and include a deep diving test facility. We support almost every U.S. Navy R&D facility and have a significant presence in the Office of Naval Research. 16 Missile Defense. We have more than a decade of experience in missile defense programs. We provide long-range planning, threat assessment, systems engineering and integration, acquisition support services and program management services. o Theater-Wide Ballistic Missile Defense or "TBMD." Since January 1999, we have supported the U.S. Navy by providing management, systems engineering and technical support to the TBMD program. We provide a broad range of support to develop, test, evaluate, and produce the Navy's future ballistic missile defense systems. Due to our Navy TBMD System experience, we were selected to provide similar support to the National Missile Defense program. We believe missile programs will experience near-and-long-term growth as the DOD moves forward to meet the U.S. federal government's mandate for a national missile defense system. Our Growth Strategy Our goal is to become the first pure-play technology services company to be included in the top tier of government technology service providers. Our objective is to continue to profitably grow our business as a premier provider of comprehensive technology solutions and services to the U.S. federal government market. Our strategy to achieve this objective includes the following: o Continue to Increase Market Penetration. In the past 10 years, the U.S. federal government's shift towards using significantly larger, more comprehensive contracts, such as GWACs, has favored companies with a broad range of technical capabilities and proven track records. As a prime contractor on three of the four largest GWACs for information technology services based on overall contract ceiling value, we have benefited from these changes. We will continue to expand our role with current customers on existing programs while also pursuing new opportunities only available through these larger contracts. o Capitalize on Increased Emphasis on Information Security, Homeland Security and Intelligence. Defense spending is projected to exceed $375.0 billion in government fiscal year 2004, an increase of almost 3% over government fiscal year 2003, and is expected to reach $401.7 billion in government fiscal year 2005, a 7% increase over projected government fiscal year 2003 spending. Defense budgets are expected to grow by 30% over the next six years, based on the Department of Defense spending plan submitted to Congress. We believe that many of the key operational goals of the U.S. federal government correlate with our expertise, including developing a national missile defense system, increasing homeland security, protecting information systems from attack, conducting effective intelligence homeland security, protecting information systems from attack, conducting effective intelligence operations, and training for new approaches to warfare through simulation. o Capitalize on Growing Demand in the Secure Identification and Access Management Solutions Market. The use of credential card technologies for secure identification and access control solutions is rapidly gaining momentum with U.S. federal agencies, the DOD and foreign governments. These cards are used for cardholder authentication, physical access control and logical access control. Our acquisition of ISI enhances our position in this market and provides us with a full range of capabilities to meet our customers' requirements. ISI brings us extensive experience with optical storage card technology, which is used primarily for authentication using biometrics and physical access control. This capability, combined with our expertise in integrated circuit card technology, used primarily for logical access control, uniquely positions us to capitalize on the growing demand in this market regardless of the application or credential card technology selected by customers. o Cross-Sell our Full Range of Services to Existing Customers. We plan to continue expanding the scope of existing customer relationships by marketing and delivering the full range of our capabilities to each customer. Having developed a high level of customer satisfaction and critical domain knowledge as the incumbent on many long-term contracts, we have a unique advantage and opportunity to cross-sell our services and capture additional contract opportunities. For example, we believe our strong performance record and detailed understanding of customer requirements developed on the U.S. Air Force Cargo Movement Operations System led directly to our being awarded a contract relating to the Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative. 17 o Continue our Disciplined Acquisition Strategy. We employ a disciplined methodology to evaluate and select acquisition candidates. We have completed six strategic acquisitions since 1997. Our industry remains highly fragmented and we believe the changing government procurement environment will continue to provide additional opportunities for industry consolidation. We will continue to selectively review acquisition candidates with complementary skills or market focus. History and Organization In April 1996, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of our predecessor corporation, Anteon International Corporation (then known as Ogden Professional Services Corporation), a Virginia corporation, which we refer to in this filing as "Anteon Virginia." In connection with the acquisition we changed the name of Anteon Virginia to Anteon Corporation. Anteon Virginia then acquired several companies and businesses, including Techmatics, Inc. On January 1, 2001, Anteon Virginia was renamed Anteon International Corporation and transferred most of its operations into Techmatics, which became its principal operating subsidiary, and was in turn renamed Anteon Corporation. As a result, we then owned approximately 99% of Anteon Virginia and Anteon Virginia owned 100% of Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics). On March 15, 2002, we entered into certain reorganization transactions in connection with our initial public offering, including the merger of Anteon Virginia into us. Following the merger, the name "Anteon International Corporation" is borne solely by a single Delaware corporation, which is the direct 100% parent company of Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics). Acquisitions We employ a highly disciplined methodology to evaluate acquisitions. Since 1997 we have evaluated several hundred targets and have successfully completed and integrated six strategic acquisitions. Each of these acquired businesses has been accretive to earnings, exceeded our synergy expectations, added to our technical capabilities and expanded our customer reach. The acquired businesses and their roles within our service offerings are summarized in the table below.
Revenues prior to Year Acquired Business Business Description acquisition(1) ($ in millions) 1997 Vector Data Intelligence collection, exploitation, and dissemination systems $ 35.6 1998 Techmatics Surface ship and combat systems and ballistic missile defense 56.7 program management 1999 Analysis & Undersea ship and combat systems, acoustical signal processing, 170.4 Technology modeling and simulation, information technology systems and software design 2000 Sherikon Military healthcare services systems, networking and 62.7 communications systems 2001 SIGCOM Training Training simulation systems and services 12.5 2003 ISI Secure identification and access management solutions and military 130.5 logistics and training
-------------------------------------------------------- (1) Consolidated revenue of acquired business for its most recently completed fiscal year ended prior to the acquisition date. 18 In August 1997, we purchased Vector Data Systems, Inc., or "Vector Data," a supplier of specialized information systems and services for the collection, analysis and distribution of military intelligence data. In May 1998, we acquired Techmatics, Inc., an established provider of systems engineering and program management services for large-scale military system development, including the Navy's surface ship fleet, on-ship combat systems and missile defense programs. With the acquisition of Analysis & Technology, Inc., or "A&T," in June 1999, we expanded our customer base for systems engineering and program management services to the Navy's undersea systems and added important technical expertise in computer-based training, modeling, simulation and advanced signal processing. In October 2000, we purchased Sherikon, Inc., or "Sherikon," extending the reach of our information technology solutions to military healthcare delivery system. In July 2001, we acquired the training division of SIGCOM, Inc. and increased the range of our information technology-enabled training solutions to include the realistic simulation of urban environments for the planning and preparation of overseas military operations. In May 2003, we purchased ISI, a provider of secure identification and access management solutions and military logistics and training to primarily the Department of Defense. Existing Contract Profiles We currently have a portfolio of more than 500 active contracts. Our contract mix for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 38% time and materials contracts, 32% cost-plus contracts and 30% fixed price contracts (a substantial majority of which were firm fixed price level of effort). Under a time and materials contract, the contractor is paid a fixed hourly rate for each direct labor hour expended and is reimbursed for direct costs. To the extent that actual labor hour costs vary significantly from the negotiated rates under a time and materials contract, we may generate more or less than the targeted amount of profit. Cost-plus contracts provide for reimbursement of allowable costs and the payment of a fee which is the contractor's profit. Cost-plus fixed fee contracts specify the contract fee in dollars or as a percentage of allowable costs. Cost-plus incentive fee and cost-plus award fee contracts provide for increases or decreases in the contract fee, within specified limits, based upon actual results as compared to contractual targets for factors such as cost, quality, schedule and performance. Under a fixed price contract, the contractor agrees to perform the specified work for a firm fixed price. To the extent that actual costs vary from the price negotiated we may generate more or less than the targeted amount of profit or even incur a loss. In addition, we generally do not pursue fixed price software development work that may create material financial risk. We do, however, execute some fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts which represent similar levels of risk as time and materials contracts. The substantial majority of these fixed price contracts involve a defined number of hours or a defined category of personnel. We refer to such contracts as "level of effort" contracts. Fixed price percentages in the table below include predominantly fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts. Our historical contract mix is summarized in the table below. Contract Mix Year End --------------------------------------- Contract Type 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost-Plus............................. 37% 41% 37% 35% 32% Time and Materials.................... 38% 31% 34% 37% 38% Fixed Price........................... 25% 28% 29% 28% 30% Our contract mix changes from year to year depending on the contract mix of companies we acquire, as well as our efforts to obtain more time and materials and fixed price work. In addition to a wide range of single award contracts with defense, civil, state and local government customers, we also hold a number of multiple award omnibus contracts and GWACs that currently support more than 3,600 separate task orders. The broad distribution of contract work is demonstrated by the fact that no single award contract or task order accounted for more than 8% of our total 2003 revenue. 19 Government Wide Acquisition Contracts. We are one of the leading suppliers of information technology services under GWACs, and a prime contractor for three of the four largest GWACs for information technology services as measured by overall contract ceiling value. These contract vehicles are available to any government customer and provide a faster, more-effective means of procuring contract services. For example, in December 1998, we were awarded ANSWER, a 10-year multiple award contract with the GSA to provide highly technical information technology and systems engineering program support and infrastructure management. We have been awarded over 560 task orders to date, with an annualized revenue run rate as of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 of approximately $150 million. Our total estimated contract value for this contract is approximately $1.6 billion for the period January 1999 to December 2008. Listed below are the four largest GWACs. Contract Owning Period of Ceiling Contract Name Agency Performance Value Role -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANSWER GSA 1998 - 2008 $25 billion Prime Millenia GSA 1999 - 2009 $25 billion Subcontractor Millenia Lite GSA 2000 - 2010 $20 billion Prime CIO-SP II NIH 2000 - 2010 $20 billion Prime Listed below are our top programs by 2003 revenue, including single award and multiple award contracts. We are a prime contractor on each of these programs.
Top Programs by 2003 Revenue ($ in millions) Estimated Period of Remaining Contract Contract Customer Performance 2003 Revenue Contract Value Type ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANSWER GSA 1/1/99-12/31/08 $ 158.3 $ 818.5 T&M/FFP GSA SCHEDULE & BPAs GSA 10/30/96-10/09/07 102.6 469.8 T&M/FFP SAFTAS U.S. Air Force 01/01/01-12/31/15 42.8 436.1 CP GSA PES Contract GSA 01/06/00-01/05/05 33.1 381.5 CP CENTRIX/LOCE Department of Defense 12/01/02-05/31/04 26.4 22.6 CP Millenia Lite-Area GSA 07/06/00-07/05/10 2 24.7 272.5 CP GSA-PES GSA 05/01/00-02/08/06 24.5 10.3 FFP GSA-MOBIS GSA 11/21/97-09/30/07 21.6 58.1 CP Carrier BPA U.S. Navy 03/10/97-12/31/03 19.2 0.7 T&M/FFP MOUT-IS Army/STRICOM/Training 07/03/97-08/31/05 17.0 7.5 FFP
20 Subcontractors In fulfilling our contract obligations to customers, we may utilize the services of one or more subcontractors. The use of subcontractors to support bidding for and the subsequent performance of awarded contacts is a customary aspect of U.S. federal government contracting. Subcontractors may be tasked by us with performing work elements of the contract similar to or different from those performed by us or other subcontractors. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 22% of our total direct costs result from work performed by subcontractors. As discussed further in "Risk Factors," if our subcontractors fail to satisfy their contractual obligations, our prime contract performance could be materially and adversely affected. Estimated Remaining Contract Value and New Business Development On December 31, 2003, our estimated remaining contract value was $5.6 billion, of which $661.1 million was funded backlog. In determining estimated remaining contract value, we do not include any provision for an increased level of work likely to be awarded under our GWACs. The estimated remaining contract value is calculated as current revenue run rate over the remaining term of the contract. Our estimated remaining contract value consists of funded backlog which is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services and unfunded contract value which is based upon management's estimate of the future potential of our existing contracts to generate revenues for us. These estimates are based on our experience under such contracts and similar contracts, and we believe such estimates to be reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that the unfunded contract value will be realized as contract revenue or earnings. In addition, almost all of the contracts included in estimated remaining contract value are subject to termination at the election of the customer. ESTIMATED REMAINING CONTRACT VALUE Unfunded Estimated Funded Contract Remaining As of December 31, Backlog Value Contract Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in millions) 2003 $ 661 $ 4,948 $ 5,609 2002 418 3,868 4,286 2001 309 3,217 3,526 2000 308 2,560 2,868 1999 195 1,926 2,121 From December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2003, our estimated remaining contract value increased at a 28% compound annual growth rate. We believe this growth demonstrates the effectiveness of our two-tiered business development process that management has developed to respond to the strategic and tactical opportunities arising from the evolving government procurement environment. New task order contract vehicles and major high-profile programs are designated strategic opportunities, and their pursuit and execution are managed centrally. A core team comprised of senior management and our strategic business unit heads makes all opportunity selection and resource allocation decisions. Work that can be performed under our many existing task order contract vehicles is designated a tactical opportunity, which is then managed and performed at the business unit level with support as needed from other company resources. All managers and senior technical personnel are encouraged to source new work, and incentives are weighted to ensure corporate objectives are given primary consideration. Customers We provide information technology and systems engineering solutions to a highly diverse group of U.S. federal, state, local and international government organizations worldwide. Domestically, we service more than 50 agencies, bureaus and divisions of the U.S. federal government, including nearly all cabinet-level agencies and all branches of the military. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the U.S. federal government accounted for approximately 99% of our total revenues. International and state and local governments provided the remaining 1%. The DOD accounted for approximately 88% of our total revenues and services to U.S. federal civilian organizations were approximately 10%. Our largest customer group is the U.S. Navy, which management believes accounted for approximately 44% of revenues during the year ended December 31, 2003, through 30 different Navy organizations. 21 An account receivable from a U.S. federal government agency enjoys the overall credit worthiness of the U.S. federal government, even though each such agency has its own budget. Pursuant to the Prompt Payment Act, payments from government agencies must be made within 30 days of final invoice or interest must be paid. Competition The federal information technology and systems engineering services industries are comprised of a large number of enterprises ranging from small, niche-oriented companies to multi-billion dollar corporations with a major presence throughout the U.S. federal government. Because of the diverse requirements of U.S. federal government clients and the highly competitive nature of large U.S. federal contracting initiatives, corporations frequently form teams to pursue contract opportunities. Prime contractors leading large proposal efforts select team members on the basis of their relevant capabilities and experience particular to each opportunity. As a result of these circumstances, companies that are competitors for one opportunity may be team members for another opportunity. We frequently compete against well-known firms in our industry as a prime contractor. Obtaining a position as either a prime contractor or subcontractor on government-wide contracting vehicles is only the first step to ensuring a secure competitive position. Competition then takes place at the task order level, where knowledge of the client and its procurement requirements and environment are keys to winning the business. We have been successful in ensuring our presence on GWACs and GSA Schedule contracts, and in competing for work under those contracts. Through the variety of contractual vehicles at our disposal, as either a prime contractor or subcontractor, we have the ability to market our services to any federal agency. Because of our extensive experience in providing services to a diverse array of federal departments and agencies, we have first-hand knowledge of our clients and their goals, problems and challenges. We believe this knowledge gives us a competitive advantage in competing for tasks and positions us well for future growth. Employees As of December 31, 2003, we employed approximately 7,600 employees, 97% of whom were billable and 69% of whom held security clearances. Our workforce is well educated and experienced in the defense and intelligence sectors. Functional areas of expertise include systems engineering, computer science, business process reengineering, logistics, transportation, materials technologies, avionics and finance and acquisition management. None of our employees is represented by any collective bargaining agreements. Available Information Our internet address is www.anteon.com. We make available free of charge through our internet site, via a hyperlink to the 10KWizard.com web site, our annual reports on Form 10-K; quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; current reports on Form 8-K; and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the "Exchange Act," as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Item 2. Properties Our headquarters are located in leased facilities in Fairfax, Virginia. In total, we lease approximately 1.3 million square feet of office, shop and warehouse space in over 100 facilities across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia. We own an office building in North Stonington, Connecticut, which occupies 63,578 square feet of office space and which is currently being held for sale. 22 Item 3. Legal Proceedings We are involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, but do not believe that they will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise. 23 Part II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters Our common stock has been publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the "NYSE," since March 11, 2002. The following table sets forth the high and low sale price per share of our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 as reported by the NYSE. 2003 Quarter Ended High Low --------------------- ---------- ------------ March 31 $ 25.85 $ 20.00 June 30 $ 29.50 $ 21.86 September 30 $ 35.10 $ 27.30 December 31 $ 38.95 $ 30.71 2002 Quarter Ended High Low --------------------- ---------- ------------ March 31 * $ 21.85 $ 19.25 June 30 $ 26.75 $ 20.10 September 30 $ 28.26 $ 18.90 December 31 $ 29.35 $ 19.40 *Trading commenced on March 11, 2002 We have not in the past paid, and do not expect for the foreseeable future to pay, dividends on our common stock. Instead, we anticipate that all of our future earnings, if any, will be used in the operation and expansion of our business, for working capital, and other general corporate purposes. Our board will determine whether to pay dividends in the future based on conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as economic and other conditions as the board may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock is restricted by the provisions of Delaware law and covenants in our Credit Facility. As of February 23, 2004, the number of stockholders of record of our common stock was approximately 402. Item 6. Selected Financial Data The selected consolidated financial data set forth below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. These results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period and are not comparable between prior periods as a result of business acquisitions consummated in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2003. Results of operations of these acquired businesses are included in our consolidated financial statements for the periods subsequent to the respective dates of acquisition. You should read the selected consolidated financial data presented below in conjunction with Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," Item 1. "Business" and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this filing. 24
Year ended December 31, 1999 (a) 2000 2001 (a) 2002 (a) 2003 -------- ------ ---------- ---------- ------- (in thousands, except per share data and percentages) ----------------------------------------------------- Statements of operations data: Revenues........................................$ 400,850 $ 542,807 $ 715,023 $ 825,826 $ 1,042,474 Costs of revenues............................... 353,245 474,924 627,342 711,328 897,264 ------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- Gross profit.................................... 47,605 67,883 87,681 114,498 145,210 General and administrative expenses, including acquisition related costs........... 27,926 38,592 51,442 48,197 58,647 Amortization of non-compete agreements.......... 909 866 349 -- 101 Goodwill amortization........................... 3,440 4,714 6,704 -- -- Other intangibles amortization.................. -- 2,673 2,321 1,907 2,349 ------------ -------------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Operating income ............................... 15,330 21,038 26,865 64,394 84,113 Other Income.................................... -- -- -- 417 -- Gains on sales and closures of business......... -- -- 4,046 -- -- Gains on sales of investments and other, net........................................... 2,585 -- -- -- -- Secondary offering expenses..................... -- -- -- -- 852 Interest expense, net of interest income........................................ 19,002 26,513 26,353 21,626 24,244 Minority interest in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries.................................. (39) 32 (38) (18) (54) ------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes............................ (1,126) (5,443) 4,520 43,167 58,963 Provision for (benefit from) income taxes......................................... 401 (153) 4,602 16,723 22,773 ------------ -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- Net income (loss)..........................$ (1,527) $ (5,290) $ (82) $ 26,444 $ 36,190 ============ ============== ============ ============== ============== Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ (0.06) $ (0.22) $ (0.01) $ 0.82 $ 1.04 ============ ============== ============ ============== ============== Weighted average shares outstanding........ 23,785 23,787 23,787 32,163 34,851 Diluted earnings (loss) per common share.......$ (0.06) $ (0.22) $ (0.01) $ 0.78 $ 0.98 ============ ============== ============ ============== ============== Weighted average shares outstanding........ 23,785 23,787 23,787 34,022 36,925 Other data: EBITDA (b)......................................$ 25,978 $ 36,347 $ 47,357 $ 70,994 $ 90,097 EBITDA margin (c).............................. 6.5% 6.7% 6.6% 8.6% 8.6% Cash flow from (used in) operating activities....................................$ 11,767 $ 17,101 $ 37,879 $ (1,722) $ 37,443 Cash flow from (used in) investing activities.................................... (111,672) (28,912) (1,707) (1,423) (95,431) Cash flow from (used in) financing activities.................................... 100,957 12,036 (35,676) 5,481 55,810 Capital expenditures............................ 4,761 6,584 2,181 3,225 3,049 Balance sheet data (as of December 31): Current assets..................................$ 118,583 $ 148,420 $ 144,418 $ 208,396 $ 244,591 Working capital (d)............................. 48,818 56,841 27,559 80,390 105,287 Total assets.................................... 278,691 324,423 306,651 364,692 479,280 Long-term debt, including current portion....................................... 212,301 237,695 202,905 105,701 158,776 Stockholders' equity (deficit).................. 3,672 (1,576) (3,442) 128,829 174,492
(a) On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 145, and as a result, reclassified $4.2 million ($2.6 million net of tax) of losses, $519,000 ($330,000 net of tax) of gains and $772,000 ($463,000 net of tax) of loss previously recorded as extraordinary items in 2002, 2001 and 1999, respectively, to interest expense, net of interest income. Additionally, the tax impact as a result of the reclassifications has been adjusted in the tax provision amounts shown. (b) "EBITDA", as defined, represents income before income taxes, plus depreciation, amortization and net interest expense. EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure but should not be construed as an alternative to operating income or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, "GAAP"). We believe that EBITDA is a useful supplement to net income and other income statement data because it is used by some investors in understanding and measuring a company's cash flows generated from operations that are available for taxes, debt service and capital expenditures. However, all companies do not calculate EBITDA in the same manner, and as a result, the EBITDA measures presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The computations of EBITDA are as follows: 25
Year ended December 31, 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ($ in thousands) Net income (loss)............................. $ (1,527) $ (5,290) $ (82) $ 26,444 $ 36,190 Provision for (benefit from) income tax 401 (153) 4,602 16,723 22,773 Interest expense, net of interest income...... 19,002 26,513 26,353 21,626 24,244 Depreciation.................................. 3,753 7,024 7,110 4,294 4,440 Amortization.................................. 4,349 8,253 9,374 1,907 2,450 ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- EBITDA........................................ $ 25,978 $ 36,347 $ 47,357 $ 70,994 $ 90,097 Secondary offering expenses................... -- -- -- -- 852 ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Adjusted EBITDA (e)........................... $ 25,978 $ 36,347 $ 47,357 $ 70,994 $ 90,949 =========== ========== =========== ========== ========== Net income (loss)............................. (0.3%) (1.0%) (0.1%) 3.2% 3.5% EBITDA margin (c)............................. 6.5% 6.7% 6.6% 8.6% 8.6% Adjusted EBITDA margin (f).................... 6.5% 6.7% 6.6% 8.6% 8.7%
(c) EBITDA margin represents EBITDA calculated as a percentage of total revenues. (d) Working Capital is equal to current assets minus current liabilities. (e) Adjusted EBITDA is presented herein because we believe it to also be relevant and useful to our investors. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA plus the additional costs associated with the secondary offering. (f) Adjusted EBITDA margin represents Adjusted EBITDA calculated as a percentage of total revenues. 26 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Item 6. "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this filing. Some of the statements in the following discussion are forward-looking statements. See "Forward-Looking Statements." General We are a leading provider of information technology solutions and systems engineering and integration services to government clients as measured by revenue. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the-art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. We also provide many of our government clients with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. We have a broad client and contract base and a diverse contract mix. We currently serve over 1,000 U.S. federal government clients in more than 50 government agencies, as well as state and foreign governments. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 88% of our revenue was derived from contracts with the DOD and intelligence agencies, and approximately 10% from civilian agencies of the U.S. federal government. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 89% of our revenue was from contracts where we were the lead, or "prime," contractor. Our diverse contract base has approximately 500 active contracts and more than 3,600 active task orders. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our largest contract or task order accounted for approximately 7% of our revenues. We have a diverse mix of contract types, with approximately 38%, 32%, and 30% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 derived from time and materials, cost-plus and fixed price contracts, respectively. In addition, we generally do not pursue fixed price software development contracts that may create financial risk. Additionally, we have contracts with an estimated remaining contract value of $5.6 billion as of December 31, 2003, of which $661.1 million is funded backlog. Our contracts have a weighted-average term of approximately seven years. From December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2003, our estimated remaining contract value increased at a 28% compound annual growth rate. Description of Critical Accounting Policies Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates including those related to uncollected accounts receivable and other contingent liabilities, revenue recognition, goodwill and other intangible assets. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that our critical accounting policies which require more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are revenue recognition, costs of revenues, goodwill impairment, long-lived assets and identifiable intangible asset impairment and business combinations. Revenue Recognition During the year ended December 31, 2003, we estimate that approximately 98% of our revenues were derived from services and approximately 2% from product sales. Services are performed under contracts that may be categorized into three primary types: time and materials, cost-plus reimbursement and firm fixed price. Revenue for time and materials contracts is recognized as time is spent at hourly rates, which are negotiated with the customer. Time and materials contracts are typically more profitable than cost-plus contracts because of our ability to negotiate rates and manage costs on those contracts. Revenue is recognized under cost-plus contracts on the basis of direct and indirect costs incurred plus a negotiated profit calculated as a percentage of costs or as performance-based award fee. Cost-plus type contracts provide relatively less risk than other contract types because we are reimbursed for all direct costs and certain indirect costs, such as overhead and general and administrative expenses, and are paid a fee for work performed. For cost-plus award fee type contracts, we recognize the expected fee to be awarded by the customer at the time such fee can be reasonably estimated, based on factors such as our prior award experience and communications with the customer regarding our performance, including any interim performance evaluations rendered by the customer. Revenues are recognized under substantially all fixed price contracts based on the percentage-of-completion basis, using the cost-to-cost method for all services provided. For non-service related fixed price contracts, revenues are recognized as units are delivered (the units-of-delivery method). In addition, we evaluate our contracts for multiple deliverables which may require the segmentation of each deliverable into separate accounting units for proper revenue recognition. 27 We recognize revenues under our U.S. federal government contracts when a contract is executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of the services or products has occurred, the contract is funded and collectibility of the contract price is considered probable. Our contracts with agencies of the U.S. federal government are subject to periodic funding by the respective contracting agency. Funding for a contract may be provided in full at inception of the contract or ratably throughout the term of the contract as the services are provided. From time to time we may proceed with work based on customer direction pending finalization and signing of contractual funding documents. We have an internal process for approving any such work. All revenue recognition is deferred during periods in which funding is not received. Costs incurred during such periods are deferred if the receipt of funding is assessed as probable. In evaluating the probability of funding being received, we consider our previous experiences with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and our knowledge of available funding for the contract or program. If funding is not assessed as probable, costs are expensed as they are incurred. We recognize revenues under our U.S. federal government contracts based on allowable contract costs, as mandated by the U.S. federal government's cost accounting standards. The costs we incur under U.S. federal government contracts are subject to regulation and audit by certain agencies of the U.S. federal government. Historically, contract cost disallowances resulting from government audits have not historically been significant. We may be exposed to variations in profitability, including potential losses, if we encounter variances from estimated fees earned under award fee contracts and estimated costs under fixed price contracts. Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. Examples of such estimates include the level of effort needed to accomplish the tasks under the contract, the cost of those efforts, and a continual assessment of our progress toward the completion of the contract. From time to time, circumstances may arise which require us to revise our estimated total revenue or costs. Typically, these revisions relate to contractual changes involving our services. To the extent that a revised estimate affects contract revenue or profit previously recognized, we record the cumulative effect of the revision in the period in which it becomes known. In addition, the full amount of an anticipated loss on any type of contract is recognized in the period in which it becomes known. We generally do not pursue fixed price software development work that may create material financial risk. We do, however, provide services under fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts, which represent similar levels of risk as time and materials contracts. Our contract mix was approximately 38% time and materials, 32% cost-plus and 30% fixed price (a substantial majority of which are firm fixed price level of effort) during the year ended December 31, 2003. The contract mix can change over time depending on contract awards and acquisitions. For example, ISI has a higher proportion of cost plus contracts which we believe provides us with an opportunity, over time, to migrate those contracts to higher margin time and materials and fixed-price labor work. Under cost-plus contracts with the U.S. federal government, operating profits are statutorily limited to 15% but typically range from 5% to 7%. Under fixed price and time and materials contracts, margins are not subject to statutory limits. However, the U.S. federal government's objective in negotiating such contracts is to seldom allow for operating profits in excess of 15% and, due to competitive pressures, operating profits on such contracts are often less than 10%. We maintain reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable which may arise in the normal course of business. Historically, we have not had significant write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable. However, we do perform work on many contracts and task orders, where on occasion, issues may arise, which would lead to accounts receivable not being fully collected. 28 Costs of Revenues ----------------- Our costs are categorized as either direct or indirect costs. Direct costs are those that can be identified with and allocated to specific contracts and tasks. They include labor, fringe (vacation time, medical/dental, 401K plan matching contribution, tuition assistance, employee welfare, worker's compensation and other benefits), subcontractor costs, consultant fees, travel expenses and materials. Indirect costs are either overhead or general and administrative expenses. Indirect costs cannot be identified with specific contracts or tasks, and to the extent that they are allowable, they are allocated to contracts and tasks using appropriate government-approved methodologies. Costs determined to be unallowable under the Federal Acquisition Regulations cannot be allocated to projects. Our principal unallowable costs are interest expense, amortization expense for goodwill (prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 in January 2002), amortization expense for separately identified intangibles from acquisitions, certain general and administrative expenses and, prior to our initial public offering, management fees paid to Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., an affiliate of our principal stockholders. A key element to our success has been our ability to control indirect and unallowable costs, enabling us to profitably execute our existing contracts and successfully bid for new contracts. In addition, with the acquisition of new companies, we have been able to manage our indirect costs and improve operating margins by integrating the indirect cost structures and realizing opportunities for cost synergies. Costs of revenues are considered to be a critical accounting policy because of the direct relationship to revenue recognized. Goodwill Impairment -------------------- Goodwill relating to our acquisitions represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired, and has a carrying amount of approximately $212.2 million and $138.6 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The majority of the increase in goodwill is related to the acquisition of ISI in May 2003. For acquisitions completed prior to July 1, 2001, and until the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from twenty to thirty years. Determination of the amortization period was dependent on the nature of the operations acquired. Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, and no longer amortize goodwill, but rather test for impairment of our goodwill at least annually using a fair value approach. We completed our transition analysis under SFAS No. 142 as of June 30, 2002 and our annual impairment analyses as of September 30, 2002 and 2003, noting no indications of impairment for any of our reporting units. As of December 31, 2003, there have been no events or circumstances that would indicate an impairment test should be performed sooner than our planned annual test as of September 30, 2004. Long-Lived Assets and Identifiable Intangible Asset Impairment -------------------------------------------------------------- The carrying amount of long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets was approximately $17.9 million and $12.7 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Of the $17.9 million at December 31, 2003, approximately $7.3 million of the assets are related to our acquisition of ISI. Long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are evaluated for impairment when events occur that suggest that such assets may be impaired. Such events could include, but are not limited to, the loss of a significant customer or contract, decreases in U.S. federal government appropriations or funding of certain programs, or other similar events. None of these events occurred for the year ended December 31, 2003. We determine if an impairment has occurred based on a comparison of the carrying amount of such assets to the future undiscounted net cash flows, excluding charges for interest. If considered impaired, the impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their estimated fair value, as determined by an analysis of discounted cash flows using a discounted interest rate based on our cost of capital and the related risks of recoverability. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recognized an impairment charge of approximately $135,000, included in general and administrative expenses, in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, to write-down the carrying value of a building held for sale to its estimated fair market value. In evaluating impairment, we consider, among other things, our ability to sustain our current financial performance on contracts and tasks, our access to and penetration of new markets and customers and the duration of, and estimated amounts from, our contracts. Any uncertainty of future financial performance is dependent on the ability to maintain our customers and the continued funding of our contracts and tasks by the government. Over the past four years, we have been able to win the majority of our contracts that have been recompeted. In addition, we have been able to sustain financial performance through indirect cost savings from our acquisitions, which have generally resulted in either maintaining or improving margins on our contracts and tasks. If we are required to record an impairment charge in the future, it would have an adverse impact on our results of operations. 29 Business Combinations --------------------- We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized at their estimated fair market values at the acquisition date. The purchase price in excess of the estimated fair market value of the net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired represents goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price related to our business combinations involves significant estimates and management judgement that may be adjusted during the allocation period, but in no case beyond one year from the acquisition date. Costs incurred related to successful business combinations are capitalized as costs of business combinations, while costs incurred by us for unsuccessful or terminated acquisition opportunities are expensed when we determine that such opportunities will no longer be pursued. Costs incurred related to probable business combinations are deferred. On May 23, 2003, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of ISI, a provider of credential card technologies and military logistics and training systems, based in Annandale, Virginia, for a total purchase price of approximately $91.6 million, excluding transaction costs of approximately $737,000. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $4.8 million of contracts and related customer relationships and $500,000 for the value of a non-compete agreement. The value of the contracts and related customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by us. At the time of the acquisition, the contracts and related customer relationships had an expected useful life of approximately 5.3 years. The non-compete agreement is being amortized straight-line over the three year term of the agreement. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. The total purchase price paid, including transaction and other deal related costs, of $92.4 million was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands): Accounts receivable $ 22,792 Prepaid and other current assets 764 Property and equipment 3,312 Other assets 120 Current income tax receivable 655 Accounts payable and accrued expenses (11,186) Deferred income tax, net (458) Deferred revenue (2,645) Other liabilities (558) Contracts and customer relationships 4,751 Goodwill 74,335 Non-compete agreement 500 ---------- Total consideration $ 92,382 ========== Statements of Operations The following is a description of certain line items from our consolidated statements of operations. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 include the operations of ISI for the period beginning May 23, 2003, the date of the acquisition. 30 Costs of revenues include direct labor and fringe costs for program personnel and direct expenses incurred to complete contracts and task orders. Costs of revenues also include depreciation, overhead, and other direct contract costs, which include subcontract work, consultant fees, and materials. Overhead consists of indirect costs relating to operational managers, rent/facilities, administration, travel and other expenses. General and administrative expenses are primarily for corporate functions such as management, legal, finance and accounting, contracts and administration, human resources, company management information systems and depreciation, and also include other unallowable costs such as marketing, certain legal fees and reserves. Amortization expenses relate to the costs associated with goodwill (prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002) and intangible assets from our acquisitions. These intangible assets represent the fair value assigned to employee workforce as part of our acquisitions of A&T and Sherikon (prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 141 on January 1, 2002) and contract backlog as part of our acquisitions of A&T, Sherikon, SIGCOM Training, and ISI. Amortization expenses also include costs associated with certain non-compete agreements related to the ISI acquisition. Interest expense is primarily related to our Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009, or the "12% Notes," our term loans and revolving Credit Facility, our subordinated debt and subordinated convertible promissory notes held by our stockholders prior to their repayment or conversion in connection with our IPO, and other miscellaneous interest costs. In addition, approximately $1.9 million of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 relates to the recognition of previously unrecognized losses from the termination of approximately $30.0 million in interest rate swaps. During the year ended December 31, 2003, in conjunction with our tender offer for our 12% Notes, we incurred approximately $7.2 million of interest expense for the bond premium and consent payment. Other income is from non-core business items such as gains on the sales and closures of businesses and investments. Funded Backlog and Estimated Remaining Contract Value Each year a significant portion of our revenue is derived from existing contracts with our government clients, and a portion of the revenue represents work related to maintenance, upgrade or replacement of systems under contracts or projects for which we are the incumbent provider. Proper management of contracts is critical to our overall financial success and we believe that effective management of costs makes us competitive on price. Historically, we believe that our demonstrated performance record and service excellence have enabled us to maintain our position as an incumbent service provider on more than 90% of our contracts that have been recompeted. We have increased our estimated remaining contract value by approximately $1.3 billion, from $4.3 billion as of December 31, 2002, to $5.6 billion at December 31, 2003, of which approximately $66.1 million was funded backlog as of December 31, 2003. Funded backlog increased approximately $242.9 million to $661.1 million at December 31, 2003, from $418.2 million as of December 31, 2002. Our estimated remaining contract value represents the aggregate contract revenue we estimate will be earned at a given time over the remaining life of our contracts. When more than one company is awarded a contract for a given work requirement, we include in estimated remaining contract value only our estimate of the contract revenue we expect to earn over the remaining term of the contract. Funded backlog is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment for goods and services. Because the U.S. federal government operates under annual appropriations, agencies of the U.S. federal government typically fund contracts on an incremental basis. Accordingly, the majority of the estimated remaining contract value is not funded backlog. Our estimated remaining contract value is based on our experience under contracts and we believe our estimates are reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that our existing contracts will result in actual revenues in any particular period or at all. These amounts could vary depending upon government budgets and appropriations. In addition, we are periodically asked to work at-risk on projects. At-risk means that the customer has asked us to work, or to continue working, on a project even though there are no funds obligated and released for payment by the customer. In most cases, the government is in the process of funding the contract or tasks and requests that we continue work to avoid disruptions to the project. Historically, we have not recorded any significant write-offs because funding was not ultimately received. 31 Acquisitions, Divestitures and Business Closures The following table summarizes our acquisitions, divestitures and business closures.
Revenues for the most recently completed twelve month period ended prior Name Status Acquisition Date to acquisition ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in thousands) ACQUISITIONS Vector Data Systems........... Acquired August 1997 $ 35,600 Techmatics.................... Acquired May 1998 56,700 Analysis & Technology......... Acquired June 1999 170,400 Sherikon...................... Acquired October 2000 62,700 SIGCOM Training............... Acquired July 2001 12,500 ISI........................... Acquired May 2003 130,500 Name Status Divestiture/Closure Revenues for the twelve months ended prior to Date divestiture/closure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (in thousands) DIVESTITURES/CLOSURES CITE.......................... Sold June 2001 $ 2,411 IMC........................... Sold July 2001 21,710 DisplayCheck.................. Sold April 2002 270 STSR.......................... Closed December 2001 3,427
Acquisitions In 1996, we were formed by affiliates of and companies managed by Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., including Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech. II LLC and Frederick J. Iseman, which we refer to collectively as the "Caxton-Iseman Stockholders." On April 1, 1996, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Anteon Virginia (then known as Ogden Professional Services Corporation) from Ogden Corporation in a leveraged transaction. Anteon Virginia provided information technology and network system services primarily to the U.S. government and its agencies. We paid an aggregate consideration of approximately $40.4 million to Ogden, including transaction costs. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Vector Data Systems--On August 29, 1997, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Vector Data including Vector Data's eighty percent equity interest in Vector Data Systems (UK) Limited, collectively, "Vector." Vector supplied specialized information systems and services for the collection, analysis and distribution of military intelligence data. The aggregate consideration paid by us was approximately $19.0 million, including transaction costs. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Techmatics--On May 29, 1998, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Techmatics, an established provider of systems engineering and program management services for large-scale military system development, including the Navy's surface ship fleet, on-ship combat systems and missile defense programs. The aggregate consideration paid by us was approximately $45.9 million, including transaction costs. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Analysis & Technology--On June 23, 1999, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of A&T a provider of systems and engineering technologies, technology-based training systems, and information technologies to the U.S. government and commercial customers, for an aggregate consideration, including transaction costs, of approximately $115.6 million. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. 32 Sherikon--On October 20, 2000, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Sherikon, a technology solutions and services firm, for an aggregate consideration, including transaction costs, of approximately $34.8 million. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. SIGCOM Training--On July 20, 2001, we acquired the assets, contracts and personnel of the training systems division of SIGCOM, Inc., for an aggregate consideration of $11.4 million, including transaction costs. The training systems division of SIGCOM, Inc. is a provider of sophisticated simulation systems used by the most advanced military and government organizations around the world, including the U.S. Army, U. S. Marine Corps, U. S. Navy Seals, the FBI, SWAT teams, British Special Forces and NATO troops, to help acclimate members of the armed forces to combat conditions in urban areas. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Information Spectrum, Inc. - On May 23, 2003, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of ISI, a provider of secure identification and access management solutions and military logistics and training systems, based in Annandale, Virginia, for a total purchase price of approximately $92.4 million, including transaction costs of approximately $737,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Divestitures/Closures In June 2001, our management made a strategic decision to focus our resources on our core services business. As a result, we have sold, closed or substantially curtailed several small businesses. Center for Information Technology Education--We established the Center for Information Technology Education, or "CITE," in 1999 to conduct training for adults in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area who were interested in information technology as a second career. CITE offered ORACLE database and JAVA training. While initially profitable, the business was impacted by the slowdown of the general economy. On June 29, 2001, we sold the business for $100,000, of which $50,000 was paid in cash and the remainder was required to be paid in equal monthly installments of approximately $8,300 beginning August 1, 2001. In addition, we retained the tuition from courses that were already underway prior to the sale on June 29, 2001. CITE's losses from operations totaled $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 on revenue of $1.2 million. CITE's income from operations totaled $414,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000 on revenues of $2.5 million. CITI-SIUSS LLC--We established a joint venture, CITI-SIUSS LLC (formerly known as Anteon-CITI-LLC), with Criminal Investigative Technology, Inc. in 1999 to participate in the law enforcement software development and services market. After two years of investment in software and business development expenses, the joint venture had not generated a sufficient customer base to create a self-supporting business. In June 2001, we decided to cease software development operations but to continue to support existing customers. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the joint venture generated operating losses of $2.6 million on revenues of approximately $1.5 million, compared with operating losses of $2.5 million on revenues of $879,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000. We do not intend to make any additional investment in developing or enhancing the existing software. Interactive Media Corp.--On July 20, 2001, we sold all of our stock in Interactive Media Corp., or "IMC," for $13.5 million in cash, subject to adjustment based on the amount of working capital as of the day of sale. IMC specializes in providing training services to customers primarily in the commercial marketplace. Prior to the sale, IMC transferred to us the assets of the government division of IMC, which specializes in training services primarily for the government marketplace. For the commercial division, revenues were approximately $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, as compared to $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. Operating loss was approximately $41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001, as compared to operating income of $686,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000. The total gain from the sale recorded for the year ended December 31, 2001, was approximately $3.5 million. 33 DisplayCheck--Through our acquisition of A&T in June 1999, we acquired expertise in electronic testing of liquid crystal displays and other microdisplay products that utilize liquid crystal on silicon technologies. This newly emergent market was pursued to determine business feasibility. While we were successful in generating a limited amount of revenue from our test equipment products, we decided not to make any further investments in this market. Operations ceased in August 2001. Operating losses of $407,000 on revenues of $664,000 were incurred in the year ended December 31, 2001. DisplayCheck generated an operating loss of $15,000 on revenue of $703,000 in 2000. On April 3, 2002, we sold principally all of the assets and transferred certain liabilities of the business for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. South Texas Ship Repair--Through our acquisition of Sherikon in October 2000, we acquired South Texas Ship Repair, or "STSR". STSR specialized in performing ship repair projects for government, commercial and private customers. The market conditions for this type of work deteriorated significantly in late 2000 and early 2001. Management decided to cease the operations of STSR in December 2001. During the year ended December 31, 2001, we incurred operating losses of $2.1 million on revenues of $3.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2001, we also wrote off approximately $1.0 million in goodwill, which was part of the original goodwill from the Sherikon acquisition. Results of Operations Our historical consolidated financial statements do not reflect the full-year impact of the operating results of a number of our acquisitions, divestitures and closures, since their operating results are only included or excluded from our results from the date of acquisition, divestiture or closure, as applicable. In addition, our operating results from period to period may not be comparable with future results because of the incurrence of a number of expenses as discussed below and the impact of the amortization principles of SFAS No. 142. 34 The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations based on the amounts and percentage relationship of the items listed to revenues during the period shown:
Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 (1) 2001 (1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands, except percentages) Revenues $ 1,042,474 100.0% $ 825,826 100.0% $ 715,023 100.0% Costs of Revenues.......... 897,264 86.1 711,328 86.1 627,342 87.7 ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Gross Profit............... 145,210 13.9 114,498 13.9 87,681 12.3 Costs and expenses.......... General and administrative. 58,647 5.6 48,197 5.8 51,442 7.2 Amortization(2)............ 2,450 0.2 1,907 0.3 9,374 1.3 ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Operating Expenses......... 61,097 5.8 50,104 6.1 60,816 8.5 ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Operating income.............. 84,113 8.1 64,394 7.8 26,865 3.8 Secondary offering expenses 852 0.1 -- -- -- -- Interest expense, net......... 24,244 2.3 21,626 2.6 26,353 3.7 Minority interest............. (54) -- (18) -- (38) -- Other (income) expense, net... -- -- (417) -- (4,046) (0.6) ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Income before provision for income taxes............. 58,963 5.7 43,167 5.2 4,520 0.7 Provision for income taxes.... 22,773 2.2 16,723 2.0 4,602 0.7 ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income (loss)............. $ 36,190 3.5% $ 26,444 3.2% $ (82) 0.0% ============= =========== ============ ============ ============ ============
(1) On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 145, and as a result, reclassified $4.2 million ($2.6 million net of tax) of losses and $519,000 ($330,000 net of tax) of gains previously recorded as extraordinary items in 2002 and 2001, respectively, to interest expense, net of interest income. Additionally, the tax impact as a result of these reclassifications has been adjusted in the tax provision amounts shown. (2) Includes amortization of non-compete agreements, amortization of contract backlog intangibles and 2001, before the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill amortization and amortization of employee workforce intangibles. 2003 compared with 2002 Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2003, revenues increased by $216.6 million, or 26.2%, to $1.0 billion from $825.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in revenues, was attributable to organic growth and the acquisition of ISI. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. We believe organic growth is a useful supplemental measure to revenue. Management uses organic growth as part of its evaluation of core operating results and underlying trends. For the year ended December 31, 2003, our organic growth was 16.2%, or $134.2 million. The acquisition of ISI accounted for approximately $82.5 million of the growth for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by growth in the following contracts: Secretary of the Air Force Technical and Analytical Support, Battlefield Information Collection Exploitation Systems, contracts with the U.S. Army for military operations on urban terrain, ANSWER, our Professional Engineering Services schedule contract, our other GSA contracts, and contracts with DHS. In 2003, approximately 3% of our revenues were derived from DHS. In addition, our revenues derived from DOD increased from approximately 78% in 2002 to 88% in 2003. 35 Costs of Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2003, costs of revenues increased by $186.0 million, or 26.1%, to $897.3 million from $711.3 million for year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in costs of revenues was due in part to the corresponding growth in the revenues resulting from organic growth and the acquisition of ISI. The majority of the increase in costs of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 was due to increases of $68.9 million, $20.7 million, and $86.9 million in direct labor, fringe costs, and other direct contract costs, respectively. The increases in direct labor, fringe costs and other direct contract costs were offset in part by reductions in certain overhead expenses. General and Administrative Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2003, general and administrative expenses increased $10.4 million, or 21.6%, to $58.6 million from $48.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 5.6% from 5.8%. This decline in the percentage of revenues was driven primarily by operational cost efficiencies achieved in connection with acquired operations and their, successful integration. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to the corresponding growth in revenues. Amortization For the year ended December 31, 2003, amortization expenses increased $500,000, or 28.5 %, to $2.4 million from $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in amortization expense is a result of additional amortization related to intangible assets acquired in connection with the purchase of ISI and a related non-compete agreement. As a result of the increase in revenues, amortization expense as a percentage of revenues decreased. Operating Income For the year ended December 31, 2003, operating income increased $19.7 million, or 30.6%, to $84.1 million from $64.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in operating income is primarily a result of the corresponding increase in revenues. Operating income as a percentage of revenues increased to 8.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in the percentage of revenues was driven by the decline in the percentage of general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues. Interest Expense, Net For the year ended December 31, 2003, interest expense, net of interest income, increased $2.6 million, or 12.1%, to $24.2 million from $21.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in interest expense is primarily a result of a $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment we incurred in connection with our tender offer in December 2003 for our 12% Notes. Excluding the interest expense related to our refinancing including the $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment for our 12% Notes , the write off of $2.6 million of deferred financing fees, and $300,000 of fees, interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 would have been approximately $14.1 million, which would have represented a 35% decrease from 2002. Our debt balance as of December 31, 2003 exceeds the debt balance as of December 31, 2002. The debt balance increased due to $150.0 million in new term loan borrowings made under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of December 19, 2003 offset, in part, by the repayment of approximately $18.4 million in existing term loans and $73.1 million in our 12% Notes. This amendment and restatement is discussed further in "Liquidity and Capital Resources". Secondary Offering Expenses On September 22, 2003, certain of our stockholders sold 6,600,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC (Commission File Nos. 333-108147 and 333-108858). In the fourth quarter of 2003, the underwriters of this offering partially exercised their over-allotment option with respect to additional shares held by the selling stockholders. As a result, on October 16, 2003, certain of the selling stockholders sold an additional 297,229 shares of our common stock in a second closing pursuant to the same underwritten offering. In connection with this offering, we incurred approximately $852,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, which amounts were reimbursed by certain of the selling stockholders and recorded by us as a contribution to additional paid-in capital. 36 Other Income We did not have any other income for the year ended December 31, 2003. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2002 included a gain on the sale of DisplayCheck assets and receipt of insurance proceeds for misappropriated equipment previously recorded as a loss. Provision For Income Taxes As a result of certain non-deductible secondary offering expenses referred to above, state legislative changes and other federal and state credits and incentives, our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 38.6%, compared with 38.8% for the year ended December 31, 2002. 2002 compared with 2001 Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2002, revenues increased to $825.8 million, or 15.5%, from $715.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase in revenues was attributable to organic growth and the full year 2002 impact of the acquisition of SIGCOM Training in July 2001, which contributed revenues of approximately $23.1 million in 2002 and approximately $7.9 million in 2001. This increase was offset in part by the sale of the commercial business of Interactive Media Corp., or "IMC," on July 20, 2001, which contributed $11.7 million in revenue through the sale date and the sale or closure of other businesses in 2001, which contributed revenues of approximately $6.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2002, our revenues grew organically by approximately 16.5% to $802.7 million from $688.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. We believe organic growth is a useful supplemental measure to revenue. Management uses organic growth as part of its evaluation of core operating results and underlying trends. Our organic growth was primarily attributable to growth in contracts for the development of information technology, communications systems for the intelligence community, training, modeling and simulation across our Department of Defense customer base, support for U.S. Navy programs and support for U.S. Air Force acquisition and operations. Costs of Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2002, costs of revenues increased by $84.0 million, or 13.4%, to $711.3 million from $627.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. For the year ended December 31, 2002, costs of revenues as a percentage of revenues decreased to 86.1% from 87.7% for the year ended December 31, 2001. The costs of revenues increase was due primarily to the corresponding growth in revenues resulting from organic growth and our acquisition of SIGCOM Training. The gross margin increased from 12.3% for the year ended December 31, 2001 to 13.9% for the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily due to reductions in overhead expenses and depreciation. Depreciation decreased from $7.1 million in 2001 to $4.3 million in 2002. Most of the decrease was due to the curtailment of operations of CITI-SIUSS LLC in 2001 and completion of the remaining software depreciation during the first half of 2001. General and Administrative Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2002, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 6.3%, to $48.2 million from $51.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002, as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 5.8% from 7.2%. Certain items totaling $6.6 million that were incurred in the year ended December 31, 2001, but were not incurred in the year ended December 31, 2002, included a $3.6 million fee payable to Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. in connection with the termination of our management fee agreement as of December 31, 2001, management fees of $1.0 million paid to Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., a $750,000 write-down of the carrying value of our North Stonington, Connecticut facility (a building held-for-sale), a $600,000 settlement and $497,000 in legal fees incurred in the first quarter of 2001 for matters relating to a dispute with a former subcontractor, and a $181,000 severance charge relating to the termination of a former A&T executive. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2001 also included costs related to several businesses which were either sold or closed during 2001, including IMC, CITE, DisplayCheck and STSR. 37 Amortization For the year ended December 31, 2002, amortization expenses decreased $7.5 million, or 79.7%, to $1.9 million from $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Amortization as a percentage of revenues was 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in amortization expenses was primarily attributable to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002, which eliminated further amortization of goodwill. In addition, for the year ended December 30, 2001, we wrote off $1.0 million in goodwill associated with the closure of STSR in 2001. See the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Operating Income For the year ended December 31, 2002, operating income increased $37.5 million, or 139.7%, to $64.4 million from $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Operating income as a percentage of revenues increased to 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2002 from 3.8% for the year ended December 31, 2001. Interest Expense, Net For the year ended December 31, 2002, interest expense, net of interest income, decreased $4.7 million, or 17.9%, to $21.6 million from $26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to a reduction in our debt as a result of our initial public offering in March 2002, which generated $75.2 million in net cash, and the conversion of our $22.5 million subordinated convertible promissory note held by Azimuth Tech. II LLC, one of our principal stockholders. In addition, interest expense decreased as a result of lower borrowing rates in 2002 compared with 2001. Interest expense in 2002 includes $1.9 million of previously unrecognized losses related to the termination of approximately $30.0 million in interest rate swaps. Also included in the 2002 amount is $4.2 million related to prepayment penalties and write-off of deferred financing costs Other Income For the year ended December 31, 2002, other income decreased $3.6 million to $417,000 from $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2002 included a gain on the sale of DisplayCheck assets and receipt of insurance proceeds for misappropriated equipment previously recorded as a loss. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2001 was primarily comprised of gains on sales and closure of businesses of $4.0 million. Gains on sales and closure of businesses consisted of a $100,000 gain on the sale of CITE's assets and $487,000 representing the remaining minority interest as of the date of curtailment of operations of CITI-SIUSS, LLC. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2001, we sold IMC as discussed above, resulting in a gain of $3.5 million. Provision for Income Taxes Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 38.8%, compared with 101.8% for the year ended December 31, 2001, primarily due to a reduction in non-deductible goodwill amortization expense as a result of the implementation of SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002. Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 We generated $37.4 million in cash from operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. By comparison, we used $1.7 million in cash from operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. Compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, the collection of contract receivables in 2003 improved seven days from 78 to 71 days sales outstanding, or "DSO." The improvement in total DSO from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003 was attributable to our improved billing and collection processes and an improvement in government payment cycles. Contract receivables increased $33.8 million to $222.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $189.1 million in 2002. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 represented 46.5% of total assets at that date. As a result of our acquisition of ISI, accounts receivable increased by approximately $22.8 million. The remaining increase is attributable to the overall growth of our business. For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash used in investing activities was $95.4 million, which was attributable primarily to our acquisition of ISI. Cash provided by financing activities was $55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, due to additional borrowings under the revolving portion of our Credit Facility to finance the acquisition of ISI. 38 On December 19, 2003, we amended and restated our Credit Facility. This amendment and restatement provided for, among other things, a new term loan of $150.0 million, or "Term Loan B," with a maturity date of December 31, 2010, the extension of the maturity date of the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility to December 31, 2008, a revolving loan commitment in the aggregate principal amount of $200.0 million, the repayment of our existing term loan, or the "Term Loan A," and the financing of our tender offer and consent solicitation completed on December 23, 2003 in respect of our 12% Notes. In addition, the Credit Facility permits us to raise up to $200.0 million of additional debt in the form of additional term loans, subordinated debt or revolving loans. All borrowings under our Credit Facility are subject to financial covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to: maximum ratio of net debt to EBITDA and maximum ratio of senior debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility. Additionally, as a result of changes made in the amendment and restatement, revolving loans are now based upon an asset test or maximum ratio of net eligible accounts receivable to revolving loans. The proceeds of the $150.0 million Term Loan B were used to repay the balance of our Term Loan A, together with interest of approximately $18.5 million, finance the tender offer and consent solicitation for our 12% Notes, as described below, in the amount of approximately $81.2 million, pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with these transactions of approximately $1.5 million, and repay outstanding revolving loans together with interest of approximately $38.2 million. On December 23, 2003, we repurchased $73.1 million aggregate principal amount, or approximately 97%, of our outstanding 12% Notes. As of the expiration date of the tender offer and as of December 31, 2003, approximately $1.9 million in aggregate principal amount of the 12% Notes remained outstanding. The repurchase price for our 12% Notes was $1,110.95 per $1,000 principal amount of the 12% Notes, which included accrued and unpaid interest of $12.67 per $1,000 in principal amount of the 12% Notes up to, but not including, December 23, 2003, the payment date, and a consent payment of $20.00 per $1,000 principal amount of the 12% Notes tendered prior to December 5, 2003, the consent date. The repurchase price for those 12% Notes tendered after the consent date was $1,090.95 per $1,000 principal amount of 12% Notes, which excludes the consent payment of $20.00 per $1,000 principal amount of the 12% Notes. The aggregate repurchase price for all of the 12% Notes validly surrendered for repurchase and not withdrawn was approximately $81.2 million, which includes a $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment and approximately $900,000 of accrued interest. Historically, our primary liquidity requirements have been for debt service under our Credit Facility and 12% Notes and for acquisitions and working capital requirements. We have funded these requirements primarily through internally generated operating cash flow and funds borrowed under our existing Credit Facility. The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for such financings. For the year ended December 31, 2003, we were not in compliance with one of the financial covenants required by our Credit Facility. We subsequently obtained a waiver for compliance with this covenant for the year ended December 31, 2003. We were in compliance with all other financial covenants required by our Credit Facility. At December 31, 2003, total debt outstanding under our Credit Facility was approximately $154.4 million, consisting of $150.0 million of Term Loan B, and $4.4 million outstanding under the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility. The total funds available to us under the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility as of December 31, 2003 were $112.7 million. As of December 31, 2003, our Credit Facility would have permitted additional borrowings of up to $203.7 million. Beginning with our fiscal year 2004, we are required to prepay, in amounts specified in our Credit Facility, borrowings under the Term Loan B under certain conditions related to excess annual cash flow and the receipt of proceeds from certain asset sales and debt or equity issuances. In addition, beginning on March 31, 2004, we are scheduled to pay quarterly principal installments of approximately $375,000 against the Term Loan B until it matures on December 31, 2010 at which time the remaining balance will be due. As of December 31, 2003, we did not have any capital commitments greater than $1.5 million. Our principal working capital need is for funding accounts receivable, which has increased with the growth of our business. Our principal sources of cash to fund our working capital needs are cash generated from operations and borrowings under our Credit Facility. 39 We have relatively low capital investment requirements. Capital expenditures were $3.0 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, primarily for leasehold improvements and office equipment. Our business acquisition expenditures relating to ISI were $92.4 million in 2003. The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our Credit Facility. In the past, we have engaged in acquisition activity, and we intend to do so in the future. Historically, we have financed our acquisitions through a combination of bank debt, subordinated debt, subordinated public and private debt and equity investments. We expect to be able to finance any future acquisitions either with cash provided from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility, bank loans, equity offerings, or some combination of the foregoing. We intend to, and expect over the next twelve months to be able to, fund our operating cash, capital expenditure and debt service requirements through cash flow from operations and borrowings under our Credit Facility. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations will depend on our future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside our control. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligation We use off-balance sheet financing, primarily to finance certain capital items. Operating leases are used primarily to finance computers, servers, phone systems, and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings. As of December 31, 2003, we financed equipment with an original cost of approximately $13.4 million through operating leases. Had we not used operating leases, we would have used our existing Credit Facility to purchase these assets. Other than the operating leases described above, and facilities leases, we do not have any other off-balance sheet financing. The following table provides information (in thousands) as of December 31, 2003 regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations.
Payments due by period --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Less than More than Contractual Obligations Total 1 year 1-3 year 3-5 years 5 years ------------------------------ -------- --------- ------------ ----------- ------------ Long-term debt $ 158,776 $ 4,000 $ 3,000 $ 7,400 $ 144,376 Capital lease obligations 977 421 343 213 -- Operating leases 151,573 29,991 44,585 31,693 45,304 Purchase obligations -- -- -- -- -- Other long-term liabilities -- -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ----------- Total $ 311,326 $ 34,412 $ 47,928 $ 39,306 $ 189,680 =========== =========== ============ ========== ===========
40 Inflation We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business in 2003, 2002, or 2001. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2002, the Emerging Issue Task Force, or "EITF", issued a consensus on Issue 00-21, or "EITF 00-21," Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF 00-21 addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. It also addresses how arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting in an arrangement. EITF 00-21 does not apply to deliverables in arrangements to the extent the accounting for such deliverables is within the scope of other existing higher-level authoritative accounting literature. The effective date of EITF 00-21 for the Company was July 1, 2003. The adoption of EITF 00-21 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment to Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how certain free standing financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity are classified and measured. Financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 150 are required to be recorded as liabilities (or assets in certain circumstances) which may require reclassification of amounts previously reported in equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle should be reported for financial instruments created before the issuance of this Statement and still existing at the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46(R), or "Interpretation No. 46(R)," Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51. Interpretation No. 46(R) provides guidance for identifying a controlling interest in a Variable Interest Entity, or "VIE," established by means other than voting interests. Interpretation No. 46(R) also requires consolidation of a VIE by an enterprise that holds such a controlling interest. The effective date for interests qualifying as VIEs is December 31, 2003. We do not have any interests qualifying as VIEs, including residual value guarantees or fixed purchase options under leases as of December 31, 2003. As a result, Interpretation No. 46(R) does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk We have interest rate exposure relating to certain of our long-term obligations. The remaining $1.9 million of our 12% Notes have a fixed interest rate of 12%. The interest rates on both the Term Loan B and the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate swaps that are currently in place. In addition, we have a cash flow management plan focusing on billing and collecting receivables to pay down debt. A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt would have resulted in our interest expense fluctuating by $514,000 and $249,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. On January 29, 2002, we cancelled approximately $30.0 million of interest swap agreements and recognized previously unrecognized losses of $1.9 million in interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2003, the fair value of our remaining interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $10.0 million resulted in a net liability of $230,000 and has been included in other current liabilities. 41 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Our consolidated financial statements are provided in Part IV, Item 15 of this filing. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure We had no disagreements with our independent accountants on accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure during the two years prior to the date of our most recent consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2003. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2003, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the year ended December 31, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 42 PART III Management Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. 43
PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K Page Number in 2003 Annual Report (a) 1. Financial Statements Independent Auditors' Report F-1 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2003 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2003 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2003 F-5 - F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 - F-41 (a) 2. Financial Statement Schedules Independent Auditors' Report S-1 Valuation and Qualifying Accounts S-2 (a) 3. Exhibits See Exhibit Index beginning on page 46
(b) Reports on Form 8-K On October 29, 2003, the Company furnished in a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 12 thereof a press release and financial supplement relating to the Company's financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. On November 20, 2003, the Company furnished in a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 thereof a press release relating to the Company's commencement of a tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to its outstanding 12% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009. On December 23, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 5 thereof a press release announcing the completion of its tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to its outstanding 12% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 and the closing of certain amendments to its existing credit agreement. 44 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Anteon international Corporation By: /s/: Joseph M. Kampf ---------------------------------------- Joseph M. Kampf President and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 4, 2003 ------------------- Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Name Title Date ------------------------------------ ---------------- ----------------- /s/: Joseph M. Kampf March 4, 2003 ------------------------------------ ----------------- Joseph M. Kampf President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) /s/: Charles S. Ream March 4, 2003 ------------------------------------ ----------------- Charles S. Ream Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) /s/: Frederick J. Iseman ------------------------------------ Frederick J. Iseman Chairman of the Board and Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: Gilbert F. Decker ------------------------------------ Gilbert F. Decker Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: Robert A. Ferris ------------------------------------ Robert A. Ferris Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: Paul G. Kaminski ------------------------------------ Paul G. Kaminski Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: Steven M. Lefkowitz ------------------------------------ Steven M. Lefkowitz Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: Thomas J. Tisch ------------------------------------ Thomas J. Tisch Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: General Henry Hugh Shelton ------------------------------------ General Henry Hugh Shelton Director March 4, 2003 ----------------- /s/: William J. Perry ------------------------------------ William J. Perry Director March 4, 2003 -----------------
45 EXHIBIT INDEX 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 7, 1999, by and among Anteon Corporation, Buffalo Acquisition Corporation and Analysis & Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit Z to Analysis & Technologies, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 1999). 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger between Anteon International Corporation, a Virginia corporation, and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement, filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002.) 3.2 Certificate of Designations of Series A Preferred Stock of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002.) 3.3 Amended and Restated By-laws of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002.) 4.1 Indenture, dated as of May 11, 1999, by and among Anteon Corporation, Vector Data Systems, Inc., Techmatics, Inc. and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 9, 1999 (Commission File No. 333-84835)). 4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, effective as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Analysis & Technology, Inc., Interactive Media Corp. and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, effective as of October 14, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Anteon-CITI LLC and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.4 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2000, among Anteon Corporation, Sherikon, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2001, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Anteon Corporation), Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics, Inc.) and The Bank of New York, as successor trustee of IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture between the Registrant and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 4.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2002, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, Anteon International Corporation (formerly Anteon Corporation), a Virginia corporation, and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 46 4.8 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 23, 2003, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.) and The Bank of New York, as trustee. 4.9 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 5, 2003, among Anteon International Corporation, Anteon Corporation, Information Spectrum, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee. 4.10 Registration Rights Agreement dated March 11, 2002, among the Registrant, Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech. II LLC, Frederick J. Iseman, Joseph M. Kampf and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 4.11 Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 3, 2003, to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 2002, among the Registrant, Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech. II LLC, Frederick J. Iseman, Joseph M. Kampf and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Anteon International Corporation's Form S-3 Registration Statement filed on December 17, 2003 (Commission File No. 333-111249)). 4.12 Rights Agreement, dated March 15, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 5, 2002). 10.4 Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Anteon International Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 9, 1999 (Commission File No. 333-84835)). 10.5 Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 13, 2000, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Anteon Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on June 15, 2001). 10.6 Amendment No. 2, dated as of March 29, 2000, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of Anteon Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on June 15, 2001). 10.7 Amendment No. 3, dated as of June 30, 2000, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Anteon Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on June 15, 2001). 10.8 Amendment No. 4, dated as of October 19, 2000, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Anteon Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on June 15, 2001). 10.9 Amendment No. 5, dated as of December 31, 2000, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Anteon Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on June 15, 2001). 10.10 Amendment No. 6, dated as of February 1, 2002, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No.1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 47 10.11 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2002, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Duetsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 filed on March 11, 2003). 10.12 Amendment Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2002, among Anteon International Corporation, Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. 10.15 Security Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Analysis & Technology, Inc., Interactive Media Corp., Techmatics, Inc., Vector Data Systems, Inc. and Mellon Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Anteon International Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 9, 1999 (Commission File No. 333-84835)). 10.16 Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 14, 2002). 10.17 Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 19, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 10.18 Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among Anteon Corporation, Sherikon, Inc. and the stockholders of Sherikon, Inc., dated as of October 20, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2000). 10.19 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2001, between Anteon Corporation and SIGCOM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2001). 10.20 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 20, 2001, by and among Anteon International Corporation, Interactive Media Corporation and FTK Knowledge (Holdings) Inc. (incorporated by reference to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2001). 10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2003, by and among Anteon International Corporation, Information Spectrum, Inc., the Shareholders of Information Spectrum, Inc. and Mark Green as Shareholder's Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2003). 10.22 Retention Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP. 31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). 48 Independent Auditors' Report The Board of Directors Anteon International Corporation and subsidiaries: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Anteon International Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Anteon International Corporation and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule II is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic consolidated financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. As discussed in note 2(f) to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As discussed in note 2(r) to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment to FASB Statement 13 and Technical Corrections. McLean, Virginia KPMG LLP February 17, 2004 F-1
ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except share and per share data) Assets 2003 2002 ------------------ ----------------- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,088 $ 4,266 Accounts receivable, net 222,937 189,059 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 17,925 15,071 Deferred tax assets, net 1,641 -- ------------------ ----------------- Total current assets 244,591 208,396 Property and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $22,489 and $18,971, respectively 12,759 9,992 Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $17,376 and $17,376, respectively 212,205 138,619 Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $11,729 and $9,279, respectively 9,725 7,685 ------------------ ----------------- Total assets $ 479,280 $ 364,692 ================== ================= Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities: Term Loan A, current portion $ -- $ 3,798 Term Loan B, current portion 1,500 -- Subordinated notes payable, current portion 2,500 2,500 Obligations under capital leases, current portion 341 -- Accounts payable 36,793 47,630 Due to related party 48 -- Accrued expenses 85,468 57,603 Income tax payable 641 7,738 Other current liabilities 230 806 Deferred tax liability -- 2,230 Deferred revenue 11,783 5,701 ------------------ ----------------- Total current liabilities 139,304 128,006 Term Loan A, less current portion -- 17,403 Term Loan B, less current portion 148,500 -- Revolving credit facility 4,400 7,000 Senior subordinated notes payable 1,876 75,000 Obligations under capital leases, less current portion 465 -- Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net 10,017 7,808 Other long term liabilities 16 490 ------------------ ----------------- Total liabilities 304,578 235,707 ------------------ ----------------- Minority interest in subsidiaries 210 156 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 -- -- Common stock, $0.01 par value, 175,000,000 shares authorized and 35,354,996 and 34,419,049 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively 354 344 Common stock, Class B, voting, $0.01 par value, 3,000 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 -- -- Common stock, Class A, voting, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 -- -- Common stock, non voting, $0.01 par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 -- -- Stock subscription receivable -- (12) Additional paid-in capital 115,863 106,849 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (72) (509) Retained earnings 58,347 22,157 ------------------ ----------------- Total stockholders' equity 174,492 128,829 ------------------ ----------------- Commitments and contingencies Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 479,280 $ 364,692 ================== ================= See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Consolidated Statements of Operations Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands, except share and per share data) 2003 2002 2001 ----------------- -------------- -------------- (reclassified-see note 2(r)) Revenues $ 1,042,474 $ 825,826 $ 715,023 Costs of revenues 897,264 711,328 627,342 ----------------- -------------- -------------- Gross profit 145,210 114,498 87,681 ----------------- -------------- -------------- Operating Expenses: General and administrative expenses 58,647 48,197 51,442 Amortization of noncompete agreements 101 -- 349 Goodwill amortization -- -- 6,704 Other intangibles amortization 2,349 1,907 2,321 ----------------- -------------- -------------- Total operating expenses 61,097 50,104 60,816 ----------------- -------------- -------------- Operating income 84,113 64,394 26,865 Other income -- 417 -- Gains on sales and closures of businesses -- -- 4,046 Secondary offering expenses 852 -- -- Interest expense, net of interest income of $239, $289, and $344, respectively 24,244 21,626 26,353 Minority interest in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries (54) (18) (38) ----------------- -------------- -------------- Income before provision for income taxes 58,963 43,167 4,520 Provision for income taxes 22,773 16,723 4,602 ----------------- -------------- -------------- Net income (loss) $ 36,190 $ 26,444 $ (82) ================= ============== ============== Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ 1.04 $ 0.82 $ (0.01) ================= ============== ============== Basic weighted average shares outstanding 34,851,281 32,163,150 23,786,565 Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.98 $ 0.78 $ (0.01) ================= ============== ============== Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 36,925,488 34,021,597 23,786,565 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands, except share data) Accumulated Retained Total Stock Additional other earnings stockholders' All series subscription paid-in comprehensive (accumulated equity common stock receivable capital income (loss) deficit) (deficit) Shares Amount ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ---------- Balance, December 31, 2000 23,786,565 $ 238 $ (12) $ 2,366 $ 37 $ (4,205) $ (1,576) Transition adjustment-interest rate swaps (net of tax of $419) -- -- -- -- (629) -- (629) Comprehensive income (loss): Interest rate swaps (net of tax of $717) -- -- -- -- (1,075) -- (1,075) Freign currency translation -- -- -- -- (80) -- (80) Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (82) (82) ---------- -------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- -- -- (1,155) (82) (1,237) ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Balance, December 31, 2001 23,786,565 238 (12) 2,366 (1,747) (4,287) (3,442) Issuance of common stock, net 4,687,500 47 -- 75,130 -- -- 75,177 Conversion of minority interest to common stock 180,120 2 -- 279 -- -- 281 Exercise of stock options 1,135,632 11 -- 3,954 -- -- 3,965 Conversion of subordinated promissory note 4,629,232 46 -- 22,454 -- -- 22,500 Tax benefit from exercise of stock options -- -- -- 2,666 -- -- 2,666 Comprehensive income (loss): Interest rate swaps (net of tax of $838) -- -- -- -- 1,239 -- 1,239 Foreign currency translation -- -- -- -- (1) -- (1) Net income -- -- -- -- -- 26,444 26,444 ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Comprehensive income -- -- -- -- 1,238 26,444 27,682 ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Balance, December 31, 2002 34,419,049 344 (12) 106,849 (509) 22,157 128,829 Exercise of stock options 935,947 10 -- 4,878 -- -- 4,888 Tax benefit from exercise of stock options -- -- -- 3,281 -- -- 3,281 Stock based compensation expense -- -- -- 3 -- -- 3 Proceeds from certain stockholder related to secondary offering -- -- -- 852 -- -- 852 Write-off uncollectible stock subscription -- -- 12 -- -- -- 12 Comprehensive income : Interest rate swaps (net of tax of $209) -- -- -- -- 324 -- 324 Foreign currency translation -- -- -- -- 113 -- 113 Net income -- -- -- -- -- 36,190 36,190 ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Comprehensive income: -- -- -- -- 437 36,190 36,627 ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Balance, December 31, 2003 35,354,996 $ 354 $ -- $115,863 $ (72) $ 58,347 $ 174,492 ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands) 2003 2002 2001 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ 36,190 $ 26,444 $ (82) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Gains on sales and closures of businesses -- -- (4,046) Interest rate swap termination -- (1,903) -- Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 4,440 4,294 7,110 Goodwill amortization -- -- 6,704 Amortization of noncompete agreements 101 -- 349 Other intangibles amortization 2,349 1,907 2,321 Amortization of deferred financing costs 4,014 2,442 697 Loss on disposals of property and equipment 190 25 791 Deferred income taxes (1,742) 4,090 3,512 Minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries 54 18 38 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (12,477) (57,715) 1,268 Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,245) (8,059) 727 (Increase) decrease in other assets 142 105 178 Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 5,592 22,601 15,744 Increase (decrease) in income tax payable (2,998) 7,229 (22) (Decrease) increase in deferred revenue 3,306 (3,042) 2,254 (Decrease) increase in other liabilities (473) (158) 336 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Net cash provided (used in) by operating activities 37,443 (1,722) 37,879 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment and other assets (3,049) (3,225) (2,181) Acquisition of Sherikon, Inc., net of cash acquired -- -- (21) Acquisition of SIGCOM, net of cash acquired -- -- (10,975) Acquisition of Information Spectrum, Inc., net of cash acquired (92,382) -- -- Proceeds from sales of businesses, net -- -- 11,464 Proceeds from sale of building -- 1,802 -- Other, net -- -- 6 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Net cash used in investing activities (95,431) (1,423) (1,707) --------------- ---------------- --------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on bank and other notes payable (43) (47) (185) Payment on subordinated notes payable -- (567) (5,000) Payments on business purchase consideration payable -- -- (1,185) Payments on note payable to Ogden -- -- (3,212) Deferred financing costs (2,728) (1,292) -- Principal payments on Term Loan A (21,202) (25,853) (12,946) Proceeds from Term Loan B 150,000 -- -- Proceeds from certain stockholders related to secondary offering 852 -- -- Proceeds from revolving credit facility 1,009,500 862,600 771,200 Principal payments on revolving credit facility (1,012,100) (874,300) (784,500) Redemption of senior subordinated notes payable (73,124) (25,000) -- Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses 4,902 81,808 -- Principal payments under capital lease obligations (247) -- -- Principal payments on subordinated notes payable to stockholders -- (7,499) -- Payment of subordinated notes payable-related party -- (4,369) -- Proceeds from minority interest, net -- -- 152 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 55,810 5,481 (35,676) --------------- ---------------- --------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,178) 2,336 496 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 4,266 1,930 1,434 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,088 $ 4,266 $ 1,930 =============== ================ =============== (continued)
F-5
ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 2003 2002 2001 ------------- ---------------- --------------- Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information (in thousands): Interest paid: Tender offer of senior subordinated notes payable $ 7,177 $ -- $ -- Other 14,199 18,971 23,396 ----------- ------------ ------------- Total interest paid $ 21,376 $ 18,971 $ 23,396 =========== ============ ============= Income taxes paid (refunds received), net $ 27,410 $ 2,634 $ (52) =========== ============ =============
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities: In March 2002, in connection with the Company's initial public offering ("IPO") of shares of its common stock, a $22.5 million principal amount subordinated convertible promissory note of the Company held by Azimuth Tech. II LLC, one of the Company's principal stockholders, was converted pursuant to its terms into 4,629,232 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $4.86 per share. In March 2002, the Company exchanged approximately 90,060 shares held by minority interest holders in Anteon Virginia at December 31, 2001 into 180,120 shares of the Company. During 2001, the Company finalized the allocation of the purchase price of Sherikon, Inc., resulting in an increase of $100,000 in accrued liabilities and in the goodwill from the acquisition for contingencies identified at the date of acquisition (see note 4(a)). In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps generated a deferred tax liability of $209,000 and $838,000, respectively. During 2003, the Company recorded approximately $1.0 million of equipment utilizing capitalized leases. See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-6 ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2003 and 2002 (1) Organization and Business Anteon International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("Anteon" or the "Company") (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.), was incorporated on March 15, 1996 for the purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding stock of Ogden Professional Services Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ogden Technology Services Corporation and an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Ogden Corporation (collectively "Ogden"). Upon completion of the acquisition effective April 22, 1996, Ogden Professional Services Corporation was renamed Anteon Corporation, a Virginia corporation, and later renamed Anteon International Corporation, a Virginia corporation. The Company provides professional information technology solutions and advanced systems engineering services to government clients. The Company designs, integrates, maintains and upgrades information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other government missions. The Company also provides many of its clients with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. The Company is subject to all of the risks associated with conducting business with the U.S. federal government, including the risk of contract termination for the convenience of the government. In addition, government funding continues to be dependent on congressional approval of program level funding and on contracting agency approval for the Company's work. The extent to which the Company's existing contracts will be funded in the future cannot be determined. (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its directly and indirectly, majority-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. (b) Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments that have original maturities of three months or less. (c) Property and Equipment Property and equipment is stated at cost, or fair value at the date of acquisition if acquired through a purchase business combination. Property and equipment under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation and amortization is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: Computer hardware and software 3 to 7 years Furniture and equipment 5 to 12 years Leasehold and building improvements shorter of estimated useful life or lease term Buildings 31.5 years Property and equipment under capital leases shorter of estimated useful life or lease term (d) Deferred Financing Costs Costs associated with obtaining the Company's financing arrangements are deferred and amortized over the term of the financing arrangements using a method that approximates the effective interest method, and are included in intangible and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. F-7 (e) Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets SFAS No. 144 requires the Company to review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 as of January 1, 2002, with no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. During 2003 and 2001, the Company recognized an impairment charge of approximately $135,000 and $750,000, respectively, included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, to write-down the carrying value of a building held-for-sale to its fair market value. (f) Goodwill The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 as of January 1, 2002, except for acquisitions occurring after June 30, 2001, for which the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 were applicable. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS No. 141 specifies the criteria that intangible assets acquired in a business combination must meet to be recognized and reported separately from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 121 and, subsequently, SFAS No. 144 after its adoption. As of January 1, 2002, the Company reclassified approximately $1.9 million of intangible assets associated with an acquired employee workforce from intangible assets to goodwill, which in accordance with SFAS No. 142, are no longer separately identifiable from goodwill. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company evaluated its existing intangible assets and goodwill that were acquired in purchase business combinations, and made any necessary reclassifications in order to conform with the new classification criteria in SFAS No. 141 for recognition of intangible assets separate from goodwill. The Company also reassessed the useful lives and residual values of all definite-lived intangible assets acquired. In connection with SFAS No. 142's goodwill impairment evaluation, the Company is required to perform an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. To accomplish this, the Company identified its reporting units and determined the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to these reporting units as of January 1, 2002. The Company determined the estimated fair value of each reporting unit and compared it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. As a result of this comparison, no indication that the reporting units' fair values were less than their carrying values was noted. In the future, to the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, an indication would exist that a reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired, and the Company would be required to perform the second step of the impairment test. In the second step, the Company must compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with SFAS No. 141. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. As of September 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis required under SFAS No. 142. The Company applied the same methodology described above in performing its annual impairment test and did not identify any indication of goodwill impairment for any reporting unit. The Company will perform the annual impairment test as of September 30 each year unless circumstances or events indicate that an impairment test should be performed sooner. F-8 Had the amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 been applied as of January 1, 2001, for all of the Company's acquisitions, the Company's loss, net income and earnings per common share would have been as follows (unaudited) (in thousands, except per share data): Year ended December 31, 2001 ----------------- Loss $ (82) Add back: Goodwill amortization 5,663 Add back: Workforce amortization 545 ----------------- Adjusted net income $ 6,126 ================= Basic earnings per share: Loss $ (0.01) Goodwill amortization 0.24 Workforce amortization 0.02 ----------------- Adjusted net income $ 0.25 ================= Diluted earnings per share: Loss $ (0.01) Goodwill amortization 0.24 Workforce amortization 0.02 ----------------- Adjusted net income $ 0.25 ================= (g) Other Intangible Assets The Company amortizes the allocated cost of noncompete agreements entered into in connection with business combinations on a straight-line basis over the terms of the agreements. Other acquired intangibles related to workforce (prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142) and acquired contracts are amortized straight-line based upon expected employment and contract periods, respectively. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 141, on January 1, 2002, intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized only if such assets arise from a contractual or other legal right and are separable, that is, capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination that do not meet this criteria are considered a component of goodwill. As of January 1, 2002, the Company reclassified approximately $1.9 million, net of accumulated amortization, of intangible assets associated with acquired employee workforce from intangible assets to goodwill, which in accordance with SFAS No. 142, are no longer separately identifiable from goodwill. As of December 31, 2003, the Company has approximately $13.3 million of intangible assets ($5.2 million net of accumulated amortization) related to contracts and related customer relationships intangible assets, which are being amortized straight-line over periods of up to 5.3 years Software development costs represent expenditures for the development of software products that have been capitalized in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Amortization is computed on an individual product basis and is the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues for a product to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product or (b) the amount computed using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic useful life of the product. The Company uses economic lives ranging from one to three years for all capitalized software development costs. Amortization of software development costs begins when the software product is available for general release to customers. As of December 31, 2001, approximately $4.8 million had been capitalized for software development, all of which had been amortized. There were no capitalized software costs after 2001 due to the curtailment of operations of CITI-SIUSS. F-9 (h) Revenue Recognition For each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, in excess of 95% of the Company's revenues were derived from services performed under contracts that may be categorized into three primary types: time and materials, cost-plus reimbursement and firm fixed price. For the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 38% of the Company's contracts were time and material, 32% cost-plus and 30% fixed price (a substantial majority of which are firm fixed price level of effort.) Revenue for time and materials contracts is recognized as time is spent at hourly rates, which are negotiated with the customer. Revenue is recognized under cost-plus contracts on the basis of direct and indirect costs incurred plus a negotiated profit calculated as a percentage of costs or as performance-based award fee. For cost-plus award fee type contracts, the expected fee to be awarded by the customer is recognized at the time such fee can be reasonably estimated, based on factors such as our prior award experience and communications with the customer regarding the Company's performance, including any interim performance evaluations rendered by the customer. Revenues are recognized under substantially all fixed price contracts based on the percentage-of-completion basis, using the cost-to-cost method for all services provided. For non-service related fixed price contracts, revenues are recognized as units are delivered (the units-of-delivery method). In addition, the Company evaluates its contracts for multiple deliverables which may require the segmentation of each deliverable into separate accounting units for proper revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenues under its federal government contracts when a contract is executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, funding has been received, delivery of the services or products has occurred and collectibility of the contract price is considered probable. The Company contracts with agencies of the federal government are subject to periodic funding by the respective contracting agency. Funding for a contract may be provided in full at inception of the contract or ratably throughout the term of the contract as the services are provided. From time to time the Company may proceed with work based on customer direction pending finalization and signing of formal funding documents. The Company has an internal process for approving any such work. All revenue recognition is deferred during periods in which funding is not received. Allowable contract costs incurred during such periods are deferred if the receipt of funding is assessed as probable. In evaluating the probability of funding being received, the Company considers its previous experience with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and the Company's knowledge of available funding for the contract or program. If funding is not assessed as probable, costs are expensed as they are incurred. The Company recognizes revenues under its federal government contracts based on allowable contract costs, as mandated by the federal government's cost accounting standards. The costs the Company incurs under federal government contracts are subject to regulation and audit by certain agencies of the federal government. Contract cost disallowances, resulting from government audits, have not historically been significant. The Company may be exposed to variations in profitability, including potential losses, if the Company encounters variances from estimated fees earned under award fee contracts and estimated costs under fixed price contracts. Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. Examples of such estimates include the level of effort needed to accomplish the tasks under the contract, the cost of those efforts, and a continual assessment of our progress toward the completion of the contract. From time to time, circumstances may arise which require us to revise the Company's estimated total revenue or costs. Typically, these revisions relate to contractual changes involving its services. To the extent that a revised estimate affects contract revenue or profit previously recognized, the Company records the cumulative effect of the revision in the period in which it becomes known. In addition, the full amount of an anticipated loss on any type of contract is recognized in the period in which it becomes known. F-10 Software revenue is generated from licensing software and providing services, including maintenance and technical support, and consulting. The Company recognizes the revenue when the license agreement is signed, the license fee is fixed and determinable, delivery of the software has occurred, and collectibility of the fee is considered probable. The Company's software license sales including maintenance and consulting services are recognized at their fair values when all other recognition criteria are met. Service revenues consists of maintenance and technical support and is recognized ratably over the service period. Other service revenues are recognized as the related services are provided. Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized upon acceptance by the customer, which is typically within thirty days of shipment. Subsequent to the curtailment of operations of CITI-SIUSS in 2001 (see note 3(b)), there have been no new product or license sales. All software revenue recognized in 2002 relates to maintenance services provided on existing software arrangements. There were no CITI-SIUSS software revenues in 2003. Amounts collected in advance of being earned are recognized as deferred revenues. (i) Costs of Acquisitions Costs incurred on successful acquisitions are capitalized as a cost of the acquisition, while costs incurred by the Company for unsuccessful or terminated acquisition opportunities are expensed when the Company determines that the opportunity will no longer be pursued. Costs incurred on probable acquisitions are deferred. (j) Income Taxes The Company calculates its income tax provision using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates would be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. (k) Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions The balance sheets of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars for consolidated financial statement purposes using the current exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. The revenue and expense accounts of foreign subsidiaries are converted using the weighted average exchange rate during the period. Gains or losses resulting from such translations are included in accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity (deficit). Gains and losses from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are included in current period income. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. (l) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25 ("APB No. 25"), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Related Interpretations. The Company has an employee stock option plan. Compensation expense for stock options granted to employees is recognized based on the difference, if any, between the fair value of the Company's common stock and the exercise price of the option at the date of grant. The Company has also granted stock appreciation rights to certain of its directors. Through 2001, the Company recognized an insignificant amount of compensation expense associated with the stock appreciation rights equal to the excess fair value of the underlying stock at each reporting period. The Company discloses the pro forma effect on net income (loss) as if the fair value based method of accounting as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"), Accounting for Stock-based Compensation had been applied. F-11 The Company accounts for stock options granted to non-employees using the fair value method of accounting as prescribed by SFAS No. 123. Compensation expense related to stock options granted to non-employees is not significant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, to stock-based employee compensation:
2003 2002 2001 ------------ ------------ ------------ (in thousands, except per share data) Net income (loss), as reported $ 36,190 $ 26,444 $ (82) Add: Stock based compensation recorded 3 -- -- Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method, net of tax (3,749) (3,477) (1,206) ----------- ---------- ----------- Pro forma net income (loss) $ 32,444 $ 22,967 $ (1,288) Earnings (loss) per share: Basic-as reported $ 1.04 $ 0.82 $ (0.01) =========== ========= =========== Basic-pro forma $ 0.93 $ 0.71 $ (0.05) =========== ========== =========== Diluted-as reported $ 0.98 $ 0.78 $ (0.01) =========== ========== =========== Diluted-pro forma $ 0.88 $ 0.68 $ (0.05) =========== ========== ===========
(m) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, due to the relatively short duration of these financial instruments. Except for the senior subordinated notes payable and the subordinated notes payable to stockholders, the carrying amounts of the Company's indebtedness approximate their fair values as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, as they bear interest rates that approximate the market. The fair value of the senior subordinated notes payable on principal amounts of $1.9 million and $75.0 million, based on quoted market value, was approximately $2.1 million and $81.0 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. (n) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS No. 133"), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, which requires that derivative instruments be recognized at fair value in the balance sheet. The Company has entered into certain interest rate swap agreements, which are accounted for under SFAS No. 133. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that qualify as effective hedges of cash flows are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments for all other hedging activities, including the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges, are recognized in current period earnings. F-12 (o) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share The Company computes earnings (loss) per common share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS No. 128"), Earnings Per Share. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares are comprised of the Company's employee stock options and shares associated with the Company's subordinated convertible note payable prior to the Company's IPO. (p) Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying amounts of reported assets and liabilities, including property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, valuations for income taxes and accounts receivable, and the valuation of derivative instruments and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (q) Stock Split Effective February 19, 2002, the Company increased the aggregate authorized shares of its common stock to 37,503,000 shares, and authorized a 2,449.95-for-1 common stock split. All references to the number and per share amounts relating to the Company's common shares have been retroactively restated for the stock split. (r) Reclassification Pursuant to SFAS 145 In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 145 ("SFAS No. 145"), Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment to FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 addresses the reporting of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt and rescinds FASB Statements 4 and 64. Under the new standard, only gains and losses from extinguishments meeting the criteria of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 would be classified as extraordinary items. Thus, gains or losses arising from extinguishments of debt that are part of the Company's recurring operations would not be reported as extraordinary items. Upon adoption, previously reported extraordinary gains or losses not meeting the requirements for classification as such in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 were required to be reclassified for all periods presented. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 as of January 1, 2003, and as a result, the Company reclassified $4.2 million ($2.6 million net of tax) of losses and $519,000 ($330,000 net of tax) of gains previously recorded as extraordinary items for the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, to interest expense. Additionally, the tax impact as a result of these reclassifications has been adjusted in the tax provision amounts shown. (s) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In December 2002, the Emerging Issue Task Force, or ("EITF"), issued a consensus on Issue 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF 00-21 addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. It also addresses how arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting in an arrangement. EITF 00-21 does not apply to deliverables in arrangements to the extent the accounting for such deliverables is within the scope of other existing higher-level authoritative accounting literature. The effective date of EITF 00-21 for the Company is July 1, 2003. The adoption of EITF 00-21 did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. F-13 In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment to Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on the financial condition or the operating results of the Company. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how certain free standing financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity are classified and measured. Financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 150 are required to be recorded as liabilities (or assets in certain circumstances) which may require reclassification of amounts previously reported in equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle should be reported for financial instruments created before the issuance of this Statement and still existing at the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have an impact on the financial condition or the operating results of the Company. In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46(R), ("Interpretation No. 46(R)"), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51. Interpretation No. 46(R) provides guidance for identifying a controlling interest in a Variable Interest Entity, or "VIE," established by means other than voting interests. Interpretation No. 46(R) also requires consolidation of a VIE by an enterprise that holds such a controlling interest. The effective date for interests qualifying as VIEs is December 31, 2003. The Company does not have any interests qualifying as VIEs, including residual value guarantees or fixed purchase options under leases as of December 31, 2003. As a result, Interpretation No. 46(R) does not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements. (3) Sales and Closure of Businesses (a) Sale of CITE On June 29, 2001, the Company sold its Center for Information Technology Education ("CITE") business to a subsidiary of Pinnacle Software Solutions, Inc. for a total purchase price of $100,000, of which $50,000 was paid on the date of closing, with the remainder due and paid in six equal, monthly payments of approximately $8,300 beginning on August 1, 2001. CITE provided evening and weekend training for individuals to attain certification in Oracle developer and Java. Revenues generated by CITE were approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. As of the date of sale, the carrying value of the net assets of CITE was approximately zero, resulting in a gain on the sale of the business of approximately $100,000. (b) Curtailment of Operations of CITI-SIUSS LLC During 1999, the Company and Criminal Investigative Technology, Inc. ("CITI") entered into a joint venture ("CITI-SIUSS LLC"), formerly known as Anteon-CITI LLC (the "Venture"). The Venture developed and marketed certain investigative support products and services. At the date of formation, CITI contributed certain assets to the Venture. The Company has the sole ability to control the management and operations of CITI-SIUSS LLC and, accordingly, consolidated its results. Under the joint venture agreement, the Company was allocated 98% of the profits and losses of CITI-SIUSS until its investment in the Venture was recovered, at which time profits and losses were shared based on the respective ownership interests of the joint venturers. As the Company had not yet recovered its investment, 98% of the Venture's losses had been allocated to the Company and 2% recognized as minority interest in losses in the consolidated statements of operations. Upon the occurrence of certain events, the Company had the option to purchase the 50% interest owned by CITI, at a formula price as included in the joint venture agreement. F-14 On June 22, 2001, the Company decided to cease software development operations of the Venture because it concluded that the Venture was not likely to establish a self-supporting business without significant capital contributions. Revenues generated by the Venture were approximately $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Operating losses were approximately $2.6 million for the year December 31, 2001. The Venture was obligated to provide maintenance and support services on existing contracts through June 30, 2002. Upon the completion of this obligation, the Company anticipated that no excess proceeds would be available to the Company or the minority interest party in the Venture. Accordingly, the remaining minority interest of approximately $487,000 was reversed during the quarter ended June 30, 2001, and the resulting gain was included in gains on sales and closures of businesses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. (c) Sale of Interactive Media Corporation On July 20, 2001, the Company sold all of the stock in Interactive Media Corporation ("IMC") for $13.5 million in cash, subject to adjustment based on the amount of working capital (as defined in the sale agreement) as of the date of sale. In addition, the Company had a contingent right to receive an additional $500,000 in cash based on IMC's performance from the date of closing through the end of calendar year 2001. Prior to the sale, IMC transferred to the Company the assets of the government division of IMC, which specializes in training services primarily to the government marketplace. Accordingly, at the date of sale, IMC provided training services to customers primarily in the commercial marketplace. For the commercial division, revenues were approximately $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Operating loss was approximately $(41,000) for the year ended December 31, 2001. With respect to the working capital adjustment, the Company had reserved approximately $550,000 of the gain on the sale at the time of closing. Subsequently, the Company reached an agreement with the purchaser of IMC to settle the adjustment in the amount of $475,000 as a result of working capital deficiencies at the closing of the transaction. The Company paid this amount to the purchaser on June 14, 2002. The remaining $75,000 reserve related to a retention bonus which was paid to a key employee of IMC during the year ended December 31, 2002. The total gain recognized on the sale of IMC in 2001 was approximately $3.5 million. As a result of the sale of IMC, the Company realized an income tax benefit of approximately $1.6 million relating to differences between the income tax and financial statement carrying amounts of the Company's investment in IMC. Approximately $760,000 of this benefit resulted from differences that existed as of the date of the Company's acquisition of A&T, of which IMC was a subsidiary. Accordingly, during the third quarter of 2001, the Company recognized the income tax benefit related to the pre-acquisition difference as a reduction of goodwill from the acquisition of A&T, and recognized the remaining tax benefit of $790,000 as a reduction of income tax expense. (d) Closure of South Texas Ship Repair On December 19, 2001, the Company decided to close the South Texas Ship Repair ("STSR") business, which was acquired as part of the Sherikon acquisition in October 2000. STSR specialized in the repair of ships for both government and commercial customers. Revenues were $3.3 million and operating loss was $(2.1) million for the year ended December 31, 2001. In conjunction with the closure of STSR, the Company recognized a charge of approximately $1.0 million for the write-down of goodwill from the Sherikon acquisition, which was attributable to STSR. This charge is included in goodwill amortization in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, for the year ended December 31, 2001. The remaining expected costs of fulfilling STSR's existing contracts of approximately $169,000 have been accrued as of December 31, 2003. F-15 (4) Acquisitions (a) The Training Division of SIGCOM, Inc. On July 20, 2001, the Company acquired the assets, contracts and personnel of the training division of SIGCOM, Inc. ("SIGCOM"). The principal business of the training division of SIGCOM's is the design, construction, instrumentation, training and maintenance of simulated live-fire training facilities to help acclimate members of the armed forces to combat conditions for mobile operations on urban terrain. The company's primary reason for acquiring SIGCOM was the significant capabilities of SIGCOM that augment the Company's defense training capabilities. The total purchase price was $11.0 million, excluding $409,000 of transaction costs, of which $10.0 million was paid in cash to the seller and $1.0 million of which was placed in escrow to secure the seller's obligations to indemnify the Company for certain potential liabilities which were not assumed. Transaction costs included a $100,000 fee paid to Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., an affiliate of and advisor to the Company. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The Company allocated approximately $4.1 million of the purchase price to accounts receivable, approximately $1.5 million to acquired accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and $440,000 to an intangible asset related to contract backlog, which was amortized over a two-year period, in accordance with SFAS No. 142. Approximately $8.1 million has been allocated to tax deductible goodwill arising from the acquisition, which in accordance with SFAS No. 142, is not being amortized (see note 2(f)). (b) Information Spectrum, Inc. On May 23, 2003, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Information Spectrum, Inc. ("ISI"), a provider of credential card technologies, military logistics and training systems, based in Annandale, Virginia, for a total purchase price of approximately $91.6 million, excluding transactions costs of approximately $737,000. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition, based on estimates made by management. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $4.8 million of contracts and related customer relationships and $500,000 for the value of a non-compete agreement. The value of the contracts and related customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by the Company. The contracts and related customer relationships are being amortized straight-line over its expected useful life of approximately 5.3 years. The non-compete agreement value was based on the consideration paid for the agreement and is being amortized straight-line over the three year term of the agreement. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. F-16 The total purchase price paid, including transaction costs, of $92.4 million was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):
Accounts receivable $ 22,792 Prepaid and other current assets 764 Property and equipment 3,312 Other assets 120 Current income tax receivable 655 Accounts payable and accrued expenses (11,186) Deferred income tax, net (458) Deferred revenue (2,645) Other liabilities (558) Contracts and customer relationships 4,751 Goodwill 74,335 Non-compete agreement 500 ----------- Total consideration $ 92,382 ===========
Unaudited Pro Forma Data The following unaudited pro forma summary presents consolidated information as if the acquisition of ISI and SIGCOM had occurred as of January 1, 2001. The pro forma summary is provided for informational purposes only and is based on historical information that does not necessarily reflect actual results that would have occurred nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations of the combined entities (in thousands, except per share data):
2003 2002 2001 ---------------- ------------- ---------------- Total revenues $ 1,096,152 $ 955,590 $ 826,298 Total expenses 1,059,467 927,976 823,395 ---------------- ------------- ---------------- Net income $ 36,685 $ 27,614 $ 2,903 ================ ============= ================ Basic earnings per common share $ 1.05 $ 0.86 $ 0.12 ================ ============= ================ Diluted earning per common share $ 0.99 $ 0.81 $ 0.12 ================ ============= ================
(5) Accounts Receivable The components of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, are as follows (in thousands): 2003 2002 ------------- ------------- Billed and billable $ 198,144 $ 179,216 Unbilled 22,210 8,929 Retainages due upon contract completion 6,705 5,162 Allowance for doubtful accounts (4,122) (4,248) ------------ ------------ Total $ 222,937 $ 189,059 ============ ============ In excess of 95% of the Company's revenues for each of 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been earned, and accounts receivable as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are due, from agencies of the U.S. federal government. Unbilled costs and fees and retainages billable upon completion of contracts are amounts due primarily within one year and will be billed on the basis of contract terms and delivery schedules. F-17 The accuracy and appropriateness of the Company's direct and indirect costs and expenses under its government contracts, and therefore its accounts receivable recorded pursuant to such contracts, are subject to extensive regulation and audit, including by the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") or by other appropriate agencies of the U.S. government. Such agencies have the right to challenge the Company's cost estimates or allocations with respect to any government contract. Additionally, a substantial portion of the payments to the Company under government contracts are provisional payments that are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies. Incurred cost audits have been completed by DCAA through 2001. Historically, such audits have not resulted in any significant disallowed costs. Although the Company can give no assurances, in the opinion of management, any adjustments likely to result from inquiries or audits of its contracts would not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. (6) Property and Equipment Property and equipment consists of the following as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
2003 2002 ------------ ------------ Land $ 393 $ 393 Buildings 1,581 1,717 Computer hardware and software 19,686 13,348 Furniture and equipment 6,732 8,697 Leasehold improvements 6,856 4,808 ------------ ----------- 35,248 28,963 Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization 22,489) (18,971) ------------ ----------- Total $ 12,759 $ 9,992 ============ ===========
(7) Accrued Expenses The components of accrued expenses as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):
2003 2002 ------------ ------------ Accrued payroll and related benefits $ 52,602 $ 38,819 Accrued subcontractor costs 25,987 13,396 Accrued interest 153 1,138 Other accrued expenses 6,726 4,250 ------------ ------------ Total $ 85,468 $ 57,603 ============ ============
(8) Indebtedness (a) Credit Agreement On June 23, 1999, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement ("Credit Facility") with a syndicate of nine commercial banks. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company entered into promissory notes with aggregate available financing facilities of $180.0 million. The Credit Facility was comprised of a revolving credit facility for aggregate borrowings of up to $120.0 million ("Revolving Facility"), as determined based on a portion of eligible billed accounts receivable and a portion of eligible unbilled accounts receivable and the ratio of net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), as defined in the Credit Facility, and maturing on June 23, 2005; and a $60.0 million note ("Term Loan") with principal payments due quarterly commencing June 30, 2001, and $15.0 million at maturity on June 23, 2005. However, under certain conditions related to excess annual cash flow, as defined in the agreement, and the receipt of proceeds from certain asset sales, and debt or equity issuances, the Company was required to prepay, in amounts specified in the agreement, borrowings under the Term Loan. Due to excess cash flows, as defined, generated in 2001, an additional principal payment of $10.7 million was paid under the term loan on March 14, 2002. A portion of the net proceeds from the IPO were used to make an additional principal payment of $11.4 million in March 2002. As a result of the permanent reduction of a portion of its debt under the term loan, the Company wrote off a proportionate amount of the unamortized deferred financing fees related to the portion of the term loan that was repaid. The write-off of $304,000 has been reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. Effective October 21, 2002, this Credit Facility was replaced by an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as discussed below. F-18 Under the Credit Facility, the interest rate on both the Revolving Facility and the Term Loan was at a floating rate based upon, at the Company's option, LIBOR, or the Alternate Base Rate ("ABR"), which is the higher of Credit Suisse First Boston's ("CSFB") prime rate (less one quarter of one percent) and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus one half of one percent, in each case plus a margin determined based on the Company's ratio of net debt to EBITDA. Interest was payable on the last day of each quarter. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the interest rates on the Revolving Facility and Term Loan ranged from 3.53 percent to 6.00 percent and 4.61 percent to 11.75 percent, respectively. (b) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of October 21, 2002 On October 21, 2002, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its existing Credit Agreement (the "2002 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the Credit Facility was amended to allow for the following: (1) a $200.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"); and (2) a $22.3 million three-year senior secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility"). The aggregate amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility was determined based on a portion of eligible accounts receivable. In general, the Company's borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was subject to its borrowing base (defined as portions of eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable) and the Company's ratio of net debt to EBITDA and net senior debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company incurred approximately $626,000 in expenses related to this Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. These expenses have been capitalized as additional deferred financing fees and are being amortized over the remaining term of the Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility would have matured on June 30, 2005. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility bore interest at a floating rate based upon, at the Company's option, LIBOR, or the ABR, which is the higher of CSFB prime rate (less one quarter of one percent) and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus one half of one percent, in each case plus a margin determined based upon our ratio of net debt to EBITDA (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). In certain cases, the Company was required to make excess cash payments (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) to the extent certain conditions and ratios are met. From January 1, 2003 through December 18, 2003 and from the date of the amendment through December 31, 2002, the interest rates for the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility ranged from 3.35 percent to 5.25 and 3.63 percent to 5.75 percent, respectively. Effective December 19, 2003, this credit facility was replaced by an additional Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as discussed below. (c) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of December 19, 2003 On December 19, 2003, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the "2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") related to our Credit Facility. This current amendment and restatement, among other things, provides for the following: (1) a new Term Loan B under the Term Loan Facility in the amount of $150.0 million with a maturity date of December 31, 2010; (2) the extension of Revolving Credit Facility's maturity date to December 31, 2008; (3) the repayment of the outstanding balance of approximately $18.4 million of the Term Loan A; and (4) the financing of the tender offer and consent solicitation made on November 23, 2003, related to the outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes (see below). In addition, the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement permits the Company to raise up to $200.0 million of additional debt in the form of additional term loans, subordinated debt or revolving loans, with certain restrictions on the amount of revolving loans. All borrowings under the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are subject to financial covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to: maximum ratio of net debt to EBITDA (as defined in the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) and maximum ratio of senior debt to EBITDA. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with one of the financial covenants required by its 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company subsequently obtained a waiver for compliance with this covenant for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company was in compliance with all other financial covenants required by its 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Additionally, as a result of the changes made in this amendment and restatement, revolving loans are based upon an asset test or maximum ratio of net eligible accounts receivable to revolving loans. From the date of the amendment through December 31, 2003, the interest rates for the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility ranged from 3.16 percent to 5.00 percent. F-19 In connection with the repayment of the Term A Loan, the Company wrote off the related unamortized deferred financing fees. The write-off of $485,000 has been reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. All of the Company's existing and future domestic subsidiaries unconditionally guarantee the repayment of amounts borrowed under the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the Company's and its domestic subsidiaries' tangible and intangible assets, including substantially all of the capital stock of the Company's subsidiaries. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also permits the Company to elect from time to time to (i) repurchase certain amounts of its subordinated debt and outstanding common stock from its share of excess cash flow (as defined in the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement); and (ii) repurchase certain amounts of its subordinated debt from it share of net cash proceeds of issuances of equity securities. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, certain of which allow for grace periods. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the outstanding amounts under the 2002 and 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were as follows (in thousands):
2003 2002 ------------ ----------- Revolving Credit Facility $ 4,400 $ 7,000 Term Loan A -- 21,201 Term Loan B 50,000 -- ------------ ----------- Total debt 154,400 28,201 Less current installments (1,500) (3,798) ------------ ----------- Long-term debt, excluding current installments $ 152,900 $ 24,403 ============ ===========
The remaining available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2003 were $112.7 million. As of December 31, 2003, the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement would have permitted additional borrowings of up to $203.7 million. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, total interest expense incurred on the Revolving Credit Facility was approximately $1.9 million, $1.1 million, and $2.7 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, total interest expense incurred on the Term Loan A was approximately $700,000, $1.2 million, and $4.1 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, total interest expense incurred on the Term Loan B was approximately $156,000. F-20 (d) Senior Subordinated Notes Payable On May 11, 1999, the Company sold $100.0 million, in aggregate principal amount of 12% senior subordinated notes due 2009, or "12% Notes." The proceeds of the issuance of the 12% Notes were principally used to purchase Analysis & Technology, Inc. The 12% Notes are subordinate to the Company's 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Facility but rank senior to any other subordinated indebtedness. The 12% Notes mature May 15, 2009 and interest is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The Company used net proceeds from its initial public offering ("IPO") to redeem $25.0 million principal amount of its 12% Notes on April 15, 2002. In addition, as a result of the redemption of the $25.0 million principal amount of the Company's 12% Notes, the Company incurred a $3.0 million prepayment premium and wrote-off a proportionate amount of approximately $928,000 of the unamortized deferred financing fees related to the portion of the 12% Notes that were repaid. The prepayment premium and write-off of deferred financing fees for both the term loan and the 12% Notes totaling $4.2 million, have been reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. On December 23, 2003, the Company repurchased $73.1 million in aggregate principal amount, or approximately 97% of the outstanding 12% Notes. As of the expiration date of the tender offer and December 31, 2003, approximately $1.9 million in aggregate principal amount remained outstanding, which is callable on May 15, 2004. The repurchase price for the 12% Notes was $1,110.95 per $1,000 principal amount of Notes tendered prior to December 5, 2003, the Consent Date. The repurchase price for those Notes tendered after December 5, 2003 was $1,090.95 per $1,000 principal amount of the 12% Notes, which excludes the consent payment of $20.0 per $1,000 principal amount. The aggregate repurchase price for all of the 12% Notes validly surrendered for repurchase and not withdrawn was approximately $81.2 million. In addition, as a result of the tender offer, the Company incurred a $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment and wrote-off approximately $2.1 million of the unamortized deferred financing fees related to the portion of the 12% Notes that were repurchased. The tender premium, consent payment and write-off of deferred financing fees have been reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. Total interest expense for the 12% Notes incurred during 2003, 2002 and 2001was approximately $8.8 million, $9.9 million, and $12.0 million, respectively. (e) Subordinated Notes Payable In connection with the purchase of Sherikon, Inc. in 2000, the Company entered into subordinated promissory notes with the Sherikon, Inc. shareholders as of the date of acquisition in the aggregate principal amount of $7.5 million, discounted to approximately $6.5 million. During 2001, $5.0 million of the subordinated promissory notes were repaid. The remaining $2.5 million of subordinated promissory notes were due on October 20, 2002. On October 18, 2002, the Company asserted an indemnification claim against the former shareholders of Sherikon, Inc. in an aggregate amount exceeding the $2.5 million promissory note. The Company has not made this $2.5 million scheduled payment pending resolution of the indemnification claim; however, $124,000 of interest has been accrued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, total interest expense on the subordinated promissory notes with the Sherikon, Inc. shareholders was approximately $124,000, $232,000, and $665,000, respectively. F-21 (f) Subordinated Note Payable to Ogden As partial consideration for the acquisition of Anteon Virginia, the Company entered into a subordinated promissory note with Ogden in the principal amount of $8.5 million, bearing interest at 12% payable quarterly. The principal amount of the note was due in April 2004, but could be prepaid without penalty at any time prior to maturity. On June 29, 2001, Anteon Virginia purchased from Ogden the then outstanding principal amount of the subordinated note payable to Ogden due from the Company for $3.2 million in full settlement of the Company's obligation to Ogden. In connection with the payment, the Company recognized interest income of $519,000, on the retirement of the subordinated note payable to Ogden, which is included in interest expense, net of interest income, on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2001. Total interest expense incurred on the subordinated note payable to Ogden for the year ended December 31, 2001 was approximately $86,000, respectively. (g) Subordinated Notes Payable to Stockholders Concurrent with the acquisition of Anteon Virginia, the Company and its majority stockholder at that time, Azimuth Technologies, L.P., and three other stockholders entered into subordinated promissory note agreements in the aggregate principal amount of $7.5 million, all bearing interest at 6%, which were payable quarterly. The principal amount of the notes was due in April 2004, but could be prepaid without penalty at any time prior to maturity. In March 2002, the Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its IPO to repay in full this subordinated promissory note. Total interest expense incurred on the subordinated notes payable for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was approximately $90,000 and $450,000, respectively. (h) Subordinated Convertible Note Payable - Related Party On June 23, 1999, the Company and Azimuth Tech. II LLC, an affiliate of Azimuth Technologies, L.P., the Company's majority stockholder at that time, and Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., entered into a subordinated convertible promissory note agreement for $22.5 million. The note bore interest at 12%, with interest payable semi-annually each June 30 and December 31, through maturity on June 23, 2010. The Company could not prepay the note prior to December 23, 2001, unless there was a sale of the Company or an initial public offering of the Company's common stock. On or after December 23, 2001, the note could be prepaid by the Company without penalty. The note was convertible into the Company's non-voting common stock at the option of the holder at any time at the conversion price of $4.86 per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits, dividends and certain issuances of common stock. At the Company's option, accrued interest on the note could have been paid either in cash or additional notes which are identical to the above note, except that the additional notes were not convertible into shares of the Company's common stock. In March 2002, in connection with the Company's IPO, the Company repaid $4.4 million in accrued interest related to the note, and the $22.5 million principal amount subordinated convertible promissory note was converted pursuant to its terms into 4,629,232 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $4.86 per share. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company incurred approximately $667,000, and $3.2 million, respectively, of interest expense on these notes. F-22 (i) Future Maturities Scheduled future maturities under the Company's indebtedness, excluding the $2.5 million Subordinated Notes Payable, are as follows (in thousands): Year ending December 31, 2004 $ 1,500 2005 1,500 2006 1,500 2007 1,500 2008 5,900 Thereafter 144,376 -------------- $ 156,276 ============== (j) Interest Rate Swap Agreements OBJECTIVES AND CONTEXT The Company uses variable-rate debt to finance its operations through its Revolving Facility and Term Loan B. These debt obligations expose the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. If interest rates increase, interest expense increases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense also decreases. Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of its interest payments. It is the Company's objective to hedge a portion of its longer-term variable interest payments for the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. STRATEGIES To meet this objective, management enters into various interest rate swap derivative contracts to manage fluctuations in cash flow resulting from fluctuations in interest rates. The interest rate swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the Company's long-term debt obligations to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Under the interest rate swaps, the Company receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating fixed-rate long-term debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than cash flow hedging purposes. That is, the Company does not speculate using derivative instruments. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES The Company assesses interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company monitors interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both the Company's outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as the Company's offsetting hedge positions and estimates the expected impact of changes in interest rates on the Company's future cash flows. F-23 Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, the fair value of interest rate swaps was recorded as a transition adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. This resulted in a decrease of $629,000, net of tax, to accumulated other comprehensive income as of January 1, 2001. Changes subsequent to January 1, 2001 in the fair value of interest rate swaps designed as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows associated with floating-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These amounts subsequently are reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment in the same period in which the related interest on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company exercised its cancellation rights under certain interest rate swap agreements and cancelled $30.0 million notional amount of such agreements. These interest rate swap agreements related primarily to term loan obligations that had been permanently reduced. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 included losses of $1.9 million associated with these cancellations. Over the next twelve months, approximately $230,000 of losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the interest rate swaps are expected to be reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment of the hedged debt obligation. As of December 31, 2003, the fair value of the Company's interest swap agreements resulted in a net liability of $230,000 and has been included in other current liabilities. The Company's interest rate swap agreements effectively changed the Company's interest rate exposure for the following amounts, as of December 31, 2003, to the following fixed rates:
Fair Value as Effective of Date of Swap Notional Maturity of Fixed Rate December 31, Agreement Amount Swap Agreement of Interest (in thousands) --------------- ------------ --------------- ------------ ------------- June 2001 $10 million June 30, 2004 5.78% $(230) --------------- ------------ --------------- ------------ -------------
The fair value of interest rate swaps is the estimated amount, based on quoted market prices, that the counterparty would (receive) pay to terminate the swap agreements at December 31, 2003. (9) Capital Stock The Company's authorized capital stock currently consists of 175,000,000 shares of common stock and 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all directors then being elected. The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to receive dividends, when, and if declared by the Company's board out of legally available funds. Upon the Company's liquidation or dissolution, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the Company's assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after payment of liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any holders of preferred stock then outstanding. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock, which may be issued in the future. On December 17, 2003, the Company registered approximately 11.1 million shares of its common stock for sale in an underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC. These securities may be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Preferred Stock The Company's preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Company's board is authorized to fix the dividend rights, dividend rates, any conversion rights or right of exchange, any voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, the redemption price or prices, the payments in the event of liquidation, and any other rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of any series of preferred stock and the number of shares constituting such series and their designation. The Company has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock other than in connection with the rights distribution described below. F-24 Depending upon the rights of such preferred stock, the issuance of preferred stock could have an adverse effect on holders of the Company's common stock by delaying or preventing a change in control, adversely affecting the voting power of the holders of common stock, including the loss of voting control to others, making removal of the present management more difficult, or resulting in restrictions upon the payment of dividends and other distributions to the holders of common stock. Rights Agreement In connection with the Company's IPO, the Company distributed one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock to the stockholders of record on that date (the "Rights Agreement"). Under the Company's Rights Agreement, each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $76.50 per one one-thousandth of a share, under certain circumstances provided for in the Rights Agreement. Until a "separation date" (as defined in the Rights Agreement) occurs, the rights will: o Not be exercisable; o Be evidenced by certificates that represent shares of the Company's common stock; and o Trade with the Company's common stock. The rights will expire at the close of business on the ten-year anniversary of the Rights Agreement, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company. (10) Income Taxes The provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, consist of the following (in thousands), respectively:
Years ended December 31, ----------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ----------- ------------ ------------- Current provision: Federal $ 21,718 10,245 1,321 State 2,305 1,431 810 Foreign 121 119 62 ----------- ------------ ------------- Total current provision 24,144 11,795 2,193 ----------- ------------ ------------- Deferred provision: Federal (1,145) 4,331 1,501 State (226) 597 853 Foreign -- -- 55 ----------- ------------ ------------- Total deferred provision (1,371) 4,928 2,409 ----------- ------------ ------------- Total income tax provision $ 22,773 16,723 4,602 =========== ============ =============
F-25 The income tax provisions for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, are different from those computed using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% as set forth below (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, ----------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2001 ----------- ------------ ------------- Expected tax expense, computed at statutory rate $ 20,637 15,108 1,582 State taxes, net of federal expense 1,501 1,259 1,259 Nondeductible expenses 332 330 304 Goodwill amortization -- -- 1,804 Secondary offering expenses 265 -- -- Increase in marginal federal rate -- -- 200 Stock basis difference on sale of subsidiary -- -- (790) Foreign rate differences (15) 53 (21) Other 53 (27) 264 ----------- ------------ ------------- $ 22,773 16,723 4,602 =========== ============ =============
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 is presented below (in thousands):
2003 2002 -------------- ------------- Deferred tax assets: Accrued expenses $ 8,505 $ 6,244 Intangible assets, due to differences in amortization 2,399 2,492 Interest rate swaps 89 298 Accounts receivable allowances 1,607 706 Property and equipment, due to differences in depreciation 1,334 831 Net operating loss and credit carryforwards 540 356 -------------- ------------- Total gross deferred tax assets 14,474 10,927 Less: valuation allowance (295) (295) -------------- ------------- Net deferred tax assets 14,179 10,632 -------------- ------------- Deferred tax liabilities: Deductible goodwill, due to differences in amortization 9,087 7,502 Revenue recognition differences 5,536 6,616 Accrued expenses 6,630 5,741 Property and equipment, due to differences in depreciation 1,302 811 -------------- ------------- Total deferred tax liabilities 22,555 20,670 -------------- ------------- Deferred tax liabilities, net $ (8,376) $ (10,038) ============== =============
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies that can be implemented by the Company in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible based on available tax planning strategies, management presently believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the portion of the benefits of these deductible differences related to Federal income taxes. The Company has established a valuation allowance as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 of $295,000 and $295,000, respectively against certain state net operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2003, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $69,000 and $6.8 million, respectively. Carryforwards have various expiration dates beginning in 2004. F-26 (11) Employee Benefit Plans Employees of the Company may participate in 401(k) retirement savings plans, whereby employees may elect to make contributions pursuant to a salary reduction agreement upon meeting eligibility requirements. Participants may contribute up to 22 percent of salary in any calendar year to these plans, provided that amounts in total do not exceed certain statutory limits. The Company matches up to 50 percent of the first 6 percent of a participant's contributions, subject to certain limitations, and participants immediately vest in the Company's contributions. The Company made contributions to these plans of approximately $8.3 million, $7.1 million, and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 respectively. Employees vest immediately in the Company's contributions. ISI had a 401(k) and a profit-sharing plan ("ISI Plan") in effect covering all employees at least 18 years of age. The ISI Plan provided for both employee and employer contributions. Employees vested immediately in their own contributions. The Company's contributions are discretionary as determined by management. Employees become 100 percent vested in these contributions after five years of service. The Company did not contribute to the ISI plan in 2003. Profit-sharing expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $1.8 million. As of January 1, 2004, the ISI Plan terminated and the ISI Plan assets were transferred to the Company's 401(k) Plan. (12) Stock Option and Other Compensation Plans (a) Stock Option Plan In January 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Anteon Virginia Corporation Omnibus Stock Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"). At the discretion of the Board of Directors, the stock option plan permits the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock awards, and/or phantom stock to employees or directors of the Company. As of December 31, 2003, an aggregate of 383,540 shares of the Company's common stock were reserved for issuance under the stock option plan. The exercise price of stock options granted is the market value of the common stock at the grant date. Prior to the Company's IPO, the exercise price of stock options granted was determined by the Company's Board of Directors but was not to be less than the fair value of the underlying shares of common stock at the grant date. For stock options granted to employees, 20% of the shares subject to the options vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and an additional 20% vest on each succeeding anniversary of the grant date. For options granted from the date of the adoption of the Company's stock option plan until September 21, 2000, employees have a period of three years from the vesting date to exercise the option to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. In 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved that 20 percent of the options issued on the August 1, 1997 grant date vested immediately. On September 21, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors approved that, with respect to stock options granted from that date forward, each grantee has a period of 8 years from the date of grant in which to exercise options which vest. On March 11, 2002, the Company's Board of Directors approved that, with respect to stock options granted from that date forward, each grantee has a period of 10 years from the date of grant in which to exercise options which vest. F-27 The following tables summarize information regarding options under the Company's stock option plan:
Weighted average Outstanding Number Option price exercise and of shares per share price exercisable ------------ -------------- ------------- ------------- Outstanding at December 31, 2000 4,286,000 $ 0.84-6.49 $ 4.27 1,489,516 Granted 64,000 8.10 8.10 Exercised (82,680) 0.84-6.41 1.84 Cancelled or expired (250,480) 0.84-8.10 5.64 ------------ -------------- ------------- Outstanding at December 31, 2001 4,016,840 $ 0.84-8.10 $ 4.21 2,178,960 Granted 1,417,000 18.00-27.25 19.04 Exercised (1,135,632) 0.84-8.10 3.49 Cancelled or expired (175,000) 2.30-18.00 6.24 ------------ -------------- ------------- Outstanding at December 31, 2002 4,123,208 $ 0.84-27.25 $ 8.98 1,647,368 Granted 641,500 23.30-33.75 28.53 Exercised (935,947) 0.84-27.25 5.23 Cancelled or expired (221,600) 4.66-27.25 14.39 ------------ -------------- ------------- Outstanding as of December 31, 2003 3,607,161 $ 0.84-33.75 $ 13.59 1,520,301 ============ ============== =============
Option and weighted average price information by price group is as follows:
Shares outstanding Exercisable shares ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Number Weighted Weighted Number of Weighted average average exercise remaining average of shares price life shares exercise price ------------ -------------- ------------- ------------- --------------- December 31, 2003: $0.84 411,618 $ 0.84 0.8 411,618 $ 0.84 $2.30 to $3.36 14,400 $ 2.53 1.8 14,400 $ 2.53 $4.02 to $4.66 336,000 $ 4.61 2.7 336,000 $ 4.61 $4.86 to $5.25 457,266 $ 5.20 3.6 281,706 $ 5.20 $6.25 to $6.49 531,600 $ 6.30 3.5 257,200 $ 6.30 $8.10 19,800 $ 8.10 5.3 1,200 $ 8.10 $18.00 to $27.25 1,194,977 $ 19.18 5.8 218,177 $ 19.18 $23.30 to $33.75 641,500 $ 28.54 7.5 -- ------------ ------------- 3,607,161 1,520,301 ============ =============
(b) Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan Under a plan established during 2000, certain of the Company's directors are compensated on a deferred basis. In lieu of their annual director fees, each director under the plan has the choice of receiving deferred compensation, payable in either: (1) cash upon the completion of their service as a director, equal to the annual fees due them plus interest accruing at an annual rate equal to the Company's one-year borrowing cost in effect at the beginning of each quarter and the end of each quarter, (2) a stock appreciation right based on the number of shares that could be acquired in consideration of the annual fees, or (3) a combination of each of the above. The Company recognized approximately $144,000 during the year ended December 31, 2001 as compensation expense. The plan was terminated by the board effective as of December 31, 2001. (c) Pro Forma Disclosures The Company applies APB No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the Company stock option plan. Adoption of the fair market value provisions prescribed in SFAS No. 123 is optional with respect to stock-based compensation to employees; however, pro forma disclosures are required as if the Company adopted the fair value recognition requirements under SFAS No. 123. F-28 Had compensation cost for the grants under the Company stock option plan been determined consistent with the fair market value provisions prescribed in SFAS No. 123, the Company's pro forma net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 would approximate $32.4 million, $23.0 million, and $(1.3 million), respectively, using an expected option life of 5, 5, and 7 years, respectively, dividend yield rate of 0% and volatility rates of 43.3%, 47.8%, and 70%, respectively, and risk-free interest rates of 3.28%, 2.78%, and 4.84% for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively (see note 2(l)). The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. (13) Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) includes the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and changes in the fair values of interest rate swaps. The Company presents comprehensive income (loss) as a component of the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (deficit). The amount of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment was approximately $69,000, $(44,000) and $(43,000), as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amount of accumulated other comprehensive income related to interest rate swaps was $230,000 ($141,000 net of tax) and $763,000 ($465,000 net of tax) as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. (14) Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share The computations of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share are as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2003 Weighted average Income shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount -------------- ----------------- --------- (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic earnings per share $ 36,190 34,851,281 $ 1.04 ============== =========== Stock options 2,074,207 Diluted earnings per share $ 36,190 36,925,488 $ 0.98 ============== ===========
For the year ended December 31, 2002 Weighted average Income shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount -------------- ----------------- ----------- (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic earnings per share $ 26,444 32,163,150 $ 0.82 ============== =========== Stock options 1,858,447 Diluted earnings per share $ 26,444 34,021,597 $ 0.78 ============== ===========
F-29 For the year ended December 31, 2001 Weighted average Income shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount -------------- --------------- ----------- (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic losses per share $ (82) 23,786,565 $ (0.01) ============== =========== Stock options -- Diluted losses per share $ (82) 23,786,565 $ (0.01) ============== ===========
(15) Commitments and Contingencies (a) Leases The Company is obligated under capital leases covering certain property and equipment that expire at various dates during the next five years. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the gross amount of property and equipment and related accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases were as follows:
2003 2002 ------------- ------------- Property and equipment $ 1,037 $ -- Less accumulated amortization (265) -- ------------- ------------- $ 772 $ -- ============= =============
Amortization of assets held under capital leases is included in depreciation expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also leases facilities and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2010. These leases generally contain renewal options for periods ranging from 3 to 5 years, and require the Company to pay all executory costs such as maintenance, taxes, and insurance. As of December 31, 2003, the aggregate minimum annual rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending December 31 Capital Operating ----------------------- Leases Leases ------------ ---------------- 2004 $ 421 $ 29,991 2005 212 23,785 2006 132 20,800 2007 121 17,173 2008 91 14,520 Thereafter -- 45,304 ----------- ---------------- Total minimum lease payments $ 977 $ 151,573 ================ Less estimated executory costs (at 7.25%) (71) ----------- Net minimum lease payments 906 Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 5.88% to 10.50%) 100 ----------- Present value of net minimum capital 806 lease payments Less current installments of obligations under capital leases 341 ----------- Obligations under capital leases, excluding current installments $ 465 ===========
F-30 Rent expense under all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was approximately $25.4 million, $24.2 million, and $23.1 million, respectively. (b) Management Fees Effective June 1, 1999, the Company entered into an arrangement with Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., an affiliate and advisor to the Company, whereby the Company was required to pay $1.0 million to Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. as a management fee. Effective December 31, 2001, the Company entered into a new agreement with Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. that terminated the management fee agreement. Under the terms of this new agreement, the Company was obligated to pay Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. a one-time, $3.6 million fee, which was recognized as general and administrative expense in 2001 and is reflected as due to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001. As a result, Caxton-Iseman no longer provides management advisory services to the Company. Any further services requested by the Company that are provided by Caxton-Iseman, if any, will be paid for by the Company at rates negotiated at that time. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company incurred $1.0 million of management fees with Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. (c) Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Company and its legal counsel cannot currently predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, but do not believe that they will have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. (16) Secondary Offering Expenses On September 22, 2003, certain of the Company's stockholders sold 6,600,000 shares of the Company's common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the underwriters of this offering partially exercised their over-allotment option with respect to additional shares held by the selling stockholders. As a result, on October 16, 2003, certain of the selling stockholders sold an additional 297,229 shares of the Company's common stock in a second closing pursuant to the same underwritten offering. In connection with this offering, the Company incurred approximately $852,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003. These expenses were reimbursed by certain of the selling stockholders and the reimbursement was recorded by the Company as a contribution to paid-in-capital. (17) Domestic Subsidiaries Summarized Financial Information Under the terms of the Company's Credit Facility, the Company's wholly owned domestic subsidiaries (the "Guarantor Subsidiaries") are guarantors of the Company's Credit Facility. Such guarantees are full, unconditional, joint and several. Separate unaudited condensed financial statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because the Company's management has determined that they would not be material to investors. Non-guarantor subsidiaries include the Company's foreign subsidiaries. The following supplemental financial information sets forth, on a combined basis, condensed balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows information for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Company's non-guarantor subsidiaries and for the Company. F-31
As of December 31, 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Balance Sheets Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents $ (9) $ 437 $ 1,660 $ -- $ 2,088 Accounts receivable, net -- 222,511 426 -- 222,937 Prepaid expenses and other current 303 29,484 115 (10,336) 19,566 assets Property and equipment, net 2,024 10,646 89 -- 12,759 Due from parent (188,718) 188,911 (193) -- -- Investment in and advances to subsidiaries 30,780 (21,730) -- (9,050) -- Goodwill, net 168,532 43,673 -- -- 212,205 Intangible and other assets, net 73,230 4,495 -- (68,000) 9,725 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- Total assets $ 86,142 $ 478,427 $ 2,097 $ (87,386) $ 479,280 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- Indebtedness $ 4,376 $ 222,400 $ -- $ (68,000) $ 158,776 Accounts payable 405 36,212 176 -- 36,793 Due to related party 48 -- -- -- 48 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 3,267 82,917 496 -- 86,680 Deferred revenue 10,336 11,372 411 (10,336) 11,783 Other long-term liabilities -- 10,498 -- -- 10,498 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- Total liabilities 18,432 363,399 1,083 (78,336) 304,578 Minority interest in subsidiaries -- -- 210 -- 210 Total stockholders' equity (deficit) 67,710 115,028 804 (9,050) 174,492 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 86,142 $ 478,427 $ 2,097 $ (87,386) $ 479,280 ============= ============ ============= =========== ==========
F-32
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Statements of Operations Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Revenues $ 2 $ 1,033,596 $ 9,521 $ (645) $ 1,042,474 Costs of revenues -- 889,424 8,485 (645) 897,264 ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Gross profit 2 144,172 1,036 -- 145,210 Total operating expenses 3,418 87,412 744 (30,477) 61,097 ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Operating income (3,416) 56,760 292 30,477 84,113 Other income 9,595 20,882 -- (30,477) -- Secondary offering expenses 852 -- -- -- 852 Interest and other expense (income), net 14,461 9,805 (22) -- 24,244 Minority interests in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries -- -- (54) -- (54) ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Income (loss) before provision for income taxes (9,134) 67,837 260 -- 58,963 Provision (benefit) for income taxes (3,589) 26,241 121 -- 22,773 ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Net income (loss) $ (5,545) $ 41,596 $ 139 $ -- $ 36,190 ============= ============= ============= =========== =============
F-33
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor International Statements of Cash Flows Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Corporation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Net income (loss) $ (5,545) $ 41,596 $ 139 $ 36,190 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 782 3,589 69 4,440 Amortization of noncompete agreements -- 101 -- 101 Other intangibles amortization 2,227 122 -- 2,349 Amortization of deferred financing costs 3,896 118 -- 4,014 Loss on disposals of property and equipment -- 170 20 190 Deferred income taxes -- (1,742) -- (1,742) Minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries -- -- 54 54 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities 179,518 (188,480) 809 (8,153) ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 180,878 (144,526) 1,091 37,443 ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment and other assets (442) (2,552) (55) (3,049) Acquisition of ISI, net of cash acquired (92,164) (218) -- (92,382) ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities (92,606) (2,770) (55) (95,431) ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on bank and other notes payable -- (43) -- (43) Deferred financing costs 308 (3,036) -- (2,728) Principal payments on Term Loan A (21,202) -- -- (21,202) Proceeds from Term Loan B -- 150,000 -- 150,000 Proceeds from certain selling stockholders related to our secondary offering 852 -- -- 852 Proceeds from revolving credit facility -- 1,009,500 -- 1,009,500 Principal payments on revolving credit facility -- (1,012,100) -- (1,012,100) Redemption of senior subordinated notes payable (73,124) -- -- (73,124) Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses 4,902 -- -- 4,902 Principal payments under capital lease obligations -- (247) -- (247) ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (88,264) 144,074 -- 55,810 ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 8 (3,222) 1,036 (2,178) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year (17) 3,659 624 4,266 ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ (9) $ 437 $ 1,660 $ 2,088 ============= ============ =========== ===========
F-34
As of December 31, 2002 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Balance Sheets Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents $ (17) $ 3,659 $ 624 $ -- $ 4,266 Accounts receivable, net -- 188,466 593 -- 189,059 Prepaid expenses and other 1,288 13,365 418 -- 15,071 current assets Property and equipment, net 2,364 7,505 123 -- 9,992 Due from Parent (22,607) 22,746 (139) -- -- Investment in and advances to 23,898 -- subsidiaries (2,630) -- (21,268) Goodwill, net 94,946 43,673 -- -- 138,619 Intangible and other assets, net 65,863 1,621 201 (60,000) 7,685 ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total assets $ 165,735 $ 278,405 $ 1,820 $ (81,268) $ 364,692 ============= =========== ============ ============ =========== Indebtedness $ 98,701 $ 67,000 $ -- $ (60,000) $ 105,701 Accounts payable 526 46,804 300 -- 47,630 Accrued expenses and other 2,582 65,401 394 -- 68,377 liabilities Deferred revenue 5,512 189 -- 5,701 -- Other long-term liabilities 8,069 229 -- 8,298 ------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Total liabilities 101,809 192,786 1,112 (60,000) 235,707 Minority interest in subsidiaries -- -- 156 -- 156 Total stockholders' equity (deficit) 63,926 85,619 552 (21,268) 128,829 ------------- ---------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 165,735 $ 278,405 $ 1,820 $ (81,268) $ 364,692 ============= ========== ============ ============ ===========
F-35
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (reclassified-see note 2(r)) Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Statements of Operations Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Revenues $ -- $ 826,640 $ 5,252 $ (6,066) $ 825,826 Costs of revenues 2 712,725 4,667 (6,066) 711,328 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- Gross profit (2) 113,915 585 -- 114,498 Total operating expenses 1,699 63,136 368 (15,099) 50,104 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- Operating income (1,701) 50,779 217 15,099 64,394 Other income 7,181 8,335 -- (15,099) 417 Interest expense (income), net 13,791 7,850 (15) -- 21,626 Minority interest in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries -- -- (18) -- (18) ------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- Income (loss) before provision for income taxes (8,311) 51,264 214 -- 43,167 Provision (benefit) for income taxes (3,232) 19,835 120 -- 16,723 ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------- Net income (loss) $ (5,079) $ 31,429 $ 94 $ -- $ 26,444 ============= ============ ============= =========== =============
F-36
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor International Statements of Cash Flows Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Corporation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Net income (loss) $ (5,079) $ 31,429 $ 94 $ 26,444 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Loss on disposals of property and equipment -- 24 1 25 Interest rate swap termination (1,903) -- -- (1,903) Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 632 3,613 49 4,294 Other intangibles amortization 1,687 220 -- 1,907 Amortization of deferred financing costs 2,442 -- -- 2,442 Deferred income taxes 2,537 1,553 -- 4,090 Minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries -- -- 18 18 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities (2,256) (37,041) 258 (39,039) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1,940) (202) 420 (1,722) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment and other assets (1,169) (2,009) (47) (3,225) Proceeds from sale of building -- 1,802 -- 1,802 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Net cash used in investing activities (1,169) (207) (47) (1,423) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on bank and other notes payable -- (47) -- (47) Deferred financing costs (642) (650) -- (1,292) Payment on subordinated notes payable -- (567) -- (567) Principal payments on Term Loan A (25,853) -- -- (25,853) Proceeds from revolving credit facility -- 862,600 -- 862,600 Principal payments on revolving credit facility (18,700) (855,600) -- (874,300) Redemption of senior subordinated notes payable (25,000) -- -- (25,000) Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses 81,808 -- -- 81,808 Principal payments on subordinated notes payable to stockholders (7,499) -- -- (7,499) Payment of subordinated notes payable-related party (4,369) -- -- (4,369) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (255) 5,736 -- 5,481 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (3,364) 5,327 373 2,336 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 3,347 (1,668) 251 1,930 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ (17) $ 3,659 $ 624 $ 4,266 ============= ============ ============ =============
F-37
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (reclassified-see note 2(r)) Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Statements of Operations Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Revenues $ -- $ 716,616 $ 8,662 $ (10,255) $ 715,023 Costs of revenues -- 629,729 7,868 (10,255) 627,342 -------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Gross profit -- 86,887 794 -- 87,681 Total operating expenses 4,123 56,262 431 -- 60,816 -------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Operating income (4,123) 30,625 363 -- 26,865 Other income -- 4,046 -- -- 4,046 Interest expense (income), net 16,863 9,507 (17) -- 26,353 Minority interest in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries (14) 32 (56) -- (38) -------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Income (loss) before provision for income taxes (21,000) 25,196 324 -- 4,520 Provision (benefit) for income taxes (8,070) 12,555 117 -- 4,602 -------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $ (12,930) $ 12,641 $ 207 $ -- $ (82) ============== ============= ============= =========== ===========
F-38
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consolidated Anteon Non- Anteon Condensed Consolidated International Guarantor Guarantor Elimination International Statements of Cash Flows Corporation Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Corporation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (in thousands) Net income (loss) $ (12,930) $ 12,641 $ 207 -- $ (82) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Gain on sales and closures of business -- (4,046) -- -- (4,046) Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 885 6,182 43 -- 7,110 Goodwill amortization 5,334 1,370 -- -- 6,704 Other intangibles amortization 2,223 98 -- -- 2,321 Amortization of noncompete agreements -- 349 -- -- 349 Amortization of deferred financing costs 697 -- -- -- 697 Loss on disposals of property and equipment -- 791 -- -- 791 Deferred income taxes (476) 3,988 -- -- 3,512 Minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries 14 (32) 56 -- 38 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities 43,401 (20,973) (278) (1,665) 20,485 ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 39,148 368 28 (1,665) 37,879 ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment and other assets (314) (1,774) (93) -- (2,181) Acquisition of Sherikon Inc., net of cash acquired (21) -- -- -- (21) Acquisition of SIGCOM, net of cash acquired -- (10,975) -- -- (10,975) Proceeds from sales of businesses -- 11,464 -- -- 11,464 Other, net -- 6 -- -- 6 Intercompany transfers (338) 121 217 -- -- ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (673) (1,158) 124 -- (1,707) ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on bank and other notes payable -- (185) -- -- (185) Payments on business purchase consideration payable and subordinated notes payable (5,000) (1,185) -- -- (6,185) Payments on note payable to Ogden (3,212) -- -- -- (3,212) Principal payments on Term Loan A (12,946) -- -- -- (12,946) Proceeds from revolving credit facility 771,200 -- -- -- 771,200 Principal payments on revolving credit facility (784,500) -- -- -- (784,500) Distribution to parent for debt service (1,665) -- -- 1,665 -- Proceeds from minority interest, net 152 -- -- -- 152 ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (35,971) (1,370) -- 1,665 (35,676) ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ---------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,504 (2,160) 152 -- 496 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 844 491 99 -- 1,434 ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 3,348 $ (1,669) $ 251 $ -- $ 1,930 ============= =========== ============= =========== ===========
F-39 (18) Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) The following summarizes the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per share data):
Quarter ended: March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 Total -------------- ------------ --------------- --------------- ----------- 2003 Revenues $ 228,591 254,093 279,080 280,710 1,042,474 Operating income 17,966 20,254 22,699 23,194 84,113 Net income 9,075 10,309 10,943 5,863 36,190 Basic earnings per common share 0.26 0.30 0.31 0.17 1.04 Diluted earnings per common share: 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.16 0.98 2002 Revenues $ 192,629 201,938 214,314 216,945 825,826 Operating income 14,517 16,021 16,549 17,307 64,394 Net income 4,134 5,509 8,166 8,635 26,444 Basic earnings per common share 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.25 0.82 Diluted earnings per common share: 0.14 0.15 0.22 0.24 0.78
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company acquired Information Spectrum, Inc. (note 4(b)). (19) Segment Reporting Based on the Company's organization through July 20, 2001, the Company reported two business segments: the Company's government contracting business and the Company's commercial, custom training and performance solutions group (collectively, "IMC", which was sold by the Company during the third quarter of fiscal 2001). Although the Company is organized by strategic business unit, the Company considers each of its government contracting units to have similar economic characteristics, provide similar types of services, and have a similar customer base. Accordingly, the Company's government contracting segment aggregates the operations of the Company with Vector Data Systems, Inc., Techmatics, Inc., Analysis & Technology, Inc., Sherikon, Inc., SIGCOM, and ISI. These prior acquisitions were consolidated and merged into Anteon Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The amounts shown below reflect both IMC Commercial, the unit sold on July 20, 2001 (see note 3(c)), and IMC Government. Immediately prior to the sale of IMC Commercial, the Company integrated the IMC Government unit into the government contracting business. The Company's chief operating decision maker utilized both revenue and earnings before interest and taxes in assessing performance and making overall operating decisions and resource allocations. Certain indirect costs such as corporate overhead and general and administrative expenses were allocated to the segments. Allocation of overhead costs to segments was based on measures such as revenue and employee headcount. General and administrative costs was allocated to segments based on the government-required three-factor formula, which used measures of revenue, labor and net book value of fixed assets. Interest expense, investment income, gains on sales and closures of businesses and income taxes was not allocated to the Company's segments. F-40 The following tables present information about the Company's segments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 (in thousands).
As of and for the year ended Government Interactive December 31, 2001 Contracting Media Eliminations Consolidated ----------------------------------------------- -------------- ------------- --------------- -------------- Total assets $ 306,651 -- -- 306,651 ============== ============= =============== ============== Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 696,420 18,603 -- 715,023 Intersegment sales 36 15 (51) -- -------------- ------------- --------------- -------------- 696,456 18,618 (51) 715,023 ============== ============= =============== ============== Operating income, net $ 25,839 1,026 -- $ 26,865 Gains on sales and closures of businesses 4,046 Interest expense, net 26,353 Minority interest in earnings of (38) subsidiaries -------------- Income before provision for income taxes 4,520 Provision for income taxes 4,602 -------------- Net loss $ (82) ==============
F-41