20-F
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Form 20-F
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR(g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number
333-14194
GRUPO TMM, S.A.B.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
TMM GROUP
(Translation of
Registrant’s name into English)
United Mexican States
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Avenida de la Cuspide, No. 4755
Colonia Parques del Pedregal,
14010 Mexico City, D.F., Mexico
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
American Depositary Shares, each representing
one Ordinary Participation Certificate
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
(Certificado de
Participación Ordinaria)
|
|
|
(“CPO”)
|
|
|
CPOs, each representing one nominative common share,
without par value (“Share”)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (for listing purposes only)
|
Shares
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (for listing purposes only)
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report.
56,933,137 Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
o Yes
No þ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
o Yes
No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
|
|
U.S.
GAAP o
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards
Board þ
|
Other o
If “Other” has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o
Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12,
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to
the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes o No o
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Introduction
In this Annual Report, references to “$,”
“US$,” “Dollars” or “dollars” are
to United States Dollars and references to “Ps.,”
“Pesos” or “pesos” are to Mexican Pesos.
This Annual Report contains translations of certain Peso amounts
into Dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of
the reader. These translations should not be construed as
representations that the Peso amounts actually represent such
Dollar amounts or could be converted into Dollars at the rates
indicated or at any other rate. In this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
except as otherwise provided, references to “we,”
“us,” “our” and “Company,” mean
Grupo TMM, S.A.B. and its consolidated subsidiaries, and
“Grupo TMM” means “Grupo TMM, S.A.B.”
As a result of the promulgation of the new securities law in
México in June 2006, public companies were transformed by
operation of law into Sociedades Anónimas
Bursátiles (Public Issuing Corporation). Accordingly,
on December 20, 2006, the Company added
“Bursátil” to its registered name to comply with
the requirements under Mexico’s new securities law, or
Ley del Mercado de Valores. As a result, the Company is
known as Grupo TMM, Sociedad Anónima Bursátil,
or Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
Presentation
of Financial Information
Our financial statements are published in dollars and prepared
in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (“IASB”). We maintain our financial
books and records in dollars. However, we keep our tax books and
records in Pesos. Sums presented in this Annual Report may not
add precisely due to rounding.
Forward-Looking
Information
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking
statements are based on the beliefs of the Company’s
management as well as on assumptions made. Actual results could
differ materially from those included in such forward-looking
statements. Readers are cautioned that all forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainty.
The following factors, among others described in this Annual
Report, could cause actual results to differ materially from
such forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet
our obligations, including the ability of our subsidiaries to
generate sufficient distributable cash flow and to distribute
such cash flow in accordance with our existing agreements with
our lenders and strategic partners and applicable law;
|
|
|
•
|
Mexican, U.S. and global economic, political and social
conditions;
|
|
|
•
|
The effect of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(“NAFTA”) on the level of
U.S.-Mexico
trade;
|
|
|
•
|
Conditions affecting the international shipping and
transportation markets;
|
|
|
•
|
Our ability to reduce corporate overhead costs;
|
|
|
•
|
The availability of capital to fund our expansion plans;
|
|
|
•
|
Our ability to utilize a portion of our current and future tax
loss carryforwards (“Net Operating Losses” or
“NOLs”);
|
|
|
•
|
Changes in fuel prices;
|
|
|
•
|
Changes in legal or regulatory requirements in Mexico or the
U.S.;
|
|
|
•
|
Market and interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
•
|
Competition in geographic and business areas in which we conduct
our operations;
|
|
|
•
|
The adverse resolution of litigation and other contingencies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
The ability of management to manage growth and successfully
compete in new businesses; and
|
|
|
•
|
The ability of the Company to repay, restructure or refinance
its indebtedness.
|
Readers are urged to read this entire Annual Report including,
but not limited to, the section entitled “Risk
Factors,” and carefully consider the risks, uncertainties
and other factors that affect our business. The information
contained in this Annual Report is subject to change without
notice. Readers should review future reports filed by us with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). We undertake no obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statements included in this Annual
Report, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by applicable law or stock
exchange regulation.
PART I
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
IDENTITY
OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
OFFER
STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
Selected
Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected financial data. The
financial information presented for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was derived
from our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, of which the
financial statements for each of the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 are contained elsewhere
herein. The Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
On May 13, 2003, we sold our 51% interest in TMM Puertos y
Terminales, S. A. de C. V. (“TMMPyT”), included in our
ports and terminals segment (which included our port operations
at Cozumel, Manzanillo, Veracruz and Progreso), for
approximately $114 million in cash, subject to certain
post-closing adjustments. See Item 5. “Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — Results of
Operations — Discontinued Operations” and
Note 2 and Note 26 to the Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements.
On April 1, 2005, we finalized the sale of our interest in
Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
(“Grupo TFM”) to Kansas City Southern
(“KCS”), which comprised the remaining portion of our
railroad operations segment. As consideration for the sale of
our interest in Grupo TFM to KCS, Grupo TMM received
$200 million in cash, $47 million, subject to certain
adjustments specified below, in a 5% promissory note that was
originally expected to be paid to Grupo TMM in June 2007 and
18 million shares of KCS common stock valued, as of
April 1, 2005, at approximately $347 million.
On September 13, 2005, Grupo TMM, KCS and Grupo TFM reached
a settlement agreement with the Mexican Government in connection
with Grupo TFM’s VAT lawsuit and the Mexican
Government’s put option (the “Put”). In
accordance with a settlement jointly prepared and proposed by
the Company and KCS in early 2005, Grupo TFM acquired
20 percent of the shares issued by Grupo TFM subject to the
Put held by the Mexican Government on a basis that effectively
offsets the VAT claim and Put obligation, ending all litigation
on these issues.
On December 9, 2005, the Company sold 18 million
shares of KCS common stock to Morgan Stanley & Co. for
aggregate gross proceeds of $400.5 million, which the
Company used on January 17, 2006 to prepay an aggregate
principal amount of $331 million and interest in the amount
of $16 million on the Grupo TMM Senior Secured Notes due
2007 (the “2007 Notes”).
On March 13, 2006, in accordance with the Amended and
Restated Acquisition Agreement (the “AAA”) dated
December 15, 2004, KCS paid to the Company
$110 million through a combination of 1,494,469 shares
of KCS (the “VAT Earnout Shares”), a promissory note
in the original principal amount of $40 million, and an
additional
2
$35 million in cash (collectively, the “VAT
Contingency Payment”). See Item 4. “Information
on the Company — Recent Developments —
Disposition of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to
KCS.”
On December 7, 2006, the Company sold the VAT Earnout
Shares for approximately $37.3 million.
On September 21, 2007, KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM Logistics,
S.A. de C.V. (“TMM Logistics”) entered into a
Settlement Agreement to settle and release all claims asserted
against each other in arbitration proceedings initiated by KCS
under the AAA. Under the terms of the settlement, KCS paid Grupo
TMM $54.1 million in cash and the obligations of KCS under
the Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note, which would
have been payable in 2010, were terminated. The Indemnity Escrow
Note and the Tax Escrow Note had been valued at their face value
of $91.7 million in our Financial Statements. As a result
of this settlement, all disputes between KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM
Logistics were fully and finally settled.
The following data presents selected consolidated financial
information of the Company and should be read in conjunction
with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
Financial Statements of the Company, including the Notes
thereto, also included in this
Form 20-F,
and to Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects”.
GRUPO
TMM, S.A.B. AND SUBSIDIARIES UNDER IFRS
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
303.3
|
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
$
|
306.6
|
|
|
$
|
251.0
|
|
|
$
|
226.9
|
|
Income (Loss) on transportation(a)
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Other (expense) Income — Net(b)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
Operating Income (Loss)(c)
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
(63.8
|
)
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Interest Expense — Net(d)
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
Loss before benefit from (provision for) Income Taxes
|
|
|
(29.2
|
)
|
|
|
(68.8
|
)
|
|
|
(85.9
|
)
|
|
|
(65.7
|
)
|
|
|
(120.4
|
)
|
Benefit from (provision for) Income Taxes
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
(43.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Net Loss from continuing operations for the Year
|
|
|
(28.3
|
)
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
(109.4
|
)
|
|
|
(126.6
|
)
|
Net (Loss) Income from discontinued operations(e)
|
|
|
(38.6
|
)
|
|
|
111.4
|
|
|
|
199.3
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
Net (Loss) Income for the year
|
|
|
(66.9
|
)
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
175.5
|
|
|
|
(99.9
|
)
|
|
|
(84.7
|
)
|
Attributable to Minority interest
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Attributable to stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A.B
|
|
|
(67.1
|
)
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
171.3
|
|
|
|
(102.5
|
)
|
|
|
(86.7
|
)
|
Loss per Share from continuing operations(f)
|
|
|
(0.498
|
)
|
|
|
(0.719
|
)
|
|
|
(0.419
|
)
|
|
|
(1.920
|
)
|
|
|
(2.222
|
)
|
(Loss) Earnings per Share from discontinued operations(e)(f)
|
|
|
(0.677
|
)
|
|
|
1.955
|
|
|
|
3.500
|
|
|
|
0.166
|
|
|
|
0.736
|
|
(Loss) Earnings per Share from Net (Loss) Income for the year(f)
|
|
|
(1.175
|
)
|
|
|
1.236
|
|
|
|
3.080
|
|
|
|
(1.755
|
)
|
|
|
(1.488
|
)
|
(Loss) Earnings per Share attributable to stockholders of Grupo
TMM, S.A.B.(f)
|
|
|
(1.177
|
)
|
|
|
1.227
|
|
|
|
3.007
|
|
|
|
(1.800
|
)
|
|
|
(1.521
|
)
|
Book value per share(g)
|
|
|
1.983
|
|
|
|
3.207
|
|
|
|
2.094
|
|
|
|
(0.867
|
)
|
|
|
0.934
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (000s)
|
|
|
56,962
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
$
|
52.9
|
|
|
$
|
46.3
|
|
|
$
|
65.1
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
347.9
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Non — Current Assets Classified as Held For Sale(h)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,080.5
|
|
|
|
2,142.2
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
142.3
|
|
|
|
168.7
|
|
|
|
470.9
|
|
|
|
2,218.7
|
|
|
|
2,287.4
|
|
Property, machinery and
equipment-Net
|
|
|
351.1
|
|
|
|
282.8
|
|
|
|
165.8
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
Concessions — Net
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
662.2
|
|
|
|
635.5
|
|
|
|
793.1
|
|
|
|
2,352.0
|
|
|
|
2,466.6
|
|
Liabilities directly related to non-current assets classified as
held for sale(h)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,054.6
|
|
|
|
1,139.2
|
|
Current portion of long term debt(i)
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
421.1
|
|
Obligations for sale of receivables short term(i)
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Long - term debt(i)
|
|
|
303.2
|
|
|
|
141.4
|
|
|
|
524.8
|
|
|
|
469.4
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Obligations for sale of receivables long term(i)
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
|
|
172.6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
121.1
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) attributable to
Stockholders’ of Grupo TMM, S.A.B
|
|
|
113.0
|
|
|
|
182.7
|
|
|
|
119.3
|
|
|
|
(49.4
|
)
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
Minority equity interest in subsidiaries
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
686.0
|
|
|
|
678.2
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
118.9
|
|
|
|
191.3
|
|
|
|
136.7
|
|
|
|
636.7
|
|
|
|
731.4
|
|
OTHER DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental Capital Investments(j)
|
|
$
|
104.5
|
|
|
$
|
184.3
|
|
|
$
|
145.1
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Results of Operations — Income
on Transportation.” |
|
(b) |
|
Includes mainly: (i) in the year ended December 31,
2007: a non-recurring restructuring cost, a loss from the sale
of non productive assets and leases of related equipment,
partially offset by a gain from recoverable taxes net of
expenses and a gain from the sale of subsidiaries; (ii) in
the year ended December 31, 2006: impairment charges
related to long-lived assets, provision for the management fee
to SSA Mexico, Inc. (“SSA”), provision for the labor
contingencies and credit related to the recognition of the
participation in unconsolidated subsidiaries; (iii) in the
year ended December 31, 2005: credits related to
recoverable taxes, a gain from the sale of subsidiaries,
provision for the management fee to SSA and an adjustment to
goodwill; (iv) in the year ended December 31, 2004:
credits related to recoverable taxes and a loss from the sale of
fixed assets; (v) in the year ended December 31, 2003:
credits related to recoverable taxes, restructuring expenses, a
loss on the sale of subsidiaries and a loss on the sale of fixed
assets. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes the reclassification of income (expense) —
net in accordance with International Accounting Standard
(“IAS”) No. 1: “Presentation of Financial
Statements.” |
|
(d) |
|
Interest expense, net of exchange gains and losses. |
|
(e) |
|
The results of discontinued operations represent the results of
our ports and terminals operations that were sold in May 2003
and the results of our railroad operations that were sold in
April 2005. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects — Results of
Operations — Discontinued Operations” and
Note 2 and Note 26 to our Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
|
(f) |
|
As of December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 the number of
shares outstanding was 56,963,137 and as of December 31,
2007 the number of shares outstanding was 56,933,137. See
Item 4. “Information on the Company —
History and Development of the Company.” |
4
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Book value per share: results from dividing total
shareholders’ equity attributable to stockholders of the
Grupo TMM by the outstanding shares at the end of each period. |
|
(h) |
|
See Note 5 to the Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements. “Non-current asset available for sale and
discontinued operations.” |
|
(i) |
|
Proceeds received as borrowings are net of transaction costs
incurred in accordance with IAS No. 39: “Financial
Instruments Recognition and Measurement.” |
|
(j) |
|
See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Capital Expenditures and
Divestitures.” |
GRUPO TMM
S.A.B. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
TRANSPORTATION REVENUES (IFRS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and terminals operations(a)
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
Maritime operations(b)
|
|
|
179.0
|
|
|
|
146.4
|
|
|
|
159.6
|
|
|
|
127.8
|
|
|
|
116.0
|
|
Logistics operations(c)
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
97.6
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
Intercompany revenues(d)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
303.3
|
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
$
|
306.6
|
|
|
$
|
251.0
|
|
|
$
|
226.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME ON TRANSPORTATION (IFRS):(e)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and terminals operations
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Maritime operations
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Logistics operations
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Shared corporate costs(e)
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Ports and terminals operations consist of a port in Acapulco,
Mexico, a terminal at Tuxpan, Mexico, the operation of shipping
agencies at numerous ports in Mexico and certain Colombian
companies, which Colombian companies were included until
December 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
Maritime operations primarily consist of supply ships, product
tankers, parcel tankers and tugboats. |
|
(c) |
|
Our Logistics operations consist of trucking and intermodal
transport, warehousing, container maintenance and repair and
intermodal terminal operations. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents intercompany transactions between segments. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes restructuring expenses: In 2005: $0.1 million in
Maritime operations, $1.2 million in Logistics operations,
$0.3 million in Ports and Terminals operations and
$0.4 million in shared corporate costs. In 2004:
$0.2 million in Maritime operations and $0.6 million
in shared corporate costs. In 2003: $1.3 million in
Maritime operations, $0.1 million in Logistics operations
and $1.8 million in shared corporate costs. |
|
(f) |
|
To better reflect Grupo TMM’s corporate costs, the Company
modified the presentation of its corporate expenses as of
December 31, 2007, separating human resources and
information technology costs to be allocated to each business
unit in accordance with its use. Income on transportation
includes the following allocated total administrative costs: In
2007: $1.9 million in Ports and Terminals operations,
$6.4 million in Maritime operations, $14.1 million in
Logistics operations and $18.5 million in shared corporate
costs. In 2006: $1.8 million in Ports and Terminals
operations, $5.9 million in Maritime operations,
$9.5 million in Logistics operations and $14.6 million
in shared corporate costs. In 2005: $4.2 million in Ports
and Terminals operations, $5.3 million in Maritime
operations, $9.8 million in Logistics operations and
$12.4 million in shared corporate costs. In 2004:
$3.7 million in Ports and Terminals operations,
$5.3 million in Maritime operations, $9.1 million in
Logistics operations and $11.2 million in shared corporate
costs. In 2003: $3.2 million in Ports and Terminals
operations, $9.7 million in Maritime operations,
$7.5 million in Logistics operations and $12.5 million
in shared corporate costs. |
5
Average
Shares Outstanding
Income per share is calculated based on the average number of
shares outstanding in each relevant year. The average number of
common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2003, 2004,
2005, 2006 was 56,963,137 and as of December 31, 2007 was
56,933,137. See Item 4. “Information on the
Company — History and Development of the Company.”
Dividends
At shareholders’ meetings, shareholders have the ability,
at their discretion, to approve dividends from time to time. At
the ordinary shareholders’ meeting held on April 24,
1997, the shareholders of our predecessor, TMM, declared a
dividend (which has not yet been paid) equivalent to $0.17 per
share, subject to our outstanding debt obligations and
availability of funds. At the shareholders’ meeting where
such dividend was declared, the shareholders delegated to the
Board of Directors the authority to determine when the dividend
may be paid. No other dividend has been declared since 1997.
Exchange
Rates
We maintain our financial records in Dollars. However, we keep
our tax records in Pesos. We record in our financial records the
Dollar equivalent of the actual Peso charges for taxes at the
time incurred using the prevailing exchange rate. In 2007,
approximately 61% of our net consolidated revenues and 39% of
our operating costs and expenses were generated or incurred in
Dollars. The remainder of our net consolidated revenues and
operating expenses were denominated in Pesos.
The following table sets forth the high, low, average and
period-end noon buying rates for Pesos reported by Banco de
Mexico (the “Noon Buying Rate”) expressed as Pesos per
U.S. dollar for the periods indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rates
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
High(1)
|
|
|
Low(1)
|
|
|
Average(2)
|
|
|
Year(3)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
|
|
11.24
|
|
2004
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
|
|
11.15
|
|
2005
|
|
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
|
|
10.89
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
2006
|
|
|
11.48
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
2007
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
10.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rates
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Monthly,
|
|
High(4)
|
|
|
Low(4)
|
|
|
Average(5)
|
|
|
Month(6)
|
|
|
Year 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
|
10.91
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
February
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
March
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
April
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
May
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
June(7)
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The highest and lowest of the Noon Buying Rates for the Peso per
U.S. dollar reported by Banco de Mexico on the last business day
of each month during the relevant year. |
|
(2) |
|
The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each
month during the relevant year. |
|
(3) |
|
The Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each relevant year. |
|
(4) |
|
The highest and lowest of the Noon Buying Rates of each day in
the relevant month. |
|
(5) |
|
The average of the Noon Buying Rates of each day in the relevant
month. |
|
(6) |
|
The Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each relevant month. |
|
(7) |
|
Through June 13, 2008. |
On June 27, 2008, the Noon Buying Rate was Ps. 10.2841 =
$1.00 (equivalent to Ps. 1.00 = $0.097).
6
Risk
Factors
Risks
Relating to our Indebtedness
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
condition and impair our ability to operate our business, and we
may not be able to pay the interest on and principal amount of
our indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2007, Grupo TMM’s total debt
(excluding the securitization facility) amounted to
$321.0 million, which includes $262.0 million of our
Mexican Peso-Denominated Trust Certificates Program (the
“Trust Certificates Program”) and
$59.0 million of Bank Debt; of this debt,
$17.8 million is short-term debt and $303.2 million is
long-term debt. As of March 31, 2008, Grupo TMM’s
total debt (excluding the securitization facility) amounted to
$384.5 million, which includes $273.5 million of our
Trust Certificates Program and $111.0 million of Bank
Debt; of this debt, $33.6 million is short-term debt and
$350.9 million is long-term debt.
In addition, as of December 31, 2007, Grupo TMM’s
balance due under its securitization facility with Deutsche Bank
AG (the “Securitization Facility”) was
$126.8 million, which includes $130.9 million of
principal amount, $1.2 million of interest and a
transaction cost adjustment of $5.3 million; of this debt,
$13.4 million is short-term debt and $113.4 million is
long term debt. As of March 31, 2008, the balance due under
the Securitization Facility was $124.2 million, which
includes $127.9 million of principal amount,
$1.2 million of interest and a transaction cost adjustment
of $4.9 million; of this debt, $13.9 million is
short-term debt and $110.3 million is long-term debt. Under
IFRS, transaction costs in connection with financings are
required to be accounted for as debt.
We are a highly leveraged company and our level of indebtedness
could have important consequences, including the following:
|
|
•
|
limiting cash flow available for capital expenditures,
acquisitions, working capital and other general corporate
purposes because a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations must be dedicated to servicing debt;
|
|
•
|
increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in economic or
industry conditions;
|
|
•
|
exposing us to risks inherent in interest rate fluctuations
because future borrowings may be at interest rates that are
higher than current rates, which could result in higher interest
expenses;
|
|
•
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
competitive and other changes in our business;
|
|
•
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt and greater operating and
financing flexibility than we do;
|
|
•
|
limiting our ability to engage in activities that may be in our
long term best interest as a result of restrictive covenants
contained in our loan facilities and in our Securitization
Facility; and
|
|
•
|
limiting our ability to borrow additional money to fund our
working capital and capital expenditures or to refinance our
existing indebtedness, or to enable us to fund the acquisitions
contemplated in our business plan.
|
Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon future
operating performance, including the ability to increase
revenues significantly, renew our existing vessel contracts and
control expenses. Future operating performance depends upon
various factors, including prevailing economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory, business and other factors
that are beyond our control.
If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to
service our indebtedness we may default under our various
financing facilities. If we default under any such facility, the
relevant lender or lenders could then take action to foreclose
against any collateral securing the payment of such facility.
Substantially all of our shipping assets have been pledged to
secure our obligations under our Trust Certificates Program
and our various vessel financing facilities. See Item 3.
“Key Information — Selected Financial Data.”
7
Grupo
TMM is primarily a holding company and depends upon funds
received from its operating subsidiaries to make payments on its
indebtedness.
Grupo TMM is primarily a holding company and conducts the
majority of its operations, and holds a substantial portion of
its operating assets, through numerous direct and indirect
subsidiaries. As a result, Grupo TMM relies on income from
dividends and fees related to administrative services provided
to its operating subsidiaries for its operating income,
including the funds necessary to service its indebtedness. In
addition, we have pledged the stock of certain of our
subsidiaries and sales receivables to secure the repayment of
our Securitization Facility.
Under Mexican law, profits of Grupo TMM’s subsidiaries may
only be distributed upon approval by such subsidiaries’
shareholders, and no profits may be distributed by its
subsidiaries to Grupo TMM until all losses incurred in prior
fiscal years have been offset against any sub-account of Grupo
TMM’s capital or net worth account. In addition, at least
5% of profits must be separated to create a reserve (fondo de
reserva) until such reserve is equal to 20% of the aggregate
value of such subsidiary’s capital stock (as calculated
based on the actual nominal subscription price received by such
subsidiary for all issued shares that are outstanding at the
time).
There is no restriction under Mexican law upon Grupo TMM’s
subsidiaries remitting funds to it in the form of loans or
advances in the ordinary course of business, except to the
extent that such loans or advances would result in the
insolvency of its subsidiaries, or for its subsidiaries to pay
to it fees or other amounts for services.
To the extent that Grupo TMM relies on dividends or other
distributions from subsidiaries that it does not wholly own,
Grupo TMM will only be entitled to a pro rata share of the
dividends or other distributions provided by such subsidiaries.
Restrictive
covenants in our financing agreements, including the
Securitization Facility, the Trust Certificates Program and
our ship financings, may restrict our ability to pursue our
business strategies.
Our Securitization Facility and agreements for our ship
financings contain a number of restrictive covenants and any
additional financing arrangements we enter into may contain
additional restrictive covenants. These covenants restrict or
prohibit many actions, including our ability, or that of our
subsidiaries, to, among others:
|
|
•
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
create or suffer to exist liens;
|
|
•
|
make prepayments of particular indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
make certain restricted payments, including the payment of
dividends;
|
|
•
|
make certain investments;
|
|
•
|
engage in certain transactions with shareholders and affiliates;
|
|
•
|
use assets as security in other transactions;
|
|
•
|
issue guarantees;
|
|
•
|
sell assets; and
|
|
•
|
engage in certain mergers and consolidations or in
sale-leaseback transactions.
|
Our Trust Certificate Programs also contains a number of
restrictive covenants. These covenants relate solely to the
vessels, contracts related to such vessels and the restricted
cash under such program. Certificate holders’ only recourse
under the Trust Certificates Program is to the trust assets.
If we fail to comply with these and other restrictive covenants,
our obligation to repay our indebtedness may be accelerated. If
we cannot pay the amounts due on the Securitization Facility,
the Trust Certificates Program or under one or more of our
vessel financing facilities, the relevant lender or lenders
could then take action to foreclose against any collateral
securing the payment of such facility or facilities. Most of our
shipping assets have been pledged to secure our obligations
under our Trust Certificates Program and various vessel
financing facilities.
8
As of December 31, 2006, we did not meet certain financial
ratios contained in our vessel financings, resulting in an event
of default under these facilities, although all of the relevant
lenders waived such default through September 30, 2007. As
of December 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008, we were in
compliance with all of our covenants under these facilities.
We
have to service our peso denominated debt with revenues
generated in dollars, as we do not generate sufficient revenue
in pesos from our operations to service all of our peso
denominated debt. This could adversely affect our ability to
service our debt in the event of a devaluation or depreciation
in the value of the dollar against the Mexican
peso.
As of March 31, 2008, approximately 75% of our debt was
denominated in pesos. This debt, however, must be serviced by
funds generated by our subsidiaries. As of the date of this
Annual Report, we do not generate sufficient revenue in pesos
from our operations to service all of our peso denominated debt.
Consequently, we have to use revenues generated in Dollars to
service our peso denominated debt. A devaluation or depreciation
in the value of the dollar, compared to the Mexican peso, could
adversely affect our ability to service our debt. During 2007,
the Mexican Peso depreciated approximately 0.9% against the
Dollar.
Fluctuations in the Mexican Peso/Dollar exchange rate could lead
to shifts in the types and volumes of Mexican imports and
exports, negatively impacting results on some of our businesses.
Although a decrease in the level of exports may be offset by a
subsequent increase in imports, any offsetting increase might
not occur on a timely basis, if at all. Future developments in
U.S.-Mexican
trade beyond our control may result in a reduction of freight
volumes or in an unfavorable shift in the mix of products and
commodities, we carry.
Risks
Relating to our Business
Uncertainties
relating to our financial condition in our recent past and other
factors raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern and could have resulted in our dissolution
under Mexican Corporate Law.
Under Mexican law, when a company has accumulated losses in
excess of two-thirds of its capital stock, any third party with
legal interest may request the corresponding judicial
authorities to declare the dissolution of the company. In our
audited report for the year ended December 31, 2004, our
independent auditors expressed substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a “going concern.” This
situation no longer existed in 2005 when the Company obtained
enough net income to absorb all accumulated losses. However, in
our audited report for the periods ended December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2007, our independent auditors again
indicated that a substantial doubt exists as to our continuation
as a going concern because we have sustained substantial losses
from continuing operations during the past five years.
Although Grupo TMM reduced its debt and financial expense in a
material way in 2005 and 2006, and improved its income on
transportation, it experienced a net loss in both 2006 and 2007.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our
ability to generate sufficient profits
and/or
obtain necessary funding from outside sources and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to generate such profits or
obtain such funding.
We
have had a history of net losses. If we are unable to maintain
profitability and generate positive cash flow, we may not be
able to continue operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred a net
loss of $66.9 million. For the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, our net income was
$70.4 million and $175.5 million, respectively,
resulting mostly from our sale of Grupo TFM to KCS. See
Item 4. “Information on the Company — Recent
Developments — Disposition of Grupo TMM’s
interest in Grupo TFM to KCS.” If we had not sold Grupo TFM
to KCS, we may have experienced losses in 2005 and 2006. In
addition, during the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, we incurred a net loss of $99.9 and $84.7 million,
respectively. If we are unable to maintain profitability and
generate positive cash flow, we may not be able to continue our
operations.
9
If our
time charter arrangements are terminated or expire, our business
could be adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2007, we had two product tanker vessels
on bareboat charter and six vessels on time charter to PEMEX
Refinación (“PER”), and nineteen offshore supply
vessels on time charter to Pemex Exploración y
Producción (“PEP”). PER and PEP are subsidiaries
of Petroleos Mexicanos, the national oil company of Mexico
(“PEMEX”). In addition, in 2007 we entered into four
offshore supply vessel chartering agreements with private
operators with time periods ranging from one to two years. In
the event that our time charter arrangements are terminated or
expire without being renewed, we will be required to seek new
bareboat or time charter arrangements for these vessels. We
cannot be sure that bareboat or time charters will be available
for the vessels following termination or expiration, or that
bareboat or time charter rates in effect at the time of such
termination or expiration will be comparable to those in effect
under the existing time charters or in the present market. In
the event that bareboat or time charters are not available on
terms acceptable to us, we may use those vessels in the spot
market. Because charter rates in the spot market are subject to
greater fluctuation than longer term bareboat or time charter
rates, any failure to maintain existing, or enter into
comparable, charter arrangements could adversely affect our
operating results.
Our
results from operations are dependent on fuel
expenses.
Our logistics and parcel tanker operations consume significant
amounts of energy and fuel, the cost of which has significantly
increased worldwide in recent years. With respect to our other
operations our customers pay for the fuel consumption. We
currently meet, and expect to continue to meet, our fuel
requirements almost exclusively through purchases at market
prices from PEMEX, a government-owned entity exclusively
responsible for the distribution and sale of diesel fuel,
maritime diesel oil and bunker fuel in Mexico. The price of
diesel fuel used by our trucks is established by the Mexican
Government based on domestic policies and does not necessarily
reflect the increase of prices in international markets; however
if we are unable to acquire diesel fuel from PEMEX on acceptable
terms, our operations could be adversely affected. In addition,
instability caused by imbalances in the worldwide supply and
demand of oil may result in continuing increases in fuel prices.
Our fuel expense represents a significant portion of our
operating expenses in our logistics and parcel tanker
operations, and there may be increases in the price of fuel that
cannot be hedged or transferred to the final user of our
transportation services. We cannot assure you that our
operations would not be materially adversely affected in the
future if prevailing conditions remain for a long period of time
or if energy and fuel costs continue to increase.
Downturns
in the U.S. economy or in trade between the United States and
Mexico would likely have adverse effects on our business and
results of operations.
The level and timing of our business activity is heavily
dependent upon the level of
U.S.-Mexican
trade and the effects of NAFTA on such trade. Downturns in the
U.S. or Mexican economy or in trade between the United
States and Mexico would likely have adverse effects on our
business and results of operations. Our logistics business and
the transportation of products traded between Mexico and the
United States depend on the U.S. and Mexican markets for
these products, the relative position of Mexico and the United
States in these markets at any given time and tariffs or other
barriers to trade. Our revenues were affected by the downturn in
the U.S. economy in 2003. However, the U.S. economy
started to reflect a recovery in the third quarter of 2003, and
showed signs of continued improvement in 2004. In 2005 and 2006,
both U.S. and Mexican economies maintained the improvements
they achieved during 2004, growing at moderate rates;
nevertheless, the U.S. economy experienced a downturn
during 2007 which we expect will affect the Mexican economy in
2008. Any future downturn in the U.S. economy could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
ability to meet our debt service obligations as described above.
We may
be unable to successfully expand our business.
Future growth of our businesses will depend on a number of
factors, including:
|
|
•
|
the continued identification, evaluation and participation in
niche markets;
|
|
•
|
the identification of joint venture opportunities or acquisition
candidates;
|
10
|
|
•
|
our ability to enter into acquisitions on favorable terms;
|
|
•
|
our ability to finance any expansion of our business;
|
|
•
|
our ability to hire and train qualified personnel, and to
maintain our existing managerial base;
|
|
•
|
the successful integration of any acquired businesses with our
existing operations; and
|
|
•
|
our ability to manage expansion effectively and to obtain
required financing.
|
In order to maintain and improve operating results from new
businesses, as well as our existing businesses, we will be
required to manage our growth and expansion effectively.
However, the management of new businesses involves numerous
risks, including difficulties in assimilating the operations and
services of the new businesses, the diversion of
management’s attention from other business concerns and the
disadvantage of entering markets in which we may have no or
limited direct or prior experience. Our failure to effectively
manage our business could preclude our ability to expand our
business and could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations.
Significant
competition could adversely affect our future financial
performance.
Certain of our business segments face significant competition,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. Our international parcel tanker transportation
services, our coastwise product tanker business, and our
offshore vessel services rendered in the Gulf of Mexico have
faced significant competition, mainly from U.S., Mexican and
other international shipping companies acting directly or
through a Mexican intermediary.
In our logistics operations division, our trucking transport and
automotive logistics services have faced intense competition,
including price competition, from a large number of U.S.,
Mexican, and other international trucking lines and logistics
companies. We cannot assure you that we will not lose business
in the future due to our inability to respond to competitive
pressures by decreasing our prices without adversely affecting
our gross margins and operational results.
Downturns
in certain cyclical industries in which our customers operate
could have adverse effects on our results of
operations.
The shipping, transportation and logistics industries are highly
cyclical, generally tracking the cycles of the world economy.
Although transportation markets are affected by general economic
conditions, there are numerous specific factors within each
particular market segment that may influence operating results.
Some of our customers do business in industries that are highly
cyclical, including the oil and gas and automotive sectors. Any
downturn in these sectors could have a material adverse effect
on our operating results. Also, some of the products we
transport have had a historical pattern of price cyclicality,
which has typically been influenced by the general economic
environment and by industry capacity and demand. We cannot
assure you that prices and demand for these products will not
decline in the future, adversely affecting those industries and,
in turn, our financial results.
Grupo
TMM is a party to a number of arrangements with other parties as
joint investors in non-wholly owned subsidiaries.
Grupo TMM is a party to a number of arrangements with other
parties under which it and such parties have jointly invested in
non-wholly owned subsidiaries, and Grupo TMM may enter into
other similar arrangements in the future. Grupo TMM’s
partners in these non-wholly owned subsidiaries may at any time
have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are
inconsistent with our interests or those of the entity in which
they have invested with us. Any of these partners may also be
unable to meet their economic or other obligations to the
non-wholly-owned subsidiaries, and Grupo TMM may be required to
fulfill those obligations. Furthermore, any dividends that are
distributed from subsidiaries that Grupo TMM does not wholly own
would be shared pro rata with its partners according to their
relative ownership interests. For these or any other reasons,
disagreements or disputes with partners with whom Grupo TMM has
a strategic alliance or relationship could impair or adversely
affect its ability to conduct its business and to receive
distributions from, and return on its investments in, those
subsidiaries.
11
Over
time, vessel values may fluctuate substantially and, if these
values are lower at a time when we are attempting to dispose of
a vessel, we may incur a loss.
Vessel values can fluctuate substantially over time due to a
number of different factors, including:
|
|
•
|
prevailing economic conditions in the market;
|
|
•
|
a substantial or extended decline in world trade;
|
|
•
|
increases in the supply of vessel capacity;
|
|
•
|
prevailing charter rates; and
|
|
•
|
the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships, as a
result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment,
changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or
standards, or otherwise.
|
In the future, if the market values of our vessels deteriorate
significantly, we may be required to record an impairment charge
in our financial statements, which could adversely affect our
results of operations. If a charter terminates, we may be unable
to re-charter the vessel at an acceptable rate and, rather than
continue to incur costs to maintain and finance the vessel, may
seek to dispose of it. Our inability to dispose of the vessels
at a reasonable price could result in a loss on its sale and
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Our
growth depends upon continued growth and demand for the liquid
bulk and offshore vessel industries which may have been at or
near the peak of its upward trend and charter hire rates have
already been at or near historical highs. These factors may lead
to reductions and volatility in charter hire rates and
profitability.
The liquid bulk and offshore vessel industries are both cyclical
and volatile in terms of charter hire rates and profitability.
In the future, charter rates and demand for our vessels may
fluctuate as a result of changes in the size of and geographic
location of supply and demand for oil and related products, as
well as changes in maritime regulations. These and other factors
affecting the supply and demand for liquid bulk, offshore and
vessels in general are outside of our control, and the nature,
timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are
unpredictable.
The factors that influence demand for our vessels’ capacity
include:
|
|
•
|
supply and demand for products suitable for shipping by our
vessels;
|
|
•
|
changes in global production of products transported by our
vessels;
|
|
•
|
the distance cargo products are to be moved by sea;
|
|
•
|
the globalization of manufacturing;
|
|
•
|
global and regional economic and political conditions;
|
|
•
|
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including
changes in the distances over which cargoes are transported;
|
|
•
|
environmental and other regulatory developments;
|
|
•
|
currency exchange rates; and
|
|
•
|
weather.
|
The factors that influence the supply of our vessels’
capacity include:
|
|
•
|
the number of newbuilding deliveries;
|
|
•
|
the scrapping rate of older vessels similar to our vessels;
|
|
•
|
the price of steel and other raw materials;
|
|
•
|
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit
the useful life of vessels;
|
12
|
|
•
|
the number of vessels that are out of service; and
|
|
•
|
port congestion.
|
Our ability to re-charter our vessels upon the expiration or
termination of their current charters and the charter rates
payable under any renewal or replacement charters will depend
upon, among other things, the prevailing state of the charter
market for our vessels. If the charter market is depressed when
our vessels’ charters expire, we may be forced to
re-charter our vessels at reduced rates or even possibly a rate
whereby we incur a loss, which may reduce our earnings or make
our earnings volatile. The same issues will exist if we acquire
additional vessels and attempt to obtain multi-year time charter
arrangements as part of our acquisition and financing plan.
Our
growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with
existing charterers and to obtain new charterers, for which we
will face substantial competition.
One of our principal objectives is to acquire additional vessels
in conjunction with entering into additional multi-year,
fixed-rate time charters for these ships. The process of
obtaining new multi-year time charters is highly competitive and
generally involves an intensive screening process and
competitive bids, and often extends for several months. Shipping
charters are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to
the vessel operator, including:
|
|
•
|
shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer
service and safety;
|
|
•
|
shipping experience and quality of ship operations (including
cost effectiveness);
|
|
•
|
quality and experience of seafaring crew;
|
|
•
|
the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and
financial stability in general;
|
|
•
|
relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable
berths;
|
|
•
|
relationships with ship owners and the ability to obtain
suitable second-hand vessels;
|
|
•
|
construction management experience, including the ability to
obtain on-time delivery of new ships according to customer
specifications;
|
|
•
|
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter,
such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure
events, among others; and
|
|
•
|
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.
|
We expect substantial competition from a number of experienced
companies, including state-sponsored entities and major shipping
companies. Some of these competitors have significantly greater
financial resources than we do, and can therefore operate larger
fleets and may be able to offer better charter rates. We
anticipate that an increasing number of marine transportation
companies will enter the sector, including many with strong
reputations and extensive resources and experience. This
increased competition may cause greater price competition for
time charters. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to
expand our relationships with existing customers or to obtain
new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which would have
a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our
stockholders.
The
aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in
the future, which could adversely affect our
earnings.
In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating
condition increases with the age of the vessel. As our fleet
ages, we will incur increased costs. Older vessels are typically
less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more
recently constructed vessels. Cargo insurance rates also
increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less
desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations and safety or
other equipment standards related to the age of a vessel may
also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new
equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities
in which our vessels may engage. Although our current fleet of
45 vessels had an average age (weighted by Dead Weight
Tonnage, or DWT) of approximately 15.4 years as of
13
April 31, 2008, we cannot assure you that, as our vessels
age, market conditions will justify such expenditures or will
enable us to profitably operate our vessels during the remainder
of their expected useful lives.
Our
results of operations may be adversely affected by operational
risks inherent in the transportation and logistics
industry.
The operation of supply vessels, trucks and other machinery
relating to the shipping and cargo business involves an inherent
risk of catastrophic marine or land disaster, mechanical
failure, collisions, property losses to vessels or trucks,
piracy, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to
political actions in Mexico and in foreign countries. In
addition, the operation of any oceangoing vessel is subject to
the inherent possibility of catastrophic marine disasters,
including oil spills and other environmental accidents, and the
liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in
international trade. Any such event may result in a reduction of
revenues or increased costs. The Company’s vessels and
trucking equipment are insured for their estimated value against
damage or loss, including war, terrorism acts, and pollution
risks and we also carry other insurance customary in the
industry.
We maintain insurance to cover the risk of partial or total loss
of or damage to all of our assets, including, but not limited
to, seagoing vessels, port facilities, port equipment, trucks,
land facilities and offices. In particular, we maintain marine
hull and machinery and war risk insurance on our vessels, which
covers the risk of actual or constructive total loss.
Additionally, we have protection and indemnity insurance for
damage caused by our operations to third persons. With certain
exceptions, we do not carry insurance covering the loss of
revenue resulting from a downturn in our operations or resulting
from vessel off-hire time on certain vessels. In certain
instances, and depending on the ratio of insurance claims to
insurance premiums paid, we may choose to self-insure our
over-the-road equipment following prudent guidelines. We cannot
assure you that our insurance would be sufficient to cover the
cost of damages suffered by us or damages to others, that any
particular claim will be paid or that such insurance will
continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates in the
future.
Additionally, some shipping and related activities decrease
substantially during periods of bad weather. Such adverse
weather conditions can adversely affect our results of
operations and profitability if they occur with unusual
intensity, during abnormal periods, or last longer than usual in
our major markets, especially during peak shipping periods.
Our
operations are subject to extensive environmental and safety
laws and regulations and we may incur costs that have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition as a result of our
liabilities under or potential violations of environmental and
safety laws and regulations.
Our operations are subject to general Mexican federal and state
laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. The Procuraduría Federal de Protección
al Ambiente (Mexican Attorney General for Environmental
Protection) is empowered to bring administrative and criminal
proceedings and impose corrective actions and economic sanctions
against companies that violate environmental laws, and
temporarily or permanently close non-complying facilities. The
Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales
(Mexican Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural
Resources) (“SEMARNAT”) and other ministries have
promulgated compliance standards for, among other things, water
discharge, water supply, air emissions, noise pollution,
hazardous substances transportation and handling, and hazardous
and solid waste generation. Under the environmental laws, the
Mexican Government has implemented a program to protect the
environment by promulgating rules concerning water, land, air
and noise discharges or pollution, and the transportation and
handling of wastes and hazardous substances.
We are also subject to the laws of various jurisdictions and
international conferences with respect to the discharge of
hazardous materials, wastes and pollutants into the environment.
While we maintain insurance against certain of these
environmental risks in an amount which we believe is consistent
with amounts customarily obtained in accordance with industry
norms, we cannot assure you that our insurance will be
sufficient to cover damages suffered by us or that insurance
coverage will always be available for these possible damages.
Furthermore, such insurance typically excludes coverage for
fines and penalties that may be levied for non-compliance with
environmental laws and regulations.
14
We anticipate that the regulation of our business operations
under federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations will increase and become more stringent over time.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that the adoption of
additional or more stringent environmental laws and regulations
would have on our results of operations, cash flows, capital
expenditure requirements or financial condition.
Our international parcel transportation services rendered in the
Gulf of Mexico and our coastwise product tanker business
rendered in both the Gulf of Mexico and in the Pacific Ocean
provide services to transport petrochemical products and refined
clean and dirty petroleum products respectively. See
Item 4. “Information on the Company —
Business Overview — Maritime Operations.” Under
the United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA” or
“OPA 90”), responsible parties, including ship-owners
and operators, are subject to various requirements and could be
exposed to substantial liability, and in some cases unlimited
liability, for removal costs and damages, including natural
resource damages and a variety of other public and private
damages, resulting from the discharge of oil, petroleum or
related substances into the waters of the U.S. In some
jurisdictions, including the U.S., claims for spill
clean-up or
removal costs and damages would enable claimants to immediately
seize the ships of the owning and operating company and sell
them in satisfaction of a final judgment. The existence of
comparable statutes enacted by individual states of the U.S.,
but requiring different measures of compliance and liability,
creates the potential for similar claims being brought in the
U.S. under state law. In addition, several other countries
have adopted international conventions that impose liability for
the discharge of pollutants similar to OPA. If a spill were to
occur in the course of operation of one of our vessels carrying
petroleum products, and such spill affected the waters of the
United States or another country that had enacted legislation
similar to OPA, we could be exposed to substantial or unlimited
liability. Additionally, our vessels carry bunkers (ship fuel)
and certain goods that, if spilled, under certain conditions,
could cause pollution and result in substantial claims against
us, including claims under international laws and conventions,
OPA and other U.S. federal, state and local laws. Further,
under OPA and similar international laws and conventions, we are
required to satisfy insurance and financial responsibility
requirements for potential oil spills and other pollution
incidents. Penalties for failure to maintain the financial
responsibility requirements can be significant and can include
the seizure of the vessel.
Our vessels must also meet stringent operational, maintenance
and structural requirements, and they are subject to rigorous
inspections by governmental authorities such as the
U.S. Coast Guard for those vessels, which operate within
USA territorial waters. Non-compliance with these regulations
could give rise to substantial fines and penalties.
We could have liability with respect to contamination at our
former U.S. facilities or third-party facilities in the
U.S. where we have sent hazardous substances or wastes
under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or
“Superfund”) and comparable state laws (known as state
Superfund laws). CERCLA and the state Superfund laws impose
joint and several liability for the cost of investigation and
remediation, natural resources damages, certain health studies
and related costs, without regard to fault or the legality of
the original conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect
to the release into the environment of certain substances. These
persons, commonly called “potentially responsible
parties” or “PRPs” include the current and
certain prior owners or operators of and persons that arranged
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at sites
where a release has occurred or could occur. In addition, other
potentially responsible parties, adjacent landowners or other
third parties may initiate cost recovery actions or toxic tort
litigation against PRPs under CERCLA or state Superfund law or
state common law.
The U.S. Clean Water Act imposes restrictions and strict
controls regarding the discharge of wastes into the waters of
the United States. The Clean Water Act and comparable state laws
provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for
unauthorized discharges of pollutants. In the event of an
unauthorized discharge of wastes or pollutants into waters of
the United States, we may be liable for penalties and could be
subject to injunctive relief.
Potential
labor disruptions could adversely affect our financial condition
and our ability to meet our obligations under our financing
arrangements.
As of March 31, 2008, we had 7,128 employees,
approximately 78% of whom were unionized. The compensation terms
of the labor agreement with these employees are subject to
renegotiation on an annual basis
15
and all other terms are renegotiated every two years. If we are
not able to negotiate these provisions favorably, strikes,
boycotts or other disruptions could occur, and these potential
disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations and on our ability
to meet our payment obligations under our financing arrangements.
Continuing
world tensions, including as the result of wars, other armed
conflicts and terrorist attacks could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Continuing world tensions, including those relating to the
Middle East and North Korea, as well as terrorist attacks in
various locations and related unrest, have increased worldwide
political and economic instability and depressed economic
activity in the U.S. and globally, including the Mexican
economy. The continuation or escalation of existing armed
hostilities or the outbreak of additional hostilities as a
consequence of further acts of terrorism or otherwise could
cause a further downturn
and/or
significant disruption to the economies of the U.S., Mexico and
other countries. The continued threat of terrorism within the
United States and abroad and the potential for military action
and heightened security measures in response to such threat may
cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world,
including restrictions on cross-border transport and trade.
Our
customers may take actions that may reduce our
revenues.
If our customers believe that our financial condition will
result in a lower quality of service, they may discontinue use
of our services. Additionally, some customers may demand lower
prices. While we have contracts with some of our customers that
prevent them from terminating our services or which impose
penalties on customers who terminate our services, it may be
impractical or uneconomical to enforce these agreements in
Mexican courts. If any of these events occurs, our revenues will
be reduced.
Our
financial statements may not give you the same information as
financial statements prepared under United States accounting
rules.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS.
IFRS differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP
including, among others, the classification of minority interest
and employees’ profit sharing, the accounting treatment for
capitalized interest, consolidation of subsidiaries, and
acquisition of shares of subsidiaries from minority stockholders
and the computation of deferred taxes. For this and other
reasons, the presentation of financial statements and reported
earnings prepared in accordance with IFRS may differ materially
from the presentation of financial statements and reported
earnings prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Risks
Relating to Mexico
Economic,
political and social conditions may adversely affect our
business.
Our financial performance may be significantly affected by
general economic, political and social conditions in the markets
where we operate. Most of our operations and assets are located
in Mexico. As a result, our financial condition, results of
operations and business may be affected by the general condition
of the Mexican economy, the devaluation of the Peso as compared
to the U.S. Dollar, Mexican inflation, interest rates,
regulation, taxation, social instability and political, social
and economic developments in Mexico. Many countries in Latin
America, including Mexico, have suffered significant economic,
political and social crises in the past, and these events may
occur again in the future. Instability in the region has been
caused by many different factors, including:
|
|
•
|
significant governmental influence over local economies;
|
|
•
|
substantial fluctuations in economic growth;
|
|
•
|
high levels of inflation;
|
|
•
|
changes in currency values;
|
|
•
|
exchange controls or restrictions on expatriation of earnings;
|
|
•
|
high domestic interest rates;
|
16
|
|
•
|
wage and price controls;
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental economic or tax policies;
|
|
•
|
imposition of trade barriers;
|
|
•
|
unexpected changes in regulation; and
|
|
•
|
overall political, social and economic instability.
|
Mexico
is an emerging market economy, with attendant risks to our
results of operations and financial condition.
Mexico has historically experienced uneven periods of economic
growth. Mexico’s gross domestic product (“GDP”)
increased 1.4%, 4.2%, 2.8%, 4.8% and 3.3% in 2003, 2004, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively. GDP growth was slightly higher than
the Mexico Consensus
Board(1)
estimated for 2007; however, the Mexico Consensus Board
estimates that GDP in Mexico is expected to fall by
approximately 2.6% in 2008, while inflation is expected to be
less than 4.0%. We cannot assure you that these estimates will
prove to be accurate. The Mexican Government has exercised, and
continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican
economy. Accordingly, Mexican governmental actions concerning
the economy and state-owned enterprises could have a significant
impact on Mexican private sector entities in general and on us
in particular, as well as on market conditions, prices and
returns on Mexican securities, including our
securities.
Currency
fluctuations or the devaluation and depreciation of the Peso
could limit the ability of the Company and others to convert
Pesos into U.S. Dollars or other currencies which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Severe devaluation or depreciation of the Peso may also result
in governmental intervention, as has resulted in Argentina, or
disruption of international foreign exchange markets. This may
limit our ability to transfer or convert Pesos into
U.S. Dollars and other currencies for the purpose of making
timely payments of interest and principal on our dollar
denominated indebtedness and adversely affect our ability to
obtain foreign currency and other imported goods. The Mexican
economy has suffered current account balance of payment deficits
and shortages of foreign exchange reserves in the past. While
the Mexican Government does not currently restrict, and for more
than ten years has not restricted, the right or ability of
Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert Pesos into
U.S. Dollars or to transfer other currencies outside of
Mexico, the Mexican Government could institute restrictive
exchange control policies in the future. To the extent that the
Mexican Government institutes restrictive exchange control
policies in the future, our ability to transfer or convert Pesos
into U.S. Dollars for the purpose of making timely payments
of interest and principal on indebtedness would be adversely
affected. Devaluation or depreciation of the Peso against the
U.S. Dollar may also adversely affect U.S. Dollar
prices for our debt securities.
Pursuant to the provisions of NAFTA, if Mexico experiences
serious balance of payment difficulties or the threat thereof in
the future, Mexico would have the right to impose foreign
exchange controls on investments made in Mexico, including those
made by U.S. and Canadian investors. Any restrictive
exchange control policy could adversely affect our ability to
obtain dollars or to convert Pesos into dollars for purposes of
making interest and principal payments to our creditors to the
extent that we may have to make those conversions. This could
have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
High
interest rates in Mexico could increase our financing
costs.
Mexico historically has had, and may continue to have, high real
and nominal interest rates. The interest rates on
28-day
Mexican government treasury securities averaged 6.23%, 6.82% and
9.20%, in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. For the years 2006
and 2007 the interest rate on
28-day
Mexican government treasury securities averaged 7.19% and for
the five-month period ended May 31, 2008, it averaged
7.43%. Accordingly, if we have to incur Peso-denominated debt in
the future, it will likely be at higher interest rates.
(1) The
Mexico Consensus Board is formed by six internationally
recognized firms (American Chamber Mexico, Banamex, UTEP Border
Region, Wells Fargo, Center for Economic Forecasting and Latin
Source Mexico).
17
A total of $260.8 million of our debt represented by our
Trust Certificates Program was incurred in Mexican Pesos at
the Mexican interbank rate, TIIE, plus 2.25%, although the
Company has hedged the risk at a maximum rate of 11.5% for the
next three years. As of December 31, 2007, the 91 day
TIIE rate was 7.99% and as of March 31, 2008 and
May 31, 2008 such rate was 7.94%. At June 19, 2008,
the rate was 8.06%.
Developments
in other emerging market countries or in the U.S. may affect us
and the prices of our securities.
The market value of securities of Mexican companies, the
economic and political situation in Mexico and our financial
condition and results of operations are, to varying degrees,
affected by economic and market conditions in other emerging
market countries and in the U.S. Although economic
conditions in other emerging market countries and in the
U.S. may differ significantly from economic conditions in
Mexico, investors’ reactions to developments in any of
these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market
value or trading price of securities of Mexican issuers,
including our securities, or on our business.
Our operations, including demand for our products or services
and the price of our debt securities, have also historically
been adversely affected by increases in interest rates in the
U.S. and elsewhere. Particularly, U.S. interest rates
reached their highest levels for the past three years during
2007. Although the Federal Reserve Bank implemented
“measured” decreases in 2008, as interest rates rise
the interest payments on our floating rate debt and the cost of
refinancing our financing arrangements at maturity will rise as
well.
Mexico
may experience high levels of inflation in the future, which
could adversely affect our results of operations.
Mexico has a history of high levels of inflation, and may
experience inflation in the future. During most of the 1980s and
during the mid- and late 1990s, Mexico experienced periods of
high levels of inflation. The annual inflation rates for the
last five years, as measured by changes in the National Consumer
Price Index, as provided by Banco de México, were:
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
2008 (five months ended May 31)
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
Mexico’s current level of inflation has been reported at
higher levels than the annual inflation rate of the
U.S. and Canada. The U.S. and Canada are Mexico’s
main trading partners. We cannot give any assurance that the
Mexican inflation rate will decrease, increase or maintain its
current level for any significant period of time. A substantial
increase in the Mexican inflation rate as currently in effect
would have the effect of increasing some of our costs, which
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations, as well as our ability to service our debt
obligations. High levels of inflation may also affect the
balance of trade between Mexico and the United States, and other
countries, which could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Political
events in Mexico could affect Mexican economic policy and our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The social and political situation in Mexico, including the
heightened tension resulting from the closely contested 2006
presidential election and presidential succession, could
adversely affect the Mexican economy, including the stability of
its currency, which in turn could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations,
as well as market conditions and prices for our securities.
Since February 2008, statistics indicate that Mexico’s
daily production has fallen by more than 500,000 barrels
per day and could fall by another 50% in the coming years.
Currently 40% of the total amount of gasoline used for
Mexico’s domestic consumption is imported.
18
The Mexican Senate is currently considering certain oil reform
programs, which programs are being opposed by the Democratic
Revolution Party. Specialists have concluded that if investments
not are made to further Pemex’s technological capabilities,
its oil production could decline considerably, which could
weaken the financial position of the Mexican government.
Although there have not yet been any material adverse
repercussions resulting from political changes and the recent
elections, multi-party rule is still relatively new in Mexico
and could result in economic or political conditions that could
have a negative impact on the Mexican economy that would
materially and adversely affect our operations. Finally, the
Mexican economy in the past has suffered balance of payment
deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves.
Mexican
antitrust laws may limit our ability to expand through
acquisitions or joint ventures.
Mexico’s federal antitrust laws and regulations may affect
some of our activities, including our ability to introduce new
products and services, enter into new or complementary
businesses or joint ventures and complete acquisitions. In
addition, the federal antitrust laws and regulations may
adversely affect our ability to determine the rates we charge
for our services and products. Approval of the Comisión
Federal de Competencia, or Mexican Antitrust Commission, is
required for us to acquire and sell significant businesses or
enter into significant joint ventures and we cannot assure you
that we would be able to obtain such approval.
Investors
may not be able to enforce judgments against the
Company.
Investors may be unable to enforce judgments against us. We are
a stock corporation, organized under the laws of Mexico.
Substantially all our directors and officers reside in Mexico,
and all or a significant portion of the assets of those persons
may be located outside the United States. It may not be possible
for investors to effect service of process within the United
States upon those persons or to enforce judgments against them
or against us in U.S. courts, including judgments
predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
U.S. federal securities laws. Additionally, it may not be
possible to enforce, in original actions in Mexican courts,
liabilities predicated solely on the U.S. federal
securities laws and it may not be possible to enforce, in
Mexican courts, judgments of U.S. courts obtained in
actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
U.S. securities laws.
Risks
Relating to Ownership of our Equity
The
protection afforded to minority shareholders in Mexico is
different from that afforded to minority shareholders in the
United States.
Under Mexican law, the protections afforded to minority
shareholders are different from, and may be less than, those
afforded to minority shareholders in the United States. Under
Mexican law, there is no procedure for class actions as such
actions are conducted in the United States and there are
different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder
lawsuits against companies. Therefore, it may be more difficult
for minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us,
our directors or our controlling shareholders than it would be
for minority shareholders of a United States company.
The
Company is controlled by the Serrano Segovia
family.
Members of the Serrano Segovia family control the Company
through their direct and indirect ownership of our Shares.
Holders of our ADSs may not vote at our shareholders meetings.
Each of our ADSs represents one CPO. Holders of CPOs are not
entitled to exercise any voting rights with respect to the
Shares held in the CPO Trust. Such voting rights are exercisable
only by the trustee, which is required by the terms of the trust
agreement to vote such Shares in the same manner as the majority
of the Shares that are not held in the CPO Trust that are voted
at any shareholders’ meeting. Currently the Serrano Segovia
Family owns a majority of the Shares that are not held in the
CPO Trust. As a result, the Serrano Segovia family will be able
to direct and control the policies of the Company and its
subsidiaries, including mergers, sales of assets and similar
transactions. See Item 7. “Major Shareholders and
Related Party Transactions — Major Shareholders.”
19
A
change in control may adversely affect us.
A substantial portion of the Shares and ADSs of the Company held
by the Serrano Segovia family is currently pledged to secure
indebtedness of the Serrano Segovia family and entities
controlled by them and may from time to time in the future be
pledged to secure obligations of other of their affiliates. A
foreclosure upon any such Shares held by the Serrano Segovia
family could result in a change of control under the various
debt instruments of the Company and its subsidiaries. Such debt
instruments provide that certain change of control events with
respect to us will constitute a default and that the relevant
lenders may require us to prepay our debt obligations including
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of such
repayment. If such a default occurs, we cannot assure you that
we will have enough funds to repay our debt.
Holders
of ADSs may not be entitled to participate in any future
preemptive rights offering, which may result in a dilution of
such holders equity interest in our company.
Under Mexican law, if we issue new shares for cash as a part of
a capital increase, we generally must grant our stockholders the
right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain
their existing ownership percentage in our company. Rights to
purchase shares in these circumstances are commonly referred to
as preemptive rights. We may not be legally permitted to allow
holders of ADSs in the United States to exercise preemptive
rights in any future capital increase unless (1) we file a
registration statement with the SEC with respect to that future
issuance of shares or (2) the offering qualifies for an
exemption from the registration requirements of the
U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At the time of any
future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and
potential liabilities associated with filing a registration
statement with the SEC, as well as the benefits of preemptive
rights to holders of ADSs in the United States and any other
factors that we consider important in determining whether to
file a registration statement.
If we do not file a registration statement with the SEC to allow
holders of ADSs in the United States to participate in a
preemptive rights offering or if there is not an exemption from
the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act of
1933 available, the equity interests of holders of ADSs would be
diluted to the extent that ADS holders cannot participate in a
preemptive rights offering.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION
ON THE COMPANY
|
History
and Development of the Company
We were formed on August 14, 1987, under the laws of Mexico
as a variable capital corporation (sociedad anonima de
capital variable) to serve as a holding company for
investments by certain members of the Serrano Segovia family.
TMM merged with and into Grupo TMM (formerly Grupo Servia, S.A.
de C.V. (“Grupo Servia”)), which was effected on
December 26, 2001, leaving Grupo TMM as the surviving
entity. Under the terms of the merger, all of the assets,
privileges and rights and all of the liabilities of TMM were
transferred to Grupo TMM upon the effectiveness of the merger.
TMM was founded on September 18, 1958, by a group of
private investors, including the Serrano Segovia family.
In December 2001, the boards of directors of TMM and Grupo TMM
unanimously approved a corporate reorganization and merger in
which TMM was merged with and into Grupo TMM. After the merger,
each shareholder of TMM continued to own the same relative
economic interest in Grupo TMM as the shareholder owned in TMM
prior to the merger. In preparation for the merger, the
shareholders of Grupo TMM approved the division
(escisión) of Grupo TMM into two companies, Grupo
TMM and a newly formed corporation, Promotora Servia, S.A. de
C.V. (“Promotora Servia”). Under the terms of the
escisión, Grupo TMM transferred all of its assets,
rights and privileges (other than its interest in TMM) and all
of its liabilities to Promotora Servia. The transfer of assets
to Promotora Servia was made without recourse and without
representation or warranty of any kind, and all of Grupo
TMM’s creditors expressly and irrevocably consented to the
transfer of the liabilities to Promotora Servia.
On September 13, 2002, we completed a reclassification of
our Series L Shares of stock as shares. The
reclassification combined our two classes of stock into a single
class by converting each share of our Series L Shares into
one share of our shares. The reclassification also eliminated
the variable portion of our capital stock and we
20
became a fixed capital corporation (sociedad anonima).
Following the reclassification, we had 56,963,137 Shares
outstanding. As a result of the elimination of the variable
portion of our capital stock, our registered name changed from
Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V. to Grupo TMM, S.A.
As a result of the promulgation of the new securities law in
México in June 2006, publicly traded companies in Mexico
were transformed by operation of law into Sociedades
Anónimas Bursátiles (Public Issuing Corporation)
and were required to amend their by laws to conform them to the
provisions of the new law. Accordingly, on December 20,
2006 the Company added the term “Bursátil” to its
registered name to comply with the requirements under
Mexico’s new securities law, or Ley del Mercado de
Valores. As a result, the Company is known as Grupo TMM,
Sociedad Anónima Bursátil, or Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
In addition, the Series A Shares of the Company were
renamed as nominative common shares without par value. The
rights afforded by the new Shares are identical to the rights
afforded by the former Series A Shares.
Today, we are a fixed capital corporation listed on the Mexican
Stock Exchange (Bolsa Mexicana de Valores) incorporated
under the Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles for a
term of 99 years. We are headquartered at Avenida de la
Cúspide, No. 4755, Colonia Parques del Pedregal, 14010
Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, and our telephone number is
+52-55-5629-8866. Our agent for service of process in the United
States is CT Corporation, located at 111 Eighth Avenue, New
York, New York 10011 and its telephone number is
(212) 894-8700.
Grupo TMM’s Internet website address is www.grupotmm.com.
The information on Grupo TMM’s website is not incorporated
into this Annual Report.
Business
Overview
General
We believe we are one of the largest integrated logistics and
transportation companies in Mexico providing specialized
maritime services and integrated logistics services, including
trucking services and ports and terminals management services,
to premium clients throughout Mexico. Our goal is to provide
full intermodal logistics and “door-to-door” services
to our customers by being a source of trucking, port and ship
services for clients transporting goods across land and water in
the NAFTA corridor.
Maritime Operations. Our Maritime Operations
division provides maritime transportation services, including
offshore vessels that provide transportation and other services
to the Mexican offshore oil industry, tankers that transport
petroleum products within Mexican waters, parcel tankers that
transport liquid chemical and vegetable oil cargos from and to
the U.S. and Mexico, and tugboats that provide towing
services at the port of Manzanillo, Mexico. We provide these
services through our fleet of 45 vessels, which includes
product and chemical tankers, harbor tugs and a variety of
offshore supply vessels.
Ports and Terminals Operations. We presently
operate two Mexican port facilities, Tuxpan and Acapulco, under
concessions granted by the Mexican Government, which provide for
certain renewal rights. This business unit also provides port
agent services to vessel owners and operators in the main
Mexican ports.
Logistics Operations. We provide dedicated
trucking services to major manufacturers, including automobile
plants, and retailers with facilities and operations throughout
Mexico. We offer full-service logistical facilities in major
industrial cities and railroad hubs throughout Mexico, including
Aguascalientes, Toluca, Puebla, Veracruz, Nuevo Laredo,
Cuernavaca, Mexico City, Monterrey, Manzanillo, Ensenada, and
Altamira. The services we provide include consulting, analytical
and logistics outsourcing, which encompass the management of
inbound movement of parts to manufacturing plants consistent
with
just-in-time
inventory planning practices; logistics network (order-cycle)
analysis; logistics information process design; trucking,
intermodal transport and auto haulage services; warehousing and
bonded warehousing facility management; supply chain and
logistics management; product handling and repackaging; local
pre-assembly; maintenance and repair of containers in principal
Mexican ports and cities and inbound and outbound distribution
using truck transport.
21
Set forth below are our total revenues over the last 3 fiscal
years for each of our business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Transportation Revenues
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
$
|
179.2
|
|
|
$
|
146.4
|
|
|
$
|
159.6
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
108.4
|
|
Intercompany Revenues*
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
303.3
|
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
$
|
306.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents the elimination of intercompany transactions between
segments. |
All of these revenues are earned in Mexico except for a portion
of revenues from our Chemical Tankers and Product Tankers.
Recent
Developments
Extension
of Tugboat Services Concession in Manzanillo
In 2006, we obtained an eight-year extension from the relevant
authorities to continue to provide tugboat services at the port
of Manzanillo, Colima from January 1, 2007 until
January 27, 2015.
In 2007, we obtained a 10 year authorization from the
relevant authorities to provide tugboat services of LPG Vessels
to Z Gas del Pacifico, S.A. de C.V. terminal in Manzanillo.
Mexican
Peso-Denominated Trust Certificates Program
On April 30, 2007, at the shareholders’ meeting of the
Company, our shareholders authorized the establishment of a
program for the issuance of trust certificates, which are
securities secured solely by the trust assets and denominated in
Mexican Pesos, for up to an amount of nine billion Pesos. The
proceeds from the sale of these certificates will be utilized by
us to refinance our existing bank financings of our vessel fleet
and to acquire additional vessels as contemplated by our
expansion program. A portion of the cash proceeds from the
issuance of the trust certificates is required to be held by the
trust as restricted cash. The trust assets are comprised of the
vessels contributed to the trust, the contracts related thereto
and the restricted cash thereunder. Certificate holders’
only recourse under the Trust Certificates Program is to
the trust assets.
We closed our first and second issuances of trust certificates
under the program on July 19, 2007 and April 30, 2008
in an amount of 3 billion Pesos and 1.55 billion
Pesos, respectively. Our first issuance was used primarily to
refinance existing vessel indebtedness. Our second issuance will
mainly be used to finance the acquisition of five new and used
vessels for an approximate aggregate amount of
$111.4 million. The Company expects to use the third
issuance, worth an estimated 4.4 billion pesos, to acquire
10 additional new vessels for an approximate aggregate amount of
$348 million.
The total program amount of trust certificates will be issued in
separate tranches, secured by a lien on identified vessels
refinanced or purchased with each tranche.
Purchase
of Two Tugboats
On February 12, 2007, we entered into an agreement for the
purchase of two newbuilding tugboats with Med Yilmaz
Shipyard in Turkey for an aggregate purchase price of
$14 million. In January 2008 we entered into a line of
credit with Natixis Populaires to finance 85% of the total
purchase price for the acquisition of these tugboats. On
March 20, 2008 both vessels commenced operations in our
tugboat services division in the Port of Manzanillo, Mexico.
22
Vessels
Purchased through our Trust Certificates
Program.
PSV Isla Monserrat. On October 27, 2007,
we entered into an agreement for the purchase from DESS PSV Ltd
of a Platform Supply Vessel (“PSV”) Isla Monserrat
(which was built in 2007 and has an average Brake Horse Power
(“BHP”) of 5,400). This PSV was delivered to TMM in
January 2008 and is currently operating in the Gulf of Mexico.
The purchase of this vessel was financed by the second tranche
of our Trust Certificates Program.
AHTS Sea Wolverine. On April 3, 2008, we
entered into an agreement for the purchase from DESS Ciprus Ltd
of an Anchor Handling Tug Supply vessels (“AHTS”) Sea
Wolverine (which was built in 2008 and has an average BHP of
6,500),. This AHTS was delivered in June 2008. We intend to add
this AHTS to our offshore fleet in the Gulf of Mexico. The
purchase of this vessel was financed by the second tranche of
our Trust Certificates Program.
Two AHTS. On April 3, 2007, we entered
into an agreement for the purchase from Rising Flag Worldwide
Ltd of two AHTS (which are expected to be built during 2008 and
2009, respectively, and to have an average BHP of 6,800). These
AHTS are expected to be delivered in June 2008 and February
2009, respectively, and we intend to add these vessels to our
offshore fleet in the Gulf of Mexico. The purchase of these
vessels was financed by the second tranche of our
Trust Certificates Program.
Three Mini PSV. On March 7, 2007, we
entered into an agreement for the purchase from Adriatic Marine
LLC of three mini PSV. These mini PSV are expected to be
delivered in July 2008, February 2009 and October 2009,
respectively. We intend to add these vessels to our offshore
fleet in the Gulf of Mexico. The purchase of one of the vessels
was financed by the second tranche of the
Trust Certificates Program and we expect to finance the
acquisition of the other two vessels through the third tranche
of our Trust Certificates Program.
Two FSIV. On November 21, 2007, we
entered into an agreement for the construction by Horizon
Shipbuilding of two Fast Support Intervention Vessels
(“FSIV”). These FSIV are expected to be delivered in
June and September 2009, respectively. We intend to add these
vessels to our offshore fleet in the Gulf of Mexico. We expect
to finance both of these acquisitions through the third tranche
of our Trust Certificates Program.
Purchase
of Auto Haulage Business Assets
On July 19, 2007, we purchased certain auto haulage
operating assets from Auto Convoy Mexicano, S.A. de C.V., a
Mexican auto hauling company, and certain other parties for an
aggregate purchase price of Ps. 429 million. These
auto haulage operating assets were incorporated in our logistics
division and commenced operations in September 2007.
Mutual
Claims Asserted Between Grupo TMM and KCS
In addition to the $200.0 million in cash and
18 million shares of KCS stock that were delivered to the
Company under the terms of the AAA on April 1, 2005, KCS
also delivered in escrow an Indemnity Escrow Note for
$47 million due June 1, 2007, which provides insurance
against material breaches or misrepresentations by the Company
of its obligations under the AAA. Pursuant to the terms of the
AAA, on January 29, 2007, KCS notified the Company of its
intention to assert certain claims under Section 10 of the
AAA seeking indemnification against the Indemnity Escrow Note.
On January 31, 2007, the Company notified KCS of claims
that it intended to assert against KCS for breaches under the
AAA and other related agreements.
On May 15, 2007, KCS filed a demand for arbitration seeking
indemnification against the Indemnity Escrow Note. The Company
also filed a demand for arbitration seeking indemnification for
certain claims against KCS. See Item 8. “Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings — Dispute
with Kansas City Southern”. In connection with the
arbitration, KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM Logistics entered into a
Settlement Agreement to settle and release all claims asserted
against each other. Under the terms of the settlement, KCS paid
Grupo TMM $54.1 million in cash and the obligations of KCS
under the Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note, which
would have been payable in 2010, were terminated. The Indemnity
Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note had been valued at their
face value of $91.7 million in our Financial Statements. As
a result of this settlement, all disputes between KCS, Grupo TMM
and TMM Logistics were fully and finally settled.
23
SSA
Claims
In July 2006 and February 2007, Grupo TMM received two claim
notices from SSA in relation to certain contingencies affecting
SSA (formerly TMMPyT) in connection with the Amended and
Restated Master Agreement dated July 21, 2001, which are
still pending resolution between SSA and the relevant
authorities. On June 4, 2007, we received a copy of an
arbitration demand from SSA before the International Chamber of
Commerce (“ICC”) seeking indemnification in the amount
of 30 million Pesos. On June 14, 2007, we were
officially notified by the ICC of the arbitration proceedings.
The Company believes such claim to be without merit and intends
to vigorously contest this claim; however, we cannot assure you
that we will be successful.
Settlement
of Leonardo, L.P. Claim
On September 14, 2006, Leonardo, L.P. filed a lawsuit
against the Company seeking damages in the amount of
$1.6 million in connection with the adjustment in the
strike price and the underlying number of shares of Grupo TMM
stock that could be exercisable under the Note Linked Securities
issued by the Company in May of 2002 (“NLSs”). The
Company filed an answer stating that the applicable statute of
limitations had expired. The Company entered into a settlement
agreement on April 13, 2007 pursuant to which the Company
paid Leonardo, L.P. a total of $850,000, with the final
installment being paid in December 2007.
The
Mexican Market
Since TMM’s formation in 1958, the growth and
diversification of the Mexican economy have largely driven our
growth. As a result of NAFTA, which became effective on
January 1, 1994, trade with and investment in the Mexican
economy has significantly increased, resulting in greater
traffic along the North-South cross-border trade routes, which
comprise the NAFTA corridor. The following table illustrates the
growth of the foreign trade segment of the Mexican economy over
the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Trade 2005-2007(a)
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions of Dollars)
|
|
|
Total Exports
|
|
$
|
271,875
|
|
|
$
|
249,925
|
|
|
$
|
214,233
|
|
Total Imports
|
|
$
|
281,949
|
|
|
$
|
256,058
|
|
|
$
|
221,820
|
|
Total Trade Flows
|
|
$
|
553,824
|
|
|
$
|
505,983
|
|
|
$
|
436,052
|
|
Growth Rate — Exports
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Growth Rate — Imports
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Growth Rate — Total
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Growth Rate — GDP(b)
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The figures include the in-bound (maquiladora) industry. |
|
(b) |
|
The methodology for calculating Growth Rate-GDP was modified by
the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica
(INEGI) and is based on 1993 prices. |
|
|
|
Source: Banco de Mexico (BANXICO) |
Notwithstanding generally weak economic conditions, overall
Mexican foreign trade increased in 2007 as compared to 2006, and
also increased in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Discontinued
Operations
On May 13, 2003, we sold to SSA our 51% interest in TMMPyT
included in our ports and terminals segment (which included our
ports operations at Cozumel, Manzanillo, Veracruz and Progreso),
for approximately $114 million in cash, subject to certain
post-closing adjustments.
On April 1, 2005, we finalized the sale of Grupo TMM’s
interest in Grupo TFM to KCS, which comprised all of our
remaining railroad operations. As consideration for this sale,
we received $200 million in cash, $47 million in
24
a 5% promissory note that was paid in June 2007, 18 million
shares of KCS common stock sold in December 2005 for
$400.5 million, and an additional $110 million in cash
and stock that was paid by KCS on March 13, 2006 after the
completion of a settlement involving the VAT and Put lawsuits.
See “— Recent Developments —
Disposition of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to
KCS” and ‘— Marketing Arrangements.”
The results of our ports and terminals operations that were sold
in May 2003, and the results of our railroad operations that
were sold in April 2005 (which included the Tex Mex Railway
operation), are discussed in this Annual Report in the
“Discontinued Operations” section. See Item 5.
“Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —
Results of Operations — Discontinued Operations”
and Note 5 to our Financial Statements included elsewhere
herein.
Business
Strategy
Over the past few years, we have made significant changes to our
business and shifted our strategy to focus on
“door-to-door” service to our customers by being a
source of trucking, port and ship services for clients
transporting goods across land and water in the NAFTA Corridor.
Set forth below is a description of the elements of our strategy.
Expansion
of our Maritime Operations
We plan to expand our Maritime Operations by:
(i) increasing cabotage services with medium and long-term
contracts through the seniority granted to Mexican ship-owners
under the Mexican Navigation Law (Mexican flagged vessels have a
preference to perform cabotage in Mexican waters),
(ii) satisfying demand for exploration and distribution
services, which we believe are increasing within Mexico and
(iii) meeting market requirements of new generation vessels
with higher-rated and deeper-water capabilities. Considering the
urgent need of PEMEX to increase its 3P oil and gas reserves,
there is an increasing demand for exploration and distribution
services within Mexico which we will try to service through
medium and long-term contracts and meeting market requirements
of new generation vessels with higher-rated and deeper-water
capabilities.
In addition, during 2006 and as part of the acquisition of the
minority interests in our offshore and tugboats businesses, we
(i) purchased five offshore vessels from Seacor which now
carry the Mexican flag, (ii) converted three vessels that
were under lease to owned status, (iii) purchased one more
offshore vessel, (iv) purchased two vessels from Seacor
which now carry the Mexican flag, and (v) purchased the
remaining 40% minority stake held by Smit in our harbor towing
business. The new offshore vessels are working under time
charter contracts supporting offshore oil exploration and
production activities in the Gulf of Mexico.
During 2007, and as part of our Business Plan, we
(i) entered into an agreement for the purchase of two
newbuilding tugboats that were delivered in January 2008,
(ii) entered into an agreement for the purchase of the PSV
Isla Monserrat that was delivered in January 2008,
(iii) entered into an agreement for the purchase of the
AHTS Sea Wolverine that was delivered in June 2008,
(iv) entered into an agreement for the purchase of two
AHTS, which are expected to be delivered in 2008 and 2009,
(v) entered into an agreement for the construction of two
FSIV that are expected to be delivered in June and September
2009, and (vi) exercised purchase options for the chemical
tankers M/T “Maya” and the M/T “Olmeca”.
In addition, we are developing our product tanker business and
since July 2005 we have entered into two product tanker
contracts with PEMEX under bareboat charters for a five year
term. During 2006, TMM also entered into a marketing agreement
with Navi8 (formerly FR8), a company that actively trades a time
charter fleet, owns and invests in tonnage, manages vessels for
third parties and for its own account and acts as an exclusive
cargo broker for oil traders and trades in the freight
derivatives market. This agreement should allow TMM the
flexibility to (i) offer vessels to PEMEX under time
charter schemes and (ii) enter international markets. TMM
is currently bidding for the opportunity to provide PEMEX with
five product tankers under bareboat contracts for a five year
term.
Expansion
of our Integrated Logistics Operations
We plan to continue to expand our Logistics Operations,
including dedicated truck transportation, auto haulage,
warehousing, cargo handling and logistics support, thereby
enhancing our position as a true “door-to-door”
25
logistics and multimodal service provider. We intend to enter
into additional dedicated logistics contracts and acquire
equipment or businesses that will enable us to perform services
we previously outsourced. See item 4. “Information on
the Company — Recent Developments.”
Expansion
of our Alliances with Leading Companies in Multimodal
Transportation and Logistics
The success of our commercial and strategic alliances will
enable us to market a full range of services in the context of a
total supply chain distribution process. Through our existing
alliances, we have been able to benefit from synergies,
enhancing our own competitiveness. In the future, we may seek to
expand or modify these alliances pursuant to our business plans.
Ports
Operations
We own over 2,000 acres of land in the port of Tuxpan. We
believe that this plot of land is a strategic investment and
could be used in the future in connection with the development
of Tuxpan as a major seaport.
Reducing
Corporate Overhead and Other Operating Costs
Over the last few years, we have significantly reduced our
operating costs. In 2003, we reduced our corporate staff
headcount from 222 to 97 full-time equivalents through the
elimination of redundant positions and the transfer of certain
employees to other business areas within the Company.
Furthermore, we have developed an information systems platform
that integrates logistics services using Internet technology,
thereby increasing the efficiency of our logistics operations.
The information systems platform supports dedicated logistics
contracts and yard management and allows our customers to access
information regarding the location and status of their cargo via
touch-tone telephone or computer.
In 2005, after the sale of Grupo TFM, we reduced the number of
personnel in our Logistics Operations segment from 8,491 to
5,000. As of December 31, 2006, our Logistics Operations
personnel totaled 5,055. In 2007 we increased corporate and
other operating expenses due to the warehousing and auto haulage
acquisitions. These two new businesses added 946 employees
to our Company. In November 2007, the Board of Directors
approved and executed a corporate restructuring of the senior
executives of the Company which was intended to reduce corporate
expenses and improve the Company’s performance.
We believe our level of corporate overhead was in-line with our
business during 2007.
In addition, we have reduced and will continue to reduce, the
number of companies within our organizational structure in an
effort to streamline operations and reduce operating costs.
Sources
of Financing
We expect to finance the expansion plans mentioned above mainly
through secured credit arrangements and other asset-backed
financings, similar to what the Company has been doing through
its Trust Certificates Program.
Debt
Refinancing
The refinancing of our current debt is a priority in order to
extend the maturity of such debt and achieve lower debt service
requirements and interest costs. Accordingly, we are evaluating
several alternatives to refinance debt that was not refinanced
through our Trust Certificates Program and to generate
sustainable operating profits. In addition, our goal is to
improve our operational flexibility by refinancing the debt with
debt that does not contain as many restrictive covenants as are
contained in our current debt agreements.
26
Certain
Competitive Advantages
We believe that we benefit from the following competitive
advantages:
|
|
•
|
no other company offers a similar breadth and depth of services
as a third-party logistics provider in Mexico;
|
|
•
|
the ability to contract for the transportation of large amounts
of cargo by sea, as well as transport by truck, enables us to
provide value-added “door-to-door” service to our
customers. The value of our transportation service is further
enhanced by our ability to provide warehousing services for some
types of cargo. This ability to provide integrated services
gives us a competitive advantage over companies that provide
only maritime transportation to, or overland transportation
within, Mexico; and
|
|
•
|
we are a Mexican-owned and Mexican-operated company, a
distinction that allows us marketing and operational advantages
and, in certain cases, preferential treatment in certain niche
markets within Mexico.
|
Mexican law provides that cabotage (intra-Mexican movement
between ports) is reserved for ships flying the Mexican flag.
Maritime
Operations
Our Maritime Operations include: (a) supply and logistics
services to the offshore industry at offshore facilities in the
Gulf of Mexico and between ports, moving crews
and/or cargo
to and from oil platforms; (b) product tankers for the
transportation of petroleum products, such as the distribution
of oil to a variety of coastal cities where the oil is further
distributed inland throughout Mexico; (c) parcel tankers,
also known as chemical tankers, for the transportation of liquid
chemical cargoes between ports in Mexico and the U.S.; and
(d) tugboats that provide harbor towing services in and out
of the port of Manzanillo. Mexican law provides that cabotage
(intra-Mexican movement between ports) is reserved for ships
flying the Mexican flag, which we believe provides us with a
competitive advantage in this market. This segment accounted for
59% of consolidated revenues for the years 2007 and 2006, and
52% of consolidated revenues in 2005.
Fleet
Management
As of April 30, 2008, we operated a fleet comprised of
product tankers and parcel tankers, as well as a fleet of
offshore vessels and tugboats. Of a total of 45 vessels, 33
are owned tonnage (2 product tankers, 24 offshore vessels, 2
parcel tankers and 5 tugboats) and 12 are chartered units (3
parcel tankers, 8 product tankers, and 1 tugboat).
The table below sets forth information as of April 30,
2008, about our fleet of owned and chartered vessels by type,
size and capacities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Total Dead
|
|
|
Total Cubic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
|
Weight Tons
|
|
|
Meter Capacity
|
|
|
BHP(*)
|
|
Vessel Type
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore service vessels
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
Product tankers
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
443.0
|
|
|
|
470.4
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Parcel tankers
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
72.9
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Tug boats
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
4,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
543.3
|
|
|
|
550.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Average Brake Horse Power. |
|
** |
|
Not applicable. |
Offshore
Vessels
We have been participating in this business for 16 years.
In March 2006, the Company purchased Seacor’s
40 percent interest in Marmex. As part of this transaction,
TMM also purchased five offshore vessels owned by Seacor, which
began flying the Mexican flag, and at the same time converted
three additional offshore vessels from
27
leased to owned status. All eight vessels are working under time
charter contracts supporting offshore oil exploration and
production activities in the Gulf of Mexico.
TMM, in its offshore division, provides supply and logistics
services to the offshore industry between the ports and the
offshore facilities in the Gulf of Mexico through a specialized
fleet that includes fast and conventional crew vessels, supply
vessels, anchor handling tug supply vessels and Dynamic
Positioning (“DP”) vessels. Other services include
supply and administration of onboard personnel, coordination and
supervision of the maritime transport of staff, materials and
equipment from the base on shore to operational points of the
vessels within the oil-drilling zone of the Gulf of Mexico, and
coordination and supervision of catering and accommodation
matters onboard the vessels. As of February 29, 2008,
TMM’s offshore fleet represented 8% of Mexico’s
offshore fleet. As of April 30, 2008, eighteen
(18) TMM vessels were directly hired by PEMEX, and six
(6) additional vessels were hired by private operators
engaged in the construction and maintenance sectors for PEMEX.
Product
Tankers
Since 1992, we have provided product tanker chartering services
to PEMEX for the transportation of clean and dirty petroleum
products, from refineries to various Mexican ports. Our fleet is
comprised of ten product tankers, which include two long-term
contracts entered into during May and June 2005, and seven short
term contracts with PEMEX. Additionally, we operate one product
tanker in the spot market.
Set forth below is information regarding our product tanker
fleet as of April 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Flag
|
|
Hull
|
|
|
DWT(1)
|
|
|
LOA(5) (m)(6)
|
|
|
Beam(m)
|
|
|
Charterer
|
|
Amatlan II
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
45,467
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Choapas II
|
|
|
1992
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
44,646
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Monte Alban
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
DS(2
|
)
|
|
|
37,583
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Pula
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
46,941
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Green Point
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
49,511
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Spot Market
|
Kapadokia
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
DB(4
|
)
|
|
|
46,828
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Veracity
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
40,520
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Fidelity I
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
DH(3
|
)
|
|
|
43,832
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Gavros
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
DB(4
|
)
|
|
|
476,17
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Pemex
|
Overseas Neptune
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Marshal Islands
|
|
|
DS(2
|
)
|
|
|
40,520
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Pemex
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dead weight tons. |
|
(2) |
|
Double side. |
|
(3) |
|
Double-hull. |
|
(4) |
|
Double bottom. |
|
(5) |
|
Overall length. |
|
(6) |
|
Meters. |
We have a competitive advantage in the Mexican market as Mexican
Maritime law establishes that cabotage services should be
provided by Mexican flag vessels and only Mexican companies are
allowed to fly the Mexican flag.
OPA 90 established that vessels that do not have double-hulls
will be prohibited from transporting crude oil and petroleum
products in U.S. coastwise transportation after a certain
date based on the age and size of the vessel unless they are
modified with a double-hull. In addition Annex II
(Rules 13G and 13H) from
MARPOL 73/78
establishes a phase out calendar for single hull tankers. We are
aware of this regulation and do not charter or intend to acquire
vessels that do not comply with these rules.
28
Parcel
Tankers
Our parcel tanker business operates between Mexican and American
ports in the Gulf of Mexico, transporting chemicals, vegetable
and animal oils and molasses. The majority of the transported
cargo is under contracts of affreightment (“COAs”) in
which the customers commit the carriage of their cargo over a
fixed period time on multiple voyages, with a minimum and a
maximum cargo tonnage at a fixed price. The vessel operator is
responsible for the vessel, the fuel and the port expenses.
Currently, our chemical tanker fleet is comprised of two owned
and three time-chartered vessels. We transported
1.6 million tons of goods in our parcel tankers during 2007
and 1.6 million tons during 2006. Our primary customers
that use our parcel tanker services include major oil and
chemical companies.
Set forth below is information regarding our parcel tankers as
of April 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOA
|
|
|
Beam
|
|
|
Draft
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity M3
|
|
Vessel
|
|
Flag
|
|
Year
|
|
|
(m)(1)
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
DWT*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Olmeca
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
130.0
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
Maya
|
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
123.0
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
12,451
|
|
|
|
14,102
|
|
Lacandon
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
12,716
|
|
|
|
14,313
|
|
Azov Wind
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
151.3
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
16,231
|
|
|
|
17,512
|
|
Silver Wind
|
|
Liberia
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
151.3
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
16,231
|
|
|
|
17,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
77,829
|
|
|
|
80,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Dead weight tons. |
|
(1) |
|
Meters. |
Harbor
Towing
Since January 1997, TMM (formerly Servicios Mexcanos en
Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V.) has provided tugboat services in the
port of Manzanillo under a
10-year
concession, including port docking and navigation in and out of
channels and port facilities into open waters. In December 2006,
the concession to operate this business was renewed by the
relevant authorities for eight more years. As of April 30,
2008 we are operating six vessels in this port, five of which
are owned.
Customers
and Contractual Arrangements
The primary purchasers of our Maritime Operations services are
multi-national oil, gas and chemical companies. These services
are generally contracted for on the basis of short-term or
long-term time charters, voyage charters, contracts of
affreightment or other transportation agreements tailored to the
shipper’s requirements. Our ten largest customers accounted
for approximately 56% and 33% of Maritime Operations revenues
and consolidated revenues, respectively. The loss of one or a
few of our customers could have a material adverse effect on the
results of operations of our Maritime Operations.
The services we provide are arranged through different
contractual arrangements. Time charters are the principal
contractual form for our Maritime Operations.
In the case of a time charter, the customer is responsible for
the hire, fuel and port expenses, and we are responsible for the
nautical operation of the vessel including the expenses related
with the crew, maintenance, and insurance of the vessels. When
we bareboat charter a vessel to a customer, the customer is
responsible for the hire and fuel port expenses but also assumes
all risk of the nautical operation, including the associated
expenses. COAs are contracts with a customer for the carriage of
cargoes that are committed on a multi-voyage basis over a period
of weeks or months, with minimum and maximum cargo tonnages
specified over the period at fixed rates per ton depending on
the duration of the contract. Typically, under voyage charters
and contracts of affreightment the vessel owner pays for the
fuel and any applicable port charges.
29
Markets
The demand for offshore vessels is affected by the level of
offshore exploration and drilling activities, which in turn is
influenced by a number of factors including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
expectations as to future oil and gas commodity prices;
|
|
|
•
|
customer assessments of offshore drilling prospects compared to
land-based opportunities;
|
|
|
•
|
customer assessments of cost, geological opportunity and
political stability in host countries;
|
|
|
•
|
worldwide demand for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
(“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and
pricing;
|
|
|
•
|
the level of production of non-OPEC countries;
|
|
|
•
|
the relative exchange rates for the U.S. dollar; and
|
|
|
•
|
various government policies regarding exploration and
development of their oil and gas reserves.
|
Ports and
Terminals Operations
We conduct operations at the Mexican ports of Acapulco and
Tuxpan. We have been granted three partial assignment agreements
of rights and obligations in respect to our operations at
Tuxpan. Additionally, we own land and a multipurpose cargo
terminal in Tuxpan. Our concession in Acapulco and our partial
assignment agreement of rights and obligations in Tuxpan give us
the right of first refusal to continue operations for a second
term once the term of the original contract expires.
In December 2005, we sold our business in Colombia. Before the
sale of our business in Colombia, this segment accounted for 13%
and 19% of consolidated revenues in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Without the Colombian business, the Ports and Terminals
operations accounted for 3% of consolidated revenues in 2007 and
2006 and 6% in 2005.
The following table sets forth our existing port facilities and
concessions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port
|
|
Concession
|
|
Date Awarded
|
|
Duration
|
|
Acapulco
|
|
Integral port administration
|
|
June 20, 1996
|
|
25 years (with the possibility of extension)
|
Tuxpan
|
|
Approximately 1,300 meters of waterfront
|
|
September 25, 2000
|
|
20 years (with the possibility of extension)
|
|
|
Approximately 740 hectares of land
|
|
April 7, 1997
|
|
20 years (with the possibility of extension)
|
|
|
Stevedoring Services
|
|
August 4, 1999
|
|
10 years (with the possibility of extension)
|
Acapulco
In June 1996, we received a
25-year
concession to operate the tourist port of Acapulco and commenced
operations in July 1996. Our port interests in Acapulco are
operated through a joint venture with SSA called
Administración Portuaria Integral de Acapulco, S.A. de C.V.
(“API Acapulco”), in which we have a 51% interest.
Through API Acapulco, we operate and manage an automobile
terminal, a cruise ship terminal with a capacity to receive two
cruise ships simultaneously and an automobile warehouse with a
capacity to store up to 1,700 automobiles. The automobile
terminal was completed in November 1997 and the passenger
terminal was completed during the fourth quarter of 2000.
In 2007, we handled 38,773 automobile exports for Volkswagen,
Chrysler and Nissan to South America and Asia, reflecting an
increase of 3.5% from 2006, when we handled approximately 37,452
automobiles at our terminal.
30
Acapulco is one of the main tourist ports in Mexico. Major
cruise ship lines, such as Carnival, Royal Caribbean, Princess
and Holland America, among others, make use of our terminal.
During 2007, we had 135 cruise ship calls, which represent a
9.7% increase from 123 calls in 2006.
Tuxpan
We own approximately 2,000 acres of land in Tuxpan, and we
own a terminal of multipurpose cargo through our wholly owned
subsidiary Tecomar, S.A. de C.V. We have access to a contiguous
public berth where containers and general cargo can be unloaded
and delivered to our multipurpose terminal. Additionally, we
offer container-warehousing services at this port. While we
currently handle only a small volume of cargo at the port, we
are in the process of developing the site. Our Tuxpan port
facilities are operated through Operadora Portuaria de Tuxpan,
S.A. de C.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo TMM.
As part of the sale of TMMPyT in 2003, we agreed not to compete
with SSA or its affiliates in Mexico for a term of five years,
except in connection with our port operations at Tuxpan and API
Acapulco. SSA has a right of first refusal with respect to new
port operations of the Company or its affiliates up to a maximum
of 49% total equity interest in Tuxpan and Lázaro
Cárdenas Ports.
Shipping
Agencies
We operate shipping agencies at the ports of Acapulco, Veracruz,
Coatzacoalcos, Ciudad del Carmen, Dos Bocas, Tuxpan,
Cozumel, Costa Maya, Ensenada, Progreso and Zihuatanejo. Our
shipping agencies provide services to vessel owners and
operators in Mexican ports, including (i) port agent
services, including the preparation of the required
documentation with the relevant port authorities for the
dispatch of vessels; (ii) protective agent services, which
support the rotation of crew members and the supply of spare
parts; (iii) cargo and multimodal supervision;
(iv) ship chandler services, which include the procurement
of food, water and supplies and (v) bunkering services,
which include the coordination of fuel delivery services. Our
shipping agencies also provide shipping agency services at other
major ports through agreements with local agents.
Logistics
Operations
Through TMM Logistics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo TMM,
we provide dedicated logistics trucking services to major
manufacturers, including automobile manufacturers, and retailers
with facilities and operations throughout Mexico. We offer
full-service logistical facilities in major industrial cities
and railroad hubs throughout Mexico, including in
Aguascalientes, Toluca, Puebla, Veracruz, Nuevo Laredo, Mexico
City and Monterrey, among others. The services that we provide
include consulting, analytical and logistics outsourcing
services, which encompass the management of inbound movement of
parts to manufacturing plants consistent with
just-in-time
inventory planning practices; logistics network (order-cycle)
analysis; logistics information process design; trucking, auto
haulage and intermodal transport; warehousing and bonded
warehousing facility management; supply chain and logistics
management; product handling and repackaging; local
pre-assembly; maintenance and repair of containers in principal
Mexican ports and cities; and inbound and outbound distribution
using multiple transportation modes. Due to the scope of our
operations, together with the extent of our experience and
resources, we believe that we are uniquely positioned to
coordinate the entire supply chain for our customers. This
segment accounted for 38% of consolidated revenues in 2007 and
2006 and 35% of consolidated revenues in 2005.
Automotive
Services
We provide specialized logistics support for the automotive
industry within Mexico. Services include the arrangement and
coordination of the movement of motor vehicle parts or
sub-assemblies from supplier facilities to assembly plants,
warehousing, inspection and yard management. Our logistics
services can be provided as end-to-end integrated logistics
programs (bundled) or discrete services (unbundled) depending on
customer needs.
Trucking
Services
In conjunction with our logistics facilities, we offer truck
transport and dedicated logistics trucking services as a
value-added component to streamline the movement of products to
and from major Mexican cities and rail hubs.
31
Under Mexican law, truck transportation within Mexico can be
performed only by Mexican-owned companies, such as Grupo TMM. As
of April 30, 2008, we operated 598 trucks. We currently
provide dedicated trucking services to several major
manufacturers and retailers including Jumex, Allied-Domecq,
Wal-Mart, Unilever, Waldo’s and Nissan.
Our over-the-road units provide trucking services on a spot
basis to major retail stores and consumer product companies. We
also provide intermodal services for drayage cargo at Pantaco in
Mexico City and Monterrey.
Container
Repair and Maintenance
We offer maintenance and repair services for dry and
refrigerated containers in Manzanillo, Veracruz, Altamira,
Ensenada, and Aguascalientes. These services involve keeping
refrigerated components and other parts of a container in
useable condition, including mechanical repair, welding and
repainting of such containers.
Intermodal
Services
Since 2002, TMM Logistics and Hub Group, which is the largest
intermodal marketing company in the United States, have
been part of a joint network to manage freight moving between
Canada, the United States and Mexico. TMM Logistics provides all
sales support and operational arrangement within Mexico for the
network. In 2004, we began providing intermodal services,
door-to-door.
TMM
Plus
TMM Plus is a state-of-the-art supply chain platform that we
developed which enables us to better control our operations and
to provide our customers with full tracking of their products
while products are moving through the supply chain. In addition,
this tool increases our capabilities for designing and
controlling a variety of logistics services. This platform has
expanded our service offerings, which we expect to continue to
increase both the volume of business as well as revenues.
Warehousing
Services
We added warehousing to our logistics services in 2006 through
the acquisition of Almacenadora de Depósito Moderno, S.A.
de C.V. Organización Auxiliar de Crédito
(“ADEMSA”). ADEMSA currently operates over
380,000 square meters of warehousing space throughout
Mexico, including 68,000 square meters of direct warehouse
space (the largest of which is located northern Mexico City).
Due to its regulated nature, ADEMSA is one of a limited number
of warehousing companies authorized by the Mexican government to
provide bonded warehousing services and to issue negotiable
certificates of deposit.
Auto
Haulage
On July 19, 2007, TMM acquired from Autoconvoy Mexicano,
S.A. de C.V., operating assets including a fleet of 228 trucks
and 423 haul-away trailers, each equipped with a satellite
tracking system.
We have our own yards in Puebla, Aguascalientes and Cuernavaca,
equipped with all the facilities necessary for the operation of
the newly formed TMM Logistics haul-away division (management
offices, repair shops, shelter yards, security, warehouses, etc).
Since July 19, 2007 TMM has coordinated vehicle
distribution on a national level, from the main automotive
manufacturers’ plants, to the national dealers or borders
for export purposes.
TMM’s
Strategic Partners
We are currently a partner in strategic arrangements with the
following companies:
|
|
|
Business
|
|
Partner
|
|
Ports (Acapulco)
|
|
SSA Mexico, Inc.
|
Automotive Logistics
|
|
Auto Warehousing Co.; Rolf Schnellecke S.A. de C.V.
|
32
In October 2000, EMD, a subsidiary of General Motors
(“GM”), invested $20 million in our subsidiary
TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM Multimodal”)
(representing an approximate 3.4% interest in TMM Multimodal).
Under the terms of the Subscription and Stockholder Agreement
relating to its investment in TMM Multimodal, EMD had the right
to cause Grupo TMM to purchase, or, alternatively, to cause TMM
Multimodal to redeem, all, but not less than all, of EMD’s
shares in TMM Multimodal at a price equal to the original
investment of $20 million, plus interest compounded
annually from June 30, 2000 at the rate of 12% per annum,
less certain distributions received by EMD in respect of its
shares of TMM Multimodal. On March 15, 2005, GM notified
the Company of its intention to exercise its put option on
April 4, 2005; and on such date, with the cash proceeds
from the sale of its interest in Grupo TFM to KCS, Grupo TMM
paid approximately $34.0 million to GM in exchange for the
shares of TMM Multimodal.
Disposition
of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to KCS
General
On April 1, 2005, we completed the sale of our interest in
Grupo TFM to Kansas City Southern, or KCS, pursuant to the AAA.
Under the AAA, as consideration for the purchase and upon
consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, the
Company received: (i) $200 million in cash;
(ii) 18 million shares of KCS common stock, which were
valued on such date at approximately $347 million;
(iii) promissory notes in a principal amount of
$47 million (the “Indemnity Escrow Notes”) and
(iv) up to $110 million in a combination of cash, KCS
stock and notes following the TFM VAT Award. Pursuant to the
Indemnity Escrow Agreement, the Indemnity Escrow Notes were
deposited in an escrow account (the “Indemnity
Escrow”) and will be available to satisfy certain indemnity
claims by KCS. The Indemnity Escrow may be reduced as noted
below.
Upon closing of the transaction, we recognized a gain on the
sale of Grupo TFM in the amount of $196.3 million, or
$176.4 million net of deferred income taxes.
The $200 million in cash proceeds from the sale were used
to pay down the following obligations: (i) approximately
$70.5 million in principal and accrued interest on our
securitization program, (ii) approximately
$34.0 million to satisfy the GM Put Option and applicable
taxes, (iii) approximately $70.0 million to pay down
the 2007 Notes on a pro rata basis on May 13, 2005
($68.0 million in principal amount and $2.0 million in
accrued interest) and (iv) approximately $26 million
in related fees and expenses.
On December 9, 2005, Grupo TMM sold all 18 million
shares of KCS common stock to Morgan Stanley as a block sale,
for a total of $400.5 million. With these proceeds, on
December 15, 2005 Grupo TMM launched a cash tender offer
whereby we purchased at the completion thereof on
January 17, 2006, $331 million aggregate principal
amount of our outstanding 2007 Notes. Pursuant to the terms of
the indenture governing the 2007 Notes, the annual interest rate
on such notes was reduced by 1% (from
101/2%
to
91/2%)
as a result of this reduction in principal.
Furthermore, on March 13, 2006, Grupo TMM received from KCS
the VAT Contingency Payment consisting of $110 million in a
combination of $35 million in cash, a $40 million
promissory note maturing on April 1, 2010 (the “VAT
Escrow Note”), and 1,494,469 shares of KCS stock. On
December 7, 2006, Grupo TMM sold these 1,494,469 KCS shares
for approximately $37.3 million.
As discussed above, there were various disputes between Grupo
TMM and KSC relating to the sale of Grupo TFM. On
September 21, 2007, KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM Logistics
entered into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to which each
settled and released all claims asserted against the other in
arbitration proceedings initiated by KCS under the AAA. Under
the terms of the settlement, KCS paid Grupo TMM
$54.1 million in cash and the obligations of KCS under the
Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note, which would have
been payable in 2010, were terminated. The Indemnity Escrow Note
and the Tax Escrow Note had been valued at their face value of
$91.7 million in our Financial Statements. As a result of
this settlement, all disputes between KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM
Logistics were fully and finally settled.
33
Stockholders’
Agreement
In connection with the shares received as part of the
consideration for the purchase of Grupo TFM (the
“Acquisition”), the Company and certain of its
Subsidiaries and principal stockholders (the “Stockholder
Parties”) entered into a Stockholders’ Agreement with
KCS containing provisions which, prior to its termination,
restricted certain transfers of the shares, restricted certain
activities aimed at influencing the control and management of
KCS by the Company and obligated KCS to assist in a transaction
to distribute the shares to the Company’s stockholders.
On December 9, 2005, we executed a block sale of our
18 millions shares of KCS common stock received from the
Acquisition to Morgan Stanley. As a result of the sale of all of
the KCS shares received from KCS under the AAA, the
Stockholder’s Agreement has terminated in accordance with
its terms.
Registration
Rights Agreement
KCS entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Grupo TMM
and certain of its affiliates pursuant to which it agreed to
register under the U.S. securities laws the shares of KCS
that were issued to Grupo TMM in connection with the
Acquisition. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, any of the
registrations would be underwritten registrations and the
Company had the right to select the underwriter, subject to the
approval of KCS, which could not be unreasonably withheld. In
addition, Grupo TMM had unlimited piggy-back rights, subject to
customary cut back rights. The obligation of KCS to file any
registration statement or to maintain its effectiveness was
subject to typical holdback, delay and deferral provisions. With
respect to the first four registrations under the Registration
Rights Agreement, KCS was required to pay all costs associated
with the registration of the shares, but not any indemnity fees
or commissions.
Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, KCS registered
the resale of 18 million shares held by us in December
2005. In December 2006, KCS also registered the resale of
1,494,469 additional shares received as part of the VAT Put
Settlement, which were subsequently sold in December 2006.
The Company does not currently own any KCS shares.
Consulting
Agreement
José F. Serrano International Business, S.A. de C.V. (the
“Consultant”), a consulting company organized by
Sr. José Serrano, entered into a consulting agreement
with KCS dated December 15, 2004 (the “Consulting
Agreement”) pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to
provide consulting services to KCS in connection with the
portion of the business of KCS conducted in Mexico (with
particular focus on the maintenance, fostering and promotion of
a positive relationship between KCS and Mexican Government
officials) for a period of three years. Consulting services were
provided exclusively in Mexico. As consideration for the
services, the Consultant received an annual fee of
$3.0 million per year for a period of three years. On
March 13, 2006, on the one hundred eightieth (180th) day
following the Final Resolution of the VAT Claim and Put, the
Consultant received an additional fee of $9.0 million in
cash. The Consulting Agreement was terminated in September 2007
as part of the settlement with KCS.
Marketing
Arrangements
In connection with the sale of Grupo TFM to KCS, the parties and
their affiliates entered into three marketing arrangements
described below.
Kansas City Southern Railway Company entered into a Marketing
and Services Agreement with TFM, TMM Logistics and its
subsidiaries and affiliates with an initial term extending
through April 1, 2010. Under the terms of the Marketing and
Services Agreement, TMM Logistics and its subsidiaries and
affiliates received (i) “most favored nations”
treatment on services provided by KCS and its subsidiaries,
including TFM, subject to the right of KCS to refuse to comply
with such obligation on three occasions without penalty if KCS
deemed such non-compliance to be economically beneficial to it,
(ii) an exclusive right to provide Road
Railertm
freight transport services over TFM’s rail system within
Mexico, (iii) a right to provide certain logistics services
if TFM outsourced work at any of its intermodal terminals,
provided that certain conditions were met, and (iv) a right
to bid for all other transportation related services outsourced
by TFM. KCS exercised the early termination provision in the
Marketing and Services
34
Agreement and ended the services of M&R, Pretrip,
Intermodal, Inspection and Automotive Services. In addition, TFM
also exercised the early termination provision and ended the two
Rail and Transportation Agreements with TMM Logistics.
Sales and
Marketing
Much of the success of our business depends on our marketing
network. Our marketing network includes affiliated offices,
agencies at Mexican ports and a sales force based throughout
Mexico to sell our logistics, ports and specialized maritime
services. Our marketing and sales efforts are designed to grow
and expand our current customer base by initiating long-term
contracts. We have devised, implemented and will continue to
implement several customer service initiatives in connection
with our marketing efforts, which include the designation of
customer sales territories and assignment of customer service
teams to particular customers.
Since we commenced operations, we have been actively seeking to
obtain new customer contracts with the expectation of entering
into long-term contracts with such new clients or with existing
customers. Although written customer contracts are not customary
in Mexico, we have succeeded in negotiating written contracts
with a number of our major customers.
Systems
and Technology
We continually enhance our technology and information systems to
support our operations. Our systems are updated regularly to
increase operating efficiencies, improve customer satisfaction
and maintain regulatory compliance. We have deployed devices and
software to increase accuracy and security in our information
systems in order to ensure the continuity of our business
operations.
We have developed TMM Plus, an internet-based information
systems platform that integrates different logistics services,
thereby increasing the efficiency of our logistics operations.
The information systems platform supports dedicated logistics
contracts and yard management. The systems platform allows our
customers to access information regarding the location and
status of their cargo via computer. See
“— Business Strategy — Reducing
Operating Costs.”
Competition
Maritime
Operations
The Company’s primary competitors in the Offshore Vessel
business are Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (partner of Otto
Candies LLC in Mexico) and Nautica Saltamar, S.A. de C.V. (a
Mexican company with commercial agreements with Tidewater, Inc.,
the world’s largest offshore vessel operator). Tidewater,
Inc. has a substantially greater percentage of domestic and
foreign offshore marine market share compared to the Company and
its other competitors. Other important offshore vessel operators
in México include Consultoría y Servicios Petroleros,
S.A. de C.V., Naviera Integral S.A. de C.V., Naviera
Tamaulipas S.A. de C.V., Seamar Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.,
Edison Chouest Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V., and Cotemar S.A. de
C.V.
The Company’s primary competitor in the Parcel Tanker
business is Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. Some other
competitors in this business include Odfjell Seachem and Mapa
Logistics S.A. de C.V.
Our tugboat business does not have a direct competitor within
the port of Manzanillo, however other important tugboat
operations in Mexico are provided by Saam Remolques, S.A. Cia.
Maritima del Pacifico, S.A de C.V and Cia Maritima S.A de C.V.
The Company’s primary competitors in the Product Tanker
business are Arrendadora Ocean Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
and Naviera del Sureste, S.A. de C.V.
The Company believes the most important competitive factors
concerning the Maritime Operations segment are pricing, the
flying of the Mexican flag and the availability of equipment to
fit customer requirements, including the ability to provide and
maintain logistical support given the complexity of a project
and the cost of transferring equipment from one market to
another. The Company believes it can capitalize on opportunities
as they develop for purchasing, mobilizing, or upgrading vessels
to meet changing market conditions.
35
Logistics
Operations
In our Third Party Logistics business, the Company faces
competition primarily from Car Logistics S.A. de C.V. and Axis
Logistics S.A. de C.V.
In its Maintenance and Repair business, the Company faces
competition primarily from Container Care International Inc.,
Reparación Internacional de Contenedores, S.A. de C.V. and
Maersk Sealand Inc.
The Company’s key competitors in its Trucking business are
Transportistas Unidos Mexicanos División Norte, S.A. de
C.V., Transportes Easo, S.A. de C.V., Transportes Castores de
Baja California, S.A. de C.V. and Transportes de Carga Tres
Guerras, S.A. de C.V.
Our Warehousing business’ main competitors are Exel
Logistics de Mexico S.A. de C.V., Zimag Logistics, Accel
Logistica S.A. de C.V., Kuehne & Nagel S.A de C.V. and
Grupo Onest Logistics.
In the auto hauling business, the Company faces competition
primarily from Transportes Cuauhtemoc, S.A. de C.V.,
Auto Traslados sin Rodar, S.A. de C.V., Consorcio de Servicios
Internacionales, S.A. de C.V. y González Trucking, S.A. de
C.V.
The Company believes the most important competitive factors in
the Logistics Operations segment are price, customer service,
brand name, experience, operating capabilities and
state-of-the-art information technology.
REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK
Certain countries have laws which restrict the carriage of
cargos depending upon the nationality of a vessel or its crew or
the origin or destination of the vessel, as well as other
considerations relating to particular national interests. In
accordance with Mexico’s Ley de Navegación y
Comercio Marítimos (Navigation Law), cabotage
(intra-Mexican movement) is reserved for ships flying the
Mexican flag. We believe we are currently in material compliance
with all restrictions imposed by the jurisdictions in which we
operate. However, we cannot predict the cost of compliance if
our business is expanded into other jurisdictions which have
enacted similar regulations.
We are also subject to the laws of various jurisdictions and
international conferences with respect to the discharge of
materials into the environment. See
“— Environmental Regulation” and
“— Insurance.”
Truck transportation within Mexico is reserved for Mexican
nationals or entities that include in their constituent
documents or Bylaws the “foreigner exclusion clause”
(cláusula de exclusión de extranjeros), or a
clause allowing other foreign investment through “neutral
investment vehicles or securities.” Truck transportation is
regulated by the Ley de Caminos, Puentes y Autotransporte
Federal and the Ley de Vias Generales de Comunicacion.
Our port operations are subject to the Ley de Puertos.
Port operations require a concession title granted by the
Mexican Government to special companies incorporated under the
Ley de Puertos, which companies may partially assign
their concession title to third parties for the use and
exploitation of assets owned by the Mexican Government in the
different port facilities (subject to the Ley de Puertos
and the terms and conditions of the concession title).
Various port services require a special permit granted by the
Ministry of Communications and Transportation of Mexico.
Concession titles may be revoked under certain circumstances in
accordance with applicable law and the terms of the concession
title. Partial assignments of concession titles may be rescinded
under certain circumstances established in the corresponding
assignment agreements. Foreign investment in special companies
incorporated under the Ley de Puertos (such as API
Acapulco) may not exceed 49%, except through vehicles or
securities deemed by applicable Mexican law as “neutral
investments.”
New
Mexican Navigation Law
On June 1, 2006 a new Mexican Navigation Law (“Ley
de Navegación y Comercio Marítimos”) was
published in Mexico’s Official Gazette, and became
effective 30 days thereafter. This law:
(i) strengthens the reservation of cabotage services for
Mexican individuals dedicated to shipping or Mexican shipping
companies; (ii) establishes mechanisms and procedures for
the resolution of maritime controversies or disputes and
(iii) in general terms, is
36
protective of the Mexican shipping industry. Nevertheless, there
can be no assurance that the percentage of Mexican-flagged
vessels operating in Mexico will continue to increase in the
future.
The law gives precedence to international treaties ratified by
Mexico to foster uniformity in the type of regime applicable to
specific circumstances such as the Hague Visby Rules,
CLC/FUND Conventions, 1976 Limitation Convention, Salvage
Convention, COLREGS, and MARPOL. (All vessels navigating Mexican
waters must enter into protection and indemnity insurance
agreements.)
Listed below are some of the salient points of the legislation:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Customary provisions enabling authorities to carry out
inspections of vessels and investigations of incidents;
|
|
|
•
|
New regulations concerning registration of vessels and waivers
allowing Mexican companies to operate foreign flag vessels in
otherwise reserved domains;
|
|
|
•
|
Foreign vessels are obliged to designate a shipping agent in
order to call at Mexican ports;
|
|
|
•
|
Mexican flag vessels are required to operate with Mexican crews
only and cabotage is in principle reserved for Mexican vessels;
|
|
|
•
|
When a foreign vessel is abandoned by the owners with their
cargo on board, provisions of the new legislation coordinate
repatriation and temporary maintenance of the crew which the law
deems ultimately to be the joint and several liability of the
owner and agent;
|
|
|
•
|
The carriage of passengers, cargo and towage in ports and
pilotage are also regulated;
|
|
|
•
|
Captains are responsible for damage and loss caused to vessels
or ports due to negligence, lack of proper qualification,
carelessness or bad faith, but are not responsible for damages
caused by an act of God or force majeure;
|
|
|
•
|
Companies providing towage services must carry insurance to
cover their liabilities to the satisfaction of the authorities;
|
|
|
•
|
Pollution is regulated by international treaties; however this
only covers CLC-type liabilities. Pollution in respect of other
substances is dealt with under local legislation which has no
limitation. This is irrespective of any criminal proceedings or
sanctions against the party responsible for the
incident; and
|
|
|
•
|
Maritime privileges are also considered within the law.
|
The law establishes time limits for commencement of proceedings
with respect to 7 specific types of contracts as follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Bareboat charter;
|
|
|
•
|
Time charter;
|
|
|
•
|
Voyage charter;
|
|
|
•
|
Carriage of Goods;
|
|
|
•
|
Passengers;
|
|
|
•
|
Salvage; and
|
|
|
•
|
Towage.
|
Environmental
Regulation
Our operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment, as
well as technical environmental requirements issued by the
SEMARNAT. Under the General Law of Ecologic Equilibrium and
Protection of the Environment (Ley General de Equilibrio
Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente) and the
General Law for Integral Prevention and Handling of Residues
(Ley General de Prevención y Gestión Integral del
Residuos), the SEMARNAT and other authorized ministries have
promulgated standards, for,
37
among other things, water discharge, water supply, emissions,
noise pollution, hazardous substances, transportation and solid
waste generation. The terms of the port concessions also impose
on us certain environmental law compliance obligations. See
“— Insurance.”
Under OPA, responsible parties, including owners and operators
of ships, are subject to various requirements and could be
exposed to substantial liability, and in some cases, unlimited
liability for removal costs and damages, including natural
resource damages and a variety of other public and private
damages, resulting from the discharge of oil, petroleum or
related substances into United States waters by their vessels.
In some jurisdictions, claims for removal costs and damages
would enable claimants to immediately seize the ships of the
owning and operating company and sell them in satisfaction of a
final judgment. The existence of comparable statutes enacted by
individual states of the United States, but requiring different
measures of compliance and liability, creates the potential for
similar claims being brought under state law. In addition,
several international conventions that impose similar liability
for the discharge of pollutants have been adopted by other
countries. If a spill were to occur in the course of the
operation of one of our vessels carrying petroleum products, and
such spill affected the United States or another country that
had enacted legislation similar to OPA, we could be exposed to
substantial or unlimited liability.
The U.S. Clean Water Act imposes restrictions and strict
controls regarding the discharge of wastes into the waters of
the United States. The Clean Water Act and comparable state
laws, provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties
for unauthorized discharges of pollutants. In the event of an
unauthorized discharge of wastes or pollutants into waters of
the United States, we may be liable for penalties and could be
subject to injunctive relief.
In addition, our seagoing transport of petroleum and petroleum
products subjects us to additional regulations and exposes us to
liability specific to this activity. Laws and international
conventions adopted by several countries in the wake of the
“Exxon Valdez” accident, most notably OPA (discussed
above), could result in substantial or even unlimited liability
for us in the event of a spill. Moreover, these laws subject
tanker owners to additional regulatory and insurance
requirements. We believe that we are in compliance with all
material requirements of these regulations.
We could have liability with respect to contamination at our
former U.S. facilities or third-party facilities in the
U.S. where we have sent hazardous substances or wastes
under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or
“Superfund”) and comparable state laws (known as state
Superfund laws). CERLCA and the state Superfund laws impose
joint and several liability for the cost of investigation and
remediation, natural resources damages, certain health studies
and related costs, without regard to fault or the legality of
the original conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect
to releases into the environment of certain substances. There
persons, commonly called “potentially responsible
parties” or “PRPs” include the current and
certain prior owners or operators of and persons that arranged
for the disposal or treatment of certain substances at sites
where a release has or could occur. In addition, other
potentially responsible parties, adjacent landowners or other
third parties may initiate cost recovery actions or toxic tort
litigation against PRPs under CERCLA, state Superfund laws or
state common law.
Noncompliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations
may result in the imposition of considerable administrative or
civil fines, temporary or permanent shutdown of operations or
other injunctive relief, or criminal prosecution. We currently
believe that all of our facilities and operations are in
substantial compliance with applicable environmental
regulations. There are currently no material legal or
administrative proceedings pending against us with respect to
any environmental matters, and we do not believe that continued
compliance with environmental laws will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that the adoption of
additional or more stringent environmental laws and regulations
would have on the operations of companies that are engaged in
the type of business in which we are engaged, or specifically,
on our results of operations, cash flows, capital expenditure
requirements or financial condition.
38
Insurance
Our business is affected by a number of risks, including
mechanical failure of vessels, trucks and other transportation
equipment, collisions, property loss of vessels, trucks and
other transportation equipment, piracy, cargo loss or damage, as
well as business interruption due to political circumstances in
Mexico and in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes.
In addition, the operation of any oceangoing vessel is subject
to the inherent possibility of catastrophic marine disaster,
including oil spills and other environmental accidents, and the
liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in
international trade.
We maintain insurance to cover the risk of partial or total loss
of or damage to all of our assets, including, but not limited
to, harbour and seagoing vessels, port facilities, port
equipment, trucks, land facilities and offices. In particular,
we maintain marine hull and machinery and war risk insurance on
our vessels, which covers the risk of actual or constructive
total loss. Additionally, we have protection and indemnity
insurance for damage caused by our operations to third persons.
With certain exceptions, we do not carry insurance covering the
loss of revenue resulting from a downturn in our operations or
resulting from vessel off-hire time on certain vessels. In
certain instances, and depending on the ratio of insurance
claims to insurance premiums paid, we may choose to self-insure
our over-the-road equipment following prudent guidelines. We
believe that our current insurance coverage is adequate to
protect against the accident-related risks involved in the
conduct of our business and that we maintain a level of coverage
that is consistent with industry practice. However, we cannot
assure you that our insurance would be sufficient to cover the
cost of damages suffered by us or damages to others, that any
particular claim will be paid or that such insurance will
continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates in the
future. OPA 90, by imposing potentially unlimited liability upon
owners, operators and bareboat charters for certain oil
pollution accidents in the United States, made liability
insurance more expensive for ship-owners and operators.
Organizational
Structure
We hold a majority of the voting stock in each of our
subsidiaries. The most significant subsidiaries, as of
April 30, 2008, include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
Name
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Administración Portuaria Integral de Acapulco S.A. de C.V.
(Ports)*
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Lacto Comercial Organizada, S.A. de C.V. (Trucking)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Autotransportación y Distribución Logística, S.A.
de C.V.(Logistics)*
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Transportación Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
(formerly Naviera del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V.) (Product and
Parcel Tankers, Offshore vessels and harbour tugboat operations)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Terminal Marítima de Tuxpan, S.A. de C.V. (Ports)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V. (Logistics)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Seglo, S.A. de C.V. (Logistics)*
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
TMM Agencias, S.A. de C.V. (Shipping agencies)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Seglo Operaciones Logísticas, S.A. de C.V (Logistics)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
TMM División Marítima, S. A. de C. V. (Offshore
vessels)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
TMM Remolcadores, S. A. de C. V. (tugboat vessels)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
TMM Parcel Tankers, S. A. de C. V. (Tanker vessels)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Almacenadora de Deposito Moderno, S. A. de C. V. (Warehousing)(1)
|
|
|
México
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Less than wholly-owned by the Company. |
|
(1) |
|
See Note 1 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Our principal executive offices are located in Mexico City, and
are currently under lease from March 2006 through March 2021.
Our business activities and the business activities of our
subsidiaries in the logistics and
39
transportation fields are conducted with both leased and owned
equipment, and, in certain instances, through concessions
granted to us by the Mexican Government. We were granted the
right to operate certain facilities, including certain cruise
ship terminals and ports, as part of franchises awarded through
the Mexican Government’s privatization activity. We operate
facilities, either through leases or with direct ownership
interests, in Acapulco, Aguascalientes, Altamira, Campeche,
Coatzacoalcos, Cuernavaca, Ensenada, Veracruz, Mexico City,
Monterrey, Nuevo Laredo, Puebla, Queretaro, Toluca and Tuxpan.
See Item 4. “Information on the Company —
Business Overview,” and Notes 9 and 10 to our Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Concession Rights and Related Assets as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
API Acapulco
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tugboats in the port of Manzanillo
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
|
|
(5,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concession rights and related assets — net
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Total
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
Vessels
|
|
$
|
234,979
|
|
|
$
|
207,579
|
|
|
25
|
Dry-docks (major vessel repairs)
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
|
|
6,033
|
|
|
2.5
|
Buildings and installations
|
|
|
12,988
|
|
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
20 and 25
|
Warehousing equipment
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
10
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
3 and 4
|
Terminal equipment
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
10
|
Ground transportation equipment
|
|
|
37,735
|
|
|
|
19,668
|
|
|
4, 5 and 10
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,358
|
|
|
|
248,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
23,538
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
31,163
|
|
|
|
19,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property, Plant and Equipment — net
|
|
$
|
351,059
|
|
|
$
|
282,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4A.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
Executive
Overview
We generate our revenues and cash flows by providing our
customers with value-added multimodal transportation and
logistics services, such as dedicated truck transportation,
warehousing, storage management, ports and terminals operations,
cargo handling and logistics support. Our commercial and
strategic alliances allow us to market a full range of services
in the context of a total supply chain distribution process.
Through such alliances, we have been able to benefit not only
from synergies, but also from the operational expertise of our
alliance partners, enhancing our own competitiveness.
40
Our operating results are generally affected by a variety of
factors, including fluctuations in exchange rates, operating
performance of our business units, changes in applicable
regulations and fluctuations in oil prices. The effect of
changes in these factors impacts our revenues and operating
results.
Over the last few years, we have made and continue to make
significant changes to our business, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Reducing our corporate overhead: Over the last
few years, we have significantly reduced our operating costs by
reducing our corporate executive headcount from 222 to
97 full-time equivalent positions, through the elimination
of redundant functions and the transfer of certain employees to
other business areas within the Company. In 2005, and after the
sale of Grupo TFM, Logistics Operations was restructured
reducing its personnel to the current levels. Our projections
for 2008 contemplate a continued reduction in our corporate
overhead on an annualized basis. See “— Business
Strategy — Reducing Corporate Overhead and Other
Operating Costs.”
|
|
|
•
|
Introducing cost-saving technology: We have
developed TMM Plus, an Internet-based information systems
platform that integrates logistics services, thereby increasing
the efficiency of our logistics operations. The information
systems platform supports dedicated logistics contracts and yard
management. The systems platform allows our customers to access
information regarding the location and status of their cargo via
computer. See “— Logistics Operations —
TMM Plus.”
|
|
|
•
|
Selling our port businesses: On May 13,
2003, we sold our 51% interest in TMMPyT, included in our Ports
and Terminals segment (which included our port operations at
Cozumel, Manzanillo, Veracruz and Progreso), for approximately
$114 million in cash, subject to certain post-closing
adjustments. Net proceeds from this sale were used to repay
amounts under our securitization facility and other short-term
debt.
|
|
|
•
|
Extending the maturity of our debt: During
2006, we repaid in full all of our public debt, including our
2006 and 2007 Notes. We also entered into (i) a
$200.0 million receivables securitization facility with
Deutsche Bank AG that matures in September 2012 and
(ii) other credit agreements to finance the acquisition of
three offshore vessels. However, we continue to review and
analyze alternatives to refinance our debt to extend the
maturity and reduce the interest expense thereof. See
Item 4. “Information on the Company — Recent
Developments — Mexican Peso-Denominated
Trust Certificate Program.”
|
|
|
•
|
Establishing our Trust Certificates
Program: On April 30, 2007 we established a
Mexican Peso-Denominated Trust Certificates Program for the
issuance of trust certificates, which are securities secured by
trust assets and denominated in Mexican Pesos, for an aggregate
amount of Ps. 9.0 billion. We closed our first and
second issuances of trusts certificates under the program on
July 19, 2007 and April 30, 2008, in an amount of
Ps. 3.0 billion and Ps. 1.55 billion,
respectively. Our first issuance was used primarily to refinance
existing vessel indebtedness. Our second issuance will mainly be
used to finance the acquisition of five new and used vessels for
an approximate aggregate amount of $111.4 million. The
Company expects to use the third issuance, worth an estimated
4.4 billion pesos, to acquire 10 additional new vessels for
an approximate aggregate amount of $348 million.
|
|
|
•
|
Selling our interest in Grupo TFM to KCS: On
April 1, 2005, we completed the sale of our interest in
Grupo TFM to KCS. See Item 4. “Information on the
Company — Recent Developments — Disposition
of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to KCS.”
|
|
|
•
|
Purchase of 40% Marmex stake from Seacor: On
March 3, 2006, the Company purchased Seacor’s
40 percent interest in Marmex, our former offshore vessel
joint venture company dedicated to providing maritime offshore
services in Mexico’s Gulf Coast. As part of this
transaction, Grupo TMM also purchased five offshore vessels
owned by Seacor which began flying the Mexican flag, and at the
same time converted three additional offshore vessels from
leased to owned status. All eight vessels are working under time
charter contracts supporting offshore oil exploration and
production activities in the Gulf of Mexico. The aggregate cost
of these transactions, including the purchase of 40% of the
Marmex shares, the purchase of five vessels from Seacor, and the
conversion to owned status of the three vessels under lease, was
$75 million, of which $70 million was financed through
bank debt.
|
41
|
|
|
|
•
|
Purchase of 40% SMR stake from Smit: On
May 9, 2006, the Company purchased the remaining
40 percent minority stake held by the Dutch company Smit in
Servicios Mexicanos en Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V.
(“SMR”), a joint venture company dedicated to
providing harbor towing services at the Port of Manzanillo,
Mexico. The purchase price was $9.0 million. The concession
to operate this business was recently renewed by the ports
authorities for an additional eight years until January 2015.
|
|
|
•
|
Purchase of 100% Almacenadora de Depósito Moderno, S.A.
de C.V. Organización Auxiliar de Crédito
(“ADEMSA”): On December 13, 2006,
the Company purchased 100% of ADEMSA’s shares. ADEMSA
currently operates over 380,000 square meters of
warehousing space throughout Mexico, including
68,000 square meters of direct warehouse (the largest of
which is located in northern Mexico City). Due to its regulated
nature, ADEMSA is one of a limited number of warehousing
companies authorized by the Mexican government to provide bonded
warehousing services and to issue negotiable certificates of
deposit.
|
|
|
•
|
Purchase of Assets from Autoconvoy Mexicano, S.A. de
C.V.: On July 19, 2007, Grupo TMM acquired
from Autoconvoy Mexicano, S.A. de C.V., operating assets
including a fleet of 228 trucks and 423 haul-away trailers, each
equipped with a satellite tracking system. We have our own yards
in Puebla, Aguascalientes and Cuernavaca, equipped with all the
necessary facilities for the operation of the newly formed TMM
Logistics haul-away division (management offices, repair shops,
shelter yards, security, warehouses, etc). Since July 19,
2007, Grupo TMM has been coordinating and distributing vehicles
on a national level, from the main automotive
manufacturers’ plants, to the national dealers or borders
for export purposes.
|
Operating
Results
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Financial
Statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
Annual Report. Our Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with IFRS, which differ in certain respects from
U.S. GAAP.
General
Set forth below is a summary of the results of operations
(excluding our discontinued operations described below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions of Dollars)
|
|
|
Consolidated Transportation Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
$
|
179.0
|
|
|
$
|
146.4
|
|
|
$
|
159.6
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
108.4
|
|
Intercompany revenues
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
303.3
|
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
$
|
306.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on Transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
$
|
44.1
|
|
|
$
|
30.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.2
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Shared corporate costs
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Discontinued
Operations
The summary of operating results from discontinued operations is
as follows:
Income
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
157,459
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29,733
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects railroad operations as discontinued operations |
Transportation
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Railroad Operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
170,088
|
|
Intercompany Revenues
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(12,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
157,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects railroad operations as discontinued operations |
For the year ended December 31, 2005, revenues for railroad
operations included only three months of operations because of
the TFM disposition on April 1, 2005 (See Note 5 to
our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information).
Operating
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Railroad Operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
29,733
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects railroad operations as discontinued operations |
For the year ended December 31, 2005, operating income for
railroad operations included only three months of operations
because of the TFM disposition on April 1, 2005 (See
Note 5 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information).
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations in 2006 and 2007
On April 1, 2005, Grupo TMM received $594 million for
the sale of its share interest in Grupo TFM to KCS, including
$200 million in cash, $47 million in a 5% promissory
note which matured on June 1, 2007, and 18 million
shares of KCS common stock worth $347 million at that date.
Furthermore, on March 13, 2006, Grupo TMM received an
additional payment of $110 million from KCS in a
combination of $35 million in cash, a $40 million note
receivable that matures on April 1, 2010, and
1,494,469 shares of KCS common stock valued at
$35 million dependent on a favorable resolution of the VAT
liability and the PUT. Due to the contingent nature of the
latter receivable, it was not recognized as a receivable at the
time of the sale, but was recognized as income from discontinued
operations within the consolidated statement of operations for
2006 until actual cash was collected in April 2006 with its
corresponding revenue in the amount of $111.4 million (See
Note 5 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements).
On September 21, 2007, the Company announced that it had
reached a settlement with KCS in connection with the arbitration
procedure instituted under the terms of the AAA dated
December 15, 2004 between Grupo TMM and
43
KCS. This settlement terminated any and all controversies under
the AAA and its ancillary documents, and provided for mutual
releases between the parties. Under the terms of the settlement,
KCS paid Grupo TMM $54.1 million in cash and the
obligations of KCS under the Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax
Escrow Note, which were payable in 2010, were terminated. In
Grupo TMM’s financial statements, these Notes were carried
at face value plus interest earned at $91.7 million, hence
it was recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations as a loss from discontinued operations for 2007, in
the amount of $38.6 million including $1 million of
settlement expenses (See Note 5 to our Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements).
Fiscal
Year ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year ended
December 31, 2006
Revenues from operations for the year ended December 31,
2007 were $303.3 million compared to $248.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Reported revenues for
each of Grupo TMM’s divisions increased in 2007 as compared
to 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Transportation Revenues
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007 vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
|
179.0
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
146.4
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
Intercompany Revenues(*)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
303.3
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Represents the elimination of intercompany transactions between
segments. |
Ports
and Terminals Operations
Ports and Terminals operations’ revenues increased 4.9% to
$8.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2007 and
accounted for 2.8% of total net revenues, compared to
$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Revenues attributable to the port in Acapulco improved by 12.4%
over 2006 revenues due to increased cruise calls from 123 calls
in 2006 to 135 calls in 2007. Tuxpan operations decreased 25%
due to repairs made to the warehouse.
Maritime
Operations
Maritime Operations’ revenues increased 22.3% to
$179.0 million in 2007 and accounted for 59.0% of net total
revenues compared to $146.4 million in 2006. This increase
was mainly attributable to a 13.5% increase over 2006 revenues
in revenues from services related to supplies ships and a 32.5%
increase over 2006 revenues in revenues from services related to
product tankers. These increases were mainly attributable to an
increased number of vessels in operation, higher day rates and
better utilization factors due to less offhire days for drydock.
Logistics
Operations
Logistics operations’ revenues increased by 23.4% to
$115.9 million in 2007 and accounted for 38.2% of net total
revenues compared to $93.9 million in 2006. Trucking
revenues increased due to improved freight volumes and to longer
hauls. Warehousing and auto hauling operations contributed with
$16.9 million and $9.1 million of revenues,
respectively. Maintenance and repair revenues increased due to
an improved mix of revenues and inbound logistics improved
mainly to increased line feeding volumes. Revenue was impacted
by a $9.3 million loss from the cancellation of a contract
between Kansas City Southern de México and Ford Motor
Company in which TMM Logistics was a subcontractor
44
Income on
Transportation
Under IFRS, income on transportation reflects revenues on
transportation less operating costs and expenses. Reference to
operating income in this Annual Report refers to income on
transportation, plus/minus the effect of other income (expenses)
as presented in the Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report.
Total costs and expenses for the year ended December 31,
2007 increased 18.0% to $279.6 million from
$237.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This increase was mainly attributable to an increase of 32.6% in
leases and other rents, an increase of 18.4% in fuel materials
and supplies, an increase of 18.4% in salaries, wages and
employee benefits and an increase of 55.8% in depreciation and
amortization, partially offset by a 5.8% decrease in purchased
services and a 5.0% decrease in other costs and expenses.
Operating income increased to $23.7 million or 113.5%, for
the year ended December 31, 2007 from an operating income
of $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The following table sets forth information concerning the
Company’s operating income by business segment for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo TMM Operations
|
|
|
|
Income on Transportation (1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007 vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(44.3
|
)%
|
Shared Corporate Costs
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
113.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating results are reported as Income on Transportation in
our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual
Report. |
|
(2) |
|
To better reflect Grupo TMM’s corporate costs, the Company
modified the presentation of its corporate expenses as of
December 31, 2007, separating human resources and
information technology costs to be allocated to each business
unit in accordance with its use. Includes the following
allocated total administrative costs: In 2007: $1.9 million
in Ports and Terminals operations, $6.4 million in Maritime
operations, $14.1 million in Logistics operations and
$18.5 million in shared corporate costs and in 2006:
$1.8 million in Ports and Terminals operations,
$5.9 million in Maritime operations, $9.5 million in
Logistics operations and $14.6 million in shared corporate
costs. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the following Restructuring Expenses incurred in 2005:
$0.1 million in Maritime operations, $1.2 millions in
Logistics operations, $0.3 millions in Ports and Terminals
operations and $0.4 million in shared corporate costs. |
Ports
and Terminals Operations
Ports and terminals operations’ operating income for the
year ended December 31, 2007 increased to
$1.4 million, after deducting $1.9 million of
administrative costs, compared to $1.2 million, after
deducting $1.8 million of administrative costs, for the
year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was mainly due
to a 12.4% increase in revenues at our port in Acapulco to
$6.38 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
cruise calls increased from 123 cruise calls in 2006 to 135 in
cruise calls 2007 while overall costs remained stable.
Maritime
Operations
Maritime Operations’ operating income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 increased to $44.1 million, after
deducting $6.4 million of administrative costs, compared to
$30.5 million, after deducting $5.9 million of
45
administrative costs, for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This increase was mainly due to a reduction of 21.5% in costs
and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 as a
result of increased owned offshore and tanker vessels in
operation compared to the year ended December 31, 2006.
Higher day rates and more efficient utilization also increased
the operating profit as a result of increased owned offshore and
tanker vessels in operation as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Logistics
Operations
Logistics Operations incurred an operating loss for the year
ended December 31, 2007 of $3.4 million, after
deducting $14.1 million of administrative costs, compared
to a loss of $6.1 million, after deducting
$9.5 million of administrative costs, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. This improvement was mainly due to
increased profits in the trucking, maintenance &
repair segments, and the contribution of profits from the
warehouse segment, which was partially offset by increased costs
and operating expenses in the auto hauling segment during the
final three months of fiscal 2007.
Net
Financing Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Net Financing Cost
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
$
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)%
|
Net financing cost incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007, was $48.5 million, decreasing
$7.3 million from $55.8 million incurred during the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease resulted
primarily from the absence of certain costs incurred in 2006 but
not in 2007, including the amortization of financial expenses
related to the prepayment of the Company’s 2007 Notes.
Other (Expenses) income — Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Other (expenses) income, net
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
(81.7
|
)%
|
Other (expenses) income net for the year ended December 31,
2007 primarily included: $10.4 million for a non-recurring
restructuring cost, a $4.6 million loss from the sale of
non productive assets and leases of related equipment, which was
partially offset by $10.8 million from recoverable taxes
net of expenses and a gain from the sale of subsidiaries. Other
(expenses) income — net for the year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily included: a $21.3 million
impairment charge for long-lived assets, a $1.5 million
provision for the management fee to SSA and a $1.1 million
provision for labor contingencies.
Benefit
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
(97.1
|
)%
|
A benefit for income taxes of $0.8 million was reported for
the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to a tax benefit
of $27.8 million reported for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The tax benefit resulted primarily from
the use of certain tax loss carry forwards.
46
Minority
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)%
|
Minority interest was reduced to $0.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $0.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was caused by a
reduction in net income for the year from companies in which we
hold a minority interest.
Net
(Loss) Income for the year, attributable to stockholders of
Grupo TMM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Net (Loss) Income for the year attributable to stockholders of
Grupo TMM
|
|
$
|
(67.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)%
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred a net
loss of $67.1 million or a loss of $1.18 dollars per
share,which included a loss of $38.6 million from
discontinued operations. In the year ended December 31,
2006, we reported a net income of $69.9 million or income
$1.23 dollars per share, which included income of
$111.4 million from discontinued operations.
Fiscal
Year ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year ended
December 31, 2005
Revenues from operations for the year ended December 31,
2006 were $248.1 million compared to $306.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005. Reported revenues for
each of Grupo TMM’s divisions decreased in 2006 as compared
to 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Transportation Revenues
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006 vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
(79.1
|
)%
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
|
146.4
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
159.6
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
Intercompany Revenues(*)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
248.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
306.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Represents the elimination of intercompany transactions between
segments. |
Ports
and Terminals Operations
Ports and Terminals operations’ revenues decreased 79.1% to
$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
accounted for 3.3% of net total revenues compared to
$38.8 million for 2005. Revenues were reduced primarily due
to the sale of our Colombian assets and the effect of the
reclassification of the net revenues from our shipping agency
business. Revenues attributable to automobile handling at the
port in Acapulco improved 27.5% over 2005 levels due to
increased export volumes to South America and Asia from
25,963 units in 2005 to 37,452 units in 2006,
respectively. This increase was offset in part by a decrease in
cruise ship calls mainly due to the mechanical failure of one of
our customer’s cruise ship vessels.
47
Maritime
Operations
Maritime Operations’ revenues decreased 8.3% to
$146.4 million in 2006 and accounted for 59.0% of net total
revenues compared to $159.6 million in 2005. This decrease
was mainly attributable to a decrease of 18.6% in revenues from
services related to supplies ships and a decrease of 3.5% in
revenues from services related to product tankers, each as
compared to 2005 levels. These decreases were mainly
attributable to a decreased number of vessels in operation and
an atypical year of dry dock requirements.
Logistics
Operations
Logistics operations’ revenues decreased by 13.4% to
$93.8 million in 2006 and accounted for 37.8% of net total
revenues compared to $108.4 million in 2005. These revenues
were primarily impacted by the termination of services as a
result of the breach by Kansas City Southern de México, a
KCS affiliate, of certain service agreements (see
“Disposition of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to
KCS — Marketing Arrangements”) and the
termination of non-profitable businesses. Trucking revenues
increased by 32.1% over 2005 levels to $35.6 million in
2006 due mainly to the acquisition of new operating equipment
during the year.
Income on
Transportation
Under IFRS, income on transportation reflects revenues on
transportation less operating costs and expenses. Reference to
operating income in this Annual Report refers to income on
transportation, plus/minus the effect of other income (expenses)
as presented in the Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report.
Total costs and expenses for the year ended December 31,
2006 decreased 21.5% to $237.0 million from
$301.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
This decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease of 37.7% in
leases and other rents and a decrease of 32.6% in purchased
services. Operating income increased to $11.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 from an operating income
of $4.7 million incurred for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo TMM Operations
|
|
|
|
Income on Transportation (1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006 vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
43.90
|
%
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)%
|
Shared Corporate Costs
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
136.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating results are reported as Income on Transportation in
our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual
Report. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the following total administrative costs in 2006:
$1.8 million in Ports and Terminals operations,
$5.9 million in Maritime operations, $9.5 million in
Logistics operations and $14.6 million in shared corporate
costs. Includes the following total administrative costs in
2005: $4.2 million in Ports and Terminals operations,
$5.3 million in Maritime operations, $9.8 in Logistics
operations and $12.4 million in shared corporate costs. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the following Restructuring Expense incurred in 2005:
$0.1 million in Maritime operations, $1.2 millions in
Logistics operations, $0.3 millions in Ports and Terminals
operations and $0.4 million in shared corporate costs. |
48
Ports
and Terminals Operations
Ports and Terminals Operations’ operating income for the
year ended December 31, 2006 increased to
$1.2 million, after deducting $1.8 million of
administrative costs, compared to $0.7 million, after
deducting $4.2 million of administrative costs, for the
year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was mainly due
to a 27.5% increase in revenues from auto handling at our port
in Acapulco to $1.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as export volumes to Japan and South
America increased from 25,963 automobiles in 2005 to 37,452 in
2006, while overall costs remained stable.
Maritime
Operations
Maritime Operations’ operating income for the year ended
December 31, 2006 increased to $30.5 million, after
deducting $5.9 million of administrative costs, from
$21.2 million, after deducting $5.3 million of
administrative costs, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
This increase was mainly due to a reduction of 21.5% in costs
and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a
result of an increase in owned offshore and tanker vessels in
operation compared to the year ended December 31, 2005.
Logistics
Operations
Logistics Operations incurred an operating loss for the year
ended December 31, 2006 of $6.1 million, after
deducting $9.5 million of administrative costs, compared to
a loss of $4.8 million, after deducting $9.8 million
of administrative costs, for the year ended December 31,
2005. The operating loss for the year ended December 31,
2006 was impacted by the termination of services as a result of
the breach by Kansas City Southern de Mexico of certain service
agreements (see “Disposition of Grupo TMM’s interest
in Grupo TFM to KCS — Marketing Arrangements”)
and by the costs associated with terminating unprofitable
operations.
Net
Financing Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Net Financing Cost
|
|
$
|
55.8
|
|
|
$
|
89.6
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)%
|
Net financing cost incurred for the year ended December 31,
2006 was $55.8 million compared to a net financing cost of
$89.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Net financing costs included a net exchange loss of
$0.4 million in 2006 and a net exchange gain of
$1.3 million in 2005. Financing costs decreased mainly due
to a $47.3 million reduction of the interest and principal
amount on the 2007 Notes. The decrease was partially offset by
an expense of $8.5 million for interest on new borrowings
and $7.0 million of additional amortization of expenses
capitalized from debt restructuring arising from a principal
payment of $331.0 million in January 2006, and a principal
payment of $155.8 million in September 2006, each with
respect to the 2007 Notes.
Other
(Expense) Income — Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Other (expenses) income, net
|
|
$
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)%
|
Other (expenses) income — net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $24.1 million, and primarily
included: a $21.3 million impairment charge for long-lived
assets, a $1.5 million provision for the management fee to
SSA and a $1.1 million provision for labor contingencies.
49
Benefit
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
(55.2
|
)%
|
A benefit for income tax of $27.8 million was reported for
the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to a tax benefit
of $62.0 million reported for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The tax benefit resulted primarily from
the use of certain tax loss carry forwards.
Minority
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
(88.1
|
)%
|
Minority interest was reduced to $0.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $4.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005. This decrease resulted from the
acquisition of shares of subsidiaries previously owned by
minority shareholders.
Net
(Loss) Income for the year, attributable to stockholders of
Grupo TMM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Net (Loss) Income for the year attributable to stockholders of
Grupo TMM
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
|
$
|
171.3
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)%
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we reported net
income of $69.9 million or income of $1.2 dollars per
share, which included income of $111.4 million from
discontinued operations. In the year ended December 31,
2005, we reported net income of $171.3 million or income of
$3.0 dollars per share, which included income of
$199.3 million from discontinued operations.
See Item 11. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk — Inflation Rate Risk” and
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk — Foreign Currency Risk” for a discussion
about how inflation and foreign currency risks affect the
Company’s business.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
IFRS as issued by the IASB.
We have identified certain key accounting policies on which our
financial condition and results of operations are dependent.
These key accounting policies most often involve complex
matters, may be based on estimates and involve a significant
amount of judgment. In the opinion of our management, our
critical accounting policies under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP
are those related to revenue recognition, financial statement
translations into U.S. dollars, use of financial
instruments and deferred income taxes. For a full description of
all of our accounting policies, see Note 2 to our Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
Revenue Recognition. Voyage revenues (parcel
tankers) are recognized as income at the time the voyage is
completed. Revenues associated with voyages in process are
deferred and recognized at the conclusion of the voyage. Voyage
revenues for the relevant accounting period are recognized as
income based on where the shipments
50
originated and the corresponding destination actually reached
during that period. This requires that management, at the
cut-off date for each accounting period, estimate the progress
of shipments during that period.
Financial Statement Translations into
U.S. Dollars. In preparing our Financial
Statements, we translate amounts in other currencies to
U.S. dollars under IFRS based on the guidelines established
by IAS 21, “The Effect of Changes in Foreign Exchange
Rates,” IAS 29, “Financial Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Economies” and SIC 19,
“Reporting Currency” and under U.S. GAAP based on
the guidance of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52,
“Foreign Currency Translation”
(“SFAS 52”). Pursuant to the revised version of
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 21 by the IASB (see
Note 2 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements)
“The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”,
whereby the concept of functional currency is discussed, Grupo
TMM analyzed the economic environment in which its subsidiaries
were operating during 2005. The analysis disclosed the need to
change the functional currency of some of Grupo TMM’s
subsidiaries from the U.S. dollar to the Mexican peso. The
revised IAS 21 allows choosing the reporting currency which
remained the U.S. dollar in our Financial Statements.
Financial Instruments. We may make use of
derivative financial instruments to hedge our fuel costs which
are a significant component of our operating expenses. We
account for these instruments based on the guidance of IAS 39,
“Financial Instruments, Recognition and Measurement”
under IFRS and FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” under U.S. GAAP.
In using derivative instruments to protect ourselves against
unexpected surges in fuel costs we have to consider various
factors including: (i) traffic levels, (ii) efficiency
of operations and equipment, and (iii) fuel market
conditions. If the assumptions we make in our projections are
not accurate, the intended results with the use of derivative
instruments might not be achieved and we may not be able to
effectively protect ourselves against increases in fuel costs.
Deferred Income Taxes. We apply the provisions
of IAS 12, “Income Taxes,” and SFAS 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” The guidance under both
IFRS and U.S. GAAP establishes that the recognition of net
operating loss carryforwards should be based on the likelihood
that such tax credits will be effectively used to offset future
tax liabilities. In making such an evaluation we have to
exercise significant judgment in estimating the level of future
taxable income that we will generate and our projections take
into consideration certain assumptions, some of which are under
our control and others, which are not. Key assumptions include
inflation rates, currency fluctuations and future revenue
growth. If our assumptions are not accurate, the amount of tax
credits we have recognized could be significantly impacted.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements IFRS
Grupo TMM has adopted for the first time the International
Financial Reporting Standard (“IFRS”) 7 Financial
Instruments: Disclosures and IFRS 8 Operating Segments in its
2007 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The application
of both standards did not require retrospective amendments to
the 2006 accounts or their presentation. Other Standards or
Interpretations relevant to IFRS financial statements did not
become effective during 2007.
Significant effects on current, prior or future periods arising
from the first-time application of the standards listed above in
respect of presentation, recognition and measurement of accounts
are described in the following paragraphs. An overview of the
Standards and Interpretations that will become mandatory for
Grupo TMM in future periods is also provided in such paragraphs.
In accordance with the amendment of IAS 1 Presentation of
Financial Statements, Grupo TMM now reports on its capital
management objectives, policies and procedures in each annual
financial report. The new disclosures that have become necessary
as a result of this change in IAS 1 can be found in Note 28
to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure is mandatory for
reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2007 or
later. The new standard replaces and amends disclosure
requirements previously set out in the International Accounting
Standard (IAS) 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and
Disclosures and has been adopted by Grupo TMM in its 2007
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. All disclosures
relating to financial instruments including all comparative
information have been updated to reflect the new requirements.
In particular, Grupo
51
TMM’s financial statements now feature a sensitivity
analysis, to explain the Company’s market risk exposure in
regards to its financial instruments, and a maturity analysis
that shows the remaining contractual maturities of financial
liabilities, each as of the balance sheet date. See
Notes 2, 15, 16 and 28 to the Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements. The first-time application of IFRS 7,
however, has not resulted in any prior-period adjustments of
cash-flows, net income or balance sheet line items.
Grupo TMM decided to adopt IFRS 8 Operating Segments, which
replaces IAS 14 Segment Reporting early. The adoption of this
standard has not affected the way Grupo TMM identifies separate
operating segments relevant for segment reporting, because Grupo
TMM continues to present segment results in accordance with
internal management reporting information. See Note 24 to
the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following new Standards and Interpretations, which are yet
to become mandatory, have not been applied in Grupo TMM’s
2007 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective for
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Periods
|
Title
|
|
Full Title of Standard or Interpretation
|
|
Beginning on or After:
|
|
IFRIC 11
|
|
Group and Treasury Share Transactions
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
IFRIC 14
|
|
The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding
Requirements and their Interaction
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
IFRIC 12
|
|
Service Concession Arrangements
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
IFRIC 13
|
|
Customer Loyalty Programs
|
|
July 1, 2008
|
IAS 23
|
|
Borrowing Costs
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IAS 1
|
|
Presentation of Financial Statements
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IFRS 2
|
|
Amendment to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment: Vesting Conditions
and Cancellations
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IAS 32 and IAS 1
|
|
Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements:
Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on
Liquidation
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IFRS 3
|
|
Business Combinations (Revised 2008)
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
IAS 27
|
|
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
The IASB has published Improvements to IFRS (the “2008
Improvements”) which make minor amendments to a number of
the standards contained in the standards. This publication
completes the IASB’s first round of annual improvements.
Structure of 2008 Improvements
Part I of the 2008 Improvements includes amendments that
result in accounting changes for presentation, recognition or
measurement purposes.
Part II includes those amendments that are terminology or
editorial changes only, which the IASB expects to have no or
minimal effect on accounting.
52
The following table sets out the standards that are affected by
the amendments, and the issues addressed. Part I of the
2008 Improvements (amendments that result in accounting changes
for presentation, recognition or measurement purposes):
|
|
|
Standard Affected
|
|
Subject of Amendment
|
|
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations
|
|
Plan to sell the controlling interest in a subsidiary
|
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
|
|
Current/non-current classification of derivatives
|
|
|
Recoverable amount
|
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
Sale of assets held for renstal
|
|
|
Curtailments and negative past service cost
Plan administration costs
|
IAS 19 Employee Benefits
|
|
Replacement of term ‘fall due’
Guidance on contingent liabilities
|
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and
Disclosure of Government Assistance
|
|
Government loans with a below-market rate of interest
|
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs
|
|
Components of borrowing costs
|
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
|
|
Measurement of subsidiary held for sale in separate financial
statements
|
IAS 28 Investments in Associates
|
|
Required disclosures when investments in associates are
accounted for at fair value through profit or loss
Impairment of investment in associate
|
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures
|
|
Required disclosures when interests in jointly controlled
entities are accounted for at fair value through profit or loss
|
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
|
|
Description of measurement basis in financial statements
|
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
|
|
Disclosure of estimates used to determine recoverable amount
|
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
|
|
Advertising and promotional activities
Unit of production method of amortisation
Reclassification of derivatives into or out of the
classification of at fair value through profit or loss
|
IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
|
|
Designating and documenting hedges at the segment level
Applicable effective interest rate on cessation of fair value
hedge accounting
|
IAS 40 Investment Property
|
|
Property under construction or development for future use as
investment property
|
IAS 41 Agriculture
|
|
Discount rate for fair value calculations Additional biological
transformation
|
The effective date for each amendment is included in the
standard affected. In most cases the amendments apply for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2009, with early
adoption permitted.
The IASB has issued amendments to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards and IAS 27
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, entitled Cost of
an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly Controlled Entity or
Associate (the “Amendments”).
The Amendments affect only the separate financial statements of
a parent entity or investor. The primary changes are:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the introduction of a ‘deemed cost’ exemption to IFRS
1 for first-time adopters of IFRS when measuring the cost of an
investment in a subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or
associate;
|
53
|
|
|
|
•
|
the removal of IAS 27’s requirement to deduct
pre-acquisition dividends from the cost of an investment in a
subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or associate in the
separate financial statements of the investor entity; and
|
|
|
•
|
new requirements on accounting for the formation of a new parent.
|
The Amendments shall be applied for annual periods beginning on
or after January 1, 2009.
Based on Grupo TMM’s current business model and accounting
policies, management does not expect material impacts on its
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements when the new
standards, Amendments and interpretations described above become
effective.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our business is capital intensive and requires ongoing
expenditures for, among other things, improvements to ports and
terminals, infrastructure and technology, capital expenditures
for vessels and other equipment, leases and repair of equipment
and maintenance of our vessels. Our principal sources of
liquidity consist of cash flows from operations, existing cash
balances, sales of assets and debt financing.
Grupo TMM is primarily a holding company and conducts the
majority of its operations, and holds a substantial portion of
its operating assets through numerous direct and indirect
subsidiaries. As a result, it relies on income from dividends
and fees related to administrative services provided from its
operating subsidiaries for its operating income, including the
funds necessary to service its indebtedness.
Under Mexican law, dividends from our subsidiaries, including a
pro rata share of the available proceeds of our joint ventures,
may be distributed only when the shareholders of such companies
have approved the corresponding financial information, and none
of our subsidiaries or joint venture companies can distribute
dividends to us until losses incurred by such subsidiary have
been recouped. In addition, at least 5% of profits must be
separated to create a reserve (fondo de reserva) until
such reserve is equal to 20% of the aggregate value of such
subsidiary’s capital stock (as calculated based on the
actual nominal subscription price received by such subsidiary
for all issued shares that are outstanding at the time).
As of December 31, 2007, Grupo TMM’s total debt
(excluding the securitization facility) amounted to
$321.0 million, which includes $262.0 million of our
Mexican Peso-Denominated Trust Certificates Program (the
“Trust Certificates Program”) and
$59.0 million of Bank Debt; of this debt,
$17.8 million is short-term debt and $303.2 million is
long-term debt. As of March 31, 2008, Grupo TMM’s
total debt (excluding the securitization facility) amounted to
$384.5 million, which includes $273.5 million of our
Trust Certificates Program and $111.0 million of Bank
Debt; of this debt, $33.6 million is short-term debt and
$350.9 million is long-term debt.
In addition, as of December 31, 2007, Grupo TMM’s
balance due under its securitization facility with Deutsche Bank
AG (the “Securitization Facility”) was
$126.8 million, which includes $130.9 million of
principal amount, $1.2 million of interest and a
transaction cost adjustment of $5.3 million; of this debt,
$13.4 million is short-term debt and $113.4 million is
long term debt. As of March 31, 2008, the balance due under
the Securitization Facility was $124.2 million, which
includes $127.9 million of principal amount,
$1.2 million of interest and a transaction cost adjustment
of $4.9 million; of this debt, $13.9 million is
short-term debt and $110.3 million is long-term debt. Under
IFRS, transaction costs in connection with financings are
required to be accounted for as debt.
Our total shareholders’ equity in 2007, including minority
interest in consolidated subsidiaries, was $118.9 million,
resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.8.
As of December 31, 2006, Grupo TMM’s total debt
amounted to $169.0 million, which includes
$167.1 million of principal amount, $1.8 of interest and
transaction costs that reduce the amount outstanding by
$0.1 million; of this debt, $27.5 million is
short-term debt and $141.42 million is long-term debt.
The debt under securitization facilities amounted to
$189.3 million, which includes $195.2 million of
principal amount, $1.8 million of interest and transaction
costs that reduce the amount outstanding by $7.6 million;
of this debt, $16.7 million is short-term debt and
$172.6 million is long term debt.
54
Our total shareholders’ equity in 2006, including minority
interest in consolidated subsidiaries, was $191.3 million,
resulting in a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.9.
On January 9, 2008, Grupo TMM (through its subsidiary TMM
Remolcadores, S. A. de C. V.) entered into a financing agreement
in the amount of $11.9 million (85% of the vessels purchase
price) with a term of seven years, at a fixed rate of 6.35% with
quarterly payments of principal and interest, for the
acquisition of two tugboats.
On January 11, 2008, in order to refinance its acquisition
of ADEMSA, Grupo TMM closed a financing agreement in the amount
of $8.5 million with a term of seven years, at a fixed rate
of 8.01% with semi-annual payments of principal starting on
January 2010 and semi-annual interests payments.
On January 24, 2008, through its subsidiary TMM Flota
Maritíma, S. A. de C. V., Grupo TMM obtained a financing
facility of up to $100.0 million for the acquisition and
construction of vessels to be delivered in
2008-2010.
The financing facility was used for the acquisition of one
supply vessel for $32.8 million (90% of the purchase price)
for a term of seven years. The facility included two kinds of
loans, the senior loan of $27.4 million at variable rate of
Libor +185 basis points and the junior loan of
$5.4 million at variable rate of Libor + 400 basis
points, with monthly payments of principal and interest. Both
loans were fully pre-paid on April 30, 2008 with the
proceeds of the second issuance of the Trust Certificates
Program.
As of March 31, 2008, we had net working capital (current
assets less current liabilities) of $32.4 million. We had
net working capital of $42.2 million, $66.1 million
and $364.9 million as of December 31, 2007,
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The decrease in net working capital from December 31, 2006
to December 31, 2007 is primarily attributable to
receivables collected from KCS in an amount of
$51.1 million, which decrease was partially offset by an
increase in restricted cash on hand to $20.6 million and an
increase in certain current assets of $6.6 million.
On April 30, 2008 Grupo TMM issued securities under the
second tranche of our Trust Certificates Program for
Ps. 1.55 billion, or approximately $136.9 million
dollars, at Mexico’s interbank equilibrium interest rate,
TIIE, plus 195 basis points. The proceeds from the second
tranche of this program will be used to acquire additional
offshore vessels, to repay existing debt, to fund required cash
reserves and to pay issuance related expenses.
Grupo TMM expects to close the third tranche of our trust
certificates program for an estimated amount of
Ps. 3.4 billion (approximately $323 million)
during the third quarter of 2008. We intend to use these
proceeds to acquire seven vessels, including product tankers and
highly specialized offshore vessels.
Information
on Cash Flows
Summary cash flow data for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
333,966
|
|
|
|
(332,295
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(40,424
|
)
|
|
|
(103,255
|
)
|
|
|
437,644
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
34,741
|
|
|
|
(261,926
|
)
|
|
|
(98,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,984
|
)
|
|
|
(31,215
|
)
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
21,706
|
|
|
|
52,921
|
|
|
|
46,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
14,722
|
|
|
$
|
21,706
|
|
|
$
|
52,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s
consolidated cash position decreased by $7.0 million from
the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was mainly
attributable to $104.5 million being used to acquire fixed
assets and to acquire shares of certain subsidiaries from
minority shareholders, and $88.3 million being used for the
payment of the securitization facilities ($64.3 million of
principal and $24.0 million of interest), which was
partially offset by $64.1 million provided from the sale of
fixed assets and subsidiaries shares, and $125.4 million,
net provided under contractual debt.
55
Our
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash flows used in operating activities amounted to
$1.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to net cash provided by operating activities of
$334.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.
This decrease was primarily due to a use of restricted funds in
the amount of $351.5 million, mainly to pay
$347.0 million in principal and interest on the 2007 Notes
and a decrease in working capital in the amount of
$6.3 million, which was partially offset by an increase in
operating cash flow in the amount of $21.7 million. Net
cash used in operating activities in the year ended
December 31, 2005 was $332.3 million. This increase
was primarily due to an increase in the amount of restricted
cash on hand.
The following table summarizes cash flows from operating
activities for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income for the year
|
|
$
|
(66,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,417
|
|
|
$
|
175,492
|
|
Depreciation and amortization and other amortization
|
|
|
28,743
|
|
|
|
20,438
|
|
|
|
28,789
|
|
Amortization of discount on senior secured debentures
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
(27,815
|
)
|
|
|
(62,021
|
)
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets — net
|
|
|
(5,302
|
)
|
|
|
(3,934
|
)
|
|
|
(3,697
|
)
|
Impairment test in long-lived assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,262
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (Loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
38,563
|
|
|
|
(111,362
|
)
|
|
|
(199,363
|
)
|
(Decrease) Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(20,553
|
)
|
|
|
330,928
|
|
|
|
(341,079
|
)
|
Total changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
25,004
|
|
|
|
31,301
|
|
|
|
67,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
$
|
333,966
|
|
|
$
|
(332,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $40.4 million, which included
$100.7 million for the acquisition of property, machinery
and equipment and $3.8 million for the acquisition of
shares of certain subsidiaries from minority stockholders,
offset in part by $7.2 million from the sale of fixed
assets and $56.9 million, net from the sale of
subsidiaries. Net cash provided by investing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $103.3 million, which
included $569.0 million from the sale of our interest in
Grupo TFM and other subsidiaries, $154.3 million for the
acquisition of property, machinery and equipment which was
offset in part by $12.3 million from the sale of fixed
assets and $68.7 million received from KCS as an earnout
net of expenses, net from the sale of subsidiaries’ shares.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2005, was $437.6 million which included
$581.1 million, net from the sale of subsidiaries and
$1.7 million from the sale of fixed assets, which was
partially offset by $107 million for the acquisition of
property, machinery and equipment, and $38.1 million for
the acquisition of shares of certain subsidiaries from minority
shareholders.
See “— Capital Expenditures and
Divestitures” below for further details of capital
expenditures and divestitures relating to the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Our
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2007, cash provided by
financing activities amounted to $34.7 million. The
increase was mainly due to an increase in net contractual debt,
which was partially offset by $88.3 million from the
payment of debt under the securitization facilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, cash used in
financing activities amounted to $261.9 million. This
decrease was primarily due to pay down of $443.5 million in
principal amount of our 2007 Notes and the corresponding
interest, which was offset in part by $181.6 million of
proceeds under our securitization facility.
56
In the year ended December 31, 2005, cash used in financing
activities amounted to $98.8 million, which was used to pay
down $77.4 million under our receivables securitization
facility and interest related thereto and to pay down
$67.8 million of principal on our 2007 Notes, and
$21.2 million of interest thereon, which was offset in part
by the incurrence of $68.0 million of debt from Natixis
Populaires.
Business
Plan
Until 2005, the Company had limited its capital expenditures in
fixed assets due to its liquidity difficulties and indebtedness
restrictions. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company made
significant capital expenditures as described below in
“Capital Expenditures and Divestitures.”
Maritime Operations. As part of our business
plan to have a wholly owned division, we acquired the remaining
40% interest in each of the offshore and tugboat businesses.
With regard to our product tanker business, we have entered into
2 product tanker contracts with PEMEX under bareboat charters
for a 5-year
term, which began operations in July 2005. PEMEX is currently in
a bidding process to enter into a long-term finance lease for
bareboat contracts.
Ports and Terminals Operations. We own over
2,000 acres of land in the port of Tuxpan. We believe this
greenfield could be used in the future in connection with the
development of Tuxpan as a major seaport.
Logistics Operations. We intend to expand our
alliances with leading companies in the multimodal
transportation and logistics businesses, purchase equipment that
will enable us to perform services we previously outsourced, and
expand on our “Mixing Centers” and “Multipurpose
Yards” concepts in the Mexican industry. We also intend to
participate further in value added segments such as less than
truck load services (i.e., combining cargo from different
customers in order to complete a truck load), refrigerated
distribution services and other land transportation and
logistics related businesses.
We intend to finance the above mentioned projects through
secured credit arrangements and other asset-backed financings.
We cannot guarantee the success of any of the plans discussed
above or that we will obtain any of the additional financing
necessary to pursue the plans.
Our
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The auditors’ report on our Financial Statements for the
year ended December 31, 2007, includes an explanatory
paragraph describing the existence of substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a “going concern.” The
report observes that (i) the continuation of the Company as
an ongoing business depends on our compliance with our financial
obligations on a regular basis, (ii) to be successful in
our new investments we need to increase our fleet of vessels and
take into consideration the requirements of Pemex and our other
clients and (iii) the Financial Statements do not include
any adjustment over the assets or liabilities that could be
necessary if the company is not able to continue as an ongoing
business.
In addition, we have made certain decisions to improve the
operating and financial results such as (i) acquiring
operating assets in the Logistics Unit, (ii) acquiring new
vessels and (iii) initiating the process for the issuance
of the second tranche of the Certificados Bursatiles program,
which was used to refinance our current debt. The Company’s
management believes that its 2008 business plan considers a
significant increase in income and generation of cash from
operations. These increases would be derived from business
levels and assets that are substantially in place as of the end
of the Company’s fiscal year 2007. The Company’s
management also believes that the aforementioned will permit the
Company to continue on its positive trend of increasing
efficiency and coverage ratios and realizing its current
strategy of creating a healthy and competitive financial
structure for the Company in the medium term.
Although we believe that the above-mentioned changes should be
enough to provide the Company with the ability to continue as a
going concern, we can give no assurance that they will give the
desired result.
See Item 3. “Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Liquidity
Business — Uncertainties” relating to our
financial condition in recent years and other factors which
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern and could result in our dissolution under Mexican
Corporate Law.
57
Capital
Expenditures and Divestitures
The following tables set forth our principal capital
expenditures and divestitures during the last three years:
Our
Principal Capital Expenditures for the Last Three
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
2005(c)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals Operations
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
Maritime Operations
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
Logistics Operations
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
104.5
|
|
|
$
|
184.3
|
|
|
$
|
145.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2007, capital expenditures include: (i) Ports and
Terminals Operations: $0.9 million in construction in
process for the expansion and maintenance of port and terminal
facilities; (ii) Maritime Operations: $41.1 million in
acquisition of vessels, $5.7 million in equipment
improvement, $6.3 million in construction in process for
the expansion and renovation of offices in Ciudad del Carmen and
$3.8 in acquisition of shares of subsidiaries from minority
shareholders; (iii) Logistics Operations:
$43.8 million in operating equipment and related fixed
assets and $1.0 million in construction in process; and
(iv) Corporate: $1.9 million in fixed assets and other
related strategic corporate projects. |
|
(b) |
|
In 2006, capital expenditures include: (i) Ports and
Terminals Operations: $0.6 million in construction in
process for the expansion and maintenance of port and terminal
facilities and $0.7 million in other related assets;
(ii) Maritime Operations: $87.7 million in acquisition
of vessels and $4.4 in acquisition of shares of subsidiaries
from minority shareholders; (iii) Logistics Operations:
$7.8 million in construction in process and
$4.3 million in operating equipment and related fixed
assets; and (iv) Corporate: $3.9 million in strategic
corporate projects and $34.1 million in acquisition of
shares of subsidiaries from minority shareholders. |
|
(c) |
|
In 2005, capital expenditures include: (i) Ports and
Terminals Operations: $0.3 million in construction in
process for the expansion and maintenance of port and terminal
facilities and $0.3 million in other related assets;
(ii) Maritime Operations: $4.3 million in equipment
improvements; (iii) Logistics Operations: $6.8 million
in construction in process and $0.2 million in other fixed
assets; and (iv) Corporate: $3.4 million in strategic
corporate projects and other shared fixed assets. |
Our
Principal Capital Divestitures for the Last Three
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
2005(c)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Capital Divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of shares of subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
$
|
68.7
|
|
|
$
|
581.0
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
64.1
|
|
|
$
|
81.0
|
|
|
$
|
582.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2007, capital divestitures include $7.2 million from the
sale of other fixed assets. |
|
(b) |
|
In 2006, capital divestitures include $12.3 million from
the sale of other fixed assets. |
|
(c) |
|
In 2005, capital divestitures include:
(i) $560.0 million from the sale of our 51%
participation in GTFM to KCS and $21.0 million from the
sale of shares of other subsidiaries and
(ii) $1.7 million from the sale of other fixed assets. |
58
Outlook
on Capital Expenditures
In early 2006, we made significant capital expenditures for the
purchase of 40% of Marmex’s shares from Seacor, the
purchase of eight offshore vessels, the conversion to owned
status of three offshore vessels under lease, the purchase of
the remaining 40% minority stake held by Smit in our harbor
towing business and the acquisition of additional trucking
equipment and technology. During 2007, we also made significant
capital expenditures in on-going construction for the expansion
and maintenance of our port and terminal facilities, acquisition
of vessels and equipment improvement, trucking equipment and
other related and strategic corporate projects. During 2008 and
the coming years, we expect to incur significant capital
expenditures on transportation assets, including, but not
limited to, additional tankers and offshore vessels, chemical
carriers and tugboats, ports and terminals assets and logistics
assets.
Securitization
Facility
Under the terms of its prior securitization facility, the
Company and certain of its subsidiaries sold receivables to a
trust, which in turn, issued certificates to investors
(“Certificates”). For accounting purposes, the
securitization facility represents the total U.S. dollar
amount of future services to be provided to customers under the
securitization facility. The balance due under this
securitization facility was approximately $74.9 million as
of December 31, 2004, at an annual fixed interest rate of
9.25%. The facility contemplates the restriction of cash for the
purposes of securing any potential payment defaults. The balance
of restricted cash under this facility as of December 31,
2004 was $6.8 million.
On April 5, 2005, there was approximately
$70.5 million of aggregate principal amount and interest on
outstanding certificates under the securitization facility,
which was paid by the Company on such date using the cash
proceeds received from the sale of Grupo TFM to KCS (see
“Disposition of Grupo TMM’s interest in Grupo TFM to
KCS — The Amended Acquisition Agreement”).
On September 25, 2006, the Company entered into a
securitization facility with Deutsche Bank, AG for
$200.0 million, using many of the structural features of
the previous securitization transactions.
On October 15, 2007, the Company prepaid 50 million
certificates at a price of $52 million with the proceeds of
the settlement with KCS.
As of December 31, 2007, the outstanding balance under the
receivables securitization facility was $130.9 million
bearing a fixed annual rate of approximately 12.5%. Under this
securitization facility we were required to keep
$4.6 million of restricted cash on hand as of
December 31, 2007.
Product
Tanker and Offshore Vessel Financings
As of December 31, 2006, we had an aggregate principal
amount of $56.0 million outstanding under a
5-year loan
facility with Natixis (formerly Natexis Banques Populaires)
which matures in 2010. Proceeds from this loan facility were
used to purchase two medium-range class, double-hull product
tankers which are serving Pemex under
5-year
bareboat charter contracts and related technical management
agreements. The obligations under this indebtedness are payable
in Dollars and the aggregate cost of the facility is
approximately 8.0% fixed. As of December 31, 2006 we had an
aggregate principal amount of $110.1 million outstanding
under various loan facilities with DZ Bank AG, the Bank of
Tokyo-Mitsubishi and West LB AG with maturities ranging from 4
to 7 years and fixed interest costs ranging from 8.1% to
8.6% (See Note 13 to the accompanying Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein). On
July 19, 2007, the Company refinanced all of these
facilities with the first issuance of its
Trust Certificates Program. As of December 31, 2007,
the Company had no outstanding product tankers and offshore
vessels financings other than under its Trust Certificates
Program.
Capital
Leases
The amounts outstanding under our capital leases represent
payment obligations under a capital lease agreement, which
matured in May 2005 for the financing of a container-handling
crane. The agreement contained standard provisions for this type
of transaction under which, among other things, we had the
option to purchase the
59
financed assets at the end of the lease term at a previously
determined price. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had
no outstanding capital lease obligations.
Operating
Leases
Vessel,
Transportation Equipment and Other Operating
Leases
We lease vessels, transportation and container-handling
equipment, our corporate office building and other assets under
agreements which are classified as operating leases. The terms
of these lease agreements vary from 1 to 15 years
and contain standard provisions for these types of operating
agreements.
Grupo
TMM
91/2% Notes
due 2003 and Grupo TMM
101/4% Senior
Notes due 2006
We issued our 2003 notes on May 15, 1993, in an aggregate
principal amount of $200 million, of which approximately
$176.9 million in aggregate principal amount as outstanding
as of August 10, 2004. The 2003 notes were issued pursuant
to an indenture between us and Citibank, N.A. as trustee, and
they accrued interest at a rate of
91/2%
per annum. The 2003 notes were unsecured, unsubordinated
obligations, ranked pari passu in right of payment with
all of our then existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated
obligations, and were senior in right of payment to all of our
future subordinated indebtedness.
We issued our 2006 notes on November 15, 1996, in an
aggregate principal amount of $200 million, of which
approximately $2.9 million as outstanding as of
December 31, 2005. The 2006 notes were issued pursuant to
an indenture between us and The Bank of New York as trustee, and
accrued interest at a rate of
101/4%
per annum. We were required to make interest payments on the
2006 notes every May 15th and
November 15th until maturity. The 2006 notes matured
on November 15, 2006 and were unsecured, unsubordinated
obligations, ranked pari passu in right of payment with
all of our existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated
obligations, and were senior in right of payment to all of our
future subordinated indebtedness.
The 2003 notes matured on May 15, 2003, and on such date
the Company defaulted on its obligation to pay the principal
amount and accrued unpaid interest on such notes and the accrued
unpaid interest on its 2006 notes. As a result, the Company
began negotiations with a representative committee of holders of
2003 notes and 2006 notes, engaging the firms of Miller,
Buckfire, Lewis LLC (now Miller, Buckfire LLC) and Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as its financial and legal
advisors, respectively, in the United States; and the firms
Elek, Moreno-Valle y Asociados, S.C. and Quijano, Cortina, Lopez
y De la Torre, S.C. as its financial and legal advisors,
respectively, in Mexico. The Company also supported the creation
of an ad hoc committee of holders of 2003 notes and 2006 notes,
who engaged Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin and Akin,
Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld as its financial and legal
advisors, respectively, in the United States; and Franck,
Galicia y Robles, S.C. (now Galicia y Robles, S.C.) as the
committee’s legal advisors in Mexico.
After several months of negotiations, on August 11, 2004,
Grupo TMM completed the Exchange Offer of its 2007 Notes upon
the closing of a private exchange offer, which closed
simultaneously with a public exchange offer for the
Company’s 2003 and 2006 notes. Pursuant to the Exchange
Offer, an aggregate amount of $170.7 million or
approximately 96.5% of the 2003 notes and an aggregate amount of
$197.1 million or approximately 98.6% of the 2006 notes
were tendered. Holders of the 2003 and 2006 notes who tendered
their respective 2003 and 2006 notes pursuant to the Exchange
Offer received approximately $459.5 million aggregate
principal amount of Senior 2007 Notes. On August 11, 2004,
upon consummation of the Exchange Offer and Consent
Solicitation, substantially all of the restrictive covenants
under the 2006 notes were eliminated.
On August 11, 2004, the Company also completed a private
placement of approximately $6.5 million in principal amount
of 2007 Notes to Promotora Servia, an affiliate of certain
members of the Serrano family and $13.7 million in
principal amount of 2007 Notes to J.B. Hunt, Inc. Both private
placements were accepted as consideration for the cancellation
of then current obligations of the Company to these parties.
Additionally, on such date, with a portion of the net proceeds
of a simultaneous placement of $29 million in principal
amount of 2007 Notes to certain members of the ad hoc committee
of holders of 2003 notes and 2006 notes, the Company paid:
(i) $7.2 million in cash with respect to the principal
amount of all of the 2003 Notes that were not tendered in the
60
Exchange Offer; (ii) $0.4 million in cash of accrued
and unpaid interest on the 2006 Notes that were not tendered in
the Exchange Offer; and (iii) financial advisory and other
related expenses of the Exchange Offer.
On November 15, 2006, the Company paid the outstanding
balance of $2.9 million in principal and $0.15 million
in accrued interest in full on the 2006 notes that were not
tendered in the Exchange Offer.
Grupo
TMM Senior Secured Notes due 2007
The 2007 Notes represented a three-year senior secured (by
substantially all of the assets of the Company and its material
subsidiaries) obligation (extendable to four years at the option
of the Company under certain circumstances), for an initial
principal amount of $508,703,000 and with an initial annual
interest rate of 10.5% if interest was paid entirely in cash, or
of 12.0% if the Company elected to pay the interest due in a
combination of a minimum of 2% annually in cash and the
remainder in kind (through the issuance of additional 2007 Notes
or Company ADSs).
On January 17, 2006, the Company used the proceeds from the
sale of 18 million shares of Kansas City Southern stock for
an aggregate gross cash consideration of $400.5 million to
redeem a partial amount of the 2007 Notes. As a result of this
partial redemption, the interest rate payable on the 2007 Notes
was reduced to 9.50%. On May 15, 2006, the Company made
another partial redemption of $1.1 million of the 2007
Notes, resulting in an aggregate outstanding balance of
$155.8 million.
On September 25, 2006, with the proceeds from the
Securitization program, the Company redeemed the balance of
$155.8 million of Notes due 2007 in full. The total amount
paid by the Company, including principal, accrued interest, fees
and other expenses as contemplated under the indenture of the
2007 Notes was $159.9 million.
Purchase
of two Chemical Tankers
On May 25, 2007 the Company purchased the M/T
“Maya” and purchased the M/T “Olmeca” on
June 19, 2007. We entered into a
10-year line
of credit with DVB Bank A.G. in an aggregate amount of
$52.5 million to finance the acquisition of these chemical
tankers. Principal and interest are payable on a monthly basis.
Interest is payable at an average rate of 7.61% per annum.
Mexican
Peso-Denominated Trust Certificates Program
On April 30, 2007, at the shareholders’ meeting of the
Company, our shareholders authorized the establishment of a
program for the issuance of trust certificates, which are
securities secured by trust assets and denominated in Mexican
Pesos, for up to an amount of nine billion Pesos. The proceeds
from the sale of these certificates will be used by us to
refinance our existing bank financings of our vessel fleet, and
to finance the acquisition of additional vessels as contemplated
by our expansion program.
We closed our first and second issuances of trust certificates
under the program on July 19, 2007 and April 30, 2008
in an amount of 3 billion Pesos and 1.55 billion
Pesos, respectively. Our first issuance was used primarily to
refinance existing vessel indebtedness. Our second issuance will
mainly be used to finance the acquisition of five new and used
vessels in the approximate aggregate amount of
$111.4 million. The Company expects to use the third
issuance of the tranche, worth an estimated 4.4 billion
pesos, to acquire ten additional new vessels in the approximate
aggregate amount of $348 million.
The total program amount of trust certificates will be issued in
separate tranches, secured by a lien on identified vessels for
each tranche.
Auto
Haulage Financing
On July 19, 2007, we purchased certain auto haulage
operating assets from Auto Convoy Mexicano, S.A. de C.v., a
former Mexican auto hauling company, for an aggregate purchase
price of 429 million Pesos. These auto haulage operating
assets were incorporated in our logistics division and commenced
operations in September 2007.
The Company entered into a financing facility denominated in
Pesos with DC Automotriz Servicios S. de R.L. de C.V. to finance
the purchase of these assets in July 2007, for
$11.4 million, with 84 monthly payments of
61
principal and interest beginning on January 2008. Interest is
payable at a variable rate based on the 91 day TIIE plus
200 basis points. As of December 31, 2007, the
facility had an outstanding amount of $11.4 million.
Other
Debt
As of December 31, 2007, our newly acquired warehousing
subsidiary had an aggregate principal amount of
$0.55 million outstanding under various short-term loan
facilities denominated in Pesos with local banks. The average
interest rate on this debt was 11.45% in Pesos.
Trend
Information
Historically, a substantial portion of the revenue generated by
our maritime operations has been achieved through contracts with
PEMEX. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, 52%, 42% and 56%, respectively,
of the revenue generated by maritime operations resulted from
contracts with PEMEX. We believe that we will further increase
our revenues in this business segment going forward. PEMEX is
expected to increase its deep water exploration in order to
restore its decreasing oil reserves; as a result, we expect an
increase in PEMEX demand for different types of vessels on the
offshore sector.
The future success of our logistics business depends upon our
ability to enter into contracts with large automotive
manufacturers, retail and consumer goods companies and to become
a supplier for Government entities, providing integrated
logistics and shipping services. Our primary skills that make us
competitive are: (i) our logistics expertise, (ii) our
ability to continue developing warehousing, logistics and other
land transportation infrastructure, and (iii) our ability
to provide state-of-the-art systems to provide logistics
solutions. In July 2004 TFM (now KCSM) entered into a contract
with Ford Motor Co. and subcontracted the services thereunder to
TMM Logistics for the execution of this agreement. This
automotive logistics contract was terminated on March 31,
2006, resulting in a reduction in our logistics business
revenues.
We have refinanced most of the debt related to vessel
acquisitions with the first issuance of our
Trust Certificates Program reduced the corresponding debt
service obligations and extended the term of our vessel
financings. The ability to satisfy our obligations under our
debt in the future will depend upon our future performance,
including our ability to increase revenues significantly and
control expenses. Future operating performance depends upon
prevailing economic, financial, business and competitive
conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control. Our ability to refinance our debt and take other
actions will depend on, among other things, our financial
condition at the time, the restrictions in the instruments
governing our debt and other factors, including market
conditions, the macroeconomic environment and such variables as
the Peso-dollar exchange rate and benchmark money market rates
in Pesos and dollars, which are beyond our control.
We have funded capital expenditures with funds from operating
cash flows and expect to seek additional financing through
secured credit arrangements and asset-backed financings for
additional capital expenditures as we have been doing with our
Trust Certificates Program described above.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2007, we did not have any off-balance
sheet arrangements. We report our assets and liabilities
according to the current IFRS as issued by the IASB.
62
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our obligations for payments under
our capital leases, debt obligations, operating leases and other
financing arrangements for the periods indicated as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness(1)
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, unless noted otherwise)
|
|
|
Mexican Trust Certificates(2)
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
275,121
|
|
|
|
276,382
|
|
Parcel Tanker Vessels Financings(3)
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
10,167
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
24,583
|
|
|
|
46,574
|
|
Automotive Equipment Financing(4)
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
11,864
|
|
Other debt(5)
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,030
|
|
|
$
|
13,417
|
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
|
$
|
302,928
|
|
|
$
|
335,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations(6)
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Vessel, Transportation Equipment and Other Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
$
|
13,924
|
|
|
$
|
17,674
|
|
|
$
|
11,754
|
|
|
$
|
36,783
|
|
|
$
|
80,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,924
|
|
|
$
|
17,674
|
|
|
$
|
11,754
|
|
|
$
|
36,783
|
|
|
$
|
80,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Other(7)
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Securitization facility
|
|
$
|
8,209
|
|
|
$
|
60,948
|
|
|
$
|
57,668
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
126,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,209
|
|
|
$
|
60,948
|
|
|
$
|
57,668
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
126,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts include principal payments and accrued and unpaid
interest as of December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Debt allocated in one special purpose company in connection with
the financing of two Tanker Vessels and eighteen offshore
vessels, denominated in Mexican Pesos (Trust Certificates
Program). |
|
(3) |
|
Debt allocated in one special purpose company in connection with
the financing of two Parcel Tanker Vessels. |
|
(4) |
|
Debt in connection with the Land & Logistics equipment
financing, denominated in Mexican Pesos. |
|
(5) |
|
Debt allocated to ADEMSA denominated in Mexican Pesos. |
|
(6) |
|
These amounts include the minimum lease payments. |
|
(7) |
|
These amounts include principal payments and accrued and unpaid
interest as of December 31, 2007 under the securitization
facility. |
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
Directors
and Senior Management
Board
of Directors
Our Estatutos Sociales, or Bylaws, provide that our board of
directors shall consist of not less than seven and not more than
21 directors, without taking into account the appointment
of their respective alternates. We currently have nine directors
on our board. Our board of directors is elected annually by a
majority vote of our shareholders and is responsible for the
management of the Company. The Company does not have any
agreements to pay benefits to any directors upon termination of
their employment.
63
Our current Board of Directors was elected and ratified at the
Company’s Annual General Ordinary Shareholders’
Meeting held on April 30, 2008. Our directors and alternate
directors, their principal occupations and years of service
(rounded to the nearest year) as a director or alternate
director are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Principal Occupation
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José F. Serrano Segovia
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Grupo TMM
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Ramón Serrano Segovia
|
|
First Vice-chairman of Grupo TMM
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Maria Josefa Serrano Segovia
|
|
Second Vice-chairman of Grupo TMM
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
José Luis Salas Cacho
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Ignacio Rodriguez Rocha
|
|
Attorney
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Lorenzo Cué Sánchez Navarro
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Luis Martinez Argüello
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Sergio Chedraui Eguia
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
José Luis Ávalos del Moral
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Alternate Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José Francisco Serrano Cuevas
|
|
President Deputy Director
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Antonio Cué Sánchez Navarro
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Jaime Zabludovsky Kuper
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Paloma Serrano de Chedraui
|
|
Private Investor
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
The directors (whenever elected) shall remain in office for the
period of time stated below, calculated from the date of their
appointment. The directors may be reelected and, in case of the
failure to appoint their substitute or, if the designated
substitute does not take office, the directors in office being
substituted shall continue to perform their duties for up to
thirty calendar days following the date of expiry of the term
for which they were appointed, as described below. For further
information see Item 10. “Additional Information
— Board of Directors.”
|
|
|
Position in the Board of Directors
|
|
Term
|
Chairman
|
|
7 years
|
First Vice-Chairman
|
|
7 years
|
Second Vice-Chairman
|
|
Between 3 and 7 years (As determined by the General
Shareholders’ Meeting that elects him/her.)
|
Other Directors
|
|
1 year
|
José
F. Serrano Segovia
Mr. José F. Serrano was born on November 22,
1940. He has served as Chairman of Grupo TMM since 1992.
Throughout his professional career, he has owned several
family-owned companies in Mexico. Among the most outstanding
positions of his professional and entrepreneurial career are:
Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chairman of the Board of
Grupo Anáhuac, S.A. de C.V. and Chairman of the Executive
Committee and Chairman of the Board of Hules Mexicanos, S.A. de
C.V. Mr. José F. Serrano holds a master’s degree
in engineering from Villanova University in Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Ramón
Serrano Segovia
Mr. Serrano was born on April 6, 1947.
Mr. Serrano has served as Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Grupo TMM since 1991. In the past, Mr. Serrano
served as Vice President of several companies owned by the
Serrano Family such as Cementos Anáhuac, S.A. and Hules
Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.
64
Maria
Josefa Cuevas de Serrano
Mrs. Serrano was born on June 16, 1946.
Mrs. Serrano has served as the Second Vice Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Grupo TMM since 2006. Mrs. Serrano is
the founder of the Sociedad Internacional de Valores de Arte
Mexicano, A.C. (SIVAM), which promotes classical music and
outreach for talented artists in Mexico. Additionally, she is an
active promoter of Mexican art in Mexico and abroad.
Mrs. Serrano is the wife of Mr. José F. Serrano
Segovia.
José
Luis Salas Cacho
Mr. Salas was born on May 31, 1954. Throughout his
professional career he has founded several real estate, telecom
and energy companies. Additionally Mr. Salas has a
political background, having served as the general coordinator
of the presidential campaigns of Manuel J. Clouthier in 1988,
and Diego Fernández de Cevallos in 1994 and as the
strategic coordinator of Vicente Fox’s presidential
campaign in 2000. Additionally, he is Chairman of Grupo
Servicón, Corporación Saca and Corporación Sama.
Mr. Salas holds a master’s degree in Business
Administration from the Instituto Panamericano de Alta
Dirección de Empresas (IPADE).
Ignacio
Rodríguez Rocha
Mr. Rodríguez was born on July 13, 1936. He has
been an attorney in private practice since 1960. He is a member
of the Board of Automotriz México, S.A. de C.V and Diesel
de Toluca, S.A. de C.V. Mr. Rodríguez is currently a
partner of Rodriguez Rocha, S.C.
Lorenzo
Cué Sánchez-Navarro
Mr. Sánchez Navarro was born on August 11, 1966.
He is currently CEO and President of Capital Integral, S.A. de
C.V., a private mutual fund for agroindustrial and entertainment
investments. Previously, he was President and founding partner
of BCBA Ingeniería Inmobiliaria, S.A. de C.V. He holds a
degree in Business Administration and Finance from Maclaren
Business School, University of San Francisco.
Luis
Martínez Argüello
Mr. Martínez was born on January 1, 1941. Since
February 2003, Mr. Martínez has been the CEO of
Servicio Global de Asesoría y Cabildeo, S.C. and of
San Lucas Trading Co., S.A. de C.V. From 1972 to January
2003, Mr. Martínez worked in the Mexican cement
industry. In 1972 he worked at Cemex, S.A. de C.V. as Corporate
Director of Strategic Planning, leaving in 1982 to work at
Cementos Apasco, S.A. de C.V. as the Commercial and
International Corporate Director until 1990, when he returned to
Cemex, to serve as Corporate Director of Special Projects. He
holds a degree in Business Administration from the Universidad
Iberoamericana and a postgraduate degree in Administration from
Harvard University.
Sergio
Chedraui Eguia
Mr. Chedraui was born on July 11, 1976 in Jalapa,
Veracruz. Mr. Chedraui is Chairman and CEO of the Board of
Consupago, S.A. de C.V., which provides for consumption credits.
Additionally, he is a member of the Board of several companies,
including Vanguardia Fondos de Inversión, Grupo
Publicitario del Golfo, S.A. de C.V, Nacional Financiera del
Estado de Veracruz and Grupo Comercial Chedraui, S.A. de C.V. He
holds an Accounting degree from the Universidad Anáhuac.
Mr. Chedraui is the
son-in-law
of Mr. Ramón Serrano Segovia.
José
Luis Avalos del Moral
Mr. Ávalos del Moral was born on September 4, 1943. In
2003 he began his own consulting firm offering consulting
services in connection with corporate governance, finance,
strategic planning and human resources. Early in his career,
Mr. Avalos was Senior Auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers and
then held several high-level managerial positions in the Finance
and Planning divisions at IBM, both in Mexico City and New York.
He previously worked at Banco Nacional de Mexico where he held
the position of Comptroller, among others. He is a member of the
Board as well as President of the Auditing Committee of Hispano,
S.A. Graphic Arts. In 1967 he
65
graduated with honors as a Public Accountant from the
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Mr. Ávalos also holds a masters degree in Business
Administration from Pace University of New York.
José
Francisco Serrano Cuevas
José Francisco Serrano Cuevas was born on August 29,
1980. Mr. Serrano has been President Deputy Director since
2007 and is in charge of developing new projects. He holds a
degree in Finance and Business Administration from Newport
International University, U.S.A. Additionally, Mr. Serrano
studied art at the School of the Museum of Fine Arts, in Boston,
MA. Mr. Serrano is the son of Mr. José F. Serrano
Segovia.
Antonio
Cué Sánchez-Navarro
Mr. Cué was born on May 17, 1967. He is currently
a co-CEO of a leading real estate development company in Mexico.
Prior to his career in real estate development,
Mr. Cué was an investor and Director at several
banking groups in Mexico, including Grupo Financiero Inbursa and
Grupo Financiero del Sureste. In addition to running his real
estate firm in Mexico, he is also an investor and member of the
Board of several companies including: Capital Integral,
Promotora Agrícola Cué, Inmobiliaria Reforma, Metros
Cúbicos, Kio Networks and Grupo Ildomani, the principal
franchisee for Dave & Busters in Mexico. He is a
Certified Public Accountant and currently lives in the United
States.
Jaime
Zabludovsky Kuper
Mr. Zabludovsky was born on March 29, 1956. He is a
founding partner of Soluciones Estratégicas, S.C. a
consulting company for international trade. In 1994, he became
Deputy Secretary for International Trade Negotiations. In such
capacity he developed Mexico’s trade negotiating strategy
and oversaw the implementation and administration of NAFTA as
well as the Mexican FTA’s with Chile, Costa Rica, Bolivia,
Colombia and Venezuela. From 1998 to 2001, as Mexican Ambassador
to the EU and Chief negotiator for the Mexico-EU FTA, he headed
the Mexican team in the negotiations of the first transatlantic
free trade agreement. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Yale
University.
Paloma
Serrano de Chedraui
Mrs. Chedraui was born on March 31, 1981. She holds an
International Businesses degree from Universidad Anáhuac, a
degree in History, Philosophy, Art and Literature and a degree
in Institutional Solutions on Women Studies. Additionally,
Mrs. Chedraui holds a degree in
E-Business
and International Marketing from the Queensland MacQuarie
University, in Australia. Mrs. Chedraui is the daughter of
Mr. Ramón Serrano Segovia.
The Company does not currently have any agreement with any of
the directors who are not also executive officers to provide
pension, retirement or similar benefits, nor does the Company
provide for benefits upon termination.
66
Executive
Officers
Our officers serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Our executive officers, their position and years of service with
us and as an executive officer are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
Corporate Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
José F. Serrano Segovia
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Fernando Sanchez Ugarte
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez
|
|
Corporate Administrative Director
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Jacinto David Marina Cortes
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Agustin Salinas Gonzalez
|
|
Corporate Human Resources Director
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Elvira Ruiz Carreño
|
|
Corporate Audit Director
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Business Unit Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Manuel Ocejo Rodriguez
|
|
Director, Maritime Transportation and
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Ports and Terminals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Glenn Magaña
|
|
Commercial Director, TMM Logistics
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Jorge Septien Cuevas
|
|
Operations Director, TMM Logistics
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
José F. Serrano Segovia, who is chairman of the board of
directors, is a brother of Ramón Serrano Segovia, who is a
member of the Board of Directors of Grupo TMM. Maria Josefa
Cuevas de Serrano is a member of the Board of Directors and is
the wife of José F. Serrano Segovia. José Serrano
Cuevas, who is an alternate director of the Board of Directors,
is the son of José F. Serrano Segovia and Maria Josefa
Cuevas de Serrano.
Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the aggregate total
compensation paid to our directors, alternate directors and
executive officers for services in all capacities, was
approximately $6.4 million. See Item 7. “Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
Pension,
Retirement or Similar Benefits
Seniority premiums, retirement plan obligations (“Pension
Benefits”) and other employee compensation payable at the
end of employment are based on actuarial calculations using the
projected unit credit method. Pension benefits are based mainly
on years of service, age and salary level upon retirement.
Seniority premiums, Pension Benefits and other employee
compensation upon termination include the amortization of past
service costs over the average remaining working lifetime of
employees.
Board
Practices
Our Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors shall consist of
at least seven but not more than 21 directors elected at
our annual ordinary shareholders’ meeting to serve until
their successors accept their election at the next annual
ordinary shareholders’ meeting. The Board of Directors is
responsible for the management of the Company. Mexican law
requires that at least 25% of the members of the Board be
independent directors.
Audit
and Corporate Practices Committee
The Board of Directors appointed an Audit and Corporate
Practices Committee, which was approved at the Extraordinary
Shareholders Meeting held on December 20, 2006. This
Committee is composed of José Luis Salas Cacho (President),
Ignacio Rodriguez Rocha, Luis Martínez Argüello and
José Luis Ávalos del Moral, who has accounting and
related financial management expertise in compliance with NYSE
Corporate Governance Standard 303A.07 and the Mexican Securities
Law. Additionally Mr. Ávalos is considered a financial
expert according to the
67
standards set forth in Section 407 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002. In accordance with Mexican Securities Law and
Mexican Corporate Practices, the committee’s
responsibilities include, among others:
Audit
responsibilities:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of
the Company; discussing the financial statements of the Company
with all parties responsible for preparing and reviewing such
statements, and advising the Board of Directors on their
approval thereof;
|
|
|
•
|
Overseeing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and
overseeing audits of the financial statements of the Company;
|
|
|
•
|
Evaluating the performance of the Company’s external
auditor and its independent status;
|
|
|
•
|
Advising the board of directors on the compliance of the
Company’s or any of its subsidiaries’ internal
controls, policies and in-house auditing, and identifying any
deficiencies in accordance with the bylaws of the Company and
applicable regulations;
|
|
|
•
|
Providing sufficient opportunity for a private meeting between
members of our internal and external auditors and the Audit
Committee, who may also request additional information from
employees and legal counsel;
|
|
|
•
|
Providing support to the board of directors in supervising and
reviewing the Company’s corporate accounting and disclosure
policies and discussing guidelines and policies to govern the
process of risk assessment with management;
|
|
|
•
|
Advising the board of directors on any audit-related issues in
accordance with the bylaws of the Company and applicable
regulations;
|
|
|
•
|
Assisting the board of directors in the selection of the
external auditor (subject to approval by vote of the
shareholders);
|
|
|
•
|
Reviewing the financial statements and the external
auditor’s report. The Committee may request that the
external auditor be present when reviewing such reports, in
addition to the Committee’s mandatory meeting with the
external auditor at least once a year;
|
|
|
•
|
Preparing the board of director’s opinion on the
Chairman’s annual report and submitting it at the
Shareholders Meeting for its approval; and
|
|
|
•
|
Overseeing compliance by the Company’s chief executive
officer with decisions made at a Shareholders Meeting or a Board
of Directors meeting.
|
Corporate
Practices responsibilities:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Requesting an opinion from independent experts as the Committee
might see fit, in accordance with applicable regulations;
|
|
|
•
|
Calling Shareholders Meetings and reviewing the agenda;
|
|
|
•
|
Supporting the board of directors in preparing its reports in
accordance with the bylaws of the Company and applicable
regulations;
|
|
|
•
|
Suggesting procedures for hiring the Company’s chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and senior executive
officers;
|
|
|
•
|
Reviewing human resources policies, including senior executive
officers’ performance evaluation policies, promotions and
structural changes to the Company;
|
|
|
•
|
Assisting the board of directors in evaluating senior executive
officers’ performance;
|
|
|
•
|
Evaluating executive officer’s compensation. The Company is
not required under Mexican law to obtain shareholder approval
for equity compensation plans; the Board of Directors is
required to approve the Company’s policies on such
compensation plans;
|
68
|
|
|
|
•
|
Reviewing related party transactions; and
|
|
|
•
|
Performing any activity set forth in the Mexican Securities Law.
|
Code
of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to its
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and
other members of our senior management. We last updated the Code
of Ethics in January 2004. The Code of Ethics may be viewed on
the Company website at www.grupotmm.com under the caption
“Investors — Corporate Governance.” An
English version of this document is available upon written
request sent to Grupo TMM, S.A.B., Avenida de la Cuspide,
No. 4755, Colonia Parques del Pedregal, 14010 Mexico City,
D.F., Mexico, Attn: Human Resources.
Statutory
Auditor
Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law (MSML), the
surveillance of the Company is entrusted to different committees
(i.e., Audit and Corporate Practices Committees), as previously
described, which replace the role of the Statutory Auditor. At
the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on
December 20, 2006, the Statutory Auditor, Mr. Javier
García Sabaté, and the alternate Statutory Auditor
were duly replaced by the Audit and Corporate Practices
Committee of the Company. However, Mr. Javier García
Sabaté and the alternate Statutory Auditor continue to
serve as the Statutory Auditor for all of our subsidiaries.
NYSE
Corporate Governance Comparison
Pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the Listed Company Manual of
the NYSE, we are required to provide a summary of the
significant ways in which our corporate governance practices
differ from those required for U.S. companies under the
NYSE listing standards. We are a Mexican corporation with shares
listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Our corporate governance
practices are governed by our bylaws, the Mexican Securities
Market
Law1,
the General Law of Mercantile Corporations and the regulations
issued by the Mexican Securities and Exchange Commission. On
annual basis, we file a report with the Mexican Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Mexican Stock Exchange regarding our
compliance with the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices.
The table below discloses the significant differences between
our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards.
|
|
|
NYSE Standards
|
|
Our Corporate Governance Practices
|
|
Director Independence. Majority of board of directors
must be independent. §303A.01
|
|
Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law, the Company’s
shareholders are required to appoint a board of directors of not
more than 21 directors, 25% of whom must be independent
within the meaning of the Mexican Securities Law, which differs
from the definition of independent under the rules of the New
York Stock Exchange. Pursuant to the Company’s bylaws,
shareholders are required to appoint a board of directors of not
more than 21 directors and not less than seven.
|
1 The
new Mexican Securities Law became effective in December 2006.
Pursuant to such law, we were required to make certain changes
to our bylaws.
69
|
|
|
NYSE Standards
|
|
Our Corporate Governance Practices
|
|
|
|
Our current board of directors consists of nine directors and four alternate directors. Five of our directors and two of our alternate directors are independent directors within the meaning of the Mexican Securities Law.
Pursuant to our bylaws and to the Mexican Securities Law, an independent board member must be appointed based on his experience, ability and professional prestige, and cannot
be an employee of the Company or have any conflict of interest with the Company. A board member is not considered independent if he has acted as external auditor of the Company in the twelve-months preceding his/her appointment.
|
A director is not independent if such director is:
|
|
Under Article 26 of the New Mexican Securities Law, a director
is not independent if such director is:
|
(i) a person who the board determines has a material direct or
indirect relationship with the company, its parent or a
consolidated subsidiary;
|
|
(i) a director, officer or employee of the Company or of the
entities that are part of the corporate group or consortium of
which the Company is a part of (one-year cooling off period);
|
(ii) the person is, or has been within the last three years, an
employee, or an immediate family member is, or has been within
the last three years, an executive officer, of the company, its
parent or a consolidated subsidiary, other than employment as
interim chairman or CEO;
|
|
(ii) a person that has significant influence or authority over
the Company or over any of the entities that are a part of the
corporate group or consortium of which the Company is a part of;
|
(iii) a person who has received or whose immediate family member
has received during any
12-month
period in the last three years, more than $100,000 in direct
compensation from the company, its parent or a consolidated
subsidiary, other than director and committee fees or deferred
compensation for prior service (and other than compensation for
service as interim chairman or CEO or received by an immediate
family member for service as a non-executive employee);
|
|
(iii) a shareholder that is part of the group of persons that
has a controlling interest in the Company;
|
(iv) a person who is a partner with or employed, or whose
immediate family member is a partner with or employed in a
professional capacity other than tax planning, by the present
internal or external auditor of the company or the person or
immediate family member was within the last three years (but is
no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally
worked on the listed company’s audit within that time;
|
|
(iv) a client, supplier, debtor or creditor (or a partner,
director or employee thereof) that is considered significant. A
client or supplier is considered significant when the sales of
the Company represent more than 10% of the client’s or
supplier’s total sales during the twelve months preceding
his appointment. A debtor or creditor is considered significant
whenever the aggregate amount of the relevant loan represents
more than 15% of the debtor’s, creditor’s or the
Company’s aggregate assets;
|
(v) an executive officer, or an immediate family member of an
executive officer, of another company whose compensation
committee’s membership includes, or included in the last
three years, an executive officer of the listed company, its
parent or a consolidated subsidiary; or
|
|
(v) a “family member” related to any of the persons
mentioned above in (i) through (iv). “Family member”
includes a person’s spouse, concubine or other relative up
to the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity.
|
70
|
|
|
NYSE Standards
|
|
Our Corporate Governance Practices
|
|
(vi) an executive officer or employee of a company, or an
immediate family member of a director is an executive officer of
a company, that has made payments to, or received payments from,
the listed company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary for
property or services in an amount which, in any of the last
three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2%
of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues
|
|
|
“Immediate family member” includes a person’s
spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and
fathers-in-law,
sons and
daughters-in-law,
brothers and
sisters-in-law
and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the
person’s home. Individuals who are no longer immediate
family members due to legal separation, divorce or death (or
incapacity) are excluded. §303A.02(b)
|
|
|
Executive Sessions. Non-management directors must meet
regularly in executive sessions without management. Independent
directors should meet alone in an executive session at least
once a year. §303A.03
|
|
There is no similar requirement under our bylaws. However, the
Mexican Securities Law provides that the Audit and Corporate
Practices Committee, within its audit functions, must meet
regularly with directors.
|
Audit committee. Audit committee satisfying the
independence and other requirements of
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act and the more stringent requirements under
the NYSE standards is required. §§303A.06, 303A.07
|
|
We have an Audit and Corporate Practices Committee composed of
four independent directors, one of whom has accounting and
related financial management expertise in compliance with NYSE
standard 303A.07 and in compliance with the Mexican Securities
Law; additionally Mr. Ávalos is considered a financial
expert according to the standards set forth in Section 407 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. The members of the Audit and
Corporate Practices Committee are proposed by the President in
accordance with the Mexican Securities Law and are appointed by
the Board of Directors. The foregoing notwithstanding, the
President of the Audit and Corporate Practices Committee must be
appointed and/or removed from his position exclusively by the
General Shareholders’ Meeting and he must always be an
independent director. The President of the Audit and Corporate
Practices Committee in no event whatsoever may preside over the
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
Our Audit and Corporate Practices Committee complies with the
requirements of the Mexican Securities Law, Article 42, sections
I and II and its main responsibilities include, among
others:
|
|
|
Audit responsibilities:
|
|
|
• Overseeing the accounting
and financial reporting processes of the Company; discussing the
financial statements of the Company with all parties responsible
for preparing and reviewing such statements, and advising the
Board of Directors on their approval thereof;
|
|
|
• Overseeing compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements and overseeing audits of the
financial statements of the Company;
|
71
|
|
|
NYSE Standards
|
|
Our Corporate Governance Practices
|
|
|
|
• Evaluating the performance
of the Company’s external auditor and its independent
status;
|
|
|
• Advising the Board of
Directors on the compliance of the Company’s or any of its
subsidiaries’ internal controls, policies and in-house
auditing, and identifying any deficiencies in accordance with
the bylaws of the Company and applicable regulations;
|
|
|
• Providing sufficient
opportunity for a private meeting between members of the
Company’s internal and external auditors and the Audit
Committee, who may also request additional information from
employees and legal counsel;
|
|
|
• Providing support to the
Board of Directors in supervising and reviewing the
Company’s corporate accounting and disclosure policies and
discussing guidelines and policies to govern the process of risk
assessment with management;
|
|
|
• Advising the Board of
Directors on any audit related issue in accordance with the
bylaws of the Company and applicable regulations;
|
|
|
• Assisting the Board of
Directors in the selection of the external auditor (subject to
approval by vote of the shareholders);
|
|
|
• Reviewing the financial
statements and the external auditor’s report. The Committee
may request that the external auditor to be present when
reviewing such reports, in addition to the Committee’s
mandatory meeting with the external auditor at least once a year;
|
|
|
• Preparing the Board of
Director’s opinion on the Chairman’s annual report and
submitting it at the Shareholders Meeting for its approval; and
|
|
|
• Overseeing compliance by the
Company’s chief executive officer with decisions made at a
Shareholders Meeting or a Board of Directors meeting.
|
|
|
Corporate Practices responsibilities:
|
|
|
• Requesting an opinion from
independent experts as the Committee might see fit, in
accordance with applicable regulations;
|
|
|
• Calling Shareholders
Meetings and reviewing the agenda;
|
|
|
• Supporting the Board of
Directors in preparing its reports in accordance with the bylaws
of the Company and applicable regulations;
|
|
|
• Suggesting procedures for
hiring the Company’s chief executive officer, chief
financial officer and senior executive officers;
|
72
|
|
|
NYSE Standards
|
|
Our Corporate Governance Practices
|
|
|
|
• Reviewing human resources
policies, including senior executive officers’ performance
evaluation policies, promotions and structural changes to the
Company;
|
|
|
• Assisting the board in
evaluating senior executive officers’ performance;
|
|
|
• Evaluating executive
officer’s compensation. We are not required under Mexican
law to obtain shareholder approval for equity compensation
plans. The Company’s Board of Directors is required to
approve the Company’s policies on such compensation plans;
|
|
|
• Reviewing related party
transactions; and
|
|
|
• Performing any activity set
forth in the Mexican Securities Law.
|
Nominating/corporate governance committee.
Nominating/corporate governance committee of independent
directors is required. The committee must have a charter
specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the
committee. §303A.04
|
|
In accordance with the new Mexican Securities Law, the Board of
Directors appointed an Audit and Corporate Practices Committee
composed of four independent directors.
|
Compensation committee. Compensation committee of
independent directors is required, which must approve executive
officer compensation. The committee must have a charter
specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the
committee. §303A.05
|
|
We do not have a Compensation Committee. Our Audit and Corporate
Practices Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving
executive officer’s compensation.
|
Equity compensation plans. Equity compensation plans
require shareholder approval, subject to limited exemptions.
§303A.08
|
|
We are not required under Mexican law to obtain shareholder
approval for equity compensation plans. Our board of directors
is required to approve the Company’s policies with respect
to such compensation plans.
|
Code of Ethics. Corporate governance guidelines and a
code of business conduct and ethics is required, with disclosure
of any waiver for directors or executive officers. §303A.10
|
|
We have adopted a code of ethics in alignment with U.S.
standards, which has been accepted by all of our directors and
executive officers and other personnel. We are required by Item
16B of this Form 20-F to disclose any waivers granted to our
chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal
accounting officer and persons performing similar functions.
|
Employees
As of March 31, 2008, we had 7,128 employees,
approximately 78% of whom were unionized. As of
December 31, 2007, we had 6,861 employees,
approximately 80% of whom were unionized. As of
December 31, 2006, we had 5,055 employees,
approximately 68% of whom were unionized. As of
December 31, 2005, we had 5,000 employees,
approximately 66% of whom were unionized. In accordance with
customary practice in Mexico, we negotiate union contracts
annually with regard to wages and every two years with regard to
other matters, including benefits. We have experienced nine
strikes since 1958. The longest of these strikes occurred in
1981 and lasted 21 days. We have not experienced a strike
since 1987 and believe that relations with our employees are
good.
Share
Ownership
As of June 4, 2008, the Serrano Segovia family held
8,813,729 Shares directly, and the CPO Trustee maintained
45,567,797 Shares of our capital stock in the form of ADSs,
including 1,000,000 Shares that are
73
beneficially owned by the Serrano Segovia family. Accordingly,
as of such date, the Serrano Segovia family controlled the
voting power of our capital stock. The voting power controlled
by the Serrano Segovia family varies from time to time,
depending upon the number of Shares held by the Serrano Segovia
family and by the CPO Trust and others. As of May 30, 2008,
other than as set forth below in the table entitled “Major
Shareholders,” no other directors, alternate directors or
executive officers owned any shares of our capital stock.
Shares were contributed to the CPO Trust established with a
30-year term
by Nacional Financiera, S.N.C. (the “CPO Trustee”) on
November 24, 1989. The CPO Trustee authorized the issuance
of non-redeemable ordinary participation certificates
(certificados de participación ordinarios no
amortizables) (“CPOs”) that correspond to our
Shares. One CPO may be issued for each Share contributed to the
CPO Trust. CPOs constitutes separate negotiable instruments
different and apart from the Shares, and afford to their holders
only economic rights with respect to the Shares held in the CPO
Trust. Such voting rights are exercisable only by the CPO
Trustee, which is required by the terms of the CPO Trust to vote
such Shares in the same manner as holders of a majority of the
outstanding Shares not held in the CPO Trust and voted at the
relevant meeting. Mexican and non-Mexican investors may hold
CPOs without restrictions of any kind. The acquisition of Shares
representing 5% or more of the capital stock of Grupo TMM by any
person or group of persons (other than the Serrano Segovia
family and the CPO Trustee), in one or a series of simultaneous
or successive transactions requires the prior approval of the
board of directors. As of June 4, 2008, the CPO Trustee
held CPOs underlying an aggregate of 45,567,797 Shares in
the form of ADSs.
As a result of the promulgation of the new securities law in
México in June of 2006, public companies were transformed
by operation of law into Sociedades Anónimas
Bursátiles (Public Issuing Corporation) and were
required to amend their by-laws to conform to the provisions of
the new law. As a result thereof, the Series A Shares of
the Company were renamed and are now referred to as nominative
common shares, without par value. The rights afforded by these
new shares are identical to the rights afforded by the former
Series A Shares.
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table indicates, as of June 27, 2008, unless
otherwise indicated, the persons or groups who are the
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding Shares. The
percentage of Shares owned by each person shown below is based
on 56,547,837 Shares outstanding as of June 27, 2008
Each person with shared voting and dispositive power with
respect to certain securities is deemed to own all such
securities for purposes hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
ADRs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
José F. Serrano Segovia(a)(b)(c)
|
|
|
5,743,750
|
|
|
|
66,471
|
|
|
|
5,810,221
|
|
|
|
6,371,571
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Ramón Serrano Segovia(a)(b)(c)
|
|
|
2,508,629
|
|
|
|
933,529
|
|
|
|
3,442,158
|
|
|
|
4,003,508
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Beck Mack & Oliver(d)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,364,600
|
|
|
|
4,364,600
|
|
|
|
4,364,600
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Based upon information set forth in a Schedule 13D/A filed
on June 27, 2008, José F. Serrano Segovia, has sole
voting and investment authority over 5,810,221 Shares and
Ramón Serrano Segovia has sole voting and investment
authority over 3,442,158 Shares. By virtue of their shared
control of Promotora Servia, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation
(“Promotora”), José F. Serrano Segovia and
Ramón Serrano Segovia each share voting and investment
authority over an additional 561,350 Shares beneficially
owned by Promotoria. Of the 561,350 Shares beneficially
owned by Promotoria, 560,850 are owned directly by its
subsidiary Servicios Directivos Servia, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican
corporation (“Servicios”). As of June 27, 2008,
(i) 1,000,00 of 9,252,379 Shares held directly by
José and Ramón Serrano Segovia are represented by ADSs
and (ii) 135,000 of the 561,350 Shares beneficially
owned by Promotoria are represented by ADSs. As of June 27,
2008, an aggregate of 9,813,229 Shares (including Shares
represented by ADSs) beneficially owned by José F. Serrano
Segovia and Ramón Serrano Segovia were pledged for the
benefit of their creditors pursuant to certain pledge agreements. |
|
|
|
b) |
|
José and Ramón Serrano Segovia have jointly pledged
4,718,150 Shares to Banco Invex, S.A., to secure a loan in
the principal amount of $3.0 million. Jose Serrano Segovia
and Ramón Serrano Segovia have jointly pledged
4,534,229 Shares to Ixe Banco, S.A. to secure a loan in the
aggregate amount of $4.5 million. Servicios |
74
|
|
|
|
|
Directivos Servia, S.A. de C.V. has pledged 425,850 Shares
to Banco Invex, S.A. to secure a loan in the principal amount of
$3.0 million referenced above. Servicios Directivos Servia,
S.A. de C.V. has pledge 135,000 shares to IXE Banco, S.A.
to secure a loan in the aggregate amount of $4.5 million. |
|
|
|
c) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed on June 27, 2007,
José F. Serrano Segovia and Ramón Serrano Segovia are
no longer the beneficial owners of an aggregate of
11,819,365 Shares, representing 21% of the issued and
outstanding Shares, that had been pledged to Argyll Equities,
LLC (“Argyll”). |
|
|
|
d) |
|
Based upon information contained in such company’s
Schedule 13F filed as of April 18, 2008. |
At June 4, 2008, 45,541,797 Shares were held in the
form of ADSs which have limited voting rights. See Item 9.
“The Offer and Listing.”
Related
Party Transactions
Promotora
Servia Agreements
We and Grupo Servia entered into a tax benefits agreement dated
December 5, 2001, (the “Tax Benefits Agreement”)
providing for the transfer to us of certain benefits derived
from Grupo Servia’s ability to consolidate the results of
its subsidiaries and affiliates, and providing for a payment to
Promotora Servia of $9.4 million by us in respect of such
benefits. On December 31, 1991, Grupo Servia obtained an
authorization from the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit to
consolidate its results with each and every one of its
subsidiaries or affiliates for tax purposes (the “Fiscal
Consolidation”). Pursuant to the Tax Benefits Agreement,
Grupo Servia assigned to us the benefits derived from the Fiscal
Consolidation.
On April 30, 2003, we amended the terms of an agreement
with Promotora Servia to extend the payment date for a portion
of the amount owed thereunder until May 30, 2003. We paid
$20.4 million (representing the amount owed under the Tax
Benefits Agreement and that portion of the amount owed under the
agreement that had not been extended) to Promotora Servia on
April 30, 2003. The remaining unpaid balance owed to
Promotora Servia was $6.5 million, and as payment in full
for such obligations, Promotora Servia received 2007 Notes in
lieu of a cash payment containing the same payment terms as
those offered in the restructuring in an aggregate principal
amount equal to such remaining unpaid balance.
Seacor
Through a joint venture, Grupo TMM (60% interest) and Seacor
Inc. (40% interest) participated together, until March 2006, in
the offshore services industry sector through their subsidiaries
Seamex International, Ltd. and Maritima Mexicana, S.A.
(“Marmex”, now “TMM”). Seacor is one of the
largest U.S. companies engaged in operating supply ships
and supplying support services to offshore drilling platforms in
the Gulf of Mexico. TMM operates offshore vessels providing
services to the Mexican offshore drilling site in the Cantarell
field in the southern part of the Gulf of Mexico. Seamex
International, Ltd. and Seacor had internal arrangements through
which each company could receive or transfer money in accordance
with its cash requirements, as well as provide agency services
and repair services to each other. In March 2006, the Company
purchased Seacor’s 40% interest in Marmex pursuant to an
agreement entered into in December 2005. TMM also purchased five
offshore vessels owned by Seacor which began flying the Mexican
flag, and at the same time converted three additional offshore
vessels from leased to owned status. See Item 4.
“Business Overview — Recent Developments.”
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
See Item 18 — “Financial Statements.”
Legal
Proceedings
Dispute
with Kansas City Southern
In addition to the $200.0 million in cash and
18 million shares of KCS stock that were delivered to the
Company under the terms of the AAA on April 1, 2005, KCS
also delivered in escrow an Indemnity Escrow Note for
$47 million due June 1, 2007, which provided insurance
against material breaches or misrepresentations by the
75
Company of its obligations under the AAA. Pursuant to the terms
of the AAA, on January 29, 2007, KCS notified the Company
of its intention to assert certain claims under Section 10
of the AAA seeking indemnification against the Indemnity Escrow
Note. On January 31, 2007. the Company notified KCS of
claims that it intended to assert against KCS for breaches under
the AAA and other related agreements.
On May 15, 2007, KCS filed a demand for arbitration seeking
indemnification against the Indemnity Escrow Note. The Company
also filed a demand for arbitration seeking indemnification for
certain claims against KCS. Subsequently, KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM
Logistics entered into a Settlement Agreement and settled and
released all claims asserted against each other. Under the terms
of the settlement, KCS paid Grupo TMM $54.1 million in cash
and the obligations of KCS under the Indemnity Escrow Note and
the Tax Escrow Note, which would have been payable in 2010, were
terminated. The Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note
had been valued at their face value of $91.7 million in our
Financial Statements. As a result of this settlement, all
disputes between KCS, Grupo TMM and TMM Logistics were fully and
finally settled. See Item 8. “Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings — Dispute
with Kansas City Southern.”
Other
Legal Proceedings
On September 15, 2003, HFTP Investment, L.L.C., Gaia
Offshore Master Fund Ltd., and Caerus Fund, Ltd. filed a
lawsuit against us seeking a declaratory judgment to adjust the
exercise price of the note-linked securities and the number of
ADSs acquirable upon exercise of the note-linked securities
acquired by them from us in connection with convertible notes
issued by us in April 2002. On June 5, 2006, we paid
$1.8 million as payment for the judgment issued in
connection with this proceeding.
On September 14, 2006, Leonardo, L.P. filed a lawsuit
against the Company seeking damages in the amount of
$1.6 million in connection with the adjustment in the
strike price and the underlying number of shares of Grupo TMM
stock that could be exercisable under the Note Linked Securities
issued by the Company in May of 2002 (“NLSs”). The
Company filed an answer stating that the applicable statute of
limitations had expired. The Company entered into a settlement
agreement on April 13, 2007 pursuant to which the Company
paid Leonardo, L.P. a total of $850,000, with the final
installment being paid in December 2007.
In July 2006 and February 2007, Grupo TMM received two claim
notices from SSA in relation to certain contingencies affecting
SSA (formerly TMMPyT) in connection with the Amended and
Restated Master Agreement dated July 21, 2001, which are
still pending resolution between SSA and the relevant
authorities. On June 4, 2007, we received a copy of an
arbitration demand from SSA before the International Chamber of
Commerce (“ICC”) seeking indemnification in the amount
of 30 million Pesos. On June 14, 2007, we were
officially notified by the ICC of the arbitration proceedings.
The Company believes such claim to be without merit.
We are a party to various other legal proceedings and
administrative actions, all of which are of an ordinary or
routine nature and incidental to our operations. Although it is
impossible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in
the opinion of our management, such proceedings and actions
should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity. For information regarding our pending tax
assessment, see Note 27 to our Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
Dividends
At shareholders’ meetings, shareholders have the ability,
in their discretion, to approve dividends from time to time. At
the ordinary shareholders’ meeting held on April 24,
1997, the shareholders of our predecessor, TMM, declared a
dividend, which has not yet been paid, equivalent to $0.17 per
share, subject to restrictions established by instruments
governing our outstanding debt obligations and to the
availability of funds. At the shareholders’ meeting that
declared such dividend, the shareholders delegated to the Board
of Directors the authority to determine when the dividend may be
paid.
Significant
Changes
See Item 4. “Information on the Company —
Business Overview — Recent Developments.”
76
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
THE
OFFER AND LISTING
|
Trading
Our Shares started trading on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores,
S.A. de C.V. (the “Mexican Stock Exchange” or the
“Bolsa”) on September 24, 1980 and our
Series L Shares began trading on August 9, 1991. In
June 1992, L Share ADSs, each representing one Series L
Share, were issued by Citibank, N.A. (the
“Depositary”) as depositary in exchange for
Rule 144A ADSs and as part of an initial public offering,
and commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”). On September 13, 2002, we completed a
reclassification of our Series L Shares of stock as Shares.
The reclassification combined our two classes of stock into a
single class by converting each share of our Series L
Shares into one share of our Shares. The reclassification also
eliminated the variable portion of our capital stock and we
became a fixed capital corporation (sociedad anónima).
Following the reclassification, we had 56,963,137 Shares
outstanding. As a result of the elimination of the variable
portion of our capital stock, our registered name changed from
Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V. to Grupo TMM, S.A.
As a result of the promulgation of the new securities law in
México in June of 2006, public companies were transformed
by operation of law into Sociedades Anónimas
Bursátiles (Public Issuing Corporation) and were required
to amend their by-laws to conform them to the provisions of the
new law. On December 20, 2006 the Company added the term
“Bursátil” to its registered name to comply with
the requirements under Mexico’s new securities law or Ley
del Mercado de Valores, resulting in Grupo TMM, Sociedad
Anónima Bursátil, or Grupo TMM, S.A.B. In addition,
the Series A Shares of the Company were renamed and are now
referred to as nominative common shares, without par value. The
rights afforded by these new shares are identical to the rights
afforded by the former Series A Shares.
As of June 4, 2008, of the 56,547,837 outstanding Shares,
45,567,797 were held in the form of ADSs.
The CPOs do not trade independently of the Shares on the Bolsa.
In the event that CPOs are sold to a Mexican national, the
Shares underlying such CPOs will be delivered directly to the
purchaser through S.D. Indeval, S.A. de C.V.
(“Indeval”). Indeval is a privately owned central
securities depositary that acts as a clearing house, depositary,
custodian, settlement, and transfer agent and registration
institution for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions, eliminating
the need for physical transfer of securities. Because
non-Mexican nationals cannot acquire direct interests in the
Shares, in the event that the purchaser of such Shares is not a
Mexican national, such Shares must be delivered in the form of
CPOs through Indeval.
Limitations
Affecting ADS Holders and CPO Holders
Each share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at any of our
shareholders’ meetings. Holders of CPOs are not entitled to
vote the shares underlying such CPOs. Such voting rights are
exercisable only by the CPO trustee, which is required to vote
all such shares in the same manner as the holders of a majority
of the shares that are not held in the CPO trust and that are
voted at the relevant meeting.
Whenever a shareholders’ meeting approves a change of
corporate purpose, change of domicile or restructuring from one
type of corporate form to another, any shareholder who has voted
against such change or restructuring has the right to withdraw
as a shareholder and receive an amount equal to the book value
of its shares (in accordance with our latest balance sheet
approved by the annual ordinary general shareholders’
meeting), provided such shareholder exercises its right to
withdraw during the
15-day
period following the meeting at which such change or
restructuring was approved. Because the CPO trustee is required
to vote the shares held in the CPO trust in the same manner as
the holders of a majority of the shares that are not held in the
CPO trust and that are voted at the relevant meeting, appraisal
rights will not be available to holders of CPOs.
The tables below set forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low prices on the Mexican Stock Exchange and
on the NYSE for the Shares and the ADSs, respectively.
77
Mexican
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Pesos)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares(*)
|
|
Previous Five Years:
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
55.00
|
|
|
|
16.61
|
|
2004
|
|
|
47.50
|
|
|
|
25.92
|
|
2005
|
|
|
42.50
|
|
|
|
31.40
|
|
2006
|
|
|
54.00
|
|
|
|
28.10
|
|
2007
|
|
|
37.60
|
|
|
|
28.10
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 20, 2006, the Series A Shares were
replaced by nominative common shares, without par value. |
Mexican
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Pesos)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares(*)
|
|
Previous Two Years (by Quarter):
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
54.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
49.00
|
|
|
|
41.77
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
48.40
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
30.21
|
|
|
|
29.10
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
37.60
|
|
|
|
28.10
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
42.80
|
|
|
|
34.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
38.50
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 20, 2006, the Series A Shares were
replaced by nominative common shares, without par value. |
Mexican
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Pesos)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
Previous Six Months:
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
29.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
January 31, 2008
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
23.70
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
22.50
|
|
|
|
22.50
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
|
21.10
|
|
|
|
19.75
|
|
May 31, 2008
|
|
|
21.59
|
|
|
|
16.19
|
|
Source: InfoSel Financiero
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 20, 2006, the Series A Shares were
replaced by nominative common shares, without par value. |
78
New York
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share ADS(*)
|
|
Previous Five Years:
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
2004
|
|
|
4.56
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
2005
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
2006
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 20, 2006, the Series A Shares were
replaced by nominative common shares, without par value. |
New York
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share ADS(*)
|
|
Previous Two Years (by Quarter):
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
3.39
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
As of December 20, 2006, the Series A Shares were
replaced by nominative common shares, without par value. |
New York
Stock Exchange
Price per Share
(Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share ADS
|
|
Previous Six Months:
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
January 31, 2008
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
May 31, 2008
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Source: NYSE — Price history composite
79
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
|
Share
Capital
Not applicable.
Memorandum
and Articles of Association
The following is a summary of the provisions of the Estatutos
Sociales (Bylaws) of Grupo TMM and is qualified in its
entirety by the actual provisions within the Bylaws themselves
and applicable provisions of the General Law of Mercantile
Companies (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles) and the
Mexican Securities Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores). For
a description of the provisions of our Bylaws relating to our
Board of Directors, General Director, Special Committees and
Statutory Auditors, as well as Audit and Corporate Practices
Committee, see Item 6. “Directors, Senior Management
and Employees.”
Organization
and Register
We were incorporated in the United Mexican States as a
sociedad anonima, as evidenced by public deed number
26,225 dated August 14, 1987. We amended our Bylaws on
August 29, 2002 in connection with the reclassification of
our Series A Shares and Series L Shares.
On June 4th, 2008, certain articles of the Company’s
Bylaws were modified at the General Shareholders’ Meeting.
The modification to Article 14 added further restrictions
to the acquisition or the transfer of the Company’s shares
providing more specific detail with respect to the requirements
and authorizations required in order to acquire five percent
(5%) or more of the Company’s shares. Article 25 was
modified in order to comply with the Mexican Exchange Law (Ley
del Mercado de Valores). Finally, Article 27 was modified
to clarify which shareholders are required to sign the
Shareholders Meeting Attendance Sheet. This General
Shareholders’ Meeting was properly formalized in public
deed number 18,196 (filing before the Public Commerce Registry
pending) by and before Mr. Juan Martín Álvarez
Moreno, Public Brokerage number 46 of Mexico City, Federal
District.
Our statement of corporate purposes authorizes us to engage in,
among other things, shipping and transportation services, the
development, organization and management of all types of
companies or entities, the acquisition of shares or units of the
capital stock of other companies or entities, and generally, to
carry out and execute all acts, transactions, agreements and
operations of any nature as may be necessary or convenient in
furtherance of our corporate purposes.
Board
of Directors
Our business and affairs are managed by the Board of Directors
and by a General Director. The Board of Directors consists of
not more than 21 or less than seven persons, provided that at
least 25% of the directors are independent. Our directors are
elected annually at the Annual General Shareholders’
Meeting. The Board of Directors shall always have a Chairman, a
First Vice-Chairman and a Second Vice-Chairman and other
Directors.
The directors (whenever elected) shall remain in office for the
period of time stated below, calculated from the date of their
appointment. The directors may be re-elected and, in case of the
failure to appoint their substitute or if the designated
substitute does not take office, the directors in office being
substituted shall continue to perform their duties for up to 30
calendar days following the date of expiry of the term for which
they were appointed:
|
|
|
Position in the Board of Directors
|
|
Term
|
Chairman
|
|
7 years
|
First Vice-Chairman
|
|
7 years
|
Second Vice-Chairman
|
|
Between 3 and 7 years (As determined by the General
Shareholders’ Meeting that elects him/her.)
|
Other Directors
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
Except that in no event whatsoever shall more than one third
(1/3) of the member directors be replaced for any fiscal year of
the Company.
|
80
In the event of the permanent absence of the Chairman or of any
of the Vice-Chairmen, the Board of Directors, at the first
meeting held after said permanent absence shall temporarily
appoint from among its members or persons outside the same, the
director or directors that shall fill relevant vacancies. Also,
in the event of resignation or permanent absence of any of the
other directors, the Board of Directors shall make the
appointments of temporary directors as may be required for the
continuance of the Board’s integration and duties. In both
cases, a General Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting shall be
called as soon as possible to ratify or make definitive
appointments of the relevant directors and, in any case, in the
absence of said call, the first General Shareholders’
Meeting held after any of said events shall carry out the final
appointment.
The Board of Directors shall appoint a Secretary and a Deputy
Secretary, who shall not be a part of the Board of Directors.
Said Secretary and Deputy Secretary may at any time be removed
by the Board of Directors and their temporary and final absences
shall be covered by the persons appointed by the Board of
Directors. Despite the fact that the Secretary and the Deputy
Secretary are not members of the Board of Directors of the
Company, they may sign jointly or severally and instruct the
publication of any call to the Shareholders’ Meeting of the
Company ordered or resolved by the Board of Directors or the
Audit and Corporate Practices Committee.
The meetings of the Board of Directors may be ordinary or
extraordinary. The ordinary meetings shall be held periodically
on the dates and times designated by such Board of Directors,
provided that such Board of Directors meets at least 4 times
during each fiscal year. The extraordinary meetings shall be
held when the Chairman of the Board of Directors determines or
at the request of 25% of the directors. The Board of Directors
shall meet at the Company’s registered office or at any
other place in Mexico or abroad as determined beforehand in the
respective call. The meetings of the Board of Directors shall be
presided over by the Chairman and in his absence, by the
alternate Chairman and, in the absence of the alternate
Chairman, by any director designated by the directors present at
the meeting in question, by a majority of votes.
In order for a Board of Directors meeting to be valid, at least
half of the directors that make up the Board of Directors from
time to time must be in attendance and the Chairman and a
Vice-Chairman shall always and in any event be in attendance. If
a meeting of the Board of Directors may not be held due to the
lack of quorum or the absence of the Chairman and a
Vice-Chairman, the call shall be repeated as many times as
needed. In order for the resolutions of the Board of Directors
to be valid, the favorable vote of the majority of the directors
present at the meeting in question is required. In the event of
a tie, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or his alternate,
as applicable, shall have the tie-breaking vote.
For resolutions of the Board of Directors to be valid in
connection with the matters listed below, the favorable vote of
(i) the Chairman of the Board of Directors and
(ii) the First Vice-Chairman or the Second Vice-Chairman is
required. The following matters shall be decided upon
exclusively by the Board of Directors of the Company:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The approval
and/or
modification of the annual budget, which must be approved for
each fiscal year of the Company;
|
|
|
2.
|
The imposition or creation of any lien on any of the assets of
the Company
and/or of
the corporations controlled by the Company, or the resolution of
the Company
and/or of
the corporations controlled by the Company, to guarantee
obligations of the Company
and/or of
its subsidiaries, or to guarantee obligations of third parties,
in all of said cases, when the value of any of said transactions
involves in a single act or in a series of related acts, an
amount equal to or higher than five percent of the total
consolidated assets of the Company during a calendar year;
|
|
|
3.
|
The decision to begin a new business line or the suspension of
any business line developed by the Company or by any corporation
in which the Company participates, either directly or indirectly;
|
|
|
4.
|
Any decision related to the acquisition or sale of assets
(including shares or equity interests or their equivalent, in
any corporation controlled or not controlled by the Company or
in which the Company has a significant share, or to any
financing
and/or the
creation of any liens, when the value of any of said
transactions involves in a single act or in a series of related
acts, an amount equal to or higher than five percent of the
total consolidated assets of the Company during a calendar year;
|
81
|
|
|
|
5.
|
The determination of the manner in which the Company shall
exercise its voting rights regarding shares or equity interests
(or their equivalent) issued by its subsidiaries or entities in
which the Company owns at least 20% of the capital stock
thereof; and
|
|
|
6.
|
The establishment of any committee of the Company other than the
Audit and Corporate Practices Committee.
|
The Board of Directors shall primarily have the duty of
establishing general strategies for the direction of the
business of the Company and its subsidiaries and that of
overseeing the management and direction of the same and the
performance of the relevant managers or officers. Such Board may
establish one or more committees. In any event, the Company
shall establish one or more committees in charge of the duties
of audit and corporate practices.
General
Director
The General Director, or Chief Executive Officer, shall be in
charge of the day-to-day management of the Company, the
direction and execution of the businesses of the Company and of
its subsidiaries, subject to the strategies, policies and
guidelines approved by the Board of Directors or, as the case
may be, by committees created pursuant to the corporate By-Laws.
In order to fulfill his duties, the General Director shall have
the powers granted to him by the Board of Directors at the time
of his appointment or at any other time after his appointment.
For the exercise of his duties and activities and the
fulfillment of his obligations, the General Director shall be
assisted by all the relevant managers and other employees of the
Company and of the corporations controlled by the Company.
Audit
and Corporate Practices Committee
The Board of Directors of the Company must establish a committee
to carry out the audit and corporate practices functions that
shall be integrated by at least three (3) independent
directors appointed by the Board of Directors, which members are
proposed by the Chairman. The foregoing notwithstanding, the
Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Practices Committee must be
appointed
and/or
removed from his position exclusively by the General
Shareholders’ Meeting and he must always be an independent
director. The Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Practices
Committee in no event whatsoever may preside over the Board of
Directors.
The oversight of the management, direction and execution of the
business of the Company and of its subsidiaries shall be
entrusted to the Board of Directors through the aforementioned
Audit and Corporate Practices Committee, as well as through the
individuals or corporations that carry out the external audit of
the Company for each fiscal year.
Capital
Stock
To conform to the provisions of the new Mexican Securities Law,
our Series A Shares of the capital stock were converted
into nominative common shares without par value, thereby
deleting any series. The rights of the latter Series A
Shares and these common Shares are identical.
Consequently, our total capital stock is divided into 56,963,137
(Fifty Six Million Nine Hundred Sixty Three Thousand One Hundred
Thirty Seven) of nominative, common Shares without par value.
Our total stated capital stock is Ps. 700,000,000.00.
Registration
and Transfer
All Shares are evidenced by share certificates in registered
form. Mexican law requires that all shares be represented by a
certificate, although a single certificate may represent
multiple shares of stock. Certificates may be issued in the name
of the registered holder. All of our share certificates are
issued in the name of the registered holder. Mexican law also
requires that all transfers, encumbrances and liens on
nominative shares must be recorded in the share registry book
and are only enforceable against us and third parties after such
registration occurs. S.D. Indeval, S.A. de C.V.
(“Indeval”) is the registrar and transfer agent for
the Shares held in book-entry form. A global
82
certificate representing all Shares in book entry form is
deposited at Indeval. Shareholders holding their share
certificates directly are required to be recorded as such by the
secretary of the Company in our share registry book.
Shareholders’
Meetings
Shareholders are entitled to vote on all matters at ordinary or
special shareholders’ meetings. The Board of Directors will
convene an Annual Shareholders’ Meeting at least once a
year on the date determined by the Board of Directors within the
first four months following the end of the fiscal year. In
addition to dealing with the matters included on the agenda, the
shareholders’ meeting should discuss, approve or modify the
report of the Board of Directors, of the General Director and of
the committee(s) that carry out the duties of corporate and
audit practices, related to (i) the day-to-day conduct of
business, (ii) the general balance sheet, (iii) the
statement of income and losses, (iv) the statement of
changes in financial position, and (v) the statement of the
change in shareholders’ equity for such fiscal year. At
such meeting directors shall also be appointed as per our Bylaws
for the next fiscal year and their compensation shall be
determined.
All notices of shareholders’ meetings shall be published
once in the official newspaper of the domicile of the Company
and in one of the newspapers of major circulation in such
domicile, at least 15 days prior to the date scheduled for
the meeting to be held. In order for the Ordinary
Shareholders’ Meetings to be considered legally convened as
a result of the first call, at least half of the capital stock
in circulation at that time must be represented thereat, and the
resolutions of such meeting shall be valid when passed by a
majority of the votes present.
Ordinary Shareholders’ Meetings require the attendance of
shareholders holding at least half the shares that have the
right to attend such meetings, and the affirmative vote of a
majority of the holders present at any such meeting, in a first
call, and in a second call, the affirmative vote of majority
holders of shares that have the right to attend any such meeting
irrespective of the number of shares presents thereat, in order
to take action.
Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meetings require the attendance
of shareholders holding at least 75% of the shares that have the
right to attend and vote at any such meetings, and the
affirmative vote of at least half the issued and outstanding
shares having such voting right, in a first call, and in a
second or subsequent call, the attendance and affirmative vote
of at least half the issued and outstanding shares having the
right to attend and vote at any such meeting in order to take
action.
Shareholders may be present or represented by a simple proxy at
shareholders’ meetings. Directors and statutory auditors of
the Company may not represent any shareholder at any
shareholders’ meeting.
In order to attend any meeting, shareholders must obtain an
admission card prior to the meeting from Indeval or another
financial institution in the United Mexican States or abroad.
Such financial institution must notify the Company (telegraphic
or facsimile means are authorized) of the name of the depositor,
the number of shares deposited and the date on which the deposit
was made. Admission cards to shareholders’ meetings may be
regularly obtained through authorized brokers in the United
Mexican States which, together with the list issued by Indeval,
will be sufficient for any shareholder to obtain the
corresponding admission card.
Limitation
on Share Ownership
Mexican law and our corporate charter prohibit ownership of
Shares by foreign investors. Any acquisition of Shares in
violation of this charter provision would be null and void.
Any foreigner who acquires any interest or participation in our
capital stock through CPOs will be considered a Mexican citizen
insofar as Mexican law and we are concerned (except with respect
to the right to own Shares) and will be deemed to understand and
agree that such foreigner may not invoke the protection of his
government in connection with his interest or participation in
the Company, under penalty of forfeiture of such interest or
participation in favor of the United Mexican States.
We contributed Shares of our capital stock to the Master Neutral
Investment Trust (Fideicomiso Maestro de Inversion Neutra)
(the “CPO Trust”) established with a
30-year term
by Nacional Financiera, S.N.C. (the “CPO Trustee”) on
November 24, 1989. The CPO Trustee authorized the issuance
of non-redeemable ordinary participation certificates
(certificados de participación ordinarios no
amortizables) (“CPOs”) that correspond to our
83
Shares. One CPO may be issued for each of our Shares contributed
to the CPO Trust. CPOs constitute separate negotiable
instruments different and apart from our Shares, and afford to
their holders only economic rights attaching to Shares.
Consequently, holders of CPOs are not entitled to exercise any
voting rights with respect to the Shares held in the CPO Trust.
Such voting rights are exercisable only by the CPO Trustee,
which is required by the terms of the CPO Trust to vote such
Shares in the same manner as holders of a majority of the
outstanding Shares not held in the CPO Trust and voted at the
relevant meeting.
Prior to its termination date, the CPO Trustee will sell Shares
held by the CPO Trust, and deliver the proceeds thereof to CPO
holders in proportion to their respective CPO holdings.
Alternatively, we may establish a new trust to enable continued
foreign equity participation in the Company. Although, we will
endeavor to establish a new trust to substitute the CPO Trust,
no assurance can be made that we will in fact establish or be
able to establish such new trust.
Mexican and non-Mexican investors may hold CPOs without
restrictions of any kind.
We note that because CPOs are negotiable instruments separate
and apart from Shares of the Company, holders of CPOs do not
qualify as shareholders, and may not exercise the minority
rights afforded by the General Law of Mercantile Companies and
Mexican Securities Law of the United Mexican States, except for
the right to exercise a derivative action for civil liability
against the Directors and relevant officers of the Company or
its subsidiaries, as further detailed in section entitled
“Minority Rights” below.
Acquisition
of Share Capital
On December 20, 2006, the Company amended Article 14
of its bylaws to provide that the consent of the Board of
Directors would be required for acquisitions that would result
in any person or group of persons acquiring 5% or more of our
Shares whether in a single transaction or in several
simultaneous or successive transactions, notwithstanding the
number of shares that such person may own at such time. If the
approved process is not complied with, the acquirer will not be
entitled to vote the acquired Shares. The approved process will
apply only to direct acquisitions of Shares and not to CPOs and
ADSs. In addition, the acquisition of Shares by any Mexican
national may also be subject to the applicable provisions of
Mexican antitrust laws. The Board is required to resolve with
respect to any request for authorization to acquire five percent
(5%) or more of our Shares within a period of 3 months
following the request and to take into account certain criteria
as set forth in our Bylaws that relates to the consequences
affecting the Company by such acquisition. Notwithstanding this
restriction, in the event of a public offering for the
acquisition of one hundred (100%) of our Shares, no
authorization by the Board of Directors in connection with such
public offering is necessary and the Board of Directors is
required by law to render an opinion related to the terms and
conditions of such public offering which opinion is to be
rendered pursuant to applicable regulations. Our Bylaws provide
that any amendment to the aforementioned provision may only be
approved at a General Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting,
at which shares representing five percent (5%) or more of the
capital stock of the Company have not voted against.
On June 4th, 2008, Article 14 of the Company’s
Bylaws was further modified at the General Shareholder’s
Meeting. These modificiations added further restrictions to the
acquisition or the transfer of the Company’s shares
providing more specific detail with respect to the requirements
and authorizations required in order to acquire five percent
(5%) or more of the Company’s shares.
Rights
|
|
1.
|
Applicable
to Shareholders, CPOs holders and the CPO Trustee
|
The shareholder, or group of shareholders representing at least
five percent or more of the capital stock, may exercise a
derivative action for civil liability against the directors and
relevant officers of the Company, provided the complaint
includes the total amount of the liabilities in favor of the
Company, its subsidiaries or entities in which the Company owns
20% or more of the capital stock thereof, and not only the
personal interest of the petitioners. The assets obtained as a
result of the claim shall be for the benefit of the Company, its
subsidiaries, or such entities, as applicable.
84
Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law, CPOs or ADSs holders, as
well as the CPO Trustee, may also exercise the aforementioned
civil liability action.
|
|
2.
|
Applicable
to Shareholders
|
The shareholder or group of shareholders representing at least
20% or more of the capital stock may oppose in court the
resolutions of the General Shareholders’ Meetings, provided
(i) the complaint is filed within the 15 days
following the adjournment of the Shareholders’ Meeting,
(ii) the plaintiffs have not attended the
Shareholders’ Meeting or they have cast their vote against
the resolution, and (iii) the complaint states the clause
of the Company’s Bylaws or of the legal norm violated, as
well as a description of the violation. Shareholders exercising
such opposition right must deposit their Shares before a Notary
Public or an authorized financial institution and their
complaint shall be accompanied by evidence of such deposit.
Deposited shares may not be withdrawn until a final judgment is
rendered.
The shareholder or group of shareholders representing at least
10% of the capital stock shall be entitled to appoint, at the
Annual General Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held in order
to elect directors, a Regular Member and, as the case may be,
his respective alternate. The appointment of any director
carried out by a minority may only be reversed when all other
directors are also removed, unless the removal is attributable
to a justified reason according to the applicable law.
Holders of 10% or more of the capital stock of the Company, may
require the Chairman of the Board of Directors or of the Audit
and Corporate Practices Committee to call a General
Shareholders’ Meeting.
The shareholder or group of shareholders representing, at least,
10% of the shares represented at a Shareholders’ Meeting
may request that the voting on any matter of which they are not
sufficiently informed be postponed and in said case the voting
on said matter shall be postponed for three calendar days,
without the need for a new call. This right may be exercised
only once for the same matter.
In addition, shareholders are entitled to (i) review all
information and documents pertaining to the matters for which a
Shareholders’ Meeting has been called at the offices of the
Company and within at least 15 calendar days of the scheduled
date of the meeting; (ii) request that certain relevant
issues be dealt with at the meeting that were not originally on
the agenda for the meeting, if called for under sundry or
general matters in the relevant call for the meeting;
(iii) be represented at the meeting by persons designated
by them pursuant to standard proxy forms that are to be made
available by the Company with at least 15 calendar days prior to
the date scheduled for the meeting which will contain the name
of the Company, the matters to be discussed at the meeting and
spaces for instructions as to the manner of the vote; and
(iv) execute agreements between or among different
shareholders provided that any such shareholders’
agreement(s) must be disclosed to the Company within five
business days following the date of their execution for
disclosure thereof to the public through the relevant stock
exchanges and disclosure of their existence in the annual
reports of the Company, and provided further that such
agreements will not affect any voting at any Shareholders’
Meeting of the Company, may not be enforced against the Company
and will only be effective among the executing shareholders upon
disclosure to the public as aforesaid.
Limitation
of Officers’ and Directors’ Liability
In addition to voting for directors at the Annual
Shareholders’ Meeting, shareholders are asked to vote upon
the financial statements of the Company and the annual reports
of the Board of Directors, the Audit and Corporate Practices
Committee, and the General Director. If the holders of a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast approve
management’s performance, all shareholders are deemed to
have released the directors and officers from claims or
liability to us or our shareholders arising out of actions taken
or any failure to take actions by any of them on our behalf
during the prior fiscal year, with certain exceptions. Officers
and directors may not be released from any claims or liability
for criminal acts, fraud, self-dealing or gross negligence.
Members of the Board of Directors and the officers of the
Company shall not incur, individually or jointly, any
responsibility for the damages
and/or
losses they may cause to the Company or its subsidiaries or of
entities in which the Company owns 20% or more of the capital
stock thereof, derived from acts executed by, or decisions
85
made, by any of them, to the extent that acting in good faith,
any of the following exclusions of responsibility applies:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
They fulfill the requirements that the Bylaws and the applicable
laws may stipulate for the approval of matters to be dealt with
by the Board of Directors or, as the case may be, by committees
of which they are members.
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
They make decisions or vote at the meetings of the Board of
Directors or, as the case may be, committees to which they
belong, based on the information provided by the relevant
managers, the corporation providing the external audit services
or the independent experts, whose capacity and credibility do
not offer a cause for reasonable doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
They have selected the most suitable alternative, to the best of
their knowledge and belief, or negative property damages had not
been foreseeable, in both cases, based on the information
available at the time of the decision.
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
They fulfill the resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meeting,
provided these do not violate the law.
|
We shall indemnify and hold the directors, the General Director
and all other relevant managers of the Company or of the
mercantile corporations controlled by the Company harmless from
all damages
and/or
losses that their performance may cause to the Company and the
corporations controlled by the Company or in which it has a
significant influence, except in the event of deceitful acts or
acts in bad faith, unlawful acts in accordance with the
applicable legislation or whose indemnity, pursuant to said
legislation may not be agreed or granted by the Company. For
said purposes, we may obtain liability insurance or any similar
insurance and grant any bonds and bails that may be necessary or
convenient. All legal costs related to the respective defense
shall be payable by us against general expenses, which shall
only be refunded to the Company by the director in question, the
General Director or the relevant manager in question, when
required pursuant to a firm court order releasing the Company
from its indemnity obligations.
Liquidation
Rights
Any liquidation of the Company shall be carried out in the
manner provided under the valid General Law of Mercantile
Companies. The shareholders’ meeting, in the act of
agreeing to the dissolution, should establish the rules that, in
addition to the legal provisions and the provisions provided
herein, should dictate the actions of the liquidators. Holders
of 75% percent of the votes entitled to be cast is required to
approve a liquidation of the Company.
Dividends
Dividends are declared by the shareholders. All holders of
common stock (represented by shares, CPOs or ADSs) will share
equally on a per share basis in any dividend declared by our
shareholders.
Certain
Voting Rights
Our only class of outstanding capital stock consists of Shares.
Shares, when properly issued, are fully voting shares of capital
stock without par value.
Preemptive
and Other Rights
In case of a capital increase, except in the case of treasury
shares (in which case no preemptive rights applies), the holders
of Shares have the preemptive right to subscribe for the new
shares issued as a result of a capital increase, in proportion
to the number of shares owned by each of them.
Material
Contracts
See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Indebtedness.”
86
Exchange
Controls
There are currently no exchange controls in Mexico; however,
Mexico has imposed foreign exchange controls in the past.
Pursuant to the provisions of NAFTA, if Mexico experiences
serious balance of payment difficulties or the threat thereof in
the future, Mexico would have the right to impose foreign
exchange controls on investments made in Mexico, including those
made by U.S. and Canadian investors.
Taxation
The following is a summary of certain United States federal
income tax and certain Mexican federal tax consequences related
to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our ADSs by
certain holders.
This summary is not a complete description or analysis of all
potential tax considerations relevant to a decision to acquire,
hold or dispose of our ADSs. The summary applies only to
U.S. holders or non-resident U.S. holders (both as
defined below) and does not take into account the tax
considerations of persons who may be subject to special rules,
such as tax-exempt entities; financial institutions; insurance
companies; real estate investment trusts; regulated investment
companies; grantor trusts; partnerships; former citizens or
long-term residents of the United States; broker-dealers;
traders in securities or currencies; holders liable for
alternative minimum tax; U.S. holders that own (directly,
indirectly or constructively) 10% or more of the voting shares
of our Company; holders that hold our ADSs as part of a straddle
or a hedging or conversion transaction or other integrated
investment transaction; or holders whose functional currency is
not the U.S. dollar.
This summary with respect to United States federal income taxes
is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), treasury regulations, including
proposed regulations and temporary regulations, promulgated
under the Code, rulings, official pronouncements and judicial
decisions, all as in effect on the date of this Annual Report.
The summary with respect to Mexican federal taxes is based on
the Mexican federal tax laws, regulations issued thereunder,
rulings and general rules issued by the Ministry of Finance and
Public Credit (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito
Público), official pronouncements and judicial
decisions, all as in effect on the date of this Annual Report.
All these things are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect, and to different interpretations.
The governments of the United States and Mexico ratified an
income tax treaty and a protocol which came into effect on
January 1, 1994, and such treaty has been amended by
subsequent protocols (collectively, the “Tax Treaty”).
The United States and Mexico have also entered into an agreement
concerning the exchange of information with respect to tax
matters.
This summary does not address United States federal estate and
gift tax considerations or the effect of any United States state
or local tax law. You should consult your own tax advisers
concerning the application of the United States federal income
tax law to your particular situation as well as any tax
consequences arising under the law of any state, local or
foreign tax jurisdiction.
General
The following summary contains a general description of certain
Mexican federal tax and United States federal income tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of
our ADSs by:
|
|
•
|
United States holders, defined below, who hold our securities as
capital assets and whose functional currency is the United
States Dollar, in the case of United States federal income tax
consequences; and
|
|
•
|
United States holders that are non-residents of Mexico for
Mexican federal tax purposes and that do not have a permanent
establishment in Mexico (“non-resident
U.S. holders”), in the case of Mexican federal tax
consequences.
|
For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. holder” is
generally any holder of any of our ADSs who or which is
(i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a
corporation, partnership, or other entity created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, or any political
subdivision thereof; (iii) an estate the income of which is
includible in gross income for United States federal income tax
purposes regardless of source; or (iv) a trust (other than
a grantor trust) if (A) a court within the United States is
able to exercise primary supervision over the
87
administration of the trust and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (B) it has a valid election in place to be
treated as a United States person. For purposes of this summary,
the term “U.S. holder” does not include a citizen
or resident of the United States that is also a resident of
Mexico for Mexican federal tax purposes. If a partnership holds
our ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend
on the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partners of a partnership holding our ADSs should
consult their own tax advisers.
In general, for Mexican federal tax purposes, an individual is a
resident of Mexico if he has established his home in Mexico,
unless he has a home both in Mexico and abroad; in such case an
individual will be considered to be a resident of Mexico if the
individual’s “center of vital interests” is in
Mexico. For these purposes, the center of vital interests will
be considered to be located in Mexico, among other cases, if
either (i) more than 50% of the individual’s total
income in a calendar year is derived from a source in Mexico, or
(ii) the main center of the individual’s professional
activities is located in Mexico. Mexican Nationals who are state
officials or state workers even though their individual’s
center of vital interests is located abroad are deemed to be
residents of Mexico. A Mexican national is presumed to be a
resident of Mexico unless such person can demonstrate otherwise.
A legal entity is a resident of Mexico if it maintains the
principal administration of its business or the effective
location of its management in Mexico. If a legal entity or an
individual is deemed to have a permanent establishment in Mexico
for Mexican federal income tax purposes, all income attributable
to such permanent establishment will be subject to Mexican
federal income taxes, in accordance with applicable laws.
If an individual or legal entity ceases to be resident of Mexico
for Mexican federal tax purposes, such individual or legal
entity must make certain filings with the Mexican tax
authorities within a
15-day
period before its change of residency or, in certain cases,
within a month following the date of change of residency.
A non-resident of Mexico is an individual or legal entity that
does not satisfy the requirements to be considered a resident of
Mexico for Mexican federal tax purposes.
Mexican
Federal Tax Consequences
This summary of certain Mexican federal tax consequences relates
only to non-resident U.S. holders of our ADSs.
Dividends — Dividends, either in cash or in any
other form, paid with respect to the Shares underlying the CPOs
represented by our ADSs will not be subject to Mexican
withholding or any other Mexican tax.
Capital Gains — Capital gains arising from the
sale or other disposition of our ADSs will not be subject to
Mexican income tax.
Deposits and withdrawals of ADSs will not give rise to any
Mexican tax or transfer duties.
The sale of our ADSs will not be subject to the Mexican flat
rate business tax (Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Unica).
In general, commissions paid in brokerage transactions for the
sale of our ADSs on the Mexican Stock Exchange are subject to a
value-added tax of 15%.
Other Mexican Taxes — There are no Mexican
inheritance or succession taxes applicable to the ownership,
transfer or disposition of our ADSs. Gratuitous transfers of our
ADSs may, in some circumstances, subject the recipient to
Mexican federal income tax. There are no Mexican stamp, issue,
registration or similar taxes or duties payable by non-resident
U.S. holders with respect to our ADSs.
United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of certain United States federal
income tax consequences to U.S. holders of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of ADSs. It does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all tax consequences and should not
be considered as legal or tax advice.
88
Each U.S. holder should consult such holder’s own
tax adviser concerning the overall tax consequences to it of the
ownership or disposition of the ADSs that may arise under United
States federal, state and local laws, as well as foreign law.
For United States federal income tax purposes, a holder of an
ADS will generally be treated as the beneficial owner of the CPO
represented by such ADS and each CPO will represent a beneficial
interest in the underlying Share represented by such CPO.
Distributions — Distributions paid out of our
current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under
United States federal tax law) with respect to our ADSs will be
includible in the gross income of a U.S. holder as ordinary
income when the distributions are received by the depositary and
will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction
otherwise allowable to U.S. holders that are corporations.
To the extent that a distribution exceeds earnings and profits,
it will be treated first as a nontaxable return of the
U.S. holder’s tax basis in the ADSs to the extent of
such tax basis, and then as gain from the sale or disposition of
a capital asset. A U.S. holder must include in gross income
as ordinary income the gross amount of the dividends, including
any Mexican tax withheld therefrom, without regard to whether
any portion of such tax may be refunded to the U.S. holder
by the Mexican tax authorities.
The amount of any dividend paid in Pesos will equal the
U.S. dollar value of the Pesos received, calculated by
reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the
distribution is includible in income, regardless of whether the
Pesos are converted into U.S. dollars. In addition,
U.S. holders may recognize a foreign currency gain or loss,
generally treated as an ordinary gain or loss, upon the
disposition of the Pesos measured by the difference between such
U.S. dollar value and the amount realized on the
disposition.
Certain dividends received with respect to the ADSs by an
individual U.S. holder may be subject to taxation at a
maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are “qualified
dividends”. Qualified dividends with respect to an
individual U.S. holder generally include, among other
dividends, dividends that are received from a “qualified
foreign corporation” and held for a certain holding period.
A qualified foreign corporation generally includes a foreign
corporation if: (A) (i) its shares, including its ADSs, are
readily tradable on an established securities market in the
United States or (ii) it is eligible for benefits of a
comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has approved for the
purposes of the qualified dividend rule and (B) it was not
a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) with
respect to the individual U.S. holder in the taxable year
in which the dividend was paid and in the preceding taxable
year. The ADSs are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and
will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States so long as they are so listed.
Further, as discussed below, we believe that we are not a PFIC.
Therefore, we believe that dividends paid to an individual
U.S. holder with respect to the ADSs generally may be taxed
at a maximum rate of 15%. The maximum 15% tax rate is effective
with respect to qualified dividends included in income during
any taxable year ending before January 1, 2011.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Mexican tax
withheld, if any, from dividend payments on ADSs will be treated
as foreign income tax that may be deductible from taxable income
or credited against a U.S. holder’s United States
federal income tax liability. The Mexican tax may be deducted
only if the U.S. holder does not claim a credit for any
Mexican or other foreign taxes paid or accrued in that year.
Foreign income tax credits are subject to limitations under the
Code. In general, the limitations are calculated separately with
respect to separate classes of income. Dividends paid with
respect to the ADSs for taxable year beginning after 2006 are
either foreign source “passive category income” or
“general category income,” depending on the
U.S. holder’s circumstances.
Capital Gains — In general, upon the sale or
other disposition of ADSs, a U.S. holder will recognize a
gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized
on the sale or disposition (in U.S. dollars, generally
determined at the spot rate on the date of disposition, or in
the case of a cash basis U.S. holder, at the exchange rate
in effect on the settlement date, if the amount realized is
denominated in a foreign currency) and the
U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ADSs (in
U.S. dollars). The gain or loss will be treated as a
capital gain or loss if the ADSs were held as a capital asset
and will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the ADSs have
been held for more than one year on the date of the sale or
other disposition. Capital gains of individuals are generally
taxed at lower rates than items of ordinary income. With respect
to sales or other dispositions occurring during any taxable year
ending before January 1, 2011, the maximum long-term
capital gain tax rate for an individual U.S. holder is
generally 15%.
89
For sales or other dispositions occurring during any taxable
year ending after December 31, 2010, the maximum long-term
capital gain rate for an individual U.S. holder is
generally 20%. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
limitations. A gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder on
a sale or other disposition of ADSs generally will be treated as
a gain or loss from sources within the United States for United
States federal income tax purposes. However, for foreign tax
credit purposes, such gain may be re-characterized as foreign
source income under the Tax Treaty.
Foreign tax credit rules are extremely complex and, thus,
U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisers
regarding the application of the foreign tax credit rules to
their investments in, and disposition of, the ADSs.
PFIC Rules— We believe that we were not a PFIC
for United States federal income tax purposes for the 2007
taxable year and we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for our
2008 taxable year. However, because PFIC status depends upon the
composition of our income and assets and the market value of our
assets from time to time (including, among others, less than
25 percent owned equity investments) and because the
characterization of certain income and assets is uncertain under
the PFIC rules, there can be no assurance that we will not be
considered a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were treated as a
PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder held
ADSs, certain adverse consequences could apply to such
U.S. holder.
In general, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year,
gain recognized by a U.S. holder on the sale or other
disposition of ADSs would be allocated ratably over the
U.S. holder’s holding period for such ADSs. The
amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other
disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be
taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each taxable
year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for
individuals or corporations, as appropriate, and an interest
charge would be imposed on the tax liability attributable to
such allocated amounts. Further, any distribution in respect of
ADSs to the extent it exceeds 125% of the average of the annual
distributions on such securities received by the
U.S. holder during the preceding three years or the
U.S. holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter,
would be subject to taxation as described above. Certain
elections (including a mark to mark election) may be available
to ameliorate the adverse consequences resulting from PFIC
status.
Information
Reporting And Backup Withholding
Dividends on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of
our ADSs paid to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to
the information reporting requirements of the Code, and may be
subject to backup withholding unless the holder:
(i) establishes that it is a domestic corporation or other
exempt holder, or (ii) provides an accurate taxpayer
identification number, certifies that is not subject to backup
withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements
of the backup withholding rules. Any amount withheld under these
rules generally will be allowed as a credit against the
U.S. holder’s United States federal income tax
liability.
United
States Tax Consequences for
Non-U.S.
Holders
A holder of our ADSs that is not a U.S. holder for United
States federal income tax purposes (a
“non-U.S. holder”)
generally will not be subject to a United States federal income
or withholding tax on dividends received on ADSs, unless such
income is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder
or a United States trade or business.
A
non-U.S. holder
of ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax on gain realized on the sale of ADSs, unless:
(1) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by
the holder of a United States trade or business; or (2) in
the case of gain realized by an individual
non-U.S. holder,
the
non-U.S. holder
is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Although
non-U.S. holders
generally are exempt from backup withholding, a
non-U.S. holder
may be required to comply with certification and identification
procedures in order to establish its exemption from information
reporting and backup withholding.
90
Documents
On Display
All documents concerning the Company referred to herein may be
inspected at our offices in Mexico City. We will provide a
summary of such documents in English upon request. In addition,
the materials in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
and exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference room
in Washington, D.C. Please call the Securities and Exchange
Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on public reference rooms. The
Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web site on the
Internet at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports and other information regarding us.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The following information includes “forward-looking
statements” that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual
results could differ from those presented. All information below
is presented under IFRS as of December 31, 2007, in
U.S. dollars.
We are exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity
prices. We use derivative instruments, on a selective basis, to
manage these risks. We do not use derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. We maintain and control our
treasury operations and overall financial risk through policies
approved by senior management and our Board of Directors.
Foreign
Currency Risk
A majority of the Company’s revenues and costs and expenses
are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, the Company is
still exposed to foreign currency risk and may occasionally use
currency derivatives to manage alternating levels of exposure.
These derivatives allow the Company to offset an increase in
operating
and/or
administrative expenses arising from foreign currency
appreciation or depreciation against the U.S. dollar.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the
United States dollar as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
88,869
|
|
|
$
|
50,419
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(335,696
|
)
|
|
|
(47,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(246,827
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the past, the Company has entered into, and in the future may
from time to time enter into, currency derivatives denominated
in Mexican Pesos or other relevant currencies. The objective of
the Company when using these derivatives is always to manage
specific risks and exposures, and not to trade such instruments
for profit or loss. A majority of the Company’s
indebtedness is denominated in U.S. Dollars, and most of
this debt is fixed-rate.
Interest
Rate Risk
We depend upon debt-financing transactions, including debt
securities, bank and vendor credit facilities and leases, to
finance our operations. These transactions expose us to interest
rate risk, with the primary interest rate risk exposure
resulting from changes in the relevant base rates (CETES, TIIE,
LIBOR and/or
prime rate) which are used to determine the interest rates that
are applicable to borrowings under our credit facilities. We are
also exposed to interest rate risk in connection with the
refinancing of maturing debt.
The table below provides information about the Company’s
debt obligations. For debt obligations, the table represents
principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates
by expected maturity dates. The information is presented in
thousands of U.S. dollars, which is the Company’s
reporting currency.
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breakdown of Fixed and Variable Rates of Financial
Obligations(1)
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
$
|
18,784
|
|
|
$
|
19,658
|
|
|
$
|
51,457
|
|
|
$
|
35,408
|
|
|
$
|
54,593
|
|
|
$
|
179,900
|
|
|
$
|
179,900
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
|
11.15
|
%
|
|
|
11.22
|
%
|
|
|
11.27
|
%
|
|
|
10.82
|
%
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
|
|
11.06
|
%
|
|
|
**
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
279,985
|
|
|
$
|
287,037
|
|
|
$
|
287,037
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information as of December 31, 2007 |
|
** |
|
Not applicable |
As of December 31, 2007, the Company entered into an
interest CAP transaction with Banco Santander, S.A. in an amount
of Ps. 3.0 billion to hedge against fluctuations in
the TIIE rates in Mexico. These contracts were entered into in
connection with the first tranche of the Trust Certificates
Program.
On April 30, 2008 the Company entered into an interest CAP
transaction with Banco Santander, S.A. in an amount of
Ps. 1.55 billion to hedge against fluctuations in the
TIIE rates in Mexico. These contracts were entered into in
connection with the second tranche of the
Trust Certificates Program.
Commodity
Price Risk
The Company is exposed to price changes in the commodities
markets for certain inventory goods, and specifically fuel. The
Company purchases its diesel fuel on a spot basis within Mexico,
and it purchases ship bunker fuel in the United States for
certain of its operations. These purchases are affected by price
changes in the international energy commodity market. In the
past, the Company has entered into diesel fuel and other energy
commodity derivatives transactions to manage these risks and may
continue to engage in similar transactions in the future.
Inflation
Rate Risk
A substantial increase in the Mexican inflation rate would have
the effect of increasing our Peso-denominated costs and
expenses, which could affect our results of operations and
financial condition. High levels of inflation may also affect
the balance of trade between Mexico and the United States and
other countries, which could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Derivatives
Exposure
As of December 31, 2007, the Company entered into an
interest CAP transaction with Banco Santander, S.A. in an amount
of Ps. 3.0 billion to hedge against fluctuations in
the TIIE rates in Mexico. These contracts were entered into in
connection with the first tranche of the Trust Certificates
Program.
On April 30, 2008 the Company entered into an interest CAP
transaction with Banco Santander, S.A. in an amount of
Ps. 1.55 billion to hedge against fluctuations in the
TIIE rates in Mexico. These contracts were entered into in
connection with the second tranche of the
Trust Certificates Program.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
As of December 31, 2007, we had not met certain financial
ratios contained in our vessel financing agreements, resulting
in an event of default under these facilities. However, all of
the relevant lenders waived such default from
92
the period beginning December 31, 2007 through
September 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2007 and
May 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all of its
covenants under the facilities.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
See Item 4. “Information on the Company —
Organizational Structure — Reclassification of
Series A and Series L Shares.”
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer that: (i) pertains to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the Company’s assets; (ii) provides reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements for external reporting in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and
that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance
with authorization of the Company’s management and
directors; and (iii) provides reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedure may deteriorate.
The Company, with the participation of its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making its
assessment of internal control over financial reporting,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway
Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
As a result of this assessment, the Company’s management
has determined that there are deficiencies that constitute a
material weakness in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting for the period. A material weakness in
internal control over financial reporting is a control
deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard
No. 5), that results in there being more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The
deficiencies that the Company’s management has determined
constitute a material weakness are:
GL SAP Controls: The Company identified multiple users with
excessive access levels, within the GL SAP module, that resulted
in segregation of duties conflicts. In addition, the existing
monitoring controls did not operate at a level of precision to
monitor the actions performed by users with excessive access for
appropriateness. In addition, the existing automated and manual
controls were not designed to detect or prevent potential fraud
on a timely basis.
As a result of this material weakness in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting, management has
concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was not effective
based on the criteria set forth by the COSO of the Treadway
Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework .
The Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm, Salles Sainz — Grant Thornton, S.C, has issued
an attestation report on management’s assessment of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This
report appears below.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
93
We have audited Grupo TMM, S.A.B.’s (Grupo TMM) (a Mexican
Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Grupo TMM’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Grupo
TMM’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The following material weakness has been identified and included
in management’s assessment. There are control deficiencies
in the segregation of duties and user access levels within the
SAP General Ledger module that will preclude Grupo TMM from
preventing or detecting a material misstatement on a timely
basis.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness
described above on the achievement of the objectives of the
control criteria, Grupo TMM has not maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. and
subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007. The material
weakness identified above was considered in determining the
nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit
of the 2007 financial statements, and this report does not
affect our report dated May 30, 2008, which expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
SALLES, SAINZ — GRANT THORNTON, S.C.
Mexico City, Mexico
May 30, 2008
94
The following are actions that Company’s management has
taken and plans to continue to remediate the material weakness
described above:
General IT Controls: The area of Manage
Changes is currently centralizing and managing its processes
within a strict control framework where any change must be
approved by the SOX owner process and by the requester of the
change. At the end of the process all documental evidence
necessary to request, justify, authorize and prove that the
change is under control and also compliant with the segregation
of environments is reviewed by the SOX owner process prior to
transporting the change into the production environment. This
process was first implemented in November 2007 and was
reinforced in May 2008.
User Security Access Control: The Ensure
System Security area has implemented an administration
users’ process through a centralized function. The control
process requires generating documental evidence to show the
access assigned to end user. This process was first implemented
in November 2007 and was reinforced in May 2008.
SAP System Access Control: There is a new in
house tool to review the access control to this application. Its
main function is to identify and monitor the sensitive
transactions and SOD conflicts assigned to end users. This tool
was implemented in June 2008.
Security Configuration in SAP
System: Currently, there are no end users with
rights to change or to modify the system configuration. All
changes are controlled through the segregation of environments.
They are managed through the SOX processes Change Management of
Applications, Infrastructure and Emergency. This process was
first implemented in November 2007 and was reinforced in May
2008.
GL SAP Controls: The Administrative
Applications Manager worked during the first half of 2008 to
eliminate transactions related to the GL account master from
unauthorized users. Additionally, there is a new in house tool
to review the access control of this application. Its main
function is to identify and monitor the sensitive transactions
and SOD conflicts assigned to end users. This tool was
implemented in June 2008.
There is a new process created to control and justify when it is
necessary to assign a sensitive transaction or a SOD conflict in
a SAP end user. The process establishes the need to justify this
assignment formally by a letter from the immediate user’s
chief. The letter must include a business reason or a
compensatory control that minimize the associated risk of this
access. This process was implemented in June 2008.
Additionally, the Company is conducting a detailed review of
access control based on the methodology called RBAC (Role Based
on Access Control), that will help us to develop a new control
security structure model for the SAP System according to
role-based functions. This activity is also a pre-requirement
for the implementation of the Identity Management application.
This process will be implemented in December 2008.
|
|
ITEM 16A.
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
The board of directors of Grupo TMM appointed an Audit and
Corporate Practices Committee which is comprised of four
independent directors, each of whom has significant experience
in analyzing and evaluating financial reports and an
understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting. The members of this committee are José Luis
Salas Cacho (President), Ignacio Rodriguez Rocha, Luis
Martínez Argüello and José Luis Ávalos del
Moral. Mr. Ávalos is considered a financial expert
according to the standards set forth in Section 407 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and also has accounting and related
financial management expertise in compliance with NYSE standard
303A.07 and in compliance with the Mexican Securities Law.
Grupo TMM has adopted a code of ethical conduct entitled,
“Business Conduct Code,” covering all its officers,
including its principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer, and all of its
employees. We will provide a copy of the Business Conduct Code
free of charge upon written request sent to Grupo TMM, Avenida
de la Cuspide, No. 4755, Colonia Parques del Pedregal,
14010 Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, Attn: Human Resources.
There have been no amendments to our Business Conduct Code
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
95
We have not granted any waivers to any provision of our Business
Conduct Code to any officer, employee or member of the Audit or
Corporate Practices Committee during the Company’s fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 16C.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The following table reflects our principal accounting fees and
services for the years 2007 and 2006:
GRUPO
TMM, S. A. B.
Summary of Auditors’ Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Audit Fees(a)
|
|
$
|
1,024.0
|
|
|
$
|
978.0
|
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax Fees(b)
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
Other Fees(c)
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
227.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(d)
|
|
$
|
1,146.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,291.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Audit Fees — Fees relate to the review of our Annual
Financial Statements and Annual Report filed with the SEC and
review of other SEC filings. |
|
(b) |
|
Tax Fees — Fees relate to specific tax issues, in
compliance with the applicable tax laws in Mexico. |
|
(c) |
|
Other Fees — Fees relate to the compliance with
foreign trade regulations and to the compliance with
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; supervision in the update of the
Company’s systems platform, in compliance with applicable
regulations. |
|
(d) |
|
The total amount does not include Mexican tax (“Impuesto
al Valor Agregado” or “IVA”). |
The Company’s Audit Committee pre-approves all fees for the
services provided by the independent auditors, including the
fees for 2006 and 2007 in accordance with the Company’s
policies and procedures.
|
|
ITEM 16D.
|
EXEMPTIONS
FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 16E.
|
PURCHASE
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 17.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Not applicable.
96
|
|
ITEM 18.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The following financial statements are filed as part of this
Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
97
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
98
GRUPO
TMM, S.A.B. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
99
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Grupo TMM, S.A.B and subsidiaries (“Grupo TMM” or the
“Company”), as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007, all expressed
in U.S. dollars. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s Management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and
International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Grupo TMM as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Grupo
TMM’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated May 30, 2008 (see Item 15) expressed
an adverse opinion on the consolidated business internal control
over financial reporting.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 4, the Company has sustained substantial
losses from continuing operations during the past five years,
and substantial doubt exists as to its continuation as a going
concern. Continuation is dependent upon the success of future
operations and obtaining additional financing. Management’s
plans in regard to these matters are also described in
Note 4. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/ Salles,
Sainz — Grant Thornton, S.C.
SALLES, SAINZ — GRANT THORNTON, S.C.
Mexico City, Mexico
May 30, 2008
F-1
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
December 31,
2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
21,706
|
|
|
$
|
14,722
|
|
Restricted cash (Notes 14, 15 and 16)
|
|
|
16,960
|
|
|
|
37,513
|
|
Accounts receivable — net of provision for impairment
of $3,533 in 2006 and $4,443 in 2007
|
|
|
40,599
|
|
|
|
44,812
|
|
Amounts due from related parties (Note 18)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Taxes receivable (Note 6)
|
|
|
10,563
|
|
|
|
9,723
|
|
Accounts receivable from KCS (Note 5)
|
|
|
51,113
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other accounts receivable — Net (Note 7)
|
|
|
17,801
|
|
|
|
22,946
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
5,457
|
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
Other current assets (Note 8)
|
|
|
4,425
|
|
|
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
168,686
|
|
|
|
142,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable from KCS (Note 5)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Concession rights — Net (Note 9)
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
Property, machinery and equipment — Net (Note 10)
|
|
|
282,811
|
|
|
|
351,059
|
|
Prepaid expenses and others (Note 11)
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
Investments in associates (Note 12)
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
Intangible assets (Note 13)
|
|
|
19,819
|
|
|
|
38,175
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 23)
|
|
|
112,833
|
|
|
|
115,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
635,456
|
|
|
$
|
662,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Notes 14 y 16)
|
|
$
|
27,555
|
|
|
$
|
17,787
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
20,422
|
|
|
|
28,660
|
|
Accrued expenses (Note 19)
|
|
|
37,840
|
|
|
|
40,127
|
|
Obligations for sale of receivables (Note 15)
|
|
|
16,727
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
102,544
|
|
|
|
100,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (Notes 14 y 16)
|
|
|
141,401
|
|
|
|
303,229
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
9,803
|
|
|
|
9,803
|
|
Employee obligations (Note 25)
|
|
|
13,363
|
|
|
|
12,497
|
|
Obligations from sale of receivables (Note 15)
|
|
|
172,617
|
|
|
|
113,362
|
|
Other long-term liabilities (Note 20)
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
341,568
|
|
|
|
443,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
444,112
|
|
|
|
543,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (Note 21):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, 56,963,137 shares authorized and issued
without par value
|
|
|
121,158
|
|
|
|
121,158
|
|
Treasury shares (30,000 shares)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Statutory reserve
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
62,174
|
|
|
|
(9,876
|
)
|
Capital Premium
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
Initial accumulated translation loss
|
|
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
|
(17,757
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 3)
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
(2,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,668
|
|
|
|
112,959
|
|
Minority interest (Note 3r)
|
|
|
8,676
|
|
|
|
5,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
191,344
|
|
|
|
118,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
635,456
|
|
|
$
|
662,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands of US dollars, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
306,599
|
|
|
$
|
248,148
|
|
|
$
|
303,256
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
|
|
75,575
|
|
|
|
68,306
|
|
|
|
80,878
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
101,689
|
|
|
|
63,368
|
|
|
|
84,131
|
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
79,655
|
|
|
|
53,661
|
|
|
|
50,561
|
|
Fuel, material and supplies
|
|
|
15,485
|
|
|
|
21,204
|
|
|
|
25,118
|
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,668
|
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
25,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,881
|
|
|
|
237,014
|
|
|
|
279,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
11,134
|
|
|
|
23,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) — Net (Note 22)
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(24,066
|
)
|
|
|
(4,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
(12,932
|
)
|
|
|
19,341
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
96,037
|
|
|
|
60,036
|
|
|
|
55,616
|
|
Exchange income (loss) — Net
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cost
|
|
|
(89,588
|
)
|
|
|
(55,828
|
)
|
|
|
(48,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(85,892
|
)
|
|
|
(68,760
|
)
|
|
|
(29,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from income taxes (Note 23)
|
|
|
62,021
|
|
|
|
27,815
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations for the year
|
|
|
(23,871
|
)
|
|
|
(40,945
|
)
|
|
|
(28,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year
|
|
|
199,363
|
|
|
|
111,362
|
|
|
|
(38,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
$
|
175,492
|
|
|
$
|
70,417
|
|
|
$
|
(66,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
|
|
$
|
171,304
|
|
|
$
|
69,908
|
|
|
$
|
(67,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per continuing operations for the year per share
(Note 26)
|
|
$
|
(0.419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.719
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year per
share (Note 26)
|
|
$
|
3.500
|
|
|
$
|
1.955
|
|
|
$
|
(0.677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Stockholders of
Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (Note 26)
|
|
$
|
3.007
|
|
|
$
|
1.227
|
|
|
$
|
(1.177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Statutory
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
121,158
|
|
|
$
|
4,172
|
|
|
$
|
(162,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,528
|
|
|
$
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,359
|
)
|
|
$
|
686,026
|
|
|
$
|
636,667
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
Loss on acquisition of shares of subsidiary from minority
Stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(6,911
|
)
|
|
|
(11,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (expense) for the year recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Minority share on discontinuing operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(665,834
|
)
|
|
|
(665,834
|
)
|
Net profit for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,304
|
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
|
|
175,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized income and expense for the year
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
168,636
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
121,158
|
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
|
6,176
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
|
119,277
|
|
|
|
17,469
|
|
|
|
136,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in statutory reserve on April 25, 2006
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,566
|
|
|
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
Loss on acquisition of shares of subsidiary from minority
Stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(9,302
|
)
|
|
|
(9,591
|
)
|
Provision for employee indemnifications
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense for the year recognized recognized directly in
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,517
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net profit for the year
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69,908
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69,908
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
70,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized income and expense for the year
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
54,825
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
121,158
|
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
|
|
61,001
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
|
182,668
|
|
|
|
8,676
|
|
|
|
191,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in statutory reserve on April 30, 2007
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,495
|
|
|
|
(3,495
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treaury shares on December 14, 2007
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
Provision for employee indemnifications
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense for the year recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,573
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Dividends paid to minority stockholders in subsidiaries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
Capital stock decrease of subsidiaries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Net (Loss) for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,072
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(66,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized income and expense for the year
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(73,140
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
121,094
|
|
|
$
|
16,233
|
|
|
$
|
(12,139
|
)(1)
|
|
$
|
5,528
|
|
|
$
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
112,959
|
|
|
$
|
5,903
|
|
|
$
|
118,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a reserve for the purchase of treasury stock by $9,929. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
$
|
175,492
|
|
|
$
|
70,417
|
|
|
$
|
(66,912
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,668
|
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
25,652
|
|
Other amortizations
|
|
|
16,121
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
Amortization and discount on obligations
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(Benefit) from income taxes
|
|
|
(62,021
|
)
|
|
|
(27,815
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
(Loss) Gain on sale of property, machinery and equipment -Net
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
(3,934
|
)
|
|
|
983
|
|
Gain on sale of other subsidiaries
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,285
|
)
|
Impairment in long-lived assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,262
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year
|
|
|
(199,363
|
)
|
|
|
(111,362
|
)
|
|
|
38,563
|
|
Provision for interest on debt
|
|
|
67,437
|
|
|
|
33,863
|
|
|
|
47,132
|
|
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(341,079
|
)
|
|
|
330,928
|
|
|
|
(20,553
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(5,199
|
)
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
(4,213
|
)
|
Decrease (Increase) in other accounts receivable and related
parties
|
|
|
8,047
|
|
|
|
(7,676
|
)
|
|
|
(5,112
|
)
|
Decrease (Increase) in materials and supplies
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(1,384
|
)
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
Decrease (Increase) in other current assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(2,338
|
)
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in other non-current assets
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
(15,559
|
)
|
Decrease in other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(8,080
|
)
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(507,787
|
)
|
|
|
263,549
|
|
|
|
65,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(332,295
|
)
|
|
|
333,966
|
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of property, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
12,293
|
|
|
|
7,186
|
|
Acquisition of property, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
(107,031
|
)
|
|
|
(154,347
|
)
|
|
|
(100,740
|
)
|
Sales of shares of subsidiaries
|
|
|
581,054
|
|
|
|
68,754
|
|
|
|
56,901
|
|
Acquisitions of companies and minority interest in associated
companies
|
|
|
(38,072
|
)
|
|
|
(29,955
|
)
|
|
|
(3,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
437,644
|
|
|
|
(103,255
|
)
|
|
|
(40,424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under capital lease obligation
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(Payments of) Proceeds from financial debt
|
|
|
(21,265
|
)
|
|
|
(443,527
|
)
|
|
|
125,401
|
|
Cash (paid) received from sale of accounts
receivable — Net
|
|
|
(77,351
|
)
|
|
|
181,601
|
|
|
|
(88,334
|
)
|
Dividends paid to minority stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
Dividends from non consolidated companies
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided in financing activities
|
|
|
(98,767
|
)
|
|
|
(261,926
|
)
|
|
|
34,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
(31,215
|
)
|
|
|
(6,984
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
|
|
46,339
|
|
|
|
52,921
|
|
|
|
21,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
$
|
52,921
|
|
|
$
|
21,706
|
|
|
$
|
14,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
16,234
|
|
|
$
|
52,219
|
|
|
$
|
47,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax and asset tax paid
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (“Grupo TMM” or the
“Company”) is a Mexican company whose main activity is
providing multimodal transportation and logistics services to
premium clients throughout Mexico. Grupo TMM provides services
related to dedicated trucking, third-party logistics, offshore
supply shipping, clean oil and petrochemical products shipping,
tugboat services, warehouse management, shipping agency, inland
and seaport terminal businesses, container and railcar
maintenance and repair, and other activities related to the
shipping and cargo transport business. Due to the geographic
location of some of the subsidiaries and the activities in which
they are engaged, Grupo TMM and its subsidiaries are subject to
the laws and ordinances of other countries, as well as
international regulations governing maritime transportation and
the observance of safety and environmental regulations.
Due to the introduction of a new Mexican securities exchange law
that went into effect in December 2006, it was necessary for the
Company to adopt a new official company name, Grupo TMM,
Sociedad Anónima Bursátil (“Grupo TMM,
S.A.B.”).
Grupo TMM’s headquarter is located at Avenida de la
Cuspide #4755, Colonia Parques del Pedregal, Delegacion
Tlalpan, C.P. 14010, México, D.F.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, Grupo TMM owned the
following equity percentage interests in the following companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Servicios Corporativos TMM, S.A. de C.V. y subsidiarias
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Inmobiliaria TMM, S.A. de C.V. y subsidiarias
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Operadora Marítima TMM, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Transportación Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. y
subsidiarias
|
|
a), i) 100%
|
|
a), i) 100%
|
TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V. y subsidiarias
|
|
d)100%
|
|
d)100%
|
Operadora Portuaria de Tuxpan, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Terminal Marítima de Tuxpan, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
k) 100%
|
|
k) 100%
|
Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. y subsidiarias
|
|
a)
|
|
—
|
Marmex Offshore, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
b), i) 100%
|
|
b), i)
|
Buques Tanque del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
c), j) 100%
|
|
c), j) 100%
|
Buques Tanque del Golfo, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
c), j) 100%
|
|
c), j) 100%
|
Transportes Líquidos Mexicanos, LTD
|
|
a) 100%
|
|
a) 100%
|
Personal Marítimo, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
a) 100%
|
|
a) 100%
|
TMM Agencias, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
a) 100%
|
|
a) 100%
|
Servicios de Logística de México, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
e) 100%
|
|
e) 100%
|
Servicios en Operaciones Logísticas, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Servicios Administrativos de Transportación, S.A. de
C.V.
|
|
e)
|
|
—
|
Lacto Comercial Organizada, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
100%
|
|
100%
|
Marmex Marine Mexico, Inc. (antes Seacor Marine Mexico, Inc)
|
|
a) 100%
|
|
a) 100%
|
Promotora Intermodal de Carga, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
d)
|
|
—
|
NL Cargo S.A. de C.V.
|
|
d)
|
|
—
|
Marmex International Services, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
g), i) 100%
|
|
g), i)
|
F-6
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Almacenadora de Depósito Moderno, S. A. de C. V.
|
|
f) 100%
|
|
f) 100%
|
TMM Parcel Tankers, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
h) 100%
|
TMM International Services, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
h), i)
|
TMM División Marítima, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
i) 100%
|
TMM Continental, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
j)
|
TMM América, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
j)
|
TMM Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
l) 100%
|
Transporte Integral Doméstico, S.A. de CV.
|
|
—
|
|
m)
|
Multimodal Doméstica S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
n)
|
TMM Flota Marítima, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
o)100%
|
TMM New Proyects, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
o)100%
|
Nicte Inmobiliaria, S.A.P.I. de C.V
|
|
—
|
|
o)100%
|
Inmobiliaria Ikusi, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
o)100%
|
Comercializadora y Distribuidora Milgret, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
|
|
—
|
|
o)100%
|
Repcorp, S.A. de C.V. y subsidiaria
|
|
92.3%
|
|
100%
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, Grupo TMM holds a
controlling interest in the following consolidated subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Autotransportación y Distribución Logística, S.A.
de C.V.
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Administración Portuaria Integral de Acapulco, S.A. de
C.V.
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Servicios Administrativos API Acapulco, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
p)51
|
%
|
Seglo Operaciones Logísticas, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, Grupo TMM also held a non
controlling interest in the following companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Seglo, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Procesos Operativos de Materiales, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
As a result of the merger of Transportes Marítimos
México, S.A. and TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. into Grupo
TMM, the following companies became wholly owned subsidiaries of
Grupo TMM: Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
(“Marmex”), Transportes Líquidos Mexicanos, LTD,
Personal Marítimo, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Mexicanos en
Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V. (“SMR”), and TMM Agencias,
S.A. de C.V. On December 01, 2005, Grupo TMM acquired from
Seacor Marine International, LLC the company Marmex Marine
Mexico, Inc. (formerly Seacor Marine Mexico, Inc.) which owned
40% of the shares of Marítima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. in the
amount of $20.0 million. |
|
|
|
On March 3, 2006, Grupo TMM, through Newmarmex, S.A. de
C.V., a subsidiary of TMM which is in turn a subsidiary of Grupo
TMM, obtained financing to buy Seacor’s interest in Marmex
Marine (Mexico). |
|
|
|
On March 2, 2006, Grupo TMM and Smit International, N.V.
(“Smit”), a Dutch company that is the Company’s
partner and minority interest shareholder in SMR, agreed to
allow the Company to purchase the 40% minority interest of SMR
held by Smit for a price of $9.5 million. Approval for the
consummation of this transaction was received from the
Manzanillo Integrated Port Authority in May 2006. |
|
|
|
Finally, on May 15, 2006, SMR and Marmex merged into TMM,
leaving TMM as the surviving entity. |
F-7
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
b) |
|
On December 27, 2005, Marmex Offshore, S.A. de C.V. was
incorporated in Mexico City, DF, whose line of business consists
of providing sea and river transportation services. |
|
c) |
|
On June 20, 2005, the following companies were incorporated
in the State of México: Buques Tanque del Pacífico,
S.A. de C.V. (BTP) and Buques Tanque del Golfo, S.A. de C.V.
(BTG). Both companies’ line of business is the sea and
river transportation services. |
|
d) |
|
In October 2006, a merger took place of Promotora Intermodal de
Carga, S.A. de C.V. and NL Cargo, S.A. de C.V. into TMM
Logistics, S.A. de C.V. |
|
e) |
|
On November 30, 2006, Servicios Administrativos de
Transportación, S.A. de C.V. merged into Servicios de
Logística de México, S.A. de C.V. (“SLM”). |
|
f) |
|
On December 11, 2006, the company Almacenadora de
Depósito Moderno, S.A. de C.V. (“Ademsa”) was
acquired for an amount up to $12.4 million. As of
December 31, 2007, $10.4 million have been paid with
respect to this acquisition. |
|
g) |
|
On March 31, 2006, the company Marmex International
Services, S.A. de C.V. (“MIS”) was formed in Mexico,
D.F., with the objective of providing maritime and fluvial
transport services. |
|
h) |
|
.On May 9, 2007, two companies were formed in Mexico City.,
TMM Parcel Tankers, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM Parcel”) and
TMM International Services, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM
International Services”), with the objective of providing
supporting services to maritime platforms. |
|
i) |
|
As part of the corporate restructuring plan implemented during
2007, on May 4, 2007, it took place a spin off of TMM
División Marítima, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM
División”) from Transportación Marítima
Mexicana, S. A. de C. V. (“TMM”). On July 19,
2007, a merger took place of Marmex Offshore, MIS and TMM
International Services, into TMM División, prevailing the
latter as the merging company. |
|
j) |
|
Pursuant to the restructuring plan, on May 9, 2007, TMM
Continental, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM Continental”) and TMM
America, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM America”) were spun off
from BTG and BTP, respectively. Grupo TMM sold TMM Continental
and TMM America to an unrelated party on November 23, 2007. |
|
k) |
|
On June 1, 2007, Tecomar, S.A. de C.V. merges into Terminal
Marítima de Tuxpan, S.A. de C.V., prevailing the latter as
the merging company. |
|
l) |
|
On August 29, 2007, TMM Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V. was
formed in Mexico City., with the objective of providing
supporting services to maritime platforms. |
|
m) |
|
On July 31, 2007, Transporte Integral Doméstico, S.A.
de C.V. (“TID”), an import and export company, as spun
off from TMM. On December 20, 2007, TID was sold to an
unrelated party. |
|
n) |
|
On October 15, 2007, Multimodal Doméstica, S.A. de
C.V. (shipping agency services) was spun off from TMM Agencias,
S.A. de C.V. and sold to an unrelated party on November 23,
2007. |
|
o) |
|
On December 13, 2007, several companies were formed in the
State of Mexico, as follows: 1) TMM Flota Marítima,
S.A. de C.V. and TMM New Projects, S.A. de C.V., with the
objective to provide supporting services to maritime platforms;
2) Nicte Inmobiliaria, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Inmobiliaria
Ikusi, S.A.P.I de C.V., whose objective is the trading of urban
real estate and the installation of communication systems.;
3) Comercializadora y Distribuidora Milgret, S.A.P.I. de
C.V. whose line of business is the trading of goods and real
estate. |
|
p) |
|
On December 28, 2007, Servicios Administrativos API
Acapulco, S.A. de C.V. was formed in the State of Guerrero,
Mexico, to perform outsourced personnel services. |
2. Changes
in accounting policies and future accounting
pronouncements:
Grupo TMM has adopted for the first time International Financial
Reporting Standard (IFRS), 7 Financial Instruments:
Disclosures and IFRS 8 Operating Segments in its 2007
consolidated financial statements. The application of both
Standards did not require retrospective adjustments to the 2006
accounts or their presentation.
F-8
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Other new Standards or Interpretations relevant for IFRS
financial statements did not become effective during the current
financial year.
Significant effects on current, prior or future periods arising
from the first-time application of the standards listed above in
respect of presentation, recognition and measurement of accounts
is described in the following paragraphs. An overview of
Standards and Interpretations that will become mandatory for
Grupo TMM in future periods is also given in the following
paragraphs.
In accordance with the amendment of IAS 1, Presentation of
Financial Statements, Grupo TMM now reports on its capital
management objectives, policies and procedures in each annual
financial report. The new disclosures that become necessary due
to this change in IAS 1 can be found in Note 28.
IFRS 7 is mandatory for reporting periods beginning on
1 January 2007 or later. The new Standard replaces and
amends disclosure requirements previously set out in
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation and Disclosures. All disclosures
relating to financial instruments including all comparative
information have been updated to reflect the new requirements.
In particular, Grupo TMM’s financial statements now feature
a sensitivity analysis, to explain the Group’s market risk
exposure in regards to its financial instruments, and a maturity
analysis that shows the remaining contractual maturities of
financial liabilities, each as at the balance sheet date (see
Notes 14, 15, 16 and 28).
Grupo TMM has early adopted IFRS 8, which replaces IAS 14,
Segment Reporting. The adoption of this Standard has not
affected the way Grupo TMM identifies separate operating
segments relevant for segment reporting because Grupo TMM
continues to present segment results in accordance with internal
management reporting information. The format can be found in
Note 24.
The following new Standards and Interpretations, which are yet
to become mandatory have not been applied in Grupo TMM’s
2007 consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective for
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Periods
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning on or
|
Title
|
|
Full Title of Standard or Interpretation
|
|
After
|
|
IFRIC 11
|
|
IFRIC 11 IFRS 2 — Group and Treasury Share Transactions
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
IFRIC 14
|
|
IAS 19 — The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset,
Minimum
Funding Requirements and their Interaction
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
IFRIC 12
|
|
Service Concession Arrangements
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
IFRIC 13
|
|
Customer Loyalty Programs
|
|
July 1, 2008
|
IAS 23
|
|
Borrowing Costs
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IAS 1
|
|
Presentation of Financial Statements
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IFRS 2
|
|
Amendment to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment: Vesting
Conditions and Cancellations
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IAS 32 and IAS 1
|
|
Amendments to IAS 32, “Financial Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation” and IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial
Statements” entitled Puttable Financial Instruments and
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations Arising on Liquidation
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
IFRS 3
|
|
Business Combinations (Revised 2008)
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
IAS 27
|
|
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
|
|
July 1, 2009
|
In May 2008 the IASB published Improvements to IFRSs (’the
2008 Improvements’) which makes minor amendments to a
number of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
This publication completes the IASB’s first round of annual
improvements.
F-9
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Structure of
the 2008 Improvements
Part I of the 2008 Improvements includes amendments that
result in accounting changes for presentation, recognition or
measurement purposes.
Part II includes those amendments that are terminology or
editorial changes only, which the IASB expects to have no or
minimal effect on accounting.
The following table sets out the IFRSs that are affected by the
amendments, and the issue addressed.
Part I of the 2008 Improvements (amendments that result in
accounting changes for presentation, recognition or measurement
purposes):
|
|
|
Standard Affected
|
|
Subject of Amendment
|
|
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations
|
|
Plan to sell the controlling interest in a subsidiary
|
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
|
|
Current/non-current classification of derivatives
|
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
Recoverable amount
Sale of assets held for rental
|
IAS 19 Employee Benefits
|
|
Curtailments and negative past service cost
Plan administration costs
Replacement of term ‘fall due’ Guidance on contingent
liabilities
|
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of
Government Assistance
|
|
Government loans with a below-market rate of interest
|
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs
|
|
Components of borrowing costs
|
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
|
|
Measurement of subsidiary held for sale in separate financial
statements
|
IAS 28 Investments in Associates
|
|
Required disclosures when investments in associates are
accounted for at fair value through profit or loss Impairment of
investment in associate
|
IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures
|
|
Required disclosures when interests in jointly controlled
entities are accounted for at fair value through profit or loss
|
IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies
|
|
Description of measurement basis in financial statements
|
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
|
|
Disclosure of estimates used to determine recoverable amount
|
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
|
|
Advertising and promotional activities Unit of production method
of amortisation
|
IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
|
|
Reclassification of derivatives into or out of the
classification of at fair value through profit or loss
Designating and documenting hedges at the segment level
Applicable effective interest rate on cessation of fair value
hedge accounting
|
IAS 40 Investment Property
|
|
Property under construction or development for future use as
investment property
|
IAS 41 Agriculture
|
|
Discount rate for fair value calculations Additional biological
transformation
|
F-10
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
The effective date for each amendment is included in the IFRS
affected. In most cases the amendments apply for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009, with early adoption
permitted.
In May 2008 the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 1, First-time
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, and
IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements,
entitled Cost of an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly
Controlled Entity or Associate (‘the Amendments’).
The Amendments affect only the separate financial statements of
a parent entity or investor. The main changes are:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the introduction of a ’deemed cost’ exemption into
IFRS 1 for first-time adopters of IFRS when measuring the cost
of an investment in a subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or
associate;
|
|
|
•
|
the removal of IAS 27’s requirement to deduct
pre-acquisition dividends from the cost of an investment in
subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or associate in profit or
loss in the separate financial statements of the investor
entity; and
|
|
|
•
|
new requirements on accounting for the formation of a new parent.
|
The Amendments are required to be applied for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009.
Based on Grupo TMM’s current business model and accounting
policies, management does not expect any material impact on its
consolidated financial statements when the new Standards,
amendments, and interpretations described above become effective.
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of significant accounting policies:
|
The consolidated financial statements of Grupo TMM have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board (“IFRS”). Amounts are expressed in United States
dollars, the currency in which most transactions and a
significant portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities
arose and/or
are denominated. The Mexican National Banking and Securities
Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, or
“CNBV”) approved this method in 1985. The initial
effect of conversion to the United States dollar as the
functional currency is shown as a debit of $17,757 in the
statement of changes in stockholders’ equity of Grupo.
These consolidated financial statements have been approved by
the Board of Directors of the Company on April 11, 2008.
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company
are as follows:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Grupo TMM and those of its subsidiaries. All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated. Grupo TMM
consolidates the companies in which it holds 51% or more direct
or indirect participation
and/or has
control.
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities over which Grupo TMM has the power
to govern the financial and operating policies, generally
accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the the
voting rights. These subsidiaries would be de-consolidated from
the date that control by Grupo TMM ceases.
The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the
assets transferred, equity instruments issued and liabilities
incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly
attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business
combination are measured initially at their fair values at the
acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority
interest.
F-11
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
All intercompany transactions, balances and unrealized gains on
transactions between Grupo TMM’s companies are eliminated
upon consolidation. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless
the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset
transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been
changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies
adopted by Grupo TMM.
Associates
Associates are all entities over which Grupo TMM has significant
influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding
between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in
associates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting
and are initially recognized at their acquisition cost.
When Grupo TMM’s share of losses in an associate equals or
exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other
unsecured receivables, Grupo TMM does not recognize further
losses, unless it has incurred obligations or is committed to
make payments on behalf of the associate.
Gains and losses on transactions between Grupo TMM and its
associates are eliminated to the extent of Grupo’s interest
in the associates. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless
the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset
transferred.
Although Grupo TMM and its Mexican subsidiaries are required to
maintain their books and records in Mexican pesos
(“Ps”) for tax purposes, Grupo and subsidiaries keep
records and use the United States dollar as their functional and
reporting currency, as such currency reflects the economic
substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to
the entity.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican pesos are
translated into United States dollars using current exchange
rates. The difference between the exchange rate on the date of
the transaction and the exchange rate on the settlement date, or
balance sheet date if not settled, is included in the income
statement as a foreign exchange gain/loss. Non-monetary assets
or liabilities originally denominated in Mexican pesos are
translated into United States dollars using the historical
exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Capital stock
transactions and minority interest are translated at historical
rates. Results of operations are mainly translated at the
monthly average exchange rates. Depreciation and amortization of
non-monetary assets are translated at the historical exchange
rate.
Pursuant to the revised version of International Accounting
Standard (IAS) 21, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign
Exchange Rates”, wherein the concept of functional
currency is discussed, Grupo TMM since 2005 analyzed the
economic environment in which its subsidiaries were operating
during such year. The analysis disclosed the need to change the
functional currency of some of Grupo TMM’s subsidiaries
from the U.S. dollar to the Mexican peso. The revised IAS
21 allows choosing the reporting currency which remained to be
the U.S. dollar in the accompanying financial statements.
The effect of this change in Grupo TMM’s financial
statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Non controlling interest
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
F-12
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
c.
|
Cash and
cash equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents represent highly liquid
interest-bearing deposits and investments with an original
maturity of less than three months and are stated at cost plus
interest earned. Restricted cash represents the amount required
to guarantee the payments according to the obligations arising
from the debt agreements on the acquisition of vessels and from
the sale of receivables (See Notes 14, 15 and 16).
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less
a provision made for estimated losses on these receivables.
Losses or impairment on trade receivables are provided for when
there is objective evidence that Grupo TMM will not be able to
collect all amounts due to it in accordance with the original
terms of the receivables.
The amount of the write-down is determined as the difference
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value
of estimated future cash flows, and is included in income for
the year (See Note 22).
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less
a provision made for estimated losses on these receivables.
Losses or impairment on trade receivables are provided for when
there is objective evidence that Grupo TMM will not be able to
collect all amounts due to it in accordance with the original
terms of the receivables.
The amount of the write-down is determined as the difference
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value
of estimated future cash flows, and is included in income for
the year (See Note 22).
|
|
f.
|
Materials
and supplies-
|
Materials and supplies, consisting mainly of fuel and items for
maintenance of property and equipment, are valued at the lower
of the average cost or net realizable value.
Concession rights correspond to payments made for the rights to
operate the assets under concession, which are stated at cost,
and are amortized over the terms specified in the agreements.
|
|
h.
|
Property,
machinery and equipment, net-
|
Property, machinery and equipment are stated at construction or
acquisition cost. Acquisitions through capital leases or charter
arrangements with an obligation to purchase are capitalized
based on the present value of future minimum payments,
recognizing the related liability. Depreciation of
transportation equipment is computed using the straight-line
method based on the useful lives of the assets net of the
estimated residual value. Depreciation of other fixed assets is
computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Recurring maintenance and repair expenditures are charged to
operating expenses as incurred. The major repairs on
transportation equipment are capitalized and amortized over the
period in which benefits are expected to be received (two to
three years for vessels).
Prepaid expenses represent advance payments for future services
to be received.
F-13
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost in a
business combination over the fair value of the Grupo TMM’s
share of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is
carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Negative
goodwill is recognized immediately after acquisition in the
income statement.
|
|
k.
|
Deferred
income tax and corporate flat tax-
|
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability
method, on temporary differences arising between the tax basis
of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the
financial statements. Currently enacted or substantively enacted
tax rates are used in the determination of deferred income tax.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporate Flat Tax law
(IETU — for its Spanish acronym) abrogated the Asset
Tax Law. IETU is a tax that co-exists with Income Tax,
therefore, the Company developed projections based on
reasonable, reliable assumptions properly supported, which
represent Management’s best estimate where it has
identified that the expected trend is essentially that Income
Tax will be incurred by Grupo TMM in future years. Accordingly,
only deferred Income Tax has been recognized.
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profit against which the temporary
differences can be utilized will be available (see Note 23).
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising
on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the
timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be
controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will
not reverse in the foreseeable future.
|
|
l.
|
Employees’
statutory profit-sharing-
|
Employees’ statutory profit-sharing is determined by the
Company at the rate of 10% on taxable income, adjusted as
prescribed by the Mexican Income Tax Law. The employees’
statutory profit-sharing liability for 2005, 2006 and 2007, is
in the amount of $397, $161 and $369, respectively, among
certain subsidiaries of the Company.
Borrowings are recognized initially as the proceeds received,
net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently
stated at amortized cost using the effective yield method; any
difference between proceeds (net of the minimum transaction
costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the income
statement over the period of the borrowings.
|
|
n.
|
Pensions
and seniority premiums-
|
Seniority premiums, to which employees are entitled after
15 years of service and after having retired at the age of
60, and retirement plan benefits obligations, are expensed in
the years in which the services are rendered (see Note 25).
Other compensation based on length of service to which employees
may be entitled to in the event of dismissal, in accordance with
the Mexican Federal Labor Law, are provided for based on an
actuarial computation, in accordance with IAS 19 “Employee
Benefits”.
Revenue comprises the fair value for services, net of rebates
and discounts and after the elimination of revenue within
subsidiaries.
Voyage revenues are recognized proportionally as a shipment
moves from origin to destination.
F-14
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Revenues and costs associated with trucking transportation
services and other non-maritime transactions are recognized at
the time the services are rendered.
|
|
p.
|
Impairment
of intangible assets and long-lived assets-
|
The carrying value of intangible assets and long-lived assets is
annually reviewed by the Company and impairments are recognized
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of an
asset’s net selling price and its value in use. For the
purpose of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the
lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable
discounted cash flows.
Leases of property, machinery and equipment where the Company
has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are
classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalized at
the inception of the lease at the lower of the fair value of the
leased property and the present value of the minimum lease
payments. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to
the income statement over the lease period so as to produce a
constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of
the liability for each period.
Leases where the lessor retains a significant portion of the
risks and rewards of ownership are classified as operating
leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the
income statement as they become due over the period of the lease.
Non controlling interest represents the minority interest of
third parties in the subsidiaries of Grupo TMM.
In identifying its operating segments, management generally
follows Grupo TMM’s service lines, which represent the main
services provided by the Group. Each of these operating segments
is managed separately as each of these service lines requires
different technologies and other resources as well as marketing
approaches. All inter-segment transfers are carried out at
arm’s length prices.
The accounting policies Grupo TMM uses for segment reporting
under IFRS 8 are the same as those used in its financial
statements, with the exception that corporate assets which are
not directly attributable to the business activities of any
operating segment are not allocated. In the financial periods
presented, this primarily applies to the Grupo TMM’s
headquarters.
|
|
t.
|
Non-current
assets held for sale-
|
Non-current assets are classified as assets held for sale and
stated at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs
to sell if their carrying amount is recovered principally
through a sale transaction rather than through a continuing use
(see Note 5).
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that could
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
balace sheet date, as well as income or loss for the period.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
F-15
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Grupo TMM does not
have other equity instruments besides the 56,933,137 shares
of common stock.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new
shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of
tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable
to the issue of new shares or options, or for the acquisition of
a business, are included in the cost of acquisition as part of
the purchase consideration.
|
|
w.
|
Obligations
from sale of receivables
|
The Company has entered into factoring agreements for the sale
of present and future receivables. Proceeds are received when an
agreement is made to issue trust certificates based on a pool of
collections of receivables that are in turn applied on a
scheduled basis as payments of principal and interest.
Collection is held by the designated trust and amounts exceeding
scheduled payments are reimbursed to the Company.
On September 25, 2006, the Company entered into a
securitization agreement with Deutsche Bank AG in the amount of
$200 million based on the same structure used in the
aforementioned programs (see Note 15).
Certain figures of the year 2006 were reclassified to conform
them to the presentation of the 2007 figures in accordance with
IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”. In 2007
the provision for employees’ profit sharing is included
within costs and expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations, and interest paid is presented as cash
used in financing activities in the accompanying consolidated
statement of cash flows.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards,
which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going
concern. However, the Company has sustained substantial losses
from continuing operations in recent years: $23.8 million
in 2005, $40.9 million in 2006 and $28.3 million in
2007. Continuation of the Company as a going concern is
dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financing
requirements on a continuing basis, to comply with its present
financing arrangements, and to succeed in its future operations.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating
to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might
be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
Management has taken the following steps to improve its
operating and financial results:
a) the acquisition of operating assets for the logistics
segment, b) the acquisition of a new fleet of new vessels
to replace an aging fleet of leased vessels, c) an
organizational restructuring to reduce administrative expenses,
and d) the commencement of a financing project to replace
certain debt with Trust Certificates having more favorable
conditions and interest rates.
The Company’s management believes that its 2008 business
plan considers a significant increase in income and generation
of cash from operations. These increases would be derived from
business levels and assets that are substantially in place as of
the end of the Company’s fiscal year 2007. Company’s
management also believes that the aforementioned will permit the
Company to continue on its positive trend of increasing
efficiency and coverage ratios and realizing its current
strategy of creating a healthy and competitive financial
structure for the Company in the medium term.
F-16
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Non-current
assets available for sale and discontinued operations
|
On December 15, 2004, Kansas City Southern (KCS) entered
into the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement
(“AAA”) with Grupo TMM and other parties to acquire
control of the railroad business of TFM through the purchase of
shares of common stock of Grupo TFM. Under the terms of the AAA,
KCS would acquire all of the interest of Grupo TMM in Grupo TFM
for $200 million in cash; 18 million shares of KCS
common stock; $47 million in a 5%, two-year promissory note
subject to satisfaction of conditions of an escrow agreement;
and up to $110 million payable in a combination of cash and
stock related to the final resolution of the Value Added Tax
(VAT) claim and Put Option (20% of the shares of TFM held by the
Mexican Government) as such terms are defined in the AAA.
As of December 31, 2004, all of the conditions precedent to
the closing contemplated in the AAA had been satisfied, with the
exception of the approval of the shareholders of KCS, which was
ultimately obtained on March 29, 2005.
On April 1, 2005, Grupo TMM received $594 million for
the sale of its share interest in Grupo TFM to KCS, including
$200 million in cash, $47 million in a 5% promissory
note maturing on June 1, 2007, and 18 million common
shares of KCS worth $347 million at that date. Furthermore,
on March 13, 2006, Grupo TMM received an additional payment
of $110 million from KCS in a combination of
$35 million in cash, a $40 million note receivable
that matures on April 1, 2010, and 1,494,469 shares of
KCS stock valued at $35 million dependent on a favorable
resolution of the VAT liability and the PUT. Due to the
contingent nature of the latter receivable, it was not
recognized as a receivable at the time of the sale, but until
actual cash was collected in April 2006 with its corresponding
revenue recognized as income from discontinued operations within
the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for 2006.
The $200 million received in cash from the sale referred to
above was used to fulfill the following obligations:
i) around $70 million in principal and accrued
interest to the Securitization Facility of Grupo TMM,
ii) $34 million approximately to relieve the GM
PUT (see Note 14), iii) $70 million were utilized
on May 13, 2005, to prepay on a pro rata basis the 2007
secured Senior Notes (around $68 million for principal
amount and around $2 million of accrued interest), and
iv) $26 million approximately that were used to bear
related expenses.
On December 6, 2005 the Company sold 18 million common
shares of KCS to Morgan Stanley & Co. for aggregate
gross proceeds of $400.5 million, which the Company used on
January 17, 2006 to prepay an aggregate principal amount of
$331 million and interest of $16 million of the 2007
Notes (see Note 14).
On December 7, 2006 the Company sold 1,494,469 shares
of KCS as a result of an additional payment subject to the
favorable resolution of the VAT liability, for
$38.5 million.
On September 24, 2007, the Company announced that it had
reached a settlement with KCS in connection with the arbitration
procedure instituted under the terms of the AAA dated
December 15, 2004 between Grupo TMM and KCS. This
settlement terminates any and all controversies under the AAA
and its ancilliary documents, and provides for mutual releases
between the parties. Under the terms of the settlement, KCS paid
Grupo TMM $54.1 million in cash and the obligations of KCS
under the Indemnity Escrow Note and the Tax Escrow Note, which
was payable in 2010, were terminated. In Grupo TMM’s
financial statements, these Notes were carried at face value
plus interest earned by $91.7 million, hence it was
recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations a loss from discontinued operations for 2007, in the
amount of $38.6 million including $1 million of
settlement expenses.
On October 15, 2007, the Company withdrew
Trust Certificates from the accounts receivable
securitization program in the amount of $50.0 million, plus
a $2.0 million withdrawal premium by using the proceeds of
the KCS settlement discussed above. In connection therewith,,
the Indemnity Promissory Note and the Tax Promissory Note
supporting the paid obligations were cancelled.
F-17
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
An analysis of the results of operations and cash flows of the
discontinued operations on the railroad business, for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2005, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
157,459
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
127,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
|
29,733
|
|
Other (expenses) income — Net
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,222
|
|
Net financing cost
|
|
|
(26,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,364
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(5,156
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(9,089
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,245
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
14,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Only Railroad Business |
The railroad business is included in the segment Railroad
Division (see Note 24).
At December 31 2006 and 2007, taxes receivable are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Special tax on production and services
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
Income Tax and recoverable VAT
|
|
|
10,322
|
|
|
|
9,369
|
|
Other
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,563
|
|
|
$
|
9,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Other
accounts receivable:
|
At December 31 2006 and 2007, other accounts receivable are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Services for port, maritime and other operations
|
|
$
|
10,926
|
|
|
$
|
14,936
|
|
Insurance claims
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
Former stockholders of Ademsa
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,801
|
|
|
$
|
22,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31 2006 and 2007, the other current assets are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
4,824
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
Prepaid insurance premiums
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Other
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,425
|
|
|
$
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also holds concessions to operate the cruise and
vehicle terminal in Acapulco and the tugboat services in
Manzanillo. The Manzanillo concession has been renewed for an
additional eight year period in January 2007. Under these
concession agreements, the Company has the obligation to keep in
good condition the facilities contemplated under the
concessions. At the end of the terms of the concession
agreements, the concessions’ assets will revert to the
Government. Therefore the concessions rights and the partial
rights cessions set up rights in favour of the Federal
Government (see Note 27).
Management believes the Company has complied with all the
concessions’ requirement as of December 31, 2007.
At December 31 2006 and 2007, concession rights are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Lives (years)
|
|
|
Integral Acapulco Port Administration(1)
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Tugboats in the Port of Manzanillo(2)
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(5,001
|
)
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concession rights — Net
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of concession rights was $0.5 million for each
of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, and
$0.3 million for 2007.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Concession is due in June 2021. |
|
(2) |
|
Concession is due in January 2015. As of January 2007 the
concession value has been fully amortized. |
F-19
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Property,
machinery and equipment, net:
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, property, machinery and
equipment are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-Net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Year-Net of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Adittions
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
and Others
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
$
|
89,507
|
|
|
$
|
124,348
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,831
|
|
|
$
|
12,107
|
|
|
$
|
207,579
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Dry - docks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(major vessel repairs)
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
6,033
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Buildings and installations
|
|
|
11,045
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
|
20 y 25
|
|
Warehousing equipment
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
3 y 4
|
|
Terminal equipment
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Ground transportation equipment
|
|
|
14,796
|
|
|
|
8,377
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
19,668
|
|
|
|
4.5 y 10
|
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,390
|
|
|
|
136,255
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
16,302
|
|
|
|
248,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
14,070
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
31,357
|
|
|
|
17,786
|
|
|
|
22,886
|
(1)
|
|
|
(6,490
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
165,817
|
|
|
$
|
154,347
|
|
|
$
|
23,634
|
|
|
$
|
2,583
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
16,302
|
|
|
$
|
282,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Year-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-Net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Adittions
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
and Others
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Vessels
|
|
$
|
207,579
|
|
|
$
|
41,494
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
14,352
|
|
|
$
|
234,979
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Dry - docks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(major vessel repairs)
|
|
|
6,033
|
|
|
|
5,221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Buildings and installations
|
|
|
10,669
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
12,988
|
|
|
|
20 y 25
|
|
Warehousing equipment
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
3 y 4
|
|
Terminal equipment
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Ground transportation equipment
|
|
|
19,668
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
22,188
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
37,735
|
|
|
|
4.5 y 10
|
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,928
|
|
|
|
51,097
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
24,552
|
|
|
|
23,361
|
|
|
|
296,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,422
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
19,767
|
|
|
|
49,643
|
|
|
|
4,825
|
|
|
|
(33,422
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
31,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
282,811
|
|
|
$
|
100,740
|
|
|
$
|
9,683
|
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
23,361
|
|
|
$
|
351,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $19.3 million impairment of long-lived assets, and
$3.6 million of fiduciary rights cancellation |
|
(2) |
|
Includes assets from the acquisition of subsidiaries for
$2.5 million and $0.1 million of translation
adjustment from subsidiaries functional currency change. |
The accumulated depreciation of property, machinery and
equipment as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, was
$103.1 million and $114.6 million, respectively.
|
|
11.
|
Prepaid
expenses and other:
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, prepaid expenses are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Guarantee deposit
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Other share investments(1)
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
Derivative from interest rate hedging
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,473
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes investments in non-controlled companies. |
F-21
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Investments
in associates:
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, investments in associates
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Seglo, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,859
|
|
|
$
|
4,660
|
|
Procesos Operativos de Materiales, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,882
|
|
|
$
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, intangible assets are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Year — Net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Amortization /
|
|
|
Year — Net of
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adittions
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
Cancellations
|
|
|
Test
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Software
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
998
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(603
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
|
3 y 5
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks(1)
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,021
|
|
|
$
|
11,423
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(603
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
19,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Year — Net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Amortization /
|
|
|
Year — Net of
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adittions
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
Cancellations
|
|
|
Test
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Software
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
|
3 y 5
|
|
Goodwill (Ademsa)(1)
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (ACM)(2 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks(3)
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non compete agreement(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,819
|
|
|
$
|
18,813
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
38,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This goodwill arises from the business combination of Ademsa as
the acquiree (See Note 1f). The customer relationship
intangible asset was not recognized separately from goodwill in
view that its fair value could not be measured reliably. |
|
(2) |
|
This goodwill arises from the Auto Hauling assets business
acquisition in 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
On December 31, 2004, Grupo TMM acquired Marmex’
trademark rights from its former partner Seacor Marine
International, LLC, for the amount of $9.0 million, which
was presented as an item deducting the minority interest amount.
As described in Note 1a), Grupo TMM acquired such minority
interest and therefore the trademark rights are now classified
within Intangible assets. |
|
(4) |
|
A stockholder with significant influence in the business
decision making of Grupo TMM decided to sell her interest. In
view that this individual had also knowledge of business plans,
market condition, as well as relationships with customers and
vendors of Grupo TMM, the Board of Directors approved the
Company on |
F-22
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
November 20, 2007, to enter into a non compete agreement
for a 5 years period with this individual. It is important
to mention that there is a significant penalty in case of no
compliance with the non compete agreement. |
Total debt, as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, is summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Short-term portion of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Certificates Program (see Note 16)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,240
|
|
DVB Bank América(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
DC Automotriz Servicios(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
Natexis Banques Populaires(1)
|
|
|
9,955
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
DZ Bank(4)
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Westlb LB AG(2)
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Bank of Tokio Mitsubishi(2)
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
HSBC, S.A.(6)
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
BBVA Bancomer, S.A.(6)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Santander Serfín, S.A.(6)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,555
|
|
|
$
|
17,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Certificates Program (see Note 16)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
253,522
|
|
DVB Bank América(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
39,983
|
|
DC Automotriz Servicios(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,724
|
|
Natexis Banques Populaires(1)
|
|
|
46,025
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Westlb LB AG(2)
|
|
|
41,031
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Bank of Tokio Mitsubishi(2)
|
|
|
29,620
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
New Notes due 2007(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
DZ Bank(4)
|
|
|
24,725
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,401
|
|
|
$
|
303,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In July 2005, Grupo TMM entered into two credit agreements to
acquire two tanker vessels (Amatlán II and Choapas
II), in the amount of $42.3 million at an average fixed
rate of 7.8% for Amatlán II, and of $26 million at an
average fixed rate of 8.0% for Choapas II, both with quarterly
installments of principal and interest and a due date of
August 15, 2010. In connection therewith, the Company
established two trusts per each vessel; the first one is
directed to secure revenue and debt repayment after obtaining
the right to collect from PEMEX the services rendered; and the
second one is directed to secure the vessel as collateral. |
As result of the Fiduciary Trust Certificates new program
issued on July 19, 2007(see Note 16), the Company
prepaid the abovementioned debt in the amount of
$52.0 million, including principal, interest and associated
expenses with the transaction.
F-23
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In February 2006, Grupo TMM (through Marmex Offshore, S.A. de
C.V., a subsidiary — see Note 1) entered
into two loan agreements to finance the purchase of 8 offshore
vessels (Isla Arcas, Isla Azteca, Isla Guadalupe, Isla Colorada,
Isla Creciente, Isla de Cedros, Isla Miramar and Isla Verde). In
August and September 2006, the Company amended and supplemented
one of these loan agreements to finance the purchase of an
additional 2 offshore vessels (Isla Arboleda and Isla del Toro).
The first three vessels (Isla Arcas, Isla Azteca and Isla
Guadalupe) were financed through a single $19.8 million
facility with a fixed rate of 8.12% maturing February 27,
2013; the next five vessels (Isla Colorada, Isla Creciente, Isla
de Cedros, Isla Miramar and Isla Verde) were financed through a
$31.9 million facility with an initial rate of 8.17%
(comprised of a senior loan priced at Libor plus 200 basis
points and a junior loan priced at 15.0% fixed) and maturing on
February 27, 2013. In addition, the Isla Arboleda and Isla
del Toro were financed with an addition of $4.9 million and
$25.4 million, respectively, to this last facility, and
with an initial rate of 8.58% and 8.53%, respectively (comprised
of a senior loan priced at Libor plus 200 basis points and
a junior loan priced at 15.0% fixed). Both additions also mature
on February 27, 2013. The facilities described above have a
schedule of repayment of principal and interest on a quarterly
basis. In connection therewith, the Company established two
trusts per each loan facility: the first one is directed to
secure revenue and debt repayment after obtaining the right to
collect the services rendered to PEMEX Exploration and PEMEX
Refining, and other clients; and, the second one is directed to
secure the vessels as collateral. |
As result of the Fiduciary Trust Certificates new program
issued on July 19, 2007(see Note 16), the Company
prepaid the abovementioned debt for the amount of
$78.8 million, including principal, interest and associated
expenses with the transaction.
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The 2003 notes represented ten-year instruments bearing 9.50%
annual interest (9.25% annually up to November 14,
2000) through May 15, 2003. On such date, the Company
defaulted on its obligation to pay the principal amount and
accrued unpaid interest on the 2003 notes, and the accrued
unpaid interest on its 2006 notes. As a result, the Company
began negotiations with a representative committee of holders of
2003 and 2006 notes. |
On August 11, 2004, Grupo TMM completed the Exchange Offer
of its New Senior Secured Notes expiring in 2007 (the “New
Notes due 2007”) upon the closing of a private exchange
offer. Pursuant to the Exchange Offer, an aggregate amount of
$170.7 million or approximately 96.5% of the 2003 notes
were tendered and an aggregate amount of $197.1 million or
approximately 98.6% of the 2006 notes were tendered. Holders of
the 2003 and 2006 notes who tendered their respective 2003 and
2006 notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer received approximately
$459.5 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes due
2007.
On August 11, 2004, Grupo TMM also completed the private
placement of approximately $6.5 million principal amount of
Senior Secured Notes to Promotora Servia, an affiliate owned by
members of the Serrano Segovia family, and $13.7 million
principal amount of Senior Secured Notes to J.B. Hunt Inc. Both
private placements were accepted as consideration for the
cancellation of outstanding obligations of the Company with such
parties.
Also on August 11, 2004, with net proceeds from the sale of
an additional $29 million in face amount of New Notes due
2007, the Company paid a) $7.2 million in cash in
respect of the principal amount, plus accrued unpaid interest on
all of the 2003 notes that were not tendered in the Exchange
Offer, b) $0.4 million in cash in respect of the
accrued unpaid interest on the 2006 notes that were not tendered
in the Exchange Offer, and c) Financial advisory and other
fees related to the consummation of the Exchange Offer.
New Notes due 2007 represent a three-year senior and secured (by
virtually all of the Company’s assets, including a pledge
of the Grupo TFM shares held by TMM Multimodal) obligation
(extendable to four years at the option of the Company under
certain circumstances), for an initial principal amount of
$508,703 and with an annual interest of 10.5% if interest is
paid entirely in cash, or of 12.0% if the Company elects to pay
the interest due in a combination of a minimum due in cash of 2%
annually and the remainder in kind (through the issuance of
additional New Notes 2007 or Company’s American
Depositary Shares (ADS). This
F-24
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
payment-in-kind
interest rate will increase to 12.5% for the period between
August 1, 2006 and February 1, 2007, and to 13.0% for
the period between February 1, 2007 and August 1,
2007. If the Company elects to extend the maturity of the New
Notes due 2007 until August 1, 2008, it would have to pay a
pro rata portion of a cash fee equal to 4% of the then
outstanding principal amount under its New Notes due 2007, and
the applicable rate would be 12% payable in cash only. Grupo TMM
has restricted cash in the amount of $347.9 million as of
December 31, 2005, dedicated to prepay a portion of the New
Notes 2007. Once this cash is applied to the payment of the
2007 Bonds, the company is entitled to reduce in 100 base points
the interest rate applicable to cash payments (up to 9.5%) as a
consequence of the aggregate payment of such bonds.
On January 17, 2006 the Company used the “Restricted
Cash” (resulting from the sale of 18 million shares of
Kansas City Southern stock for an aggregate gross cash
consideration of $400.5 million) to redeem a partial amount
of New Notes due 2007, with a remaining balance of
$16.9 million of restricted cash after such payment. As a
result of this partial redemption, the Company also received a
reduction in the interest rate payable in the New Notes due
2007, with 9.50% as the resulting rate. On May 15, 2006 the
Company made another partial redemption of $1.1 million of
New Notes due 2007, resulting in an aggregate outstanding
balance of $155.8 million.
With the proceeds from the Securitization program (see
note 15), on September 25, 2006 the Company redeemed
the balance of $155.8 million of New Notes due 2007 in
full. The total amount paid by the Company, including principal,
accrued interest, fees and other expenses as contemplated under
the indenture of the New Notes due 2007 was $159.9 million.
|
|
|
(4) |
|
On February 2006, Grupo TMM (through Newmarmex, S.A. de C.V.
“Newmarmex” — See Note 1) entered
into a $18.0 million loan facility for the financing of
twelve offshore vessels (Isla Arena, Isla Ballena, Isla Clarion,
Isla Coronado, Isla Cozumel, Isla de Lobos, Isla del Carmen,
Isla Montague, Isla Passavera, Isla Pelicano, Isla Tiburon and
Marmex III) at a fixed rate of 11.92% and maturing on
February 16, 2010. On April 2006, Grupo TMM (through Marmex
International Services, S.A. de C.V. “MIS” —
See Note 1) entered into a $21.8 million loan
facility for the financing of one offshore vessel (Isla Grande)
at a fixed rate of 8.5% and maturing on April 15, 2013. |
The facilities described above have a schedule of repayment of
principal and interest on a quarterly basis. In connection
therewith, the Company established two trusts per each loan
facility: the first one is directed to secure revenue and debt
repayment after obtaining the right to collect the services
rendered from PEMEX Exploracion y Produccion and other clients;
and the second one is directed to secure the vessels as
collateral.
In February 2007 DZ Bank transferred the credit rights to DVB
Bank, thus becoming the new creditor
As result of the Fiduciary Trust Certificates new program
issued on July 19, 2007 (see Note 16), the Company
prepaid the 13 offshore vessels for the amount of
$27.3 million, including principal, interest and associated
expenses with the transaction.
In May and June 2007, the Company through its subsidiary TMM
Parcel Tankers entered into a borrowing transactions to acquire
two chemical vessels (Maya and Olmeca), the first one with a
loan facility for $25.0 million, with an average interest
rate of 7.42%, the senior note with a fixed rate of 6.88%, and
the junior note with a fix rate of 11.365%, the second vessel
loan facility for the amount of $27.5 million, with an
average interest rate of 7.78%, the senior note with a fixed
rate of 7.21%, and the junior note with a fixed interest rate of
11.07025%. Both loans are payable in monthly instalments of
principal and interest,, maturing on May 25, 2017, and
June 19, 2017, respectiely.
|
|
|
(5) |
|
On July 19, 2007, the Company through its subsidiary Lacto
Comercial Organizada, S.A. de C.V. (“Lacorsa”) entered
into a Mexican peso-denominated loan facility in the amount of
$11.5 million with a variable interest rate of 91 days
TIIE (Mexico’s interbank equilibrium interest rate) plus
200 basis points, to acquire a service contract with DC
Automotriz Servicios, S. de R.L. de C.V., and operating Auto
Haulage assets. The loan facility |
F-25
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
is payable in 84 consecutive monthly instalments, commencing in
January 2008, and maturing in December 2014. |
|
(6) |
|
On December 2006, Grupo TMM acquired 100% of the capital stock
of Ademsa — See Note 1f). At such time, Ademsa
had three outstanding Mexican peso-denominated loans: |
a) Working capital loan facility with Banco BBVA-Bancomer
of $0.25 million ($2.8 million pesos) with principal
repayment at maturity and monthly interest payments at TIIE plus
320 basis points and maturing April 10, 2007 with an
effective rate as of the end of 2006 of 10.53%,
b) Working capital loan facility with Banco Santander
Serfin of $0.23 million ($2.4 million pesos) with
principal repayment at maturity and monthly interest payments at
TIIE plus 200 basis points and maturing May 12, 2007
with an effective rate as of the end of 2006 of 9.39%, and
c) Working capital loan facility with HSBC of
$0.55 million ($6.0 million pesos) with principal
repayment at maturity and monthly interest payments at TIIE plus
534 basis points and maturing May 16, 2007 with an
effective rate as of the end of 2006 of 12.68%.
d) On December 17, 2007, ADEMSA renew the loan
facility with HSBC for the amount of $0.55 million
($6.0 million pesos), for working capital, with principal
repayment at maturity and monthly interest payments at TIIE plus
534 basis points and maturing on June 14, 2008.
Covenants-
The agreements related to the above-mentioned loans contemplate
certain covenants including the observance of certain financial
ratios, and restrictions on dividend payments and sales of
assets, among others. Grupo TMM and its subsidiaries were in
compliance with these covenants and restrictions at
December 31, 2006 and 2007.
Interest expense amounted to $65,568, $26,853 and
$23,630 million for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively. The weighted average interest rate
paid was 11.91% in 2005, 9.50% in 2006 and 10.93% in 2007.
Maturity of long-term debt, as of December 31, 2006 and
2007, is as follows (book value amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Net Borrowings
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
24,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
23,083
|
|
|
$
|
21,873
|
|
2010
|
|
|
35,165
|
|
|
|
20,540
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,664
|
|
|
|
20,123
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9,664
|
|
|
|
45,091
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
39,721
|
|
|
|
195,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,401
|
|
|
$
|
303,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
A summary of the estimated fair values of the Company’s
bank loans and other obligations, as of December 31, 2006
and 2007, is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Short-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
$
|
17,147
|
|
|
$
|
17,147
|
|
|
$
|
13,740
|
|
|
$
|
13,740
|
|
Variable-rate
|
|
|
8,591
|
|
|
|
8,591
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,555
|
|
|
$
|
25,738
|
|
|
$
|
17,787
|
|
|
$
|
15,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$
|
81,991
|
|
|
$
|
81,991
|
|
|
$
|
42,500
|
|
|
$
|
42,500
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
59,410
|
|
|
|
59,410
|
|
|
|
277,605
|
|
|
|
277,605
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,876
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,401
|
|
|
$
|
141,401
|
|
|
$
|
303,229
|
|
|
$
|
320,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Obligations
from sale of receivables:
|
Pursuant to the securitization facility, the Company and certain
of its subsidiaries sold receivables to a trust, which in turn,
issued certificates to investors (“Certificates”). For
accounting purposes, the securitization facility represents the
total U.S. dollar amount for future services to be rendered
to customers under the securitization facility.
On April 5, 2005 there was approximately $70.5 million
of aggregate principal amount and interest on Certificates
outstanding under the securitization facility, which was paid by
the Company on such date using the cash proceeds received from
the sale of Grupo TFM to KCS (See Note 5).
On September 25, 2006 the Company entered into a
Securitization Facility with Deutsche Bank, AG for
$200.0 million, using the same features and structure of
the previous securitization deals. As of December 31, 2006
the outstanding balance under the Securitization Facility was
$195.2 million (exclusive of $7.6 million of
transaction cost and $1.7 million of interest payable)
bearing a fixed annual rate of 12.47%. This new Securitization
facility has restricted cash at December 31, 2006 and 2007
for the amount of $6.5 and $4.6 million respectively.
Under the terms of the Securitization facility, the Company
pledged to Deutsche Bank AG (as certificateholder), the
collection rights associated with the Indemnity Escrow Note (see
Note 5). The consideration paid by KCS under the Indemnity
Escrow Note will be released to the Company absent an event of
default. If an event of default exists and is continuing as
defined in the Securitization facility, the Indeminity Escrow
Note proceeds will be applied to the repayment of a like amount
of certificates under the Securitization facility.
In addition, the proceeds associated with the VAT Escrow Note
(see Note 5) will be applied towards the reduction in
certificates under the Securitization facility no later than
6 months after the receipt of such proceeds.
On October 15, 2007, the Company withdrew from the sale of
receivables program certificates in the amount of
$50.0 million plus $2.0 million premium. The resources
applied to this prepayment came from the KCS settlement
F-27
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
(see Note 5). Also as a result of the settlement with KCS
the Indemnity Promissory note and the Tax Promissory Note
securing the payment obligations were cancelled.
As of December 2006 and 2007 the obligations from sale of
receivables are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Serie 2006
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(4,846
|
)
|
|
|
(69,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding balance
|
|
|
195,154
|
|
|
|
130,901
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
Transaction cost
|
|
|
(7,566
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(16,727
|
)
|
|
|
(13,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation for the sale of long-term accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
172,617
|
|
|
$
|
113,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of the obligations from sale of receivables as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, are summarized as follows (book
value amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Debt — Net
|
|
|
Debt — Net
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
16,727
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2008
|
|
|
16,909
|
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
2009
|
|
|
19,145
|
|
|
|
13,908
|
|
2010
|
|
|
64,751
|
|
|
|
47,040
|
|
2011
|
|
|
77,622
|
|
|
|
31,408
|
|
2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,154
|
|
|
$
|
130,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants
The agreements related to the above-mentioned loans contemplate
certain covenants including the observance of certain financial
ratios, and restrictions on dividend payments and sales of
assets. Grupo TMM and its subsidiaries were in compliance with
these covenants and restrictions at December 31, 2006 and
2007.
|
|
16.
|
Trust
certificates program:
|
On July 19, 2007, the Company sold receivable rights
associated with 20 vessels of its fleet and pawned such
vessels to the Issuer Trust F/460 constituted with JP
Morgan, S.A. bank as a Trustee. This first tranche on the amount
of $275.1 million (denominated in $3,000 million
Mexican pesos) in Trust Certificates was carried out under
the Trust Certificate Program for up to $825.4 million
(denominated in $9,000 million Mexican pesos) established
by the Company. The Trust Certificates corresponding to the
First Tranche have a 20 year term and an AA (mex) credit
rating issued by Fitch de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
The product deriving from the First Tranche was used in
a) prepayment of several bank credits on the amount of
approximately $158.3 million including capital, interests
and costs associated to such prepayment, b) payment of
approximately $9.5 million in expenses and commissions
related to this First Tranche, c) the provision of cash
reserves on the amount of $33.7 million, and d) the
remaining amount of $73.6 millions was delivered to the
Company.
F-28
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Interests deriving from this First Tranche will be payable
bi-annually on December 15 and June 15 of the corresponding
year, having hired a coverage derivate financial instrument
(interest rate CAP) which allows for the trust’s maximum
payable rate to be of an annual 11.50% during the first
3 years of the First Tranche’s maturity.
The First Tranche represents the total amount in
U.S. Dollars for future services to be provided to the
Contracting Parties, according to the Trust Certificate
Program’s terms. The flow balance under this program as of
December 31, 2007 was for $275.1 million (denominated
in $3,000 million Mexican pesos) with an annual fixed
interest rate of 10.05% for the first coupon payable on
December 15, 2007, and a variable interest rate for the
subsequent periods at an equivalent TIIE (Mexico’s
interbank equilibrium interest rate) plus 225 base points. This
First Tranche observes a cash restriction in order to guarantee
certain operating obligations and potential payments which are
compulsory for non-payment. The restricted cash balance as of
December 31, 2007 was approximately $32.9 million.
Under the terms of the First Tranche, resources collected by the
Issuer Trust will be used to cover for operating costs and
expenses related to the 20 vessels, as well as to cover for
principal and interests based on the agreed amortization. The
remaining resources, if any, will be used in equal ratios to
a) prospectively amortize the Certificates and b) to
be delivered as free resources to the Company.
As of December 31, 2007 Trust Certificates are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Series 2007
|
|
$
|
275,121
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,121
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Transaction cost
|
|
|
(14,359
|
)
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(8,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Certificates, long-term
|
|
$
|
253,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of the trust certificates program as of
December 31, 2007, are summarized as follows (book value
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Debt — Net
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
7,240
|
|
2009
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
2010
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
2011
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
2012
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
2013 to 2027
|
|
|
209,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
275,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 29, 2002, the Company entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement with the buyers named therein, pursuant to
which the buyers agreed to purchase senior convertible notes
(the “convertible notes”) into shares or ADS in an
aggregate amount of $32.5 million. Additionally,
note-linked securities (“NLSs”) were issued which
F-29
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
were exercisable for 1,311,290 of the Company’s
Series A shares or ADS’s at an exercise price of
$9.9139 per share or ADS for a term of three years after
issuance.
Between December 31, 2002 and May 2, 2003, the Company
repaid the convertible notes in full and in cash, therefore no
convertible notes were converted into capital stock of the
Company.
On May 29, 2005 the period to exercise the NLSs expired,
and none of the holders thereof excercised the NLSs. The shares
of Grupo TMM stock reserved for conversion of the convertible
notes and for the NLSs were duly cancelled in a stockholders
meeting held on August 18, 2006. The premium that arised
from the issuance of those convertible notes ís now
considered as a Capital premium within the stockholders’
equity.
On September 15, 2003 HTFP Investments, LLC, Gaia Offshore
Water Fund, Ltd. and Caerus Fund, Ltd. filed a lawsuit against
the Company seeking a judicial declaration to adjust the strike
price and the underlying number of shares of Grupo TMM that
could be exercisable under the NLSs. On June 5, 2006 the
Company settled with these three claimants for an aggregate
consideration of $1.8 million.
On September 14, 2006 Leonardo, L.P. (another purchaser
under the Securities Purchase Agreement) filed a lawsuit against
the Company seeking damages in the amount of $1.6 million
in connection with the adjustment in the strike price and the
underlying number of shares of Grupo TMM that could be
exercisable under the NLSs. The Company answered this lawsuit
seeking relief as the period during which Leonardo L.P. was
entitled to enforce their rights under the NLSs had expired
prior to this lawsuit, and as such, the Company is no longer
liable for such damages. The Company will defend this lawsuit
vigorously. It estimated that the result of this lawsuit will
not exceed 50% of the claimed amount and such amount has been
reserved.
On April 13, 2007, the Company reached an agreement with
Leonardo L.P. to settle the abovementioned issue paying
$0.85 million in 8 installments maturing on
December 15, 2007, that were timely fulfilled.
|
|
18.
|
Balances
and transactions with related parties:
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007 the balances and transactions
with related parties are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(*)Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seglo Operaciones Logísticas(1)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The accounts receivable and payable due from or due to related
parties were driven by the services disclosed in the
transactions with related parties. |
|
(1) |
|
Seglo Operaciones Logísticas, S.A. de C.V. is a 50% jointly
controlled interest by Grupo TMM carrying out supply and
logistics operations for the automotive industry. |
F-30
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
The most relevant transactions with related parties at December
2005, 2006 and 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee(1)
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative services(2)
|
|
|
2,977
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees(2)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel on board items(3)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes management fees billed by Grupo TMM S.A.B. and
Servicios Corporativos TMM, S.A. de C.V. to Seglo S.A. in the
amount of $46, $66 and $57, for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Also
includes Seglo Operaciones Logisticas, S.A. de C.V. invoicing to
Seglo S.A. de C.V. in 2005, 2006 and 2007 for $79, $37 and $84,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
A transaction between Seglo Operaciones Logísticas, S.A. de
C.V. and Seglo S.A. de C.V. |
|
(3) |
|
Personnel in Marmex from Seacor Marine LLC. |
At December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, key management
personnel compensation includes the following expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Short-term employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
|
$
|
5,670
|
|
|
$
|
6,365
|
|
Social security costs
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,685
|
|
|
$
|
5,759
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, accrued expenses are
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
$
|
9,386
|
|
|
$
|
17,067
|
|
General expenses
|
|
|
8,989
|
|
|
|
11,477
|
|
Operational expenses
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Other
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,840
|
|
|
$
|
40,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Other
long term liabilities:
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the other long term
liabilities are summarized as follows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Tax on dividends
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
This tax on dividends will become payable when the related
declared dividends are actually paid.
|
|
21.
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
Capital
stock
At the Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on
August 28, 2002, the Company’s stockholders agreed to
reclassify Series “L” shares to Series “A”
shares eliminating the variable portion of capital stock of the
Company. Therefore, Grupo made the transfer of its series
“L” shares into the same number of series
“A” shares, in a proportion of one to one. Thus, in
order to obtain the series “L” shares relating to
foreign residents the amount of ADS’s was increased and the
corresponding transfer was made into ADS’s.
After the purchase of 30,000 shares of common stock for
treasury on December 14, 2007, the capital stock amounts to
Ps 699,631, is fixed and is comprised of 56,933,137 Series
“A” shares fully issued and outstanding, nominative,
without nominal value and with full voting rights, which can be
held only by persons or companies of Mexican nationality or
Mexican companies that include among their by-laws an exclusion
clause for foreign entities or individuals.
Dividends
Dividends paid are not subject to income tax if paid from the
Net Tax Profit Account and will be taxed at a rate that
fluctuates between 4.62% and 7.69% if they arise from the
Reinvested Net Tax Profit Account. Dividends paid in excess of
this account are subject to a tax equivalent to 38.89%.The tax
is payable by the Company and may be credited against its income
tax in the same year or the following two years. Dividends paid
from previously taxed profits are not subject to tax withholding
or additional tax payment.
The tax credit allowed under certain circumstances by the
Mexican Income Tax Law is also applicable to offset advance
income tax payments and not only against income tax payable for
the year.
In the event of a capital reduction, any excess of
stockholders’ equity over capital contributions, the latter
restated in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax
Law, must be treaated as dividends.
Purchase
of common stock for treasury
On December 14, 2007, at the Stockholders’ Meeting a
program was approved to purchase common stock for treasury up to
an amount of $10.0 million, which should not exceed net
income. In connection therewith a reserve of $9.9 million
was provided for in the accompanying statement of operations.
F-32
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Other
(expenses) income — net:
|
At December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 other (expenses) income
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Taxes recovered, net of (expenses) incurred
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,811
|
|
Gain on sale of subsidiaries (Note 1)
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,975
|
|
Expenses incurred on corporate restructuring:
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers dismissals
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,049
|
)
|
Outside consulting
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
Reserve for BIMMSA contingencies
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Lease equipment excess
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,390
|
)
|
Sale of non productive assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(21,262
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Negative goodwill write-off
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Provision for SSA management fees
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
Provision for labor contingencias
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other — Net
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Income
tax, asset tax, corporate flat tax, and tax loss
carryforwards:
|
Income
tax
Under a specific ruling dated December 17, 2004, Grupo TMM
obtained an authorization from the taxing authorities (Central
Legal Administration for Large Taxpayers of the Ministry of
Finance) to transfer the tax consolidation process that it had
authorized to perform as the consolidation or holding company
since 1991, to Repcorp, a company 92.30% owned by Grupo TMM.
This consolidation process transfer was effective
January 1, 2005, once Grupo TMM complied with certain
requirements called for by the aforementioned ruling.
Notwithstanding the reclassification from the tax consolidation
regime, the same authority on November 8, 2006, determined
that the above reclassification from tax consolidation was null
and void, due to presumed nonperformances by Grupo TMM. For this
reason the above reclassification from the tax consolidation
regime never went into effect and, therefore, Grupo TMM should
continue to act as the controlling entity of the consolidation
group for tax purposes.
Pursuant to the above, the Company considered it necessary to
file an appeal for annulment with the Federal Tax and
Administration Court last January 30, 2007, so as to have a
ruling that resolves to render the official letter issued by the
tax authorities null and void. In the opinion of the external
advisors of Grupo TMM who brought such action, the matter
discussed herein is attainable since, in their opinion, it lacks
the pertinent legal basis and reasons that all acts should have
so as to be considered legal.
For the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, consolidated
tax losses were incurred in the amounts of $626,501, and $70,277
respectively, whereas the taxable income for the year ended
December 31, 2007, amounted to $267,809.
F-33
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
The difference between taxable and book income is due primarily
to the gain or loss on inflation recognized for tax purposes,
the difference between tax and book amortization and
depreciation, as well as certain temporary differences reported
in different periods for financial and tax purposes, and
non-deductible expenses.
The benefit for income tax included in income for the year ended
at December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, is computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current income tax
|
|
$
|
(460
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,188
|
)
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
63,186
|
|
|
|
29,288
|
|
|
|
5,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Benefit
|
|
|
62,726
|
|
|
|
28,212
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
Asset tax
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
62,021
|
|
|
$
|
27,815
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of the income tax (provision) benefit based on
the statutory income tax rate, to recorded income tax
(provision) benefit for the years ended at December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(85,892
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax at 30% in 2005, 29% in 2006 and 28% in 2007
|
|
|
25,768
|
|
|
|
19,940
|
|
|
|
8,174
|
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,756
|
|
|
|
(19,365
|
)
|
|
|
(2,679
|
)
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Inflationary effects on monetary assets and
liabilities — net
|
|
|
(6,524
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,912
|
)
|
Taxable income from the vessel revenue securitization program
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(93,694
|
)
|
Inflationary effects related to indexing and exchange rate
devaluation on tax loss carryforwards — net
|
|
|
(19,879
|
)
|
|
|
48,528
|
|
|
|
28,898
|
|
Provisions and allowances for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(16,263
|
)
|
|
|
(3,163
|
)
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
Sale of assets
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Valuation allowance on tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
(58,399
|
)
|
|
|
(15,699
|
)
|
|
|
58,937
|
|
Non-taxable revenue
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
Sale of shares
|
|
|
128,655
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
Non deductible expenses
|
|
|
(8,479
|
)
|
|
|
(3,956
|
)
|
|
|
(3,079
|
)
|
Change in tax rates
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
Other — net
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
62,021
|
|
|
$
|
27,815
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with a modification to the Mexican income tax law
the general corporate tax rate is 28% for the year 2007 and
subsequent years.
F-34
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
The components of deferred tax assets and (liabilities) for the
years ended Decembre 31, 2006 and 2007, are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
283,161
|
|
|
$
|
234,437
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(147,220
|
)
|
|
|
(88,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,941
|
|
|
|
146,154
|
|
Income tax paid on dividends
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Inventories and provisions, net
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
Concession rights and property, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
(28,182
|
)
|
|
|
(35,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
112,833
|
|
|
$
|
115,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recognized deferred tax assets related to its
tax loss carryforwards as well as its subsidiaries and other
items after evaluating the reversal of existing taxable
temporary differences. To the extent that the balance of the
deferred tax assets exceeds the existing temporary differences.
Management has evaluated the recoverability of such amounts by
estimating future taxable profits in the foreseeable future
which extend from 2008 through 2012. The tax profits include
estimates of profitability and macroeconomic assumptions which
are based on management’s best judgement (See Note 4).
Asset
tax
Until December 31, 2006, asset tax was assessed at a 1.8%
rate on the amount resulting from reducing the face value of
certain debts from the restated value of assets. Payments made
on income tax during the same period could be credited against
asset tax. The excess of payments on asset tax over income tax
due in the period may be recovered in the following ten fiscal
years, provided that income tax exceeds asset tax in an amount
equivalent to the restated value of that amount paid. In
addition, the difference resulting from subtracting the asset
tax of the last three years from income tax could be taken as a
tax credit against the tax of the year. Effective
January 1, 2007, the base of computation and the statutory
rate of the asset tax was amended. The new base should have been
determined based on the assets with no reduction of any debt,
and the tax rate was 1.25% instead of 1.8%. Effective
January 1, 2008, the asset tax was abrogated.
Corporate
flat tax (IETU)
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporate Flat Tax Law is in
force. This new Law also abrogated the Asset Tax Law.
The Corporate Flat Tax (IETU — for its Spanish
acronym) of the period will be calculated by applying a 17.5%
rate (transitorily, the IETU rate will be 16.5% for 2008, 17%
for 2009, and 17.5% for 2010 and thereon) to income determined
based on cash flows, which results by reducing authorized
deductions from the total income received from activities to
which it applies. The so-called IETU credits are reduced from
the above income, as provided for in currently enacted
legislation.
IETU credits are amounts that can be reduced from the IETU
itself, which include, among other things, IETU loss
carryforwards, credits on salaries, social security
contributions, and deductions of some assets such as inventories
and fixed assets, during the transition period as a result of
the effectiveness of the IETU.
The IETU is a tax that co-exists with Income Tax, therefore, it
will be subject to the following:
|
|
a)
|
If the amount of the IETU exceeds Income Tax of the same period,
the Company will pay IETU. Pursuant to the foregoing, the
Company will reduce Income Tax paid in the same period from the
IETU of the period.
|
|
b)
|
If the IETU is less that Income Tax of the same period, the
company will not pay IETU in the period.
|
F-35
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
c) |
If the IETU base is negative due to deductions that exceed
taxable income, there will be no IETU due. In addition, the
amount of that base multiplied by the IETU rate results in a
IETU credit that can be offset against Income Tax of the same
period or, if applicable, against the IETU of subsequent periods.
|
Tax loss
carryforwards
At December 31, 2007, Grupo TMM had tax loss carryforwards
on a tax consolidation basis, which under the Mexican Income Tax
Law are inflation-indexed through the date of utilization as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation-Indexed
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts up to June
|
|
|
Year in Which Loss
|
|
2007, in Thousands of
|
|
Year of
|
Arose
|
|
US Dollars
|
|
Expiration
|
|
2004
|
|
|
11,619
|
|
|
2014
|
2005
|
|
|
652,655
|
|
|
2015
|
2005
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
2015
|
2006
|
|
|
48,484
|
|
|
2016
|
2007
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$714,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Financial
information by segment:
|
The Company operates in the following segments: specialized
maritime transportation, land transportation and logistics,
operation of ports and terminals, and related services.
Specialized maritime transportation (“Maritime
Transportation Division”) operations include the
transportation of liquid petroleum and petrochemical products in
bulk, materials and supplies for drilling platforms, as well as
tugboat services. Land transportation and logistics
(“Logistics Division”) includes dedicated truck
services and logistics solutions. Port operations (“Ports
and Terminal Division”) include terminal service and agency
activities, both cargo and passenger. The discontinued operation
of the Rail transportation (“Railroad Division”),
includes interline connections in US and Mexican railroad lines
and was sold in March 31, 2005.
F-36
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Information for each operating segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and
|
|
|
Railroad
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Terminals
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
and Shared
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
159,575
|
|
|
$
|
108,403
|
|
|
$
|
38,853
|
|
|
$
|
170,088
|
|
|
$
|
(12,861
|
)
|
|
$
|
464,058
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(129,523
|
)
|
|
|
(107,260
|
)
|
|
|
(35,625
|
)
|
|
|
(117,925
|
)
|
|
|
(4,475
|
)
|
|
|
(394,808
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,887
|
)
|
|
|
(2,193
|
)
|
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
|
|
(22,431
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(34,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
$
|
22,165
|
|
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
962
|
|
|
$
|
29,732
|
|
|
$
|
(17,358
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, expenses and income not allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain for the year attributable to equity holders of Grupo
TMM, S.A.B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment
|
|
$
|
254,178
|
|
|
$
|
96,952
|
|
|
$
|
67,637
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
418,767
|
|
Shared assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
374,359
|
|
|
|
374,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
254,178
|
|
|
$
|
96,952
|
|
|
$
|
67,637
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
374,359
|
|
|
$
|
793,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities by segment
|
|
$
|
62,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,938
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
104,208
|
|
Shared liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
552,172
|
|
|
|
552,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
62,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,938
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
552,172
|
|
|
$
|
656,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures by segment
|
|
$
|
92,137
|
|
|
$
|
11,657
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
43,339
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
148,462
|
|
Shared non-cash transactions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash transactions
|
|
$
|
92,137
|
|
|
$
|
11,657
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
43,339
|
|
|
$
|
3,948
|
|
|
$
|
152,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2005. |
F-37
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Terminals
|
|
|
and Shared
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
146,425
|
|
|
$
|
93,890
|
|
|
$
|
8,121
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
248,148
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(101,641
|
)
|
|
|
(94,511
|
)
|
|
|
(5,684
|
)
|
|
|
(18,646
|
)
|
|
|
(220,482
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(13,434
|
)
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(16,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
$
|
31,350
|
|
|
$
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
$
|
(19,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, expenses and income not allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain for the year attributable to equity holders of Grupo
TMM, S.A.B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment
|
|
$
|
450,639
|
|
|
$
|
125,604
|
|
|
$
|
62,801
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
639,044
|
|
Shared assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,588
|
)
|
|
|
(3,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
450,639
|
|
|
$
|
125,604
|
|
|
$
|
62,801
|
|
|
$
|
(3,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
635,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities by segment
|
|
$
|
276,377
|
|
|
$
|
93,217
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
369,867
|
|
Shared liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74,245
|
|
|
|
74,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
276,377
|
|
|
$
|
93,217
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
74,245
|
|
|
$
|
444,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures by segment
|
|
$
|
159,430
|
|
|
$
|
22,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
182,766
|
|
Shared non-cash transactions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash transactions
|
|
$
|
159,430
|
|
|
$
|
22,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
184,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ports and
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Terminals
|
|
|
and Shared
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
179,170
|
|
|
$
|
115,873
|
|
|
$
|
8,495
|
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
$
|
303,256
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(116,974
|
)
|
|
|
(113,792
|
)
|
|
|
(6,067
|
)
|
|
|
(17,074
|
)
|
|
|
(253,907
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(18,136
|
)
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
|
(25,652
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on transportation
|
|
$
|
44,060
|
|
|
$
|
(3,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
(18,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, expenses and income not allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain for the year attributable to equity holders of Grupo
TMM, S.A.B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(67,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment
|
|
$
|
424,212
|
|
|
$
|
121,066
|
|
|
$
|
31,502
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
576,780
|
|
Shared assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
85,394
|
|
|
|
85,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
424,212
|
|
|
$
|
121,066
|
|
|
$
|
31,502
|
|
|
$
|
85,394
|
|
|
$
|
662,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities by segment
|
|
$
|
430,485
|
|
|
$
|
138,445
|
|
|
$
|
3,987
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
572,917
|
|
Shared liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(29,605
|
)
|
|
|
(29,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
430,485
|
|
|
$
|
138,445
|
|
|
$
|
3,987
|
|
|
$
|
(29,605
|
)
|
|
$
|
543,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures by segment
|
|
$
|
56,874
|
|
|
$
|
44,765
|
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
102,550
|
|
Shared non-cash transactions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash transactions
|
|
$
|
56,874
|
|
|
$
|
44,765
|
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
|
$
|
104,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
|
|
25.
|
Employee
obligations:
|
Seniority premiums, retirement plan benefits (“pension
benefits”) obligations, and other employee compensation
payable at the end of employment are based on actuarial
calculations using the projected unit credit method. Pension
benefits are based mainly on years of service, age and salary
level upon retirement.
Seniority premiums, pension benefits and other employee
compensation upon termination charged to income include the
amortization of past service costs over the average remaining
working lifetime of employees.
The following is a breakdown of the net labor cost of seniority
premium and pension benefits, together with the actuarial
estimation of the present value of this benefit, as well as the
basic actuarial assumptions for the calculation of these labor
obligations for the years ended at December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Labor cost
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
Financial cost
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Amortization of the transitory obligation and variations in
assumptions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net period cost
|
|
$
|
1,304
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a breakdown of the net labor cost of other
compensation to employees payable at the end of employment,
together with the actuarial estimation of the present value of
this benefit, as well as the basic actuarial assumptions for the
calculation of these labor obligations for the years ended at
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Labor cost
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
Financial cost
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
Amortization of the transitory obligation and variations in
assumptions
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net period cost
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 31, 2006, the Company decided to modify the
retirement pension plan in one of its subsidiaries, maintaining
the benefits for the personnel already pensioned, that would
represent a substantial reduction in future net period costs.
The change in the plan resulted in a significant cost reduction
in the period in the amount of $2.7 million, and a
provision of $1.0 million to compensate some employees.
At December 31, 2006 and 2007 the pensions and seniority
premiums are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation (DBO)
|
|
$
|
8,982
|
|
|
$
|
9,179
|
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(4,210
|
)
|
Unamortized transition amount
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for pensions and seniority premiums
|
|
$
|
7,391
|
|
|
$
|
4,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, and 2007 the DBO for the pensions and
seniority premiums are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
8,797
|
|
|
$
|
8,982
|
|
Labor cost
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Financial cost
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(936
|
)
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,982
|
|
|
$
|
9,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, and 2007 the plan assets of the
pensions and seniority premiums are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Plan contributions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,443
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
|
$
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the termination of the
working relationship is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
DBO
|
|
$
|
6,858
|
|
|
$
|
8,446
|
|
Amortizable transition assets
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for termination of the working relationship
|
|
$
|
5,972
|
|
|
$
|
7,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the DBO for termination of
the working relationship is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,650
|
|
|
$
|
6,858
|
|
Labor cost
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Financial cost
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
6,858
|
|
|
$
|
8,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the changes in the pension
plan, seniority premium, and termination plan are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Reserve for obligations at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,233
|
|
|
$
|
13,363
|
|
Net period cost
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
Modifications to the plan
|
|
|
(2,687
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Personnel turnover
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Plan contributions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,443
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
Employee indemnity provision recognized in capital directly
|
|
|
3,633
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for obligations at end of year
|
|
$
|
13,363
|
|
|
$
|
12,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets are comprised mainly of investments at fixed rates,
marketable securities authorized as investments for pension
plans by the National Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV)
and treasury certificates issued by the Mexican government. At
December 31, 2007, the plan assets include 1.6 million
of Grupo TMM’s shares in the amount of $3.7 million.
The economic assumptions on discount rates, salary and long-term
return increases used in the valuation of the projected benefit
obligation, were 9% and 5% in 2006 and 2007 respectively.
At December 31, 2006, and 2007 the Company recorded a
provision for indemnification payments to employees of $3.6, and
$1.5 million, respectively, charged directly to equity in
accordance with the provisions of IFRS 19 Employee Benefits.
At December 31, 2007, approximately 80% of the
Company’s employees work under collective agreements that
are subject to annual salary reviews and bi-annually, for other
compensations. Grupo TMM has 6,861 and 5,055 employees as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
26.
|
Net
Income (loss) per share:
|
At December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, earnings (loss) per
share are calculated based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the year. There are no potentially
dilutive instruments outstanding, therefore basic and diluted
earnings (losses) per share are the same:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year
|
|
$
|
171,304
|
|
|
$
|
69,908
|
|
|
$
|
(67,072
|
)
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,963
|
|
|
|
56,962
|
|
Basic gain/(loss) per share attributable to Grupo
|
|
$
|
3.007
|
|
|
$
|
1.227
|
|
|
$
|
(1.177
|
)
|
|
|
27.
|
Commitments
and contingencies:
|
Concession
Duties
Pursuant to the concession under which it operates the ports and
tugboat services, the Company must make monthly fixed and
variable rental payments. Such payments totaled $285, $322 and
$376 million in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
F-41
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Leases
and charters
The Company uses various bareboat and time-chartered vessels to
supplement its fleet for periods ranging from seven months to
ten years. The related charter expenses were $70, in 2005, $37,
in 2006 and $52 million, in 2007.
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, an analysis of minimum
future charter and lease payments specified in the related
agreements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
46,962
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2008
|
|
|
31,605
|
|
|
|
52,398
|
|
2009
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
|
|
13,532
|
|
2010
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,836
|
|
2011
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,665
|
|
|
$
|
71,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of its truck and trailer fleet renewal program, the
Company has entered into a long-term operating lease agreements
for such equipment, maturing in 2017.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the minimum rental
payments for these operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
|
|
4,369
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
4,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,584
|
|
|
$
|
18,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On July 2006 and February 2007, Grupo TMM received two claim
notices from SSA Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“SSA”) in
relation to certain contingencies affecting SSA (formerly TMM
Puertos y Terminales, S.A. de C.V.), which are still pending of
resolution between SSA and the relevant authorities. Grupo TMM
considers such claims to be without merit and is of the position
that the Company is not required to indemnify SSA under the
terms of the agreements between both parties.
On July 4, 2007, SSA filed an arbitration claiming to Grupo
TMM, for the reimbursement of the 2003 profit sharing that SSA
had to pay to its employees. The amount claimed is approximately
$3.0 million. As mentioned before Grupo TMM position is
that SSA’s claim has no merit.
|
|
II)
|
Refined
Product Services (“RPS”) Claim.
|
On August 7, 2007, Transportación Maritima Mexicana,
S.A. de C.V. (“TMM”) file an arbitration claiming to
RPS for the amount of $0.05 million, for some expenses
incurred by TMM in the Palenque’s re-delivered vessel.
On October 19, 2007 RPS sued TMM, for unreasonable issues
and damages caused to the Palenque vessel in the amount of
$3.0 million.
F-42
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
TMM has enough supports to face RPS claim, also the amount
claimed by RPS is excessive and for non supported issues.
III) Mutual
claims between TMM and Worldwide Services, Ltd
(“WWS”)
In December 2007, TMM and WWS failed claims against each other,
TMM claim is in the amount of $0.343 million for fuel and
low performance of the Veracruz vessel, and WWS claim is in the
amount of $1.332 million, mainly an over-performance of the
same vessel.
TMM and WWS are negotiating both companies’ claims before
going into arbitration.
|
|
IV)
|
Other
legal proceedings
|
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings and
administrative actions, all of which are of an ordinary or
routine nature and incidental to its operations. Although it is
impossible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in
the opinion of the Company’s management, such proceedings
and actions should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company has transactions and relationships with related
parties. Because of these relationships, in accordance with the
Mexican Income Tax Law, the Company must obtain a transfer
pricing study for the transactions that took place during 2007
that confirms that the terms of these transactions are the same
as those that would result from transactions among wholly
unrelated parties. The Company is in the process of completing
this study.
|
|
28.
|
Financial
risk management, objectives and policy:
|
Grupo TMM’s main financial instruments, other than derivate
financial instruments, are bank loans, securitization structures
for future income, cash and short term deposits. The main
objective of these financial instruments is to provide the
Company with all necessary funds to properly perform its
operations. The Company has several other financial assets and
liabilities, such as commercial credits and commercial payables,
which arise directly from its operations.
Grupo TMM also enters into derivate transactions, which mainly
include interest rate CAPs as described in Note 16. The
objective is to manage variable interest rate risks arising from
the Company’s operations and from its financing sources.
The method to acknowledge the resulting gain or loss depends on
the coverage nature.
Main risks arising from the Company’s financial instruments
are the cash flow risk deriving from interest rate variations,
liquidity risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. The Company
analyzes the risks and determines management policies for each
of these risks as described in the following summary:
Changes in the derivates fair value which are designated and
labeled as cash flow coverage and which are highly effective,
are recognized in stockholders’equity. When the projected
transaction or commitment by a company brings about the
acknowledgement of an asset (e.g. property, machinery and
equipment) or a liability, earnings and losses previously
recognized in stockholders’equity are transferred and
included in the initial assessment of the asset or liability
cost. Otherwise, earnings and losses previously recognized in
stockholders’equity are transferred to the consolidated
income statement of operations and are classified as income or
expense in the same periods in which the company providing the
coverage committed itself to doing so or whenever a projected
transaction affects the consolidated statement of operations
(e.g. when the projected sale takes place).
Changes in any derivate fair value not qualifying to be
registered in the books as coverage under IAS 39, are
immediately recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations.
F-43
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
When a determined coverage is due or sold, or whenever it does
not meet the criteria to be recognized in in the books under IAS
39, any cumulative earning or loss is recorded in
stockholders’equity in that moment and remains in it until
the committed or projected transaction is finally acknowledged
in the consolidated statement of operations. When a committed or
projected transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
cumulative earnings or losses recorded in
stockholders’equity are immediately acknowledged in the
consolidated statement of operations.
Fair
value of financial instruments
Fair value estimated amounts are determined by the Company
through the use of available information in the market, as well
as through appropriate assessment methods. However, it is
essential to apply a considerable good judgment when
interpreting market information in order to estimate the fair
value.
Fair value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, short-term
debt and payables, are netted to record values according to the
short-term maturity of these instruments.
Fair value of the Company’s loans as well as of other
financial obligations, is estimated based upon prices quoted
within the markets or, alternatively, based upon financing rates
offered to the Company for loans with the same maturity periods
at the end of each year. Debt with variable interest rates
generally represents rates available for the Company in effect
as of December
31,
2007 for the issue of debt under similar terms and maturity
periods and, therefore, book record values of these obligations
are a reasonable estimate of their fair value.
Cash flow
risk
The Group’s exposure to market interest rates variations is
mainly related to its long-term debt obligations under floating
interest rates.
The Group’s policy is to manage its interests cost by using
a combination of a fixed and variable rate of debts. At the end
of 2007 the Group held 40% of its loans at fixed interest rates.
Moreover, one of its obligations was covered by an interest rate
CAP of not more than 11.5%. In order to manage this combination
with an efficient cost, the Group enters into interest rate
swaps, where it commits itself to interchanging, at determined
intervals, the difference between the fixed interest rate and
the variable interest rate at amounts that are calculated in
reference to an agreed theoretical amount of principal, through
agreements in which the Group receives the difference in excess
of the maximum interest rate determined in the contracts. This
exchange is aimed to cover for the underlying debt obligations.
As of December
31,
2007, and after considering the interest rates swaps and
CAP’s, approximately 40% of the Group’s loans are in a
fixed situation or are covered by an interest rate CAP.
Foreign
currency risk
As a result of important operations within Mexico, the
Group’s balance may be significantly affected by the
interest rate fluctuations between Mexican Pesos and
U.S. Dollars. The Group does not cover for this exposure.
The Group has the objective of minimizing its exposure effects
in functional currency by obtaining Mexican pesos denominated
debt. During 2007, the Company issued Trust Certificates in
the amount of $3,000 million pesos.
The Group also faces a transactional currency exposure. This
exposure derives from sales and acquisitions made in foreign
currencies other than U.S. dollars, which is the
Group’s functional currency. Around 40% of the Group’s
sales are denominated in Mexican pesos, while almost 62% of its
costs are also denominated in Mexican pesos.
F-44
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies other
than U.S. dollars, classified according to its
corresponding interbank exchange rate as related to the
U.S. dollar, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets in Mexican pesos
|
|
$
|
50,035
|
|
|
$
|
88,458
|
|
Assets in other currencies
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Liabilities in Mexican pesos
|
|
|
(47,453
|
)
|
|
|
(335,438
|
)
|
Liabilities in other currencies
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
$
|
(246,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December
31,
2006 and 2007, the exchange rate was 10.8116 and 10.9043 Mexican
pesos per U.S. dollar, respectively. As of the date of
issuance of the accompanyng audited consolidated financial
statement, the exchange rate was 10.5503 Mexican pesos per
U.S. dollar and the Company’s monetary asset and
liability position (unaudited) is similar to the one prevailing
as of December
31,
2007.
Commodity
prices risk
The Company does not handle commodities, therefore this risk is
inexistent.
Interest
rates risks
The Company’s earnings and its operations cash flows are
considerably independent from changes in the market interest
rates. Grupo TMM’s policy is to obtain fixed rated
instruments in its loans and, in case that a loan has a variable
interest rate, the Company’s policy is to obtain all needed
derivate financial instruments in order to fix such rate. As of
December
31,
2007, the Company had $187 million and $280 million of
debt leased at a fixed and variable rate, respectively.
The amount variable rate debt associated with the First Tranche
of the Trust Certificate Program, which amounts to
$275 million USD ($3,000 million Mexican pesos), has
an interest rate CAP allowing for the maximum payable rate
demanded to the Issuing Trust to be of an annual 11.50% during
the first three years of the First Tranche’s effectiveness.
Credit
risk
The Group only enters into commercial negotiations with solvent
third parties. Grupo TMM’s policy is that all of the
customers who prefer to operate under credit conditions, are
subject to credit verification procedures. Moreover, receivable
balances are permanently watched for, thus reducing the
Group’s exposure to receivables.
Regarding the credit risks deriving from other financial assets
of Grupo TMM, which include cash and cash equivalents, financial
assets available for sale and certain derivate instruments,
Grupo TMM’s exposure to risks is related to the possibility
of non-compliance by its counterparts, with a maximum exposure
which is equivalent to the sum of such instruments. Due to the
fact that Grupo TMM only performs this kind of operations with
third parties whose solvency is thoroughly acknowledged, the
Company does not demand for guarantees.
Risk
concentration
In 2007 the Company obtained revenues from PEMEX Refining and
PEMEX Exploration and Production, representing 18% and 15% of
its total revenues, respectively. None of the rest of its
customer represents more than 8% of total revenues.
The Company assesses its customer financial situation and
accrues a delinquency accounts reserve if needed.
F-45
Grupo
TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial
Statements — (Continued)
Liquidity
risk
The Group’s objective is to maintain proper balance between
financing continuity and flexibility through the use of bank
loans and securitization. As of December 31, 2007, only 6%
of the Group’s financial liabilities are due during the
upcoming 12 months.
Capital
management
With the objective of improving its stockholderes’
profitability, the Company will contract debt under the best
possible market conditions in order to invest in fixed operating
assets which will, at the same time, allow it to keep a proper
relationship between the capital value and its debt.
Vessels
acquisition and loan facilities
On January 9, 2008 to acquire two tugboats Grupo TMM
through its subsidiary TMM Remolcadores, S.A. de C.V., entered
into a loan facility in the amount of $119 million, for
7 years at a fixed interest rate of 6.35% with quarterly
installments of principal and interest.
On January 24, 2008 to acquire vessels Grupo TMM trough its
subsidiary TMM Flota Maritima, S.A. de C.V. (“TMM Flota
Maritima”), entered into a loan facility up to
$100.0 million, such construction vessels to be delivered
in
2008-2010.
TMM Flota Maritima acquired two supplier vessels in the
aggregate amount of $32.85 million, for 7 years and a
starting average interest rate of 5.98%, a senior note with a
variable interest rate of Libor plus 185 basis points, and
a junior note with a variable interest rate of Libor plus
400 basis points.
Trust
certificates program
On April 30, 2008, Grupo TMM issued securities under the
second tranche of the Trust Certificates Program in the
amount of Ps. 1.55 billion, at TIIE (Mexico’s
interbank equilibrium interest rate) plus 195 basis points.
The proceeds from the second tranche of this program will be
used to acquire additional offshore vessels, to repay existing
debt, to fund required cash reserves and to pay issuance related
expenses.
F-46
Documents filed as exhibits to this Annual Report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Bylaws of Grupo TMM, S.A. (now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.), together with
an English translation, as registered with the Public Registry
of Commerce on September 26, 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004).
|
|
1
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Grupo TMM, S.A.B., as registered
with the Public Registry of Commerce on February 23, 2007
(translation).
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Ordinary Participation Certificate, together with an
English translation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-1 —
Registration
No. 33-47334).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Form of Deposit Agreement for Series A Ordinary
Participation Certificate American Depositary Shares among the
Company, Citibank, as depositary and all holders and beneficial
owners of American Depositary Shares evidenced by the American
Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement
on
Form F-4 —
Registration
No. 333-14194).
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Trust Agreement, dated November 24, 1989 (the
“CPO Trust Agreement”), between Nacional
Financiera, S.N.C., as grantor, and as CPO Trustee, together
with an English translation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-1 —
Registration
No. 33-47334).
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Public Deed, dated January 28, 1992, together with an
English translation (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-1 —
Registration
No. 33-47334).
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of January 25,
2001, to the Indenture dated as of May 12, 1996, between
the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of TMM’s Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal 2000).
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
Specimen Global Note representing the 2006 Notes (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registration
Statement of
Form F-4 —
File
No. 333-8322).
|
|
2
|
.7
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2002, by and between
Citibank, N.A., as Depositary and the Company, supplementing the
Deposit Agreement for the Series A Ordinary Participation
Certificate American Depositary Shares (incorporated by
reference to the Registration Statement on
Form F-3 —
Registration
No. 333-90710)
|
|
2
|
.8
|
|
Irrevocable Instruction Letter, dated as of May 22,
2002, between the Company and Citibank, as Depositary
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form F-3 —
Registration
No. 333-90710)
|
|
2
|
.9
|
|
Indenture by and between Grupo TMM, S.A.(now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.)
as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee, dated as of August 11, 2004, governing
Senior Secured Notes due 2007 (including Form of Senior Secured
Note due 2007) (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.9 of TMM’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal 2005)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
CPO Trust Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-1 —
Registration
No. 33-47334)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Euro-Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated April 30,
1999, between TMM and Chase Manhattan International Limited
(“CMIL”), as Dealer translation (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of TMM’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal 2000)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Supplemental Dealer Agreement, dated June 18, 1999, between
TMM and CMIL (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of TMM’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal 2000)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Issue and Paying Agency Agreement, dated April 30, 1999,
among TMM, The Chase Manhattan Bank, London Branch, the Chase
Manhattan Bank, New York City Office and the Chase Manhattan
Bank Luxembourg, S.A. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 of TMM’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal 2000)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Acquisition Agreement dated as of April 21, 2003, by and
among Kansas City Southern, KARA Sub, Inc., Grupo TMM, S.A. (now
Grupo TMM, S.A.B.), TMM Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and TMM
Multimodal, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-4 —
Registration
No. 333-99075
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 24, 2003)
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 21, 2003, by and
among Kansas City Southern, Grupo TMM, S.A. (now Grupo TMM,
S.A.B.) and Grupo TFM, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.26 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-4 —
Registration
No. 333-99075
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 24, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 10, 2003, by and
among Mexico Ports & Terminals Holdings, S.A. de C.V,
SSA Mexico, Inc., División de Negocio Especializado, S.A.
and Inmobiliaria TMM, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 of the Registration Statement on
Form F-4 —
Registration
No. 333-99075
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 24, 2003)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement dated as of
December 15, 2004, by and among Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V.
(now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.), TMM Multimodal, S.A. de C.V., TMM
Holdings, S.A. de C.V., Kansas City Southern, Caymex
Transportation, Inc., KCS Finance, Inc., KCS Sub, Inc., and KARA
Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 of the
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Stockholders’ Agreement dated as of December 15, 2004,
by and among Kansas City Southern, Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V. (now
Grupo TMM, S.A.B.) and certain of Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V.’s
(now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.) subsidiaries and affiliates
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 of the Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 15,
2004, by and among Kansas City Southern, Grupo TMM, S.A. de C.V.
(now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.) and certain of Grupo TMM, S.A. de
C.V.’s (now Grupo TMM, S.A.B.) subsidiaries and affiliates
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 of the Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Marketing and Services Agreement dated as of December 15,
2004, by and among TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V., Kansas City
Southern and TFM, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.32 of the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Rail Transportation Agreement dated as of December 15,
2004, by and between TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V. and TFM, S.A.
de C.V. (Containers) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.33 of the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
Rail Transportation Agreement dated as of December 15,
2004, by and between TMM Logistics, S.A. de C.V. and TFM, S.A.
de C.V.
(RoadRailerstm)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 of the Annual
Report on
Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
6
|
.1*
|
|
Computation of earnings per share under IFRS
|
|
7
|
.1*
|
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charge under IFRS
|
|
8
|
.1*
|
|
List of Main Subsidiaries
|
|
12
|
.1*
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
12
|
.2*
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
13
|
.1*
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
13
|
.2*
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
147
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing this annual report on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized this annual report to
be signed on our behalf by the undersigned to sign this annual
report on its behalf.
GRUPO TMM, S.A.B.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jacinto
Marina Cortes
|
Jacinto Marina Cortes
Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 30, 2008
148