10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

- OR -

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-31553

CME GROUP INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	36-4459170
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
20 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois	60606
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(312) 930-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of October 21, 2009 was as follows: 66,519,078 shares of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 625 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-1, $0.01 par value; 813 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-2, $0.01 par value; 1,287 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-3, $0.01 par value; and 413 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-4, $0.01 par value.

CME GROUP INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	7
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	7
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008	8
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008	9
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008	11
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	13
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	36
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		38
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	38
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
Item 6.	Exhibits	40
SIGNATURES		41

2

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

On August 22, 2008, NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (NYMEX Holdings) merged into CMEG NY Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CME Group Inc. (CME Group). Unless otherwise noted, disclosures of trading volume, revenue and other statistical information include the results of NYMEX Holdings beginning on August 23, 2008.

Certain Terms

Throughout this document, unless otherwise specified or if the context otherwise requires:

• “CME Group” refers to CME Group Inc. comprised of (1) CME Holdings and its subsidiaries prior to the completion of the merger between CME Holdings and CBOT Holdings, which occurred on July 12, 2007, (2) the combined company of CME Holdings and CBOT Holdings and their respective subsidiaries after July 12, 2007 and (3) the combined company of CME Holdings, CBOT Holdings and NYMEX Holdings as well as their respective subsidiaries after August 22, 2008;

• “CME Holdings” refers to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., which was the surviving corporation in its merger with CBOT Holdings and which was renamed CME Group Inc. in connection with the merger;

• “CME” refers to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CME Group;

• “CBOT Holdings” refers to CBOT Holdings, Inc.;

• “CBOT” refers to Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBOT Holdings and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CME Group on July 12, 2007;

• “NYMEX Holdings” refers to NYMEX Holdings, Inc.;

• “NYMEX” refers to New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. and, unless otherwise indicated also refers to its subsidiary, Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX), which were wholly-owned subsidiaries of NYMEX Holdings and became subsidiaries of CME Group on August 22, 2008 when NYMEX Holdings merged into CMEG NY Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CME Group, which was renamed CMEG NYMEX Holdings Inc.;

• “Exchange” refers to CME, CBOT and NYMEX, collectively; and

• “We,” “us” and “our” refers to CME Group and its consolidated subsidiaries, collectively.

3

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

From time to time, in written reports and oral statements, we discuss our expectations regarding future performance. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions, including references to assumptions. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data, current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. We want to caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Among the factors that might affect our performance are:

• our ability to realize the benefits and control the costs of our acquisition of NYMEX Holdings and our ability to successfully integrate the businesses of CME Group and NYMEX Holdings, including the fact that such integration may be more difficult, time consuming or costly than expected and revenues following the transaction may be lower than expected and expected cost savings from the transaction may not be fully realized within the expected time frames or at all;

• increasing competition by foreign and domestic entities, including increased competition from new entrants into our markets and consolidation of existing entities;

• our ability to keep pace with rapid technological developments, including our ability to complete the development and implementation of the enhanced functionality required by our customers;

• our ability to continue introducing competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis, including through our electronic trading capabilities, and our ability to maintain the competitiveness of our existing products and services;

• our ability to adjust our fixed costs and expenses if our revenues decline;

• our ability to continue to generate revenues from our processing services;

• our ability to maintain existing customers, develop strategic relationships and attract new customers;

• our ability to expand and offer our products in foreign jurisdictions;

• changes in domestic and foreign regulations;

• changes in government policy, including policies relating to common or directed clearing, changes as a result of a harmonization of the regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), or changes relating to the enacted or proposed legislation relating to the current economic crisis;

• the costs associated with protecting our intellectual property rights and our ability to operate our business without violating the intellectual property rights of others;

• our ability to generate revenue from our market data that may be reduced or eliminated by the growth of electronic trading or declines in subscriptions;

• changes in our rate per contract due to shifts in the mix of the products traded, the trading venue and the mix of customers (whether the customer receives member or non-member fees or participates in one of our various incentive programs) and the impact of our tiered pricing structure;

4

• the ability of our financial safeguards package to adequately protect us from the credit risks of clearing members;

• the ability of our compliance and risk management methods to effectively monitor and manage our risks;

• changes in price levels and volatility in the derivatives markets and in underlying fixed income, equity, foreign exchange and commodities markets;

• economic, political and market conditions, including the recent volatility of the capital and credit markets and the impact of current economic conditions on the trading activity of our current and potential customers;

• our ability to accommodate increases in trading volume and order transaction traffic without failure or degradation of the performance of our systems;

• our ability to execute our growth strategy and maintain our growth effectively;

• our ability to manage the risks and control the costs associated with our acquisition, investment and alliance strategy;

• our ability to continue to generate funds and/or manage our indebtedness to allow us to continue to invest in our business;

• industry and customer consolidation;

• decreases in trading and clearing activity;

• the imposition of a transaction tax on futures and options on futures transactions;

• the unfavorable resolution of material legal proceedings;

• the seasonality of the futures business; and

• changes in the regulation of our industry with respect to speculative trading in commodity interests and derivative contracts.

For a detailed discussion of these and other factors that might affect our performance, see Item 1A. of this Report as well as Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009.

The Globe logo, CME, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, CME Group, Globex and E-mini, are trademarks of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. CBOT and Chicago Board of Trade are trademarks of Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. NYMEX, New York Mercantile Exchange and ClearPort are trademarks of New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Further information about CME Group and its products can be found at http://www.cmegroup.com. Information made available on our web site does not constitute a part of this Report.

TRAKRS, Total Return Asset Contracts, are exchange-traded non-traditional futures contracts designed to provide market exposure to various market-based indexes which trade electronically on the CME Globex electronic platform. Clearing and transaction fees on these products are minimal relative to other products. Unless otherwise noted, disclosures of trading volume and average rate per contract exclude our TRAKRS products.

5

In August 2006, we acquired Swapstream, a London-based electronic trading platform for interest rate swaps. Disclosures of trading volume and average rate per contract exclude these products.

Hurricane Risk Landfall Options (HuRLOs) are European style call options on whether, and where, a hurricane first makes landfall on the U.S. Coast. Unless otherwise noted, disclosures of trading volume and average rate per contract exclude our HuRLO products.

All references to “options” or “options contracts” in the text of this document refer to options on futures contracts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to CME Group products include references to exchange-traded products on one of its regulated exchanges (CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX). Products listed in these exchanges are subject to the rules and regulations of the particular exchange and the applicable rulebook should be consulted.

6

Item 1. Financial Statements

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	204.1		$	297.9
Collateral from securities lending, at fair value		—			426.9
Marketable securities, including pledged securities of $50.0 and $283.8		93.7			310.1
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2.0 and $1.8		264.0			234.0
Other current assets		119.6			189.1
Cash performance bonds and security deposits		6,824.8			17,653.5
Total current assets		7,506.2			19,111.5
Property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $525.8 and $479.5		726.9			707.2
Intangible assets – trading products		16,982.0			16,982.0
Intangible assets – other, net		3,277.1			3,369.4
Goodwill		7,549.3			7,519.2
Other assets		478.1			469.4
Total Assets	$	36,519.6		$	48,158.7
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	36.1		$	71.0
Payable under securities lending agreements		—			456.8
Short-term debt		299.7			249.9
Other current liabilities		157.8			211.8
Cash performance bonds and security deposits		6,824.8			17,653.5
Total current liabilities		7,318.4			18,643.0
Long-term debt		2,239.3			2,966.1
Deferred tax liabilities, net		7,669.9			7,728.3
Other liabilities		161.7			132.7
Total Liabilities		17,389.3			29,470.1
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 9,860 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—
Series A junior participating preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 140 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 66,400 and 66,417 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		0.7			0.7
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, 3 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		17,144.4			17,128.5
Retained earnings		2,113.9			1,719.7
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(128.7	)		(160.3	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		19,130.3			18,688.6
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	36,519.6		$	48,158.7

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues
Clearing and transaction fees	$	540.6		$	558.7		$	1,605.2		$	1,542.3
Quotation data fees		81.4			75.7			249.0			192.3
Processing services		0.1			17.9			0.3			53.9
Access and communication fees		11.4			10.9			34.5			32.2
Other		16.9			17.7			56.3			48.5
Total Revenues		650.4			680.9			1,945.3			1,869.2
Expenses
Compensation and benefits		87.3			84.5			262.0			231.4
Communications		11.5			11.5			35.5			39.1
Technology support services		11.3			11.9			34.7			47.0
Professional fees and outside services		17.9			17.0			61.9			47.8
Amortization of purchased intangibles		30.7			29.1			94.5			63.2
Depreciation and amortization		32.3			34.1			93.4			102.9
Occupancy and building operations		19.1			18.9			57.3			52.9
Licensing and other fee agreements		21.2			19.3			67.5			44.8
Restructuring		0.6			0.1			5.2			2.1
Other		17.1			33.8			46.7			73.7
Total Expenses		249.0			260.2			758.7			704.9
Operating Income		401.4			420.7			1,186.6			1,164.3
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
Investment income		10.5			18.0			22.4			41.4
Impairment of long-term investment		(22.4	)		—			(22.4	)		—
Gains (losses) on derivative investments		—			7.4			—			(7.8	)
Securities lending interest income		—			8.6			2.8			32.2
Securities lending interest and other costs		—			(28.9	)		(0.1	)		(48.2	)
Interest and other borrowing costs		(32.1	)		(17.9	)		(103.2	)		(21.6	)
Guarantee of exercise right privileges		—			8.0			—			12.8
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries		(1.6	)		(20.0	)		(4.5	)		(27.9	)
Other income (expense)		—			0.1			(0.4	)		(8.4	)
Total Non-Operating Income (Expense)		(45.6	)		(24.7	)		(105.4	)		(27.5	)
Income before Income Taxes		355.8			396.0			1,081.2			1,136.8
Income tax provision		153.5			227.3			458.0			483.4
Net Income	$	202.3		$	168.7		$	623.2		$	653.4
Earnings per Common Share:
Basic	$	3.05		$	2.82		$	9.39		$	11.66
Diluted		3.04			2.81			9.37			11.61
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares:
Basic		66,384			59,870			66,339			56,054
Diluted		66,573			60,086			66,514			56,302

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

8

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Class A Common Stock (Shares)		Class B Common Stock (Shares)	Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008	66,417		3	$	17,129.2		$	1,719.7		$	(160.3	)	$	18,688.6
Comprehensive income:
Net income								623.2						623.2
Change in net unrealized loss on securities, net of tax of $16.3											25.2			25.2
Change in net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans, net of tax of $0.9											(1.4	)		(1.4	)
Change in net unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax of $2.8											4.4			4.4
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $2.2											3.4			3.4
Total comprehensive income														654.8
Cash dividends on common stock of $3.45 per share								(229.0	)					(229.0	)
Repurchase of Class A common stock	(139	)			(27.0	)								(27.0	)
Exercise of stock options	92				15.2									15.2
Excess tax benefits from option exercises and restricted stock vesting					1.0									1.0
Vesting of restricted Class A common stock	16
Shares issued to Board of Directors	12				2.4									2.4
Shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan	2				0.7									0.7
Stock-based compensation					23.6									23.6
Balance at September 30, 2009	66,400		3	$	17,145.1		$	2,113.9		$	(128.7	)	$	19,130.3

9

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Class A Common Stock (Shares)		Class B Common Stock (Shares)	Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2007	53,278		3	$	10,689.3		$	1,619.4		$	(3.1	)	$	12,305.6
Comprehensive income:
Net income								653.4						653.4
Change in net unrealized gain on securities, net of tax of $7.7											(10.9	)		(10.9	)
Change in net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans, net of tax of $0.2											0.4			0.4
Net unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax of $0.5											(0.8	)		(0.8	)
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $4.1											(6.1	)		(6.1	)
Total comprehensive income														636.0
Cash dividends on common stock of $8.45 per share								(538.4	)					(538.4	)
Class A common stock issued in exchange for BM&FBovespa SA stock	1,189				631.4									631.4
Class A common stock issued in NYMEX Holdings merger, including vested stock options, restricted stock units and issuance costs	12,566				5,963.3									5,963.3
Tax benefit of stock issuance costs related to CBOT Holdings merger					6.4									6.4
Repurchase of Class A common stock	(62	)			(24.0	)								(24.0	)
Exercise of stock options	106				11.4									11.4
Excess tax benefits from option exercises and restricted stock vesting					7.6									7.6
Vesting of issued restricted Class A common stock	6
Shares issued to Board of Directors	5				2.5									2.5
Shares issued under Employee Stock Purchase Plan	2				0.7									0.7
Stock-based compensation					26.3									26.3
Balance at September 30, 2008	67,090		3	$	17,314.9		$	1,734.4		$	(20.5	)	$	19,028.8

10

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	623.2		$	653.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		23.6			26.3
Amortization of shares issued to Board of Directors		1.9			1.7
Amortization of purchased intangibles		94.5			63.2
Depreciation and amortization		93.4			102.9
Recognition of in-process research and development acquired from Credit Market Analysis Limited		—			3.7
Allowance for doubtful accounts		0.2			0.6
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on marketable securities		(2.6	)		(0.2	)
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of debt financing costs		11.6			2.2
Loss on sale of metals trading products		—			2.8
Net loss on derivative investments		—			7.8
Impairment of securities lending assets		—			21.7
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets		—			14.1
Impairment of long-term investment		22.4			—
Guarantee of exercise right privileges		—			(12.8	)
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries		4.5			27.9
Deferred income taxes		(28.9	)		(32.2	)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(30.2	)		(25.9	)
Other current assets		(8.4	)		60.1
Other assets		(7.6	)		(16.7	)
Accounts payable		(34.9	)		6.1
Income taxes payable		1.7			22.9
Other current liabilities		(56.2	)		(91.3	)
Other liabilities		29.6			24.4
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		737.8			862.7
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities		389.1			254.1
Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities		(159.9	)		(168.4	)
Net change in NYMEX securities lending program investments		425.9			119.3
Purchases of property, net		(112.9	)		(119.4	)
Acquisition of Credit Market Analysis Limited, net of cash received		—			(94.2	)
Acquisition of NYMEX Holdings, Inc., net of cash received		—			(2,769.9	)
NYMEX membership rights payments		—			(612.0	)
Merger-related transaction costs		—			(17.5	)
Purchase of derivative related to BM&FBovespa SA investment		—			(45.2	)
Proceeds from sale of metals trading products		—			15.0
Capital contributions to FXMarketSpace Limited		(2.8	)		(7.2	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		539.4			(3,445.4	)

11

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds (repayments) of commercial paper, net	$	(1,168.8	)	$	1,035.0
Proceeds from other borrowings, net of issuance costs		743.5			2,883.9
Repayment of other borrowings		(250.0	)		(1,282.9	)
Net change in NYMEX securities lending program liabilities		(456.8	)		(119.3	)
Cash dividends		(229.0	)		(202.7	)
Repurchase of Class A common stock, including costs		(27.0	)		(14.2	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		15.2			11.4
Excess tax benefits from option exercises and restricted stock vesting		1.2			7.9
Proceeds from Employee Stock Purchase Plan		0.7			0.7
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		(1,371.0	)		2,319.8
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(93.8	)		(262.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		297.9			845.3
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	204.1		$	582.4
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income taxes paid	$	469.6		$	459.6
Interest paid (excluding securities lending program)		88.2			6.9
Non-cash investing activities:
Change in net unrealized securities gains (losses)		41.5			(18.6	)
Change in net unrealized derivatives gains (losses)		7.2			(1.3	)
Non-cash financing activities:
Fair value of Class A common stock, stock options and restricted stock units issued in connection with NYMEX Holdings merger		—			5,963.3
Fair value of Class A common stock issued in exchange for BM&FBovespa SA stock		—			631.4
Dividends declared but unpaid on Class A common stock		—			335.7

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

12

CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation

CME Group Inc. (CME Group) acquired Credit Market Analysis Limited, a private company incorporated in the United Kingdom, and its three subsidiaries (collectively, CMA) on March 23, 2008. The financial statements and accompanying notes presented in this report include the financial results of CMA beginning on March 24, 2008.

On August 22, 2008, CME Group completed its merger with NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (NYMEX Holdings). The financial statements and accompanying notes presented in this report include the financial results of the former NYMEX Holdings and its subsidiaries beginning on August 23, 2008.

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CME Group without audit. Certain notes and other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted.

The consolidated financial statements consist of CME Group and its subsidiaries (collectively, the company), including Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (CBOT), New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) and their respective subsidiaries (collectively, the exchange). In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in CME Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2, 2009.

2. Business Combinations

Effective August 22, 2008, CME Group completed its merger with NYMEX Holdings. The company entered into this merger primarily as a means to expand its product base, further leverage its existing operating model, extend its presence in the over-the-counter market and better position itself to compete on a global scale.

Under purchase accounting, CME Group is considered the acquirer of NYMEX Holdings. The purchase price consists of the following (in millions):

Acquisition of NYMEX Holdings’ outstanding common stock:
In exchange for CME Group’s Class A common stock	$	5,931.2
In exchange for cash		3,412.6
Fair value of NYMEX Holdings’ stock options and restricted stock units assumed		43.7
Merger-related transaction costs		51.8
Total Purchase Price	$	9,439.3

Acquisition of common stock. Pursuant to the merger agreement, NYMEX Holdings’ shareholders elected to receive cash, stock or a combination thereof as consideration for their shares. The aggregate consideration included a mandatory cash component equal to the product of NYMEX Holdings’ common stock outstanding at August 22, 2008 and $36.00 per share. Based on the election for cash and stock as subject to the mandatory cash requirement, CME Group issued 12.5 million shares of Class A common stock to NYMEX Holdings’ shareholders. The share price of $473 used to calculate the fair value of stock issued was based on the average closing price of CME Group’s Class A common stock for the five-day period beginning two trading days before and ending two trading days after March 17, 2008 (the merger announcement date).

Fair value of stock options and restricted stock units assumed. At the close of the merger, NYMEX Holdings had 1,412,000 stock options and 188,700 restricted stock units outstanding. Each stock option and restricted stock unit was converted using an exchange ratio of 0.2378 derived from the allocation of cash and stock consideration to the shareholders in accordance with the merger agreement.

13

The fair value of the stock options was determined using a share price of $342, the closing price of CME Group’s Class A common stock on August 21, 2008. The fair value of stock options was calculated using a Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions: expected lives of 0.1 to 4.9 years; risk-free interest rates of 1.7% to 3.0%; expected volatility of 45%; and a dividend yield of 1.3%. The portion of the fair value of unvested stock options related to future service was allocated to deferred stock-based compensation and is still being amortized over the remaining vesting period.

Merger-related transaction costs. These include costs incurred by CME Group for investment banking fees, legal and accounting fees, and other external costs directly related to the merger.

Final purchase price allocation. The purchase price has been allocated to NYMEX Holdings’ net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of August 22, 2008.

(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	642.7
Other current assets		794.6
Property and equipment		260.6
Intangible assets		10,664.6
Other non-current assets		130.2
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		(726.7	)
Restructuring liabilities		(39.1	)
Membership rights payments		(612.0	)
Long-term deferred tax liabilities, net		(4,026.7	)
Other non-current liabilities		(125.3	)
Deferred stock-based compensation		10.7
Total Tangible and Intangible Assets and Liabilities		6,973.6
Goodwill		2,465.7
Total Purchase Price	$	9,439.3

The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The intangible assets and goodwill acquired are not deductible for tax purposes except for a small portion of goodwill attributable to merger-related transaction costs.

Pre-merger contingencies. The company has not identified any material unrecorded pre-merger contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable.

Pro forma results. The following unaudited condensed pro forma consolidated income statements assume that the NYMEX Holdings merger was completed as of January 1, 2007. Pro forma results have been prepared as of the beginning of the year prior to the date of the merger in accordance with SEC guidelines.

(in millions, expect per share data)	Quarter Ended September 30, 2008			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Total Revenues	$	794.4		$	2,383.9
Total Expenses		339.2			925.7
Total Non-Operating Income (Expense)		(55.8	)		(111.4	)
Net Income		168.1			759.3
Earnings per Common Share:
Basic		2.51			11.36
Diluted		2.50			11.32

This pro forma information has been prepared for comparative purposes only and is not intended to be indicative of past or future results. The pro forma information for the periods presented includes purchase accounting effects on historical NYMEX Holdings’ operating results, amortization of purchased intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense for unvested stock options as well as the impact of NYMEX’s membership rights payments on investment income. Results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008 include NYMEX Holdings’ merger-related transaction costs of approximately $43.6 million and $52.7 million, respectively.

14

3. Performance Bonds and Security Deposits

CME maintains performance bond and security deposit requirements for futures and options traded on or cleared through CME, CBOT, NYMEX or other exchange marketplaces, as well as for over-the-counter (OTC) products listed for clearing only. Each firm that clears futures, options and OTC products is required to deposit acceptable collateral and maintain specified performance bonds and security deposits principally in the form of cash, funds deposited in the various Interest Earning Facility programs, U.S. government and certain foreign government securities, bank letters of credit, shares of specific U.S. equity securities or gold. Clearing firm positions executed in CME, CBOT and NYMEX exchange marketplaces and cleared-only contracts are subject to the guarantee of CME. Each clearing firm’s positions are separately accounted for in regulated and non-regulated accounts, for which performance bond and security deposit requirements are calculated. Performance bonds and security deposits are available to meet the financial obligations of that clearing firm to CME. In the event that performance bonds and security deposits of a defaulting clearing firm are inadequate to fulfill that clearing firm’s outstanding financial obligation, the entire security deposit fund is available to cover potential losses after first utilizing operating funds of CME in excess of amounts needed for normal operations. Cash performance bonds and security deposits may fluctuate due to the investment choices available to clearing firms and the change in the amount of deposit required. As a result, these offsetting liabilities may vary significantly over time.

In addition, the rules and regulations of CBOT require certain minimum financial requirements for delivery of physical commodities. To satisfy these requirements, CBOT clearing firms must deposit collateral with CME in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury securities or letters of credit.

CME accounts for its guarantee of contract settlement in accordance with current accounting guidance. CME marks to market all open positions at least twice a day and requires payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and makes payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value. Under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses, the maximum exposure related to CME’s guarantee would be approximately one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions, before considering CME’s ability to access defaulting firms’ performance bond and security deposit balances as well as other available resources. During the first nine months of 2009, CME transferred an average of approximately $3.1 billion a day through its clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions have lost value to clearing firms whose positions have gained value. CME reduces its guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory security deposits. The company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at September 30, 2009.

15

4. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible assets consisted of the following at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	September 30, 2009									December 31, 2008
(in millions)	Cost			Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value			Cost			Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
Amortizable Intangible Assets:
Clearing firm, market data and other customer relationships	$	2,842.5		$	(161.9	)	$	2,680.6		$	2,842.5		$	(90.3	)	$	2,752.2
Lease-related intangibles		83.2			(18.7	)		64.5			83.2			(9.9	)		73.3
Dow Jones licensing agreement		74.0			(14.9	)		59.1			74.0			(9.9	)		64.1
Technology-related intellectual property		28.4			(7.4	)		21.0			28.4			(3.9	)		24.5
Open interest		12.3			(12.3	)		—			12.3			(9.5	)		2.8
Market maker agreement		9.7			(5.5	)		4.2			9.7			(4.3	)		5.4
Other (a)		3.6			(2.3	)		1.3			3.9			(1.8	)		2.1
		3,053.7			(223.0	)		2,830.7			3,054.0			(129.6	)		2,924.4
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(7.1	)		(0.8	)		(7.9	)		(9.4	)		0.3			(9.1	)
Total Amortizable Intangible Assets	$	3,046.6		$	(223.8	)	$	2,822.8		$	3,044.6		$	(129.3	)	$	2,915.3
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets:
Trading products							$	16,982.0								$	16,982.0
Trade names								452.1									452.1
Other (b)								2.6									2.6
								17,436.7									17,436.7
Foreign currency translation adjustments								(0.4	)								(0.6	)
Total Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets								17,436.3									17,436.1
Total Intangible Assets							$	20,259.1								$	20,351.4

(a) At September 30, 2009, other amortizable intangible assets consist of non-compete and service agreements. At December 31, 2008, other amortizable intangible assets consist primarily of non-compete and service agreements and trade names with limited lives.

(b) At September 30, 2009, other indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of products in development. At December 31, 2008, other indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of products in development and a regulatory license.

Total amortization expense for intangible assets was $30.7 million and $29.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total amortization expense for intangible assets was $94.5 million and $63.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the future estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets is expected to be:

(in millions)
Remainder of 2009	$	30.6
2010		121.8
2011		121.6
2012		116.5
2013		110.8
2014		109.2
Thereafter		2,212.3

16

Goodwill activity consisted of the following for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008:

(in millions)	Balance at December 31, 2008		Acquisitions		Impairment Adjustment			Other Activity (c)			Balance at September 30, 2009
CBOT Holdings	$	5,036.1	$	—	$	—		$	(0.4	)	$	5,035.7
NYMEX Holdings		2,436.7		—		—			26.6			2,463.3
CMA		46.4		—		—			3.9			50.3
Total Goodwill	$	7,519.2	$	—	$	—		$	30.1		$	7,549.3
(in millions)	Balance at January 1, 2008		Acquisitions		Impairment Adjustment			Other Activity (c)			Balance at December 31, 2008
CBOT Holdings	$	5,037.3	$	—	$	—		$	(1.2	)	$	5,036.1
NYMEX Holdings		—		2,438.9		—			(2.2	)		2,436.7
CMA		—		60.6		—			(14.2	)		46.4
Swapstream		11.9		—		(11.9	)		—			—
Total Goodwill	$	5,049.2	$	2,499.5	$	(11.9	)	$	(17.6	)	$	7,519.2

(c) Other activity consists primarily of adjustments to restructuring costs and tax contingencies for CBOT Holdings and NYMEX Holdings, the recognition of excess tax benefits upon exercise of stock options assumed for CBOT Holdings and NYMEX Holdings, and foreign currency translation adjustments for CMA.

In 2008, the company recorded a $3.2 million and an $11.9 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying amounts of Swapstream intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, to their estimated fair values based on the results of an annual impairment test.

The company conducts goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing at least annually. The company is required to consider a market participant’s perspective when developing the assumptions used to estimate fair value for its impairment tests. It may be possible that the estimated fair value of certain intangible assets and goodwill may be less than net book value when impairment testing is performed in the future. As a result, the company would be required to record an impairment charge at that time.

5. Long-Term Investments

As part of its merger with NYMEX Holdings in August 2008, the company acquired an approximately 15% ownership interest in IMAREX ASA (IMAREX). The investment in IMAREX is accounted for as available for sale and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2009, the company assessed its investment in IMAREX for other-than-temporary impairment and recognized an impairment charge of $22.4 million due to an extended and significant decline in the market value of IMAREX’s stock. At September 30, 2009, the carrying value of the investment after recognizing impairment was $19.0 million.

6. Debt

Debt consisted of the following:

(in millions)	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Short-term debt:
$250 million floating rate notes due August 2009, interest equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 0.20%, reset quarterly(1)	$	—	$	249.9
$300 million floating rate notes due August 2010, interest equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset quarterly(2)		299.7		—
Total short-term debt	$	299.7	$	249.9
Long-term debt:
$300 million floating rate notes due August 2010, interest equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 0.65%, reset quarterly(2)	$	—	$	299.5
Term loan due 2011, interest equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 1%, reset quarterly(3)		420.5		420.5
$750 million fixed rate notes due August 2013, interest equal to 5.40%		747.9		747.5
$750 million fixed rate notes due February 2014, interest equal to 5.75%		746.0		—
Commercial paper (4)		324.9		1,498.6
Total long-term debt	$	2,239.3	$	2,966.1

(1) In October 2008, the company entered into an interest-rate swap agreement that modified the variable interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.12% beginning with the interest accrued after November 6, 2008.

(2) In September 2008, the company entered into an interest-rate swap agreement that modified the variable interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.92% beginning with the interest accrued after November 6, 2008.

(3) In September 2008, the company entered into an interest-rate swap agreement that modified the variable interest obligation associated with this facility so that the interest payable effectively became fixed at a rate of 4.72% beginning with the interest accrued after October 22, 2008.

(4) At December 31, 2008, this was the portion of commercial paper backed by the three-year senior credit facility and the 364-day revolving bridge facility. Commercial paper backed by the revolving bridge facility was repaid in February 2009 with the net proceeds from the 5.75% fixed rate notes due February 2014. At September 30, 2009, this represented commercial paper backed by the three-year senior credit facility.

Commercial paper notes with an aggregate par value of $6.0 billion and maturities ranging from 1 to 94 days were issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The weighted average discount rates for commercial paper outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were 0.22% and 2.61%, respectively. During the first nine

17

months of 2009 and 2008, the weighted average balance, at par value, of commercial paper outstanding was $677.4 million and $271.0 million, respectively.

Long-term debt maturities, at par value, were as follows as of September 30, 2009:

(in millions)
2011	$	745.5
2012		—
2013		750.0
2014		750.0

Commercial paper is considered to mature in 2011 because it is backed by the three-year senior credit facility, which expires in 2011.

On September 30, 2009, the three-year senior credit facility was amended, at the company’s request, to reduce the aggregate amount of revolving commitments available from $995.0 million to $945.5 million and to reduce the minimum required amount of each request for an increase in revolving commitments from $25.0 million to $10.0 million.

At September 30, 2009, the fair values of the $750.0 million fixed rate notes due 2013 and the $750.0 million fixed rate notes due 2014 were approximately $806.5 million and $822.7 million, respectively. Fair value was estimated using quoted market prices.

7. Restructuring

CBOT

In August 2007, subsequent to its merger with CBOT Holdings, the company approved and initiated plans to restructure its operations in order to eliminate redundant costs and improve operational efficiencies. Restructuring efforts include reductions in employee positions, the closure of duplicate facilities and consolidation of trading and other technologies. Total estimated restructuring costs of $29.6 million consist primarily of severance and transitional payments and contract termination penalties. Payments for restructuring costs related to the merger with CBOT Holdings were substantially complete by July 2008 from its inception. Through September 30, 2009, the company recorded restructuring expense of $11.2 million under this plan from its inception.

NYMEX

In October 2008, subsequent to its merger with NYMEX Holdings, the company approved and initiated plans to restructure its operations in order to eliminate redundant costs and improve operational efficiencies. Restructuring efforts include reductions in employee positions and consolidation of trading and other technologies.

Total estimated restructuring costs of $47.3 million consist primarily of severance and transitional payments and contract termination payments. Payments for restructuring costs related to the merger with NYMEX Holdings were substantially complete by August 2009. Costs of $39.1 million were recognized as a liability in the allocation of NYMEX Holdings’ purchase price, and accordingly, have resulted in an increase to goodwill. In addition to costs recognized in purchase accounting, costs of $8.2 million have been or are expected to be recognized as restructuring expense over the service period required from transitional employees. Through September 30, 2009, the company recorded restructuring expense of $7.8 million under this plan from its inception.

The following is a summary of restructuring activity (in millions):

	Planned Restructuring Costs		Interest on Deferred Payments		Accrued to Date		Total Cash Payments			Liability at September 30, 2009		Total Expected Payments
Severance and related costs - CBOT	$	21.2	$	0.1	$	21.3	$	(21.1	)	$	0.2	$	21.4
Severance and related costs - NYMEX		36.7		—		36.7		(33.9	)		2.8		37.1
Contract terminations - CBOT		7.9		0.3		8.2		(8.2	)		—		8.2
Contract terminations- NYMEX		10.2		—		10.2		(10.2	)		—		10.2
Total Restructuring	$	76.0	$	0.4	$	76.4	$	(73.4	)	$	3.0	$	76.9

18

Restructuring expense may change as the company executes its approved plans. Future increases in estimates will be recorded as an adjustment to operating expenses. Future decreases in estimates that were recognized as liabilities through the allocation of purchase price will continue to be recorded as adjustments to goodwill.

8. Contingencies

Legal Matters. There were two purported class action complaints pending against the former NYMEX Holdings, the former NYMEX Holdings board of directors and CME Group in the Delaware Court of Chancery related to the merger between CME Group and NYMEX Holdings. One of the class actions was brought on behalf of the former NYMEX Holdings’ shareholders and the second class action was brought on behalf of the NYMEX Class A members. On September 30, 2009, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the shareholders’ and the NYMEX Class A members’ complaints. The court’s decision remains subject to appeal.

On October 14, 2003, the U.S. Futures Exchange, L.L.C. (Eurex U.S.) and U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc., filed suit against CBOT and CME in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The suit alleges that CBOT and CME violated the antitrust laws and tortiously interfered with the business relationship and contract between Eurex U.S. and The Clearing Corporation. Eurex U.S. and U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. are seeking a preliminary injunction and treble damages. On December 12, 2003, CBOT and CME filed separate motions to dismiss or, in the event the motion to dismiss is denied, to move the venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On September 2, 2004, the judge granted CBOT’s and CME’s motions to transfer venue to the Northern District of Illinois. In light of that decision, the judge did not rule on the motions to dismiss. On March 25, 2005, Eurex U.S. filed a second amended complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On June 6, 2005, CME and CBOT filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On August 25, 2005, the judge denied the joint CME/CBOT motion to dismiss. On April 9, 2007, CME and CBOT filed two joint motions for summary judgment. The parties continue to engage in discovery. Based on its investigation to date and advice from legal counsel, the company believes this suit is without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against these charges.

On August 19, 2008, Fifth Market filed a complaint against CME Group and CME seeking a permanent injunction against CME’s Globex system and enhanced damages for what the plaintiff alleges is willful infringement, in addition to costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. The suit alleges that CME infringes two U.S. patents. Based on its investigation to date and advice from legal counsel, the company believes this suit is without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against these charges.

In addition, the company is a defendant in, and has potential for, various other legal proceedings arising from its regular business activities. While the ultimate results of such proceedings against the company cannot be predicted with certainty, the company believes that the resolution of any of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Employment Agreements. On August 5, 2009, the compensation committee and the board of directors of CME Group approved a revised employment agreement for Craig S. Donohue, the company’s Chief Executive Officer. In the event of a termination under certain circumstances, Mr. Donohue is entitled to a one-time lump sum severance payment equal to two times the sum of his then current base salary plus the amount of his threshold bonus (75% of his current base salary) under the company’s annual bonus incentive plan for that year. Under the terms of his agreement, Mr. Donohue will be entitled to receive a minimum annual base salary of $0.9 million for 2009 and of $1.0 million thereafter during the term of the agreement. This agreement expires on December 31, 2012, unless terminated sooner by the company or Mr. Donohue.

9. Guarantees

Guarantee of Exercise Rights Privileges. On August 23, 2006, CBOT Holdings and CBOT, along with a class consisting of certain CBOT full members, filed a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (CBOE). The lawsuit seeks to enforce and protect the exercise right privileges (ERP). The lawsuit alleges that these ERPs allow CBOT’s full members who hold them to become full members of CBOE and to participate on an equal basis with other members of CBOE in CBOE’s announced plans to demutualize. In July 2009, the court issued its final order approving the terms of the settlement. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, holders of ERPs could submit a claim to participate in the settlement as a Class A or Class B settlement participant until October 14, 2008. Participating Class A members will share in an equity pool equal to 18% of the total common stock issued by CBOE in its

19

demutualization and will share in a cash pool of up to $300.0 million, subject to a cap of $600,000 per individual. Participating Class B members would be paid $250,000 per ERP. The settlement is in the process of being appealed. In connection with the CBOT Holdings merger, the company provided holders of ERPs the option of tendering their ERP to the company for $250,000 payable following the closing of the merger or to participate in the CBOE lawsuit with a guaranteed payment of up to $250,000 from the company if the lawsuit results in a recovery of less than that amount. The maximum possible aggregate payment under the company’s guarantee, assuming that all outstanding ERPs are paid $250,000 by the company, is $293.0 million. The liability under the guarantee, which is recorded at fair value in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, was estimated at $1.2 million at September 30, 2009.

Mutual Offset Agreement. CME and Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) have a mutual offset agreement. The original term of the renewed agreement was through October 2009. The term of the agreement will be successively renewed for one-year periods unless terminated in advance by either party. Pursuant to such renewals, the current term is through October 2010. Under this agreement, CME can maintain collateral in the form of U.S. Treasury securities or irrevocable letters of credit. At September 30, 2009, CME was contingently liable to SGX on irrevocable letters of credit totaling $33.0 million and had pledged securities with a fair value of $50.0 million. Regardless of the collateral, CME guarantees all cleared transactions submitted through SGX and would initiate procedures designed to satisfy these financial obligations in the event of a default, such as the use of performance bonds and security deposits of the defaulting clearing firm.

10. Stock-Based Payments

Total expense for stock-based payments, including shares issued to the board of directors, converted CBOT Holdings options and converted NYMEX Holdings options, was $25.5 million and $28.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income for stock-based payment arrangements was $10.2 million and $11.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In the first nine months of 2009, the company granted employees stock options totaling 173,040 shares under the CME Group Omnibus Stock Plan. The options have a ten-year term with an exercise price ranging from $195 to $332 per share, the closing market prices on the dates of grant. The fair value of these options totaled $20.2 million, measured at the grant dates using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period. The Black-Scholes fair value of the option grant was calculated using the following assumptions: dividend yield ranging from 1.4% to 2.4%; expected volatility ranging from 47% to 49%; risk-free interest rate ranging from 2.4% to 3.2% and expected life ranging from 6.2 to 6.5 years. The grant date weighted average fair value of options granted during the first nine months of 2009 was $117 per share.

In the first nine months of 2009, the company also granted 81,629 shares of restricted Class A common stock which generally have a vesting period of two to five years. The fair value of these grants was $23.2 million, which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period.

11. Fair Value Measurements

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and related disclosures provides direction for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities by defining fair value and establishing a framework for measuring fair value. The guidance creates a three-level hierarchy that establishes classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes.

• Level 1 inputs, which are considered the most reliable evidence of fair value, consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 inputs consist of observable market data, other than Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable.

• Level 3 inputs consist of unobservable inputs which are derived and cannot be corroborated by market data or other entity-specific inputs.

In general, the company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine the fair value of marketable securities, securities lending collateral and equity investments. Level 1 assets generally include U.S. Treasury securities, exchange-traded mutual funds, and publicly-traded equity securities. If quoted prices are not available to determine fair value, the company uses other inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Assets included in

20

Level 2 consist primarily of U.S. Government agency securities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, asset-backed securities and certain corporate bonds. Level 3 assets generally include certain corporate bonds and asset-backed securities. These assets have been valued using valuation models with inputs that are both observable and unobservable. The unobservable inputs used in these models are significant to the fair value of the assets and require management’s judgment.

The company determined the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts, considered Level 2 assets, using standard valuation models with market-based observable inputs including forward and spot exchange rates and interest rate curves.

The fair value of the liability for the guarantee of ERPs is derived using probability-weighted Black-Scholes option values for various scenarios. The liability is included in Level 3 because management uses significant unobservable inputs including probability, expected return and volatility factors to determine the fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to each asset or liability’s fair value measurement.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets at Fair Value:
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	55.1	$	—	$	—	$	55.1
Mutual funds		22.5		—		—		22.5
Corporate bonds		—		0.1		—		0.1
Municipal bonds		—		5.0		—		5.0
Asset-backed securities		—		4.0		—		4.0
U.S. Government agency securities		—		7.0		—		7.0
Total		77.6		16.1		—		93.7
Equity investments		65.5		—		—		65.5
Total Assets at Fair Value	$	143.1	$	16.1	$	—	$	159.2
Liabilities at Fair Value:
Interest rate swap contracts	$	—	$	30.9	$	—	$	30.9
Guarantee of CBOE exercise right privileges		—		—		1.2		1.2
Total Liabilities at Fair Value	$	—	$	30.9	$	1.2	$	32.1

The following is a reconciliation of assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

(in millions)	Asset- Backed Security (1)			Guarantee of CBOE ERP Liability
Fair value of asset (liability) at January 1, 2009	$	1.5		$	(1.2	)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in non-operating income (expense)		1.0			—
Settlements		(2.5	)		—
Fair value of asset (liability) at September 30, 2009	$	—		$	(1.2	)
Total unrealized gains (losses) related to financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009	$	—		$	—

(1) This asset-backed security was transferred from the securities lending program investment portfolio to the marketable securities portfolio during June 2009.

During the first nine months of 2009, CME Group did not record impairment on any assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

21

12. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of common stock outstanding for each reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the increase in shares using the treasury stock method to reflect the impact of an equivalent number of shares of common stock if stock options were exercised and restricted stock awards were converted into common stock. Outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards of approximately 613,000 and 750,000 were anti-dilutive for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Outstanding stock options of approximately 525,000 and 395,000 were anti-dilutive for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. There were no anti-dilutive restricted stock awards for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008. These anti-dilutive shares were not included in the diluted earnings per common share calculations.

Beginning January 1, 2009, a change in accounting guidance requires the use of a two-class method to determine the impact of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards on diluted earnings per common share. The company determined that the impact of using the two-class method is immaterial. If the impact becomes material, the company will change its application of the guidance.

	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Net Income (in millions)	$	202.3	$	168.7	$	623.2	$	653.4
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares (in thousands):
Basic		66,384		59,870		66,339		56,054
Effect of stock options		163		208		150		240
Effect of restricted stock awards		26		8		25		8
Diluted		66,573		60,086		66,514		56,302
Earnings per Common Share:
Basic	$	3.05	$	2.82	$	9.39	$	11.66
Diluted		3.04		2.81		9.37		11.61

13. Subsequent Events

The company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, and has determined that there are no subsequent events that require disclosure other than the following event:

On October 9, 2009, CME amended its 364-day revolving line of credit, which may be used by its clearing house in certain situations. The amended credit agreement extends the termination date from October 9, 2009 to December 9, 2009.

22

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes in this Form 10-Q and CME Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

On March 23, 2008, CME Group acquired Credit Market Analysis Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, CMA). On August 22, 2008, NYMEX Holdings, Inc (NYMEX Holdings) merged with CME Group. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes the financial results of CMA beginning on March 24, 2008, and the financial results of the former NYMEX Holdings beginning August 23, 2008.

References in this discussion and analysis to “we,” “us” and “our” are to CME Group and its consolidated subsidiaries, collectively. References to “exchange” are to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (CBOT), and New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX), collectively.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Financial Highlights

The comparability of our operating results for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 to the same periods in 2008 are significantly impacted by our merger with NYMEX Holdings. In the discussion and analysis that follows, we have quantified the incremental revenue and expense resulting from this transaction wherever such amounts were material and identifiable. While identifiable amounts may provide indications of general trends, the analysis cannot completely address the effects attributable to integration efforts.

The following summarizes significant changes in our financial performance for the periods presented.

	Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)	2009			2008			Change		2009			2008			Change
Total operating revenues	$	650.4		$	680.9		(4	)%	$	1,945.3		$	1,869.2		4	%
Total operating expenses		249.0			260.2		(4	)		758.7			704.9		8
Operating margin		62	%		62	%				61	%		62	%
Non-operating income (expense)	$	(45.6	)	$	(24.7	)	84		$	(105.4	)	$	(27.5	)	n.m.
Effective tax rate		43	%		57	%				42	%		43	%
Net income	$	202.3		$	168.7		20		$	623.2		$	653.4		(5	)
Diluted earnings per common share		3.04			2.81		8			9.37			11.61		(19	)
Cash flows from operating activities										737.8			862.7		(14	)

n.m. not meaningful

• Incremental revenues generated by NYMEX products and services was the primary driver for the increase in operating revenues during the first nine months of 2009. Additional revenues were partially offset by a decrease in overall CME and CBOT trading volume as well as processing services. Our processing service agreement with NYMEX was terminated as a result of our merger. The decrease in operating revenue during the third quarter of 2009 was due to the overall decline in trading volumes. The decline was partially offset by a full quarter of revenue recognized for NYMEX in 2009.

• During the first nine months of 2009, overall increases in operating expenses were attributable largely to increases in amortization of purchased intangibles, compensation and benefits costs as well as licensing and other fee agreements resulting from the merger with NYMEX Holdings. The overall decrease in operating expenses in the third quarter of 2009 was due primarily to the goodwill impairment charge related to our Swapsteam operations in the third quarter of 2008.

• The increase in non-operating expense was due primarily to an increase in interest expense and other borrowing costs resulting from debt issuances in August 2008 and February 2009 and an impairment loss on our investment in IMAREX ASA (IMAREX).

23

• Year to date, our effective tax rate in 2009 was consistent with the same period in 2008. We recorded a charge for the impact of our new combined state and local tax rates in the third quarter of 2008, which was offset by the favorable impact of an Illinois tax law change in the first quarter of 2008.

• During the first nine months of 2009, the decrease in diluted earnings per common share reflected the impact of common stock issuances made in conjunction with the NYMEX Holdings merger as well as the other impacts on net income discussed above.

• The decrease in revenues from CME and CBOT trading products also contributed to a decrease in cash flows from operating activities.

Operating Revenues

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2009		2008		Change		2009		2008		Change
Clearing and transaction fees	$	540.6	$	558.7	(3	)%	$	1,605.2	$	1,542.3	4	%
Quotation data fees		81.4		75.7	8			249.0		192.3	29
Processing services		0.1		17.9	(100	)		0.3		53.9	(99	)
Access and communication fees		11.4		10.9	4			34.5		32.2	7
Other		16.9		17.7	(5	)		56.3		48.5	16
Total Operating Revenues	$	650.4	$	680.9	(4	)	$	1,945.3	$	1,869.2	4

Clearing and Transaction Fees. The decrease in revenues in the third quarter of 2009 was attributable primarily to an overall decline in trading volumes. During the third quarter, the decline in revenues was partially offset by an increase in the average rate per contract as well as incremental volume generated from NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services in the third quarter of 2009 when compared with the third quarter of 2008. During the first nine months of 2009, the increase in revenues is attributable to an increase in the average rate per contract and the incremental trading volume generated by NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services. This increase was partially offset by a decline in CME and CBOT product trading volume in the first nine months of 2009.

Trading Volume

The following table summarizes average daily volume. For comparative purposes, CME, CBOT and NYMEX products have been presented separately. The 2008 average daily volume for NYMEX products has been calculated for the period August 23 through September 30, 2008. All amounts exclude TRAKRS, Swapstream and Hurricane Risk Landfall Option (HuRLO) contracts.

24

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(amounts in thousands)	2009		2008		Change		2009		2008		Change
Products and Services Average Daily Volume:
Interest rate:
CME	2,462		3,082		(20	)%	2,400		3,671		(35	)%
CBOT	1,961		2,948		(34	)	1,823		3,224		(43	)
Equity:
CME	2,516		3,596		(30	)	2,883		3,341		(14	)
CBOT	140		245		(43	)	169		210		(19	)
Foreign exchange:
CME	660		710		(7	)	580		672		(14	)
Commodity and alternative investment:
CME	85		101		(15	)	83		100		(17	)
CBOT	623		722		(14	)	655		801		(18	)
Energy (including CME ClearPort):
NYMEX	1,483		1,490		—		1,476		1,490		(1	)
Metal (including CME ClearPort):
NYMEX	201		268		(25	)	204		268		(24	)
Aggregate Average Daily Volume:
CME	5,723		7,489		(24	)	5,946		7,784		(24	)
CBOT	2,724		3,915		(30	)	2,647		4,235		(37	)
NYMEX	1,684		1,758		(4	)	1,680		1,758		(4	)
Electronic Volume:
CME	4,930		6,426		(23	)	5,111		6,503		(21	)
CBOT	2,281		3,216		(29	)	2,155		3,409		(37	)
NYMEX	1,056		1,054		—		999		1,054		(5	)
Electronic Volume as a Percentage of Total Average
Daily Volume	80	%	81	%			80	%	80	%

n.m. not meaningful

During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, a decrease in interest rate products volume contributed to a decline in overall volume. This decrease in overall volume was partially offset by the incremental volume generated from NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services. In the following discussion on volume, changes in NYMEX and CME ClearPort volumes are calculated using volume for the entire year in 2008. NYMEX and CME ClearPort volumes generated prior to the merger date do not correspond to revenues recognized by CME Group.

Interest Rate Products

The overall decline in interest rate volume was due largely to the credit crisis and the Federal Reserve Bank’s zero interest rate policy for short-term interest rates. We expect to continue to see lower interest rate trading volume in 2009 when compared with 2008 as long as these conditions are present and there are no offsetting events or circumstances.

The following table summarizes average daily volume and changes in average daily volume relative to the same periods in 2008 for our key interest rate products.

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(amounts in thousands)	Average Daily Volume	Change		Average Daily Volume	Change
Eurodollar futures	1,815	(22	)%	1,743	(35	)%
Eurodollar options	645	(14	)	655	(34	)
U.S. Treasury futures and options:
10-Year	938	(26	)	893	(38	)
5-Year	441	(43	)	399	(52	)
30-Year	299	(30	)	287	(40	)
2-Year	216	(39	)	178	(52	)

We believe the decrease in volume for Eurodollar futures and options is attributable to the zero interest rate policy and increased risk aversion following the credit crisis, which have reduced certain customers’ ability or need to assume and maintain positions.

The overall decline in U.S. Treasury note futures and options volume is believed to be caused by the credit crisis, which has resulted in reduced corporate debt issuances, reduced mortgage issuances and refinancing activity, a slowdown in U.S. Treasury cash market trading in the third quarter of 2009 when compared with the third quarter 2008 as well as the Federal Reserve Bank’s purchase of U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, market participants’ need to hedge interest rate risk has been reduced by the current zero interest rate policy.

During the second and third quarter of 2009, overall interest rate product volume has increased relative to the first quarter of 2009. We believe that these increases were due to increasing stability in the macroeconomic climate.

25

Equity Products

During the third quarter of 2009, volume for E-mini S&P 500 contracts decreased by 24% to 2.1 million contracts per day and average daily volume for E-mini NASDAQ 100 contracts declined 35% to 0.3 million contracts. Volumes in the third quarter of 2009 declined as a result of decreased levels of market volatility compared with previous quarters in 2009. Average volatility, as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index, decreased to 25% in the third quarter of 2009 compared with 39% in the first six months of 2009. Additionally, the decline in volume was attributable to the termination of Russell-based contracts. Trading volume for Russell-based contracts averaged 0.2 million per day in the third quarter of 2008.

Year to date, average daily volume for E-mini equity products decreased by 13% to 2.8 million contracts when compared with the same period in 2008. The termination of our license to list Russell-based contracts contributed to the decline in overall E-mini equity volume. Russell-based contracts trading volume averaged 0.3 million contracts per day for the first nine months of 2008. In addition, volume for the E-mini NASDAQ 100 contracts decreased by 27% to an average of 0.3 million contracts per day during the first nine months of 2009. Trading volume for E-mini S&P 500 contracts during the first nine months of 2009 remained consistent with the same period in 2008.

Foreign Exchange Products

We believe that the decline in average daily volume for foreign exchange products during the first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same period in 2008, is due largely to extreme market volatility, convergence of global interest rates and increased risk aversion by market participants resulting from the credit crisis.

The following table summarizes average daily volume and changes in average daily volume relative to the same period in 2008 for our top foreign exchange futures and options products.

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(amounts in thousands)	Average Daily Volume	Change		Average Daily Volume	Change
Euro	227	(13	)%	211	(10	)%
British pound	109	17		94	6
Japanese yen	100	(28	)	91	(36	)
Australian dollar	81	50		60	19
Canadian dollar	69	36		58	13

We attribute the decline in average daily volume in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 for our Euro and Japanese yen products to the convergence of interest rates towards zero between the European, United States and Japanese markets. The growth in trading volume of the British pound, Australian dollar and Canadian dollar is attributable to a divergence between interest rates in the United States and the interest rates in the British, Australian and Canadian markets.

Commodity and Alternative Investment Products

We believe the overall average daily volume for commodity and alternative investments products decreased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 when compared with the same periods in 2008 due largely to a decrease in market volatility and decreased demand for commodity products as a result of the credit crisis. We believe the credit crisis has reduced certain customers’ ability or need to assume and maintain positions.

26

Energy (including CME ClearPort)

Energy products primarily consist of crude oil, natural gas, power and other energy-related exchange-traded contracts and over-the-counter contracts cleared through CME ClearPort. Average daily volume for energy contracts cleared through CME ClearPort increased by 1% and 18% to 0.5 million contracts in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2008 as market participants looked to mitigate counterparty risk on their over-the-counter exposures through central counterparty clearing.

Metal (including CME ClearPort)

Metal products generally include gold, silver and other precious and base metals. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, we believe metal products volume decreased by 24% and 15% to 0.2 million contracts per day, respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2008 due primarily to lower volatility and decreased demand for metal products as a result of the credit crisis.

Average Rate per Contract

An increase in the average rate per contract favorably impacted revenues in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 when compared with the same periods in 2008. All amounts in the following table exclude TRAKRS, Swapstream and HuRLO products.

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009		2008		Change		2009		2008		Change
Total volume (in millions)		648.5		775.6	(16	)%		1,929.4		2,317.3	(17	)%
Clearing and transaction fees (in millions)	$	540.5	$	558.6	(3	)	$	1,605.1	$	1,541.9	4
Average rate per contract	$	0.834	$	0.720	16		$	0.832	$	0.665	25

During the third quarter of 2009, the average rate per contract increased when compared with the same periods in 2008 due to the incremental impact of NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services. The average rates per contract for NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services were $1.495 and $2.304, respectively, in the third quarter of 2009. The average rates per contract for NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services were $1.508 and $2.161, respectively, for the period August 23, 2008 through September 30, 2008. The increase in average rate per contract was partially offset by an increase in member and special program volume as a percentage of total volume to 84% from 82%. Member volume and special program volume earn a lower rate compared with non-member volume.

The average rate per contract increased in the first nine months of 2009 due to the addition of NYMEX products and CME ClearPort services to our existing product line, which had an average rate per contract of $1.537 and $1.992, respectively, in the first nine months of 2009. Additionally, the average rate per contract increased due to a lower portion of CME and CBOT interest rate products as a percentage of total volume compared with CME and CBOT equity products, which have a higher rate per contract. As a percentage of volume, equity products trading volume increased by 6% in the first nine months of 2009, while interest rate products volume decreased by 8% when compared with the same periods in 2008. The increase in average rate per contract during the first nine months of 2009 was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate per contract for E-mini S&P futures and options because incremental volume during the first nine months of 2009 exceeded the fee cap on volume traded on the CME Globex platform.

Volume/Rate Analysis

Average rate per contract is impacted by our rate structure, which includes volume-based incentives; product mix; trading venue, and the percentage of trading volume executed by customers who are members compared with non-member customers. Due to the relationship between average rate per contract and volume, the change in revenues attributable to changes in each is only an approximation. Using the total volume and average rate per contract data provided in the table above, we estimate that clearing and transaction fees revenue increased by $87.9 million due to the increase in average rate per contract and decreased by $106.0 million due to the decline in total volume, resulting in a net decrease in revenues in the third quarter of 2009 of $18.1 million. For the first nine months of 2009, we estimate that clearing and transaction fees revenue increased by $385.8 million due to the increase in average rate per contract and decreased by $322.6 million due to a decline in total volume, resulting in a net increase in revenues of $63.2 million.

27

Concentration of Revenue

We bill a substantial portion of our clearing and transaction fees to our clearing firms. The majority of clearing and transaction fees received from clearing firms represent charges for trades executed and cleared on behalf of their customers. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately 130 clearing firms. Two firms represented 13% and 11% of our clearing and transaction fees revenue in the first nine months of 2009. Should a clearing firm withdraw, we believe that the customer portion of the firm’s trading activity would likely transfer to another clearing firm of the exchange. Therefore, we do not believe we are exposed to significant risk from the loss of revenue received from a particular clearing firm.

Quotation Data Fees. Increases in revenue in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 were due to the following:

	Quarter Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions except monthly fee per device)	2009		2008		Change			2009		2008		Change
Average estimated monthly basic device screen count		404,000		358,000		46,000			420,000		319,000		101,000
Basic device monthly fee per device	$	55	$	55	$	—		$	55	$	55	$	—
Estimated increase in revenues due to an increase in screen counts					$	7.6						$	49.9
Data feed surcharges						0.8							3.9
Vendor licensing fees						0.6							3.4
Vendor audit assessments						(3.7	)						(3.5	)
CME, CBOT and NYMEX services						5.3							53.7
CMA services						0.5							4.2

The increase in revenues was attributable to incremental revenues of $12.5 million and $61.3 million generated from NYMEX services in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2008. Incremental revenues from NYMEX services were partially offset by a decrease in CME and CBOT revenues. Average basic device screen counts for existing CME and CBOT customers declined in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 due primarily to cost-cutting initiatives at customer firms. The decrease in vendor audit assessments in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 was due primarily to $4.4 million of assessments recognized in the third quarter of 2008 related to audits of customer-reported device counts. This represented revenue that would have otherwise been recognized in prior periods.

Effective January 1, 2010, all users of our basic service will pay $61 per month for each basic device.

The two largest resellers of our market data represented approximately 55% of our quotation data fees in the first nine months of 2009. However, we consider exposure to significant risk of revenue loss to be minimal despite this concentration. In the event that one of these vendors no longer subscribes to our market data, we believe the majority of that vendor’s customers would likely subscribe to our market data through another reseller. Additionally, several of our largest institutional customers that utilize services from the two largest resellers report usage and remit payment of quotation data fees directly to us.

Processing Services. The decrease in revenues in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, is attributable to the termination of our prior service agreement with NYMEX as a result of our merger. Our trade matching agreement with NYMEX generated revenues of $10.7 million and $45.7 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, respectively. In addition, we agreed to terminate the operations of FXMarketSpace Limited (FXMS), our joint venture with Reuters, during the third quarter of 2008. As a result, we recognized $6.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 for upfront fees paid by FXMS for clearing and trade matching services that would have otherwise been recognized through January 2012. For the quarter-to-date and year-to-date periods, revenue from services provided to FXMS totaled $7.1 million and $8.1 million, respectively, in 2008.

Access and Communication Fees. The growth in revenues for the first nine months of 2009 when compared with the same period in the prior year was attributable primarily to the ongoing upgrade of customer bandwidth connections and our co-location program. The increase in revenues was partially offset by a decrease in trading floor-related fees resulting from the consolidation of our Chicago trading floors in mid-2008.

Other Revenues. The rental income and associated revenues generated from building operations acquired in our merger with NYMEX Holdings were the primary drivers of the increase in revenues in first nine months of 2009 when compared

28

with the same period in 2008. Total incremental revenues from NYMEX Holdings’ operations were $8.5 million for the first nine months of 2009. In addition, trading revenue generated by GFX Corporation (GFX) increased by $2.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 due to an increase in trading activity during the first quarter of 2009.

In the first nine months of 2009, the increase in revenues was partially offset by a decrease in revenues generated from services provided to our joint ventures of $1.7 million. In the prior year, we recognized revenue for upfront fees received from FXMS for billing and regulatory services of $1.9 million.

Operating Expenses

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2009		2008		Change		2009		2008		Change
Compensation and benefits	$	87.3	$	84.5	3	%	$	262.0	$	231.4	13	%
Communications		11.5		11.5	—			35.5		39.1	(9	)
Technology support services		11.3		11.9	(6	)		34.7		47.0	(26	)
Professional fees and outside services		17.9		17.0	5			61.9		47.8	29
Amortization of purchased intangibles		30.7		29.1	6			94.5		63.2	50
Depreciation and amortization		32.3		34.1	(5	)		93.4		102.9	(9	)
Occupancy and building operations		19.1		18.9	1			57.3		52.9	8
Licensing and other fee agreements		21.2		19.3	10			67.5		44.8	51
Restructuring		0.6		0.1	n.m.			5.2		2.1	153
Other		17.1		33.8	(49	)		46.7		73.7	(37	)
Total Operating Expenses	$	249.0	$	260.2	(4	)	$	758.7	$	704.9	8

n.m. not meaningful

Compensation and Benefits. Increases in expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, consisted of the following:

	Estimated Increase (Decrease)
(dollars in millions)	Quarter to Date			Year to Date
Average headcount	$	5.7		$	25.0
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan		5.7			8.7
Average salaries, benefits and employer taxes		0.3			2.9
Bonus		(1.1	)		(1.7	)
Stock-based compensation		(6.7	)		(2.7	)

• In the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, average headcount increased by 9%, or about 180 employees, and 14%, or about 270 employees, respectively. The increases in headcount were due to the addition of approximately 400 employees in our merger with NYMEX Holdings in August 2008. The increases were partially offset by the impact of our restructuring initiatives. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had approximately 2,250 and 2,340 employees, respectively.

• The increase in our non-qualified deferred compensation plan liability for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009 also contributed to an increase in expense. This impact does not affect net income because of an equal and offsetting change in investment income.

• The increase in average salaries, benefits and employer taxes in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, were attributable primarily to salary increases related to promotions and rising pension and healthcare costs.

• In the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, increases in expense were partially offset by a decrease in bonus expense, when compared with the same periods in 2008, due primarily to a decline in performance relative to our 2009 cash earnings target versus our 2008 performance relative to our 2008 cash earnings target.

• In the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, increases in expense were also offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation due primarily to our decision to delay annual stock grants for 2009 until the third quarter. The additional expense related to the June 2008 grant and the conversion of stock options previously granted to NYMEX Holdings’ employees partially offset the impact of this delay. We expect stock-based compensation expense to increase in the fourth quarter of 2009 due to the September 2009 grant.

29

Communications. The elimination of costs incurred to support our CBOT metals trading products on e-CBOT, CBOT’s legacy electronic trading platform, and improved network efficiencies as a result of the consolidation of trading systems and floor operations in Chicago contributed to a decline in expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008. The decrease was offset by incremental expenses of $1.1 million and $3.9 million generated by NYMEX operations in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively.

Technology Support Services. The decreases in expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, were due largely to the termination of maintenance and service agreements for e-CBOT in July 2008. The declines in expenses were partially offset by incremental expenses generated by NYMEX operations.

Professional Fees and Outside Services. Costs incurred to support various strategic initiatives, including our efforts to provide clearing services for credit default swaps and other over-the-counter products, led to growth in expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009. The increases in expenses were also attributable to legal fees and consulting services as well as other outside services associated with our merger integration efforts.

Amortization of Purchased Intangibles. The additional expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, were due to the amortization of intangible assets acquired in our merger with NYMEX Holdings, which was completed in August 2008. The increase was partially offset by the write-off of our Swapstream intangible assets in the third quarter of 2008, which resulted in less amortization expense in subsequent periods.

Depreciation and Amortization. Declines in expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, were attributable primarily to trading floor consolidation and systems integration in prior periods. The decreases were partially offset by incremental depreciation expense related to assets acquired in our merger with NYMEX Holdings in August 2008.

Property additions are summarized below. Technology-related assets include purchases of computers and related equipment, software, the cost of developing internal use software and the build-out of our data centers. The decline in total property additions as well as technology-related assets as a percentage of total additions during the third quarter of 2009, when compared with the same period in 2008, is due primarily to completion of the initial phase of our new data center which was placed into service in August 2009. Approximately $82.1 million of assets related to the new data center were placed into service with estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 39 years.

	Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Change		2009			2008			Change
Total property additions, including landlord-funded leasehold improvements	$	33.9		$	42.2		(20	)%	$	112.9		$	119.5		(5	)%
Technology-related assets as a percentage of total additions		58	%		78	%				70	%		78	%

Occupancy and Building Operations. Increases in expenses in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, were attributable primarily to commercial real estate acquired in our merger with NYMEX Holdings. Expenses associated with the acquired property include utilities, maintenance, property taxes and insurance expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease resulting from a reduction in temporary space in our Chicago headquarters.

Licensing and Other Fee Agreements. The incremental expense generated from royalty fees and broker rebates on NYMEX products, which totaled $5.8 million and $27.2 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, contributed to the increases in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 when compared with the same periods in 2008. Increases in both periods were partially offset by declines in licensing fees for E-mini and standard equity products of $4.1 million and $4.2 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively.

Restructuring. The growth in expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, was attributable to the restructuring program initiated in August 2008 subsequent to our merger with NYMEX Holdings. This program was substantially complete by August 2009.

30

Other Expense. Expenses decreased in the third quarter and first nine months when compared with the same periods in 2008 due primarily to the goodwill impairment charge of $10.9 million related to our Swapstream operations in the third quarter of 2008. Incremental foreign currency transaction gains of $1.5 million and $3.8 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, and a $2.8 million loss on the sale of our metals trading products in the third quarter of 2008 also contributed to a decrease in expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009. A $3.7 million write-off in 2008 related to in-process research and development acquired in the CMA acquisition contributed to a decrease in expenses in the first nine months of 2009. The company’s expense reduction efforts, partially offset by incremental expenses incurred as part of the NYMEX Holdings merger in 2008, also contributed to the decreases in expense for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2009.

Non-Operating Income (Expense)

	Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Change		2009			2008			Change
Investment income	$	10.5		$	18.0		(41	)%	$	22.4		$	41.4		(46	)%
Impairment of long-term investment		(22.4	)		—		n.m.			(22.4	)		—		n.m.
Gains (losses) on derivative investments		—			7.4		(100	)		—			(7.8	)	(100	)
Securities lending interest income		—			8.6		(100	)		2.8			32.2		(91	)
Securities lending interest and other costs		—			(28.9	)	(100	)		(0.1	)		(48.2	)	(100	)
Interest and other borrowing costs		(32.1	)		(17.9	)	80			(103.2	)		(21.6	)	n.m.
Guarantee of exercise rights privileges		—			8.0		(100	)		—			12.8		(100	)
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries		(1.6	)		(20.0	)	(92	)		(4.5	)		(27.9	)	(84	)
Other income (expense)		—			0.1		(100	)		(0.4	)		(8.4	)	(95	)
Total Non-Operating Income (Expense)	$	(45.6	)	$	(24.7	)	84		$	(105.4	)	$	(27.5	)	n.m.

n.m. not meaningful

Investment Income. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, when compared with the same periods in 2008, investment income declined due to decreases in market interest rates throughout 2008 resulting from rate reductions by the Federal Open Market Committee. The decline due to interest rates was partially offset by an increase in the invested portion of clearing firms’ cash from performance bonds and security deposits.

Annualized average rates of return and average investment balances indicated in the table below include the portion of clearing firms’ cash performance bonds and security deposits we chose to invest and other short-term investments classified as either cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets.

	Quarter Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
Invested portion of clearing firms’ cash:
Annualized average rate of return		0.11	%		2.47	%		(2.36	)%		0.12	%		2.62	%		(2.50	)%
Average investment balance	$	5,393.3		$	360.3		$	5,033.0		$	4,977.2		$	384.7		$	4,592.5
Change in income due to rates								(31.7	)								(92.9	)
Change in income due to balance								30.9									89.8
Other short-term investments:
Annualized average rate of return		0.33	%		2.77	%		(2.44	)%		0.66	%		2.93	%		(2.27	)%
Average investment balance	$	443.0		$	1,239.8		$	(796.8	)	$	533.1			1,213.7		$	(680.6	)
Change in income due to rates								(2.7	)								(9.1	)
Change in income due to balance								(5.6	)								(14.9	)

The analysis presented in the table above does not include income (loss) on insurance contracts or gains (losses) on marketable securities related to our non-qualified deferred compensation plans. We experienced $5.7 million and $8.7 million increases in income on marketable securities associated with our deferred compensation plans in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2008. We exclude the

31

impact of the marketable securities related to our non-qualified deferred compensation plan from this analysis because gains and losses from these securities are offset by an equal amount of compensation and benefits expense.

Dividend income from our investments in BM&FBovespa SA (BM&F) and TMX Group Inc. stock is also excluded from the table above. Dividend income decreased by $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 when compared with the same period in 2008.

Impairment of Long-Term Investments. We assess our equity investments for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. As of September 30, 2009, we determined that our investment in IMAREX was impaired due to an extended and significant decline in the market price of its stock. As a result, we recognized an impairment charge of $22.4 million. The carrying value of our investment, after recognizing the impairment, was $19.0 million at September 30, 2009.

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Investments. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the net gain (loss) on derivative investments was due to the gain on a put option contract purchased to hedge our risk of changes in the fair value of BM&F stock resulting from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilian real. We entered into the put option with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. in February 2008 and we terminated the contract in September 2008 when Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for bankruptcy.

Securities Lending Income and Expense. During the first nine months of 2009, CME’s securities lending program remained suspended due to high volatility in the credit markets and extreme demand for U.S. Treasury securities.

	Quarter Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
Average daily balance of funds invested (in billions)	$	—		$	1.2		$	(1.2	)	$	—		$	1.2		$	(1.2	)
Annualized average rate earned		—	%		2.48	%		(2.48	)%		—	%		3.47	%		(3.47	)%
Annualized average rate paid		—			2.11			(2.11	)		—			2.86			(2.86	)
Net earned from securities lending		—	%		0.37	%		(0.37	)%		—	%		0.61	%		(0.61	)%

Securities lending interest expense for the first nine months of 2009 included a $0.3 million recovery of a $6.0 million impairment charge previously recognized in the third quarter of 2008 related to CME’s securities lending program.

The table above does not include activity from the NYMEX securities lending program, which closed in June 2009. Under the program, securities lending interest income and expense totaled $2.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the first nine months of 2009. For the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, securities lending interest income and expense totaled $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. In the third quarter of 2008, we also recognized an impairment loss of $15.7 million on a corporate debt security held in the NYMEX securities lending portfolio.

Interest and Other Borrowing Costs. The increase in interest and other borrowing costs in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 is due to higher average debt levels outstanding, which were the result of debt issued in August 2008. These borrowings consisted of commercial paper and short- and long-term notes. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, borrowings consisted of commercial paper until the debt issuance in August 2008.

	Quarter Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
Weighted average borrowings outstanding (par value in millions)	$	2,640.6		$	1,474.7		$	1,165.9		$	2,987.2		$	639.8		$	2,347.4
Weighted average effective yield		4.51	%		3.97	%		0.54	%		4.08	%		3.43	%		0.65	%
Total cost of borrowing		4.80			4.85			(0.05	)		4.68			4.11			0.57

Total cost of borrowing includes interest, commitment fees, accretion of discounts on debt and debt issuance costs. In February 2009, we terminated our revolving bridge facility. Total debt issuance costs recognized for the bridge facility during the first quarter of 2009 were $7.6 million, including $4.6 million of accelerated costs resulting from the facility’s termination.

32

Guarantee of Exercise Right Privileges. Under the terms of our merger with CBOT Holdings, holders that did not elect to sell their ERPs to us are entitled to a minimum guaranteed payment of up to $250,000 if the resolution of the lawsuit between CBOT and CBOE results in payments of less than $250,000 to the ERP holders. In December 2008, a settlement hearing for the ERP litigation was held. In July 2009, the court approved the final terms of the settlement and permitted a 30-day window for appeals. In August 2009, the holders filed a notice of appeals with the court. Our liability under the guarantee, which is recorded at fair value in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, was estimated at $1.2 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. We will continue to reassess and, if necessary, adjust the fair value of the guarantee on a quarterly basis until the lawsuit is resolved.

Equity in Losses of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. The termination of our investment in FXMS in the third quarter of 2008 contributed to the decreases in losses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 when compared with the same periods in 2008. In 2008, we recognized losses from our investment in FXMS of $19.1 million and $26.5 million for the third quarter and first nine months, respectively. Losses in 2009 include losses from our investments in DME Holdings Limited, Green Exchange Holdings LLC and OneChicago LLC.

Other Non-Operating Expense. The reduction in expense is attributable to transfer and other transaction fees related to our investment in BM&F in the first quarter of 2008.

Income Tax Provision

The effective tax rate decreased to 42.4% for the first nine months of 2009 from 42.5% in the same period of 2008. In the third quarter of 2008, we incurred a charge of $48.3 million to record the impact of the new combined state and local tax rate on our existing net deferred tax liability resulting from our merger with NYMEX Holdings. This increase in our effective tax rate was partially offset by the benefit from an Illinois tax law change that resulted in a $38.6 million reduction in the net deferred tax liability in the first quarter of 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash. Net cash provided by operating activities was $737.8 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with $862.7 million for the same period in 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $114.6 million higher than net income. The $114.6 million increase was due primarily to $94.5 million of amortization of purchased intangibles and $93.4 million of depreciation and amortization, offset by a $56.2 million decrease in other current liabilities, a $34.9 million decrease in accounts payable and a $30.2 million increase in accounts receivable. The decrease in other current liabilities was due primarily to a decrease in accrued bonus expense as well as accrued restructuring related to our merger with NYMEX Holdings. The decrease in accounts payable was due to the timing of large capital expenditure payments. Accounts receivable in any period result primarily from the clearing and transaction fees billed in the last month of the reporting period.

Cash provided by investing activities was $539.4 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared with cash used of $3.4 billion in the same period of 2008. The increase in cash was due primarily to cash paid to shareholders in our merger with NYMEX Holdings in 2008 of $2.8 billion, net of cash received, and a payment of $612.0 million for the termination of certain NYMEX membership rights in conjunction with the merger. The increase in cash was also due to a $306.6 million net change in the NYMEX securities lending program investments and a $143.5 million increase in proceeds from maturities of marketable securities, net of purchases.

Cash used in financing activities was $1.4 billion in the first nine months of 2009 compared with cash provided of $2.3 billion in the same period of 2008. The increase in cash used relative to the prior period was due primarily to new issuances of debt of $2.6 billion in 2008 in conjunction with our merger with NYMEX Holdings compared with net debt reductions of $675.3 million in 2009.

Debt Instruments. We maintain public debt of $1.8 billion, consisting of $300.0 million of floating rate notes due in 2010, $750.0 million of 5.40% fixed rate notes due in 2013 and $750.0 million of 5.75% fixed rate notes due in 2014. The floating rate notes due in 2010 accrue interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.65%. We entered into an interest-rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the rate at 3.92% for the floating rate notes due in 2010. The proceeds from the debt issuances were used to finance our merger with NYMEX Holdings and to repay any outstanding commercial paper borrowings that were backstopped by our 364-day revolving bridge facility as well as for general corporate purposes. We terminated the bridge facility on February 10, 2009.

33

We also maintain a $1.4 billion senior credit facility with various financial institutions, which includes a term loan of $420.5 million and a revolving credit facility of $945.5 million. On September 30, 2009, we amended this agreement to reduce the aggregate amount of revolving credit facility commitments to $945.5 million from $995.5 million and to reduce the minimum required amount of each request for an increase in revolving commitments from $25.0 million to $10.0 million. As long as we are not in default under the senior credit facility, we have the option to increase the facility from time to time by an aggregate amount of up to $1.1 billion, to a total of $2.5 billion of revolving loans, with only the consent of the agent and the lenders providing the additional funds. Proceeds from the senior credit facility were used to pay fees and expenses and finance our merger with NYMEX Holdings; to pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing of existing debt of NYMEX Holdings; to finance dividends and stock repurchases, and to support issuances of commercial paper. The revolving credit facility expires on August 21, 2011.

At September 30, 2009, we have excess borrowing capacity for general corporate purposes of approximately $620.5 million.

We maintain a 364-day revolving line of credit with a consortium of banks to be used in certain situations by our clearing house. The line of credit, which was amended on October 9, 2009, provides for borrowings of up to $600.0 million. This line of credit is collateralized by clearing firm security deposits held by us in the form of U.S. Treasury or agency securities, as well as security deposit funds in the Interest Earning Facilities and any performance bond deposits of a clearing firm that has defaulted on its obligation. The line of credit can only be drawn on to the extent it is collateralized. At September 30, 2009, security deposit collateral available was $2.0 billion. We have the option to request an increase in the line from $600.0 million to $1.0 billion with the participating banks’ approval. The agreement was amended on October 9, 2009 to extend the termination date from October 9, 2009 to December 9, 2009.

As of September 30, 2009, we maintained an AA long-term credit rating and an A1+ short-term credit rating with Standard & Poor’s. We maintained an Aa3 long-term credit rating and a P1 short-term credit rating with Moody’s Investor Service (Moody’s). The outlook for our ratings is considered stable by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. Given our ability to pay down debt levels and refinance existing debt facilities if necessary, we expect to maintain an investment grade rating. If our ratings are downgraded due to a change in control which results in a downgrade below investment grade, we are required to make an offer to repurchase our fixed and floating rate notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The indentures governing our floating and fixed rate notes, our 364-day revolving line of credit for $600.0 million and our senior credit facility for $1.4 billion due 2011 do not contain specific covenants that restrict the ability to pay dividends. These documents, however, do contain other customary financial and operating covenants that place restrictions on the operations of the company, which could indirectly affect the ability to pay dividends.

For example, under our senior credit facility, we are required to remain in compliance with a consolidated net worth test, defined as our consolidated shareholders’ equity as of June 30, 2008 on a pro forma basis to give effect to the NYMEX Holdings merger and to give effect to the share repurchases made and special dividends paid, but only up to the amount of such repurchases and dividends publicly announced and made or paid within 18 months after August 22, 2008 (and in no event greater than $1.5 billion in the aggregate for such repurchases and dividends), multiplied by 0.65.

In addition, our 364-day revolving line of credit contains a requirement that CME remain in compliance with a consolidated tangible net worth test, defined as consolidated shareholder’s equity less intangible assets (as defined in the agreement), of not less than $96.0 million. In the event that CME elects to increase the facility, the minimum consolidated tangible net worth test will increase ratably up to $120.0 million. CME Group, as a holding company, has no operations of its own. Instead, it relies on dividends declared and paid to it by its subsidiaries, including CME, in order to provide a portion of the funds which it uses to pay dividends to its shareholders.

As of September 30, 2009, we are in compliance with the various covenant requirements of all our debt facilities.

CME Group and its subsidiaries are also required to comply with restrictions contained in the General Corporation Laws of its state of incorporation which could also limit its (or their) ability to declare and pay dividends. The decision to pay dividends is also subject to the discretion of each entity’s board of directors.

34

To satisfy our performance bond obligation with Singapore Exchange Limited, we pledge CME-owned U.S. Treasury securities in lieu of, or in combination with, irrevocable letters of credit. At September 30, 2009, the letters of credit totaled $33.0 million. In addition, we had pledged securities with a fair value of $50.0 million at September 30, 2009.

CME also guarantees a $5.0 million standby letter of credit for GFX. The beneficiary of this letter of credit is the clearing firm that is used by GFX to execute and maintain its futures position. The letter of credit would be utilized in the event that GFX defaults in meeting performance bond requirements to its clearing firm.

Liquidity and Cash Management. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $204.1 million at September 30, 2009 and $297.9 million at December 31, 2008. The balance retained in cash and cash equivalents is a function of anticipated or possible short-term cash needs, prevailing interest rates, our investment policy and alternative investment choices. In June 2008, we approved a repurchase of up to $1.1 billion of CME Group Class A common stock over a period of 18 months. Effective January 2009, we suspended this program to devote our excess cash flows to debt reduction. With respect to short-term cash needs, we expect 2009 capital expenditures to total approximately $140.0 million.

Net current deferred tax assets of $16.5 million and $95.5 million are included in other current assets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Total net current deferred tax assets include primarily unrealized losses and accrued expenses.

Net long-term deferred tax liabilities were $7.7 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Total net deferred tax liabilities include deferred tax liabilities of $7.8 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to purchase accounting for intangible assets in our mergers with CBOT Holdings and NYMEX Holdings.

Within our domestic long-term deferred tax liability, we have a long-term deferred tax asset of $144.9 million for an unrealized capital loss incurred in Brazil related to our investment in BM&F. As of September 30, 2009, we do not currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to fully realize the value of the unrealized capital loss. As a result, a partial valuation allowance of $24.7 million was previously provided for the amount of the unrealized capital loss that exceeds potential capital gains that could be used to offset the capital loss in future periods. We also have a long-term deferred tax asset related to Brazilian taxes of $128.1 million for a net operating loss and an unrealized capital loss incurred in Brazil related to our investment in BM&F. A full valuation allowance of $128.1 million was previously provided because we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of the net operating loss or the unrealized capital loss in Brazil in the future.

Net long-term deferred tax assets also include a $17.1 million deferred tax asset for net operating losses related to Swapstream. Our assessment at September 30, 2009 is that we do not currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of these foreign net operating losses in the future. As a result, the $17.1 million deferred tax asset arising from these net operating losses was fully reserved as the losses were incurred.

Fair Value Measurements. We use a three-level framework in order to determine the fair value of financial assets and liabilities. In general, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine fair values of marketable securities, securities lending collateral and equity investments. Level 1 assets include U.S. Treasury securities, exchange-traded mutual funds, repurchase agreements and publicly-traded equity securities. If quoted prices are not available to determine fair value, we use other inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Assets included in Level 2 consist primarily of U.S. Government agency securities, municipal bonds, asset-backed securities and certain corporate bonds. Level 3 assets include certain corporate bonds and asset-backed securities. These assets have been valued using valuation models with inputs that are both observable and unobservable. The unobservable inputs used in these models are significant to the fair value of the investments and require management’s judgment.

We determine the fair value of our interest rate swap contracts, considered Level 2 assets, using standard valuation models that are based on market-based observable inputs including forward and spot exchange rates and interest rate curves.

35

The fair value of our liability for the guarantee of ERPs is derived using probability-weighted Black-Scholes option values for various scenarios. The liability is included in Level 3 because management uses significant unobservable inputs including probability, expected return and volatility factors to determine its fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the asset or liability’s fair value measurement.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets at Fair Value:
Marketable securities	$	77.6	$	16.1	$	—	$	93.7
Equity investments		65.5		—		—		65.5
Total Assets at Fair Value	$	143.1	$	16.1	$	—	$	159.2
Liabilities at Fair Value:
Interest rate swap contracts	$	—	$	30.9	$	—	$	30.9
Guarantee of CBOE exercise right privileges		—		—		1.2		1.2
Total Liabilities at Fair Value	$	—	$	30.9	$	1.2	$	32.1

The following is a reconciliation of assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

(in millions)	Asset- Backed Security (1)			Guarantee of CBOE ERP Liability
Fair value of asset (liability) at January 1, 2009	$	1.5		$	(1.2	)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in non-operating income (expense)		1.0			—
Settlements		(2.5	)		—
Fair value of asset (liability) at September 30, 2009	$	—		$	(1.2	)
Total unrealized gains (losses) related to financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009	$	—		$	—

(1) This asset-backed security was transferred from the securities lending collateral assets portfolio to the marketable securities portfolio during June 2009.

During the first nine months of 2009, we did not record impairment on any assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance that changes the analysis required to determine whether a variable interest gives a company a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This guidance may result in the consolidation of entities that we currently do not consolidate and requires an ongoing reassessment of the consolidation requirement. In addition, enhanced disclosures are required that will provide the readers of financial statements with more transparent information about a company’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard’s adoption on our financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to various market risks, including those related to interest rates, credit, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The following discussion addresses only material changes in our market risk exposure since

36

December 31, 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 7A. of CME Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009.

Equity Price Risk

We hold certain investments in equity securities for strategic purposes. Investments subject to equity price risks are generally recorded as available for sale at their fair value. Equity investments whose sale is restricted for greater than 12 months are carried at cost, net of impairment charges, until the restriction is within 12 months of expiration at which time they are recorded at fair value.

Fair values for publicly-trade equity investments are based on quoted market prices. Fair values are subject to fluctuation and, consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions.

The table below summarizes our publicly-traded equity investments at September 30, 2009. Equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

(dollars in millions)	Original Cost		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Unrealized Gain, Net of Tax
BM&FBOVESPA S.A.	$	631.4	$	747.0	$	262.9	$	293.7	(1)
TMX Group Inc. (2)		46.0		46.5		46.5		0.3
IMAREX ASA (2)		41.4		19.0		19.0		—

(1) In February 2008, we exchanged 1.2 million shares of CME Group Class A common stock for 101.1 million shares in BM&F. The company may not sell its shares in BM&F for four years after the purchase date. As a result, BM&F stock is reported in other assets at original cost less impairment loss until within 12 months of the restriction lapsing, after which time the stock will be accounted for as an available-for-sale security. The unrealized gain is currently not recorded. In addition, the unrealized gain does not take into account an unrealized loss of $63.3 million, net of tax, resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) since recognizing impairment on the investment in December 2008.

(2) This investment was acquired in August 2008 as part of our merger with NYMEX Holdings.

We do not currently hedge against equity price risk. Equity investments are assessed for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. An assessment of whether an equity investment is other-than-temporarily impaired takes into consideration the magnitude and duration of the unrealized loss. On September 30, 2009, we determined that our investment in IMAREX ASA was other-than-temporarily impaired and recorded an impairment charge of $22.4 million.

We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk related to these investments. Unrealized changes in value due to foreign currency exchange rates are reflected in the unrealized gain presented in the table above.

37

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, the company’s management, including the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

On August 22, 2008, CME Group completed its merger with NYMEX Holdings. In connection with the merger, NYMEX Holdings was merged into CMEG NY Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CME Group, and the subsidiaries of NYMEX Holdings, including NYMEX and COMEX, became part of the consolidated group of subsidiaries of CME Group. During the third quarter of 2009, the company continued with its integration of the former NYMEX Holdings business into the business of CME Group, including the integration of the internal controls and procedures of the former NYMEX Holdings and its subsidiaries into CME Group’s internal controls over financial reporting. There were no other changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting, other than the integration efforts relating to the merger with NYMEX Holdings.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The following is an update to the company’s Legal Proceedings as disclosed in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2, 2009.

On August 23, 2006, CBOT Holdings, Inc. and CBOT, along with a class consisting of certain CBOT full members, filed a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) seeking to enforce and protect the CBOE exercise right privileges (ERPs). In June 2008, the parties agreed to a settlement in principle. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, participating Class A members will share in an equity pool equal to 18% of the total common stock issued by CBOE in its demutualization and will share in a cash pool of up to $300.0 million, subject to a cap of $600,000 per individual. Participating Class B members would be paid $250,000 per ERP. In July 2009, the court issued its final order approving the terms of the settlement, which was subsequently appealed in August 2009.

There were two purported class action complaints pending against the former NYMEX Holdings, the former NYMEX Holdings board of directors and CME Group in the Delaware Court of Chancery related to the merger between CME Group and NYMEX Holdings. One of the class actions was brought on behalf of the former NYMEX Holdings’ shareholders and the second class action was brought on behalf of the NYMEX Class A members. On September 30, 2009, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the shareholders’ and the NYMEX Class A members’ complaints. The court’s decision remains subject to appeal.

38

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009. These risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risks and uncertainties in our Form 10-K are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	(a) Total Number of Class A Shares Purchased (1)	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) (in millions)
July 1 to July 31	15	$	282.06	—	$	849
August 1 to August 31	2,901	$	276.12	—	$	849
September 1 to September 30	2,188	$	277.96	—	$	849
Total	5,104	$	276.93	—	$	849

(1) Shares purchased consist of an aggregate of 5,104 shares of Class A common stock surrendered in the third quarter to satisfy employees’ tax obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock.

(2) Under the terms of the share buyback program announced on June 23, 2008, the company is authorized to purchase shares of Class A common stock with a value of up to $1.1 billion, subject to market conditions. The buyback program is authorized to take place over a period of up to 18 months. The authorization of the board of directors permits the repurchase of shares through the open market, an accelerated program, a tender offer or privately negotiated transactions. The share buyback authorization remains in place; however, in the first quarter of 2009 the company suspended purchasing shares in order to focus on paying down debt.

39

Item 6. Exhibits

10.1*	Agreement, dated August 5, 2009, between CME Group Inc. and Craig S. Donohue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to CME Group Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 6, 2009).
10.2*	Amended and Restated Agreement, dated August 5, 2009, between CME Group Inc. and Phupinder Gill (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to CME Group Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 6, 2009).
10.3*	Agreement, dated September 24, 2009, between Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and James Newsome.
10.4	Amendment No. 1 and Limited Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2009.
10.5**	License Agreement Amendment No. 9, dated as of July 24, 2009, between Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.
31.1	Section 302 Certification—Craig S. Donohue
31.2	Section 302 Certification—James E. Parisi
32.1	Section 906 Certification
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Compensatory arrangement.

** Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the SEC pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act.

40

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CME Group Inc. (Registrant)
Dated: November 6, 2009	By:	/S/    JAMES E. PARISI
	Name:	James E. Parisi
	Title:	Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

41

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

09/24/2009

James Newsome

5 Byram Court

Mendham, NJ 07945

Dear Jim,

Reference is made to that certain agreement, commencing on August 26, 2008 (the “Original Agreement”), with the undersigned Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”), with respect to your performance of your duties as an advisor to CME and its parent, subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively with CME, “CME Group”). Both you and CME agree that it is desirable that you and CME enter into this letter agreement (this “Agreement”) with respect to the matters provided herein.

1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for 12 months from August 26, 2009 (through August 25, 2010, the “Term”). This Agreement shall terminate upon your death or “permanent disability.” For purposes of this Agreement, “permanent disability” shall mean any mental or physical disability or illness which results in your being unable to substantially perform your duties for a continuous period of 150 days or for periods aggregating 180 days of any 365 day period.

2. Scope of Services. During the Term, you will render services to CME Group as provided for in Annex A and such other services reasonably requested by CME Group’s Executive Chairman or other authorized officer of CME Group with respect to business and regulatory matters pertaining to CME Group. In providing such services, you shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, orders, codes and other acts of any applicable governmental authority and the policies, standards and regulations of CME Group. Insofar as reasonably practicable, CME Group shall consider your convenience in the timing of requests to perform services under this Agreement, and your failure or inability, by reason of temporary illness or other cause beyond your control to respond to requests during any such temporary period shall not be deemed to constitute a default on your part in the performance of your services under this Agreement. Your services under this Agreement shall not exceed 33.33 hours per month of services hereunder.

3. Advisor Fee and Non-Compete and Release Payment. In consideration for your services as an advisor and the confidentiality and other provisions of this Agreement, CME shall pay to you $500,000 per annum during the Term, and in consideration for the non-compete and release provisions of this Agreement, CME shall pay to you $500,000 per annum during the Term, for an aggregate of $1,000,000 (the “Total Payments”) payable in 11 installments during the Term. The first installment of $166,667 shall be made on or before October 20. Following the month of October, the remaining 10 equal installments of $83,333.30 shall be processed on the Friday of the week in which the 15^th of the month falls, which will result in the deposit to your account on the 2^nd business day following that Friday. CME shall have the right to deduct from the Total Payments payable to you under this Agreement for any documented debt or judgment which any CME Group company may have against you (collectively, “Debts”).

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 2

4. Expense Reimbursement /Other Benefits. CME shall reimburse you for all reasonable and necessary out-of-pocket travel and other expenses incurred by you at the specific request of CME Group to the extent such reimbursement is consistent with CME Group’s expense reimbursement policies from time to time in effect in connection with your performance of services as an advisor hereunder. Such expenses shall be reimbursed promptly after your submission to CME of expense statements, including copies of receipts and other documents verifying the amounts included therein, in such reasonable detail as CME may require.

5. Nature of the Advisor Relationship. You will perform the services required under this Agreement as an independent contractor to, and not as an agent or employee of CME or any other CME Group company. Except as and to the extent that CME or another CME Group company, as the case may be, may otherwise prescribe in writing, you shall not have any authority to negotiate or to conclude any contracts on behalf of, or otherwise bind, CME or any other CME Group company. You shall be solely responsible for and shall pay all amounts of applicable federal and state income and self employment taxes. You shall not be eligible to participate in any employee benefit, group insurance or compensation plans or programs maintained by CME or any CME Group company. Neither CME nor any other CME Group company shall provide Social Security, unemployment compensation, disability insurance, workers’ compensation or similar coverage, or any other statutory employment benefit, to you.

6. Assisting Competitors. During the Term and for a period of one (1) year following the Term, you will not, without the prior written consent of CME Group, (a) render any services whether or not for compensation, to other individuals, firms, corporations or entities in connection with any matter that involves material interests adverse to any CME Group company, (b) directly or indirectly compete with any CME Group company anywhere in the world or (c) engage in any business or activity that you reasonably believe to be materially detrimental to the business or interests of any CME Group company.

7. Confidential Information. In connection with your service to CME Group pursuant to this Agreement you will acquire confidential information with respect to the business, plans, strategies, finances, technology, markets, operations, customers, members, employees, suppliers and vendors and other matters of or related to CME Group (“Confidential Information”). In that regard, you should presume that any information you receive about CME Group or its customers, members or others through your work pursuant to this Agreement is confidential and, therefore, should not be disclosed or made public, except when disclosure is authorized or legally required. Unless disclosure is required by law, you shall not, without the prior written consent of CME Group, at any time, whether during or after the Term, communicate or divulge any Confidential Information to anyone other than those persons or entities designated by CME Group. All records, files, documents, notes, data and the like relating to the business or activities of any CME Group company which you shall prepare, develop, use, compile or receive shall be and remain the sole property of CME, or such other CME Group company as the case may be, and shall be returned upon CME

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 3

Group’s request. “Confidential Information” shall exclude information (a) readily available in the public domain other than as a result of your act or omission or (b) obtained from third parties rightfully in possession of such information and having no direct or indirect confidentiality obligation to any CME Group company.

8. Indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, CME agrees to indemnify you if you are a party or are threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative by reason of the services you provide to CME Group under this Agreement. The indemnification shall be from and against expenses (including attorney’s fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by you or on your behalf in connection with such threatened or actual action, suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom, but shall only be provided if you acted in good faith and in a manner you reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of CME Group and, with respect to any criminal action, suit or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe your conduct was unlawful.

9. Non-Waiver. The failure by either party to exercise any of its or his rights in the event of a breach of this Agreement by the other party shall not be construed as a waiver of such breach or any subsequent breach, or prevent either party from later enforcing strict compliance with this Agreement as to such breach or any subsequent breach.

10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be modified or deleted in such manner so as to make this Agreement, as modified, legal and enforceable, and the remaining provisions hereof shall continue in full force and effect. In addition to the foregoing, if a court holds that the restrictions stated herein are unreasonable, the parties hereto agree that the maximum period, scope or geographical area reasonable under the circumstances shall be substituted for the stated period, scope or area and that the court shall be allowed to revise the restrictions contained herein to cover the maximum period, scope or area permitted by law.

11. Survival. This paragraph 11 and paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 shall survive and continue in full force and effecting accordance with their respective terms, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement.

12. Release.

a. As used in this Agreement, “CME Parties” means (i) CME and each CME Group company, (ii) all of CME’s and CME Group company’s predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries and affiliates and (iii) all past and present officers, directors, agents, employees, officials, employee benefit plans (and their sponsors, fiduciaries and administrators), insurers and attorneys of the entities described in parts (i) and (ii) of this sentence. In exchange for the Total Payments and the payments from CME described in paragraph 4, you, on behalf of yourself and your agents, representatives, attorneys, heirs, executors, administrators, spouse, children, successors and assigns, and any other person (natural or otherwise) acting or purporting to act on behalf of any of the foregoing,

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 4

fully release each of the CME Parties regarding all known, unknown, suspected, absolute or contingent claims, causes of action, liabilities, damages, fees, remunerations, obligations, promises, judgments or demands of any nature whatsoever, in law or in equity, of every kind and description (“Claims”) regarding any act or failure to act that occurred up to and including the date on which you sign this Agreement, including, without limitation, any and all Claims asserted with respect to fraud, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, conversion or otherwise by you or your counsel, representatives or agents regarding the waiver of severance payments or any other waiver made to you in connection with the merger between CME Group Inc. and NYMEX Holdings, Inc (the “Merger”). Notwithstanding anything contained in this paragraph 12(a) to the contrary, you do not release or otherwise waive (i) any rights to indemnification pursuant to Section 6.9 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger made and entered into among CME Group Inc., CMEG NY Inc., NYMEX Holdings, Inc. and New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (collectively, the “Merger Entities”), which rights shall survive the termination of this Agreement, or (ii) any rights to indemnification pursuant to the respective by-laws or certificates of incorporation of the Merger Entities, the NYMEX Holdings, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan dated January 9, 2008, or any other surviving plan(s) of the Merger Entities.

b. CME, each CME Group company and all of CME’s and CME Group company’s predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries and corporate affiliates, on behalf of themselves and their attorneys and assigns, fully release you regarding all Claims regarding any act or failure to act that occurred up to and including the date on which you sign this Agreement relating to any violation of that certain separation agreement and general release, dated as of September, 2008, between you and CME Group Inc. (the “Separation Agreement and General Release”).

13. Notices. All notices and other required communications under this Agreement (“Notices”) shall be in writing, and shall be sent to a party at the address set forth below such party’s signature block below. A party may change its address by sending Notice to the other party of the new address. Notices shall be given: (a) by personal delivery to the other party; (b) by facsimile, with a confirmation sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; (c) by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; or (d) by express courier (e.g. DHL, Federal Express, etc.). Notices shall be effective and shall be deemed delivered: (i) if by personal delivery, on the date of the personal delivery; (ii) if by facsimile, on the date stated in the electronic confirmation, delivered during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at recipient’s location), and, if not delivered during normal business hours, on the next business day following delivery; (iii) if solely by mail, on the date of receipt as stated on the return receipt; or (iv) if by express courier, on the date signed for or rejected as reflected in the courier’s delivery log.

14. Remedies. You recognize and agree that given the nature of CME Group’s business, the scope and duration of the restrictions in this paragraph 14 and in paragraphs 6, 7, 12(a) and 15 are reasonable and necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of CME Group and do not unduly interfere with your career or economic pursuits. You recognize and agree

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 5

that a breach of any or all of the provisions of this paragraph 14 or paragraphs 6, 7, 12(a) or 15 shall constitute immediate and irreparable harm to CME Group’s business, for which damages cannot be readily calculated and for which damages is an inadequate remedy. Accordingly, without limiting any remedies available to CME Group, you acknowledge and agree that CME Group shall therefore be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent any breach or threatened breach of any such paragraphs. You further acknowledge and agree that in any action for breach of such paragraphs, including, without limitation, an action seeking injunctive or other equitable relief, you will not assert or contend that any of such paragraphs are facially unreasonable or otherwise facially unenforceable. Furthermore, without limiting any remedies available to CME Group, you agree that if a final judicial determination is made by a court of competent jurisdiction that you have breached any or all of the provisions contained in this paragraph 14 or paragraphs 6, 7, 12(a) or 15, you shall, within two (2) business days of such final judicial determination, pay or deliver to CME any and all payments, including, without limitation, the Total Payments, made to you by CME pursuant to this Agreement, which payment by you to CME shall be paid by wire transfer of immediately-available U.S. funds to an account designated by CME.

15. Covenant Not to Sue. You acknowledge and agree that you shall not, directly or indirectly, institute or file any suit or proceeding, make or prosecute any claim or otherwise make any assertion that any provisions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, this paragraph 15, are unenforceable against you or otherwise invalid in any manner.

16. Miscellaneous. This Agreement is personal to you, and you shall not assign this Agreement without CME’s prior written consent. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to choice of law rules. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between CME and yourself with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and voids all prior negotiations, discussions, and agreements, whether written or oral, including, without limitation, the Original Agreement; provided, however, that any previous release or waiver, including, without limitation, the release contained in the Separation Agreement and General Release and any release or waiver executed by you in connection with the Merger, shall survive pursuant to their terms and not be in any manner be amended, modified, altered, voided or otherwise affected by this Agreement. This Agreement may not be amended, modified or extended other than by a written agreement executed by the parties hereto. This Agreement may be executed and delivered (including by facsimile or electronic transmission) in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

[Signature page follows.]

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 6

Please confirm that the foregoing Agreement correctly sets forth the agreement between CME and yourself by signing and returning this Agreement to CME.

CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.	Agreed and Accepted as of this 24 day of September 2009
/s/ Craig S. Donohue	/s/ James Newsome
Craig S. Donohue	James Newsome
Address for Notice Purposes: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. 20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Attention: Kathleen Cronin, Managing Director, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary facsimile: 312-930-4556	Address for Notice Purposes: 5 Byram Court Mendham, NJ 07945 facsimile: 212-301-4600

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

James Newsome

September 24, 2009

Page 7

Annex A

• At the direction of CME Group’s Executive Chairman or other authorized officer of CME Group, travel to Washington D.C. a minimum of once every two (2) months for the purpose of attending meetings organized by CME Group’s Executive Chairman or other authorized officer of CME Group with members of Congress and the staff of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission as relates to matters affecting CME Group and provide a detailed written summary of all such meetings. Such meetings and the content thereof shall be developed in consultation with CME Group’s Executive Chairman or other authorized officer of CME Group.

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 T312 930 1000 F312 466 4410 cmegroup.com

EX-10.4

Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT NO. 1 AND LIMITED WAIVER

TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT NO. 1 AND LIMITED WAIVER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) dated as of September 30, 2009, is made by and among CME GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States (“Bank of America”), in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement described below) (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”) and each of the Lenders party hereto.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders have entered into that certain Credit Agreement dated as of August 22, 2008 (the “Credit Agreement”; capitalized terms used in this Amendment not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given thereto in the Credit Agreement), pursuant to which the Lenders have made available to the Borrower a term loan facility and a revolving credit facility; and

WHEREAS, the Borrower has advised the Administrative Agent and the Lenders that it desires to amend certain provisions of the Credit Agreement to, among other things, (i) reduce the aggregate amount of the Revolving Commitments by $50,000,000, and apply the entirety of such reduction to (and thereby terminate the Revolving Commitment of) Woodlands Commercial Bank (f/k/a Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank) (collectively, the “Woodlands Commitment Reduction”), and waive certain terms of the Credit Agreement related thereto, and (ii) reduce the minimum required amount of each request under the Revolving Commitments increase option set forth in Section 2.19 of the Credit Agreement to $10,000,000, in each case as more particularly set forth below, and the Lenders signatory hereto are willing to effect such amendments and waivers on the terms and conditions contained in this Amendment;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and further valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Limited Waivers. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and solely with respect to the Woodlands Commitment Reduction,

(a) the Lenders signatory hereto hereby waive the requirement set forth in Section 2.07(c) of the Credit Agreement that the Borrower provide prior notice to the Administrative Agent of the Woodlands Commitment Reduction; and

(b) the Lenders signatory hereto hereby (i) waive the requirement set forth in Section 2.07(c) of the Credit Agreement that the reduction in the Revolving Commitments described in this Amendment be applied among the Revolving Lenders on a ratable basis in accordance with their respective Revolving Commitments, and (ii) acknowledge that immediately upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, Woodlands Commercial Bank (f/k/a Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank) shall no longer be a

“Lender” under the Credit Agreement unless and until such time as it becomes a “Lender” pursuant to and in accordance with Section 9.04 or Section 2.19 of the Credit Agreement.

The waivers set forth in this Section 1 are limited to the extent specifically set forth above and no other terms, covenants or provisions of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document are intended to be effected hereby.

2. Amendments to Credit Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

(a) Section 2.19(a) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “$25,000,000” in the fifth line and inserting “$10,000,000” in lieu thereof.

(b) Section 2.14(a) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “(other than a payment or conversion made pursuant to Section 2.06)” in the third and fourth line and inserting “(other than a payment made pursuant to Section 2.12(b))” in lieu thereof.

(c) The portion of the existing Schedule 2.01 entitled “(1) Revolving Lenders and Commitment Amounts:” is deleted it in its entirety and “Schedule 2.01 (1) Revolving Lenders and Commitments Amounts:” attached as Exhibit A hereto is inserted in lieu thereof.

(d) Exhibit A of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Sections 3 and 5 therein and inserting the following, respectively, in lieu thereof:

3. Borrower: CME Group Inc.

5. Credit Agreement: Credit Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2008, among CME Group Inc., the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and UBS Securities LLC, BMO Capital Markets and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Co-Syndication Agents, as amended from time to time.

3. Release. Each of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive all claims, suits, debts, liens, losses, causes of action, demands, rights, damages or costs, or expenses of any kind, character or nature whatsoever, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, which any of them may have or claim to have against Woodlands Commercial Bank (f/k/a Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank) solely in its capacity as a lender under the Credit Agreement (including without limitation, a failure by Woodlands Commercial Bank to fund any Loan required to be funded by it under the Credit Agreement and specifically excluding its capacity as a dealer in connection with any commercial paper transaction, its capacity as a counterparty under any Swap Transaction or its capacity as an investment banker or financial advisor) or its agents, employees, officers, affiliates, directors, representatives, successors and assigns in each case acting in the same capacity (collectively, the “Released Parties”) originating in whole or in part on or before the date this Amendment is executed to the extent arising out of or as a direct result of the Credit Agreement (including

2

without limitation, a failure by Woodlands Commercial Bank to fund any Loan required to be funded by it under the Credit Agreement but specifically excluding any issuance of commercial paper, Swap Transaction or other transaction other than the Credit Agreement) (collectively, the “Claims”). Each of the Borrower and the Administrative Agent further agree forever to refrain from commencing, instituting or prosecuting any lawsuit, action or other proceeding against any Released Parties with respect to such Claims. Each of the Released Parties shall be a third party beneficiary of this Amendment.

4. Effectiveness; Conditions Precedent. The effectiveness of this Amendment and the amendments and waivers to the Credit Agreement contained herein are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent:

(a) the Administrative Agent shall have received each of the following documents or instruments in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent:

(i) counterparts of this Amendment duly executed by the Borrower, and Lenders which constitute Required Lenders, and acknowledged by the Administrative Agent;

(ii) (x) a true and complete copy of resolutions for the Borrower authorizing the amendments contemplated hereby, (y) a certification that each of the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the Borrower has not been amended or otherwise modified since the effective date of the Credit Agreement or, in the alternative, attaching true and complete copies of all amendments and modifications thereto and (z) evidence of the good standing of the Borrower; and

(iii) a certificate signed by a Senior Officer of the Borrower certifying as to the representations and warranties set forth in Section 5(a).

(b) unless waived by the Administrative Agent, all accrued reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses of the Arrangers and the Administrative Agent required to be paid pursuant to Section 9.03 of the Credit Agreement on or prior to the closing of the Amendment shall have been paid.

This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in clauses (a) and (b) above and the Administrative Agent shall give notice to the Borrower of the effectiveness of this Amendment.

5. Representations and Warranties. In order to induce the Lenders to enter into this Amendment, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders as follows:

(a) At the time of and immediately after giving effect to this Amendment, (i) the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in Article III of the Credit Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, and (ii) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.

3

(b) This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.

6. Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Relevant Documents”), sets forth the entire understanding and agreement of the parties hereto in relation to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior negotiations and agreements among the parties relating to such subject matter. No promise, condition, representation or warranty, express or implied, not set forth in the Relevant Documents shall bind any party hereto, and no such party has relied on any such promise, condition, representation or warranty. Each of the parties hereto acknowledges that, except as otherwise expressly stated in the Relevant Documents, no representations, warranties or commitments, express or implied, have been made by any party to any other party in relation to the subject matter hereof or thereof. None of the terms or conditions of this Amendment may be changed, modified, waived or canceled orally or otherwise, except in writing and in accordance with Section 9.02 of the Credit Agreement.

7. Full Force and Effect of Agreement. Except as hereby specifically amended, modified or supplemented, the Credit Agreement is hereby confirmed and ratified in all respects and shall be and remain in full force and effect according to its terms.

8. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original as against any party whose signature appears thereon, and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by telecopy or other electronic transmission (e.g. pdf or electronic mail) shall be effective as a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.

9. Governing Law. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL IN ALL RESPECTS BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. The Borrower hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the State of New York sitting in New York County and of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Amendment, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such New York State or, to the extent permitted by law, in such Federal court. This Amendment shall be further subject to the provisions of Sections 9.09 and 9.10 of the Credit Agreement.

10. Enforceability. Any provision of this Amendment held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity, illegality or enforceability without affecting the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof; and the invalidity of a particular provision in a particular jurisdiction shall not invalidate such provision in any other jurisdiction.

4

11. References. All references to the “Credit Agreement” shall mean the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby.

12. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrower, the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and their respective successors, legal representatives, and assignees to the extent such assignees are permitted assignees as provided in Section 9.04 of the Credit Agreement.

[Signature pages follow.]

5

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be made, executed and delivered by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.

BORROWER:
CME GROUP INC.
By:	/s/ James A. Pribel
Name:	James A. Pribel
Title:	Treasurer

ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Administrative Agent
By:	/s/ Maryanne Fitzmaurice
Name:	Maryanne Fitzmaurice
Title:	Senior Vice President

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as a Lender
By:	/s/ Maryanne Fitzmaurice
Name:	Maryanne Fitzmaurice
Title:	Senior Vice President

UBS LOAN FINANCE LLC, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Marie Haddad
Name:	Marie Haddad
Title:	Associate Director
By:	/s/ Mary E. Evans
Name:	Mary E. Evans
Title:	Associate Director

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, as a Lender
By:	/s/ David Mahmood
Name:	David Mahmood
Title:	Managing Director

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender
By:	James N. DeVries
Name:	James N. DeVries
Title:	Senior Vice President

BMO CAPITAL MARKETS FINANCING, INC., as a Lender
By:	/s/ Linda Haven
Name:	Linda Haven
Title:	Managing Director

COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRAILIA, as a Lender
By:	/s/ John Raftopoulos
Name:	John Raftopoulos
Title:	Risk Executive

SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Richard Johnson
Name:	Richard Johnson
Title:	Senior Vice President
By:	/s/ Mieko Miyamoto
Name:	Mieko Miyamoto
Title:	Assistant Vice President

TD BANK, NA, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Todd S. Sturza
Name:	/s/ Todd S. Sturza
Title:	Regional Vice President

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Thomas Caruso
Name:	/s/ Thomas Caruso
Title:	First Vice President

WILLIAM STREET LLC, as a Lender
By:	/s/ John Makrinos
Name:	John Makrinos
Title:	Authorized Signatory

LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Candi Obrentz
Name:	Candi Obrentz
Title:	Associate Director, Financial Institutions, USA
By:	/s/ Shane Klein
Name:	Shane Klein
Title:	Director, Financial Institution

PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Reginald H. Imamura
Name:	Reginald Imamura
Title:	Senior Vice President

BANK OF CHINA, NEW YORK BRANCH, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Xio Wang
Name:	Xio Wang
Title:	Assistant General Manager

THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Tamara M. Dowd
Name:	Tamara M. Dowd
Title:	Vice President

BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Shelley He
Name:	Shelley He
Title:	Deputy General Manager

MEGA INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK CO., LTD. NEW YORK BRANCH, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Priscilla H.T. Hsing
Name:	Priscilla H.T. Hsing
Title:	VP & DGM

THE CHIBA BANK, LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Yukihito Inamura
Name:	Yukihito Inamura
Title:	General Manager

WOODLANDS COMMERCIAL BANK
(f/k/a LEHMAN BROTHERS COMMERCIAL BANK), as a Lender
By:	/s/ Gary Murray
Name:	Gary Murray
Title:	Chief Credit Officer

EXHIBIT A

SCHEDULE 2.01

LENDER COMMITMENTS

(1) Revolving Lenders and Commitment Amounts:

Lender	Revolving Commitment		Applicable Percentage
Bank of America, N.A.	$	150,000,000.00	15.864621893	%
UBS Loan Finance LLC	$	150,000,000.00	15.864621893	%
The Bank of Nova Scotia	$	125,000,000.00	13.220518245	%
U.S. Bank National Association	$	75,000,000.00	7.932310947	%
BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc.	$	62,500,000.00	6.610259122	%
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.	$	62,500,000.00	6.610259122	%
Lloyds TSB Bank plc	$	62,500,000.00	6.610259122	%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia	$	37,500,000.00	3.966155473	%
Svenska Handelsbanken	$	37,500,000.00	3.966155473	%
TD Bank, NA	$	25,000,000.00	2.644103649	%
The Bank of New York Mellon	$	25,000,000.00	2.644103649	%
William Street LLC	$	25,000,000.00	2.644103649	%
PNC Bank National Association	$	20,000,000.00	2.115282919	%
Bank of China, New York Branch	$	17,500,000.00	1.850872554	%
The Northern Trust Company	$	17,500,000.00	1.850872554	%
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd., New York Branch	$	15,000,000.00	1.586462189	%
Chang Hwa Commercial Bank, Ltd., New York Branch	$	15,000,000.00	1.586462189	%
First Commercial Bank New York Agency	$	10,000,000.00	1.057641460	%
Mega International Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. New York Branch	$	8,000,000.00	.846113168	%
The Chiba Bank, Ltd., New York Branch	$	5,000,000.00	.528820730	%
Total	$	945,500,000.00	100.000000000	%

EX-10.5

Exhibit 10.5

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks (“*****”), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

EXECUTION VERSION

LICENSE AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT No. 9

This License Agreement Amendment No. 9 (the “Amendment No. 9”) executed and delivered as of July 24, 2009 amends the License Agreement dated September 20, 2005, as later amended (the "Agreement") by and between Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”), as assignee and successor in interest to Standard & Poor’s Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, S&P and CME are parties to the Agreement, and now mutually desire to amend certain terms of the same.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and conditions contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows. All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment No. 9 shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

1. Section 2(a) of the Agreement shall be amended by replacing the last sentence of the existing Section 2(a) with the following:

In addition, S&P hereby further grants to CME worldwide licenses: (1) to use the S&P-GSCI Excess Return Index, S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index in connection with clearing, marketing, and promoting Cleared OTC Swaps; and (2) to use and refer to the S&P-GSCI Excess Return Index, S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index marks in connection with clearing, marketing, and promoting Indexed Contracts and with making such disclosures about such Cleared OTC Swap as CME deems necessary or desirable under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or regulations or under this Agreement in order to indicate the source of the S&P Stock Indices.

3. Section 5 of the Agreement shall be amended by adding the following language after Section 5(k):

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks (“*****”), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(K) Cleared OTC Swap License Fee - Oil and Gold. In addition to all other fees and royalties payable by CME in this Agreement, CME shall pay S&P an annual OTC payment each year for the right to clear, market and promote the Cleared OTC Swaps based on the S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index. The first such payment is due sixty (60) days after execution of this Amendment No. 9. Subsequent payments shall be due on the anniversaries of this Amendment No. 9 during the Term. The payments shall be $***** in the first year, $***** in the second and third years. Either party, in its sole discretion, may propose an adjustment of the annual payment for the Cleared OTC Swaps based on the S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index by providing written notice of such at least 180 days prior to the third anniversary of this Amendment No. 9. Such adjusted payment shall apply to the remainder of the Term. The parties agree to negotiate in good faith any proposed adjustment. If the parties do not agree on the adjustment prior to 30 days before the third anniversary, this Agreement shall terminate on the third anniversary solely with respect to the Cleared OTC Swaps based on the S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index. If no such written notice is received, the payment shall remain at $***** per year for the remainder of the Term.

4. Section 10(h) of the Agreement shall be amended by replacing the existing language with the following:

(h) Cleared OTC Swap Report. CME shall provide to S&P a quarterly report within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar quarter. The format and contents of such report shall be in CME’s sole discretion but it shall at a minimum include the number of Cleared OTC Swaps based on the S&P-GSCI Excess Return Index, S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index licensed hereunder and cleared by CME during the quarter. Further, CME shall provide S&P an annual report within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar year that includes the identities of all parties to transactions in Cleared OTC Swaps based on the S&P-GSCI Excess Return Index, S&P-GSCI Crude Oil Excess Return Index, and S&P-GSCI Gold Excess Return Index. S&P shall treat such reports as confidential information and shall use the annual report sole for the purpose of determining such parties’ licensed rights to participate in the Cleared OTC Swaps market at CME.

5. In the event of any conflict, ambiguity or inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 9 and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 9 shall govern and control.

2

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks (“*****”), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Except as modified hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

3

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks (“*****”), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 9 to be executed as of the date specified above.

STANDARD & POOR’S FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, assignee and successor in interest to Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.		CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.
By:	/s/ Robert Shakotko	By:	/s/ Rick Redding
Name:	Robert Shakotko	Name:	Rick Redding
Title:	Managing Director, Index Services	Title:	Managing Director Products and Services Development

4

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Craig S. Donohue, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CME Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2009

/s/ Craig S. Donohue

Name: Craig S. Donohue

Title: Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

I, James E. Parisi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CME Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2009

/s/ James E. Parisi

Name: James E. Parisi

Title: Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CME Group Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Craig S. Donohue, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James E. Parisi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Craig S. Donohue
Name:	Craig S. Donohue
Title:	Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 6, 2009

/s/ James E. Parisi
Name:	James E. Parisi
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 6, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.