The Company's reserves for losses and loss expenses are comprised of case reserves and incurred but not reported liabilities ("IBNR"). When a claim is reported, a case reserve is established for the estimated ultimate payment based upon known information about the claim. As more information about the claim becomes available over time, case reserves are adjusted up or down as appropriate. Reserves are also established on an aggregate basis to provide for IBNR liabilities and expected loss reserve development on reported claims.

Loss reserves included in the Company’s financial statements represent management’s best estimates based upon an actuarially derived point estimate and other considerations. The Company uses a variety of actuarial techniques and methods to derive an actuarial point estimate for each operating unit. These methods include paid loss development, incurred loss development, paid and incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods and frequency and severity methods. In circumstances where one actuarial method is considered more credible than the others, that method is used to set the point estimate. The actuarial point estimate may also be based on a judgmental weighting of estimates produced from each of the methods considered. Industry loss experience is used to supplement the Company’s own data in selecting “tail factors” in areas where the Company’s own data is limited. The actuarial data is analyzed by line of business, coverage and accident or policy year, as appropriate, for each operating unit.

The establishment of the actuarially derived loss reserve point estimate also includes consideration of qualitative factors that may affect the ultimate losses. These qualitative considerations include, among others, the impact of re-underwriting initiatives, changes in the mix of business, changes in distribution sources and changes in policy terms and conditions.

The key assumptions used to arrive at the best estimate of loss reserves are the expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation, and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Expected loss ratios represent management’s expectation of losses at the time the business is priced and written, before any actual claims experience has emerged. This expectation is a significant determinant of the estimate of loss reserves for recently written business where there is little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Expected loss ratios are generally derived from historical loss ratios adjusted for the impact of rate changes, loss cost trends and known changes in the type of risks underwritten. Expected loss ratios are estimated for each key line of business within each operating unit. Expected loss cost inflation is particularly important for the long-tail lines, such as excess casualty, and claims with a high medical component, such as workers’ compensation. Reported and paid loss emergence patterns are used to project current reported or paid loss amounts to their ultimate settlement value. Loss development factors are based on the historical emergence patterns of paid and incurred losses, and are derived from the Company’s own experience and industry data. The paid loss emergence pattern is also significant to excess and assumed workers’ compensation reserves because those reserves are discounted to their estimated present value based upon such estimated payout patterns.

Loss frequency and severity are measures of loss activity that are considered in determining the key assumptions described in our discussion of loss and loss expense reserves, including expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Loss frequency is a measure of the number of claims per unit of insured exposure, and loss severity is a measure of the average size of claims. Factors affecting loss frequency include the effectiveness of loss controls and safety programs and changes in economic activity or weather patterns. Factors affecting loss severity include changes in policy limits, retentions, rate of inflation and judicial interpretations.

Another factor affecting estimates of loss frequency and severity is the loss reporting lag, which is the period of time between the occurrence of a loss and the date the loss is reported to the Company. The length of the loss reporting lag affects our ability to accurately predict loss frequency (loss frequencies are more predictable for lines with short reporting lags) as well as the amount of reserves needed for incurred but not reported losses (less IBNR is required for lines with short reporting lags). As a result, loss reserves for lines with short reporting lags are likely to have less variation from initial loss estimates. For lines with short reporting lags, which include commercial automobile, primary workers’ compensation, other liability (claims-made) and property business, the key assumption is the loss emergence pattern used to project ultimate loss estimates from known losses paid or reported to date. For lines of business with long reporting lags, which include other liability (occurrence), products liability, excess workers’ compensation and liability reinsurance, the key assumption is the expected loss ratio since there is often little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Historically, the Company has experienced less variation from its initial loss estimates for lines of businesses with short reporting lags than for lines of business with long reporting lags.


	June 30,
(In thousands)	2023		2022
Net reserves at beginning of period	$	14,248,879	$	12,848,362


Net provision for losses and loss expenses:
Claims occurring during the current year (1)	3,064,046		2,748,725
Increase in estimates for claims occurring in prior years (2) (3)	28,853		9,765
Loss reserve discount accretion	15,510		16,579
Total	3,108,409		2,775,069
Net payments for claims:
Current year	375,365		318,129
Prior years	2,019,371		1,688,843
Total	2,394,736		2,006,972
Foreign currency translation	5,929		(94,526)
Net reserves at end of period	14,968,481		13,521,933
Ceded reserves at end of period	2,951,515		2,623,888
Gross reserves at end of period	$	17,919,996	$	16,145,821

(3) For certain retrospectively rated insurance policies and reinsurance agreements, reserve development is offset by additional or return premiums. Adverse development, net of additional and return premiums, was $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023, and favorable development was $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively.

The COVID-19 global pandemic impacted, and may further impact, the Company’s loss costs. Accordingly, the ultimate net impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s reserves remains uncertain. Furthermore, new variants of the COVID-19 virus may create risks with respect to loss costs as well as other potential impacts of a pandemic.

As of June 30, 2023, the Company had recognized losses for COVID-19-related claims activity, net of reinsurance, of approximately $352 million, of which $298 million relates to the Insurance segment and $54 million relates to the Reinsurance & Monoline Excess segment. Such $352 million of COVID-19-related losses included $348 million of reported losses and $4 million of IBNR. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the Company recognized current accident year losses for COVID-19-related claims activity, net of reinsurance, of approximately $259 thousand, all of which relates to the Insurance segment.

During the six months ended June 30, 2023, adverse prior year development (net of additional and return premiums) of $21 million included $25 million of adverse development for the Insurance segment, partially offset by $4 million of favorable development for the Reinsurance & Monoline Excess segment.

Overall adverse development was recognized during the first quarter of 2023 in both business segments due to property catastrophe losses related to 2022 events that were still being adjusted and settled. In particular, losses related to U.S. winter storms that occurred in December were a significant driver of the development, as information gathering and evaluation of these losses were still ongoing into the first quarter. As a result, prior year reserve development (net of additional and return premiums) overall was adverse by $24 million in the first quarter, but was favorable by $3 million during the second quarter of 2023.

For the Insurance segment, in addition to the property prior year adverse development discussed above, the adverse development during the six months ended June 30, 2023 included adverse prior year development on casualty lines for the 2016 through 2019 accident years, which was largely offset by favorable prior year development on casualty lines for the 2021 and 2022 accident years. The adverse development on the 2016 through 2019 accident years was concentrated in the other liability line of business, and to a lesser degree, professional liability, including medical professional. The development, which particularly impacted business attaching excess of primary policy limits, was driven by a larger than expected number of large losses reported. The Company believes social inflation is contributing to an increase in the frequency of large losses for these accident years. Social inflation can include higher settlement demands from plaintiffs, use of tactics such as litigation funding

The favorable prior year development on casualty lines for the 2021 and 2022 accident years in the Insurance segment was concentrated in the professional liability, workers’ compensation, and other liability lines of business, partially offset by adverse development in commercial auto liability. Due to uncertainty regarding incurred loss frequency and severity in light of ongoing social inflation and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company set its initial loss ratios for the 2021 and 2022 accident years prudently, and largely maintained these estimates through the end of each respective accident year. The reported loss experience for these lines of business for the 2021 and 2022 accident years has been better than was expected, and the Company has begun to react to this favorable emergence as the accident years mature beyond 12 months. Commercial auto liability experienced adverse prior year development during the six months ended June 30, 2023 for the 2021 and 2022 accident years, which was driven by a larger than expected number of large losses reported.

For the Reinsurance & Monoline Excess segment, the favorable development during the six months ended June 30, 2023 was driven mainly by favorable development in excess workers’ compensation, partially offset by adverse development in property (discussed above) and non-proportional reinsurance assumed liability lines of business. The favorable excess workers’ compensation development was driven by continued lower claim frequency and reported losses relative to our expectations, and to favorable claim settlements. The favorable development was spread across many prior accident years. The adverse development on reinsurance assumed liability was associated primarily with our U.S. assumed reinsurance business, and related to accounts reinsuring excess and umbrella business and construction projects. The adverse development was concentrated mainly in accident years 2017 through 2020.

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, favorable prior year development (net of additional and return premiums) of $3 million included $3 million of favorable development for the Insurance segment, slightly offset by $0.3 million of adverse development for the Reinsurance & Monoline Excess segment.

The overall favorable development for the Insurance segment was primarily attributable to favorable development on the 2020 and 2021 accident years, partially offset by adverse development on the 2015 through 2019 accident years. The favorable development on the 2020 and 2021 accident years was concentrated in the other liability lines of business, including products liability and commercial multi-peril liability, and to a lesser extent professional liability and workers’ compensation. The Company experienced lower reported claim frequency in these lines of business during 2020 and 2021 relative to historical averages, and continued to experience lower reported incurred losses relative to our expectations for these accident years as they developed during 2022. These trends began in 2020 and we believe were caused by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including for example, lockdowns, reduced driving/traffic and increased work from home. Due to the ongoing uncertainty regarding the ultimate impacts of the pandemic on accident years 2020 and 2021 incurred losses, the Company has been cautious in reacting to these lower trends in setting and updating its loss ratio estimates for these years. As these accident years continued to mature, the Company continued to recognize some of the favorable reported experience in its ultimate loss estimates made during 2022.

The adverse development on the 2015 through 2019 accident years is concentrated in the other liability and professional liability, including medical professional, lines of business, and to a lesser degree commercial auto liability. The development is driven by a larger than expected number of large losses reported. The Company believes social inflation is contributing to an increase in the frequency of large losses for these accident years. Social inflation can include higher settlement demands from plaintiffs, use of tactics such as litigation funding by the plaintiffs’ bar, negative public sentiment towards large businesses and corporations, and erosion of tort reforms, among others.

The overall slight adverse development for the Reinsurance & Monoline Excess segment was driven mainly by adverse development in the professional liability and non-proportional reinsurance assumed property and liability lines of business, substantially offset by favorable development in excess workers’ compensation. The adverse development spread mainly across accident years 2015 through 2021 was associated primarily with our U.S. assumed reinsurance business and related to accounts insuring construction projects and professional liability exposures. The favorable excess workers’ compensation development was mainly in 2011 and prior accident years, and was driven by a review of the Company’s claim reporting patterns as well as a number of favorable claim settlements relative to expectations.