XML 83 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Loans Receivable
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable, Gross, Allowance, and Net [Abstract]  
Loans Receivable
Loans Receivable
Loans receivable are as follows:
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Loans receivable
$
411,851

 
$
401,961

 
 
 
 
Valuation allowance:
 
 
 
  Specific
$

 
$
3,000

  General
1,916

 
2,620

  Total
$
1,916

 
$
5,620

 
 
 
 
Impaired loans:
 
 
 
  With a specific valuation allowance
$

 
$
1,775

  Without a valuation allowance
30,000

 
31,023

  Unpaid principal balance
30,000

 
35,872

 
 
 
 
For the nine months ended September 30:
2013
 
2012
  Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance
$
137

 
$
(14,053
)
  Loans receivable charged off

 
139

For the three months ended September 30:
 
 
 
  Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance
72

 
(7,280
)
  Loans receivable charged off

 
54


The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable and assesses the ability of each borrower to pay principal and interest based upon loan structure, underlying property values, cash flow and related financial and operating performance of the property and market conditions. Loans receivable with a potential for default are further assessed using a discounted cash flow analysis and comparable cost and sales methodologies, if appropriate.
The Company's eight largest loans receivable, which have an aggregate amortized cost of $304 million and an aggregate fair value of $308 million at September 30, 2013, are secured by commercial real estate located primarily in New York City, California, Hawaii and Chicago. These loans earn interest at floating LIBOR-based interest rates and have maturities (inclusive of extension options) through August 2025.
The Company utilizes an internal risk rating system to assign a risk to each of its commercial loans. The loan rating system takes into consideration credit quality indicators including loan to value ratios, which compare the outstanding loan amount to the estimated value of the property, the borrower's financial condition and performance with respect to loan terms, the Company's position in the capital structure, and the overall leverage in the capital structure. Based on this rating system, one loan with an aggregate cost basis of $30 million was considered to be impaired at September 30, 2013. After considering the amount of loss in the event of a default and whether a loss is probable, the Company determined that a specific valuation allowance was not required.