10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-51002

ZIPREALTY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	94-3319956
(State of incorporation)	(IRS employer
	identification number)

2000 POWELL STREET, SUITE 300
EMERYVILLE, CA	94608
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(510) 735-2600

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x
		(Do not check if
		a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

We had 21,564,111 shares of common stock outstanding at November 1, 2013.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION		4
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	6
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	7
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	33
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION		33
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	33
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	34
Item 5.	Other Information	35
Item 6.	Exhibits	35
SIGNATURE		35
EXHIBIT INDEX		36

2

Statement regarding forward-looking statements

This report includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy and operations, and plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will likely,” “should,” “could,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “aim,” “expect,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “designed,” “provides,” “facilitates,” “assists,” “helps” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this report include, but are not limited to, statements relating to:

· trends in the residential real estate market, the market for mortgages, and the general economy;

· our future financial results;

· our future growth;

· our future advertising and marketing activities; and

· our future investment in technology.

We have based these forward-looking statements principally on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance and you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.

These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as such disclosure may be revised under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report. Readers should carefully review such cautionary statements as they identify certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends. Those cautionary statements are not exclusive and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this report or in materials incorporated herein by reference.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this report.

Trademarks

“ZipRealty” is one of our registered trademarks in the United States. We also own the rights to the domain name “www.Real-Estate.com.” “REALTOR” and “REALTORS” are registered trademarks of the National Association of REALTORS^®. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners.

Internet site

Our Internet address is www.ziprealty.com. We make publicly available free of charge on our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on our website is not a part of this report.

3

Where you can find additional information

You may review a copy of this report, including exhibits and any schedule filed therewith, and obtain copies of such materials at prescribed rates, at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference at Room 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants, such as ZipRealty, that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:

ZIPREALTY, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,511		$	12,921
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $15 and $15, respectively		1,266			1,496
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,903			1,763
Total current assets		17,680			16,180
Restricted cash		500			500
Property and equipment, net		2,946			2,387
Other assets		267			362
Total assets	$	21,393		$	19,429
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,081		$	823
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		4,287			4,293
Accrued restructuring charges, current portion		81			221
Total current liabilities		5,449			5,337
Other long-term liabilities		595			592
Total liabilities		6,044			5,929
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 25,164 and
24,303 shares issued and 21,553 and 20,692 outstanding, respectively		25			24
Additional paid-in capital		163,028			159,430
Accumulated deficit		(130,084	)		(128,334	)
Treasury stock, at cost: 3,610 shares		(17,620	)		(17,620	)
Total stockholders' equity		15,349			13,500
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	21,393		$	19,429

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ZIPREALTY, INC. 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months  Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September  30,					September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
Net revenues	$	21,816	$	19,767		$	58,873		$	56,128
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		12,742		11,171			33,837			30,605
Product development (1)		1,912		1,729			5,588			5,224
Sales and marketing		5,451		4,837			15,851			15,694
General and administrative		1,600		1,743			5,151			5,916
Litigation settlement charges (Note 7)		3		5,000			88			5,000
Restructuring charges, net		4		233			66			1,390
Total operating costs and expenses		21,712		24,713			60,581			63,829
Income (loss) from operations		104		(4,946	)		(1,708	)		(7,701	)
Interest income		2		6			5			18
Income (loss) before income taxes		106		(4,940	)		(1,703	)		(7,683	)
Provision for income taxes		12		-			47			-
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.00	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)
Diluted	$	0.00	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		21,114		20,637			20,894			20,630
Diluted		22,492		20,637			20,894			20,630
(1) Amortization of internal-use software and website development costs included in product development		336		285			979			856

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

ZIPREALTY, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

	Three Months  Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Change in accumulated unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax		-		-			-			3
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,680	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

ZIPREALTY, INC. 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands) 

	Nine Months  Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,429			1,317
Stock-based compensation expense		1,038			884
Non-cash restructuring charges		-			4
Provision for doubtful accounts		5			(2	)
Amortization of short-term investment premium		-			44
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		-			5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		225			(237	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(147	)		156
Other assets		95			3
Accounts payable		258			(246	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(6	)		4,121
Accrued restructuring charges, current portion		(140	)		(1	)
Other long-term liabilities		3			(163	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		1,010			(1,798	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from  sale of short-term investments		-			7,960
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,943	)		(1,302	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,943	)		6,658
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock option exercises		2,523			80
Acquisition of treasury stock		-			(7	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,523			73
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,590			4,933
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		12,921			12,634
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	14,511		$	17,567

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the three and nine months then ended have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for annual financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements, and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position for the periods presented. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013, or any other period. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and reflect the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.

Seasonality

The Company’s net transaction revenues and income (loss) from operations have historically varied from quarter to quarter. Such variations are principally attributable to variations in home sales activity over the course of the calendar year. The Company has historically experienced lower net transaction revenues during the first quarter because holidays and adverse weather conditions in certain regions typically reduce the level of sales activity and listings inventories between the Thanksgiving and Presidents’ Day holidays. The Company’s historical quarterly operations have been additionally impacted in recent years as a result of economic conditions and government programs that altered home buyer behavior. Net transaction revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 27.5% and 27.6% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net transaction revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 78.2% and 78.4% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Significant accounting policies

Revenue recognition

The Company derives the majority of its revenue from commissions earned as agents in residential real estate transactions and from commission referrals earned from its network of third-party brokerages. Commission revenue is recognized upon closing of a transaction, net of any rebate or commission discount or transaction fee adjustment. These transactions typically do not have multiple deliverables.

Non-commission revenues are derived primarily from marketing agreements with residential mortgage service providers, the sale of online advertising, lead referral fees and other revenues. Marketing service revenues are recognized over the term of the agreements as the contracted services are delivered. Advertising revenues on contracts are recognized as impressions are delivered or as clicks are provided to advertisers. Advertising and marketing contracts may consist of multiple deliverables which generally include a blend of various impressions or clicks as well as other marketing deliverables. Revenues related to revenue sharing arrangements are recognized based on revenue reports received from our partners, provided that collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence an arrangement exists, the service has been delivered and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

8

2. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Property and equipment, net

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	(In thousands)
Computer hardware and software	$	10,755		$	9,095
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		1,961			1,938
Leasehold improvements		1,954			1,656
Total		14,670			12,689
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(11,724	)		(10,302	)
Total property and equipment, net	$	2,946		$	2,387

Depreciation and amortization expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 was approximately $482,000 and $448,000, respectively.

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued compensation	$	1,340	$	1,073
Accrued agent commissions		1,476		1,423
Accrued marketing		987		863
Accrued litigation settlement		66		227
Accrued professional fees		110		188
Other accrued expenses		308		519
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	4,287	$	4,293

3. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s cash equivalents were invested in money market funds. The table below sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets:

9

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated		Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money Market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Recorded as:	(In thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	7,959	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	7,957

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the fair value hierarchy, established by the accounting standard related to fair value measurement, to prioritize the inputs used in valuation techniques. There are three broad levels to the fair value hierarchy of inputs to fair value. Level 1 is the highest priority and Level 3 is the lowest priority and are as follows:

· Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

· Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

· Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The Company measures and reports certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis, including its investments in money market funds. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no liabilities recorded at fair value. The fair values of the Company’s Level 1 financial assets are based on quoted market prices of the identical underlying security. The Company did not have any Level 2 and Level 3 financial assets at September 30, 2013 and at December 31, 2012. The Company utilizes a pricing service to assist in obtaining fair value pricing for its investment portfolio.

At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company’s cash equivalents amounting to $8.0 million, were invested in money market funds and were measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy.

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

10

4. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Denominator:
Shares used to compute EPS:
Basic		21,114		20,637			20,894			20,630
Diluted		22,492		20,637			20,894			20,630
Net income (loss) per share basic and diluted:
Basic	$	-	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)
Diluted	$	-	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)

The following weighted-average outstanding options and non-vested common shares were excluded in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented because including them would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Options to purchase common stock		2,174		5,095		5,593		4,729
Nonvested common stock		-		-		45		-
Total		2,174		5,095		5,638		4,729

5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Valuation assumptions and stock-based compensation expense

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the day of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, dividend yields and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected life of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was estimated by taking the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the option. The Company did not have any options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The risk-free interest rate estimate is based upon U.S. Treasury bond rates appropriate for the expected life of the options.

The assumptions used and the resulting estimates of weighted average fair value per share of options granted were as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Expected volatility		0	%		51	%		51%-52%			49%-51%
Risk-free interest rate		0.0	%		0.9	%		1.0-1.3%			0.7-1.2%
Expected life (years)		0.0			6.1			5.5-6.1			5.5-6.1
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period	$	0.00		$	1.16		$	1.76		$	0.62

11

Stock-based compensation expense was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenues	$	165	$	124	$	218	$	163
Product development		28		10		77		46
Sales and marketing		131		36		230		122
General and administrative		158		116		513		473
Restructuring charges, net		-		80		-		80
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	482	$	366	$	1,038	$	884

The accounting standards require forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimated expected forfeitures based on various factors including employee class and historical experience. The amount of stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. As of September 30, 2013, there was $3.1 million of unrecorded stock-based compensation, after estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.8 years. As of September 30, 2013, there was $63,000 of unrecorded stock-based compensation related to unvested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 0.4 years.

Stock option activity

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the period indicated was as follows:

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Life (Years)		Value
	(In thousands)							(In thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		5,097		$	3.16		6.15	$	2,614
Options granted		1,277			3.57
Options exercised		(831	)		3.04
Options forfeited/cancelled/expired		(344	)		5.15
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		5,199		$	3.15		7.26	$	13,104
Exercisable  at September 30, 2013		2,844		$	3.46		5.86	$	6,762

Options generally vest over a four-year period with one-fourth (1/4) of the shares vesting one year after the vesting commencement date, and an additional one-forty eighth (1/48) of the shares vesting on the first day of each calendar month thereafter until all such shares are exercisable. Options generally expire after ten years. Options issued pursuant to the Company’s voluntary stock option exchange program, completed in July 2009, vested ratably over a 36 month period and expire after seven years.

The Company granted options for 183,000 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2012 that provide accelerated vesting if the Company’s closing stock price is equal to or greater than $5.00 per share for a period of 120 consecutive days. On the same date, the Company also granted options for 183,000 shares that provided for vesting in full if the Company achieves adjusted EBITDA profitability for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was achieved. 

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $5.47 on September 30, 2013, and the exercise price for the options that were in-the-money at September 30, 2013. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of September 30, 2013 was 2,502,000. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was $1,129,000 and $25,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares.

12

Restricted Stock

The Company expenses the cost of restricted stock awards, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, ratably over the period during which the restriction lapse. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $38,000 and $68,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $0 and ($3,000), respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company had 15,000 and 45,000 shares of nonvested restricted stock awards, respectively.

			Weighted
			Average
	Number of		Exercise
	Shares		Price
	(In thousands)
Nonvested at December 31, 2012		15	$	2.87
Shares granted		30		3.00
Shares vested		-		-
Shares forfeited		-		-
Nonvested at September 30, 2013		45	$	2.96

6. INCOME TAXES

The Company currently forecasts losses for the year. Since these losses are not benefitted, they are not included in the effective tax rate calculation. The tax provision is comprised of Texas margin tax and other state minimum taxes and is recorded ratably in the interim period.

The Company maintains that a full valuation allowance should be maintained for its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2013. The Company supports the need for a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets due to negative evidence including recent historical results and management’s expectations for the future.

7. LEGAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES

On September 26, 2011, the Division of Labor Standard Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California (the “DLSE”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, State Labor Commissioner, etc., v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint concerned the Company’s compensation practices regarding real estate agents in California, who at the time at issue were classified as employees. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the Company failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime, and failed to provide itemized wage statements, as required by California laws. In addition to wages and overtime, the complaint seeks liquidated damages, for a total claim in excess of $17 million. On September 28, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement Agreement and General Release (the “Agreement”) with the DLSE concerning the complaint. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company paid $0.2 million to the DLSE for attorneys’ fees and costs, and $4.8 million into a trust for disbursement to former employees as back wages. The Company will pay the employer’s share of F.I.C.A. taxes and other employer tax responsibilities on back wages as they are distributed to former employees, as well as the administrative costs of the claims administrator for the trust, which totaled $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 and $0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and which could total an additional $0.1 million if all remaining former employee claimants participate. A liability and corresponding expense for this additional $0.1 million of employer taxes and administrative fees have not been reflected within the balance sheet because an estimate of the ultimate liability for payment of these payroll taxes cannot be reasonably determined. Disbursements to former employees are subject to their execution of a release claim against the Company. The Agreement also includes a full release by the DLSE from further liability on this issue. On October 12, 2012, the Court dismissed the entire action, with prejudice, against the defendants.

13

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating leases

The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through February 2019. The terms of the lease agreements provide for renewal options and escalation clauses. Future gross and net lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2013 were as follows, in thousands:

	Gross
	Operating					Net Operating
	Lease		Sublease			Lease
	Commitments		Income			Commitments
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2013	$	450	$	(20	)	$	430
2014		1,770		(42	)		1,728
2015		1,537		(43	)		1,494
2016		1,221		(44	)		1,177
2017		678		(34	)		644
2018		233		-			233
2019		12		-			12
Total minimum lease payments	$	5,901	$	(183	)	$	5,718

Legal proceedings

On March 26, 2010, we were named as one of fourteen defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Smarter Agent LLC v. Boopsie, Inc., et al. The complaint alleges that the defendants have each infringed on patents owned by Smarter Agent relating to mobile device application technology and seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The US Patent Office is currently examining the patent issue, and litigation is stayed pending the completion of that investigation. After completing investigation of this matter, we do not believe that we have infringed on any patent, or that we have any liability for the claims alleged, and, thus, we intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

On February 17, 2012, two real estate sales agents formerly employed by us, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, District of Arizona, Patricia Anderson and James Kwasiborski v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint concerns our compensation practices nationwide regarding our real estate agents, who at the time at issue were classified as employees. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime as required by federal law. The complaint seeks liquidated and treble damages in addition to wages and overtime for an unspecified amount. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and, thus, we believe that this claim is without merit. In addition to the federal law allegations, the complaint alleges violation of the Arizona Minimum Wage law. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

On February 29, 2012, one real estate agent formerly employed by us, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Tracy Adewunmi v. ZipRealty, Inc., concerning our compensation practices regarding real estate agents in California. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime, failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to reimburse employee expenses and failed to provide itemized wage statements as required by California laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages including penalties and attorneys’ fees in addition to wages and overtime. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” and were compensated accordingly in full compliance with California law. Additionally, we filed a cross complaint against Ms. Adewumni for fraud and breach of contract, in which we alleged that she created false client accounts that resulted in her receiving higher commission payments than she was entitled to receive under her employment agreement. On May 20, 2013, Ms. Adewumni dropped the class claims in her complaint and, thus, this case now involves only the claims of individual plaintiff, Tracy Adewumni. We have completed further investigation and discovery and continue to believe that Ms. Adewumni’s claims are without merit. Litigation is ongoing, and the case is set for trial in February 2014. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

14

 On January 11, 2013, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United State District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Arczar LLC v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint alleges that our mobile device application has infringed on a patent owned by Arczar relating to computer vision system technology and seeks unspecified damages and other equitable relief. Effective July 24, 2013, we entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with Arczar that resulted in a dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice and our purchase of a perpetual license to Arczar’s patents.

We are not currently subject to any other material legal proceedings. From time to time we have been, and we currently are, a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of the business. The amounts in dispute in these matters are not material to us, and we believe that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Indemnifications

The Company has entered into various indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of our business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified parties, which include certain of our service providers as well as others, in connection with certain occurrences. In addition, the corporate charter documents require the Company to provide indemnification rights to the Company’s directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, and permit the Company to provide indemnification rights to our other employees and agents, for certain events that occur while these persons are serving in these capacities. The Company’s charter documents also protect each of its directors, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, from personal liability to the Company and its stockholders from monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director. The Company has also entered into indemnification agreements with the Company’s directors and each of our officers with a title of Vice President or higher.

The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unspecified. The Company is not aware of any material indemnification liabilities for actions, events or occurrences that have occurred to date. The Company maintains insurance on some of the liabilities the Company has agreed to indemnify, including liabilities incurred by the Company’s directors and officers while acting in these capacities, subject to certain exclusions and limitations of coverage.

9. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES, NET

2012 Restructuring Plan

During February 2012, the Company announced a restructuring, including a work force realignment to more appropriately allocate resources to its key strategic initiatives. The workforce realignment involved investing resources in some areas, reducing resources in others and eliminating some areas of the Company’s business that did not support its strategic priorities. During March 2012, the Company announced the transition of its owned-and-operated brokerage office in Salt Lake City to a third-party brokerage joining the Company’s Powered by Zip network. The Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.1 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

2011 Restructuring Plan

During January 2011, the Company announced a restructuring, including closing brokerage operations in selected underperforming markets and a workforce reduction in sales support and administration functions. The associated restructuring charges included employee severance pay and related expenses, non-cancelable lease obligations and other exit costs. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has recorded the majority of the cost of this restructuring. Accrued 2011 Restructuring Plan charges as of September 30, 2013 relate primarily to non-cancelable lease obligations and related facility costs which the Company expects to pay over the remaining terms of the obligations.

15

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

	Balance as of   December 31,							Non-cash		Balance as of   September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
	2012		Charges		Payments			Adjustment		2013		2013
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	27	$	54	$	(81	)	$	-	$	-	$	1,585
Lease obligation and other exit costs		44		-		(24	)		-		20		75
		71		54		(105	)		-		20		1,660
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		-		-		-			-		-		1,450
Lease obligation and other exit costs		150		12		(65	)		-		97		842
Non-cash charges		-		-		-			-		-		59
		150		12		(65	)		-		97		2,351
Total	$	221	$	66	$	(170	)	$	-	$	117	$	4,011

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

	Balance as of   December 31,							Non-cash			Balance as of   September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
	2011		Charges		Payments			Adjustment			2012		2012
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	-	$	1,335	$	(1,253	)	$	(80	)	$	2	$	1,335
Lease obligation and other exit costs		-		54		(11	)					43		54
Non-cash charges		-		-		-			-			-		-
		-		1,389		(1,264	)		(80	)		45		1,389
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		39		1		(40	)		-			-		1,452
Lease obligation and other exit costs		377		-		(173	)		-			204		889
Non-cash charges		-		-		-			-			-		-
		416		1		(213	)		-			204		2,341
Total	$	416	$	1,390	$	(1,477	)	$	(80	)	$	249	$	3,730

Accrued restructuring changes for September 30, 2013 and 2012 relates primarily to non-cancelable lease obligations and related facility costs which the company expects to pay over the remaining terms of the lease obligations.

16

Accrued restructuring charges were included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued restructuring charges (current liabilities)	$	81	$	221
Other long-term liabilities		36		-
Total accrued restructuring charges	$	117	$	221

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

The following discussion should be read together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including but not limited to those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Those reasons include, without limitation, those described at the beginning of this report under “Statement regarding forward-looking statements,” as well as those that may be set forth elsewhere in this report. Except as otherwise required by law, we do not intend to update any information contained in these forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

We are the most prominent online, technology-enabled real estate brokerage company in the United States. Our company owned-and-operated real estate brokerage serves 19 metropolitan markets with nearly 1,700 licensed REALTORS®. We serve an additional 19 markets through our Powered by Zip, or PbZ, business, which provides our technology platform as an enterprise cloud-based application. We operate ZipRealty.com, which is consistently the most visited real estate brokerage website in the nation according to Hitwise, an information services company, and which attracts about 2.8 million unique monthly visitors. We also provide consumers with highly rated mobile applications that offer all of the key features of our website and optimize them for all major platforms and devices.

Both our owned-and-operated brokerage and our Powered by Zip network share the same internal engine: the powerful proprietary customer service technology, known as Zap, and the online marketing capabilities that form the foundation of our business. We developed Zap over a 14 year period during which our technology team partnered with REALTORS® across the country to collaboratively develop a customer service platform that empowers real estate professionals to deliver superior customer service in a significantly more efficient approach. We refer to this innovation feedback loop as our “innovation factory” and believe that our disciplined management of this process directly led to Zap’s success in our brokerage and Powered by Zip network and also allows us to keep this application on the cutting-edge.

As the direct result of offering the most accurate, timely and comprehensive housing information, buyers using our services can quickly find relevant home listings that meet their search criteria and are well positioned when they are ready to interact with local REALTORS® affiliated with our owned-and-operated brokerage or our PbZ network. At the same time, sellers using our system gain assurance that their listings are marketed effectively online to interested home buyers.

Recent advances in technology

We made several advances to our consumer and agent facing technology during the third quarter of 2013. The most significant milestone was our development of Mobile Zap and successful alpha and beta testing during the third quarter, which we then launched in October of 2013. Mobile Zap offers agents in both our owned and operated business and our PbZ network the full functionality of the desktop version, augmented with mobile-specific features such as geolocation and one-touch click to call functionality. Mobile Zap provides productivity enhancements over the desktop version with crisp data visualization designed to improve filtering and sorting capabilities for effective and efficient client platform management. Communication is improved with notifications now linked to SMS as well as email to enable an agent to respond more rapidly, which is a metric that resonates well with consumers. The “Quick Add” feature of Mobile Zap allows agents to add new contacts, showing appointments, tasks and calendar items while in the field. The showings option includes a field to capture comments on the home during the visit. Data provided by Agent Comments highlights the agents’ local insight, knowledge and experience to online consumers. We expect that the Mobile Zap launch will increase the number, timeliness and quality of Agent Comments.

17

In the third quarter, we continued to drive innovation on our website to improve its SEO drawing power. Recognizing the increasing importance of social media to consumer behavior as well as to relevance with respect to search engine algorithms, we developed social sharing buttons on home detail pages, enabling agents to link to their social profiles from their profiles on ZipRealty.com, and opening up social sharing of Agent Reviews. These efforts resulted in social referral traffic that was up more than 50% year-over-year in the third quarter. In addition, Agent Comments continue to be a significant driver for SEO. Agent Comments were up 136% year-over-year in the third quarter, and total 47,859 across the website at October 15, 2013. We expect that Mobile Zap will increase the volume of Agent Comments through increased participation by agents and a higher number of comments per agent.

All of these technology advances benefited from the close collaboration between our technology team and our agents. These continuing advances demonstrate our conviction that this innovation factory serves as one of our core competencies, helping us maintain our technology leadership in the residential real estate industry.

Constituencies

Our proprietary technology, established reputation as full service online brokerage, and Powered by Zip network, as well as our prominence both online and in mobile, allow us to serve three main constituencies in the residential real estate industry:

First and foremost, we serve serious consumers, which we define as those who expect to purchase or sell a home within the next six to eighteen months. We offer these consumers our technology and services to provide control, choice and seamless, customized service. Through ZipRealty.com and our award-winning mobile apps, we provide consumers with the most accurate and relevant data on homes currently for sale through an easy-to-use interface and, when they are ready, connect them with knowledgeable local REALTORS® to assist them through every step of their real estate transaction.

Second, we serve real estate professionals in our owned-and-operated brokerage business. For these professionals, who seek more productive ways to conduct business in the fiercely competitive residential real estate industry, we generate a large base of customer leads which, through an advanced algorithm developed over the course of 14 years, have been systematically matched to yield productive agent-client relationships. These leads are made even more valuable with Zap, which is a system that helps incubate customer relationships with the assistance of powerful prospecting tools and real-time data on client activity that enables agents to provide excellent anticipatory service. We also market ZipRealty-affiliated REALTORS® on ZipRealty.com by showcasing their local know-how and real estate activity and by providing them with personalized agent websites.

Third, we serve other real estate brokerages and their affiliated agents who seek a competitive edge in this new era in which consumers are increasingly using online services for home buying and selling. For these brokerages, we not only generate online leads on their behalf, but we also provide them access to Zap as an enterprise cloud-based application that better enables them to turn these leads into closed transactions. Zap gives these brokerages crystal-clear, real-time visibility on their transaction pipeline, brokerage operations and financials, while facilitating a paperless office environment. Because Zap is a cloud-based application, our brokerage partners benefit from our rapid innovation cycle without the burden of expensive IT maintenance and software upgrade costs.

Geographic reach

We conduct our owned-and-operated brokerage services in 19 markets nationwide, all of which were opened prior to May 2009: Austin, TX; Baltimore, MD; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Dallas, TX; Denver, CO; Houston, TX; Las Vegas, NV; Los Angeles, CA; Orange County, CA; Orlando, FL; Phoenix, AZ; Richmond, VA; Sacramento, CA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco Bay area, CA; Seattle, WA; Portland, OR; and Washington, DC.

Our Powered by Zip network serves leading local brokerages in 19 markets where we do not otherwise conduct business: Atlanta, GA; Brooklyn, NY; Charlotte, NC; Greater Hudson Valley, NY; Greater Philadelphia area, PA; Jacksonville, FL; Long Island, NY; Miami, FL; Minneapolis, MN; Nashville, TN; Palm Beach, FL; Pittsburgh, PA; Raleigh-Durham, NC; Salt Lake City, UT; Sarasota-Naples, FL; St. Louis, MO; Tampa, FL; Tucson, AZ; and Virginia Beach, VA.

18

The markets in our owned-and-operated brokerage and Powered by Zip network are served by over 2,200 local, licensed real estate agents, all of whom are independent contractors.

In 2013, we continued to extend our MLS coverage to include several new markets where we do not yet have a physical presence or a PbZ partner. This expanded coverage facilitates expansion of our PbZ network.

We derive all of our revenues from our core business of offering the best proprietary technology and online marketing capabilities available in our industry. We derive the majority of our net revenues from commissions earned in our owned-and-operated brokerage representing buyers and sellers in residential real estate transactions. We record commission revenues net of any commission discount, transaction fee adjustment or, when applicable, rebate. Net transaction revenues are principally driven by our base of real estate professionals whose productivity leads to the number of transactions closed and the average net revenue per transaction. Average net revenue per transaction is a function of the home sales price and percentage commission received on each transaction and can vary significantly by market. We also derive revenues from net commission earned by brokerages in our Powered by Zip network. Brokerages in our Powered by Zip network typically pay a combination of a monthly subscription and transaction-based success fee for our full SaaS solution. This solution includes a co-branded website, online agent marketing, a steady stream of leads for their metropolitan area, the Zap brokerage operating system for managing the business, and the full agent functionality of the Zap platform for managing the client interaction, lead incubation and customer service. Additionally, we derive revenues from our website through marketing arrangements with residential mortgage service providers as well as the sale of online display advertising. Finally, we earn lead referral fees. Marketing and other revenues, which includes Powered by Zip revenues, represented approximately 7% of our net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 7% for the same period in 2012.

RECENT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS

Restructuring and realignment: In early 2011, we began a restructuring to refocus on our core strengths in technology, online marketing and on our most attractive local real estate markets. To that end, we closed our owned-and-operated offices in twelve markets in the first quarter of 2011, two markets in the fourth quarter of 2011, and two markets in the first half of 2012. In fourteen of those markets, we either transitioned our local operations to third-party brokerages in our Powered by Zip network, or we added brokerages to our Powered by Zip network after we had discontinued our local operations. In addition, in early 2012, we reorganized our corporate structure by realigning our organization to operate more efficiently and to refocus our resources on the highest value priorities. We combined our product and marketing functions, and we separated our brokerage operations from our technology and marketing functions. We conducted a further reorganization of our field sales team later in the year, which has empowered our local offices and real estate professionals to make decisions that are better tailored to the dynamics of their particular markets, with the goal of increasing productivity and customer service levels.

Powered by Zip: In 2011, we launched the Powered by Zip program to provide third-party real estate brokerages with our robust proprietary end-to-end technology solution. Since then, we have launched 19 independent brokerage clients that use our technology, which we refer to as Powered by Zip. Over the past year, we have gained significant experience serving our Powered by Zip customers. The terms on which we offer our technology vary among these brokerages because we are still developing, testing and building our business model, and because each brokerage is at a different stage of adoption and incorporation of the technology and services into their business. We currently evaluate each individual brokerage’s performance using the same metrics that we use for our owned-and-operated brokerage, as well as other subjective measures such as the agents’ experience and level of engagement with our technology.

We continue to develop our plans to expand Powered by Zip outside our owned-and-operated service areas.  Our primary objective is to make our technology available to brokerages who seek to earn greater income through more timely and detailed management of their business and into the hands of agents who seek to earn greater income through increased productivity and world class customer service.

MARKET CONDITIONS AND TRENDS IN OUR BUSINESS

We compete in the domestic residential real estate market. Beginning in late 2005, the market was negatively impacted by a significant correction in the total value of homesale transactions and the deep economic recession that followed. The market began showing signs of recovery between mid-2011 and early 2012, and since that time it has shown strong sales and price recovery. Despite these reasons for optimism, mortgage interest rates have recently reached their highest level since late 2011 and, if they continue to rise, could impair the recovery. We believe that the health of the residential housing market in 2013 will continue to be significantly affected by the availability of credit, inventory and shadow inventory levels, the pace at which banks process their foreclosure pipelines, and interest rates, as well as any significant change in unemployment levels. We cannot predict any changes in those macroeconomic forces, nor can we predict the combined impact of those changes on the residential real estate market.

19

Current residential real estate market conditions: Recent indicators of national residential real estate market include the following:

· Volume: According to the National Association of REALTORS®, or NAR, total existing-home sales in September 2013 increased 10.7% year-over-year, with volume increases in all major regions of the country. September 2013 represented the 27^th consecutive month of national year-over-year volume increases and the 10^th consecutive month of double-digit year-over-year increases. Nevertheless, the size of the year-over-year volume increases declined during the third quarter, as higher home prices and mortgage interest rates reduced home affordability to a five-year low.

· Price: According to NAR, the national median existing-home price in September 2013 increased 11.7% year-over-year, with price increases in all major regions of the country. The September 2013 year-over-year price increase represented the 19^th consecutive month of national year-over-year increases and the 10^th consecutive month of double-digit year-over-year increases, but slowed from the almost eight-year peak of 14.7% reached in August 2013. The price increase was likely due, in part, to inventory shortages as well as decreases in the percentage of national home sales that represented distressed properties, which fell to 14% in September 2013 from 24% in September 2012.

· Inventory: NAR reported an inventory of 2.21 million existing homes available for sale at the end of September 2013, which represented a 5 month supply at the then-current sales pace, and which was up 1.8% year-over-year. NAR believes that a housing supply of over six months is needed for equilibrium between home buyers and sellers, and that current inventory levels favor sellers and contribute to price growth.

Fluctuations in quarterly profitability: We have experienced fluctuations in profitability from period to period. Our profitability has been impacted by various factors, including ongoing market challenges, government intervention, seasonality, market expansions and closures, and legal settlements.

Industry seasonality and cyclicality: The residential real estate brokerage market is influenced both by seasonal factors and by overall economic cycles. While individual markets vary, transaction volume nationally tends to increase progressively from January through the summer months, then to slow gradually over the last three to four months of the calendar year. Revenues in each quarter are significantly affected by activity during the prior quarter, given the typical 30 to 45-day time lag between contract execution and closing for traditional home purchases. For non-traditional sales, the time lag from contract execution to closing can be longer. We have been, and believe we will continue to be, influenced by overall market activity and seasonal forces. We generally experience the most significant impact in the first and fourth quarters of each year, when our revenues are typically lower relative to the second and third quarters as a result of traditionally slower home sales activity and reduced listings inventory between Thanksgiving and Presidents’ Day.

The impact of seasonality can be masked by the general health of the residential real estate market at any given point in time, whether affected by macroeconomic events, periodic business cycles or other factors. Generally, when economic conditions are fair or good, the housing market tends to perform well. If the economy is weak, if interest rates dramatically increase, if mortgage lending standards tighten, or if there are disturbances such as terrorist attacks or threats, the outbreak of war or geopolitical uncertainties, the housing market likely would be negatively impacted.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

20

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and of those policies, we believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been delivered and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

We derive the majority of our net revenues from commissions earned in our owned-and-operated residential real estate brokerage, and from commission referrals earned from brokers in our Powered by Zip network. We recognize commission based revenues upon closing of a sale and purchase transaction, net of any rebate, commission discount or transaction fee adjustment. These transactions typically do not have multiple deliverable arrangements.

Non-commission based revenues are derived primarily from marketing agreements with residential mortgage service providers, the sale of online advertising, lead referral fees and other revenues. We classify these revenues as marketing and other revenues. Marketing service revenues are recognized over the term of the agreements as the contracted services are delivered. Advertising revenues on contracts are recognized as impressions are delivered or as clicks are provided to advertisers. Advertising and marketing contracts may consist of multiple deliverables which generally include a blend of various impressions or clicks as well as other marketing deliverables. Revenues related to revenue sharing arrangements are recognized based on revenue reports received from our partners, provided that collectability is reasonably assured.

Internal-use software and website development costs

We account for internal-use software and website development costs, including the development of our proprietary customer service technology, known as Zap, in accordance with the guidance set forth in the related accounting standards. We capitalize internal costs consisting of payroll and direct payroll-related costs of employees who devote time to the development of internal-use software, as well as any external direct costs. We amortize these costs over their estimated useful lives, typically 24 months. Our judgment is required in determining the point at which various projects enter the stages at which costs may be capitalized, in assessing the ongoing value of the capitalized costs, and in determining the estimated useful lives over which the costs are amortized. The estimated life is based on management’s judgment as to the product life cycle.

Stock-based compensation

We follow the provisions of accounting standards for share-based payments, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees, consultants and directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases, based on estimated fair values. Under the fair value recognition provisions of the accounting standards, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the awards expected to vest and recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period of the award.

We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, dividend yields and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The expected life of options is estimated by taking the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the option. We estimate expected forfeitures based on various factors including employee class and historical experience. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period the estimates are revised.

Income taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from the differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The measurement of current and deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of enacted tax laws; the effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period adjusted for the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

21

The accounting guidance for income taxes requires that deferred tax assets be evaluated for future realization and reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our recent historical results and our expectations for the future. Historically, we have recorded a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, the majority of which relate to net operating loss carry-forwards and we maintain that a full valuation allowance should be accounted for against our net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2013.

Restructuring costs

In connection with our cost reduction initiatives, we record restructuring charges for employee termination costs, costs related to leased facilities to be abandoned or subleased, fixed asset impairments and other exit-related costs. Formal plans are developed and approved by management. Restructuring costs related to employee severance and related expenses are recorded when probable and estimable. Fixed assets impaired as a result of restructuring are typically accounted for as assets held for sale or are abandoned. The recognition of restructuring charges requires us to make judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing, and costs associated with the planned restructuring activity, including estimating sublease income and the fair value, less selling costs, of fixed assets being disposed of. Estimates of future liabilities may change, requiring us to record additional restructuring charges or to reduce or reverse the amount of liabilities already recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the remaining accrued liabilities to ensure their adequacy, that no excess accruals are retained and that the utilization of the provisions is for the intended purpose in accordance with the approved restructuring plan. In the event circumstances change and the provision is no longer required, the provision is reversed.

Litigations

We are involved in legal proceedings on an ongoing basis. Based upon our evaluation and consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these matters and an analysis of potential results, we accrue for losses related to litigation if we determine that a loss is probable and it can be reasonably estimated. If only a range of estimated losses can be determined, then we record an amount within the range that, in our judgment, reflects the most likely outcome; if none of the estimates within that range is a better estimate than any other amount, we record the low end of the range. Any such accrual is charged to expense in the appropriate period. We record litigation expenses in the period in which the litigation services were provided.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes certain financial data related to our operations for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
Consolidated statement of operations data (unaudited)	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net revenues	$	21,816	$	19,767		$	58,873		$	56,128
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of revenues		12,742		11,171			33,837			30,605
Product development (1)		1,912		1,729			5,588			5,224
Sales and marketing		5,451		4,837			15,851			15,694
General and administrative		1,600		1,743			5,151			5,916
Litigation settlement charges  (Note 7)		3		5,000			88			5,000
Restructuring charges, net		4		233			66			1,390
Total operating costs and expenses		21,712		24,713			60,581			63,829
Income (loss) from operations		104		(4,946	)		(1,708	)		(7,701	)
Interest income		2		6			5			18
Income (loss) before income taxes		106		(4,940	)		(1,703	)		(7,683	)
Provision for income taxes		12		-			47			-
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.00	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)
Diluted	$	0.00	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.37	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		21,114		20,637			20,894			20,630
Diluted		22,492		20,637			20,894			20,630
(1) Amortization of internal-use software and website development costs included in product development	$	336	$	285		$	979		$	856

22

The following table presents our operating results as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Consolidated statement of operations data (unaudited)
Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of revenues		58.4			56.5			57.5			54.5
Product development		8.8			8.7			9.5			9.3
Sales and marketing		25.0			24.5			26.9			28.0
General and administrative		7.3			8.8			8.7			10.5
Litigation settlement charges		-			25.3			0.1			8.9
Restructuring charges, net		-			1.2			0.1			2.5
Total operating costs and expenses		99.5			125.0			102.8			113.7
Income (loss) from operations		0.5			(25.0	)		(2.8	)		(13.7	)
Interest income		-			-			-			-
Income (loss) before income taxes		0.5			(25.0	)		(2.8	)		(13.7	)
Provision for income taxes		0.1			-			0.1			-
Net income (loss)		0.4	%		(25.0	)%		(2.9	)%		(13.7	)%

_______

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Other operating data (1)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase		Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)		Change
Number of markets-same markets (2)		19		19		-
Number of markets-total markets (2)		19		19		-
Number of transactions closed during the period-same markets (3)		2,749		2,676		73		2.7	%
Number of transactions closed during the period-total markets (3)		2,749		2,687		62		2.3	%
Average net revenue per transaction-same markets (4)	$	7,352	$	6,812	$	540		7.9	%
Average net revenue per transaction-total markets (4)	$	7,352	$	6,816	$	536		7.9	%
Number of agents at end of the period-same markets		1,692		1,583		109		6.9	%
Number of agents at end of the period-total markets		1,692		1,583		109		6.9	%

(1) Other operating data includes our owned-and-operated markets only.

(2) Our brokerage operations in Salt Lake City were closed and transitioned to a brokerage in the Powered by Zip network during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The Westchester/Bronx portion and the Long Island portion of our Greater Hudson Valley brokerage operations were transitioned to third-party brokerages in the Powered by Zip network during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively, and are excluded from the owned-and-operated data for all periods.

(3) The term “transaction” refers to each representation of a buyer or seller in a real estate purchase or sale.

(4) Average net revenue per transaction equals net transaction revenues divided by number of transactions with respect to each period.

23

Net revenues

Net transaction revenues consist primarily of commissions earned in our owned-and-operated residential real estate brokerage. Marketing and other revenues consist primarily of marketing agreements, lead generation, advertising and transaction referral commission, including commission referrals earned from brokers in our Powered by Zip network.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Net transaction revenues:	(In thousands)
Same market	$	20,211	$	18,229	$	1,982			10.9	%
Closed market		-		87		(87	)		(100.0	)%
		20,211		18,316		1,895			10.3	%
Marketing and other revenues		1,605		1,451		154			10.6	%
Total net revenues	$	21,816	$	19,767	$	2,049			10.4	%

The increase in our net transaction revenues of $1.9 million or 10.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 was driven primarily by increases in net revenue per transaction of $536 or 7.9% and an increase in the number of transactions closed during the period of 62 or 2.3%. Transactions closed during the period on a same market basis were 2,749 compared to 2,676 last year, an increase of 73 or 2.7%. We believe the increase in same market transaction volume was attributable to the positive impact of our recently implemented agent recruiting activities combined with increases in inventory over the past quarter and associated moderation of home price growth over the same period in some markets we serve. The market continues to be impacted by reduced availability of mortgage financing and low inventory. Same market average net revenue per transaction for the period was $7,352 compared to $6,812 last year, an increase of $540 or 7.9%, due to the impact of higher average homesale prices. The increase in marketing and other revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 was attributable to increased transaction referrals from brokers in our Powered by Zip network of $0.2 million and lead generation of $0.1 million offset by a decrease in advertising income of $0.1 million.

We expect our net revenues will increase modestly in 2013 compared to 2012, driven mainly by an increase in the average net revenue per transaction with increasing growth in the overall number of transactions closed in the second half of the year. We also expect our marketing and other revenue will increase for 2013 primarily attributable to increased revenues from our Powered by Zip network and greater marketing agreement revenues.

Cost of revenues

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Cost of revenues:	(In thousands)
Same markets	$	12,742	$	11,130	$	1,612			14.5	%
Closed markets		-		41		(41	)		(100.0	)%
Total	$	12,742	$	11,171	$	1,571			14.1	%

The increase in cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 was related to higher commission rates paid to agents. Same market cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were $12.7 million compared to $11.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Agent commissions increased by approximately $1.5 million or 13.8%. Same market cost of revenues as a percentage of net transaction revenues was 63.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 61.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

24

We expect our cost of revenues will increase in 2013, compared to 2012, because of an expected increase in same market net revenues. Our cost of revenues moves in relation to the same market net revenues on which commissions are based and also increases or decreases as a result of the mix of commission rates paid to our agents.

Product development

Product development expenses include our information technology costs relating to the maintenance of our website, proprietary technology platform and systems infrastructure. These costs consist primarily of compensation and benefits, software, equipment and infrastructure costs consisting primarily of facilities, communications and other operating expenses. Product development expenses also include amortization of capitalized internal-use software and website development costs.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase		Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)		Change
	(In thousands)
Product development	$	1,912	$	1,729	$	183		10.6	%

The increase in product development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 was due primarily to increases to salaries and benefits of $0.1 million and technology infrastructure costs of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, product development expenses increased by 0.1 percentage points for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.

We expect to continue enhancing tools and features on our website and technology platform for consumers and brokers in our Powered by Zip network and expect that our product development expenses will increase in 2013, compared to 2012, in absolute dollars.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel engaged in sales, sales support and customer service as well as promotional, advertising and client acquisition costs. These expenses have been categorized below between those incurred in our market offices and those expenses which are incurred by the regional and corporate support functions across all markets.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase		Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)		Change
Sales and marketing:	(In thousands)
Market level	$	3,964	$	3,778	$	186		4.9	%
Regional/corporate support and marketing		1,487		1,059		428		40.4	%
Total	$	5,451	$	4,837	$	614		12.7	%

Market level sales and marketing expenses increased for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of $0.2 million or 4.9% was principally attributable to increases in salaries and benefits of $0.2 million. As a percentage of net revenues, market level sales and marketing expenses were 18.2% in 2013 compared to 19.1% in 2012.

Regional/corporate sales support and marketing expenses increased by $0.4 million and consisted primarily of increases to salaries and benefits of $0.3 million and customer acquisition and marketing expenses of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, regional/corporate sales support and marketing expenses were approximately 6.8% in 2013 compared to 5.4% in 2012.

We expect our market level and regional/corporate sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues for 2013, compared to 2012, primarily as a result of our Powered by Zip expansion and associated sales and marketing activities.

25

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel, facilities and operating expenses related to our executive, finance, human resources, facilities and legal organizations, and fees for professional services. Professional services are principally comprised of outside legal, audit and tax services.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
	(In thousands)
General and administrative	$	1,600	$	1,743	$	(143	)		(8.2	)%

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by approximately $0.1 million or 8.2% and were primarily attributable to decreased professional fees of $0.3 million offset by an increase in salaries and benefits of $0.1 million and facilities and operating expenses of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, general and administrative expenses were 7.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 8.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

We expect our general and administrative expenses for 2013, compared to 2012, will decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues primarily as a result of our 2011 and 2012 restructurings and the reduction in consulting and professional fees.

Restructuring charges, net

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
	(In thousands)
Restructuring charges, net	$	4	$	233	$	(229	)		(98.3	)%

  On March 31, 2012, we announced a restructuring, including a work force realignment to more appropriately allocate resources to key strategic initiatives and the closing of brokerage operations in our Salt Lake City market. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we announced a restructuring, including closing brokerage operations in selected underperforming markets and a workforce reduction in sales support and administration functions which we expect to pay over the remaining terms of our lease obligations.

 Interest income

Interest income relates to interest we earn on our money market deposits and short-term investments.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	2	$	6	$	(4	)		(66.7	)%

Interest income fluctuates as our cash equivalents and short-term investment balances change and applicable interest rates increase or decrease. The decrease in interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012, was due primarily to lower average balances. The lower average balances were attributable primarily to cash used in our operating activities as a result of the litigation settlement charges of $5.8 million in 2012 and the net loss incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

26

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Other operating data (1)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Number of markets-same markets (2)		19		19		-
Number of markets-total markets (2)		19		19		-
Number of transactions closed during the period-same markets (3)		7,601		7,904		(303	)		(3.8	)%
Number of transactions closed during the period-total markets (3)		7,601		8,023		(422	)		(5.3	)%
Average net revenue per transaction-same markets (4)	$	7,142	$	6,502	$	640			9.8	%
Average net revenue per transaction-total markets (4)	$	7,142	$	6,501	$	641			9.9	%
Number of agents at end of the period-same markets		1,692		1,583		109			6.9	%
Number of agents at end of the period-total markets		1,692		1,583		109			6.9	%

(1) Other operating data includes our owned-and-operated markets only.

(2) Our brokerage operations in Salt Lake City were closed and transitioned to a brokerage in the Powered by Zip network during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The Westchester/Bronx portion and the Long Island portion of our Greater Hudson Valley brokerage operations were transitioned to third-party brokerages in the Powered by Zip network during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively, and are excluded from the owned-and-operated data for all periods.

(3) The term “transaction” refers to each representation of a buyer or seller in a real estate purchase or sale.

(4) Average net revenue per transaction equals net transaction revenues divided by number of transactions with respect to each period.

Net revenues

Net transaction revenues consist primarily of commissions earned in our owned-and-operated residential real estate brokerage. Marketing and other revenues consist primarily of marketing agreements, lead generation, advertising and transaction referral commission, including commission referrals earned from brokers in our Powered by Zip network.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Net transaction revenues:	(In thousands)
Same market	$	54,283	$	51,389	$	2,894			5.6	%
Closed market		-		767		(767	)		(100.0	)%
		54,283		52,156		2,127			4.1	%
Marketing and other revenues		4,590		3,972		618			15.6	%
Total net revenues	$	58,873	$	56,128	$	2,745			4.9	%

The increase in our net transaction revenues of $2.1 million or 4.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was driven primarily by increases in net revenue per transaction of $641 or 9.9% offset by a decrease in the number of transactions closed during the period of 422 or 5.3%. Transactions closed during the period on a same market basis were 7,601 compared to 7,904 last year, a decrease of 303 or 3.8%. We believe the decrease in same market transaction volume was attributable to agent turnover along with inventory constraints and a year-over-year decline in home sale transactions in some markets we serve. The market continues to be impacted by reduced availability of mortgage financing and low inventory. Same market average net revenue per transaction for the period was $7,142 compared to $6,502 last year, an increase of $640 or 9.8%, due to the impact of higher average homesale prices. The increase in marketing and other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $0.6 million was attributable to increased transaction referrals from brokers in our Powered by Zip network of $0.4 million, advertising income of $0.1 million, and lead generation of $0.1 million.

27

We expect our net revenues will increase modestly in 2013 compared to 2012, driven by mainly by an increase in the average net revenue per transaction with increasing growth in the overall number of transactions closed in the second half of the year. We also expect our marketing and other revenue will increase for 2013 primarily attributable to increased revenues from our Powered by Zip network and greater marketing agreement revenues.

Cost of revenues

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Cost of revenues:	(In thousands)
Same markets	$	33,837	$	30,235	$	3,602			11.9	%
Closed markets		-		370		(370	)		(100.0	)%
Total	$	33,837	$	30,605	$	3,232			10.6	%

The increase in cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was related to higher commission rates paid to agents. Same market cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $33.8 million compared to $30.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Agent commissions increased by approximately $3.2 million or 10.4%. Same market cost of revenues as a percentage of net transaction revenues was 62.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 58.0% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

We expect our cost of revenues will increase in 2013, compared to 2012, because of an expected increase in market net revenues. Our cost of revenues moves in relation to the market net revenues on which commissions are based and also increases or decreases as a result of the mix of commission rates paid to our agents.

Product development

Product development expenses include our information technology costs relating to the maintenance of our website, proprietary technology platform and systems infrastructure. These costs consist primarily of compensation and benefits, software, equipment and infrastructure costs consisting primarily of facilities, communications and other operating expenses. Product development expenses also include amortization of capitalized internal-use software and website development costs.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase		Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)		Change
	(In thousands)
Product development	$	5,588	$	5,224	$	364		7.0	%

The increase in product development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was due primarily to increases in salaries and benefits of $0.1 million, technology infrastructure costs of $0.1 million and amortization of internal use software of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, product development expenses increased by 0.2 percentage points for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

We expect to continue enhancing tools and features on our website and technology platform for consumers and brokers in our Powered by Zip network and expect that our product development expenses will increase in 2013, compared to 2012, in absolute dollars.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel engaged in sales, sales support and customer service as well as promotional, advertising and client acquisition costs. These expenses have been categorized below between those incurred in our market offices and those expenses which are incurred by the regional and corporate support functions across all markets.

28

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
Sales and marketing:	(In thousands)
Market level	$	11,651	$	12,295	$	(644	)		(5.2	)%
Regional/corporate support and marketing		4,200		3,399		801			23.6	%
Total	$	15,851	$	15,694	$	157			1.0	%

Market level sales and marketing expenses decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 primarily as a result of closing markets and eliminating positions in our remaining markets attributable to our 2011 and 2012 restructurings. The decrease of $0.6 million or 5.2% was principally attributable to decreases in customer acquisition and marketing costs of $0.6 million and facilities and operating expenses of $0.4 million offset by an increase in salaries and benefits of $0.3 million and recruiting and training expenses of $0.1 million. Approximately $0.4 million of the overall decrease was attributable to operations of the closed markets. As a percentage of net revenues, market level sales and marketing expenses were 19.8% in 2013 compared to 21.9% in 2012.

Regional/corporate sales support and marketing expenses increased by $0.8 million and consisted primarily of increases to salaries and benefits of $0.4 million, customer acquisition and marketing expenses of $0.4 million and facilities and operation expenses of $0.1 million offset by a decrease in advertising and marketing expenses of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, regional/corporate sales support and marketing expenses were approximately 7.1% in 2013 compared to 6.1% in 2012.

We expect our market level and regional/corporate sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues for 2013, compared to 2012, primarily as a result of our Powered by Zip expansion and associated sales and marketing activities.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel, facilities and operating expenses related to our executive, finance, human resources, facilities and legal organizations, and fees for professional services. Professional services are principally comprised of outside legal, audit and tax services.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
	(In thousands)
General and administrative	$	5,151	$	5,916	$	(765	)		(12.9	)%

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by approximately $0.8 million or 12.9% and were primarily attributable to decreased professional fees of $0.6 million, salaries and benefits of $0.2 million and facilities and operating expenses of $0.1 million offset by an increase in recruiting and training expenses of $0.1 million. As a percentage of net revenues, general and administrative expenses were 8.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 10.5% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

We expect our general and administrative expenses for 2013, compared to 2012, will decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues primarily as a result of our 2011 and 2012 restructurings and the reduction in consulting and professional fees.

Restructuring charges, net

	Nine  Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
		(In thousands)
Restructuring charges, net	$	66	$	1,390	$	(1,324	)		(95.3	)%

29

  On March 31, 2012, we announced a restructuring, including a work force realignment to more appropriately allocate resources to key strategic initiatives and the closing of brokerage operations in our Salt Lake City market. The associated restructuring charges incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $0.1 million included employee severance pay and related expenses, non-cancelable lease obligations and other exit costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we announced a restructuring, including closing brokerage operations in selected underperforming markets and a workforce reduction in sales support and administration functions which we expect to pay over the remaining terms of our lease obligations.

 Interest income

Interest income relates to interest we earn on our money market deposits and short-term investments.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase			Percent
	2013		2012		(Decrease)			Change
		(In thousands)
Interest income	$	5	$	18	$	(13	)		(72.2	)%

Interest income fluctuates as our cash equivalents and short-term investment balances change and applicable interest rates increase or decrease. The decrease in interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was due primarily to lower average balances. The lower average balances were attributable primarily to cash used in our operating activities as a result of the litigation settlement charges of $5.8 million in 2012 and the net loss incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal sources of liquidity for 2013 are our cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents at fair value of $14.5 million and no bank debt, line of credit or equipment facilities.

Operating activities

Our operating activities provided cash in the amount of $1.0 million and used cash in the amount of $1.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash provided in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 resulted primarily from a net loss of $1.8 million offset by net changes in operating assets and liabilities of $0.3 million and other non-cash adjustments of $2.5 million. The non-cash adjustments resulted primarily from $1.4 million of depreciation and amortization and $1.0 million of stock-based compensation expense. The increase in cash provided attributable to the net changes in operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by timing differences in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses relating to agent compensation, bonuses, and customer acquisition expenses. Cash used in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 resulted primarily from a net loss of $7.7 million offset by net changes in operating assets and liabilities of $3.6 million and non-cash adjustments of $2.2 million. The decrease in cash used attributable to the net change in operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by timing differences in accounts payable, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and accrued expenses relating to the litigation settlement of $5 million along with agent compensation bonuses, and customer acquisition expenses. The non-cash adjustments resulted primarily from $1.3 million of depreciation and amortization and $0.9 million of stock-based compensation expense.

Our primary source of operating cash flow is the collection of net commission income from escrow companies or similar intermediaries in the real estate transaction closing process, plus marketing and other revenues. These cash collections are offset by cash payments for agent commissions and related costs as well as for product development, sales and marketing and general and administrative costs including employee compensation, benefits, client acquisition costs and other operating expenses. Due to the structure of our commission arrangements, our accounts receivable are settled in cash on a short-term basis and our accounts receivable balances at period end have historically been significantly less than one month’s net revenues.

30

Investing activities

Our investing activities used cash of $1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and provided cash of $6.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Cash used in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 represents the purchase of property and equipment, including amounts for website development and internal use software. Cash provided in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 represent the net proceeds from the sales and maturity of short-term investments of $8.0 million less $1.3 million in purchases of property and equipment, including amounts for website development and internal use software. 

Currently, we expect our remaining 2013 capital expenditures to be approximately $0.7 million primarily attributable to amounts capitalized for internal-use software and website development costs as well as expenditures for increased server capacity and software. In the future, our ability to make significant capital investments may depend on our ability to generate cash flow from operations and to obtain adequate financing, if necessary and available.

Financing activities

Our financing activities provided cash of $2.5 million and $0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily from proceeds from stock option exercises.

Future needs

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund cash used in our operations, restructurings and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our level of investment in technology and online marketing initiatives, our rate of growth in our local markets and in expanding our Powered by Zip broker referral network and possible litigation settlements and legal fees. In addition, our capital requirements may be affected by the macroeconomic environment and state of the residential real estate market, and if they suffer, we may have a greater need to fund our business by using our cash and cash equivalents, which could not continue indefinitely without raising additional capital.

We currently have no bank debt or line of credit facilities. In the event that additional financing is required, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business and results of operations will likely suffer.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

We lease office space under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through February 2019. The following table provides summary information concerning our future obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2013:

	Payments Due by Period
	Less Than		1 to 3		3 to 5		More Than
	1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Operating lease commitments	$	1,804	$	2,897	$	1,149	$	51	$	5,901

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND INDEMNIFICATIONS

We do not have any off balance-sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt. Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or synthetic leases. Our indemnifications agreements are described in note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies” of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

31

NON-GAAP MEASURE

The table below shows the trend of Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net revenue	$	21,816		$	19,767		$	58,873		$	56,128
Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,075		$	1,021		$	913		$	811
Adjusted EBITDA margin		4.9	%		5.2	%		1.6	%		1.4	%

We present Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as a supplemental measure of our performance. We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information regarding the operating results of our core business activity and prospects for the future. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) less interest income plus interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, stock-based compensation and further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider reflective of our ongoing core operating performance.

We present Adjusted EBITDA because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our operating performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are reflective of our core operating performance. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our financial results and business strategies, develop budgets, manage expenditures and as a factor in evaluating management’s performance when determining incentive compensation.

Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

• although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

• non-cash stock-based compensation is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term incentive compensation package, although we exclude it as an expense when evaluating our ongoing operating performance for a particular period;

• Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges or credits resulting from matters we consider not to be reflective of our core ongoing operations; and

• other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. When evaluating our performance, Adjusted EBITDA should be considered alongside other financial measures, including net income and our other GAAP results.

The following is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Reconciliation of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss)	(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	94		$	(4,940	)	$	(1,750	)	$	(7,683	)
Add back:
Interest income		(2	)		(6	)		(5	)		(18	)
Provision for  income taxes		12			-			47			-
Depreciation and amortization		482			448			1,429			1,318
Stock-based compensation expense		482			366			1,038			884
Restructuring charges, net		4			153			66			1,310
Litigation settlement charges (non-core-operating) (1)		3			5,000			88			5,000
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,075		$	1,021		$	913		$	811

(1) Litigation settlement charges (non-core operations) represents amounts we consider not reflective our core ongoing operations and includes settlement and claim expense for litigation associated with our former model for our agents which has since been transitioned from an employee to an independent contractor model.

32

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:

Interest rate sensitivity

Our investment policy requires us to invest funds in excess of current operating requirements. The principal objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income consistent with minimizing risk of material loss. We believe this investment policy is prudent, and helps to reduce, but does not prevent, loss of principal, and results in minimal interest rate exposure on our investments.

As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of money market funds and our short-term investments consisted primarily of investment grade, highly liquid interest-bearing securities. The recorded carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to their short maturities and short-term investments are carried at fair value. The amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument is limited. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates in the United States, particularly since the majority of our investments are fixed income investments. If market interest rates were to increase or decrease immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels at September 30, 2013 and 2012, there would be a negligible increase or decline in fair market value of the portfolio.

Exchange rate sensitivity

We consider our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal, as we do not have any revenues or expenses denominated in foreign currencies. We have not engaged in any hedging or other derivative transactions to date.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures:

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such items are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings:

On March 26, 2010, we were named as one of fourteen defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Smarter Agent LLC v. Boopsie, Inc., et al. The complaint alleges that the defendants have each infringed on patents owned by Smarter Agent relating to mobile device application technology and seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The US Patent Office is currently examining the patent issue, and litigation is stayed pending the completion of that investigation. After completing investigation of this matter, we do not believe that we have infringed on any patent, or that we have any liability for the claims alleged, and, thus, we intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

On February 17, 2012, two real estate sales agents formerly employed by us, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, District of Arizona, Patricia Anderson and James Kwasiborski v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint concerns our compensation practices nationwide regarding our real estate agents, who at the time at issue were classified as employees. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime as required by federal law. The complaint seeks liquidated and treble damages in addition to wages and overtime for an unspecified amount. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and, thus, we believe that this claim is without merit. In addition to the federal law allegations, the complaint alleges violation of the Arizona Minimum Wage law. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

33

On February 29, 2012, one real estate agent formerly employed by us, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Tracy Adewunmi v. ZipRealty, Inc., concerning our compensation practices regarding real estate agents in California. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime, failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to reimburse employee expenses and failed to provide itemized wage statements as required by California laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages including penalties and attorneys’ fees in addition to wages and overtime. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” and were compensated accordingly in full compliance with California law. Additionally, we filed a cross complaint against Ms. Adewumni for fraud and breach of contract, in which we alleged that she created false client accounts that resulted in her receiving higher commission payments than she was entitled to receive under her employment agreement. On May 20, 2013, Ms. Adewumni dropped the class claims in her complaint and, thus, this case now involves only the claims of individual plaintiff, Tracy Adewumni. We have completed further investigation and discovery and continue to believe that Ms. Adewumni’s claims are without merit. Litigation is ongoing, and the case is set for trial in February 2014. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

 On January 11, 2013, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United State District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Arczar LLC v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint alleges that our mobile device application has infringed on a patent owned by Arczar relating to computer vision system technology and seeks unspecified damages and other equitable relief. Effective July 24, 2013, we entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with Arczar that resulted in a dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice and our purchase of a perpetual license to Arczar’s patents.

We are not currently subject to any other material legal proceedings. From time to time we have been, and we currently are, a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of the business. The amounts in dispute in these matters are not material to us, and we believe that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 

Item 1A. Risk Factors:

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Because of risks and uncertainties affecting our operating results and financial condition, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. You should consider carefully the risk factors described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. At this time, we are not aware of any material changes to the nature of those risk factors. We intend to set forth material changes to the nature of those risk factors in our future reports on Form 10-Q as required by Item 1A of Part II thereof. For business, market and other developments in the quarter ended September 30, 2013, please see Item 2 of Part I of this report, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

34

Item 5. Other Information:

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits:

 The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this report.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ZIPREALTY, INC.
By:	/s/    Eric L. Mersch
	Eric L. Mersch
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2013

35

 Exhibit Index

Exhibit number	Description
3.1(1)	Certificate of Correction to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2(a)(2)	Bylaws
4.1(2)	Form of Common Stock Certificate
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-51002) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2008.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on S-1 (File No. 333-115657) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on May 20, 2004, as amended.

* Identifies a management contract or compensatory plan of arrangement required to be filled as an exhibit to this report.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filled herewith, is not part of a registration statement or prospectus of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

36

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles C. Baker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ZipRealty, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2013	By:	/s/ Charles C. Baker
		Charles C. Baker
		Chief Executive Officer and President

37

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric L. Mersch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ZipRealty, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2013	By:	/s/  Eric L. Mersch
		Eric L. Mersch
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

38

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles C. Baker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.

Date: November 8, 2013	By:	/s/    Charles C. Baker
		Charles C. Baker
		Chief Executive Officer and President

39

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric L. Mersch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.

Date: November 8, 2013	By:	/s/    Eric L. Mersch
		Eric L. Mersch
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

40

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Background and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and reflect the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.

Seasonality

Seasonality

The Company’s net transaction revenues and income (loss) from operations have historically varied from quarter to quarter. Such variations are principally attributable to variations in home sales activity over the course of the calendar year. The Company has historically experienced lower net transaction revenues during the first quarter because holidays and adverse weather conditions in certain regions typically reduce the level of sales activity and listings inventories between the Thanksgiving and Presidents’ Day holidays. The Company’s historical quarterly operations have been additionally impacted in recent years as a result of economic conditions and government programs that altered home buyer behavior. Net transaction revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 27.5% and 27.6% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Net transaction revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 78.2% and 78.4% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue recognition

The Company derives the majority of its revenue from commissions earned as agents in residential real estate transactions and from commission referrals earned from its network of third-party brokerages. Commission revenue is recognized upon closing of a transaction, net of any rebate or commission discount or transaction fee adjustment. These transactions typically do not have multiple deliverables.

Non-commission revenues are derived primarily from marketing agreements with residential mortgage service providers, the sale of online advertising, lead referral fees and other revenues. Marketing service revenues are recognized over the term of the agreements as the contracted services are delivered. Advertising revenues on contracts are recognized as impressions are delivered or as clicks are provided to advertisers. Advertising and marketing contracts may consist of multiple deliverables which generally include a blend of various impressions or clicks as well as other marketing deliverables. Revenues related to revenue sharing arrangements are recognized based on revenue reports received from our partners, provided that collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence an arrangement exists, the service has been delivered and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012		Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net revenues	$ 21,816		$ 19,767		$ 58,873		$ 56,128
Operating costs and expenses
Cost of revenues	12,742		11,171		33,837		30,605
Product development	1,912	[1]	1,729	[1]	5,588	[1]	5,224	[1]
Sales and marketing	5,451		4,837		15,851		15,694
General and administrative	1,600		1,743		5,151		5,916
Litigation settlement charges (Note 7)	3		5,000		88		5,000
Restructuring charges, net	4		233		66		1,390
Total operating costs and expenses	21,712		24,713		60,581		63,829
Income (loss) from operations	104		(4,946)		(1,708)		(7,701)
Interest income	2		6		5		18
Income (loss) before income taxes	106		(4,940)		(1,703)		(7,683)
Provision for income taxes	12				47
Net income (loss)	$ 94		$ (4,940)		$ (1,750)		$ (7,683)
Net loss per share:
Basic	$ 0.00		$ (0.24)		$ (0.08)		$ (0.37)
Diluted	$ 0.00		$ (0.24)		$ (0.08)		$ (0.37)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	21,114		20,637		20,894		20,630
Diluted	22,492		20,637		20,894		20,630

[1] Amortization of internal-use software and website development costs included in product development

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements

3. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s cash equivalents were invested in money market funds. The table below sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets:

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated		Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money Market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Recorded as:	(In thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	7,959	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	7,957

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the fair value hierarchy, established by the accounting standard related to fair value measurement, to prioritize the inputs used in valuation techniques. There are three broad levels to the fair value hierarchy of inputs to fair value. Level 1 is the highest priority and Level 3 is the lowest priority and are as follows:

• Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

• Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The Company measures and reports certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis, including its investments in money market funds. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no liabilities recorded at fair value. The fair values of the Company’s Level 1 financial assets are based on quoted market prices of the identical underlying security. The Company did not have any Level 2 and Level 3 financial assets at September 30, 2013 and at December 31, 2012. The Company utilizes a pricing service to assist in obtaining fair value pricing for its investment portfolio.

At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company’s cash equivalents amounting to $8.0 million, were invested in money market funds and were measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy.

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation (Narrative) (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Background and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]
Percentage of net transaction revenues in year	27.50%	27.60%	78.20%	78.40%

XML

Balance Sheet Components (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Balance Sheet Components [Abstract]

Schedule of Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Computer hardware and software	$	10,755	$	9,095
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		1,961		1,938
Leasehold improvements		1,954		1,656
Total		14,670		12,689
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(11,724)		(10,302)
Total property and equipment, net	$	2,946	$	2,387

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued compensation	$	1,340	$	1,073
Accrued agent commissions		1,476		1,423
Accrued marketing		987		863
Accrued litigation settlement		66		227
Accrued professional fees		110		188
Other accrued expenses		308		519
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	4,287	$	4,293

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Summary of Company's Nonvested Restricted Stock) (Details) (Restricted Stock [Member], USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock [Member]
Number of Shares
Non-vested at beginning of period	15
Shares granted	30
Non-vested at end of period	45
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Non-vested at beginning of period	$ 2.87
Shares granted	$ 3.00
Non-vested at end of period	$ 2.96

XML

Balance Sheet Components (Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Balance Sheet Components [Abstract]
Accrued compensation	$ 1,340	$ 1,073
Accrued agent commissions	1,476	1,423
Accrued marketing	987	863
Accrued litigation settlement	66	227
Accrued professional fees	110	188
Other accrued expenses	308	519
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$ 4,287	$ 4,293

XML

Balance Sheet Components (Schedule of Property and Equipment) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property and equipment, gross	$ 14,670	$ 12,689
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(11,724)	(10,302)
Property and equipment, net	2,946	2,387
Computer Hardware And Software [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property and equipment, gross	10,755	9,095
Furniture, Fixtures And Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property and equipment, gross	1,961	1,938
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property and equipment, gross	$ 1,954	$ 1,656

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012 Provide Accelerated Vesting if the Company's Closing Stock Price is Equal to or Greater than $5.00 per Share for a Period of 120 Consecutive Days [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Provide Vesting in Full if the Company Achieves Adjusted EBITDA Profitability for the Year Ending December 31, 2012 [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Pursuant to the Company's Voluntary Stock Option Exchange Program, Completed in July 2009 [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 In-the-Money Options [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 In-the-Money Options [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Restricted Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecorded stock-based compensation, after estimated forfeitures	$ 3,100,000		$ 3,100,000							$ 63,000
Weighted average remaining recognition period			2 years 9 months 18 days							4 months 24 days
Options vesting period			4 years				36 months
Share Price	$ 5.47		$ 5.47
Options granted in period					183,000	183,000
Options expiration period			10 years				7 years
Closing stock price					$ 5.00
Options exercisable	2,844,000		2,844,000					2,502,000
Total intrinsic value of options exercised								1,129,000	25,000
Stock-based compensation expense (income) related to restricted stock	$ 38,000	$ 0	$ 68,000	$ (3,000)
Stock awards outstanding										45,000	15,000

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Future Gross and Net Lease Commitments under Non-Cancelable Operating Leases) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Remainder of 2013	$ 430
2014	1,728
2015	1,494
2016	1,177
2017	644
2018	233
2019	12
Total minimum lease payments	5,718
Gross Operating Lease Commitments [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Remainder of 2013	450
2014	1,770
2015	1,537
2016	1,221
2017	678
2018	233
2019	12
Total minimum lease payments	5,901
Sublease Income [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Remainder of 2013	(20)
2014	(42)
2015	(43)
2016	(44)
2017	(34)
Total minimum lease payments	$ (183)

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Available-For-Sale Short-Term Investments, Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	$ 7,959	$ 7,957
Money Market Funds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	7,959	7,957
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	7,959	7,957
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	7,959	7,957
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	7,959	7,957
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	$ 7,959	$ 7,957

XML

Restructuring Charges, Net (Accrued Restructuring Charges Included In Balance Sheet) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Accrued restructuring charges (current liabilities)	$ 81	$ 221
Total accrued restructuring charges	117	221	249	416
Other LongTerm Liabilities [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Other long-term liabilities	$ 36

XML

Balance Sheet Components (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Balance Sheet Components [Abstract]
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 482	$ 448	$ 1,429	$ 1,317

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$ 94	$ (4,940)	$ (1,750)	$ (7,683)
Change in accumulated unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax				3
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ 94	$ (4,940)	$ (1,750)	$ (7,680)

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Background and Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Background and Basis of Presentation

1. BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the three and nine months then ended have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for annual financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements, and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position for the periods presented. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013, or any other period. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and reflect the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.

Seasonality

The Company’s net transaction revenues and income (loss) from operations have historically varied from quarter to quarter. Such variations are principally attributable to variations in home sales activity over the course of the calendar year. The Company has historically experienced lower net transaction revenues during the first quarter because holidays and adverse weather conditions in certain regions typically reduce the level of sales activity and listings inventories between the Thanksgiving and Presidents’ Day holidays. The Company’s historical quarterly operations have been additionally impacted in recent years as a result of economic conditions and government programs that altered home buyer behavior. Net transaction revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 27.5% and 27.6% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Net transaction revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 accounted for approximately 78.2% and 78.4% of annual net transaction revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Significant accounting policies

Revenue recognition

The Company derives the majority of its revenue from commissions earned as agents in residential real estate transactions and from commission referrals earned from its network of third-party brokerages. Commission revenue is recognized upon closing of a transaction, net of any rebate or commission discount or transaction fee adjustment. These transactions typically do not have multiple deliverables.

Non-commission revenues are derived primarily from marketing agreements with residential mortgage service providers, the sale of online advertising, lead referral fees and other revenues. Marketing service revenues are recognized over the term of the agreements as the contracted services are delivered. Advertising revenues on contracts are recognized as impressions are delivered or as clicks are provided to advertisers. Advertising and marketing contracts may consist of multiple deliverables which generally include a blend of various impressions or clicks as well as other marketing deliverables. Revenues related to revenue sharing arrangements are recognized based on revenue reports received from our partners, provided that collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence an arrangement exists, the service has been delivered and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

XML

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Net Income (Loss) Per Share [Abstract]

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

4. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940)	$	(1,750)	$	(7,683)
Denominator:
Shares used to compute EPS:
Basic		21,114		20,637		20,894		20,630
Diluted		22,492		20,637		20,894		20,630
Net income (loss) per share basic and diluted:
Basic	$	-	$	(0.24)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.37)
Diluted	$	-	$	(0.24)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.37)

The following weighted-average outstanding options and non-vested common shares were excluded in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented because including them would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Options to purchase common stock		2,174		5,095		5,593		4,729
Nonvested common stock		-		-		45		-
Total		2,174		5,095		5,638		4,729

XML

Balance Sheet Components

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Balance Sheet Components [Abstract]

Balance Sheet Components

2. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Property and equipment, net

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Computer hardware and software	$	10,755	$	9,095
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		1,961		1,938
Leasehold improvements		1,954		1,656
Total		14,670		12,689
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(11,724)		(10,302)
Total property and equipment, net	$	2,946	$	2,387

Depreciation and amortization expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 was approximately $482,000 and $448,000, respectively.

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued compensation	$	1,340	$	1,073
Accrued agent commissions		1,476		1,423
Accrued marketing		987		863
Accrued litigation settlement		66		227
Accrued professional fees		110		188
Other accrued expenses		308		519
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	4,287	$	4,293

XML

Restructuring Charges, Net (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Restructuring charges, net	$ 4	$ 233	$ 66	$ 1,390
2012 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring charges, net			$ 100

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	$ 7,959	$ 7,957
Liabilities measured on recurring basis, fair value	0	0
Money Market Funds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, short term investment	$ 7,959	$ 7,957

XML

Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Computation of Basic and Dilutive Net Income (Loss) Per Share) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$ 94	$ (4,940)	$ (1,750)	$ (7,683)
Denominator:
Basic	21,114	20,637	20,894	20,630
Diluted	22,492	20,637	20,894	20,630
Net income (loss) per share basic and diluted:
Basic	$ 0.00	$ (0.24)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.37)
Diluted	$ 0.00	$ (0.24)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.37)

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Summary of Company's Stock Option Activity) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Number of shares:
Outstanding at beginning of period	5,097
Options granted	1,277
Options exercised	(831)
Options forfeited/cancelled/expired	(344)
Outstanding at end of period	5,199
Exercisable at end of period	2,844
Weighted Average Exercise Price:
Outstanding at beginning of period	$ 3.16
Options granted	$ 3.57
Options exercised	$ 3.04
Options forfeited/cancelled/expired	$ 5.15
Outstanding at end of period	$ 3.15
Exercisable at end of period	$ 3.46
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Outstanding at beginning of period	6 years 1 month 24 days
Outstanding at end of period	7 years 3 months 4 days
Exercisable at end of period	5 years 10 months 10 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of period	$ 2,614
Outstanding at end of period	13,104
Exercisable at end of period	$ 6,762

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Accounts receivable, allowance	$ 15	$ 15
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	25,164,000	24,303,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	21,553,000	20,692,000
Treasury stock at cost, shares	3,610,000	3,610,000

XML

Legal Settlement Charges

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Legal Settlement Charges [Abstract]

Legal Settlement Charges

7. LEGAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES

On September 26, 2011, the Division of Labor Standard Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California (the “DLSE”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, State Labor Commissioner, etc., v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint concerned the Company’s compensation practices regarding real estate agents in California, who at the time at issue were classified as employees. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the Company failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime, and failed to provide itemized wage statements, as required by California laws. In addition to wages and overtime, the complaint seeks liquidated damages, for a total claim in excess of $17 million. On September 28, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement Agreement and General Release (the “Agreement”) with the DLSE concerning the complaint. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company paid $0.2 million to the DLSE for attorneys’ fees and costs, and $4.8 million into a trust for disbursement to former employees as back wages. The Company will pay the employer’s share of F.I.C.A. taxes and other employer tax responsibilities on back wages as they are distributed to former employees, as well as the administrative costs of the claims administrator for the trust, which totaled $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 and $0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and which could total an additional $0.1 million if all remaining former employee claimants participate. A liability and corresponding expense for this additional $0.1 million of employer taxes and administrative fees have not been reflected within the balance sheet because an estimate of the ultimate liability for payment of these payroll taxes cannot be reasonably determined. Disbursements to former employees are subject to their execution of a release claim against the Company. The Agreement also includes a full release by the DLSE from further liability on this issue. On October 12, 2012, the Court dismissed the entire action, with prejudice, against the defendants.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Amortization of internal-use software and website development costs included in product development	$ 336	$ 285	$ 979	$ 856

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 14,511	$ 12,921
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $15 and $15, respectively	1,266	1,496
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,903	1,763
Total current assets	17,680	16,180
Restricted cash	500	500
Property and equipment, net	2,946	2,387
Other assets	267	362
Total assets	21,393	19,429
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,081	823
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	4,287	4,293
Accrued restructuring charges, current portion	81	221
Total current liabilities	5,449	5,337
Other long-term liabilities	595	592
Total liabilities	6,044	5,929
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 25,164 and 24,303 shares issued and 21,553 and 20,692 outstanding, respectively	25	24
Additional paid-in capital	163,028	159,430
Accumulated deficit	(130,084)	(128,334)
Treasury stock, at cost: 3,610 shares	(17,620)	(17,620)
Total stockholders' equity	15,349	13,500
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 21,393	$ 19,429

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Short-Term Investments Classified as Available-For-Sale Securities, Except for Restricted Cash, and Reported at Fair Value 1) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Gross Amortized Cost	$ 7,959	$ 7,957
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Estimated Fair Value	7,959	7,957
Money Market Funds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Gross Amortized Cost	7,959	7,957
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Estimated Fair Value	$ 7,959	$ 7,957

XML

Restructuring Charges, Net (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Restructuring Charges, Net [Abstract]

Accrued Restructuring Charges Activity

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

		Balance as of  December 31,					Non-cash			Balance as of  September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
		2012	Charges		Payments		Adjustment			2013		2013
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	27	$	54	$	(81)	$	-	$	-	$	1,585
Lease obligation and other exit costs		44		-		(24)		-		20		75
		71		54		(105)		-		20		1,660
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		-		-		-		-		-		1,450
Lease obligation and other exit costs		150		12		(65)		-		97		842
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		59
		150		12		(65)		-		97		2,351
Total	$	221	$	66	$	(170)	$	-	$	117	$	4,011

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

		Balance as of  December 31,					Non-cash			Balance as of  September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
		2011	Charges		Payments		Adjustment			2012		2012
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	-	$	1,335	$	(1,253)	$	(80)	$	2	$	1,335
Lease obligation and other exit costs		-		54		(11)				43		54
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		-
		-		1,389		(1,264)		(80)		45		1,389
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		39		1		(40)		-		-		1,452
Lease obligation and other exit costs		377		-		(173)		-		204		889
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		-
		416		1		(213)		-		204		2,341
Total	$	416	$	1,390	$	(1,477)	$	(80)	$	249	$	3,730

Accrued Restructuring Charges Included in Balance Sheet

Accrued restructuring charges were included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued restructuring charges (current liabilities)	$	81	$	221
Other long-term liabilities		36		-
Total accrued restructuring charges	$	117	$	221

XML

Legal Settlement Charges (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	Sep. 26, 2011	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 28, 2012 Former Employees [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Legal fee of DSLE [Member]
Legal Settlement By Party [Line Items]
Liquidated damages sought by the complaint	$ 17
Legal settlement costs				4.8	0.2
Loss contingency		0.1	0.8
Loss contingency increase		$ 0.1

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Assumptions Used and Resulting Estimates of Weighted Average Fair Value Per Share of Options Granted) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected volatility, Minimum			51.00%	49.00%
Expected volatility, Maximum			52.00%	51.00%
Expected volatility	0.00%	51.00%
Risk-free interest rate, Minimum			1.00%	0.70%
Risk-free interest rate, Maximum			1.30%	1.20%
Risk-free interest rate	0.00%	0.90%
Expected life	0 years	6 years 1 month 6 days
Expected dividend yield	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Weighted-average fair value per share of options granted	$ 0.00	$ 1.16	$ 1.76	$ 0.62
Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected life			5 years 6 months	5 years 6 months
Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected life			6 years 1 month 6 days	6 years 1 month 6 days

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Stock-Based Compensation Expense) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 482	$ 366	$ 1,038	$ 884
Cost of Revenues [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	165	124	218	163
Product Development [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	28	10	77	46
Sales and Marketing [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	131	36	230	122
General and Administrative [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	158	116	513	473
Restructuring Charges [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense		$ 80		$ 80

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

6. INCOME TAXES

The Company currently forecasts losses for the year. Since these losses are not benefitted, they are not included in the effective tax rate calculation. The tax provision is comprised of Texas margin tax and other state minimum taxes and is recorded ratably in the interim period.

The Company maintains that a full valuation allowance should be maintained for its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2013. The Company supports the need for a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets due to negative evidence including recent historical results and management’s expectations for the future.

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Short-Term Investments Classified as Available-for-Sale Securities, Except for Restricted Cash, and Reported at Fair Value 2) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Estimated fair value	$ 7,959	$ 7,957
Cash Equivalents [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Estimated fair value	$ 7,959	$ 7,957

XML

Restructuring Charges, Net (Accrued Restructuring Charges Activity) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended		21 Months Ended	33 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	$ 221	$ 416
Charges	66	1,390
Payments	(170)	(1,477)
Non-cash adjustments		(80)
Balance at ending of period	117	249	249	117
Total charges to date			3,730	4,011
2012 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	71
Charges	54	1,389
Payments	(105)	(1,264)
Non-cash adjustments		(80)
Balance at ending of period	20	45	45	20
Total charges to date			1,389	1,660
2011 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	150	416
Charges	12	1
Payments	(65)	(213)
Balance at ending of period	97	204	204	97
Total charges to date			2,341	2,351
Employee Severance and Related Expenses [Member] | 2012 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	27
Charges	54	1,335
Payments	(81)	(1,253)
Non-cash adjustments		(80)
Balance at ending of period		2	2
Total charges to date			1,335	1,585
Employee Severance and Related Expenses [Member] | 2011 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period		39
Charges		1
Payments		(40)
Total charges to date			1,452	1,450
Lease Obligation and Other Exit Costs [Member] | 2012 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	44
Charges		54
Payments	(24)	(11)
Balance at ending of period	20	43	43	20
Total charges to date			54	75
Lease Obligation and Other Exit Costs [Member] | 2011 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of period	150	377
Charges	12
Payments	(65)	(173)
Balance at ending of period	97	204	204	97
Total charges to date			889	842
Non-Cash Charges [Member] | 2011 Restructuring Plan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Total charges to date				$ 59

XML

Restructuring Charges, Net

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Restructuring Charges, Net [Abstract]

Restructuring Charges, Net

9. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES, NET

2012 Restructuring Plan

During February 2012, the Company announced a restructuring, including a work force realignment to more appropriately allocate resources to its key strategic initiatives. The workforce realignment involved investing resources in some areas, reducing resources in others and eliminating some areas of the Company’s business that did not support its strategic priorities. During March 2012, the Company announced the transition of its owned-and-operated brokerage office in Salt Lake City to a third-party brokerage joining the Company’s Powered by Zip network. The Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.1 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

2011 Restructuring Plan

During January 2011, the Company announced a restructuring, including closing brokerage operations in selected underperforming markets and a workforce reduction in sales support and administration functions. The associated restructuring charges included employee severance pay and related expenses, non-cancelable lease obligations and other exit costs. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has recorded the majority of the cost of this restructuring. Accrued 2011 Restructuring Plan charges as of September 30, 2013 relate primarily to non-cancelable lease obligations and related facility costs which the Company expects to pay over the remaining terms of the obligations.

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

		Balance as of  December 31,					Non-cash			Balance as of  September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
		2012	Charges		Payments		Adjustment			2013		2013
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	27	$	54	$	(81)	$	-	$	-	$	1,585
Lease obligation and other exit costs		44		-		(24)		-		20		75
		71		54		(105)		-		20		1,660
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		-		-		-		-		-		1,450
Lease obligation and other exit costs		150		12		(65)		-		97		842
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		59
		150		12		(65)		-		97		2,351
Total	$	221	$	66	$	(170)	$	-	$	117	$	4,011

Restructuring charges activity, relating to the 2012 and 2011 Restructuring Plans, was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

		Balance as of  December 31,					Non-cash			Balance as of  September 30,		Total Charges to date as of September 30,
		2011	Charges		Payments		Adjustment			2012		2012
	(In thousands)
2012  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses	$	-	$	1,335	$	(1,253)	$	(80)	$	2	$	1,335
Lease obligation and other exit costs		-		54		(11)				43		54
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		-
		-		1,389		(1,264)		(80)		45		1,389
2011  Restructuring Plan
Employee severance and related expenses		39		1		(40)		-		-		1,452
Lease obligation and other exit costs		377		-		(173)		-		204		889
Non-cash charges		-		-		-		-		-		-
		416		1		(213)		-		204		2,341
Total	$	416	$	1,390	$	(1,477)	$	(80)	$	249	$	3,730

Accrued restructuring changes for September 30, 2013 and 2012 relates primarily to non-cancelable lease obligations and related facility costs which the company expects to pay over the remaining terms of the lease obligations.

Accrued restructuring charges were included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Accrued restructuring charges (current liabilities)	$	81	$	221
Other long-term liabilities		36		-
Total accrued restructuring charges	$	117	$	221

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Valuation assumptions and stock-based compensation expense

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the day of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, dividend yields and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected life of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was estimated by taking the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the option. The Company did not have any options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The risk-free interest rate estimate is based upon U.S. Treasury bond rates appropriate for the expected life of the options.

The assumptions used and the resulting estimates of weighted average fair value per share of options granted were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Expected volatility		0%		51%		51%-52%		49%-51%
Risk-free interest rate		0.0%		0.9%		1.0-1.3%		0.7-1.2%
Expected life (years)		0.0		6.1		5.5-6.1		5.5-6.1
Expected dividend yield		0%		0%		0%		0%
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period		$0.00		$1.16		$1.76		$0.62

Stock-based compensation expense was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenues	$	165	$	124	$	218	$	163
Product development		28		10		77		46
Sales and marketing		131		36		230		122
General and administrative		158		116		513		473
Restructuring charges, net		-		80		-		80
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	482	$	366	$	1,038	$	884

The accounting standards require forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimated expected forfeitures based on various factors including employee class and historical experience. The amount of stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. As of September 30, 2013, there was $3.1 million of unrecorded stock-based compensation, after estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.8 years. As of September 30, 2013, there was $63,000 of unrecorded stock-based compensation related to unvested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 0.4 years.

Stock option activity

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the period indicated was as follows:

					Weighted
			Weighted		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of		Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		Life (Years)		Value
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		5,097	$	3.16		6.15	$	2,614
Options granted		1,277		3.57
Options exercised		(831)		3.04
Options forfeited/cancelled/expired		(344)		5.15
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		5,199	$	3.15		7.26	$	13,104
Exercisable  at September 30, 2013		2,844	$	3.46		5.86	$	6,762

Options generally vest over a four-year period with one-fourth (1/4) of the shares vesting one year after the vesting commencement date, and an additional one-forty eighth (1/48) of the shares vesting on the first day of each calendar month thereafter until all such shares are exercisable. Options generally expire after ten years. Options issued pursuant to the Company’s voluntary stock option exchange program, completed in July 2009, vested ratably over a 36 month period and expire after seven years.

The Company granted options for 183,000 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2012 that provide accelerated vesting if the Company’s closing stock price is equal to or greater than $5.00 per share for a period of 120 consecutive days.  On the same date, the Company also granted options for 183,000 shares that provided for vesting in full if the Company achieves adjusted EBITDA profitability for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was achieved. 

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $5.47 on September 30, 2013, and the exercise price for the options that were in-the-money at September 30, 2013. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of September 30, 2013 was 2,502,000. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was $1,129,000 and $25,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares.

Restricted Stock

The Company expenses the cost of restricted stock awards, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, ratably over the period during which the restriction lapse. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $38,000 and $68,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $0 and ($3,000), respectively.  As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company had 15,000 and 45,000 shares of nonvested restricted stock awards, respectively.

			Weighted
			Average
	Number of		Exercise
	Shares		Price
	(In thousands)
Nonvested at December 31, 2012		15	$	2.87
Shares granted		30		3.00
Shares vested		-		-
Shares forfeited		-		-
Nonvested at September 30, 2013		45	$	2.96

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$ (1,750)	$ (7,683)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	1,429	1,317
Stock-based compensation expense	1,038	884
Non-cash restructuring charges		4
Provision for doubtful accounts	5	(2)
Amortization of short-term investment premium		44
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	225	(237)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(147)	156
Other assets	95	3
Accounts payable	258	(246)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(6)	4,121
Accrued restructuring charges, current portion	(140)	(1)
Other long-term liabilities	3	(163)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	1,010	(1,798)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of short term investments		7,960
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,943)	(1,302)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(1,943)	6,658
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock option exercises	2,523	80
Acquisition of treasury stock		(7)
Net cash provided by financing activities	2,523	73
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	1,590	4,933
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	12,921	12,634
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 14,511	$ 17,567

XML

Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Weighted-Average Outstanding Options, Warrants and Non-Vested Common Shares) (Details) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	2,174	5,095	5,638	4,729
Stock Options [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share	2,174	5,095	5,593	4,729
Nonvested Common Stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share			45

XML

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Short-Term Investments and Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Short-Term Investments Classified as Available-For-Sale Securities, Except for Restricted Cash, and Reported at Fair Value

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s cash equivalents were invested in money market funds. The table below sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets:

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated		Gross		Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money Market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Recorded as:	(In thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	7,959	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	7,957

Available-For-Sale Short-Term Investments, Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company’s cash equivalents amounting to $8.0 million, were invested in money market funds and were measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy.

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Money market funds	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957
Total	$	7,959	$	-	$	-	$	7,959	$	7,957	$	-	$	-	$	7,957

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating leases

The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through February 2019. The terms of the lease agreements provide for renewal options and escalation clauses. Future gross and net lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2013 were as follows, in thousands:

	Gross
	Operating				Net Operating
	Lease		Sublease		Lease
	Commitments		Income		Commitments
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2013	$	450	$	(20)	$	430
2014		1,770		(42)		1,728
2015		1,537		(43)		1,494
2016		1,221		(44)		1,177
2017		678		(34)		644
2018		233		-		233
2019		12		-		12
Total minimum lease payments	$	5,901	$	(183)	$	5,718

Legal proceedings

On March 26, 2010, we were named as one of fourteen defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Smarter Agent LLC v. Boopsie, Inc., et al. The complaint alleges that the defendants have each infringed on patents owned by Smarter Agent relating to mobile device application technology and seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The US Patent Office is currently examining the patent issue, and litigation is stayed pending the completion of that investigation. After completing investigation of this matter, we do not believe that we have infringed on any patent, or that we have any liability for the claims alleged, and, thus, we intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

On February 17, 2012, two real estate sales agents formerly employed by us, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, District of Arizona, Patricia Anderson and James Kwasiborski v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint concerns our compensation practices nationwide regarding our real estate agents, who at the time at issue were classified as employees. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime as required by federal law. The complaint seeks liquidated and treble damages in addition to wages and overtime for an unspecified amount. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and, thus, we believe that this claim is without merit. In addition to the federal law allegations, the complaint alleges violation of the Arizona Minimum Wage law. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

On February 29, 2012, one real estate agent formerly employed by us, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Tracy Adewunmi v. ZipRealty, Inc., concerning our compensation practices regarding real estate agents in California. Specifically, the complaint alleges that we failed to pay these persons minimum wage and overtime, failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to reimburse employee expenses and failed to provide itemized wage statements as required by California laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages including penalties and attorneys’ fees in addition to wages and overtime. On April 2, 2012, we filed an answer denying these allegations because we believe that our sales agents, whose job duties consisted exclusively of selling residential real estate, were properly classified as “outside salespersons” and were compensated accordingly in full compliance with California law. Additionally, we filed a cross complaint against Ms. Adewumni for fraud and breach of contract, in which we alleged that she created false client accounts that resulted in her receiving higher commission payments than she was entitled to receive under her employment agreement. On May 20, 2013, Ms. Adewumni dropped the class claims in her complaint and, thus, this case now involves only the claims of individual plaintiff, Tracy Adewumni. We have completed further investigation and discovery and continue to believe that Ms. Adewumni’s claims are without merit. Litigation is ongoing, and the case is set for trial in February 2014. No estimate of possible loss, if any, can be made at this time.

 On January 11, 2013, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United State District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Arczar LLC v. ZipRealty, Inc. The complaint alleges that our mobile device application has infringed on a patent owned by Arczar relating to computer vision system technology and seeks unspecified damages and other equitable relief. Effective July 24, 2013, we entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with Arczar that resulted in a dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice and our purchase of a perpetual license to Arczar’s patents.

We are not currently subject to any other material legal proceedings. From time to time we have been, and we currently are, a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of the business. The amounts in dispute in these matters are not material to us, and we believe that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Indemnifications

The Company has entered into various indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of our business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified parties, which include certain of our service providers as well as others, in connection with certain occurrences. In addition, the corporate charter documents require the Company to provide indemnification rights to the Company’s directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, and permit the Company to provide indemnification rights to our other employees and agents, for certain events that occur while these persons are serving in these capacities. The Company’s charter documents also protect each of its directors, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, from personal liability to the Company and its stockholders from monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director. The Company has also entered into indemnification agreements with the Company’s directors and each of our officers with a title of Vice President or higher.

The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unspecified. The Company is not aware of any material indemnification liabilities for actions, events or occurrences that have occurred to date. The Company maintains insurance on some of the liabilities the Company has agreed to indemnify, including liabilities incurred by the Company’s directors and officers while acting in these capacities, subject to certain exclusions and limitations of coverage.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Future Gross and Net Lease Commitments under Non-Cancelable Operating Leases

Future gross and net lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2013 were as follows, in thousands:

	Gross
	Operating				Net Operating
	Lease		Sublease		Lease
	Commitments		Income		Commitments
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2013	$	450	$	(20)	$	430
2014		1,770		(42)		1,728
2015		1,537		(43)		1,494
2016		1,221		(44)		1,177
2017		678		(34)		644
2018		233		-		233
2019		12		-		12
Total minimum lease payments	$	5,901	$	(183)	$	5,718

XML

Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Net Income (Loss) Per Share [Abstract]

Computation of Basic and Dilutive Net Income (Loss) per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	(4,940)	$	(1,750)	$	(7,683)
Denominator:
Shares used to compute EPS:
Basic		21,114		20,637		20,894		20,630
Diluted		22,492		20,637		20,894		20,630
Net income (loss) per share basic and diluted:
Basic	$	-	$	(0.24)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.37)
Diluted	$	-	$	(0.24)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.37)

Weighted-Average Outstanding Options, Warrants and Non-Vested Common Shares

The following weighted-average outstanding options and non-vested common shares were excluded in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented because including them would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Options to purchase common stock		2,174		5,095		5,593		4,729
Nonvested common stock		-		-		45		-
Total		2,174		5,095		5,638		4,729

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Nov. 01, 2013
Document Documentand Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Trading Symbol	zipr
Entity Registrant Name	ZIPREALTY INC
Entity Central Index Key	0001142512
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		21,564,111

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Assumptions Used and Resulting Estimates of Weighted Average Fair Value Per Share of Options Granted

The assumptions used and the resulting estimates of weighted average fair value per share of options granted were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Expected volatility		0%		51%		51%-52%		49%-51%
Risk-free interest rate		0.0%		0.9%		1.0-1.3%		0.7-1.2%
Expected life (years)		0.0		6.1		5.5-6.1		5.5-6.1
Expected dividend yield		0%		0%		0%		0%
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period		$0.00		$1.16		$1.76		$0.62

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense was as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenues	$	165	$	124	$	218	$	163
Product development		28		10		77		46
Sales and marketing		131		36		230		122
General and administrative		158		116		513		473
Restructuring charges, net		-		80		-		80
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	482	$	366	$	1,038	$	884

Summary of Company's Stock Option Activity

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the period indicated was as follows:

					Weighted
			Weighted		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of		Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		Life (Years)		Value
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		5,097	$	3.16		6.15	$	2,614
Options granted		1,277		3.57
Options exercised		(831)		3.04
Options forfeited/cancelled/expired		(344)		5.15
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		5,199	$	3.15		7.26	$	13,104
Exercisable  at September 30, 2013		2,844	$	3.46		5.86	$	6,762

Summary of Company's Nonvested Restricted Stock

			Weighted
			Average
	Number of		Exercise
	Shares		Price
	(In thousands)
Nonvested at December 31, 2012		15	$	2.87
Shares granted		30		3.00
Shares vested		-		-
Shares forfeited		-		-
Nonvested at September 30, 2013		45	$	2.96