10-K 1 ccni_10k.htm ANNUAL REPORT Blueprint
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
☑
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018
 
or
 
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 000-53088
 
COMMAND CENTER, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
 Washington
 
91-2079472
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO
 
80235
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (866) 464-5844
 
 
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None
 
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Common Stock, par value $0.001
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No☑
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No☑
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
       
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer ☐ , accelerated filer ☐ , non-accelerated filer ☐ , smaller reporting company  ☑ , or an emerging growth company ☐ (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐·No☑
 
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter, June 29, 2018, was approximately $16,500,000.
 
As of April 9, 2019, there were 4,629,331 common shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
 
The following document is incorporated by reference into Parts I, II, III, and IV of this report:  None.
Command Center, Inc.
2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of Contents
 
 
 
 
Page
 
   
  3 
  6 
  12
 
  12
 
  12
 
  14
 
 
    
   
  14
 
  15
 
  15
 
  19
 
  20
 
  37
 
  37
 
  37
 
 
    
   
  39
 
  45
 
  48
 
 50
 
 50
 
 
    
   
  51
 
  51
 

  52
 
 
 
 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Form 10-K") may contain forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our expectations for future events and future financial performance. Generally, the words “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. In addition to other factors discussed in this Form 10-K, some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include risk factors described in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Our expectations, beliefs, or projections may not be achieved or accomplished. We do not, nor have we authorized any other person to, assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-K, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
 
PART I
 
Item 1. Business
 
Introduction and General Background
 
Command Center, Inc. ("Command Center,” the “Company,” “CCI,” “we,” "us," or “our”) is a staffing company, operating primarily in the manual on-demand labor segment of the staffing industry. In 2018, we employed approximately 32,000 employees and provided services to approximately 3,600 customers, primarily in the industrial/manufacturing/warehousing, construction, hospitality, transportation, and retail industries. Our customers range in size from small businesses to large corporate enterprises. All of our temporary staff, whom we refer to as "field team members," are employed by us. Most of our work assignments are short-term, and many are filled on little advanced notice from our customers. In addition to short and longer-term temporary work assignments, we sometimes recruit and place workers in temp-to-hire positions.
 
As of April 9, 2019, we owned and operated 67 on-demand labor locations, or branches, across 22 states. We currently operate as Command Center, Inc., and we are also known in some locations as Command Labor. All financial information is consolidated and reported in our consolidated financial statements. Our corporate headquarters is located in Lakewood, Colorado.
 
In prior years we were organized as Command Staffing, LLC. We were organized as a limited liability company in December 2002 and commenced operations in 2003 as a franchisor of on-demand labor businesses. In November 2005, Temporary Financial Services, Inc., a public company, acquired the assets of Command Staffing, LLC and Harborview Software, Inc., an affiliated company that owned the software used in the operation of our on-demand labor branches. The transaction was accounted for as if Command Staffing, LLC was the accounting acquirer, and our name changed to Command Center, Inc.
 
Industry Overview
 
The on-demand labor industry has developed based on the business need for flexible staffing solutions. Many businesses operate in a cyclical production environment and find it difficult to staff according to their changing business requirements. Companies also desire a way to temporarily replace full-time employees when absent due to illness, vacation, or unplanned termination. On-demand labor offers customers the opportunity to immediately respond to changes in staffing needs, reduce the costs associated with recruiting and interviewing, eliminate unemployment and workers’ compensation exposure, and draw from a larger pool of potential employees.
 
 
 
 
 
The on-demand labor industry continues to develop specialized market segments that reflect the diverse needs of the businesses it serves. Technical skills, prior work history, duration of assignment, and drug and background check requirements vary among industries and customers. We operate primarily within the short-term, semi-skilled and unskilled segments of the on-demand labor industry. We endeavor to customize our services according to the unique opportunities and assets presented by each of our branches, while leveraging our overall size when possible. This approach reduces our overhead costs, improves economies of scale, establishes procedural uniformity and internal controls, and creates a predictable internal environment for our field team members.
 
Business
 
Strategic Growth Opportunities:  We continue to improve our network of on-demand labor branches. We supply a quality workforce and we strive to consistently match the right field team members to the right jobs. We have 67 locally-managed branches throughout the United States that serve as trusted partners to businesses and job seekers alike. Customers, representing a variety of industries, trust us to learn their business and to plan ahead to address their dynamic staffing needs. Job seekers trust us to understand their complete employment picture and place them in on-demand, temporary, temp-to-hire, or permanent placement positions where they can grow, thrive, and provide immediate value. The total number of branches open and operating increased from 66 at the end of fiscal year 2017 to 67 at the end of fiscal year 2018. In 2019, we plan to continue our strategy of carefully balancing branch expansion against return on investment at existing locations. In doing so, we expect to concentrate our revenue growth efforts primarily on sales growth within our existing branch structure, while possibly opening new branches in areas that present exceptional opportunities, and looking for acquisitions that will expand our existing operational footprint. In all of our growth opportunities, we continue to emphasize the fundamentals of our business: sell to quality accounts, increase margins where possible, and provide exceptional customer service.
 
On-demand Labor Branch Operations:  In 2018, we continued to focus on the basics of our business: service consistency and excellence, margin improvement, cost containment, sales effectiveness, and company culture. We concentrated on these measures to improve profitability and solidify the groundwork for future growth.
 
Our branches are often located in proximity to concentrated commercial and industrial areas typically with access to public transportation and other services that are important to our field team members. We have developed a branch demographic model to identify and qualify potential future locations.
 
Our operations are managed by in-branch personnel, area managers, and corporate management. Where appropriate, business development specialists are employed to help drive business to our branches. Our compensation plans for branch personnel, area managers, and other sales personnel are designed to secure and retain the qualified individuals needed to meet our business, financial, and growth objectives. Our personnel practices are designed to attract, screen, hire, train, support, and retain qualified personnel at all levels of our organization. We propagate best practices from our higher performing branches across all operating groups to produce consistent execution and improvements in company-wide performance.
 
Our Temporary Staff, or Field Team Members:  Field team members are our product and our key asset. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract, motivate, and reward our field team members. We have invested in numerous programs designed to create a long-term relationship with top-performing field team members. These programs include health insurance, bonus programs, safety rewards, longevity programs, and training programs.
 
The pool of qualified and available field team members varies by location. For most of our branches, the supply of field team members is sufficient and diverse enough to meet current customer needs. However, in some locations, field team member availability is a limiting factor. We continue to seek additional field team members through internet postings, newspaper advertisements, printed flyers, branch displays, career fairs, and word-of-mouth.
 
Our Customers:  In 2018, we serviced approximately 3,600 customers across a variety of industries. Our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 25% of our revenue in 2018. Additionally, at December 28, 2018, 12.9% of total accounts receivable was due from a single customer. The top industries we served were industrial/manufacturing/warehousing, construction, hospitality, transportation, and retail. In 2017, we serviced approximately 3,200 customers in these same industries and our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 23% of our revenue.
 
 
 
 
 
Our Marketing Strategy:  We have adapted our sales process to respond to our customers’ needs and significant time constraints. Our customers are focused on their own business requirements and rely on us to respond quickly and effectively with smart solutions to their current challenges. Our unique sales process starts by learning about customers and facilitating conversations where we offer support and contribute to a growing relationship. Together, we create an action plan that draws on our core competencies and solves our customers’ needs. Once we have resolved one need, we consistently strive to meet additional needs as presented. Many of our existing customers are served by multiple branches, across multiple cities, and in many cases, across multiple states. We have tailored programs to specifically address the needs of these national accounts and plan to continue our efforts to expand our national accounts relationships in the years ahead.
 
Our Workers’ Compensation Coverage:  In accordance with state laws, we provide our workforce with workers’ compensation insurance. Currently, we are covered under a large deductible policy with ACE American Insurance Company, or ACE, where we have primary responsibility for claims under the policy. Under our current policy, which has been in place since April 1, 2014, we are responsible for covered losses and expenses up to $500,000 per incident. Amounts in excess of $500,000 are the responsibility of ACE. From April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2014, we were covered under a large deductible policy issued by Dallas National Insurance, who changed their name to Freestone Insurance Company, or Freestone, in 2014. Under this prior policy, we are responsible for covered losses and expenses up to $350,000 per incident. Amounts in excess of $350,000 were the responsibility of Freestone; however, due to the current insolvency and liquidation of Freestone (as set forth in more detail in the below Risk Factors), any payments required to be made above this amount, if any, will likely be paid by a state guaranty fund in the jurisdiction where the injury occurred.
 
For workers’ compensation claims originating in Washington and North Dakota, we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums and obtain full coverage under mandatory state-administered programs. Our liability associated with claims in these states is limited to our premium payments.
 
Our Safety Program:  To protect our workforce and help control workers’ compensation insurance rates, we maintain several company-wide safety programs designed to increase safety awareness. We provide safety training through videos, safety testing, and basic and remedial instruction. Branch managers conduct periodic job site safety inspections on new and existing jobs to ensure that our field team members are working in a safe environment. We encourage safe work behavior through an incentive program that rewards our field team members for working accident free by allowing them to purchase safety and other items by using earned points. We also encourage our field team members to report unsafe working conditions. Branch managers also learn risk management and proper safety protocols when attending training sessions at our corporate office or elsewhere. We regularly evaluate the risk profile of the work we undertake on an ongoing basis and sometimes restrict classes of work in order to manage risk appropriately.
 
Our Seasonality:  Some of the industries in which we operate are subject to seasonal fluctuation. Many of the jobs filled by field team members are outdoors and generally performed during the warmer months of the year. As a result, activity increases in the spring and continues at higher levels through summer, then begins to taper off during fall and through winter. Seasonal fluctuations are typically less in the more temperate parts of the United States, where many of our branches are located. Fluctuations in seasonal business affect financial performance from period to period. Severe weather in any of our locations for prolonged periods has the potential to impair our business within these geographies, given the outdoor nature of many of our assignments.
 
Our Competition:  The manual labor sector of the on-demand labor industry in which we operate is largely fragmented and highly competitive, with low barriers to entry. Our competitors range in size from small, local or regional operators with five or fewer locations to large, multi-national operations with hundreds of locations.
 
The primary competitive factors in our market segment include price, the ability to timely provide the requested workers, and overall quality of service. Secondary factors include worker quality and performance, efficiency, the ability to meet the business-to-business vendor requirements, name recognition, established reputation, and customer relationships. While barriers to entry are low, businesses operating in this sector of the on-demand labor industry do require access to significant working capital, particularly in the spring and summer when seasonal staffing requirements are highest. Lack of working capital can be a significant impediment to growth for small, local, and regional on-demand labor providers. In addition, increasing government regulation is also a barrier to entry as many smaller firms cannot profitably comply with the administrative burden of the new regulations.
  
Our Trademarks and Trade Names:  We have registered “Command,” “Command Center,” “Command Staffing,” “Command Labor,” “Real Jobs for Real People,” “Bakken Staffing,” and “Exceeding Expectations Every Time,” as service marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
 
 
 
 
 
Our Intellectual Property:  We have proprietary software systems in place to handle most aspects of our operations, including field team member dispatch activities, invoicing, accounts receivable, and payroll. Our software systems also provide internal control over our operations, and allow us to produce internal management reports necessary to track the financial performance of individual branches. We refine our systems and processes based on the feedback we receive from management and others within the Company in order to adequately track and manage individual branches. Our proprietary software systems are not patented and are not licensed to, or used by, any other organization. We have invested in off-site back-up and storage systems that we believe provide reasonable protections for our electronic information systems against breakdowns as well as other disruptions and other unauthorized intrusions.
 
Our Real Property:  We lease the real property for our corporate office and of all of our branch locations. All of these properties are leased at market rates that vary depending on location. Each branch is between 1,000 and 5,000 square feet, depending on location and market conditions. We believe that our corporate office and each of the branch locations are adequate for our current needs.
 
Our Employees:  We currently employ a staff of approximately 30 at our corporate headquarters in Lakewood, Colorado, of which approximately 30 are full-time employees. The number of employees at our corporate headquarters is not expected to significantly increase over the next year. We also employ approximately 200 field operations staff in our various branches, of which approximately 180 are full-time employees. During 2018, we employed approximately 32,000 field team members. We are the employer of record for our field team members, and as such, are responsible for collecting withholding taxes and for paying employer contributions for social security, unemployment tax, workers’ compensation, other insurance programs, and all other governmental requirements imposed on employers, including any imposed by state and local governments or regulatory agencies. In addition to completing Form I-9 required by the Department of Homeland Security, we also verify the identity and work eligibility of each new employee through the federal E-Verify system.
 
Environmental Concerns:  Because we are a service business, federal, state, or local laws that regulate the discharge of materials into the environment do not impact our business.
 
Available Information: We make the following items available, free of charge, through the investor section of our website: annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Charters adopted by the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of our Board of Directors, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct, and Policy on Roles and Responsibilities of the Chairperson of the Board are also available through the investor section of our website. Our website address is: www.commandonline.com. The information contained on our website, or on other websites linked to our website, is not part of this Form 10-K.
 
Any materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
 
Hire Quest Merger Agreement:  On April 7, 2019, the Company, CCNI One, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 1”), Command Florida, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 2”), and Hire Quest Holdings, LLC (“Hire Quest”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), providing for the acquisition of Hire Quest by the Company. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub 1 will be merged with and into Hire Quest (the “First Merger”), with Hire Quest being the surviving entity (the “First Surviving Company”), and (ii) immediately following the First Merger, the First Surviving Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub 2 (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Merger”), with Merger Sub 2 being the surviving entity (the “Surviving Company”). Upon completion of the Merger and subject to shareholder approval, the Company will change its name to HireQuest, Inc. In addition, the Merger Agreement contemplates that the Company will commence a self-tender offer to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock at share price of $6.00 per share (the “Offer”).
 
Hire Quest is a trusted name in temporary staffing. Hire Quest provides the back-office support team for Trojan Labor and Acrux Staffing franchised branch locations across the United States. Trojan Labor provides temporary staffing services which includes general labor, industrial, and construction personnel.  Acrux Staffing provides temporary staffing services which includes skilled, semi-skilled and general labor industrial personnel, as well as clerical and secretarial personnel.
 
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the members of Hire Quest, if the Merger is completed, all of the ownership interests in Hire Quest will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock representing 68% of the shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after the effective time of the Merger but prior to giving effect to the purchase of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Offer.  The Merger Agreement requires Hire Quest’s net tangible assets at closing to be at least $14 million.
 
The Company and Hire Quest have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, each of the Company and Hire Quest is required, among other things, to conduct its business in the ordinary course in all material respects during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger. The Company is required to seek shareholder approval of (i) the amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to increase the authorized shares of Company’s common stock and to change the name of the Company to “HireQuest, Inc.”, (ii) the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement and the related change of control of the Company pursuant to Nasdaq listing rules, and (iii) the conversion of the Company from a Washington corporation to a Delaware corporation. The Company will call and hold a shareholders meeting seeking to obtain such approvals. The Company will distribute proxy statements to shareholders of record containing additional details regarding the Merger.
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
Our common stock value and our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition are subject to various risks, including, but not limited to those set forth below. If any of the following risks actually occur, our common stock, business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the value of your investment could decline and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock. These risk factors should be carefully considered together with the other information in this Form 10-K, including the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
 
 
We are vulnerable to fluctuations in the general economy. The staffing needs of our customers vary greatly with the overall condition of the economy. Even though the economy is currently experiencing a period of growth, there is a risk that conditions will change, and that the future economic climate will become more volatile, or uncertain. This could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. During periods of weak economic growth or economic contraction, the demand for staffing services typically declines. When demand drops, our business is typically impacted unfavorably as we experience a decrease of our revenue but our selling and administrative expense base may not decline as quickly as revenues. In periods of decline, we can only reduce selling and administrative expenses to a certain level without negatively impacting the long-term potential of our branch network and brands. Additionally, during economic downturns companies may slow the rate at which they pay their vendors, or they may become unable to pay their obligations. If our customers become unable to pay amounts owed to us, or pay us more slowly, then our cash flow and profitability may suffer. Deterioration of general economic conditions could have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. 
 
We are vulnerable to downturns in regional and local economies. As of  April 9, 2019, we own and operate 67 branches across 22 states. As such, we are subject to regional and local economic conditions in many markets. Additionally, our new branches are sometimes placed in metropolitan areas where we have one or more existing branches, increasing our exposure to future economic weakness in those local areas. Deterioration in regional and local economic conditions in the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
We rely on a number of key customers and if we lose any one of these customers, our revenues may decline. Although we have a significant number of customers in each of the geographic markets that we operate in, we rely on certain key customers for a significant portion of our revenues. In 2018, our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 25% of our revenue. In 2017, our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 23% of our revenue. In the future, a small number of customers may represent a significant portion of our total revenues in any given period. These customers may not consistently use our services at a particular rate over any subsequent period. The loss of any of these customers could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
 
We are vulnerable to seasonal fluctuations with lower demand in the fall and winter months. Revenues generated from branches in markets subject to seasonal fluctuations will be less stable and may be lower than in other markets. Locating branches in highly seasonal markets involves higher risks. Our individual branch revenue can fluctuate significantly on both a quarter over quarter and year over year basis, depending on the local economic conditions and need for temporary labor services in the local economy. One of our goals is to increase the diversity of customers and industries we service at both the branch and the company level. This will reduce the potential negative impact of an economic downturn in any one industry or region. To the extent that we consider opening new branches, we intend to select branch locations with a view to maximizing total long-term return on our investment in branches, personnel, marketing, and other fixed and sunk costs. However, there can be no assurance that our profitability will not be adversely affected by low returns on investment in certain highly-seasonal markets. Weather can also have a significant impact on our operations as there is typically lower demand for staffing services during adverse weather conditions in the winter months.
 
The market for our common stock is limited and our stockholders may have difficulty reselling their shares when desired or at attractive market prices. Our stock price and our listing may make it more difficult for our stockholders to resell shares when desired or at attractive prices. Our Company stock trades on the NASDAQ stock exchange. Our common stock has continued to trade in low volumes and at low prices. On December 7, 2017, we effected a 1-for-12 reverse stock split of our common and preferred stock which also affected our trading volume. Some investors view low-priced stocks as unduly speculative and therefore not appropriate candidates for investment. Many brokerage firms and institutional investors have internal policies prohibiting the purchase or maintenance of positions in low-priced stocks.
 
 
 
 
  
“Penny stock” rules may make buying or selling our securities difficult and impact liquidity. Trading in our securities may be subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any broker-dealer who recommends our securities to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, the delivery of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, and current quotations for the securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the liquidity of our securities and consequently adversely affect the market price for our securities. 
 
Loss of key management personnel could negatively affect our business. We have a small management team and we are highly dependent on principal members of our management team to operate our business. The loss of any key employee, or the loss of one of our executives, could have a material adverse effect on our business.  While any key executive and management changes are carefully considered to ensure business continuity and performance, there is no way to estimate the potential impact of such changes. On April 1, 2018, our previous CEO of five-years was replaced by our current CEO.  Following the replacement of key personnel, including our CEO, it may take new employees substantial time and efforts to develop important expertise and knowledge. Our future performance depends on our continued ability to identify, recruit, motivate, and retain key management personnel at all levels. The failure to attract and retain key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
 
If we lose members of our Board of Directors, our ability to manage our business could be impaired. We have a highly talented board of directors and there are periodic changes to the board for a variety of business and personal reasons, including to ensure an optimal mix of experience and expertise. In January 2018, two members of our Board of Directors resigned, one of which was the chairman. While we were able to appoint replacement board members, it may take these new board members substantial time and efforts to regain the previous directors’ expertise and knowledge. Our future performance also depends on our continued ability to identify, recruit, motivate, and retain board members. The failure to attract and retain board members could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
 
Difficulty in attracting, developing, and retaining qualified branch personnel could negatively affect our business. We rely significantly on the performance and productivity of our branch managers and business development specialists to help drive new business. Each branch manager has primary responsibility for managing the operations of the individual branch, including recruiting workers, daily dispatch of personnel, collection of accounts receivable, and overall customer service. To combat a typically high turnover rate for branch managers in the on-demand labor industry, we continue to develop and refine our training and compensation plans to encourage employee retention. There is no assurance that our training and compensation plans will reduce turnover in this position.
 
Loss of key personnel could negatively affect our business. The loss of any key executive or manager could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future performance also depends on our ability to identify, recruit, motivate, and retain key management personnel. The failure to attract and retain key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
 
Unavailability of a reliable pool of field team members may negatively impact our business. On-demand labor companies must continually attract reliable temporary workers to meet customer needs. We compete for such workers with other temporary labor businesses, as well as with actual and potential customers, some of which seek to fill positions directly with regular or field team members. In addition, our customers sometimes hire our field team members into permanent positions. From time to time, during peak periods and/or in certain geographic regions, we may experience shortages of available temporary workers.
 
We are dependent upon the continued availability of workers' compensation insurance. We maintain workers' compensation insurance as required by state laws. Few insurance carriers provide workers' compensation coverage for staffing companies in the manual labor market, and the insurance market may tighten even further in the future. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain adequate levels of insurance with acceptable terms, coverages, deductibles and collateral requirements. In all of the states in which we operate, we cannot engage in business without workers' compensation insurance. In order to obtain coverage, we are required to post collateral with the carrier in the form of cash or a letter of credit from our lender. The carrier can retain this collateral for extended periods of time, and increase the amount of such collateral.
 
 
 
 
 
Increased workers’ compensation insurance premiums could negatively affect operating results.  Workers’ compensation expenses and the related liability accrual are based on our actual claims experience. Currently, as we have throughout most of our corporate history, we maintain a high deductible workers’ compensation insurance policy. Our current workers’ compensation policy has a deductible limit of $500,000 per incident, and our workers’ compensation policy immediately prior to April 2014 has a deductible limit of $350,000 per incident. For the years prior to April 2011, our policy has a deductible limit of $250,000 per person. As a result, we are substantially self-insured. Our management training and safety programs aim to minimize both the frequency and severity of workers’ compensation insurance claims, but a large number of claims, or a small number of significant claims, could require substantial payments. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to successfully limit the frequency and severity of our workers’ compensation claims, or that our insurance premiums and costs will not increase substantially. Higher costs for workers’ compensation coverage, if incurred, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
 
Increased competition in our highly competitive industry may impact our ability to retain customers or market share. We operate in a highly competitive industry with low barriers to entry. We face competition from a wide variety of companies ranging in size from large, multi-national corporations to small, local sole proprietors. This causes extensive pricing pressure, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain customers or market share going forward, nor that we will be able to maintain profitability or current profit margins.
 
We may not be able to recover collateral deposits we have placed with our workers’ compensation insurance carrier. Historically our workers’ compensation insurance carriers have required collateral deposits to secure our payment of claims up to the amount of our policy deductible. For the two-year period ending March 31, 2014, Dallas National Insurance, now known as Freestone Insurance Company, or Freestone, provided our workers’ compensation insurance coverage under a high deductible ($350,000 per incident) policy. Under the terms of the policy, we were required to provide cash collateral of $1.8 million as security for payment of claims up to the policy deductible. In April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about Freestone’s financial condition. In August 2014, the receivership was converted into a liquidation proceeding. In late 2015, we filed timely proofs of claim with the Receiver for return of our collateral deposits, one filed as a priority claim and one as a general claim. Based on available information, the company determined it is more likely than not that our priority claim will be treated in a similar manner as other creditors, resulting in the priority claim having little to no value. Accordingly, the reserve on this asset was reduced in 2018 by approximately $1.5 million, resulting in a net carrying amount of $260,000. In the event the company receives substantially less than our reasonably estimated amount, there may be a material negative effect on our financial statements.
 
Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse, unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations. We are required to prepare our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, which is periodically revised and/or expanded. From time to time, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, and the SEC. It is possible that we may be required to adopt future accounting standards which may require additional changes to the current accounting treatment that we apply to our financial statements and may also require us to make significant changes to our reporting systems. Such changes could result in a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
 
The delay between the time we pay our temporary workers and other creditors and the time we collect from our customers requires debt refinancing to provide working capital. Field team members are typically paid on the same day the services are performed, while customers are generally billed on a weekly basis with seven-day payment terms. We currently have an account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which allows us to sell eligible accounts receivable for 90% of the invoiced amount on a full recourse basis up to the facility maximum, or $14.0 million. When the receivable is collected, the remaining 10% is paid to us, less applicable fees and interest. The term of the agreement is through April 7, 2020. The cancelation of the account purchase agreement would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, cash flows, and results of operations.
 
The delay between the time we pay our temporary workers and the time we collect from our customers requires aggressive management of our credit risk and places pressure on working capital. Pressure on our working capital requires that we manage the resulting credit risk. The magnitude of the risk varies with general economic conditions. We believe that write-offs for doubtful accounts can be maintained at commercially acceptable levels without the need to resort to unduly intrusive credit management practices that could interfere with customer acquisition and retention. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that our ability to achieve and sustain profitable operations will not be adversely affected by losses from doubtful accounts or customer relations problems arising from our efforts to manage credit risk.
 
Limitations in our receivables financing agreements negatively impact our liquidity. Under our account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, our borrowing base is limited to the lesser of: (1) 90% of acceptable accounts as defined in the agreement, or (2) $14.0 million. Our collateral requirements with our workers' compensation insurance carrier are secured by a $6.2 million letter of credit from our lender. The amount of the letter of credit results in a reduction to our borrowing base, currently reducing funds otherwise available to us by $6.2 million. This limitation on our liquidity may result in our inability to expand or to sustain our operations, which could result in a material adverse impact on our business.
 
 
 
 
 
Increased employee expenses could adversely affect our operations. We are required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to employment, including verification of eligibility for employment, occupational safety and health laws, wage and hour requirements, employment insurance, and equal opportunity employment laws. Costs and expenses related to these requirements are a significant operating expense and may increase as a result of changes in such laws or regulations requiring employers to provide specified employee benefits (such as health insurance), increases in the minimum wage or the level of existing benefits, or the lengthening of periods for which unemployment benefits are available. We cannot assure that we will be able to increase fees charged to our customers to offset any increased costs and expenses, and higher costs may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
 
Failure to maintain adequate financial and management processes and controls could lead to errors in our financial reporting. If our management is unable to certify the effectiveness of our internal controls, including those of our third party vendors, or if material weaknesses in our internal controls are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence. In addition, if we do not maintain adequate financial and management personnel, processes, and controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis, which could cause our stock price to fall.
 
We will continue to be impacted by new or existing laws and regulations relating to employment. In addition to federal and state laws and regulations, many counties and cities have become active in regulating various aspects of employment, including minimum wages, paid sick leave, application forms and background checks, and required notices to employees, among others. As a staffing company and large employer with a wide geographical footprint, we are often faced with new legal requirements. Although we believe that we will be able to maintain appropriate compliance procedures, there is no assurance that our efforts will always be timely or effective, or that we will be able to recover the increased cost of new legal requirements through timely pricing increases to our customers.
 
We may incur additional tax liabilities that exceed our estimates. We are subject to federal taxes and a multitude of state and local taxes. We are regularly subject to audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could materially harm our business. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for determining tax liabilities, or change their laws, which could increase our effective tax rate and negatively affect our financial position and results of operations.
 
We may incur additional costs and regulatory risks relating to new laws regulating the hiring of undocumented workers. In addition to federal laws, the statutes of several states regulate employer practices relating to the identification and eligibility to work of new hires. We have implemented procedures intended to meet all of these requirements. We process information on each new employee through the federal government’s E-Verify system. Although we believe that we are in compliance and we will be able to maintain appropriate procedures, we cannot assure that our compliance will not be flawed or delayed because of the large number of temporary personnel that we employ. In some cases, the penalties for noncompliance are punitive. Regulatory requirements imposed on employers and enforcement actions relating to immigration status of employees are expected to increase. If we are not able to maintain appropriate compliance procedures, our operations would be materially and adversely affected.
 
We will incur additional costs and regulatory risks relating to the impact of health care reform upon our business and failure to comply with such rules and regulations could materially harm our business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively, the Health Care Reform Laws, include various health-related provisions that took effect in 2015 and 2016, including the requirement that most individuals have health insurance and establishing new regulations on health plans. Although the Health Care Reform Laws do not mandate that employers offer health insurance, beginning in 2016 tax penalties are assessable on large employers which do not offer health insurance that meets certain affordability or benefit requirements. Providing such additional health insurance benefits to our qualifying temporary workers, or the payment of tax penalties if such coverage is not provided, will increase our costs. The economic impact of the Health Care Reform Laws to us is not yet known. It is likely that the Health Care Reform Laws will be revised or rewritten pursuant to proposed legislation. The requirements and the cost impact of revisions to existing laws, Health Care Reform Laws, or new health care legislation is unknown. Under both the present laws and proposed legislation, if we are unable to raise the rates we charge our customers to cover the costs of these programs, such increases in costs could materially harm our business.
 
 
 
 
 
We may be exposed to employment-related claims and costs from field team members, customers, or third parties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are in the business of employing people and placing them in the workplaces of other businesses. As the employer of record, we are at risk for claims brought by our field team members, such as wage and hour claims, discrimination and harassment actions and workers' compensation claims. We are also at risk for liabilities alleged to have been caused by our field team members (such as claims relating to personal injuries, property damage, immigration status, misappropriation of funds or property, violation of environmental laws, or criminal activity). Significant instances of these types of issues may impact our customers’ perception of us and may have a negative effect on our results of operations. The risk is heightened because we do not have control over our customers’ workplace or direct supervision of our field team members. If we are found liable for the actions or omissions of our field team members or our customers, and adequate insurance coverage is not available, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
 
Competitive factors may require us to absorb increases in operating costs, and we may lose volume as a result. We expect to raise prices for our services in amounts sufficient to offset increased costs of services, operating costs, and cost increases due to inflation, regulatory requirements and to improve our return on invested capital. However, competitive factors may require us to absorb cost increases, which would have a negative effect on our operating margins. Even if we are able to increase costs as desired, we may lose volume to competitors willing to service customers at a lower price.
 
We face competition from companies that have greater resources than we do and we may not be able to effectively compete with these companies. There are several very large full-service and specialized temporary labor companies competing in national, regional and local markets. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we have. Price competition in the staffing industry is intense and we expect this level of competition to remain high and to increase in the future. Competition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. There is also a risk that competitors, perceiving our lack of capital resources, may undercut our prices or increase promotional expenditures in our strongest markets in an effort to force us out of business.
 
Improper disclosure of employee and customer data could result in liabilities and harm our reputation. In the course of our business, we collect, store, use, and transmit information about our employees and customers. Protecting the privacy of this information is critical to our business. We have established a system of controls for safeguarding the security and privacy of our data. Our security controls may not, in every case, be adequate to prevent unauthorized internal or external intrusions into our systems and improper disclosure of personal data and confidential information relating to our employees, our customers or our business. The regulations relating to the security and privacy of information are increasingly prevalent and demanding. The failure to adequately protect private information could expose us to claims from employees and customers and regulatory actions, harm our reputation, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Additional security measures we may take to address customer or employee concerns may cause higher operating expenses.
  
Cyberattacks or other breaches of our technology hardware and software, as well as risks associated with compliance and data privacy could have an adverse effect on our systems, our service to our customers, our reputation, our competitive position, and financial results. Our ability to manage our operations successfully is critical to our success. Our business relies on our ability to electronically gather, compile, process, store and distribute data and other information. Unintended interruptions or failures resulting from computer and telecommunications failures, equipment or software malfunction, power outages, catastrophic events, security breaches (such as unauthorized access by hackers), social engineering schemes, unauthorized access, errors in usage by our employees, computer viruses, ransomware or malware, and other events could harm our business.  While we have taken measures to minimize the impact of these problems, the proper functioning of these systems is critical to our business operations. Any security breach or failure in our computer equipment, systems or data could result in the interruption of our business operations, tarnish our reputation, and expose us to damages and litigation.
 
Our directors, officers and current principal stockholders own a large percentage of our common stock and could limit other stockholders’ influence over corporate decisions. As of  April 9, 2019, our directors, officers and current stockholders holding more than 5% of our common stock collectively beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 38% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders acting together, may be capable of controlling most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, approval of mergers, and other significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our corporate interests or the interests of our other stockholders, and they may act in a manner with which some stockholders may not agree or that may not be in the best interests of all stockholders.
 
 
 
 
 
We will likely be party, from time to time, to various legal proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to a variety of legal proceedings, lawsuits and claims. We anticipate that disputes may arise in the future relating to contract, employment, labor relations, and other matters that could result in litigation or arbitration. These proceedings could divert the attention of our management team and result in costly or unfavorable outcomes. Any such litigation could result in substantial expense and reduced profits, harm our reputation, create inability to obtain certain insurance, and have a materially adverse impact on our business and financial condition. Also see Item 3 “Legal Proceedings”.
 
Our customer contracts contain termination provisions that could decrease our future revenues and earnings. Most of our customer contracts are either day-to-day or can be terminated by the customer on short or no notice without penalty. Our customers are, therefore, not contractually obligated to continue to do business with us in the future. This creates uncertainty with respect to the revenues and earnings we may recognize with respect to our customer contracts.
 
We have a history of net losses. Although we have recorded a net profit in several of our most recent fiscal years, as of December 28, 2018, we have an accumulated deficit of approximately $36 million. We have incurred net losses in many of our fiscal years since inception. We may incur additional operating losses. We make no assurance that our revenue will increase or that we will be profitable in any future period.
 
If our goodwill is impaired, we will record an additional non-cash charge to our results of operations and the amount of the charge may be material. At least annually, or whenever events or circumstances arise indicating impairment may exist, we review goodwill for impairment as required by U.S. GAAP. In June 2016, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Hanwood Arkansas, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and Hanwood Oklahoma, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company. Together these companies operated as Hancock Staffing, or Hancock, from branches located in Little Rock, Arkansas and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. In connection with our 2016 acquisition of Hancock, we identified and recognized $1.3 million in goodwill that we added to the carrying amount of $2.5 million from the acquisition of Disaster Recovery Services after the write-off. The resulting carrying amount of $3.8 million could change if there are future changes in our capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital expenditure levels, ability to perform at levels that were forecasted, or a permanent change to our market capitalization. In the future, we may need to further reduce the carrying amount of goodwill by taking an additional non-cash charge to our results of operations. Such a charge would have the effect of reducing goodwill with a corresponding impairment expense and may have a material effect upon our reported results. The additional expense may reduce our reported profitability or increase our reported losses in future periods and could negatively affect the market for our securities, our ability to obtain other sources of capital, and may generally have a negative effect on our future operations.
  
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
 
We presently lease office space for our corporate headquarters in Lakewood, Colorado. We also lease the property for all of our current branch locations. All of these branches are leased at market rates that vary in amount, depending on location. Most of our branch leases have terms that extend over three to five years. The majority of our leases have cancellation provisions that allow us to cancel with 90 days' notice. Other leases have been in existence long enough that the term has expired and we are currently occupying the premises on month-to-month tenancies. For additional information related to our operating leases see Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies in our notes to the consolidated financial statements.
 
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
Freestone Insurance Company Liquidation: From April 2012 through March 2014, our workers’ compensation insurance coverage was provided by Dallas National Insurance, which changed its corporate name to Freestone Insurance Company in 2013 (Dallas National Insurance and Freestone Insurance Company are collectively referred to as “Freestone”). Under the terms of these insurance policies, we were required to provide cash collateral of $900,000 per year, for a total of $1.8 million, as a non-depleting fund to secure our payment up to the deductible amount on claims occurring within the respective policy years.
 
 
 
 
 
From July 2008 through March 2011, our workers’ compensation coverage was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II, through its master workers’ compensation policy with Freestone. During this time period, we deposited approximately $500,000 with an affiliate of Freestone for collateral related to the coverage provided to the company through AMS Staff Leasing II and its policy with Freestone.
 
In April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about its financial condition. In August 2014, the receivership was converted to a liquidation proceeding. In late 2015, we filed timely proofs of claim with the Receiver demonstrating our claimed right to return of the company’s collateral deposits. One proof of claim is filed as a priority claim seeking return of the full amount of our collateral deposits. The other proof of claim is a general claim covering non-collateral items. If it is ultimately determined by the court that our claim is not a priority claim, or if there are insufficient assets in the liquidation to satisfy the priority claims, we may not receive any or all of our collateral.
 
During the second quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, after evaluating information known at each point in time regarding the Freestone receivership, it became apparent there was significant uncertainty related to the collectability of the $500,000 deposit previously placed under the AMS Staff Leasing II agreement related to our insurance coverage from July 2008 through March 2011. Because of this, we recorded a reserve of $250,000 in each of those quarters, thereby fully reserving this deposit.
 
In late May 2017, the Receiver filed a petition with the court, proposing a plan as to how the Receiver would identify and pay collateral to all insureds that paid cash collateral to Freestone. In the petition, the Receiver acknowledged receiving only $500,000 of our collateral. Of the $500,000 acknowledged, the Receiver proposed to return only approximately $6,000 to us. In response to additional information provided to and sought from the Receiver by us and by others, the Receiver has withdrawn the initial petition, acknowledging possible inaccuracies.
 
As part of our review of first quarter 2018 financial results, the company’s management and board of directors reviewed the likelihood of collecting the remaining $1.8 million of collateral paid to Freestone for policy years beginning in April of 2012 and continuing through March of 2014. Based on court filings and other available information, it was determined that it is more likely than not that our priority claim will be treated in a similar manner as other creditors, resulting in the priority claim having little to no value. We believe that our recovery, if any, of the deposits placed with Freestone and its affiliates will be the greater of: (i) the amount determined and allowed resulting from a tracing analysis of our collateral deposits; or (ii) the amount we would receive in distribution as a general unsecured claimant based on the amount of our collateral deposit.
 
Therefore, we reasonably estimate the high end of the amount the company might possibly recover through the receivership process is approximately 20% of the $1.8 million deposit amount. Accordingly, for the first quarter of 2018, the reserve on this asset was reduced by approximately $1.5 million, resulting in a net carrying amount of $260,000. This amount is consistent with our current evaluation of the Freestone receivership matter.
 
In July 2018, the Receiver filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery the Second Accounting setting forth Freestone’s estimated assets and liabilities for the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. The Second Accounting does not clarify the issues with respect to collateral claims, priorities or return of collateral. In the accounting, the Receiver reports total assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $87.8 million as of December 31, 2016, and estimated liabilities of $252.0 million.
 
Presently, the Receiver has not put forth an amended or new petition regarding its position as to precisely how cash collateral claimants should be treated. Therefore, our stated reasonable estimate is the best guidance we can offer as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. In the event the Company receives substantially less than our reasonably estimated amount, there may be a material negative effect on our financial statements.
 
Other than the Freestone litigation described above, on occasion, we may be involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. While management believes that such matters are currently insignificant, matters arising in the ordinary course of business for which we are, or could become involved in litigation, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations in the future.
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
 
Not applicable.
 
PART II
 
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Reverse Stock Split
 
In December 2017, we filed an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation and effected a 1-for-12 reverse stock split of our common and preferred stock, effective as of the close of business on December 7, 2017, whereby 60,615,549 shares of our common stock were exchanged for 5,051,542 newly issued common shares. Under the terms of the reverse stock split, fractional shares issuable to stockholders were cashed out, resulting in a reverse split slightly more than 1-for-12 in the aggregate. All stock prices, per share amounts, and number of shares in this Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 1-for-12 reverse stock split, resulting in the transfer of approximately $56,000 from common stock to additional paid in capital at December 29, 2017 and December 30, 2016.
 
Market Information
 
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange under the symbol “CCNI.” The following table shows the high and low sales prices for the common stock for the quarterly period indicated for the last two fiscal years:
 
 
 
High
 
 
Low
 
Fourth Quarter, 2018
 $5.91 
 $3.55 
Third Quarter, 2018
  6.30 
  5.14 
Second Quarter, 2018
  6.40 
  5.35 
First Quarter, 2018
  6.49 
  5.32 
Fourth Quarter, 2017
  6.12 
  4.80 
Third Quarter, 2017
  5.40 
  3.72 
Second Quarter, 2017
  4.44 
  3.96 
First Quarter, 2017
  5.04 
  4.20 
 
Holders of the Corporation’s Capital Stock
 
At April 9, 2019, we had approximately 205 stockholders of record. This figure does not reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms.
 
Dividends
 
No cash dividends have been declared on our common stock to date and, at present, we do not anticipate paying a cash dividend on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
 
Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
Pursuant to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K, “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans,” we are providing the following information summarizing information about our equity compensation plans as of December 28, 2018. All share numbers have been updated for the 1-for-12 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock effective as of December 7, 2017.
 
 
 
 
 
Plan category
 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights
 
 
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
 
 
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
  160,831 
 $5.86 
  296,530 
 
Our Command Center, Inc. 2016 Employee Stock Incentive Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors on September 29, 2016 and approved by our stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on November 17, 2016. We have previously provided the material terms of such plan.
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar
 
Our transfer agent is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust, located at 17 Battery Street, 8th Floor, New York, New York, 10004.
  
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 
 
In September 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 million three-year repurchase plan of our common stock. This plan replaces the previously implemented plan, which was put in place in April 2015. During 2018 we purchased approximately 324,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $1.8 million resulting in an average price of $5.65 per share under the plan. These shares were then retired. During 2017 we purchased approximately 69,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $374,000 resulting in an average price of $5.45 per share under the plan. These shares were then retired. We have approximately $2.8 million remaining under the repurchase plan as of December 28, 2018. For additional information related to our stock repurchase see Note 6 – Stockholders’ Equity in our notes to the consolidated financial statements. The table below summarizes our common stock purchased during the fourth quarter of 2018.
 
 
 
Total shares purchased
 
 
Average price per share
 
 
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan
 
 
Approximate dollar value of shares that may be purchased under the plan
 
September 29, 2018 to October 26, 2018
  12,642 
 $5.51 
  883,435 
 $2,888,566 
October 27, 2018 to November 23, 2018
  14,153 
  4.40 
  897,588 
  2,826,254 
November 24, 2018 to December 28, 2018
  7,258 
  4.05 
  904,846 
  2,796,828 
Total
  34,053 
    
    
    
 
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item.
 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion reviews significant factors with respect to our financial condition at December 28, 2018, and results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes, tables, and selected financial data presented elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 
Our discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that are provided to assist in the understanding of anticipated future financial performance. However, such performance involves risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. A cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements is set forth under the caption “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” immediately prior to Item 1 of this Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis should be considered in light of such cautionary statements and the risk factors disclosed elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
 
The following table reflects operating results from 2018 and 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts and percentages). Percentages indicate line items as a percentage of total revenue. The table serves as the basis for the narrative discussion that follows.
 
 
 
Fifty-two weeks ended
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Revenue
 $97,389 
  100.0%
 $98,072 
  100.0%
Cost of staffing services
  72,450
 
  74.4%
  72,642 
  74.1%
Gross profit
  24,939 
  25.6%
  25,430 
  25.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  23,434
 
  24.1%
  21,347 
  21.8%
Depreciation and amortization
  324 
  0.3%
  386 
  0.4%
Income from operations
  1,181
 
  1.2%
  3,697 
  3.8%
Interest expense and other financing expense
  2 
  0.0%
  12 
  0.0%
Net income before income taxes
  1,179
 
  1.2%
  3,685 
  3.8%
Provision for income taxes
  205
 
  0.2%
  2,006 
  2.0%
Net income
 $974
 
  1.0%
 $1,679 
  1.7%
Non-GAAP data
    
    
    
    
Adjusted EBITDA
 $4,074
 
  4.2%
 $4,240 
  4.3%
 
Because we use adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our financial performance, we reconcile it to net income, which is the most comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
 
 
 
Fifty-two weeks ended
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Net income
 $974
 
 $1,679 
Interest expense
  2 
  12 
Provision for income taxes
  205
 
  2,006 
Depreciation and amortization
  324 
  386 
Non-cash compensation
  395 
  157 
Reserve for workers' compensation deposit
  1,540 
  - 
Other non-recurring expense
 634
 
  - 
Adjusted EBITDA
 $4,074
 
 $4,240 
 
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation, and certain non-recurring charges, or adjusted EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure that represents our net income before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation, and certain nonrecurring charges. We utilize adjusted EBITDA as a financial measure as management believes investors find it a useful tool to perform more meaningful comparisons and evaluations of past, present, and future operating results. We believe it is a complement to net income and other financial performance measures. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent net income as defined by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, and such information should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other measure of performance prescribed by U.S. GAAP.
 
 
 
 
 
We use adjusted EBITDA to measure our financial performance because we believe interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation, and certain non-recurring charges bear little or no relationship to our operating performance. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA measures our financial performance irrespective of our capital structure or how we finance our operations. By excluding taxes on income, we believe adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for measuring the financial performance of our operations excluding factors that are beyond our control. By excluding depreciation and amortization expense, adjusted EBITDA measures the financial performance of our operations without regard to their historical cost. By excluding non-cash compensation, adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for measuring the financial performance of our operations excluding the value of our stock and stock option awards. In addition, by excluding certain non-recurring charges, adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for measuring financial performance without non-recurring charges. For all of these reasons, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides us, and investors, with information that is relevant and useful in evaluating our business.
 
However, because adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization, it does not measure the capital we require to maintain or preserve our fixed assets. In addition, because adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense, it does not take into account the total amount of interest we pay on outstanding debt, nor does it show trends in interest costs due to changes in our financing or changes in interest rates. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by us, may not be comparable to adjusted EBITDA as reported by other companies that do not define adjusted EBITDA exactly as we define the term.
 
Results of Operations
 
Fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2018
 
Summary of Operations: Revenue was $97.4 million in 2018, compared to $98.1 million in 2017, a decrease of approximately $683,000, or 0.7%. This decrease is primarily related to lower revenue in the second and third quarter of 2018 due to higher than normal turnover in sales positions and some seasonality in the periods.
 
Our branches serve a wide variety of customers and industries across 22 states. Our individual branch revenue can fluctuate significantly on both a quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year basis depending on the local economic conditions and need for temporary labor services in the local economy. One of our goals is to increase the diversity of customers and industries we service at both the branch and the company level. We believe this will reduce the potential negative impact of an economic downturn in any one industry or region.
 
Cost of Staffing Services:  Cost of staffing services was 74.4% of revenue in 2018, compared to 74.1% in 2017, an increase of 0.3%. This relative increase was due to higher compensation paid to our field team members related to competitive forces in a tightening labor market, as well as increases in minimum wages in some states in which we operate. We also saw a relative increase in workers’ compensation insurance costs, which can fluctuate as a result of changes to the mix of work performed during the year, changes in our claims history and ongoing claims management, and changes in actuarial assumptions. These increases were partially offset by a relative decrease in our state unemployment insurance costs as we have continued to actively manage this part of our business.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, or SG&A:  SG&A was approximately $23.4 million in 2018, compared to $21.3 million in 2017, an increase of approximately $2.1 million. This increase is due to several non-recurring charges that occurred in 2018. These non-recurring charges include a $1.5 million impairment of our workers’ compensation deposit in receivership, executive severance of approximately $565,000, a one-time $100,000 expense related to the settlement of the 2018 proxy contest, and other legal and professional fees of approximately $167,000. These non-recurring expenses total approximately $2.4 million, or 10% of our SG&A. Other increases in SG&A included an increase in recruiting costs, employee medical benefits, stock based compensation, and payroll and payroll related taxes. These other increases were offset by decreases in bad debt expense, and a refund of our workers’ compensation risk pool deposit in excess of what was recorded of approximately $198,000.
 
 
 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We believe that our cash flow from operations, working capital balances at December 28, 2018, and access to our account purchase agreement, will be sufficient to fund anticipated operations through March 2020.
 
At December 28, 2018, our current assets exceeded our current liabilities by approximately $14.0 million. Included in current assets is cash of approximately $8.0 million, and trade accounts receivable of approximately $9.0 million. Included in current liabilities are accrued wages and benefits of approximately $1.2 million, and the current portion of workers’ compensation claims liability of approximately $1.0 million.
 
Our current financing agreement is an account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which allows us to sell eligible accounts receivable for 90% of the invoiced amount on a full recourse basis up to the facility maximum, or $14.0 million at December 28, 2018. When the receivable is collected, the remaining 10% is paid to us, less applicable fees and interest. The liability related to this account purchase agreement facility was approximately $399,000 and $854,000 at December 28, 2018 and at December 29, 2017, respectively. The term of the agreement is through April 7, 2020 and bears interest at the Daily One Month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.50% per annum. At December 28, 2018 the effective interest rate was 5.02%. Interest is payable on the actual amount advanced. Additional charges include an annual facility fee equal to 0.50% of the facility threshold in place and lockbox fees. As collateral for repayment of any and all obligations, we granted Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. a security interest in all of our property including, but not limited to, accounts receivable, intangible assets, contract rights, investment property, deposit accounts, and other such assets. We also have an outstanding letter of credit under this agreement in the amount of $6.2 million which reduces the amount of funds otherwise made available to us under this agreement. As of December 28, 2018 we had approximately $2,000 of availability on this facility.
 
Operating Activities:  Net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $2.6 million in 2018, compared to $4.7 million in 2017. Operating activity in 2018 included net income of approximately $1.0 million, an increase in the reserve on our workers’ compensation risk pool deposit in receivership of approximately $1.5 million, a decrease of approximately $359,000 in prepaid expense, deposits, and other assets, and a decrease in accounts receivable of approximately $282,000. These were offset by a decrease of approximately $526,000 in accrued wages and benefits and a decrease of approximately $343,000 in accounts payable. Operating activity in 2017 included net income of approximately $1.7 million, a decrease of approximately $1.7 million in our deferred tax asset, a decrease of approximately $683,000 in accounts receivable, an increase of approximately $503,000 in other current liabilities, and a decrease of approximately $578,000 in prepaid workers’ compensation. These were offset by a decrease of approximately $758,000 in our workers’ compensation claims liability and a decrease of approximately $199,000 in accounts payable.
 
Investing Activities:  Net cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $117,000 in 2018, compared to approximately $104,000 in 2017. Investing activity in both years related primarily to the purchase of equipment.
 
Financing Activities:  Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately $2.3 million in 2018, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of approximately $90,000 in 2017. Financing activities in 2018 included $1.8 million used to purchase treasury stock and net cash used to decrease our account purchase facility of approximately $455,000. Financing activity in 2017 included net cash provided by our account purchase facility of approximately $465,000 and $375,000 used to purchase treasury stock.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
Management believes that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. For additional information related to our critical accounting policies see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our notes to the consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 
 
 
Workers’ Compensation Reserves:  In accordance with the terms of our workers’ compensation liability insurance policy, we maintain reserves for workers’ compensation claims to cover our cost of all claims. We use third party actuarial estimates of the future costs of the claims and related expenses discounted by a 5% present value interest rate to determine the amount of our reserves. We evaluate the reserves quarterly and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of the claims incurred and related expenses exceed the amounts estimated, additional reserves may be required.
 
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:  Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated recoverable amount, net of allowances. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical write-off experience, age of receivable, other qualitative factors and extenuating circumstances, and current economic data and represents our best estimate of the amount of probable losses on our accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed monthly, and past due balances are written-off when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $113,000 and $282,000 at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
Goodwill and Intangible Assets:  Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets received attributable to business acquisitions and combinations. Goodwill is measured for impairment at least annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment may exist, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate. In assessing the value of goodwill, an entity compares the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an entity is required to recognize an impairment charge to goodwill equal to that difference, up to the carrying value of goodwill. We assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of the last day of our fiscal year.
 
Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over the estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment at lease annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment may exist.
 
Income Taxes:  We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our policy is to prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
 
We have analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are required to file returns and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax positions to be recognized. In the event that we are assessed penalties and/or interest, penalties will be charged to other financing expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.
 
Share-Based Compensation:  Periodically, we issue common shares or options to purchase our common shares to our officers, directors, employees, or other parties. Compensation expense for these equity awards are recognized straight-line over the service period, based on the fair value on the grant date. We recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options that are expected to vest, rather than record forfeitures when they occur. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in the future periods. We determine the fair value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model for stock options and the quoted market price for stock awards.
 
Impairment of Long-lived Asset:  We review the carrying values of our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are carried at historical cost if the projected cash flows from their use will recover their carrying amounts on an undiscounted basis without considering interest. If projected cash flows are less than their carrying value, the long-lived assets are reduced to their estimated fair value. Considerable judgement is required to project such cash flows and, if required, estimate the fair value of the impaired long-lived assets.
 
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 
 
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Regulation S-K and as such, we are not providing the information contained in this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.
 
 
 
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Command Center, Inc.
Lakewood, Colorado
 
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Command Center, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 28, 2018, the related consolidated statement of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2018 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 28, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
Basis for Opinion
 
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
 
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
 
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
 
 
Denver, Colorado
April 9, 2019
 
 
 
Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm
 
 
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Command Center, Inc.
Lakewood, Colorado
 
OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Command Center, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 29, 2017, and the related consolidated statement of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). 
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 29, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
BASIS FOR OPINION
  
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
 
 
 
/s/ EKS&H LLLP
 
March 29, 2018
Denver, Colorado
  
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
 $7,934,287 
 $7,768,631 
Restricted cash
  69,423 
  12,853 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
  9,041,361 
  9,394,376 
Prepaid expenses, deposits, and other assets
  380,930 
  740,280 
Prepaid workers' compensation
  212,197 
  167,597 
Current portion of workers' compensation deposits
  - 
  99,624 
Total current assets
  17,638,198 
  18,183,361 
Property and equipment, net
  329,255 
  372,145 
Deferred taxes
  1,079,908
  721,602 
Workers' compensation risk pool deposit, less current portion, net
  193,984 
  201,563 
Workers' compensation risk pool deposit in receivership, net
  260,000 
  1,800,000 
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
  3,930,900 
  4,085,576 
Total assets
 $23,432,245
 $25,364,247 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
    
    
Current liabilities
    
    
Accounts payable
 $219,945 
 $563,402 
Account purchase agreement facility
  398,894 
  853,562 
Other current liabilities
 821,142
  898,809 
Accrued wages and benefits
  1,218,699 
  1,503,688 
Current portion of workers' compensation claims liability
  1,003,643 
  1,031,500 
Total current liabilities
  3,662,323
  4,850,961 
Workers' compensation claims liability, less current portion
  878,455 
  917,497 
Total liabilities
  4,504,778
  5,768,458 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
    
    
Stockholders' equity
    
    
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value, 416,666 shares authorized; none issued
  - 
  - 
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 8,333,333 shares authorized; 4,680,871 and 4,993,672 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
  4,681 
  4,994 
Additional paid-in capital
  54,536,852 
  56,211,837 
Accumulated deficit
  (35,650,066)
  (36,621,042)
Total stockholders' equity
  18,891,467
  19,595,789 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 $23,432,245
 $25,364,247 
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
22
 
 
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
 
 
Fifty-two weeks ended
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Revenue
 $97,388,820 
 $98,072,198 
Cost of staffing services
  72,450,295 
  72,641,609 
Gross profit
  24,938,525 
  25,430,589 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  23,433,198
 
  21,347,681 
Depreciation and amortization
  323,852 
  386,413 
Income from operations
  1,181,475
 
  3,696,495 
Interest expense and other financing expense
  2,116 
  11,619 
Net income before income taxes
  1,179,359
 
  3,684,876 
Provision for income taxes
  205,072
 
  2,005,528 
Net income
 $974,287
 
 $1,679,348 
 
    
    
Earnings per share:
    
    
Basic
 $0.20
 
 $0.33 
Diluted
 $0.20
 
 $0.33 
 
    
    
Weighted average shares outstanding:
    
    
Basic
  4,853,000 
  5,043,254 
Diluted
  4,855,019 
  5,105,006 
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
23
 
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
  
 
 
Common stock
 
 
Additional
 
 
  
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
paid-in
 
 
Accumulated
 
 
stockholders'
 
 
 
Shares
 
 
Par value
 
 
capital
 
 
deficit
 
 
equity
 
Balance at December 30, 2016
  5,052,888 
 $5,053 
 $56,430,206 
 $(38,300,390)
 $18,134,869 
Common stock issued for services
  9,583 
  10 
  49,690 
  - 
  49,700 
Stock-based compensation
  - 
  - 
  107,090 
  - 
  107,090 
Common stock purchased and retired
  (68,799)
  (69)
  (375,149)
  - 
  (375,218)
Net income for the year
  - 
  - 
  - 
  1,679,348 
  1,679,348 
Balance at December 29, 2017
  4,993,672 
  4,994 
  56,211,837 
  (36,621,042)
  19,595,789 
Common stock issued for services
  10,973 
  11 
  62,425 
  - 
  62,436 
Stock-based compensation
  - 
  - 
  332,089 
  - 
  332,089 
Common stock purchased and retired
  (323,774)
  (324)
  (1,828,829)
  - 
  (1,829,153)
Cumulative effect of accounting change
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (3,311)
  (3,311)
Effective repurchase of stock options
    
    
  (240,670)
  - 
  (240,670)
Net income for the year
  - 
  - 
  - 
  974,287 
  974,287 
Balance at December 28, 2018
  4,680,871 
 $4,681 
 $54,536,852 
 $(35,650,066)
 $18,891,467 
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
24
 
 
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
 
 
 
 Fifty-two weeks ended
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 $974,287 
 $1,679,348 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: 
    
Depreciation and amortization
  323,852 
  386,413 
Provision for bad debt
  71,278 
  209,805 
Stock based compensation
  332,089 
  156,790 
Deferred taxes
  (358,306)
  1,666,043 
Reserve on workers' compensation risk pool deposit in receivership
  1,540,000 
  - 
Cumulative effect of accounting change
  (3,311)
  - 
Common stock issued for services
  62,436 
  - 
Gain on disposition of property and equipment
  (9,383)
  - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
    
    
Accounts receivable
  281,737 
  683,273 
Prepaid expenses, deposits, and other assets
  359,350 
  (106,665)
Prepaid workers' compensation
  (44,600)
  578,100 
Accounts payable
  (343,457)
  (198,875)
Other current liabilities
  (77,667)
  502,883 
Accrued wages and benefits
  (525,659)
  (63,897)
Workers' compensation risk pool deposits
  107,203 
  12,153 
Workers' compensation claims liability
  (66,899)
  (757,703)
Net cash provided by operating activities
  2,622,950 
  4,747,668 
Cash flows from investing activities
    
    
Purchase of property and equipment
  (158,578)
  (103,665)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
  41,675 
  - 
Net cash used in investing activities
  (116,903)
  (103,665)
Cash flows from financing activities
    
    
Net change in account purchase agreement facility
  (454,668)
  465,282 
Purchase of treasury stock
  (1,829,153)
  (375,218)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
  (2,283,821)
  90,064 
Net increase in cash
  222,226 
  4,734,067 
Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period
  7,781,484 
  3,047,417 
Cash and restricted cash, end of period
 $8,003,710 
 $7,781,484 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities
    
    
Effective purchase of vested stock options
  240,670 
  - 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
    
    
Interest paid
  3,503 
  11,620 
Income taxes paid
  18,227 
  522,525 
  Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
    
    
  Cash
 $7,934,287 
 $7,768,631
 
  Restricted cash   
  69,423
 
  12,853
 
        Total cash and restricted cash
 $8,003,710
 
 $7,781,484
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
25
Command Center, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Description of Business:  Command Center, Inc. ("Command Center,” the “Company,” “CCI,” “we,” "us," or “our”) is a leading provider of on-demand labor in the staffing industry. Our customers are primarily small to mid-sized businesses in the industrial/manufacturing/warehousing, construction, hospitality, transportation, and retail industries. At December 28, 2018 we operated 67 branches in 22 states. Our corporate headquarter is in Lakewood, Colorado.
 
Basis of Presentation:  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Command Center and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP.
 
Use of Estimates:  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition:  On December 30, 2017, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance using the modified retrospective method for all open contracts and related amendments. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 30, 2017 are presented under the new revenue recognition guidance, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with historic accounting guidance. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
We account for revenue when both parties to the contract have approved the contract, the rights and obligations of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, and collectability of consideration is probable. Our primary source of revenue is from providing temporary contract labor to our customers. Revenue is recognized at the time we satisfy our performance obligation. Our contracts have a single performance obligation, which is the transfer of services. Because our customers receive and consume the benefits of our services simultaneously, our performance obligations are typically satisfied when our services are provided. Revenue is reported net of customer credits, discounts, and taxes collected from customers that are remitted to taxing authorities. Our customers are invoiced every week and we do not require payment prior to the delivery of service. Substantially all of our contracts include payment terms of 30 days or less and are short-term in nature. Because of our payment terms with our customers, there are no significant contract assets or liabilities. We do not extend payment terms beyond one year. 
 
Below is a summary our revenue disaggregated by industry (in thousands, except percentages):
 
 
 
Fifty-two weeks ended
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Industrial, manufacturing and warehousing
 $34,207,786 
  35.1%
 $33,495,618 
  34.2%
Construction
  18,462,347 
  19.0%
  19,988,048 
  20.4%
Hospitality
  16,480,095 
  16.9%
  18,304,637 
  18.7%
Transportation
  15,322,125 
  15.7%
  14,046,085 
  14.3%
Retail and Other
  12,916,467 
  13.3%
  12,237,810 
  12.4%
Total
 $97,388,820 
  100.0%
 $98,072,198 
  100.0%
 
Cost of Staffing Services:  Cost of services includes the wages of field team members, related payroll taxes, workers’ compensation expenses, and other direct costs of services. We do not include branch level costs in this calculation such as rent, branch manager salary, or other branch level operating expenses.
 
Restricted Cash:  We maintain a cash balance that is held on deposit as a requirement of our workers’ compensation insurance provider.
 
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:  Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated recoverable amount, net of allowances. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical write-off experience, age of receivable, other qualitative factors and extenuating circumstances, and current economic data and represents our best estimate of the amount of probable losses on our accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed each period and past due balances are written-off when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $113,000 and $282,000, at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment:  Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, typically three to five years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable lease term or their useful lives. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. When assets are sold or retired, cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the consolidated balance sheet and gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of income.
 
Workers’ Compensation Reserves:  In accordance with the terms of our workers’ compensation liability insurance policy, we maintain reserves for workers’ compensation claims to cover our cost of all claims. We use third party actuarial estimates of the future costs of the claims and related expenses discounted by a 5% present value interest rate to determine the amount of our reserves. We evaluate the reserves quarterly and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of the claims incurred and related expenses exceed the amounts estimated, additional reserves may be required.
 
Goodwill and Intangible Assets:  Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets received attributable to business acquisitions and combinations. Goodwill is measured for impairment at least annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment may exist, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate. In assessing the value of goodwill, an entity compares the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an entity is required to recognize an impairment charge to goodwill equal to that difference, up to the carrying value of goodwill. We assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of the last day of our fiscal year.
 
Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over the estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment at lease annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment may exist. 
 
Income Taxes:  We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period are determined using the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our policy is to prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
 
We have analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are required to file returns, and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax positions to be recognized. In the event that we are assessed penalties and/or interest, penalties will be charged to other financing expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.
 
Earnings per Share:  Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, and does not include the impact of any potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in our earnings through the conversion of common shares issuable via outstanding stock warrants, and/or stock options. We had common stock equivalents outstanding to purchase 160,831 and 254,995 shares of common stock at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively. If we incur losses in the periods presented, or if conversion into common shares is anti-dilutive, basic and dilutive earnings per share are equal.
 
Diluted common shares outstanding were calculated using the Treasury Stock Method and are as follows:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic net income per common share
  4,853,000 
  5,043,254 
Dilutive effects of stock options
  2,019 
  61,752 
Weighted average number of common shares used in diluted net income per common share
  4,855,019 
  5,105,006 
 
 
 
 
 
Share-Based Compensation:  Periodically, we issue common shares or options to purchase our common shares to our officers, directors, employees, or other parties. Compensation expense for these equity awards are recognized straight-line over the service period, based on the fair value on the grant date. We recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options that are expected to vest, rather than record forfeitures when they occur. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in the future periods. We determine the fair value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model for stock options and the quoted market price for stock awards.
 
Advertising Costs:  Advertising costs consist primarily of print and other promotional activities. We expense advertisements as incurred and totaled approximately $32,000 and $33,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
Concentrations:  At December 28, 2018, 27.4% of total accounts payable were due to two vendors and 12.9% of total accounts receivable was due from a single customer. At December 29, 2017, 44.8% of total accounts payable were due to two vendors and 11.8% of total accounts receivable was due from a single customer.
 
Impairment of Long-lived Asset:  We review the carrying values of our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are carried at historical cost if the projected cash flows from their use will recover their carrying amounts on an undiscounted basis without considering interest. If projected cash flows are less than their carrying value, the long-lived assets are reduced to their estimated fair value. Considerable judgement is required to project such cash flows and, if required, estimate the fair value of the impaired long-lived assets.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:  We carry financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheet at the fair value of the instruments as of the consolidated balance sheet date. At the end of each period, management assesses the fair value of each instrument and adjusts the carrying value to reflect its assessment. At December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, the carrying values of our account purchse agreement, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximated their fair values due to relatively short maturities.
  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:  In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-02 amending the existing accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, including those classified as operating leases. Both the asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, with the asset being subject to adjustments such as initial direct costs.  This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. During the third quarter of 2018, the FASB issued updated guidance that provides companies with the option to apply a practical expedient that allows adoption of the provisions of the new lease accounting guidance prospectively, with a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to retained earnings upon the date of adoption. We have elected to adopt the standard using the practical expedient provided in the third quarter and adopt the guidance prospectively on the effective date. As a result of adopting this standard, we expect to recognize a right -of-use asset and lease liability of approximately $2.1 million. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on expense recognition.
 
 
 
 
 
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The standard significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace todays “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For available-for-sale securities, entities will be required to record allowances rather than reduce the carrying amount, as they do today under the other-than-temporary impairment model. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash.” The new guidance requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet, companies will be required to reconcile the amounts presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the balance sheet. Companies also need to disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2017.
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued new revenue recognition guidance under Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09 that supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The new standard focuses on creating a single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising from contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard became effective for us beginning December 30, 2017. We implemented the standard using the modified retrospective approach which recognized the cumulative effect of application on that date. As a result of adopting this new standard, we made an adjustment that increased Revenue on our Consolidated Statement of Income and decreased Accumulated deficit on our Consolidated Balance Sheet by approximately $3,000. We have applied the guidance in this new standard to all contracts at the date of initial application.
 
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the requirement to perform a Step 2 impairment test to compute the implied fair value of goodwill. Instead, companies will only compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value (Step 1) and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized may not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax-deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This amended guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We adopted this guidance during our fiscal year 2018.
 
Other accounting standards that have been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. For the period ended December 28, 2018, the adoption of other accounting standards had no material impact on our financial positions, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
The following table summarizes the book value of our assets and accumulated depreciation and amortization:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Leasehold improvements
 $289,576 
 $268,586 
Vehicles and machinery
  73,955 
  100,467 
Furniture and fixtures
  127,992 
  127,992 
Computer hardware and licensed software
  634,117 
  502,309 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
  (796,385)
  (627,209)
Total property and equipment, net
 $329,255 
 $372,145 
 
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment totaled approximately $169,000 and $165,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE 3 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
At least annually, or whenever events or circumstances arise indicating an impairment may exist, we review goodwill for impairment. We are a single reporting unit consisting of purchased on-demand labor branches, thus the analysis is conducted for the Company as a whole. Our goodwill represents the consideration given for acquisitions in excess of the fair value of identifiable assets received. No provision has been made for an impairment loss as of December 28, 2018 or December 29, 2017.
 
The following table reflects our purchased goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets.
 
 
 
    December 28, 2018
 
 
   December 29, 2017  
 

 
 Gross
 
 
 Accumulated amortization
 
 
 Net
 
 
  Gross
 
 Accumulated amortization 
 Net 
Goodwill    
 $3,777,568 
 $-
 
 $3,777,568
 
 $3,777,568
 
 $-
 
 $3,777,568
 
Finite-lived intangible assets:
    
    
    
    
    
    
Customer relationships
  430,984 
  (277,652)
  153,332 
  430,984 
  (170,597)
  260,387
 
Non-compete agreements
  228,580 
  (228,580)
  - 
  228,580 
  (180,959)
  47,621 
Total finite-lived intangible assets
  659,564 
  (506,232)
  153,332 
  659,564 
  (351,556)
  308,008 
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
Total goodwill and intangible assets   
 $4,437,132 
 $(506,232)
 $3,930,900 
 $4,437,132 
 $(351,556)
 $4,085,576 
 
Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled approximately $155,000 and $221,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
The following table reflects estimated future amortization expenses of intangible assets with definite lives as of December 28, 2018:
 
Year
 
Obligation
 
2019
 $107,746 
2020
  44,894
 
Thereafter
  - 
Total
 $152,640 
 
NOTE 4 – ACCOUNT PURCHASE AGREEMENT & LINE OF CREDIT FACILITY
 
In May 2016, we signed an account purchase agreement with our lender, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which allows us to sell eligible accounts receivable for 90% of the invoiced amount on a full recourse basis up to the facility maximum, or $14.0 million on December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017. When the receivable is paid by our customers, the remaining 10% is paid to us, less applicable fees and interest. Eligible accounts receivable are generally defined to include accounts that are not more than ninety days past due.
 
Pursuant to this agreement, we owed approximately $399,000 and $854,000 at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively. The current agreement bears interest at the Daily One Month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.50% per annum. At December 28, 2018 the effective interest rate was 5.02%. Interest is payable on the actual amount advanced. Additional charges include an annual facility fee equal to 0.50% of the facility threshold in place and lockbox fees. As collateral for repayment of any and all obligations, we granted Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. a security interest in our all of our property including, but not limited to, accounts receivable, intangible assets, contract rights, deposit accounts, and other such assets. The agreement requires that the sum of our unrestricted cash plus net accounts receivable must at all times be greater than the sum of the amount outstanding under the agreement plus accrued payroll and accrued payroll taxes. At December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017 we were in compliance with this covenant.
 
As of December 28, 2018, we have a letter of credit with Wells Fargo for approximately $6.2 million that secures our obligations to our workers’ compensation insurance carrier and reduces the amount available to us under the account purchase agreement. For additional information related to this letter of credit, see Note 5 – Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Reserves.
 
NOTE 5 – WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RESERVES
 
In April 2014, we changed our workers’ compensation carrier to ACE American Insurance Company, or ACE, in all states in which we operate other than Washington and North Dakota. The ACE policy is a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for all claims made. ACE provides insurance for covered losses and expenses in excess of $500,000 per incident. Under this large deductible program, we are largely self-insured. Per our contractual agreements with ACE, we must provide a collateral deposit of $6.2 million, which is accomplished through a letter of credit under our account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo. For workers’ compensation claims originating in Washington and North Dakota, we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums and obtain full coverage under mandatory state government administered programs. Our liability associated with claims in these jurisdictions is limited to the payment of premiums, which are based upon the amount of payroll paid within the particular state. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements reflect only the mandated workers’ compensation insurance premium liability for workers’ compensation claims in these jurisdictions.
 
From April 2012 to March 2014, our workers’ compensation coverage was obtained through Dallas National Insurance in all states in which we operate, other than Washington and North Dakota. During this time period, Dallas National changed its corporate name to Freestone Insurance Company, or Freestone. The Freestone coverage was a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for claims under the policy. Freestone provided insurance for covered losses and expenses in excess of $350,000 per incident. Per our contractual agreements with Freestone, we made payments of $1.8 million as a non-depleting deposit as collateral for our self-insured claims. See Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information on cash collateral provided to Freestone and the likelihood of its return to the company.
 
 
 
 
 
From April 2011 to March 2012, our workers’ compensation coverage was obtained through Zurich American Insurance Company, or Zurich, in all states in which we operate, other than Washington and North Dakota. The policy with Zurich was a guaranteed cost plan under which all claims are paid by Zurich. Zurich provided workers’ compensation coverage in all states in which we operate other than Washington and North Dakota.
 
Prior to Zurich, our workers’ compensation coverage was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II, or AMS, through its master workers’ compensation policy with Freestone.  The AMS agreement provided coverage in all states in which we operate, excluding Washington and North Dakota. The AMS coverage was a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for claims under the policy. Under the AMS agreement, we made payments into a risk pool fund to cover claims within our self-insured layer. Per our contractual agreements for this coverage, we were originally required to maintain two deposits, one in the amount of $500,000 and one in the amount of $215,000. At December 28, 2018, our deposits with AMS were approximately $483,000 and $192,000, respectively, and at December 29, 2017, our deposits with AMS were approximately $483,000 and $215,000, respectively.
 
Prior to AMS, our workers’ compensation carrier was American International Group, Inc., or AIG, in all states in which we operate, other than Washington and North Dakota. The AIG coverage was a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for claims under the policy. Under the AIG policies, we made payments into a risk pool fund to cover claims within our self-insured layer. At December 29, 2017, our risk pool deposit with AIG was approximately $100,000 and was fully refunded in May, 2018.
 
As part of our large deductible workers’ compensation programs, our carriers require that we collateralize a portion of our future workers’ compensation obligations in order to secure future payments made on our behalf. This collateral is typically in the form of cash and cash equivalents. At December 28, 2018, we had net cash collateral deposits of approximately $194,000. With the addition of the $6.2 million letter of credit, our cash and non-cash collateral totaled approximately $6.4 million at December 28, 2018.
 
Workers’ compensation expense for field team members is recorded as a component of our cost of services and consists of the following components: changes in our self-insurance reserves as determined by our third party actuary, actual claims paid, insurance premiums and administrative fees paid to our workers’ compensation carrier(s), and premiums paid to mandatory state government administered programs. Workers’ compensation expense for our temporary workers totaled approximately $3.8 million and $3.7 million for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
The following reflects the changes in our workers’ compensation deposits and our workers’ compensation claims liability during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Workers’ Compensation Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
Workers’ compensation deposits available at the beginning of the period
 $301,187 
 $313,340 
Deposits refunded
  (107,203)
  - 
Deposits applied to payment of claims during the period
  - 
  (12,153)
Deposits available for future claims at the end of the period
 $193,984 
 $301,187 
 
    
    
Workers’ Compensation Claims Liability
    
    
Estimated future claims liabilities at the beginning of the period
 $1,948,997 
 $2,706,701 
Claims paid during the period
  (1,850,913)
  (2,246,367)
Additional future claims liabilities recorded during the period
  1,784,014 
  1,488,663 
Estimated future claims liabilities at the end of the period
 $1,882,098 
 $1,948,997 
 
 
 
 
 
The workers’ compensation risk pool deposits are classified as current and non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet based upon management’s estimate of when the related claims liabilities will be paid. The deposits have not been discounted to present value in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All liabilities associated with our workers’ compensation claims are fully reserved on our consolidated balance sheet.
 
NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Issuance of Common Stock:  In 2018, we issued approximately 11,000 shares of common stock valued at approximately $62,000 for services, and in 2017 we issued approximately 10,000 shares of common stock valued at approximately $50,000 for services.
 
Stock Repurchase:  In September 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 million three-year repurchase plan of our common stock. This plan replaces the previously announced plan, which was put in place in April 2015. During 2018, we repurchased approximately 324,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $1.8 million, resulting in an average price of $5.65 per share. During 2017 we repurchased approximately 69,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $374,000, resulting in an average price of $5.45 per share. These shares were then retired. As of December 28, 2018, we had approximately $2.8 million remaining under the plan. We have no obligation to repurchase our shares. The table below summarizes our common stock purchased during 2018:
 
 
 
Total shares purchased
 
 
Average price per share
 
 
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan
 
 
Approximate dollar value of shares that may be purchased under the plan
 
December 30, 2017 to January 26, 2018
  4,820 
 $5.75 
  585,892 
 $4,598,243 
January 27, 2018 to February 23, 2018
  10,541 
  5.83 
  596,433 
  4,536,840 
February 24, 2018 to March 30, 2018
  7,100 
  5.62 
  603,533 
  4,496,949 
March 31, 2018 to April 27, 2018
  34,310 
  5.67 
  637,843 
  4,302,379 
April 28, 2018 to May 25, 2018
  26,382 
  5.77 
  664,225 
  4,150,262 
May 26, 2018 to June 29, 2018
  42,900 
  5.66 
  707,125 
  3,907,442 
June 30, 2018 to July 27, 2018
  36,275 
  6.03 
  743,400 
  3,688,744 
July 28, 2018 to August 24, 2018
  57,400 
  5.69 
  800,800 
  3,361,906 
August 25, 2018 to September 28, 2018
  69,993 
  5.77 
  870,793 
  2,958,257 
September 29, 2018 to October 26, 2018
  12,642 
  5.51 
  883,435 
  2,888,566 
October 27, 2018 to November 23, 2018
  14,153 
  4.40 
  897,588 
  2,826,254 
November 24, 2018 to December 28, 2018
  7,258 
  4.05 
  904,846 
  2,796,828 
Total
  323,774 
    
    
    
 
NOTE 7 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
Stock Incentive Plan:  Our 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, which permitted the grant of up to 533,333 shares of our common stock, expired in January 2016. Outstanding awards continue to remain in effect according to the terms of the plan and the award documents. On November 17, 2016, our stockholders approved the Command Center, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, under which our Compensation Committee is authorized to issue awards for up 500,000 shares over the 10-year life of the plan. Pursuant to awards under these plans, there were approximately 76,000 and 191,000 options vested at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
 
 
 
 
In July 2018, our Board of Directors authorized a restricted stock grant of approximately 48,000 shares, valued at $300,000, to our six non-employee directors. These shares vest in equal installments at each grant date anniversary over the following two years.  
 
During 2018, we granted 117,500 stock options to certain members of our board and an officer of the Company. During 2017, we granted approximately 75,000 stock options to certain officers and an employee of the Company. The options were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant, ten year life and vesting over three years from the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and expensed over the vesting period. Expected volatility is based on historical annualized volatility of our stock. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Currently we do not foresee the payment of dividends in the near term. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value are as follows:
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Expected term (years)
  5.8 
  5.8 
Expected volatility
  59.4% - 59.8%
  61.5%
Dividend yield
  0.0%
  0.0%
Risk-free rate
  2.1% - 2.4%
  1.1%
 
The following table summarizes our stock options outstanding at December 30, 2016, and changes during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017. The majority of the expired options in 2018 were issued to our former CEO and subsequently cancelled pursuant to the severance agreement with him.
 
 
 
Number of shares under options
 
 
Weighted average exercise price per share
 
 
Weighted average grand date fair value
 
Outstanding, December 30, 2016
  208,166 
 $4.40 
  2.87 
Granted
  74,997 
  5.13 
  2.65 
Forfeited
  (834)
  8.04 
  4.53 
Expired
  (27,334)
  5.32 
  3.96 
Outstanding, December 29, 2017
  254,995 
  4.49 
  6.48 
Granted
  117,500 
  5.67 
  3.15 
Forfeited
  (42,187)
  5.61 
  2.96 
Expired
  (169,477)
  3.74 
  2.47 
Outstanding, December 28, 2018
  160,831 
  5.86 
  3.18 
 
The following table reflects a summary of our non-vested stock options outstanding at December 30, 2016 and changes during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017:
 
 
 
 Number of options
 
 
 Weighted average exercise price per share
 
 
 Weighted average grant date fair value
 
Non-vested, December 30, 2016
  53,126 
 $4.81 
 $2.98 
Granted
  74,997 
  4.49 
  5.68 
Vested
  (63,750)
  5.47 
  2.86 
Forfeited
  (834)
  8.04 
  4.53 
Non-vested, December 29, 2017
  63,539 
  5.47 
  2.86 
Granted
  117,500 
  5.67 
  3.15 
Vested
  (54,329)
  5.65 
  3.11 
Forfeited
  (42,187)
  5.61 
  2.96 
Non-vested, December 28, 2018
  84,523 
  5.56 
  3.05 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table summarizes information about our stock options outstanding on, and reflects the intrinsic value recalculated based on the closing price of our common stock of $3.77 at, December 28, 2018:
 
 
 
 Number of options
 
 
 Weighted average exercise price per share
 
 
 Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)
 
 
 Aggregate intrinsic value
 
Outstanding
  160,831 
 $5.86 
  8.6
 
 $318,652 
Exercisable
  76,308 
  6.18 
  7.8
 
  - 
 
 The following table summarized information about our stock options outstanding, and reflects the weighted average contractual life at December 28, 2018:
 
 
 
Outstanding options
 
 
Vested options
 
Range of exercise prices
 
Number of shares outstanding
 
 
Weighted average contractual life
 
 
Number of shares exercisable
 
 
Weighted average contractual life
 
$4.80 - 7.00 Range
  144,582 
  9.2
 
  60,059
 
  9.2
 
$7.01 - 8.76 Range
  16,249 
  2.9 
  16,249 
  2.9 
 
Share-based compensation expense relating to the issuance of stock options totaled approximately $332,000 and $157,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively. Share-based compensation expense relating to the issuance of stock grants totaled approximately $62,000 during the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018. As of December 28, 2018, there was unrecognized share-based compensation expense totaling approximately $425,000 relating to non-vested options and restricted stock grants that will be recognized over the next 2.5 years.
 
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAX
 
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act. The Tax Act made broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that affected our fiscal years ended December 29, 2017 and December 28, 2018, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to 21%; (2) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax, or AMT, and changing how existing AMT credits can be realized; (3) creating the base erosion anti-abuse tax, or BEAT, a new minimum tax; (4) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (5) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017; (6) bonus depreciation that will allow for full expensing of qualified property; and (7) imposing limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation. In connection with our initial analysis of the impact of the Tax Act, we recorded an additional tax expense of approximately $349,000 in the fourth quarter of 2017. This expense is primarily due to remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets at the enacted rate of 21% compared to the previous rate of 34%.
 
The provision for deferred income taxes is comprised of the following:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 $473,964
 
 $126,487 
State
  89,414
 
  212,998
 
Deferred:
    
    
Federal
  (211,514)
  1,586,296 
State
  (146,792)
  79,747
 
Provision for income taxes
 $205,072
 
 $2,005,528 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred taxes are as follows:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Workers' compensation claims liability
 $469,040 
 $481,299 
Depreciation/amortization
  59,260 
  42,227 
Bad debt reserve
  28,037 
  69,622 
Deferred Rent
  17,610 
  21,235 
Accrued vacation
  36,202 
  49,030 
Impairment of workers' comp deposit
  383,786 
  - 
Stock based compensation
  35,700 
  - 
State net operating loss carryforward
  45,805
 
  - 
Other
  4,468 
  - 
AMT Credit
  - 
  58,189 
Total deferred tax asset
 $1,079,908
 
 $721,602 
 
Management estimates that our combined federal and state tax rates was approximately 17.8% for 2018, net of federal benefit on state income taxes. The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the statutory federal income tax rate and the income taxes reported on the statements of income are as follows:
 
 
 
December 28, 2018
 
 
December 29, 2017
 
Income tax expense based on statutory rate
 $247,665
 
  21.0%
 $1,252,858 
  34.0%
Permanent differences
  11,633 
  1.0%
  46,939 
  1.3%
State income taxes expense net of federal taxes
  (45,329)
  -3.8%
  220,326 
  6.0%
Remeasurement of net deferred tax asset at 21%
  - 
  0.0%
  349,240 
  9.5%
Stock based compensation
  - 
  0.0%
  36,411 
  1.0%
Other
  (8,897)
  -0.8%
  99,754 
  2.7%
Total taxes on income
 $205,072
 
  17.4%
 $2,005,528 
  54.5%
 
We have analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns and found no positions that would require a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits to be recognized. We include interest and penalties as interest expense on the consolidated financial statements.
 
NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Freestone Insurance Company Liquidation: From April 2012 through March 2014, our workers’ compensation insurance coverage was provided by Dallas National Insurance, which changed its corporate name to Freestone Insurance Company in 2013 (Dallas National Insurance and Freestone Insurance Company are collectively referred to as “Freestone”). Under the terms of these insurance policies, we were required to provide cash collateral of $900,000 per year, for a total of $1.8 million, as a non-depleting fund to secure our payment up to the deductible amount on claims occurring within the respective policy years.
 
From July 2008 through March 2011, our workers’ compensation coverage was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II, through its master workers’ compensation policy with Freestone. During this time period, we deposited approximately $500,000 with an affiliate of Freestone for collateral related to the coverage provided to the company through AMS Staff Leasing II and its policy with Freestone.
 
 
 
 
 
In April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about its financial condition. In August 2014, the receivership was converted to a liquidation proceeding. In late 2015, we filed timely proofs of claim with the Receiver demonstrating our claimed right to return of the company’s collateral deposits. One proof of claim is filed as a priority claim seeking return of the full amount of our collateral deposits. The other proof of claim is a general claim covering non-collateral items. If it is ultimately determined by the court that our claim is not a priority claim, or if there are insufficient assets in the liquidation to satisfy the priority claims, we may not receive any or all of our collateral.
 
During the second quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, after evaluating information known at each point in time regarding the Freestone receivership, it became apparent there was significant uncertainty related to the collectability of the $500,000 deposit previously placed under the AMS Staff Leasing II agreement related to our insurance coverage from July 2008 through March 2011. Because of this, we recorded a reserve of $250,000 in each of those quarters, thereby fully reserving this deposit.
 
In late May 2017, the Receiver filed a petition with the court, proposing a plan as to how the Receiver would identify and pay collateral to all insureds that paid cash collateral to Freestone. In the petition, the Receiver acknowledged receiving only $500,000 of our collateral. Of the $500,000 acknowledged, the Receiver proposed to return only approximately $6,000 to us. In response to additional information provided to and sought from the Receiver by us and by others, the Receiver has withdrawn the initial petition, acknowledging possible inaccuracies.
 
As part of our review of first quarter 2018 financial results, the company’s management and board of directors reviewed the likelihood of collecting the remaining $1.8 million of collateral paid to Freestone for policy years beginning in April of 2012 and continuing through March of 2014. Based on court filings and other available information, it was determined that it is more likely than not that our priority claim will be treated in a similar manner as other creditors, resulting in the priority claim having little to no value. We believe that our recovery, if any, of the deposits placed with Freestone and its affiliates will be the greater of: (i) the amount determined and allowed resulting from a tracing analysis of our collateral deposits; or (ii) the amount we would receive in distribution as a general unsecured claimant based on the amount of our collateral deposit.
 
Therefore, we reasonably estimate the high end of the amount the company might possibly recover through the receivership process is approximately 20% of the $1.8 million deposit amount. Accordingly, for the first quarter of 2018, the reserve on this asset was reduced by approximately $1.5 million, resulting in a net carrying amount of $260,000. This amount is consistent with our current evaluation of the Freestone receivership matter.
 
In July 2018, the Receiver filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery the Second Accounting setting forth Freestone’s estimated assets and liabilities for the period January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. The Second Accounting does not clarify the issues with respect to collateral claims, priorities or return of collateral. In the accounting, the Receiver reports total assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $87.8 million as of December 31, 2016, and estimated liabilities of $252,000,000.
 
Presently, the Receiver has not put forth an amended or new petition regarding its position as to precisely how cash collateral claimants should be treated. Therefore, our stated reasonable estimate is the best guidance we can offer as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. In the event the company receives substantially less than our reasonably estimated amount, there may be a material negative effect on our financial statements.
 
Operating leases:  We presently lease office space for our corporate headquarters in Lakewood, Colorado. We own all of the office furniture and equipment used in our corporate headquarters. We also lease the facilities for all of our branch locations. All of these facilities are leased at market rates that vary in amount depending on location. Each branch is between 1,000 and 5,000 square feet, depending on location and market conditions. Most of our branch leases have terms that extend over three to five years. Some of the leases have cancellation provisions that allow us to cancel with 90 days' notice. Other leases have been in existence long enough that the term has expired and we are currently occupying the premises on month-to-month tenancies. Below are the minimum lease obligations as of December 28, 2018:
 
Year
 
Obligation
 
2019
 $1,116,737 
2020
  778,512 
2021
  295,769 
2022
  106,265 
2023
  24,038 
Thereafter
  - 
Total
 $2,321,321 
 
Lease expense totaled approximately $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
 
Legal Proceedings: From time to time we are involved in various legal proceedings. We believe that the outcome of these proceedings, even if determined adversely, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. There have been no material changes in our legal proceedings since December 28, 2018. Legal costs related to contingencies are expensed as incurred.
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
Hire Quest Merger Agreement:  On April 7, 2019, the Company, CCNI One, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 1”), Command Florida, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub 2”), and Hire Quest Holdings, LLC (“Hire Quest”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), providing for the acquisition of Hire Quest by the Company. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub 1 will be merged with and into Hire Quest (the “First Merger”), with Hire Quest being the surviving entity (the “First Surviving Company”), and (ii) immediately following the First Merger, the First Surviving Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub 2 (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Merger”), with Merger Sub 2 being the surviving entity (the “Surviving Company”). Upon completion of the Merger and subject to shareholder approval, the Company will change its name to HireQuest, Inc. In addition, the Merger Agreement contemplates that the Company will commence a self-tender offer to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock at share price of $6.00 per share (the “Offer”).
 
Hire Quest is a trusted name in temporary staffing. Hire Quest provides the back-office support team for Trojan Labor and Acrux Staffing franchised branch locations across the United States. Trojan Labor provides temporary staffing services which includes general labor, industrial, and construction personnel.  Acrux Staffing provides temporary staffing services which includes skilled, semi-skilled and general labor industrial personnel, as well as clerical and secretarial personnel.
 
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the members of Hire Quest, if the Merger is completed, all of the ownership interests in Hire Quest will be converted into the right to receive an aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock representing 68% of the shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after the effective time of the Merger but prior to giving effect to the purchase of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Offer.  The Merger Agreement requires Hire Quest’s net tangible assets at closing to be at least $14 million.
 
The Company and Hire Quest have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, each of the Company and Hire Quest is required, among other things, to conduct its business in the ordinary course in all material respects during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger. The Company is required to seek shareholder approval of (i) the amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to increase the authorized shares of Company’s common stock and to change the name of the Company to “HireQuest, Inc.”, (ii) the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement and the related change of control of the Company pursuant to Nasdaq listing rules, and (iii) the conversion of the Company from a Washington corporation to a Delaware corporation. The Company will call and hold a shareholders meeting seeking to obtain such approvals. The Company will distribute proxy statements to shareholders of record containing additional details regarding the Merger.
 
 
 
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
Effective October 1, 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm EKS&H LLLP, or EKS&H, combined with Plante Moran PLLC, or Plante Moran. As a result of this transaction, on October 1, 2018, EKS&H resigned as our independent registered public accounting firm. Concurrent with their resignation, our audit committee approved the engagement of Plante Moran as our new independent registered public accounting firm.
 
EKS&H’s report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During our most recent fiscal year ended December 28, 2018, and through October 1, 2018, we have not had any disagreement with EKS&H on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to EKS&H’s satisfaction, would have caused EKS&H to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, during our most recent fiscal year ended December 28, 2018, and through October 1, 2018, there were no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
 
We have not consulted Plante Moran on any matter relating to either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a "reportable event" (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017.
 
We provided EKS&H and Plante Moran each with a copy of this disclosure prior to its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and requested that EKS&H and Plante Moran review this disclosure for accuracy and completeness.
 
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and our Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")), prior to the filing of this Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 28, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
(b) Management's report on internal control over financial reporting. Our management, including our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 28, 2018.
 
(c) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
 
None.
 
 
 
 
PART III
 
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
The names and ages and positions of our directors and executive officers are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years. The business address of all executive officers of the Company is 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood Colorado 80235. All of these individuals are citizens of the United States. Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven directors. Directors are elected at the annual meeting of stockholders to serve until they resign or are removed, or are otherwise disqualified to serve, or until their successors are elected and qualified. Executive officers are appointed by the Board. No family relationships exist among any of our directors or executive officers.
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
Cory Smith
Chief Financial Officer
Brendan Simaytis
Executive Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel
JD Smith
Co-chairman of the Board
R. Rimmy Malhotra
Co-chairman of the Board
Steven Bathgate
Director
Steven P. Oman
Director
Galen Vetter
Director
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
Director
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr., age 62, was appointed as our President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director on April 1, 2018. Mr. Coleman has deep experience serving in senior executive positions and on various public company boards, and has gained extensive expertise in business development and operations. He is also currently Chairman of Hudson Global Inc., a global talent solutions company, and has been a director of Hudson since May 2014. Previously, Mr. Coleman served as Principal Executive Officer of Crossroads Systems, Inc., a global provider of data archive solutions, from August 2017 to March 2018, and as the company’s President and CEO from May 2013 to July 2017. Mr. Coleman has served in a variety of senior operational roles, including CEO of Vroom Technologies, Inc., Chief Operating Officer of MetroNet Communications, and President of US West Long Distance. He also has held significant officer-level positions with Frontier Communications, Centex Telemanagement, and Sprint Communications. He formerly served as a director of: Ciber, Inc. from April 2014 to December 2017, a leading global information technology company; Crossroads Systems, Inc. from April 2013 to July 2017, a global provider of data archive solutions; NTS, Inc. from December 2012 to June 2014, a broadband services and telecommunications company; Aetrium Incorporated from January 2013 to April 2014, a recognized world leader in the global semiconductor industry; and On Track Innovations Ltd. from December 2012 to April 2014, one of the pioneers of cashless payment technology. Mr. Coleman has served as an Adjunct Professor of Leadership and Management for Regis University, and is a guest lecturer on leadership and ethics for Denver University. Mr. Coleman has a Master of Business Administration degree from Golden Gate University and is a graduate of the United States Air Force Communications System Officer School. He has a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States Air Force Academy and has also completed leadership, technology, and marketing programs at Kansas University, UCLA, and Harvard Business School.
 
Cory Smith, age 43, was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on July 31, 2017. Mr. Smith was previously employed by Command Center from 2010 through 2015, serving as our Controller during the final two years of his tenure.  Before rejoining Command Center, he was employed by Southeast Staffing beginning in 2015, where he served as the Vice President of Finance. From 2005 to 2010, Mr. Smith worked as a Certified Public Accountant, primarily performing attestation work. Mr. Smith graduated cum laude from Lewis-Clark State College with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.
 
Brendan Simaytis, age 45, was appointed Executive Vice President and General Counsel on July 1, 2018, and also serves as the Company’s Secretary. He has been employed with the company since 2011, primarily as a corporate attorney.  Beginning in May of 2017, he served as Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel.  During the course of his employment, Mr. Simaytis has become versed in all aspects of the Company’s business and operations, and he has involvement and oversight of various functions within the Company.  Before joining Command Center, he worked litigating personal injury, property and contractual claims in Missouri and Illinois on behalf of large and small corporate clients while at Williams Venker & Sanders, LLC, a civil litigation law firm in St. Louis, Missouri.  He then worked in private practice in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, representing both businesses and individuals in a variety of matters.  Mr. Simaytis graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from Northern Illinois University and a Juris Doctor from Western Michigan University Cooley Law School.  He is admitted to practice in Missouri, Illinois and Idaho.
 
 
 
 
 
JD Smith, age 48, has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 10, 2012. Mr. Smith has worked in real estate investment, construction and development since 1982. Currently, Mr. Smith is the owner of Real Estate Investment Consultants, LLC, a turnkey investment service firm serving all sectors of real estate and investment and development businesses. He also serves as chairman of the Board of Directors of iCore Connect, Inc., a publicly-held New York-based company and provider of comprehensive healthcare communications solutions. From 2008 until 2012 he was Director of Development for CP Financial, a venture capital firm based in Scottsdale, Arizona. From 1993 until 2008 he developed over two dozen projects in the Phoenix Metro Area, acting through his companies JD Investments, Inc., The High Sonoran Group, Inc., and JD Smith Development, LLC. In 1990 he formed his first operating company to buy and maintain residential rental properties and obtained his real estate license. In 1993 he graduated from Arizona State University with a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Real Estate.
 
R. Rimmy Malhotra, age 43, was appointed to our Board of Directors on April 6, 2016. From 2013 to the present, Mr. Malhotra has served as the Managing Member and Portfolio Manager for the Nicoya Fund LP, a private investment partnership. Previously, from 2008 to 2013 he served as portfolio manager of the Gratio Values Fund, a mutual fund registered under the Investment Act of 1940. Prior to this, he was an Investment Analyst at a New York based hedge fund. He earned an MBA in Finance from The Wharton School and a Master’s degree in International Relations from the University of Pennsylvania where he was a Lauder Fellow. Mr. Malhotra holds undergraduate degrees in Computer Science and Economics from Johns Hopkins University.
 
Steven Bathgate, age 64, has over 35 years of security industry experience, particularly with microcap companies. He was appointed to our Board of Directors in 2016. In 1995 he founded GVC Capital LLC and he is the Senior Managing Partner of that firm. GVC Capital is an investment banking firm located in Denver, Colorado, focusing primarily on providing comprehensive investment banking services to undervalued microcap companies. Prior to founding GVC Capital, Mr. Bathgate was CEO of securities firm Cohig & Associates in Denver from 1985 to 1995 and was previously Managing Partner, Equity Trading, at Wall Street West. He was previously a director for Global Healthcare REIT and Bluebook International, Inc. Mr. Bathgate received a Bachelor of Science in Finance from the University of Colorado, Leeds School of Business.
 
Steven P. Oman, age 70, has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 16, 2018. Mr. Oman is currently a partner in the law firm Provident Law, PLLC, located in Scottsdale, Arizona, and has held this position since June of 2015. Mr. Oman has been a practicing attorney for over 43 years, primarily in areas of business, real estate and estate planning. Prior to his work at Provident Law, he was a sole practitioner for many years in Scottsdale, Arizona, for the Law Office of Steven P. Oman. Mr. Oman has also served as a director and officer of other publicly-held companies, including Alanco Technologies, Inc., and Photocomm, Inc., providing various services and products over the years, including satellite-based technology, photovoltaics and oil industry water disposal facilities. Mr. Oman received his Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering degree in 1970 from the University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, and his J.D. from William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota in 1975. Mr. Oman is a member of the State Bar of Arizona and the Maricopa County Bar Association.
 
Galen Vetter, age 67, was appointed to our Board of Directors in April 2018. He brings significant senior executive management and board experience to Command Center, along with accounting and financial expertise. Mr. Vetter served as president of Rust Consulting, Inc. from December 2008 to May 2012, as global chief financial officer of Franklin Templeton Investment Funds from April 2004 to November 2008 and in numerous roles at RSM LLP from June 1973 to March 2004. Since January 2009 Mr. Vetter has served as a member on the Advisory Board of Directors of Land O’Lakes, Inc. Since 2013 he has served as a director of Alerus Financial, Inc.  Mr. Vetter is a licensed certified public accountant (inactive). He received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Northern Iowa.  Mr. Vetter has had extensive exposure to the analysis of financial statements and financial reporting matters and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines.
 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, age 52, was appointed to our Board of Directors in April 2018. He brings extensive operations and board experience to Command Center, along with expertise in the creation of innovative marketing and planning strategies. Mr. Hagenbuch is currently a Managing Director with Huron Consulting. Mr. Hagenbuch served on the board of directors and the audit and compensation committees of the publicly traded firm Remy International from 2008 until the sale of the company in 2015. He currently serves on the board of directors of the publicly traded company Arotech. Mr. Hagenbuch has served in senior management positions at J. Hilburn, Alix Partners, GE / GE capital, and American National Can. Mr. Hagenbuch began his professional career in the United States Navy. Mr. Hagenbuch earned an undergraduate degree in engineering from Vanderbilt University on a full Navy ROTC scholarship. He later earned an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Hagenbuch currently serves as a founding board member of the veteran’s service charity, Soldiers Who Salsa.
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance Policies and Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted a Standard of Ethics and Business Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and a Policy on Roles and Responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board. Those policies are available on our website at www.commandonline.com and in print to any stockholder upon request at no charge. Requests should be addressed to: Secretary, Command Center, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO 80235.
 
The Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of Command Center. To date, there have been no waivers under our Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, our Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
 
Committees of the Board of Directors
 
Our Board of Directors established three standing committees and a special committee to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities. The committees are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Strategic Alternatives Committee. The composition and function of each of our committees complies with the rules of the SEC that are currently applicable to us and we intend to comply with additional exchange listing requirements to the extent that they become applicable to us in the future. The Board has also adopted charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Charters for these committees are available on our website at www.commandonline.com. The charter of each committee is also available in print to any stockholder upon request at no charge. The table below shows current membership for each of the standing Board committees and the special Board committee.
 
Audit Committee
 
Compensation Committee
 
Nominating and Governance Committee
 
Strategic Alternatives Committee
Galen Vetter (Chair)
 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch (Chair)
 
JD Smith (Chair)
 
R. Rimmy Malhotra (Chair)
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
 
R. Rimmy Malhotra
 
Steven P. Oman
 
Steven Bathgate
Steven P. Oman
 
Steven Bathgate
 
Galen Vetter
 
JD Smith
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
 
Audit Committee:  Galen Vetter (Chairman), Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, and Steven P. Oman currently serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met on four occasions in 2018 and reviewed our quarterly filings and our annual filing and audit. Additional discussions among committee members outside of meetings were held to discuss the audit process and the preparation and review the consolidated financial statements.
 
Our Board of Directors has determined that Galen Vetter qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ Capital Market. All the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Each of the members of the Audit Committee met and meets the independence standards for independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
 
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include: 
a) 
appointing, determining funding for, evaluating, and replacing of, and assessing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;
b) 
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures;
c) 
pre-approving auditing and permissible non-audit services, and the terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;
d) 
coordinating the oversight and reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting;
e) 
establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and concerns; 
f) 
preparing the audit committee report required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
g) 
monitoring compliance with our Code of Ethics
 
 
 
 
 
Compensation Committee:  Lawrence F. Hagenbuch (Chairman), R. Rimmy Malhotra, and Steven Bathgate currently serve on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met on six occasions in 2018. The Compensation Committee is comprised of three non-employee directors. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee met and meets the independence standards for independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
 
The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation program, establishes our compensation philosophy and policies, and administers our compensation plans.  The Compensation Committee generally reviews the compensation programs applicable to executive officers on an annual basis.  In setting compensation levels for a particular executive, the Committee takes into consideration the proposed compensation package as a whole and each element individually, as well as the executive's past and expected future contributions to our business.
 
The Committee has the authority to engage its own independent advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. No such advisors are currently engaged. The Compensation Committee did not use an advisor to assist it in determining executive compensation for our 2018 fiscal year.  Executive management of the Company is actively involved in determining appropriate compensation and making recommendations to the Compensation Committee for its consideration.
 
Nominating and Governance Committee:  JD Smith (Chairman), Steven P. Oman, and Galen Vetter currently serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met on three occasions in 2018. Each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee met and meets the independence standards for independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
 
The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter grants such Committee the authority to determine the skills and qualifications required of directors and to develop criteria to be considered in selecting potential candidates for Board membership. Neither the Committee nor the Board has established any minimum qualifications for nominees, but the Board does consider the composition of the Board as a whole, the requisite characteristics (including independence, diversity, experience in industry, finance, administration and operations) of each candidate, and the skills and expertise of its current members, while taking into account the overall operating efficiency of the Board and its committees.
 
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
a) 
developing and recommending to the Board criteria for Board and committee membership;
b) 
establishing procedures for identifying and evaluating director candidates including nominees recommended by stockholders;
c) 
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members;
d) 
recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of the Board’s committees; and
e) 
overseeing the evaluation of the effectiveness of the organization of the Board, including its committees, and the Board’s performance.
 
Special Committee: In February 2017, our Board established the Strategic Alternatives Committee as a special committee. R. Rimmy Malhotra (Chairman), Steven Bathgate, JD Smith, and Lawrence F. Hagenbuch currently serve on the Committee. The Committee is empowered to identify and evaluate strategic opportunities available to the Company. The Committee has engaged the services of an investment banking firm to assist the Committee in fulfilling this assignment. Each of the members of the Strategic Alternatives Committee met and meets the independence standards for independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
 
Director Nominations
 
The Board of Directors nominates directors for election at each annual meeting of stockholders and appoints new directors to fill vacancies when they arise. The Nominating and Governance Committee has the responsibility to identify, evaluate, recruit and recommend qualified candidates to the Board of Directors for nomination or election.
 
One of the Board of Directors’ objectives in evaluating director nominations is to ensure that its membership is composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with a diversity of backgrounds, perspectives and skills. The Nominating and Governance Committee will select nominees for director based on their character, judgment, diversity of experience, business acumen, and ability to act on behalf of all stockholders. We do not have a formal diversity policy, however, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to have a Board representing diverse viewpoints as well as diverse expertise at policy-making levels in many areas, including business, accounting and finance, marketing and sales, legal, government affairs, regulatory affairs, business development, technology and in other areas that are relevant to our activities.
 
 
 
 
 
The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that nominees for director should have experience, such as those mentioned above, that may be useful to the Company and the Board of Directors, high personal and professional ethics and the willingness and ability to devote sufficient time to carry out effectively their duties as directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes it is appropriate for at least one, and, preferably, multiple, members of the Board of Directors to meet the criteria for an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by rules of the SEC, and for a majority of the members of the Board of Directors to meet the definition of “independent director” as defined by the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee also believes it is appropriate for key members of our management to participate as members of the Board of Directors. Prior to each annual meeting of stockholders, the Nominating and Governance Committee identifies nominees first by evaluating the current directors whose term will expire at the annual meeting and who are willing to continue in service. These candidates are evaluated based on the criteria described above, including as demonstrated by the candidate’s prior service as a director, and the needs of the Board of Directors with respect to the particular talents and experience of its directors. In the event that a director does not wish to continue in service, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines not to re-nominate the director, a vacancy is created on the Board of Directors as a result of a resignation, an increase in the size of the Board or other event, the Committee will consider various candidates for Board membership, including those suggested by the Committee members, by other Board members, by any executive search firm engaged by the Committee or by stockholders.
 
On September 5, 2017, our Board of Directors approved and adopted an amendment, effective as of such date, to our amended and restated bylaws. The amendment added Article 3.8, which is an advance notice provision for director nominations and stockholder proposals. A stockholder who wishes to suggest a prospective nominee for the Board of Directors should notify Command Center’s Secretary in writing and include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate. Information to be in the notice includes (i) the name, age, business address and residence address for the nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of each such nominee, (iii) the number of shares of capital stock of the corporation which are owned of record and beneficially by each such nominee (if any), (iv), such other information concerning each such nominee as would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee as a director in an election contest (even if an election contest is not involved) or that is otherwise required to be disclosed, under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, (v) the consent of the nominee to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected, and (vi) as to the Proposing Stockholder: (A) the name and address of the Proposing Stockholder as they appear on the corporation’s books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is being made, (B) the class and number of shares of the corporation which are owned by the Proposing Stockholder (beneficially and of record) and owned by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is being made, as of the date of the Proposing Stockholder’s notice, and a representation that the Proposing Stockholder will notify the Corporation in writing of the class and number of such shares owned of record and beneficially as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (C) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to such nomination between or among the Proposing Stockholder and any of its affiliates or associates, and any others (including their names) acting in concert with any of the foregoing, and a representation that the Proposing Stockholder will notify the corporation in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (D) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of the Proposing Stockholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, the Proposing Stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the Proposing Stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates with respect to shares of stock of the corporation, and a representation that the Proposing Stockholder will notify the Corporation in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (E) a representation that the Proposing Stockholder is a holder of record of shares of the corporation entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice, and (F) a representation whether the Proposing Stockholder intends to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve the nomination and/or otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of the nomination. Submission of a prospective nominee must comply with the requirements set forth in the Company's Bylaws.
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholder nominations must be made in accordance with the procedures outlined in, and must include the information required by, our Bylaws and must be addressed to: Secretary, Command Center, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO 80235. Stockholders can obtain a copy of our Bylaws by writing to the Secretary at this address.
 
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
 
If a stockholder wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, he or she may send any communication in writing to: Secretary, Command Center, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO 80235. The stockholder should include his or her name and address in the written communication and indicate whether he or she is a stockholder of Command Center. The Secretary will review any communication received from a stockholder, and all material communications from stockholders will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors or Committee of the Board of Directors based on the subject matter.
 
 Director Compensation
 
The following table summarizes the cash, equity awards, and all other compensation earned by each of our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018. Directors who are also officers are included in the Summary Executive Compensation Table below.
 
Name
 
Fees earned or paid in cash
 
 
Share awards (1)
 
 
Option awards (2)
 
 
Total
 
JD Smith
 $39,445 
 $64,225 
 $- 
 $103,670 
R. Rimmy Malhotra
  38,720 
  64,225 
  26,730 
  129,675 
Steven Bathgate
  32,316 
  64,225 
  26,730 
  123,271 
Steven P. Oman
  23,683 
  52,373 
  - 
  76,055 
Galen Vetter
  24,672 
  51,582 
  - 
  76,254 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
  21,504 
  51,582 
  - 
  73,086 
John Schneller (3)
  17,321 
  14,225 
  - 
  31,546 
Richard Finlay (4)
  11,364 
  - 
  - 
  11,364 
John Stewart (5)
  11,537 
  - 
  - 
  11,537 
Total
 $220,562 
 $362,436 
 $53,460 
 $636,459 
 
1) 
This column represents the grant date fair value of shares awarded to each non-employee director in 2018 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The amounts were calculated using the closing price of our stock on the grant date.
2) 
This column represents the grant date fair value of options awarded to each non-employee director in 2018 in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
3) 
Served as director until July 12, 2018.
4) 
Served as director until January 22, 2018.
5) 
Served as director and Chairman of the Board until January 16, 2018.
 
Narrative to Director Compensation Table
 
The Compensation Committee recommends and the Board of Directors determines the compensation for our directors, based on industry standards and our financial situation. During 2018, we paid each of our independent directors a base amount of $25,000 as an annual retainer, paid on a quarterly basis, and granted each independent director 8,026 restricted shares of our common stock which vest in equal installments at each grant date anniversary over the next two years. In addition, each Co-Chairman of the Board receives an additional $5,000 annual retainer, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $6,500 annual retainer, and each Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional $5,000 annual retainer. Non-chairman members of the Audit committee receive an additional $3,500 annual retainer, and non-chairman members of all other committees receive an additional $2,500 annual retainer.
 
 
 
 
 
Attendance at Meetings
 
During 2018, our Board of Directors held fifteen meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on seven occasions. During 2017, our Board of Directors held twelve meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on four occasions. Each member attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served during his or her term of office. Directors are expected to attend the Company’s meetings of stockholders, absent unusual circumstances. Last year’s annual meeting of stockholders was attended by all of our directors.
 
 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers, directors, and beneficial owners of more than 10% any of our equity securities to timely file certain reports regarding ownership of and transactions in our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the required filings must also be furnished to us. We became subject to the requirements of Section 16(a) on February 8, 2008. Section 16(a) compliance was required during the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018. Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us pursuant to Rule 16a-3(e) under the Exchange Act during 2018, we believe that, during 2018, the filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were satisfied.
  
Indebtedness of Management
 
No director or executive officer or nominee for director, or any member of the immediate family of such has been indebted to the Company during the past year.
 
Officer and Director Legal Proceedings
 
There are no legal proceedings involving our officers or directors.
 
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Role of Executive Officers in Executive Compensation
 
The Compensation Committee is charged with reviewing executive compensation and making recommendations to the Board of Directors based upon their review and analysis. None of our executive officers currently serve as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as an independent director on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The following tables provide a summary of information about compensation expensed or accrued by us during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018, and December 29, 2017 for (a) our Chief Executive Officer, (b) our former Chief Executive Officer, (c) our Chief Financial Officer, (d) our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and (e) our former Executive Vice President and General Counsel; collectively, the Named Executive Officers or NEOs. Columns required by SEC rules are omitted where there is no amount to report.
 
 
 
 
 
Name and Principal Position
 
Year
 
Salary
 
 
Bonus
 
 
Option awards (6)
 
 
All other compensation
 
 
Total
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr. (1)
 
2018
 $243,750 
 $100,000 
 $316,335 
  297(7)
 $660,382 
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
 
 
    
    
    
    
    
Cory Smith (2)
 
2018
  172,500 
  23,763 
  - 
  27,728(8)
  223,991 
Chief Financial Officer
 
2017
  63,462 
  - 
  12,450 
  - 
  75,912 
Brendan Simaytis (3)
 
2018
  196,250 
  35,644 
  - 
  90(7)
  231,984 
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
 
2017
  176,077 
  40,000 
  62,941 
  - 
  279,018 
Frederick Sandford (4)
 
2018
  68,750 
  - 
  - 
  697,664(9)
  766,414 
Former Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
2017
  275,000 
  - 
  62,251 
  - 
  337,251 
Ronald Junck (5)
 
2018
  171,363
 
  59,407 
  - 
  20,155(10)
  250,925
 
Former Executive Vice President and General Counsel
 
2017
  206,538 
  - 
  75,391 
  - 
  281,929 
 
1) 
Mr. Coleman was appointed Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2018.
2) 
Mr. Smith was appointed Chief Financial Officer on July 22, 2017.
3) 
Mr. Simaytis was appointed Executive Vice President and General Counsel on July 1, 2018.
4) 
Mr. Sandford’s tenure as an officer ended on March 31, 2018.
5) 
Mr. Junck’s tenure as an officer ended on May 25, 2018.
6) 
Refer to Note 7 – Stock-based Compensation in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for assumptions used to determine option value.
7) 
Other compensation is for Company sponsored life insurance.
8) 
Mr. Smith’s other compensation is for reimbursable relocation expenses and Company sponsored life insurance.
9) 
Mr. Sandford’s other compensation is for severance and Company sponsored life insurance.
10)
Mr. Junck's other compensation is for consulting fees and Company sponsored life insurance. 
 
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table
 
Summary of Executive Employment Agreements:  On March 31, 2019 we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Richard K. Coleman, Jr., the Company's Chief Executive Officer, effective as of April 1, 2019. This agreement provides for Mr. Coleman to continue serving as our Chief Executive Officer during an initial six month term and to receive an annual base salary of $325,000. Mr. Coleman will be eligible for a performance bonus during the initial term, and a lump sum payment equal to $200,000 at the closing of a change of control transaction, under certain conditions.
 
On June 29, 2018, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Cory Smith, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, effective as of July 1, 2018. This agreement provides for Mr. Smith to continue serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer during an initial one-year term and to receive an annual base salary of $180,000. Mr. Smith will also be eligible for an performance bonus during the initial term, and a lump sum payment of $50,000 in the event of a change of control, as defined by the agreement, during the term or within six months following the term. If Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by us without cause within 12 months following a change of control, Mr. Smith will be entitled to receive his base salary for the greater of six months or the time remaining in the current term of the agreement.
 
On June 29, 2018, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Brendan Simaytis, the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel, effective as of July 1, 2018. This agreement provides for Mr. Simaytis to continue serving as the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel during an initial one-year term and to receive an annual base salary of $200,000. Mr. Simaytis will also be eligible for an performance bonus during the initial term, and a lump sum payment of $50,000 in the event of a change of control, as defined by the agreement, during the term or within six months following the term. If Mr. Simaytis’s employment is terminated by us without cause within 12 months following a change of control, Mr. Simaytis will be entitled to receive his base salary for the greater of six months or the time remaining in the current term of the agreement.
 
On March 28, 2018, we entered into a severance agreement with our former Chief Executive Officer Frederick Sandford. Pursuant to this severance agreement, we mutually agreed to terminate Mr. Sandford’s employment as of March 31, 2018, 11:59 p.m. In addition, Mr. Sandford agreed to resign as a member of our Board of Directors and from all other positions with Command Center, also effective at 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2018. In return, we agreed to pay Mr. Sandford $275,000 severance, an amount equal to 105% of the value of Mr. Sandford’s unexercised options whether vested or not, and $25,000 to cover his legal fees. All unexercised options were terminated and cancelled as a result.
 
On May 25, 2018, we entered into a severance agreement and a consulting agreement with our former Vice President and General counsel Ronald L. Junck. Pursuant to the severance agreement, we will pay Mr. Junck severance in the amount of $75,000 over the course of four months in regular installments, pay all accrued but unused vacation time, and his participation in the Company’s health insurance plans will continue through May 31, 2018. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, Mr. Junck will provide consulting services to the Company commencing June 1, 2018, and continuing through July 31, 2018, for a $10,000 monthly fee.
 
All our executive officers receive expense reimbursement for business travel and participation in employee benefits programs made available during the term of employment.
 
Summary of the Executive Bonus Program
 
The 2018 plan was established by our Compensation Committee, in conjunction with our Board of Directors and input from management, through our current executive employments agreements. The plan sets out a goal and incentives for management upon achievement of which management will be awarded cash. This goal represents our business focus for the 2018 fiscal year and strives to align our business focus with the interests of our stockholders.
 
 
 
 
 
The plan provides for a bonus pool to be created in an amount equal to 15% of our 2018 adjusted EBITDA exceeding $3 million. This pool will be distributed to members of our executive management, with 50% of the pool going to our Chief Executive Officer, Richard K. Coleman, Jr., 25% going to our Chief Financial Officer, Cory Smith, and 25% going to our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Brendan Simaytis.
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
The following table shows grants of options outstanding on December 28, 2018, the last day of our last completed fiscal year, to each of the NEOs named in the Summary Compensation Table.
 
Name
 
Grant date
 
 Number of securities underlying unexercised options exercisable
 
 
 Number of securities underlying unexercised options unexercisable
 
 
 Option exercise price
 
Option expiration date
Richard K. Coleman, Jr.
 
4/1/2018
  42,143 
  57,857 
 $5.70
(1)
3/31/2028
Cory Smith
 
9/29/2017
  2,083 
  2,083 
  5.40
(2)
9/28/2027
Brendan Simaytis
 
9/22/2017
  8,333 
  8,333 
  4.80
(2)
9/21/2027
 
9/29/2017
  3,125 
  3,125 
  5.40
(2)
9/28/2027
 
1) 
These options vest 25% at the date of grant with the remaining 75% vesting in equal, monthly increments of the first day of each of the following 35 months.
2) 
These options vest in four equal installments, 25% at the date of grant, and 25% at each grant date anniversary over the following three years.
 
Payments upon Termination and Change in Control
 
The following is a summary setting forth potential severance payments and benefits provided for our current NEOs valued as of December 28, 2018.
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Involuntary Termination without Cause (1)
 
 
Termination for Change in Control
 
 
Death
 
 
Disability
 
Base Salary
 $231,250 
 $-
 
 $-
 
 $-
 
Bonus (2)
  80,539
 
  200,000
 
  - 
  - 
Total
 $311,789
 
 $200,000
 
 $- 
 $- 
 
1) 
Includes base salary through the end of the current term.
2) 
Includes 2018 performance bonus and change in control bonus. The change in control bonus is an amount equal to $200,000 reduced by any payment made pursuant to the 2018 performance bonus.
 
Cory Smith, Chief Financial Officer
 
Involuntary Termination without Cause (1)
 
 
Termination for Change in Control (1)
 
 
Death (1)
 
 
Disability (1)
 
Base Salary
 $90,000 
 $90,000 
 $90,000 
 $90,000 
Bonus (2)
  40,270
 90,270
  - 
  - 
Total
 $130,270
 $180,270
 $90,000 
 $90,000 
 
1) 
Includes base salary through the end of the current term, or 6 months.
2) 
Includes 2018 performance bonus and change in control bonus.
 
Brendan Simaytis, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
 
Involuntary Termination without Cause (1)
 
 
Termination for Change in Control (1)
 
 
Death (1)
 
 
Disability (1)
 
Base Salary
 $100,000 
 $100,000 
 $100,000 
 $100,000 
Bonus (2)
  40,270
  90,270
  - 
  - 
Total
 $140,270
 $190,270
 $100,000 
 $100,000 
 
1) 
 Includes base salary through the end of the current term, or 6 months.
2) 
Includes 2018 performance bonus and change in control bonus.
 
 
 
 
Payments Made Upon Any Termination: Regardless of the manner in which an NEOs employment terminates, the executive is entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts include: earned but unpaid salary through the date of termination; non-equity incentive compensation earned and payable prior to the date of termination; option grants received which have already vested and are exercisable prior to the date of termination (subject to the terms of the applicable option agreements) and unused vacation pay.
 
Payments Made Upon Involuntary Termination Without Cause: In the case of Mr. Coleman, he will continue to receive his base salary for the remainder of the then-current term. In the case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to receive their base salary through the end of the current term or six months, whichever is longer.
 
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control: Some NEO’s employment agreement contains change in control provisions. The benefits, in addition to the items listed under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above include the vesting of all outstanding stock options.
 
In the case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to receive their base salary through the end of the current term or six months, whichever is longer.
 
Payments Made Upon Death or Permanent Disability: In the event of the death or permanent disability of an NEO, the executive or personal representative or estate, as applicable, would receive, in addition to the items listed under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above the vesting of all outstanding stock options.
 
In the case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to receive their base salary through the end of the current term or six months, whichever is longer.
 
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
The following tables set forth information regarding (a) the ownership of any non-management person known to us to own more than five percent of any class of our voting common stock, and (b) the number and percentage of our shares of common stock held by each director, each of the named executive officers and directors and officers as a group. Percentages of ownership have been calculated based upon 4,680,871 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 28, 2018.
 
Security Ownership of Non-Management Owners
 
Name and address of Beneficial Owner
 
Title of class
 
Amount and nature of beneficial ownership (1)
 
 
Percent of class
 
Jerry Smith (2)
 
Common Stock
  479,725 
  10.2%
Barbara Rydesky (3)
 
Common Stock
  555,253 
  11.9%
Ephraim Fields (4)
 
Common Stock
  340,782 
  7.3%
 
1) 
Beneficial ownership is calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, and includes shares held outright, shares held by entity(s) controlled by NEOs and/or Directors, and shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants which are exercisable on or within 60 days of  April 9, 2019.
2) 
The number of shares comprising Mr. Smith’s beneficial ownership is based upon the written representations of his legal counsel. Mr. Smith’s address is: care of Command Center, Inc., 3609 S Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250 Lakewood, CO 80235.
3) 
The number of shares comprising Mrs. Rydesky’s beneficial ownership is based upon the written representations of Barbara Rydesky. Mrs. Rydesky’s address is: 3238 Pine Lake Road, Orchard Lake, MI 48234.
4) 
The number of shares comprising Mr. Fields' beneficial ownership, over which Mr. Fields has sole voting and sole dipositive power, is based upon the Schedule 13G/A filed by Ephraim Fields on February 11, 2019. Mr. Fields' address is: care of Echo Lake Capital, 501 Madison Avenue, Floor 12A, New York, NY 10022.
 
 
 
 
 
Security Ownership of Management
 
Name and address of Beneficial Owner (1)
 
Title of class
 
Amount and nature of beneficial ownership (2)
 
 
Percent of class
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr. (3)
 
Common Stock
  55,000
 
  1.2%
Brendan Simaytis (4)
 
Common Stock
  17,958 
  * 
Cory Smith (5)
 
Common Stock
  3,333 
  * 
JD Smith (6)
 
Common Stock
  42,274 
  * 
Steven P. Oman (7)
 
Common Stock
  8,442 
  * 
R. Rimmy Malhotra (8)
 
Common Stock
  140,510 
  3.0%
Steven Bathgate (9)
 
Common Stock
  114,445 
  2.4%
Galen Vetter (10)
 
Common Stock
  10,581 
  * 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch (11)
 
Common Stock
  2,278 
  * 
All Officers and Directors as a group (nine persons)
 
Common Stock
  394,821
 
  8.4%
Ron Junck (12)
 
Common Stock 
  121,685 
  2.6%
Frederick Sandford (13)
 
Common Stock
  16,250 
  * 
 
* Indicates ownership of less than 1.0%
 
1) 
The address of the NEOs and Directors is:  care of Command Center, Inc., 3609 S Wadsworth Blvd, Suite 250 Lakewood, CO 80235.
2) 
Beneficial ownership is calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, and includes shares held outright, shares held by entities controlled by NEOs and/or Directors, and shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants which are exercisable on or within 60 days of  April 9, 2019.
3) 
Options to purchase shares.
4) 
Includes 6,500 shares held outright and options to purchase 11,458 shares.
5) 
Includes 1,250 shares held outright and options to purchase 2,083 shares.
6) 
Includes 30,191 shares held outright and options to purchase 12,083 shares.
7) 
Shares held outright.
8) 
Includes 12,191 shares held outright, 123,944 shares held indirectly through the Nicoya Fund, and options to purchase 4,375 shares. The shares held by the Nicoya Fund are directly owned by the Nicoya Fund LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. This reporting person is the managing member and a co-owner of Nicoya Capital LLC, which is the managing member and owner of the Nicoya Fund.
9) 
Includes 27,155 shares held outright, 82,915 shares held indirectly, including 66,666 by Mr. Bathgate’s spouse, 7,916 by the Bathgate Family Partnership and 8,333 by Viva Co., LLC, and options to purchase 4,375 shares.
10) 
Includes 8,303 shares held outright and 2,278 shares held indirectly by Vetter Community Resources, LLC.
11) 
Shares held outright.
12)
Includes 112,762 shares held outright, and 8,923 shares held indirectly through Inland Empire Temporary Staffing Services LLC of which Mr. Junck is a member.
13)
Shares held outright.
 
Equity Compensation Plans
 
At the annual meeting of stockholders held on November 17, 2016, the stockholders approved the adoption of the Command Center, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2016 Plan"). The 2008 Stock Incentive Plan expired in January 2016, except as to awards that remain outstanding under such plan.
 
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
 
As of December 28, 2018, we had one equity compensation plan, namely the 2016 Plan, approved by the stockholders on November 17, 2016. Pursuant to the 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee is authorized to issue awards for up to 500,000 common shares over the 10-year life of the 2016 Plan. Currently, there have been approximately 192,000 options and approximately 11,000 common shares granted under the 2019 Plan.
 
 
 
 
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
There were no related party transactions during 2018 or 2017.
 
None of our executive officers serve as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. None of the current members of our Compensation Committee, nor any of their family members, has ever been our employees.
 
Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures
 
As set forth in the written charter of the Audit Committee, any related person transaction involving a Company director or executive officer must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee. Any member of the Audit Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote on the approval or ratification of the transaction. Related persons include any director or executive officer, certain stockholders and any of their “immediate family members” (as defined by SEC regulations). In addition, the Board of Directors determines on an annual basis which directors meet the definition of independent director under the NASDAQ Listing Rules and reviews any director relationship that would potentially interfere with his or her exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
 
Director Independence
 
Our Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of each director and nominee for election as a director in accordance with certain criteria, which include all elements of independence set forth in the related Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Regulations and the NASDAQ Listing Rules. As part of the Board Committee meetings, and as they feel necessary or appropriate at full Board meetings, the independent directors routinely meet in executive session without management or any non-independent directors present.
 
Based on these standards and information provided by our Board of Directors and officers, our Board of Directors determined that Steven Bathgate, R. Rimmy Malhotra, JD Smith, Steven P. Oman, Galen Vetter, and Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, all non-employee directors, are independent and have no material relationship with the Company, except as directors and as stockholders of the Company.
 
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 
The Board of Directors selected Plante & Moran, PLLC ("Plante Moran") as the independent registered public accounting firm to examine our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018. The Board of Directors selected EKS&H LLLP ("EKS&H") as the independent registered public accounting firm to examine our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017.
 
The following table summarizes the fees that Plante Moran and EKS&H charged us for the listed services during 2018 and 2017:
 
Type of fee
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Audit fee (1)
 $110,245 
 $56,611 
Audit related fees (2)
  - 
  - 
Tax fees (3)
  - 
  - 
All other fees (4)
  - 
  - 
 
 $110,245 
 $56,611 
 
1) 
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements.
2) 
Audit related fees consist of assurance and related services that include, but are not limited to, internal control reviews, attest services not required by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and not reported under “Audit fees.”
3) 
Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include preparation of federal income tax returns.
4) 
All other fees consist of fees billed for products and services other than the services reported above.
 
 
 
 
Our Audit Committee reviewed the audit and tax services rendered by Plante Moran and concluded that such services were compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence. All audit, non-audit, tax services, and other services performed by our independent accountants are pre-approved by our Audit Committee to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us. We do not use Plante Moran for financial information system design and implementation. These services, which include designing or implementing a system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements, or generates information that is significant to our financial statements, are provided internally. We do not engage Plante Moran to provide compliance outsourcing services.
 
PART IV
 
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
Documents filed as part of this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:
 
1) 
Our consolidated financial statements can be found in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2) 
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements or related notes).
3) 
The following exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:
 
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form SB-2, as filed May 7, 2001.
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, as filed November 16, 2005.
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form S-1, as filed January 14, 2008.
Amended and Restated Bylaws, as of September 5, 2017. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 8-K as filed on September 8, 2017.
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K, as filed December 7, 2017.
Form of Common Stock Share Certificate. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-1 as filed January 14, 2008.
Executive Employment Agreement with Richard K. Coleman, Jr. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K as filed on April 2, 2018.
Executive Employment Agreement with Cory Smith. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K as filed on July 6, 2018.
Executive Employment Agreement with Brendan Simaytis. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K as filed on July 6, 2018.
Command Center, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 included as Appendix B to Form DEF 14A as filed October 11, 2016.
Account Purchase Agreement by and between Command Center, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., dated May 12, 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q as filed on May 15, 2017.
Executive Severance Agreement with Frederick Sandford dated March 28, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K as filed on April 3, 2018.
Executive Severance Agreement with Ronald L. Junck dated May 25, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 8-K as filed on June 1, 2018.
Settlement agreement with Ephraim Fields, Echo Lake Capital, Keith Rosenbloom, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Randall Bort, and Sean Gelston dated April 16, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 8-K as filed on April 18, 2018.
Executive Employment Agreement with Richard K. Coleman, Jr. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K as filed on April 4, 2019.
Standard of Ethics and Business Conduct. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-K as filed on April 11, 2017.
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith).
Consent of Plante Moran (filed herewith).
Consent of EKS&H (filed herewith).
Certification of Chief Executive Officer-Section 302 Certification (filed herewith).
Certification of Chief Financial Officer-Section 302 Certification (filed herewith).
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document (filed herewith).
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed herewith).
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
 
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
 
None. 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
COMMAND CENTER, INC.
 
/s/ Richard K. Coleman, Jr.
 
Richard K. Coleman, Jr.
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Cory Smith
 
Cory Smith
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
Each person whose individual signature appears below hereby authorizes and appoints Richard K. Coleman, Jr. and Cory Smith, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his name, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. 
 
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
/s/ JD Smith
 
JD Smith
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ R. Rimmy Malhotra
 
R. Rimmy Malhotra
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Steven Bathgate
 
Steven Bathgate
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Seven P. Oman
 
Steven P. Oman
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Galen Vetter
 
Galen Vetter
 
  April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
 
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
 
April 9, 2019
Signature
 
Printed Name
 
Date
Director
 
 
 
 
 
 
52