XML 55 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Derivative Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments

7. Derivative Financial Instruments

Commodity Derivatives

     Our petroleum products blending activities produce gasoline products, and we can estimate the timing and quantities of sales of these products. We use a combination of forward purchase and sales contracts, NYMEX contracts and butane swap agreements to help manage price changes, which has the effect of locking in most of the product margins realized from our blending activities that we choose to hedge.

     We account for the forward purchase and sales contracts we use in our blending and fractionation activities as normal purchases and sales. Derivatives that qualify for and are designated as normal purchases and sales are accounted for using traditional accrual accounting. As of March 31, 2012, we had commitments under these forward purchase and sales contracts as follows (in millions):

       
  Amount Barrels
Forward purchase contracts $ 55.3 0.6
Forward sales contracts $ 44.4 0.3

 

We use NYMEX contracts to hedge against changes in the price of petroleum products we expect to sell in future periods.

Our NYMEX contracts fall into one of three categories:

     
Hedge Type Hedge Purpose Accounting Treatment
Qualifies for Hedge Accounting Treatment
Cash Flow Hedge To hedge the variability in cash flows
related to a forecasted transaction.
The effective portion of changes in the value of the
hedge are recorded to accumulated other
comprehensive income/loss and reclassified to
earnings when the forecasted transaction occurs. Any
ineffectiveness is recognized currently in earnings.
Fair Value Hedge To hedge against changes in the fair
value of a recognized asset or liability.
The effective portion of changes in the value of the
hedge are recorded as adjustments to the asset or
liability being hedged. Any ineffectiveness is
recognized currently in earnings.
Does not Qualify For Hedge Accounting Treatment
Economic Hedge To effectively serve as either a fair
value or a cash flow hedge; however,
the derivative agreement does not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment
or is not designated as a hedge in
accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815, Derivatives
and Hedging.
Changes in the value of these agreements are
recognized currently in earnings.

 

     We also use butane swap agreements, which are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, to hedge against changes in the price of selected butane purchases we expect to complete in the future. Changes in the fair value of these agreements are recognized currently in earnings. As outlined in the table below, at March 31, 2012, we had open NYMEX contracts representing 3.1 million barrels of petroleum products and open butane swap agreements on the purchase of 25 thousand barrels of butane.

     
Type of Contract/Accounting
Methodology
Product Represented by the
Contract and Associated
Barrels
Maturity Dates
NYMEX - Fair Value Hedges 0.7 million barrels of crude oil Between June 2012 and
November 2013
NYMEX - Economic Hedges 2.4 million barrels of refined
petroleum products
Between April and December
2012
Butane Swap Agreements -
Economic Hedges
25 thousand barrels of butane August 2012

 

     At March 31, 2012, the fair value of our open NYMEX contracts was a net liability of $16.4 million and the fair value of our butane swap agreements was a liability of less than $0.1 million. Combined, the net liability was $16.4 million, of which $4.7 million was recorded as a current liability to energy commodity derivatives contracts and $11.7 million was recorded as other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. At March 31, 2012, we had made margin deposits of $41.7 million for these contracts, which were recorded as energy commodity derivatives deposits on our consolidated balance sheet. We have the right to offset the combined fair values of our open NYMEX contracts and our open butane swap agreements against our margin deposits under a master netting arrangement with each of our counterparties; however, we have elected to disclose the combined fair values of our open NYMEX and butane swap agreements separately from the related margin deposits on our consolidated balance sheet. We have the right of offset under the agreements and, therefore, have offset the fair values of our NYMEX agreements and butane swap agreements together for each counterparty separately on our consolidated balance sheets.

Impact of Derivatives on Income Statement, Balance Sheet and AOCL

     The changes in derivative gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL") for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 were as follows (in thousands):

             
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
Derivative Gains Included in AOCL 2011 2012
Beginning balance $ 3,325   $ 3,161  
Reclassification of net gain on cash flow hedges to interest expense   (41 )   (41 )
Ending balance $ 3,284   $ 3,120  

 

     As of March 31, 2012, the net gain estimated to be classified to interest expense over the next twelve months from AOCL is approximately $0.2 million.

     The following table provides a summary of the effect on our consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 of derivatives accounted for under ASC 815-25, Derivatives and Hedging—Fair Value Hedges, that were designated as hedging instruments (in thousands):

                   
    Amount of Gain Recognized on
Derivative
Amount of Interest Expense
Recognized on Fixed-Rate Debt
(Related Hedged Item)
  Location of Gain
Recognized on
Derivative
Three Months Ended March 31, Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivative Instrument 2011 2012 2011 2012
Interest rate swap agreements Interest expense $ 203 $ $ 2,222 $

 

During first quarter 2012, we had open NYMEX contracts on 0.7 million barrels of crude oil that were designated as fair value hedges. Because there was no ineffectiveness recognized on these hedges, the unrealized losses of $11.6 million from the agreements as of March 31, 2012 were fully offset by an increase of $11.7 million to tank bottom inventory and a decrease of $0.1 million to other current assets; therefore, there was no net impact from these agreements on other income/expense.

     The following tables provide a summary of the effect on our consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 of the effective portion of derivatives accounted for under ASC 815-30, Derivatives and Hedging—Cash Flow Hedges, that were designated as hedging instruments (in thousands).

 

     There was no ineffectiveness recognized on the financial instruments disclosed in the above tables during the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2012.

The following table provides a summary of the effect on our consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 of derivatives accounted for under ASC 815-10-35; Derivatives and Hedging—Overall—Subsequent Measurement, that were not designated as hedging instruments (in thousands):

               
      Amount of Gain (Loss)  
      Recognized on Derivative  
      Three Months Ended  
  Location of Gain (Loss)            
Derivative Instrument Recognized on Derivative   March 31, 2011   March 31, 2012  
NYMEX commodity contracts Product sales revenues $ (38,333 ) $ (31,976 )
NYMEX commodity contracts Operating expenses   (47 )   (5,184 )
Butane swap agreements Product purchases       43  
  Total $ (38,380 ) $ (37,117 )

 

     The following tables provide a summary of the amounts included on our consolidated balance sheets of the fair value of derivatives accounted for under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, that were designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (in thousands):

             
    December 31, 2011
  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
Derivative Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
  Energy commodity derivatives     Energy commodity derivatives    
NYMEX commodity contracts contracts $ 31 contracts $
NYMEX commodity contracts Other noncurrent assets   Other noncurrent liabilities   6,457
  Total $ 31 Total $ 6,457

 

 

             
  March 31, 2012
  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
Derivative Instrument Balance Sheet Location Fair Value Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
NYMEX commodity contracts Energy commodity derivatives
contracts
$ 169 Energy commodity derivatives
contracts
$
NYMEX commodity contracts Other noncurrent assets   Other noncurrent liabilities   11,744
  Total $ 169 Total $ 11,744

 

     The following tables provide a summary of the amounts included on our consolidated balance sheets of the fair value of derivatives accounted for under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, that were not designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (in thousands):