Part I - Financial Information			Page

	Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	2

		Introductory Comments	2

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006
		and December 31, 2005	3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the
		13-weeks and 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006 and September 24, 2005	4

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
		39-weeks ended September 30, 2006 and September 24, 2005	5

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6


	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of
		Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
		Market Risk	24

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25

Part II - Other Information

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	27

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	27

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	27

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders	28

	Item 5.	Other Information	28

	Item 6.	Exhibits	28


Signature Page			29

Index to Exhibits			30

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Garmin Ltd. ("Garmin" or the "Company") included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to enable a reasonable understanding of the information presented. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005. Additionally, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with Item 2 of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in this Form 10-Q.

Garmin Ltd. And Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share information)


	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	351,723		$	334,352
Marketable securities		109,609			32,050
Accounts receivable, net		249,849			170,997
Inventories, net		333,471			199,841
Deferred income taxes		62,659			29,615
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		25,034			34,312

Total current assets		1,132,345			801,167

Property and equipment, net		209,135			179,173

Marketable securities		425,179			344,673
Restricted cash		1,461			1,356
Licensing agreements, net		3,301			6,517
Other intangible assets, net		28,116			29,349

Total assets	$	1,799,537		$	1,362,235

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	125,236		$	76,516
Salaries and benefits payable		21,233			13,005
Accrued warranty costs		28,973			18,817
Other accrued expenses		75,314			23,993
Income taxes payable		86,020			63,154
Dividend payable		108,389			-

Total current liabilities		445,165			195,485

Deferred income taxes		13,000			9,486

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.005 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized: Issued and outstanding shares - 214,977,772 as of September 30, 2006 and 216,134,000 as of December 31, 2005		1,080			1,081
Additional paid-in capital		71,666			96,242
Retained earnings		1,297,843			1,072,454
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(29,217	)		(12,513	)

Total stockholders' equity		1,341,372			1,157,264
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,799,537		$	1,362,235

See accompanying notes.


	13-Weeks Ended						39-Weeks Ended
	September 30,			September 24,			September 30,			September 24,
	2006			2005			2006			2005

Net sales	$	407,997		$	251,329		$	1,162,776		$	708,477

Cost of goods sold		209,137			121,877			584,843			335,846

Gross profit		198,860			129,452			577,933			372,631

Selling, general and administrative expenses		47,489			24,180			140,167			77,790
Research and development expense		30,399			20,116			82,105			54,862
		77,888			44,296			222,272			132,652

Operating income		120,972			85,156			355,661			239,979

Other income (expense):
Interest income		9,622			4,726			25,464			13,115
Interest expense		(2	)		(3	)		(14	)		(46	)
Foreign currency		14,874			36,388			10,386			23,784
Other		70			(140	)		3,507			158
		24,564			40,971			39,343			37,011

Income before income taxes		145,536			126,127			395,004			276,990

Income tax provision		22,558			23,637			61,226			52,905

Net income	$	122,978		$	102,490		$	333,778		$	224,085

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.57		$	0.48		$	1.54		$	1.04
Diluted	$	0.56		$	0.47		$	1.52		$	1.03

Weighted average common
shares outstanding:
Basic		216,317			215,690			216,502			216,428
Diluted		218,866			217,860			218,878			218,318

	39-Weeks Ended
	September 30,			September 24,
	2006			2005
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	333,778		$	224,085
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		15,447			13,703
Amortization		19,844			20,435
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment		(8	)		8
Provision for doubtful accounts		796			18
Deferred income taxes		(29,867	)		(372	)
Foreign currency transaction gains/losses		(19,724	)		(13,503	)
Provision for obsolete and slow moving inventories		15,260			10,830
Stock compensation expense		8,378			363
Realized gains on marketable securities		(3,852	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(79,648	)		(42,015	)
Inventories		(148,891	)		(30,818	)
Other current assets		(1,192	)		473
Accounts payable		48,720			(2,173	)
Other current liabilities		69,704			2,683
Income taxes		22,866			(4,581	)
Purchase of licenses		(2,486	)		(3,794	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		249,125			175,342

Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(45,476	)		(20,510	)
Purchase of intangible assets		(1,513	)		(404	)
Purchase of marketable securities		(348,621	)		(270,580	)
Redemption of marketable securities		197,008			220,494
Change in restricted cash		(104	)		42
Proceeds from asset sale		75			-
Net cash used in investing activities		(198,631	)		(70,958	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		10,042			4,238
Stock repurchase		(50,451	)		(26,654	)
Tax benefit related to stock option exercise		7,453			-
Net cash used in financing activities		(32,956	)		(22,416	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(167	)		(633	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		17,371			81,336
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		334,352			249,909
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	351,723		$	331,245

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 30, 2006.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Company’s fiscal year is based on a 52-53 week period ending on the last Saturday of the calendar year. Therefore the financial results of certain fiscal years, and the associated 14-week quarters, will not be exactly comparable to the prior and subsequent 52-week fiscal years and the associated quarters having only 13-weeks. The quarters ended September 30, 2006 and September 24, 2005 both contain operating results for 13-weeks, and 39-weeks for both year-to-date periods.

	13-Weeks Ended
	September 30,		September 24,
	2006		2005
Numerator:
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
per share - net income	$	122,978	$	102,490

Denominator:
Denominator for basic net income per share -
weighted-average common shares		216,317		215,690

Effect of dilutive securities -
employee stock options		2,549		2,170

Denominator for diluted net income per share -
adjusted weighted-average common shares		218,866		217,860

Basic net income per share	$	0.57	$	0.48

Diluted net income per share	$	0.56	$	0.47


	39-Weeks Ended
		September 30,		September 24,
		2006		2005
Numerator:
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
per share - net income	$	333,778	$	224,085

Denominator:
Denominator for basic net income per share -
weighted-average common shares		216,502		216,428

Effect of dilutive securities -
employee stock options		2,376		1,890

Denominator for diluted net income per share -
adjusted weighted-average common shares		218,878		218,318

Basic net income per share	$	1.54	$	1.04

Diluted net income per share	$	1.52	$	1.03

	13-Weeks Ended
	September 30,			September 24,
	2006			2005
Net income	$	122,978		$	102,490
Translation adjustment		(17,438	)		(37,772	)
Change in fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities, net of deferred taxes		4,770			(738	)
Comprehensive income	$	110,310		$	63,980


	39-Weeks Ended
		September 30,			September 24,
		2006			2005
Net income	$	333,778		$	224,085
Translation adjustment		(15,870	)		(15,528	)
Change in fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities, net of deferred taxes		(834	)		(1,976	)
Comprehensive income	$	317,074		$	206,581

	Reporting Segments
	Outdoor/				Auto/
	Fitness		Marine		Mobile		Aviation		Total
13-Weeks Ended September 30, 2006

Net sales	$	70,651	$	40,588	$	237,981	$	58,777	$	407,997
Gross profit	$	39,803	$	21,645	$	99,708	$	37,704	$	198,860
Operating income	$	28,817	$	13,659	$	59,517	$	18,979	$	120,972

13-Weeks Ended September 24, 2005

Net sales	$	58,014	$	36,389	$	96,289	$	60,637	$	251,329
Gross profit	$	31,633	$	18,927	$	38,548	$	40,344	$	129,452
Operating income	$	22,458	$	13,023	$	23,496	$	26,179	$	85,156


39-Weeks Ended September 30, 2006

Net sales	$	205,412	$	141,406	$	644,097	$	171,861	$	1,162,776
Gross profit	$	118,615	$	79,484	$	269,855	$	109,979	$	577,933
Operating income	$	85,116	$	53,718	$	155,782	$	61,045	$	355,661

39-Weeks Ended September 24, 2005

Net sales	$	168,051	$	130,276	$	240,106	$	170,044	$	708,477
Gross profit	$	89,355	$	66,174	$	103,657	$	113,445	$	372,631
Operating income	$	62,603	$	43,957	$	61,746	$	71,673	$	239,979

The Company currently sponsors three stock based employee compensation plans. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expenses for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and restricted stock based on estimated fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for periods beginning in fiscal 2006.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation costs are recognized beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 30, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as stock-based compensation expenses over the requisite service period in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123. Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expenses have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for stock options because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.

As stock-based compensation expenses recognized in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of income for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 30, 2006 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience and management’s estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS No. 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for stock option forfeitures as they occurred. The cumulative adjustment to reduce costs that were actually recognized to reflect estimated forfeitures is not material.

Adopters of SFAS No. 123(R) are required to calculate their historical additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC Pool”) for the period of 1995 to 2005 at such time that excess tax deficiencies arise in connection with stock-based compensation. Under SFAS No. 123(R), a company may use one of two methods to calculate its historical APIC Pool. A company may elect to calculate its initial pool of excess tax benefits pursuant to the method described in paragraph 81 of SFAS No. 123(R) or pursuant to the method described in FSP No. SFAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. Generally, the pool of excess tax benefits that is available to offset future excess tax deficiencies is based on the amounts that would have been recognized under SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123(R) as if the company had always applied those standards for recognition purposes.

The Company has not yet elected which method it will choose to calculate its historical APIC Pool balance. The Company will elect a method in accordance with the prescribed time limitation for doing so and understands that the election will dictate the treatment of awards vested as of the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) for purposes of updating its APIC Pool post-adoption. During the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006, excess tax benefits of $465 thousand were recognized as an increase to the APIC Pool balance and represent qualifying excess tax benefits that increased the APIC Pool eligible to absorb future write-offs of unrealized deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the $465 thousand is included in the $7.5 million year-to-date reported as a financing cash flow in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of cash flows.

Stock-based compensation expenses recognized in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of income for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 30, 2006, was $3.4 million and $8.4 million. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s income before income taxes and net income for the 13-week period ended September 30, 2006 are $3.7 million and $3.1 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) decreased the Company’s calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Had the Company determined compensation costs based on the estimated fair value at the grant dates for its stock options granted prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s pro forma net income and earnings per common share for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 24, 2005 would have been as follows:

	13-Weeks Ended
	September 24, 2005

Net income as reported	$	102,490
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair-value based method for all awards,
net of tax effects		(1,815	)
Pro forma net income	$	100,675

Net income per share as reported:
Basic	$	0.48
Diluted	$	0.47

Pro forma net income per share:
Basic	$	0.47
Diluted	$	0.46


		39-Weeks Ended
		September 24, 2005

Net income as reported	$	224,085
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair-value based method for all awards,
net of tax effects		(5,028	)
Pro forma net income	$	219,057

Net income per share as reported:
Basic	$	1.04
Diluted	$	1.03

Pro forma net income per share:
Basic	$	1.01
Diluted	$	1.01

The Company will continue to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model for purposes of valuation for share-based awards. The Company’s determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expected price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

In October 2000, the stockholders adopted a stock option plan for non-employee directors (the Directors Plan) providing for grants of options for up to 100,000 common shares of the Company’s stock. The term of each award is ten years. All awards vest evenly over a three-year period. During 2005, 2004, and 2003, options to purchase 11,000, 13,242, and 7,296 shares, respectively, were granted under this plan. During the 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006, there were 7,630 options granted under this plan.

Also in October 2000, the stockholders adopted an equity incentive plan (the Plan) providing for grants of incentive and nonqualified stock options and “other” stock compensation awards to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, pursuant to which up to 7,000,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance. The stock options generally vest over a period of five years or as otherwise determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and generally expire ten years from the date of grant, if not exercised. Option activity under the Plan during the 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006, and full year 2005 is summarized below. There have been no “other” stock compensation awards granted under the Plan.

In June 2005, the stockholders adopted an equity incentive plan (the 2005 Plan) providing for grants of incentive and nonqualified stock options and “other” stock compensation awards to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, pursuant to which up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance. The stock options generally vest over a period of five years or as otherwise determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and generally expire ten years from the date of grant, if not exercised. Award activity under the 2005 Plan during the 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006 is summarized below.

	Weighted-Average
	Exercise Price		Number of Shares
			(In Thousands)
Outstanding at December 25, 2004	$	16.06		5,450
Granted		26.51		1,672
Exercised		10.68		(644	)
Canceled		18.51		(124	)
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		19.29		6,354
Granted		33.01		22
Exercised		12.10		(552	)
Canceled		25.38		(26	)
Outstanding at April 1, 2006		20.01		5,798
Granted		46.14		1,146
Exercised		12.52		(226	)
Canceled		39.63		(10	)
Outstanding at July 1, 2006		24.69		6,708
Granted		47.30		19
Exercised		13.77		(41	)
Canceled		25.27		(8	)
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		24.82		6,678

There were 19,000 awards granted during the 13-week period ended September 30, 2006 and there were 10,000 options granted during the 13-week period ended September 24, 2005. The fair value of these awards ($18.21) was estimated with the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate 4.65%, dividend yield 1.1%, expected volatility 35%, and expected life 6.32 years. The total grants awarded in the 39-week periods ending September 30, 2006 and September 24, 2005 came to 1,186,250 and 772,450, respectively.

	13-Weeks Ended
	September 30,			September 24,
	2006			2005

Balance - beginning of the period	$	24,906		$	16,218
Accrual for products sold
during the period		15,135			3,250
Expenditures		(11,068	)		(2,700	)
Balance - end of the period	$	28,973		$	16,768


	39-Weeks Ended
		September 30,			September 24,
		2006			2005

Balance - beginning of the period	$	18,817		$	15,518
Accrual for products sold
during the period		32,731			13,879
Expenditures		(22,575	)		(12,629	)
Balance - end of the period	$	28,973		$	16,768

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN No. 48) which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, FIN No. 48 provides guidance on the derecognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is in the process of determining the effect, if any, the adoption of FIN No. 48 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The discussion set forth below, as well as other portions of this Quarterly Report, contains statements concerning potential future events. Such forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions by our management, as of the date of this Quarterly Report, including assumptions about risks and uncertainties faced by the Company. Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by their use of such verbs as expects, anticipates, believes or similar verbs or conjugations of such verbs. If any of our assumptions prove incorrect or should unanticipated circumstances arise, our actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. The differences could be caused by a number of factors or combination of factors including, but not limited to, those factors identified in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. This report has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" or the "Commission") in Washington, D.C. and can be obtained by contacting the SEC's public reference operations or obtaining it through the SEC's web site on the World Wide Web at http://www.sec.gov. Readers are strongly encouraged to consider those factors when evaluating any forward-looking statement concerning the Company. The Company will not update any forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report to reflect future events or developments.

The Company is a leading worldwide provider of navigation, communications and information devices, most of which are enabled by Global Positioning System, or GPS, technology. We operate in four business segments, the outdoor/fitness, marine, automotive/mobile and aviation markets. Our segments offer products through our network of independent dealers and distributors. However, the nature of products and types of customers for the four segments may vary significantly. As such, the segments are managed separately.

	13-Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			September 24, 2005

Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of goods sold		51.3	%		48.5	%
Gross profit		48.7	%		51.5	%
Research and development		7.5	%		8.0	%
Selling, general and administrative		11.6	%		9.6	%
Total operating expenses		19.1	%		17.6	%
Operating income		29.6	%		33.9	%
Other income (expense), net		6.0	%		16.3	%
Income before income taxes		35.6	%		50.2	%
Provision for income taxes		5.5	%		9.4	%
Net income		30.1	%		40.8	%


		39-Weeks Ended
		September 30, 2006			September 24, 2005

Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of goods sold		50.3	%		47.4	%
Gross profit		49.7	%		52.6	%
Research and development		7.1	%		7.7	%
Selling, general and administrative		12.0	%		11.0	%
Total operating expenses		19.1	%		18.7	%
Operating income		30.6	%		33.9	%
Other income (expense), net		3.4	%		5.2	%
Income before income taxes		34.0	%		39.1	%
Provision for income taxes		5.3	%		7.5	%
Net income		28.7	%		31.6	%

The company manages its operations in four segments: outdoor/fitness, marine, automotive/mobile, and aviation, and each of its segments employs the same accounting policies. Allocation of certain research and development expenses, and selling, general, and administrative expenses are made to each segment on a percent of revenue basis. The following table sets forth our results of operations (in thousands) including revenue, gross profit, and operating profit for each of our four segments during the periods shown. For each line item in the table, the total of the outdoor/fitness, marine, automotive/mobile, and aviation segments' amounts equals the amount in the condensed consolidated statements of income included in Item 1.

	Outdoor/				Auto/
	Fitness		Marine		Mobile		Aviation		Total
13-Weeks Ended September 30, 2006

Net sales	$	70,651	$	40,588	$	237,981	$	58,777	$	407,997
Gross profit	$	39,803	$	21,645	$	99,708	$	37,704	$	198,860
Operating income	$	28,817	$	13,659	$	59,517	$	18,979	$	120,972

13-Weeks Ended September 24, 2005

Net sales	$	58,014	$	36,389	$	96,289	$	60,637	$	251,329
Gross profit	$	31,633	$	18,927	$	38,548	$	40,344	$	129,452
Operating income	$	22,458	$	13,023	$	23,496	$	26,179	$	85,156


39-Weeks Ended September 30, 2006

Net sales	$	205,412	$	141,406	$	644,097	$	171,861	$	1,162,776
Gross profit	$	118,615	$	79,484	$	269,855	$	109,979	$	577,933
Operating income	$	85,116	$	53,718	$	155,782	$	61,045	$	355,661

39-Weeks Ended September 24, 2005

Net sales	$	168,051	$	130,276	$	240,106	$	170,044	$	708,477
Gross profit	$	89,355	$	66,174	$	103,657	$	113,445	$	372,631
Operating income	$	62,603	$	43,957	$	61,746	$	71,673	$	239,979

	13-weeks ended September 30, 2006					13-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Net Sales		% of Revenues			Net Sales		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	70,651		17.3	%	$	58,014		23.1	%	$	12,637			21.8	%
Marine		40,588		9.9	%		36,389		14.5	%		4,199			11.5	%
Automotive/Mobile		237,981		58.4	%		96,289		38.3	%		141,692			147.2	%
Aviation		58,777		14.4	%		60,637		24.1	%		(1,860	)		-3.1	%
Total	$	407,997		100.0	%	$	251,329		100.0	%	$	156,668			62.3	%

Increases in sales of 62% for the 13-week period ended September 30, 2006 were primarily due to a strong response to new automotive product offerings, continued strong demand for outdoor and fitness products, and a positive response to our new marine product offerings in the off-season. Approximately 61% of sales in the third quarter of 2006 were generated from products introduced in the last twelve months. Automotive/mobile became a significantly larger portion of our product mix, rising from 38% in the year ago quarter to 58% in the third quarter of 2006.

Automotive/mobile revenue grew the fastest, nearly 1.5 times the year-ago quarter, on the strength of nüvi, c-series, and other personal navigation devices (PNDs). Edge, Forerunner and eTrex “x-series” products released in the first half of 2006 continued to generate outdoor/fitness segment revenue growth that was stronger than expected. Response to new products introduced in the marine markets continued positive, with solid revenue growth relative to the year-ago quarter. Delay of certain OEM programs, WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) introduction, and certain other products resulted in lower revenues in the aviation segment in the 13-week period ended September 30, 2006 when compared with the same period in 2005.

	13-weeks ended September 30, 2006					13-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Gross Profit		% of Revenues			Gross Profit		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	39,803		56.3	%	$	31,633		54.5	%	$	8,170			25.8	%
Marine		21,645		53.3	%		18,927		52.0	%		2,718			14.4	%
Automotive/Mobile		99,708		41.9	%		38,548		40.0	%		61,160			158.7	%
Aviation		37,704		64.1	%		40,344		66.5	%		(2,640	)		-6.5	%
Total	$	198,860		48.7	%	$	129,452		51.5	%	$	69,408			53.6	%

Gross profit dollars in the third quarter of 2006 grew 54% and gross profit margin percentage declined 280 basis points over the same quarter of the previous year. Third quarter gross profit margins increased to 56%, 53%, and 42% in the outdoor/fitness, marine, and auto/mobile segments respectively, when compared to the same quarter in 2005. Third quarter 2006 gross profit margins decreased to 64% within the aviation segment when compared with the third quarter of 2005.

Gross profit margin percentage primarily decreased as a result of automotive/mobile segment revenues becoming a larger percentage of the Company’s revenue mix, although improved product costs and gross margin improvement in the outdoor/fitness and marine segments provided support, bringing gross margin for the quarter in at 49% overall. Lower than anticipated sales in aviation coupled with a less favorable product mix in this segment kept this typically solid segment from lending support to overall gross margins during the quarter.

	13-weeks ended September 30, 2006					13-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Selling, General &					Selling, General &
	Admin. Expenses		% of Revenues			Admin. Expenses		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	6,816		9.6	%	$	5,197		9.0	%	$	1,619			31.2	%
Marine		4,295		10.6	%		3,969		10.9	%		326			8.2	%
Automotive/Mobile		31,326		13.2	%		9,778		10.2	%		21,548			220.4	%
Aviation		5,052		8.6	%		5,236		8.6	%		(184	)		-3.5	%
Total	$	47,489		11.6	%	$	24,180		9.6	%	$	23,309			96.4	%

The increase in expense was driven primarily by increased advertising spending and increased staffing to support our growth. Advertising spending, which included increases in both cooperative advertising costs and television and print advertising placements, increased 115% or $12.4 million when compared to the third quarter of 2005. As a percent of sales, advertising increased from 4% of sales in third quarter of 2005 to 6% of sales in third quarter of 2006. Other selling, general and administrative expenses increased as a percent of sales from 5% of sales in the third quarter of 2005 to 6% of sales in the third quarter of 2006. In absolute dollars, other expenses increased $10.9 million when compared to the previous year quarter, with increases distributed across call center, operations, finance, administration, and marketing administration areas to support the growth of our businesses.

	13-weeks ended September 30, 2006					13-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Research &		% of			Research &		% of
	Development		Revenues			Development		Revenues			$ Change		% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	4,170		5.9	%	$	3,978		6.9	%	$	192		4.8	%
Marine		3,691		9.1	%		1,935		5.3	%		1,756		90.7	%
Automotive/Mobile		8,865		3.7	%		5,274		5.5	%		3,591		68.1	%
Aviation		13,673		23.3	%		8,929		14.7	%		4,744		53.1	%
Total	$	30,399		7.5	%	$	20,116		8.0	%	$	10,283		51.1	%

The 51% increase in research and development expense dollars was due to ongoing development activities for new products, the addition of 29 new engineering personnel to our staff during the quarter and an increase in engineering program costs during the third quarter of 2006 as a result of our continued emphasis on product innovation. Research and development costs increased $10.3 million when compared with the year-ago quarter, but declined 50 basis points as a percent of revenue primarily due to the fact that the growth rate of research and development expenditures for the period (51%) was slower than the growth rate of revenues (62%).

	13-weeks ended September 30, 2006					13-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Operating Income		% of Revenues			Operating Income		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	28,817		40.8	%	$	22,458		38.7	%	$	6,359			28.3	%
Marine		13,659		33.7	%		13,023		35.8	%		636			4.9	%
Automotive/Mobile		59,517		25.0	%		23,496		24.4	%		36,021			153.3	%
Aviation		18,979		32.3	%		26,179		43.2	%		(7,200	)		-27.5	%
Total	$	120,972		29.7	%	$	85,156		33.9	%	$	35,816			42.1	%

Operating income was down 420 basis points as a percent of revenue when compared to the year-ago quarter due to the decline in gross margins, increased advertising and marketing activities, additions to finance, technology, and administrative expenditures, and personnel additions in the call center to support the growth of our businesses. Operating margins increased to 41% and 25% within our outdoor/fitness and automotive/mobile segments, respectively, while operating margins decreased to 34% and 32% within our marine and aviation segments, respectively. Our operating margin percentage decreased in part as a function of the gross profit margin percentage decrease, which resulted from the automotive/mobile segment revenues becoming a significantly larger percentage of the Company’s revenue mix, and the fact that aviation revenues declined slightly while R&D costs for our aviation segment continued to grow.

The $14.9 million currency gain was due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Taiwan Dollar during the third quarter of fiscal 2006, when the exchange rate increased to 33.10 TD/USD at September 30, 2006 from 32.37 TD/USD at July 1, 2006. The $36.4 million currency gain in the same quarter of 2005 was due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Taiwan Dollar during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, when the exchange rate increased to 33.19 TD/USD at September 24, 2005 from 31.36 TD/USD at June 25, 2005.

While our earnings before taxes increased 15% when compared to the same quarter in 2005, our income tax expense decreased by $1.0 million, to $22.6 million, for the 13-week period ended September 30, 2006, from $23.6 million for the 13-week period ended September 24, 2005, due to our lower tax rate. The effective tax rate was 15.5% in the third quarter of 2006 and 18.7% in the third quarter of 2005. The lower tax rate in the third quarter of 2006 when compared to the same quarter in 2005 was related to tax holidays/credits and the favorable mix of taxable income among Company entities.

	39-weeks ended September 30, 2006					39-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Net Sales		% of Revenues			Net Sales		% of Revenues			$ Change		% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	205,412		17.7	%	$	168,051		23.7	%	$	37,361		22.2	%
Marine		141,406		12.2	%		130,276		18.4	%		11,130		8.5	%
Automotive/Mobile		644,097		55.3	%		240,106		33.9	%		403,991		168.3	%
Aviation		171,861		14.8	%		170,044		24.0	%		1,817		1.1	%
Total	$	1,162,776		100.0	%	$	708,477		100.0	%	$	454,299		64.1	%

Increases in sales of 64% for the 39-week period ended September 30, 2006 were primarily due to a continued very strong response to new automotive product offerings, continued solid demand for new outdoor and fitness products which exceeded our expectations, demand for new marine products, in line with our expectations during the off-season, and a small increase in aviation sales due to revenues from OEM, retrofit panel-mount, and portable products.

Automotive/mobile revenue grew the fastest, nearly 1.7 times the same period in 2005, on the strength of nüvi, c-series, and other personal navigation devices (PNDs), resulting in the automotive/mobile segment becoming a significantly larger part of our product mix. Response to new fitness products like the Edge and Forerunner, along with the new eTrex “x-series” outdoor recreational products with expandable memory, created solid growth in this segment as well. Continued positive response to our new marine products generated solid off-season revenue growth in this segment. While we remain optimistic about the aviation segment, WAAS, product and OEM program delays negatively impacted aviation revenues in the 39-weeks ending September 30, 2006, slowing the expected growth rate of this segment for 2006.

	39-weeks ended September 30, 2006					39-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Gross Profit		% of Revenues			Gross Profit		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	118,615		57.7	%	$	89,355		53.2	%	$	29,260			32.7	%
Marine		79,484		56.2	%		66,174		50.8	%		13,310			20.1	%
Automotive/Mobile		269,855		41.9	%		103,657		43.2	%		166,198			160.3	%
Aviation		109,979		64.0	%		113,445		66.7	%		(3,466	)		-3.1	%
Total	$	577,933		49.7	%	$	372,631		52.6	%	$	205,302			55.1	%

Gross profit dollars in the 39-weeks ending September 30, 2006 grew 55% and gross profit margin percentage declined 290 basis points over the same period of the previous year, which was in line with our expectations. The 39-week period’s gross profit margins increased to 58% and 56% within the outdoor/fitness and marine segments, respectively, when compared to the same period in 2005. The period’s gross profit margins decreased to 42% and 64% within the automotive/mobile and aviation segments, respectively, when compared with the same period in 2005.

Gross profit margin percentage decreased as a result of the rapidly growing automotive/mobile segment revenues becoming a larger percentage of the Company’s revenue mix, which was somewhat mediated by strong improvement in the outdoor/fitness and marine segment gross margins resulting from well-received new product introductions in those segments. Component prices firmed seasonally as anticipated and automotive product pricing declines were measured, resulting in a gross margin of 50% overall.

	39-weeks ended September 30, 2006					39-weeks ended September 24, 2005
	Selling, General &					Selling, General &					Quarter over Quarter
	Admin. Expenses		% of Revenues			Admin. Expenses		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	20,660		10.1	%	$	16,295		9.7	%	$	4,365			26.8	%
Marine		15,860		11.2	%		14,939		11.5	%		921			6.2	%
Automotive/Mobile		88,873		13.8	%		30,311		12.6	%		58,562			193.2	%
Aviation		14,774		8.6	%		16,245		9.6	%		(1,471	)		-9.1	%
Total	$	140,167		12.1	%	$	77,790		11.0	%	$	62,377			80.2	%

The 80% increase in expense was driven primarily by increased advertising spending. Advertising spending, which included increased television and media ads as well as cooperative advertising, increased $42.8 million when compared to the same period in 2005. As a percent of sales, advertising increased from 5% of sales in the 39-weeks ending September 24, 2005 to 6% of sales in the same period of 2006. Other selling, general and administrative expenses declined as a percent of sales from just over 6% of sales in the 39-weeks ending September 24, 2005 to just under 6% of sales in the 39-weeks ending September 30, 2006. In absolute dollars, other expenses increased $19.6 million when compared to the same period in 2005, with increases distributed across call center, operations, finance, administration, and marketing administration areas to support the growth of our businesses.

	39-weeks ended September 30, 2006					39-weeks ended September 24, 2005
	Research &		% of			Research &		% of			Quarter over Quarter
	Development		Revenues			Development		Revenues			$ Change		% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	12,839		6.3	%	$	10,457		6.2	%	$	2,382		22.8	%
Marine		9,906		7.0	%		7,278		5.6	%		2,628		36.1	%
Automotive/Mobile		25,200		3.9	%		11,600		4.8	%		13,600		117.2	%
Aviation		34,160		19.9	%		25,527		15.0	%		8,633		33.8	%
Total	$	82,105		7.1	%	$	54,862		7.7	%	$	27,243		49.7	%

The increase in research and development expense dollars was due to ongoing development activities for new products, the addition of 187 new engineering personnel to our staff during the 39-week period ended September 30, 2006 and an increase in engineering program costs during the period as a result of our continued emphasis on product innovation. Research and development costs increased $27.2 million when compared with the year-ago period, but declined 60 basis points as a percent of revenue primarily due to the fact that the growth rate of research and development expenditures for the period (50%) was slower than the growth rate of revenues (64%).

	39-weeks ended September 30, 2006					39-weeks ended September 24, 2005					Quarter over Quarter
	Operating Income		% of Revenues			Operating Income		% of Revenues			$ Change			% Change
Outdoor/Fitness	$	85,116		41.4	%	$	62,603		37.3	%	$	22,513			36.0	%
Marine		53,718		38.0	%		43,957		33.7	%		9,761			22.2	%
Automotive/Mobile		155,782		24.2	%		61,746		25.7	%		94,036			152.3	%
Aviation		61,045		35.5	%		71,673		42.1	%		(10,628	)		-14.8	%
Total	$	355,661		30.6	%	$	239,979		33.9	%	$	115,682			48.2	%

Operating income was down 330 basis points as a percent of revenue when compared to the same period in 2005 due to the decline in gross margins, increased advertising, finance, technology, and administrative expenditures, and personnel additions in the call center to support the growth of our businesses. Operating margins increased to 41% and 38% within our outdoor/fitness and marine segments, respectively, while operating margins decreased to 24% and 36% within our automotive/mobile and aviation segments, respectively.

Our operating margin percentage decreased generally in line with the gross profit margin percentage decrease, which resulted from the lower-margin automotive/mobile segment revenues becoming a significantly larger percentage of the Company’s revenue mix, and low aviation revenue growth relative to additions to aviation R&D expenditures, counter-balanced to some extent by margin improvements in our outdoor/fitness and marine product lines as a result of a positive response to new, higher margin products offered in these segments.

The $10.4 million currency gain was due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Taiwan Dollar during the 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006, when the exchange rate increased to 33.10 TD/USD at September 30, 2006 from 32.84 TD/USD at December 31, 2005. The $23.8 million currency gain in the 39-weeks ending September 24, 2005 was due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Taiwan Dollar during the same 39-week 2005 period, when the exchange rate increased to 33.19 TD/USD at September 24, 2005 from 32.19 TD/USD at December 25, 2004.

Income tax expense increased by $8.3 million, to $61.2 million, for the 39-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $52.9 million for the 39-week period ended September 24, 2005 due to our higher income before taxes, moderated by a lower tax rate for the period. The effective tax rate was 15.5% in the 39-weeks ending September 30, 2006 and 19.1% in the 39-weeks ending September 24, 2005. The lower tax rate in the 39-weeks ending September 30, 2006 when compared to the same period in 2005 was related to tax holidays/credits and the favorable mix of taxable income among Company entities.

Net cash generated by operating activities was $249.1 million for the 39-week period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $175.3 million for the 39-week period ended September 24, 2005. We attempt to carry sufficient inventory levels of finished goods and key components so that potential supplier shortages have as minimal an impact as possible on our ability to deliver our finished products. We experienced a $133.6 million year-to-date increase in net inventories in this 39-week period of 2006, an increase required to fill strong orders for our products during the 2006 holiday season and to address overall growing demand for our products. Accounts receivable increased $78.9 million, net of bad debts, during the 2006 period due to the shipment of products into the retail channel later in the period. This resulted in the higher receivables balance at the end of the period, as initial holiday shipments began.

Cash flow used in investing activities during the 39-week period ending September 30, 2006 was a $198.6 million use of cash. Cash flow used in investing activities principally related to $45.5 million in capital expenditures primarily related to business operation and maintenance activities, the net purchase of $151.6 million of fixed income securities associated with the investment of our on-hand cash balances, and the purchase of intangible assets of $1.5 million. It is management’s goal to invest the on-hand cash consistent with the Company’s investment policy, which has been approved by the Board of Directors. The investment policy’s primary purpose is to preserve capital, maintain an acceptable degree of liquidity, and maximize yield within the constraint of maximum safety. The Company’s average taxable equivalent return on its investments during the period was approximately 3.6%.

We have market risk primarily in connection with the pricing of our products and services and the purchase of raw materials. Product pricing and raw material costs are both significantly influenced by semiconductor market conditions. Historically, during cyclical economic downturns, we have been able to offset pricing declines for our products through a combination of introducing new products with higher margins and success in obtaining price reductions in raw material costs. In recent quarters we have experienced an increase in raw materials costs and an increase in the sale of lower-margin products as a part of the product mix, resulting in reduced gross margins.

The principal currency involved is the Taiwan Dollar. Garmin Corporation, located in Shijr, Taiwan, uses the local currency as its functional currency. The Company translates all assets and liabilities at year-end exchange rates and income and expense accounts at average rates during the year. In order to minimize the effect of the currency exchange fluctuations on our operations, we have elected to retain most of our cash at our Taiwan subsidiary in U.S. dollars. As discussed above, the exchange rate increased 0.8% during the 39-weeks ended September 30, 2006 and resulted in a foreign currency gain of $10.4 million. If the exchange rate decreased by a similar percentage, a comparable foreign currency loss would be recognized.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be timely disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely fashion. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. As of September 30, 2006, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of September 30, 2006 that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to the Company, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc., Alpine Electronics, Inc., Denso Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., American Honda Motor Co., Inc., and Garmin International, Inc. On May 16, 2005, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (“Encyclopaedia Britannica”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, against the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Garmin International, Inc. (“Garmin International”) and five other unrelated companies, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,241,671 (“the ‘671 patent”). Garmin International believes that it should not be found liable for infringement of the ‘671 patent and additionally that the ‘671 patent is invalid. On December 30, 2005, Garmin International filed a Motion for Summary Judgment for Claim Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness. On March 1, 2006 the court held a hearing on construction of the claims of the ‘671 patent. The parties await the court’s ruling on Garmin’s summary judgment motion and the court’s claim construction order. On May 23, 2006, Encyclopaedia Britannica filed an amended complaint alleging that Garmin International and the other defendants also infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,051,018 (“the ‘018 patent”), a continuation patent of the ‘671 patent, which issued on May 23, 2006. Garmin International believes that it should not be found liable for infringement of the ‘018 patent and additionally that the ‘018 patent is invalid. On July 25, 2006, Encyclopaedia Britannica filed a new complaint alleging that Garmin International and the other defendants also infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,082,437 (“the ‘437 patent”), a continuation patent of the ‘671 patent, which issued on July 25, 2006. Garmin International believes that it should not be found liable for infringement of the ‘437 patent and additionally that the ‘437 patent is invalid. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of this litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe that the claims are without merit and we will vigorously defend these actions.

Garmin Ltd. v. TomTom, Inc.; Garmin Corporation v. TomTom, Inc. These lawsuits were filed by Garmin Ltd. and Garmin Corporation against TomTom, Inc. (“TomTom”) on January 31, 2006 and February 1, 2006, respectively, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. The lawsuits have been consolidated. Garmin Ltd. and Garmin Corporation filed an amended complaint on May 5, 2006. The amended complaint alleges that TomTom is infringing U.S. Patents Nos. 6,188,956 and 6,222,485 owned by Garmin Corporation and U.S. Patents Nos. 6,901,330; 6,687,615 and 6,999,873 owned by Garmin Ltd. On April 27, 2006, TomTom served amended answers and counterclaims on Garmin Ltd. and Garmin Corporation which allege that these companies are infringing three U.S. patents that were purchased by an affiliate of TomTom International, B.V. from Horizon Navigation, Inc. on April 21, 2006. The three patents are U.S. Patents 5,291,412, 5,550,538 and 5,922,042. The amended answers and counterclaims also add Garmin International, Inc. as a counterclaim defendant. The court issued a claim construction order on August 25, 2006. The parties have filed summary judgment motions that are currently pending. The trial is scheduled to commence on February 12, 2007. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of this litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe that the counterclaims are without merit and we will vigorously defend them.

Garmin (Europe) Ltd., Garmin International, Inc, Garmin Corporation and Garmin Ltd. v. TomTom International B.V. The Company and the above-named subsidiaries of the Company filed a lawsuit against TomTom International B.V. in the District Court in the Hague, the Netherlands, on June 28, 2006. The lawsuit seeks a declaration of non-infringement of TomTom’s European Community Registered Design No. 000267968-001 (the “Registered Design”)..TomTom responded on July 15, 2006 by filing an action for preliminary relief in the District Court in the Hague, the Netherlands, claiming that certain models of Garmin’s StreetPilot products infringe the Registered Design. On November 2, 2006, the court issued a judgment in the preliminary relief proceedings finding that Garmin’s products do not infringe the Registered Design and denying TomTom’s claim for preliminary relief. The court also awarded Garmin approximately 37,000 euros for attorneys’ fees and costs. Garmin believes that none of its products infringe the Registered Design and Garmin is prosecuting vigorously its action for a declaration of non-infringement.

Garmin (Europe) Ltd. v. TomTom International B.V. On July 17, 2006, Garmin (Europe) Ltd. filed a lawsuit against TomTom International B.V. in the High Court of Justice in London, England. The lawsuit seeks a declaration that United Kingdom Patent No. GB 2400293 B (the “’293 Patent”) issued in the name of TomTom B.V., is invalid and an order that the ‘293 patent be revoked. On July 31, 2006, TomTom B.V. filed a defense indicating that it intended to defend this lawsuit and also filed a counterclaim alleging that certain models of Garmin’s StreetPilot products and Garmin’s nüvi products infringe the ‘293 patent.. Garmin (Europe) Ltd. believes that none of its products infringe the ‘293 patent and that the ‘293 patent is invalid. Garmin (Europe) Ltd. intends to prosecute vigorously its action seeking a declaration of invalidity and revocation of the ‘293 patent and to defend vigorously TomTom’s allegation of infringement of the ‘293 patent. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of this litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe that TomTom’s counterclaim is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend it

There are many risks and uncertainties that can affect our future business, financial performance or share price. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. There have been no material changes during the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 30, 2006 in the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks, however, are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No.	Description

Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cayman Islands (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	98-0229227 (I.R.S. Employer identification no.)
5^th Floor, Harbour Place, P.O. Box 30464 SMB, 103 South Church Street George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (Address of principal executive offices)	N/A (Zip Code)

	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005

Raw materials	$	124,958		$	65,348
Work-in-process		46,069			27,845
Finished goods		176,367			121,404
Inventory reserves		(13,923	)		(14,756	)

Inventory, net of reserves	$	333,471		$	199,841

	North
	America		Asia		Europe		Total
September 30, 2006
Sales to external customers	$	699,987	$	63,170	$	399,619	$	1,162,776
Long-lived assets	$	142,791	$	64,152	$	2,192	$	209,135

September 24, 2005
Sales to external customers	$	449,715	$	35,451	$	223,311	$	708,477
Long-lived assets	$	134,681	$	41,841	$	542	$	177,064

Period	Total # of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

13-weeks ended September 30, 2006	1,155,300	$43.50	1,155,300	1,844,700


Total	1,155,300	$43.50	1,155,300	1,844,700

For	Against	Abstain

98,139,968	51,675	18,998

Garmin Ltd. And Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In thousands)

	13-weeks ended			13-weeks ended
	September 30, 2006			September 24, 2005
Interest Income	$	9,622		$	4,726
Interest Expense		(2	)		(3	)
Foreign Currency Exchange		14,874			36,388
Other		70			(140	)
Total	$	24,564		$	40,971

	39-weeks ended			39-weeks ended
	September 30, 2006			September 24, 2005
Interest Income	$	25,464		$	13,115
Interest Expense		(14	)		(46	)
Foreign Currency Exchange		10,386			23,784
Other		3,507			158
Total	$	39,343		$	37,011


	GARMIN LTD.

	By	/s/ Kevin Rauckman
		Kevin Rauckman Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)