10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                

Commission file number 001-33133

METABOLIX, INC.

Delaware	04-3158289
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
21 Erie Street Cambridge, MA	02139
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(617) 583-1700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of July 29, 2013 was 34,516,762.

Metabolix, Inc.

Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I. Financial Information		3
Item
1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	6
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	7
2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
4.	Controls and Procedures	24
Part II. Other Information		24
Item
1.	Legal Proceedings	24
1A.	Risk Factors	25
2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	25
5.	Other Information	25
6.	Exhibits	25
SIGNATURES		27

2

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

METABOLIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

UNAUDITED

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,908		$	14,572
Short-term investments	19,770			29,201
Accounts receivable	336			839
Due from related parties	—			75
Unbilled receivables	819			372
Inventory	3,196			3,204
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	884			692
Total current assets	36,913			48,955
Restricted cash	619			594
Property and equipment, net	1,087			1,358
Long-term investments	—			2,508
Other assets	95			95
Total assets	$	38,714		$	53,510
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	102		$	1,233
Accrued expenses	3,211			3,519
Current portion of deferred rent	138			165
Short-term deferred revenue	529			1,067
Total current liabilities	3,980			5,984
Deferred rent, net of current portion	—			55
Other long-term liabilities	137			131
Total liabilities	4,117			6,170
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value per share); 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value per share); 100,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 34,451,328 and 34,306,570 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	345			343
Additional paid-in capital	290,971			289,050
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(59		)	(21		)
Accumulated deficit	(256,660		)	(242,032		)
Total stockholders’ equity	34,597			47,340
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	38,714		$	53,510

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

3

METABOLIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

UNAUDITED

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue:
Revenue from termination of ADM collaboration	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	38,885
Grant revenue	584			461			1,308			839
Product revenue	822			373			1,611			387
Research and development revenue	238			—			618			—
License fee and royalty revenue	62			89			111			134
Total revenue	1,706			923			3,648			40,245
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product revenue	1,196			437			1,753			492
Research and development	4,945			5,006			9,802			11,051
Selling, general, and administrative	3,422			3,437			6,734			7,836
Total costs and expenses	9,563			8,880			18,289			19,379
Income (loss) from operations	(7,857		)	(7,957		)	(14,641		)	20,866
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net	12			34			33			75
Other expense, net	(21		)	(25		)	(20		)	(49		)
Total other income (expense), net	(9		)	9			13			26
Net income (loss)	$	(7,866	)	$	(7,948	)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.43	)	$	0.61
Diluted	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.43	)	$	0.61
Number of shares used in per share calculations:
Basic	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,160,018
Diluted	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,264,428

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

4

METABOLIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

UNAUDITED

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income (loss):	$	(7,866	)	$	(7,948	)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Other comprehensive income
Change in unrealized gain on investments	(4		)	(5		)	(11		)	(18		)
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment	(12		)	(7		)	(27		)	(5		)
Total other comprehensive loss	(16		)	(12		)	(38		)	(23		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(7,882	)	$	(7,960	)	$	(14,666	)	$	20,869

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

5

METABOLIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

UNAUDITED

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation	531			718
Charge for 401(k) company common stock match	268			264
Stock-based compensation	1,677			2,083
Inventory impairment	271			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	503			(362		)
Due from related party	75			311
Unbilled receivables	(446		)	(217		)
Inventory	(263		)	(2,821		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(192		)	203
Accounts payable	(1,131		)	101
Accrued expenses	(345		)	(675		)
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities	(76		)	(78		)
Deferred revenue	(538		)	(38,562		)
Net cash used in operating activities	(14,294		)	(18,143		)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment	(270		)	(287		)
Change in restricted cash	(25		)	—
Purchase of investments	(10,580		)	(47,935		)
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of investments	22,509			57,207
Net cash provided by investing activities	11,634			8,985
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from options exercised	14			19
Net cash provided by financing activities	14			19
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(18		)	(6		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(2,664		)	(9,145		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,572			21,277
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	11,908		$	12,132

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

6

METABOLIX, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNAUDITED

(All dollar amounts, except share and per share amounts, are stated in thousands)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period or the entire fiscal year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013.

With the exception of 2012 when the Company recognized $38,885 of deferred revenue from the terminated Telles joint venture, it has recorded net losses since its inception, including the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company held unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments of $31,678 at June 30, 2013. The Company believes that these resources and the cash to be generated from existing grants and expected product sales will be sufficient to meet its projected operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, any significant costs incurred to establish a commercial biopolymer manufacturing facility will shorten this liquidity horizon and require that the Company seek additional funds in order to continue and advance its operations. The Company continues to face significant challenges and uncertainties and, as a result, the Company’s available capital resources may be consumed more rapidly than currently expected due to: (a) lower than expected sales of the Company’s new biopolymer products as a result of slow market adoption; (b) increases in capital costs and operating expenses related to the establishment and start-up of commercial manufacturing operations either on its own or with third parties for its biopolymer products; (c) changes the Company may make to the business that affect ongoing operating expenses; (d) changes the Company may make in its business strategy; (e) changes in the Company’s research and development spending plans; and (f) other items affecting the Company’s forecasted level of expenditures and use of cash resources. Accordingly, the Company will need to raise additional funds to support its operating and capital needs. The Company may attempt to obtain additional funding through public or private financing, collaborative arrangements with strategic partners, or through additional credit lines or other debt financing sources to increase the funds available to support operations. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the Company can successfully execute these actions, and the Company can provide no assurance that it will. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, its existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of its existing stockholders. If the Company raises additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to its potential products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to the Company. Without additional funds, the Company may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some of its sales and marketing efforts, research and development activities, or other operations and potentially delay product development in an effort to provide sufficient funds to continue its operations. If any of these events occurs, the Company’s ability to achieve its development and commercialization goals would be adversely affected.

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no material changes in accounting policies since the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including the accounts of the Company’s newly established German subsidiary, Metabolix GmbH.   All significant intercompany transactions were eliminated. Telles, LLC (“Telles”), the Company’s former joint venture with Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) that terminated in early 2012, was not consolidated by the Company.

7

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company primarily invests its excess cash and cash equivalents in money market funds, corporate debt, federal agency notes and U.S. treasury notes. Investments are acquired in accordance with the Company’s investment policy which establishes a concentration limit per issuer.

The Company provides credit to customers in the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. At June 30, 2013, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables include $724 or 63% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $315 or 27% from customer product sales. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables included $561 or 46% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $535 or 44% from customer product sales. At June 30, 2013, no customer had accounts receivable due from product sales of 10% or greater, and December 31, 2012, one customer represented 41%, of accounts receivable due from product sales.

3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued updated accounting guidance for the
presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward exists. The updated guidance requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefits against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carryforward that would apply in settlement of the uncertain tax position. In addition, unrecognized tax benefits will be netted against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carryforwards that would be utilized, rather than only against carryforwards that are created by unrecognized tax benefits. The update is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). This newly issued accounting standard requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Reclassification adjustments were insignificant for all periods presented.

4. BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock equivalents include stock options and warrants. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding is calculated by adding to the weighted shares outstanding any potential (unissued) shares of common stock from outstanding stock options and warrants based on the treasury stock method.  In periods when a net loss is reported, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect, meaning the loss per share would be reduced. Therefore, in periods when a loss is reported there is no difference in basic and diluted loss per share.

8

Shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share are as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,866	)	$	(7,948	)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,160,018
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	—			—			—			104,410
Dilutive potential common shares	—			—			—			104,410
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,264,428

The number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock related to options and warrants that were excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares since the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below:

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Options	5,643,518	4,456,627	5,535,876	4,436,627
Warrants	4,086	4,086	4,086	4,086
Total	5,647,604	4,460,713	5,539,962	4,440,713

5. INVENTORY

The components of biopolymer inventories are as follows:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Raw materials	$	674	$	640
Work-in-process	—		2
Finished goods	2,522		2,562
Total inventory	$	3,196	$	3,204

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, included within finished goods are $163 and $257, respectively, of inventory that the Company has sold and shipped to customers for which the Company has not yet recognized revenue under its product revenue recognition policy. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $271 charge to cost of product revenue for raw material and finished goods inventory that it determined was unlikely to be sold or converted to future sellable product based on customer demand and current sales forecasts.

6. INVESTMENTS

Investments consist of the following:

	Amortized		Unrealized					Market
	Cost		Gain		(Loss)			Value
June 30, 2013
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
Total	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
December 31, 2012
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	29,189	$	12	$	—		$	29,201
Long-term investments:
Government-sponsored enterprises	2,507		1		—			2,508
Total	$	31,696	$	13	$	—		$	31,709

9

Long-term investments have maturity dates of two years or less. The average maturity of the Company’s marketable securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was three and four months, respectively.

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company has certain financial assets recorded at fair value which have been classified as either Level 1 or 2 within the fair value hierarchy as described in the accounting standards for fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between independent market participants at the measurement date.  Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize observable data such as quoted prices in active markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value hierarchy level is determined by the lowest level of significant input.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not own any Level 3 financial assets.

The Company’s financial assets classified as Level 2 were initially valued at the transaction price and have been subsequently valued typically utilizing third party pricing services. Because the Company’s investment portfolio may include securities that do not always trade on a daily basis, the pricing services use many observable market inputs to determine value including reportable trades, benchmark yields and benchmarking of like securities. The Company validates the prices provided by the third party pricing services by reviewing their pricing methods and obtaining market values from other pricing sources. After completing the validation procedures, the Company did not adjust or override any fair value measurements provided by these pricing services as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The tables below present information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value.

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active
	markets for identical		Significant other		Significant
	assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		June 30, 2013
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	8,043	$	—	$	—	$	8,043
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		19,770		—		19,770
Total	$	8,043	$	19,770	$	—	$	27,813

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active				Significant
	markets for identical		Significant other		unobservable
	assets		observable inputs		inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2012
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	11,157	$	—	$	—	$	11,157
Government securities	—		2,015		—		2,015
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		29,201		—		29,201
Long-term investments:
Government securities	—		2,508		—		2,508
Total	$	11,157	$	33,724	$	—	$	44,881

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of ninety days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents, and investments purchased with an original maturity date of more than ninety days at the date of

10

purchase and a maturity date of one year or less at the balance sheet date to be short-term investments.  All other investments are classified as long-term.

8. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Employee compensation and benefits	$	1,695	$	2,379
Professional services	436		301
Intellectual property	163		105
Other	917		734
Total accrued expenses	$	3,211	$	3,519

9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards of $814 and $1,677 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards was $980 and $2,102 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. At June 30, 2013, there was approximately $4,714 of pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested awards not yet recognized, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.25 years.

A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Number of		Weighted Average
	Shares		Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2012	5,579,042		$	6.68
Granted	903,915		1.67
Exercised	(7,550	)	1.82
Forfeited	(127,693	)	3.69
Expired	(173,871	)	10.09
Outstanding at June 30, 2013	6,173,843		5.91
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013	3,458,023		$	8.28
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013			$	1.18

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company determined the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for option grants, respectively:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013	2012
Expected dividend yield	—	—
Risk-free rate	0.71% - 1.49%	0.67% - 1.15%
Expected option term (in years)	6.0	5.3 – 5.5
Volatility	84% - 85%	85% - 87%

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

On February 17, 2012, a purported shareholder class action, Hilary Coyne v. Metabolix, Inc., Richard P. Eno, and Joseph Hill, Civil Action 1:12-cv-10318 (the “Class Action”), was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, naming the Company and certain officers of the Company as defendants. The Class Action alleges that the Company made material misrepresentations and/or omissions of material fact in the Company’s disclosures during the period from March 10, 2010 through its January 12, 2012 press release announcing that ADM had given notice of termination of the Telles joint venture for PHA biopolymers, all in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. The Class Action seeks certification as a class action, compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or

11

 injunctive relief. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 15, 2012 that supersedes the initial complaint and demands identical relief based on substantially similar allegations. On December 14, 2012, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which plaintiffs opposed, and on which the court has not yet ruled.

On March 7, 2012, a purported derivative lawsuit, Childs v. Kouba et al., Civil Action 12-0892 (the “Derivative Action”), was filed in Massachusetts Superior Court for Middlesex County, on behalf of the Company against members of the Company’s Board of Directors for alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties and based on a nearly identical set of alleged facts as those asserted in the Class Action. The Derivative Action seeks compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. The parties in the Derivative Action filed and the court granted a joint motion to stay the derivative action until after resolution of the anticipated motion to dismiss in the Class Action.

The Company is currently unable to assess the probability of loss or estimate a range of potential loss, if any, associated with these matters because they are at an early stage.

From time to time, the Company may be subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently aware of any such other proceedings or claims that it believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or the results of operations.

11. GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

The accounting guidance for segment reporting establishes standards for reporting information on operating segments in annual financial statements. The Company operates in one segment, which is the business of developing and commercializing technologies for the production of polymers and chemicals in plants and in microbes. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker does not manage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance are based on the Company’s consolidated operating results.

As of June 30, 2013, less than 10% of the Company’s combined total assets were located outside of the United States and the reported net income (loss) outside of the United States for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was less than 10% of the combined net income of the consolidated Company.

The geographic distribution of the Company’s revenues and long-lived assets from continuing operations is summarized as follows:

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	1,094	$	81	$	531	$	—		$	1,706
Inter-geographic revenues	675		208		—		(883		)	—
Net revenues	$	1,769	$	289	$	531	$	(883	)	$	1,706
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	890	$	33	$	—	$	—		$	923
Inter-geographic revenues	—		147		—		(147		)	—
Net revenues	$	890	$	180	$	—	$	(147	)	$	923
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	2,940	$	177	$	531	$	—		$	3,648
Inter-geographic revenues	675		411		—		(1,086		)	—
Net revenues	$	3,615	$	588	$	531	$	(1,086	)	$	3,648
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	40,150	$	95	$	—	$	—		$	40,245
Inter-geographic revenues	—		328		—		(328		)	—
Net revenues	$	40,150	$	423	$	—	$	(328	)	$	40,245

Foreign revenue is based on the country in which the Company’s subsidiary that earned the revenue is domiciled. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, $337 and $712, respectively, in product was shipped to customers by Metabolix GmbH, the Company’s newly established wholly-owned subsidiary located in Cologne, Germany.

12

The geographic distribution of the Company’s long-lived assets is summarized as follows:

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations		Total
June 30, 2013	$	1,020	$	67	$	—	$	—	$	1,087
December 31, 2012	$	1,309	$	49	$	—	$	—	$	1,358

12. INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using future enacted tax rates.  A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not recognize any tax expense or benefit due to its continued net operating loss position.  Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of favorable tax attributes in future tax returns, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its otherwise recognizable net deferred tax assets.

The Company follows the accounting guidance related to income taxes including guidance which addresses accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance prescribes a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transitions. The Company had no amounts recorded for any unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The tax years 2009 through 2012 remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject, which are primarily in the U.S. Additionally, the Company can be audited for any loss year up to three years after the year in which the loss is utilized to offset taxable income.  This would include loss years prior to 2009.

The Company’s policy is to record estimated interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties recorded related to uncertain tax positions.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of $211,016 and $148,611, respectively. Included in the federal and state NOL carryforwards are approximately $19,213 of deductions related to the exercise of stock options subsequent to the adoption of amended accounting guidance related to stock based compensation. This amount represents an excess tax benefit as defined under the amended accounting guidance related to stock based compensation and has not been recorded as a deferred tax asset. The Company’s existing federal and state NOL carryforwards begin to expire in 2013. At December 31, 2012, the Company also had available research and development credits for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $4,502 and $3,577, respectively. The federal and state research and development credits will begin to expire in 2014 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Company also had available investment tax credits for state income tax purposes of $100, which also begin to expire in 2013. Management has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, which are comprised principally of NOL carryforwards and research and development credits. Under the applicable accounting standards, management has considered the Company’s history of losses and concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of federal and state deferred tax assets. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets.

Utilization of the NOL and research and development credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, due to ownership change limitations that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and research and development credit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. The Company completed an evaluation of its ownership changes through December 31, 2011 and has determined that its NOL and research and development credit carryforwards originating on or before that date are not subject to an annual limitation under Section 382. The Company has not currently completed an evaluation of ownership changes through December 31, 2012. To the extent an ownership change occurs in the future, the net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to limitation.

No additional provision has been made for U.S. income taxes related to the undistributed earnings of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company or for unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries. As such, earnings are expected to be permanently reinvested, the investments are essentially permanent in duration, or the Company has concluded that no additional tax liability will arise as a result of the distribution of such earnings. A liability could arise if amounts are distributed by such subsidiaries or if such subsidiaries are ultimately disposed. It is not practical to estimate the

13

additional income taxes related to permanently reinvested earnings or the basis differences related to investment in subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings at December 31, 2012 approximated $252.

13. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

All costs associated with internal research and development as well as research and development services conducted for others are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses include direct costs for salaries, employee benefits, subcontractors, facility related expenses, depreciation and stock-based compensation related to employees and non-employees involved in the Company’s research and development. Costs related to revenue-producing contracts and government grants are recorded as research and development expenses.

14. ADM COLLABORATION

From 2004 through 2011, the Company developed and began commercialization of its PHA biopolymers through a technology alliance and subsequent commercial alliance with ADM Polymer Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ADM. The Commercial Alliance Agreement between the Company and ADM Polymer specified the terms and structure of the alliance. The agreement governed the activities and obligations of the parties and included the establishment of a joint venture company, Telles, to market and sell PHA biopolymers, the construction of a manufacturing facility capable of producing 110 million pounds of material annually, the licensing of technology to Telles and to ADM, and the conducting of various research, development, manufacturing, sales and marketing, compounding and administrative services by the parties.

Under the Commercial Alliance Agreement, ADM was permitted, under limited circumstances, to terminate the alliance if a change in circumstances that was not reasonably within the control of ADM made the anticipated financial return from the project inadequate or too uncertain. The agreement provided that, upon termination by ADM due to a change in circumstances, the Company would be permitted to continue to produce and sell PHA biopolymers, and ADM would be required to perform manufacturing services for the Company for a period of time following the termination (subject to certain payment obligations to ADM). On January 9, 2012, ADM notified the Company that it was terminating the commercial alliance effective February 8, 2012, citing the projected financial returns from the alliance were too uncertain.

Upon termination of the alliance, the Company’s intellectual property licenses to ADM Polymer and Telles ended, with Metabolix retaining all rights to its intellectual property.  ADM retained its manufacturing facility located in Clinton, Iowa, previously used to produce PHA biopolymers for Telles.  Also upon termination, contractual payments made to the Company by ADM during the term of the alliance totaling $38,885 and recorded as deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet were immediately recognized during its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, as the Company had no further performance obligations in connection with the alliance.

After termination of the Commercial Alliance Agreement, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement in which the parties agreed to specific terms related to the winding up and dissolution of Telles. Under this Settlement Agreement, the Company purchased certain assets of the joint venture for $2,982, including Telles’s entire inventory, exclusive and perpetual rights to all of Telles’s trademarks, and all product registrations, certifications and approvals for Telles’s PHA biopolymers. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, ADM relinquished any claims with respect to certain co-funded equipment previously acquired by the Company and situated at locations other than ADM’s Clinton, Iowa manufacturing facility, and the Company and Telles waived any rights to post-termination manufacturing and fermentation services under the Commercial Alliance Agreement.

In February 2013, Telles was formally dissolved and ADM notified the Company that no trade or other obligations remain to be paid. As a result, the Company does not believe that it is contingently liable for any third party obligations stemming from the former ADM collaboration.

15. RELATED PARTIES

The Company engaged in various transactions with Tepha, Inc. (“Tepha”), a related party, and recorded $25 and $86 of license and royalty revenue during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded license and royalty revenue from Tepha of $59 and $94, respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding receivables due from Tepha.

The Company engaged in various transactions with ADM and Telles during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as the parties wound down the affairs of the terminated Commercial Alliance Agreement.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no outstanding receivables or payment obligations remained with either party.

14

16. RESTRUCTURING

In connection with the Telles termination, in the first quarter of 2012, the Company restructured its biopolymers business and downsized its operations to more appropriately align its 2012 business priorities and strategic plans with its cash and investment resources. The Company recognized $877 of restructuring charges within operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  There were no remaining balances accrued for restructuring charges at December 31, 2012.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

(All dollar amounts are stated in thousands)

Forward Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In particular, statements contained in the Form 10-Q, including but not limited to, statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plan prospects, projected revenue or costs and objectives of management for future research, development or operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipate,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believe,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” and “continue,” or similar words.

Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the limits of our knowledge of our business and operations, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are neither promises nor guarantees. Our business is subject to significant risk and uncertainties and there can be no assurance that our actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. These forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: future financial performance and position and management’s strategy, plans and objectives for research and development, product development, and commercialization of current and future products, including the commercialization of our biopolymer products. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated including, without limitation, risks related to our dependence on establishing collaborations or partnerships for the commercialization of our products, risks related to the development and commercialization of new and uncertain technologies, risks associated with our protection and enforcement of our intellectual property rights, as well as other risks and uncertainties set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The forward-looking statements and risk factors presented in this document are made only as of the date hereof and we do not intend to update any of these risk factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of our forward-looking statements other than as required under the federal securities laws.

Overview

Metabolix is an innovation-driven bioscience company focused on delivering sustainable solutions to the plastics, chemicals and energy industries. We have core capabilities in microbial genetics, fermentation process engineering, chemical engineering, polymer science, plant genetics and botanical science, and we have assembled these capabilities in a way that has allowed us to integrate our biotechnology research with real world chemical engineering and industrial practice. In addition, we have created an extensive intellectual property portfolio to protect our innovations and, together with our technology, to serve as a valuable foundation for future industry collaborations.

The markets for petroleum-based plastics, chemicals and fuels are among the largest in the global economy. Issues associated with the prolonged use of petroleum-based products include plastic waste management and pollution, limited fossil fuel availability and price volatility, and global warming and climate change. We believe that a substantial global market opportunity exists to develop and commercialize our technology to produce sustainable, renewable alternatives to petroleum-based products including advanced biopolymers, biobased industrial chemicals and bioenergy.

Metabolix was formed to leverage the ability of natural systems to produce complex biopolymers from renewable resources. We have focused on a family of biopolymers found in nature called polyhydroxyalkanoates, or (“PHAs”), which occur naturally in living organisms and are chemically similar to polyesters. We have demonstrated the production of PHAs at the industrial scale to produce PHA biopolymers and biobased industrial chemicals, as well as production of polyhydroxybutyrate (“PHB”), a subclass of PHA biopolymer, in agriculturally significant crop plants.

15

From 2004 through 2011, we developed and began commercialization of our PHA biopolymers through a technology alliance and subsequent commercial alliance with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), one of the largest agricultural processors in the world. Under the commercial alliance, ADM was responsible for resin manufacturing, and Metabolix was primarily responsible for product development, compounding, marketing and sales. Through this alliance, the companies established a joint venture company, Telles, LLC (“Telles”), to commercialize PHA biopolymer products.

After ADM terminated the Telles joint venture early in 2012, we retained significant rights and assets associated with the PHA biopolymers business which are being used to launch the business using a new commercial model, continuing business operations, marketing biopolymer products, and identifying alternate manufacturing capability. We hold exclusive rights to the Metabolix technology and intellectual property used in the joint venture. We acquired all of Telles’s product inventory and compounding raw materials totaling more than five million pounds, all product certifications and all product trademarks including MirelTM and MveraTM, and we retained all co-funded pilot plant equipment in locations outside of the Commercial Manufacturing Facility in Clinton, Iowa. In early 2012, we restructured the biopolymers business retaining a core team in our biopolymers group to provide continuity with technology, manufacturing process, and markets.

During 2012, we established Metabolix GmbH, a subsidiary located in Cologne, Germany, to serve as a focal point for our commercial activities in Europe. This cost effective location is intended to enable us to directly access the European market, which is the largest for bioplastics. We also took steps toward establishing a new commercial model for our PHA biopolymers business. We worked closely with our core customers to supply product from existing inventory as a bridge to new supply. We evaluated the potential applications for our biopolymer products and narrowed our market development focus to three high value market segments: (i) film and bag applications; (ii) performance additives; and (iii) functional biodegradation. In March 2012, we began directly booking product sales and shipping product from inventory to our customers. During the second half of the year, we developed, sampled and launched two new products: Mvera B5008, a compostable film grade, and I6001, a polymeric modifier for polyvinyl chloride.

During 2013, we expect to continue to use existing inventory to continue to develop the market and to supply new and existing customers. We continue to explore alternative options to establish a new biopolymer manufacturing and supply chain properly sized to our business.

For our second platform, we are developing C4 and C3 chemicals from biobased sources, not the fossil fuels that are currently used to produce most industrial chemicals today. Our process for creating biobased industrial C4 and C3 chemicals involves engineering metabolic pathways into microbes that, in a fermentation process, produce specific PHA structures that serve as precursors for the chemicals. Through our PHA technology, we are able to control the microbe biology to achieve high concentrations of specific, naturally-occurring PHA that accumulate inside cells as they metabolize sugars. This intracellular accumulation of the biopolymers inside the microbes is a unique and differentiating aspect of our technology. When the fermentation is completed, we use a novel internally developed recovery process known as “FAST” (fast-acting, selective thermolysis) that converts the biopolymer to the target chemical using heat.

In the C4 program, we have produced biobased gamma butyrolactone (“GBL”) at industrial scale and demonstrated a chemical profile that meets or exceeds the existing industrial specifications. In 2012, we completed the preliminary design for a commercial scale plant to enable production of biobased GBL and, through an established conversion process, butanediol (“BDO”). This plan, which could be implemented under a potential future collaboration, includes specifications for all of the components of our fermentation and recovery process. In conjunction with our technical progress, we expect to continue discussions with industry leaders with the goal of forming the industry alliances necessary to successfully bring our biobased C4 industrial chemicals, including GBL and BDO, into commercial production.

We believe that developing and commercializing biobased C3 chemicals could represent another attractive market for our technology. In 2011, we undertook a market analysis of the global market for acrylic acid, a C3 chemical, to assess the market participants, renewable technology competition, economics, intellectual property status, and end markets.

In 2012, we continued scale up of fermentation and optimization of microbial strains to produce biobased C3 chemicals. We also successfully scaled up recovery of acrylic acid from dried biomass using the “FAST” process in our Cambridge laboratory. We also provided sample quantities of dried biomass for conversion to biobased acrylic acid for customer evaluation. We believe that strategic alliances will be required to commercialize C3 chemicals, and in 2013, we expect to continue to engage in partnership discussions.

In our third technology platform, we are harnessing the renewable nature of plants to make bioplastics, renewable chemicals and bioenergy from crops. The focal point of our plant technology efforts is around PHB, the simplest member of the broad PHA family of biopolymers. While applications for PHAs have focused mainly on their use as biodegradable bioplastics, these polymers have a

16

number of other unique features that will allow their use in other applications, such as the production of chemical intermediates and their use as value-added animal feeds. We are creating proprietary systems to produce PHB in high quantity in the leaves of biomass crops or seeds of oilseed crops for these multiple applications.

Our work in crops highlights our leading edge capabilities and research targeting multi-gene expression and transformation of plants. Researchers at Metabolix have designed novel, multi-gene expression systems to increase production of PHB in plant tissue. The science behind this shift in metabolism is complex since the goal is to significantly increase production of PHB to be viable at industrial scale without impairing the ability of the plant to thrive in its natural environment. In 2011, Metabolix was awarded a $6 million grant by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) to engineer switchgrass producing 10 percent PHB, by weight, in the whole plant and to develop methods to thermally convert the PHB-containing biomass to crotonic acid and a higher density residual biomass fraction for production of bioenergy.  Further, in 2012, Metabolix was awarded four new grants for leading-edge crop research targeting multi-gene expression and transformation of plants including important biofuel and food crops. Funding from these four grants is expected to total approximately $1.0 million and will run through 2014.

In 2013, we expect to continue to advance research under our grants, focused on increasing PHB production in switchgrass and developing a thermal conversion process for crotonic acid. We may also seek to establish alliances with partners to commercially exploit this platform. We are in the process of capturing intellectual property gained in our work in crops and will be evaluating the possibilities of monetizing that intellectual property.

As of June 30, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $256,660 and total stockholders’ equity was $34,597.

Collaborative Arrangements

We are not currently participating in any collaborative arrangements. Our historical strategy for collaborative arrangements has been to retain substantial participation in the future economic value of our technology while receiving current cash payments to offset research and development costs and working capital needs. By their nature, our collaborative agreements have been complex, containing multiple elements covering a variety of present and future activities.

ADM Collaboration

From 2004 through 2011, the Company developed and began commercialization of its PHA biopolymers through a technology alliance and subsequent commercial alliance with ADM Polymer Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ADM. The Commercial Alliance Agreement between Metabolix and ADM Polymer specified the terms and structure of the alliance. The agreement governed the activities and obligations of the parties and included the establishment of a joint venture company, Telles, LLC (“Telles”), to market and sell PHA biopolymers, the construction of a manufacturing facility capable of producing 110 million pounds of material annually, the licensing of technology to Telles and to ADM, and the conducting of various research, development, manufacturing, sales and marketing, compounding and administrative services by the parties.

Under the Commercial Alliance Agreement, ADM was permitted, under limited circumstances, to terminate the alliance if a change in circumstances that was not reasonably within the control of ADM made the anticipated financial return from the project inadequate or too uncertain. The agreement provided that, upon termination by ADM due to a change in circumstances, we would be permitted to continue to produce and sell PHA biopolymers, and ADM would be required to perform manufacturing services for us for a period of time following the termination (subject to certain payment obligations to ADM). On January 9, 2012, ADM notified us that it was terminating the commercial alliance effective February 8, 2012, citing the projected financial returns from the alliance were too uncertain.

Upon termination of the alliance, Metabolix intellectual property licenses to ADM Polymer and Telles ended, with Metabolix retaining all rights to its intellectual property.  ADM retained its manufacturing facility located in Clinton, Iowa, previously used to produce PHA biopolymers for Telles.  Also upon termination, contractual payments made to us by ADM during the term of the alliance totaling $38,885 and recorded as deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet were immediately recognized during its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, as the Company had no further performance obligations in connection with the alliance.

After termination of the Commercial Alliance Agreement, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement in which the parties agreed to specific terms related to the winding up and dissolution of Telles. Under this Settlement Agreement, we purchased certain assets of the joint venture for $2,982, including Telles’s entire inventory, exclusive and perpetual rights to all of Telles’s trademarks, and all product registrations, certifications and approvals for Telles’s PHA biopolymers. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, ADM relinquished any claims with respect to certain co-funded equipment previously acquired by Metabolix and situated at locations other than ADM’s Clinton, Iowa manufacturing facility, and Metabolix and Telles waived any rights to post-termination manufacturing and fermentation services under the Commercial Alliance Agreement.

17

In February 2013, Telles was formally dissolved and ADM notified us that no trade or other obligations remain to be paid. As a result, we do not believe that the Company is contingently liable for any third party obligations stemming from the former ADM collaboration.

Government Grants

As of June 30, 2013, expected gross proceeds of $3,996 remain to be received under our United States and Canadian government grants, which includes amounts for reimbursement to our subcontractors, as well as reimbursement for our employees’ time, benefits and other expenses related to future performance.

The status of our United States and Canadian government grants is as follows:

		Total		Total received		Remaining amount
	Funding	Government		through		available as of		Contract/Grant
Program Title	Agency	Funds		June 30, 2013		June 30, 2013		Expiration
Renewable Enhanced Feedstocks For Advanced Biofuels And Bioproducts	Department of Energy	$	6,000	$	2,705	$	3,295	June 2014
Subcontract from University of California (Los Angeles) project funded by ARPA-E entitled “Plants Engineered to Replace Oil: Energy Plant Design”	Department of Energy	566		152		414		September 2014
Capacity Building for Commercial-Scale PHB Camelina Development	National Research Council Canada	247		123		124		March 2014
Subcontract from University of Massachusetts (Amherst) project funded by ARPA-E entitled “Development of a Dedicated High Value Biofuels Crop”	Department of Energy	259		213		46		June 2013
Development of a Sustainable Value Added Fish Feed Using PHB Producing Camelina	National Research Council Canada	90		25		65		March 2014
Screening and Improvement of Polyhydroxybuyrate (PHB) Production Camelina Sativa Lines for Field Cultivation	Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP)	56		4		52		December 2013
Advanced Technologies For Engineering of Camelina	Canadian Ministry of Agriculture	194		194		—		February 2013
Total		$	7,412	$	3,416	$	3,996

18

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The significant accounting policies used in preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are consistent with those discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The critical accounting policies and the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are consistent with those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments.”

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenue

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012		Change
Grant revenue	$	584	$	461	$	123
Product revenue	822		373		449
Research and development revenue	238		—		238
License fee and royalty revenue	62		89		(27		)
Total revenue	$	1,706	$	923	$	783

Total revenue was $1,706 and $923 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $584 of government grant revenue compared to $461 for the same period in 2012.  Grant revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 primarily consisted of $512 and $447, respectively, in revenue earned from the Renewable Enhanced Feedstocks for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts (“REFABB”) grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy in mid-2011. During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $822 and $373, respectively, of product revenue related to the sale of biopolymer.  At June 30, 2013, short-term deferred revenue of $529 shown on the Company’s balance sheet includes $206 of deferred product revenue, nearly all of which is expected to be recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2013.  The Company’s product revenue recognition policy is to defer recognition of product sales until the later of sixty days or receipt of payment from the customer in order to allow discretion in accepting product returns for a period of sixty days after delivery.  During the three months ended June 30, 2013 we recognized $238 of research and development revenue, which was attributable to a funded research and development arrangement with a third party.

We expect total revenue to substantially decrease during 2013 compared to 2012, due to the one-time recognition of the deferred revenue associated with the Telles joint venture in 2012. We anticipate that product revenue will increase in 2013 compared to 2012, as we continue to gain market acceptance for our products, although there will be fluctuations from quarter-to-quarter.

Costs and expenses

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012		Change
Cost of product revenue	$	1,196	$	437	$	759
Research and development	4,945		5,006		(61		)
Selling, general, and administrative	3,422		3,437		(15		)
Total costs and expenses	$	9,563	$	8,880	$	683

19

Cost of Product Revenue

Cost of product revenue was $1,196 and $437 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These costs primarily include inventory product costs of $705 associated with product revenue recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2013 plus current period freight and warehousing costs of $111 and $96, respectively.  Inventory product costs include the cost of sample inventory provided to prospective customers. We also routinely evaluate inventory for impairment.  During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded a $271 charge to cost of product revenue for raw material and finished goods inventory that we determined was unlikely to be sold or converted to future sellable product based on customer demand and our current sales forecasts.

Although there will be fluctuations from quarter to quarter, we expect our overall cost of product revenue will continue to increase during 2013 and beyond, commensurate with our increasing product sales, and as our lower cost inventory acquired from Telles is depleted and replaced with new higher cost manufactured inventory, including new product grades that will enter the market during the year. During 2013, we may also incur costs for  small scale commercial manufacturing operations either on our own or with third parties for our biopolymer products.  Due to the expected high per unit cost of these smaller manufacturing batches, any inventory costs in excess of our expected saleable market price will be immediately expensed as cost of product revenue.  We also anticipate that our cost of product revenue as a percentage of product sales will fluctuate during the remainder of 2013 as our mix of biopolymer products sales changes.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were $4,945 and $5,006 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $61 was primarily due to a decrease in employee compensation and related benefit expenses.  Employee compensation and related benefit expenses were $2,835 and $2,959 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $124 was primarily attributable to a decrease in headcount.

We expect our future research and development expenses will increase due to costs related to our validation of potential biopolymer manufacturing sites.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were consistent at $3,422 and $3,437 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses will increase during 2013 as we continue to expand our biopolymer sales and marketing activities, primarily in Europe.

Other Income (Expense), net

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012			Change
Interest income, net	$	12		$	34		$	(22	)
Other expense, net	(21		)	(25		)	4
Total other income (expense), net	$	(9	)	$	9		$	(18	)

Other income (expense), net were an expense of $9 and income of $9 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other income (expense), net during both periods consisted primarily of income from our investments, offset by investment management and custodial fees.

20

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenue

	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2013		2012		Change
Revenue from termination of ADM collaboration	$	—	$	38,885	$	(38,885	)
Grant revenue	1,308		839		469
Product revenue	1,611		387		1,224
Research and development revenue	618		—		618
License fee and royalty revenue	111		134		(23		)
Total revenue	$	3,648	$	40,245	$	(36,597	)

Total revenue was $3,648 and $40,245 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $38,885 of previously deferred revenue related to our Telles joint venture with ADM that terminated effective February 8, 2012.  This deferred revenue, which was previously expected to be recognized over a future estimated ten year period as we met our contractual performance obligations, became immediately recognizable upon termination when no further performance obligations remained.  Grant revenue was $1,308 and $839 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase of $469 primarily consisted of $278 in revenue from new grants that had no revenue recorded in the first half of 2012, and a net increase in revenue recognized from the REFABB grant of $171 in comparison to the six months ended June 30, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $1,611 and $387, respectively, of product revenue related to the sale of biopolymer. At June 30, 2013, short-term deferred revenue of $529 shown on the Company’s balance sheet includes $206 of deferred product revenue, nearly all of which is expected to be recognized during the quarter ending September 30, 2013.  The Company’s product revenue recognition policy is to defer recognition of product sales until the later of sixty days or receipt of payment from the customer in order to allow discretion in accepting product returns for a period of sixty days after delivery.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 we recognized $618 of research and development revenue, which was attributable to a funded research and development arrangement with a third party.

We expect total revenue to substantially decrease during 2013 compared to 2012, due to the one-time recognition of the deferred revenue associated with the Telles joint venture in 2012. We anticipate that product revenue will increase in 2013 compared to 2012, as we continue to gain market acceptance for our products, although there will be fluctuations from quarter-to-quarter.

Costs and expenses

	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2013		2012		Change
Cost of product revenue	$	1,753	$	492	$	1,261
Research and development	9,802		11,051		(1,249		)
Selling, general, and administrative	6,734		7,836		(1,102		)
Total costs and expenses	$	18,289	$	19,379	$	(1,090	)

Cost of Product Revenue

Cost of product revenue was $1,753 and $492 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These costs primarily include inventory product costs of $995 associated with product revenue recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013 plus current period freight and warehousing costs of $287 and $200, respectively.  Inventory product costs include the cost of sample inventory provided to prospective customers. We also routinely evaluate inventory for impairment.  During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded a $271 charge to cost of product revenue for raw material and finished goods inventory that we determined was unlikely to be sold or converted to future sellable product based on customer demand and our current sales forecasts.

Although there will be fluctuations from quarter to quarter, we expect our overall cost of product revenue will continue to increase during 2013 and beyond commensurate with our increasing product sales and as our lower cost inventory acquired from Telles is depleted and replaced with new higher cost manufactured inventory, including new products grades that will enter the market during the year. During 2013, we may also incur costs for small scale commercial manufacturing operations either on our own or with third parties for our biopolymer products.  Due to the expected high per unit cost of these smaller manufacturing batches, any inventory costs in excess of our expected saleable market price will be immediately expensed as cost of product revenue. We also anticipate that our cost of product revenue as a percentage of product sales will fluctuate during the remainder of 2013 as our mix of biopolymer products sales changes.

21

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were $9,802 and $11,051 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $1,249 was primarily attributable to decreases in employee compensation and related benefits, consulting services and depreciation expense.  Employee compensation decreased to $5,742 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $6,617 for the respective period in 2012. The decrease of $875 was primarily due to a decrease in headcount. Consulting services decreased to $131 during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $343 during the respective period in 2012. The decrease of $212 was primarily attributable to lower expenses for consulting services for biopolymer research and development, a decrease in the number of polymer product trials and lower product testing service expense. Depreciation expense was $462 and $655 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $193 was primarily attributable to property and equipment reaching full depreciation at a rate faster than the acquisition of new capital assets.

We expect our future research and development expenses will increase due to costs related to our validation of potential biopolymer manufacturing sites.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $6,734 and $7,836 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $1,102 was primarily related to a decrease in employee compensation and related benefit expenses and consulting services.  Employee compensation and related benefit expenses were $3,985 and $4,488 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $503 was primarily due to reduction of headcount. Consulting expense decreased to $229 from $468 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease of $239 was primarily due to reduced use of consultants to support sales.

We expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses will increase during 2013 as we continue to expand our biopolymer sales and marketing activities, primarily in Europe.

Other Income (Expense), net

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012			Change
Interest income, net	$	33		$	75		$	(42	)
Other expense, net	(20		)	(49		)	29
Total other income (expense), net	$	13		$	26		$	(13	)

Other income (expense), net were $13 and $26 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other income (expense), net during both periods consisted primarily of income from our investments, offset by investment management and custodial fees.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Currently, we require cash to fund our working capital needs, to purchase capital assets and to pay our operating lease obligations.

The primary sources of our liquidity have been:

· equity financing;

· our former strategic alliance with ADM;

· government grants;

· product revenues; and

· interest earned on cash and short-term investments.

We have incurred significant expenses related to our research and development efforts. As of June 30, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $256,660. Our total unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments as of June 30, 2013 were $31,678 as compared to $46,281 at December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, we had no outstanding debt.

22

Our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2013 were held for working capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve our capital. As of June 30, 2013, we had restricted cash of $619. Restricted cash primarily consists of $494 held in connection with the lease agreement for our Cambridge, Massachusetts facility and $100 held in connection with our corporate credit card program. Investments are made in accordance with our corporate investment policy, as approved by our Board of Directors. Investments are limited to high quality corporate debt, U.S. Treasury bills and notes, bank debt obligations, municipal debt obligations and asset-backed securities. The policy establishes maturity limits, concentration limits, and liquidity requirements. As of June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with this policy.

With the exception of 2012 when the Company recognized $38,885 of deferred revenue from the terminated Telles joint venture, it has recorded net losses since its inception, including the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company held unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments of $31,678 at June 30, 2013. We believe that these resources and the cash to be generated from existing grants and expected product sales will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements for the next twelve months. However, any significant costs incurred to establish a commercial biopolymer manufacturing facility will shorten this liquidity horizon and require that we seek additional funds in order to continue and advance our operations. We continue to face significant challenges and uncertainties and, as a result, our available capital resources may be consumed more rapidly than currently expected due to: (a) lower than expected sales of our biopolymer products as a result of slow market adoption; (b) increases in capital costs and operating expenses related to the establishment and start-up of commercial manufacturing operations either on our own or with third parties for our biopolymer products; (c) changes we may make to the business that affect ongoing operating expenses; (d) changes we may make to our business strategy; (e) changes in our research and development spending plans; and (f) other items affecting our forecasted level of expenditures and use of cash resources. Accordingly, we will need to raise additional funds to support our operating and capital needs and, in the long term, we will require significant additional financing to continue to fund our operations. We may attempt to obtain additional funding through public or private financing, collaborative arrangements with strategic partners, or through additional credit lines or other debt financing sources to increase the funds available to support operations. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the Company can successfully execute these actions, and the Company can provide no assurance that it will. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our potential products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to the Company. Without additional funds, we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some of our sales and marketing efforts, research and development activities, or other operations and potentially delay product development in an effort to provide sufficient funds to continue our operations. If any of these events occurs, our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals would be adversely affected.

Net cash used in operating activities was $14,294 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to net cash used of $18,143 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The reduction in usage for operating activities of $3,849 primarily reflects $2,982 used to purchase the Telles inventory and $877 of restructuring charges in 2012.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $11,634 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $8,985 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Net cash provided by investing activities during the recent six month period included $22,509 received from maturing investments partially offset by reinvestments of $10,580 and capital equipment purchases of $270.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $14 and $19 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was solely attributable to the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2013.

	Payments Due by Period
			Less than		2-3		4-5		More than
	Total		1 year		years		years		5 years
Purchase obligations	$	50	$	25	$	25	$	—	$	—
Operating lease obligations	1,474		1,467		7		—		—
Total	$	1,524	$	1,492	$	32	$	—	$	—

23

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2013, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.

Related Party Transactions

See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for a full description of our related party transactions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued updated accounting guidance for the
presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward exists. The updated guidance requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefits against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carryforward that would apply in settlement of the uncertain tax position. In addition, unrecognized tax benefits will be netted against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carryforwards that would be utilized, rather than only against carryforwards that are created by unrecognized tax benefits. The update is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). This newly issued accounting standard requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes in information regarding our exposure to market risk, as described in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management (with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2013. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On February 17, 2012, a purported shareholder class action, Hilary Coyne v. Metabolix, Inc., Richard P. Eno, and Joseph Hill, Civil Action 1:12-cv-10318 (the “Class Action”), was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, naming the Company and certain officers of the Company as defendants. The Class Action alleges that the Company made material misrepresentations and/or omissions of material fact in the Company’s disclosures during the period from March 10, 2010 through its

24

January 12, 2012 press release announcing that ADM had given notice of termination of the Telles joint venture for PHA biopolymers, all in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. The class action seeks certification as a Class Action, compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 15, 2012 that supersedes the initial complaint and demands identical relief based on substantially similar allegations. On December 14, 2012, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which plaintiffs opposed, and on which the court has not yet ruled.

On March 7, 2012, a purported derivative lawsuit, Childs v. Kouba et al., Civil Action 12-0892 (the “Derivative Action”), was filed in Massachusetts Superior Court for Middlesex County, on behalf of the Company against members of the Company’s Board of Directors for alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties and based on a nearly identical set of alleged facts as those asserted in the Class Action. The Derivative Action seeks compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. The parties in the Derivative Action filed and the court granted a joint motion to stay the Derivative Action until after resolution of the anticipated motion to dismiss in the Class Action.

The Company is currently unable to assess the probability of loss or estimate a range of potential loss, if any, associated with these matters because they are at an early stage.

From time to time, the Company may be subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently aware of any such other proceedings or claims that it believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or the results of operations.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes in information regarding our risk factors as described in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On April 17, 2013, the Company issued 81,726 shares of common stock to participants in its Metabolix, Inc. 401(k) Plan as a matching contribution.  The issuance of these securities is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as exempted securities.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, there were no repurchases made by us or on our behalf, or by any “affiliated purchasers,” of shares of our common stock.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS.

10.1        Severance Agreement between the Registrant and Sarah P. Cecil executed July 1, 2013 (furnished herewith).

10.2Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Johan van Walsem executed July 12, 2013 (furnished herewith).

31.1        Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Principal Executive Officer (furnished herewith).

31.2        Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Principal Financial Officer (furnished herewith).

25

32.1        Section 1350 Certification (furnished herewith).

101.1The following financial information from the Metabolix Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 formatted in XBRL; (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.*

*XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

26

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	METABOLIX, INC.
August 2, 2013	By:	/s/ RICHARD P. ENO
		Richard P. Eno
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
August 2, 2013	By:	/s/ JOSEPH D. HILL
		Joseph D. Hill
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

27

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

May 31, 2013

Sarah P. Cecil

Metabolix, Inc.

21 Erie Street

Cambridge, MA 02139

Re:  Severance Agreement

Dear Sarah:

Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) believes that it is in the best interests of the Company to provide you with certain severance benefits in the event of a termination of your employment without Cause or in connection with a Change of Control (each as defined below), in order to provide you with financial security and sufficient encouragement to remain with the Company.

Therefore, you and the Company agree as follows:

1.Change of Control Severance Benefits.

In the event that your employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason within 12 months immediately following or 6 months immediately prior to a Change of Control (each as defined herein), and contingent on your executing a complete release of claims against the Company within thirty (30) days after the date of termination, and provided you do not revoke such release (a fully effective release is hereafter referred to as the “Release”), then, in addition to any accrued salary and benefits otherwise payable to you by law or pursuant to the Company’s benefit plans as in effect at the date of termination:

(a)the Company shall continue your base salary at the rate in effect at the date of termination for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of termination, and such salary continuation shall commence on the 37th day after the date on which your employment terminates and shall be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practice, provided that the first payment will include all amounts which would have been paid in the 37 days following your termination of employment;

(b)the Company shall pay COBRA premiums to maintain medical and dental benefits, if any, in effect at the time of termination until the earlier of (i) twelve (12) months following the date of termination, or (ii) the date you become insured under a medical insurance plan providing similar benefits to that of the Company plan; and

(c)the Company shall cause the full vesting of all your unvested equity, including but not limited to any options or restricted stock granted to you under the 2006 Stock Plan or any authorized successor stock plan, provided that the conditions to vesting other than the passage of time have been satisfied.

2.Termination without Cause.

In the event that your employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (other than in connection with a Change of Control as provided in Section 1), and contingent on your executing a Release within thirty (30) days after the date of termination, and provided you do not revoke such Release, then, in addition to any accrued salary and benefits otherwise payable to you by law or pursuant to the Company’s benefit plans as in effect at the date of termination:

(a)the Company shall continue your base salary at the rate in effect at the date of termination for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of termination, and such salary continuation shall commence on the 37th day after the date on which your employment terminates and shall be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practice, provided that the first payment will include all amounts which would have been paid in the 37 days following your termination of employment; and

(b)the Company shall pay COBRA premiums to maintain medical and dental benefits, if any, in effect at the time of termination until the earlier of (i) twelve (12) months following the date of termination, or (ii) the date you become insured under a medical insurance plan providing comparable benefits to that of the Company plan.

3.Definitions.

3.1.“Cause” for termination shall be limited to the following:

(a)Your conviction of a felony; or

(b)Your commission of fraud, or misconduct that results in material and demonstrable damage to the business or reputation of the Company; or

(c)Your willful and continued failure to perform your duties to the Company (other than such failure resulting from your incapacity due to disability, as determined by the Company’s disability insurance provider) within 10 business days after the Company delivers a written demand for performance to you that specifically identifies the actions to be performed.

3.2.“Change of Control”.  As used herein, a “Change of Control” shall occur or be deemed to have occurred only upon any one or more of the following events:

(a)any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) becomes a “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) (other than the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, or any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), directly or

2

indirectly, of securities of the Company, representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

(b)persons who, as of the effective date of this agreement, constitute the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason including, without limitation, as a result of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger, consolidation or similar transaction, to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors, provided that any person becoming a director of the Company subsequent to the effective date of this agreement whose election is approved by at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall, for purposes of this Section 6(f), be considered a member of the Incumbent Board; or

(c)the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation or other entity, other than (1) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (2) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no “person” (as hereinabove defined) acquires more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

(d)the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

3.3.“Good Reason” shall mean that you means that you have complied with the ‘Good Reason Process’ (hereinafter defined) following the occurrence of any of the following events:  (i) a material diminution in your responsibilities, authority or duties; (ii) a material diminution in your Base Salary; (iii) a material change in the geographic location at which you provide services to the Company; or (iv) the material breach of this Agreement by the Company.  ‘Good Reason Process’ shall mean that (i) you reasonably determine in good faith that a ‘Good Reason’ condition has occurred; (ii) you notify the Company in writing of the occurrence of the Good Reason condition within 60 days of the occurrence of such condition; (iii) you cooperate in good faith with the Company’s efforts, for a period not less than 30 days following such notice (the ‘Cure Period’), to remedy the condition; (iv) notwithstanding such efforts, the Good Reason condition continues to exist; and (v) you terminate your employment within 60 days after the end of the Cure Period.  If the Company cures the Good Reason condition during the Cure Period, Good Reason shall be deemed not to have occurred.

3

4.Taxes.

4.1.All payments required to be made by the Company to you under this Agreement shall be subject to the withholding of such amounts for taxes and other payroll deductions as the Company may reasonably determine it should withhold pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.  To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Agreement be exempt from, or comply with, the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, and this Agreement shall be construed and applied in a manner consistent with this intent.  In the event that any severance payments or benefits hereunder are determined by the Company to be in the nature of nonqualified deferred compensation payments, you and the Company hereby agree to take such actions as may be mutually agreed to ensure that such payments or benefits comply with the applicable provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the official guidance issued thereunder.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company does not guarantee the tax treatment or tax consequences associated with any payment or benefit arising under this Agreement.

4.2.Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Agreement, a termination of employment shall be deemed not to have occurred until such time as you incur a “separation from service” with the Company in accordance with Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Code and the applicable provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h).

4.3.Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Agreement, if at the time of your ‘separation from service,’ the Company determines that the you are a ‘specified employee’ within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then to the extent any payment or benefit that you become entitled to under this Agreement on account of your separation from service would be considered deferred compensation subject to the 20 percent additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A(a) of the Code as a result of the application of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, such payment shall not be payable and such benefit shall not be provided until the date that is the earlier of (A) six months and one day after your separation from service, or (B) your death.  If any such delayed cash payment is otherwise payable on an installment basis, the first payment shall include a catch-up payment covering amounts that would otherwise have been paid during the six-month period but for the application of this provision, and the balance of the installments shall be payable in accordance with their original schedule.  Solely for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each installment payment described in Section 5 is considered a separate payment.

5.At-Will Employment.  The Company and you acknowledge that, notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement, your employment with the Company is and shall be at-will, as defined under applicable law.  Nothing in this Agreement is intended to provide you with any right to continue in the employ of the Company for any period of specific duration or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way your rights or the rights of the Company, which rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate your employment at any time and for any reason. If your employment terminates for any reason, you shall not be

4

entitled to any payments, benefits, damages, awards or compensation other than as provided by this Agreement, or as may otherwise be established under the Company’s then existing employee benefit plans or policies at the time of termination.

6.General.

6.1.Entire Agreement.  This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between you and the Company with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements and understandings relating to the subject matter hereof, including without limitation the Change of Control Severance Agreement dated December 17, 2008, which is hereby terminated.

6.2.Modifications, Amendments, Waivers.  The terms and provisions of this Agreement may be modified or amended only by written agreement executed by you and the Company. The terms and provisions of this Agreement may be waived, or consent for the departure therefrom granted, only by written document executed by the party entitled to the benefits of such terms or provisions.

6.3.Assignment.  The Company shall cause its rights and obligations hereunder to be assumed by any person or entity that succeeds to all or substantially all of the Company’s business or that part of the Company’s business in which you are principally involved and may assign its rights and obligations hereunder to any Company affiliate.  You may not assign your rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company and any such attempted assignment by you without the prior written consent of the Company will be void.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement and your rights hereunder shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, your personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, and legatees.

6.4.Governing Law.  This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder will be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of Massachusetts, without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof.

If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement, please so indicate by signing and returning to us the enclosed copy of this Agreement.

Very truly yours,
Metabolix, Inc.
By:	/s/ Richard P. Eno
	Richard P. Eno
	President & CEO

5

Accepted and agreed:
/s/ Sarah P. Cecil
Sarah P. Cecil
Date:	July 1, 2013

6

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

Johan van Walsem

c/o Metabolix, Inc.

21 Erie Street

Cambridge, MA 02139

July 12, 2013

Dear Johan:

This is to confirm our proposal for your new position at Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”).

Your new position will be Chief Operating Officer.  A proposed job description including reporting relationships has been provided to you.  Your new position will begin on or about July 22, 2013, with the specific date to be mutually agreed.

Your salary will be increased, effective as of the date you begin your new role, to $295,000 on an annualized basis.

Upon commencement of your new role, the Company will grant you a stock option under the Metabolix, Inc. 2006 Stock Option and Incentive Plan for the purchase of 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value of the Company’s common stock (as defined in the Plan) on the date of such grant, vesting in 16 equal quarterly installments over a period of four years from the date of commencement of your new role.

Except as set forth above, the terms of your current employment agreement, including your target bonus percentage, will remain in effect unchanged.

If this proposal is acceptable, please sign below and return a copy of this letter to me.

		Sincerely,
		METABOLIX, INC.
		By:	/s/ Richard P. Eno
			Richard P. Eno
			President & CEO
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
/s/ Johan van Walsem
Johan van Walsem
Date:	July 12, 2013

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard P. Eno, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Metabolix, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 2, 2013
	/s/ RICHARD P. ENO
	Name:	Richard P. Eno
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph D. Hill, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Metabolix, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 2, 2013	/s/ JOSEPH D. HILL
	Name:	Joseph D. Hill
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Richard P. Eno, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Joseph D. Hill, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

Dated: August 2, 2013	/s/ RICHARD P. ENO
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: August 2, 2013	/s/ JOSEPH D. HILL
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

XML

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

11. GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

The accounting guidance for segment reporting establishes standards for reporting information on operating segments in annual financial statements. The Company operates in one segment, which is the business of developing and commercializing technologies for the production of polymers and chemicals in plants and in microbes. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker does not manage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance are based on the Company’s consolidated operating results.

As of June 30, 2013, less than 10% of the Company’s combined total assets were located outside of the United States and the reported net income (loss) outside of the United States for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was less than 10% of the combined net income of the consolidated Company.

The geographic distribution of the Company’s revenues and long-lived assets from continuing operations is summarized as follows:

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	1,094	$	81	$	531	$	—		$	1,706
Inter-geographic revenues	675		208		—		(883		)	—
Net revenues	$	1,769	$	289	$	531	$	(883	)	$	1,706
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	890	$	33	$	—	$	—		$	923
Inter-geographic revenues	—		147		—		(147		)	—
Net revenues	$	890	$	180	$	—	$	(147	)	$	923
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	2,940	$	177	$	531	$	—		$	3,648
Inter-geographic revenues	675		411		—		(1,086		)	—
Net revenues	$	3,615	$	588	$	531	$	(1,086	)	$	3,648
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	40,150	$	95	$	—	$	—		$	40,245
Inter-geographic revenues	—		328		—		(328		)	—
Net revenues	$	40,150	$	423	$	—	$	(328	)	$	40,245

Foreign revenue is based on the country in which the Company’s subsidiary that earned the revenue is domiciled. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, $337 and $712, respectively, in product was shipped to customers by Metabolix GmbH, the Company’s newly established wholly-owned subsidiary located in Cologne, Germany.

The geographic distribution of the Company’s long-lived assets is summarized as follows:

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations		Total
June 30, 2013	$	1,020	$	67	$	—	$	—	$	1,087
December 31, 2012	$	1,309	$	49	$	—	$	—	$	1,358

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Revenue:
Revenue from termination of ADM collaboration				$ 38,885
Grant revenue	584	461	1,308	839
Product revenue	822	373	1,611	387
Research and development revenue	238		618
License fee and royalty revenue	62	89	111	134
Total revenue	1,706	923	3,648	40,245
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product revenue	1,196	437	1,753	492
Research and development	4,945	5,006	9,802	11,051
Selling, general, and administrative	3,422	3,437	6,734	7,836
Total costs and expenses	9,563	8,880	18,289	19,379
Income (loss) from operations	(7,857)	(7,957)	(14,641)	20,866
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net	12	34	33	75
Other expense, net	(21)	(25)	(20)	(49)
Total other income (expense), net	(9)	9	13	26
Net income (loss)	$ (7,866)	$ (7,948)	$ (14,628)	$ 20,892
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic (in dollars per share)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.43)	$ 0.61
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.43)	$ 0.61
Number of shares used in per share calculations:
Basic (in shares)	34,434,271	34,183,702	34,393,998	34,160,018
Diluted (in shares)	34,434,271	34,183,702	34,393,998	34,264,428

XML

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

4. BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock equivalents include stock options and warrants. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding is calculated by adding to the weighted shares outstanding any potential (unissued) shares of common stock from outstanding stock options and warrants based on the treasury stock method.  In periods when a net loss is reported, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect, meaning the loss per share would be reduced. Therefore, in periods when a loss is reported there is no difference in basic and diluted loss per share.

Shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share are as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,866	)	$	(7,948	)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,160,018
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	—			—			—			104,410
Dilutive potential common shares	—			—			—			104,410
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,264,428

The number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock related to options and warrants that were excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares since the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below:

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Options	5,643,518	4,456,627	5,535,876	4,436,627
Warrants	4,086	4,086	4,086	4,086
Total	5,647,604	4,460,713	5,539,962	4,440,713

XML

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Schedule of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,866	)	$	(7,948	)	$	(14,628	)	$	20,892
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,160,018
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	—			—			—			104,410
Dilutive potential common shares	—			—			—			104,410
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share	34,434,271			34,183,702			34,393,998			34,264,428

Schedule of number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock related to options and warrants that were excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Options	5,643,518	4,456,627	5,535,876	4,436,627
Warrants	4,086	4,086	4,086	4,086
Total	5,647,604	4,460,713	5,539,962	4,440,713

XML

INCOME TAXES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

12. INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using future enacted tax rates.  A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not recognize any tax expense or benefit due to its continued net operating loss position.  Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of favorable tax attributes in future tax returns, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its otherwise recognizable net deferred tax assets.

The Company follows the accounting guidance related to income taxes including guidance which addresses accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance prescribes a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transitions. The Company had no amounts recorded for any unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The tax years 2009 through 2012 remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject, which are primarily in the U.S. Additionally, the Company can be audited for any loss year up to three years after the year in which the loss is utilized to offset taxable income.  This would include loss years prior to 2009.

The Company’s policy is to record estimated interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties recorded related to uncertain tax positions.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of $211,016 and $148,611, respectively. Included in the federal and state NOL carryforwards are approximately $19,213 of deductions related to the exercise of stock options subsequent to the adoption of amended accounting guidance related to stock based compensation. This amount represents an excess tax benefit as defined under the amended accounting guidance related to stock based compensation and has not been recorded as a deferred tax asset. The Company’s existing federal and state NOL carryforwards begin to expire in 2013. At December 31, 2012, the Company also had available research and development credits for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $4,502 and $3,577, respectively. The federal and state research and development credits will begin to expire in 2014 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Company also had available investment tax credits for state income tax purposes of $100, which also begin to expire in 2013. Management has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, which are comprised principally of NOL carryforwards and research and development credits. Under the applicable accounting standards, management has considered the Company’s history of losses and concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of federal and state deferred tax assets. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets.

Utilization of the NOL and research and development credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, due to ownership change limitations that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and research and development credit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. The Company completed an evaluation of its ownership changes through December 31, 2011 and has determined that its NOL and research and development credit carryforwards originating on or before that date are not subject to an annual limitation under Section 382. The Company has not currently completed an evaluation of ownership changes through December 31, 2012. To the extent an ownership change occurs in the future, the net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to limitation.

No additional provision has been made for U.S. income taxes related to the undistributed earnings of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company or for unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries. As such, earnings are expected to be permanently reinvested, the investments are essentially permanent in duration, or the Company has concluded that no additional tax liability will arise as a result of the distribution of such earnings. A liability could arise if amounts are distributed by such subsidiaries or if such subsidiaries are ultimately disposed. It is not practical to estimate the additional income taxes related to permanently reinvested earnings or the basis differences related to investment in subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings at December 31, 2012 approximated $252.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 814	$ 980	$ 1,677	$ 2,102
Stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested awards not yet recognized	$ 4,714		$ 4,714
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized			2 years 3 months
Number of Shares
Outstanding at the beginning of the period (in shares)			5,579,042
Granted (in shares)			903,915
Exercised (in shares)			(7,550)
Forfeited (in shares)			(127,693)
Expired (in shares)			(173,871)
Outstanding at the end of the period (in shares)	6,173,843		6,173,843
Options exercisable at the end of the period (in shares)	3,458,023		3,458,023
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at the beginning of the period (in dollars per share)			$ 6.68
Granted (in dollars per share)			$ 1.67
Exercised (in dollars per share)			$ 1.82
Forfeited (in dollars per share)			$ 3.69
Expired (in dollars per share)			$ 10.09
Outstanding at the end of the period (in dollars per share)	$ 5.91		$ 5.91
Options exercisable at the end of the period (in dollars per share)	$ 8.28		$ 8.28
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted (in dollars per share)			$ 1.18
Assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options
Risk-free rate, minimum (as a percent)			0.71%	0.67%
Risk-free rate, maximum (as a percent)			1.49%	1.15%
Expected option term			6 years
Volatility, minimum (as a percent)			84.00%	85.00%
Volatility, maximum (as a percent)			85.00%	87.00%
Minimum
Assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options
Expected option term				5 years 3 months 18 days
Maximum
Assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options
Expected option term				5 years 6 months

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Schedule of information about assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active
	markets for identical		Significant other		Significant
	assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		June 30, 2013
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	8,043	$	—	$	—	$	8,043
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		19,770		—		19,770
Total	$	8,043	$	19,770	$	—	$	27,813

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active				Significant
	markets for identical		Significant other		unobservable
	assets		observable inputs		inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2012
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	11,157	$	—	$	—	$	11,157
Government securities	—		2,015		—		2,015
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		29,201		—		29,201
Long-term investments:
Government securities	—		2,508		—		2,508
Total	$	11,157	$	33,724	$	—	$	44,881

XML

INVESTMENTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INVESTMENTS

Schedule of investments

	Amortized		Unrealized					Market
	Cost		Gain		(Loss)			Value
June 30, 2013
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
Total	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
December 31, 2012
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	29,189	$	12	$	—		$	29,201
Long-term investments:
Government-sponsored enterprises	2,507		1		—			2,508
Total	$	31,696	$	13	$	—		$	31,709

XML

INVENTORY (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
INVENTORY
Raw materials	$ 674	$ 640
Work-in-process		2
Finished goods	2,522	2,562
Total inventory	3,196	3,204
Inventory on which revenue not recognized	163	257
Cost of obsolete raw material and finished goods	$ 271

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
INCOME TAXES
Unrecognized tax benefits	$ 0	$ 0
Accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions	$ 0	$ 0

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments	$ 31,678
Minimum period for which unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments and cash to be generated from existing grants and expected product sales will be sufficient to meet projected operating requirements	12 months
Deferred revenue recognized from the terminated Telles joint venture		$ 38,885

XML

ADM COLLABORATION (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended		0 Months Ended		3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Feb. 28, 2013 ADM Polymer Telles	Feb. 08, 2012 Commercial Alliance Agreement Telles	Feb. 08, 2012 Commercial Alliance Agreement ADM Polymer lb	Mar. 31, 2012 Commercial Alliance Agreement ADM Polymer
Significant collaboration
Annual production capability of manufacturing facility that will be constructed under the agreement (in pounds)				110,000,000
Deferred revenue recognized	$ 38,885				$ 38,885
Purchase price to acquire assets of joint venture			2,982
Potential obligations in connection with the agreement		$ 0

XML

INVENTORY (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INVENTORY

Schedule of the components of biopolymer inventories

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Raw materials	$	674	$	640
Work-in-process	—		2
Finished goods	2,522		2,562
Total inventory	$	3,196	$	3,204

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$ (14,628)	$ 20,892
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation	531	718
Charge for 401(k) company common stock match	268	264
Stock-based compensation	1,677	2,083
Inventory impairment	271
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	503	(362)
Due from related party	75	311
Unbilled receivables	(446)	(217)
Inventory	(263)	(2,821)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(192)	203
Accounts payable	(1,131)	101
Accrued expenses	(345)	(675)
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities	(76)	(78)
Deferred revenue	(538)	(38,562)
Net cash used in operating activities	(14,294)	(18,143)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment	(270)	(287)
Change in restricted cash	(25)
Purchase of investments	(10,580)	(47,935)
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of investments	22,509	57,207
Net cash provided by investing activities	11,634	8,985
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from options exercised	14	19
Net cash provided by financing activities	14	19
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(18)	(6)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(2,664)	(9,145)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,572	21,277
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 11,908	$ 12,132

XML

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no material changes in accounting policies since the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including the accounts of the Company’s newly established German subsidiary, Metabolix GmbH.   All significant intercompany transactions were eliminated. Telles, LLC (“Telles”), the Company’s former joint venture with Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) that terminated in early 2012, was not consolidated by the Company.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company primarily invests its excess cash and cash equivalents in money market funds, corporate debt, federal agency notes and U.S. treasury notes. Investments are acquired in accordance with the Company’s investment policy which establishes a concentration limit per issuer.

The Company provides credit to customers in the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. At June 30, 2013, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables include $724 or 63% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $315 or 27% from customer product sales. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables included $561 or 46% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $535 or 44% from customer product sales. At June 30, 2013, no customer had accounts receivable due from product sales of 10% or greater, and December 31, 2012, one customer represented 41%, of accounts receivable due from product sales.

XML

INVENTORY

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INVENTORY

INVENTORY

5. INVENTORY

The components of biopolymer inventories are as follows:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Raw materials	$	674	$	640
Work-in-process	—		2
Finished goods	2,522		2,562
Total inventory	$	3,196	$	3,204

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, included within finished goods are $163 and $257, respectively, of inventory that the Company has sold and shipped to customers for which the Company has not yet recognized revenue under its product revenue recognition policy. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $271 charge to cost of product revenue for raw material and finished goods inventory that it determined was unlikely to be sold or converted to future sellable product based on customer demand and current sales forecasts.

XML

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued updated accounting guidance for the
presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward exists. The updated guidance requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefits against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carryforward that would apply in settlement of the uncertain tax position. In addition, unrecognized tax benefits will be netted against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carryforwards that would be utilized, rather than only against carryforwards that are created by unrecognized tax benefits. The update is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). This newly issued accounting standard requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Reclassification adjustments were insignificant for all periods presented.

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details 2) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Net operating loss carryforwards
Deduction related to the exercise of stock options		$ 19,213
Maximum period to audit for loss	3 years
Federal
Net operating loss carryforwards
NOL carryforwards		211,016
State
Net operating loss carryforwards
NOL carryforwards		$ 148,611

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ACCRUED EXPENSES

Schedule of accrued expenses

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Employee compensation and benefits	$	1,695	$	2,379
Professional services	436		301
Intellectual property	163		105
Other	917		734
Total accrued expenses	$	3,211	$	3,519

XML

ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details) (Receivables, Credit risk concentration, USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
U.S. and Canadian government grants
Concentration of credit risk
Accounts receivable	$ 724	$ 561
Receivables/Sales (as a percent)	63.00%	46.00%
Customer product receivables
Concentration of credit risk
Accounts receivable	$ 315	$ 535
Receivables/Sales (as a percent)	27.00%	44.00%
Customer one
Concentration of credit risk
Receivables/Sales (as a percent)	10.00%	41.00%
Number of customers	0	1

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
ACCRUED EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits	$ 1,695	$ 2,379
Professional services	436	301
Intellectual property	163	105
Other	917	734
Total accrued expenses	$ 3,211	$ 3,519

XML

RESTRUCTURING (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
RESTRUCTURING
Restructuring charges recognized	$ 877
Restructuring charges accrued		$ 0

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Preferred stock, par value per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	34,451,328	34,306,570
Common stock, shares outstanding	34,451,328	34,306,570

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ACCRUED EXPENSES

ACCRUED EXPENSES

8. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Employee compensation and benefits	$	1,695	$	2,379
Professional services	436		301
Intellectual property	163		105
Other	917		734
Total accrued expenses	$	3,211	$	3,519

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income (loss):	$ (7,866)	$ (7,948)	$ (14,628)	$ 20,892
Other comprehensive income
Change in unrealized gain on investments	(4)	(5)	(11)	(18)
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment	(12)	(7)	(27)	(5)
Total other comprehensive loss	(16)	(12)	(38)	(23)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ (7,882)	$ (7,960)	$ (14,666)	$ 20,869

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 11,908	$ 14,572
Short-term investments	19,770	29,201
Accounts receivable	336	839
Due from related parties		75
Unbilled receivables	819	372
Inventory	3,196	3,204
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	884	692
Total current assets	36,913	48,955
Restricted cash	619	594
Property and equipment, net	1,087	1,358
Long-term investments		2,508
Other assets	95	95
Total assets	38,714	53,510
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	102	1,233
Accrued expenses	3,211	3,519
Current portion of deferred rent	138	165
Short-term deferred revenue	529	1,067
Total current liabilities	3,980	5,984
Deferred rent, net of current portion		55
Other long-term liabilities	137	131
Total liabilities	4,117	6,170
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value per share); 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock ($0.01 par value per share); 100,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 34,451,328 and 34,306,570 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	345	343
Additional paid-in capital	290,971	289,050
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(59)	(21)
Accumulated deficit	(256,660)	(242,032)
Total stockholders' equity	34,597	47,340
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 38,714	$ 53,510

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Summary of option activity

	Number of		Weighted Average
	Shares		Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2012	5,579,042		$	6.68
Granted	903,915		1.67
Exercised	(7,550	)	1.82
Forfeited	(127,693	)	3.69
Expired	(173,871	)	10.09
Outstanding at June 30, 2013	6,173,843		5.91
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013	3,458,023		$	8.28
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013			$	1.18

Schedule of assumptions used in determining fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013	2012
Expected dividend yield	—	—
Risk-free rate	0.71% - 1.49%	0.67% - 1.15%
Expected option term (in years)	6.0	5.3 – 5.5
Volatility	84% - 85%	85% - 87%

XML

ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including the accounts of the Company’s newly established German subsidiary, Metabolix GmbH.   All significant intercompany transactions were eliminated. Telles, LLC (“Telles”), the Company’s former joint venture with Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) that terminated in early 2012, was not consolidated by the Company.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company primarily invests its excess cash and cash equivalents in money market funds, corporate debt, federal agency notes and U.S. treasury notes. Investments are acquired in accordance with the Company’s investment policy which establishes a concentration limit per issuer.

The Company provides credit to customers in the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. At June 30, 2013, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables include $724 or 63% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $315 or 27% from customer product sales. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s accounts and unbilled receivables included $561 or 46% from U.S. and Canadian government grants and $535 or 44% from customer product sales. At June 30, 2013, no customer had accounts receivable due from product sales of 10% or greater, and December 31, 2012, one customer represented 41%, of accounts receivable due from product sales.

XML

RELATED PARTIES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
Related party transactions
Outstanding receivable					$ 75
Tepha, Inc.
Related party transactions
License and royalty revenue	25	59	86	94
Outstanding receivable	0		0		0
ADM Polymer
Related party transactions
Outstanding receivable	0		0		0
Payment obligations	0		0		0
Telles
Related party transactions
Outstanding receivable	0		0		0
Payment obligations	$ 0		$ 0		$ 0

XML

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 item	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION
Number of operating segments			1
Geographic Information
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$ 1,706	$ 923	$ 3,648	$ 40,245
Net revenues	1,706	923	3,648	40,245
Long-lived assets	1,087		1,087		1,358
Maximum
Geographic Information
Percentage of assets in foreign countries	10.00%		10.00%
Percentage of net income (loss) from foreign countries	10.00%	10.00%	10.00%	10.00%
U.S.
Geographic Information
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	1,094	890	2,940	40,150
Inter-geographic revenues	675		675
Net revenues	1,769	890	3,615	40,150
Long-lived assets	1,020		1,020		1,309
Canada
Geographic Information
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	81	33	177	95
Inter-geographic revenues	208	147	411	328
Net revenues	289	180	588	423
Long-lived assets	67		67		49
Germany
Geographic Information
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	531		531
Net revenues	531		531
Deferred revenue	337		712
Eliminations
Geographic Information
Inter-geographic revenues	(883)	(147)	(1,086)	(328)
Net revenues	$ (883)	$ (147)	$ (1,086)	$ (328)

XML

INVESTMENTS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Investments
Amortized Cost	$ 19,768	$ 31,696
Unrealized Gain	3	13
Unrealized (Loss)	(1)
Market Value	19,770	31,709
Maximum maturity period of long term investment	2 years
Average maturity of marketable securities available-for-sale	3 months	4 months
Short-term investments | Government sponsored enterprises
Investments
Amortized Cost	19,768	29,189
Unrealized Gain	3	12
Unrealized (Loss)	(1)
Market Value	19,770	29,201
Long-term investments | Government sponsored enterprises
Investments
Amortized Cost		2,507
Unrealized Gain		1
Market Value		$ 2,508

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Fair value measurements
Short-term investments	$ 19,770	$ 29,201
Long-term investments		2,508
Recurring | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)
Fair value measurements
Total	8,043	11,157
Recurring | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) | Money market funds
Fair value measurements
Cash equivalents:	8,043	11,157
Recurring | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)
Fair value measurements
Total	19,770	33,724
Recurring | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | Government securities
Fair value measurements
Cash equivalents:		2,015
Short-term investments	19,770	29,201
Long-term investments		2,508
Recurring | Balance as of the end of the period
Fair value measurements
Total	27,813	44,881
Recurring | Balance as of the end of the period | Government securities
Fair value measurements
Cash equivalents:		2,015
Short-term investments	19,770	29,201
Long-term investments		2,508
Recurring | Balance as of the end of the period | Money market funds
Fair value measurements
Cash equivalents:	$ 8,043	$ 11,157

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company has certain financial assets recorded at fair value which have been classified as either Level 1 or 2 within the fair value hierarchy as described in the accounting standards for fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between independent market participants at the measurement date.  Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize observable data such as quoted prices in active markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value hierarchy level is determined by the lowest level of significant input.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not own any Level 3 financial assets.

The Company’s financial assets classified as Level 2 were initially valued at the transaction price and have been subsequently valued typically utilizing third party pricing services. Because the Company’s investment portfolio may include securities that do not always trade on a daily basis, the pricing services use many observable market inputs to determine value including reportable trades, benchmark yields and benchmarking of like securities. The Company validates the prices provided by the third party pricing services by reviewing their pricing methods and obtaining market values from other pricing sources. After completing the validation procedures, the Company did not adjust or override any fair value measurements provided by these pricing services as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The tables below present information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value.

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active
	markets for identical		Significant other		Significant
	assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		June 30, 2013
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	8,043	$	—	$	—	$	8,043
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		19,770		—		19,770
Total	$	8,043	$	19,770	$	—	$	27,813

	Fair value measurements at reporting date using
	Quoted prices in active				Significant
	markets for identical		Significant other		unobservable
	assets		observable inputs		inputs		Balance as of
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2012
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	11,157	$	—	$	—	$	11,157
Government securities	—		2,015		—		2,015
Short-term investments:
Government securities	—		29,201		—		29,201
Long-term investments:
Government securities	—		2,508		—		2,508
Total	$	11,157	$	33,724	$	—	$	44,881

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of ninety days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents, and investments purchased with an original maturity date of more than ninety days at the date of purchase and a maturity date of one year or less at the balance sheet date to be short-term investments.  All other investments are classified as long-term.

XML

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

Schedule of the geographic distribution of revenues from continuing operations

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	1,094	$	81	$	531	$	—		$	1,706
Inter-geographic revenues	675		208		—		(883		)	—
Net revenues	$	1,769	$	289	$	531	$	(883	)	$	1,706
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	890	$	33	$	—	$	—		$	923
Inter-geographic revenues	—		147		—		(147		)	—
Net revenues	$	890	$	180	$	—	$	(147	)	$	923
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	2,940	$	177	$	531	$	—		$	3,648
Inter-geographic revenues	675		411		—		(1,086		)	—
Net revenues	$	3,615	$	588	$	531	$	(1,086	)	$	3,648
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers	$	40,150	$	95	$	—	$	—		$	40,245
Inter-geographic revenues	—		328		—		(328		)	—
Net revenues	$	40,150	$	423	$	—	$	(328	)	$	40,245

Schedule of the geographic distribution of long-lived assets from continuing operations

	U.S.		Canada		Germany		Eliminations		Total
June 30, 2013	$	1,020	$	67	$	—	$	—	$	1,087
December 31, 2012	$	1,309	$	49	$	—	$	—	$	1,358

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details 3) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Tax credits
Additional provision for income taxes related to the undistributed earnings	$ 0
Additional tax liability as a result of the distribution of earnings which are expected to be permanently reinvested	0
Unremitted earnings		252
Federal | Research and development
Tax credits
Available tax credits		4,502
State | Research and development
Tax credits
Available tax credits		3,577
State | Investment
Tax credits
Available tax credits		$ 100

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

On February 17, 2012, a purported shareholder class action, Hilary Coyne v. Metabolix, Inc., Richard P. Eno, and Joseph Hill, Civil Action 1:12-cv-10318 (the “Class Action”), was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, naming the Company and certain officers of the Company as defendants. The Class Action alleges that the Company made material misrepresentations and/or omissions of material fact in the Company’s disclosures during the period from March 10, 2010 through its January 12, 2012 press release announcing that ADM had given notice of termination of the Telles joint venture for PHA biopolymers, all in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. The Class Action seeks certification as a class action, compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or  injunctive relief. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 15, 2012 that supersedes the initial complaint and demands identical relief based on substantially similar allegations. On December 14, 2012, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which plaintiffs opposed, and on which the court has not yet ruled.

On March 7, 2012, a purported derivative lawsuit, Childs v. Kouba et al., Civil Action 12-0892 (the “Derivative Action”), was filed in Massachusetts Superior Court for Middlesex County, on behalf of the Company against members of the Company’s Board of Directors for alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties and based on a nearly identical set of alleged facts as those asserted in the Class Action. The Derivative Action seeks compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, plaintiff’s costs and attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. The parties in the Derivative Action filed and the court granted a joint motion to stay the derivative action until after resolution of the anticipated motion to dismiss in the Class Action.

The Company is currently unable to assess the probability of loss or estimate a range of potential loss, if any, associated with these matters because they are at an early stage.

From time to time, the Company may be subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently aware of any such other proceedings or claims that it believes will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or the results of operations.

XML

INVESTMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INVESTMENTS

INVESTMENTS

6. INVESTMENTS

Investments consist of the following:

	Amortized		Unrealized					Market
	Cost		Gain		(Loss)			Value
June 30, 2013
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
Total	$	19,768	$	3	$	(1	)	$	19,770
December 31, 2012
Short-term investments:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	29,189	$	12	$	—		$	29,201
Long-term investments:
Government-sponsored enterprises	2,507		1		—			2,508
Total	$	31,696	$	13	$	—		$	31,709

Long-term investments have maturity dates of two years or less. The average maturity of the Company’s marketable securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was three and four months, respectively.

XML

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period or the entire fiscal year. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013.

With the exception of 2012 when the Company recognized $38,885 of deferred revenue from the terminated Telles joint venture, it has recorded net losses since its inception, including the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company held unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and investments of $31,678 at June 30, 2013. The Company believes that these resources and the cash to be generated from existing grants and expected product sales will be sufficient to meet its projected operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, any significant costs incurred to establish a commercial biopolymer manufacturing facility will shorten this liquidity horizon and require that the Company seek additional funds in order to continue and advance its operations. The Company continues to face significant challenges and uncertainties and, as a result, the Company’s available capital resources may be consumed more rapidly than currently expected due to: (a) lower than expected sales of the Company’s new biopolymer products as a result of slow market adoption; (b) increases in capital costs and operating expenses related to the establishment and start-up of commercial manufacturing operations either on its own or with third parties for its biopolymer products; (c) changes the Company may make to the business that affect ongoing operating expenses; (d) changes the Company may make in its business strategy; (e) changes in the Company’s research and development spending plans; and (f) other items affecting the Company’s forecasted level of expenditures and use of cash resources. Accordingly, the Company will need to raise additional funds to support its operating and capital needs. The Company may attempt to obtain additional funding through public or private financing, collaborative arrangements with strategic partners, or through additional credit lines or other debt financing sources to increase the funds available to support operations. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the Company can successfully execute these actions, and the Company can provide no assurance that it will. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, its existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of its existing stockholders. If the Company raises additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to its potential products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to the Company. Without additional funds, the Company may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some of its sales and marketing efforts, research and development activities, or other operations and potentially delay product development in an effort to provide sufficient funds to continue its operations. If any of these events occurs, the Company’s ability to achieve its development and commercialization goals would be adversely affected.

XML

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Difference between basic and diluted loss per share			$ 0
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$ (7,866)	$ (7,948)	$ (14,628)	$ 20,892
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	34,434,271	34,183,702	34,393,998	34,160,018
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options (in shares)				104,410
Dilutive potential common shares				104,410
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share	34,434,271	34,183,702	34,393,998	34,264,428
Antidilutive securities
Antidilutive common stock excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares	5,647,604	4,460,713	5,539,962	4,440,713
Options
Antidilutive securities
Antidilutive common stock excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares	5,643,518	4,456,627	5,535,876	4,436,627
Warrants
Antidilutive securities
Antidilutive common stock excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares	4,086	4,086	4,086	4,086

XML

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

13. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

All costs associated with internal research and development as well as research and development services conducted for others are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses include direct costs for salaries, employee benefits, subcontractors, facility related expenses, depreciation and stock-based compensation related to employees and non-employees involved in the Company’s research and development. Costs related to revenue-producing contracts and government grants are recorded as research and development expenses.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards of $814 and $1,677 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards was $980 and $2,102 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. At June 30, 2013, there was approximately $4,714 of pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested awards not yet recognized, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.25 years.

A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Number of		Weighted Average
	Shares		Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2012	5,579,042		$	6.68
Granted	903,915		1.67
Exercised	(7,550	)	1.82
Forfeited	(127,693	)	3.69
Expired	(173,871	)	10.09
Outstanding at June 30, 2013	6,173,843		5.91
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013	3,458,023		$	8.28
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013			$	1.18

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company determined the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for option grants, respectively:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013	2012
Expected dividend yield	—	—
Risk-free rate	0.71% - 1.49%	0.67% - 1.15%
Expected option term (in years)	6.0	5.3 – 5.5
Volatility	84% - 85%	85% - 87%

XML

RESTRUCTURING

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RESTRUCTURING

RESTRUCTURING

16. RESTRUCTURING

In connection with the Telles termination, in the first quarter of 2012, the Company restructured its biopolymers business and downsized its operations to more appropriately align its 2012 business priorities and strategic plans with its cash and investment resources. The Company recognized $877 of restructuring charges within operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  There were no remaining balances accrued for restructuring charges at December 31, 2012.

XML

ADM COLLABORATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ADM COLLABORATION

ADM COLLABORATION

14. ADM COLLABORATION

From 2004 through 2011, the Company developed and began commercialization of its PHA biopolymers through a technology alliance and subsequent commercial alliance with ADM Polymer Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ADM. The Commercial Alliance Agreement between the Company and ADM Polymer specified the terms and structure of the alliance. The agreement governed the activities and obligations of the parties and included the establishment of a joint venture company, Telles, to market and sell PHA biopolymers, the construction of a manufacturing facility capable of producing 110 million pounds of material annually, the licensing of technology to Telles and to ADM, and the conducting of various research, development, manufacturing, sales and marketing, compounding and administrative services by the parties.

Under the Commercial Alliance Agreement, ADM was permitted, under limited circumstances, to terminate the alliance if a change in circumstances that was not reasonably within the control of ADM made the anticipated financial return from the project inadequate or too uncertain. The agreement provided that, upon termination by ADM due to a change in circumstances, the Company would be permitted to continue to produce and sell PHA biopolymers, and ADM would be required to perform manufacturing services for the Company for a period of time following the termination (subject to certain payment obligations to ADM). On January 9, 2012, ADM notified the Company that it was terminating the commercial alliance effective February 8, 2012, citing the projected financial returns from the alliance were too uncertain.

Upon termination of the alliance, the Company’s intellectual property licenses to ADM Polymer and Telles ended, with Metabolix retaining all rights to its intellectual property.  ADM retained its manufacturing facility located in Clinton, Iowa, previously used to produce PHA biopolymers for Telles.  Also upon termination, contractual payments made to the Company by ADM during the term of the alliance totaling $38,885 and recorded as deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet were immediately recognized during its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, as the Company had no further performance obligations in connection with the alliance.

After termination of the Commercial Alliance Agreement, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement in which the parties agreed to specific terms related to the winding up and dissolution of Telles. Under this Settlement Agreement, the Company purchased certain assets of the joint venture for $2,982, including Telles’s entire inventory, exclusive and perpetual rights to all of Telles’s trademarks, and all product registrations, certifications and approvals for Telles’s PHA biopolymers. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, ADM relinquished any claims with respect to certain co-funded equipment previously acquired by the Company and situated at locations other than ADM’s Clinton, Iowa manufacturing facility, and the Company and Telles waived any rights to post-termination manufacturing and fermentation services under the Commercial Alliance Agreement.

In February 2013, Telles was formally dissolved and ADM notified the Company that no trade or other obligations remain to be paid. As a result, the Company does not believe that it is contingently liable for any third party obligations stemming from the former ADM collaboration.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jul. 29, 2013
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	METABOLIX, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001121702
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		34,516,762
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

RELATED PARTIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RELATED PARTIES

RELATED PARTIES

15. RELATED PARTIES

The Company engaged in various transactions with Tepha, Inc. (“Tepha”), a related party, and recorded $25 and $86 of license and royalty revenue during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded license and royalty revenue from Tepha of $59 and $94, respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding receivables due from Tepha.

The Company engaged in various transactions with ADM and Telles during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as the parties wound down the affairs of the terminated Commercial Alliance Agreement.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no outstanding receivables or payment obligations remained with either party.