10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended      September 30, 2013

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File number:     000-51836

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Illinois	36-4368292
(State of Organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

c/o Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. General Partner 141 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 1340A Chicago, Illinois	60604
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(312) 264-4375

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [X]    No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).                                          Yes [X]    No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Large accelerated filer [  ]     Accelerated filer [  ]      Non-accelerated filer [ ]Smaller reporting company [X]       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).        Yes [   ]  No [ X ]

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. are included in Item 1:

	Page(s)
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2013(Unaudited) and December 31, 2012(Audited)	3
Condensed Schedules of Investments as of September 30, 2013(Unaudited) and December 31, 2012(Audited)	4-5
Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012    (Unaudited)	6
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Net Assets) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and    September 30, 2012(Unaudited)	7
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8-17

2

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2013(Unaudited)  and December 31, 2012(Audited)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts:
Cash at brokers	$	3,373,928		$	5,669,131
Unrealized loss on open futures contracts, net		(114,010)			(50,123)
Total equity in brokers trading accounts		3,259,918			5,619,008
U.S. Government securities, at fair value		17,298,568			19,441,749
Cash and cash equivalents		208,266			3,643,786
Total assets	$	20,766,752		$	28,704,543
LIABILITIES
Brokerage commissions payable	$	4,357		$	4,357
Accrued management fees – General Partner		17,468			23,510
Administrative and other fees payable		144,270			249,876
Withdrawals payable		451,270			2,656,516
Total liabilities		617,365			2,934,259
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (NET ASSETS)
Partners’ capital (net assets)		20,149,387			25,770,284
Total liabilities and partners’ capital (net assets)	$	20,766,752	-	$	28,704,543

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

3

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)

U.S. Government securities:			Percent of Partners' Capital
(total cost - $17,298,240)	Fair Value		(Net Assets)
U.S. Treasury Bills due 10/03/2013 at .03%, principal amount  $1,000,000	$	999,997	4.96	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/13/2014 at .02%, principal amount  $8,300,000		8,299,390	41.19
U.S. Treasury Bills due 3/20/2014 at .03%, principal amount  $4,000,000		3,999,890	19.85
U.S. Treasury Bills due 5/01/2014 at .01%, principal amount  $4,000,000		3,999,291	19.85
	$	17,298,568	85.85	%
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures		Percent of Partners' Capital
	Contracts		(Net Assets)
Futures contracts*:
U.S. Futures Positions
Agricultural	$	(42,915)	(0.21)	%
Metals		35,320	0.17
Energy		(182,873)	(0.91)
Total U.S. Futures Positions		(190,468)	(0.95)	%
Foreign Futures Positions
Agricultural		(29,133)	(0.14)
Metals		105,591	0.52
Total Foreign Futures Positions		76,458	0.38	%
Total Futures Contracts	$	(114,010)	(0.57)	%
*No individual futures contract position constitutes greater than 1 percent of Partners’ Capital (Net Assets).
Accordingly, the number of contracts and expiration dates are not presented.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2012(Audited)

U.S. Government securities:			Percent of Partners' Capital
	Fair Value		(Net Assets)
(total cost - $19,437,729)
U.S. Treasury Bills due 1/10/2013 at 0.09%, principal amount $2,100,000	$	2,097,948	8.14	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/7/2013 at 0.12%, principal amount $1,150,000		1,149,858	4.46
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/14/2013 at 0.1%, principal amount $2,100,000		2,097,741	8.14
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/14/2013 at 0.05%, principal amount $1,500,000		1,499,917	5.82
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/14/2013 at 0.04%, principal amount $800,000		799,964	3.10
U.S. Treasury Bills due 3/07/2013 at 0.1%, principal amount $2,100,000		2,097,619	8.14
U.S. Treasury Bills due 3/07/2013 at 0.06%, principal amount $4,000,000		3,999,596	15.52
U.S. Treasury Bills due 3/14/2013 at 0.06%, principal amount $1,500,000		1,499,811	5.82
U.S. Treasury Bills due 3/14/2013 at 0.04%, principal amount $800,000		799,936	3.10
U.S. Treasury Bills due 4/18/2013 at 0.04%, principal amount $1,500,000		1,499,678	5.82
U.S. Treasury Bills due 4/18/2013 at 0.05%, principal amount $900,000		899,875	3.50
U.S. Treasury Bills due 5/02/2013 at 0.06%, principal amount $1,000,000		999,806	3.88
	$	19,441,749	75.44	%
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long		Percent of Partners' Capital
	Contracts		(Net Assets)
Futures contracts*:
U.S. Futures Positions
Agricultural	$	(337,574)	(1.31)	%
Metals		(44,370)	(0.17)
Energy		43,440	0.17
Total U.S. Futures Positions		(338,504)	(1.31)
Foreign Futures Positions
Agricultural		(502)	(0.00)
Metals		288,883	1.12
Total Foreign Futures Positions		288,381	1.12
Total Futures Contracts	$	(50,123)	(0.19)	%
*No individual futures contract position constitutes greater than 1 percent of Partners’ Capital (Net Assets).
Accordingly, the number of contracts and expiration dates are not presented.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Statements of Operations for the Three andNine  Months Ended September 30, 2013and September 30,  2012  (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended		Nine  Months Ended		Nine  Months Ended
	September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Net trading gains (losses):
Realized	$	418,601		$	2,835,256	$	(760,005)	$	(62,180)
Change in unrealized		489,836			193,829		(63,887)		1,738,495
Commissions		(10,153)			(13,646)		(36,569)		(50,348)
		898,284	-		3,015,439		(860,461)		1,625,967
Investment income:
Interest income		1,943			5,094		8,170		22,493
Other income		41,632					41,632
Gain from MF Global  (Note 4)		-			817,140		-		817,140
		43,575			822,234		49,802		839,633
Expenses:
Management fees – General Partner		52,308			70,872		173,294		236,841
Administrative fees and other expenses		96,015			169,845		314,173		538,216
		148,323			240,717		487,467		775,057
Net investment gain (loss)		(104,748)			581,517		(437,665)		64,576
Net income (loss)	$	793,536		$	3,596,956	$	(1,298,126)	$	1,690,543
Net increase (decrease) in NAV per GP and LP unit:
General Partner	$	5.92		$	21.07	$	(9.27)	$	9.67
Limited Partners-Series A	$	5.92		$	21.07	$	(9.27)	$	9.67
Limited Partners-Series B	$	5.44		$	20.72	$	(9.46)	$	9.47
Net income (loss) per General and Limited Partners (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period):
General Partner	$	8,521		$	48,664	$	(14,168)	$	29,914
Limited Partners-Series A		753,130			3,430,079		(1,225,961)		1,594,645
Limited Partners-Series B		31,885			118,213		(57,997)		65,984
	$	793,536		$	3,596,956	$	(1,298,126)	$	1,690,543
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

.

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Net Assets) for theNineMonths Ended September 30, 2013and September 30, 2012  (Unaudited)

	General Partner			Limited Partners
				Series A			Series B
	Number of Units	Dollars		Number of Units	Dollars		Number of Units	Dollars		Total		Total
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2012	1,732	$	299,995	140,726	$	24,371,666	6,485	$	1,098,623	$	25,470,289	$	25,770,284
Contributions	-		-	-		-	144		25,117		25,117		25,117
Net income (loss)			(14,168)			(1,225,961)	-		(57,997)		(1,283,958)		(1,298,126)
Withdrawals	(293)		(50,000)	(24,692)		(4,126,799)	(1,035)		(171,089)		(4,297,888)		(4,347,888)
Partners’ capital (net assets), September 30, 2013	1,439	$	235,827	116,034	$	19,018,906	5,594	$	894,654	$	19,913,560	$	20,149,387
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2011	3,444	$	584,022	198,238	$	33,611,272	4,135	$	690,297	$	34,301,569	$	34,885,591
Contributions	-		-	-		-	2,171		355,231		355,231		355,231
Net income (loss)	-		29,914	-		1,594,645	-		65,984		1,660,629		1,690,543
Withdrawals	(1,134)		(200,000)	(39,170)		(6,697,578)	(117)		(19,860)		(6,717,438)		(6,917,438)
Partners’ capital (net assets), September 30, 2012	2,310	$	413,936	159,068	$	28,508,339	6,189	$	1,091,652	$	29,599,991	$	30,013,927
	Sept 30,		Sept 30,
Per unit data	2013		2012
Net asset value Series A	$   163.91	$	179.22
Net asset value Series B	$   159.93	$	176.39
Net asset value General Partner	$   163.91	$	179.22
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

7

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1.Significant Accounting Policies:  

Nature of Business and Organization: Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the "Partnership") is an Illinois Limited Partnership that was established in May 2000. The Partnership trades a portfolio primarily of commodity futures and forward contracts, principally on recognized exchanges. The Partnership may also purchase contracts in the over the counter marketplace under certain circumstances. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the “long side” of the market. The Partnership’s investment strategy is designed to replicate the Rogers International Commodity Index ® (the “Index”) and positions are rebalanced monthly to maintain the Index’s relative weightings. James B. Rogers designed the Index.

The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001 with assets raised from the offering of its original units of limited partnership interest, now referred to as "Series A" units, and offered Series A units through October 2005.The Partnership began offering Series B units in November2010.  Series A units and Series B units are identical with respect to their participation in the profits and losses of the Partnership;however, Series B units do not participate in any Partnership expenses or recoveries related to the bankruptcy of Refco Inc. and its affiliates.The Partnership’s General Partner and commodity pool operator is Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. (the “General Partner”).

Accounting Policies:  The Partnership follows Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition and results of operation. 

Net Assets: The valuation of net assets includes open commodity futures contracts owned by the Partnership, if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these contracts has been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day of each month. Net asset value is determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals partners’ capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:  Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents represent amounts on deposit with a broker to facilitate payment of expenses and partner withdrawals.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:Securities and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value.

Deposits with Brokers:  The Partnership deposits assets with brokers subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and broker requirements.  Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such brokers.  The Partnership earns interest income on its assets deposited with the brokers.

Revenue Recognition: Futures and forward contracts are recorded on a trade date basis and realized gains or losses are recognized when contracts are liquidated.  Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net unrealized gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses.  Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the preceding period is reported in the statement of operations. 

Interest Income Recognition:The Partnership records interest income on the accrual basis.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The Partnership’s estimate regarding the carrying value of its receivable from MF Global, Inc. (Note 4) is a significant estimate and due to the uncertainty of future events, this estimate could change in the near term. 

Foreign Currency Translation: Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month.  The Partnership does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities and derivative financial instruments held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized trading gains or losses.

8

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 1.Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):

Ongoing Offering Expenses: Ongoing offering expenses are accrued on an ongoing basis and charged to expense as incurred.

Income Taxes: No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements as each partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on its respective share of the Partnership’s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.

The Partnership is generally not subject to examination by U.S. federal or state taxing authorities for tax years before 2009. The Partnership has no material uncertain tax positions, and accordingly, has not recorded a liability for the payment of interest or penalties through September 30, 2013.

Profit and Loss Allocation:Profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated by series based on the number of units held.

Withdrawals Payable:  Withdrawals approved by the General Partner prior to month-end with a fixed effective date and fixed amount are recorded as withdrawals payable as of month-end (See Note 6).

Statement of Cash Flows:  The Partnership has elected not to provide a statement of cash flows as permitted by GAAP as all of the following conditions have been met:

-During the year, substantially all of the Partnership’s investments were highly liquid;

-Substantially all of the Partnership’s investments are carried at fair value;

-The Partnership had little or no debt during the year;

-The Partnership’s financial statements include a statement of changes in partners’ capital (net assets).

Note 2.Fair Value Measurements:

As described in Note 1, the Partnership records its investments at fair value.  Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The Partnership utilizes valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value.   The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).   The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1.  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2.  Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. 

Level 3.  Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.  The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information in the circumstances and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. 

9

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 2.Fair Value Measurements (Continued):

The following section describes the valuation techniquesused by the Partnership to measure different financial instruments at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the financial instrument is categorized.

The fair values of exchange traded futures contracts are based upon exchange settlement prices.  Money market funds included in cash and cash equivalents are valued using quoted market prices.  U.S. Government securities are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on quoted prices for identical assets in an active market. These financial instruments are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 using the fair value hierarchy:

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Description	Level 1		Level 1
Equity in brokers trading account:
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net*	$	(114,010)	$	(50,123)
U.S. Government securities*		17,298,568		19,441,749
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds		65,397		3,112,326
Total assets at fair value	$	17,249,955	$	22,503,953

*See condensed schedules of investments for further description.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 there were no Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities. The Partnership assesses the levels of the investments at each measurement day, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers among Levels 1, 2 and 3 during the year.

In addition, substantially all of the Partnership’s other assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments and are reflected at fair value, or at carrying amounts that approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

10

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 3.Derivative Transactions

Qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative agreements are presented.

The Partnership’s business is the speculative trading of futures contracts. The Partnership does not consider any derivative instruments to be hedging instruments, as this term is generally understood under FASB guidance.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership’s derivative contracts had the following impact on the statements of financial condition and statements of operations:

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	119,030	$	(191,077)	$	(72,047)
Metals		171,331		(30,420)		140,911
Energy				(182,874)		(182,874)
Totals	$	290,361	$	(404,371)	$	(114,010)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in brokers trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	104,777	$	(442,852)	$	(338,075)
Metals		394,948		(150,435)		244,513
Energy		83,363		(39,924)		43,439
Totals	$	583,088	$	(633,211)	$	(50,123)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in broker trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

11

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 3.Derivative Transactions (Continued):

Trading revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
Type of Contract	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Agricultural	$	(16,474)	$	768,069	$	(702,665)	$	694,694
Metals		653,706		1,513,704		429,875		1,505,323
Energy		271,205		747,312		(551,102)		(523,702)
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Line Item in Statements of Operations
Realized	$	418,601	$	2,835,256	$	(760,005)	$	(62,180)
Change in unrealized		489,836		193,829		(63,887)		1,738,495
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315

Trading income is exclusive of brokerage commissions.

For the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the monthly average number of contracts bought and sold was509,610,  670,and 905, respectively.

Note 4.MF Global Bankruptcy:

On October 31, 2011, MF Global Inc., the Partnership’s clearing broker at that time (“MF Global”), reported to the  Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm.  As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and a SIPC led liquidation commenced.  As of October 31, 2011, the Partnership held $5,131,353 of partners’ capital in customer segregated and secured accounts at MF Global Inc. on deposit as required to support futures positions. The majority of the Partnership’s assets were then, and are now, held in bank custody accounts. 

Through December 31, 2011, this receivable was reduced by $2,174,797 comprised of disbursements initiated by the bankruptcy trustee, as well as other trading related activities.  The Partnership filed appropriate claims with the bankruptcy trustee for remaining amounts due (the MF Global Claim).  However, due to the inherent uncertainty in the timing and results of the liquidation process from the bankruptcy proceedings, the Partnership recognized a 2.78% (or $1,130,702) loss on the MF Global Claim, which was an estimate of the Partnership’s pro-rata share of the projected MF Global asset shortfall. 

The Partnership received $295,025 in distributions from the MF Global bankruptcy trustee during 2012.   At September 30, 2012, the Partnership wrote up the value of its MF Global bankruptcy claims by $817,140, based on information received regarding independent third party bids for the claims.  Due to uncertainties surrounding the eventual timing and recovery amounts available through the MF Global bankruptcy process, in October 2012, the General Partner concluded that selling the Partnership’s bankruptcy claims was in the best interest of the Partnership and its investors.  Accordingly, the Partnership sold its claims on November 1, 2012, recognizing an additional $82,206 in income as of October 31, 2012, to write up the claims to the final sale amount.  Income recognized from each of the September 30, 2012 and October 31, 2012 write-ups was allocated to the investors in the Partnership in the month in which each such event occurred.   The final net loss sustained by the Partnership related to the MF Global bankruptcy, after the sale of the MF Global claims, was $231,356. 

12

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 5.Agreements and Related-Party Transactions:

The Limited Partnership Agreement vests all responsibility and powers for the management of the business and affairs of the Partnership with the General Partner, Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., including trading decisions.

The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to the General Partner equal to 0.08333% of the net assets of the Partnership at the close of the preceding month (1.00% per annum).

The Partnership is responsible for the administrative and trading expenses related to its operations. The General Partner may incur certain expenses on behalf of the Partnership and charge the Partnership for its allocable portion of these expenses.

Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C. (“Uhlmann”), a party related to the General Partner by reason of common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the selling group manager for the Partnership.  The Partnership pays Uhlmann a share of selling fees when units are sold by its registered brokers.  Selling fees of up to 2% of the gross offering proceeds (which includes a 0.50% reallowance to Uhlmann) are charged to partners’ capital upon issuance of Series B Partnership units.

In addition, there is an annual trailing servicing fee of up to 1% of the net asset value of the specific partner’s capital account payable to the soliciting broker-dealer for ongoing investor services.  For all Series B units sold, the total trailing servicing fee is not to exceed 7.99% of the gross offering proceeds of the units sold.

The Price Futures Group, Inc. (“PFG”), a related party to the General Partner through common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the introducing broker for the Partnership, whereby certain accounts of the Partnership are introduced to the Partnership’s clearing broker. A portion of the brokerage fee paid by the Partnership for clearing transactions is paid to PFGby the clearing broker.

Fund Dynamics, LLC, an affiliate of the General Partner through common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the Partnership’s administrator. Fund Dynamics, LLC calculates both the daily and monthly Net Asset Value (“NAV”), prepares the monthly accounting package, and prepares monthly investor statements.

A summary of fees charged by related parties to the Partnership is as follows:

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Management fees – General Partner	$	52,307	$	70,872	$	173,294	$	236,841
Administrative fees – Fund Dynamics		12,464		16,829		40,906		55,312
Trailing servicing fees – Uhlmann		38,882		45,206		125,514		150,206
Selling Fees – Uhlmann		-		5,746		513		7,250

Note 6.Partnership Capital and Withdrawals:

The Partnership accepts contributions as of the close of business on the last business day of each month for investment on the first day of the next succeeding month. The General Partner may accept or reject contributions and waive the minimum contribution amounts in its sole discretion. 

Effective November 1, 2010, the Partnership began accepting contributions for Series B units. The Partnership has been closed to Series A units contributions since October 31, 2005. Effective May 1, 2013, the Partnership ceased offering its units of limited partnership and is no longer accepting contributions. 

13

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 6.Partnership Capital and Withdrawals(Continued):

The purchase price of a unit is the net asset value per unit as of the end of each calendar month. Net asset value per unit is calculated as the net asset value at month-end divided by the number of outstanding units. 

The Partnership accepts withdrawals on a monthly basis. Requests for withdrawal should be received by the General Partner no later than six business days prior to the end of the month in which an investor chooses to withdraw. Requests for withdrawal should be sent to the General Partner by email, fax, or overnight courier.

Note 7.         Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Credit and Market Risk:

The Partnership is involved in trading activities that may have market and/or credit risk. Financial instruments employed in the Partnership’s operations may have market and/or credit risk in excess of the amounts recorded in the statement of financial condition.

Market Risk - Market risks arise from changes in the market value of financial instruments.  Theoretically, the Partnership’s exposure is equal to the notional contract value of futures contracts entered. Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. 

Credit Risk - Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract.  The Partnership’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is generally the net unrealized gain on the open positions plus the value of the margin or collateral held by the counterparty.  Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges.   Financial instruments traded off-exchange give rise to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform by, the counterparties to such trades.

Concentration of Credit Risk - The Partnership clears all of its futures trades through one clearing broker, ADM Investor Services, Inc.  In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk.  This risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties to these transactions.

The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities.  In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of the Partnership’s assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits.

The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.

14

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

Note 8.   Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for limited partners for the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	157.99	$	154.48	$	158.15	$	155.67
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		7.07		6.59		17.65		16.77
Investment income:		0.02		0.01		4.84		5.45
Expenses:		(1.17)		(1.15)		(1.42)		(1.50)
Net investment gain (loss)		(1.15)		(1.14)		3.42		3.95
Net gain (loss) per unit		5.92		5.45		21.07		20.72
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39
Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	173.18	$	169.39	$	169.55	$	166.92
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		(5.74)		(5.97)		9.36		7.43
Investment income:		0.06		0.06		4.54		6.30
Expenses:		(3.59)		(3.55)		(4.23)		(4.26)
Net investment gain (loss)		(3.53)		(3.49)		0.31		2.04
Net gain (loss) per unit		(9.27)		(9.46)		9.67		9.47
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39

15

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(2.90)	%	(2.95)	%	7.32	%	9.40	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	2.86	%	2.89	%	3.04	%	3.56	%
Total return (3)	3.75	%	3.53	%	13.32	%	13.31	%
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(4.34)	%	(4.39)	%	0.26	%	1.62	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	4.27	%	4.32	%	3.62	%	3.36	%
Total return (3)	(5.35)	%	(5.58)	%	5.70	%	5.67	%

The above ratios were calculated for the partners taken as a whole.  The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partner’s capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions (see Note 5).

(1) Annualized.

(2 ) The ratio of expenses to average partners’ capital (net asset) values does not include brokerage commissions.

(3)Not annualized.

Note 9.Litigation:

The Partnership is a beneficiary of a Litigation Trust which is seeking recoveries from third parties, related to the 2005 bankruptcy of Refco, Inc. and numerous affiliates (the “Refco Bankruptcy”). As of September 30, 2013,  the Partnership has received the full value of its allowed claims in the Refco Bankruptcy and has recovered approximately $5.7 million in excess of its allowed securities claim in the Refco Bankruptcy and may receive additional Refco Bankruptcy related recoveries, although there can be no assurance that it will or that any additional recoveries will be material. Management is unable to estimate the amounts of any such additional recoveries.

16

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Notes to the Financial Statements  (Unaudited)

All Refco Bankruptcy related recoveries received by the Partnership, including excess recoveries except as described below, have been allocated among all partners in the Partnership who were partners as of October 31, 2005, on a pro-rata basis as of October 31, 2005, with redeemed partners receiving cash distributions. Cash distributions to redeemed partners from excess

Note 9.   Litigation(Continued);

recoveries during the nine months ending September 30, 2013 totaled approximately $434,424.   There were no cash distributions to redeemed partners for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership, the Partnership reimbursed the General Partner approximately $7,796 from excess recoveries for legal costs incurred by the General Partner defending against suits related to the Refco Bankruptcy in 2010.  There are no fees due under these arrangements as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Partnership has reserved $69,646 of the excess Refco related recoveries to apply to expenses incurred to administer ongoing communication with, and distributions and reporting to, redeemed limited partners with respect to Refco related recoveries received by the Partnership. These expenses include but are not limited to professional fees, printing, postage, and administration fees. At September 30, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012, $0 and $4,646 of these expenses is included in administrative and other fees payable on the statement of financial condition.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012,  $178,990 and $456,561 in excess Refco related recoveries were payable to redeemed limited partners.

Note 10.Indemnifications:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties, both of which provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Partnership that have not yet occurred. The Partnership expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.

Note 11.Interim Financial Statements:

The statements of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, as of September 30, 2013, the statement of operations and changes in partners’ capital (net assets) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012and the accompanying notes to the financial statements are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP may be omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  In the opinion of the General Partner, such financial statements and accompanying disclosures reflect all adjustments, which were of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2013, results of operations and changes in partner’s capital (net assets) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The results of operation for three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC.

Note 12.Subsequent Events:

Subsequent to September 30, 2013,withdrawals totaled approximately  $338,894.

17

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

The Partnership’s principalobjective is to provide an alternative investment vehicle for investors with diversified investment portfolios.  The Partnership’s trading is designed to replicate the positions which comprise the Rogers International Commodity Index.  The Partnership invests and trades in a portfolio of commodity futures and exchange traded forward contracts.  The Partnership invests and trades solely on the “long side” of the market.  The General Partner(“Beeland Management”) manages all business of the Partnership.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership raised additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to its offering, which ceased May 1, 2013and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing.  Due to the nature of the Partnership’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

LIQUIDITY

Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.”  During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit.  This may affect the Partnership’s ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed.  Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading.  Similar occurrences could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Partnership to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades.  In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Partnership may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.

Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Partnership’s trading operations, the Partnership’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Partnership’s net income or loss is directly related to changes in the value of the Index, which the Partnership is designed to replicate, and is not dependent on trading decisions made by the Beeland Management apart from balancing positions to track the Index.  In periods of general market inflation, Beeland Management would expect the value of the Index to increase; similarly, in periods of general market deflation, Beeland Management would expect the value of the Index to decrease.  The Partnership’s performance may be negative in years when the Index’s performance is positive due to fees charged.

The components of the Partnership’s return are normally the gains and losses recognized from the changes in futures market prices and the interest income earned on cash balances. The mechanics and rules of futures markets allow the Partnership to earn interest on approximately 90% to 100% of its assets.  

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Partnership’s net assets were $20,149,387and $25,770,284, respectively.  

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
Net Revenues	Sept 30, 2013		Sept 30, 2012		Sept 30, 2013		Sept 30, 2012
Realized net trading gains	$	418,601	$	2,835,256	$	(760,005)	$	(68,824)
Unrealized trading gains (losses)		489,836		193,829		(63,887)		1,738,495
Interest income		1,943		5,094		8,170		22,493
Commissions		(10,153)		(13,646)		(36,569)		(43,704)
Other income		41,632		817,140		41,632		817,140
Total Net Revenues		941,859		3,837,673		(810,659)		2,465,600
Operating Expenses
Management fees		52,308		70,872		173,294		236,841
Administrative fees and other expenses		96,015		169,845		314,173		538,216
Total Operating Expenses		148,323		240,717		487,467		775,057
Net Income	$	793,536	$	3,596,956	$	(1,298,126)	$	1,690,543

E-1

The Partnership pays various fees and expenses on a continuing basis which include management fees, servicing fees, and brokerage commission and transaction fees.

Results of Operations

2013

The Partnership posted a gain of 3.68% in January.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was positive.  The energy, agricultural and metals sectors posted gains of 2.36%, 1.00% and 0.61% respectively. The best performing commodities in January were canola, RBOB gasoline, cotton, platinum and tin.  The highest grossing commoditieswere light crude, brent crude, cotton, RBOB gasoline and corn.

The Partnership posted a loss of -4.27% in February.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was negative.  The energy, agriculture and metals sectors posted losses of -1.80%, -1.02% and -1.17%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in February were lumber orange juice, coffee, soybean meal, and natural gas.  The highest grossing commodities were cotton, lumber, natural gas, coffee and orange juice.

The Partnership posted a gain of .14% in March.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was mixed.  The energy sector posted a gain of 1.46%, while the agriculture and metals sectors posted losses of -.37% and -.66%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in March were natural gas, orange juice, cocoa-NYSE, oats and light crude. The highest grossing commodities were light crude, natural gas, cotton, soybean oil and orange juice.

The Partnership posted a loss of -3.86% in April.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was negative.  The energy, metals and agricultural sectors posted losses of -2.12%, -1.31% and -.21%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in April were cocoa, natural gas, wheat,orange juice and sugar. The highest grossing commodities were wheat, natural gas, KC wheat, cocoa and soybeans.

The Partnership posted a loss of -2.01% in May.  For the month of May,  the performance for the Index’s sectors was all negative. The energy, agricultural and metal sectors posted losses of -0.97%, -0.69% and -0.04% respectively. The best performing commodities in May were lead, orange juice, palladium, soybean meal and soybeans.  The highest grossing commoditieswere soybeans, lead, copper, corn and soybean meal.

The Partnership posted a loss  of- 2.55% in June.  For the month of June,  the performance for the Index’s sectors was mixed.  The energy sector posted a gain of 1.02%, while the agriculture and metals sectors posted losses of –1.50%, and –1.84%, respectively. The best performing commodities in June were sugar, lean hogs, light crude, gas oil and cotton.  The highest grossing commoditieswere light crude, brent crude, cotton, sugar and lean hogs.

E-2

The Partnership posted a gain of 3.25% in July.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was mixed. The agriculture sector posted a loss of .37%, while the energy and metals sectors posted gains of 3.11% and .52% respectively.  The best performing commodities In July were cocoa, coffee, orange juice, palladium and RBOB gasoline. The highest grossing commodities were light crude, brent crude, RBOB gasoline, gold and coffee.

The Partnership posted a gain of 3.13% in August.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was all positive. The agricultural, metals and energy sectors returned 0.49%, 0.94% and 1.94%, respectively. The best performing commodities in August were silver, soybean meal, soybeans, rubber and euro rapeseed.  The highest grossing commodities were light crude, brent crude, soybeans, silver and gold.

The Partnership posted a loss of -2.58% in September.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was all negative. The energy, agricultural and metals sectors returned -1.90%, -0.36% and -0.16%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in September were tin, cocoa, lumber, and sugar. The highest grossing commodities were cotton, wheat, copper, tin and lumber.

The Partnership’s year to date return for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was -5.58%.

2012

The Partnership posted a gain of 3.16% in January.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was positive.  The metals, agriculture and energy sectors posted gains of 2.62%, .40% and .35%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in January were tin, silver, rubber, orange juice and zinc.  The highest grossing commodities were brent crude, aluminum, silver, copper and gold.

The Partnership posted a gain of 4.13% in February.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was positive.  The energy, agriculture and metals sectors posted gains of 3.65%, .56% and .22%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in February were brent crude, soybean meal, canola, soybeans and light crude.  The highest grossing commodities were light crude, brent crude, soybeans, RBOB gasoline and sugar.

The Partnership posted a loss of 2.84% in March.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was negative.  The agriculture, metals and energy sectors posted losses of -1.29%, -1.01% and -.26%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in March were soybean meal, oats, canola, Euro rapeseed and soybeans.  The highest grossing commodities were soybeans, brent crude, cotton, soybean meal and canola.

The Partnership posted a loss of -0.93% in April.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was negative. The agriculture, energy, and metals sectors posted losses of -0.58%, -0.09%, and -0.02%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in April were soybean meal, soybeans, azuki beans, lumber and lead. The highest grossing commodities were crude oil, soybeans, lead, soybean meal, and zinc.

The Partnership posted a loss of -11.76% in May.  The performance for all of the Index’s sectors was negative.  The agriculture, energy, and metals sectors posted losses of –2.94%, -6.45%, and -1.97%, respectively.The best performing commodities in May were lean hogs,milling wheat, live cattle, natural gasand KC wheat. The highest grossing commoditieswere live cattle, natural gas, lean hogs, milling wheat and milk.

The Partnership posted a gain of 2.23% in June.  The performance for the Index’s sectors wasmixed. The agriculture sector posted a gain of 3.03%, while the energyand metals sectors posted losses of -0.51% and -0.01%respectively.  The best performing commodities in June were oats, corn, soybean meal, wheat, and natural gas. The highest grossing commoditieswere corn, wheat, soybeans, natural gas, and copper.

The Partnership posted a gain of 5.49% in July.  The performance for the Index’s sectors wasmixed. The agriculture and energy sectors posted gains of 3.45% and 2.60% respectively, while the metals sector posted  alossof -

E-3

0.23%.  The best performing commodities in July were corn, soybean meal, KC wheat, wheat and soybeans.  The highest grossing commoditieswere corn, brent crude, wheat, light crude, and soybeans.

The Partnership posted a gain of 4.45% in August.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was all positive. The agriculture, energy, and metals sectors posted gains of 0.34%, 3.70%, and 0.67%, respectively.  The best performing commodities in August were RBOB gasoline, silver, heating oil, gas oil, and brent crude.  The highest grossing commoditieswere light crude, brent crude, RBOB gasoline, cotton, and silver.

The Partnership posted a gain of 2.85% in September.  The performance for the Index’s sectors was mixed. The agriculture and energy sectors posted losses of 0.97% and .82% respectively and the metals sector posted a gain of 2.12%.  The best performing commodities in September were rubber, lead, nickel, zinc and natural gas.  The highest grossing commoditieswere aluminum, natural gas, lead, copper and zinc.

For the month ending October 31, 2011, the Partnership recognized a loss of $1,130,702 or 2.78% due to the MF Global bankruptcy.  This action was based on information provided by the bankruptcy trustee at that time.  Based on current information regarding the bankruptcy proceedings, including with respect to the levels at which other claimants have been able to sell their claims, it is the opinion of the Partnership that the ultimate effect of the MF Global bankruptcy will be significantly less than originally estimated. For this reason, at September 30, 2012, the Partnership wrote up the value of its MF Global bankruptcy claim by $817,140. 

The Partnership’s year to date return for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 5.70%.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Partnership trades primarily in futures and exchange traded forward contracts and may therefore become a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the open positions of the Partnership at the same time, the Partnership could experience substantial losses.

In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, exchange-traded forward, or over the counter contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Partnership. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.  In off-exchange transactions, traders must rely solely on the credit of their counterparties.  Margins, which may be subject to loss in the event of a default, are generally required in exchange trading, and counterparties may require collateral in the over-the-counter markets.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES – VALUATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP’S POSITIONS

The General Partner believes that the accounting policies that are most critical to the Partnership’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Partnership’s positions.  The majority of the Partnership’s positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges.  Any spot or forward foreign currency contracts held by the Partnership are also valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers’ quotes.  Thus, the General Partner expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Partnership’s assets will be valued on a daily basis using objective measures.

E-4

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Partnership does not engage in off-balance sheet arrangements with other entities.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Partnership does not enter into any contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments of a type that would be typical for an operating company or that would affect its liquidity or capital resources.  The Partnership’s sole business is trading futures,exchange-traded commodity forward, and,possibly,commodity related over the counter contracts.  All such contracts are settled by offset, not delivery.  The Partnership’s Financial Statements, included in this report, present a Schedule of Investments setting forth the unrealized gain and unrealized loss on the Partnership’s open futures contracts at September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012.

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Beeland Management have evaluated the effectiveness of Beeland Management’s disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the Partnership as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is being filed and have concluded that Beeland Management has effective disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership is made known to them by others within Beeland Management, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.There have been no significant changes in Beeland Management’s internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the Partnership that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Beeland Management’s internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the Partnership.

E-5

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required.

ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

 (c)Pursuant to the Partnership’s Limited Partnership Agreement, investors may redeem their units at the end of each calendar month at the then current month-end net asset value per unit.  The redemption of units has no impact on the value of units that remain outstanding, and units are not reissued once redeemed.

The following tables summarize the redemptions by investors during the three months ended September 30, 2013

Series A
Month:	Units Redeemed:	NAV per Unit ($):
July 31, 2013	(1,794.72)	$	163.14
August 31, 2013	(4,565.33)	$	168.25
September 30, 2013	(1,656.79)	$	163.91
Series B
Month:	Units Redeemed:	NAV per Unit ($):
July 31, 2013	-	$	159.20
August 31, 2013	(147.23)	$	164.17
September 30, 2013	-	$	159.93

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.(Removed and Reserved)

ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS

31.01	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
31.02	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
32.01	Section 1350 Certification
32.02	Section 1350 Certification

E-6

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

E-7

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on November 13, 2013.

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

(Registrant)

By: Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner

By: /s/Walter Thomas Price III

Walter Thomas Price III

Managing Member

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:/s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman

Managing Member

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

E-8

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.01

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Walter Thomas Price III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2013

By:  /s/ Walter Thomas Price III

Walter Thomas Price III

Managing Member (Principal Executive Officer)

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.02

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Allen D. Goodman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2013

By:  /s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Walter Thomas Price III, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 13, 2013

By:  /s/ Walter Thomas Price III

Walter Thomas Price III

Managing Member (Principal Executive Officer)

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Allen D. Goodman, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 13, 2013

By:  /s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

XML

Indemnifications

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Indemnifications [Abstract]

Indemnifications

Note 10.Indemnifications:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties, both of which provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Partnership that have not yet occurred. The Partnership expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.

XML

Condensed Schedule Of Investments (Parenthetical) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Total cost	$ 17,298,240	$ 19,437,729
Maximum percentage of individual futures contract position of net assets	1.00%	1.00%
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 10/03/2013 At .03%, Principal Amount $1,000,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due	Oct. 03, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield	0.03%
Principal Amount	1,000,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/13/2014 At .02%, Principal Amount $8,300,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due	Feb. 13, 2014
Treasury Bill Effective Yield	0.02%
Principal Amount	8,300,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/20/2014 At .03%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due	Mar. 20, 2014
Treasury Bill Effective Yield	0.03%
Principal Amount	4,000,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 5/01/2014 At .01%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due	May 01, 2014
Treasury Bill Effective Yield	0.01%
Principal Amount	4,000,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 1/10/2013 At 0.09%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Jan. 10, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.09%
Principal Amount		2,100,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/7/2013 At 0.12%, Principal Amount $1,150,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Feb. 07, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.12%
Principal Amount		1,150,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.1%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Feb. 14, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.10%
Principal Amount		2,100,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.05%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Feb. 14, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.05%
Principal Amount		1,500,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $800,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Feb. 14, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.04%
Principal Amount		800,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/07/2013 At 0.1%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Mar. 07, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.10%
Principal Amount		2,100,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/07/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Mar. 07, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.06%
Principal Amount		4,000,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/14/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Mar. 14, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.06%
Principal Amount		1,500,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/14/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $800,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Mar. 14, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.04%
Principal Amount		800,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 4/18/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Apr. 18, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.04%
Principal Amount		1,500,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 4/18/2013 At 0.05%, Principal Amount $900,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		Apr. 18, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.05%
Principal Amount		900,000
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 5/02/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $1,000,000 [Member]
US Treasury Bill Due		May 02, 2013
Treasury Bill Effective Yield		0.06%
Principal Amount		$ 1,000,000

XML

Derivative Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Derivative Transactions [Abstract]

Derivative Transactions

Note 3.Derivative Transactions

Qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative agreements are presented.

The Partnership’s business is the speculative trading of futures contracts. The Partnership does not consider any derivative instruments to be hedging instruments, as this term is generally understood under FASB guidance.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership’s derivative contracts had the following impact on the statements of financial condition and statements of operations:

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	119,030	$	(191,077)	$	(72,047)
Metals		171,331		(30,420)		140,911
Energy				(182,874)		(182,874)
Totals	$	290,361	$	(404,371)	$	(114,010)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in brokers trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	104,777	$	(442,852)	$	(338,075)
Metals		394,948		(150,435)		244,513
Energy		83,363		(39,924)		43,439
Totals	$	583,088	$	(633,211)	$	(50,123)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in broker trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

Note 3.Derivative Transactions (Continued):

Trading revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
Type of Contract	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Agricultural	$	(16,474)	$	768,069	$	(702,665)	$	694,694
Metals		653,706		1,513,704		429,875		1,505,323
Energy		271,205		747,312		(551,102)		(523,702)
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Line Item in Statements of Operations
Realized	$	418,601	$	2,835,256	$	(760,005)	$	(62,180)
Change in unrealized		489,836		193,829		(63,887)		1,738,495
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315

Trading income is exclusive of brokerage commissions.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the monthly average number of contracts bought and sold was509,610,  670,  and 905, respectively.

XML

Financial Highlights (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Financial Highlights [Abstract]

Financial Highlights for Limited Partners

Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	157.99	$	154.48	$	158.15	$	155.67
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		7.07		6.59		17.65		16.77
Investment income:		0.02		0.01		4.84		5.45
Expenses:		(1.17)		(1.15)		(1.42)		(1.50)
Net investment gain (loss)		(1.15)		(1.14)		3.42		3.95
Net gain (loss) per unit		5.92		5.45		21.07		20.72
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39
Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	173.18	$	169.39	$	169.55	$	166.92
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		(5.74)		(5.97)		9.36		7.43
Investment income:		0.06		0.06		4.54		6.30
Expenses:		(3.59)		(3.55)		(4.23)		(4.26)
Net investment gain (loss)		(3.53)		(3.49)		0.31		2.04
Net gain (loss) per unit		(9.27)		(9.46)		9.67		9.47
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39

Financial Highlights Ratio

	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(2.90)	%	(2.95)	%	7.32	%	9.40	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	2.86	%	2.89	%	3.04	%	3.56	%
Total return (3)	3.75	%	3.53	%	13.32	%	13.31	%
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(4.34)	%	(4.39)	%	0.26	%	1.62	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	4.27	%	4.32	%	3.62	%	3.36	%
Total return (3)	(5.35)	%	(5.58)	%	5.70	%	5.67	%

The above ratios were calculated for the partners taken as a whole.  The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partner’s capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions (see Note 5).

(1)Annualized.

(2 ) The ratio of expenses to average partners’ capital (net asset) values does not include brokerage commissions.

(3)Not annualized.

XML

Interim Financial Statements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Interim Financial Statements [Abstract]

Interim Financial Statements

Note 11.Interim Financial Statements:

Note 1. The statements of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, as of September 30, 2013, the statement of operations and changes in partners’ capital (net assets) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the accompanying notes to the financial statements are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP may be omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  In the opinion of the General Partner, such financial statements and accompanying disclosures reflect all adjustments, which were of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2013, results of operations and changes in partner’s capital (net assets) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The results of operation for three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Summary Of Partnership's Assets Measured At Fair Value On Recurring Basis) (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net	$ (114,010)		$ (50,123)
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net	(114,010)	[1]	(50,123)	[1]
Assets at fair value	17,249,955		22,503,953
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring [Member] | U.S Government Securities [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets at fair value	17,298,568	[1]	19,441,749	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets at fair value	$ 65,397		$ 3,112,326

[1] See condensed schedules of investments for further description.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Transfers among Level 1, 2, and 3	$ 0
Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets at fair value	0	0	0
Liabilities at fair value	0	0	0
Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets at fair value	0	0	0
Liabilities at fair value	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Financial Highlights (Financial Highlights For Limited Partners) (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Series A [Member]
Auction Market Preferred Securities, Stock Series [Line Items]
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	157.99	158.15	173.18	169.55
Net trading gain (losses)	7.07	17.65	(5.74)	9.36
Investment income:	0.02	4.84	0.06	4.54
Expenses:	(1.17)	(1.42)	(3.59)	(4.23)
Net investment gain (loss)	(1.15)	3.42	(3.53)	0.31
Net gain (loss) per unit	$ 5.92	$ 21.07	$ (9.27)	$ 9.67
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	163.91	179.22	163.91	179.22
Series B [Member]
Auction Market Preferred Securities, Stock Series [Line Items]
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	154.48	155.67	169.39	166.92
Net trading gain (losses)	6.59	16.77	(5.97)	7.43
Investment income:	0.01	5.45	0.06	6.30
Expenses:	(1.15)	(1.50)	(3.55)	(4.26)
Net investment gain (loss)	(1.14)	3.95	(3.49)	2.04
Net gain (loss) per unit	$ 5.45	$ 20.72	$ (9.46)	$ 9.47
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	159.93	176.39	159.93	176.39

XML

MF Global Bankruptcy (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012 MF Global Inc. [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 MF Global Inc. [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 MF Global Inc. [Member]	Oct. 31, 2011 MF Global Inc. [Member]
Due To And From Broker-Dealers And Clearing Organizations [Line Items]
General Partners' Capital Account								$ 5,131,353
Receivable reduced by bankruptcy						2,174,797
Partnership loss percentage						2.78%
Partnership recognized loss						1,130,702
Proceeds from bankruptcy distributions							295,025
Claims value adjustment amount							817,140
Claims, additional income					82,206
Net loss	$ 793,536	$ 3,596,956	$ (1,298,126)	$ 1,690,543	$ 231,356

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Provision for income taxes	$ 0
Material uncertain tax positions	0
Liability for the payment of interest and penalties	0
Debt	$ 0

XML

Statements Of Changes In Partners' Capital (Net Assets) (USD $)	General Partner [Member]	Limited Partners-Series A [Member]	Limited Partners-Series B [Member]	Limited Partners [Member]	Total
Partners' capital (net assets) at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 584,022	$ 33,611,272	$ 690,297	$ 34,301,569	$ 34,885,591
Partners' capital (net assets), Units at Dec. 31, 2011	3,444	198,238	4,135
Contributions			355,231	355,231	355,231
Contributions, Units			2,171
Net income (loss)	29,914	1,594,645	65,984	1,660,629	1,690,543
Withdrawals	(200,000)	(6,697,578)	(19,860)	(6,717,438)	(6,917,438)
Withdrawals, Units	(1,134)	(39,170)	(117)
Partners' capital (net assets) at Sep. 30, 2012	413,936	28,508,339	1,091,652	29,599,991	30,013,927
Partners' capital (net assets), Units at Sep. 30, 2012	2,310	159,068	6,189
Partners' capital (net assets) at Dec. 31, 2012	299,995	24,371,666	1,098,623	25,470,289	25,770,284
Partners' capital (net assets), Units at Dec. 31, 2012	1,732	140,726	6,485
Contributions			25,117	25,117	25,117
Contributions, Units			144
Net income (loss)	(14,168)	(1,225,961)	(57,997)	(1,283,958)	(1,298,126)
Withdrawals	(50,000)	(4,126,799)	(171,089)	(4,297,888)	(4,347,888)
Withdrawals, Units	(293)	(24,692)	(1,035)
Partners' capital (net assets) at Sep. 30, 2013	$ 235,827	$ 19,018,906	$ 894,654	$ 19,913,560	$ 20,149,387
Partners' capital (net assets), Units at Sep. 30, 2013	1,439	116,034	5,594

XML

Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1.Significant Accounting Policies:  

Nature of Business and Organization: Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the "Partnership") is an Illinois Limited Partnership that was established in May 2000. The Partnership trades a portfolio primarily of commodity futures and forward contracts, principally on recognized exchanges. The Partnership may also purchase contracts in the over the counter marketplace under certain circumstances. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the “long side” of the market. The Partnership’s investment strategy is designed to replicate the Rogers International Commodity Index ® (the “Index”) and positions are rebalanced monthly to maintain the Index’s relative weightings. James B. Rogers designed the Index.

The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001 with assets raised from the offering of its original units of limited partnership interest, now referred to as "Series A" units, and offered Series A units through October 2005.The Partnership began offering Series B units in November 2010.  Series A units and Series B units are identical with respect to their participation in the profits and losses of the Partnership; however, Series B units do not participate in any Partnership expenses or recoveries related to the bankruptcy of Refco Inc. and its affiliates.  The Partnership’s General Partner and commodity pool operator is Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. (the “General Partner”).

Accounting Policies:  The Partnership follows Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition and results of operation. 

Net Assets: The valuation of net assets includes open commodity futures contracts owned by the Partnership, if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these contracts has been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day of each month. Net asset value is determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals partners’ capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:  Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents represent amounts on deposit with a broker to facilitate payment of expenses and partner withdrawals.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:Securities and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value.

Deposits with Brokers:  The Partnership deposits assets with brokers subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and broker requirements.  Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such brokers.  The Partnership earns interest income on its assets deposited with the brokers.

Revenue Recognition: Futures and forward contracts are recorded on a trade date basis and realized gains or losses are recognized when contracts are liquidated.  Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net unrealized gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses.  Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the preceding period is reported in the statement of operations. 

Interest Income Recognition:The Partnership records interest income on the accrual basis.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The Partnership’s estimate regarding the carrying value of its receivable from MF Global, Inc. (Note 4) is a significant estimate and due to the uncertainty of future events, this estimate could change in the near term. 

Foreign Currency Translation: Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month.  The Partnership does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities and derivative financial instruments held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized trading gains or losses.

Note 1.Significant Accounting Policies (Continued):

Ongoing Offering Expenses: Ongoing offering expenses are accrued on an ongoing basis and charged to expense as incurred.

Income Taxes: No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements as each partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on its respective share of the Partnership’s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.

The Partnership is generally not subject to examination by U.S. federal or state taxing authorities for tax years before 2009. The Partnership has no material uncertain tax positions, and accordingly, has not recorded a liability for the payment of interest or penalties through September 30, 2013.

Profit and Loss Allocation: Profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated by series based on the number of units held.

Withdrawals Payable:  Withdrawals approved by the General Partner prior to month-end with a fixed effective date and fixed amount are recorded as withdrawals payable as of month-end (See Note 6).

Statement of Cash Flows:  The Partnership has elected not to provide a statement of cash flows as permitted by GAAP as all of the following conditions have been met:

-During the year, substantially all of the Partnership’s investments were highly liquid;

-Substantially all of the Partnership’s investments are carried at fair value;

-The Partnership had little or no debt during the year;

-The Partnership’s financial statements include a statement of changes in partners’ capital (net assets).

XML

MF Global Bankruptcy

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

MF Global Bankruptcy [Abstract]

MF Global Bankruptcy

Note 4.MF Global Bankruptcy:

On October 31, 2011, MF Global Inc., the Partnership’s clearing broker at that time (“MF Global”), reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm.  As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and a SIPC led liquidation commenced.  As of October 31, 2011, the Partnership held $5,131,353 of partners’ capital in customer segregated and secured accounts at MF Global Inc. on deposit as required to support futures positions. The majority of the Partnership’s assets were then, and are now, held in bank custody accounts. 

Through December 31, 2011, this receivable was reduced by $2,174,797 comprised of disbursements initiated by the bankruptcy trustee, as well as other trading related activities.  The Partnership filed appropriate claims with the bankruptcy trustee for remaining amounts due (the MF Global Claim).  However, due to the inherent uncertainty in the timing and results of the liquidation process from the bankruptcy proceedings, the Partnership recognized a 2.78% (or $1,130,702) loss on the MF Global Claim, which was an estimate of the Partnership’s pro-rata share of the projected MF Global asset shortfall. 

Note 1. The Partnership received $295,025 in distributions from the MF Global bankruptcy trustee during 2012.   At September 30, 2012, the Partnership wrote up the value of its MF Global bankruptcy claims by $817,140, based on information received regarding independent third party bids for the claims.  Due to uncertainties surrounding the eventual timing and recovery amounts available through the MF Global bankruptcy process, in October 2012, the General Partner concluded that selling the Partnership’s bankruptcy claims was in the best interest of the Partnership and its investors.  Accordingly, the Partnership sold its claims on November 1, 2012, recognizing an additional $82,206 in income as of October 31, 2012, to write up the claims to the final sale amount.  Income recognized from each of the September 30, 2012 and October 31, 2012 write-ups was allocated to the investors in the Partnership in the month in which each such event occurred.   The final net loss sustained by the Partnership related to the MF Global bankruptcy, after the sale of the MF Global claims, was $231,356. 

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

Note 2.Fair Value Measurements:

As described in Note 1, the Partnership records its investments at fair value.  Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The Partnership utilizes valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value.   The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).   The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1.  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2.  Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. 

Level 3.  Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.  The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information in the circumstances and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. 

Note 2.Fair Value Measurements (Continued):

The following section describes the valuation techniquesused by the Partnership to measure different financial instruments at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the financial instrument is categorized.

The fair values of exchange traded futures contracts are based upon exchange settlement prices.  Money market funds included in cash and cash equivalents are valued using quoted market prices.  U.S. Government securities are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on quoted prices for identical assets in an active market. These financial instruments are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 using the fair value hierarchy:

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Description	Level 1		Level 1
Equity in brokers trading account:
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net*	$	(114,010)	$	(50,123)
U.S. Government securities*		17,298,568		19,441,749
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds		65,397		3,112,326
Total assets at fair value	$	17,249,955	$	22,503,953

*See condensed schedules of investments for further description.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 there were no Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities. The Partnership assesses the levels of the investments at each measurement day, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers among Levels 1, 2 and 3 during the year.

In addition, substantially all of the Partnership’s other assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments and are reflected at fair value, or at carrying amounts that approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

XML

Derivative Transactions (Narrative) (Detail)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013 contract	Sep. 30, 2012 contract	Sep. 30, 2013 contract	Sep. 30, 2012 contract
Derivative Transactions [Abstract]
Average contracts bought and sold	509	610	670	905

XML

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions (Narrative) (Detail)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Monthly management fee to General Partner	0.08333%
Management fees	1.00%
Annual trailing servicing fees	1.00%
Maximum trailing servicing fees	7.99%
Uhlmann [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Effective date of acquisition of Beeland Management	Apr. 01, 2013
Selling fees paid	2.00%
Reallowance	0.50%

XML

Subsequent Events (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Withdrawals	$ 451,270	$ 2,656,516
Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Withdrawals	$ 338,894

XML

Condensed Schedule Of Investments (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	$ (114,010)	$ (50,123)
Futures Contracts [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	(114,010)	(50,123)
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	(0.57%)	(0.19%)
Futures Contracts [Member] | U.S. Futures Positions [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	(190,468)	(338,504)
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	(0.95%)	(1.31%)
Futures Contracts [Member] | U.S. Futures Positions [Member] | Agricultural [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	(42,915)	(337,574)
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	(0.21%)	(1.31%)
Futures Contracts [Member] | U.S. Futures Positions [Member] | Metals [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	35,320	(44,370)
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	0.17%	(0.17%)
Futures Contracts [Member] | U.S. Futures Positions [Member] | Energy [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	(182,873)	43,440
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	(0.91%)	0.17%
Futures Contracts [Member] | Foreign Futures Positions [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	76,458	288,381
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	0.38%	1.12%
Futures Contracts [Member] | Foreign Futures Positions [Member] | Agricultural [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	(29,133)	(502)
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	(0.14%)	0.00%
Futures Contracts [Member] | Foreign Futures Positions [Member] | Metals [Member]
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Futures Contracts	105,591	288,883
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	0.52%	1.12%
U.S Government Securities [Member]
Fair Value	17,298,568	19,441,749
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	85.85%	75.44%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 10/03/2013 At .03%, Principal Amount $1,000,000 [Member]
Fair Value	999,997
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	4.96%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/13/2014 At .02%, Principal Amount $8,300,000 [Member]
Fair Value	8,299,390
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	41.19%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/20/2014 At .03%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
Fair Value	3,999,890
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	19.85%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 5/01/2014 At .01%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
Fair Value	3,999,291
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)	19.85%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 1/10/2013 At 0.09%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
Fair Value		2,097,948
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		8.14%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/7/2013 At 0.12%, Principal Amount $1,150,000 [Member]
Fair Value		1,149,858
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		4.46%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.1%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
Fair Value		2,097,741
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		8.14%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.05%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
Fair Value		1,499,917
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		5.82%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 2/14/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $800,000 [Member]
Fair Value		799,964
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		3.10%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/07/2013 At 0.1%, Principal Amount $2,100,000 [Member]
Fair Value		2,097,619
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		8.14%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/07/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $4,000,000 [Member]
Fair Value		3,999,596
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		15.52%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/14/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
Fair Value		1,499,811
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		5.82%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 3/14/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $800,000 [Member]
Fair Value		799,936
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		3.10%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 4/18/2013 At 0.04%, Principal Amount $1,500,000 [Member]
Fair Value		1,499,678
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		5.82%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 4/18/2013 At 0.05%, Principal Amount $900,000 [Member]
Fair Value		899,875
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		3.50%
U.S Government Securities [Member] | U.S. Treasury Bills Due 5/02/2013 At 0.06%, Principal Amount $1,000,000 [Member]
Fair Value		$ 999,806
Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)		3.88%

XML

Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Credit And Market Risk

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Credit And Market Risk [Abstract]

Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Credit And Market Risk

Note 7.         Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Credit and Market Risk:

The Partnership is involved in trading activities that may have market and/or credit risk. Financial instruments employed in the Partnership’s operations may have market and/or credit risk in excess of the amounts recorded in the statement of financial condition.

Market Risk - Market risks arise from changes in the market value of financial instruments.  Theoretically, the Partnership’s exposure is equal to the notional contract value of futures contracts entered. Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. 

Credit Risk - Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract.  The Partnership’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is generally the net unrealized gain on the open positions plus the value of the margin or collateral held by the counterparty.  Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges.   Financial instruments traded off-exchange give rise to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform by, the counterparties to such trades.

Concentration of Credit Risk - The Partnership clears all of its futures trades through one clearing broker, ADM Investor Services, Inc.  In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk.  This risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties to these transactions.

The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities.  In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of the Partnership’s assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits.

The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.

XML

Statements Of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Net trading gains (losses):
Realized	$ 418,601	$ 2,835,256	$ (760,005)	$ (62,180)
Change in unrealized	489,836	193,829	(63,887)	1,738,495
Commissions	(10,153)	(13,646)	(36,569)	(50,348)
Total trading gains (losses)	898,284	3,015,439	(860,461)	1,625,967
Investment income:
Interest income	1,943	5,094	8,170	22,493
Other income	41,632		41,632
Gain from MF Global (Note 4)		817,140		817,140
Total investment income	43,575	822,234	49,802	839,633
Expenses:
Management fees-General Partner	52,308	70,872	173,294	236,841
Administrative fees and other expenses	96,015	169,845	314,173	538,216
Total Expenses	148,323	240,717	487,467	775,057
Net Investment gain (loss)	(104,748)	581,517	(437,665)	64,576
Net income (loss)	793,536	3,596,956	(1,298,126)	1,690,543
General Partner [Member]
Expenses:
Net income (loss)			(14,168)	29,914
Net decrease in NAV per GP and LP unit:
Net increase (decrease) in NAV per GP unit	5.92	21.07	(9.27)	9.67
Net loss per General and Limited Partners (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period):
Net income (loss) per General Partners	8,521	48,664	(14,168)	29,914
Limited Partners-Series A [Member]
Expenses:
Net income (loss)			(1,225,961)	1,594,645
Net decrease in NAV per GP and LP unit:
Net increase (decrease) in NAV per LP unit	$ 5.92	$ 21.07	$ (9.27)	$ 9.67
Net loss per General and Limited Partners (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period):
Net income (loss) per Limited Partners	753,130	3,430,079	(1,225,961)	1,594,645
Limited Partners-Series B [Member]
Expenses:
Net income (loss)			(57,997)	65,984
Net decrease in NAV per GP and LP unit:
Net increase (decrease) in NAV per LP unit	$ 5.44	$ 20.72	$ (9.46)	$ 9.47
Net loss per General and Limited Partners (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period):
Net income (loss) per Limited Partners	$ 31,885	$ 118,213	$ (57,997)	$ 65,984

XML

Statements Of Financial Condition (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Equity in broker trading accounts:
Cash at brokers	$ 3,373,928	$ 5,669,131
Unrealized loss on open futures contracts, net	(114,010)	(50,123)
Total equity in brokers trading accounts	3,259,918	5,619,008
U.S. Government securities, at fair value	17,298,568	19,441,749
Cash and cash equivalents	208,266	3,643,786
Total assets	20,766,752	28,704,543
LIABILITIES
Brokerage commissions payable	4,357	4,357
Accrued management fees - General Partner	17,468	23,510
Administrative and other fees payable	144,270	249,876
Withdrawals payable	451,270	2,656,516
Total liabilities	617,365	2,934,259
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (NET ASSETS)
Partners' capital (net assets)	20,149,387	25,770,284
Total liabilities and partners' capital (net assets)	$ 20,766,752	$ 28,704,543

XML

Derivative Transactions (Impact Of Derivative Contracts On Statement Of Financial Conditions) (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset Derivatives	$ 290,361		$ 583,088
Liability Derivatives	(404,371)		(633,211)
Net Derivatives	(114,010)	[1]	(50,123)	[1]
Agricultural [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset Derivatives	119,030		104,777
Liability Derivatives	(191,077)		(442,852)
Net Derivatives	(72,047)	[1]	(338,075)	[1]
Metals [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset Derivatives	171,331		394,948
Liability Derivatives	(30,420)		(150,435)
Net Derivatives	140,911	[1]	244,513	[1]
Energy [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset Derivatives			83,363
Liability Derivatives	(182,874)		(39,924)
Net Derivatives	$ (182,874)	[1]	$ 43,439	[1]

[1] The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in brokers trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

XML

Agreements and Related-Party Transactions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions [Abstract]

Fees Charged by Related Parties to Partnership

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Management fees – General Partner	$	52,307	$	70,872	$	173,294	$	236,841
Administrative fees – Fund Dynamics		12,464		16,829		40,906		55,312
Trailing servicing fees – Uhlmann		38,882		45,206		125,514		150,206
Selling Fees – Uhlmann		-		5,746		513		7,250

XML

Financial Highlights (Financial Highlights Ratio) (Detail)	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012		Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Series A [Member]
Auction Market Preferred Securities, Stock Series [Line Items]
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners' capital (net assets)	(2.90%)	[1]	7.32%	[1]	(4.34%)	[1]	0.26%	[1]
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets)	2.86%	[1],[2]	3.04%	[1],[2]	4.27%	[1],[2]	3.62%	[1],[2]
Total return	3.75%	[3]	13.32%	[3]	(5.35%)	[3]	5.70%	[3]
Series B [Member]
Auction Market Preferred Securities, Stock Series [Line Items]
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners' capital (net assets)	(2.95%)	[1]	9.40%	[1]	(4.39%)	[1]	1.62%	[1]
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets)	2.89%	[1],[2]	3.56%	[1],[2]	4.32%	[1],[2]	3.36%	[1],[2]
Total return	3.53%	[3]	13.31%	[3]	(5.58%)	[3]	5.67%	[3]

[1] Annualized.

[2] The ratio of expenses to average partners’ capital (net asset) values does not include brokerage commissions.

[3] Not annualized.

XML

Litigation (Detail) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2010
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Recovered excess of security claims	$ 5,700,000
Excess distributions	434,424	0
Amount reserved to apply to expense incurred to administer	69,646
Expenses included in administrative and other fees payable	0	4,646
Recoveries payable to redeemed limited partners	178,990	456,561
General Partner [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Excess distributions	$ 0	$ 0	$ 7,796

XML

Partnership Capital And Withdrawals

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Partnership Capital And Withdrawals [Abstract]

Partnership Capital And Withdrawals

Note 6.Partnership Capital and Withdrawals:

The Partnership accepts contributions as of the close of business on the last business day of each month for investment on the first day of the next succeeding month. The General Partner may accept or reject contributions and waive the minimum contribution amounts in its sole discretion. 

Effective November 1, 2010, the Partnership began accepting contributions for Series B units. The Partnership has been closed to Series A units contributions since October 31, 2005.  Effective May 1, 2013, the Partnership ceased offering its units of limited partnership and is no longer accepting contributions. 

Note 6.Partnership Capital and Withdrawals(Continued):

The purchase price of a unit is the net asset value per unit as of the end of each calendar month. Net asset value per unit is calculated as the net asset value at month-end divided by the number of outstanding units. 

The Partnership accepts withdrawals on a monthly basis. Requests for withdrawal should be received by the General Partner no later than six business days prior to the end of the month in which an investor chooses to withdraw. Requests for withdrawal should be sent to the General Partner by email, fax, or overnight courier.

XML

Derivative Transactions (Trading Gains And Losses From Derivative Contracts) (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Trading Activity, Gains and Losses, Net [Line Items]
Trading Revenue	$ 908,437	$ 3,029,085	$ (823,892)	$ 1,676,315
Realized	418,601	2,835,256	(760,005)	(62,180)
Change in unrealized	489,836	193,829	(63,887)	1,738,495
Agricultural [Member]
Trading Activity, Gains and Losses, Net [Line Items]
Trading Revenue	(16,474)	768,069	(702,665)	694,694
Metals [Member]
Trading Activity, Gains and Losses, Net [Line Items]
Trading Revenue	653,706	1,513,704	429,875	1,505,323
Energy [Member]
Trading Activity, Gains and Losses, Net [Line Items]
Trading Revenue	$ 271,205	$ 747,312	$ (551,102)	$ (523,702)

XML

Litigation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Litigation [Abstract]

Litigation

Note 9.Litigation:

The Partnership is a beneficiary of a Litigation Trust which is seeking recoveries from third parties, related to the 2005 bankruptcy of Refco, Inc. and numerous affiliates (the “Refco Bankruptcy”). As of September 30, 2013, the Partnership has received the full value of its allowed claims in the Refco Bankruptcy and has recovered approximately $5.7 million in excess of its allowed securities claim in the Refco Bankruptcy and may receive additional Refco Bankruptcy related recoveries, although there can be no assurance that it will or that any additional recoveries will be material. Management is unable to estimate the amounts of any such additional recoveries.

All Refco Bankruptcy related recoveries received by the Partnership, including excess recoveries except as described below, have been allocated among all partners in the Partnership who were partners as of October 31, 2005, on a pro-rata basis as of October 31, 2005, with redeemed partners receiving cash distributions. Cash distributions to redeemed partners from excess

Note 9.   Litigation(Continued);

recoveries during the nine months ending September 30, 2013 totaled approximately $434,424.   There were no cash distributions to redeemed partners for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership, the Partnership reimbursed the General Partner approximately $7,796 from excess recoveries for legal costs incurred by the General Partner defending against suits related to the Refco Bankruptcy in 2010. There are no fees due under these arrangements as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Partnership has reserved $69,646 of the excess Refco related recoveries to apply to expenses incurred to administer ongoing communication with, and distributions and reporting to, redeemed limited partners with respect to Refco related recoveries received by the Partnership. These expenses include but are not limited to professional fees, printing, postage, and administration fees. At September 30, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012, $0 and $4,646 of these expenses is included in administrative and other fees payable on the statement of financial condition.

Note 1. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012,  $178,990 and $456,561 in excess Refco related recoveries were payable to redeemed limited partners.

XML

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions [Abstract]

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions

Note 5.Agreements and Related-Party Transactions:

The Limited Partnership Agreement vests all responsibility and powers for the management of the business and affairs of the Partnership with the General Partner, Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., including trading decisions.

The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to the General Partner equal to 0.08333% of the net assets of the Partnership at the close of the preceding month (1.00% per annum).

The Partnership is responsible for the administrative and trading expenses related to its operations. The General Partner may incur certain expenses on behalf of the Partnership and charge the Partnership for its allocable portion of these expenses.

Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C. (“Uhlmann”), a party related to the General Partner by reason of common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the selling group manager for the Partnership.  The Partnership pays Uhlmann a share of selling fees when units are sold by its registered brokers.  Selling fees of up to 2% of the gross offering proceeds (which includes a 0.50% reallowance to Uhlmann) are charged to partners’ capital upon issuance of Series B Partnership units.

In addition, there is an annual trailing servicing fee of up to 1% of the net asset value of the specific partner’s capital account payable to the soliciting broker-dealer for ongoing investor services.  For all Series B units sold, the total trailing servicing fee is not to exceed 7.99% of the gross offering proceeds of the units sold.

The Price Futures Group, Inc. (“PFG”), a related party to the General Partner through common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the introducing broker for the Partnership, whereby certain accounts of the Partnership are introduced to the Partnership’s clearing broker. A portion of the brokerage fee paid by the Partnership for clearing transactions is paid to PFG by the clearing broker.

Fund Dynamics, LLC, an affiliate of the General Partner through common management, and effective April 1, 2013, common ownership, acts as the Partnership’s administrator. Fund Dynamics, LLC calculates both the daily and monthly Net Asset Value (“NAV”), prepares the monthly accounting package, and prepares monthly investor statements.

A summary of fees charged by related parties to the Partnership is as follows:

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Management fees – General Partner	$	52,307	$	70,872	$	173,294	$	236,841
Administrative fees – Fund Dynamics		12,464		16,829		40,906		55,312
Trailing servicing fees – Uhlmann		38,882		45,206		125,514		150,206
Selling Fees – Uhlmann		-		5,746		513		7,250

XML

Statements Of Changes In Partners' Capital (Net Assets) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Limited Partners-Series A [Member]
Net asset value per unit	$ 163.91	$ 179.22
Limited Partners-Series B [Member]
Net asset value per unit	$ 159.93	$ 176.39
General Partner [Member]
Net asset value per unit	$ 163.91	$ 179.22

XML

Agreements And Related-Party Transactions (Fees Charged By Related Parties To Partnership) (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management fees-General Partner	$ 52,308	$ 70,872	$ 173,294	$ 236,841
General Partner [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management fees-General Partner	52,307	70,872	173,294	236,841
Fund Dynamics [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Administrative fees-Fund Dynamics	12,464	16,829	40,906	55,312
Uhlmann [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Trailing servicing fees-Uhlmann	38,882	45,206	125,514	150,206
Selling Fees-Uhlmann		$ 5,746	$ 513	$ 7,250

XML

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

Note 12.Subsequent Events:

Subsequent to September 30, 2013,withdrawals totaled approximately $338,894.

XML

Financial Highlights

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Financial Highlights [Abstract]

Financial Highlights

Note 8.   Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for limited partners for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	157.99	$	154.48	$	158.15	$	155.67
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		7.07		6.59		17.65		16.77
Investment income:		0.02		0.01		4.84		5.45
Expenses:		(1.17)		(1.15)		(1.42)		(1.50)
Net investment gain (loss)		(1.15)		(1.14)		3.42		3.95
Net gain (loss) per unit		5.92		5.45		21.07		20.72
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39
Per Unit Performance
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	173.18	$	169.39	$	169.55	$	166.92
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		(5.74)		(5.97)		9.36		7.43
Investment income:		0.06		0.06		4.54		6.30
Expenses:		(3.59)		(3.55)		(4.23)		(4.26)
Net investment gain (loss)		(3.53)		(3.49)		0.31		2.04
Net gain (loss) per unit		(9.27)		(9.46)		9.67		9.47
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	163.91	$	159.93	$	179.22	$	176.39

	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended		Three months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(2.90)	%	(2.95)	%	7.32	%	9.40	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	2.86	%	2.89	%	3.04	%	3.56	%
Total return (3)	3.75	%	3.53	%	13.32	%	13.31	%
	Series A		Series B		Series A		Series B
	Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2012
Ratio of net investment gain (loss) to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)	(4.34)	%	(4.39)	%	0.26	%	1.62	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)	4.27	%	4.32	%	3.62	%	3.36	%
Total return (3)	(5.35)	%	(5.58)	%	5.70	%	5.67	%

The above ratios were calculated for the partners taken as a whole.  The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partner’s capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions (see Note 5).

(1)Annualized.

(2 ) The ratio of expenses to average partners’ capital (net asset) values does not include brokerage commissions.

(3)Not annualized.

XML

Derivative Transactions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Derivative Transactions [Abstract]

Impact of Derivative Contracts on Statement of Financial Conditions

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2013
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	119,030	$	(191,077)	$	(72,047)
Metals		171,331		(30,420)		140,911
Energy				(182,874)		(182,874)
Totals	$	290,361	$	(404,371)	$	(114,010)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in brokers trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2012
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	104,777	$	(442,852)	$	(338,075)
Metals		394,948		(150,435)		244,513
Energy		83,363		(39,924)		43,439
Totals	$	583,088	$	(633,211)	$	(50,123)

*The net fair value of all asset and liability derivative is included in equity in broker trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

Trading Gains and Losses from Derivative Contracts

	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
Type of Contract	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Agricultural	$	(16,474)	$	768,069	$	(702,665)	$	694,694
Metals		653,706		1,513,704		429,875		1,505,323
Energy		271,205		747,312		(551,102)		(523,702)
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315
	Three months ended		Three months ended		Nine months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012
Line Item in Statements of Operations
Realized	$	418,601	$	2,835,256	$	(760,005)	$	(62,180)
Change in unrealized		489,836		193,829		(63,887)		1,738,495
	$	908,437	$	3,029,085	$	(823,892)	$	1,676,315

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Nature of Business and Organization

Nature of Business and Organization: Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the "Partnership") is an Illinois Limited Partnership that was established in May 2000. The Partnership trades a portfolio primarily of commodity futures and forward contracts, principally on recognized exchanges. The Partnership may also purchase contracts in the over the counter marketplace under certain circumstances. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the “long side” of the market. The Partnership’s investment strategy is designed to replicate the Rogers International Commodity Index ® (the “Index”) and positions are rebalanced monthly to maintain the Index’s relative weightings. James B. Rogers designed the Index.

The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001 with assets raised from the offering of its original units of limited partnership interest, now referred to as "Series A" units, and offered Series A units through October 2005.The Partnership began offering Series B units in November 2010.  Series A units and Series B units are identical with respect to their participation in the profits and losses of the Partnership; however, Series B units do not participate in any Partnership expenses or recoveries related to the bankruptcy of Refco Inc. and its affiliates.  The Partnership’s General Partner and commodity pool operator is Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. (the “General Partner”).

Accounting Policies

Accounting Policies:  The Partnership follows Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition and results of operation. 

Net Assets

Net Assets: The valuation of net assets includes open commodity futures contracts owned by the Partnership, if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these contracts has been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day of each month. Net asset value is determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals partners’ capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents:  Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents represent amounts on deposit with a broker to facilitate payment of expenses and partner withdrawals.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:Securities and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value.

Deposits with Brokers

Deposits with Brokers:  The Partnership deposits assets with brokers subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and broker requirements.  Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such brokers.  The Partnership earns interest income on its assets deposited with the brokers.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition: Futures and forward contracts are recorded on a trade date basis and realized gains or losses are recognized when contracts are liquidated.  Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net unrealized gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses.  Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the preceding period is reported in the statement of operations. 

Interest Income Recognition

Interest Income Recognition:The Partnership records interest income on the accrual basis

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The Partnership’s estimate regarding the carrying value of its receivable from MF Global, Inc. (Note 4) is a significant estimate and due to the uncertainty of future events, this estimate could change in the near term. 

Foreign Currency Translation

Foreign Currency Translation: Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month.  The Partnership does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities and derivative financial instruments held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized trading gains or losses.

Ongoing Offering Expenses

Ongoing Offering Expenses: Ongoing offering expenses are accrued on an ongoing basis and charged to expense as incurred.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes: No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements as each partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on its respective share of the Partnership’s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.

The Partnership is generally not subject to examination by U.S. federal or state taxing authorities for tax years before 2009. The Partnership has no material uncertain tax positions, and accordingly, has not recorded a liability for the payment of interest or penalties through September 30, 2013.

Profit and Loss Allocation

Profit and Loss Allocation: Profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated by series based on the number of units held.

Withdrawals Payable

Withdrawals Payable:  Withdrawals approved by the General Partner prior to month-end with a fixed effective date and fixed amount are recorded as withdrawals payable as of month-end (See Note 6).

Statement of Cash Flows

Statement of Cash Flows:  The Partnership has elected not to provide a statement of cash flows as permitted by GAAP as all of the following conditions have been met:

-During the year, substantially all of the Partnership’s investments were highly liquid;

-Substantially all of the Partnership’s investments are carried at fair value;

-The Partnership had little or no debt during the year;

-The Partnership’s financial statements include a statement of changes in partners’ capital (net assets).

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND LP
Entity Central Index Key	0001118384
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	0

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Summary of Partnership's Assets Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Description	Level 1		Level 1
Equity in brokers trading account:
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net*	$	(114,010)	$	(50,123)
U.S. Government securities*		17,298,568		19,441,749
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds		65,397		3,112,326
Total assets at fair value	$	17,249,955	$	22,503,953

*See condensed schedules of investments for further description.