XML 50 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2020. Rent expense for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.9 million and $2.7 million and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 was $0.8 million and $2.7 million. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period and accrues for rent expense incurred but not paid.

Future annual minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases as of March 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

Year Ending June 30,

   Operating
Leases
 

2015 (remaining three months)

   $ 926  

2016

     3,683  

2017

     3,323  

2018

     3,245  

2019

     1,303  

2020 and thereafter

     57  
  

 

 

 
$ 12,537  
  

 

 

 

Guarantor Arrangements

The Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts under certain circumstances and subject to deductibles and exclusions. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is not material. Accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company from time to time enters into standard indemnification provisions in its agreements with its clients. Pursuant to these provisions, the Company may be obligated to indemnify its clients for certain losses suffered or incurred, including losses arising from violations of applicable law by the Company or by its third-party website publishers, losses arising from actions or omissions of the Company or its third-party publishers, and for third-party claims that a Company product infringed upon any United States patent, copyright or other intellectual property rights. Where practicable, the Company limits its liabilities under such indemnities.

The potential amount of future payments to defend lawsuits or settle indemnified claims under these indemnification provisions is generally limited and the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnity provisions is not material, and accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

 

Litigation

In December 2012, Internet Patents Corporation (“IPC”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that the Company has infringed a patent held by IPC. In September 2013, the court dismissed a related case because it found that the patent is invalid, and on the same date, the court issued IPC an Order to Show Cause that the lawsuit against the Company should not be dismissed. In October 2013, IPC filed a response to the order and the court subsequently dismissed the case against the Company. In October 2013, IPC filed its appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The United States Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on the appeal on August 6, 2014, and the Company is awaiting a decision. While the Company denies IPC’s claims and believes that the probability of any loss is remote, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in this matter and any adverse ruling or settlement may have a significant impact on its business and operating results. In addition, regardless of the outcome of the matter, the Company may incur significant legal fees defending the action until it is resolved.