XML 37 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies [Text Block]
19.

Commitments and Contingencies


  (i)

Capital Commitments

As of December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2017, the Company had the following contracted capital commitments:

      December 31,     June 30,  
      2016     2017  
  For construction of buildings $ 2,225,978   $ 2,514,537  
  For purchases of equipment   451,063     166,726  
  Capital injection to Dalian BAK Power and Dalian BAK Trading Note   9,895,996     400,000  
    $ 12,573,037   $ 3,081,263  

  Note:

Initially, BAK Asia was required to pay the remaining capital within two years, of the date of issuance of the subsidiary’s business license according to PRC registration capital management rules. According to the revised PRC Companies Law which became effective on March 2014, the time requirement of the registered capital contribution has been abolished. As such, BAK Asia has its discretion to consider the timing of the registered capital contributions. On April and May 2017, Dalian BAK Power received $9,495,974 injected from BAK Asia.


  (ii)

Litigation

On July 7, 2016, Shenzhen Huijie Purification System Engineering Co., Ltd (“Shenzhen Huijie”), one of the Company’s contractors, filed a lawsuit against Dalian BAK Power in the Peoples’ Court of Zhuanghe City, Dalian for the failure to pay pursuant to the terms of the contract and entrusted part of the project of the contract to a third party without their prior consent. The plaintiff sought a total amount of $1,223,858 (RMB8,430,792), including construction costs of $0.9 million (RMB6.3 million), interest of $30,938 (RMB0.2 million) and compensation of $0.3 million (RMB1.9 million), which the Company already accrued for as of September 30, 2016. On September 7, 2016, upon the request of Shenzhen Huijie, the Court froze Dalian BAK’s bank deposits totaling $1,223,858 (RMB8,430,792) for a period of one year. On June 30, 2017, according to the first instance, the court ruled that CBAK Power should pay the remaining contract amount of RMB6,135,860 (approximately $0.9 million) claimed by Shenzhen Huijie as well as other expenses incurred including deferred interest, discounted charge on bills payable, litigation fee and property preservation fee totaled $0.1 million. On July 24, 2017, Dalian CBAK Power filed an appeal to Dalian Intermediate People's Court challenging the lower court's judgement rendered on June 30, 2017. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend ourselves in this lawsuit.