XML 22 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 10.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  The definition of fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date.  The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement; not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Valuation Hierarchy

FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

 
·
Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 
·
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 
·
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.



Assets

Securities available-for-sale – Where quoted prices are available for identical securities in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities and certain other financial products. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired loans – A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable Pinnacle Financial will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan's original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral less selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses or the expense is recognized as a charge-off. Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Other investments – Included in other investments are investments in certain nonpublic private equity funds.  The valuation of nonpublic private equity investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such assets. These investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. The carrying values of other investments are adjusted either upwards or downwards from the transaction price to reflect expected exit values as evidenced by financing and sale transactions with third parties, or when determination of a valuation adjustment is confirmed through ongoing reviews by senior investment managers. A variety of factors are reviewed and monitored to assess positive and negative changes in valuation including, but not limited to, current operating performance and future expectations of the particular investment, industry valuations of comparable public companies and changes in market outlook and the third-party financing environment over time. In determining valuation adjustments resulting from the investment review process, emphasis is placed on current company performance and market conditions. These investments are included in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Other real estate owned  – Other real estate owned (OREO) represents real estate foreclosed upon by Pinnacle National through loan defaults by customers.  Substantially all of these amounts relate to lots, homes and residential development projects that are either completed or are in various stages of construction for which Pinnacle Financial believes it has adequate collateral.  Upon foreclosure, the property is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, based on appraised value, less selling costs estimated as of the date acquired with any loss recognized as a charge-off through the allowance for loan losses.  Additional OREO losses for subsequent valuation downward adjustments are determined on a specific property basis and are included as a component of noninterest expense along with holding costs.  Any gains or losses realized at the time of disposal are reflected in noninterest income or noninterest expense, as applicable.  Other real estate owned is included in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Other assets – Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance policies and interest rate swap agreements.  The carrying amount of the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance is based on information received from the insurance carriers indicating the financial performance of the policies and the amount Pinnacle Financial would receive should the policies be surrendered.  Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.  The carrying amount of interest rate swap agreements is based on Pinnacle Financial's pricing models that utilize observable market inputs obtained from a third party bank.  Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Liabilities

Other liabilities – Pinnacle Financial has certain liabilities carried at fair value including certain interest rate swap agreements.  The fair value of these liabilities is based on Pinnacle Financial's pricing models that utilize observable market inputs obtained from a third party bank and is reflected within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following tables present the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by FASB ASC 820 valuation hierarchy (as described above) (in thousands):

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011

   
Total carrying
value in the
consolidated
balance sheet
  
Quoted market
 prices in an
active market
 
 
(Level 1)
  
Models with
significant
 observable market
parameters
 
(Level 2)
  
Models with
 significant
unobservable
 market
 parameters
(Level 3)
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
            
    U.S. government agency securities
 $53,069  $-  $53,069  $- 
    Mortgage-backed securities
  659,392   -   659,392   - 
    State and municipal securities
  199,718   -   199,718   - 
    Corporate notes and other
  10,601   -   10,601   - 
Total investment securities available-for-sale
 $922,780   -  $922,780   - 
Other investments
  3,236   -   -   3,236 
Other assets
  62,806   -   14,001   48,805 
Total assets at fair value
 $988,822  $-  $936,781  $52,041 
                  
Other liabilities
 $14,203  $-  $14,203  $- 
Total liabilities at fair value
 $14,203  $-  $14,203  $- 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010

   
Total carrying
value in the
consolidated
balance sheet
  
Quoted market
prices in an
active market
 
 
(Level 1)
  
Models with
 significant
observable market
 parameters
 
(Level 2)
  
Models with
significant
 unobservable
 market
parameters
(Level 3)
 
Investment securities available-for-sale:
            
    U.S. government agency securities
 $90,415  $-  $90,415  $- 
    Mortgage-backed securities
  701,262   -   701,262   - 
    State and municipal securities
  211,481   -   211,481   - 
    Corporate notes and other
  11,159   -   11,159   - 
Total investment securities available-for-sale
  1,014,317   -   1,014,317   - 
Other investments
  2,693   -   -   2,693 
Other assets
  62,710   -   14,441   48,269 
Total assets at fair value
 $1,079,720  $-  $1,028,758  $50,962 
                  
Other liabilities
 $14,639  $-  $14,639  $- 
Total liabilities at fair value
 $14,639  $-  $14,639  $- 


Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2011

   
Total carrying
value in the
consolidated
 balance sheet
  
Quoted market
 prices in an
 active market
 
 
(Level 1)
  
Models with
significant
observable market
parameters
(Level 2)
  
Models with
significant
 unobservable
 market
parameters
(Level 3)
  
Total gains
(losses) for
the quarter
ended
June 30,
2011
 
Other real estate owned
 $52,395  $-  $-  $52,395  $(1,552)
Impaired loans, net (1)
  54,702   -   -   54,702   (4,233)
Total
 $107,097  $-  $-  $107,097  $(5,785)

 
(1)
Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $5.0 million as required by ASC 310-10, “Receivables.”

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2010

 
Total carrying
value in the
consolidated
balance sheet
Quoted market
 prices in an
 active market
 
 
(Level 1)
Models with
significant
observable
market
 parameters
(Level 2)
Models with
significant
unobservable
 market
parameters
(Level 3)
Total gains
(losses) for
the year
 ended
December 31,
2010
Other real estate owned
    $     59,608
$               -
$                 -
    $       59,608
$    (11,365)
Impaired loans, net (2)
71,906
 -
                   -
71,906
    (11,446)
Total
    $   131,514
$               -
$                 -
    $     131,514
$    (22,811)

 
(2)
Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $8.9 million as required by ASC 310-10, “Receivables.”

In the case of the bond portfolio, Pinnacle Financial monitors the valuation technique utilized by various pricing agencies to ascertain when transfers between levels have been affected.  The nature of the remaining assets and liabilities is such that transfers in and out of any level are expected to be rare.  For the six months ended June 30, 2011, there were no transfers between levels 1, 2 or 3.

The table below includes a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by Pinnacle Financial within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources), the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology (in thousands):

   
Six months ended June 30,
 
   
2011
  
2010
 
   
Other
assets
  
Other liabilities
  
Other
assets
  
Other liabilities
 
Fair value, January 1
 $50,962  $-  $49,518  $- 
Total realized gains included in income
  824   -   514   - 
Change in unrealized gains/losses included in other comprehensive income for assets and liabilities still held at June 30
  -   -   -   - 
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net
  255   -   248   - 
Transfers out of Level 3
  -   -   -   - 
Fair value, June 30
 $52,041  $-  $50,280  $- 
Total realized gains included in income related to financial assets and liabilities still on the consolidated balance sheet at June 30
 $824  $-  $514  $- 

The following methods and assumptions were used by Pinnacle Financial in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments that are not measured at fair value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flow models. Those models are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, do not represent an exit price market participant concept, and could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. The use of different methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Such amounts have not been revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amounts of cash, due from banks, federal funds sold, and short-term discount notes sold approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature.

 
Securitiesheld-to-maturity and available-for-sale - Estimated fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices where available.  If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

 
Loans - For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values approximate carrying values. For other loans, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow models, using current market interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price/market-participant concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820-10 and generally produces a higher value than an exit approach/market-participant approach.  Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow models or based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

 
Mortgage loans held-for-sale - Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.  Fair value is based on the anticipated sales price of these loans as the loans are usually sold within a few weeks of their origination.

 
Deposits, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Subordinated Debt - The carrying amounts of demand deposits, savings deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, floating rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and floating rate subordinated debt approximate their fair values. Fair values for certificates of deposit, fixed rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and fixed rate subordinated debt are estimated using discounted cash flow models, using current market interest rates offered on certificates, advances and other borrowings with similar remaining maturities.  For fixed rate subordinated debt, the maturity is assumed to be as of the earliest date that the indebtedness will be repriced.

 
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments - The fair values of Pinnacle Financial's off-balance-sheet financial instruments are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements. However, commitments to extend credit do not represent a significant value to Pinnacle Financial until such commitments are funded. Pinnacle Financial has determined that the fair value of commitments to extend credit is not significant.
 
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of Pinnacle Financial's financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

   
June 30, 2011
  
December 31, 2010
 
   
Carrying
Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
  
Carrying Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Financial assets:
            
Cash and cash equivalents
 $216,252  $216,252  $188,586  $188,586 
Securities available-for-sale
  922,780   922,780   1,014,317   1,014,317 
Securities held-to-maturity
  2,727   2,791   4,320   4,412 
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
  14,162   14,162   16,206   16,206 
Loans, net (1)
  3,130,134   3,125,258   3,129,865   3,184,437 
Derivative assets
  14,001   14,001   14,441   14,441 
    Bank owned life insurance
  48,303   48,303   47,724   47,724 
    Other investments
  3,236   3,236   2,693   2,693 
                  
Financial liabilities:
                
Deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 $3,886,033  $3,848,733  $3,979,352  $3,974,408 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
  111,191   107,151   121,393   126,399 
Subordinated debt
  97,476   56,271   97,476   75,360 
Derivative liabilities
  14,203   14,203   14,639   14,639 
                  
   
Notional
Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
  
Notional
Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Off-balance sheet instruments:
                
Commitments to extend credit
 $873,981  $-  $848,023  $- 
Standby letters of credit
  84,389   360   75,172   275 


 
1.
The estimated fair values presented above were determined using discounted cash flow models.  Had Pinnacle Financial incorporated credit risk into our analysis, the estimated fair value of loans would have been lower by approximately $310 million at June 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010.  The addition of a credit risk assumption would approximate the fair value that a market participant would realize in a hypothetical orderly transaction.