December 12, 2006

Via U.S. Mail and Facsimile (011-852-2121-3232)

Chang Xiaobing
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
China Unicom Limited
75th Floor, The Center
99 Queen`s Road Central, Hong Kong

	Re:	China Unicom Limited
		Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
		Filed June 29, 2006
		File No. 1-15028

Dear Mr. Xiaobing:

      We have limited our review of your Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 to disclosure relating to your
contacts
with a country that has been identified as a state sponsor of
terrorism, and we have the following comments.  Our review with
respect to this issue does not preclude further review by the
Assistant Director group with respect to other issues.  At this
juncture, we are asking you to provide us with supplemental
information, so that we may better understand your disclosure.
Please be as detailed as necessary in your response. After
reviewing
this information, we may raise additional comments.

      Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your
filings.
We look forward to working with you in these respects.  We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or on any other
aspect
of our review.  Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers
listed
at the end of this letter.

General
1. We note the disclosure on page 43 that you have established
fiber-
optic interconnections between China and North Korea.  North Korea
is
identified as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. State
Department and is subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export
controls.  Please describe for us your past, current, and any
anticipated operations in, and other contacts with, North Korea,
whether through direct or indirect arrangements.  Your response
should describe any contacts, including any agreements or
commercial
arrangements, you may have with the government of North Korea or
entities controlled by that government.
2. [0]Please discuss the materiality of the operations or other
contacts described in response to the foregoing comment, and
whether
they constitute a material investment risk for your security
holders.
You should address materiality in quantitative terms, including
the
dollar amounts of any associated revenues, assets, and
liabilities.
Please also address materiality in terms of qualitative factors
that
a reasonable investor would deem important in making an investment
decision, including the potential impact of corporate activities
upon
a company`s reputation and share value.

We note, for example, that Arizona and Louisiana have adopted
legislation requiring their state retirement systems to prepare
reports regarding state pension fund assets invested in, and/or
permitting divestment of state pension fund assets from, companies
that do business with countries identified as state sponsors of
terrorism.  The Missouri Investment Trust has established an
equity
fund for the investment of certain state-held monies that screens
out
stocks of companies that do business with U.S.-designated state
sponsors of terrorism.  The Pennsylvania legislature has adopted a
resolution directing its Legislative Budget and Finance Committee
to
report annually to the General Assembly regarding state funds
invested in companies that have ties to terrorist-sponsoring
countries.  Your materiality analysis should address the potential
impact of the investor sentiment evidenced by such actions
directed
toward companies having business activities in, or other business
contacts with, North Korea.

Your qualitative materiality analysis also should address whether,
and the extent to which, the North Korean government or entities
controlled by the North Korean government receive cash or act as
intermediaries in connection with your operations.



* * * * *

      Please respond to this comment within 10 business days or
tell
us when you will provide us with a response.  Please file your
response letter on EDGAR.

      We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosure in the filings to be certain that the
filings include all information required under the Exchange Act of
1934 and that they have provided all information investors require
for an informed investment decision.  Since the company and its
management are in possession of all facts relating to the
company`s
disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of
the
disclosures they have made.

      In connection with responding to our comment, please
provide,
in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that:

* the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in the filings;

* staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with
respect to the filings; and

* the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.

      In addition, please be advised that the Division of
Enforcement
has access to all information you provide to the staff of the
Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filings or
in
response to our comments on your filings.

      Please understand that we may have additional comments after
we
review your response to our comments.  Please contact Pradip
Bhaumik,
Attorney-Advisor, at (202) 551-3333 if you have any questions
about
the comments or our review.  You may also contact me at (202) 551-
3470.

								Sincerely,



								Cecilia D. Blye, Chief
								Office of Global Security
Risk


cc: 	Larry Spirgel
		Assistant Director
		Division of Corporation Finance

		Kyle Moffatt
		Accounting Branch Chief
		Division of Corporation Finance

Chang Xiaobing
China Unicom Limited
December 12, 2006
Page 1