XML 110 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
The company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term debt, long-term debt, and foreign exchange forward and options contracts. The company uses derivatives for hedging and non-trading purposes in order to manage its foreign exchange rate exposures.
 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
 
As a result of the company’s substantial international operations, it is exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations, including in connection with transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies. In addition, the company translates sales and financial results denominated in foreign currencies into U.S. dollars for purposes of its consolidated financial statements. As a result, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against these foreign currencies generally will have a negative impact on reported revenues and operating income, while depreciation of the U.S. dollar against these foreign currencies will generally have a positive effect on reported revenues and operating income. For fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the company's reported financial results were adversely affected by appreciation of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies relative to the prior years.
 
The company has a foreign currency cash flow hedging program to reduce the company’s exposure to changes in exchange rates on foreign currency purchases and sales. The company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage the company’s exposures arising from foreign currency exchange risk. Gains and losses on the underlying foreign currency exposures are partially offset with gains and losses on the foreign currency forward contracts. Under this foreign currency cash flow hedging program, the company has designated the foreign exchange contracts (the “contracts”) as cash flow hedges of underlying forecasted foreign currency purchases and sales. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the contracts is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL) in the consolidated balance sheet and is recognized in operating income when the underlying forecasted transaction impacts earnings. The terms of the foreign exchange contracts generally require the company to place cash on deposit as collateral if the fair value of these contracts represents a liability for the company. The fair values of the foreign exchange derivative instruments and any related collateral cash deposits are presented on a net basis as the derivative contracts are subject to master netting arrangements. The company’s foreign exchange contracts generally mature within twelve months.
 
At September 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the notional amount of the company's foreign exchange contracts outstanding under its foreign currency cash flow hedging program were $47 million, $75 million, and $113 million respectively. The company classifies the cash flows associated with the contracts in cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. This is consistent with the classification of the cash flows associated with the underlying hedged item.

The company generally does not hedge against its foreign currency exposure related to translations to U.S. dollars of its financial results denominated in foreign currencies. However, due to increasing foreign currency exchange risk associated with purchasing economics related to the Indian Rupee, the company entered into foreign currency option contracts on expected future purchases tied to the Indian Rupee. The contracts were entered into during April 2014 with effective dates from the start of fiscal year 2015 through the end of fiscal year 2016. Changes in fair value associated with these contracts are recorded in cost of sales.
 
The following table summarizes the impact of the company’s derivatives instruments on comprehensive income for fiscal years ended September 30 (in millions): 
 
Location of
Gain (Loss)
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain recognized in AOCL
(effective portion)
AOCL
 
$
3

 
$

 
$
3

Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCL
into income (effective portion)
Cost of Sales
 
1

 
1

 
3

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Amount of gain recognized in income
Cost of Sales
 

 

 



Fair Value
 
Fair values of financial instruments are summarized as follows (in millions): 
 
September 30,
2014
 
September 30,
2013
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
Cash and cash equivalents
$
247

 
$
247

 
$
318

 
$
318

Short-term debt
7

 
7

 
13

 
13

Long-term debt
965

 
1,143

 
1,125

 
1,266

Foreign exchange forward contracts (asset)
2

 
2

 

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts (liability)

 

 
1

 
1

Short-term foreign currency option contracts (asset)
2

 
2

 

 

Long-term foreign currency option contracts (asset)
1

 
1

 

 



The following table reflects the offsetting of derivative assets and liabilities (in millions):
 
September 30, 2014
 
September 30, 2013
 
Gross
Amounts Recognized
 
Gross Amounts
Offset
 
Net Amounts
Reported
 
Gross
Amounts Recognized
 
Gross Amounts
Offset
 
Net Amounts
Reported
Derivative Asset
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contract
2

 

 
2

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contract

 

 

 
1

 

 
1



Fair Value
The current FASB guidance provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.
 
Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related instrument.
In instances where inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels in the above fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the valuation. The company's assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair value measurements requires judgment and considers factors specific to each asset or liability.
Fair value of financial instruments by the valuation hierarchy at September 30, 2014 is as follows (in millions):
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents
$
247

 
$

 
$

Short-term debt

 

 
7

Long-term debt

 
1,093

 
50

Foreign exchange forward contracts (asset)

 
2

 

Short Term foreign currency option contracts

 

 
2

Long Term foreign currency option contracts

 

 
1


Cash and cash equivalents — All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying value approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The company did not have any cash equivalents at September 30, 2014 or September 30, 2013.
     Short- and Long-term debt — Fair values are based on transaction prices at public exchange for publicly traded debt. For debt instruments that are not publicly traded, fair values are based on interest rates that would be currently available to the company for issuance of similar types of debt instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Foreign exchange forward contracts — The company uses foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts with terms of one year or less to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts is based on a model which incorporates observable inputs including quoted spot rates, forward exchange rates and discounted future expected cash flows utilizing market interest rates with similar quality and maturity characteristics.
Foreign currency option contracts — The company uses foreign currency option contracts on expected future purchases tied to the Indian Rupee due to increasing foreign currency exchange risk. The contracts were entered into during April 2014 with effective dates from the start of fiscal year 2015 through the end of fiscal year 2016. The fair value of foreign currency option contracts is based on a third-party proprietary model, which incorporates inputs at varying unobservable weights of quoted spot rates, market volatility, forward rates, and time element utilizing market rates with similar quality and maturity characteristics. Changes in fair value associated with these contracts are recorded in cost of sales in the consolidated statement of operations.