TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PAGE |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
18 |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
34 |
|
56 |
|
58 |
|
58 |
|
58 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
73 |
|
73 |
|
73 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
74 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
|
75 |
|
75 |
|
75 |
|
76 |
|
76 |
|
76 |
|
76 |
|
77 |
INTRODUCTION
Definitions
In this Annual Report, unless the context otherwise requires:
|
• |
references to “Camtek,” the “Company,” “us,” “we”, “our” and the “Registrant”
refer to Camtek Ltd., an Israeli company, and its consolidated subsidiaries (unless otherwise indicated); |
|
• |
references to “ordinary shares,” “our shares” and similar expressions refer to the Registrant’s ordinary
shares, NIS 0.01 nominal (par) value per share; |
|
• |
references to “dollars,” “U.S. dollars” and “$” are to United States Dollars; |
|
• |
references to “shekels” and “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels, the Israeli currency; |
|
• |
references to the “Companies Law” are to Israel’s Companies Law, 5759-1999; |
|
• |
references to the “Israeli Securities Law” are to Israel’s Securities Law, 5728-1968; |
|
• |
references to the “SEC” are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission; and |
|
• |
references to the “Nasdaq Rules” are to rules of the Nasdaq Global Market. |
Cautionary Language Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 20-F includes certain statements that are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We
have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events.
Forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology words such as “may,” “will,” “should,”
“could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,” “seeks,” “strategy,” “potential” or “continue”
or the negative or other variations of these words, or other comparable words or phrases, but are not the only way these statements are
identified. These statements discuss future expectations, plans and events, contain projections of results of operations or of financial
condition or state other “forward-looking” information. When a forward-looking statement includes an underlying assumption,
we caution that, while we believe the assumption to be reasonable and make it in good faith, assumed facts almost always vary from actual
results, and the difference between a forward-looking statement and actual results can be material. Forward-looking statements may be
found in Item 4. “Information on the Company” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and in
this Annual Report generally. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these statements as a result of various
factors, including all the risks discussed in “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements in this Annual Report.
All of our forward-looking
statements are qualified by and should be read in conjunction with those disclosures. These statements are only predictions that represent
our views only as of the date they are made and may change as time passes. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the
forward-looking events discussed in this Annual Report might not occur. Except as may be required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation
to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
PART
I
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers. |
Not
applicable.
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable. |
Not
applicable.
A. [Reserved.]
B. Capitalization
and Indebtedness.
Not applicable.
C. Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
D. Risk
Factors.
There is a high degree
of risk associated with our Company and business. If any of the following risks occur, our business, revenues, operating results and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected and the trading price of our ordinary shares could decline.
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
The waves of the global COVID-19 pandemic
may continue to negatively impact the global economy in a significant manner for a further extended period of time, and may also adversely
affect our operating results in a material manner.
The COVID-19 worldwide
pandemic, which began in December 2019, has created macro-economic uncertainty and disruption in the business and financial markets. Many
countries around the world, including Israel, have been taking measures designed to limit the continued spread of COVID-19, including
closing workplaces, restricting travel, prohibiting assembling, closing international borders and quarantining populated areas. As our
global operations require physical presence in many stages of our business activities, including travel for installation and services,
shipment of materials and products, as well as teamwork, we are particularly vulnerable to the consequences of and the restrictions caused
by COVID-19. While our results of operations have not been adversely affected so far in a material manner, given the continued uncertainty
around the extent and timing of the future spread or mitigation of COVID-19 and around the imposition or relaxation of protective measures,
we cannot reasonably estimate the impact to our future results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. If COVID-19 continues
to negatively impact the global economy in a significant manner for a further extended period of time, this may adversely affect our future
operations and results in a material manner.
Below are some of the
risks and challenges that we may face as a result of the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic for a further extended period of time:
• Economic
downturn or slowdown of macro-economic development and significant decline of business which could harm the strength of the worldwide
electronics industry in general and the semiconductor fabrication and packaging industry in particular. Such downturn or slowdown could
affect demand for our customers’ end products and as a result may cause manufacturers in the semiconductor industry to suspend or
reduce capital investments in our products for use in their manufacturing processes, and decrease our sales of products and related services
to such industry;
• An
extended period of global supply chain and economic disruption as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations, access to sources of liquidity and financial condition, though the full extent and duration is
uncertain;
• Disruptions
to production and installation operations. Although we have so far managed, in general, to manufacture, install and maintain our products,
we may suffer as a result of additional, more extensive or continuous restrictions on our operations and those of our suppliers and contractors,
including on our or their ability to manufacture, distribute, install or maintain our products or provide services relating thereto;
• Disruptions
to our supply chain and outsourced production-activities that could extend lead times and significantly increase the price of one or more
component or materials, as well as our supply chain and shipment costs. COVID-19 presents various challenges to our supply chain and manufacturing
activities, which we outsource;
•
COVID-19 has also adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect and increase our costs in doing business, including a significant
increase in components, materials and shipment costs;
•
Disruptions to our marketing and sales activities or to our after-sale activities. Disruptions or restrictions may also be imposed
on our marketing and sales operations, including on our ability to submit bids and purchase orders, participate in RFPs, perform site-visits
and surveys, or other after sale support, maintenance and repair services;
• Disruptions
or restrictions on our operations and those of our contractors and customers, including on our ability to travel or to install or provide
services to our products, as well as temporary closures of our facility or the facilities of our suppliers, manufacturers or customers,
and prohibitions on the export, import or release from customs of products and components;
• Lower
work efficiency, productivity and service quality; while most of our employees in Israel and globally are vaccinated against COVID-19,
such vaccination may become ineffective after a certain period of time or against any mutation thereof, COVID-19 could continue to harm
the health of one or more of our employees. Employees may lose their ability to manage and run our operations, share their knowhow and
further pursue the development of our products and business;
•
Disruption, reduction or interruption in supply, disruption to our suppliers, manufacturers or customers and their other vendors,
lack or delay in the supply of raw materials and goods, or in the performance of work or services by our contractors and subcontractors;
•
Disruption to R&D efforts. A slowdown and delays in our research and development (“R&D”) projects, due to the effect
of COVID-19 restrictions and constraints, might delay introductions of new products while exposing us to significant loss;
•
Imposition of fines, penalties, damages and contract terminations (including the exercise of certain force majeure clauses), and damage
to our reputation and relationship with our customers, as a result of delays in production, shipment, deliveries and services due to any
of the above constraints;
• COVID-19
has had and could continue to have an adverse effect on our business as a result of the materialization of any of the above or similar
risks with respect to our significant customers. Our business has been and could further be impacted negatively if there is a prolonged
impact of COVID-19 in countries from which we generate a significant portion of our business. For example, this may cause, and to some
extent has caused a freeze of procurement budgets, cancellation, suspension or reduction in new equipment purchases from us, failure by
our customers in meeting their obligations under purchase orders already issued, postponement or cancellation of rollout projects, and
postponement in the introduction of our new products and capabilities;
•
Financial difficulties and insolvencies of major customers, which could lead to slowing the payment of their obligations to us or even
discharging those obligations; and
•
Difficulties in collection of amounts due from customers and in satisfying revenue recognition procedures.
• We
are closely monitoring the developments and continually assessing the potential impact of COVID-19 on our business and the mitigation
measures to minimize that impact. However, there is a global uncertainty with respect to the expected timing for the defeat of COVID-19.
It is not clear for how long protective measures will continue to be imposed, how quickly the vaccination will be effective in stopping
the continued spread of the virus and any mutation thereof globally, if at all, and whether there will be enough of the population vaccinated
for such solution to become effective. As the scale and duration of these effects remain uncertain, further realization of any of the
above-mentioned or other risks could have macro and micro negative effects on the global economy and financial markets in general, and
on our business in particular, and cause a material risk to our operations, financial condition and share price. Furthermore, to the extent
that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the
other factors described in this section.
Risk Factors Related
to Our Business and Our Markets
A substantial majority of our sales have been
to manufacturers in the Asia Pacific region, with China being our largest territory. The concentration of our sales and other resources
within a particular geographical region, subjects us to additional material risks.
In 2021, our sales in the Asia Pacific region
(mainly China, Taiwan and South Korea) accounted for approximately 83% of our total revenues with sales to China being the majority within
this region. A number of Asian countries have experienced or could experience political and economic instability. For instance, Taiwan
and China encountered a number of continuous disputes, as have North and South Korea, and Japan has experienced significant economic instability
for a number of years. Additionally, the Asia-Pacific region is susceptible to the occurrence of natural disasters, such as earthquakes,
cyclones, tsunamis and flooding. Changes in local legislation, changes in governmental policies, controls and regulations, trade restrictions,
a downturn in economic or financial conditions, an outbreak of hostilities or other political upheaval, as well as any further extraordinary
events having an adverse effect on the economy or business environment in this region, would likely harm the operations of our customers
in these countries, may cause a significant decline in our future revenues and may have an adverse effect on our results of operations
and cash flow. These general risks are heightened in China, which is our largest territory, where the nature of the economy, local legislation,
governmental policies and regulatory environment are rapidly evolving and where foreign companies may face the negative effects of changed
governmental policies, regulatory, business and cultural obstacles. Additionally, recent policies adopted by China with respect to trade,
may present obstacles, such as regulatory restraints or significant increases in tariffs on goods imported into these markets.
Changes in global trade
policies and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations, as we
are dependent on international sales, which expose us to global political and economic risks that could impede our plans for expansion
and growth.
The international environment
in which we operate is affected from inter-country trade agreements and tariffs. Specifically, recent revisions made in the U.S. administrative
policy with respect to China, as well as future actions of the U.S. administration and that of foreign governments with respect to tariffs
or international trade agreements and policies are creating a global trade environment which remains currently unclear. The escalation
of a trade war, tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials exported by us to China may significantly
impede our ability to sell our products and provide services to our customers in China or other affected territories. Such developments
may result in a decrease in demand for our products and technologies as well as delays in payments from our customers. Furthermore, other
governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements, changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions
or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries, where our
customers are located, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Our principal customers
are located in the Asia Pacific region and the United States, and we manufacture our products in Israel. International operations expose
us to a variety of risks that could seriously impact our financial condition and impede our growth including:
• Instability in
political or economic conditions, including but not limited to inflation, recession, foreign currency exchange restrictions and devaluations,
restrictive governmental controls on the movement and repatriation of earnings and capital, and actual or anticipated military or political
conflicts, particularly in emerging markets;
• Rising inflation
and elevated U.S. budget deficits and overall debt levels, including as a result of federal pandemic relief and stimulus legislation and/or
economic or market and supply chain conditions, can put upward pressure on interest rates and could be among the factors that could lead
to higher interest rates in the future.
• Higher interest
rates could adversely affect our overall business or reduce our liquidity.
• Intergovernmental
conflicts or actions, including but not limited to armed conflict, trade wars and acts of terrorism or war, including current war between
Russia and Ukraine; and
• Interruptions
to the Company’s business with its largest customers, distributors and suppliers resulting from but not limited to, strikes, and
financial instabilities. For instance, trade restrictions, changes in tariffs and import and export license requirements could adversely
affect our ability to sell our products in the countries adopting or changing those restrictions, tariffs or requirements. This could
reduce our sales by a material amount.
All of these risks could
result in increased costs or decreased revenues, either of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.
The global supply of
electronic components, including integrated circuits, has experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, a sharp increase in demand,
while production capacity remains limited. This has had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on the lead-time for our components
and increase in their prices.
The global demand for
electronic components has experienced a sharp increase, with a growing number of industries dramatically increasing their demand and consumption.
This, together with the effect of COVID-19 and trade restrictions, which have, for example, discouraged U.S. companies from using fabs
in China, have led to a longer lead-time to receive electronic components, which in turn has led many companies to stock up and increase
their inventory levels, which has added to the pressure on the supply chain and caused an increase in the prices of the electronic components.
As a result of this situation, we may be unable to obtain essential components in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost that is necessary
for us to remain competitive. During such times, supplier-specific or industry-wide lead times for delivery can be as long as twelve months
or more. Industry-wide demand increases for such components could increase its market price as well as the market price of replacement
parts and consumable materials needed to manufacture our products. If we are unable to obtain components in a timely manner to fulfill
our customers’ demand on technology and production capacity, or at a reasonable cost, we may be unable to meet commitments under
our contracts with customers, which could expose us to substantial liquidated damages and other claims and could materially and adversely
affect our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.
In the current highly
competitive business environment, our customers require us to fill orders within a very short period of time. Our products are complex
and require essential components and subsystems that are produced by a number of suppliers and subcontractors. In order to meet our customers’
needs in the timeframe they require, we usually need to pre-order components and subsystems based on our forecasts of future orders, rather
than on actual orders. While we believe that we have sufficient inventory to fill our customers’ orders, our predictions may not
correspond to our actual future needs and our suppliers and subcontractors cannot always supply such components and subsystems within
a shorter than anticipated time frame; this concern is heightened due to the supply chain obstacles detailed above. Our inability to anticipate
rapid market changes or the implications of the global components shortage may cause an increase of inventory which could result in material
inventory write-offs, which we have incurred in the past, or may alternately limit our ability to satisfy customer orders, which could
result in the loss of sales and could cause customers to seek products from our competitors. To date, we have successfully managed our
supply chain, but if these factors continue or become more severe, they may have an adverse effect on our supply chain and on our ability
to fulfill customer orders in a timely manner, which could in turn have an adverse effect on our position in the market and on our business
and operations.
Our business could be materially disrupted
by negative effects on the semiconductor industry.
The semiconductor industry,
including semiconductor equipment industry, relies on a global supply chain and is considered strategically important by major trading
countries. Political, economic and financial crises have in the past negatively affected the semiconductor industry and its end markets
and could do so again in the future. Our business may also be materially affected by the impact of geopolitical tensions and related actions.
Trade barriers have had a particular adverse impact on the semiconductor industry and related markets. Prolonged or increased use of trade
barriers may result in a decrease in the growth of the global economy and semiconductor industry and could cause turmoil in global markets,
which in turn often results in declines in our customers’ electronic products sales and could decrease demand for our products and
services. Also, any increase in the use of economic sanctions or export control restrictions to target certain countries and companies
could impact our ability to continue supplying products and services to our customers globally and to our customers’ demand for
our products and services, and could disrupt semiconductor supply chains.
Any future systemic political,
economic or financial crisis or market volatility, including interest rate fluctuations, inflation or deflation and changes in economic,
trade, fiscal and monetary policies in major economies, could cause revenue or profits for us or the semiconductor industry as a whole
to decline dramatically. If the economic conditions in the markets in which our customers operate or the financial condition of our customers
were to deteriorate, the demand for our products and services may decrease and impairments, write-downs and other accounting charges may
be required, which could reduce our operating income and net income.
Global and local price-pressures may increase
our costs of operations
We have encountered
during the last year, and there is a global concern that such trend will continue, an increase in the costs of raw materials, components,
electric power and water, shipping and in turn the cost of the R&D, production and sales work-force. If the price pressure intensifies,
this could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and business.
Our customers’
manufacturing processes are highly complex, costly and potentially vulnerable to impurities and other disruptions, and cost increases,
that can significantly increase their costs and delay products’ purchase by our customers.
Our customers’
manufacturing processes are highly complex, require advanced and costly equipment, and are continuously being modified to improve manufacturing
yields and product performance. Disruptions in manufacturing operations could be caused by numerous issues including impurities in raw
materials (such as chemicals, gases and wafers), facilities issues (such as electrical power and water outages), equipment failures (such
as performance issues or defects) or IT issues (such as down computer systems and viruses). For example, during 2021 Chinese provinces
have implemented power rationing and diverted electricity to critical sectors due to coal shortages and in order to meet energy intensity
targets. Any of these issues, and others, could lower production yields or interrupt manufacturing, which could result in the cancellation
or delay of purchase of our products, as well as cause our customers to experience reduced revenues, increased costs or reduced quality
delivered to their customers.
The markets we serve
are highly competitive and have dominant market participants, some with greater resources than us. Such competition could adversely affect
the terms on which we sell our products and may negatively affect our financial results.
The markets that we serve
are highly competitive. During market slowdowns, competition is intensified due to the reduced demand for the products that we manufacture.
When competitors respond to declining demand by offering discounts, free evaluation machines or more favorable credit terms, we may need
to implement some or all of the same methods in order to maintain our market position. These could mean lower prices for our products
and a corresponding reduction in our gross margin, as well as more favorable payment terms to our customers and a corresponding decline
in our cash flow. If we have to lower prices to remain competitive and are unable to reduce our costs to offset price reductions or are
unable to introduce new, higher performance products with higher prices, our operating results may be adversely affected. Some of our
competitors have greater financial, personnel and other resources and offer a broader range of products and services. These competitors
may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements, develop additional or superior
products, benefit from greater economies of scale, offer more aggressive pricing or devote greater resources to the promotion of their
products. Other competitors are local smaller competitors, which target the low-end market and may offer products at lower prices. If
we are unsuccessful in effectively responding to our competition, our financial results will be adversely affected by reduced revenues
as well as lower margins, which may lead to financial losses.
Technology in the markets
in which we operate is rapidly evolving, and we may not be able to adequately predict these changes or keep pace with emerging industry
standards, which could lead to a loss of revenues or adversely affect our profits.
The markets for our products
are characterized by changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in end-user requirements and new product introductions.
Our future success will depend on our ability to accurately predict new market needs and requirements and to enhance accordingly our existing
products and develop and introduce new technologies for the markets in which we operate. These products must keep pace with technological
developments and address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. If we fail to anticipate correctly, or if we are unable
to keep pace with, technological changes, products offered by our competitors or emerging industry standards, our ability to generate
revenues may be negatively affected. Adopting new technologies may also result in material inventory write-offs which would adversely
affect our results of operations.
Our operating results have varied, and will likely continue to
vary significantly from quarter to quarter, and from our expectations for any specific period making it difficult to predict future results.
Our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and could
continue to vary from quarter to quarter or from our expectations for any specific period in the future. This complicates our planning
processes, reduces the predictability of our earnings and subjects our stock to price and volume fluctuations. Period-to-period comparisons
of our results of operations may not always provide indications of our future performance.
Some of the factors that may influence our
operating results include:
|
• |
global economic conditions and worldwide demand for electronic equipment; |
|
• |
instability in the global markets and in the geopolitical environment in many parts of the world, including the current war between
Russia and Ukraine, as well as other disruptions may continue to put pressure on global economic conditions; |
|
• |
changes in demand for our systems; |
|
• |
changes made by customers to orders for our systems and/or installation schedules; |
|
• |
product introductions and the market penetration period of new products; |
|
• |
rapid shifts in industry capacity; |
|
• |
the size, timing and shipment of substantial orders; |
|
• |
timing of evaluation and qualification of our products by new customers; |
|
• |
lack of visibility/low levels of backlog from the preceding quarter; |
|
• |
pricing of our products; |
|
• |
timing of new product, upgrades or enhancements; |
|
• |
level of operating expenses such as R&D expenses, agent commissions; |
|
• |
fluctuations in interest rates; |
|
• |
an outbreak of a contagious disease, such as COVID-19, which may cause us or our suppliers and/or customers to temporarily suspend
our operations in the affected city or country; and |
|
• |
Because most of our revenues are generated in U.S. dollars, but a significant portion of our expenses is incurred in currencies other
than U.S. dollars, and mainly New Israeli Shekels, our profitability may be seriously harmed by currency fluctuations. |
In light of these factors
and the cyclical nature of the markets we target, we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results.
We have expanded, and
may further attempt to expand our activity within and/or beyond our current served markets, through M&A activity. Such activity may
adversely affect our results of operations.
We have in the past expanded
our activity to adjacent markets through M&A, and we may further decide to expand our activity through M&A activities. Such M&A
activity could lead to post-merger integration difficulties and increased expenses; diversion of management’s attention from our
core business and operations; failure to estimate the acquired businesses’ future performance and failure to execute on such expectations;
inaccurate evaluation of the fair value of certain assets acquired, liabilities assumed and contingent liabilities; the loss of key employees
of the acquired operations. We may incur significant costs in connection with seeking acquisitions or other strategic opportunities regardless
of whether the transaction is completed and, to the extent applicable, in combining our operations if such a transaction is completed.
In addition, as a result
of acquisition activity, our future results of operations may be influenced by the possibility of our incurring impairment charges as
a result of decline in value of goodwill and other intangible assets, ongoing amortization of intangible assets acquired and financing
expenses due to re-evaluation of contingent liabilities and other liabilities assumed presented at fair value (see also in Item 5.A below
- “Operating Results - Critical Accounting Policies). Future acquisitions
could also result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, a decrease in our cash resources, incurrence of debt, contingent
liabilities or impairment charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could harm our business. Furthermore,
we compete for acquisition and investment opportunities with other well-established and well-capitalized entities. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to locate acquisition or investment opportunities upon favorable terms.
Increased
cyber-attacks, data breaches, risks and threats, along with changes in privacy and data protection laws could have an adverse effect on
our business.
Threats to network and data security are constantly evolving and
becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated. Our servers and computer systems could be vulnerable to cybersecurity risks. An increasing
number of organizations have disclosed breaches of their information security systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly
targeted attacks. Given the substantial increase of cyber-attacks in recent years, we have implemented network security technological,
operational and organizational measures and drafted an internal global information technology security policy. This policy, which follows
industry best practices and focuses on Camtek’s network and information security, was reviewed by our audit committee and board
of directors. The possible cyber-attacks via unauthorized access, exploitation, manipulation, deception, corruption, disruption, damage,
leak, theft or loss of our intellectual property or any other digital assets could result in liabilities to us and other material costs.
Cyber-attacks aimed at our digital assets could accumulate increased costs to prevent, respond to or mitigate these incidents. It is also
possible that our digital assets and business processes could be jeopardized, compromised or halted via cyber-attacks, without being noticed
for some time.
Although
we have not yet experienced any cyber-attacks that affected our operations, we have experienced several failed attempts to penetrate our
systems and cannot fully guarantee that any potential cyber incidents will not have an adverse effect on our company in the future. Even
though we have invested in implementing various cyber security solutions in our networks and systems, in order to mitigate and reduce
our exposure to these cyber risks, we can provide no assurance that our current digital assets are fully protected against all sorts of
cyber-attacks by malicious third parties. We have purchased a cyber-liability insurance policy to cover certain security and privacy damages.
However, we cannot be certain that our coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. In addition, the potential liabilities
associated with these events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain as they could lead to financial losses, damage to our reputation,
business processes, financial condition and results of operations.
The regulatory
framework for data and privacy protection issues is rapidly evolving worldwide. New comprehensive data protection laws, including the
General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which imposes stricter obligations and provides for greater penalties for noncompliance.
We may be required to incur significant costs to comply with such data and privacy protection laws, as applicable to our company, or else
face an adverse effect on our business prospects and/or financial position. As we have a presence in Europe, our European subsidiaries
are subject to the GDPR in relation to their collection, control, processing, sharing, disclosure and other use of data relating to their
employees or customers. These
laws and regulations constantly evolve and remain subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these
laws and regulations are often uncertain. New privacy laws add additional complexity, requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk,
require additional investment in resources to compliance programs, and could result in increased compliance costs and/or changes in business
practices and policies.
Fluctuations in currency
exchange rates may result in additional expenses being recorded or in the prices of our products becoming less competitive and thus may
have negative impact on our profitability.
We are a global company
that operates in a multi-currency environment. As a major portion of the costs of our Israeli operations, such as personnel, subcontractors,
materials and facility‑related costs, are incurred in NIS, an increase in the NIS value relative to the U.S. Dollar will increase
our costs expressed in U.S. Dollars. We may, from time to time, take various measures designed to reduce our exposure to these effects,
but any such steps may be inadequate to protect us from currency rate fluctuations. In addition, although our products’ prices
in most countries are denominated in U.S. Dollars, in certain territories (currently, Europe and Japan) our products’ prices are
denominated in local currencies, and much of our service income in these territories is denominated in local currencies. If there is a
significant devaluation in the relevant local currencies in which we operate compared to the U.S. Dollar, we may be required to increase
those prices and as a result our products and services may become less competitive.
A longer sales process
for new products may increase our costs and delay time to market of our products, both of which may negatively impact our revenues, results
of operations, cash flow and may result in inventory write-offs.
Our sales process to
new and existing customers usually involves: demonstrations and testing against industry benchmarks in our sales centers; sales and technical
presentations and presentations regarding our products’ competitive advantages; and installation of the systems at the customer’s
site for side-by-side competitive evaluations for a period of approximately six months. More evaluation time is devoted during the initial
market penetration period for new products such as new products under our Eagle product line, and for new customers in new markets, since
these circumstances usually require qualification of the systems by the customers and engineering efforts to fix errors, customize tasks
and add new features. Considering the above factors, the length of time until we recognize revenue can vary and affect our revenues, and
results of operations. The long sales process may cause an increase in inventory levels and a risk for inventory write downs and write-offs;
for more details regarding recent inventory write downs and write-offs see Item 5.A – “Operating
Results – Critical Accounting Policies – Valuation of Inventory”.
We depend
on our intellectual property and litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights may be costly and expose us to risks.
If we are unable to protect our proprietary technologies, we may not be able to compete effectively as well as incur significant expenses.
Our intellectual property,
including our patents, is material to the conduct of our business. Our success depends on our continued ability to use our intellectual
property and on the adequate protection and enforcement of such intellectual property. There can be no assurance that the steps we take
to protect and maintain our rights in our intellectual property will be adequate, or that third parties will not infringe, misappropriate
or violate our intellectual property. If any of our efforts to protect our intellectual property is not adequate, or if any third party
infringes, misappropriates or violates our intellectual property, the value of our products may be harmed. As a result, if we are unable
to successfully protect, maintain, or enforce our rights in our intellectual property, there could be a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. In addition, to the extent that we do, from time to time, institute litigation to enforce our intellectual
property rights, such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could negatively affect profits, regardless
of whether we are able to successfully enforce such rights.
Third parties, including
one of our competitors in the field of semiconductor wafer inspection equipment, Rudolph Technologies Inc. (“Rudolph” which,
on October 25, 2019, merged with Nanometric Inc. into a company named Onto Innovation Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Onto Innovation”),
previously asserted claims, and may assert additional claims in the future, that we have infringed their patents or intellectual property
rights. Following the settlement of $13 million and dismissal of all of Rudolph’s outstanding claims in 2017, we do not currently
have any outstanding intellectual property claims against us (and, in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement with Rudolph,
no such claims were asserted by Rudolph within the three years following the execution thereof, i.e., until July 2020).
However, we may in the
future face such intellectual property claims against us, which, even if without merit, could lead to protracted litigation, could cause
delays in introducing new products, could be costly to defend and could divert management’s attention from our business. As a result,
any such claim could harm our business and cause a decline in our results of operations and financial condition, which in turn may materially
and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Successful claims against us (such as the claim asserted by Rudolph regarding
our Falcon product in which a final ruling was granted in Rudolph’s favor in 2016) could impose on us monetary awards for damages,
as well as for plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and other costs, and could limit our ability to sell products in certain jurisdictions.
Additional costs and expenses may also be incurred in the event of out of court settlement of claims against us (such as the settlement
of the Rudolph claims in 2017), which could result in monetary consequences and affect our profitability.
We differentiate our
products and technologies from those of our competitors by using our intellectual property for the development of our products. We rely
on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements to protect our intellectual
property. These measures may not be adequate to protect our proprietary technologies and it may be possible for a third party, including
a competitor, to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technologies without authorization or to develop similar technologies
independently. The inability to protect our intellectual property may affect our competitive advantage and we may incur significant expenses.
We depend on a number
of key personnel who would be difficult to replace.
Our continued growth
and success significantly depend on the managerial and technical skills of the members of our senior management and key employees. If
our operations rapidly expand, we believe that we will need to promote and hire qualified engineering, administrative, operational, financial
and marketing personnel. In particular, we may find it difficult to hire key personnel with the requisite knowledge of our business, products
and technologies. The process of locating, training and successfully integrating qualified personnel into our operations can be lengthy
and expensive. During periods of economic growth, competition for qualified engineering and technical personnel is intense.
We may not sustain profitable
operations or continue to have positive operating cash flows in the future.
Our ability to generate
profits is dependent mainly on our ability to generate sufficient sales. In the future, our sales may not be sufficient to cover an increase
in our expenses and we may not be able to maintain profitability, mainly during a protracted slowdown. We have from time to time in the
past undertaken cost cutting initiatives in response to economic conditions, including reducing our worldwide workforce, and may again
in the future have to undertake cost reduction initiatives. Our failure to maintain profitability or to continue to have positive operating
cash flows may impact our ability to compete in the market for the short and long term and impair our financial condition.
Compliance with environmental,
health, export controls, and other laws and potential liabilities could materially impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Due to our global operations,
we must comply with certain international and domestic laws, export control regulations and restrictions which may expose our business
to risks. In addition, our business is subject to numerous domestic laws and regulations designed to protect the environment, including
with respect to discharges and management of hazardous substances, wastes and emissions and soil and ground water contamination. The failure
to comply with current or future environmental requirements could expose us to criminal, civil and administrative charges and monetary
liability. We believe that we have complied with these requirements and that such compliance has not had a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Although we are not presently aware of any liability that could be material
to our business, financial condition or operating results, due to the nature of our business and environmental risks, we cannot provide
assurance that any such material liability will not arise in the future.
We may fail to maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (the “Sarbanes Oxley Act”) imposes certain duties on us and our executives
and directors, including the requirements of Section 404 (Assessment of Internal Control), which requires (i) management’s annual
review and evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and (ii) an attestation report issued by an independent registered
public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting, in connection with the filing of our Annual Report on Form 20-F
for each fiscal year. We have documented and tested our internal control systems and procedures in order for us to comply with the requirements
of Section 404. Our efforts to comply with such requirements have resulted in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion
of management time and attention, and we expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of resources.
In addition, while our
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting resulted in our conclusion that as of December 31, 2021, our internal control
over financial reporting was effective, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods. If we fail to maintain the adequacy
of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls
over financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in investigation or sanctions
by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial
information, and the market price of our ordinary shares.
Risks
Relating to Our Ordinary Shares
Sales of our ordinary shares may depress our
share price.
Offerings of ordinary
shares by us and any issuances or sales of a substantial number of ordinary shares in the public market or otherwise, or the perception
that such sales may occur, could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline or could impair our ability to raise capital
through a future sale of our ordinary shares. In addition, we have issued a substantial number of ordinary shares in connection with the
exercise of options to purchase our ordinary shares, and in the future we may issue additional shares in connection with the exercise
of existing options, which are eligible for, or may become eligible for, unrestricted resale. Any sales of such shares in the public market
or otherwise could reduce the prevailing market price of our ordinary shares, as well as make future sales of ordinary shares by us less
attractive or not feasible, thus limiting our capital resources.
Our share price and trading
volumes have demonstrated significant volatility in the past and may continue to fluctuate in the future. Such share price volatility
could limit investors’ ability to sell our shares at a profit, could limit our ability to raise funds successfully and may cause
additional exposure for securities class action litigation.
The stock market in
general and the market price of our ordinary shares, in particular, are subject to fluctuation. As a result, changes in our share price
may be unrelated to our operating performance. The price of our ordinary shares has experienced significant volatility in the past and
may continue to do so in the future. During the period from January 1, 2021 through March 9, 2022, the closing price of our
ordinary shares ranged from $21.50 to $48.15 per share. The price volatility of our shares and periodic volatile trading volume may make
it difficult for investors to predict the value of their investment, to sell shares at a profit at any given time or to plan purchases
and sales in advance. A variety of factors may affect the market price and the trading volume of our ordinary shares, including:
|
• |
global economic conditions, which generally influence stock market prices and volume fluctuations, including as a result of the effects
of COVID-19 and the current war between Russia and Ukraine; |
|
• |
investors’ views of the attractiveness of our new products; |
|
• |
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance and/or announcements of actual results that vary significantly from
such expectations; |
|
• |
the announcement by us or our competitors of corporate transactions, merger and acquisition activities or other similar events impacting
our financial performance; |
|
• |
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; |
|
• |
our earnings releases and the earnings releases of our competitors; |
|
• |
market conditions relating to our customers’ industries; |
|
• |
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors; |
|
• |
other announcements, whether by us or others, referring to our financial condition, results of operations and changes in strategy;
|
|
• |
large block transactions in our ordinary shares; |
|
• |
additions or departures of our key personnel; |
|
• |
future offerings or sales of our ordinary shares; and |
|
• |
announcements of significant claims or proceedings against us. Many of these factors are out of our control, and we believe that
period-to-period comparisons of our financial results will not necessarily be indicative of our future performance. |
Moreover, the market
prices of equity securities of companies that have a significant presence in Israel may also be affected by the changing security situation
in the Middle East and particularly in Israel. As a result, these companies may experience volatility in their share prices and/or difficulties
in raising additional funds required to effectively operate and grow their businesses. Thus, market and industry-wide fluctuations and
political, economic and military conditions in the Middle East may adversely affect the trading price of our ordinary shares, regardless
of our actual operating performance. Further, as a result of the volatility of our stock price, we could be subject, and were subject
in the past, to securities litigation, which could result in substantial costs and could divert management’s attention and Company
resources from business. Securities class action litigations are being brought from time to time against companies following periods
of volatility in the market price of their securities, and in the past, one was brought against us. Although this claim was dismissed,
we cannot guarantee that similar litigation would not be brought against us in the future.
Our principal shareholders,
Priortech and Chroma, hold a controlling interest in us and could be able to exercise their control in ways that may be adverse to the
interests of our other shareholders. Our relationship with Priortech and Chroma may give rise to a conflict of interests.
Priortech Ltd. (“Priortech”)
and Chroma ATE Inc. (“Chroma”), beneficially hold in the aggregate 38.94% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. As
a result of the voting agreement between Priortech and Chroma, according to which they vote together in Camtek’s shareholders meetings
and therefore deemed to be joint controlling shareholders of Camtek, they have the ability to influence the outcome of certain matters
submitted to a vote of Camtek’s shareholders, including the election of members of its board of directors and the approval of significant
corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of making it more difficult to obtain approval for a
change in control of Camtek. Mr. Rafi Amit, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Yotam Stern, a member of our
Board, hold, as of March 10, 2022, an aggregate of approximately 20.33% of the voting power at Priortech’s general meeting
of shareholders, through a voting agreement with David Kishon, Itzhak Krell (deceased)¸ Haim Langmas (deceased), Zehava Wineberg
(deceased) and Hanoch Feldstien (including the estates of the foregoing deceased founders, the “Founding Members”), governing inter-alia joint
voting at Priortech’s general meetings of shareholders and the right of first refusal among themselves (the “Priortech Voting
Agreement”), and as such may be deemed to control Priortech. Messrs. Amit and Stern also hold various positions in Priortech and
its affiliated companies, which may give rise to conflicts of interest. Mr. Amit, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer on a 90% position,
acts as Priortech’s Chairman of the board of directors and provides consulting and management services to Priortech on a 10% basis.
Mr. Stern holds several other positions in the Priortech group including the position of Chief Executive Officer at Priortech.
In addition, in the framework
of the series of definitive agreements signed in February 2019, in which Chroma acquired ordinary shares from Priortech and additional
new shares were issued to Chroma by Camtek, Leo Huang, the chairman of the board of directors and a controlling shareholder of Chroma,
and I-Shih Tseng, a director and Business Unit President of Chroma, were appointed to serve as members of our board of directors, which
may give rise to conflicts of interest. Despite our efforts to conduct ourselves by Israeli law procedural requirements concerning interested
party transactions, including with respect to audit committee, board of directors and shareholder approvals (including the special majority
requirement in appropriate cases), we cannot be certain that the possible conflicts of interest in any of these transactions and activities
is fully eliminated. For more details regarding our senior management arrangements, see Item 6.B below - “Compensation
– Employment Agreements”.
If we are classified
as a passive foreign investment company, our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences.
There is a risk that
we may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”). Our treatment as a PFIC could result in a reduction
in the after-tax return of U.S. holders of our ordinary shares and may generally cause a reduction in the value of our shares. For U.S.
federal income tax purposes, we will generally be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year in which either: (i) 75% or more of our gross
income is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of our total assets (generally determined on a quarterly basis) for
the taxable year consist of assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. Based on an analysis of our current
income, assets, activities and market capitalization and expectations about our future, income, assets, activities and market capitalization,
we do not believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2021 and do not expect to be a PFIC for the current year
or in the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not challenge
our analysis or our conclusion regarding our PFIC status. This is a factual determination that must be made annually after the close of
each taxable year. The value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC determination may be determined by reference to the public price of
ordinary shares, which could fluctuate significantly. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC for
the current taxable year or in the foreseeable future. If we were a PFIC at any time when a U.S. holder acquired or held our ordinary
shares, such U.S. holder generally will be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to such ordinary shares. If we were determined to be
a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, highly complex rules would apply to U.S. holders owning our ordinary shares and such U.S.
holders could suffer adverse U.S. tax consequences. For more information, please see Item 10.E below - “U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations– Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company”.
Our ordinary shares are
traded on more than one market and this may result in price variations.
In addition to being
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market, our ordinary shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”). Trading in our
ordinary shares on these markets take place in different currencies (U.S. Dollars on Nasdaq and NIS on TASE) and at different times (resulting
from different time zones, trading days and public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of our ordinary shares
on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our ordinary shares on one market could cause
a decrease in the trading price of our ordinary shares on the other market.
Risks
Relating to Our Operations in Israel
Conditions in the Middle
East and Israel may adversely affect our operations.
Our headquarters and
sole facility (including manufacturing facilities) are located in the North of the State of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and
military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly influence our operations. Specifically, we could be adversely affected
by hostilities involving Israel; the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners; a downturn
in the economic or financial condition of Israel; and a full or partial mobilization of the reserve forces of the Israeli army. Since
the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Middle Eastern neighbors.
While Israel has entered into peace arrangements and/or understandings with Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Bahrein, Sudan and Morocco, it has no
peace arrangements with any other neighboring or Arab countries. Over the years, this state of hostility, varying from time to time in
intensity and degree, has led to security and economic problems for Israel.
Further, all efforts
to improve Israel’s relationship with the Palestinians have failed to result in a permanent peaceful solution, and there have been
numerous periods of hostility as well as civil insurrection of Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in recent years. Also,
relations between Israel and Iran continue to be hostile, due to the fact that Iran is perceived by Israel as sponsor of Hamas (a militia
group and political party controlling the Gaza Strip) and Hezbollah (a Shia Islamist political party and militant group
based in Lebanon), while maintaining a military presence in Syria, and with regard to Iran’s nuclear program. The recent maritime
attacks over Israeli civil targets contributed to the tension in the region and further intensified the hostility between Iran and Israel
and between Israel and Hezbollah, which operates adjacent to Israel’s northern border.
Lastly, Israel has been
engaged, from time to time, in armed conflicts with Hamas. These conflicts involve missile strikes against civilian targets in the southern
parts of Israel and have also involved such missile strikes against central parts of Israel, most recently in May 2021. All of the above
raise a concern as to the stability in the region, which may affect the political and security situation in Israel and therefore could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the continued conflict with the Palestinians
is already disrupting some of Israel’s trading activities. Certain countries, primarily in the Middle East, but also in Malaysia
and Indonesia, as well as certain companies and organizations around the world, continue to participate in a boycott of Israeli brands,
and others doing business with Israel and Israeli companies. The boycott, restrictive laws, policies or practices directed towards Israel
or Israeli businesses could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, for example by way of sales
opportunities that we could not pursue or from which we will be precluded in the future. In addition, should the BDS Movement, the movement
for boycotting, divesting and sanctioning Israel and Israeli institutions (including universities) and products become increasingly influential
in the United States and Europe, this may also adversely affect our business and financial condition. Further deterioration of our relations
with the Palestinians or countries in the Middle East could expand the disruption of international trading activities in Israel, may materially
and negatively affect our business conditions, could harm our results of operations, and adversely affect the share price of our ordinary
shares.
Our business may also
be disturbed by the obligation of personnel to perform military service. Our employees who are Israeli citizens are generally subject
to a periodical obligation to perform reserve military service, until they reach the age of 45 (or older, for reservists with certain
occupations), but during military conflicts, these employees may be called to active duty for longer periods of time. In response to the
increase in violence and terrorist activity in the past years, there have been periods of significant call-ups for military reservists
and it is possible that there will be further military reserve duty call-ups in the future. In case of further regional instability such
employees, who may include one or more of our key employees, may be absent for extended periods of time, which may materially adversely
affect our business. Furthermore, our Company’s insurance does not cover any loss arising of events related to the security situation
in the Middle East. While the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages caused by acts of war or terror
attacks, we cannot be certain that such coverage will be maintained. We can give no assurance that the political, economic and security
situation in Israel will not have a material adverse impact on our business in the future.
Our ability to take advantage
of Israeli government programs and tax benefits may change, which could increase our tax expenses.
We have previously participated
in certain Israeli government programs and enjoyed certain tax benefits, particularly tax exemptions, resulting from our “Approved
Enterprise” status, provided to us due to our manufacturing facilities in Israel. In order to continue to be eligible for these
programs, or similar programs, and tax benefits, we must continue to meet certain conditions, including making specified investments in
fixed assets and equipment. If we fail to meet such conditions in the future, these tax benefits could be cancelled, and we could be required
to refund any tax benefits already received. Further, these programs and tax benefits may not continue in the future at their current
levels or at any level. The termination or reduction of these tax benefits would likely increase our tax liability. For information regarding
the above-mentioned tax benefits, see Item 10.E below – “Taxation –
Israeli Taxation - Tax Benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959.”
The government grants
we received for know-how research and development expenditures impose certain restrictions on utilization of the funded grants and may
expose us to payment of royalties in connection with the commercialization thereof.
We have received government
grants from the Israel Innovation Authority (the “IIA”) for the financing of a portion
of our research and development expenditures over the years. Even following full repayment of any IIA grants, and unless otherwise agreed
by the applicable authority of the IIA, we must nevertheless continue to comply with the requirements of the Encouragement of Industrial
Research and Development Law, 1984 and the regulations promulgated there under (together: the “R&D Law”), with respect
to technologies the development of which was financed by such grants (the “Financed Know-How”), including an obligation for
repayment of such grants from sales of products based on the Financed Know-How, if and when such sales occur.
In addition to the obligation
to pay royalties to the IIA, the R&D Law requires that products which incorporate Financed Know-How be manufactured in Israel, and
prohibits the transfer of the Financed Know-How and any right derived therefrom to third parties, unless otherwise approved in advance
by the IIA. Such prior consent may be given by the IIA subject to payment of increased royalties. Although as of the date of this Annual
Report, no Financed Know-How is used or incorporated in our current or currently anticipated product lines, these restrictions and requirements
for payment could in the future – if and as applicable – impair our ability to sell such Financed Know-How, or to outsource
or transfer manufacturing activities with respect to any product or technology based on Financed Know-How, outside of Israel.
Furthermore, the consideration
available to our shareholders in a transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of Financed Know-How (such as a merger or similar
transaction) may be reduced by any amounts that we are required to pay to the IIA. For more information regarding the above-mentioned
and other restrictions imposed by the R&D Law and regarding grants received by us from the IIA (and the repayment thereof), see Item
4.B below - “Business Overview – The Israel Innovation Authority”.
It may be
difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us or our officers and directors, or to assert U.S. securities law claims in Israel.
We are incorporated under
the laws of the State of Israel. Service of process upon our directors and officers, all of whom reside outside the United States, may
be difficult to obtain within the United States. Furthermore, because the majority of our assets and all of our directors and officers
are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us or any of them may not be collectible within
the United States. Further, it may be difficult for an investor to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in
Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel is not the
most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear such a claim, it is not certain whether
Israeli law or U.S. law will be applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must
be proved as a fact by an expert witness, which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be
governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel addressing these matters.
Being a foreign private issuer exempts us
from certain SEC requirements and Nasdaq Rules, which may result in less protection than is afforded to investors under rules applicable
to domestic issuers.
We are a “foreign
private issuer” within the meaning of rules promulgated by the SEC. As such, we are exempt from certain provisions under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) applicable to U.S. public companies,
including:
|
• |
the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form
8-K; |
|
• |
the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of securities registered
under the Exchange Act, including extensive disclosure of compensation paid or payable to certain of our highly compensated executives
as well as disclosure of the compensation determination process; |
|
• |
the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information; and
|
|
• |
the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing
insider liability for profit realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase,
of the issuer’s equity securities within less than six months). |
In addition, we are permitted
to follow certain home country corporate governance practices and law instead of those rules and practices otherwise required by Nasdaq
for domestic issuers. For instance, we have relied on the foreign private issuer exemption with respect to shareholder approval requirements
for equity-based compensation plans, with respect to the Nasdaq requirement to have a separate compensation committee and a formal charter
for such committee, and with respect to the quorum requirement for the convening of general meetings of shareholders; See in Item 16G.
“Corporate Governance” below. Following our home country corporate
governance practices, as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a U.S. company listed on Nasdaq, may provide less protection
to investors than is afforded under the Nasdaq Rules applicable to domestic issuers.
Provisions of Israeli
law may delay, prevent or make undesirable an acquisition of all or a significant portion of our shares or assets.
Israeli corporate law
regulates mergers and acquisitions and requires that a tender offer be effected when certain thresholds of percentage ownership of voting
power in a company are exceeded (subject to certain conditions), which may have the effect of delaying, preventing or making more difficult
a merger with, or acquisition of, us. See Item 10.B - “Memorandum and Articles
- Anti-Takeover Effects of Israeli Laws; Mergers and Acquisitions Under Israeli Law” below. Further, Israeli tax considerations
may make potential transactions undesirable to us, or to some of our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty
with Israel, granting tax relief to such shareholders from Israeli tax. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral
in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions, including a holding period of two
years from the date of the transaction during which certain sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are restricted.
Moreover, with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes
payable even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred. See Item 10.E - “Taxation
- Israeli Taxation” below. In addition, in accordance with the Restrictive Trade Practices Law, 1988 and under the
R&D Law, approvals regarding a change in control (such as a merger or similar transaction) may be required in certain circumstances.
For more information regarding such required approvals please see in Item 4.B - “Business
Overview - The Israel Innovation Authority” below.
In addition,
as a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, we are subject to the Israeli Economic Competition Law, 1988 and
the regulations promulgated thereunder (formerly known as the Israeli Antitrust Law, 1988), under which we may be required in certain
circumstances to obtain the approval of the Israel Competition Authority (formerly known as the Israel Antitrust Authority) in order to
consummate a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets. These provisions of Israeli law could have the effect of delaying
or preventing a change in control and may make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial
to our shareholders, and may limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for our ordinary shares.
Shareholder rights and
responsibilities are governed by Israeli law which differs in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S.
companies.
Since we are incorporated
under Israeli law, the rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by our articles of association, as amended from time
to time (our “Articles”) and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ
in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in United States-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder
of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith and in a customary manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations
towards the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting
at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters, such as an amendment to a company’s articles of association, an increase
of a company’s authorized share capital, a merger of a company and approval of related party transactions that require shareholder
approval. A shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.
In addition, a controlling
shareholder or a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent
the appointment of an Office Holder in a company, or who otherwise has the power to direct a company’s operations, has a duty to
act in fairness towards such company. Israeli law does not define the substance of this duty of fairness and there is limited case law
available to assist us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpreted
to impose additional obligations and liabilities on our shareholders that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
|
Item 4. |
Information on the Company. |
A. History
and Development of the Company
Our legal and commercial
name is Camtek Ltd. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel in 1987 and operate under the Companies Law. Our headquarters
are located in Ramat Gavriel Industrial Zone, P.O. Box 544, Migdal Ha’Emek 23150, Israel, and our telephone number is +972-4-604-8100.
Other than Israel, we currently have operations in the Asia Pacific region, North America and Europe. Our agent for service of process
in the United States is Camtek USA, Inc., located at Fremont Blvd., Ste. 112, Fremont, California 48389, Tel: 510-624-9905. We have been
a public company since July 2000. Our ordinary shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and on the TASE.
In our first years of
operation, we provided manual optical inspection equipment to address the needs of the PCB industry. In September 2001, we acquired
a developer and producer of Automatic Optical Inspection (AOI) Inspection systems for the semiconductor fabrication industry. This acquisition
allowed us to enter the back-end semiconductor inspection market. After a period of intense internal research and development, in the
fourth quarter of 2003, we shipped our first new Falcon system for the back-end market of the semiconductor industry. The first revenue
recognition of the Falcon system was in the second quarter of 2004. In the following years, applying our core technologies, we introduced
three additional Inspection and Metrology product lines for the semiconductor industry - the Condor, the Gannet and the Eagle; sales of
all four semiconductor Inspection and Metrology product lines have since accounted for a significant portion of our total sales. In 2017,
we consolidated all of our products for the semiconductor industry (which, following the PCB Sale Transaction in 2017 (see in this Item
4.A below), constitute all of our product lines) under the Eagle product lines. See in Item 4.B - “Business
Overview” below.
In 2017, we concluded
the sale of our Printed Circuit Board (“PCB”) inspection business unit (the “PCB Sale Transaction”), to Trophy
Imaging Technology Co. Ltd. Pursuant to the PCB Sale Transaction, we sold the entire assets and activity of our PCB business unit (including
our subsidiaries in China and Taiwan which were engaged primarily in such activity), in consideration for a total cash payment of $32
million at closing and an additional cash amount of $1.257 million, the payment of which was conditioned upon the financial performance
of the PCB business unit and was made in full in 2019. Since the closing of the PCB Sale Transaction, we have devoted, and will
continue to devote, our resources and attention to further developing and expanding our semiconductor Inspection and Metrology field of
activity.
Further, as a result
of our acquisition of the assets and certain liabilities of Printar Ltd. (“Printar”) in 2009, we became involved in the field
of the Functional InkJet Technology (“FIT”), which we gradually reduced over a few years, until eventually reaching the decision
to fully cease such activity in 2018. In 2009 we also completed the acquisition of the entire share capital of SELA – Semiconductor
Engineering Laboratories Ltd. (“Sela”) which was engaged in the development, manufacturing and marketing of automated SEM
(Scanning Electron Microscope) and TEM (Transmission Electron Microscope) sample preparation equipment, primarily for the front-end semiconductor
industry. In 2015, the Company concluded a definitive agreement for the transfer of the Sela division activity (assets and liabilities)
to a company fully owned by Sela’s long time business manager, thereby effectively terminating any and all involvement of the Company
in the Sela business.
In July 2000, we sold
5,835,000 ordinary shares in an initial public offering, in which we received net proceeds of approximately $35 million. In August 2002,
we sold 5,926,730 ordinary shares in a rights offering of ordinary shares to our then existing shareholders (of which 5,922,228 shares
were sold to Priortech), in which we received net proceeds of $6.1 million. On August 23, 2005, we raised $5 million as a convertible
loan from FIMI Opportunity Fund L.P and FIMI Israel Opportunity Fund, Limited Partnership (FIMI), which amount was repaid in full by August
2010. On April 30, 2006, we completed a private placement in which we issued 2,525,252 ordinary shares to Israeli institutional investors
at a price of $5.94 per share, raising $14.5 million. In May 2015, we completed a public offering of our shares on Nasdaq in which we
issued 4,655,982 shares at a price of $2.85 per share, raising net proceeds of $11.9 million. In November 2020, we issued 4,025,000 ordinary
shares in a public offering, which included the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase 525,000 ordinary shares, at
a price of $17.00 per share, raising $64.3 million net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. In November
2021, we closed an offering of $200 million aggregate principal amount of 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (“Convertible Notes”)
in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, which included the full exercise
of underwriters’ option to purchase an additional $25 million of Convertible Notes, raising $194.5 million net of underwriting discounts
and commissions and other offering expenses.
In February 2019, the
Company signed a series of definitive agreements, referred to as the “Chroma Transaction”, in the framework of which Chroma
acquired a total of 6,117,440 ordinary shares from Priortech at a price of $9.50 per share, and an additional 1,700,000 new shares were
issued to Chroma by the Company, at the same price of $9.50 per share; as of March 8, 2022, Chroma holds 17.83% of our ordinary shares,
while Priortech holds 21.11% of our ordinary shares. The Chroma Transaction was closed in June, 19, 2019 (the “Chroma Closing Date”),
following the occurrence of closing conditions defined therein, including the approval of the Chroma Transaction by the Company’s
shareholders in the 2019 AGM (as defined below) as well as the grant of approvals by certain regulatory bodies, including the Committee
on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the Taiwan Overseas Foreign Investment Commission (MOEAIC).
In addition,
the Company entered into a Technological Cooperation Agreement with Chroma under which the Company granted Chroma a license for an application
under Company’s triangulation technology platform. In addition, Priortech and Chroma entered into a voting agreement according to
which they vote together in the Company’s shareholders meetings and have joint control over the Company (the “Chroma Voting
Agreement”). Under the Chroma Voting Agreement, Chroma is entitled to nominate individuals for two seats on the Company’s
eight-member Board and Priortech is entitled to nominate three members. The remaining seats are held by two external directors. The Company
also entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement with Priortech and Chroma, according to which Chroma is
entitled to the same rights Priortech has with respect to registration of our shares (see Item 7.B. – “Related
Party Transactions”).
For a discussion of material
cash requirements, including capital expenditures, see Item 5.B - “Liquidity
and Capital Resources” below.
The SEC maintains an
Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports and other material that are filed through the SEC’s Electronic Data
Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval, or EDGAR, system. Our website is located at www.camtek.com. The information on our website is not incorporated
by reference into this Annual Report.
B. Business
Overview.
Our Business
Camtek is a developer
and manufacturer of high-end inspection and metrology equipment for the semiconductor industry. Camtek’s systems inspect IC and
measure IC features on wafers throughout the production process of semiconductor devices, covering the front and mid-end and up to the
beginning of assembly (Post Dicing). Camtek’s systems inspect wafers for the most demanding semiconductor market segments, including
Advanced Packaging, Memory, CMOS Image Sensors, Power, RF and MEMS, serving the industry’s leading global IDMs, OSATs, and foundries.
Semiconductors
wafers are scanned under the advanced optic heads (2D Inspection and metrology and 3D metrology) in our systems, advanced software and
algorithms are implemented on the scanned wafers data, as a result our systems automatically sort good dies and defected dies, the defected
dies will be sort out of the production lots and will not be inserted into a package or a product. Hence, the total end product yield
is enhanced by ensuring that only known good dies will be shipped to end-users. The systems are easy to operate and offer high accuracy
and productivity in high volume manufacturing environments. These systems incorporate proprietary advanced image processing software and
algorithms, as well as advanced electro‑optics and precision mechanics and are designed for easy operation and maintenance. Our
global, direct customer support organization provides responsive, local pre- and post- sales support for our customers through our wholly
owned subsidiaries located in 8 offices around the world.
Inspection and Metrology
are implemented at various stages along the semiconductor manufacturing process. Camtek’s systems serve various manufacturing stages
starting from the front-end macro inspection and Outgoing Quality Control (OQC), through Inspection and Metrology of bumps in the mid-end
and the inspection of post-diced wafers in the back end (Assembly).
Our Markets
The semiconductor manufacturing
industry produces integrated circuits mainly on silicon wafers but also on other materials. Each wafer contains numerous integrated dice
containing microelectronic devices. The growth of the semiconductor manufacturing industry in the past few years has been driven largely
by demand from electronics such as smartphones and the proliferation of applications including the Internet of Things and cloud computing.
Continued growth is expected with the enhancements of existing products, the introduction of the 5G networks and the inclusion of emerging
technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), as well as rapid growth in automotive and industrial electronics. The effect of such
market growth trends on the demand of Inspection and Metrology systems is driven by two main factors: (i) growing electronic devices manufacturing
volume requires more equipment (ii) applications such as automotive and mobile phones require a higher level of reliability and hence
more Inspection and Metrology.
In the fast-growing advanced
packaging market segment, which includes wide variety of devices and technologies, a new inspection and measurements steps become crucial
to ensure a known good package. The bumps are becoming the main interface instead of the conventional wire bonding. There is a wide variety
of bump types and sizes which are used for different packaging requirements. Camtek’s systems are equipped with state-of-the-art
metrology and inspection capabilities designed to address many of those inspection and metrology steps, including bump height, die stack
planarity, RDL dimensions and surface defects. These are examples of typical process steps where inspection and metrology are critical
to ensure high quality products.
Wafers with tens of
millions of bumps in very dense architecture are becoming more common and require 100% inspection and metrology due to the packaging reliability
requirements. The high cost of packages which in many cases combine multiple dice requires Known Good Dice in order to ensure that each
die in the package is fully functional. Camtek’s systems are designed to deliver 100% Inspection and Metrology in high volume manufacturing
environment, without compromising on throughput and performance. We expect that the two fastest growing segments in advanced packaging
will be the Heterogeneous Integration (HI), which is becoming the standard for high performance computing, and Fan Out Wafer Level Packaging
(FOWLP). Camtek’s flexible inspection and metrology systems utilize a wide variety of technologies to address the complex requirements
of these growing segments.
The shift of memory devices
to advanced packaging is growing to support high-end systems. A good example is High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) of DRAM dice stacked on top
of each other enabling higher bandwidth at less power consumption. Camtek provides 100% inspection and metrology of all the components
in the stack ensuring known-good-package.
Another fast-growing
segment is the CMOS image sensors (“CIS”) used for cameras. With the growing number
of cameras in each mobile phone and the increase in the number of pixels per each sensor and reduction in the size of each pixel, a high-resolution
inspection is mandatory. Camtek has developed unique capabilities to address these requirements and its systems are being used by the
largest CIS manufacturers.
The transition toward
5G, the fifth generation of cellular networks, also creates opportunities for Camtek. 5G smartphones and provides improved efficiency
and wide bandwidth, by using an increased number of RF filters (up to three times the former amount) with much smaller geometries. These
challenges require more accurate and, in many cases, 100% inspection and metrology. Camtek offers dedicated inspection solutions to support
the growing RF manufacturing market, enabling high-volume manufacturing at high throughput
Compound semiconductors
are undergoing a major expansion addressing many new applications and using various materials such SiC, GaN, GaAs and others, to improve
the performance of new devices such as Power and Face Recognition applications
The compound semiconductors
manufacturing process is unique and requires dedicated solutions for Inspection and Metrology. Camtek’s offering includes the inspection
of Epitaxial layers, inner cracks within the Epitaxial layer, surface topography, Bow measurement, data analysis and more.
During the last couple
of years, Camtek has penetrated the macro inspection in the Front End of the manufacturing process addressing the challenges of defect-free
and high-yield wafer manufacturing. The variety of defects calls for detection optimization, fast screening and categorization of
the high-volume manufacturing environment, while maintaining high throughput. Camtek’s Eagle platform can handle these challenges
and detect all defects of interest at high volume manufacturing rate.
Product Lines
Inspection and Metrology
Systems
Our systems consist of:
|
• |
an electro-optical assembly unit which consists of a video camera, precision optics and illumination sources. The electro-optical
unit captures the image of the inspected product; |
|
• |
a precise, movable table, that holds the inspected product; and |
|
• |
an electronic hardware unit, which operates the entire system and includes embedded components that process and analyze the captured
image by using our proprietary algorithms. |
The inspected product
is placed on a designated platform and is scanned under the optical assembly unit. The optical assembly unit then captures images of the
product, while the electronic hardware unit processes the image using the analysis algorithms. Detected discrepancies are logged and reported
as defects per the user definitions. The image of the defect is immediately available for verification by the system operator. Our systems
can also compile and communicate statistical reports of inspection findings via the customer’s factory information system.
We offer a broad range
of systems for automated optical Inspection and Metrology of semiconductor wafers. We invest significant resources in R&D to provide
our customers with advantageous performance, low cost of ownership, high reliability and ease of operation. We believe that a significant
part of our competitive advantage derives from our R&D innovative capabilities which enable us to adapt our technologies to evolving
market needs and customers’ requirements.
Over the years, our Inspection
and Metrology products for the semiconductor industry included the Falcon, Condor, Gannet and Eagle products lines. As of today, we produce
and sell only the Eagle platform and have phased out all other models.
Product
|
Function |
Eagle-i |
The Eagle-i system family is designed for high volume 2D inspection, delivering superior
2D inspection and 2D metrology capabilities. The system utilizes the most advanced algorithms enabling detection of down to sub-micron
defects and measuring two micron line and space redistribution layer (“RDL”). The Eagle-i
system family includes the EagleT-I and EagleT-I
Plus models, which were designed for better accuracy and optical resolutions and higher throughput.
|
Eagle-AP |
The Eagle-AP system family addresses the fast-growing advanced packaging market using
state of the art technologies, both software and hardware, that deliver superior 2D and 3D inspection and metrology capabilities on the
same platform. The Eagle-AP metrology capabilities support the wide spectrum of bump sizes and all bump types, including copper pillars,
micro-bumps, solder and gold bumps, meeting the advanced packaging market requirements, including measurement of bumps down to 2µm
(microns) and providing high throughput. The Eagle-AP system family includes the EagleT-AP
and EagleT-AP Plus
models, equipped with higher throughput and improved metrology capabilities. |
Golden Eagle |
Designed mainly for Fanout Panel-Level-Package (FO-PLP) applications, Camtek’s
Golden Eagle is used for the inspection and metrology of standard panel sizes, up to 650mm x 650mm. The Golden Eagle addresses the challenges
of Fanout Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP), while providing a robust system that addresses high-volume manufacturing requirements.
|
In addition, we intend to offer certain
software solutions we develop, such as the Automatic Defect Classification (ADC), which provides automatic defect classification of color
images, utilizing deep learning techniques, and will enable our customers to reduce and even eliminate manual verification.
Customers
We target wafer manufacturers
and companies involved in the testing, assembly and packaging of semiconductor devices.
Our customers are semiconductor
manufacturers, among them outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT), integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) and wafer level packaging
subcontractors. Our customers, many of whom have multiple facilities, are located throughout Asia, Europe and North America. In 2019,
one customer accounted for 11% of our total revenues. However, in 2020 and 2021, no individual customer accounted for more than 10% of
our total revenues. As of December 31, 2021, our installed base was over 1,500 systems.
The following table shows
our revenues classified by geographical region for each of the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars (In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
224,931 |
|
|
|
137,555 |
|
|
|
115,925 |
|
United States |
|
|
28,641 |
|
|
|
9,847 |
|
|
|
10,388 |
|
Europe |
|
|
16,087 |
|
|
|
8,457 |
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and Customer
Support
We have established a
global distribution and support network throughout the territories in which we sell, install and support our products, including the Asia
Pacific region, North America and Europe. We believe that this is an essential factor in our customers’ decision to purchase our
products. We primarily utilize our own employees to provide these customer support services. We may expand our network into additional
territories as market conditions warrant.
We have a distribution
rights agreement with a Japanese company, under which this company sells, installs and supports our products in Japan.
As of December 31, 2021, 160 of our employees were engaged in our worldwide marketing and support efforts, including support and marketing
administration staff. Due to the concentration of customers in the Asia Pacific region, we have significantly expanded our marketing and
support teams in this region.
Our marketing efforts
include participation in various trade shows and conventions, publications and trade press, product demonstrations performed at our facilities
and regular contact with customers by marketing personnel. We generally provide a 12‑month warranty to our customers. In addition,
for a fee, we offer service and maintenance contracts commencing after the expiration of the warranty period. Under our service and maintenance
contracts, we provide prompt local, on-site customer support. Our experienced local teams have been able to install and support our customers
throughout the pandemic with virtual support, as needed, from our experts in the headquarters
We take various measures
to secure customers’ payment on a case by case basis by means of letters of credit. Also, we receive advanced payments before shipment
from most customers.
Manufacturing
Our manufacturing activities
consist primarily of the assembly and final integration of parts, components and subassemblies, which are acquired from third‑party
vendors and subcontractors. The manufacturing process for our products generally lasts six to twelve weeks. We utilize subcontractors
for the production of subsystems, and our current main product, the Eagle system, is manufactured by two Israeli contractors who perform
most of the material planning, procurement, manufacturing, testing and assembly work with respect to such systems.
We rely on single source
and limited source suppliers and subcontractors for a number of essential components and subsystems of our products. We have increased
our inventories and production capacity to meet our needs taking in account the global shortage. During times of rapid increase in demand
in the semiconductor fabrication industry, the delivery time of suppliers in this industry is extended. However, to date, we have been
able to obtain sufficient units of these components to meet our needs in a timely fashion.
Our manufacturing facility
is located in Migdal Ha’Emek, Israel.
Competition
The markets
in which we operate are highly competitive. Our main competitors are Onto Innovations, Skyverse, ATI Electronics Pty Ltd., Cheng Mei Instrument
Technology Co., ASTI Holding Limited, Toray Industries Inc. and, for some limited applications, KLA-Tencor Corporation.
We believe that the principal
elements of a sustainable competitive advantage are:
|
• |
ongoing research, development and commercial implementation of new image acquisition, processing and analysis technologies;
|
|
• |
product architecture based on proprietary core technologies and commercially available hardware. Such architecture supports shorter
time-to-market, flexible cost structure, longer service life and higher margins; |
|
• |
fast response to evolving customer needs; |
|
• |
ability to maintain competitive pricing; |
|
• |
product compatibility with customer automation environment; and |
|
• |
strong pre- and post-sale support (applications, service and training) deployed in immediate proximity to customer sites. |
We believe that we compete
effectively on all of these factors.
The Israel Innovation
Authority
The
Government of Israel encourages research and development projects in Israel through the IIA (the Israel Innovation Authority), pursuant
to and subject to the provisions of the R&D Law. We received grants from the IIA for several projects and may receive additional grants
in the future.
Under the terms of certain
IIA grants, a company may be required to pay royalties ranging between 3% to 6% of the revenues generated from its products or services
incorporating Financed Know-How, until 100% of the dollar value of the grant is repaid (plus LIBOR interest applicable to grants received
on or after January 1, 1999).
The R&D Law
generally requires that a product incorporating Financed Know-how be manufactured in Israel. However, subject to receipt of an approval
from the IIA, some of the manufacturing volume may be performed outside of Israel. Such approval is subject to the repayment of increased
royalties, in an amount of up to 300% of the total grant amount, plus applicable interest, and an increase of 1% in the royalty rate,
depending on the extent of the manufacturing that is to be conducted outside of Israel.
The R&D Law also
provides that Financed Know-How and any right derived therefrom may not be transferred to third parties, unless such transfer was approved
in accordance with the R&D Law. The research committee operating under the IIA may approve the transfer of Financed Know-How between
Israeli entities, provided that the transferee undertakes all the obligations in connection with the R&D grant as prescribed under
the R&D Law. In certain cases, the research committee may also approve a transfer of Financed Know-How outside of Israel, in both
cases subject to the receipt of certain payments, calculated according to a formula set forth in the R&D Law. In the case of transfer
outside of Israel, a payment of up to six times the total amount of the grants plus applicable interest, and in the case the R&D activity
related to the know-how remains in Israel, a payment of three times of such total amount. These approvals are not required for the sale
or export of any products resulting from such R&D activity or based on such Financed Know-How.
Further, the R&D
Law imposes reporting requirements on certain companies with respect to changes in the ownership of a grant recipient. The grant recipient,
its controlling shareholders, and foreign interested parties of such companies must notify the IIA of any change in control of the grant’s
recipient or the holdings of the “means of control” of the recipient that result in an Israeli or a non-Israeli becoming an
interested party directly in the recipient. The R&D Law also requires the new interested party to undertake to comply with the R&D
Law. For this purpose, “control” means the ability to direct the activities of a company (other than any ability arising solely
from serving as an officer or director of the company), including the holding of 25% or more of the “means of control”, if
no other shareholder holds 50% or more of such “means of control.” “Means of control” refers to voting rights
or the right to appoint directors or the chief executive officer. An “interested party” of a company includes a holder of
5% or more of its outstanding share capital or voting rights, its chief executive officer and directors, someone who has the right to
appoint its chief executive officer or at least one director, and a company with respect to which any of the foregoing interested parties
owns 25% or more of the outstanding share capital or voting rights or has the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors. Accordingly,
in certain cases, any non-Israeli who acquires 5% or more of our ordinary shares may be required to notify the IIA that it has become
an interested party and to sign an undertaking to comply with the R&D Law. In addition, the rules of the IIA may require additional
information or representations with respect to such events.
As of December 31, 2021,
the total amount of grants received by us from the IIA and not yet repaid (including interest accrued by Camtek) was $7.9 million. This
amount also includes grants received by Printar, which we assumed in the framework of the acquisition of Printar’s assets and certain
liabilities, and which we have written off as we believe that no such payments will be made to the IIA (for more information please see
the discussion relating to the cessation of the FIT activity in Item 4.B above - “Business
Overview – Our Business”). As of the date of this Annual Report, no Financed Know-How is utilized in our current or
currently anticipated activities.
At the end of 2021, the
publication of the LIBOR is scheduled to cease and alternative interests will be applied on, among other things, the grants received from
the IIA. While the effect that the replacement of the LIBOR interest will have on the Company remains uncertain as of the date of this
annual report, and as the IIA has not yet published the alternative interest that will be applied by it, the Company assesses that such
change will not have a material effect on its operations and financial condition in light of the common interests in the market.
Capital Expenditures
The following table shows
our capital expenditures in fixed assets for the last three years:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
(U.S. Dollars in thousands) |
|
Machinery and equipment*
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
Right of use (ROU) assets
** |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Computer equipment and
software |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Building and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Office furniture and
equipment |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,995 |
|
|
$ |
5,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,458 |
|
* including transfer
of inventory to fixed assets in the aggregate of $2,204, $1,772, and $1,405 in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
** related to implementation
of ASC 842 - Leases as of January 1, 2019.
Material Effects of Governmental
Regulations
The following EU directives,
which represent the European standard required in order to sell in Europe, apply to our business: Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC and EMC
2004/108/EC. The following SEMI Standards, which define uniform standards for manufacturers in the semiconductor fabrication industry
and production equipment producers, apply to us: SEMI S-2 (safety requirements for sale of equipment in the semiconductor fabrication)
and SEMI S-8 (ergonomic requirements for sale of equipment in the semiconductor fabrication industry). We comply with the above-mentioned
governmental regulations during the systems’ design process, which is conducted in accordance with the Company’s quality assurance
manual ISO9001:2015. In addition, all modules of systems are tested by independent laboratories that certify their compliance with
these governmental regulations and have required accreditation.
C. Organizational
Structure
Through its affiliated
companies, one of our principal shareholders, Priortech, engages in various aspects of the electronic production, including, advance packaging
designs for the semiconductor industry and advanced organic coreless substrate technology. Priortech currently holds 21.11% of our outstanding
ordinary shares, and is a party to the Chroma Voting Agreement. Under the Chroma Voting Agreement, Priortech is entitled to nominate three
Board members. We have no revenues from sales to affiliates and subsidiaries of Priortech.
The following
table shows the Company’s subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned by us or by our subsidiaries (except for Camtek HK Ltd., in
which Priortech holds no more than one percent of the voting rights), together with each subsidiary’s jurisdiction of incorporation,
as of the date of this Annual Report:
Name of Subsidiary |
Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
Camtek H.K. Ltd. |
Hong Kong |
Camtek USA Inc. |
New Jersey, USA |
Camtek (Europe) NV |
Belgium |
Camtek Germany GmbH |
Germany |
Camtek Inspection Technology (Suzhou) Ltd. |
China |
Camtek Japan Ltd. |
Japan |
Camtek Inspection Technology Limited |
Taiwan |
Camtek South East Asia Pte Ltd. |
Singapore |
Camtek Korea Ltd. |
South Korea |
D. |
Property, Plants and Equipment |
Our main office, manufacturing
and research and development facilities are located in the Ramat Gavriel Industrial Zone of Migdal Ha’Emek in northern Israel. These
facilities occupy 110,000 square feet of which 16,000 square feet are devoted to the manufacturing of our products, and approximately
10,500 square feet are leased to a third-party lessee.
Our sales offices and
demonstration centers, which we lease in various locations around the world, occupy an aggregate of approximately 33,900 square feet.
Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff
Comments.
None.
|
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. |
General
The following
discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and the notes to those statements included therein, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. The following discussion does not address certain items in respect of our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019 in reliance on amendments to disclosure requirements adopted by the SEC. A discussion of our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019 may be found in “Item 5 – “Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects” of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2020, filed with the SEC on March 17, 2021.
Overview
We design,
develop, manufacture and market automated solutions dedicated for enhancing production processes and yield for the semiconductor fabrication
industry, principally based on our Inspection and Metrology core technology; see in Item 4.B “Business
Overview - Our Business” above.
We sell our systems internationally.
The majority of sales of our systems in 2021 were to manufacturers in the Asia Pacific region, including South Korea, China, Taiwan and
South East Asia, due to, among other factors, the migration of the electronic manufacturers into this region following the development
and growth of electronics industry centers.
In the year ended December
31, 2021, our sales in the Asia Pacific region (mostly China, Taiwan and South Korea) accounted for approximately 83% of our total
revenues.
In addition to revenues
derived from the sale of systems and related products, we generate revenues from providing maintenance and support services for our products.
We generally provide a one-year warranty with our systems. Accordingly, service revenues are not earned during the warranty period.
In regular
market conditions, the demand for our systems is characterized by short notice. To meet customers’ needs for quick delivery and
to realize the competitive advantage of the ability to do so, we have to pre-order components and subsystems based on our forecast of
future orders, rather than on actual orders. This need is compounded by the fact that, in times of increasing demand in our markets, our
suppliers and subcontractors tend to extend their delivery schedules or fail to meet their delivery deadlines. To compensate for these
unscheduled delays, we build inventories further into the future, which increases the risk that our forecast may not correspond to our
actual future needs. The uncertainties involved in these longer-term estimates during regular times of business expansion tend to increase
the level of component and subsystem inventories (See also in Item 3.D.
- “Risk
Factors - A longer sales process for new products may increase our costs and delay time to market of our products, both of which may negatively
impact our revenues, results of operations, cash flow and may result in inventory write-offs” above
and under Item 5.A -
“Operating Results - Critical Accounting Policies - Valuation of Inventory” below).
Compared to our sales cycles for repeat orders from existing customers, we have longer sales cycles for new customers in our markets as
well as for new customers in new markets. In addition, the selling cycle in our markets typically takes several quarters from first contact
to revenue recognition, including on-site evaluation. Naturally, repeat orders take less time.
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and
expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, intangible assets, contingent liabilities, long-lived assets, income
taxes, share-based payments and leases. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being
different from those on which we based our assumptions. These estimates and judgments are regularly reviewed by management on an ongoing
basis at the end of each quarter prior to the public release of our financial results.
Critical accounting policies
are those that, in management’s view, are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of
operations and most demanding on their calls on judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. We believe our most critical accounting policies and estimates relate
to:
Revenue
Recognition.
The Company’s contracts
with its customers include performance obligations to provide its products or to service the installed products. A product sale contract
may include an extended warranty (that is, for longer than the twelve-month standard warranty) as well as installation, both of which
are considered separate performance obligations.
The Company recognizes
revenue from contracts for sales of products when the Company transfers control of the product to the customer. From October 2020, this
generally occurs upon shipment whereas previously it was generally upon installation at the customer’s premises. This policy change
was made following changes to pre-shipment calibration and testing processes which have enabled the simplification and streamlining of
the installation at the customer site. The change did not have a material effect on revenues. Revenues from the contract are recognized
in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to receive once the product is operating in accordance
with its specifications and signed documentation of the arrangement, such as a signed contract or purchase order, has been received. Payment
terms with customers may vary, but are generally based on milestones within the delivery process such as shipping and installation. Payment
terms do not include significant financing components.
The Company does not
incur costs in obtaining a contract except for agents’ commissions, which are incurred upon the recognition of revenues. Revenues
are recognized over a period of less than a year and as such, there are no underlying sales commissions to be capitalized.
Service revenues consist
mainly of contracts charged under time and material arrangements. Service revenues from maintenance contracts are recognized ratably over
the contract period.
Contracts with customers
may include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based
on its relative standalone selling price. The Company generally determines standalone selling prices based on the prices charged to customers.
The Company’s multiple
performance obligations consist of product sales, installation services and non-standard warranties. Since October 2020, following the
change in the point in time at which product revenues are recognized, for cases in which product revenue has been recognized but installation
has not occurred as of the balance sheet date, a fixed amount is deferred from revenue in respect of the installation services yet to
be performed. A non-standard warranty is one that is for a period longer than 12 months. Accordingly, income from a non-standard warranty
is deferred as unearned revenue and is recognized ratably as revenue commencing with and over the applicable warranty term.
The Company records contract
liabilities when the customer has been billed in advance of the Company completing its performance obligations. These amounts are recorded
as deferred revenue in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Valuation of Accounts Receivable. We review accounts receivable to determine which are doubtful
of collection. In making this determination of the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider information at hand regarding
specific customers, including aging of the receivable balance, evaluation of the security received from customers, our history of write-offs,
relationships with our customers and the overall credit worthiness of our customers. Changes in the credit worthiness of our customers,
the general economic environment and other factors may impact the level of our future write-offs.
Valuation
of Inventory. Inventories consist of completed systems, partially completed
systems and components, and are recorded at the lower of cost, determined by the moving – average basis, or net realizable value.
We review inventory for obsolescence and excess quantities to determine that items deemed obsolete or excess inventory are appropriately
reserved. In making the determination, we consider forecasted future sales or service/maintenance of related products and the quantity
of inventory at the balance sheet date, assessed against each inventory item’s past usage rates and future expected usage rates.
Changes in factors such as technology, customer demand, competing products and other matters could affect the level of our obsolete and
excess inventory in the future.
In the years 2021 and
2020 we wrote-off inventory in the amount of approximately $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively which were related to damaged,
obsolete, excess and slow-moving inventory. These amounts are included in the item line called “Cost of revenues” in the consolidated
statements of operations. The write-offs create a new cost basis and are a permanent reduction of inventory cost. Inventory that is not
expected to be converted or consumed in 2022 is classified as non-current. As of December 31, 2021, a $5.2 million portion of our inventory
was classified as non-current. Management periodically evaluates our inventory composition, giving consideration to factors such as the
probability and timing of anticipated usage and the physical condition of the items, and then estimates a charge (reducing the inventory)
to be provided for slow moving, technologically obsolete or damaged inventory. These estimates could vary significantly from actual requirements
based upon future economic conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive factors that were not foreseen or did not exist when the
inventory write-offs were established.
Intangible
assets. Patent registration costs are capitalized at cost and amortized,
beginning with the first year of utilization, over its expected life of ten years.
We review our long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future
cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as computed by subtracting the fair market value of the asset from its carrying value.
Provisions
for contingent liabilities. A contingency (provision) in accordance with
ASC Topic 450-10-05, Contingencies, is an existing condition or situation involving uncertainty as to the range of possible loss to the
entity. A provision for claims is recognized if it is probable (likely to occur) that a liability has been incurred and the amount can
be estimated reasonably. Provisions in general are highly judgmental, especially in cases of legal disputes. We assess the probability
of an adverse event if the probability is evaluated to be probable, we are required to fully provide for the total amount of the estimated
contingent liability. We continually evaluate our pending provisions to determine if accruals are required. It is often difficult to accurately
estimate the ultimate outcome of a contingent liability. Different variables can affect the timing and amount we provide for certain contingent
liabilities. Our assessments are therefore subject to estimates made by us and our legal counsel. Adverse revision in our estimates of
the potential liability could materially impact our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets. We apply ASC Subtopic 360-10, “Property, Plant
and Equipment”. This Statement requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison
of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of
the long-lived asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as computed by subtracting
the fair market value of the asset from its carrying value. We prepare future cash flows based on our best estimates including projections
and financial statements, future plans and growth estimates.
Income
Taxes. We account for income taxes under ASC Subtopic 740-10 Income Taxes
– Overall. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognized in respect of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts as well as in respect of tax losses and other deductions which may be deductible
for tax purposes in future years, based on tax rates applicable to the periods in which such deferred taxes will be realized. The rates
applied are those enacted in law as of December 31, 2021. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it
is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred
tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible
and during which the carry-forwards are available. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to
the amount considered more likely than not to be realized.
Our financial statements
include deferred tax assets, net, which are calculated according to the above methodology. If there is an unexpected critical deterioration
in our operating results and forecasts, we would have to increase the valuation allowance with respect to those assets. We believe that
it is more likely than not that those net deferred tax assets included in our financial statements will be realized in subsequent years.
Stock
Option and Restricted Share Plans. We account for our employee stock-based
compensation awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASC Topic
718 requires that all employee stock‑based compensation is recognized as a cost in the financial statements and that for equity-classified
awards such cost is measured at the grant date fair value of the award. We estimate grant date fair value using the Black‑Scholes-Merton
option‑pricing model. Forfeitures are recognized when they occur.
Leases. Results
and disclosure requirements are presented under Topic 842, Leases.
Under Topic 842,
we determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on
the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, we consider only payments that are fixed and determinable
at the time of commencement. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use its incremental borrowing rate based on the
information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical
rate based on its understanding of what our credit rating would be 2.43% in 2021. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate
the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. When determining the probability of exercising such options,
we consider contract-based, asset-based, entity-based, and market-based factors. Lease agreements may contain variable costs such as common
area maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes or other costs. Variable lease costs are expensed as incurred on the consolidated statements
of income. Our lease agreements generally do not contain any residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.
Operating lease ROU assets
are presented as property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. The current portion of operating lease liabilities is
included in other current liabilities and the long-term portion is presented within long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheet.
For operating leases,
the ROU asset is subsequently measured throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease liability, plus initial direct costs,
plus (minus) any prepaid (accrued) lease payments, less the unamortized balance of lease incentives received. Lease expense for lease
payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
ROU assets for operating
leases are periodically reduced by impairment losses. We use the long-lived assets impairment guidance in ASC Subtopic 360-10, Property,
Plant, and Equipment – Overall, to determine whether an ROU asset is impaired, and if so, the amount of the impairment loss to recognize.
New
standards not yet adopted
In December 2019, the
FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU
2019-12), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes. This guidance became effective in the first quarter of 2021 on a prospective
basis. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2020, the
FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts
in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity.
ASU 2020-06 reduces the number of accounting models for convertible instruments and allows more contracts to qualify for equity classification.
Adoption is either a modified retrospective method or a fully retrospective method of transition. ASU 2020-06 will be effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted. Effective January 1, 2021, the Company early adopted
ASU 2020-06 using the modified retrospective approach.
Comparison of Period-to-Period
Results of Operations
The following table presents consolidated
statement of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenues:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Total Cost of revenues |
|
|
49.07 |
% |
|
|
53.01 |
% |
|
|
51.66 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
50.93 |
% |
|
|
46.99 |
% |
|
|
48.34 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
8.70 |
% |
|
|
12.56 |
% |
|
|
12.19 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
15.94 |
% |
|
|
19.91 |
% |
|
|
19.76 |
% |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
24.64 |
% |
|
|
32.47 |
% |
|
|
31.94 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
26.29 |
% |
|
|
14.52 |
% |
|
|
16.39 |
% |
Financial income , net |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.60 |
% |
Income tax expenses |
|
|
(4.32 |
)% |
|
|
(1.04 |
)% |
|
|
(1.46 |
)% |
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
22.35 |
% |
|
|
13.97 |
% |
|
|
15.54 |
% |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
22.35 |
% |
|
|
13.97 |
% |
|
|
16.41 |
% |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 compared to Year Ended December 31,
2020
Revenues. Revenues
increased by 73% to $269.7 million in 2021 from $155.9 million in 2020, due primarily to an increase in the number of product units sold.
Gross
Profit. Gross profit consists of revenues less cost of revenues, which includes
the cost of components, production materials, labor, depreciation, factory and service center overheads and provisions for warranties.
These expenditures are only partially affected by sales volume. Our total gross profit increased to $137.3 million in 2021 from $73.2
million in 2020, an increase of $64.1 million, or 88%. Our gross margin increased to 50.9% in 2021, compared to a gross margin of
47.0% in 2020, mainly as a function of increased revenues.
Research
and Development Costs. Research and development expenses consist primarily
of salaries, materials consumption and costs associated with subcontracting certain development efforts. Total research and development
expenses for 2021 increased to $23.5 million from $19.6 million in 2020 due to increased research and development activity, due to higher
investment in new products and technologies, as well as an increase in headcount.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses consist primarily of expenses associated with salaries, commissions, promotion and travel, professional services and rent costs.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 38% to $43.0 million in 2021 from $31.0 million in 2020, mainly due
to increased commissions, salary expenses and marketing expenses resulting from the increased sales, offset by decreased shipping expenses.
Financial
Income, Net. We had net financial income of $1.0 million in 2021 compared
to $0.8 in 2020. Foreign currency income, net, resulting from transactions not denominated in U.S. Dollars, amounted to $0.05 million
in 2021 compared to expenses of $0.35 in 2020.
Provision
for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $11.7 million in 2021, an
increase of $10.1 million from the $1.6 million expense in 2020. This is partially due to the Company’s increased income and partially
due to a settlement with the Israeli Tax Authorities which resulted in a one-time tax expense of $5.3 million in respect of its historical
exempt earnings.
Net
Income from continuing operations. We realized net income of $60.3 million
in 2021 compared to net income of $21.8 million in 2020, due to increased revenues.
B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2021,
our cash and cash equivalent and short-term deposit balances totaled approximately $397.9 million. At December 31, 2020, our cash and
cash equivalent balances totaled approximately $177.8 million. The year-to-year increase in cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits
mainly results from the successful issuance of the Convertible Notes, in addition to increased revenues. Our cash is invested in bank
deposits spread among several banks, primarily in Israel.
From our
inception through December 31, 2021 we raised approximately $36.0 million from our initial public offering in 2000, approximately
$6.1 million in a rights offering of ordinary shares to our then existing shareholders in 2002, $14.5 million from a private placement
to Israeli institutional investors in 2006, $11.9 million in a public offering of our shares in May 2015, $16.2 million pursuant to the
share issuance under the Chroma Transaction in June 2019, and $64.3 million in a public offering of our shares in November 2020. Further,
in November 2021, we closed an offering of $200 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes due 2026 (see Item 4.A. –
“History and Development of the Company”).
Our working capital was
approximately $430.5 million in 2021 and $204.5 million in 2020. The increase is mainly attributed to increased cash and cash equivalents,
and short-term deposits, increased inventories and accounts receivable, offset by increased trade accounts payable.
Our capital expenditures
during 2021 were approximately $4.2 million, mainly to increase our production capacity and to support our R&D, operations and IT
activities.
Cash
flow from operating activities
Net cash and cash equivalents
provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 totaled $61.0 million and $25.8 million, respectively.
During 2021, cash provided
by operating activities was primarily attributed to net income and the increases in other current liabilities, offset by increases in
inventory and trade accounts receivable.
During 2020, cash provided
by operating activities was primarily attributed to net income and the increase in trade account payable and other current liabilities,
offset by increases in inventory and trade accounts receivable.
Cash
flow from investing activities
Cash flow used in investing
activities in 2021 was $120.2 million, due to investment in short-term and long-term deposits and fixed and intangible assets. Cash flow
used in investing activities in 2020 was $23.1 million, due to investment in short-term deposits and fixed and intangible assets.
Our capital expenditures
in 2021 and 2020 were used primarily for operating activities. In 2022, we expect our capital expenditures to increase to over $7 million
as we invest in our facilities.
Cash
flow from financing activities
Cash flow
provided by financing activities in 2021 was $194.8 million, mainly due to the issuance of the Convertible Notes.
Cash flow
provided by financing activities in 2020 was $64.9 million, mainly due to the public offering of our shares.
Our principal
liquidity requirement is expected to be for working capital and capital expenditures, as well as acquisitions. We anticipate funding these
cash requirements and capital expenditures through a combination of cash flow from operations and existing balances of cash and cash equivalents
and short-term deposits.We anticipate that our existing capital resources and cash flows from operations will be adequate to satisfy our
liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. If available liquidity is not sufficient to meet our operating obligations as
they come due, our plans include pursuing alternative financing arrangements or reducing expenditures as necessary to meet our cash requirements
(see also Item 3.D “Risk Factors - We have historically incurred significant
losses and negative cash flows and may not sustain profitable operations or continue to have positive operating cash flows in the future”
above).
Effective
Corporate Tax Rate
Camtek’s production
facility in Israel has been granted “Approved Enterprise” status under the Investment Law (as defined in Item 10.E –
“Taxation – Israeli Taxation - Tax Benefits Under the Law for the Encouragement
of Capital Investments, 1959” below). We participate in the Alternative Benefits Program and, accordingly, income from our
Approved Enterprise will be tax exempt for a period of 10 years, commencing on the first year in which the Approved Enterprise first generates
taxable income, due to the fact that we operate in Zone ”A” in Israel.
On April 1, 2005, an
amendment to the Investment Law came into effect (the “Amendment”) and significantly
changed the provisions of the Investment Law. The Amendment limits the scope of an enterprise which may be approved by the Investment
Center by setting criteria for the approval of a facility as a “Beneficiary Enterprise”; such criteria generally require that
at least 25% of the Beneficiary Enterprise’s income will be derived from export. Additionally, the Amendment enacted major changes
in the manner in which tax benefits are awarded under the Investment Law so that companies no longer require Investment Center approval
in order to qualify for tax benefits.
In addition, the Amendment
provides that terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval issued prior to December 31, 2004 will remain subject to the
provisions of the Investment Law as they were on the date of such prior approval. Therefore, our existing Approved Enterprise will generally
not be subject to the provisions of the Amendment. As a result of the Amendment, tax-exempt income generated under the provisions of the
new law, as part of a new Beneficiary Enterprise, will subject us to taxes upon distribution or liquidation.
Camtek has been granted
the status of Approved Enterprise, under the Investment Law, for investment programs for the periods which ended in 2007 and 2010, and
the status of Beneficiary Enterprise according to the Amendment, for a period which ended in 2014. In addition, Camtek has elected 2010
as the year of election for a period ending 2021 (collectively, “Programs”).
On December 29, 2010,
the Investment Law was amended to significantly revise the tax incentive regime in Israel commencing on January 1, 2011. For more
information, see Item 10.E – “Taxation – Israeli Taxation - Tax
Benefits Under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959” below.
During the years 1998-2006
the company was subject to tax in accordance with the Approved and Beneficiary Enterprise under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital
Investments. As such, the Company has income that was exempt from tax. Distribution of dividend from the exempt income requires the Company
to pay income tax on the amount of the dividend distributed at the tax rate that would have been applicable to it in the year the income
was produced if it had not been exempt from tax. In February 2022, the Company, in a settlement with the Israeli Tax Authorities,
elected to take advantage of the temporary rule of 2022 in Israel and pay a reduced tax rate on its historical exempt earnings to allow
the Company to distribute dividends from these earnings in the future with no additional corporate tax liability. The Company’s
Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2021 included a one-time tax expense of $5,315, as a result of this settlement.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation
See Item
3.D – “Risk Factors –
Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Our Markets – Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may result in additional expenses
being recorded or in the prices of our products becoming less competitive and thus may have negative impact on our profitability”
above.
C.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses.
We believe that intensive
R&D is essential to our business. We devote substantial R&D resources to developing new products and to improving our existing
products to meet our customers’ evolving needs. We have dedicated teams with expertise in image processing software and algorithms,
electronic hardware, electro‑optics, physics, mechanics and systems design.
Our R&D efforts are
primarily focused on:
|
• |
improving our defect detection capabilities while reducing the number of false alarms, simplifying operation and reducing the level
of user expertise required to realize the benefits of our systems; |
|
• |
increasing the throughput of our Inspection and Metrology systems; |
|
• |
providing unique technological solutions to our customers; and |
|
• |
adding capabilities to expand our market segments. |
In addition, we are focusing
our efforts on leveraging our core technologies, expertise and experience into continually enhancing the value to the user and the return
on investment from our products. We believe that our internal multi‑disciplinary expertise will enable us to maintain and enhance
our technological edge.
As of December 31,
2021, we had 104 employees engaged in R&D, all of whom are based in our headquarters in Israel. We also use subcontractors for the
development of some of the hardware components of our systems. Our R&D expenses were $23.5 million and $19.6 million for the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, representing 8.7% and 12.6% of the total revenues for the years then ended.
We will continue to devote
our R&D resources to maintaining and extending our technology leadership position.
Our R&D costs are
expensed as incurred.
In general, we rely on
a combination of our copyrights, trade secrets, patents, trademarks and non-disclosure agreements to protect our proprietary know-how
and intellectual property. We also enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and with all of the subcontractors who develop
and manufacture components for use in our products. We also employ specialists whose main role is to maintain and protect our intellectual
property from both professional and legal perspectives. We cannot be certain that actions we take to protect our proprietary rights will
be adequate nor can we be certain that we will be able to deter reverse engineering or that there will not be independent third-party
development of our technology.
We have 153 issued and
applied-for patents worldwide, of which 99 are registered patents. and 6 U.S. provisional applications. These patents relate to our
proprietary technology and know-how developed for Inspection and Metrology and Functional Inkjet Technology tools. We also have one registered
trademark in Israel.
D.
Trend Information
Currently, the outlook
for 2022 and beyond is positive as projected by VLSI Research and SEMI Organization. However, the global outbreak of the COVID-19may impose
unpredictable implications on the global economy which may affect the semiconductor industry. See "Item
3D. Risk Factors" above. The semiconductor industry has been influenced by weakness or uncertainties in global economic conditions.
The OECD had forecasted the world GDP to grow by 4.5% in 2022 which is a positive indication for our industry. According to several research
reports, key drivers for future demand in the semiconductor industry include mobile devices, data centers infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence,
augmented and virtual reality, smart sensors, Internet-of-Things and other electronic equipment.. See "Item 3D. Risk Factors" in this
annual report on Form 20-F. For specific trend information regarding the markets in which we operate see Item 4.B - “Business
Overview - Our Markets” above.
E. Critical
Accounting Estimates – see Item 5.A “Operating
Results – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”
|
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Key Employees |
A.
Directors and Senior Management
The following table lists
the name, age and position of each of our current directors and senior management:
Name
|
|
Age |
|
Title |
Rafi Amit |
|
73 |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors* |
Yotam Stern |
|
69 |
|
Director |
Leo
Huang |
|
68 |
|
Director |
I-Shih Tseng |
|
60 |
|
Director |
Yael Andorn |
|
51 |
|
Director** |
Yosi Shacham-Diamand
|
|
68 |
|
Director** |
Moty Ben-Arie
|
|
67 |
|
Director |
Orit
Stav |
|
51 |
|
Director |
Moshe Eisenberg
|
|
55 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Ramy Langer |
|
68 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Orit Geva Dvash
|
|
50 |
|
Vice President - Human Resources |
* Rafi Amit serves as our Chairman of the
Board of Directors as of our 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, dated June 3, 2019 (the “2019
AGM”). The approval of Mr. Amit’s appointment as Chairman, while continuing to assume CEO’s responsibilities,
was last obtained in the 2019 AGM.
** Ms. Yael Andorn and Prof. Yosi Shacham-Diamand
have served as our external directors (as such term is defined under the Companies Law) since October 2018.
Set forth below is a biographical summary of each of the above-named
directors and senior management.
Rafi
Amit has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2014, and as
our Chairman of the Board of Directors since the 2019 AGM. Between 2010 and March 2017, Mr. Amit also served as our Active Chairman of
the Board of Directors. Previously, Mr. Amit served as our Chief Executive Officer from January 1998 until August 2010 and as Chairman
of the Board of Directors from 1987 until April 2009. Since 1981, Mr. Amit has also served as the President and director of Priortech
and has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Priortech since 1988. From 1981 until 2004, Mr. Amit served as Priortech’s
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Amit holds a B.Sc. in Industrial Engineering and Management from Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.
Yotam
Stern has served on our Board of Directors since 1987. From May 2009 until
August 2010, Mr. Stern served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and from 2001 until 2012, Mr. Stern served as our Executive
Vice President, Business & Strategy. From 1998 until 2001, Mr. Stern served as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Stern
served in the past as the Chief Financial Officer of Priortech and has been serving as a director of Priortech since 1985 and as its Chief
Executive Officer since 2004. He holds a B.A. in Economics from Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Leo
Huang has served on our Board of Directors as a representative of Chroma
since June 3, 2019. Mr. Huang co-founded Chroma in 1984 and has been serving as chairman of the board of directors of Chroma since October
23, 1984. Mr. Huang was the QA Engineer of TIMEX Corp. from 1975 to 1977 and served as the Sales Manager of Philips Electronics Industries
(Taiwan) Ltd. from 1978 to 1984. Mr. Huang holds a bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering from National Chiao Tung University
in 1973.
I-Shih
Tseng has served on our Board of Directors as a representative of Chroma
since June 3, 2019. Mr. Tseng joined Chroma in 1998, serving as a director since June 6, 2012 and as Business Unit President of Chroma
since July 1, 2007. Mr. Tseng was a Research Assistant at Pennsylvania State University from 1986 to 1992 and served as the Project Manager
of Institute for Information Industry from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Tseng received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania
State University in 1992.
Yael
Andorn has served on our Board of Directors since October 3, 2018 and she is currently the Chairperson of our Audit Committee.
Ms. Andorn is the founder and CEO of CapitalA, and serves on the Boards of Directors of Israeli public companies such as El-Al Airlines
and Castro. Ms. Andorn previously served on private and public boards, including Midroog-Moody’s Rating, Oil Refineries (Bazan),
Retalix, The National Lottery, Clal Health Insurance and Clal Credit Insurance, and as head of the Investment Committee of the Teacher’s
Saving Fund. Ms. Andorn served as director general of Israel’s Ministry of Finance between 2013 and 2015 and as Partner at Viola
Credit between 2012 and 2013. Between 2005 and 2011, Ms. Andorn served as CEO at Amitim and also served on its investment committee. Ms.
Andorn held several positions at Israel’s Ministry of Finance Budget Department, Bank of Israel and IDF 8200 Intelligence Unit.
Ms. Andorn holds a Bachelor of Economics and a Master in Business Administration from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Yosi
Shacham-Diamand has served on our Board of Directors since October 3, 2018.
Since 2001, Prof. Shacham-Diamand serves as The Bernard L. Schwartz Academic Chair for nano scale information technologies in the Department
of Electrical Engineering - Physical Electronics, and in the Department of Material Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tel
Aviv University. Prof. Shacham-Diamand currently serves on the advisory board of CartaSense Ltd. and SolChip Ltd., and previously served
as consultant to numerous manufacturing companies such as: Zoran Inc., Intel Inc., Applied Materials Inc., Nova Instruments Inc., as well
as to numerous investment and holding companies in Israel and abroad. Prof. Shacham-Diamand previously served on the board of directors
of PCB Ltd. (today, Priortech Ltd.) and “RAMOT” by Tel Aviv University. He is a visiting professor at Waseda University, Tokyo,
Japan (Since 2004) and a visiting professor at the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, The Politecnico di Torino, Torino,
Italy (Since 2018), and serves as a distinguished international Chair Professor in Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan (since 2012).
Since 2014, Prof Shacham-Diamand serves as a member of the MAGNET committee, Ministry of Trade and Industry. Prof. Shacham-Diamand holds
a D.Sc. EE, M.Sc. EE, and B.Sc. EE (Summa-cum Laude), all from the Technion- Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and also completed
a postdoctoral research at U.C. Berkeley, CA, USA.
Moty
Ben-Arie has served on our Board of Directors since March 28, 2017.
From March 2017 until the 2019 AGM, Mr. Ben-Arie served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Ben-Arie is the co-founder and
serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of Invisicare Ltd. Mr. Ben-Arie has served as a consultant to entrepreneurs and investors
since 2014. Previously, Mr. Ben-Arie served as the CEO of Sital Technology from 2012 until 2014. From 2006 until 2011, Mr. Ben-Arie also
served as a managing partner of Vertex Ventures, where he focused on investments in Israeli-related hi-tech companies and evaluation of
companies in the field of telecommunication, IT, test equipment, medical equipment and multidisciplinary systems. During these years,
Mr. Ben-Arie served as a member of the fund investment committee, managed investments in several companies and served as a board member
in companies in their early stages, including Color Chip Inc., Multiphi, Expand Networks, Comability and Ethos Networks. From 2000 until
2006, Mr. Ben-Arie also served as a partner of Walden Israel Ventures, where he focused on investments in Israeli-related hi-tech companies.
During these years, Mr. Ben-Arie managed investments in several companies and served as a board member in companies from early stage,
including Color Chip Inc. and Passave. From 1998 until 2000, Mr. Ben-Arie served as a director in Radcom Ltd., as a consultant in Walden
Israel, and financed seed phases for new startups. From 1991 until 1998, Mr. Ben-Arie served as the co-founder and CEO of Radcom Ltd.,
Israel. From 1978 until 1982, Mr. Ben-Arie served as an electronic engineer and a project manager in Elisra Ltd. Mr. Ben-Arie holds a
MBA from Tel Aviv University, and a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.
Orit
Stav has served on our Board of Directors since September 24, 2020. Ms.
Stav is an experienced investment manager with 20 years of experience in the field of Venture Capital & Private Equity, as well as
in the technology sector. Ms. Stav is a co-founder and serves as a managing partner at Israel Innovation Partners, a business advisory
firm that specializes in building business relationship between global companies and Israeli technology start-ups. Currently, Ms. Stav
serves as a board member in Altshuler Shaham Properties Ltd., Hadasit Bio Technologies Holdings Ltd., Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources
Ltd., Aran Research and Development Ltd, ORT Technologies Ltd, A. Luzon Real Estate & Finance Ltd and Ya’acobi Brothers Group
(YSB) Ltd. From 2014 until 2015, Ms. Stav served as a managing partner of EVA Ventures venture capital. From 2010 until 2012, Ms. Stav
served as a country manager in Wimdu GmbH, an international internet company. From 2006 until 2009 she served as an investment manager
in Siemens Venture
Capital, and from 1998 until 2005 served
as an investment partner in Platinum Neurone Ventures, PNV, an Israeli venture capital fund. Ms. Stav Holds a MBA from the University
of Hertfordshire, UK and a B.A. in Economics and Management from Tel Aviv University.
Moshe
Eisenberg has served as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2011.
From 2010 to 2011, Mr. Eisenberg served as the Chief Financial Officer of Exlibris, a global provider of library automation solution for
the academic market. Prior to that, from 2005 to 2009, Mr. Eisenberg served as the Chief Financial Officer of Scopus Video Networks
Ltd., a leading provider of digital compression, decoding & video processing equipment. Prior to that, Mr. Eisenberg held various
professional and managerial positions at Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. and its wholly owned US subsidiary, Spacenet Inc. Mr. Eisenberg
holds an MBA from Tel Aviv University and a B.Sc. in Agricultural Economics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Ramy
Langer has served as our Chief Operating Officer since November 2017,
following the consummation of the PCB Sale Transaction. Prior to his appointment as Chief Operating Officer he served as Vice President
- Semiconductors Division from February 2014. From 2007 until 2012, Mr. Langer served as the Chief Executive Officer (and co-founder)
of Infinite Memory Ltd., a fab-less developer of products based on Saifun Semiconductors Ltd.’s technology. From 2005 until 2007,
Mr. Langer served as Vice President- Business Development of Saifun, where he marketed non-volatile memory IP. From 2002 until 2005, Mr.
Langer served as Managing Director of Infineon Flash, a fab-less developer of products based on Saifun’s technology using Infineon
DRAM process. From 1999 until 2002, Mr. Langer served as Vice President- Marketing & Sales of Tower Semiconductors Ltd., manufacturer
of integrated circuits. Prior to that, Mr. Langer held various executive positions at Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc., a leading global
semiconductor assembly equipment manufacturer. Mr. Langer holds a B.Sc. in Electronic Engineering from the Technion – Israel Institute
of Technology and a M.Sc. in Electronic Engineering from Drexel University, Philadelphia.
Orit
Geva Dvash has served as our VP Human Resources (“HR”)
since November 2017. Previously, since 2014, Ms. Geva Dvash served as our HR Director. From 2008 to 2014, Ms. Geva Dvash served as our
HR manager. From 2002 to 2008, Ms. Geva Dvash served at various HR positions at IBM research lab. Ms. Geva Dvash holds a Masters in political
science from Haifa University and B.A. in political science and English literature from Haifa University.
Arrangements Involving Directors and Senior
Management
In accordance
with the terms of the Chroma Voting Agreement, at the 2019 AGM Mr. Leo Huang and Mr. I-Shih Tseng were appointed for service as our directors
(see Item 4.A. – “History and Development of the Company”).
Except for the Chroma
Voting Agreement, there are no arrangements or understandings of which we are aware relating to the election of our directors or the appointment
of executive officers in our Company. In addition, there are no family relationships among any of the individuals listed in this Section
A (Directors and Senior Management).
B.
Compensation
Aggregate Executive Compensation
The aggregate remuneration
paid by us for the year ended December 31, 2021 to all persons listed in Section A (Directors and Senior Management) above, was approximately
$3,931,228. This sum includes $181,057 paid to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits, amounts expended by us for automobiles
made available to all our executive officers, and other fringe benefits commonly reimbursed or paid by companies in Israel.
We have a performance-based
bonus plan which includes our executive officers. The plan is based on our overall performance, and individual performance. Up to 50%
of the performance objectives of our executive officers may be qualitative, provided that with respect to our Chief Executive Officer
such portion shall not exceed three monthly base salaries. The measureable performance objectives can change year over year, and
are a combination of financial parameters, such as revenues, booking, operating or net income and collection. The plan for our executive
officers is reviewed and approved annually by our Audit Committee (in its capacity as our Compensation Committee) and Board of Directors,
as is any bonus payment to an executive officer made under such plan (provided that with respect to the bonus plan for our CEO we also
obtain shareholder approval – see in Item 6.B - “Compensation –
Employment Agreements” below).
We compensate
our independent directors for serving on our board of directors by payment of cash fees in accordance with regulations promulgated under
the Companies Law concerning the remuneration of external directors (the “Remuneration
Regulations”), reimbursement for expenses and the award of share options
or restricted stock units (“RSUs”).
Messrs. Rafi Amit and Yotam Stern, as well as Chroma’s representatives on our Board, do not receive compensation for their
service as our directors. See Item 6.C “Board
Practices - Remuneration of Directors” below.
Individual Compensation
of Covered Office Holders
The table below presents
the compensation granted to our five most highly compensated Office Holders (as such term is defined in the Companies Law; see Item 6.C
- “Board Practices – External
Directors – Qualification” below) during or with respect
to the year ended December 31, 2021. We refer to the five individuals for whom disclosure is provided herein as our “Covered Office
Holders”. All amounts specified below are in terms of cost to the Company, as recorded in our financial statements.
Name and Principal
Position (1) |
Salary Cost
(USD) (2) |
Bonus
(USD) (3) |
Equity-Based Compensation
(USD) (4) |
Other
(USD) (5) |
Total
(USD) |
Rafi Amit – Chief Executive Officer |
313,134 |
370,837 |
715,832 |
107,778 |
1,507,581 |
Ramy Langer - Chief Operating Officer |
362,059 |
127,732 |
432,604 |
- |
922,395 |
Moshe Eisenberg - Chief Financial Officer |
303,479 |
114,247 |
391,566 |
- |
809,292 |
Orit Geva-Dvash - Vice President, Human Resources |
192,094 |
53,357 |
201,795 |
- |
447,246 |
Yael Andorn – Director, Chairwoman of the Audit Committee |
- |
- |
24,125 |
40,897 |
65,02 |
Total |
1,170766 |
666,173 |
1,765,922 |
148,675 |
3,751,536 |
|
(1) |
All Covered Office Holders are employed on a full-time (100%) basis, except for Mr. Amit who dedicates 90% of his time to his role
as our Chief Executive Officer and except for Ms. Yael Andorn who serves as an external director in the Company’s Board of Directors.
|
|
(2) |
Salary cost includes the Covered Office Holder’s gross salary plus payment of social benefits made by the Company on behalf
of such Covered Office Holder. Such benefits may include, to the extent applicable to the Covered Office Holder, payment, contributions
and/or allocations for saving funds (e.g. Managers’ Life Insurance Policy), education funds (referred to in Hebrew as “Keren
Hishtalmut”), pension, severance, risk insurances (e.g. life, or work disability insurance), payments for social security
and tax gross-up payments, vacation, car, medical insurance and benefits, phone, convalescence or recreation pay, and other benefits and
perquisites consistent with the Company’s policies. |
|
(3) |
Represents annual bonuses paid in accordance with the Covered Office Holder’s performance of targets as set forth in his or
her bonus plan and approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors and/ or any special one-time bonuses as approved
by the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors in accordance with the Company’s Compensation Policy. |
|
(4) |
Represents the equity-based compensation expenses recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2021 for each Covered Office Holder, based on the options’ fair value on the grant date, calculated in accordance
with accounting guidance for equity-based compensation. |
|
(5) |
Includes relocation expenses which may consist of, to the extent applicable to the Covered Office Holder: housing, schooling, car,
medical insurance and travel expenses for the Covered Office Holder and family members residing with him abroad. |
Employment Agreements
We maintain written employment
agreements with our employees, including all of our executive officers, that contain customary provisions, including non-compete and confidentiality
agreements.
Effective May 26, 2015,
we entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Amit, Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board of Directors. Under
his amended employment agreement, Mr. Amit spends 90% of his time in service as our CEO, and his compensation includes: (i) an annual
base salary in the amount of $313,133 (the “CEO Base Salary”); (ii) an annual performance-based
bonus; and (iii) and annual grant of equity. At the 2021 AGM, our shareholders approved a three-year Cash Bonus Plan for Mr. Amit, for
the years 2021-2023. According to the bonus plan, Mr. Amit’s annual on target cash bonus for each of these years shall be equal
to not more than the CEO Base Salary, conditioned upon his performance in each of these years measured against criteria pre-determined
by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, with respect to the applicable year. According to the annual equity plan, Mr. Amit’s
annual grant of equity for each of these three years shall not exceed 300% of the CEO Base Salary, and at least 40% of it shall be subject
to performance-based vesting or otherwise comprised of options with a fair market value exercise price.
Further, Mr. Amit’s
amended agreement contains confidentiality provisions for the term of Mr. Amit’s services and thereafter, and non-compete provisions
for the term of Mr. Amit’s service and for a six-month period after the termination of his service. It provides that all intellectual
property developed by Mr. Amit, or in which he took part, during or in connection with his services, is our sole property. The agreement
may be terminated by the Company at any time, by written notice of termination delivered to Mr. Amit six months in advance. We may, however,
immediately terminate the employment of Mr. Amit in various circumstances, including in the case of a breach of fiduciary duty.
As Mr. Amit
may be deemed, together with the Priortech Founding Members and Chroma, to control the Company (see Item 3.D - “Risk
Factors- Our principal shareholders, Priortech and Chroma, hold a controlling interest in us and will be able to exercise their control
in ways that may be adverse to your interests. Our relationship with Priortech and Chroma may give rise to a conflict of interests”
above), in accordance with the Companies Law, his terms of employment must be approved by the Company’s shareholders at least once
every three years, and, accordingly, were last re-approved at the 2021 AGM. Mr. Amit does not receive any compensation in consideration
for his service as a member of our Board of Directors.
C.
Board Practices
Corporate Governance
Practices
We are incorporated
in Israel and therefore are subject to various corporate governance practices under the Companies Law, relating to matters such as external
directors, audit and compensation committees, internal auditor and approvals of interested parties transactions. These matters are in
addition to the Nasdaq Rules and other relevant provisions of U.S. securities laws. Under applicable Nasdaq Rules, a foreign private issuer
such as us may generally follow its home country rules of corporate governance in lieu of comparable Nasdaq Rules, except for certain
matters such as composition and responsibilities of the audit committee and the independence of its members. See Item 3.D – “Risk
Factors - Being
a foreign private issuer exempts us from certain SEC Requirements and Nasdaq Rules, which may result in less protection that is afforded
to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers” above. For
information regarding home country rules followed by us see Item 16G –”Corporate Governance”
below.
General Board Practices
Our Articles provide
that our Board of Directors shall consist of not less than five and not more than ten directors, including the external directors. Currently,
our board consists of eight members. At our 2021 AGM, each of Messrs. Rafi Amit, Yotam Stern, Moty Ben-Arie, Leo Huang,I-Shih Tseng,
and Orit Stav were re-appointed for service as our directors. All directors were appointed following the recommendation by the Company’s
Nomination Committee, and each of them is serving an approximately one-year term, which is due to expire at our 2022 annual general meeting
of shareholders (the “2022 AGM”). In addition, following the recommendation of our
Nomination Committee and Board of Directors, our shareholders approved, at our 2021 AGM, the re-appointment for a second term of services
of Ms. Yael Andorn and Prof. Yosi Shacham-Diamand as external directors in accordance with the Companies Law, for a term of three years
each.
According to the Chroma Voting Agreement
(see Item 4.A. – “History and Development of the Company”), Chroma
is entitled to nominate individuals for two seats on the Company’s eight member Board and Priortech is entitled to nominate three
members. The remaining seats are held by two external directors and an additional independent director.
In accordance with the
Companies Law, our Board of Directors retains all the powers in managing our Company that are not specifically granted to the shareholders.
For example, the Board may make decisions to borrow money for the Company, and may set aside reserves out of our profits, for whatever
purposes it sees fit.
The Board of Directors
may pass a resolution when a quorum is present (in person or via telecommunication), and by a vote of at least a majority of the directors
present when the resolution is put to vote. A quorum is defined as at least a majority of the directors then in office who are lawfully
entitled to participate in the meeting but not less than two directors. The Chairman of the Board is elected and removed by the Board
members. Minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors are recorded and kept at our offices. In addition, the Board of Directors may
pass a resolution by way of a written resolution signed by all members of our Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors
may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, appoint a committee of the Board and delegate to such committee all or any of the
powers of the Board, as it deems appropriate. Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, the Board
may, at any time, amend, restate or cancel the delegation of any of its powers to any of its committees. Our Board of Directors has appointed
an Audit Committee, also serving as a Compensation Committee, and a Nomination Committee. For information regarding the duties, responsibilities
and composition of each of our committees, see Item 6.C – “Board Practices
- Committees of the Board of Directors” below.
Our Articles provide
that any director may appoint as an alternate director, by written notice to us or to the Chairman of the Board, any individual who is
qualified to serve as director and who is not then serving as a director or alternate director for any other director. An alternate director
has all of the rights and obligations of a director, excluding the right to appoint an alternate for himself. Currently no alternate directors
serve on our board.
Election, Terms and Skills
of Directors
Directors, other than
external directors, are elected by a resolution of the shareholders at the annual general meeting and serve until the conclusion of the
next annual general meeting of the shareholders, unless earlier terminated in the event of such director’s death, resignation, bankruptcy,
incapacity or removal by a resolution of the shareholders.
According to the Companies
Law, a person who does not possess the skills required and the ability to devote the appropriate time to the performance of the office
of director in a company, taking into consideration, among other things, the special requirements and size of that company, shall neither
be appointed as a director nor serve as a director in a public company. A public company shall not convene a general meeting the agenda
of which includes the appointment of a director, and a director shall not be appointed, unless the candidate has submitted a declaration
that he or she possesses the skills required and the ability to devote the appropriate time to the performance of the office of director
in the company, that sets forth the aforementioned skills and further states that the limitations set forth in the Companies Law regarding
the appointment of a director do not apply in respect of such candidate.
A director who ceases
to possess any qualification required under the Companies Law for holding the office of director or who becomes subject to any ground
for termination of his/her office must inform the company immediately and his/her office shall terminate upon such notice.
Independent Directors
Under the Nasdaq Rules,
a majority of our directors is required to be independent. The independence criteria under the Nasdaq Rules excludes, among others, any
person who is: (i) a current or former (at any time during the past three years) employee of a company or its affiliates; or (ii) an immediate
family member of an executive officer (at any time during the past three years) of a company or its affiliates.
In addition, under the
Companies Law, an “independent director” is either an external director or a director appointed or classified as such who
meets the same non-affiliation criteria as an external director, as determined by the company’s audit committee, and who has not
served as a director of the company for more than nine consecutive years. For these purposes, ceasing to serve as a director for a period
of two years or less would not be deemed to sever the consecutive nature of such director’s service. However, as our shares are
listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we may also, in accordance with the Companies Regulations (Alleviation for Public Companies
whose shares are Traded on the Stock Exchange Outside of Israel), 2000 (the “Alleviation Regulations”),
classify directors who qualify as independent directors under the relevant non-Israeli rules, as “independent directors” under
the Companies Law. In addition, the Alleviation Regulations provide that “independent directors” may be elected for additional
terms that do not exceed three years each, beyond the nine consecutive years permitted under the Companies Law, provided that, if the
director is being re-elected for an additional term or terms beyond the nine consecutive years, the company’s audit committee, followed
by the board of directors, have approved that considering the expertise and special contribution of the director to the work of the board
of directors and its committees, the appointment for an additional term of service is beneficial to the company.
Six of our eight members
of the Board - Mses. Yael Andorn and Orit Stav and Messrs. I -Shih Tseng, Leo Huang, Yosi Shacham-Diamand and Moty Ben Arie - qualify
as independent directors under the Nasdaq Rules. Four of our eight members of the Board - Mses. Yael Andorn and Orit Stav and Messrs.
Yosi Shacham-Diamand and Moty Ben Arie - qualify as independent directors under the Companies Law.
External Directors
Under the Companies Law,
we are required to appoint at least two external directors. Each committee of a company’s board of directors which is authorized
to exercise the board of directors’ authorities is required to include at least one external director, except for the audit committee
and the compensation committee, which are required to include all of the external directors. The Alleviation Regulations allow companies
whose shares are traded on Nasdaq and which do not have a controlling shareholder (within the meaning of the Companies Law) to exempt
themselves from the requirement to have external directors on their board of directors and from related requirements imposed by the Companies
Law concerning the composition of the audit and compensation committees, provided that they continue to comply with the relevant
U.S. securities laws and the Nasdaq Rules applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, regarding the independence of the board of directors and
the composition of the audit and compensation committees. Currently, the relief provided in the Alleviation Regulations does not apply
to us.
Qualification. To
qualify as an external director, an individual or his or her relative, partner, employer, any person to whom such person is directly or
indirectly subject to, or any entity under his or her control may not have, as of the date of appointment, or may not have had during
the previous two years, any affiliation with the company, any entity controlling the company on the date of the appointment or with any
entity controlled, at the date of the appointment or during the previous two years, by the company or by its controlling shareholder (and
in a company that does not have a shareholder or an affiliated group of shareholders holding 25% or more of the company’s voting
rights, such person may not have any affiliation with any person who, at the time of appointment, is the chairman, the chief executive
officer, the chief financial officer or a 5% shareholder of the company). In general, the term “affiliation” includes: an
employment relationship, a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis, control and service as an Office Holder; “Control”
is defined in the Israeli Securities Law as the ability to direct the actions of a company but excluding a power that is solely derived
from a position as a director of the company or any other position with the company; a person who is holding 50% or more of the “controlling
power” in the company – voting rights or the right to appoint a director or a general manager – is automatically considered
to possess control. The Companies Law defines the term “Office
Holder” of a company to include a director, the chief executive officer,
an executive vice president, a vice president, any other person fulfilling or assuming any of the foregoing positions without regard to
such person’s title, and any manager who is directly subordinated to the chief executive officer.
In addition, no person
can serve as an external director if the person’s position or other business creates, or may create conflicts of interest with the
person’s responsibilities as an external director or may otherwise interfere with the person’s ability to serve as an external
director. Until the lapse of two years from termination of office, a company or its controlling shareholder may not give any direct or
indirect benefit to a former external director.
Election
and Term of External Directors. External directors are elected
by a majority vote at a shareholders’ general meeting, provided that either:
|
• |
a majority of the shares voted at the meeting, which are not held by controlling shareholders or shareholders with personal interest
in approving the appointment (excluding personal interest not resulting from contacts with the controlling shareholder), not taking into
account any abstentions, vote in favor of the election; or |
|
• |
a vote in which the total number of shares voting against the election of the external director, does not exceed two percent
of the aggregate voting rights in the company. |
In a company in which,
at the date of appointment of an external director, all the directors are of the same gender, the external director to be appointed shall
be of the other gender.
An external director
can be removed from office only by: (i) the same majority of shareholders that is required to elect an external director; or (b) a court,
and provided that either (a) the external director ceases to meet the statutory qualifications with respect to his or her appointment,
or (b) the external director violates his or her duty of loyalty to the company. The court may also remove an external director from office
if he or she is unable to perform his or her duties on a regular basis.
An external director
who ceases to possess any qualification required under the Companies Law for holding the office of an external director must inform the
company immediately and his/her office shall terminate upon such notice.
In general, external
directors serve a three-year term, which may then be extended for two additional three-year periods. Thereafter, in accordance with regulations
promulgated under the Companies Law, an external director may be appointed for additional terms of service of not more than three years
each provided that: (a) a company’s audit committee, followed by the board of directors, have approved that considering the expertise
and special contribution of the external director to the work of the board of directors and its committees, the appointment for an additional
term of service is beneficial to the company; (b) the appointment for an additional term of service is approved in accordance with the
requirements of the Companies Law; and (c) the prior periods of service of such external director, as well as the reasoning of the audit
committee and board of directors for the approval of the extension of the term of service, were presented to the shareholders prior to
their approval.
Re-election of an external
director may be effected through one of the following mechanisms:
|
1. |
a shareholder holding one percent or more of a company’s voting rights proposed the re-election of the nominee; |
|
2. |
the board of directors proposed the re-election of the nominee and the election was approved by the shareholders by the majority
required to appoint external directors for their initial term; or |
|
3. |
the external director who is up for renewal has proposed himself or herself for re-election. |
With respect to mechanisms
1 and 3 above, the re-election is required to fulfill all of the following terms: (i) to be approved by a majority of the votes cast by
the shareholders of the Company, excluding the votes of controlling shareholders and shareholders who have a personal interest in approving
such nomination resulting from their relations with the controlling shareholders; (ii) to include votes cast in favor of the re-election
by such non-excluded shareholders constituting more than two percent of the voting rights in the Company; and (iii) the external director
is not a related or competing shareholder or a relative of such a related or competing shareholder, at the time of the appointment, and
does not and did not have any affiliation with a related or competing shareholder, at the time of the appointment or within the two years
preceding the appointment. A “related or competing shareholder” is a shareholder proposing the re-appointment or a shareholder
holding 5% or more of the outstanding shares or voting rights of the company, provided that at the time of the re-appointment, such shareholder,
a controlling shareholder thereof or a company controlled by such shareholder or by a controlling shareholder thereof, have business relationships
with the Company or are competitors of the Company.
Financial
and Accounting Expertise. Pursuant to the Companies Law and
regulations promulgated there under, (1) each external director must have either “accounting and financial expertise” or “professional
qualifications” and (2) at least one of the external directors must have “accounting and financial expertise”. A director
with “accounting and financial expertise” is a director whose education, experience and skills qualifies him or her to be
highly proficient in understanding business and accounting matters and to thoroughly understand the company’s financial statements
and to stimulate discussion regarding the manner in which financial data is presented. A director with “professional qualifications”
is a person who meets any of the following criteria: (i) has an academic degree in economics, business management, accounting, law, public
administration; (ii) has a different academic degree or has completed higher education in an area relevant to the company’s business
or which is relevant to his or her position; or (iii) has at least five years’ experience in any of the following, or has a total
of five years’ experience in at least two of the following: (A) a senior position in the business management of a corporation with
substantial business activities, (B) a senior public position or a senior position in the public service, or (C) a senior position in
the company’s main fields of business.
Compensation.
An external director is entitled to compensation as provided in the Remuneration Regulations and is otherwise prohibited from receiving
any other compensation, directly or indirectly, from the Company. For more information, please see “Remuneration
of Directors” below.
Our
External Directors. Ms. Yael Andorn and Prof. Yosi Shacham-Diamand
were re-appointed as our external directors at the 2021 AGM, for a three-year-term which will expire on September 19, 2024. Our Board
of Directors has determined that Ms. Andorn has the “accounting and financial expertise” and that Mr. Shacham-Diamand has
the “professional qualifications” required by the Companies Law.
Remuneration of Directors
Generally, directors’
remuneration should be consistent with a company’s compensation policy for Office Holders (see “Compensation
Policy” below) and requires the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholders (in that
order). Notwithstanding the above, in certain circumstances shareholder approval may be waived (see below) and, under different circumstances,
the compensation committee and the board of directors may approve an arrangement that deviates from the compensation policy, provided
that such arrangement is approved by a special majority of the company’s shareholders, including (i) at least a majority of the
shareholders, present and voting (abstentions are disregarded), who are not controlling shareholders and who do not have a personal interest
in the matter, or (ii) the non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the matter who were present
and voted against the matter hold two percent or less of the voting power of the Company.
According to the Remuneration
Regulations, external directors are generally entitled to an annual fee, a participation fee for each meeting of the board of directors
or any committee of the board on which he or she serves as a member, and reimbursement of travel expenses for participation in a meeting
which is held outside of the external director’s place of residence. The minimum, fixed and maximum amounts of the annual and participation
fees are set forth in the Remuneration Regulations, as supplemented by the Alleviation Regulations, based on the classification of the
company according to the amount of its capital. The candidate for service as external director must be notified by the company of his
or her remuneration terms prior to his or her appointment and, subject to certain exceptions, such remuneration will not be amended throughout
the three-year period during which he or she is in office. A company may also compensate an external director in shares or rights to purchase
shares, other than convertible debentures which may be converted into shares, in addition to the annual and participation remuneration
and the reimbursement of expenses, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Remuneration Regulations.
According to regulations
promulgated under the Companies Law with respect to relief in approval of certain related party transactions (the “Relief
Regulations”), shareholders’ approval for directors’ compensation and employment arrangements is not required
if both the Compensation Committee and the board of directors resolve that either (i) the directors’ compensation and employment
arrangements are solely for the benefit of the company or (ii) the remuneration to be paid to any such director does not exceed the maximum
amounts set forth in the Remuneration Regulations. Further, according to the Relief Regulations, shareholders’ approval for directors’
compensation and employment arrangements is not required if (i) both the Compensation Committee and the board of directors resolve that
such terms (a) are not more beneficial than the former terms, or are essentially the same in their effect; and (b) are in line with the
company’s compensation policy; and (ii) such terms are brought for shareholder approval at the next general meeting of shareholders.
Also, according to the Remuneration Regulations, shareholder approval may be waived if the remuneration to be paid to the external directors
is between the fixed and maximum amounts set forth in such regulations.
As consideration
for their service as directors and their participation in each meeting of the Board or Board’s committees, we pay each of our external
and independent directors (all Board members except for Messrs. Amit, Stern, Huang and Tseng) a fixed annual fee, a fixed participation
fee and reimbursement of expenses in the following amounts: NIS 130,000 (approximately $39,397) as annual fee, NIS 3,500 (approximately
$1,076) as in-person participation fee, NIS 2,100 (approximately $645) for conference call participation and NIS 1,750 (approximately
$538) for each written resolutions. As these amounts are in the range between the fixed amounts of the annual and participation fees,
as set forth in the Remuneration Regulations, based on the amount of the Company’s capital, and the maximum amounts of such fees
as set forth in the Alleviation Regulations, they are exempt from shareholder approval, in accordance with the Relief Regulations. The
above-mentioned cash remuneration is in line with the Company’s Executives & Directors Compensation Policy (the “Compensation
Policy”), according to which each of the Company’s non-executive
(and non-controlling) directors is entitled to receive cash fees which include annual and participation fees. Messrs. Amit, Stern,
Huang and Tseng do not receive any payment with respect to their service as our directors.
At the 2021 AGM,
our shareholders approved an annual equity award mechanism for our directors, pursuant to which, each of our directors who are not
classified as controlling shareholders (including our external directors but excluding Mr. Tseng, who himself is not a controlling shareholder,
but serves as our director pursuant to the Voting Agreement and therefore does not receive any compensation for such service), either
currently serving or as shall be appointed from time to time (“Non-Controlling Directors”),
will be entitled to a fixed annual equity award, comprised of an equal mix between options to purchase Shares at an exercise price equal
to the average closing price per Share as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market during the 30 consecutive calendar days preceding the date
of grant, and RSUs bearing an annual value of 50,000 USD (the “Annual Equity Award”).
The following table
sets forth the number of Ordinary Shares held by our directors, as of March 10, 2022, and the number of options exercisable and RSUs vested
as of March 10, 2022, and within 60 days from such date:
Name of Director |
|
Number of RSUs
vested within
60 days as of
March 10, 2022 |
|
Number of RSUs
vested as of
March 10, 2022 and
within 60 days |
|
Number of
Ordinary
Shares held as of
March 10, 2022 |
Rafi Amit |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Yotam Stern |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
12.000 |
Moty Ben- Arie |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
3,229 |
Yael Andorn |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
3,229 |
Yosi Shacham-Diamand |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
3,229 |
Leo Huang |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
I-Shih Tseng |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Orit Stav |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
The options were granted
pursuant to our then in effect equity plan and in accordance with the grant terms included therein. The RSUs were granted pursuant to
our Share Incentive Plan (and Sub-Plan for Grantees Subject to Israeli Taxation) (the “2018 Plan”).
For additional information regarding the main terms of the option and RSUs grants, please see item 6.E below – “Share
Ownership – Share Incentive Plans”.
Committees of the Board
of Directors
Audit
Committee
SEC
and Nasdaq Requirements. In accordance with the Exchange Act, rules of the
SEC under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq Rules, we are required to have an audit committee consisting of at least three directors, each of
whom is (i) independent; (ii) does not receive any compensation from the Company (other than directors’ fees); (iii) is not an affiliated
person of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (iv) has not participated in the preparation of the Company’s (or subsidiary’s)
financial statements during the past three years; and (v) financially literate and one of whom has been determined by the board to be
the audit committee financial expert. The duties and responsibilities of the audit committee under the Nasdaq Rules include: (i) recommending
the appointment of the Company’s independent auditor to the board of directors, determining its compensation and overseeing the
work performed by it; (ii) pre-approving all services of the independent auditor; (iii) overseeing our accounting and financial reporting
processes and the audits of our financial statements; and (iv) handling complaints relating to accounting, internal controls and auditing
matters.
We have adopted an
audit committee charter as required by the Nasdaq Rules.
Companies
Law Requirements. Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of any
Israeli company whose shares are publicly traded must appoint an audit committee, comprised of at least three directors including all
of the external directors. In addition, the majority of the members must meet certain independence criteria and may not include: (i) the
chairman of the board; (ii) any controlling shareholder or a relative thereof; (iii) any director employed by or providing services or
a regular basis to the Company, a controlling shareholder or a company owned by a controlling shareholder; or (iv) any director whose
main income is provided by a controlling shareholder (the “Non-Permitted
Members”). The chairman of such audit committee must be an external
director.
The duties and responsibilities
of our audit committee under the Companies Law include (1) identification of irregularities and deficiencies in the management of our
business, in consultation with the internal auditor and our independent auditors, and suggesting appropriate courses of action to amend
such irregularities; (2) reviewing and approval of certain transactions and actions of the Company, including the approval of related
party transactions, that require approval by the audit committee under the Companies Law; defining whether certain acts and transactions
that involve conflicts of interest are material or not and whether transactions that involve conflict of interests are material or not
and whether transactions that involve interested parties are extraordinary or not, and to approve such transactions; (3) determining with
respect to transactions with controlling shareholders, even if such are not extraordinary transactions, a duty to conduct a competitive
process, under the supervision of the committee or under the supervision of whomever designated by the committee and according to standards
determined by the committee, or determining other proceedings, prior to entering into such transactions, all in accordance with the type
of transaction; (4) determining the method of approval of transactions which are not insignificant, including the types of transactions
which shall require approval of the committee; (5) recommending the appointment of the internal auditor and its compensation to the board
of directors; (6) examining the performance of our internal auditor and whether he is provided with the required resources and tools necessary
for him to fulfill his role, considering, among others, the Company’s size and special needs; and (7) setting procedures for handling
complaints made by Company’s employees in connection with management deficiencies and the protection to be provided to such employees.
Non-Permitted Members
shall not attend audit committee’s meetings or take part in its decisions, unless the chairman of the audit committee has determined
that such person is required for the presentation of a certain matter. Nevertheless, an employee who is not a controlling shareholder
or a relative thereof may be present at the discussion part only, pursuant to the Committee’s request, and the Company’s legal
counsel and secretary, who are not controlling shareholders or relatives thereof, may be present during both discussion and decision making
parts - pursuant to the Committee’s request.
The quorum for discussions
and decisions shall be the majority of the members, provided that the majority of the members present meet the independence criteria set
forth in the Companies Law and at least one of them is an external director.
Our
Audit Committee. The members of our Audit Committee are Ms. Yael Andorn
and Messrs. Moty Ben Arie and Yosi Shacham-Diamand, all of whom are independent directors in accordance with Nasdaq Rules and meet the
independence criteria set forth in the Companies Law. Ms. Andorn is the Chairperson of our Audit Committee and qualifies as its audit
committee financial expert.
Compensation
Committee
Nasdaq
Requirements. Under Nasdaq Rules, the compensation payable to our executive
officers must be determined or recommended to the board for determination either by a majority of the independent directors on the board,
in a vote in which only independent directors participate, or by a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors, subject
to certain exceptions.
Companies
Law Requirements. According to the Companies Law, the board of directors
of any Israeli company whose shares are publicly traded, must appoint a compensation committee, comprised of at least three directors,
including all of the external directors which shall be the majority of its members and one thereof must serve as the chairman of the committee.
The remaining members of the committee must satisfy the criteria for remuneration applicable to the external directors and qualified to
serve as members of the audit committee pursuant to Companies Law requirements, as described above. However, an audit committee that satisfies
the requirements of the Companies Law regarding the composition of a compensation committee may be authorized to carry out all duties
and responsibilities of the compensation committee.
Further, under the Companies
Law, a compensation committee is responsible for: (i) providing the board of directors its recommendations with respect to the approval
of the compensation policy (see below - “Compensation Policy”)
and any amendments and/or extensions thereto; (ii) periodically reviewing the implementation of the compensation policy and providing
the board of directors with recommendations with respect to any amendments or updates thereto; (iii) reviewing and resolving whether or
not to approve arrangements with respect to the terms of office and employment of Office Holders; and (iv) determining whether or not
to exempt a transaction with a candidate for chief executive officer, who is not affiliated with the Company or its controlling shareholder,
from shareholder approval if subjection of such transaction to shareholder approval may prevent its conclusion, and provided that the
terms approved are consistent with the compensation policy.
The attendance and participation
in meetings of the compensation committee are subject to the same limitations that apply to the Audit Committee. The quorum for discussions
and decisions shall be the majority of the members, provided that those members present are independent directors and at least one of
them is an external director.
Our
Compensation Committee. We follow the provisions of the Companies Law with
respect to the composition and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee. As all of the members of our Audit Committee meet the independence
requirements for compensation committee members set forth in the Nasdaq Rule 5605(d)(2), as a foreign private issuer, we have elected,
pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5615(a)(3), to follow Israeli practice, in lieu of compliance with the certain provisions of Nasdaq Rule 5605(d),
which would require us to have a separate compensation committee. Pursuant to the Companies Law, allowing an audit committee that satisfies
the requirements of the Companies Law regarding the composition of a compensation committee, to carry out all duties and responsibilities
of the compensation committee, our Board of Directors has authorized our Audit Committee to carry out the duties and responsibilities
of the compensation committee.
Nomination
Committee
Nasdaq
Requirements. The Nasdaq Rules require that director nominees be selected
or recommended for the board’s selection either by a nomination committee composed solely of independent directors or by a majority
of independent directors, in a vote in which only independent directors participate, subject to certain exceptions.
Since 2018 our Nomination
Committee has assumed the responsibility for recommending to the Board nominees for election (including re-election) to the Company’s
Board of Directors, in lieu of the recommendation by our independent directors.
Our
Nomination Committee. In
2018 our Board of Directors appointed a Nomination Committee, comprised
of our two external directors, Ms. Andorn and Mr. Shacham-Diamand. Consistent with the requirements of the Nasdaq Rules, our Nomination
Committee is responsible for: (i) identifying potential new candidates for service on the Company’s Board of Directors, taking into
account, inter alia, the candidate’s applicable experience, expertise and/or familiarity
with the Company’s field of business, as well as the candidate’s ethical character, independent judgment and industry reputation;
(ii) conducting appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of potential candidates for service as directors; and (iii)
reviewing and resolving whether or not to approve arrangements with respect to such candidates.
Approval of Office Holders
Terms of Employment
The terms of office and
employment of Office Holders (other than directors and the chief executive officer) require the approval of the compensation committee
and the board of directors, provided such terms are in accordance with the company’s compensation policy. Shareholder approval is
also required if the compensation of such officer is not in accordance with such policy. However, in special circumstances the compensation
committee and then the board of directors may nonetheless approve such compensation even if such compensation was not approved by the
shareholders, following a further discussion and for detailed reasoning.
The terms of office and
employment of directors, the chief executive officer or controlling shareholders (or a relative thereof), regardless of whether or not
such terms conform to the company’s compensation policy, should be approved by the compensation committee, the board of directors
and the shareholders, by a special majority, except for: (a) approval of terms of office and employment of directors, which are consistent
with the company’s compensation policy, and require shareholder approval by a regular majority; or (b) approval of terms of office
and employment of directors pursuant to certain reliefs provided for under the Remuneration Regulations and/or the Relief Regulations,
with respect to which shareholder approval is waived. Shareholder special majority should include (i) at least a majority of the shareholders
who are not controlling shareholders and who do not have a personal interest in the matter, present and voting (abstentions are disregarded),
or (ii) the non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the matter who were present and voted
against the matter hold two percent or less of the voting power of the company (“Special Majority”).
Notwithstanding the above, in special circumstances the compensation committee and then the board of directors may nonetheless approve
compensation for the chief executive officer, even if such compensation was not approved by the shareholders, following a further discussion
and for detailed reasoning. In addition, under certain circumstances, a company’s compensation committee may exempt the terms of
office and employment of a candidate for service as the CEO from shareholders’ approval, provided that the candidate is not a director
and that the terms of office are compliant with the company’s compensation policy.
In addition, amendment
of existing terms of office and employment of Office Holders who are not directors requires the approval of the compensation committee
only, if the compensation committee determines that the amendment is not material.
Compensation Policy
Under the Companies Law
we are required to adopt a compensation policy, which sets forth company policy regarding the terms of office and employment of Office
Holders, including compensation, equity awards, severance and other benefits, exemption from liability and indemnification. Such compensation
policy should take into account, among other things, providing proper incentives to directors and officers, management of risks by the
company, the officer’s contribution to achieving corporate objectives and increasing profits, and the function of the officer or
director.
Our Compensation Policy
is designed to balance between the importance of incentivizing Office Holders to reach personal targets and the need to assure that the
overall compensation meets our Company’s long-term strategic performance and financial objectives. The Compensation Policy provides
our Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors with adequate measures and flexibility to tailor each of our Office Holder’s
compensation package based, among other matters, on geography, tasks, role, seniority and capability. Moreover, the Compensation Policy
is intended to motivate our Office Holders to achieve ongoing targeted results in addition to a high level business performance in the
long term, without encouraging excessive risk taking.
The Compensation Policy
and any amendments thereto must be approved by the board of directors, after considering the recommendations of the compensation committee,
and by a Special Majority of our shareholders. The Compensation Policy must be reviewed from time to time by the board, and must be re-approved
or amended by the board of directors and the shareholders no less than every three years. If the Compensation Policy is not approved by
the shareholders, the compensation committee and the board of directors may nonetheless approve the policy, following further discussion
of the matter and for detailed reasons.
We have
adopted a new compensation policy for office holders, which was approved by our shareholders at a special general meeting of shareholders
held in July 2020 and amended at the 2021 AGM (together with such amendment, the “Compensation
Policy”). The following is a brief overview of the main terms included
in the Compensation Policy, and specifically describes the amendments made in the Compensation Policy at the 2021 AGM:
Base
Salaries
Executives’ Base
Salaries is determined by the Compensation Committee and Board based on comparative benchmark information regarding salaries of applicable
executives in peer group companies, rather than on fixed caps as provided for under the current compensation policy. Executives’
Base Salaries shall not exceed the 50th percentile of the relevant benchmark, unless the Compensation Committee and the Board deem that
unique and special circumstances warrant a deviation from such cap with respect to a specific Executive.
Annual
Cash Bonus
On
Target Cash Plan: Under the Compensation Policy, Executives’ On Target Cash Plan shall be calculated based on each Executive’s
annual Base Salary, so that the On Target Cash Plan of Executives other than the CEO shall be capped at 75% of such Executives’
annual Base Salary, and the CEO’s On Target Cash Plan shall be capped at 100% of his or her annual Base Salary.
On
Target Bonus Cap: Under the Compensation Policy, the actual Cash Plan payment to all Executives (including the CEO) shall be capped
at 200% of the Executive’s On Target Cash Plan.
On
Target Bonus Threshold: the Compensation Policy provides for an increased threshold for payment of any amounts under an Executive’s
Cash Plan, such that payment of any bonus under the Company’s Cash Plan will only be made upon the achievement of a minimum Non
GAAP Net Profit of $6,000,000.
Change
of Control Bonus
The Compensation Policy
provides for a “change of control” cash payment of up to six monthly Base Salaries, and further provides that in the event
of a change of control that creates a significant value to the Company’s shareholders, by presenting a premium of at least 40% over
the average of the closing prices per share of the Company’s ordinary shares as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market for the 20 trading
days ending one day prior to the execution of the term sheet (or similar instrument) for such change of control event, the Compensation
Committee and Board may approve an increased “change in control” cash payment, of up to 12 monthly Base Salaries.
Equity
Based Compensation
Under the Compensation
Policy, the total yearly Equity Value granted to an Executive shall not exceed (i) with respect to the CEO - 300% of his annual Base Salary;
and (ii) with respect to all other Executives, 250% of such Executive’s annual Base Salary, provided that at least 40% of
the equity based components granted to each Executive (including the CEO) shall be comprised of either options at a fair market value
exercise price, or shall be otherwise subject to performance-based vesting.
Directors
Compensation
The Compensation Policy
provides for general guidelines with respect to the Company’s non-executive and non-controlling directors’ remuneration, pursuant
to which, in line with the current compensation policy, directors’ remuneration shall be comprised of cash compensation which includes
annual fee and meeting participation fee as shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law, as well as equity
based compensation, the annual value of which shall be capped at $100,000.
Insurance
Framework
The Compensation Policy
provides for caps on the premium which may be paid and coverage which may be purchased under the Company’s Directors & Officers
(D&O) insurance policies, pursuant to which the coverage which may be purchased shall be limited to the higher of: (i) $30,000,000;
or (ii) 10% of the Company’s market cap (based on the average closing price of the Company’s share on the Nasdaq Global Market
during the preceding 30 days), and the cap on the premium which may be paid for each policy shall be increased to one million $1,000,000.
Further, the Compensation Committee shall be authorized, to the extent an additional insurance coverage is required in its opinion with
respect to a specific material transaction or a series of related transactions, to purchase coverage in amounts of up to 3 times the then
existing limit of coverage under the Compensation Policy, with costs of up to 3 times the then existing limit of premium amounts under
the Compensation Policy, without additional shareholders' approval, if and to the extent permitted under the Companies Law.
Additional
Provisions
The Compensation Policy
includes additional provisions, including with respect to: separation package; claw back policy; relocation compensation; special circumstances
cash incentive; indemnification and exemption; and deviation from policy caps.
Approval of Certain Transactions
with Related Parties
The Companies Law requires
the approval of the audit committee or the compensation committee, thereafter the approval of the board of directors and in certain cases
— the approval of the shareholders, in order to effect specified actions and extraordinary transactions, such as the following:
|
• |
transactions with Office Holders and third parties - where an Office Holder has a personal interest in the transaction; |
|
• |
employment terms of Office Holders; and |
|
• |
extraordinary transactions with controlling parties or with a third party where a controlling party has a personal interest in the
transaction; or any transaction with the controlling shareholder or his relative regarding terms of service (provided directly or indirectly,
including through a company controlled by the controlling shareholder) and terms of employment (for a controlling shareholder who is not
an Office Holder). A “relative” is defined in the Companies Law as spouse, sibling, parent, grandparent, descendant, spouse’s
descendant, sibling or parent and the spouse of any of the foregoing. |
Such extraordinary transactions
with controlling shareholders require the approval of the audit committee, or the compensation committee, the board of directors and the
majority of the voting power of the shareholders present and voting at the general meeting of the company (not including abstentions),
provided that either:
|
• |
the majority of the shares of shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and who are present and voting, vote
in favor; or |
|
• |
shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction do not represent more than two percent
of the aggregate voting rights in the company. |
Any shareholder participating
in the vote on approval of an extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder must inform the company prior to the voting whether
or not he or she has a personal interest in the approval of the transaction, and if he or she fails to do so, his or her vote will be
disregarded.
Further, such extraordinary
transactions, as well as any transactions with a controlling shareholder or his relative concerning terms of service or employment, need
to be re-approved no less than every three years provided however that with respect to certain such extraordinary transactions the audit
committee may determine that a longer duration is reasonable given the circumstances related thereto and such extended period has been
approved by the shareholders.
In accordance with regulations
promulgated under the Companies Law, certain defined types of extraordinary transactions between a public company and its controlling
shareholder(s) are exempt from the shareholder approval requirements.
In addition, the approval
of the audit committee, followed by the approval of the board of directors and the shareholders, is required to effect a private placement
of securities, in which either: (i) 20% or more of the company’s outstanding share capital prior to the placement is offered, and
the payment for which (in whole or in part) is not in cash, in tradable securities registered in a stock exchange or not under market
terms, and which will result in an increase of the holdings of a shareholder that holds 5% or more of the company’s outstanding
share capital or voting rights or will cause any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a holder of more than 5% of the company’s
outstanding share capital or voting rights; or (ii) a person will become a controlling shareholder of the company.
A “controlling
shareholder” is defined in the Israeli Securities Law and in the provisions governing related party transactions under the Companies
Law as a person with the ability to direct the actions of a company but excluding a person whose power derives solely from his or her
position as a director of the company or any other position with the company, and with respect to approval of transactions with related
parties also as a person who holds 25% or more of the voting power in a public company, if no other shareholder owns more than 50% of
the voting power in the company, and provided that two or more persons holding voting rights in the company, who each have a personal
interest in the approval of the same transaction, shall be deemed to be one holder for the evaluation of their holdings with respect to
approval of transactions with related parties.
Compensation committee
approval is required and thereafter, in most cases, the approval of the board of directors and in certain cases – the additional
approval of the shareholders, in order to approve the grant of an exemption from the responsibility for a breach of the duty of care towards
the company, for the provision of insurance and for an undertaking to indemnify any Office Holder of the company; see below under
“Insurance, Indemnification and Exemption”.
Duties of Office Holders
and Shareholders
Duties
of Office Holders
Fiduciary
Duties
The Companies Law imposes
a duty of care and a duty of loyalty on all Office Holders of a company, including directors and officers. The duty of care requires an
Office Holder to act with the level of care with which a reasonable Office Holder in the same position would have acted under the same
circumstances. The duty of loyalty includes avoiding any conflict of interest between the Office Holder’s position in the company
and his personal affairs, any competition with the company, or exploiting any business opportunity of the company in order to receive
personal advantage for himself or others. It also requires an Office Holder to reveal to the company any information or documents relating
to the company’s affairs which the Office Holder has received due to his position as an Office Holder.
The company may approve
an action by an Office Holder from which the Office Holder would otherwise have to refrain due to its violation of the Office Holder’s
duty of loyalty if: (i) the Office Holder acts in good faith and the act or its approval does not cause harm to the company, and (ii)
the Office Holder discloses the nature of his or her interest in the transaction to the company a reasonable time before the company’s
approval.
Each person listed in
the table under “Directors and Senior Management” above is considered an Office Holder under the Companies Law (for definition
of “Office Holder” under the Companies Law see above under “External
directors” – “Qualification”).
Disclosure
of Personal Interests of an Office Holder
The Companies Law requires
that an Office Holder of a company promptly disclose any personal interest that he or she may possess and all related material information
and documents known to him or her relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. If the transaction is an extraordinary
transaction, the Office Holder must also disclose any personal interest held by the Office Holder’s spouse, siblings, parents, grandparents,
descendants, spouse’s siblings, parents and descendants and the spouses of any of these people, or any corporation in which the
Office Holder: (i) holds at least 5% of the company’s outstanding share capital or voting rights; (ii) is a director or general
manager; or (iii) has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager. An extraordinary transaction is defined as a
transaction that is either (i) not in the ordinary course of business; (ii) not on market terms; or (iii) likely to have a material impact
on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
In the case of a transaction
which is not an extraordinary transaction, after the Office Holder complies with the above disclosure requirements, only board approval
is required unless the articles of association of the company provide otherwise. The transaction must be for the benefit of the company.
If a transaction is an extraordinary transaction, or with respect to terms of office and employment, then in addition to any approval
stipulated by the articles of association, it also must be approved by the company’s audit committee (or with respect to terms of
office and employment, the compensation committee) and then by the board of directors, and, under certain circumstances, by the shareholders
of the company. A director who has a personal interest in a transaction, may be present if a majority of the members of the board of directors
or the audit committee (or with respect to terms of office and employment, the compensation committee), as the case may be, has a personal
interest. If a majority of the board of directors has a personal interest, then shareholders’ approval is also required.
Duties
of Shareholders
Under the Companies Law,
a shareholder has a duty to act in good faith toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his or her power in
the company, including, among other things, by voting in a general meeting of shareholders with respect to the following matters: (a)
any amendment to the articles of association; (b) an increase of the company’s authorized share capital; (c) a merger; or (d) approval
of interested party transactions which require shareholders’ approval.
In addition, any controlling
shareholder, any shareholder who knows that he or she possess power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder
who, pursuant to the provisions of a company’s articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an
Office Holder in the company, is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company. The Companies Law does not describe the substance
of this duty but states that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of the
duty of fairness, taking into account such shareholder’s position.
Insurance, Indemnification
and Exemption
Pursuant to the Companies
Law and the Israeli Securities Law, the Israeli Securities Authority is authorized to impose administrative sanctions, including monetary
fines, against companies like ours and their officers and directors, for certain violations of the Israeli Securities Law (see in “Administrative
Enforcement” below) or the Companies Law. The Companies Law further provides that companies like ours may indemnify their
officers and directors and purchase an insurance policy to cover certain liabilities, if provisions for that purpose are included in their
articles of association.
Our Articles allow us
to indemnify and insure our Office Holders to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Office
Holders’ Exemption
Under the Companies Law,
and provided that the company’s articles of association allow it to do so, an Israeli company may exempt in advance an Office Holder
from his or her liability to the company, in whole or in part, for a breach of his or her duty of care (except in connection with distributions).
Exemption from liability for a breach of duty of loyalty is not allowed. Our Articles allow us to exempt our Office Holders to the fullest
extent permitted by law.
Office
Holders’ Insurance
Our Articles provide
that, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, we may enter into a contract for the insurance of all or part of the liability imposed
on our Office Holders in respect of an act performed by him or her in his or her capacity as an Office Holder, concerning the following:
|
• |
a breach of his or her duty of care to us or to another person; |
|
• |
a breach of his or her duty of loyalty to us, provided that the Office Holder acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to assume
that his or her act would not prejudice our interests; and |
|
• |
a financial liability imposed upon him or her in favor of another person. |
Without derogating from
the aforementioned, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, we may also enter into a contract to
insure an Office Holder for expenses, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees, incurred by him or her in relation to an
administrative proceeding instituted against such Office Holder or payment required to be made to an injured party pursuant to certain
provisions of the Israeli Securities Law.
Office
Holder’s Indemnification
Our Articles provide
that, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, we may indemnify any of our Office Holders in respect
of an obligation or expense specified below, imposed on or incurred by the Office Holder in respect of an act performed in his capacity
as an Office Holder, as follows:
|
• |
a financial liability imposed on him or her in favor of another person by any judgment, including a settlement or an arbitration
award approved by a court; |
|
• |
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the Office Holder as a result of an investigation or
proceeding instituted against him by a competent authority which concluded without the filing of an indictment against him and without
the imposition of any financial liability in lieu of criminal proceedings, or which concluded without the filing of an indictment against
him but with the imposition of a financial liability in lieu of criminal proceedings concerning a criminal offense that does not require
proof of criminal intent or in connection with a financial sanction (the phrases “proceeding concluded without the filing of an
indictment” and “financial liability in lieu of criminal proceeding” shall have the meaning ascribed to such phrases
in section 260(a)(1a) of the Companies Law); |
|
• |
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, expended by an Office Holder or charged to the Office Holder by
a court, in a proceeding instituted against the Office Holder by the Company or on its behalf or by another person, or in a criminal charge
from which the Office Holder was acquitted, or in a criminal proceeding in which the Office Holder was convicted of an offense that does
not require proof of criminal intent; and |
|
• |
expenses, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees, incurred by an Office Holder in relation to an administrative
proceeding instituted against such Office Holder, or payment required to be made to an injured party, pursuant to certain provisions of
the Israeli Securities Law. |
The Company may undertake
to indemnify an Office Holder as aforesaid, (a) prospectively, provided that, in respect of the first act (financial liability) the undertaking
is limited to events which in the opinion of the board of directors are foreseeable in light of the Company’s actual operations
when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or criteria set by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances,
and further provided that such events and amount or criteria are set forth in the undertaking to indemnify, and (b) retroactively; provided,
however, that the total aggregate indemnification amount that the Company shall be obligated to pay to all of its Office Holders, for
all matters and circumstances described above, shall not exceed an amount equal to twenty five percent (25%) of the shareholders’
equity at the time of the indemnification.
Limitations
on Insurance and Indemnification
The Companies Law provides
that a company may not insure, exempt or indemnify an Office Holder for any breach of his or her liability arising from any of the following:
|
• |
a breach by the Office Holder of his or her duty of loyalty, except that the company may enter into an insurance contract or indemnify
an Office Holder if the Office Holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;
|
|
• |
a breach by the Office Holder of his or her duty of care if such breach was intentional or reckless, but unless such breach was solely
negligent; |
|
• |
any act or omission done with the intent to derive an illegal personal benefit; or |
|
• |
any fine, civil fine, financial sanction or monetary settlement in lieu of criminal proceedings imposed on such Office Holder.
|
Under the Companies Law,
exemption and indemnification of, and procurement of insurance coverage for, our Office Holders, must be approved by our compensation
committee and our board of directors and, with respect to the CEO and to an Office Holder who is a director also by our shareholders.
However, according to the Relief Regulations, shareholders’ approval for the procurement of directors’ insurance is not required
if the insurance policy is approved by our compensation committee and (i) the terms of such policy are within the framework for insurance
coverage as approved by our shareholders and set forth in our compensation policy; (ii) the premium paid under the insurance policy is
at fair market value; and (iii) the insurance policy does not and may not have a substantial effect on the Company’s profitability,
assets or obligations. Further, as our insurance coverage includes Office Holders who are controlling shareholders, in accordance
with the Relief Regulations, shareholders’ approval may be waived, if, in addition to the approval of the compensation committee
as set forth above, our board of directors approves all such matters approved by the compensation committee, and both organs approve that
the terms of the insurance policy are identical with respect to all Office Holders, including the controlling shareholders.
Indemnification letters,
covering exemption from, indemnification and insurance of those liabilities imposed under the Companies Law and the Israeli Securities
Law discussed above, were granted to each of our present Office Holders and were approved for future Office Holders. Hence, we indemnify
our Office Holders to the fullest extent permitted under the Companies Law.
We currently hold directors’
and officers’ liability insurance policy for the benefit of our Office Holders, including our directors. This policy was approved
by our Compensation Committee on December 21, 2021, and is effective until November 30, 2022.
Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons, we have been advised
that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Administrative
Enforcement
The Israeli Securities
Law includes an administrative enforcement procedure to be used by the Israeli Securities Authority, or ISA, to enhance the efficacy of
enforcement in the securities market in Israel. This administrative enforcement procedure may be applied to any company or person (including
director, officer or shareholder of a company) performing any of the actions specifically designated as breaches of law under the Securities
Law. Furthermore, the Israeli Securities Law requires that the Chief Executive Officer of a company supervise and take all reasonable
measures to prevent the company or any of its employees from breaching such law. The Chief Executive Officer is presumed to have fulfilled
such supervisory duty if the company adopts internal enforcement procedures designed to prevent such breaches, appoints a representative
to supervise the implementation of such procedures and takes measures to correct the breach and prevent its reoccurrence.
As detailed above, under
the Israeli Securities Law, a company cannot obtain insurance against or indemnify a third party (including its officers and/or employees)
for any administrative procedure and/or monetary fine (other than for payment of damages to an injured party). The Israeli Securities
Law permits insurance and/or indemnification for expenses related to an administrative procedure, such as reasonable legal fees, provided
that it is permitted under the company’s articles of association.
We have adopted and implemented
an internal enforcement plan to reduce our exposure to potential breaches of the Companies Law and sections in the Israeli Securities
Law, which are applicable to us. Our Articles and letters of indemnification permit, among others, insurance and/or indemnification as
contemplated under the Israeli Securities Law (see “Insurance, Indemnification
and Exemption” above).
Employees
The following table sets
forth the number of our employees engaged in the specified activities at the end of each of the years 2021, 2020 and 2019:
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
Executive management
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Sales support
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Administration
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Operations
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
The following table sets
forth the number of our employees located in the following geographic regions at the end of each of the years 2021, 2020 and 2019:
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
Israel
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Abroad
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Total
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
With
respect to our Israeli employees, no collective bargaining agreements apply to our employees. However, by virtue of extension orders,
certain provisions of the collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut (General Federation of Labor in Israel) and the Coordination
Bureau of Economic Organizations, relating primarily to the length of the work day, minimum wages, pension contributions, insurance for
work-related accidents, procedures for dismissing employees, determination of severance pay and other conditions of employment - are applicable
to our employees.
With
respect to our (or any of our subsidiaries) Chinese employees, certain provisions of Chinese Labor Contract Law and Social Insurance Law
primarily govern the formation of employer-employee relations, termination of employment, severance pay, worker dispatch, part-time
employment and social insurance.
We
consider our relationship with our employees to be good, and we have never experienced a labor dispute, strike or work stoppage.
E.
Share Ownership.
The following table sets
forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares by our directors and executive officers.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally means sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting
or to dispose or direct the disposition of any ordinary shares. Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial
ownership is based upon 43,847,393 ordinary shares outstanding as of March 8, 2022.
Name |
|
Number of
Ordinary Shares Owned(1)
|
|
Percentage of Total Outstanding Ordinary Shares |
Priortech Ltd. |
|
9,256,687 |
|
21.11% |
Chroma ATE Inc. |
|
7,817,440 |
|
17.83% |
Yotam Stern(3)
|
|
12,000 |
|
0.03% |
Rafi Amit(2)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Leo Huang(4)
|
|
* |
|
* |
I-Shih Tseng |
|
* |
|
* |
Moty Ben-Arie(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Yosi Shacham- Diamand(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Yael Andorn(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Orit Stav(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Moshe Eisenberg(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
Ramy Langer(5)
|
|
* |
|
* |
* Beneficially owns less than 1% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Ordinary shares relating to
options and RSUs currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days as of March 10, 2022, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage
of the persons holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. As of the date
of this Annual Report, the total number of options held by the persons included in the above table that are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days as of March 8, 2022, was 421. |
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Amit does not own directly our ordinary shares. In addition, as a result of a
voting agreement relating to a majority of Priortech’s voting equity, Mr. Amit may be deemed to control Priortech. As a result,
Mr. Amit may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of the Company held by Priortech. Mr. Amit disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares. |
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Stern directly owns 12,000 of our ordinary shares. In addition, as a result of
a voting agreement relating to a majority of Priortech’s voting equity, Mr. Stern may be deemed to control Priortech. As a result,
Mr. Stern may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of the Company held by Priortech. Mr. Stern disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares. |
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Huang does not directly own any of our ordinary shares. Based on information we
received from Chroma Mr. Huang is considered a controlling person with regard to Chroma, accordingly Mr. Huang may be deemed to beneficially
own the shares of the Company held by Chroma. Mr. Huang disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. |
|
|
(5) |
Holding less than 1% of our outstanding ordinary shares (including options and RSUs
held by each such person which have vested or will vest within 60 days as of March 8,2022) and have therefore holding percentages have
not been listed separately. |
Share Incentive Plans
General
We currently maintain
one active share incentive plan which is the 2018 Plan.
The 2018 Plan was adopted
by the Company in April 2018 and replaced the Company’s previous equity plans - the 2014 Share Option Plan (the “2014
Plan”) and the 2007 Restricted Share Unit Plan (the “2007 Plan”).
The
purpose and intent of the 2018 Plan is to advance, pursuant to the Compensation Plan, the interests of the Company by affording to selected
employees, officers, directors, consultants and other services providers of the Company and its affiliates an opportunity to acquire or
increase its proprietary interest in the Company by the grant in their favor of options, restricted shares and RSUs (the “Awards”)
thus providing them with an additional incentive to become, and to remain, employed and/or engaged by the Company, encouraging their sense
of proprietorship and stimulating their active interest in the success of the Company.
2018
Plan
General. As
of December 31, 2021, 1,322,854 Awards were outstanding under the 2018 Plan.
Administration
of the 2018 Plan. Our 2018 Plan is administered by our Board. Under the
2018 Plan, Awards may be granted to our officers, directors, employees or consultants and those of our subsidiaries. The exercise price
of options under the 2018 Plan is determined by our Board, and is generally set as the fair market value on the date of grant. The purchase
price for each RSU and restricted share is not more than the underlying share’s nominal value, unless otherwise determined by the
Board. The vesting schedule of the Awards is also determined by the Board of Directors; generally the options vest over a four-year period,
with 25% of the options vest on each anniversary of the vesting start date. The vesting of Awards may also be subject to performance conditions,
which shall be either in addition to or instead of the aforementioned time-based vesting. Each Award granted under the 2018 Plan is usually
exercisable between its vesting time and up to seven years from the date of grant, subject to certain early expiration provisions, such
as in the event of termination of employment or engagement with the Company.
Future Awards to be granted
by us to our employees, officers, directors and consultants, or those of our affiliates, will only be made pursuant to the 2018 Plan.
Previous
Plans
As of December 31, 2021,
under the 2014 Plan there were 421 options exercisable and vested for 421 ordinary shares at a weighted average exercise price of
$4.38.
Item 7.
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
A.
Major Shareholders.
The following
table provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of March 8, 2022, held by each person or entity
who beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares. None of these shareholders has different voting rights than any
of the Company’s other shareholders.
Beneficial
Ownership
Beneficial ownership
is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally means sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose
or direct the disposition of any ordinary shares. Except as indicated by footnote, the person named in the table below has sole voting
and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares shown as beneficially owned by it. The percentage of beneficial ownership is
based upon 43,847,393 ordinary shares outstanding as of March 8, 2022.
|
|
Number of Ordinary Shares* |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priortech Ltd. (1)
|
|
|
9,256,687 |
|
|
|
21.11 |
% |
Chroma ATE Inc.
(2) |
|
|
7,817,440 |
|
|
|
17.83 |
% |
Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd (3)
|
|
|
3,420,170 |
|
|
|
7.80 |
% |
(1)
|
29.04% of the voting
equity in Priortech Ltd. is subject to a voting agreement. As a result of this agreement, and due to the fact that there are no other
shareholders holding more than 50% of the voting equity in Priortech Ltd., Messrs. Rafi Amit, Yotam Stern, David Kishon, and Hanoch Feldstien
and the estates of Itzhak Krell (deceased), Zehava Wineberg (deceased) and Haim Langmas (deceased), may be deemed to control Priortech
Ltd. The voting agreement does not provide for different voting rights for Priortech than the voting rights of other holders of our ordinary
shares. Priortech’s principal executive offices are located at South Industrial Zone, Migdal Ha’Emek 23150, Israel.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Based on the Schedule 13G filed by Chroma ATE Inc. on August 5,
2019, which presented ownership as of June 19, 2019. The 7,817,440 Ordinary Shares reported under such Schedule 13G by Chroma are beneficially
owned by Chroma. Chroma’s principal address is No. 66, Hwa Ya 1 Rd., Guishan District, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan. |
|
|
(3)
|
Based on the Schedule
13G filed by Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd. (“Migdal”) on February 2, 2022, which presented ownership as of
December 31, 2021. Of the 3,420,170 Ordinary Shares reported as beneficially owned by the Migdal (i) 3,420,170 Ordinary Shares are held
for members of the public through, among others, provident funds, mutual funds, pension funds and insurance policies, which are managed
by direct and indirect subsidiaries of Migdal, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes independent
voting and investment decisions, and (ii) 562,365 Ordinary Shares are held by companies for the management of funds for joint investments
in trusteeship, each of which operates under independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions, and (iii) -
are beneficially held for their own account (Nostro account). Migdal’s principal business address is 4 Efal Street; P.O. Box 3063;
Petach Tikva 49512, Israel. |
B. Related
Party Transactions.
Agreements with Priortech
and Chroma
For a description
of definitive agreements signed between the Company, Priortech and Chroma, see Item 4.A. – “History
and Development of the Company”.
Registration Rights Agreement
with Priortech and Chroma
On March 1, 2004, we
entered into a registration rights agreement providing for us to register with the SEC certain of our ordinary shares held by Priortech.
This registration rights agreement may be used in connection with future offerings of our ordinary shares, and includes, among others,
the following terms: (a) Priortech is entitled to make up to three demands that we register our ordinary shares held by Priortech,
subject to delay due to market conditions; (b) Priortech will be entitled to participate and sell our ordinary shares in any future
registration statements initiated by us, subject to delay due to market conditions; (c) we will indemnify Priortech in connection
with any liabilities incurred in connection with such registration statements due to any misstatements or omissions other than information
provided by Priortech, and Priortech will indemnify us in connection with any liabilities incurred in connection with such registration
statements due to any misstatements or omissions in written statements by Priortech made for the purpose of their inclusion in such registration
statements; and (d) we will pay all expenses related to registrations which we have initiated, except for certain underwriting discounts
or commissions or legal fees, and Priortech will pay all expenses related to a registration initiated at its demand in which we are not
participating.
On December 30, 2004,
the Registration Rights Agreement with Priortech was amended. The amendment concerns primarily the grant of unlimited shelf registration
rights there under to Priortech with respect to its holdings in us, and the assignability of those shelf registration rights to its transferees.
In the framework
of the Chroma Transaction, the Company, Chroma and Priortech entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement
with the Company which, following the Chroma Closing Date, replaced the previous Registration Rights Agreement and grants Chroma registration
rights with respect to our Ordinary Shares held by it, which are similar to those of Priortech. For a description of the definitive agreements
signed under the Chroma Transaction, see Item 4.A. – “History and Development
of the Company”.
Employment Agreement
with Mr. Rafi Amit
For a description of
the employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Rafi Amit, see Item 6.B - “Compensation
– Employment Agreements” above.
C. Interests
of Experts and Counsel.
Not applicable.
Item
8. Financial
Information.
A. Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information.
Please see the consolidated financial
statements listed in Item 18 for audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with this Item.
Legal Proceedings
We are not a party to any material legal
proceedings.
Dividends
See Item 10.B - “Memorandum
and Articles - Dividend and Liquidation Rights” below for more information regarding our dividend policy).
B. Significant
Changes.
None.
Item 9.
The Offer and Listing.
A. Offer
and Listing Details.
The Company’s ordinary shares are
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market and on TASE under the symbol “CAMT”. We are subject to Israeli securities legislation
which applies to companies that are traded in dual listing.
B. Plan
of distribution.
Not applicable.
C. Markets.
See above.
D. Selling
Shareholders.
Not applicable.
E. Dilution.
Not applicable.
F. Expenses
of the Issue.
Not applicable.
Item 10.
Additional Information.
A. Share
Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum
and Articles
Following is a summary of material information
concerning our share capital and a brief description of the material provisions contained in our Memorandum of Association and our Articles,
which were last amended in the 2018 AGM.
Register
Our registration number
at the Israeli registrar of companies is 51-123543-4.
Objectives and Purposes
Our Memorandum of Association
and Articles provide that our purpose is to engage in any legal business and may contribute a reasonable amount for a worthy cause, even
if such contribution is not within the framework of the Company’s business considerations.
Share Capital
Our authorized share
capital consists of one class of shares, which are our ordinary shares. Out of our authorized share capital of 100,000,000 ordinary shares,
par value NIS 0.01 per ordinary share, 43,846,643 ordinary shares were outstanding and fully-paid as of December 31, 2021.
The ordinary shares do
not have preemptive rights. The ownership and voting of our ordinary shares are not restricted in any way by our Articles, or by the laws
of the State of Israel, except for shareholders who are citizens of countries in a state of war with Israel. Under the Companies Law,
Israeli companies may purchase and hold their own shares, subject to the same conditions that apply to distribution of dividends (see
Item 10.B - “Memorandum and Articles - Dividend
and Liquidation Rights” below). These shares do not confer any rights whatsoever for as long as they are held by us. Additionally,
a subsidiary may purchase or hold shares of its parent company to the same extent that the parent company is entitled to purchase its
own shares, and these shares do not confer any voting rights for as long as they are held by the subsidiary.
Transfer of Shares
Ordinary shares are issued
in registered form. Ordinary shares registered on the books of the transfer agent in the United States may be freely transferred on the
transfer agent’s books.
Dividend and Liquidation
Rights
Our Board of Directors
may declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of ordinary shares out of our retained earnings or our earnings derived over the two
most recent years, whichever is higher, as reflected in the last audited or reviewed financial report prepared less than six months prior
to distribution, provided that there is no reasonable concern that a payment of a dividend will prevent us from satisfying our existing
and foreseeable obligations as they become due. Dividends are distributed to shareholders in proportion to the nominal value of their
respective holdings.
In the event of our liquidation,
after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of ordinary shares in proportion to the
nominal value of their respective holdings. This right may be affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights to
the holders of any class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future. Our shareholders would need to approve
any class of shares with preferential rights.
Modification of Class
Rights
The Companies Law provides
that the articles of a company may not be modified in such a manner that would have a detrimental effect on the rights of a particular
class of shares without the vote of a majority of the affected class. Under our Articles, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law,
the Company may, by a resolution adopted by its shareholders, amend the rights attached to all or any of its authorized share capital,
whether issued or not, create new classes of shares and/or attach different rights to each class of shares, including special or preferential
rights and/or different rights from those attached to the existing shares, including redeemable shares, deferred shares, etc.
Transfer Agent
The transfer agent and
registrar for our ordinary shares is the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York.
Voting, Shareholders’
Meetings and Resolutions
Holders of ordinary shares
have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. These voting rights may be affected
by the grant of special voting rights to the holders of any class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.
As part of the Chroma
Voting Agreement, Priortech and Chroma vote together in the Company’s shareholders’ meetings (see Item 4.A. – “History
and Development of the Company”).
According to the Companies
Law, an annual meeting of the shareholders must be held every year not later than 15 months following the last annual meeting. A
special meeting of the shareholders may be convened by the board of directors at its decision or upon the demand of any of: (1) two
of the directors or 25% of the then serving directors, whichever is fewer; (2) one shareholder or more owning at least 5% of the
issued share capital and at least 1% of the voting rights in the Company; or (3) one shareholder or more owning at least 5% of the
voting rights in the Company. If the Board of Directors does not convene a meeting upon a valid demand of any of the above then whoever
made the demand, and in the case of several shareholders,, those shareholders holding more than half of the voting rights of the shareholders
making such demand, may convene a meeting of the shareholders to be held within three months of the demand. Alternatively, upon petition
by the individuals making the demand, a court may order that a meeting be convened.
The quorum required
for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person or by proxy within one half hour of the time scheduled
for the beginning of the meeting, who hold or represent together at least 25% of the voting power in our company.
A meeting adjourned due
to lack of a quorum is generally adjourned to the same day in the following week at the same time and place or any time and place as the
directors designate in a notice to the shareholders. If a quorum is not present at the reconvened meeting, the meeting may be held with
any number of participants. However, if the meeting was convened following a demand by the shareholders, the quorum will be that minimum
number of shareholders authorized to make the demand.
In any shareholders’
meeting, a shareholder can vote either in person or by proxy provided such proxy is received by the Company up to twenty-four hours prior
to the time set for the meeting. Alternatively, shareholders who hold shares through members of TASE may vote electronically via the electronic
voting system of the Israel Securities Authority, up to six hours prior to the time set for the meeting. General meetings of shareholders
will be held in Israel, unless decided otherwise by our Board of Directors.
Most resolutions at a
shareholders’ meeting may be passed by a majority of the voting power of the company represented at the shareholders’ meeting
and voting on the matter. Resolutions requiring special voting procedures include the appointment and removal of external directors, approval
of transactions with controlling shareholders, the terms of office and employment of directors (except for terms which are consistent
with the company’s compensation policy, and require approval by a regular majority), the chief executive officer or controlling
shareholders, approval of the Company’s compensation policy and any amendments thereto, and approval of a merger or a tender offer.
See in Item 6.C - “Board Practices - Committees
of the Board of Directors” and “Approval of Certain Transactions
with Related Parties” above and in “Anti-Takeover Effects of Israeli
Laws; Mergers and Acquisitions under Israeli Law” below.
Anti-Takeover Effects
of Israeli Laws; Mergers and Acquisitions under Israeli Law
In general, a merger
of a company that was incorporated before the enactment of the Companies Law requires the approval of the holders of a majority of 75%
of the voting power represented at the annual or special general meeting in person or by proxy or by a written ballot, as shall be permitted,
and voting thereon in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law. Upon the request of a creditor of either party of the proposed
merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that as a result of the merger,
the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the parties to the merger. In addition, a merger may not be
completed unless at least (i) 50 days have passed from the time that the requisite proposal for the merger has been filed by each party
with the Israeli Registrar of Companies and (ii) 30 days have passed since the merger was approved by the shareholders of each party.
The Companies Law also
provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer: (a) if there is no existing shareholder
in the company holding shares conferring 25% or more of the voting rights at the general meeting (a “control block”) and as
a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of a control block; or (b) if there is no existing shareholder in the
company holding shares conferring 45% or more of the voting rights at the general meeting and as a result of the acquisition the purchaser
would become a holder of 45% or more of the voting rights at the general meeting. Notwithstanding, the above requirements do not apply
if the acquisition: (1) was made in a private placement that received shareholders’ approval (which includes an explicit approval
of the purchaser becoming a holder of a “control block”, or 45% or more, of the voting power in the company, unless there
is already a holder of a “control block” or 45% or more, respectively, of the voting power in the company); (2) was from a
holder of a “control block” in the company and resulted in the acquirer becoming a holder of a “control block”;
or (3) was from a holder of 45% or more of the voting power in the company and resulted in the acquirer becoming a holder of 45% or more
of the voting power in the company. The tender offer must be extended to all shareholders, but the offeror is not required to purchase
more than 5% of the company’s outstanding shares, regardless of how many shares are tendered by shareholders. The tender offer may
be consummated only if: (i) at least 5% of the company’s outstanding shares will be acquired by the offeror and (ii) the number
of shares tendered in the offer exceeds the number of shares whose holders objected to the offer.
If as a result of an
acquisition of shares, the acquirer will hold more than 90% of a company’s outstanding shares, the acquisition must be made by means
of a tender offer for all of the outstanding shares. If as a result of such full tender offer the acquirer would own more than 95% of
the outstanding shares, then all the shares that the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to it. The law provides for appraisal
rights if any shareholder files a request in court within six months following the consummation of a full tender offer, but the acquirer
will be entitled to stipulate that tendering shareholders forfeit their appraisal rights. If as a result of a full tender offer the acquirer
would own 95% or less of the outstanding shares, then the acquirer may not acquire shares that will cause his shareholding to exceed 90%
of the outstanding shares.
Furthermore, certain provisions of other
Israeli laws may have the effect of delaying, preventing or making more difficult an acquisition of or merger with us; see in Item 3.D
– “Risk Factors - Provisions
of Israeli law could delay, prevent or make undesirable an acquisition of all or a significant portion of our shares or assets.”
C. Material
Contracts.
None.
D. Exchange
Controls
There are currently
no Israeli currency control restrictions on payments of dividends or other distributions with respect to our ordinary shares or the proceeds
from the sale of the shares, except for the obligation of Israeli residents to file reports with the Bank of Israel regarding certain
transactions. However, legislation remains in effect pursuant to which currency controls can be imposed by administrative action at any
time.
The
ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel, except with respect to citizens of countries which are in a state
of war with Israel, is not restricted in any way by our memorandum of association or articles of association or by the laws of the State
of Israel.
E. Taxation
U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations1
Subject to the limitations
described herein, this discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of
our ordinary shares to a U.S. holder. A U.S. holder is a holder of our ordinary shares who is:
|
• |
an individual citizen or resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
• |
a corporation (or another entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws
of the United States, any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia; |
|
• |
an estate, the income of which may be included in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source; or
|
|
• |
a trust (i) if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S.
persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions, or (ii) that has in effect a valid election under applicable
U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. |
Unless otherwise specifically
indicated, this discussion does not consider the U.S. tax consequences to a person that is not a U.S. holder (a “non-U.S.
holder”) or is a partnership and considers only U.S. holders that will own ordinary shares as capital assets (generally,
for investment).
This discussion is based
on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),
current and proposed Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code and administrative and judicial interpretations of the Code, all
as currently in effect and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all
aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular U.S. holder based on the U.S. holder’s particular
circumstances. In particular, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders who are broker‑dealers,
banks, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, or governmental organizations, tax-qualified retirement plans, individual retirement
accounts and other tax-deferred accounts, financial institutions, grantor trusts, S corporations, partnerships or entities or arrangements
treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and investors therein), real estate investment trusts, regulated investment
companies, certain former citizens, U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States, or U.S. holders who own, directly,
indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of our shares (by vote or value), U.S. holders who have elected mark-to-market accounting, U.S.
holders holding the ordinary shares as part of a hedging, straddle or other risk reduction strategy or as part of a conversion transaction
or other integrated transaction. U.S. holders that received ordinary shares as a result of exercising employee stock options or otherwise
as compensation, U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive
sale provisions of the Code, persons holding our common shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United
States and U.S. holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax. This discussion does not address the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of holding or converting the Convertible Notes.
If a partnership (or
any other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our ordinary shares, the tax treatment
of the partnership and a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner the activities of the partnership
and certain determinations made at the partner level. Such a partner or partnership should consult its tax advisor as to its tax consequences.
You
are advised to consult your tax advisor with respect to the specific U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax consequences of
purchasing, holding or disposing of our ordinary shares.
Taxation of Distributions
on the Ordinary Shares
The discussion below is subject to the discussion
entitled “Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company”.
The amount of a distribution
with respect to the ordinary shares will equal the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property distributed and will also
include the amount of any taxes withheld from such distribution. A distribution paid by us with respect to the ordinary shares to a U.S.
holder will generally be treated as dividend income to the extent that the distribution does not exceed our current and accumulated earnings
and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Dividends that are received by U.S. holders that are individuals, estates
or trusts will be taxed at the rate applicable to long-term capital gains, provided that such dividends meet the requirements of “qualified
dividend income.” For this purpose, qualified dividend income generally includes dividends paid by a non-U.S. corporation if certain
holding period and other requirements are met and either (a) the stock of the non-U.S. corporation with respect to which the dividends
are paid is “readily tradable” on an established securities market in the U.S. (e.g., the Nasdaq Global Market) or (b) the
non-U.S. corporation is eligible for benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the U.S. which includes an information exchange
program and is determined to be satisfactory by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. The IRS has determined that the U.S.-Israel income
tax treaty is satisfactory for this purpose. Dividends that fail to meet such requirements are taxed at the applicable ordinary income
rates. No dividend received by a U.S. holder will be a qualified dividend (1) if the U.S. holder held the ordinary share with respect
to which the dividend was paid for less than 61 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before
the ex-dividend date with respect to such dividend, excluding for this purpose, under the rules of Code Section 246(c), any period
during which the U.S. holder has an option to sell, is under a contractual obligation to sell, has made and not closed a short sale of,
is the grantor of a deep-in-the-money or otherwise nonqualified option to buy, or has otherwise diminished its risk of loss by holding
other positions with respect to, such ordinary share (or substantially identical securities); or (2) to the extent that the U.S.
holder is under an obligation (pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to positions in property substantially
similar or related to the ordinary share with respect to which the dividend is paid. If we were to be a “passive foreign investment
company” or PFIC (as such term is defined in the Code) for any taxable year, dividends paid on our ordinary shares in such year
or in the following taxable year would not be qualified dividends. See discussion below regarding our PFIC status at “Tax
Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company”. In addition, a non-corporate U.S. holder will be able to take
a qualified dividend into account in determining its deductible investment interest (which is generally limited to its net investment
income) only if it elects to do so; in such case the dividend will be taxed at the applicable ordinary income rates.
The amount of any distribution
which exceeds the amount treated as a dividend will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital, reducing the U.S. holder’s
tax basis in its ordinary shares to the extent thereof, and then, to the extent such excess amount exceeds such holder’s tax basis
in such ordinary shares, as capital gain from the deemed disposition of the ordinary shares. Corporate holders will not be allowed a deduction
for dividends received in respect of the ordinary shares.
Distributions paid by
us in NIS generally will be included in the income of U.S. holders at the dollar amount of the distribution (including any taxes withheld
therefrom), based upon the exchange rate in effect on the date the distribution is included in income, regardless of whether the payment
is, in fact, converted into U.S. dollars. U.S. holders will have a tax basis in the NIS for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to
that dollar value. Any subsequent gain or loss in respect of the NIS arising from exchange rate fluctuations will generally be taxable
as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Subject to the limitations
set forth in the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, U.S. holders may elect to claim a foreign tax credit against their U.S.
federal income tax liability for non-U.S. income taxes withheld from dividends received in respect of the ordinary shares. The conditions
and limitations on claiming a foreign tax credit include, among others, computation rules under which foreign tax credits allowable with
respect to specific classes of income cannot exceed the U.S. federal income taxes otherwise payable with respect to each such class of
income. In this regard, dividends paid by us generally will be foreign source “passive income” for U.S. foreign tax credit
purposes. U.S. holders that do not elect to claim a foreign tax credit may instead claim a deduction for the non-U.S. income taxes withheld.
The rules relating to foreign tax credits are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor to determine whether and to what extent
you would be entitled to this credit or deduction. A U.S. holder will be denied a foreign tax credit for non-U.S. income taxes withheld
from a dividend received on the ordinary shares (i) if the U.S. holder has not held the ordinary shares for at least 16 days
of the 31-day period beginning on the date which is 15 days before the ex-dividend date with respect to such dividend or (ii) to
the extent the U.S. holder is under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related
property. Any days during which a U.S. holder has substantially diminished its risk of loss on the ordinary shares are not counted toward
meeting the required 16-day holding period.
Taxation of the Disposition
of Ordinary Shares
Subject to the discussion
below under “Tax Consequences if We Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company”
upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares (other than in certain non-recognition transactions), a U.S. holder
will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the U.S. holder’s
tax basis in such ordinary shares. The gain or loss recognized on the disposition of such ordinary shares will be long-term capital gain
or loss if the U.S. holder held the ordinary shares for more than one year at the time of the disposition. Gain or loss recognized by
a U.S. holder on a sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for
U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
A U.S. holder that uses
the cash method of accounting calculates the dollar value of the proceeds received on the sale as of the date that the sale settles. However,
a U.S. holder that uses the accrual method of accounting is required to calculate the value of the proceeds of the sale as of the trade
date and may therefore realize foreign currency gain or loss. A U.S. holder may avoid realizing foreign currency gain or loss by electing
to use the settlement date to determine the proceeds of sale for purposes of calculating the foreign currency gain or loss. In addition,
a U.S. holder that receives foreign currency upon disposition of ordinary shares and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars after
the settlement date or trade date (whichever date the U.S. holder is required to use to calculate the value of the proceeds of sale) may
have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the dollar,
which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Net Investment Income
Tax
Non-corporate U.S. holders
may be subject to an additional 3.8% surtax on all or a portion of their “net investment income”, which may include dividends
on, or capital gains recognized from the disposition of, our ordinary shares. U.S. holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors
regarding the implications of the additional Net Investment Income tax on their investment in our ordinary shares.
Tax Consequences if We
Are a Passive Foreign Investment Company
For U.S. federal income
tax purposes, we will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, if, after applying certain look through rules, either (1) 75%
or more of our gross income in a taxable year is passive income, or (2) 50% or more of the value (generally determined on the basis
of a quarterly average) of our assets in a taxable year consist of assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.
If we own (directly or indirectly) at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, we will be treated for purposes of the foregoing
tests as owning our proportionate share of that other corporation’s assets and as directly earning our proportionate share of that
other corporation’s income. Based on an analysis of our current assets, activities, market capitalization and income and expectations
about our future assets, activities, market capitalization and income, we believe that we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31,
2021. We currently expect that we will not be a PFIC in 2021 or in the foreseeable future. However, PFIC status is determined as of the
end of the taxable year and is dependent on a number of factors, including the relative value of our passive assets and our non‑passive
assets, our market capitalization and the amount and type of our gross income. There can be no assurance that we will not become a PFIC
for the current taxable year ending December 31, 2022 or in a future taxable year. No assurance can be given that the IRS or a court
of law will accept our position that we are not a PFIC, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are
a PFIC. If we are a PFIC, a U.S. holder may be subject to one of the following three alternative taxing regimes, assuming the applicable
requirements are satisfied:
The “QEF”
regime applies if the U.S. holder elects to treat us as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”) for the first taxable
year in which the U.S. holder owns our ordinary shares or in which we are a PFIC, whichever is later, and if we comply with certain reporting
requirements. Under attribution rules, if we were a PFIC for any taxable year and had any subsidiaries or other entities in which
we held a direct or indirect equity interest that were also PFICs (“Lower-tier PFICs”), U.S. Holders would be deemed to own
their proportionate share of any such Lower-tier PFIC and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax according to the rules described
in the following paragraph on (i) certain distributions by a Lower-tier PFIC and (ii) a disposition of shares of a Lower-tier PFIC, in
each case as if the U.S. Holders held such shares or equity interests directly, even if the U.S. Holders would not receive the proceeds
of those distributions or dispositions. A U.S. Holder must make the QEF election by attaching a properly completed IRS Form 8621 (for
us and any Lower-tier PFIC) to the U.S. Holder’s timely filed U.S. federal income tax return.
(a)
If the QEF regime applies, then, for each taxable year that we are a PFIC, such U.S. holder will include in its gross income a proportionate
share of our ordinary earnings (which is taxed as ordinary income) and net capital gain (which is taxed as long-term capital gain), subject
to a separate election to defer payment of taxes, which deferral is subject to an interest charge. These amounts would be included in
income by an electing U.S. holder, whether or not such amounts are actually distributed to the U.S. holder. A U.S. holder’s basis
in our ordinary shares for which a QEF election has been made would be increased to reflect the amount of any taxed but undistributed
income. Generally, a QEF election allows an electing U.S. holder to treat any gain realized on the disposition of its ordinary shares
as capital gain. Once made, the QEF election applies to all subsequent taxable years of the U.S. holder in which it holds our ordinary
shares and for which we are a PFIC and can be revoked only with the consent of the IRS.
Special rules apply
if a QEF election is made after the first taxable year in which a U.S. holder holds our ordinary shares and we are a PFIC. In such an
event, the U.S. holder would be treated as if it had sold our ordinary shares for their fair market value on the last day of the taxable
year immediately preceding the taxable year for which the QEF election is made and will recognize gain (but not loss) on such deemed sale
in accordance with the excess distribution regime described below. Under certain circumstances, a U.S. holder may be eligible to make
a retroactive QEF election with respect to a taxable year in the U.S. holder’s holding period if such U.S. holder (1)(a) reasonably
believed that we were not a PFIC as of the QEF election due date for the prior taxable year, and (b) filed a protective statement in which
the U.S. holder described the basis for its reasonable belief and extended the statute of limitation on the assessment of PFIC related
taxes for all taxable years to which the protective statement applies; (2) obtains IRS consent; or (3) is a “qualified shareholder”
within the meaning of the Treasury Regulations.
(b)
A second regime, the “mark-to-market” regime, may be elected as an alternative to making a QEF election so long as our ordinary
shares are “marketable stock” (e.g., “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange” such as the Nasdaq
Global Market). Pursuant to this regime, in any taxable year that we are a PFIC, an electing U.S. holder’s ordinary shares are marked-to-market
each taxable year and the U.S. holder recognizes as ordinary income or loss an amount equal to the difference as of the close of the taxable
year between the fair market value of our ordinary shares and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in our ordinary shares. Losses
are allowed only to the extent of net mark-to-market gain previously included by the U.S. holder under the election for prior taxable
years. An electing U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in our ordinary shares is increased by income recognized under the mark-to-market
election and decreased by the deductions allowed under the election. Under the mark-to-market election, in a taxable year that we are
a PFIC, gain on the sale of our ordinary shares is treated as ordinary income, and loss on the sale of our ordinary shares, to the extent
the amount of loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gain previously included, is treated as ordinary loss and any remaining loss
from an actual disposition of ordinary shares generally would be capital loss. The mark-to-market election applies to the taxable year
for which the election is made and all later taxable years, unless the ordinary shares cease to be marketable stock or the IRS consents
to the revocation of the election. There can be no assurances that there will be sufficient trading volume with respect to the ordinary
shares in order for the ordinary shares to be considered “regularly traded” or that our ordinary shares will continue to trade
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Accordingly, there are no assurances that the ordinary shares will be marketable stock for these purposes
A mark-to-market election generally is unlikely to be available with respect to any Lower-tier PFIC.
If the mark-to-market
election is made after the first taxable year in which a U.S. holder holds our ordinary shares and we are a PFIC, then special rules would
apply.
(c) A
U.S. holder making neither the QEF election nor the mark-to-market election is subject to the “excess distribution” regime.
Under this regime, “excess distributions” are subject to special tax rules. An excess distribution includes (1) a distribution
with respect to our ordinary shares that is greater than 125% of the average distributions received by the U.S. holder from us over the
shorter of either the preceding three taxable years or such U.S. holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares prior to the distribution
year and (2) gain from the disposition of our ordinary shares.
Excess distributions
must be allocated ratably to each day that a U.S. holder has held our ordinary shares. A U.S. holder must include amounts allocated to
the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, in its gross income as ordinary
income for that year. All amounts allocated to other taxable years of the U.S. holder would be taxed at the highest tax rate for each
such year applicable to ordinary income and the U.S. holder also would be liable for interest on the deferred tax liability for each such
year calculated as if such liability had been due with respect to each such year. The portions of gains and distributions that are not
characterized as “excess distributions” are subject to tax in the current taxable year as ordinary income under the normal
tax rules of the Code. Similar treatment would apply to shares of any Lower-tier PFICs that are generally treated for this purpose as
if held by the U.S. holder.
In
addition, special reporting requirements may apply to U.S. holders with respect to our ordinary shares, if we were to be treated as a
PFIC, and a failure to comply with such requirements may subject a U.S. holder to substantial penalties or other adverse tax consequences.
We will notify U.S. holders in the event we conclude that we will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year to enable U.S. holders to
consider whether or not to elect to treat us as a QEF for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to “mark-to-market” the ordinary
shares, or to become subject to the “excess distribution” regime, and we expect that in such event we will provide U.S. holders
with the information needed to make a QEF election with respect to us or any Lower-tier PFIC.
U.S.
holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules, including eligibility for and the manner
and advisability of making, the QEF election or the mark-to-market election.
Non-U.S. Holders of Ordinary
Shares
Except as described below,
a non-U.S. holder of ordinary shares will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on the receipt of dividends on, and
the proceeds from the disposition of, an ordinary share, unless, in the case of U.S. federal income taxes, that item is effectively connected
with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States and, in the case of a resident of a country which
has an income tax treaty with the United States, that item is attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States or, in the
case of an individual, a fixed place of business in the United States. In addition, gain recognized by an individual non-U.S. holder on
the disposition of ordinary shares will be subject to income tax in the United States if the non-U.S. holder is present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Information Reporting
and Backup Withholding
A U.S. holder (except
for certain exempt recipients, such as corporations) generally is subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding
with respect to dividends paid on, and the receipt of the proceeds from the disposition of, our ordinary shares. A U.S. holder of our
ordinary shares who does not provide a correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding
will generally not apply if a U.S. holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that such holder is not subject
to backup withholding or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding applies.
Non-U.S. holders generally
will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding with respect to the payment of dividends on, or proceeds from the disposition
of, our ordinary shares provided the non-U.S. holder provides its taxpayer identification number, certifies to its foreign status or otherwise
establishes an exemption from backup withholding applies.
Backup withholding is
not an additional tax and may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a holder, or alternatively, the
holder may be eligible for a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules, in either case, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Certain U.S. holders
who hold interests in “specified foreign financial assets” (as defined in Section 6038D of the Code) are generally required
to file an IRS Form 8938 as part of their U.S. federal income tax returns to report their ownership of such specified foreign financial
assets, which may include our ordinary shares, if the total value of those assets exceed certain thresholds. Substantial penalties
may apply to any failure to timely file IRS Form 8938. In addition, in the event a holder that is required to file IRS Form 8938 does
not file such form, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such holder for the related
tax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding their tax reporting obligations.
ISRAELI TAXATION
The following summary
describes the current tax structure applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us. It also discusses Israeli
tax consequences material to persons purchasing our ordinary shares. We recommend that you consult your tax advisor as to the particular
tax consequences of an investment in our ordinary shares.
General
Corporate Tax Structure
The regular corporate
tax rate applicable in 2021 and 2022 is 23%.
However, the effective
tax rate payable by a company that derives income from a preferred enterprise, discussed further below, may be considerably less. See
below in Item 10.E - “Taxation - Tax Benefits under the Law for the Encouragement
of Capital Investments, 1959”.
Tax benefits under the
Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Investment Law”)
The Company’s production
facility has been granted “Approved Enterprise” status under the Investment Law. The Company participates in the Alternative
Benefits Program and, accordingly, income from its approved enterprises will be tax exempt for a period of 10 years (or up to 14 years
commencing in the year in which the company was granted “Approved Enterprise” status), commencing in the first year in which
the Approved Enterprise first generates taxable income; this is due to the fact that the Company operates in Zone ”A”
in Israel.
On April 1, 2005, an
amendment to the Investment Law came into effect (the “Amendment”) and has significantly
changed the provisions of the Investment Law. The Amendment limits the scope of enterprises which may be approved by the Investment Center
by setting criteria for the approval of a facility as a “Beneficiary Enterprise”, such as provisions generally requiring that
at least 25% of the Beneficiary Enterprise’s income will be derived from export. Additionally, the Amendment enacted major changes
in the manner in which tax benefits are awarded under the Investment Law so that companies no longer require Investment Center approval
in order to qualify for tax benefits.
In addition, the Amendment
provides that terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval already granted will remain subject to the provisions of the
law as they were on the date of such approval. Therefore, the Company’s existing Approved Enterprise will generally not be subject
to the provisions of the Amendment. As a result of the Amendment, tax-exempt income generated under the provisions of the Amendment, as
part of a new Beneficiary Enterprise, will subject the Company to taxes upon distribution or liquidation.
The Company has been
granted the status of Approved Enterprises, under the Investment Law, for investment programs for the periods which ended in 2007 and
2010, and the status of Beneficiary Enterprise according to the Amendment, for a period ending in 2014. In addition Camtek has elected
2010 as the year of election for a period ending 2021 (collectively, “Programs”).
The Investment Law and
the criteria for receiving an “Approved Enterprise” or “Beneficiary Enterprise” status may be amended from time
to time and there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional benefits under the Investment Law.
On December 29, 2010,
the Investment Law was amended to significantly revise the tax incentive regime in Israel commencing on January 1, 2011 (the “December
2010 Amendment”). The December 2010 Amendment introduced a new status of “Preferred Enterprise,” replacing the
existing status of “Beneficiary Enterprise.” Similarly to “Beneficiary Enterprise,” a Preferred Enterprise is
an industrial company meeting certain conditions, including deriving a minimum of 25% of its income from export activities. However, under
the December 2010 Amendment, the requirement for a minimum investment in production assets in order to be eligible for the benefits granted
under the Investments Law was cancelled. A Preferred Enterprise is entitled to a reduced flat tax rate with respect to preferred enterprise
income at the following rates:
Tax Year |
Development “Zone A” |
Other Areas within Israel |
Regular Corporate Tax Rate |
2011-2012 |
10% |
15% |
24%-25% |
2013 |
7% |
12.5% |
25% |
2014-2015 |
9% |
16% |
26.5% |
2016 |
9% |
16% |
25% |
2017 |
7.5% |
16% |
24% |
2018 |
7.5% |
16% |
23% |
2019 |
7.5% |
16% |
23% |
2020 |
7.5% |
16% |
23% |
2021 |
7.5% |
16% |
23% |
Dividends distributed
from income which is attributed to “Preferred Enterprise” will be subject to withholding tax at source at the following rates:
(i) Israeli resident corporation at 0%; (ii) Israeli resident individual at 20%; and (iii) non-Israeli resident at 20%, such withholding
tax rate can be reduced subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty.
The December 2010 Amendment
was also revised to allow financial assistance to companies located in development Zone A to be granted not only as a cash grant but also
as a loan. The rates for grants and loans could be up to 20% of the amount of the approved investment.
In December, 2016, the
Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 2016 which includes
Amendment 73 to the Investment Law (the “December 2016 Amendment”) was published. The investment law was amended to introduce
a new tax incentive regime for intellectual property (IP) based companies. Effective January 1, 2017, the December 2016 Amendment enhanced
tax incentives for certain industrial companies by reducing the corporate tax rate and tax withholding obligation.
According to the December
2016 Amendment, a Preferred Enterprise located in development Zone A will be subject to a tax rate of 7.5% instead of 9% effective from
January 1, 2017 and thereafter (the tax rate applicable to preferred enterprises located in other areas remains at 16%). The December
2016 Amendment also prescribes special tax tracks for Technological Enterprises, which are subject to regulation issued by the Minister
of Finance on May 28, 2017.
In 2019 the Company filed
a notice to the Israeli Tax Authorities regarding the implementation of the Preferred Enterprise for its 2019 preferred income (instead
of a Beneficiary Enterprise). As the Company is located in Development Area A, the applied corporate tax rate is 7.5%.
The new tax tracks under
the December 2016 Amendment are as follows:
Preferred Technological
Enterprise - an enterprise for which total consolidated revenues of its parent company and all subsidiaries are less than NIS 10 billion.
A Preferred Technological Enterprise, as defined in the Law, which is located in the center of Israel will be subject to tax at a rate
of 12% on profits deriving from intellectual property (in development zone A - a tax rate of 7.5%).
Special Preferred Technological
Enterprise - an enterprise for which total consolidated revenues of its parent company and all subsidiaries exceed NIS 10 billion. Such
enterprise will be subject to tax at a rate of 6% on profits deriving from intellectual property, regardless of the enterprise’s
geographical location.
In summary, as of 2019, the applicable tax rates are as follows:
Enterprise type |
Development “Zone A” |
Other Areas within Israel |
Regular Corporate Tax Rate |
Preferred Enterprise |
7.5% |
16% |
23% |
Special Preferred Enterprise |
5% |
8% |
23% |
Preferred Technological Enterprise |
7.5% |
12% |
23% |
Special Preferred Technological Enterprise |
6% |
6% |
23% |
In addition, any dividend
distributed from a Preferred Technological Enterprise to foreign companies holding at least 90% of the share capital will be subject to
a reduced tax rate of 4%.
Neither the provisions
of the December 2010 Amendment nor the December 2016 Amendment apply to companies currently having an “Approved Enterprise”
or “Beneficiary Enterprise” status, which will continue to be entitled to the tax benefits according to the provisions of
the Investment Law prior to the aforementioned amendments, unless the company having the benefits of such status has elected by filing
with the Israeli Tax Authority not later than the date prescribed for the filing of the company’s annual tax return for the respective
year, to adopt the provisions of the December 2010 Amendment. Such election cannot be later rescinded. A company having the status of
“Beneficiary Enterprise” or “Approved Enterprise” making such election by June 30, 2015 will be entitled to distribute
income generated by the Beneficiary Enterprise” or “Approved Enterprise,” subject to withholding tax at source at the
following rates: (i) Israeli resident corporations at 0%; (ii) Israeli resident individuals at 20%; and (iii) non-Israeli residents at
20%, such withholding tax rate can be reduced subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty.
During the years 1998-2006 Camtek was subject
to tax in accordance with the Approved and Beneficiary Enterprise provisions under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments.
As such, Camtek has income that was exempt from tax. Distribution of dividends from the exempt income requires to pay income tax on the
amount of the dividend distributed at the tax rate that would have been applicable to it in the year the income was produced if it had
not been exempt from tax. In February 2022, the Company, in a settlement with the Israeli Tax Authorities, elected to take advantage of
the temporary rule of 2022 in Israel and pay a reduced tax rate on its historical exempt earnings to allow the Company to distribute dividends
from these earnings in the future with no additional corporate tax liability (See Note 18B(b) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
The Company’s Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2021 included a one-time tax expense of $5,315, with in respect
of this settlement.
Law
for the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development, 1984
For information regarding
the R&D Law, see above in Item 4.B - “Business Overview - The
Israel Innovation Authority, formerly – the Israeli Office of Chief Scientist”.
Net
Operating Loss Carry forwards
As of December 31,
2021, the Company did not have a net operating loss, or NOL carry forward for Israeli tax purposes.
Law
for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969
We
believe that we currently qualify as an “Industrial Company” within the meaning of the Law for the Encouragement of Industry
(Taxes), 1969 (the “Industry Encouragement Law”). According to the Industry Encouragement
Law, an “Industrial Company” is a company incorporated in, and resident of Israel, at least 90% of the income of which, in
a given tax year, exclusive of income from specified government loans, capital gains, interest and dividends which are not classified
for such company as business income, is derived from an industrial enterprise owned by it. In general, an “Industrial enterprise”
is defined as an enterprise whose major activity in a given tax year is industrial production.
The
following corporate tax benefits are available to Industrial Companies:
|
• |
amortization of the cost of purchased know-how and patents over an eight-year period for tax purposes, from the tax year it began
to use them; |
|
• |
amortization of expenses incurred in some cases in connection with a public issuance of publicly traded securities over a three-year
period; and |
|
• |
accelerated depreciation rates on equipment and buildings. |
Eligibility
for the benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority. No
assurance can be given that we qualify or will continue to qualify as an “Industrial Company” or that the benefits described
above will be available in the future.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Applicable to Non-Israeli Shareholders
Israeli law generally
imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets including securities of an Israeli company (whether or not traded). The Income
Tax Ordinance [New Version], 1961 (the “Ordinance”) distinguishes between “Real Capital Gain” and the “Inflationary
Surplus.” The Real Capital Gain is the excess of the total capital gain over Inflationary Surplus. The Inflationary Surplus is computed
generally on the basis of the cost multiplied by the difference between the Israeli consumer monthly price index as known at the date
of sale and the date of purchase and, with respect to an individual, when the shares are nominated or linked to a foreign currency the
Inflationary Surplus would be calculated according to the difference in changes in the foreign currency. The Inflationary Surplus accumulated
after January 1, 1994 is exempt from capital gains tax.
Pursuant to the Ordinance,
the Real Capital Gains tax rate applicable to individuals upon the sale of such securities is such individual’s marginal tax rate
but not more than 25%, or 30% with respect to an individual who meets the definition of a ‘Substantial Shareholder’ on the
date of the sale of the securities or at any time during the 12 months preceding such date. A ‘Substantial Shareholder’ is
defined as a person who, either alone or together with any other person, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the means
of control of a company (including, among other things, the right to receive profits of the Company, voting rights, the right to receive
the Company’s liquidation proceeds and the right to appoint a director). Notwithstanding the foregoing, dealers in securities (Individual
and corporate shareholders) in Israel are taxed at regular tax rates applicable to business income a corporate tax rate for a corporation
and a marginal tax rate of up to 47% for an individual in 2021 onward.
With respect to corporate
investors, capital gain tax equal to the ordinary corporate tax rate (23% in 2021 and thereafter) will be imposed on the sale of our traded
shares.
However, Under Israeli
law, the capital gain from the sale of shares by non-Israeli residents is tax exempt in Israel as long as our shares are listed on the
Nasdaq Global Market or any other stock exchange recognized by the Israeli Ministry of Finance, and provided certain other conditions
are met, the most relevant of which are: (A) the capital gain is not attributed to the foreign resident’s permanent establishment
in Israel, (B) the shares were acquired by the foreign resident after the company’s shares had been listed for trading, and (C)
if the seller is a non-Israeli corporation, less than 25% of its means of control are held by Israeli residents.
As our ordinary shares
are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market, which qualifies as a Recognized Exchange, Real Capital Gains on the sale of our ordinary shares
held by non-Israeli tax resident investors (individuals and corporations) will generally be exempt from Israeli capital gains tax so long
as certain conditions are met, including that the shares were not held through a permanent establishment that the non-Israeli tax resident
investor maintains in Israel.
In any event, non-Israeli
corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemptions if an Israeli resident (a) has a controlling interest of more than 25% in
such non-Israeli corporation, or (b) is the beneficiary of or is entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli
corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
Furthermore, the sale
of shares may be exempt from Israeli capital gain tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty, as discussed below, subject to
the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the Israel Tax Authority (the “ITA”) allowing for such exemption.
Withholding Taxes
Persons paying consideration
for shares, including purchasers of shares, Israeli securities dealers effecting a transaction, or a financial institution through which
securities being sold are held, are required, subject to any applicable exemptions and the demonstration by the selling shareholder of
its non-Israeli residency and other requirements, to withhold tax upon the sale of publicly traded securities at a rate of 25% for individuals
and at the corporate tax rate (23% in 2021 and thereafter) for corporations.
Income Taxes on Dividend
Distributions to Non-Israeli Shareholders
Non-Israeli residents
(whether individuals or corporations) are generally subject to Israeli withholding tax on the receipt of dividends paid by Israeli publicly
traded companies at the rate of 25%, if the shares are registered with a nominee company (as such term is used in the Israeli Securities
Law, 5728-1968). If the shares are not registered with a nominee company, the rate of 25% will apply to non-Israeli residents shareholders
who are not considered Substantial Shareholders, as defined above, and who were not Substantial Shareholders at any time during the 12
months preceding the date of the distribution, and the rate of 30% will apply to dividends paid to Substantial Shareholders and to persons
who were Substantial Shareholders at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of the distribution. Notwithstanding the above,
a lower tax rate may be provided under an applicable tax treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence (subject
to the receipt in advance of a valid tax certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate). The distribution of dividends to non-Israeli
residents (either individuals or corporations) from income derived from a company’s Approved Enterprises or Benefited Enterprises
or a Preferred Enterprise, in each case during the applicable benefits period is subject to withholding tax at a rate of 20%, unless a
lower tax rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty.
A non-Israeli resident
who has received dividend income derived from or accrued in Israel, from which the full amount of tax was duly withheld, is generally
exempt from the duty to file tax returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided that: (i) such income was not derived from a business
conducted in Israel by the taxpayer; (ii) the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel with respect to which a tax return
is required to be filed; and (iii) the taxpayer is not liable for excess tax.
U.S. Israel Tax Treaty
The sale of shares may
also be exempt from Israeli capital gain tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. For example, the Convention Between the
Government of the United States and the Government of the State of Israel With Respect to Taxes of Income, as amended, or the U.S.-Israel
Tax Treaty. The U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty exempts U.S. residents for the purposes of the treaty from Israeli capital gain tax in connection
with such sale, provided (i) the U.S. resident owned, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of the Israeli resident company’s voting
power at any time within the 12-month period preceding such sale; (ii) the seller, being an individual, is present in Israel for a period
or periods of less than 183 days during the taxable year; (iii) the capital gain from the sale was not derived through a permanent establishment
of the U.S. resident in Israel and (iv) the capital gains is not arising from such sale, exchange or disposition which is attributed to
real estate located in Israel. Otherwise, the sale, exchange or disposition of shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable
However, under
the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, U.S. residents for the purposes of the treaty may be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against U.S.
federal income tax imposed on the sale, under the circumstances and subject to the limitations specified in the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty
and U.S. tax legislation, as discussed below under “Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations – Distributions.
Under the U.S.-Israel
Tax Treaty, the maximum Israeli withholding tax on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident for the purposes
of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, is generally 25%. The U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty provides that a 15% or a 12.5% Israeli dividend withholding
tax will apply to dividends paid to a U.S. corporation owning 10% or more of an Israeli company’s voting shares during, in general,
the current tax year in which the dividend is distributed and preceding tax year of the Israeli company. The 15% rate applies to dividends
distributed from income derived from an Approved Enterprise, or a Benefited Enterprise, or a Preferred Enterprise, in each case within
the applicable period, and the lower 12.5% rate applies to dividends distributed from income derived from other sources. However, these
provisions do not apply if the company has certain amounts of passive income. The aforementioned rates under the U.S.-Israel Treaty will
not apply if the dividend income was derived through a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident in Israel.
Furthermore, an additional
tax liability at the rate of 3% is applicable on the annual taxable income, including, but not limited to, income derived from dividends,
interest and capital gains, of individuals who are subject to tax in Israel (whether such individual is an Israeli resident or non-Israeli
resident) exceeding a certain threshold (NIS 647,640 in 2021), which amount is linked to the Israeli consumer price index.
F.
Dividends and Paying Agents.
Not applicable.
G.
Statement by Experts.
Not applicable.
H.
Documents on Display.
We file annual reports and other information
with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports and other material that are filed through
the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval, or EDGAR, system. Information about us is also available on our site
at http://www.camtek.com. Such information on our site is not part of this Annual Report.
I.
Subsidiary Information.
Not applicable.
Item
11. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
Our exposure to market
risk for changes in interest rates is not significant as we have no outstanding loans; see Item 5.B –
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.
Foreign
Currency Rate Fluctuations
We are a global company
that operates in a multi-currency environment. In recent months, foreign currency exchange rates have been subject to considerable fluctuations.
As a major portion of the costs of our Israeli operations, such as personnel, subcontractors, materials and facility‑related costs,
are incurred in NIS, an increase in the NIS value relative to the U.S. Dollar will increase our costs expressed in U.S. Dollars, and a
decrease in the NIS value relative to the U.S. Dollar will decrease our costs expressed in U.S. Dollars. During 2021, the value of the
U.S. Dollar weakened against the NIS by 3%. We may, from time to time, take various measures designed to reduce our exposure to these
effects, but any such steps may be inadequate to protect us from currency rate fluctuations. We had no open hedging transactions as of
December 31, 2021.
In our consolidated financial
statements, transactions and balances originally denominated in U.S. Dollars are presented at their original amounts. Gains and losses
arising from non-dollar transactions and balances are included in net income as part of financial expenses, net.
Our balance
sheet exposures to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and other currencies are primarily from NIS denominated balances.
As of December 31, 2021, we had net liabilities of approximately $12.1 million, denominated in NIS. Any fluctuation in the exchange rate
between the NIS and the U.S. dollar of 1% will cause us expenses or income of $21 thousand, in case of increase or decrease in rates,
respectively.
In addition,
although our products’ prices in most countries are denominated in U.S. Dollars, in certain territories (currently, Europe and Japan)
our products’ prices are denominated in local currencies, and much of our service income in additional territories is denominated
in local currencies. If there is a significant devaluation in the relevant local currencies in which we operate compared to the U.S. Dollar,
those prices of our products or services that are denominated in local currency in the relevant territories will increase relative to
that local currency and may be less competitive.
Item 12.
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.
Not applicable.
PART
II
Item 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages
and Delinquencies.
Not applicable.
Item 14.
Material Modifications
to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 15.
Controls and Procedures.
(a) |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. |
Our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2021, and have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
by the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management recognizes
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. |
Our management, under
the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over our financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurances with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may decline.
Our management evaluated
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation,
management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as at December 31, 2021, and concluded that
such internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) is effective.
(c) |
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
The effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 has been audited by our principal accountant Somekh Chaikin, a member
firm of KPMG International, an independent registered public accounting firm. The related report to our shareholders and the Board of
Directors appears on page F-2 of this Annual Report.
(d) |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. |
There were no changes
to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16A. Audit
Committee Financial Expert.
Our Board of Directors
has determined that Ms. Andorn qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” for purposes of the Nasdaq Rules, and that
each of Mr. Shacham-Diamand and Ms. Andorn are independent directors in accordance with Nasdaq Rules and meet the independence criteria
set forth in the Companies Law.
Item 16B.
Code of Ethics.
We adopted
a Code of Ethics, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive, financial and
accounting officers and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethics, in its current version, is available on our
website, www.camtek.com. We will also provide a copy of the Code of Ethics to any person,
without charge, upon written request addressed to our CFO at our corporate headquarters in Israel: Camtek Ltd., Ramat Gabriel Industrial
Zone, P.O. BOX 544, Migdal Ha’Emek, Israel.
Item 16C.
Principal Accountant
Fees and Services.
Our Audit Committee maintains
a policy of approving and recommending only those services to be performed by our independent auditors which are permitted under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and the applicable rules of the SEC relating to auditor’s independence, and our independent auditors are remunerated
at levels that accord with such basic principles of auditor independence.
The following table presents the aggregate
amount of fees for professional services rendered to the Company by our principal accountant Somekh Chaikin, Tel Aviv, Israel (PCAOB ID
1057), a member firm of KPMG International and their KPMG affiliate firms, in US$, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
Fee Category |
For
2021 Services Rendered |
For
2020 Services Rendered |
|
|
|
Audit Fees (1) |
|
|
Tax Fees (2) |
|
7,700 |
* The comparative year has been reclassified
to conform to current year presentation.
(1) Audit
Fees: the audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were for professional services rendered for the integrated
audit of Camtek’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal controls over financial reporting and services that
are normally provided by independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements,
including consultancy and consents with respect to an underwritten public offering and related prospectus supplements filed with the SEC.
(2) Tax
Fees rendered during 2021 and 2020 by our auditor were for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice.
Pre-Approval Policies
and Procedures
Our Audit Committee has
adopted a policy for pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services. Under the policy, the Audit Committee will pre-approve all
auditing services and permitted non-audit services (including fees and other terms) to be performed for the Company by its independent
auditor. All of the fees listed in the table above were approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee may adopt policies
and procedures to permit delegation of authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when appropriate, including the authority
to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services. Decisions of the subcommittee to grant pre-approvals will be presented
to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Item 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not
applicable.
Item 16F.
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
Not applicable.
Item 16G.
Corporate Governance.
Pursuant to Rules 5255(a)
and 5615(a)(3) of the Nasdaq Rules, we are relying on our home country practice with respect to the following matters: the eligibly of
our securities for a direct registration program; the composition and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee; the approval of
stock option plans; certain annual meeting requirements – all as set forth below:
|
- |
We have opted out of the requirement that all securities listed on Nasdaq be eligible for a direct registration program operated
by a registered clearing agency as set forth in Rule 5255(a). Our procedures regarding the issuance of stock certificates comply with
Israeli law and practice. According to the Companies Law, a share certificate is defined as a certificate which states the name of
the owner registered in the company’s shareholders register, as well as the number of shares he or she owns. In the event that
what is registered in the company’s shareholders register conflicts with a share certificate, then the evidentiary value of the
shareholder register outweighs the evidentiary value of the share certificate. A shareholder registered in the company’s shareholders
register is entitled to receive from the company a certificate evidencing his ownership of the share. |
|
- |
As all members of our Audit Committee meet the independence requirements for compensation committee members set forth in Nasdaq Rule
5605(d)(2), as a foreign private issuer, we have elected, pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5615(a)(3), to follow Israeli practice, in lieu of compliance
with the certain provisions of Nasdaq Rule 5605(d), requiring us to have a separate compensation committee. Accordingly, and consistent
with Israeli law allowing an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of the Companies Law regarding the composition of a
compensation committee, to carry out all duties and responsibilities of the compensation committee, our Audit Committee has been authorized
to assume the functions and responsibilities of a compensation committee. In this respect, we have also opted out the requirement to adopt
and file a compensation committee charter as set forth in Rule 5605(d)(1).We have opted out of the requirement for shareholder approval
of stock option plans and other equity based compensation arrangements as set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5635 and Nasdaq Rule 5605(d), respectively.
Nevertheless, as required under the Companies Law, special shareholder voting procedures are followed for the approval of equity based
compensation of certain Office Holders or employees who are controlling shareholders or any relative thereof, as well as of our Chief
Executive Officer and members of our Board of Directors. Equity based compensation arrangements with Office Holders (chief executive officer
and directors excluded) or employees who are not controlling shareholders or any relative thereof, are approved by our Compensation Committee
and our Board of Directors, provided they are consistent with our Compensation Policy, and in special circumstances in deviation therefrom,
taking into account certain considerations as set forth in the Companies Law. |
|
- |
We have opted out the requirement for conducting annual meetings as set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5620(a), which requires Camtek to hold
its annual meetings of shareholders within twelve months of the end of a company’s fiscal year end. Instead, Camtek is following
home country practice and law in this respect. The Companies Law requires that an annual meeting of shareholders be held every year, and
not later than 15 months following the last annual meeting (see in Item 10.B –
“Memorandum and Articles - Voting, Shareholders’ Meetings and Resolutions” above). Our 2021 AGM was held on August
18, 2021, therefore our 2022 AGM must be held by November 18, 2022. Further, we have opted out the requirement set under Rule 5620(c)
of the Nasdaq Rules which requires the presence of two or more shareholders holding at least 33 1/3%, and in lieu follow our home country
practice and Israeli law, according to which the quorum for any shareholders meeting will be the presence of two or more shareholders
holding at least 25% of the voting rights in the aggregate - within half an hour from the time set for opening the meeting. |
|
- |
We have chosen to follow our home country practice in lieu of the requirements of Nasdaq Rule 5250(d)(1), relating to an issuer’s
furnishing of its annual report to shareholders. Specifically, we file annual reports on Form 20-F, which contain financial statements
audited by an independent accounting firm, electronically with the SEC and post a copy on our website. |
Item 16H.
Mine Safety Disclosure.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17.
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company has furnished financial statements
and related information specified in Item 18.
Item 18.
Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Our consolidated financial statements and
report of independent registered public accounting firm in connection therewith, as appear below, are hereby incorporated into this Annual
Report.