XML 39 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Community Health Systems, Inc. (the “Parent” or “Parent Company”) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 (“2016 Form 10-K”).

Consolidation, Policy

Noncontrolling interests in less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries of the Parent are presented as a component of total equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheets to distinguish between the interests of the Parent Company and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable or may become redeemable at a fixed or determinable price at the option of the holder or upon the occurrence of an event outside of the control of the Company are presented in mezzanine equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Throughout these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, Community Health Systems, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to on a collective basis as the “Company.” This drafting style is not meant to indicate that the publicly traded Parent or any particular subsidiary of the Parent owns or operates any asset, business, or property. The hospitals, operations and businesses described in this filing are owned and operated by distinct and indirect subsidiaries of Community Health Systems, Inc.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.    Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that could become uncollectible in the future. Substantially all of the Company’s receivables are related to providing healthcare services to patients at its hospitals and affiliated businesses.

The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts by reserving a percentage of all self-pay accounts receivable without regard to aging category, based on collection history, adjusted for expected recoveries and any anticipated changes in trends. The Company’s ability to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts is not impacted by not utilizing an aging of net accounts receivable as the Company believes that substantially all of the risk exists at the point in time such accounts are identified as self-pay. For all other non-self-pay payor categories, the Company reserves an estimated amount on historical collection rates for the uncontractualized portion of all accounts aging over 365 days from the date of discharge. These amounts represent an immaterial percentage of the outstanding accounts receivable. The percentage used to reserve for all self-pay accounts is based on the Company’s collection history. The Company collects substantially all of its third-party insured receivables, which include receivables from governmental agencies.

Collections are impacted by the economic ability of patients to pay and the effectiveness of the Company’s collection efforts. Significant changes in payor mix, business office operations, economic conditions or trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage could affect the Company’s collection of accounts receivable and the estimates of the collectability of future accounts receivable and are considered in the Company’s estimates of accounts receivable collectability. The Company also continually reviews its overall reserve adequacy by monitoring historical cash collections as a percentage of trailing net revenue less provision for bad debts, as well as by analyzing current period net revenue and admissions by payor classification, aged accounts receivable by payor, days revenue outstanding, the composition of self-pay receivables between pure self-pay patients and the patient responsibility portion of third-party insured receivables and the impact of recent acquisitions and dispositions.

Electronic Health Records Incentive Reimbursement, Policy

Electronic Health Records Incentive Reimbursement.    The federal government has implemented a number of regulations and programs designed to promote the use of electronic health records (“EHR”) technology and, pursuant to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), established requirements for a Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments program for eligible hospitals and professionals that adopt and meaningfully use certified EHR technology. The Company utilizes a gain contingency model to recognize EHR incentive payments. Recognition occurs when the eligible hospitals adopt or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology for the applicable payment period and have available the Medicare cost report information for the relevant full cost report year used to determine the final incentive payment.

Medicaid EHR incentive payments are calculated based on prior period Medicare cost report information available at the time when eligible hospitals adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology. Since the information for the relevant full Medicare cost report year is available at the time of attestation, the incentive income from resolving the gain contingency is recognized when eligible hospitals adopt, implement, upgrade or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology.

Medicare EHR incentive payments are calculated based on the Medicare cost report information for the full cost report year that began during the federal fiscal year in which meaningful use is demonstrated. Since the necessary information is only available at the end of the relevant full Medicare cost report year and after the cost report is settled, the incentive income from resolving the gain contingency is recognized when eligible hospitals demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology and the information for the applicable full Medicare cost report year to determine the final incentive payment is available.

In some instances, the Company may receive estimated Medicare EHR incentive payments prior to when the Medicare cost report information used to determine the final incentive payment is available. In these instances, recognition of the gain for EHR incentive payments is deferred until all recognition criteria described above are met.

Eligibility for annual Medicare incentive payments is dependent on providers successfully attesting to the meaningful use of EHR technology. Medicaid incentive payments are available to providers in the first payment year that they adopt, implement or upgrade certified EHR technology; however, providers must demonstrate meaningful use of such technology in any subsequent payment years to qualify for additional incentive payments. Medicaid EHR incentive payments are fully funded by the federal government and administered by the states; however, the states are not required to offer EHR incentive payments to providers.

The Company recognized approximately $2 million and $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $25 million and $54 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of incentive reimbursement for HITECH incentives from Medicare and Medicaid related to certain of the Company’s hospitals and for certain of the Company’s employed physicians that have demonstrated meaningful use of certified EHR technology or have completed attestations to their adoption or implementation of certified EHR technology. These incentive reimbursements are presented as a reduction of operating costs and expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of loss. The Company received cash related to the incentive reimbursement for HITECH incentives of approximately $3 million and $7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $39 million and $116 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recorded no deferred revenue in connection with the receipt of these payments for either September 30, 2017 or September 30, 2016.

Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy

Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.    During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a total combined impairment charge and loss on disposal of approximately $363 million to reduce the carrying value of certain hospitals that have been deemed held for sale based on the difference between the carrying value of the hospital disposal groups compared to estimated fair value less costs to sell. Included in the carrying value of the hospital disposal groups at September 30, 2017 is a net allocation of approximately $229 million of goodwill allocated from the hospital operations reporting unit goodwill based on a calculation of the disposal groups’ relative fair value compared to the total reporting unit. The Company will continue to evaluate the potential for further impairment of the long-lived assets of underperforming hospitals as well as evaluating offers for potential sale. Based on such analysis, additional impairment charges may be recorded in the future.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy

New Accounting Pronouncements.    In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, which outlines a single comprehensive model for recognizing revenue and supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance, including guidance specific to the healthcare industry. This ASU provides companies the option of applying a full or modified retrospective approach upon adoption. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018 and is currently implementing its plan for adoption and evaluating the impact on its revenue recognition policies, procedures and control framework and the resulting impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company has established an implementation group for this ASU with an implementation plan to transition to the new standard and determine its impact during 2017. A significant element of executing this plan is the process of reviewing sources of revenue and evaluating the patient account population to determine the appropriate distribution of patient accounts into portfolios with similar characteristics that, when evaluated under the new revenue standard, will result in a materially consistent revenue amount for such portfolios as if each patient account was evaluated on a contract-by-contract basis. The Company is currently evaluating the appropriate portfolios to apply in its analysis and is considering the impact of applying the new standard when its individual patient accounts are evaluated in those portfolios. The Company continues to assess the quantitative impact that the adoption of this accounting standard will have on the financial statements of the Company. Currently, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations on a prospective basis. However, it is possible that as a result of the evaluation process to adopt this ASU, a material adjustment could be made to reduce the amount of net patient accounts receivable on the consolidated statement of financial position of the Company. This potential impact is a result of the Company’s preliminary observations from the application of new processes and methodologies to determine the patient portfolios and estimate the implicit price concessions and constraints on revenue required by this new accounting standard. These assessments of the impact of implementing this ASU are subject to completion of the Company’s processes in adopting this new standard. The Company expects this process will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2017 and expects to disclose the effect of implementing this ASU in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2017 (“2017 Form 10-K”).  

The Company is also in the process of assessing the impact of the new standard on various reimbursement programs that represent variable consideration, including settlements with third party payors, disproportionate share payments, supplemental state Medicaid programs, bundled payment of care programs and other reimbursement programs in which the Company’s hospitals participate. Due to the many different forms of calculation and reimbursement that these programs take that vary from state to state, the application of the new accounting standard could have an impact on the revenue recognized for variable consideration. Moreover, industry guidance is continuing to develop around this issue, and any conclusions in the final industry guidance that is inconsistent with the Company’s application could result in changes to the Company’s expectations regarding the impact that this new accounting standard could have on the Company’s financial statements. For example, in July 2017, a draft of industry guidance was issued on the application of this ASU on variable consideration resulting from settlements with third party payors, and in October 2017, a draft of industry guidance was issued on the application of this ASU on variable consideration resulting from bundled payment of care programs and other risk-sharing arrangements. The Company is evaluating whether such industry guidance will have an impact on its current accounting policies and procedures related to third party settlements. Final drafts of industry guidance on these and other reimbursement programs unique to the healthcare industry are expected later in 2017. The Company is monitoring the development of such guidance.

Additionally, the adoption of the new accounting standard will impact the presentation on the Company’s statement of operations for a significant component of its provision for bad debts. After adoption of the new standard, the majority of what is currently classified as the provision for bad debts will be reflected as an implicit price concession as defined in the standard and therefore a reduction to net patient revenue. The Company will consider certain changes in collectability on its self-pay patient accounts receivable resulting from certain credit and collection issues not assessed at the date of service and recognize such amounts in the provision for bad debts included in operating expenses on the statement of operations.

Previously, the Company disclosed its intention to apply the full retrospective approach to implementing this ASU upon adoption at January 1, 2018. During the last several months, as the Company has developed and implemented new processes for accumulating detailed financial information on patient revenue at the portfolio level, management concluded that the full retrospective approach to applying this ASU to prior periods would be significantly impacted by the number of hospitals that the Company has divested or spun-off in recent years, and the effect of those transactions on the portfolios. As a result, the Company has now decided to apply the modified retrospective approach to adopting this ASU.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, which amends the measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for equity investments, other than those accounted for under the equity method or that require consolidation of the investee. The ASU eliminates the classification of equity investments as available-for-sale with any changes in fair value of such investments recognized in other comprehensive income, and requires entities to measure equity investments at fair value, with any changes in fair value recognized in net income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018, and is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which amends the accounting for leases, requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheet with a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating leases, which will impact the expense recognition of such leases over the lease term. The ASU also modifies the lease classification criteria for lessors and eliminates some of the real estate leasing guidance previously applied for certain leasing transactions. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2019. Because of the number of leases the Company utilizes to support its operations, the adoption of this ASU is expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Management is currently evaluating the extent of this anticipated impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations, and the quantitative and qualitative factors that will impact the Company as part of the adoption of this ASU, as well as any changes to its leasing strategy that may occur because of the changes to the accounting and recognition of leases. Most recently, the Company has organized an implementation group of cross-functional departmental management to ensure the completeness of its lease information, analyze the appropriate classification of current leases under the new standard, and develop new processes to execute, approve and classify leases on an ongoing basis. The Company has also engaged outside experts to assist in the development of this plan, as well as the identification and selection of software tools and processes to maintain lease information critical to applying the new standard.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which was issued to simplify some of the accounting guidance for share-based compensation. Among the areas impacted by the amendments in this ASU is the accounting for income taxes related to share-based payments, accounting for forfeitures, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017. Because of the recent decline in the Company’s stock price below the Company’s stock price at the stock award grant date for outstanding share-based awards, the principal impact from adopting this ASU has been a $16 million increase in the Company’s current provision for income taxes due to the deficiency created by a difference between the actual tax deduction that will be recognized from the vesting of outstanding share-based awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the higher stock compensation expense previously recorded over the vesting period as determined based on the fair value of the restricted stock at the grant date.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Instead of a two-step impairment model, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value as determined in step one of the impairment test, an impairment loss is measured at the amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This ASU is effective for any interim or annual impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. As noted in the Company’s critical accounting policy discussion on goodwill, during the fourth quarter of 2016 the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis. While the result of the step two valuation in that analysis did not indicate an impairment of goodwill, the initial calculation of hospital operations reporting unit fair value in the step one test indicated that the carrying amount of the hospital operations reporting unit exceeded its fair value by approximately $800 million. Depending on future changes in fair value and the impact of allocated goodwill for planned divestitures, at adoption there could be a material impairment charge recorded for this excess amount. The Company is evaluating whether to early adopt this ASU and what impact it will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.  

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, which changes the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for sponsors of defined benefit plans for pensions. Under the changes in this ASU, the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost will be reported in the same income statement line as other employee compensation costs arising from services during the reporting period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately in a line item outside of operating income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018, and is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated results of operations. Since the changes required in this new ASU only change the income statement classification of the components of net periodic benefit cost, no changes are expected to income from continuing operations or net income. Currently, the Company reports all of the components of net periodic benefit cost as a component of salaries and benefits on the consolidated statement of income.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, which was issued to amend hedge accounting recognition and disclosure requirements to improve transparency and simplify the application of hedge accounting for certain hedging instruments.  The amendments in this ASU that will have an impact on the Company include simplification of the periodic hedge effectiveness assessment, elimination of the benchmark interest rate concept for interest rate swaps, and enhancement of the ability to use the critical-terms match method for its cash flow hedges of forecasted interest payments. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to early adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018, and is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations