10-K 1 doc1.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Mark One) |X| ANNUAL REPORT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 OR |_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the transition period from _______ to ___________. Commission file number 0-29651 USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) WYOMING 06-1576391 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation of Organization) 70 Essex Street, Mystic, Connecticut 06355 (Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code) Registrant's telephone number, included area code: (860) 526-1560 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Shares, no par value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant as required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No | | 2 Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. | | Aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant at March 26, 2002 (computed by reference to average of the bid and asked price on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board of the common shares on such date): $21,596,067. Number of common shares outstanding at March 26, 2002: 91,745,088. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS. Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Report"), including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," and words of similar import, constitute "forward-looking statements." Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. USA Video's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including risks described in this Report, including the "Risk Factors" section contained in this Item 1, and the other documents USA Video files with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). INTRODUCTION USA Video Interactive Corp. ("USA Video" or the "Company") designs and markets to business customers streaming video and VoD systems, services and source-to-destination digital media delivery solutions that allow live or recorded digitized and compressed video to be transmitted through Internet, intranet, satellite or wireless connectivity. The Company's systems, services and delivery solutions include video content production, content encoding, media asset management, media and application hosting, multi-mode content distribution, transaction data capture and reporting, e-commerce, specialized engineering services, and Internet streaming hardware. The Company's products and services are based on its proprietary rich media delivery infrastructure and software and its Store and Forward Video-on-Demand ("VoD") patent. These technologies, together with video compression technology, facilitate the delivery of video to an end user in a timely and interactive fashion. USA Video has developed a number of specific products and services based on these technologies. These include StreamHQ(TM), a collection of source-to-destination media delivery services marketed to businesses; EncodeHQ(TM), a service that digitizes and compresses analog-source video; hardware server and encoder system applications under the brand name Hurricane Mediacaster(TM); ZMail(TM), a service that delivers web and rich media content to targeted audiences, and mediaClix(TM), a service that delivers content similar to Zmail but originating from an existing web presence. The Company was incorporated on April 18, 1986, as First Commercial Financial Group Inc. in the Province of Alberta, Canada. In 1989, its name was changed to Micron Metals Canada Corp., which purchased 100% of the outstanding shares of USA Video Inc., a Texas corporation, in order to focus on the digital media business. In 1995, the Company changed its name to USA Video Interactive Corp. and continued its corporate existence in the State of Wyoming. The Company has four wholly-owned subsidiaries: USA Video (California) Corp., USA Video Corp., USA Video Productions Inc., and USA Video Technologies, Inc. USA Video's executive and corporate offices are located in Mystic, Connecticut, and its Canadian offices are located in Vancouver, British Columbia. 3 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The cost of bandwidth and supporting equipment, such as cable modems and other broadband connectivity to homes and businesses, is expected to continue to decrease over the next several years, bringing expanded use of high bandwidth applications for video transmission to the general market. Meanwhile, compression technologies continue to improve, allowing delivery of higher quality content using existing connectivity. USA Video believes that market conditions are favorable for continued acceptance of mainstream VoD services. In published highlights of its 14th annual Communications Industry Forecast, industry merchant bank Veronis Suhler notes that per-person daily use of all forms of media continues to increase and is expected to pass 10 hours per day by 2004. In addition, Veronis Suhler forecasts that Internet advertising will more than quadruple to $24.4 billion by 2004, surpassing cable, network TV and consumer magazines, as total advertising spending grows 8.6% yearly through 2004. Total U.S. spending on media is expected to reach $663.3 billion by 2003. The 7.5% combined annual growth rate will make communications the second fastest-growing industry (behind telecommunications) among the top 12 U.S. industries. USA Video believes its source-to-destination streaming media delivery services hold significant potential for the on-line advertising and other industries. According to Arbitron/Edison Media Research's Internet VI Study released on February 7, 2001, streaming media usage has increased in the past year. As of January 2001, 13% of Americans (more than 30 million people) use Internet audio or video each month, compared to 10% in January 2000. More than one-quarter (27%) of Americans (more than 61 million people) have used Internet audio or video while 6%, over 13 million people, use streaming media each week, according to the Internet VI study. USA Video's streaming media delivery services are designed to be highly functional, cost-effective and easily implemented for advertisers targeting specific demographic groups. STRATEGIC PLAN USA Video's principal, near term, strategic objective is to expand its StreamHQ(TM) services business, while pursuing opportunities to sell replicated StreamHQ(TM) systems to corporations and organizations that prefer systems solutions to services solutions. To this end, the Company intends to: - Continue StreamHQ(TM) functionality development, particularly the automation of processes and client account management, which allows more efficient delivery of services and expansion of the services client base; - Scale the StreamHQ(TM) infrastructure in modular fashion as necessary to support an increasing number and size of Zmail and mediaClix(TM) campaigns; - Establish multiple marketing and distribution channels, particularly in the form of alliances with third parties, including some of the Company's product and service suppliers; and - Expand and enable the organic sales and marketing team, to support increased direct marketing to various markets, including advertising, corporate communications, customer service, entertainment, and education. With regard to its patent, USA Video believes that the expected substantial increases in bandwidth capacity, accompanying decreases in bandwidth cost, increases in consumer computer and video appliance storage capacity, and the proliferation of fast video file transfer techniques will result in an industry focus on downloading as an alternative to streaming as a content delivery mechanism. To position itself to take advantage of this anticipated shift, USA Video is placing increased emphasis on aggressively protecting its technology ownership rights, including licensing arrangements and other forms of enforcement. PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGIES USA Video's proprietary technologies include its (1) StreamHQ(TM) infrastructure, software, and service delivery processes; (2) Store and Forward 4 VoD patent, and (3) Digital fingerprinting piracy deterrence technology. The ability for StreamHQ(TM) to deliver services to clients with market-specific value propositions stems from its scalable, streaming-enabled web infrastructure, the software functionality that resides on this infrastructure (such as innovative asset management and user transaction data capture and reporting), and the processes developed for delivering media campaigns to clients. By delivering features unique to individual markets, such as advertising, corporate communications, and customer service, StreamHQ(TM) services are differentiated from the generic services delivered by competitors. USA Video's Store and Forward VoD Patent (#5,130,792) explicitly covers the rich media delivery model that is becoming more widely accepted as a means of delivering content for education, training, and entertainment; that is, faster-than-real-time download to computer and set-top box hard drives for subsequent content viewing without quality limitations resulting from insufficient or variable bandwidth. The impact of this patent becomes more significant as content owners and those that facilitate content delivery adopt this model. The objective of USA Video's patent-pending digital fingerprinting technology is to deter digital video piracy once a user has been authorized to view the video. This is one of the major concerns preventing content owners from committing more of their content to the digital medium. Digital fingerprinting augments traditional digital rights management techniques, which primarily focus on encrypted video delivery and authorization to view. The digital fingerprint is rendered at the player as part of an authorized video stream and contains sufficient data to track a specific streaming event should the content be pirated and distributed. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Streaming media delivery services In 2000, USA Video identified an emerging market for global media streaming services, which the Company developed under the brand "StreamHQ(TM)". StreamHQ(TM) allows corporate, educational, entertainment, and other types of business or institutional customers to use the Internet or an intranet to deliver rich media content to target audiences without having to buy, operate, and maintain a hardware system. StreamHQ(TM) is a customized, turnkey, streaming media support service. By offering business and other customers a complete source-to-destination service that consolidates web, streaming, and data management functionalities, StreamHQ(TM) eliminates the need for customers to deal with multiple service providers. StreamHQ(TM) services range from source to viewing and include: - content production; - content encoding; - media asset management, including streaming schedules and viewing entitlements; - media and application hosting, multi-mode content distribution ("centralized streaming") using existing Internet services to route video to the user; - "edge streaming" through video file transfers to a content distribution network ("CDN"); - "inside streaming" that places video files on cache and streaming servers located within a corporate or institutional LAN; and - transaction data capture and reporting. 5 In order to provide StreamHQ(TM) customers with a high level of service availability and reliability, together with an efficient and cost-effective media streaming process, USA Video has entered into arrangements with top ranked providers of data storage (EMC Corp.), a Tier 1 Internet data center (AT&T), and a CDN (Speedera Networks). Furthermore, redundancy, fail over, and security are important system design components that provide added value to clients. A key service differentiator is user transaction data management, which consists of capture, analysis, and reporting of statistical data that enables the content owner to obtain important feedback on the effectiveness of campaigns. This data includes network performance and utilization statistics, including bandwidth utilization, number of streaming sessions, streaming rates, video quality and packets lost; total number of times the video was viewed; distribution of users who viewed various portions of the video; information on times of media access, length of time media was viewed, and actions taken during viewing (pause, stop, rewind, etc.). The same data can be used by USA Video to monitor the performance of the StreamHQ(TM) system and delivery network. Additional StreamHQ(TM) features include the ability to analyze usage by location; the percentage of users who forwarded the video to other people; the percentage of users who received and viewed the forwarded video email; and categorization of users by operating system, browser type, and connection speed. Additional functionality can be customized to meet specific customer requirements. The StreamHQ(TM) infrastructure is hosted at AT&T's midtown-Manhattan Internet data center ("IDC"). USA Video publishes content and monitors operations from its operations center in Mystic, Connecticut, allowing services to be delivered and maintenance to be performed without excessive travel requirements. Aside from quality streaming, USA Video's overriding goal in its StreamHQ(TM) development and deployment has been to give customers media asset management features, tools, and information that provide accountability for their streaming expenditures. To that end, the Company has developed and is currently selling products that provide such a return on the customer's investment. Zmail is a rich media email tool that allows businesses, institutions, and organizations to communicate multi-media messages to targeted audiences via the Internet and to receive prompt, valuable feedback on the effectiveness of their communication campaigns. Zmail is an opt-in communication method, whereby the recipient is directed to a web-landing page containing an embedded media player and links to amplifying information about the media subject. All user actions within the page are captured, aggregated, and provided to the customer as intuitive statistical and trend reports. Similar to Zmail, mediaClix(TM) offers a similar landing page and media content; however, access is from a client's existing web presence rather than an opt-in email. Many of USVO's competitors are burdened with huge infrastructures for content delivery and, with the recent economic downturn, are having difficulty finding customers to utilize it. On the other hand, USA Video has taken a very austere approach to system deployment, focusing exclusively on the head-end portion of the rich media delivery architecture. Also, as a highly modular infrastructure that uses appliance-like, functionally specific components, StreamHQ(TM) is highly scalable. The system has been initially scaled to accommodate a day-one client base, in terms of storage, streaming, web, database, and bandwidth components. As this client base increases, StreamHQ(TM) can be scaled with ease and efficiency by simply adding one or more functional components. To minimize the amount of system support that is required, USA Video has built redundancy, fail-over, and security into the StreamHQ(TM) infrastructure to facilitate a straightforward maintenance approach. Media distribution systems As a unique system and service that integrates web, database, and streaming components within a single homogeneous system, the proprietary architecture, software, and processes for delivering service represent significant intellectual property for USA Video. StreamHQ(TM), as a system and collection of intellectual property, can offer the same advantages to other corporations, infrastructure providers, or managed Internet service providers. The meticulous documentation of every step in building the system allows the entire infrastructure, with all its capabilities, to be replicated expeditiously and with precision. USA Video is actively seeking qualified customers, such as Fortune 500 companies, governments, and educational institutions, as clients for 6 custom StreamHQ(TM) systems. Such sales would include hardware and assembly, software customization, licensing of intellectual property, deployment, and ongoing support. CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS USA Video's customer and market focus is the business-to-business sector, rather than the consumer sector, because of the financial wherewithal of businesses to purchase value-added StreamHQ(TM) services and/or systems. USA Video has first targeted corporations and institutions that can derive a marketing advantage from the Zmail or mediaClix(TM) service, specifically companies that can benefit from a strong call to action embedded in an engaging rich media and web presentation directed at a target audience. Such a call to action can be to: o Attend a movie, o Register for a conference, o Contribute to a non-profit organization, o Buy a product, o Sign up for premium services, or o Vote for a particular outcome in an election. Correspondingly, USA Video's customers for these services have included: o Film companies, o Event promoters, o Ministries, o Travel companies, o Sports entertainment centers, and o Political candidates. USA Video's customers for these services can also be any business or organization that is dissatisfied with response rates from traditional email campaigns or who have no idea what the response rate is. Additionally, any client who wants to increase brand or product awareness in a more cost effective manner than television advertising would be an appropriate candidate for these services. The Company is currently expanding the email component of these services to provide a comprehensive on-line marketing management capability so that customers will consider USA Video their sole source for meeting email marketing requirements. This system will deliver an integrated set of services for gathering email addresses, initiating, monitoring, and reporting on multiple campaigns, and managing and building client email lists. As USA Video expands the customer base in the advertising and marketing sector, the Company is expanding its products and capabilities to market its services in the following additional business areas: Target Market Segment Business Activity Supported --------------------- ---------------------------- Corporate Communications Customer relations Employee communications Investor relations Public relations Customer Service Targeted customer support As StreamHQ(TM) is developed to add other levels of functionality and to support additional business activities, the Company anticipates marketing its media delivery services to the following market segments as follows: 7 Education - includes colleges, universities, and elementary and high schools where video can be delivered to classrooms or offices and viewed on desktop computers or television. With instant digital access to enormous libraries of content, which may be located on or off site, instructors will be able to create specialized video programs that students may access at their convenience. The current, less efficient method of copying, mailing and logging videotapes can be replaced. StreamHQ(TM)'s inside streaming functionality will enable education customers to stream large files without interfering with the ordinary use of their Internet connections. Entertainment - includes movies, live and archived events, broadcast news, weather and home consumer programming that can be accessed at the user's convenience, thus eliminating the time restrictions and limited choices of cable television and pay-per-view television. StreamHQ(TM)'s meta data and transaction data management and reporting functionalities can provide content owners with detailed information regarding their customers' viewing habits, as well as providing security against unauthorized viewing. Training - includes corporate and motivational training procedures and other instructional materials used in various fields, including medicine, architecture and design, and construction. Corporations and government entities will be able to track and verify that training materials have been viewed by the appropriate employees, while allowing employees to access training materials at their convenience and at remote locations (e.g., from home). USA Video's marketing plan involves partnering with major solutions and services providers in the industry in order to augment the offerings of these companies with USA Video's unique services and solutions and to leverage their sales and distribution channels. The Company is expanding its in-house and external sales forces for direct marketing to potential customers. The Company relies primarily on electronic on-line marketing collateral, not-cost media exposure, customer testimonials, and its own Zmail campaigns to increase awareness of its services and products. COMPETITION USA Video competes in the streaming media delivery market. This market is characterized by rapid growth, converging technologies, and frequent upgrades to new solutions that offer superior advantages. There are numerous vendors in each product and service category, but USA Video believes that only a relatively small number of competitors currently offer a package of consolidated "source-to-destination" services for delivering digital media and few, if any, provide unique value propositions to individual markets. USA Video expects that the overall number of competitors providing niche product solutions will increase due to the market's attractive growth potential. On the other hand, the Company expects the number of vendors supplying end-to-end networking solutions will not significantly increase for the foreseeable future due to the technological difficulties and costs in developing complete systems. The market is currently dominated by a small number of larger companies including Real Networks, Microsoft (via its Windows Media Player), Yahoo, Akamai, and several others, some of which offer end-to-end streaming media solutions. USA Video believes that the principal competitive factors in the markets in which the Company presently competes and may compete in the future are: o Price; o Product performance; o Time to market; o The ability to tailor end-to-end streaming solutions for specific business vertical markets; 8 o The ability to provide value-added features such as security and reliability; and o Market presence. Most of USA Video's current competitors have, and most potential competitors are expected to have, greater financial, marketing, and technical resources than the Company. The Company also faces competition from customers to whom it is seeking to license its technology, and from suppliers of some of its technology. The Company must cooperate and at the same time compete with these companies. The Company's inability to effectively manage these complicated relationships with customers and suppliers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results, and financial condition. ASSEMBLY The Company assembles its hardware systems - whether the system is for sale to a customer or for the purpose of supporting streaming media delivery services - from components manufactured by others. The Company's technical staff specifies, procures, assembles, tests and deploys the various system components according to a precisely developed set of procedures. The Company also consults, on an as-needed basis, with companies that supply the major components of its systems. USA Video's in-house software development team creates programs and configures products to meet a wide variety of individual customer requirements. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Prior to 1999, USA Video conducted seven years of research and development of its proprietary VoD technology. In 1999, USA Video's focus shifted to marketing and sales of its products and services, with research and development directed primarily at supporting sales and development of Wavelet compression technology. In 2000, the Company devoted substantial resources to development of its StreamHQ(TM) services and began development of its proprietary still and motion Wavelet technology, which has been completed as mathematical processes. In 2001, the Company redirected the Wavelet development effort toward the invention of a content protection technology that is grounded in similar science as Wavelet compression. The result is the Company's patent-pending digital fingerprinting technology for piracy deterrence. The industry in which USA Video competes is subject to rapid technological developments, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements, and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. As a result, the Company's success, in part, depends upon its ability, on a cost-effective and timely basis, to continue to enhance its existing solutions and to develop and introduce new solutions that improve performance. In order to achieve these objectives, the Company's management and engineering personnel work closely with customers to identify and respond to customer needs, as well as with other innovators of inter-networking products. Despite USA Video's efforts, there can be no assurance that it will be able to successfully develop new products to address new customer requirements and technological changes, or that such products will achieve market acceptance. In fiscal 2001, 2000, and1999, the Company's research and development expenditures were approximately $999,000, $620,000,and $93,000, respectively. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY USA Video's success is dependent, in part, upon its proprietary technology. The Company generally relies upon patents, trademarks, and trade secret laws to establish and maintain its proprietary rights in its technology products and services. USA Video applied for a U.S. patent for its Store and Forward VoD technology on February 1, 1990. Corresponding overseas applications were filed in several countries in 1992. USA Video was granted U.S. Patent #5,130,792 in July 1992. In June 2000, the U.S. Patent Office reinstated the patent, which had expired 9 because of an administrative oversight that led to late payment of fees due in 1995. On February 10, 1999, USA Video was granted patents on its Store and Forward VoD technology in five European countries: England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The technological characteristics of the European Patents are based on the U.S. Patent, covering systems for transmitting video programs to remote locations over a switched telephone network, and are similar in scope to the U.S. patent claims. On June 12, 2000 USA Video was granted a patent by the Canadian Intellectual Property office - Canadian Patent No. 2,064,111 Video Communication System. The technological characteristics of the Canadian patent covering systems for transmitting video programs from a first location to remote locations providing for communication of the programs over selected commercial telephone networks. An additional patent application is pending in Japan. On June 19, 2001, United States Patent Application No. 09/884,787, Method and Apparatus for Digitally Fingerprinting Videos, was officially filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. There can be no assurance that USA Video's current or future patents, if any, will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or that any rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to the Company. In addition, there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications, or that claims allowed on any future patents will be sufficiently broad to protect USA Video's technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not permit the protection of USA Video's proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. USA Video intends to enforce its proprietary rights through the use of licensing agreements and, when necessary, litigation. Although USA Video believes the protection afforded by its patents, patent applications, and trademarks has value, the rapidly changing technology in the video transmission industry makes the Company's future success dependent primarily on the innovative skills, technological expertise, and management abilities of its employees rather than on patent and trademark protection. EMPLOYEES As of March 26, 2002, the Company employed twenty people, including its two senior executive officers, eight technology personnel, three finance and administration personnel, and seven sales and marketing personnel. The Company considers the relationships with its employees to be good. The Company has not experienced any work stoppages. Competition for technical personnel in the industry that USA Video competes is intense. The Company's future success will depend, in part, on its continued ability to hire, assimilate, and retain qualified personnel. To date, USA Video believes it has been successful in recruiting qualified employees, but there is no assurance that the Company will continue to do so in the future. RISK FACTORS Set forth below and elsewhere in this Report are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. THE COMPANY'S LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE ITS BUSINESS AND PROSPECTS. USA Video has a very limited operating history. The Company has made only limited sales of its products and services and was in the development stage through December 31, 1999. USA Video's business and prospects must be considered in light of the risks encountered by companies in their early stages of development, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving markets such as streaming media. Some of these risks relate to the Company's ability to: o maintain or develop relationships with suppliers and marketing partners; o continue to expand its customer base and generate repeat business from existing customers; o continue to develop and upgrade its technology, products and services; o provide superior customer service; 10 o respond to competitive developments; and o retain and motivate qualified personnel. THE COMPANY HAS INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES; IT EXPECTS TO INCUR LOSSES IN THE FUTURE, AND MAY NEVER ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY. To date, USA Video has not been profitable, has not generated significant revenue from operations, and has incurred substantial losses. For the year ended December 31, 2001, USA Video had a net loss of $3,760,821. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $29,063,303 and a working capital deficit of $828,530. The Company intends to continue to expend significant financial and management resources on the development of its proposed products and services, and other aspects of its business. As a result, the Company expects operating losses and negative cash flows to increase for the foreseeable future. Consequently, USA Video will need to significantly increase its revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. The Company may be unable to do so. If USA Video's revenues grow more slowly than anticipated or if operating expenses increase more than expected, or are not reduced sufficiently, it may never achieve profitability. Because of factors discussed in this paragraph, USA Video's auditors, in their report on the Company's financial statements, have expressed substantial doubt concerning the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. IF USA VIDEO IS UNABLE TO OBTAIN SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL FINANCING IT MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REMAIN IN BUSINESS. USA Video requires substantial working capital to fund its business. The Company has had significant operating losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception of its current business and expects to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The Company's capital requirements will depend on several factors, including the rate of market acceptance of its products and services, the ability to establish and expand a client base and the growth and effectiveness of its sales and marketing efforts. USA Video estimates it will require from $3.0 to $3.5 million in financing to meet its working capital needs over the remainder of 2002 and substantial additional financing thereafter. Further, if capital requirements vary materially from those currently planned, the Company may require additional financing. The Company has no arrangements or commitments for any financing. Financing may not be available when needed on terms favorable to the Company, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may be unable to further develop or enhance its products and services, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or ultimately, to continue in business. THE COMPANY'S OPERATING RESULTS IN FUTURE PERIODS ARE EXPECTED TO BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATIONS, WHICH WOULD LIKELY AFFECT THE TRADING PRICE OF ITS COMMON SHARES. USA Video's quarterly and annual operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of its control. Some of these factors include: o its ability to attract and retain customers; o the introduction of new video transmission services or products by others; o price competition; o the continued development of and changes in the streaming media market; o its ability to remain competitive in its product and service offerings; o its ability to attract new personnel; and 11 o U.S. and foreign regulations relating to the Internet. As a result of the factors listed above, and others, period-to-period comparisons of USA Video's operating results may not be meaningful in predicting its future performance. It is possible that the Company's operating results will not meet market expectations in some future quarter or quarters, which would likely result in a significant decline in its stock price. THE STREAMING MEDIA BUSINESS IS HIGHLY COMPETITIVE, AND USA VIDEO'S FAILURE TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY WOULD LIMIT ITS ABILITY TO RETAIN AND INCREASE ITS MARKET SHARE. The streaming media market is new, rapidly evolving and extremely competitive. The Company expects competition to intensify in the future. The Company competes with companies that provide all or certain aspects of the Company's services, including other streaming media providers, content encoders, video production companies, Internet data management companies, and others, and expects that additional competition in the future will be provided by those types of providers and others. The Company's current market share is insignificant. The video streaming market is currently dominated by a small number of larger companies, including Real Networks, Microsoft, Yahoo, Akamai and several others, some of which offer source-to-destination streaming media solutions. Most of USA Video's current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater name recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than the Company. In addition, larger, well-established and well-financed entities may acquire, invest in or form joint ventures with online competitors as the use of the Internet and other online services increases. In addition, new technologies and the expansion of existing technologies are expected to result in additional competition. USA Video may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and any inability to do so could decrease its revenues, contribute to the Company not achieving profitability and adversely affect is ability to establish, maintain and increase its market share. THE MARKET FOR USA VIDEO'S PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IS RELATIVELY NEW AND IS EVOLVING, AND THE COMPANY'S SUCCESS WILL DEPEND ON ITS ABILITY TO ADAPT TO CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS. USA Video's future financial performance will depend in large part on the growth in demand for its streaming media services and products. This market is new and emerging, is rapidly evolving, is characterized by an increasing number of market entrants and will be subject to frequent and continuing changes in customer preferences and technology. As is typical in new and evolving markets, demand and market acceptance for the Company's products and services is subject to a high level of uncertainty. Because the market for the Company's products is evolving, it is difficult to assess or predict with any assurance the size or growth rate, if any, of this market. There can be no assurance that a significant market for the Company's products will develop, or that it will develop at an acceptable rate or that new competitors will not enter the market. In addition, even if a significant market develops for such products, there can be no assurance that the Company's products will be successful in such market. If a significant market fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected or attracts new competitors, or if USA Video's products do not achieve market acceptance, the Company's business prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. USA VIDEO IS SUBJECT TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, WHICH COULD RENDER THE COMPANY'S PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OBSOLETE. USA Video's future success will depend in part on its ability to offer products and services that incorporate leading technology and address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of its current and prospective customers. The Company's market is characterized by rapidly changing and unproven technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, emerging competition and 12 frequent new service introductions. Future advances in technology may not be beneficial to or compatible with USA Video's business. In addition, the Company may not be able to incorporate technological advances into its products and services in a cost-effective and timely basis. Keeping pace with the technological advances may require substantial expenditures and lead time, particularly with respect to acquiring updated hardware and infrastructure components of its systems. The Company may require additional financing to fund such acquisitions. Any such financing may not be available on commercially reasonably terms, if at all, when needed. USA VIDEO IS DEPENDENT UPON VENDORS AND OTHER THIRD PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS, AND WILL BE COMPETING WITH SOME OF THESE COMPANIES. USA Video is, and will continue to be dependent on vendors and other providers to supply the hardware, software and co-location resources that comprise the Company's products and services. The Company has no long-term or exclusive contracts or arrangements with any of these vendors or providers. The Company cannot be certain that its current and proposed vendors and service providers will continue to do business with the Company, or that it will be able to establish relationships with new vendors and service providers, if necessary. If the Company is unable to establish and maintain satisfactory relationships and arrangements with these third parties, the Company's business could be harmed. In addition, USA Video will be dependent upon its third party vendors and other suppliers to adequately test their products before release, and to provide support for the products after delivery. The failure of any of these third party providers to do so could have a material adverse effect on USA Video's business. Further, USA Video currently competes with, and expects to compete with in the future, providers of some of its technology or system components. USA Video's inability to, at the same time, effectively cooperate and compete with these companies could harm its business. IF USA VIDEO DOES NOT CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE ITS TECHNOLOGY IN A TIMELY MANNER, ITS PRODUCTS COULD BE RENDERED OBSOLETE. The markets for USA Video products and services are characterized by: o rapidly changing technology; o evolving industry standards; o frequent new product and service introductions; and o changing customer demands. These changes and developments may render the Company's products and technologies obsolete in the future. As a result, the Company's success depends on its ability to adapt to these changes, particularly to develop or adapt products and services or to acquire new products and services that can compete successfully. There can be no assurance that USA Video will be successful in these efforts. USA VIDEO'S SERVICES ARE COMPLEX AND THE COMPANY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PREVENT DEFECTS THAT COULD DECREASE THEIR MARKET ACCEPTANCE, RESULT IN PRODUCT LIABILITY OR HARM ITS REPUTATION. USA Video's streaming media products services are complex, and the steps the Company takes to ensure that they are free of errors or defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released, may not be successful. USA Video cannot guarantee that current versions or enhanced versions or its products will be free of significant software defects or bugs. Despite the Company's testing, and testing by its third-party vendors and providers, current or future products may contain serious defects. Serious defects or errors could result in lost revenue or a delay in market acceptance of the Company's products and could seriously harm its business and operating results. Errors in its products may be caused by defects in third-party hardware 13 or software incorporated into its products. If so, the Company may be unable to fix these defects without the cooperation of these third-party providers. Because these defects may not be as significant to these providers as they are to USA Video, the Company may not receive the rapid cooperation that it may require. Errors, defects or other performance problems with the Company's products could also harm its customers' businesses or result in potential product liability claims. Even if unsuccessful, a product liability claim brought against USA Video would likely be time-consuming, costly and harmful to its reputation. Nor can there be any assurance that the Company's product liability insurance coverage will be sufficient to satisfy any successful claim. USA VIDEO'S BUSINESS WILL BE HARMED IF IT FAILS TO MANAGE ITS GROWTH AND EXPANSION. USA Video must manage its growth effectively in order to successfully sell its products and services and achieve revenue growth and profitability in a rapidly evolving market. USA Video has expanded its operations substantially since inception of its current business. The Company anticipates continued expansion of its operations to pursue existing and potential market opportunities. USA Video's rapid growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on its management and operational resources. To be successful, the Company will need to: o implement additional management information systems; o improve its operational, financial and management controls; o hire, train and retain new employees; and o coordinate its executive, engineering, professional services, accounting, finance, marketing, sales and operations organizations. USA Video's growth has resulted, and any future growth will result, in increased responsibilities for management personnel, some of whom have been employed by the Company for relatively short periods of time. In addition, USA Video may not adequately anticipate all the demands that growth may impose on its systems, procedures and organizational structure. Any failure to anticipate and respond adequately to these demands or manage its growth effectively would harm its business. ANY LOSS OF THE COMPANY'S PERSONNEL OR INABILITY TO ADD NEW PERSONNEL COULD HARM THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS. USA Video's future success depends significantly on the continued services and performance of its senior management. The Company's performance also depends on its ability to retain and motivate its other key personnel. The loss of the services of any member of USA Video's senior management team or other key employees could cause significant disruption in the Company's business. USA Video has no long-term employment agreements with senior management and does not currently maintain any "key person" life insurance. The Company's future success also depends on its ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, managerial, operations, sales and marketing and customer service personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and USA Video may not successfully attract, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. The failure to retain and attract the necessary personnel could impede the Company's future success. 14 BECAUSE A SMALL NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS ACCOUNT FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF USA VIDEO'S REVENUE, IF IT LOSES A MAJOR CUSTOMER, ITS REVENUE COULD SUFFER. One customer accounted for approximately 61% of USA Video's revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001. The Company expects a small number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of its revenue for the foreseeable future. USA Video's inability to increase the number of its customers or the loss of any one major customer could limit the Company's ability to maintain or increase its market share, or could cause revenue to drop quickly and unexpectedly. USA VIDEO'S BUSINESS MAY SUFFER IF IT CANNOT PROTECT ITS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. USA Video seeks to protect its proprietary rights through a combination of patents, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions with employees and third parties. Despite its efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of the Company's products or obtain and use information that it considers as proprietary. Litigation may be necessary to enforce USA Video's intellectual property rights, to protect its trade secrets and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Any litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and other resources with no assurance of success and could seriously harm USA Video's business and operating results. USA VIDEO'S PRODUCTS MAY INFRINGE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OTHERS, CAUSE IT TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS OR PREVENT IT FROM LICENSING ITS PRODUCTS. Other companies, including USA Video's competitors, may have or obtain patents or other proprietary rights that would prevent, limit or interfere with the Company's ability to make, use or license its products. The Company cannot be certain that its products do not and will not infringe patents or other proprietary rights of others. USA Video may be subject to legal proceedings, including claims of alleged infringement by it of the intellectual property rights of third parties. If a successful claim of infringement is brought against USA Video and it fails to or is unable to license the infringed technology on commercially reasonable terms, the Company's business and operating results could be significantly harmed. Companies in the technology market are increasingly bringing suits alleging infringement of their proprietary rights, particularly patent rights. Although USA Video is not currently subject to any litigation or claims, any future claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources with no assurance of success. Intellectual property litigation or claims could force USA Video to do one or more of the following: o cease selling, incorporating or using products or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; o obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all; or o redesign it products or services. If USA Video is forced to take any of these actions, its business could be substantially harmed. USA VIDEO'S INFRASTRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND OTHER UNEXPECTED EVENTS, AND THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY OF THESE EVENTS COULD AFFECT ITS ABILITY TO OPERATE ITS BUSINESS. USA Video's video streaming services will be provided, in large part, from its offices located in southeastern Connecticut. A major equipment failure or a natural disaster affecting this location could impair the Company's ability to 15 operate its business, which could also severely disrupt its operations. USA Video currently does not have a formal disaster recovery plan or an alternative provider of services. Additionally, the Company currently does not carry business interruption insurance to compensate it for any losses that it may sustain. USA VIDEO'S SHARE OWNERSHIP IS CONCENTRATED IN CERTAIN SHAREHOLDERS, WHICH COULD MAKE MORE DIFFICULT OR PREVENT A CHANGE IN CONTROL OR OTHER TRANSACTIONS. The interest of management could conflict with the interest of USA Video's other shareholders. USA Video's executive officers, directors and principal shareholders beneficially own, assuming the exercise of all options and warrants held by them, an aggregate of 18.58% of the Company's outstanding common shares. As a result, these shareholders will be able to exercise greater control over all matters requiring shareholder approval than other shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of USA Video, and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these shareholders, including proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, and open-market share purchase programs that could give the Company's shareholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the common shares, which in turn could reduce the market price of the Company's shares. USA VIDEO'S SUCCESS DEPENDS ON THE CONTINUED GROWTH IN DEMAND FOR E-BUSINESS APPLICATIONS. USA Video's primary business strategy involves the development of products and services that enable users to transmit video over the Internet. As a result, its future sales and any future profits will be substantially dependent upon the widespread acceptance and use of the Internet as an effective medium of business by consumers and businesses. To be successful, consumers and businesses that historically have used traditional means of commerce to transact business must continue to accept and utilize the Internet as a medium for conducting business and exchanging information. Consumers and businesses may reject the Internet as a viable commercial medium for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate network infrastructure, slow development of enabling technologies, insufficient commercial support and privacy concerns. In addition, delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity or increased government regulation could cause the Internet to lose its viability as a commercial medium. If the demand for e-business applications does not grow or grows more slowly than expected, demand for USA Video's products and services would be reduced and its revenue would suffer. GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND LEGAL UNCERTAINTIES COULD ADD ADDITIONAL COSTS AND RISKS TO DOING BUSINESS ON THE INTERNET AND COULD HARM THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS. USA Video is not currently subject to direct regulation by any governmental agency, other than regulations applicable to businesses generally, export control laws and laws or regulations directly applicable to electronic commerce. However, due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet covering issues such as: user privacy, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, and characteristics and quality of products and services. Furthermore, the growth and development of the market for electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. The adoption of additional laws or regulations may decrease the growth of the Internet or other online services, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for the Company's products and services and increase its cost of doing business. The applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, export or import matters, obscenity and personal privacy is uncertain. The vast majority of such laws were adopted prior to the 16 advent of the Internet and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes to such laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes, could create uncertainty in the Internet marketplace. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for the Company's products and services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased costs of litigation or increased service delivery costs. THE COMPANY'S SHARE PRICE HAS BEEN AND COULD BE HIGHLY VOLATILE, WHICH COULD RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES TO INVESTORS. The trading price of the Company's common shares has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors including: variations in quarterly operating results; new products or services offered by the Company or its competitors; conditions or trends in the Internet and online commerce industries; changes in the economic performance and/or market valuations of other Internet and online service companies; and other events or factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for Internet-related and technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, including large price drops in 2000 and 2001, that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially adversely affect the market price of the Company's common shares, regardless of the Company's actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against such companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources. ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN USA VIDEO'S CHARTER DOCUMENTS COULD PREVENT OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL OF THE COMPANY. USA Video's Articles of Continuance and bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that could discourage, delay or even prevent an acquisition of the Company at a premium price or at all. Any of these provisions might prevent the market price of the USA Video common shares from increasing in response to takeover attempts, and could prevent the Company's shareholders from realizing a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the common shares. USA VIDEO INTENDS TO ISSUE ADDITIONAL EQUITY SECURITIES, WHICH MAY DILUTE THE INTERESTS OF CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS OR CARRY RIGHTS OR PREFERENCES SENIOR TO THE COMMON SHARES. USA Video intends to issue additional equity securities in order to raise working capital. Accordingly, existing shareholders may experience additional dilution of their percentage ownership interest in the Company. In addition, the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of the Company's common shares. LIMITED LIABILITY OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS MAY DISCOURAGE SHAREHOLDERS FROM BRINGING A LAWSUIT AGAINST THEM. USA Video's bylaws contain provisions that limit the liability of directors for monetary damages and provide for indemnification of officers and directors. These provisions may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against officers and directors for breaches of fiduciary duty and may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against officers and directors even though such action, if successful, might otherwise have benefited the shareholders. In addition, a shareholder's investment in USA Video may be adversely affected to the extent that costs of settlement and damage awards against officers or directors are paid by USA Video pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the bylaws. 17 REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEC WITH REGARD TO LOW-PRICED "PENNY STOCKS" MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF SHAREHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR SHARES IN THE SECONDARY MARKET. "Penny stocks" are low-priced, and usually highly speculative, stock selling at less than $5.00 per share. USA Video's securities are subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors" (generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse). For transactions covered by this rule, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to sale. The rule also requires the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also disclose the commissions payable for the transaction, current quotations for the stock, and, if applicable, the fact that it is the sole market maker in the stock. Consequently, the rule may adversely affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell USA Video's securities and may adversely affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares in the secondary market. USA VIDEO DOES NOT ANTICIPATE PAYING DIVIDENDS TO SHAREHOLDERS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. USA Video has not paid dividends on its common shares and intends, for the foreseeable future, to invest any earnings in the further development of its business. Accordingly, shareholders should not expect to receive any dividends on their shares. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. USA Video headquarters and executive offices are located in Mystic, Connecticut. USA Video leases 1,116 square feet for an annual base rent of $20,400. The lease expired in 2000, and the Company occupies the facility on a month-to-month basis. USA Video leases an additional 1,547 square feet of office space in Mystic, Connecticut at an annual base rent of $18,108. The lease expired in 2000, and the Company occupies the facility on a month-to-month basis. USA Video also leases 600 square feet of office space located in Mystic, Connecticut, on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rent of $800. USA Video also leases 147 square feet of office space located in Mystic, Connecticut, on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rent of $320. USA Video also leases 800 square feet of office space located in Vancouver, British Columbia, on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rent of $1,780. USA Video believes that it will require additional space to accommodate its expanding operations. The Company is currently seeking to lease new facilities in the southeastern Connecticut area in which to consolidate the activities of its two present offices in Mystic, Connecticut. The Company believes that adequate space is available in this area at commercially reasonable rates. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. USA Video is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. No matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report. 18 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. There is a limited public market for the common shares of the Company. The common shares trade on the Canadian Venture Exchange (the "CDNX") (under the symbol "US"), and on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board (under the symbol "USVO"). From May 3, 2000 through August 28, 2000, the common shares were traded in the pink sheets published by the National Quotation Bureau. The following table shows the high and low sales prices (in Canadian dollars) of the common shares as reported by the CDNX for the periods indicated. Canadian Venture Exchange (Symbol "US") Quarter High Low ------- ---- --- ($CAN) ($CAN) First Quarter 2000 15.00 1.25 Second Quarter 2000 6.90 2.06 Third Quarter 2000 5.20 3.52 Fourth Quarter 2000 4.25 0.72 First Quarter 2001 2.60 0.70 Second Quarter 2001 1.19 0.62 Third Quarter 2001 0.85 0.35 Fourth Quarter 2001 0.67 0.33 The following table shows the high and low prices of the common shares on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board (and in the pink sheets for the period May 3, 2000 to August 28, 2000). The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions: OTC Bulletin Board/Pink Sheets (Symbol "USVO") Period High Low ------ ---- --- ($US) ($US) First Quarter 2000 10.25 0.85 Second Quarter 2000 4.969 1.315 Third Quarter 2000 4.35 2.06 Fourth Quarter 2000 2.844 0.375 First Quarter 2001 7.74 0.47 Second Quarter 2001 0.77 0.38 Third Quarter 2001 0.60 0.22 Fourth Quarter 2001 0.4125 0.21 19 As of March 26, 2002, there were 91,745,088 common shares outstanding, held by 1,270 shareholders of record. To date, the Company has not paid any dividends on its common shares and does not expect to declare or pay any dividends on such common shares in the foreseeable future. Payment of any dividends will depend upon future earnings, if any, the financial condition of the Company, and other factors as deemed relevant by the Company's Board of Directors. All sales of securities made by USA Video during the year ended December 31, 2001 that were not registered under the Securities Act have been disclosed in USA Video's reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 30, 2001, June 30, 2001 and September 30, 2001. The sales did not involve the use of an underwriter and no commissions were paid in connection with the sale of any of these securities. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. The following table presents selected historical financial data. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 are derived from USA Video's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, which have been audited by Amisano Hanson (1999) and Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP (2000 and 2001), independent auditors. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with USA Video's consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, and the information in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
December 31, Item 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 Revenue $124,006 $638,592 $20,500 -- -- Net loss ($3,760,821) ($4,661,652) ($1,684,468) ($981,598) ($678,156) Loss per share ($.04) ($.06) ($.03) ($.02) ($0.02) Total assets $1,382,178 $1,744,071 $995,351 $435,232 $418,354 Long-term obligations -- -- -- -- -- Cash dividends per share -- -- -- -- --
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION. OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY USA Video was a development-stage company from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1999, during which time it engaged primarily in the development of its end-to-end hardware systems and proprietary VoD and Wavelet compression technologies, and had very limited sales. In 2000, the Company made the first substantial sales of its end-to-end systems, and invested heavily in further development of its StreamHQ(TM) streaming media services. USA Video is transitioning its business from hardware sales to the providing of streaming media services and expects that the design and development of the first phase of its StreamHQ(TM) services will be completed during the second or third quarter of 2001. The development of StreamHQ(TM) has involved technology development, hardware and software selection and integration, and the cultivation of partnerships with suppliers and providers of services. The continued development and expansion of the Company's business will require ongoing investment in back-office systems, affiliations with network service providers and others, and increasing technical and sales/marketing staffs. As more fully discussed below, in this Management's Discussion section of this Report, the Company has not been profitable, and has not had significant 20 revenues. USA Video cannot predict its revenue levels for the next 12 months, or thereafter, nor when, or if, its operations will become profitable. The Company's expenses will continue to increase as it further develops its technology and StreamHQ(TM) services, and increases its marketing and sales efforts. USA Video will require additional financing, both for the remainder of fiscal 2001 and thereafter, to continue to operate and expand its business. There is no assurance that such financing will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REVENUES Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2001 ("fiscal 2001") were $124,006, compared with $638,592 for the year ended December 31, 2000 ("fiscal 2000"). The Company had revenues of $20,500 for the year ended December 31, 1999 ("fiscal 1999"). Approximately forty percent (40%) of revenues for fiscal 2001 were derived from sales of the Company's hardware and software systems and approximately sixty percent (60%) were from provision of engineering services. The Company had one major customer who accounted for 61% of total revenues in fiscal 2001, and three major customers who, in the aggregate, accounted for 82% of total revenues in fiscal 2000, and one customer who accounted for all revenue in fiscal 1999. EXPENSES Total expenses for fiscal 2001 were $3,892,845, compared with $5,291,663 for fiscal 2000 and $1,598,826 for fiscal 1999. For fiscal 2001, cost of sales was $66,770, as compared with $393,496 for fiscal 2000 and $19,199 for fiscal 1999. Research and development costs for fiscal 2001 were $999,058, as compared to $620,212 for fiscal 2000 and $93,337 for 1999. The increase in fiscal 2001 and 2000 was due primarily to development work on the Company's new services-based multi-mode rich media streaming solution, StreamHQ(TM), which required increased expenditures for manpower, equipment and software. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,833,440 for fiscal 2001, as compared with $2,599,591 for fiscal 2000, and $1,372,928 for fiscal 1999. Selling, general and administrative expenses consisted of marketing expenses, consulting fees, office, professional fees, and other expenses to execute the Company's business plan and for day-to-day operations. The decreases resulted from the Company's focus on developing products (StreamHQ(TM)). The primary components of the decreases from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 were: - a $284,911 decrease in fiscal 2001 in marketing expenses, as the Company revamped marketing objectives and strategies to isolate on the release of StreamHQ(TM) late in the third quarter. The marketing staff continues to identify and assess appropriate market segments, develop business arrangements with prospective partners, create awareness of new products and services, and communicate to the industry and potential customers; - a decrease of $236,458 (fiscal 2001) for administrative wages and salaries and other office expenses; and - a $81,203 decrease in advertising in fiscal 2001, as the Company, replaced media advertising with an increased sales force. Selling, general and administrative expenses consisted of marketing expenses, consulting fees, office, professional fees, and other expenses to execute the Company's business plan and for day-to-day operations. The substantial year-to-year increases resulted from the Company's increased efforts to bring products to market. The primary components of the increases fiscal 2000 to fiscal 1999 were: o a $496,743 increase in fiscal 2000, and a $212,590 increase in fiscal 1999, in marketing expenses, as the Company hired additional staff and engaged in marketing activities to identify and assess appropriate market segments, develop 21 business arrangements with prospective partners, create awareness of new products and services, and communicate to the industry and potential customers; o increases of $326,098 (fiscal 2000) and $239,644 (fiscal 1999) for administrative wages and salaries and other office expenses; and o a $221,231 increase in professional fees in fiscal 2000, as the Company, in connection with becoming a reporting issuer in the United States, required increased levels of accounting and legal services. Additional expenses included depreciation and amortization of $407,880 for fiscal 2001, compared to $224,581 for fiscal 2000 and $113,362 for fiscal 1999, as the Company added machinery and equipment necessary for the development of new products and services. Non-cash compensation charges for fiscal 2001 were $ 585,697 and fiscal 2000 were $1,453,783, due mostly to issuance of common shares and common share warrants to the Company's officers, directors and employees at a price or exercise price below the market price of the common shares at the time of issuance. Because the rules of the Canadian Venture Exchange require that the offering price for privately placed securities of listed companies be set when the offering is first announced rather than upon closing, the sale price of the common shares and the exercise price of the warrants were below the market price of the common shares on the date of issuance. Other decreases in expenses included printing, as materials were produced in-house, and website related expenses were performed by in-house staff. With the release of StreamHQ(TM) the Company will expand its business, its product development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses will continue to increase. Product development expenses will increase as the Company adds engineering personnel to its technology and Web development teams, and as its new technologies are integrated into its product line. Sales and marketing expenses will increase as the Company adds business development, sales, and marketing personnel to build business relationships and brand awareness. Advertising and public relations expenses also will increase as the Company grows its business. General and administrative expenses will increase as the Company continues to build its management infrastructure, including additional personnel, office space and internal information systems. NET LOSSES To date, the Company has not achieved profitability and expects to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future. The Company's net loss for fiscal 2001 was $3,760,821, compared with a net loss of $4,661,652 for fiscal 2000, and $1,657,078 for fiscal 1999. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES At December 31, 2001, the Company's cash position was $104,238, a decrease of $126,959 from December 31, 2000. The Company had a working capital deficit of $828,530 and an accumulated deficit of $29,063,303 at December 31, 2001. The Company's principal source of cash during fiscal 2001 was proceeds of $3,140,303 received upon exercise of warrants and from private placements of its equity securities. This was offset by $2,707,658 of cash used in operating activities and $559,604 for purchase of equipment. The Company has historically satisfied its capital needs primarily by issuing equity securities to its officers, directors, employees and a small group of investors, and from short-term bridge loans from members of management. During fiscal 2001, the Company completed three private placements, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $3,067,391. In the first offering, the Company sold 2,500,000 units, each consisting of one common share and one warrant to acquire an additional share at $0.66 per share by March 12, 2003, at $0.54 per unit, for total proceeds of $1,333,260. In the second offering, the Company sold 4,000,000 units at $0.27 per unit for $1,074,131 in proceeds. Each unit consisted of one (1) common share and one (1) 22 share purchase warrant to purchase one (1) common share at $0.35 per share, exercisable until September 28, 2003. In the third offering, the Company sold 3,300,000 units, each consisting of one common share and one warrant to acquire an additional share at $0.26 per share by December 31, 2003, at $0.20 per unit, for total proceeds of $660,000. The Company also received proceeds of $72,912 from the exercise of outstanding warrants in fiscal 2001. The Company's independent accountants, in their report accompanying the Company's audited financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2001, have stated that there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had $104,238 in cash. The Company will require an additional $3.0 million to $3.5 million to finance operations for the fiscal 2002 and intends to obtain such financing through sales of its equity securities. The threat to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern will be removed only when revenues have reached a level that sustains the Company's business operations. Assuming the aforementioned $3.0 million to $3.5 million in financing is obtained, continuing operations for the longer-term will be supported through anticipated growth in revenues and through additional sales of the Company's securities. Although longer-term financing requirements may vary depending upon the Company's sales performance, management expects that the Company will require additional financing of $5.0 million to $6.0 million for fiscal 2003. The Company has no binding commitments or arrangements for additional financing, and there is no assurance that management will be able to obtain any additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK. USA Video believes its exposure to overall foreign currency risk is not material. USA Video does not manage or maintain market risk sensitive instruments for trading or other purposes and is not exposed to the effects of interest rate fluctuations as it does not carry any long-term debt. USA Video reports its operations in US dollars and its currency exposure, although considered by USA Video as immaterial, is primarily between the US and Canadian dollars. Exposure to other currency risks is also not material as international transactions are settled in US dollars. Any future financing undertaken by USA Video will be denominated in US dollars. As USA Video increases its marketing efforts, the related expenses will be primarily in US dollars. In addition, 90% of USA Video's bank deposits are maintained in U.S. dollars. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. The financial statements and supplementary financial information required to be filed under this item are presented on pages F-1 through F-19 of this Report and are incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. In a current report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2001, USA Video reported that on February 2, 2001, it engaged Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP to replace Amisano Hanson as the Company's auditors. There have been no transactions or events required to be reported pursuant to Item 304 (b) of Regulation S-K. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT. The following table sets forth the name, age, position, and period of service in his present position of each director and executive officer of USA Video: 23
Name Age Position Period of Service Edwin Molina 46 Director, Chief Executive Officer and President Since 1998 Anton J. Drescher (1) 45 Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Since 1994 Robert D. Smith Jr. (1) 51 Director and Chief Operating Officer Since 2000 Kent Norton 42 Chief Information/Chief Technical Officer Since 2000 Matthew W. Kinnaman (2) 41 Vice President, Strategic Innovation Since 2000 Daniel E. Kinnaman 45 Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing Since 2001
(1) Member of the Audit Committee (2) Resigned as an officer effective December 31, 2001 Anton Drescher, Edwin Molina, and Anthony Castagno were elected directors of USA Video in June 2001. Mr. Castagno resigned as an officer and director on August 31, 2001, and Robert D. Smith was appointed director to replace Mr. Castagno. Each director will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and his successor is elected and qualified. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY: EDWIN MOLINA - PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR Mr. Molina served as a Senior Administrator with USA Video from June 1992 to June 30, 1998, when he was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and a director. Mr. Molina was also a Senior Administrator with Adnet USA LLC, a private California company involved in Internet advertising, from May 1996 to June 1998. ANTON J. DRESCHER - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR Mr. Drescher has been Chief Financial Officer of USA Video since December 1994. He has also been a director and Secretary/ Treasurer of Cal-Star, Inc. (formerly Future Link Systems Inc.) a public company listed on the Canadian Venture Exchange, which has been designated as an inactive issuer; Director and Secretary/Treasurer of IQuest Networks Inc. (formerly Interlink Systems Inc. and Glassmaster Industries, Inc.), a public company listed on The Canadian Venture Exchange ("CDNX") involved in digital audio distribution since 1996; President of Westpoint Management Consultants Limited, a private company engaged in tax and accounting consulting for business reorganizations since 1979; President of Harbour Pacific Capital Corp., a private British Columbia company involved in regulatory filings for businesses in Canada, since 1998; and, since 1991, a director and President of International Tower Hill Mines Limited, a public British Columbia company listed on the CDNX and involved in mineral exploration. Mr. Drescher has been a Certified Management Accountant since 1981. ROBERT D. SMITH, JR. - CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND DIRECTOR Mr. Smith joined USA Video in August 2000 as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Smith was formerly a vice president at Sonalysts Inc., of Waterford, Connecticut, where, for 22 years, he helped build the company into a $50 million, nearly 500-person international e-business, multimedia, software and engineering corporation. Mr. Smith graduated with distinction from the U.S. Naval Academy, where he was a Trident Scholar and earned a B.S. degree in oceanography and engineering. He served in a variety of officer positions in the nuclear submarine Navy prior to leaving active duty. Concurrent with his employment at Sonalysts, Inc. he continued to serve in the Naval Reserve, having recently retired with the rank of Captain. 24 KENT NORTON - CHIEF INFORMATION/CHIEF TECHNICAL OFFICER Mr. Norton joined USA Video in May 2000 as Chief Information Officer, and in addition, was appointed Chief Technical Officer in September 2000. From January 2000 to June 2000, Mr. Norton was Director of Technology and Information Systems with beenz.com, which was creating a universal, incentive-based currency for on-line merchants. Mr. Norton was employed by Computer Sciences Corporation from 1996 to January 2000, and from 1991 to 1994. His last position at Computer Sciences Corporation was senior manager, where he was responsible for the design of a global technical support infrastructure for the company's "help desks" around the world. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Norton held a senior technology position with Sonalysts, Inc. Mr. Norton holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil & Structural Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. MATTHEW W. KINNAMAN - VICE PRESIDENT, STRATEGIC INNOVATION Mr. Kinnaman joined USA Video in May 2000 as Vice President of Strategic Innovation. From April 1998 to March 2000, Mr. Kinnaman was employed at Gilder Technology Group, which, with Forbes Magazine, co-publishes George Gilder's investment strategy newsletter, the Gilder Technology Report. While at Gilder Technology Group, Mr. Kinnaman was Editorial Director of Conferences, Director of Research and Communication, Director of Business Development and Associate Editor. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Kinnaman was Director of Development and ProgramDirector for New England Keswich, Inc., a non-denominational Christian camp. DANIEL E. KINNAMAN - SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, SALES AND MARKETING Mr. Kinniman joined USA Video in October 2001 as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Kinnaman was the Executive Vice President and Group Publisher for Professional Media Group LLC. In this position, he was responsible for the publication of two nationally circulated technology and education magazines and directed the advertising sales, editorial content, and overall business direction of these publications. For the past fifteen years, Mr. Kinnaman has been a prominent speaker, writer, and independent advisor specializing in the business and education opportunities presented by emerging computer and networking technologies. He was instrumental in guiding the marketing strategy of Compaq Computer Corporation's education Division during a three-year period during which the division's sales grew considerably. Mr. Kinnaman holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing from The University of Connecticut and a Master of Arts in Education from The University of Connecticut. Mathew W. Kinnaman and Daniel Kinnaman are brothers. There are no other family relationship among any of the Company's executive officers and directors. SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Section 16"), requires that reports of beneficial ownership of capital stock and changes in such ownership be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") by Section 16 "reporting persons," including directors, certain officers, and holders of more than 10% of the outstanding common shares. The Company is required to disclose in this Annual Report on Form 10-K each reporting person whom it knows to have failed to file any required reports under Section 16 on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to it and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, the Company's officers, directors and 10% shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them except as follows: 1. Mr. Molina failed to file a Form 4 with respect to: (i) his disposition of 15,000 common shares in eight transactions in May 2000; (ii) his disposition of 35,000 common shares in 11 transactions in June 2000; (iii) his acquisition from the Company of 200,000 common shares and of warrants to purchase 200,000 common shares in August 2000; (iv) his disposition of 10,000 common shares in two transactions, and his acquisition of 875,000 common shares upon the exercise of warrants, in September 2000; and (v) his acquisition of 650,000 common shares upon the exercise of warrants in October 2000. Mr. Molina failed to file a timely Form 5 with respect to the transactions described above. Mr. Molina filed a Form 5 in March 2001 with respect to such transactions. 25 2. Mr. Smith failed to file a timely Form 3 with respect to his ownership of securities of the Company in August 2000, upon becoming an executive officer. Mr. Smith failed to file a timely Form 5 with respect to his acquisition in December 2000, of options to purchase 200,000 common shares at $1.00 per share. Mr. Smith filed a Form 3 and a Form 5 in March 2001, and an amended Form 5 in March 2001, with respect to his initial ownership and the acquisition transaction. 3. Mr. Norton failed to file a timely Form 5 with respect to: (i) his acquisition in September 2000 of options to purchase 25,000 common shares at $3.35 per share; (ii) his acquisition in December 2000 of options to purchase 100,000 common shares at $1.00 per share; and (iii) the repricing, in December 2000 of options to purchase 100,000 common shares from $2.00 to $1.00 per share. In addition, Mr. Norton failed to file a Form 4 with respect to his acquisition in September 2000 of 25,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of a previously granted stock option. Mr. Norton filed a Form 5 and an amended Form 5 in March 2001 with respect to these transactions. 4. Mr. Matt Kinnaman failed to file a Form 4 with respect to: (i) his acquisition by gift of 10,000 common shares in May 2000; (ii) his sales of 2,000 common shares in one transaction in June 2000; and (iii) his sales of 8,000 common shares in two transactions in September 2000, and a timely Form 5 with respect to the repricing in December 2000 of options to purchase 100,000 common shares from $2.00 to $1.00 per share. Mr. Kinnaman filed a Form 5 in March 2001 with respect to these transactions. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. The following table sets forth compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to USA Video's Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and to other persons serving as executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2001, whose salary and bonus for such year exceeded $100,000 (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers") for the last three completed fiscal years.
Long-Term Compensation -------------------------------------------------- Summary Compensation Table Awards Payouts Annual Compensation ---------------------------------- --------------------- Name and ------------------------------------------------ Restricted Securities Principal Other Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Award(s) Options/SARs Payouts Compensation --------- ------ -------- ---------- ------------- --------- ------------- ------- ------------ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Molina, 2001 $124,910 -0- $125,000(4) -0- -0- -0- -0- Edwin 2000 $128,361 -0- $500,000(5) -0- -0- -0- -0- (CEO) 1999 $120,999(1) -0- $200,665(6) -0- 1,200,000 -0- -0- Drescher 2001 $120,000(2) -0- $200,000(7) -0- 200,000 -0- -0- Anton, 2000 $120,000(2) -0- $500,000(8) -0- 200,000 -0- -0- (CFO) 1999 $120,000(2) -0- $159,665(9) -0- 1,000,000 -0- -0- Castagno, 2001 $82,496 v -0- $25,000(10) -0- 1,100,000 -0- -0- Anthony (EVP) 2000 $125,722 -0- $125,000(11) -0- 1,100,000 -0- -0- 1999 $120,000(3) -0- $194,300(12) -0- 250,000 -0- -0- Smith, 2001 $89,412 v -0- $22,900(13-15) -0- -0- -0- -0-
(1) Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Molina for his services as an executive officer of the company. 26 (2) Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Drescher through Harbour Pacific Capital Corp., a consulting firm wholly-owned by him, for his services as an executive officer of the Company. (3) Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Castagno for his services as an executive officer of the Company. (4) In March 2001, Mr. Molina purchased 250,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.66 per share) at $0.54 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.54 purchase price and the $0.66 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $0.84 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (5) In July 2000, Mr. Molina purchased 200,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $1.50 per share) at $1.50 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $1.50 purchase price and the $1.50 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $2.75 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (6) From February through May, 1999, Mr. Molina exercised stock options for an aggregate of 800,000 shares at an exercise price of $.067 per share, resulting in compensation of $200,665. (7) In March 2001, Mr. Drescher purchased 400,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.66 per share) at $0.54 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.54 purchase price and the $0.66 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $0.84 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (8) In July 2000, Mr. Drescher purchased 200,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $1.50 per share) at $1.50 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $1.50 purchase price and the $1.50 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $2.75 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (9) From February through June 1999, Mr. Drescher exercised stock options for an aggregate of 1,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $.067 per share, resulting in compensation of $147,800. In 1999, Mr. Drescher received interest totalling $12,965 on loans made to USA Video. (9) In January 1998, Mr. Drescher exercised stock options for 500,000 common shares at an exercise price of $.067 per share, resulting in compensation of $10,050. In 1998, Mr. Drescher received interest totalling $24,379 on loans made to USA Video. (10) In March 2001, Mr. Castagno purchased 50,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.66 per share) at $0.54 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.54 purchase price and the $0.66 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $0.84 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (11) In July 2000, Mr. Castagno purchased 50,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $1.50 per share) at $1.50 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $1.50 purchase price and the $1.50 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $2.75 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (12) In July 1999, Mr. Castagno exercised stock options for 250,000 common shares at an exercise price of $.067 per share, resulting in compensation of $194,300. (13) In March 2001, Mr. Smith purchased 40,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.66 per share) at $0.54 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.54 purchase price and the $0.66 warrant exercise price and the fair market price of $0.84 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. 27 (14) In September 2001, Mr. Smith purchased 45,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.35 per share) at $0.27 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.27 purchase price and the fair market price of $0.29 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. (15) In December 2001, Mr. Smith purchased 100,000 units (each comprised of one common share and one warrant to acquire one common share at $0.26 per share) at $0.20 per unit. This compensation resulted from the difference between the $0.20 purchase price and the fair market price of $0.22 of the common shares on the date of issuance of the units. The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of stock options to the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2001.
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rate of Stock Individual Grants Price Appreciation for Option Term -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of % of Total Market Securities Options/SARs Price on Underlying Granted to Exercise Date of Options/ SARs Employees in Price Grant Expiration 0% 5% 10% Granted Fiscal Year(1) ($/Share) ($/Share) Date ($) ($) ($) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Molina, Edwin -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Drescher, Anton -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Castagno, Anthony -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Smith, Robert -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
(1) A total of 250,000 stock options were granted to employees and consultants in 2001. The following table sets forth certain information concerning exercises of stock options by the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2001 and stock options held at year end. Aggregated Option / SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option / SAR Values
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options / SARs Options / SARs at FY-End (#) At FY-End ($)- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shares Acquired on Value Realized Exercisable/ Exercisable/ Name Exercise (#) ($) Unexercisable Unexercisable(1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Molina, Edwin -0- -0- 0 / 0 N/A / $0 Drescher, Anton -0- -0- 200,000 / 0 N/A(2) / $0 Castagno, Anthony -0- -0- 1,100,000 / 0 N/A(3) / $0 Smith, Robert -0- -0- 325,000 / 0 N/A(4) / $0
(1) On December 31, 2001, the average of the high and low bid prices of the common shares on the OTC BB was $0.22 (the "December 31, 2001 OTC BB bid price"). (2) Mr. Drescher's 200,000 options, with an exercise price of $1.00, were not in the money based on the December 31, 2001 OTC BB bid price. 28 (3) Mr. Castagno's 1,100,000 options with an exercise prices of (300,000 @ $5.00, 100,000 @ $2.00 and 700,000 @ $1.00) were not in the money based on the December 31, 2001 OTC BB bid price. (4) Mr. Smith's 325,000 options with an exercise prices of (125,000 @ $2.00 and 200,000 @ $1.00) were not in the money based on the December 31, 2001 OTC BB bid price. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS Directors receive no compensation for their service as such. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS The Company entered into Management Agreements with the following directors and officers as of August 7th, 2001 for a term of one year from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001. All of the Agreements were subsequently renewed for one year terms. o Edwin Molina - President and Chief Executive Officer o Robert D. Smith, Jr. - Chief Operating Officer o Kent Norton - Chief Information Officer and Chief Technical Officer o Matt Kinnaman - Vice-President, Strategic Innovation o Harbour Pacific Capital Corp. - financial services (owned by Anton J. Drescher) USA Video does not have an employment contract with Mr. Molina or any other Named Executive Officer. The Company has no obligation to provide any compensation to Mr. Molina or any other Named Executive Officer in the event of his resignation, retirement or termination, or a change in control of the Company, or a change in any Named Executive Officers' responsibilities following a change in control. USA Video may in the future create retirement, pension, profit sharing, insurance and medical reimbursement plans covering its Executive Officers and Directors. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. The following table sets forth as of March 26, 2001, the number of outstanding common shares of USA Video beneficially owned by (i) each person known to USA Video to beneficially own more than 5% of its outstanding common shares, (ii) each director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer, and (iv) all officers and directors as a group.
Name Shares Owned Percentage of Class ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Edwin Molina 4,824,424 (1) 5.18% Anton J. Drescher 5,681,855 (2) 6.09% Robert D. Smith 1,595,000 (3) 1.72% All Executive Officers & Directors as a Group [six persons] 14,616,279 (4) 15.00%
(1) Includes 900,000 shares underlying options and 450,000 shares underlying warrants that are currently exercisable. Mr. Molina's address is 70 Essex Street, Mystic, Connecticut. (2) Includes 950,000 shares underlying options and 600,000 shares underlying warrants that are currently exercisable. Mr. Drescher's address is 70 Essex Street, Mystic, Connecticut. (3) Includes 825,000 shares underlying options and 185,000 shares underlying warrants. Mr. Smith's address is 70 Essex Street, Mystic, Connecticut. (4) Includes 4,050,000 shares underlying options and 1,642,500 shares underlying warrants. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. In 2001, the Company paid consulting fees of $120,000 to Harbour Pacific Capital Corp., a company controlled by Anton J. Drescher, in consideration of Mr. Drescher's services as an executive officer of the Company. 29 In March 2001, USA Video completed a private placement of 2,500,000 units (each unit consisting of one common share and one warrant to purchase an additional common share at $.66 per share) for $.54 per unit, of which 1,585,000 units were sold to outside investors and 915,000 units were sold to officers, directors, and employees of the Company. Because the rules of the Canadian Venture Exchange require that the offering price for privately placed securities of listed companies be set when the offering is first announced rather than upon closing, the sale price of the units and the exercise price of the warrants were below the market price of $.84 of the common shares on the date of issuance. Units were sold to the following officers and directors of the Company, in the amounts indicated: Edwin Molina (250,000 units); Anton J. Drescher (400,000 units); Anthony J. Castagno (50,000 units); and Robert Smith (40,000 units). In September 2001, USA Video completed a private placement of 4,000,000 units (each unit consisting of one common share and one warrant to purchase an additional common share at $0.35 per share) for $0.27 per unit, of which 3,512,500 units were sold to outside investors and 487,500 units were sold to officers, directors, and employees of the Company and their affiliates. Because the rules of the Canadian Venture Exchange require that the offering price for privately placed securities of listed companies be set when the offering is first announced rather than upon closing, the sale price of the units and the exercise price of the warrants were below the market price of $0.29 of the common shares on the date of issuance. Units were sold to the following officers and directors of the Company, and their affiliates, in the amounts indicated: Robert Smith (45,000 units); and Daniel Kinnaman (200,000 units). In December 2001, USA Video completed a private placement of 3,300,000 units (each unit consisting of one common share and one warrant to purchase an additional common share at $0.26 per share) for $0.20 per unit, of which 2,782,500 units were sold to outside investors and 517,500 units were sold to officers, directors, and employees of the Company. Because the rules of the Canadian Venture Exchange require that the offering price for privately placed securities of listed companies be set when the offering is first announced rather than upon closing, the sale price of the units and the exercise price of the warrants were below the market price of $0.22 of the common shares on the date of issuance. Units were sold to the following officers and directors of the Company, in the amounts indicated: Robert Smith (100,000 units); Kent Norton (75,000 units); Daniel Kinnaman (70,000 units); and Matthew Kinnaman (62,500 units). PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a)(1) Financial Statements Independent Auditors' Reports Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Operations Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (a)(2) All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto included in this Report. (b) Reports on Form 8-K During the last quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report, the registrant filed the filing reports on Form 8-K: (i) On October 12, 2001 the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that its StreamHQ(TM) suite of rich media delivery services had satisfactorily completed operational beta testing and that the StreamHQ(TM) architecture was fully ready to support client services. (ii) On October 12, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that the registrant was been approved for listing on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and began trading on October 3, 2001 under the symbol USF. 30 (iii) On October 30, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that The Fleet Center, New England's premier sports arena, has signed a contract with the registrant to use the registrant's Zmail solution as part of its current promotional campaigns. (iv) On November 5, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that the Anthony Robbins Companies had elected to use Zmail from the registrant for an upcoming promotional campaign. (v) On December 10, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported - that the registrant and CEO Solutions, Inc., the nation's premier business opportunity consulting firm, had formed a strategic sales and marketing partnership. (vi) On December 11, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that Gilder Publishing, LLC, publisher of the Gilder Technology Report, the Digital Power Report, the Gilder Biotech Report, and Dynamic Silicon, had selected the registrant to promote the upcoming Storewidth Conference with the registrant's Zmail. (vii) On December 11, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that Phenomedia AG (www.phenomedia-usa.com), a leading company in the interactive entertainment market, has signed a contract with the registrant to stream four promotional videos showing footage from the up-coming New Line Cinema hit film The Lord of the Rings. (viii) On December 12, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that EMC Corporation (NYSE: EMC), the world leader in information storage, recognized the registrant as an EMC Proven(TM) E-Infostructure(TM) certified company. (ix) On December 21, 2001, the registrant filed a report on Form 8-K wherein the registrant reported that it had joined the AT&T Ecosystem for Media program, a network services platform with a comprehensive co-marketing and distribution program that enables companies to create, manage and deliver digital media applications. c) Exhibits None. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. By: /s/ Edwin Molina -------------------------------- Date: March 26, 2002 Edwin Molina Chief Executive Officer 31 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date ----------------------- ---------------------------------- --------- /s/ Edwin Molina Chief Executive Officer, Director March 26, 2001 ----------------------- Edwin Molina /s/ Anton J. Drescher Chief Financial Officer, (principal March 26, 2001 ----------------------- financial officer and principal Anton J. Drescher accounting officer), Director /s/ Anthony J. Castagno Director March 26, 2001 ----------------------- Anthony J. Castagno USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2001 USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ------------------------------------------ INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORTS F-2 - F-3 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Balance Sheets F-4 Statements of Operations F-5 Statements of Comprehensive Operations F-6 Statements of Stockholders' Equity F-7 Statements of Cash Flows F-8 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-9 - F-19 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Board of Directors USA Video Interactive Corp. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of USA Video Interactive Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of USA Video Interactive Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has not generated significant revenue from operations and has a net working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP New York, New York January 31, 2002 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Stockholders, USA Video Interactive Corp. We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of USA Video Interactive Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the original December 31, 1999 financial statements, as originally prepared during 2000, the Company was in the development stage, and had no established source of revenue and was dependent on its ability to raise capital from shareholders or other sources to sustain operations. These factors, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1 to the original December 31, 1999 financial statements, raise substantial doubt that the Company would be able to continue as a going concern. The financial statements did not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. AMISANO HANSON Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada March 13, 2000
USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2001 2000 ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 104,238 $ 231,197 Marketable securities - related parties 42,616 202,826 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $-0- and $7,000, respectively 30,900 122,813 Inventory 12,000 145,911 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 21,613 99,368 ------------- ------------- TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 211,367 802,115 Property and Equipment - at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $573,015 and $194,871, respectively 1,100,339 873,544 Other Assets, net of accumulated amortization of $8,016 and $22,170, respectively 70,472 68,412 Deferred Tax Assets, net of valuation allowance of $7,215,000 and $6,168,000, respectively - - ------------- ------------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,382,178 $ 1,744,071 ============= ============= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 948,417 $ 1,110,033 Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related parties - 20,830 Due to related parties 91,480 75,896 ------------- ------------- TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,039,897 1,206,759 ------------- ------------- Commitments and Contingencies Stockholders' Equity: Preferred stock - no par value; authorized 250,000,000 shares, none issued Common stock and additional paid-in capital - no par value; authorized 250,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 91,745,088 and 81,700,088 shares, respectively 29,492,071 25,766,071 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (86,487) 73,723 Accumulated deficit (29,063,303) (25,302,482) ------------- ------------- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 342,281 537,312 ------------- ------------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,382,178 $ 1,744,071 ============= =============
The accompanying notes and independent auditor's report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.
USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 2000 1999 -------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Revenue $ 124,006 $ 638,592 $ 20,500 ------------ ------------ ------------ Expenses: Cost of sales 66,770 393,496 19,199 Research and development (includes $-0-, $- 0 -, and 999,058 620,212 93,337 $82,500, respectively, to related parties) Selling, general and administrative (includes $-0-, 1,833,440 2,599,591 1,372,928 $37,758 and $479,480, respectively, to related parties) Depreciation and amortization 407,880 224,581 113,362 Noncash compensation charges 585,697 1,453,783 - ------------ ------------ ------------ Total expenses 3,892,845 5,291,663 1,598,826 ------------ ------------ ------------ Loss from operations (3,768,839) (4,653,071) (1,578,326) ------------ ------------ ------------ Other income (expense), net (includes $- 0 -, $-0- and $164,393, respectively, to related parties): Interest income (expense) (net of interest income of $5,173, $26,231and $11,715, respectively) 4,903 26,231 (1,250) Other 3,115 (34,812) (77,502) ------------ ------------ ------------ 8,018 (8,581) (78,752) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss before cumulative effect of accounting change (3,760,821) (4,661,652) (1,657,078) Cumulative effect of accounting change - - (27,390) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss $(3,760,821) $(4,661,652) $(1,684,468) ============ ============ ============ Earnings per share - basic and diluted: Loss per common share before cumulative effect of accounting change $ (.04) $ (.06) $ (.03) Cumulative effect of accounting change - - - ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (.04) $ (.06) $ (.03) ============ ============ ============ Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted 84,946,199 76,700,723 66,766,504 ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes and independent auditor's report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.
USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 2000 1999 ------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss $(3,760,821) $(4,661,652) $(1,684,468) Other comprehensive income (loss): Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments (160,210) 73,723 - ------------ ------------ ------------ Comprehensive loss $(3,921,031) $(4,587,929) $(1,684,468) ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes and independent auditor's report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.
USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY COMMON STOCK ACCUMULATED AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL COMMON OTHER STOCK COMPREHENSIVE ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS' SHARES AMOUNT SUBSCRIPTIONS INCOME (LOSS) DEFICIT EQUITY ---------- ----------- -------------- -------------- ------------- ------------ Balance at January 1, 1999 58,756,088 $18,722,966 - - $(18,956,362) $ (233,396) Issuance of common stock and common stock warrants for cash 4,250,000 1,195,267 - - - 1,195,267 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options 4,881,000 405,895 - - - 405,895 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants 5,095,000 626,024 - - - 626,024 Net loss - - - - (1,684,468) (1,684,468) ---------- ----------- -------------- -------------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1999 72,982,088 20,950,152 - - (20,640,830) 309,322 Issuance of common stock and common stock warrants for cash 1,190,000 2,260,000 - - - 2,260,000 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options 2,383,000 602,074 - - - 602,074 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants 5,145,000 500,062 - - - 500,062 Noncash compensation charges - 1,453,783 - - - 1,453,783 Change in unrealized gains (loss) - - on investments - - - $ 73,723 - 73,723 Net loss - - - - (4,661,652) (4,661,652) ---------- ----------- -------------- -------------- ------------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 2000 81,700,088 25,766,071 - 73,723 (25,302,482) 537,312 Issuance of common stock and common stock warrants for cash 9,800,000 3,067,391 - - - 3,067,391 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants 245,000 72,912 - - - 72,912 Noncash compensation charges - 585,697 - - - 585,697 Change in unrealized gains (loss) on investments - - - (160,210) - (160,210) Net loss - - - - (3,760,821) (3,760,821) ---------- ----------- -------------- -------------- ------------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 2001 91,745,088 $29,492,071 - $ (86,487) $(29,063,303) $ 342,281 ========== =========== ============== ============== ============= ============
The accompanying notes and independent auditor's report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.
USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 2000 1999 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(3,760,821) $(4,661,652) $(1,684,468) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 407,880 224,581 113,362 Noncash compensation charge 585,697 1,453,783 - Foreign exchange - - 1,657 Loss on sale of investments - related parties - - 35,788 Loss on disposal of property and equipment 18,299 - - Gain on write-off of accounts payable - - (73,926) Bad debt recovery - (108,403) - Write-down of investments in securities - - 102,465 Allowance for doubtful accounts (7,000) - - Write-down of advances - related party - - 14,375 Write-down of advances - other - - 7,000 Write-down of property and equipment - 33,122 Write-down of inventory 76,481 Cumulative effect on prior years' amortization of changing to a different amortization method - - 27,390 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 98,913 (109,515) 3,388 Increase in inventory (12,000) (145,911) - (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets 77,755 (51,164) 28,065 Increase in other assets (26,000) (14,187) (33,737) (Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses (161,616) 624,462 72,588 (Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related parties (20,830) 9,238 - Increase (decrease) in due to related parties 15,584 (112,970) 14,838 ------------ ------------ ------------ NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (2,707,658) (2,858,616) (1,371,215) ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds on sale of investments - related parties - - 4,867 Purchases of marketable securities - related party - - (88,700) Advances - related party - - (14,375) Advances - other - - (7,000) Purchases of property and equipment (559,604) (689,989) (335,715) ------------ ------------ ------------ NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (559,604) (689,989) (440,923) ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash flows from financing activity - proceeds from the issuance of common stock 3,140,303 3,362,136 2,227,186 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (126,959) (186,469) 415,048 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 231,197 417,666 2,618 ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 104,238 $ 231,197 $ 417,666 ============ ============ ============ SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid during the year for interest $ - $ 12,965 $ - ============ ============ ============ SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Marketable securities received for settlement of amounts previously written off as bad debt $ - $ 108,403 $ - ============ ============ ============ Inventory originally purchased for resale reclassified to property and equipment $ 69,430 $ - $ - ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes and independent auditor's report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements. USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. BUSINESS: USA Video Interactive Corp. (the "Company") is a designer of high-tech Internet streaming video-on-demand systems, services and solutions. At December 31, 2001 and for the three-year period then ended, substantially all of the Company's assets and substantially all its operations are located and conducted in the United States. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses of $3,760,821, $4,661,652 and $1,684,468 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. These conditions raise doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations as they come due, which management believes it will be able to do. To date, the Company has funded operations primarily through the issuance of common stock and warrants to outside investors and the Company's management. The Company believes that its operations will generate additional funds and that additional funding from outside investors and the Company's management will continue to be available to the Company when needed. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company maintains cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on these accounts. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company has classified its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale securities. These securities are carried at fair value with any unrealized gain or loss recorded as a component of stockholders' equity. The fair value of marketable securities was determined based on the quoted market prices for those instruments. At December 31, 2001, the marketable securities consisted of common stock. Inventory, which consists of computer equipment, is stated at the lower of cost or market using the specific-identification method. Property and equipment is stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in operations. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the terms of the related lease, whichever is shorter. Depreciation of property and equipment acquired prior to 1999 was previously calculated using an accelerated depreciation method over seven years for all asset classes. During 1999 the Company adopted the straight-line method for all classes using varying estimated useful lives to reflect the rapid pace of technological change. The cumulative effect on years prior to 1999 is included in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is treated as a change in accounting principle. Other assets consist of patents and patents pending owned by the Company for the Store and Forward Video System. The patents and patents pending are recorded at cost and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 17 years. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates the period of amortization of intangible assets. The factors used in evaluating the period of amortization include: (i) current operating results, (ii) projected future operating results, and (iii) other material factors that affect the continuity of the business. Revenue from hardware product sales is recognized when the product has been shipped and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue recognized from these sales is net of applicable provisions for refunds, discounts and allowances. Engineering services sales are recognized upon the service having been provided. Revenue from software sales is recognized when the product has been delivered. Revenue from multiple element contracts (hardware, software and engineering) is allocated to the various elements based on fair value. If objective evidence of fair value is not available, revenue from these contracts is deferred until the earlier of when objective evidence of fair value does exist or all elements of the contract have been delivered. Discounts will be applied to each element on a proportionate basis. No portion of the revenue will be recognized if the portion of the revenue allocable to delivered elements is subject to forfeiture, refund or other concession. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 was approximately $16,000, $97,000 and $47,000, respectively. Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and for operating loss carryforwards measured using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company periodically evaluates the reliability of its net deferred tax assets and records a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates, and revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. The aggregate effect of translation adjustments is immaterial at December 31, 2001 and 2000. Basic loss per common share ("EPS") is computed as net loss divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the impact of common stock potentially issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants. Potential common stock has been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would be antidilutive. Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements. 3. MAJOR CUSTOMERS: During the year ended December 31, 2001, one customer accounted for approximately 61% of total revenue, during the year ended December 31, 2000, three customers accounted for approximately 26%, 44% and 12% of total revenue and during the year ended December 31, 1999, one customer accounted for 100% of total revenue. 4. MARKETABLE SECURITIES: Marketable securities consist of the following: December 31, 2001 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Available-for-sale equity securities: Cost $129,103 $129,103 Unrealized gains (losses) (86,487) 73,723 --------- -------- $ 42,616 $202,826 ========= ======== 5. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS: Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following: December 31, 2001 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Refundable security deposits $ - 0 $75,000 Other (none in excess of 5% of current assets) 21,613 24,368 --------- -------- $21,613 $99,368 ========= ======== 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: Property and equipment, at cost, consists of the following:
Estimated December 31, 2001 2000 Useful Life ----------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- Office equipment $ 139,200 $ 120,974 5 years Computer equipment 1,504,771 918,058 3 years Leasehold improvements 29,383 29,383 5 years ---------- ---------- ----------- 1,673,354 1,068,415 Less accumulated depreciation 573,015 194,871 ---------- --------- $1,100,339 $ 873,544 ========== ==========
Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $383,940, $219,740 and $108,869 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
December 31 2001 2000 ------------------------------------------ ------- ------- Accounts payable $189,702 $ 209,988 Accrued professional fees 77,164 60,580 Accrued payroll and related tax withholdings 455,374 411,795 Amounts due for purchased computer equipment 226,177 427,670 -------------------------------------------- -------- ---------- $948,417 $1,110,033 ======== ==========
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: The Company leases its office and warehouse facilities under various leasing agreements. The leases expired during the prior year and the Company opted not to renew the leases and instead opted to rent the facilities on a month-to-month basis. Rent expense amounted to $79,481, $73,521 and $41,212 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company is party to a default judgment entered against one of the Company's subsidiaries. During the year ended December 31, 1995, a claim was made to the Company for the total amount payable under the terms of the lease with one of the Company's subsidiaries for office space in Dallas, Texas through 2002. The Company's management is of the opinion that the amount payable under the terms of this judgment is not estimable or determinable at this time and may be substantially mitigated by the landlords renting the property to another party. The range of possible loss is from $-0- to approximately $500,000. Any settlement resulting from the resolution of this contingency will be accounted for in the period of settlement when such amounts are estimable or determinable. 9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: On February 24, 1999, the Company issued 2,000,000 units to investors at $.07 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.07 per share. On April 17, 1999, the Company issued 1,000,000 units to investors at $.11 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.11 per share. On June 28, 1999, the Company issued 500,000 units to investors at $.40 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.40 per share. On September 1, 1999, the Company issued 750,000 units to investors at $1.00 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $1.10 per share. From January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999, the Company issued 4,881,000 shares of common stock upon the exercising of options with exercise prices ranging from $.07 to $1.00 per common share. From January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999, the Company issued 5,095,000 shares of common stock upon the exercising of warrants with exercise prices ranging from $.07 to $.29 per common share. On April 10, 2000, the Company issued 190,000 units to officers of the Company at $4.00 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $4.00 per share. On July 20, 2000, the Company issued 430,301 units to investors at $1.50 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $1.50 per share. On July 20, 2000, the Company issued 569,699 units to employees at $1.50 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $1.50 per share. The Company charged operations for approximately $712,000 representing the differential between the fair value and the purchase price of the common stock and for approximately $712,000 representing the differential between the fair value of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of the warrants. From January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the Company issued 2,383,000 shares of common stock upon the exercising of options with exercise prices ranging from $.06 to $1.00 per common share. From January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the Company issued 5,145,000 shares of common stock upon the exercising of warrants with exercise prices ranging from $.06 to $.49 per common share. On March 12, 2001, the Company issued 1,585,000 units to investors at $.54 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.66 per share. On March 12, 2001, the Company issued 915,000 units to employees at $.54 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.66 per share. The Company charged operations for approximately $294,000 representing the differential between the fair value and the purchase price of the common stock and for approximately $168,000 representing the differential between the fair value of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of the warrants. On September 28, 2001, the Company issued 3,512,500 units to investors at $.27 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.35 per share. On September 28, 2001, the Company issued 487,500 units to employees at $.27 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.35 per share. The Company charged operations for approximately $10,000 representing the differential between the fair value and the purchase price of the common stock. On December 31, 2001, the Company issued 2,782,500 units to investors at $.20 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.26 per share. On December 31, 2001, the Company issued 517,500 units to employees at $.20 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at $.26 per share. The Company charged operations for approximately $10,000 representing the differential between the fair value and the purchase price of the common stock. From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, the Company issued 245,000 shares of common stock upon the exercising of warrants with exercise prices ranging from $.12 to $.49 per common share. 10. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK WARRANTS: The Company has a stock option plan under which options to purchase shares of common stock may be granted to certain officers, directors and service providers. In June 2001, the Company adopted a new Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"). The 2001 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 8,400,000 of the Company's common shares, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The Company is listed on the Canadian Venture Exchange ("CDNX") and is subject to a limitation on the number of options a company may have. The 2001 Plan provides for the issuance of both incentive stock options and nonqualified options as those terms are defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). As of December 31, 2001, no stock options have been granted under the 2001 Plan. The Company's previous option plan will remain in effect until all granted stock options are exercised, expired or canceled. A summary of the status of the Company's options and changes during the years is presented below:
Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 ----------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- average average average Number Exercise Number Exercise Number of Exercise of Shares Price of Shares Price of Shares Price ----------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ----------- Outstanding at beginning of year 6,957,000 $0.69 6,329,000 $0.81 4,335,000 $0.07 Granted 250,000 $1.00 4,360,000 $2.27 7,375,000 $0.64 Exercised -0- $0.00 (2,383,000) $0.25 (4,881,000) $0.08 Canceled/expired (3,647,000) $1.11 (1,349,000) $2.13 (500,000) $0.07 ----------------------- ------------ ------ ------------ ------ ----------- ----- OUTSTANDING AT END OF YEAR 3,560,000 $2.18 6,957,000 $0.69 6,329,000 $0.81 =========== ===== ========= ===== ========= ===== Options exercis- able at year-end 3,560,000 6,957,000 6,329,000 ============ ========== ========== Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year $0.75 $1.05 $0.51 ====== ====== =====
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding at December 31, 2001:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable ------------------- ------------------- Weighted average Weighted Weighted Range of Remaining average average Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Prices Outstanding Price Price Exercisable Price ------------ ------------ ---------- --------- --------- --------- 1.00 - $1.99 2,395,000 0.9 $1.00 2,395,000 $1.00 2.00 - $2.99 580,000 0.4 $2.06 580,000 $2.06 3.00 - $3.99 285,000 0.7 $3.14 285,000 $3.14 4.00 - $5.00 300,000 0.1 $5.00 300,000 $5.00 ------------- ----------- ------------------- --------- ----------- --------- 1.00 - $5.00 3,560,000 3,560,000 ============= ========= ==========
The Company has elected to apply APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ("APB Opinion No. 25"), and related interpretations in accounting for its stock options and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at the grant date as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 would have been as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 ----------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss: As reported $(3,760,821) $(4,661,652) $(1,684,468) ----------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Pro forma $(3,835,821) $(9,425,070) $(5,420,133) ======================= ============ ============ ============ Loss per common share - basic and diluted: As reported $ (0.04) $ (0.06) $ (0.03) ======================= ============ ============ ============ Pro forma $ (0.05) $ (0.12) $ (0.08) ======================= ============ ============ ============
The fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 ------------------------ ------ ------ ------ Expected dividend yield - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Risk-free interest rate 4.8% 6.37% 5.46% Volatility 1.43% 1.43% 2.50% Expected life (years) 2 2 1
Certain options were granted to key employees and consultants at option prices below market price. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense has been recorded based on the difference between the option price and the market price on the date of the option. The total amount of such compensation for 2001 was approximately $104,000. Warrants to purchase shares of common stock are as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 Range Range Range Number of Number of Number of of Exercise of Exercise of Exercise Warrants Price Warrants Price Warrants Price Outstanding at beginning of year 2,295,000 $0.13 - $4.00 6,250,000 $0.07 - $1.10 7,095,000 $0.07 - $1.10 Issued 9,800,000 $0.26 - $0.80 1,190,000 $1.50 - $4.00 4,250,000 $0.07 - $1.00 Exercised (245,000) $ 0.30 (5,145,000) $0.07 - $1.28 (5,095,000) $0.07 - $0.29 Expired (860,000) $0.58 - $1.10 -0- 0.00 -0- $ 0.00 OUTSTANDING AT END OF YEAR 10,990,000 $0.26 - $4.00 2,295,000 $0.13 - $4.00 6,250,000 $0.07 - $1.10 ----------------- =========== ============= =========== ============= =========== =============
11. INCOME TAXES: As of December 31, 2001, the Company had deferred tax assets resulting primarily from net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $21,000,000, which are available to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2021. As utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards is not assured, a 100% valuation allowance has been provided. The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
December 31, 2001 2000 -------------- ----- ----- Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss carryforwards $ 7,211,000 $ 6,157,000 Allowance for doubtful accounts 34,000 36,000 Unrealized gains (losses) on investments (30,000) (25,000) Depreciation and amortization - - Valuation allowance (7,215,000) (6,168,000) ---------------------------------- ------------ ------------ NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS $ -0- $ -0- ================================== ============ ============
The reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the federal statutory rate are as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 ------------------------------------ ----- ----- Federal statutory tax rate 34% 34% Valuation allowance on net operating carryforwards (34) (34) ------------------------------------ ----- ----- EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE -0-% -0-% ========================= ===== =====
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related parties at December 31, 2000 include expenses incurred by the Company's officers on behalf of the Company and amounts due for product marketing services provided by an entity controlled by one of the Company's officers. Due to related parties at December 31, 2001 and 2000 of $91,480 and $75,896, respectively, primarily consist of advances made from officers of the Company that accrue interest at 1.25% per month and amounts due to directors for services which are noninterest-bearing and are due on demand. The estimated fair value of the amounts payable approximates the carrying amount based on rates available for similar loans. Included in research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 1999 was $82,500 paid to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company. Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $37,758 and $479,480, respectively, of expenses incurred consisting primarily of product marketing expenses, office expenses and professional services provided to the Company by entities owned or controlled by officers and directors of the Company. Included in other expenses for the year ended December 31, 1999 was $164,393 of expenses incurred in connection with transactions involving investments in related entities, write-off of advances to related parties and interest expense paid to related parties. 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS: In January 2002, the Company issued 5,700,000 stock options to certain officers, employees and consultants of the Company under the 2001 Plan. The stock options are exercisable at a price of $0.50 (U.S.) per share for a term of two years from the date of granting. 14. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Year ended December 31, 1999 $7,000 Additions - Deductions - ------------------------------- ------ Year ended December 31, 2000 7,000 Additions - Deductions 7,000 ------------------------------- ------ Year ended December 31, 2001 $ - =============================== ======
15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED): The following table summarizes selected quarterly data for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000:
First Second Third Fourth Full Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ 2001: ------ Revenue $ 1,060 $ 33,175 $ 67,626 $ 22,145 $ 124,006 Expenses (1,304,608) (954,137) (823,380) (810,720) (3,892,845) Net loss (1,298,068) (919,808) (753,999) (788,946) (3,760,821) Net loss per common share: Basic and diluted $ (0.02) $ (0.01) $ (0.01) $ (0.01) $ (0.04) 2000: ------ Revenue $ 163,600 $ 75,000 $ 307,464 $ 92,528 $ 638,592 Expenses (686,754) (965,615) (1,233,377) (2,405,917) (5,291,663) Net loss (523,154) (890,615) (925,913) (2,321,970) (4,661,652) Net loss per common share: Basic and diluted $ (0.01) $ (0.01) $ (0.01) $ (0.03) $ (0.06) -------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------