EX-13.1

2012 Annual Report RPM International Inc. Financial Section 22 Management’s Discussion 67 Quarterly Stock Price and 69 Auditor’s Reports and Analysis Dividend Information 71 Stockholder Information 35 Consolidated 68 Management’s Report 72 Global Operations Financial Statements on Internal Control 73 Directors and Officers 40 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements See cover fold-out for Selected Financial Data

Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of RPM International Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries, except for certain subsidiaries that were deconsolidated on May 31, 2010 (please refer to Note A(2) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information). Investments in less-than-majority-owned joint ventures for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over are accounted for under the equity method. Preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We continually evaluate these estimates, including those related to our allowances for doubtful accounts; inventories; allowances for recoverable taxes; useful lives of property, plant and equipment; goodwill and other intangible assets; environmental, warranties and other contingent liabilities; income tax valuation allowances; pension plans; and the fair value of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience, our most recent facts, and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities. Actual results, which are shaped by actual market conditions, may differ materially from our estimates.

We have identified below the accounting policies and estimates that are the most critical to our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, certain rebates, sales incentives and promotions in the same period the related sales are recorded.

We also record revenues generated under long-term construction contracts, mainly in connection with the installation of specialized roofing and flooring systems, and related services. In general, we account for long-term construction contracts under the percentage-of-completion method, and therefore record contract revenues and related costs as our contracts progress. This method recognizes the economic results of contract performance on a timelier basis than does the completed-contract method; however, application of this method requires reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, as well as other dependable estimates. When reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made, or if other factors make estimates doubtful, the completed-contract method is applied. Under the completed-contract method, billings and costs are accumulated on the balance sheet as the contract progresses, but no revenue is recognized until the contract is complete or substantially complete.

Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements and Foreign Currency Transactions

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, the functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is its principal operating currency. We translate the amounts included in our Consolidated Statements of Income from our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars at weighted-average

exchange rates, which we believe are representative of the actual exchange rates on the dates of the transactions. Our foreign subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars from local currency at the actual exchange rates as of the end of each reporting date, and we record the resulting foreign exchange translation adjustments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the U.S. dollar strengthens, we reflect the resulting losses as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Conversely, if the U.S. dollar weakens, foreign exchange translation gains result, which favorably impact accumulated other comprehensive income. Translation adjustments may be included in net earnings in the event of a sale or liquidation of certain of our underlying foreign investments. If we determine that the functional currency of any of our foreign subsidiaries should be the U.S. dollar, our financial statements will be affected. Should this occur, we will adjust our reporting to appropriately account for any such changes.

As appropriate, we use permanently invested intercompany loans as a source of capital to reduce exposure to foreign currency fluctuations at our foreign subsidiaries. These loans, on a consolidated basis, are treated as being analogous to equity for accounting purposes. Therefore, foreign exchange gains or losses on these intercompany loans are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If we determine that the functional currency of any of our subsidiaries should be the U.S. dollar, we will no longer record foreign exchange gains or losses on such intercompany loans.

Goodwill

We test our goodwill balances at least annually, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise, at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level, which is the operating segment level or one level below our operating segments.

In the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, we early adopted new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.

We assess qualitative factors in each of our reporting units that carry goodwill. Among other relevant events and circumstances that affect the fair value of our reporting units, we assess individual factors such as:

•

a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate;

•

an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;

•

unanticipated competition;

•

a loss of key personnel; and

•

a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of.

We assess these qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, this quantitative test is required only if we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount.

In applying the first step of the quantitative test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. Calculating the fair market value of a reporting unit requires our use of estimates and assumptions. We use significant judgment in determining the most appropriate method to establish the fair value of a reporting unit. We estimate the fair value of a reporting unit by employing various valuation techniques, depending on the availability and reliability of comparable market value indicators, and employ methods and assumptions that include the application of third-party market value indicators and the computation of discounted future cash flows for a reporting unit’s annual projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).

We evaluate discounted future cash flows for a reporting unit’s projected EBITDA. Under this approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired. An indication that goodwill may be impaired results when the carrying value of the net assets of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. At that point, the second step of the impairment test is performed, which requires a fair value estimate of each tangible and intangible asset in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

In applying the discounted cash flow methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including future business plans, actual and forecasted operating results, and market data. The significant assumptions employed under this method include discount rates; revenue growth rates, including assumed terminal growth rates; and operating margins used to project future cash flows for a reporting unit. The discount rates utilized reflect market-based estimates of capital costs and discount rates adjusted for management’s assessment of a market participant’s view with respect to other risks associated with the projected cash flows of the individual reporting unit. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. We believe we incorporate ample sensitivity ranges into our analysis of goodwill impairment testing for a reporting unit, such that actual experience would need to be materially out of the range of expected assumptions in order for an impairment to remain undetected.

Our annual goodwill impairment analysis for fiscal 2012 did not result in any impairment loss. Should the future earnings and cash flows at our reporting units decline and/or discount rates increase, future impairment charges to goodwill and other intangible assets may be required.

Other Long-Lived Assets

We assess identifiable, non-goodwill intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in facts and circumstances indicate the possibility that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable over their estimated remaining useful lives. Factors considered important in our assessment, which might trigger an impairment evaluation, include the following:

•

significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

•

significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets;

•

significant changes in the strategy for our overall business; and

•

significant negative industry or economic trends.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually during our fiscal fourth quarter. Measuring a potential impairment of non-goodwill intangibles and other long-lived assets requires the use of various estimates and assumptions, including the determination of which cash flows are directly related to the assets being evaluated, the respective useful lives over which those cash flows will occur and potential residual values, if any. If we determine that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above-described indicators or other factors, any impairment amounts would be measured based on the projected net cash flows expected from these assets, including any net cash flows related to eventual disposition activities. The determination of any impairment losses would be based on the best information available, including internal estimates of discounted cash flows; quoted market prices, when available; and independent appraisals, as appropriate, to determine fair values. Cash flow estimates would be based on our historical experience and our internal business plans, with appropriate discount rates applied. Our fiscal 2012 annual impairment tests of each of our indefinite-lived intangible assets did not result in any impairment loss.

Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes is calculated using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and certain changes in valuation allowances. We provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

In determining the adequacy of valuation allowances, we consider cumulative and anticipated amounts of domestic and international earnings or losses, anticipated amounts of foreign source income, as well as the anticipated taxable income resulting from the reversal of future taxable temporary differences. We intend to maintain any recorded valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence (for example, cumulative positive foreign earnings or additional foreign source income) exists to support a reversal of the tax valuation allowances.

Further, at each interim reporting period, we estimate an effective income tax rate that is expected to be applicable for the full year. Significant judgment is involved regarding the application of global income tax laws and regulations and when projecting the jurisdictional mix of income. Additionally, interpretation of tax laws, court decisions or other guidance provided by taxing authorities influences our estimate of the effective income tax rates. As a result, our actual effective income tax rates and related income tax liabilities may differ materially from our estimated effective tax rates and related income tax liabilities. Any resulting differences are recorded in the period they become known.

Contingencies

We are party to various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. Although we cannot precisely predict the amount of any liability that may ultimately arise with respect to any of these matters, we record provisions when we consider the liability probable and reasonably estimable. Our provisions are based on historical experience and legal advice, reviewed quarterly and adjusted according to developments. In general, our accruals, including our accruals for environmental, warranty, and tax liabilities, discussed further below, represent the best estimate of a range of possible losses. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of multiple forecasted factors that often depend on judgments about potential actions

by third parties, such as regulators, courts, and state and federal legislatures. Changes in the amounts of our loss provisions, which can be material, affect our Consolidated Statements of Income. While it is reasonably possible that excess liabilities, if they were to occur, could be material to operating results in any given quarter or year of their recognition, we do not believe that it is reasonably possible that excess liabilities would have a material adverse effect on our long-term results of operations, liquidity or consolidated financial position.

Our environmental-related accruals are similarly established and/or adjusted as more information becomes available upon which costs can be reasonably estimated. Actual costs may vary from these estimates because of the inherent uncertainties involved, including the identification of new sites and the development of new information about contamination. Certain sites are still being investigated; therefore, we have been unable to fully evaluate the ultimate costs for those sites. As a result, accruals have not been estimated for certain of these sites and costs may ultimately exceed existing estimated accruals for other sites. We have received indemnities for potential environmental issues from purchasers of certain of our properties and businesses and from sellers of some of the properties or businesses we have acquired. We also have purchased insurance to cover potential environmental liabilities at certain sites. If the indemnifying or insuring party fails to, or becomes unable to, fulfill its obligations under those agreements or policies, we may incur environmental costs in addition to any amounts accrued, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Several of our industrial businesses offer extended warranty terms and related programs, and thus have established a corresponding warranty liability. Warranty expense is impacted by variations in local construction practices and installation conditions, including geographic and climate differences.

Additionally, our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign tax laws and regulations that govern, among other things, taxes on worldwide income. The calculation of our income tax expense is based on the best information available, including the application of currently enacted income tax laws and regulations, and involves our significant judgment. The actual income tax liability for each jurisdiction in any year can ultimately be determined, in some instances, several years after the financial statements have been published.

We also maintain accruals for estimated income tax exposures for many different jurisdictions. Tax exposures are settled primarily through the resolution of audits within each tax jurisdiction or the closing of a statute of limitation. Tax exposures and actual income tax liabilities can also be affected by changes in applicable tax laws, retroactive tax law changes, or other factors, which may cause us to believe revisions of past estimates are appropriate. Although we believe that appropriate liabilities have been recorded for our income tax expense and income tax exposures, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

An allowance for anticipated uncollectible trade receivable amounts is established using a combination of specifically identified accounts to be reserved and a reserve covering trends in collectibility. These estimates are based on an analysis of trends in collectibility, past experience and individual account balances identified as doubtful based on specific facts and conditions. Receivable losses are charged against the allowance when we confirm uncollectibility. Actual collections of trade receivables could differ from our estimates due to changes in future economic or industry conditions or specific customer’s financial conditions.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and market being determined on the basis of replacement cost or net realizable value. Inventory costs include raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We review the net realizable value of our inventory in detail on an on-going basis, with consideration given to various factors, which include our estimated reserves for excess, obsolete, slow moving or distressed inventories. If actual market conditions differ from our projections, and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, write-downs of inventory values and adjustments to cost of sales may be required. Historically, our inventory reserves have approximated actual experience.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities, included in other current and long-term assets, are composed of available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized in net income on the specific identification basis. Changes in fair values of securities that are considered temporary are recorded as unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. Other-than-temporary declines in market value from original cost are reflected in operating income in the period in which the unrealized losses are deemed other than temporary. In order to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred, the duration of the decline in value and our ability to hold the investment to recovery are considered in conjunction with an evaluation of the strength of the underlying collateral and the extent to which the investment’s amortized cost or cost, as appropriate, exceeds its related market value.

Pension and Postretirement Plans

We sponsor qualified defined benefit pension plans and various other nonqualified postretirement plans. The qualified defined benefit pension plans are funded with trust assets invested in a diversified portfolio of debt and equity securities and other investments. Among other factors, changes in interest rates, investment returns and the market value of plan assets can (i) affect the level of plan funding, (ii) cause volatility in the net periodic pension cost, and (iii) increase our future contribution requirements. A significant decrease in investment returns or the market value of plan assets or a significant decrease in interest rates could increase our net periodic pension costs and adversely affect our results of operations. A significant increase in our contribution requirements with respect to our qualified defined benefit pension plans could have an adverse impact on our cash flow.

Changes in our key plan assumptions would impact net periodic benefit expense and the projected benefit obligation for our defined benefit and various postretirement benefit plans. Based upon May 31, 2012 information, the following tables reflect the impact of a 1% change in the key assumptions applied to our defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and internationally:


	U.S.						International
(In millions)	1% Increase			1% Decrease			1% Increase			1% Decrease
Discount Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2012	$	(4.1	)	$	4.9		$	(1.9	)	$	2.3
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2012	$	(44.0	)	$	54.7		$	(26.0	)	$	31.8
Expected Return on Plan Assets
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2012	$	(2.0	)	$	2.0		$	(1.4	)	$	1.4
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2012		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A
Compensation Increase
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2012	$	3.1		$	(2.8	)	$	1.2		$	(1.1	)
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2012	$	17.7		$	(15.8	)	$	7.2		$	(6.5	)

Based upon May 31, 2012 information, the following table reflects the impact of a 1% change in the key assumptions applied to our various postretirement health care plans:


	U.S.						International
(In millions)	1% Increase			1% Decrease			1% Increase			1% Decrease
Discount Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2012	$	—		$	—		$	(0.2	)	$	0.5
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2012	$	(0.8	)	$	0.9		$	(4.2	)	$	5.4
Healthcare Cost Trend Rate
Increase (decrease) in expense in FY 2012	$	—		$	—		$	0.5		$	(0.4	)
Increase (decrease) in obligation as of May 31, 2012	$	0.4		$	(0.3	)	$	3.9		$	(5.2	)

BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

Our business is divided into two reportable segments: the industrial reportable segment and the consumer reportable segment. Within each reportable segment, we aggregate several operating segments that consist of individual groups of companies and product lines, which generally address common markets, share similar economic characteristics, utilize similar technologies and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities. Our five operating segments represent components of our business for which separate financial information is available that is utilized on a regular basis by our chief executive officer in determining how to allocate the assets of the company and evaluate performance. These five operating segments are each managed by an operating segment manager who is responsible for the day-to-day operating decisions and performance evaluation of the operating segment’s underlying businesses. We evaluate the profit performance of our segments primarily based on income before income taxes, but also look to earnings (loss) before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) as a performance evaluation measure because interest expense is essentially related to corporate acquisitions, as opposed to segment operations.

Our industrial reportable segment’s products are sold throughout North America and also account for the majority of our international sales. Our industrial product lines are sold directly to contractors, distributors and end-users, such as industrial manufacturing facilities, public institutions and other commercial customers. This reportable segment comprises three separate operating segments — Building Solutions Group, Performance Coatings Group and RPM2 Group. Products and services within this reportable segment include construction chemicals; roofing systems; weatherproofing and other sealants; polymer flooring; edible coatings and specialty glazes for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries; and other specialty chemicals.

Our consumer reportable segment manufactures and markets professional use and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) products for a variety of mainly consumer applications, including home improvement and personal leisure activities. Our consumer reportable segment’s major manufacturing and distribution operations are located primarily in North America, along with a few locations in Europe. Our consumer reportable segment’s products are sold throughout North America directly to mass merchants, home improvement centers, hardware stores, paint stores, craft shops and to other smaller customers through distributors. This reportable segment comprises two operating segments — DAP Group and Rust-Oleum Group. Products within this reportable segment include specialty, hobby and professional paints; caulks; adhesives; silicone sealants and wood stains.

In addition to our two reportable segments, there is a category of certain business activities and expenses, referred to as corporate/other, that does not constitute an operating segment. This category includes our corporate headquarters and related administrative expenses, results of our captive insurance companies, gains or losses on the sales of certain assets and other expenses not directly associated with either reportable segment. Assets related to the corporate/other category consist primarily of investments, prepaid expenses and headquarters’ property and equipment. These corporate and other assets and expenses reconcile reportable segment data to total consolidated income before income taxes, interest expense and earnings before interest and taxes.

The following table reflects the results of our reportable segments consistent with our management philosophy, and represents the information we utilize, in conjunction with various strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of our portfolio of product lines.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011

Net Sales On a consolidated basis, net sales of $3.8 billion for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 improved 11.7%, or $395.6 million, over net sales of $3.4 billion during fiscal 2011. The organic growth in sales amounted to 8.6%, or $290.7 million, of the increase in fiscal 2012 net sales versus net sales for fiscal 2011, which includes volume-related improvements approximating 5.7%, or $192.1 million, and the impact of favorable pricing initiatives of approximately 2.9% of the prior year net sales, or $97.3 million. These favorable pricing initiatives, including those across both of our reportable segments, were instituted primarily during prior periods in order to offset the escalating raw material costs. Also reflected in the 8.6% growth in organic sales is the minor impact of favorable foreign exchange rates year-over-year, which amounted to approximately $1.3 million of the change in net sales from fiscal 2011. Ten small acquisitions, net of a product line divestiture, over the past year provided 3.1% of net sales growth over fiscal 2011, or $104.9 million.

Industrial segment net sales, which comprised 67% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2012, totaled $2.5 billion, an increase of 12.2% from $2.3 billion during fiscal 2011. This increase in the industrial segment’s net sales reflects organic growth of 7.8%, including unit volume growth of approximately 5.0% and favorable pricing of approximately 2.8% of the prior year net sales. Eight small acquisitions provided 4.4% of this segment’s current year growth in net sales versus net sales for fiscal 2011.

Consumer segment net sales, which comprised 33% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2012, totaled $1.2 billion, an increase of 10.7% from $1.1 billion during the prior fiscal year. The improvement in this segment resulted from organic growth in sales of 10.2%, including growth in unit volume sales approximating 7.0% of the prior year net sales, the impact of current year price increases of approximately 3.0% of the prior year net sales, and the impact of favorable foreign exchange, which amounted to 0.2% of the prior year net sales. Two small product line acquisitions, net of one small divestiture, had a favorable impact of approximately 0.5% on this segment’s net sales during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

Gross Profit Margin Our consolidated gross profit margin declined to 40.8% of net sales for fiscal 2012 from 41.4% of net sales for fiscal 2011, despite our 5.7% growth in organic sales volume for fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. The primary source of fiscal 2012 decline in gross profit margin was raw material costs, which were higher during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”) Our consolidated SG&A improved to 30.6% of net sales for fiscal 2012 compared with 31.3% of net sales for fiscal 2011. The 70 basis point decrease in SG&A as a percent of net sales versus the prior year primarily reflects the impact of the 8.6% organic growth in net sales. Other favorable reductions in SG&A resulted from reductions of insurance-related expenses, bad debt expense and warranty expense. We anticipate that warranty expense will likely continue to slowly decline over the next few years. Partially offsetting those improvements during fiscal 2012 was the combination of higher compensation and benefits expense, higher professional services expense and higher distribution expense during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

Our industrial segment SG&A was approximately $71.8 million higher during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011, but was slightly lower as a percentage of net sales, reflecting the favorable impact of the industrial segment’s 7.8% growth in organic sales during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011, combined with a decrease in warranty expense. Partially offsetting those improvements

was the impact of higher employee compensation and benefit expense, in addition to higher legal and distribution expense for fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

Our consumer segment SG&A was approximately $16.1 million higher during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011, but improved as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2012 as compared with the same period a year ago, primarily reflecting the favorable margin impact of the 10.2% growth in organic sales during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. Bad debt expense was significantly lower during fiscal 2012, due to a fiscal 2011 write off of a customer in bankruptcy that did not recur in fiscal 2012. Partially offsetting those favorable impacts was the combination of higher employee compensation expense and distribution expense during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

SG&A expenses in our corporate/other category increased by $9.4 million during fiscal 2012 to $46.4 million from $37.0 million during fiscal 2011. During fiscal 2011, there was the favorable impact from a reimbursement received from an outside service provider that did not recur in fiscal 2012, along with prior year favorable self-insurance reserve adjustments that did not recur during fiscal 2012. The increase in SG&A expense also reflects the combination of higher employee compensation and benefit expenses and higher acquisition-related expense. Partially offsetting those higher expenses was the combination of a current year insurance recovery and lower consulting and legal expense during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

We recorded total net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs of $34.8 million and $35.0 million for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. This slight decrease in pension expense of $0.2 million was primarily the result of a $5.2 million increase in service and interest cost during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011, combined with $0.2 million of additional net actuarial losses incurred during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. A higher expected return on plan assets had a favorable impact on pension expense of approximately $5.6 million for fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. We expect that pension expense will fluctuate on a year-to-year basis, depending primarily upon the investment performance of plan assets and potential changes in interest rates, but such changes are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial results. A decrease of 1.0% in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets assumptions would result in $7.7 million and $3.4 million higher expense, respectively. The assumptions and estimates used to determine the discount rate and expected return on plan assets are more fully described in Note L, “Pension Plans,” and Note M, “Postretirement Benefits,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Further discussion and analysis of the sensitivity surrounding our most critical assumptions under our pension and postretirement plans is discussed on pages 24-25 of this report under, “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Pension and Postretirement Plans.”

Other (Income), Net Other income for fiscal 2012 of $9.6 million compares with other income of $2.4 million during fiscal 2011. The majority of other income of approximately $9.2 million and $2.3 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively, is recorded by our industrial segment. The remaining balance is recorded by our consumer segment.

Other income includes royalty income of $1.5 million and $1.2 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also included is our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates totaling approximately $8.1 million and $1.2 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Reflected in fiscal 2012 is an adjustment for our change in accounting for our investment in Kemrock from an available for sale security to the equity method. In relation to that change, approximately $4.6 million of net earnings was recorded during our second quarter ended November 30, 2011, which relates to prior years.

Interest Expense Interest expense was $72.0 million for fiscal 2012 versus $65.4 million for fiscal 2011. Higher average borrowings, related to recent acquisitions, increased interest expense during fiscal 2012 by approximately $5.5 million versus fiscal 2011. Higher average borrowings year-over-year increased interest expense by approximately $2.2 million. Lower interest rates, which averaged 6.16% overall for fiscal 2012 compared with 6.32% for the same year of fiscal 2011, decreased interest expense by approximately $0.3 million during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. During fiscal 2011, we replaced our revolving credit facility with a new credit facility and wrote off all of the remaining $0.8 million in fees associated with the old revolving credit facility, which did not recur in fiscal 2012.

Investment (Income), Net Net investment income of $4.2 million during fiscal 2012 compares to net investment income of $15.7 million for fiscal 2011. Dividend and interest income totaled $6.7 million during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011. Net realized gains on the sales of investments resulted in a net loss of $0.9 million for fiscal 2012 versus a net gain of $9.7 million for fiscal 2011. Impairments recognized on securities that management has determined are other-than-temporary declines in value approximated $1.6 million for fiscal 2012, versus $0.7 million for fiscal 2011.

Income Before Income Taxes (“IBT”) Our consolidated pretax income fiscal 2012 of $328.3 million compares with pretax income of $295.1 million for fiscal 2011, which results in a pretax profit margin on net sales of 8.7% for both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.

Our industrial segment had IBT of $278.7 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 11.0% for fiscal 2012, versus IBT of $232.5 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 10.3%, for fiscal 2011. The improvement in IBT as a percent of sales for the industrial segment resulted primarily from the recognition of this segment’s equity in the earnings of its joint venture with Kemrock beginning with the current fiscal year, and a decrease in warranty expense during fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011. Our consumer segment IBT increased to $160.1 million, or 12.9% of net sales for fiscal 2012, from the fiscal 2011 result of $146.0 million, or 13.0% of net sales. While organic sales for the consumer segment grew by 10.2% in fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011, IBT as a percent of sales for the consumer segment remained relatively flat year-over-year from the impact of higher raw material costs, higher compensation expense and higher distribution expense during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

Income Tax Rate The effective income tax rate was 28.8% for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 compared to an effective income tax rate of 31.1% for fiscal 2011.

For fiscal 2012 and, to a lesser extent for fiscal 2011, the effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate principally due to lower effective tax rates of certain of our foreign subsidiaries and lower valuation allowances on foreign tax credit carryforwards. These decreases in taxes were partially offset by increases in tax as a result of the impact of non-deductible business operating expenses, state and local income taxes and provisions for valuation allowances associated with losses incurred by certain of our foreign businesses. Additionally, for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 decreases in the effective income tax rate resulted from a one-time benefit related to lower income tax rates in the United Kingdom and for net adjustments to reserves for contingencies, including interest thereon.

As of May 31, 2012, we have determined, based on the available evidence, that it is uncertain whether we will be able to recognize certain deferred tax assets. Therefore, we intend to maintain the tax valuation allowances recorded at May 31, 2012 for those deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence (for example, cumulative positive foreign earnings

or additional foreign source income) exists to support their reversal. These valuation allowances relate to U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards, certain foreign net operating losses and net foreign deferred tax assets. A portion of the valuation allowance is associated with deferred tax assets recorded in purchase accounting for prior year acquisitions.

Net Income Net income of $233.8 million for fiscal 2012 compares to net income of $203.2 million for fiscal 2011. This results in a net margin on sales of 6.2% and 6.0% for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. While organic sales grew by 8.6% during fiscal 2012 versus net sales for fiscal 2011, raw material costs and employee compensation, distribution and acquisition-related expenses were higher during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011. During the year ended May 31, 2012, we had net income from noncontrolling interests of $17.9 million versus $14.1 million during fiscal 2011. Net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders was $215.9 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, versus $189.1 million for fiscal 2011, for a margin on net sales of 5.7% and 5.6% for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Diluted earnings per share of common stock for fiscal 2012 of $1.65 compares with $1.45 for fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2011 Compared with Fiscal 2010

Net Sales On a consolidated basis, net sales of $3.38 billion for fiscal 2011 declined 0.9%, or $30.9 million, from net sales of $3.41 billion during fiscal 2010. As previously disclosed, at May 31, 2010, we deconsolidated SPHC and its subsidiaries from our balance sheet, and eliminated the results of SPHC’s and its subsidiaries’ operations from our results of operations beginning on that date. Excluding SPHC’s results for fiscal 2010 and adding back intercompany sales to SPHC results in adjusted prior year net sales of $3.12 billion, a decrease of $296.5 million, or approximately 8.7% of fiscal 2010 sales, as reported. As such, net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 8.5%, or $265.6 million from adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010. The organic growth in sales amounted to 6.6%, or $205.6 million, of the increase in fiscal 2011 net sales versus adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010, which includes volume-related improvements approximating 5.3% or $166.4 million, and the impact of favorable pricing initiatives, approximating 0.9% of the prior period adjusted net sales, or $27.1 million. These favorable pricing initiatives, including those across both of our reportable segments, were instituted primarily during prior periods in order to offset the escalating costs of many of our raw materials. Also reflected in the 6.6% growth in organic sales is the impact of favorable foreign exchange rates year-over-year, which amounted to 0.4% of adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010, or $12.1 million. These gains resulted primarily from the weaker dollar against the Canadian, Latin American and Asia-Pacific currencies during fiscal 2011, offset in part by unfavorable adjustments against the euro. Eleven small acquisitions, net of a product line divestiture, during fiscal 2011 provided 1.9% of net sales growth over adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010, or $60.0 million.

Industrial segment net sales, which comprised 67% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011, totaled $2.26 billion, a decline of 2.9% from $2.33 billion during fiscal 2010. As discussed above, net sales for fiscal 2011 reflect the impact of the deconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries. Net sales relating to the deconsolidated group for fiscal 2010 totaled $297.0 million, or 12.8% of net sales for fiscal 2010, as reported. Compared with adjusted net sales of $2.03 billion for fiscal 2010, this segment’s fiscal 2011 net sales increased by 11.3%, or $228.6 million. This increase in the industrial segment’s net sales during fiscal 2011 reflects organic growth of 8.4%, including unit volume growth of approximately 6.7%, favorable pricing of approximately 1.2% and favorable foreign exchange rates of approximately 0.5% of fiscal 2010 adjusted net sales. During

fiscal 2011, organic sales grew across nearly all of our industrial segment product lines as a result of general improvements in the economy, with the strongest growth achieved by our roofing, corrosion control coatings, fiberglass composite structures, European sealants, polymer flooring and fluorescent pigment product lines. Nine small acquisitions provided 2.9% of this segment’s fiscal 2011 growth in net sales versus fiscal 2010 adjusted net sales.

Consumer segment net sales, which comprised 33% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011, totaled $1.12 billion, an increase of 3.5% from $1.08 billion during fiscal 2010. The improvement in this segment resulted from organic growth in sales of 3.3%, including growth in unit volume sales of approximately 2.8%, the impact of current period price increases of approximately 0.3% and the impact of favorable foreign exchange rates of approximately 0.2% of fiscal 2010 net sales. The organic sales growth versus fiscal 2010 was the result of increased market share among several product lines in this segment, combined with new product introductions. Two small acquisitions, net of a product line divestiture, provided approximately 0.2% of the net change in the consumer segment’s net sales during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010.

Gross Profit Margin Our consolidated gross profit margin declined to 41.4% of net sales for fiscal 2011 from 42.1% of net sales for fiscal 2010, and from 42.3% of adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010, despite our 6.6% growth in organic sales volume versus fiscal 2010 adjusted results. The primary source of this current period decline in gross profit margin was raw material costs, which were higher during fiscal 2011 versus the prior year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”) Our consolidated SG&A margin improved to 31.3% of net sales for fiscal 2011 compared with 32.5% of actual net sales and 32.3% of adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010. The decrease in SG&A as a percent of net sales versus the prior period’s adjusted SG&A margin primarily reflects the impact of 5.3% unit volume growth in net sales versus adjusted net sales from fiscal 2010. Additionally, we incurred lower warranty, advertising and promotional expenses during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010, along with a favorable reduction in insurance-related expenses. Partially offsetting those improvements during fiscal 2011 was the combination of higher compensation expenses and higher commissions relating to the fiscal 2011 mix of sales, in addition to higher bad debt expense, distribution, professional services expenses and unfavorable foreign exchange transactions versus fiscal 2010.

Our industrial segment SG&A improved to 32.7% of net sales for fiscal 2011 from 33.6% of net sales for fiscal 2010, and versus 33.8% of adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010, primarily reflecting the impact of 6.7% growth in sales volume during fiscal 2011 versus adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010 in this segment, in addition to lower warranty expense, lower professional services expense and lower bad debt expense. Partially offsetting those improvements were higher commissions on sales resulting from the fiscal 2011 growth and mix of organic sales, as well as higher compensation, employee benefit expense and unfavorable foreign exchange transactions.

Our consumer segment SG&A as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2011 improved to 25.2% compared with 25.8% during fiscal 2010, primarily reflecting the favorable margin impact of 2.8% growth in organic sales volume during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010, combined with lower discretionary spending on advertising expense, including promotional costs, and reductions in environmental accruals during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010. Partially offsetting those gains in this segment was the combination of higher bad debt expense during fiscal

2011 versus fiscal 2010, along with slightly higher distribution expense, unfavorable foreign exchange transactions and insurance-related reserve adjustments.

SG&A expenses in our corporate/other category decreased during fiscal 2011 to $37.0 million from $46.1 million during fiscal 2010. This $9.1 million decrease reflects the combination of a reimbursement received from an outside service provider in connection with a correction to prior billings, along with lower hospitalization, employee benefit expenses and lower insurance-related expense. Partially offsetting those lower expenses was the combination of higher environmental expense, professional services expenses, acquisition-related expenses and employee-related compensation during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010.

We recorded total net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs of $35.0 million and $30.1 million for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in pension and postretirement expense of $4.9 million was primarily the result of a $5.5 million increase in service and interest cost during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010, combined with $3.1 million of additional net actuarial losses incurred during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010. A higher expected return on plan assets had a favorable impact on pension expense of approximately $3.7 million for fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010. We expect that pension and postretirement expense will fluctuate on a year-to-year basis, depending primarily upon the investment performance of plan assets and potential changes in interest rates, but such changes are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial results.

Other (Income), Net Other income for fiscal 2011 of $2.4 million compares with other income of $2.8 million during fiscal 2010. Other income includes royalty income of $1.2 million for fiscal 2011, and also includes our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates totaling approximately $1.2 million and $2.8 million for fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The majority of the other income balance for both fiscal 2011 and 2010 is recorded by our industrial segment.

Interest Expense Interest expense was $65.4 million during fiscal 2011 versus $59.3 million during fiscal 2010. Higher average borrowings, combined with additional borrowings for acquisitions, increased interest expense during fiscal 2011 by approximately $3.8 million versus fiscal 2010. Higher interest rates, which averaged 6.32% overall for fiscal 2011 compared with 6.24% for fiscal 2010, increased interest expense by approximately $1.5 million versus fiscal 2010. Lastly, during fiscal 2011, we replaced our old revolving credit facility with a new credit facility, and wrote off the remaining $0.8 million in fees associated with the old revolving credit facility.

Investment (Income), Net Net investment income of $15.7 million during fiscal 2011 compares to net investment income of $7.6 million for fiscal 2010. Dividend and interest income totaled $6.7 million during fiscal 2011 versus $5.7 million during fiscal 2010. Net realized gains on the sales of investments resulted in a net gain of $9.7 million for fiscal 2011 versus a net gain of $2.2 million for fiscal 2010. Slightly offsetting those gains were impairments, recognized on securities that management has determined are other-than-temporary declines in value, of approximately $0.7 million for fiscal 2011, versus $0.3 million for fiscal 2010.

Net Loss Upon Deconsolidation of SPHC Fiscal 2010 includes the impact of the deconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries of $7.9 million, which is more fully described in Note A(2).

IBT Our consolidated pretax income for fiscal 2011 of $295.1 million compares with fiscal 2010 pretax income of $268.5 million, and with fiscal 2010 adjusted pretax income of

$260.2 million. Pretax profit margin on net sales was 8.7% for fiscal 2011 versus an adjusted pretax profit margin on net sales of 8.3% during fiscal 2010.

Our industrial segment had IBT of $232.5 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 10.3% for fiscal 2011 versus IBT of $225.5 million, for a profit margin on net sales of 9.7% for fiscal 2010, principally reflecting the impact on this segment of the deconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries on May 31, 2010. Excluding the deconsolidated group’s results from fiscal 2010 pretax income, our industrial segment’s IBT was $202.5 million, for a profit margin on adjusted net sales of 10.0%. Our consumer segment’s IBT declined to $146.0 million, or 13.0% of net sales for fiscal 2011, from the fiscal 2010 result of $147.0 million, or 13.6% of net sales, primarily from the impact of increased raw material costs during fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010.

Income Tax Rate The effective income tax rate was 31.1% for fiscal 2011 compared to an effective income tax rate of 32.5% for fiscal 2010.

For fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, the effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate principally due to decreases in taxes as a result of the impact of certain foreign operations on our U.S. taxes, the effect of lower tax rates in certain of our foreign jurisdictions, the domestic manufacturing deduction and the research tax credit. Additionally, for fiscal 2011, a decrease in the effective income tax rate resulted from a one-time benefit related to changes in tax laws in the United Kingdom, including the effect of lower income tax rates. These decreases in taxes were partially offset by increases in state and local income taxes, non-deductible business operating expenses and provisions for valuation allowances associated with losses incurred by certain of our foreign businesses and for valuation allowances associated with foreign tax credit carryforwards.

Net Income Net income of $203.2 million for fiscal 2011 compares to net income of $181.1 million for fiscal 2010, and to adjusted net income of $178.4 million for fiscal 2010. Net margin on sales was 6.0% for fiscal 2011 compared to adjusted net margin of 5.7% on sales for fiscal 2010. The slight improvement in this net margin on an adjusted basis year-over-year primarily resulted from the benefit of our overall 6.6% growth in organic sales during fiscal 2011 versus adjusted net sales for fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011, we had net income from noncontrolling interests of $14.1 million, primarily related to our deconsolidation of SPHC. If the deconsolidation of SPHC had occurred prior to fiscal 2010, there would have been approximately $15.5 million in net income from noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2010. Net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders was $189.1 million for fiscal 2011, versus $180.0 million for fiscal 2010, for a margin on net sales of 5.6% for fiscal 2011 compared to 5.3% net margin on sales for fiscal 2010. On an adjusted basis, the fiscal 2010 net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders was $162.9 million, for an adjusted margin on net sales of 5.2%.

Diluted earnings per share of common stock for fiscal 2011 of $1.45 compares with $1.39 per share during fiscal 2010, as reported, and to an adjusted fiscal 2010 of $1.26 per share.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Operating Activities

Operating activities provided cash flow of $294.9 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 compared with $238.2 million during the prior fiscal year, resulting in a net increase in cash of $56.7 million during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011.

The net change in cash from operations includes the change in net income, which increased by $30.6 million during fiscal 2012 versus fiscal 2011; items adjusting net income for non-cash expenses and income, which increased cash flows by approximately $16.8 million less during the current fiscal year versus the prior fiscal year; and changes in working capital accounts and all other accruals, which increased cash flows by $42.9 million during the current fiscal year versus the prior fiscal year.

The decrease in accounts receivable since May 31, 2011 represents a cash inflow of $1.0 million versus the $70.4 million of cash used by accounts receivable during fiscal 2011, or approximately $71.4 million more cash provided year-over-year. This resulted from the timing of sales and collections on accounts receivable. Days sales outstanding at May 31, 2012 decreased to 58.1 days from 62.1 days sales outstanding at May 31, 2011.

Inventory balances provided $7.1 million of cash during fiscal 2012, compared with a use of cash of $71.5 million during fiscal 2011, or $78.6 million more cash provided year-over-year. Days of inventory outstanding at May 31, 2012 decreased to 68.8 days from 73.7 days of inventory outstanding at May 31, 2011.

The current year change in accounts payable provided $42.3 million less cash during the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year, resulting from a change in the timing of certain payments during the current period versus the same period a year ago. Accrued compensation and benefits provided approximately $16.4 million less cash during fiscal 2012 versus the prior year, as there were higher bonus payments made during the current year versus the same period a year ago. Other accruals, including those for other short-term and long-term items and changes in accrued loss reserves, provided $5.7 million more cash during fiscal 2012 versus the prior fiscal year, due to changes in the timing of such payments. Lastly, the current year change in cash from operating activities – other, relates partly to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange as the U.S. dollar was stronger against other major currencies at the end of the current fiscal year versus a year ago. Additionally, this impact was combined with an increase in losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) relating to pensions, which had an unfavorable impact of $77.5 million, net of tax, on the current year cash from operating activities. The increase in pension losses recognized in AOCI is primarily attributable to a lower discount rate during 2012 versus 2011 and a lower actual return on pension plan assets compared with the expected return on pension plan assets for 2012.

Cash provided from operations, along with the use of available credit lines, as required, remain our primary sources of liquidity.

Investing Activities

Capital expenditures, other than for ordinary repairs and replacements, are made to accommodate our continued growth to achieve production and distribution efficiencies, expand capacity, introduce new technology, improve EH&S capabilities, improve information systems, and enhance our administration capabilities. Capital expenditures of $71.6 million during fiscal 2012 compare with depreciation of $51.9 million. Capital spending now exceeds depreciation expense during fiscal 2012, and we expect that trend to continue. We believe our current production capacity is adequate to meet our immediate needs based on anticipated growth rates. Certain capital expenditures are already underway or beginning imminently to add longer-term capacity. Not reflected in our capital expenditures is the capacity added through our recent acquisitions of product lines and businesses, which totaled approximately $30.1 million during fiscal 2012. We anticipate that additional shifts at our production facilities, coupled with

the capacity added through acquisition activity and our planned increase in future capital spending levels, will enable us to meet increased demand during the current fiscal year.

Our captive insurance companies invest their excess cash in marketable securities in the ordinary course of conducting their operations, and this activity will continue. Differences in the amounts related to these activities on a year-over-year basis are primarily attributable to differences in the timing and performance of their investments balanced against amounts required to satisfy claims. At May 31, 2012, the fair value of our investments in marketable securities totaled $129.2 million, of which investments with a fair value of $43.8 million were in an unrealized loss position. Included in the $129.2 million of marketable securities, but held outside of our captive insurers, is our $22.7 million investment in 5.5% convertible bonds issued by Kemrock in April 2012. The bonds are convertible into ordinary shares or global depositary receipts each representing one ordinary share of Kemrock stock, and may be converted at any time on or after June 4, 2012 and up to the close of business on June 12, 2017. The fair value of our portfolio of marketable securities is based on quoted market prices for identical, or similar, instruments in active or non-active markets or model-derived-valuations with observable inputs. We have no marketable securities whose fair value is subject to unobservable inputs. At May 31, 2011, the fair value of our investments in marketable securities, including $35.8 million in securities held outside of our captives’ investments, totaled $149.6 million, of which investments with a fair value of $21.6 million were in an unrealized loss position. Total pretax unrealized losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 were $3.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

We regularly review our marketable securities in unrealized loss positions in order to determine whether or not we have the ability and intent to hold these investments. That determination is based upon the severity and duration of the decline, in addition to our evaluation of the cash flow requirements of our businesses. Unrealized losses at May 31, 2012 were generally related to the normal volatility in valuations over the past several months for a portion of our portfolio of investments in marketable securities. The unrealized losses generally relate to investments whose fair values at May 31, 2012 were less than 15% below their original cost or that have been in a loss position for less than six consecutive months. If we were to experience unrealized losses that were to continue for longer periods of time, or arise to more significant levels of unrealized losses within our portfolio of investments in marketable securities in the future, we may recognize additional other-than-temporary impairment losses. Such potential losses could have a material impact on our results of operations in any given reporting period. As such, we continue to closely evaluate the status of our investments and our ability and intent to hold these investments.

As of May 31, 2012, approximately 95% of our consolidated cash and cash equivalents were held at various foreign subsidiaries. Currently, the funds held at our foreign subsidiaries are considered permanently reinvested to be used, for instance, to expand operations organically or for acquisitions in foreign jurisdictions. Our operations in the U.S. generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy U.S. operating requirements. Although we do not intend to repatriate any significant amounts of these cash balances to the U.S. in the foreseeable future, any repatriation of these balances could be subject to governmental restrictions and U.S. and foreign taxes. However, a portion of the foreign earnings have previously been subject to U.S. taxation and could be repatriated to the U.S. with little or no residual tax impact. We believe that the tax impact of repatriating these previously taxed earnings to the U.S. would not have a material impact on our financial results.

As previously stated, we intend to permanently reinvest the cash and cash equivalents held at our various foreign subsidiaries for foreign expansion and other uses. Due to the uncertainties and complexities involved in the various options for repatriation of foreign cash, including any associated governmental or other restrictions, it is not practicable to calculate the deferred taxes associated with the remittance of these cash balances.

Financing Activities

As a result of the SPHC bankruptcy filing, our access to the cash flows of SPHC and its subsidiaries has been restricted. However, the bankruptcy filing has not resulted in any reductions in our credit ratings by Moody’s Investor Service, Standard & Poors or Fitch Ratings. Therefore, we feel this has not adversely impacted our ability to gain access to capital.

Our available liquidity, including our cash and cash equivalents and amounts available under our committed credit facilities, stood at $813.1 million at May 31, 2012. Our debt-to-capital ratio was 48.5% at May 31, 2012, compared with 46.7% at May 31, 2011.

6.125% Notes due 2019

On October 9, 2009, we sold $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Notes due 2019 (the “Notes”). The net proceeds from the offering of the Notes were used to repay $163.7 million in principal amount of our unsecured notes due October 15, 2009, and approximately $120.0 million in principal amount of short-term borrowings outstanding under our accounts receivable securitization program. The balance of the net proceeds was used for general corporate purposes.

On May 27, 2011 we issued and sold an additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes. The offering was priced at 108.09% of the $150.0 million principal amount of Notes, together with accrued interest to, but excluding the closing date, and at that price the Notes have a yield to maturity of 4.934%. The net proceeds of $162.1 million were used for general corporate purposes, including working capital and potential acquisitions of complementary businesses or other assets.

Revolving Credit Agreement

On January 5, 2011, we established a $400.0 million senior unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility with a group of banks (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility provided a $35.0 million sub-limit for swing loans (relatively short-term borrowings used for working capital purposes) and a $100.0 million sub-limit for the issuance of letters of credit. We had the option to increase the Revolving Credit Facility by an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $100.0 million. The purpose of this Revolving Credit Facility was to refinance our prior credit facility, and any borrowings from this Revolving Credit Facility could have been used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. The Revolving Credit Facility would have matured on January 5, 2015, four years from its closing date. The Revolving Credit Facility required us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a leverage covenant and interest coverage ratio. Under the terms of the leverage covenant, we could not permit our consolidated indebtedness as of any fiscal quarter end to exceed 60% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The minimum required consolidated interest coverage ratio for EBITDA to interest expense under the Revolving Credit Facility was 3.50 to 1.

As of May 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in our Revolving Credit Facility, including the leverage and interest coverage ratio covenants. At that date, our leverage ratio was 48.7%, while our interest coverage ratio was 7.04 to 1.

On June 29, 2012, we terminated our Revolving Credit Facility and entered into an unsecured syndicated revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with a group of banks. The New Credit Facility expires on June 29, 2017 and provides for a five-year $600.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes sublimits for the issuance of swingline loans, which are comparatively short-term loans used for working capital purposes, and letters of credit. The aggregate maximum principal amount of the commitments under the New Credit Facility may be expanded upon our request, subject to certain conditions, to $800.0 million. The New Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness, to finance working capital and capital expenditure needs, and for general corporate purposes.

The New Credit Facility requires us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a leverage covenant and interest coverage ratio. Under the terms of the leverage covenant, we may not permit our consolidated indebtedness as of any fiscal quarter end to exceed 60% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The minimum required consolidated interest coverage ratio for EBITDA to interest expense is 3.50 to 1. The interest coverage ratio is calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four fiscal quarters then ended.

Our access to funds under our New Credit Facility is dependent on the ability of the financial institutions that are parties to the New Credit Facility to meet their funding commitments. Those financial institutions may not be able to meet their funding commitments if they experience shortages of capital and liquidity or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests within a short period of time. Moreover, the obligations of the financial institutions under our New Credit Facility are several and not joint and, as a result, a funding default by one or more institutions does not need to be made up by the others.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

On April 7, 2009, we replaced our existing $125.0 million accounts receivable securitization program, which was set to expire on May 7, 2009, with a new, three-year, $150.0 million accounts receivable securitization program (the “AR Program”). The AR Program, which was established with two banks for certain of our subsidiaries (“originating subsidiaries”), contemplates that the originating subsidiaries will sell certain of their accounts receivable to RPM Funding Corporation, a wholly owned special purpose entity (“SPE”), which will then transfer undivided interests in such receivables to the participating banks. Once transferred to the SPE, such receivables are owned in their entirety by the SPE and are not available to satisfy claims of our creditors or creditors of the originating subsidiaries until the obligations owing to the participating banks have been paid in full. The transactions contemplated by the AR Program do not constitute a form of off-balance sheet financing and are, and will be, fully reflected in our financial statements. The entry into the new AR Program increased our liquidity by $25.0 million, but also increased our financing costs due to higher market rates. The amounts available under the AR Program are subject to changes in the credit ratings of our customers, customer concentration levels or certain characteristics of the underlying accounts receivable, and therefore at certain times we may not be able to fully access the $150.0 million of funding available under the AR Program.

On May 28, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the AR Program whereby certain “Excluded Subsidiaries” would be excluded from the defined term, “Subsidiary” as used in the AR Program. Furthermore, the defined term “EBITDA” as used in the AR Program has been revised to add back non-cash charges or losses and subtract non-cash gains in each case related to, or resulting from, the bankruptcy filing of any Excluded Subsidiary.

On May 31, 2011, we entered into Amendment No. 5 to our Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated April 7, 2009. Amendment No. 5 extends the term of the AR Program to May 30, 2014, subject to possible earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events. Pricing continues to be based on the Alternate Base Rate, a LIBOR market index rate or LIBOR for a specified tranche period plus a margin of 1.0%. This margin will increase to 1.25% if we do not maintain our public debt rating of at least BB+/Ba1/BB+ from any two of Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch. In addition, a monthly unused fee is payable to the purchasers. Amendment No. 5 also modified or eliminated certain of the financial covenants under the AR Program. Under the terms of the amended AR Program, we may not permit our consolidated indebtedness calculated on the last day of each fiscal quarter to exceed 60% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The interest coverage ratio covenant continues to require that we not permit the ratio, calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four fiscal quarters then ended, of EBITDA to interest expense for such period to be less than 3.5 to 1. Finally, the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under the pre-amended AR Program has been deleted. The financial tests that remain in the AR Program are substantially identical to the financial covenants contained in our New Credit Facility.

Our failure to comply with the covenants described above and other covenants contained in the New Credit Facility could result in an event of default under that agreement, entitling the lenders to, among other things, declare the entire amount outstanding under the New Credit Facility to be due and payable. The instruments governing our other outstanding indebtedness generally include cross-default provisions that provide that under certain circumstances, an event of default that results in acceleration of our indebtedness under the New Credit Facility will entitle the holders of such other indebtedness to declare amounts outstanding immediately due and payable.

We are exposed to market risk associated with interest rates. We do not use financial derivative instruments for trading purposes, nor do we engage in foreign currency, commodity or interest rate speculation. Concurrent with the issuance of our 6.7% Senior Unsecured Notes, RPM United Kingdom G.P. entered into a cross currency swap, which fixed the interest and principal payments in euros for the life of the 6.7% Senior Unsecured Notes and resulted in an effective euro fixed rate borrowing of 5.31%.

The following table summarizes our financial obligations and their expected maturities at May 31, 2012 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the periods indicated.

Contractual Obligations


			Payments Due In
(In thousands)	Total Contractual Payment Stream		2013		2014-15		2016-17		After 2017
Long-term debt obligations	$	1,115,536	$	2,584	$	251,522	$	151,879	$	709,551
Capital lease obligations		2,087		562		1,111		414
Operating lease obligations		152,007		37,473		49,779		28,795		35,960
Other long-term liabilities ⁽¹⁾:
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations		364,942		64,526		116,552		91,732		92,132
Contributions to pension and postretirement plans ⁽²⁾		365,200		39,400		89,000		91,500		145,300

Total	$	1,999,772	$	144,545	$	507,964	$	364,320	$	982,943

(1)

Excluded from other long-term liabilities are our gross long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, which totaled $5.0 million at May 31, 2012. Currently, we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities related to these liabilities. See Note F, “Income Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

(2)

These amounts represent our estimated cash contributions to be made in the periods indicated for our pension and postretirement plans, assuming no actuarial gains or losses, assumption changes or plan changes occur in any period. The projection results assume the required minimum contribution will be contributed.

The U.S. dollar fluctuated throughout the year, and was moderately stronger against other major currencies where we conduct operations at the fiscal year end versus the previous year end, causing an unfavorable change in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (refer to Note I to the Consolidated Financial Statements) component of stockholders’ equity of $89.9 million this year versus a favorable change of $97.8 million last year. The change in fiscal 2012 was in addition to unfavorable net changes of $77.5 million, $4.0 million and $12.6 million related to adjustments required for minimum pension and other postretirement liabilities, unrealized gains on derivatives and unrealized gains on securities, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet financings, other than the minimum operating lease commitments included in the above Contractual Obligations table and further described in Note K, “Leases,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have no subsidiaries that are not included in our financial statements, nor do we have any interests in, or relationships with, any special purpose entities that are not reflected in our financial statements. At the end of fiscal 2010, we deconsolidated our wholly owned subsidiary, SPHC, and its subsidiaries, from our balance sheet and eliminated the results of SPHC’s operations from our operations beginning on May 31, 2010. We account for our investment in SPHC, which had no value at May 31, 2012 and 2011, under the cost method (refer to Note A(2), “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates because we fund our operations through long- and short-term borrowings and denominate our business transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. We utilize a sensitivity analysis to measure the potential loss in earnings based on a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates and a 10% change in foreign currency rates. A summary of our primary market risk exposures follows.

Interest Rate Risk

Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from our floating rate debt, including various revolving and other lines of credit (refer to Note E, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At May 31, 2012, approximately 5% of our debt was subject to floating interest rates.

If interest rates were to increase 100 bps from May 31, 2012 and, assuming no changes in debt from the May 31, 2012 levels, the additional annual interest expense would amount to approximately $0.5 million on a pretax basis. A similar increase in interest rates in fiscal 2011 would have resulted in approximately $0.5 million in additional interest expense.

All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges and/ or any ineffective portion of hedges are recognized as a gain or loss in our Consolidated Statement of Income in the current period. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used effectively as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings (losses), along with the change in the value of the hedged item. Such derivative transactions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Foreign Currency Risk

Our foreign sales and results of operations are subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations (refer to Note A, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As most of our foreign operations are in countries with fairly stable currencies, such as Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, this effect has not generally been material. In addition, foreign debt is denominated in the respective foreign currency, thereby eliminating any related translation impact on earnings.

If the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen, our foreign results of operations will be unfavorably impacted, but the effect is not expected to be material. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates would not have resulted in a material impact to net income for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. We do not currently hedge against the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The foregoing discussion includes forward-looking statements relating to our business. These forward-looking statements, or other statements made by us, are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors (including those specified below), which are difficult to predict and, in many instances, are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any such forward-looking statements. These uncertainties and factors include (a) global markets and general economic conditions, including uncertainties surrounding the volatility in financial markets, the availability of capital and the effect of changes in interest rates, and the viability of banks and other financial institutions; (b) the prices, supply and capacity of raw materials, including assorted pigments, resins, solvents, and other natural gas- and oil-based materials; packaging, including plastic containers; and transportation services, including fuel surcharges; (c) continued growth in demand for our products; (d) legal, environmental and litigation risks inherent in our construction and chemicals businesses and risks related to the adequacy of our insurance coverage for such matters; (e) the effect of changes in interest rates; (f) the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates upon our foreign operations; (g) the effect of non-currency risks of investing in and conducting operations in foreign countries, including those relating to domestic and international political, social, economic and regulatory factors; (h) risks and uncertainties associated with our ongoing acquisition and divestiture activities; (i) risks related to the adequacy of our contingent liability reserves; (j) risks and uncertainties associated with the SPHC bankruptcy proceedings; and (k) other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2012, as the same may be updated from time to time. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, information or circumstances that arise after the filing date of this document.

Consolidated Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


May 31,	2012			2011
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	315,968		$	435,011
Trade accounts receivable (less allowances of $26,507 and $27,597, respectively)		745,541			712,863
Inventories		489,978			463,120
Deferred income taxes		19,868			17,764
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		239,982			239,212

Total current assets		1,811,337			1,867,970

Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost		1,050,965			998,245
Allowance for depreciation and amortization		(632,133	)		(608,218	)

Property, plant and equipment, net		418,832			390,027

Other Assets
Goodwill		849,346			831,489
Other intangible assets, net of amortization		345,620			312,867
Other		134,885			112,676

Total other assets		1,329,851			1,257,032

Total Assets	$	3,560,020		$	3,515,029

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	391,467		$	358,790
Current portion of long-term debt		2,584			2,549
Accrued compensation and benefits		166,178			156,981
Accrued loss reserves		54,652			57,645
Other accrued liabilities		144,911			159,324

Total current liabilities		759,792			735,289

Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt, less current maturities		1,112,952			1,106,304
Other long-term liabilities		346,967			224,026
Deferred income taxes		26,326			62,042

Total long-term liabilities		1,486,245			1,392,372

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 50,000 shares; none issued
Common stock, par value $0.01; authorized 300,000 shares;
issued 135,741 and outstanding 131,555 as of May 2012;
issued 134,406 and outstanding 130,580 as of May 2011		1,316			1,306
Paid-in capital		742,895			735,245
Treasury stock, at cost		(69,480	)		(62,495	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(177,893	)		6,073
Retained earnings		686,818			583,035

Total RPM International Inc. stockholders’ equity		1,183,656			1,263,164
Noncontrolling interest		130,327			124,204

Total Equity		1,313,983			1,387,368

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	3,560,020		$	3,515,029

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	233,763		$	203,168		$	181,127
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		51,939			52,385			61,823
Amortization		21,759			20,368			22,430
Net loss upon deconsolidation of SPHC								7,946
Other-than-temporary impairments on marketable securities		1,604			693			260
Deferred income taxes		(7,088	)		7,708			32,485
Stock-based compensation expense		13,904			12,282			10,030
Other		(6,590	)		(1,086	)		(1,768	)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect from purchases and sales of businesses:
Decrease (increase) in receivables		980			(70,440	)		(17,748	)
Decrease (increase) in inventory		7,115			(71,523	)		(15,059	)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current and long-term assets		17,857			(22,645	)		2,230
Increase in accounts payable		13,635			55,896			19,638
Increase in accrued compensation and benefits		3,162			19,564			7,206
(Decrease) in accrued loss reserves		(4,909	)		(8,198	)		(2,705	)
Increase in other accrued liabilities		43,650			41,263			42,079
Payments made for asbestos-related claims								(92,621	)
Other		(95,909	)		(1,269	)		(53,417	)

Cash From Operating Activities		294,872			238,166			203,936

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(71,615	)		(39,826	)		(23,241	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(163,414	)		(38,972	)		(73,985	)
Purchase of marketable securities		(69,824	)		(92,060	)		(105,364	)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		51,415			77,035			93,972
Proceeds from sales of assets and businesses		2,171			1,301			1,892
Decrease in cash due to deconsolidation of SPHC								(18,568	)
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates		(31,842	)		(9,315	)		(2,745	)
Other		15,787			(4,103	)		1,086

Cash (Used For) Investing Activities		(267,322	)		(105,940	)		(126,953	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Additions to long-term and short-term debt		27,894			200,499			314,059
Reductions of long-term and short-term debt		(36,128	)		(24,502	)		(319,642	)
Cash dividends		(112,153	)		(108,585	)		(105,430	)
Repurchase of stock		(6,985	)		(21,811	)		(2,283	)
Exercise of stock options		9,931			12,116			14,667

Cash From (Used For) Financing Activities		(117,441	)		57,717			(98,629	)

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		(29,152	)		29,713			(16,386	)

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(119,043	)		219,656			(38,032	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		435,011			215,355			253,387

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	315,968		$	435,011		$	215,355

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	70,517		$	62,892		$	53,897
Income taxes	$	96,067		$	65,935		$	45,090
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Debt from business combinations	$	3,858		$	—		$	2,991

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)			Retained Earnings			Total RPM International Inc. Equity			Non-Controlling Interests			Total Equity			Total Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
$	(50,453	)	$	(31,557	)	$	427,955		$	1,143,671		$	—		$	1,143,671		$	(13,103	)

	—			—			180,037			180,037			1,090			181,127			181,127
	—			(83,454	)		—			(83,454	)		—			(83,454	)		(83,454	)
	—			—			(105,430	)		(105,430	)		—			(105,430	)
	—			7,220			—			(77,765	)		80,678			2,913
	—			—			—			12,351			—			12,351
	—			—			—			3,852			—			3,852
	9,767			—			—			6,211			—			6,211

	(40,686	)		(107,791	)		502,562			1,079,473			81,768			1,161,241			97,673

	—			—			189,058			189,058			14,110			203,168			203,168
	—			113,864			—			113,864			15,093			128,957			128,957
	—			—			(108,585	)		(108,585	)		—			(108,585	)
	—			—			—			(13,233	)		13,233			—
	(17,948	)		—			—			(17,948	)		—			(17,948	)
	(507	)		—			—			9,898			—			9,898
	—			—			—			3,855			—			3,855
	(3,354	)		—			—			6,782			—			6,782

	(62,495	)		6,073			583,035			1,263,164			124,204			1,387,368			332,125

	—			—			215,936			215,936			17,827			233,763			233,763
	—			(183,966	)		—			(183,966	)		(27,879	)		(211,845	)		(211,845	)
	—			—			(112,153	)		(112,153	)		—			(112,153	)
	—			—			—			(16,175	)		16,175			—
	(3,008	)		—			—			(3,008	)		—			(3,008	)
	(718	)		—			—			6,599			—			6,599
	—			—			—			3,991			—			3,991
	(3,259	)		—			—			9,268			—			9,268

$	(69,480	)	$	(177,893	)	$	686,818		$	1,183,656		$	130,327		$	1,313,983		$	21,918

NOTE A — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1) Consolidation, Noncontrolling Interests and Basis of Presentation

Our financial statements include all of our majority-owned subsidiaries, except for certain subsidiaries that were deconsolidated on May 31, 2010 (please refer to Note A(2)). We account for our investments in less-than-majority-owned joint ventures, for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, under the equity method. Effects of transactions between related companies, except for certain subsidiaries that were deconsolidated, are eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling interests are presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements as if parent company investors (controlling interests) and other minority investors (noncontrolling interests) in partially owned subsidiaries have similar economic interests in a single entity. As a result, investments in noncontrolling interests are reported as equity in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, our Consolidated Financial Statements include 100% of a controlled subsidiary’s earnings, rather than only our share. Transactions between the parent company and noncontrolling interests are reported in equity as transactions between stockholders, provided that these transactions do not create a change in control.

In September 2011, we increased our ownership in Kemrock Industries and Exports Limited (“Kemrock”) to over 20% of Kemrock’s outstanding shares of common stock. Kemrock is one of India’s leading manufacturers of high performance reinforced polymer composites. Our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the impact of the change in accounting for our investment in Kemrock from an available for sale security to the equity method, which was required as a result of our additional investment in Kemrock in September 2011. Please refer to Note C for further discussion.

In October 2011, we entered into an agreement to advance Kemrock $12.0 million in exchange for the continued supply of goods and commercial materials that Kemrock has exported to us in the past, with the full amount to be satisfied over a six month period. As of May 31, 2012, Kemrock has supplied us with approximately $9.0 million of goods and materials; the remaining portion of the advance is expected to be satisfied during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The advance is classified within prepaid and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In December 2011, we entered into a separate agreement to loan Kemrock $15.0 million, which is to be repaid in cash, or alternatively, goods and commercial materials, no later than September 15, 2012. As of May 31, 2012, Kemrock had repaid approximately $5.0 million of this loan. The loan is classified as a note receivable and is included in prepaid and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also in December 2011, we entered into a global depository receipt (“GDR”) Purchase Agreement with Kemrock, whereby we purchased 693,072 GDRs of Kemrock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7.2 million. The GDRs are included in our investment in Kemrock and are classified as other long-term assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In April 2012, we invested $22.7 million in 5.5% convertible bonds issued by Kemrock. The bonds are convertible into ordinary shares or global depositary receipts each representing one ordinary share of Kemrock stock, and may be converted at any time on or after June 4, 2012 and up to the close of business on June 12, 2017. Our investment in Kemrock’s convertible bonds is classified in other long-term assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Our business is dependent on external weather factors. Historically, we have experienced strong sales and net income in our first, second and fourth fiscal quarters comprising the three-month periods ending August 31, November 30 and May 31, respectively, with weaker performance in our third fiscal quarter (December through February).

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

2) Deconsolidation of Specialty Products Holding Corp. (“SPHC”)

On May 31, 2010, Bondex International, Inc. (“Bondex”) and its parent, SPHC, filed Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. SPHC is our wholly owned subsidiary. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, when a subsidiary becomes subject to the control of a government, court, administrator, or regulator, deconsolidation of that subsidiary is generally required. We have therefore deconsolidated SPHC and its subsidiaries from our balance sheet as of May 31, 2010, and have eliminated the results of SPHC’s operations from our results of operations beginning on that date. We believe we have no responsibility for liabilities of SPHC and Bondex. As a result of the Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, on a prospective basis we will continue to account for our investment in SPHC under the cost method.

We had a net receivable from SPHC at May 31, 2010, that we expect may change before the bankruptcy proceedings have been finalized. The potential change relates to our indemnification of an insurer on appeal bonds pertaining to Bondex’s appeal of two asbestos cases that had been underway prior to the bankruptcy filing, neither of which are material in amount. During our 2012 third fiscal quarter, one of the appeal bonds was satisfied, and one remains outstanding. Included in the net amount due from SPHC are receivables and payables, which we concluded we have the right to report as a net amount based on several factors, including the fact that all amounts are determinable, the balances are due to and from our subsidiaries, and we have been given reasonable assurance that netting the applicable receivables and payables would remain legally enforceable. We analyzed our net investment in SPHC as of May 31, 2010, which included a review of our advances to SPHC, an assessment of the collectibility of our net receivables due from SPHC, and a computation of the gain to be recorded upon deconsolidation based on the carrying amount of our investment in SPHC. In accordance with GAAP, the gain on deconsolidation related to the carrying amount of net assets of SPHC at May 31, 2010, was calculated in accordance with ASC 810-10-40-5, as follows:

a)	the aggregate of (1) the fair value of consideration received, (2) the fair value of any retained noncontrolling investment in the former subsidiary at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated, and (3) the carrying amount of any noncontrolling interest in the former subsidiary; less

b)	the carrying amount of the former subsidiary’s assets and liabilities.

In determining the carrying value of any retained noncontrolling investment in SPHC at the date of deconsolidation we considered several factors, including analyses of cash flows combined with various assumptions relating to the future performance of this entity and a discounted value of SPHC’s recorded asbestos-related contingent obligations based on information available to us as of the date of deconsolidation. The discounted cash flow approach relies primarily on Level 3

unobservable inputs, whereby expected future cash flows are discounted using a rate that includes assumptions regarding an entity’s average cost of debt and equity, incorporates expected future cash flows based on internal business plans, and applies certain assumptions about risk and uncertainties due to the bankruptcy filing. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. As a result of this analysis, we determined that the carrying value of our retained interest in SPHC approximated zero.

As a result of the combined analyses of each of the components of our net investment in SPHC, we recorded a net loss of approximately $7.9 million, which was reflected in Other Expense, Net, during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year ended May 31, 2010. No changes have been made to these amounts through May 31, 2012.

3) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date the Consolidated Financial Statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

4) Acquisitions/Divestitures

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date.

During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, we completed six acquisitions. Four of the acquired product lines report through our industrial reportable segment, which included the following: a manufacturer of polyurethane and urethane-based flooring and decking solutions for cruise ships, yachts and naval applications based in Genoa, Italy; a supplier and provider of equipment and solutions for water and fire damage restoration, professional cleaning and environmental control based in Burlington, Washington; a supplier of passive fire protection and insulation products headquartered in Barcelona, Spain; and a manufacturer and supplier of EIFS and complementary product lines based in Germany and serving the German and French construction markets. Two of the acquired product lines report through our consumer reportable segment, which included the following: a manufacturer of automotive aftermarket coatings based in Hallam, Victoria, Australia; and a manufacturer of specialty coating based in Cicero, Illinois. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011, we completed six acquisitions, all of which report through our industrial reportable segment. The acquired product lines included the following: a supplier and installer of industrial flooring systems based in Norway; a product line that includes biodegradable modular systems for vegetated roofs; a manufacturer of polyurethane and epoxy coatings for waterproofing and industrial flooring based in Germany; a supplier of sealants, tapes and membranes for construction markets based in Turkey; a supplier of curb, bridge and channel drainage products for construction and infrastructure markets based in the U.K.; and a manufacturer of synthetic fibers engineered for use as a secondary reinforcement in ready mix concrete and cement-based building products based in LaFayette, Georgia. The purchase price for each acquisition has been allocated to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition. These acquisitions have been aggregated by year of purchase in the following table:


	Fiscal 2012 Acquisitions				Fiscal 2011 Acquisitions
(In thousands)	Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)	Total			Weighted-Average Intangible Asset Amortization Life (In Years)	Total
Current assets		$	84,693			$	15,221
Property, plant and equipment			30,096				3,016
Goodwill	N/A		55,177		N/A		16,265
Tradenames—indefinite lives	N/A		26,986		N/A		—
Other intangible assets	14		43,062		11		13,493
Other long-term assets			3,066				2

Total Assets Acquired		$	243,080			$	47,997
Liabilities assumed			(64,743	)			(9,776	)

Net Assets Acquired		$	178,337	⁽¹⁾		$	38,221	⁽²⁾

(1)	Figure includes cash acquired of $12.3 million.

(2)	Figure includes cash acquired of $0.8 million.

Our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the results of operations of acquired businesses as of their respective dates of acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 were not materially different from reported results and, consequently, are not presented.

5) Foreign Currency

The functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is its principal operating currency. Accordingly, for the periods presented, assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates at year end, while income and expense for the periods have been translated using a weighted-average exchange rate.

The resulting translation adjustments have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity, and will be included in net earnings only upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying foreign investment, neither of which is contemplated at this time. Transaction gains and losses have been immaterial during the past three fiscal years.

6) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.

7) Property, Plant & Equipment


May 31,	2012		2011
(In thousands)
Land	$	36,767	$	35,481
Buildings and leasehold improvements		291,026		277,268
Machinery and equipment		723,172		685,496

Total property, plant and equipment, at cost		1,050,965		998,245
Less: allowance for depreciation and amortization		632,133		608,218

Property, plant and equipment, net	$	418,832	$	390,027

We review long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying values of these assets may not be recoverable. For assets that are to be held and used, an impairment charge is recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets are less than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, internal appraisals or external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of their carrying value or estimated net realizable value.

Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the following ranges of useful lives:


Land improvements		3 to 30 years
Buildings and improvements		3 to 50 years
Machinery and equipment		1 to 30 years

Total depreciation expense for each fiscal period includes the charges to income that result from the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases.

8) Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized when realized or realizable, and when earned. In general, this is when title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Further, revenues are realizable when we have persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce our revenues for estimated customer returns and allowances, certain rebates, sales incentives, and promotions in the same period the related sales are recorded.

We also record revenues generated under long-term construction contracts, mainly in connection with the installation of specialized roofing and flooring systems, and related services. Certain long-term construction contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, and therefore we record contract revenues and related costs as our contracts progress. This method recognizes the economic results of contract performance on a timelier basis than does the completed-contract method; however, application of this method requires reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, as well as other dependable estimates. When reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made, or if other factors make estimates doubtful, the completed contract method is applied. Under the completed contract method, billings and costs are accumulated on the balance sheet as the contract progresses, but no revenue is recognized until the contract is complete or substantially complete.

9) Shipping Costs

Shipping costs paid to third-party shippers for transporting products to customers are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, shipping costs were $112.0 million, $103.0 million and $101.7 million, respectively.

10) Inventories


May 31,	2012		2011
(In thousands)
Raw material and supplies	$	160,869	$	142,133
Finished goods		329,109		320,987

Total Inventory	$	489,978	$	463,120

11) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350 and account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the entities acquired are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets.

We performed the required annual goodwill impairment assessments as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level, which is the operating segment level or one level below. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we early adopted new FASB guidance that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. It provides an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Under the new guidance, the traditional two-step quantitative process is required only if an entity concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. After performing the annual goodwill impairment qualitative assessment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we determined that it was necessary to perform the traditional two-step goodwill impairment test for two of our reporting units.

The traditional two-step quantitative goodwill impairment assessment involves estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and comparing it with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, additional steps are followed to determine and recognize, if appropriate, an impairment loss. Calculating the fair value of the reporting units requires our significant use of estimates and assumptions. We estimate the fair values of our reporting units by applying a combination of third-party market-value indicators, when observable market data is available, and discounted future cash flows to each of our reporting unit’s projected EBITDA. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including actual and forecasted operating results and market data. As a result of the assessments performed for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, there were no indicators of impairment.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually. We perform the required annual impairment assessments as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. The annual impairment assessment involves

estimating the fair value of each indefinite-lived asset and comparing it with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. Calculating the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets requires our significant use of estimates and assumptions. We estimate the fair values of our intangible assets by applying a relief-from-royalty calculation, which includes discounted future cash flows related to each of our intangible asset’s projected revenues. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including actual and forecasted revenues and market data. The results of our annual impairment test for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 did not result in any impairment.

Should the future earnings and cash flows at our reporting units decline and/or discount rates increase, future impairment charges to goodwill and other intangible assets may be required.

12) Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in SG&A expenses. For the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, advertising costs were $34.1 million, $33.3 million and $39.4 million, respectively.

13) Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The amounts charged to expense for the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $45.4 million, $40.9 million and $41.3 million, respectively.

14) Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to our employees and directors, which may include restricted stock, stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). We measure stock-based compensation cost at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We recognize the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the related vesting period. Refer to Note H, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further information.

15) Investment (Income) Expense, Net

Investment (income) expense, net, consists of the following components:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Interest (income)	$	(5,031	)	$	(5,058	)	$	(4,035	)
Loss (gain) on sale of marketable securities		862			(9,675	)		(2,160	)
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities		1,604			693			260
Dividend (income)		(1,621	)		(1,642	)		(1,641	)

Investment (income) expense, net	$	(4,186	)	$	(15,682	)	$	(7,576	)

16) Other (Income), Net

Other (income), net, consists of the following components:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Royalty (income), net	$	(1,520	)	$	(1,249	)	$	(2,829	)
Equity in (income) of unconsolidated affiliates		(8,079	)		(1,148	)		5

Other (income), net	$	(9,599	)	$	(2,397	)	$	(2,824	)

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

Beginning with our fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, we began purchasing shares of Kemrock Industries and Exports Limited (“Kemrock”) common stock. Kemrock is one of India’s leading manufacturers of high performance reinforced polymer composites, and is also part of a strategic alliance with certain of our subsidiaries for licensed manufacturing and supply of molded and pultruded gratings. By May 31, 2011, we had acquired a total of approximately 3.2 million shares of Kemrock common stock, for an accumulated cost approximating $24.2 million, which represented approximately 18% of Kemrock’s outstanding shares at that time. Our investment in Kemrock common stock had been classified in other long-term assets on our balance sheet and included with available-for-sale securities, which are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices.

In September 2011, we purchased approximately 870,000 additional shares of Kemrock common stock, which increased our ownership to 23% of Kemrock’s outstanding shares. In December 2011, we entered into a GDR Purchase Agreement with Kemrock, whereby we purchased from Kemrock 693,072 GDRs of Kemrock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7.2 million. We account for our investment in the Kemrock GDRs as common stock equivalents within our total investment in Kemrock.

Due to the presumption under GAAP that an entity with an ownership percentage greater than 20% has significant influence, and no other factors would refute that presumption, we changed our accounting for this investment to the equity method. Due to timing differences in our fiscal reporting periods, we record our share of Kemrock’s financial activity on a two-month lag.

In accordance with the equity method of accounting, increases in ownership which result in a change to the equity method of accounting generally require retroactive recognition of an investor’s share of earnings and losses in prior periods. We evaluated the impact of retroactively reflecting our investment in Kemrock and determined that due to the relative insignificance of our share of earnings and losses for Kemrock in prior periods, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the impact of the adjustments was not material to our financial statements for any previously reported fiscal period, nor is the cumulative effect material to the current fiscal year. Therefore, we recorded a total of $5.2 million of net earnings during our fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2011, of which approximately $4.6 million related to prior periods. For the year ended May 31, 2012, we recorded a total of $6.1 million of net earnings related to our share of Kemrock’s earnings. These amounts are reflected in other (income), net in our income statement.

Further adjustments will be made to our investment over time in order to recognize our share of Kemrock’s earnings as they occur, rather than as dividends or other distributions are received. Any changes in our proportionate share of the underlying equity of Kemrock, which could result from their issuance of additional equity securities, are recognized as increases or decreases in shareholders’ equity, net of any related tax effects.

Our investment in Kemrock is reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at its adjusted carrying value and classified as a long-term asset. Our investment in Kemrock had a carrying value of $42.2 million at May 31, 2012 and a fair market value of $35.8 million at May 31, 2011.

17) Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and the amounts used for income tax purposes and for certain changes in valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets when, in our estimation, it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

We have not provided for U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes on approximately $876.8 million of foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of May 31, 2012, because such earnings have been retained and reinvested by the subsidiaries. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. or foreign withholding taxes, which may become payable if undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were paid to us as dividends. The additional income taxes and applicable withholding taxes that would result had such earnings actually been repatriated are not practically determinable.

18) Earnings Per Share of Common Stock

Earnings per share (EPS) is computed using the two-class method. The two-class method determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends and dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Our unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities. Basic EPS of common stock is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS of common stock is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of share of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential shares of common stock include outstanding stock options, stock awards and convertible notes. See Note J, “Earnings Per Share of Common Stock,” for additional information.

19) Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance that simplified how entities test goodwill for impairment. After an assessment of certain qualitative factors, if it is determined to be more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, entities must perform the quantitative analysis of the goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the quantitative test(s) become optional. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We elected to adopt this guidance for the 2012 goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter. There was no impact on our consolidated financial results.

In June 2011, the FASB issued amended disclosure requirements for the presentation of other comprehensive income (OCI) and accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). OCI is comprised of costs, expenses, gains and losses that are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income, and AOCI comprises the aggregated balances of OCI in equity. The amended guidance eliminated the option to present period changes (OCI) as part of the Statement of Changes in Equity.

Under the amended guidance, all period changes (OCI) are to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Only summary totals are to be included in the AOCI section of the Statement of Changes in Equity. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the requirement to present reclassifications from AOCI on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes are effective June 1, 2012 with early adoption permitted. We will adopt these provisions as of June 1, 2012, and we do not anticipate any impact on our consolidated financial results as the amendments relate only to changes in financial statement presentation.

20) Subsequent Event

The New Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on our ability, and in certain instances, our subsidiaries’ ability, to incur liens, make certain investments, or sell or transfer assets. Additionally, we may not permit (i) our consolidated leverage ratio to exceed 60% of the sum of our consolidated indebtedness and consolidated stockholders’ equity or (ii) our consolidated interest coverage ratio to be less than 3.5 to 1.0.

NOTE B — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reportable segment, for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows:


(In thousands)	Industrial Segment			Consumer Segment			Total
Balance as of June 1, 2010	$	392,850		$	375,394		$	768,244
Acquisitions		16,265						16,265
Purchase accounting adjustments ⁽¹⁾		1,586						1,586
Translation adjustments		35,055			10,339			45,394

Balance as of May 31, 2011		445,756			385,733			831,489
Acquisitions		50,233			4,944			55,177
Translation adjustments		(30,098	)		(7,222	)		(37,320	)

Balance as of May 31, 2012	$	465,891		$	383,455		$	849,346

(1)	Relates primarily to other accruals and finalization of certain property, plant and equipment and intangibles valuations; and current year adjustments to purchase price contingencies.

Total accumulated impairment losses were $14.9 million at May 31, 2012 and 2011, which was recorded during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 by our industrial reportable segment.

Other intangible assets consist of the following major classes:


(In thousands)	Amortization Period (In Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Other Intangible Assets
As of May 31, 2012
Amortized intangible assets
Formulae		3 to 33	$	174,190	$	103,414	$	70,776
Customer-related intangibles		3 to 33		139,824		52,616		87,208
Trademarks/names		4 to 40		26,050		11,192		14,858
Other		1 to 40		49,373		25,526		23,847

Total Amortized Intangibles				389,437		192,748		196,689
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks/names				148,931				148,931

Total Other Intangible Assets			$	538,368	$	192,748	$	345,620

As of May 31, 2011
Amortized intangible assets
Formulae		3 to 33	$	172,536	$	97,185	$	75,351
Customer-related intangibles		3 to 33		115,810		45,696		70,114
Trademarks/names		4 to 40		27,961		10,591		17,370
Other		1 to 40		44,910		23,784		21,126

Total Amortized Intangibles				361,217		177,256		183,961
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks/names				128,906				128,906

Total Other Intangible Assets			$	490,123	$	177,256	$	312,867

The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $21.4 million, $20.0 million and $22.2 million, respectively. For the next five fiscal years, we estimate annual intangible asset amortization expense related to our existing intangible assets to approximate the following: 2013 — $20.9 million, 2014 — $19.9 million, 2015 — $19.1 million, 2016 — $18.5 million and 2017 — $17.8 million.

NOTE C – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The following tables summarize marketable securities held at May 31, 2012 and 2011 by asset type:


	Available-For-Sale Securities
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value (Net Carrying Amount)
May 31, 2012
Equity securities:
Stocks—foreign	$	1,016	$	79	$	—		$	1,095
Stocks—domestic		24,380		2,776		(1,046	)		26,110
Mutual funds—foreign		17,489		521		(936	)		17,074
Mutual funds—domestic		39,246		1,114		(1,077	)		39,283

Total equity securities		82,131		4,490		(3,059	)		83,562
Fixed maturity:
U.S. treasury and other government		19,347		530		(12	)		19,865
Kemrock convertible bonds		22,701		—		—			22,701
Corporate bonds		2,305		349		(5	)		2,649
Foreign bonds		38		1		—			39
Mortgage-backed securities		241		105		(2	)		344

Total fixed maturity securities		44,632		985		(19	)		45,598

Total	$	126,763	$	5,475	$	(3,078	)	$	129,160


(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due:
Less than one year	$	25,098	$	25,104
One year through five years		11,787		12,070
Six years through ten years		5,378		5,628
After ten years		2,369		2,796

	$	44,632	$	45,598

NOTE D — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Financial instruments recorded on the balance sheet include cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, marketable securities, notes and accounts payable, and debt.

An allowance for anticipated uncollectible trade receivable amounts is established using a combination of specifically identified accounts to be reserved, and a reserve covering trends in collectibility. These estimates are based on an analysis of trends in collectibility, past experience, and individual account balances identified as doubtful based on specific facts and conditions. Receivable losses are charged against the allowance when we confirm uncollectibility.

All derivative instruments are recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges and/or any ineffective portion of hedges are recognized as a gain or (loss) in our Consolidated Statement of Income in the current period. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used effectively as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), along with the change in the value of the hedged item. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

The valuation techniques utilized for establishing the fair values of assets and liabilities are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect management’s market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value, as follows:

Level 1 Inputs — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 Inputs — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 Inputs — Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.


(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at May 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and other government	$	—	$	19,865		$	—	$	19,865
Foreign bonds				39					39
Mortgage-backed securities				344					344
Corporate bonds				2,649					2,649
Stocks—foreign		1,095							1,095
Stocks—domestic		26,110							26,110
Mutual funds—foreign				17,074					17,074
Mutual funds—domestic				39,283					39,283
Foreign currency forward contract				(1,356	)				(1,356	)
Cross-currency swap				(2,159	)				(2,159	)
Investment in Kemrock convertible debt				22,701					22,701

Total	$	27,205	$	98,440		$	—	$	125,645


(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at May 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury and other government	$	—	$	26,480		$	—	$	26,480
Mortgage-backed securities				532					532
Corporate bonds				3,029					3,029
Stocks—foreign		37,549							37,549
Stocks—domestic		31,849							31,849
Mutual funds—foreign				18,413					18,413
Mutual funds—domestic				31,791					31,791
Foreign currency forward contract				6,157					6,157
Cross-currency swap				(20,519	)				(20,519	)

Total	$	69,398	$	65,883		$	—	$	135,281

Our marketable securities are composed of mainly available-for-sale securities, and are valued using a market approach based on quoted market prices for identical instruments. The availability of inputs observable in the market varies from instrument to instrument and depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is actively traded, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. For most of our financial instruments, pricing inputs are readily observable in the market, the valuation methodology used is widely accepted by market participants, and the valuation does not require significant management discretion. For other financial instruments, pricing inputs are less observable in the market and may require management judgment.

Our cross-currency swap is a liability that has a fair value of $2.2 million at May 31, 2012, that was originally designed to fix our interest and principal payments in euros for the life of our unsecured 6.70% senior notes due November 1, 2015, which resulted in an effective euro fixed-rate borrowing of 5.31%. The basis for determining the rates for this swap included three legs at the inception of the agreement: the U.S. dollar (USD) fixed rate to a USD floating rate; the euro floating to euro fixed rate; and the dollar to euro basis fixed rate at inception. Therefore, we essentially exchanged fixed payments denominated in USD for fixed payments denominated in euros, paying fixed euros at 5.31% and receiving fixed USD at 6.70%. The ultimate payments are based on the notional principal amounts of 150 million USD and approximately 125 million euros. There will be an exchange of the notional amounts at maturity. The rates included in this swap are based upon observable market data, but are not quoted market prices, and therefore, the cross-currency swap is considered a Level 2 liability on the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, this cross-currency swap has been designated as a hedging instrument, and is classified as other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We had a foreign currency forward contract with a fair value of $6.2 million at May 31, 2011, which matured on November 23, 2011. At May 31, 2012, we have a foreign currency forward contract with a fair value of approximately $1.4 million, which is classified as other accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our foreign currency forward contract, which has not been designated as a hedge, was designed to reduce

our exposure to the changes in the cash flows of intercompany foreign-currency-denominated loans related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates by fixing the functional currency cash flows. The foreign exchange rates included in the forward contract are based upon observable market data, but are not quoted market prices, and therefore, the forward currency forward contract is considered a Level 2 liability on the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying value of our current financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. At May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, the fair value of our long-term debt was estimated using active market quotes, based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, which are considered to be Level 2 inputs. Based on the analysis performed, the fair value and the carrying value of our financial instruments and long-term debt as of May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 are as follows:


	At May 31, 2012
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	315,968	$	315,968
Marketable equity securities		83,562		83,562
Marketable debt securities		45,598		45,598
Long-term debt, including current portion		1,115,536		1,232,180

	At May 31, 2011
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	435,011	$	435,011
Marketable equity securities		119,602		119,602
Marketable debt securities		30,041		30,041
Long-term debt, including current portion		1,108,853		1,203,016

NOTE E — BORROWINGS

A description of long-term debt follows:


May 31,	2012		2011
(In thousands)
Unsecured 6.25% senior notes due December 15, 2013	$	200,000	$	200,000
Unsecured 6.50% senior notes due February 14, 2018⁽¹⁾		247,890		247,522
Unsecured 6.125% senior note due October 15, 2019⁽²⁾		460,688		461,859
Unsecured 6.70% senior notes due November 1, 2015⁽³⁾		150,000		150,000
Revolving credit agreement for $400,000 with a syndicate of banks, through January 5, 2015⁽⁴⁾		48,797		40,943
Other obligations, including capital leases and unsecured notes payable at various rates of interest due in installments through 2017.		8,161		8,529

		1,115,536		1,108,853
Less: current portion		2,584		2,549

Total Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities	$	1,112,952	$	1,106,304

(1)

The $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2018 is adjusted for the amortization of the original issue discount, which approximated $2.1 million and $2.5 million at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The original issue discount effectively reduced the ultimate proceeds from the financing. The effective interest rate on the notes, including the amortization of the discount, is 6.704% for both years presented.

(2)

Includes the combination of the October 2009 initial issuance of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount and the May 2011 issuance of an additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of these notes. The $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2019 from the initial issuance is adjusted for the amortization of the original issue discount, which approximated $0.2 million and $0.3 million at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The original issue discount effectively reduced the ultimate proceeds from the October 2009 financing. The effective interest rate on the notes issued in October 2009, including the amortization of the discount, is 6.139%. The additional $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes due 2019 issued in May 2011 is adjusted for the unamortized premium received at issuance, which approximated $11.0 million and $12.1 million at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The premium effectively increased the proceeds from the financing. The effective interest rate on the $150.0 million notes issued in May 2011 is 4.934%.

(3)	We entered into a cross-currency swap, which fixed the interest and principal payments in euros, resulting in an effective fixed-rate borrowing of 5.31%.

(4)	Interest was tied to euro LIBOR and AUD LIBOR at May 31, 2012, and averaged 1.99% and 5.65%, respectively, for euro denominated debt and AUD denominated debt. Interest was tied to euro LIBOR and prime rate at May 31, 2011, and averaged 2.80% and 3.90%, respectively, for euro denominated debt.

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to May 31, 2012 are as follows: 2013 — $2.6 million; 2014 — $201.3 million; 2015 — $50.2 million; 2016 — $151.3 million; 2017 — $0.6 million; and thereafter $709.5 million. Additionally, at May 31, 2012, we had unused lines of credit totaling $497.2 million.

6.125% Notes due 2019

Revolving Credit Agreement

purposes) and a $100.0 million sub-limit for the issuance of letters of credit. We had the option to increase the Revolving Credit Facility by an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $100.0 million. The purpose of this Revolving Credit Facility was to refinance our prior credit facility, and any borrowings from this Revolving Credit Facility could have been used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. The Revolving Credit Facility would have matured on January 5, 2015, four years from its closing date. The Revolving Credit Facility required us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a leverage covenant and interest coverage ratio. Under the terms of the leverage covenant, we could not permit our consolidated indebtedness as of any fiscal quarter end to exceed 60% of the sum of such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The minimum required consolidated interest coverage ratio for EBITDA to interest expense under the Revolving Credit Facility was 3.50 to 1.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

such indebtedness and our consolidated shareholders’ equity on such date. The interest coverage ratio covenant continues to require that we not permit the ratio, calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four fiscal quarters then ended, of EBITDA to interest expense for such period to be less than 3.5 to 1. Finally, the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under the pre-amended AR Program has been deleted. The financial tests that remain in the AR Program are substantially identical to the financial covenants contained in our New Credit Facility.

NOTE F — INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with ASC 740, which requires the recognition of deferred income taxes using the liability method.

Income (loss) before income taxes as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income is summarized below for the periods indicated. Certain foreign operations are branches of RPM International Inc.’s subsidiaries and are therefore subject to income taxes in both the United States and the respective foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, the provision (benefit) for income taxes by jurisdiction and the income (loss) before income taxes by jurisdiction may not be directly related.


Year Ended May 31,	2012		2011		2010
(In thousands)
United States	$	187,687	$	217,427	$	198,103
Foreign		140,602		77,626		70,351

Income Before Income Taxes	$	328,289	$	295,053	$	268,454

Provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following for the periods indicated:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Current:
U.S. Federal	$	45,547		$	37,871		$	8,407
State and local		6,836			4,764			4,854
Foreign		49,231			41,542			41,581

Total Current		101,614			84,177			54,842

Deferred:
U.S. Federal		(787	)		8,186			37,651
State and local		(572	)		2,200			1,235
Foreign		(5,729	)		(2,678	)		(6,401	)

Total Deferred		(7,088	)		7,708			32,485

Provision for Income Taxes	$	94,526		$	91,885		$	87,327

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:


(In thousands)	2012			2011
Deferred income tax assets related to:
Inventories	$	8,719		$	8,726
Allowance for losses		8,935			9,713
Accrued compensation and benefits		113,934			70,744
Accrued other expenses		6,525			5,397
Other long-term liabilities		24,931			19,345
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards		76,740			71,397

Total Deferred Income Tax Assets		239,784			185,322
Less: valuation allowances		(75,167	)		(70,408	)

Net Deferred Income Tax Assets		164,617			114,914

Deferred income tax (liabilities) related to:
Depreciation		(46,045	)		(46,807	)
Pension and other postretirement benefits		(15,824	)		(18,120	)
Amortization of intangibles		(109,206	)		(94,265	)

Total Deferred Income Tax (Liabilities)		(171,075	)		(159,192	)

Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities), Net	$	(6,458	)	$	(44,278	)

At May 31, 2012, we had U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $21.7 million, which expire starting in 2014. Additionally at May 31, 2012 we had approximately $7.1 million of state net operating loss carryforwards that expire at various dates beginning in 2013 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $210.7 million, of which approximately $26.5 million will expire at various dates beginning in 2013 and approximately $184.2 million that have an indefinite carryforward period. Also, as of May 31, 2012, we had foreign capital loss carryforwards of approximately $19.2 million that have an indefinite carryforward. These net operating loss, capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards may be used to offset a portion of future taxable income and, thereby, reduce or eliminate our U.S. federal, state or foreign income taxes otherwise payable.

When evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets, we consider, amongst other items, whether a jurisdiction has experienced cumulative pretax losses and whether a jurisdiction will generate the appropriate character of income to recognize a deferred income tax asset. More specifically, if a jurisdiction experiences cumulative pretax losses for a period of three years, including the current fiscal year, or if a jurisdiction does not have sufficient income of the appropriate character in the relevant carryback or projected carryforward periods, we typically conclude that it is more likely than not that the respective deferred tax asset should not be realized unless factors such as expected operational changes, availability of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, reversal of taxable temporary differences or other information exists that would lead us to conclude otherwise. If, after we have evaluated these factors, the deferred income tax assets are not expected to be realized within the carryforward or carryback periods allowed for that

jurisdiction, we would conclude that a valuation allowance is required. To the extent that the deferred income tax asset is expected to be utilized within the carryback or carryforward periods, we would conclude that a valuation allowance would not be required.

In applying the above, we determined, based on the available evidence, that it is uncertain whether future taxable income of certain of our foreign subsidiaries, as well as anticipated foreign source income, will be significant enough to recognize certain of these deferred tax assets. As a result, we recorded net incremental valuation allowances of approximately $4.8 million in fiscal 2012. An increase of approximately $9.8 million is associated with translated foreign net operating losses, principally related to European entities, not expected to be utilized during the respective tax carryforward periods. This increase is offset by approximately $5.0 million associated with reductions in foreign tax credit carryforwards.

Total valuation allowances of approximately $75.2 million and $70.4 million have been recorded as of May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The recorded valuation allowances relate to U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards, certain foreign net operating losses and net foreign deferred tax assets. A portion of the valuation allowance is associated with deferred tax assets recorded in acquisition accounting. In accordance with ASC 805, any reversal of a valuation allowance that was recorded in acquisition accounting reduces income tax expense.

The following table reconciles income tax expense (benefit) computed by applying the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate against income (loss) before income taxes to the provision (benefit) for income taxes:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Income tax expense (benefit) at the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate	$	114,901		$	103,141		$	93,959
Impact of foreign operations		(32,192	)		(39,932	)		(32,529	)
State and local income taxes net of federal income tax benefit		4,073			4,527			3,958
Tax benefits from the domestic manufacturing deduction		(3,744	)		(2,750	)		(756	)
Nondeductible business expense		1,304			1,404			1,560
Valuation allowance		9,353			24,994			18,107
Other		831			501			3,028

Provision (Benefit) for Income Tax Expense	$	94,526		$	91,885		$	87,327

Effective Income Tax Rate		28.8	%		31.1	%		32.5	%

Uncertain income tax positions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 740. The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits:


(In millions)	2012			2011			2010
Balance at June 1	$	6.4		$	2.7		$	2.8
Additions based on tax positions related to current year		—			0.3			0.3
Additions for tax positions of prior years		0.5			3.9			1.2
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(0.4	)		(0.5	)		(0.2	)
Settlements		(3.2	)		—			(1.4	)

Balance at May 31	$	3.3		$	6.4		$	2.7

During fiscal 2012 we settled the U.S. federal income tax examination for fiscal years 2007 and 2008. Additionally, we successfully petitioned a prior year income tax assessment from a non-U.S. jurisdiction. As a result, our reserve for unrecognized tax benefits was reduced for these two fiscal 2012 events by approximately $3.2 million.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, was $2.4 million at May 31, 2012, $5.1 million at May 31, 2011 and $1.8 million at May 31, 2010. We do not anticipate any significant changes to the total unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. At May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the accrual for interest and penalties was $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, have been classified as other long-term liabilities unless expected to be paid in one year.

We, or our subsidiaries, file income tax returns in the U.S. and in various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. As of May 31, 2012 we are subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for the fiscal years 2009 through 2012. In addition, with limited exceptions, we, or our subsidiaries, are generally subject to state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the fiscal years 2005 through 2012.

We are currently under examination, or have been notified of an upcoming tax examination for various Non-U.S. and U.S. jurisdictions including an ongoing Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination of the company’s U.S. income tax returns for the fiscal 2009 and 2010 tax years. Although it is possible that certain tax examinations, including the IRS examination of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, could be resolved during the next 12 months, the timing and outcomes are uncertain.

We include SPHC and its domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “SPHC Group”) in our consolidated federal income tax return. We entered into a tax-cooperation agreement (the “Agreement”) with the SPHC Group, effective from June 1, 2010. Generally, the Agreement provides, amongst other items, that the federal income taxes of the SPHC Group are to be computed on a stand-alone separate return basis. The current portion of such income tax payable, if any, is due from the SPHC Group to us. Conversely, subject to the terms of the Agreement, income tax benefits associated with net operating loss or tax credit carryovers generated by the SPHC Group, if any, for the taxable year that benefits our consolidated income tax return for that taxable year are payable by us to the SPHC Group. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, a similar approach is applied to consolidated, combined or unitary state tax returns.

NOTE G — COMMON STOCK

On April 21, 2009, our board of directors adopted a new Stockholder Rights Plan to replace the rights plan that was originally adopted in 1999 and expired in May 2009. The new plan is substantively similar to its predecessor. Under the new plan, our board declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of our common stock, payable May 11, 2009. The rights initially trade together with shares of our common stock and will not be exercisable. The rights generally will become exercisable and allow the holder to acquire shares of our common stock at a discounted price if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our outstanding shares. Rights held by persons who exceed the applicable threshold will be void. Under certain circumstances, the rights will entitle the holder to buy shares in an acquiring entity at a discounted price. Our board may, at its option, redeem all rights for $0.001 per right, generally at any time prior to the rights becoming exercisable. The rights will expire May 11, 2019, unless earlier redeemed, exchanged or amended by the board. The new plan specifically provides that our board will review the status of the new plan at the end of five years to determine if any such action should be taken.

On January 8, 2008, we announced our authorization of a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase shares of our common stock at our discretion for general corporate purposes. Our intention with regard to this program is to limit our repurchases only to amounts required to offset dilution created by stock issued in connection with our equity-based compensation plans, or approximately one to two million shares per year. As a result of this authorization, we may repurchase shares from time to time in the open market or in private transactions at various times and in amounts and for prices that we deem appropriate, subject to insider trading rules and other securities law restrictions. The timing of our purchases has depended upon, and will continue to depend upon, prevailing market conditions, alternative uses of capital and other factors. We may limit or terminate the repurchase program at any time. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, we repurchased 164,773 shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $3.0 million, or an average cost of $18.25 per share, under this program. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011, we repurchased approximately 1.0 million shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $17.9 million, or an average cost of $17.33 per share, under this program. There was no activity under this program during fiscal 2010.

NOTE H — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to our employees and directors; these awards include restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options and SARs. We grant stock-based incentive awards to our employees and/or our directors under various share-based compensation plans. Plans that provide for stock option grants or share-based payment awards include the 1996 Key Employees Stock Option Plan (the “1996 Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”), which includes provisions for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance stock units and SARs. Other plans, which provide for restricted stock grants only, include the 2003 Restricted Stock Plan for Directors (the “2003 Plan”) and the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”).

We measure stock-based compensation cost at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the award. We recognize the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the related vesting period.

The following table represents total stock-based compensation expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Income:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands)
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	13,904		$	12,282		$	10,030
Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,921	)		(4,337	)		(3,538	)

Total stock-based compensation cost	$	8,983		$	7,945		$	6,492

Stock Option Plans

Stock options are awards that allow our employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a fixed price. We grant stock options at an exercise price equal to the stock price on the date of the grant. The fair value of SARs granted is estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life of options granted is derived from the input of the option-pricing model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatility rates are based on historical volatility of shares of our common stock.

The following is a summary of our weighted-average assumptions related to grants made during the last three fiscal years:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
Risk-free interest rate		2.5	%		2.1	%		3.2	%
Expected life of option		7.5	yrs		7.5	yrs		7.5	yrs
Expected dividend yield		3.8	%		4.1	%		4.3	%
Expected volatility rate		29.5	%		29.6	%		30.4	%

Compensation cost for awards under the 1996 Plan is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period. No shares vested during the year ended May 31, 2012. Shares of common stock under option are not eligible for dividend payments until the shares are exercised.

The Omnibus Plan was approved by our stockholders on October 8, 2004, and is intended to be the primary stock-based award program for covered employees. A wide variety of stock and stock-based awards, as well as dollar-denominated performance-based awards, may be granted under the Omnibus Plan. SARs are issued at fair value at the date of grant, have up to ten-year terms and have graded-vesting terms over four years. Compensation cost for these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period. Currently all SARs outstanding are to be settled with stock. As of May 31, 2012, there were 3,161,500 SARs outstanding and 610,244 stock options outstanding.

The following table summarizes option and share-based payment activity (including SARs) under these plans during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012:


	2012
Share-Based Payments	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares Under Option
(Shares in thousands)
Balance at June 1	$	17.94		4,028
Options granted		22.12		545
Options canceled/expired		14.08		(1	)
Options exercised		15.03		(800	)

Balance at May 31				3,772

Exercisable at May 31	$	18.53		2,382


Stock Option Plans	2012		2011		2010
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share	$	4.69	$	3.97	$	4.09
Intrinsic value of options exercised	$	7.0	$	7.7	$	6.8
Tax benefit from options exercised	$	1.4	$	1.2	$	2.4
Fair value of SARS vested	$	2.0	$	2.2	$	1.9

At May 31, 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding was $27.1 million and 5.7 years respectively, while the aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual life of options exercisable was $18.7 million and 4.4 years, respectively.

At May 31, 2012, the total unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to SARs that were previously granted was $4.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over 3.25 years. We anticipate that approximately 1.3 million shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $20.26 and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 8.0 years will ultimately vest under these plans.

Restricted Stock Plans

We also grant stock-based awards, which may be made in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock and performance stock units. These awards are granted to eligible employees or directors, and entitle the holder to shares of our common stock as the award vests. The fair value of the awards is determined and fixed based on the stock price at the date of grant. A description of our restricted stock plans follows.

Under the Omnibus Plan, a total of 12,000,000 shares of our common stock may be subject to awards. Of the 12,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under the Omnibus Plan, up to 6,000,000 shares may be subject to “full-value” awards such as restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance stock and performance stock unit awards.

The following table summarizes the share-based performance-earned restricted stock (“PERS”) activity during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		2012
Balance at June 1	$	17.29		1,035
Shares granted		21.49		468
Shares forfeited		20.14		(14	)
Shares vested		14.49		(419	)

Balance at May 31	$	20.18		1,070

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $21.49, $19.31 and $18.96 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The restricted stock cliff vests after three years. Nonvested restricted shares of common stock under the Omnibus Plan are eligible for dividend payments. At May 31, 2012, unamortized deferred compensation expense of $10.9 million remained and is being amortized over the applicable vesting period for each participant.

In July 2007, performance-contingent restricted stock (“PCRS”) awards were approved. PCRS awards were made pursuant to the Omnibus Plan and are contingent upon the level of attainment of performance goals for the three-year period from June 1, 2007 ending May 31, 2010. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, we did not grant any PCRS awards. Since the performance goals were not met, the 287,000 PCRS awards were forfeited on or prior to July 19, 2010. On October 7, 2010, our Compensation Committee approved contingent awards of PCRS, (the “2011 PCRS”), for certain executives. During October 2010, 680,000 shares were granted at a weighted-average grant-date price of $20.73 and subsequently, in July 2011 there were an additional 115,000 shares granted at a weighted-average grant-date price of $22.16. The awards are contingent upon the level of attainment of performance goals for the three-year and five-year periods from June 1, 2010 ending May 31, 2013, and from June

1, 2010 ending May 31, 2015, respectively. At May 31, 2012, we expect that up to 370,835 shares of stock may ultimately vest in relation to these awards. Compensation cost for these awards will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the related performance period, with consideration given to the probability of attaining the performance goals. As of May 31, 2012, there were 795,000 2011 PCRS shares outstanding and $5.2 million in total unamortized stock-based compensation expense.

The 2003 Plan was approved on October 10, 2003 by our stockholders, and was established primarily for the purpose of recruiting and retaining directors, and to align the interests of directors with the interests of our stockholders. Only directors who are not our employees are eligible to participate. Under the 2003 Plan, up to 500,000 shares of our common stock may be awarded, with awards cliff vesting over a three-year period. The following table summarizes the share-based activity under the 2003 Plan during fiscal 2012:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		2012
Balance at June 1	$	18.12		114
Shares granted to Directors		20.60		48
Shares vested		15.44		(47	)

Balance at May 31	$	20.23		115

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $20.60, $20.73 and $18.96 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Unamortized deferred compensation expense relating to restricted stock grants for directors of $1.2 million at May 31, 2012, is being amortized over the applicable remaining vesting period for each director. Nonvested restricted shares

of common stock under the 2003 Plan are eligible for dividend payments. As of May 31, 2012, there were 227,400 shares available for future grant.

Under the 2007 Plan, up to 1,000,000 shares may be awarded to certain employees, generally subject to forfeiture. The shares vest upon the latter of attainment of age 55 and the fifth anniversary of the May 31st immediately preceding the date of the grant. In addition, we also grant restricted stock units to certain employees under this plan. The following table sets forth awards and restricted stock units issued under the 2007 Plan for the years ended May 31, 2012:


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		2012
Balance at June 1	$	16.49		691
Shares granted		22.16		96
Shares vested		23.25		(9	)

Balance at May 31	$	17.12		778

The weighted-average grant-date fair value was $22.16, $17.88 and $14.66 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of May 31, 2012, 319,878 shares were available for future issuance under the 2007 Plan. At May 31, 2012, unamortized stock-based compensation expense of $5.0 million, $0.2 million and $1.2 million relating to the 2007 Plan, the 1997 Plan and the Restricted Stock Units, respectively, which are being amortized over the applicable vesting period associated with each participant.

The following table summarizes the activity for all nonvested restricted shares during the year ended May 31, 2012:

Nonvested Restricted Shares


(Shares in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Number of Shares
Balance at June 1	$	18.04		2,520
Granted		21.62		727
Vested		14.76		(475	)
Forfeited		20.14		(14	)

Balance at May 31	$	19.53		2,758

The remaining weighted-average contractual term of nonvested restricted shares at May 31, 2012 is the same as the period over which the remaining cost of the awards will be recognized, which is approximately 3.8 years. The fair value of the nonvested restricted share awards have been calculated using the market value of the shares on the date of issuance. For the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the weighted-average grant-date fair value for restricted share grants was $21.62, $19.97 and $16.26, respectively. The total fair value of shares that vested during the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $7.0 million, $10.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively. We anticipate that approximately 2.2 million shares at a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $19.53 and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 3.8 years will ultimately vest, based upon the unique terms and participants of each plan. Approximately 53,773 shares of restricted stock were vested at June 1, 2011, with 45,194 restricted shares vested as of May 31, 2012. The total intrinsic value of restricted shares converted during the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $3.1 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to all nonvested awards of restricted shares of common stock was $23.3 million as of May 31, 2012. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years. We did not receive any cash from employees as a result of employee vesting and release of restricted shares for the year ended May 31, 2012.

NOTE I — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following components:


(In thousands)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Pension And Other Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments, Net of Tax			Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Derivatives, Net of Tax			Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Securities, Net of Tax			Total
Balance at June 1, 2009	$	27,398		$	(63,202	)	$	3,514		$	733		$	(31,557	)
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax of $783											(1,399	)		(1,399	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(44,082	)		(69,791	)		(3,239	)		17,574			(99,538	)
Deferred taxes					22,442			1,072			(6,031	)		17,483
Adjustment due to deconsolidation of SPHC		222			7,286			(288	)					7,220

Balance at May 31, 2010		(16,462	)		(103,265	)		1,059			10,877			(107,791	)
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax of $2,791											(5,676	)		(5,676	)
Other comprehensive income		97,808			10,163			6,131			13,554			127,656
Deferred taxes					(3,603	)		(1,923	)		(2,590	)		(8,116	)

Balance at May 31, 2011		81,346			(96,705	)		5,267			16,165			6,073
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income, net of tax benefit of $844											1,043			1,043
Other comprehensive income		(89,863	)		(119,189	)		(5,512	)		(21,010	)		(235,574	)
Deferred taxes					41,720			1,445			7,400			50,565

Balance at May 31, 2012	$	(8,517	)	$	(174,174	)	$	1,200		$	3,598		$	(177,893	)

NOTE J — EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per share, as calculated using the two-class method, for the year ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for earnings per share:
Net income attributable to RPM International Inc. stockholders	$	215,936		$	189,058		$	180,037
Less: Allocation of earnings and dividends to participating securities		(4,024	)		(3,067	)		(2,180	)

Net income available to common shareholders—basic		211,912			185,991			177,857
Add: Undistributed earnings reallocated to unvested shareholders		9			7			6

Net income available to common shareholders—diluted	$	211,921		$	185,998		$	177,863

Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Basic weighted average common shares		128,130			127,403			127,047
Average diluted options		587			663			684

Total shares for diluted earnings per share		128,717			128,066			127,731

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders:
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.65		$	1.46		$	1.40

Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.65		$	1.45		$	1.39

For the years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, approximately 2,625,000, 2,157,000, and 1,905,000 shares of stock, respectively, granted under stock-based compensation plans were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE K — LEASES

We lease certain property, plant and equipment under long-term operating lease agreements, some of which provide for increased rental payments based upon increases in the cost-of-living index. The following table illustrates our future minimum lease commitments under all non-cancelable lease agreements, for each of the next five years and in the aggregate, as of May 31, 2012:


May 31,
(In thousands)
2013	$	38,034
2014		29,107
2015		21,784
2016		16,491
2017		12,718
Thereafter		35,960

Total Minimum Lease Commitments	$	154,094

Total rental expense for all operating leases amounted to $40.6 million, $41.4 million and $41.8 million for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets, as well as the funded status of our pension plans at May 31, 2012 and 2011, were as follows:

The fair value of the assets held by our pension plans has decreased at May 31, 2012 since our previous measurement date at May 31, 2011, due primarily to net losses on our investments in the stock markets. At the same time, plan liabilities have increased significantly due to decreases in discount rates. As such, we have increased our recorded liability for the net underfunded status of our pension plans. Due to low interest rates, we expect pension expense in fiscal 2013 to be higher than our fiscal 2012 expense level. Any future declines in the value of our pension plan assets or increases in our plan liabilities could require us to further increase our recorded liability for the net underfunded status of our pension plans and could also require accelerated and higher cash contributions to our pension plans.

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Noncurrent assets	$	—		$	—		$	42		$	—
Current liabilities		(43	)		(43	)		(492	)		(483	)
Noncurrent liabilities		(186,762	)		(76,274	)		(37,570	)		(19,510	)

Net Amount Recognized	$	(186,805	)	$	(76,317	)	$	(38,020	)	$	(19,993	)

The following table summarizes the relationship between our plans’ benefit obligations and assets:


	U.S. Plans
	2012				2011
(In thousands)	Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets
Plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets	$	385,013	$	198,208	$	288,532	$	212,215
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets		324,247		198,208		248,952		212,215


	Non-U.S. Plans
	2012				2011
(In thousands)	Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets		Benefit Obligation		Plan Assets
Plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets	$	174,358	$	136,296	$	161,632	$	141,639
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets		83,465		62,902		78,269		68,632
Plans with assets in excess of projected benefit obligations		980		1,022
Plans with assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligations		73,198		74,416		65,144		73,007

The following table presents the pretax net actuarial loss, prior service (costs) and transition assets/(obligations) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not affecting retained earnings:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net actuarial loss ⁽¹⁾	$	(205,086	)	$	(107,137	)	$	(62,750	)	$	(44,313	)
Prior service (costs)		(1,679	)		(2,031	)		(93	)		(120	)

Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not affecting retained earnings	$	(206,765	)	$	(109,168	)	$	(62,843	)	$	(44,433	)

(1)	Increases in net actuarial losses arising during 2012 were primarily attributable to a lower discount rate during 2012 versus 2011 and a lower actual return on plan assets compared with the expected return on plan assets for 2012.

The following table includes the changes recognized in other comprehensive income:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
Prior service cost	$	—		$	68		$	—		$	(9	)
Net loss (gain) arising during the year		106,459			(2,868	)		24,441			(2,763	)
Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in AOCI								(3,852	)		4,459
Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost)		(352	)		(358	)		(10	)		(12	)
Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss)		(8,510	)		(8,002	)		(2,169	)		(2,446	)

Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)	$	97,597		$	(11,160	)	$	18,410		$	(771	)

The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of May 31, 2012 that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost, but will be recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2013:

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost under the plans:

The following tables illustrate the weighted-average actual and target allocation of plan assets:

The following tables present our pension plan assets as categorized using the fair value hierarchy at May 31, 2012 and 2011:


	Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at May 31, 2012
Pooled equities	$	—	$	66,212	$	—	$	66,212
Pooled fixed income				43,446				43,446
Foreign bonds				433				433
Insurance contracts						25,974		25,974
Mutual funds				843				843
Cash and cash equivalents		410						410

Total	$	410	$	110,934	$	25,974	$	137,318


	U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at May 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury and other government	$	—	$	2,691	$	—	$	2,691
State and municipal bonds				439				439
Foreign bonds				1,566				1,566
Mortgage-backed securities				6,531				6,531
Corporate bonds				12,653				12,653
Stocks—large cap		44,926						44,926
Stocks—mid cap		16,040						16,040
Stocks—small cap		4,754						4,754
Stocks—international		7,514						7,514
Mutual funds—equity				34,515				34,515
Mutual funds—fixed				26,873				26,873
Cash and cash equivalents		35,040						35,040
Limited partnerships						2,470		2,470
Common/collective trusts						16,203		16,203

Total	$	108,274	$	85,268	$	18,673	$	212,215


	Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at May 31, 2011
Pooled equities	$	—	$	65,698	$	—	$	65,698
Pooled fixed income				44,012				44,012
Foreign bonds				402				402
Insurance contracts						30,043		30,043
Mutual funds				1,110				1,110
Cash and cash equivalents		374						374

Total	$	374	$	111,222	$	30,043	$	141,639

The following table includes the activity that occurred during the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 for our Level 3 assets:


			Actual Return on Plan Assets For:					Purchases,			Transfers
(In thousands)	Balance at Beginning of Period		Assets Still Held at Reporting Date		Assets Sold During Year			Sales and Settlements, net ⁽¹⁾			In/Out of Level 3			Balance at End of Period
Year ended May 31, 2012	$	48,716		231		(619	)		(3,998	)		(761	)	$	43,569
Year ended May 31, 2011		33,337		197		1,750			5,606			7,826			48,716

(1)	Includes the impact of exchange rate changes during the year.


The primary objective for the investments of the Retirement Plan is to provide for long-term growth of capital without undue exposure to risk. This objective is accomplished by utilizing a strategy of equities, fixed income securities and cash equivalents in a mix that is conducive to participation in a rising market, while allowing for adequate protection in a falling market. Our Investment Committee oversees the investment allocation process, which includes the selection and evaluation		of investment managers, the determination of investment objectives and risk guidelines, and the monitoring of actual investment performance. In order to manage investment risk properly, Plan policy prohibits short selling, securities lending, financial futures, options and other specialized investments except for certain alternative investments specifically approved by the Investment Committee. The Investment Committee reviews, on a quarterly basis, reports of actual Plan investment

The changes in benefit obligations of the plans at May 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

In determining the postretirement benefit amounts outlined above, measurement dates as of May 31 for each period were applied.

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

The following table presents the pretax net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service credits recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) not affecting retained earnings:


	U.S. Plans					Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011		2012			2011
Net actuarial gain (loss)	$	(35	)	$	778	$	(9,441	)	$	(2,943	)
Prior service credits		603			689

Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not affecting retained earnings	$	568		$	1,467	$	(9,441	)	$	(2,943	)

The following table includes the changes recognized in other comprehensive income:


	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012		2011		2012			2011
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
Prior service cost	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Net loss (gain) arising during the year		754		1,259		6,979			(33	)
Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in AOCI						(409	)		241
Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost)		86		86
Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss)		58		191		(72	)		(89	)

Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)	$	898	$	1,536	$	6,498		$	119

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine our year-end benefit obligations and net periodic postretirement benefit costs under the plans:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
Year-End Benefit Obligations	2012			2011			2012			2011
Discount rate		3.75	%		4.75	%		4.75	%		5.75	%
Current healthcare cost trend rate		7.70	%		7.87	%		6.92	%		7.00	%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.20	%		4.50	%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate will be realized		2029			2029			2030			2030


	U.S. Plans									Non-U.S. Plans
Net Periodic Postretirement Cost	2012			2011			2010			2012			2011			2010
Discount rate		4.75	%		5.75	%		6.90	%		5.75	%		5.75	%		8.00	%
Healthcare cost trend rate		7.87	%		8.04	%		8.60	%		7.00	%		7.40	%		10.00	%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		5.00	%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate will be realized		2029			2029			2029			2030			2030			2024

Increasing or decreasing current healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would affect our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net postretirement expense by the following amounts for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011:


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
1% Increase in trend rate
Accumulated Benefit Obligation	$	390		$	442		$	3,920		$	3,938
Postretirement Cost		21			22			473			423
1% Decrease in trend rate
Accumulated Benefit Obligation	$	(348	)	$	(394	)	$	(5,176	)	$	(3,039	)
Postretirement Cost		(19	)		(19	)		(351	)		(320	)

We expect to pay approximately $1.1 million to $1.3 million in estimated postretirement benefits in each of the next five years. In the five years thereafter (2018-2022) we expect to pay a cumulative total of $8.0 million.

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”), was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Act provides for prescription drug benefits under Medicare Part D and contains a subsidy to plan sponsors who provide “actuarially equivalent” prescription drug plans. Our actuary has determined that the prescription drug

benefit provided by our postretirement plan is considered to be actuarially equivalent to the benefits provided under the Act for all years since inception.

We have included the impact of our portion of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 subsidy in the determination of accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the U.S. nonpension postretirement benefit plan for the periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, we received reimbursements from Medicare related to this law amounting to approximately $69,000 and $97,000, respectively.

NOTE N — REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES

General — Bondex and SPHC are defendants in various asbestos-related bodily injury lawsuits filed in various state courts. These cases generally seek unspecified damages for asbestos-related diseases based on alleged exposures to asbestos-containing products.

On May 31, 2010, Bondex and its parent, SPHC, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. SPHC is the parent company of Bondex and is also the parent company for various operating companies that are not part of the reorganization filing, including Chemical Specialties Manufacturing Corp.; Day-Glo Color Corp.; Dryvit Holdings, Inc.; Guardian Protection Products Inc.; Kop-Coat Inc.; TCI, Inc. and RPM Wood Finishes Group, Inc. SPHC and Bondex (the “filing entities”) took this action to permanently and comprehensively resolve all pending and future asbestos-related liability claims associated with Bondex and SPHC-related products. As a result of the filing, all Bondex and SPHC asbestos personal injury lawsuits have been stayed due to the imposition of an automatic stay applicable in bankruptcy cases, with the exception of the cases referenced in Note A(2) with respect to which the stay was lifted. In addition, at the request of SPHC and Bondex, the bankruptcy court has entered orders staying all claims against RPM International Inc. and its affiliates that are derivative of the asbestos claims against SPHC and Bondex. Through the Chapter 11 proceedings, the filing entities intend ultimately to establish a trust in accordance with section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code and seek the imposition of a channeling injunction that will direct all future SPHC-related and Bondex-related claims to the trust. It is anticipated that the trust will compensate claims at appropriate values established by the trust documents and approved by the bankruptcy court. At this time, it is not possible to predict how long the proceedings will last, the form of any ultimate resolution or when an ultimate resolution might occur.

Prior to the bankruptcy filing, the filing entities had engaged in a strategy of litigating asbestos-related products liability claims brought against them. Claims paid during the year ended May 31, 2010, prior to the bankruptcy filing, were $92.6 million, which included defense-related payments during the year of $42.6 million. With the exception of the appeal bond satisfied during our 2012 third fiscal quarter and the potential payment described in Note A(2), no claims have been paid since the bankruptcy filing and it is not contemplated that any claims will be paid until a plan of reorganization is confirmed and an asbestos trust is established and operating.

Prior to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, we recorded asbestos-related contingent liabilities that included estimations of future costs, which by nature are subject to many uncertainties that may change over time, including (i) the ultimate number of claims filed; (ii) the amounts required to resolve both currently known and future unknown claims; (iii) the amount of insurance, if any, available to cover such claims, including the outcome of coverage litigation against the filing entities’ third-party insurers; (iv) future earnings and cash flow of the filing entities; (v) the impact of bankruptcies of other companies whose share of liability may be imposed on the filing entities under certain state liability laws; (vi) the unpredictable aspects of the litigation

process including a changing trial docket and the jurisdictions in which trials are scheduled; (vii) the outcome of any such trials including judgments or jury verdicts, as a result of our more aggressive defense posture, which included taking selective cases to verdict; (viii) the lack of specific information in many cases concerning exposure to products for which one of our subsidiaries is responsible and the claimants’ diseases; (ix) potential changes in applicable federal and/or state law; and (x) the potential impact of various proposed structured settlement transactions or subsidiary bankruptcies by other companies, some of which are the subject of federal appellate court review, the outcome of which could have materially affected future asbestos-related liability estimates.

Historical Asbestos Liability Reserve — In fiscal 2006, management retained Crawford & Winiarski (“C&W”), an independent, third-party consulting firm with expertise in the area of asbestos valuation work, to assist it in calculating an estimate of Bondex’s liability for unasserted-potential-future-asbestos-related claims. C&W’s methodology to project Bondex’s liability for unasserted-potential-future-asbestos-related claims included an analysis of: (a) a widely accepted forecast of the population likely to have been exposed to asbestos; (b) epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop asbestos-related diseases; (c) the historical rate at which mesothelioma incidences resulted in the payment of claims by Bondex; (d) the historical settlement averages to value the projected number of future compensable mesothelioma claims; (e) the historical ratio of mesothelioma-related indemnity payments to non-mesothelioma indemnity payments; and (f) the historical defense costs and their relationship with total indemnity payments. Based upon the results of this analysis, Bondex recorded an accrued liability for asbestos claims through 2016 as of May 31, 2006 of $421.3 million. This amount was calculated on a pretax basis and was not discounted for the time value of money.

During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008, the ten-year asbestos liability established as of May 31, 2006 was reviewed and evaluated. As part of that process, the credibility of epidemiological studies of Bondex’s mesothelioma claims, first introduced to management by C&W some two-and-one-half years earlier, was validated. At the core of the evaluation process, and the basis of C&W’s actuarial work on behalf of Bondex, is the Nicholson Study. The Nicholson Study is the most widely recognized reference in bankruptcy trust valuations, global settlement negotiations and the Congressional Budget Office’s work done on the proposed FAIR Act in 2006. Based on our ongoing comparison of the Nicholson Study projections and Bondex’s specific actual experience, which at that time continued to bear an extremely close correlation to the study’s projections, the asbestos liability projection was extended out to the year 2028. C&W assisted in calculating an estimate of our liability for unasserted-potential-future-asbestos-related claims out to 2028. C&W projected that the cost of extending the asbestos liability to 2028, coupled with an updated evaluation of Bondex’s current known claims to reflect its most recent actual experience, would be $288.1 million. Therefore, management added $288.1 million to the existing asbestos liability, which brought Bondex’s total asbestos-related balance sheet liabilities at May 31, 2008 to $559.7 million. On May 30, 2010, the day prior to the bankruptcy filing, Bondex had recorded an asbestos related product liability of $397.7 million.

The table below illustrates movements in the Bondex asbestos liability for fiscal 2010:

Asbestos Liability Movement (Current and Long-Term)


(In thousands)	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions to Asbestos Charge	Deductions ⁽¹⁾		Impact of Deconsolidation of SPHC ⁽²⁾			Balance at End of Period
Year Ended May 31, 2010	$	490,328		$	92,621	$	(397,707	)	$	—

(1)	Deductions include payments for defense-related costs and amounts paid to settle claims.

(2)	During the year ended May 31, 2010, SPHC and Bondex filed Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, and as a result, were deconsolidated from our results, as required. Refer to Note A(2) for further information.

This liability, as a result of the accounting for the deconsolidation of SPHC and its subsidiaries set forth in Note A(2), is no longer included in RPM International Inc.’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, effective May 31, 2010.

Insurance Coverage Litigation — During calendar year 2003, the filing entities’ third-party insurers claimed exhaustion of coverage. On July 3, 2003, certain of our subsidiaries, including the filing entities, filed the case of Bondex International, Inc. et al. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al., Case No. 1:03-cv-1322, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, for declaratory judgment, breach of contract and bad faith against the named third-party insurers, challenging their assertion that their policies covering asbestos-related claims had been exhausted. On December 1, 2008, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment and granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment against plaintiffs, including the filing entities, and entered judgment on all remaining claims and counterclaims, and dismissed the action. Plaintiffs, including the filing entities, appealed the trial court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the trial court decision on alternative grounds. Following that ruling, Bondex filed a motion with the Sixth Circuit for reconsideration. Its motion was denied. Bondex has exhausted its rights of appeal. Bondex did not include any potential benefits from the insurance coverage litigation in calculating its asbestos liability. RPM International Inc. was not a party to this insurance litigation.

Debtor-in-Possession (“DIP”) Financing — In connection with the bankruptcy filing, SPHC, Bondex and certain of SPHC’s subsidiaries entered into a three-year, $40.0 million DIP Credit facility (the “DIP Credit Facility”) with Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (New England). The Bankruptcy Court approved this facility, and granted Wachovia a super priority administrative expense claim for all amounts owed under the facility. The facility is secured by security interests and liens in virtually all of the real and personal property and assets of Bondex, SPHC and certain of SPHC’s subsidiaries. The DIP Credit Facility generally permits borrowings for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The DIP Credit Facility also imposes certain financial and non-financial covenants on SPHC and its subsidiaries. RPM International Inc. is not a party to the DIP Credit Facility and it has not guaranteed obligations under such facility.

Financial Results and Reorganization Items — The SPHC condensed consolidated financial statements set forth below have been prepared in conformity with ASC 852, Reorganizations (“ASC 852”).

Specialty Products Holding Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Income


(In thousands)
Year Ended May 31,	2010
Net Sales	$	301,142
Net sales to RPM		18,431

Total net sales		319,573
Cost of sales		203,082

Gross profit		116,491
Selling, general & administrative expenses		100,080
Interest expense		22
Investment (income), net		(266	)

Income before income taxes		16,655
Provision for income taxes		5,520

Net income	$	11,135

SPHC and its subsidiaries routinely engage in intercompany transactions with other entities within RPM in the ordinary course of business, including services provided by RPM International Inc. to SPHC and its subsidiaries under an administrative services agreement. These services include risk management and insurance services, benefits administration, IT services, legal services, environmental, health and safety compliance management, tax planning and compliance services, treasury and cash management, various accounting services, including preparation of accounting books and financial statement preparation, internal audit services, benefits associated with group purchasing of various supplies and equipment, and consulting services associated with various business development activities. The Bankruptcy Court has approved this administrative services agreement.

As a result of their bankruptcy filing, SPHC and Bondex are precluded from paying dividends to shareholders and from making payments on any pre-bankruptcy filing accounts or notes payable that are due and owing to any other entity within the RPM group of companies (the “Pre-Petition Intercompany Payables”) or other pre-petition creditors during the pendency of the bankruptcy case, without the Bankruptcy Court’s approval. Moreover, no assurances can be given that any of the Pre-Petition Intercompany Payables will ever be paid or otherwise satisfied.

When SPHC emerges from the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court, the subsequent accounting will be determined based upon the applicable circumstances and facts at such time, including the terms of any plan of reorganization.

SPHC has assessed its liquidity position as a result of the bankruptcy filing and believes that it can continue to fund its and its subsidiaries’ operating activities and meet its debt and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. The SPHC condensed consolidated financial information set forth above has been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

NOTE P — SEGMENT INFORMATION

We operate a portfolio of businesses and product lines that manufacture and sell a variety of specialty paints, protective coatings and roofing systems, sealants and adhesives. We manage our portfolio by organizing our businesses and product lines into two reportable segments: the industrial reportable segment and the consumer reportable segment. Within each reportable segment, we aggregate several operating segments that consist of individual groups of companies and product lines, which generally address common markets, share similar economic characteristics, utilize similar technologies and can share manufacturing or distribution capabilities. Our five operating segments represent components of our business for which separate financial information is available that is utilized on a regular basis by our chief executive officer in determining how to allocate the assets of the company and evaluate performance. These five operating segments are each managed by an operating segment manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day operating decisions and performance evaluation of the operating segment’s underlying businesses.

Our industrial reportable segment products are sold throughout North America and also account for the majority of our international sales. Our industrial product lines are sold directly to contractors, distributors and end-users, such as industrial manufacturing facilities, public institutions and other commercial customers. This reportable segment comprises three separate operating segments — Building Solutions Group, Performance Coatings Group and RPM2 Group. Products and services within this reportable segment include construction chemicals; roofing systems; weatherproofing and other sealants; polymer flooring; edible coatings and specialty glazes for pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries; and other specialty chemicals.

Our consumer reportable segment manufactures and markets professional use and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) products for a variety of mainly consumer applications, including home improvement and personal leisure activities. Our consumer segment’s major manufacturing and distribution operations are located primarily in North America, along with a few locations in Europe. Consumer segment products are sold directly to mass merchandisers, home improvement centers, hardware stores, paint stores, craft shops and to other smaller customers through distributors. This reportable segment comprises two operating segments — DAP Group and Rust-Oleum Group. Products within this reportable segment include specialty, hobby and professional paints; caulks; adhesives; silicone sealants and wood stains.

In addition to our two reportable segments, there is a category of certain business activities and expenses, referred to as corporate/other, that does not constitute an operating segment. This category includes our corporate headquarters and related administrative expenses, results of our captive insurance companies, gains or losses on the sales of certain assets and other expenses not directly associated with either reportable segment. Assets related to the corporate/other category consist primarily of investments, prepaid expenses and headquarters’ property and equipment. These corporate and other assets and expenses reconcile reportable segment data to total consolidated income before income taxes, identifiable assets, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization.

We reflect income from our joint ventures on the equity method, and receive royalties from our licensees.

The following tables reflect the results of our reportable segments consistent with our management philosophy, and represent the information we utilize, in conjunction with various strategic, operational and other financial performance criteria, in evaluating the performance of our portfolio of businesses.


Year Ended May 31,	2012		2011		2010
(In thousands)
Net Sales ^(a)
United States	$	2,219,680	$	1,983,238	$	2,148,893

Foreign
Canada		346,238		330,613		308,395
Europe		919,124		812,735		728,118
Other Foreign		292,374		255,255		227,310

Total Foreign		1,557,736		1,398,603		1,263,823

Total	$	3,777,416	$	3,381,841	$	3,412,716

Long-Lived Assets ^(b)
United States	$	1,065,324	$	965,235	$	966,453

Foreign
Canada		128,392		137,380		127,672
Europe		298,496		287,874		230,923
United Kingdom		192,155		209,217		184,488
Other Foreign		64,316		47,353		44,327

Total Foreign		683,359		681,824		587,410

Total	$	1,748,683	$	1,647,059	$	1,553,863

(a)	It is not practicable to obtain the information needed to disclose revenues attributable to each of our product lines.

(b)	Long-lived assets include all non-current assets, excluding non-current deferred income taxes.

NOTE Q — QUARTERLY INFOR MATION (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended May 31, 2012 and 2011:


	For Quarter Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	August 31		November 30		February 29			May 31
2012
Net Sales	$	985,918	$	916,085	$	773,643		$	1,101,770
Gross Profit	$	409,626	$	369,021	$	303,200		$	460,416
Net Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	76,811	$	49,931	$	6,625		$	82,569
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.59	$	0.38	$	0.05		$	0.63
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.59	$	0.38	$	0.05	^(a)	$	0.63
Dividends Per Share	$	0.210	$	0.215	$	0.215		$	0.215


(In thousands, except per share amounts)	August 31		November 30		February 28			May 31
2011
Net Sales	$	894,810	$	826,343	$	678,920		$	981,768
Gross Profit	$	375,426	$	339,497	$	269,518		$	416,426
Net Income Attributable to RPM International Inc. Stockholders	$	68,996	$	48,791	$	1,097		$	70,174
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.53	$	0.38	$	0.01		$	0.54
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.53	$	0.38	$	0.01	^(a)	$	0.54
Dividends Per Share	$	0.205	$	0.210	$	0.210		$	0.210

(a)	For the quarters ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, the treasury stock method was utilized for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share, as the result under the two-class method would have been less dilutive.

Quarterly earnings per share may not total to the yearly earnings per share due to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in each quarter.


Quarterly Stock Price and Dividend Information		Shares of our common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RPM. The high and low sales prices for the shares of common stock, and the cash dividends paid on the common stock, for each quarter of the two most recent fiscal years are set forth in the table below.

Range of Sales Prices and Dividends Paid


Fiscal 2012	High		Low		Dividends paid per share
First Quarter	$	23.80	$	17.20		0.210
Second Quarter	$	23.77	$	17.34		0.215
Third Quarter	$	25.90	$	22.76		0.215
Fourth Quarter	$	27.70	$	23.60		0.215


Fiscal 2011	High		Low		Dividends paid per share
First Quarter	$	19.90	$	16.07		0.205
Second Quarter	$	21.93	$	17.09		0.210
Third Quarter	$	24.68	$	19.86		0.210
Fourth Quarter	$	26.00	$	21.88		0.210


Source: New York Stock Exchange		Cash dividends are payable quarterly, upon authorization of the Board of Directors. Regular payment dates are approximately the last day of July, October, January and April.		The number of holders of record of our common stock as of July 13, 2012 was approximately 25,921, in addition to 70,758 beneficial holders.

The management of RPM International Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. RPM’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of RPM’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 31, 2012, RPM’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

The independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP, has also audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012 and their report thereon is included on page 70 of this report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS

RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Medina, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries (“RPM” or “the Company”) as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of RPM at May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), RPM’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated July 26, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Cleveland, Ohio

July 26, 2012

We have audited RPM International Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (“RPM” or “the Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). RPM’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, RPM maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of RPM as of May 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2012 and our report dated July 26, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Year Ended May 31,	2012			2011			2010
Net Sales
Industrial	$	2,535,238		$	2,259,809		$	2,328,194
Consumer		1,242,178			1,122,032			1,084,522

Total	$	3,777,416		$	3,381,841		$	3,412,716

Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes ^(a)
Industrial Segment
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	278,676		$	232,544		$	225,528
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(3,770	)		(3,304	)		(1,709	)

EBIT ^(c)	$	282,446		$	235,848		$	227,237

Consumer Segment
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	160,099		$	146,035		$	147,019
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		18			63			37

EBIT ^(c)	$	160,081		$	145,972		$	146,982

Corporate/Other
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	(110,486	)	$	(83,526	)	$	(104,093	)
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(64,107	)		(46,504	)		(50,025	)

EBIT ^(c)	$	(46,379	)	$	(37,022	)	$	(54,068	)

Consolidated
Income Before Income Taxes ^(a)	$	328,289		$	295,053		$	268,454
Interest (Expense), Net ^(b)		(67,859	)		(49,745	)		(51,697	)

EBIT ^(c)	$	396,148		$	344,798		$	320,151


	May 31, 2012					May 31, 2011
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Total investments with unrealized losses	$	43,772	$	(3,078	)	$	21,612	$	(1,518	)
Unrealized losses with a loss position for less than 12 months		42,114		(2,596	)		19,721		(1,301	)
Unrealized losses with a loss position for more than 12 months		1,658		(482	)		1,891		(217	)


	U.S. Plans									Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2010			2012			2011			2010
Service cost	$	19,906		$	16,957		$	14,020		$	3,731		$	3,535		$	1,971
Interest cost		15,307			13,738			13,499			8,076			7,622			7,352
Expected return on plan assets		(17,416	)		(12,558	)		(9,795	)		(7,867	)		(7,057	)		(6,068	)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		352			358			351			10			12			9
Net actuarial losses recognized		8,510			7,919			6,554			2,169			2,472			963
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses		—			83			—			—			(26	)		(76	)

Net Pension Cost	$	26,659		$	26,497		$	24,629		$	6,119		$	6,558		$	4,151


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
(In thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	288,532		$	258,755		$	161,632		$	137,821
Service cost		19,906			16,957			3,731			3,535
Interest cost		15,307			13,738			8,076			7,622
Benefits paid		(13,467	)		(15,915	)		(6,337	)		(5,844	)
Participant contributions								1,035			1,007
Acquisitions								880			60
Plan amendments					68						(9	)
Actuarial losses		74,735			15,110			20,563			1,835
Settlements/Curtailments					(181	)					(2,409	)
Premiums paid								(161	)		(146	)
Currency exchange rate changes								(14,081	)		18,160

Benefit Obligation at End of Year	$	385,013		$	288,532		$	175,338		$	161,632

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	212,215		$	147,370		$	141,639		$	112,435
Actual return on plan assets		(14,309	)		30,536			3,987			11,655
Employer contributions		13,769			50,405			8,363			9,770
Participant contributions								1,035			1,007
Benefits paid		(13,467	)		(15,915	)		(6,337	)		(5,844	)
Premiums paid								(161	)		(146	)
Settlements/Curtailments					(181	)					(2,409	)
Currency exchange rate changes								(11,208	)		15,171

Fair Value of Plan Assets at End of Year	$	198,208		$	212,215		$	137,318		$	141,639

(Deficit) of plan assets versus benefit obligations at end of year	$	(186,805	)	$	(76,317	)	$	(38,020	)	$	(19,993	)

Net Amount Recognized	$	(186,805	)	$	(76,317	)	$	(38,020	)	$	(19,993	)

Accumulated Benefit Obligation	$	324,247		$	248,952		$	156,663		$	143,413


	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans
Year-End Benefit Obligations	2012			2011			2012			2011
Discount rate		4.25	%		5.25	%		4.19	%		5.14	%
Rate of compensation increase		3.15	%		3.15	%		3.76	%		3.83	%


	Common Stock
	Number of Shares			Par/Stated Value			Paid-In Capital
Balance at May 31, 2009		128,501		$	1,285		$	796,441
Net income		—			—			—
Translation (loss) and other		—			—			—
Dividends paid		—			—			—
Deconsolidation of SPHC		—			—			(84,985	)
Stock option exercises, net		981			10			12,341
Stock based compensation expense		—			—			3,852
Restricted stock awards, net		436			4			(3,560	)

Balance at May 31, 2010		129,918			1,299			724,089
Net income		—			—			—
Translation gain and other		—			—			—
Dividends paid		—			—			—
Other noncontrolling interest activity		—			—			(13,233	)
Shares repurchased		(1,036	)		(10	)		10
Stock option exercises, net		784			8			10,397
Stock based compensation expense		—			—			3,855
Restricted stock awards, net		914			9			10,127

Balance at May 31, 2011		130,580			1,306			735,245
Net income		—			—			—
Translation gain and other		—			—			—
Dividends paid		—			—			—
Other noncontrolling interest activity		—			—			(16,175	)
Shares repurchased		(165	)		(2	)		2
Stock option exercises, net		577			6			7,311
Stock based compensation expense		—			—			3,991
Restricted stock awards, net		563			6			12,521

Balance at May 31, 2012		131,555		$	1,316		$	742,895


	U.S. Plans									Non-U.S. Plans
Net Periodic Pension Cost	2012			2011			2010			2012			2011			2010
Discount rate		5.25	%		5.75	%		6.90	%		5.14	%		5.26	%		6.96	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.50	%		8.75	%		8.75	%		5.63	%		5.75	%		5.94	%
Rate of compensation increase		3.15	%		3.28	%		3.28	%		3.83	%		3.81	%		3.76	%


U.S. Plans
	Target Allocation			Actual Asset Allocation
(Dollars in millions)	as of May 31, 2012			2012		2011
Equity securities		55	%	$	111.7	$	107.8
Fixed income securities		25	%		64.4		50.7
Cash					4.5		35.0
Other		20	%		17.6		18.7

Total assets		100	%	$	198.2	$	212.2



Frank C. Sullivan		Russell L. Gordon
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

July 26, 2012