6-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of September, 2006

Commission File Number: 000-49919

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)

Highway 66, Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

[ X ] Form 20-F    [] Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): []

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): []

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes [] No [ X ]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _________

SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits

99.1	News Release dated September 6, 2006
99.2	Material Change Report dated September 6, 2006
99.3	Interim Financial Statements for the Period Ended July 31, 2006
99.4	Management's Discussion and Analysis for the Period Ended July 31, 2006
99.5	Form 52-901F Certification of Interim Filings - CEO
99.6	Form 52-901F Certification of Interim Filings - CFO
99.7	News Release dated September 14, 2006
99.8	News Release dated September 19, 2006
99.9	News Release dated September 19, 2006
99.10	Information Circular
99.11	Confirmation of Mailing
99.12	News Release dated October 3, 2006

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Kirkland Lake Gold Inc.
	(Registrant)
Date: October 4, 2006	By:	/s/ Sandra Lee
		Sandra Lee
	Title:	Corporate Secretary

EX-99.1

P.O. Box 370
KIRKLAND LAKE, ON, P2N 3J7

September 6^th, 2006  Symbol – TSX & AIM: KGI

Drilling to the South Returns
5.57 Ounces of Gold per Ton over 50 Feet (uncut);
Highest Grade Gold Intersection in New System and in Camp

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce a significant drill hole intersection from the exploration and development program developing the new gold system to the south of the Camp’s Main Break.

As part of this program, the Company is attempting to define the scale and size of this gold system through drilling and development mining out to the area via the 5300 Level cross cut. In Drill Hole 50-740 the Company has intersected high-grade gold mineralization on what is interpreted to be the north extension of the Lower D North Zone, one of the mineralized zones in this system. Drill Hole 50-740 has intersected 5.57 ounces of gold per ton (uncut) over a core length of 50 feet, including 181.5 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 1.0 feet

This new 50 foot intersection correlates well with the two zones drifted on the Lower D North from the 5300 Level cross cut 360 feet to the west. The first of the two zones averaged 1.23 ounces of gold per ton (uncut) over a horizontal width of 7.3 feet and a drift length of 86 feet. The second averaged 2.12 ounces of gold per ton (uncut) over a horizontal width of 6.4 feet and a drift length of 67 feet (see press release dated August 10^th, 2006).

“These results confirm the Company’s decision to make generating information about this new area through stepped up drilling and development mining the operation’s top priority” commented Stewart Carmichael, Chief Exploration Geologist. “In addition to this intersection in Drill Hole 50-740, there are six other mineralized intercepts further down the hole, grading as high as 1.11 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 4.7 feet and 1.87 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 1.1 feet.”

Highlights of the current results include:

• Drill Hole 50-740 has intersected 5.57 ounces of gold per ton (uncut) over a core length of 50 feet, including 181.5 ounces of gold per ton (opt) over a core length of 1.0 feet. With all high assays cut to 3.50 opt, the interval averages 1.11 opt over a core length of 50 feet.
   
• The 181.5 opt assay over a core length of 1.0 feet within the 50 foot intersection is the highest recorded drill hole intersection in the history of the Kirkland Lake Camp and replaces LK Zone discovery hole which held the previous record of 102.5 opt over 1.5 foot core length (see press release dated September 20, 2004). The interval is characterised by an extraordinary abundance of telluride, in places semi-massive within the 1.0 foot section. Both follow-up chemistry and microscopy work has verified the abundant telluride, thought to be calaverite.

- 2 -

• Check assays (pulps and rejects) on the high-grade interval include 175.22 opt, 188.56 opt, 172.96 opt, and 189.42 opt averaging 181.54 opt.
   
• Of the 24 core samples comprising the 50 foot interval, 13 assayed greater than 1 opt and 4 assayed greater than 3.5 opt.
   
• The intersection is located 360 feet east of the drift on the 5300 Level where ore has been followed on 2 of 4 ore-bearing structures comprising a 50 foot width -- it is 140 feet west of previously announced drill hole 50-696 which assayed 0.49 opt over 11.2 feet of core (see press releases dated August 10^th, 2006 and February 14^th, 2006). The ore in the drift is thought to be the same as that in the intersection because of the direction of the ore, the visual similarities, the presence of similar very coarse tellurides, high grades, and similar widths (see figure #1 and figure #2).
   
• The mineralization comprises highly altered tuff, mineralized with up to 20% disseminated pyrite bridging a tuff/porphyry contact.
   
• The dip of the mineralization at the intersection point may vary from -40 degrees to -65 degrees. Further drilling will be required to accurately determine the dip and true width which is estimated to be from 22 feet to 39 feet.
   
• Drilling south of the No. 3 Shaft area has and will result in drill cost per ounce found in the $6.00 to $7.00/ounce range, much lower than the historical average of $15.00/ounce found for the Camp. This is due to overall wider mineralization and multiple zones intersected in each drill hole.

The diagrams referred to in this release may be viewed at the Company’s website, www.klgold.com and will provide context to the above statements.

Figure #1 is a plan view showing the latest intersection south of the No. 3 shaft mine workings.

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results in imperial values:

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (feet)	TO (feet)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (oz. per ton/feet)
50-740	Lower D North? Incl. and and and New New New New New New	1,085 1,114.4 1,116.4 1,118.0 1,120.0 1,137.8 1,235.8 1,260.1 1,282.3 1,306.1 1,341.8	1,135 1,115.4 1,118.0 1,120.0 1,121.9 1,139.5 1,237.4 1,263.0 1,287.0 1,307.9 1,342.9	-13.5	137	5.57/50.0’ CL = TW?, Uncut 1.11/50.0’ CL = TW?, Cut 181.54/1.0’ CL = TW?, Tell, VG 26.59/1.6’ CL = TW? 6.24/2.0’ CL = TW? 4.82/1.9’ CL = TW? 0.32/1.7’ CL = TW?, VG, Tell 0.93/1.6’ CL = TW? 0.35/2.9’ CL = TW? 1.11/4.7’ CL = TW?, VG 0.44/1.8’ CL = TW?, VG 1.87/1.1’ CL = TW?

TW=True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 3.50 oz/ton

- 3 -

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results in metric values:

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (m)	TO (m)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (grams per tonne/m)
50-740	Lower D North? Incl. and and and New New New New New New	330.8 339.8 340.4 340.9 341.5 346.9 376.8 384.2 390.9 398.2 409.1	346.0 340.1 340.9 341.5 342.0 347.4 377.3 385.1 392.4 398.8 409.4	-13.5	137	191.0/15.2m CL = TW?, Uncut 38.1/15.2m CL = TW?, Cut 6,224.3/0.3m CL = TW?, Tell, VG 911.7/0.5m CL = TW? 213.9/0.6m CL = TW? 165.3/0.5m CL = TW? 10.80/0.5m = TW?, VG Tell 31.9/0.5m CL = TW? 12.0/0.9m CL = TW? 38.1/1.4m CL = TW? 15.1/0.6m CL = TW?, VG 64.1/0.3m CL = TW?

TW = True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 120 grams/tonne

About the Company

The Company purchased the Macassa Mine and the 1,500 ton per day mill along with four former producing gold properties – Kirkland Minerals, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore and Wright Hargreaves – in December 2001. These properties, which have historically produced some 22 million ounces of gold, extend over seven kilometres between the Macassa Mine on the east and Wright Hargreaves on the west and, for the first time, are being developed and explored under one owner. This camp is located in the Abitibi Southern Greenstone Belt of Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada.

The results of the Company’s underground diamond drilling program have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by the Company's geological staff (which includes a ‘qualified person’, Michael Sutton P.Geo., the Company’s Chief Geologist, for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, of the Canadian Securities Administrators).

The Company has implemented a quality assurance and control (QA/QC) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the best possible practices. The drill core is sawn in half with half of the core samples shipped to the Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, Ontario or to the Macassa mine laboratory for analysis. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification. Other QA/QC includes the insertion of blanks, and the regular re-assaying of pulps/rejects at alternate certified labs (Polymet, Accurassay). Gold analysis is conducted by fire assay using atomic absorption or gravimetric finish. The laboratory re-assays at least 10% of all samples and additional checks may be run on anomalous values.

The Company’s Kirkland Lake properties are the subject of a report prepared by Roland H. Ridler, B.A.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D.(Econ.Geol.), P.D., entitled Kirkland Lake Mineral Properties (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves dated November 30, 2001. The Company’s Macassa Mine Property is the subject of reserve

- 4 -

and resource report prepared by Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng., entitled Review of Resources and Reserves of Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake, Ontario dated July 18, 2006. Both of these technical reports have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).

For further information, please contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	Scott Koyich
President	Investor Relations
Phone 1 705 567 5208	Phone 1 403 215 5979
Fax 1 705 568 6444	E-mail: info@klgold.com
E-mail: bhinchcliffe@klgold.com
Website- www.klgold.com
Chelsea Hayes
Pelham Public Relations
Phone 020 7743 6675
E-mail: chelsea.hayes@pelhampr.com

     Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange has reviewed and neither accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

EX-99.2

FORM 51-102F3

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

1.	Reporting Issuer
	KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.
	Suite 300 – 570 Granville Street
	Vancouver, BC V6C 3P1
	(the “Company”)
2.	Date of Material Change
	September 6, 2006
3.	Press Release
	Press Release dated September 6, 2006 was disseminated by CCN Matthews and SEDAR filed with the British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario Securities Commissions on that date.
4.	Summary of Material Change
	Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce a significant drill hole intersection from the exploration and development program developing the new gold system to the south of the Camp’s Main Break.
5.	Full Description of Material Change
	Please see attached news release.
6.	Reliance on Confidential Filing Provisions of the Act
	Not applicable.
7.	Omitted Information
	Not applicable.
8.	Senior Officers

For further information contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	President	Phone:	1 705 567 5208
		Fax:	1 705 568 6444
		E-mail:	bhinchcliffe@klgold.com
Scott Koyich	Investor Relations	Phone:	1 403 215 5979
	Website- www.klgold.com	E-mail:	info@klgold.com
Chelsea Hayes	UK Public Relations	Phone:	020 44 7743 6675
	(Pelham)	E-mail:	chelsea.hayes@pelhampr.com

9.	Date of Report
	September 8, 2006

EX-99.3

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2006

(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the "Company") have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

These statements have been approved by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these financials statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a reveiw of interim financials statements by an entity's auditor.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Balance Sheet

(Unaudited)

As at July 31, 2006 and April 30, 2006

(expressed in Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

		July 31			April 30
		2006			2006
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,194,229		$	9,411,925
Accounts receivable		988,446			2,729,475
Inventories (Note 4)		4,553,105			4,295,899
Prepaid expenses and deposits		223,020			70,250
		27,958,800			16,507,549
Security deposits (Note 3)		725,000			725,000
Mineral properties (Note 5)		31,607,865			29,986,447
Property, plant and equipment (Note 6)		11,846,325			11,504,100
Mine closure bonds		2,043,435			2,043,435
	$	74,181,425		$	60,766,531
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 12(b))	$	10,772,854		$	9,702,880
Contingencies		150,000			150,000
Other liabilities		85,500			85,500
Asset retirement obligation		1,873,467			1,845,780
		12,881,821			11,784,160
Shareholders' Equity
Capital stock (Note 8)
Authorized
Unlimited common shares without par value
Issued		124,977,004			110,088,761
52,866,888 (2006 - 50,868,138) common shares
Options (Note 9) and (Note 2(b))		918,655			1,079,766
Warrants (Note 10)		879,467			-
Contributed surplus (Note 11)		2,803,822			2,797,768
Deficit		(68,279,344	)		(64,983,924	)
		61,299,604			48,982,371
	$	74,181,425		$	60,766,531
Operations, going concern and measurement uncertainty (Note 1)

Approved by the Board of Directors:

(signed) "Brian E. Bayley" Director (signed) "Brian Hinchcliffe" Director

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Statements of Operations and Deficit

(Unaudited)

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

		Three Month Period			Three Month Period
		Ended			Ended
		July 31			July 31
		2006			2005
Mining revenue	$	8,517,052		$	7,393,952
Operating expenses
Operating costs		8,094,549			10,460,243
Stock-based compensation for operational personnel		10,338			51,842
Amortization and depletion		818,822			566,432
Royalties		343,706			220,808
		9,267,415			11,299,325
Operating margin		(750,363	)		(3,905,373	)
Other expenses
General and administrative		733,070			222,816
Stock-based compensation for administrative personnel		28,637			105,154
Exploration		1,982,308			1,222,788
Interest and bank charges		19,229			28,909
Interest and other income		(218,187	)		(82,827	)
		2,545,057			1,496,840
Loss for the period		(3,295,420	)		(5,402,213	)
Deficit - beginning of period		(64,983,924	)		(58,527,364	)
Deficit - end of period	$	(68,279,344	)	$	(63,929,577	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.12	)
Weighted Average number of shares outstanding		52,367,173			45,516,828

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

		Three Month Period			Three Month Period
		Ended			Ended
		July 31			July 31
		2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities
Loss for the period	$	(3,295,420	)	$	(5,402,213	)
Items not affecting cash
Amortization and depletion		818,822			566,432
Stock-based compensation		38,975			156,996
Asset Retirement Obligation		27,687			31,659
Changes in non-cash working capital items
Accounts receivable		1,741,029			212,511
Inventories		(257,206	)		1,367,732
Prepaid expenses and deposits		(152,770	)		(54,126	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,069,974			1,091,935
		(8,909	)		(2,029,074	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net proceeds from issuance of capital stock		15,573,678			1,057,083
		15,573,678			1,057,083
Cash flows from (applied to) investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(785,037	)		(801,439	)
Additions to mineral properties		(1,997,428	)		(2,258,184	)
		(2,782,465	)		(3,059,623	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		12,782,304			(4,031,614	)
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of period		9,411,925			8,632,547
Cash and cash equivalents - End of period	$	22,194,229		$	4,600,933
Supplemental cash flow information (Note 14)

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

Operations
Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the company) owns gold mining and milling operations in Kirkland Lake, Canada, which were inactive when acquired in December 2001.

Going concern
These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities during the normal course of business as they come due.

At July 31, 2006, the company has working capital of $17.2 million and has committed to spend $1.1 million on eligible flow-through expenditures before December 31, 2006. The funds required to continue operations and exploration activities during this period have been financed primarily from the issue of equity or convertible debt instruments.

Management estimates that these funds, together with cash flow from targeted operations, will be sufficient to meet the company's obligations and capital expenditure plans for the coming year.

These financial statements do not include any adjustment to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary should the going concern assumption be inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Measurement uncertainty

The Company's history of operating losses from mining operations has resulted in cumulative losses to July 31, 2006 of $68,279,344.

Management estimates, using a constant gold price of $625 per ounce and operating costs similar to historical costs incurred over the past year, that annual production of between 75,000 and 85,000 ounces of gold in fiscal 2007 and for each year thereafter would be required to cover costs of operations and estimated capital expenditures required for mining operations.

Gold price or Canadian/ U.S. dollar exchange rate movements, changes in the costs of labour and other costs or unforeseen production difficulties could impact on the ability of the Company to achieve its goals from operations. Aside from the prevailing favourable price of gold and available public information about prices achieved for purchase transactions involving other mineral properties, management has concluded that the carrying values of mineral properties and other mining assets is not impaired as a result of the Company’s success in:

• Realizing production improvements;
• Containing and reducing operating costs;
• Completing a number of significant capital investment projects;
• Achieving a threefold increase in proven and probable gold reserves to open up a number of high quality underground exploration targets.

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
	(a)	BASIS OF PRESENTATION
	The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals ("GAAP") in Canada. They do not include all of the information and disclosures required by Canadian GAAP for annual audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included in these financial statements. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the company's audited financial statements including the notes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2006.
	(b)	STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
	The company has a stock option plan as described in note 9. Effective May 1, 2004, the company adopted the new accounting standard for stock-based compensation. The standard sets out a fair value approach that is required for all stock-based transactions. Prior to May 1, 2004, the company used the intrinsic value-based method to account for its employee stock incentive plan and therefore no compensation expense had been recognized under the plan for stock options issued to employees and directors. This change in policy has been applied retroactively without restatement of prior periods.
	Stock-based compensation on options is recorded as an expense in the period the options are vested, based on the fair value estimated based on the Black-Scholes option pricing method.

3. SECURITY DEPOSITS

The company’s short-term investments include $225,000 held as collateral to provide a letter of credit to the Independent Electricity Market Operator as security for payment in connection with ongoing electricity usage, and $500,000 as a security deposit at the Royal Bank of Canada to cover payroll electronic file transfers.

4. INVENTORIES

		JULY 31		APRIL 30
		2006		2006
Mine operating supplies	$	1,032,169	$	1,147,502
Gold in process		3,520,936		2,657,417
Surface stockpile		-		490,980
	$	4,553,105	$	4,295,899

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

5. MINERAL PROPERTIES

		JULY 31			APRIL 30
		2006			2006
Balance - Beginning of period	$	29,986,447		$	20,227,298
Additions:
Development costs		1,997,428			11,867,437
Depletion		(376,010	)		(2,108,288	)
Balance - End of period	$	31,607,865		$	29,986,447

				ACCUMULATED		JULY 31		APRIL 30
		COST		AMORTIZATION		2006		2006
Acquisition allocation	$	795,648	$	114,796	$	680,852	$	688,935
Underground		31,396,975		3,218,330		28,178,645		26,516,153
development
Underground pumping		2,050,942		287,216		1,763,726		1,784,666
Mill & surface facilities		149,371		21,631		127,740		129,617
Lakeshore property		1,000,411		143,509		856,902		867,076
	$	35,393,347	$	3,785,482	$	31,607,865	$	29,986,447

6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

				ACCUMULATED		JULY 31
		COST		AMORTIZATION		2006
						NET
Computer equipment	$	473,904	$	327,521	$	146,383
Mine and mill equipment		15,901,982		4,760,377		11,141,605
Vehicles		115,957		61,931		54,026
Buildings		688,926		184,615		504,311
	$	17,180,769	$	5,334,444	$	11,846,325
				ACCUMULATED		APRIL 30
		COST		AMORTIZATION		2006
						NET
Computer equipment	$	433,471	$	298,532	$	134,939
Mine and mill equipment		15,227,406		4,438,354		10,789,052
Vehicles		115,957		56,132		59,825
Buildings		688,926		168,642		520,284
	$	16,465,760	$	4,961,660	$	11,504,100

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

The company has assumed responsibility for the reclamation and site restoration plans originally filed with the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mining (MNDM) in connection with the all the Kirkland Lake properties. The estimated total costs of reclamation and site restoration at July 31, 2006 are $2,711,670 and financial assurance has been provided to the MNDM by way of mine closure bonds in the amount of $2,043,435.

A reconciliation for asset retirement obligations is as follows:

		JULY 31		APRIL 30
		2006		2006
Balance - Beginning of year	$	1,845,780	$	2,110,583
Revision to timing of estimate mining life		-		(391,438	)
Accretion		27,687		126,635
Balance - End of period	$	1,873,467	$	1,845,780

There were no liabilities incurred or settled during 2007 and 2006.

The provision for asset retirement obligations is based on the following key assumptions.

• The total undiscounted cash flow as at April 30, 2007 is $2,711,670.

• The expected settlement to be in 2016.

• A credit adjusted risk free rate at which the estimated payments have been discounted of 6%.

• An inflation rate of 2%.

8. CAPITAL STOCK

	Number of		Stated
	shares		value
Balance - Beginning of period	50,868,138	$	110,088,761
Exercise of options (Note 9)	205,250		654,370
Private placements	1,793,500		16,500,200
Share issuance costs	-		(1,386,860	)
Share proceeds allocated to warrants	-		(879,467	)
Balance - End of period	52,866,888	$	124,977,004

On May 24 and 25, 2006, the company completed a private placement of 1,793,500 units at a price of $9.20 per unit totalling $16,500,200 ($15,113,340 net). Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of a share purchase warrant. 271,750 warrants are exercisable until May 24, 2007 and 625,000 warrants are exercisable until May 25, 2007 at a price of $10.50 per share. The share purchase warrants issued as part of this placement have been recorded at a fair value of $879,467.

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

9. OPTIONS

The company has adopted a stock option plan. The plan allows the company to grant options to directors, senior officers and employees of or consultants to the company and its subsidiaries or employees of a corporation providing management services to the company. The aggregate number of shares which may be subject to issuance pursuant to options granted under this plan is 3,500,000 shares.

The plan provides that the exercise price of an option granted under the plan shall not be less than the market price at the time of granting the option. Options have a maximum term of 10 years and terminate on the 90th day after the optionee ceased to be any of a director, officer, consultant or employee; on the 30th day after the optionee ceased to be an employee or consultant if the optionee was engaged in providing investor relations services for the company; or the earlier of the 90th day and the third month after the optionee ceased to be an employee or officer if the optionee is subject to the tax laws of the United States of America. Notwithstanding that options can have a maximum term of 10 years it is presently the policy of the company to issue options for terms of five years.

The change in stock options issued during the quarter ended July 31, 2006 are as follows:

				Weighted
	Number of shares			average exercise
				price
Options outstanding - May 1	737,124		$	2.87
Exercised	(205,250	)		2.24
Forfeited	(2,500	)		4.70
Options outstanding - July 31	529,374		$	3.10
Options exercisable - July 31	427,374		$	1.54

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at July 31, 2006:

			Outstanding	Exercisable
			options weighted	options weighted
			average	average
	Options	Options	remaining life	remaining life
Exercise price	outstanding	exercisable	(years)	(years)
1.35	120,000	120,000	0.04	0.05
1.60	1,124	1,124	0.01	0.01
2.20	99,750	99,750	0.27	0.34
2.45	35,000	35,000	0.06	0.06
2.80	10,000	10,000	0.04	0.05
3.95	124,000	124,000	0.54	0.67
4.70	139,500	37,500	0.83	0.28
1.35 - 4.70	529,374	427,374	1.78	1.46

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

9. OPTIONS (CONT'D)

The company grants all employee stock options with an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. Compensation costs for all grants under the employee stock option plan have been determined by the fair value method. Compensation expense recorded for the three months ended July 31, 2006 was $38,975.

The fair value of each option at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	JULY 31	APRIL 30
	2006	2006
Expected life of options	5 years	5 years
Risk-free interest rate	3 - 4%	3 - 4%
Expected stock price volatility	50	50
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%

Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and therefore, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the company's stock options.

For the period ended July 31, 2006, the value ascribed to unexercised options recorded as a component of shareholders' equity is as follows:

		JULY 31			APRIL 30
		2006			2006
Balance - Beginning of period as restated	$	1,079,766		$	1,184,062
Accretion of options granted		38,975			365,440
Exercise of options		(194,032	)		(456,217	)
Options forfeited		(6,054	)		(13,519	)
Balance - End of period	$	918,655		$	1,079,766

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

10. WARRANTS

The changes in warrants outstanding are as follows:

				Weighted
				average
	Number of			exercise
	shares			price
Warrants outstanding - May 1, 2006	4,323,647		$	3.88
Granted	199,386			-
Exercised	(227,837	)		2.18
Warrants outstanding - July 31, 2006	4,295,196		$	3.97

		JULY 31		APRIL 30
		2006		2006
Balance - Beginning of period	$	-	$	3,841,480
Unit proceeds allocated to warrants		-		-
Agents warrants issued in private placements		879,467		517,559
Exercise of warrants		-		(1,735,548	)
Expiry of warrants		-		(2,623,491	)
Balance - End of period	$	879,467	$	-

11. CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS

		JULY 31		APRIL 30
		2006		2006
Balance - Beginning of period	$	2,797,768	$	160,755
Forfeited options		6,054		13,519
Forfeited warrants		-		2,623,494
Balance - End of period	$	2,803,822	$	2,797,768

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the three months ended July 31, 2006 and 2005

(expressed in Canadian dollars)

12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following related party transactions occurred during the period:

(a) The company paid office facilities and administration services in the amount of $10,500 (2006 - $10,500) to a company related by directors in common.

(b) At July 31, 2006, accounts payable included $4,000 (2006 - $nil) owing to companies with directors in common. Amounts due to related parties are non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms of repayment.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which represented the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

13. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The company has one operating segment consisting of a mining and milling operation located in Kirkland Lake, Canada. During the periods ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 all of the company's capital assets, revenues earned and operations were in Canada.

14. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

During the period ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, the company conducted non-cash financing and investing activities as follows:

		JULY 31		JULY 31
		2006		2005
Warrants issued as convertible loans financing costs	$	879,467	$	-

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

(a) On August 30, 2006, the company received $500,000 back from the Royal Bank of Canada which was held as a security deposit to cover payroll electronic file transfers.

See accompanying notes to interim financial statements.

EX-99.4

1

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

Management’s Discussion & Analysis
First Quarter- Fiscal 2007

This portion of the Quarterly Report provides management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations to enable a reader to assess material changes in financial condition and results of operations as at and for the three month period ended July 31, 2006, in comparison to the corresponding prior year periods. This MD&A has been prepared as of September 14, 2006 and is intended to supplement the unaudited Financial Statements and notes thereto which are expressed in Canadian Dollars and prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with both the annual audited financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2006, the related annual MD&A and the most recent Annual Report (Form 20F) and Annual Information Form on file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities regulatory authorities, respectively.

Overview

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) is an operating gold mining company located in Kirkland Lake, Ontario, which owns the Macassa Mine and Mill and four contiguous former gold producing properties. Production for the quarter was 12,707 ounces or 11% (1,282 ounces) better than for the same period in fiscal 2006. Problems associated with paste fill processes which hindered production in the period have now been resolved.

The Company’s common shares trade on the TSX (Toronto Stock Exchange) and on the AIM (Alternative Investment Market) of the London Stock Exchange.

Discussion of Quarterly Results

The Company incurred a loss for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 of $3,295,420 or $0.06 per share, which compares with a loss of $5,402,213 or $0.12 per share reported for the same period of fiscal 2006. Gold revenues were 15% higher at $8,517,052 (2006- $7,393,952), with a 30% increase in gold price offset by a 15% reduction in ounces sold. Operating costs reduced to $8,098,549 (2006- $10,460,243). This decrease was a function of volume and improved productivity from the considerable investments made in training, modernizing and upgrading infrastructure and equipment. The exploration program to fully capitalize on the exploration potential of the Company’s mining properties continued with exploration expenditures of $1,982,308 (2006- $1,222,788).

Financial Highlights (all amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars, except shares and per share figures)	3 months ended July 31 2006	3 months ended July 31 2005
Revenue Operating Costs Exploration Expenditure Net (loss) Per share (basic and diluted) Cash Flow (used) for operating activities	8,517 8,095 1,982 (3,295) (0.06) (9)	7,394 10,460 1,223 (5,402) (0.12) (2,029)

2

Financial Highlights (all amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars, except shares and per share figures)	3 months ended July 31 2006	3 months ended July 31 2005
Cash Flow from financing activities Cash Flow (used) for investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash Cash at end of period Total Assets Total Liabilities Working Capital Weighted average number of shares outstanding	15,674 (2,782) 12,782 22,194 74,181 12,882 17,186 52,367,173	1,057 (3,060) (4,032) 2,401 8,259 10,932 (2,673) 45,516,828

During the first quarter of fiscal 2007:

• Gold sales were 12,311 ounces with an average price of CDN$692 per ounce. (Q1 2006: 13,951 ounces, CDN$529) and, as stated above, paste fill system problems affecting the first quarter have now been resolved.
• Operating Margins before Other Expenses reduced 43% to $750,363 or 9% of revenues (2006: $3,853,693 or 52% of revenues).
• Negative operating cash flow decreased significantly to $8,909 (2006- negative $2,029,074), and total spending including operating costs, capital spending and royalties fell 18% to $11.2 million (2006: $13.7 million).
• The Company raised a further $15.7 million by way of private placement to fund working capital and further development activities.
• Capital spending on mine development and equipment fell 9% to $2.8 million (2006: $3 million)
• A new underground communications system, two new scoop trams and two man carriers were purchased during the quarter.

The Company’s cash position at the end of July 2006 was $22,194,229.

Discussion of Costs

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007:

• A total of $8,148,223 (2006 - $10,460,405) was spent on operating costs. Approximately 70% of current operating costs relate to labour, an increase of 26% over the same period in the prior year when the Company was actively recruiting new miners.
• 55,230 tons of rock was hoisted from underground operations, of which 36,742 tons were milled as ore producing 12,707 ounces. (2006: hoisted tons: 56,670, milled tons: 28,970, production ounces: 11,425).
• 3,413 feet (2006: 2,891 feet) of lateral and vertical operating stope development was completed, an increase of 18%
• Ore grade to the mill was 0.357 ounces per ton (calculated head grade; 2006: 0.404) for the quarter vs. a forecast grade of 0.44. Dilution from various sources, and delays in mining higher- grade areas until the second quarter, are responsible for the lower grade than forecast.

3

The Company incurred a total of $818,822 (2006- $566,432) in amortization and depletion of asset costs and $19,229 (2006- $28,747) on interest and bank charges. The increase in amortization and depletion of asset costs is substantially due to the ongoing high level of underground development being undertaken by the Company. The decrease in interest and bank charges and amortization of finance charges is due to the reduction in convertible loan financing.

Exploration Costs of $1,982,308 (2006- $1,222,788) were incurred during the quarter. This figure included $276,166 of flow-through drilling and $838,000 of development work of which $448,000 relates again to flow-through.

General and administrative expenses were $733,070 (2006- $222,816). Additional professional fees associated with bringing the Company into compliance with reporting requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and additional corporate overheads substantially account for this difference between periods. Interest and other income was $218,187 (2006- $82,827) as a result of the considerably higher cash balances on deposit during the quarter compared to the same period in the prior year.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition

Liquidity & Cash Flow

The Company’s cash balance at July 31, 2006 was $22,194,229 and the working capital surplus was $17,185,946. The Company has sufficient working capital to finance ongoing development, exploration projects and, where necessary, operations as the company move into profitability.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2007:

• Cash flow used for operations was $8,909 (2006-$2,029,074). This improvement is due to the substantial increase in gold revenues and reduction in operating and exploration expenses.
• The Company raised a further $15.7 million net of expenses by way of private placement to fund ongoing working capital and further development activities.
• The total amount of new capital invested in the Company’s activities was $2,782,465 (2006- $3,059,623), with 28% of this amount spent on new mining equipment and 72% invested in underground development.

4

Summary of Quarterly Results

Quarterly Results (expressed in 000’s of Canadian dollars ) Fiscal 2007	4th Quarter	3rd Quarter	2nd Quarter	1st Quarter
Revenue				8,517
Net Earnings (Loss)				(3,295)
Earnings (Loss) per share-Basic & diluted				(0.06)
Fiscal 2006
Revenue	10,632	11,111	5,986	7,394
Net Earnings (Loss)	(2,464)	2,310	(901)	(5,402)
Earnings (Loss) per share-Basic & diluted	(0.04)	0.05	(0.02)	(0.12)
Fiscal 2005
Revenue	7,062	6,374	5,129	3,591
Net Earnings (Loss)	(3,911)	(6,331)	(8,886)	(9,031)
Earnings (Loss) per share-Basic & diluted	(0.07)	(0.14)	(0.22)	(0.25)

Although quarterly results continue to fluctuate as the Company matures, compared to the first quarter of 2006, a 43% reduction in operating losses and 50% reduction in loss per share is evidence that the heavy investment on new equipment, the development of newly discovered and higher grade ore zones, the increasing use of lower cost mining methods and employee training schemes are starting to show through in the operating results

Compared to the fourth quarter of 2006, a 4.5% reduction in Operating Margins before Other Expenses to $750,363 was offset by higher exploration expenditure resulting in the loss before tax being in line with the fourth quarter of 2006. Net losses were lower between quarters as a result of income tax recoverable.

Outlook

The Company continues seeking ways to raise production levels and to improve efficiencies by providing consistent investment in training, exploration, and equipment. Production forecasts for fiscal 2007 indicate annual gold production of between 75,000 and 85,000 ounces.

Mine design of the new high grade zones to the south has commenced and additional geotechnical information is being incorporated into development plans. These zones represent an important source of production for the Company and the potential exists to add significantly to these newly discovered areas.

Substantial costs and management time are being invested to improve operational systems, controls and processes. These initiatives will enable management to identify further opportunities to improve productivity, reduce operating costs and contribute towards achieving compliance with its statutory reporting obligations in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.

5

Exploration and Ore Reserve Update

To date, fourteen mineralized zones have been identified south of the mine workings, eight of which are in the area encompassing the New South/LK Zone. The reserves and resources of the new ore system to the south of the original Kirkland Lake camp which has produced 24 million ounces of gold were estimated at the end of the fiscal 2006 to be 136,000 ounces of probable reserve, 267,000 ounces of inferred resources, and 8,000 ounces of indicated resource. A new estimate is currently being calculated to incorporate reserves/resources added in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

During the quarter, the 5300-foot level exploration drift advanced 1,452 feet and four new drill bays were created to facilitate drilling using smaller, mobile air machines. Initial drilling from this new drift has intersected multiple zones of mineralization. While exploring the area ahead of the drift on the Lower D North Zone, 5300 Level cross cut, the Company has intersected high-grade gold mineralization on what is interpreted to be the north extension of this zone. Drill whole 50-740 has intersected 5.57 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 50 feet, including 181.5 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 1.0 feet. The dip of the mineralization at the intersection point may vary from -40 degrees to -60 degrees; further drilling will be required to accurately determine the dip and true width, which is estimated to be from 22 feet to 39 feet. Drill hole 53-466, drilled horizontally from the drift and ahead of the advancement, has intersected five mineralized zones, one of which assayed 3.34 ounces of gold per ton (“opt”) uncut or 1.71 (cut) over a core length of 16.8 feet. This mineralization appears to be related to the Lower D North Zone. In house metallurgical testing on core samples submitted from the New South Zone indicate that a 96.2% recovery may be achieved by using standard milling procedures and the cross cut is now within 700 feet of the intended bulk sample area on the New South Zone where a previous intersection returned a 124.4 foot intersection of 1.4 opt.

The new zones are different than the historically-mined quartz-hosted gold in that they comprise more consistently grading sulphide gold zones along extensive structures and are consistent with previous discoveries to the south including the Lower D Zone

Queenston Mining Inc. and Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. have a 50%-50% joint venture to explore the Kirkland Lake West (“KLW”) property owned by Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited (“Newmont”). The KLW property, which adjoins the western boundary of KL Gold’s Macassa Mine, is thought to contain the extension of the Main/04 Break ore horizon, on the western side of a major north/south fault which separates the two properties. Development on the 4700 level, of a cross-cut to be used for diamond drilling, took place during the quarter and a drill was mobilized at the end of July.

An exploration drill program was undertaken in the Company’s 2006 fiscal year, primarily funded by ‘flow-through’ investments made by Canadian investors which entitle the investors to certain tax write-offs. The Company is required to spend $2.5 million raised in a ‘flow-through’ exploration financing by December 31, 2006. By July 31, 2006 a total of $705,000 had been spent on qualifying expenditures for the quarter, and $1,372,000 in total.

Looking forward, the Company plans to focus its exploration efforts on underground drilling delineating the newly discovered areas and zones to the south. This and other newly-discovered mineralized zones, and extensions of those found through this successful exploration, will increase the ore resources and reserves of the Company.

The results of the Company’s diamond drilling program disclosed herein have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by Michael Sutton P.Geo., the Company’s Chief Geologist (a ‘qualified person’ for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, of the Canadian Securities Administrators). See the Company’s news release issued concurrently with the annual MD&A for details of Company’s quality assurance program and quality control measures and the gold resource and reserve estimates as at April 30, 2006.

6

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on its results of operations or financial condition including, without limitation, such considerations as liquidity and capital resources.

Transactions with Related Parties

Pursuant to an agreement between the Company and Quest Management Ltd., the Company pays $3,500 per month to Quest in consideration of Quest providing office, reception, secretarial and accounting services to the Company. During the quarter, the total fees paid to Quest for services performed under the agreement were $10,500. Quest is a subsidiary of Quest Capital Corp. and has one common director and a common corporate secretary with the Company.

Proposed Transactions

No transactions took place during the quarter.

Changes in Accounting Policies

There were no changes to accounting policies during the quarter.

Risks and Uncertainties

Risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business are documented in the most recent Annual Information Form.

Disclosure Controls & Procedures

As part of the MD&A for the Company’s 2006 fiscal year, management reported that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective since they did not result in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 20-F for fiscal 2004 and 2005 being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘SEC’) within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules. The 2004 and 2005 Annual Reports have now been filed and the 2006 Annual Report should be filed shortly. The Company has confirmed its intention to ensure all future filings are made within the relevant time periods.

The Company is about to embark on a significant and costly exercise to complete a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation will be carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer with the intention that the Company will be able to satisfy independent auditor attestation requirements by the 2008 fiscal year end.

Forward Looking Statements

This report contains “forward-looking statements,” including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s expectations as to the market price of gold, exchange rate, strategic plans, future commercial production, production targets and timetables, mine operating costs, capital expenditures, work programs, exploration budgets and mineral reserve and resource estimates. Forward-looking statements express, as at the date of this report, the Company’s plans, estimates, forecasts or beliefs as to the future events or results. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to, factors associated with fluctuations in the market price of precious metals,

7

mining industry risks and hazards, environmental risks and hazards, uncertainty as to the calculation of mineral reserves and resources, requirement of additional financing, and other risks described in the Company’s Annual Information Form filed with the Securities Commissions of the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario.

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

As at the date of this MD&A the following securities are outstanding:

Common Shares	52,928,388
Warrants	896,750
Options	457,874

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company’s Annual Information Form, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

EX-99.5

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Brian Hinchcliffe, Chief Executive Officer of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the issuer) for the period ending July 31, 2006;
2.	Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings; and
4.	The issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the issuer, and we have designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared.

Dated: September 14, 2006

“Brian Hinchcliffe”

BRIAN HINCHCLIFFE

Chief Executive Officer

EX-99.6

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, John S. Thomson, Acting/Interim Chief Financial Officer of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the issuer) for the period ending July 31, 2006;
2.	Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings; and
4.	The issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the issuer, and we have designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared.

Dated: September 14, 2006

“John S. Thomson”

JOHN S. THOMPSON

Acting/Interim Chief Financial Officer

EX-99.7

P.O. Box 370
KIRKLAND LAKE, ON, P2N 3J7

September 14, 2006 Symbol – TSX & AIM: KGI

First Quarter Results;
Substantial Development of Upper D Zone
and Completion of New Infrastructure

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) announces the financial, operational and exploration results for its first quarter of its 2007 fiscal year, which started May 1, 2006 and ended July 31, 2006.

Overview

During the quarter, operations processed 36,742 tons of ore grading 0.357 ounces of gold per ton for total production of 12,707 recovered ounces of gold versus a forecast of 19,378 ounces of gold. Operating revenue for the quarter based on ounces produced was $8,517,052 and operating costs were $8,098,549. In the quarter the Company spent $1,982,308 on exploration which was expensed, and is included in the loss of $3,295,420 for the first quarter ($0.06 per share).

“The quarter’s operational shortfalls occurred due to problems related to paste filling and long hole mining . To address these problems, management was added, departments were reorganized, and structural investment in the paste fill system was made”, said Brian Hinchcliffe, Company president. ”On the other hand, it was the most successful exploration quarter that we have had, and are pleased to see the results from the decision to develop the exploration level to the south.”

The reserves and resources of the New Ore System to the south (of the geological structure that has produced 24 million ounces of gold over the last almost 100 years), were estimated at the end of the Company’s fiscal year (April 30, 2006) to be 136,000 ounces probable reserves, 267,000 ounces inferred resources, and 8,000 ounces indicated resources. Most of these ounces were found in 2006. A new estimate is currently being calculated to incorporate reserves and resources added in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

FISCAL 2006 YEAR END RESERVES & RESOURCES IN NEW ORE SYSTEM:

	TONS	GRADE	OUNCES
Reserves:
Probable	246,000	0.56	136,000
Resources:
Indicated	22,000	0.39	8,000
Inferred	399,000	0.67	267,000

The 5300-foot level exploration cross-cut has been advanced 1,452 feet to the south, encountering multiple ore zones. Drifting on two of these zones produced 625 ounces of

- 2 -

gold in July from 1170 tons. While exploring the area ahead of the drift (see news release dated September 5th, 2006), drill hole 50-740 intersected 5.57 ounces of gold per ton (“opt”) over a core length of 50 feet, including 181.5 opt over a core length of 1.0 feet.
In fiscal 2006 the drill cost per ounce found was $5.34/ounce. Current drilling is at comparable rates.
To date , fourteen mineralized zones have been identified south of the Main Break, eight of which are in the area encompassing the New South/LK Zone. The number of new zones in the new ore system to the South, combined with the lateral and vertical potential of each of these, suggest that they will cumulatively have a very positive effect on the reserves and resources as the Company continues its exploration campaign
Steps taken during the quarter to address operational problems included:
a)	The problems of blockage of the paste fill system have been rectified by the design and construction of an internal device to segregate falling rock. Department reorganization has separated the paste fill area from the long hole drilling and blasting department, and dedicated underground and surface managers now are responsible for paste preparation and filling. Long hole mining scheduling was moved from a seven day cycle to a Monday to Friday, double shifted cycle, with managers on both shifts.
b)	The dilution from the ore pass system was stopped by switching to the waste pass (at the end of the quarter) which is less prone to this problem
c)	The Company has implemented a revised bonus system, designed to further link bonus to operating results.
During the quarter, the Company’s operations reached certain hurdles in several important areas:
a)	The Company completed the development of 8 Upper D South sublevels which began producing significant longhole tonnage, and continued development of the Upper D North
b)	The cross-cut at the 5300-foot level produced 922 ounces of gold from 1,419 tons of ore grading 0.65 ounces of gold (104 samples) in July and August
c)	The mechanical (equipment) availability and reliability has improved substantially

- 3 -

Details of First Quarter FY- 2007 Results

The Company incurred a loss for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 (Fiscal 2007) of $3,295,420 or $0.06 per share, which compares with a loss of $0.12 per share or a loss of $5,402,213 for the same period fiscal 2006.

Gold revenues were 15% higher at $8,517,052 (2006- $7,393,952), with a 30% increase in gold price offset by a 15% reduction in ounces sold. Operating costs reduced to $8,098,549 (2006-$10,460,243). This decrease was a function of volume and improved productivity from the considerable investments made in training, modernizing and upgrading infrastructure and equipment. The exploration program to fully capitalize on the exploration potential of the company’s mining properties continued with exploration expenditures of $1,982,308 (2006-$1,222,788).

Financial Highlights (all amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars, except shares and per share figures)	3 months ended July 31 2006                              2005
Revenue Operating Costs Exploration Expenditure Net (loss) Per share (basic and diluted) Cash Flow (used) for operating activities Cash Flow from financing activities Cash Flow (used) for investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash Cash at end of period Total Assets Total Liabilities Working Capital Weighted average number of shares outstanding	8,517 8,095 1,982 (3,295) (0.06) (9) 15,674 (2,782) 12,782 22,194 74,181 12,882 17,186 52,367,173	7,394 10,460 1,223 (5,402) (0.12) (2,029) 1,057 (3,060) (4,032) 2,401 8,259 10,932 (2,673) 45,516,828

The 1st quarter FY-2007 financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Highlights of the production results are:

• 55,230 tons of rock were hoisted from underground operations, of which 36,742 tons were milled as ore producing 12,707 ounces. (2006: hoisted tons: 56,670, milled tons: 28,970, production ounces: 11,425).
   
• 3,413 feet (2006: 2,891 feet) of lateral and vertical operating stope development was completed, an increase of 18%.

- 4 -

• Ore grade to the mill was 0.357 ounces per ton (calculated head grade; 2006: 0.404) for the quarter vs. a forecast grade of 0.44. Dilution from various sources, and delays in mining higher-grade areas until the second quarter, are responsible for the lower grade than forecast.

	3 months ended July 31
	2006	2005
Tons hoisted (ore)	33,410	28,129
Tons hoisted (waste)	21,820	28,541
Tons Milled	36,742	28,970
Ozs/ produced	12,707	11,425
Longhole drilling (feet)	40,428	36,459
Operating Lateral Development (feet)	2,849	2,420
Operating Raise Development (feet)	564	579
Definition Drilling (feet)	10,979	18,425

Highlights of the exploration results are:

• Drifting on two branches of the Lower D North Zone from the new cross cut has intersected 0.93 opt (cut; 1.23 opt uncut) over 7.3 feet width along a strike length of 86 feet, and 1.35 opt (cut; 2.12 opt uncut) over 6.4 feet width along a strike length of 67 feet. A number of other structures have chip samples as high as 2.43 opt over 6.0 feet width. Muck samples from the two branches and the entire area between have averaged 1419 tons of 0.65 opt (104 samples). One structure exhibits a change in direction and an increase in dip (from 45 degrees to 70 degrees); the intersection of 3.34 opt over 16.8 feet is located on the fold and a test hole into the east wall of the fold grades 0.80 opt over 6 feet. The true width of this zone is unknown.
   
• Drill hole 50-740 has intersected 5.57 ounces of gold per ton (uncut) over a core length of 50 feet, including 181.5 ounces of gold per ton (opt) over a core length of 1.0 feet. With all high assays cut to 3.50 opt, the interval averages 1.11 opt over a core length of 50 feet.
   
• The 181.5 opt assay over a core length of 1.0 feet within the 50 foot intersection is the highest recorded drill hole intersection in the history of the Kirkland Lake Camp and replaces LK Zone discovery hole which held the previous record of 102.5 opt over 1.5 foot core length. (See press release dated September 20, 2004). The interval is characterised by an extraordinary abundance of telluride, in places semi-massive within the 1.0 foot section. Both follow-up chemistry and microscopy work has verified the abundant telluride, thought to be calaverite.
   
• Check assays (pulps and rejects) on the high-grade interval include 175.22 opt, 188.56 opt, 172.96 opt, and 189.42 opt averaging 181.54 opt.

- 5 -

• Of the 24 core samples comprising the 50 foot interval, 13 assayed greater than 1 opt and 4 assayed greater than 3.5 opt.
   
• The dip of the mineralization at the intersection point may vary from -40 degrees to -60 degrees; further drilling will be required to accurately determine the dip and true width, which is estimated to be from 22 feet to 39 feet.
   
• The intersection is located 360 feet east of the drift on the 5300 Level where ore has been followed on 2 of 4 ore-bearing structures comprising a 50 foot width; it is 140 feet west of previously announced drill hole 50-696 which assayed 0.49 opt over 11.2 feet of core (see press releases dated August 10^th, 2006 and February 14^th, 2006). The ore in the drift is thought to be the same as that in the intersection because of the direction of the ore, the visual similarities, the presence of similar very coarse tellurides, high grades, and similar widths
   
• The mineralization comprises highly altered tuff, mineralized with up to 20% disseminated pyrite bridging a tuff/porphyry contact.
   
• The previously termed #6 Splay has been re-named as the #7 Break as it proving to be a much more substantial structure than previously thought. At least two parallel, stacked hanging wall mineralized structures associated with the #7 Break have been intersected from the 5300 X-Cut drilling as well as the Lower D North Zone.
   
• The cross cut is now within 700 feet of the intended bulk sample area on the New South Zone where a previous intersection returned a 124.4 foot intersection of 1.4 opt.
   
• The new zones are different than the historically-mined quartz-hosted gold in that they comprise more consistently grading sulphide gold zones along extensive structures and are consistent with previous discoveries to the south including the Lower D Zone

In-house metallurgical testing on core samples submitted from the New South Zone indicates that a 96.2% recovery may be achieved by using standard milling procedures.

Queenston Mining Inc. and the Company entered into a 50%-50% joint venture to explore the Kirkland Lake West (“KLW”) property owned by Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited. The KLW property, which adjoins the western boundary of the Company’s Macassa Mine, is thought to contain the extension of the Main/04 Break ore horizon, on the western side of a major north/south fault which separates the two properties. Development on the 4700-foot level, of a cross-cut to be used for diamond drilling, took place during the quarter and a drill was mobilized at the end of July.

The results of the Company’s diamond drilling program disclosed herein have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by Michael Sutton P.Geo., the Company’s Chief Geologist (a ‘qualified person’ for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, of the Canadian Securities Administrators). See the Company’s news release dated August 2, 2006 for details of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate gold resource and reserve estimates as at April 30, 2006.

- 6 -

About the Company

The Company purchased the Macassa Mine and the 1,500 tons per day mill along with four former producing gold properties – Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore and Wright Hargreaves – in December 2001. These properties, which have historically produced some 22 million ounces of gold, extend over seven kilometres between the Macassa Mine on the east and Wright Hargreaves on the west and for the first time are being developed and explored under one owner. This camp is located in the Abitibi Southern Greenstone Belt of Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada.

The Company has implemented a quality assurance and control (QA/QC) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the best possible practices. The drill core is sawn in half with half of the core samples shipped to the Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, Ontario or to the Macassa mine laboratory for analysis. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification. Other QA/QC includes the insertion of blanks, and the regular re-assaying of pulps/rejects at alternate certified labs (Polymet, Accurassay). Gold analysis is conducted by fire assay using atomic absorption or gravimetric finish. The laboratory re-assays at least 10% of all samples and additional checks may be run on anomalous values.

The Company’s Kirkland Lake properties are the subject of a report prepared by Roland H. Ridler, B.A.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D.(Econ.Geol.), P.D., entitled Kirkland Lake Mineral Properties (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves dated November 30, 2001. The Company’s Macassa Mine Property is the subject of reserve and resource report prepared by Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng., entitled Review of Resources and Reserves of Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake, Ontario dated July 18, 2006. Both of these technical reports have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).

For further information, please contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	Scott Koyich
President	Investor Relations
Phone 1 705 567 5208	Phone 1 403 215 5979
Fax 1 705 568 6444	E-mail: info@klgold.com
E-mail: bhinchcliffe@klgold.com
Website- www.klgold.com
Chelsea Hayes
Pelham Public Relations
Phone 020 7743 6675
E-mail: chelsea.hayes@pelhampr.com

     Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange has reviewed and neither accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

- 7 -

The reserves and resources disclosed in this news release have been estimated using definitions and procedures which conform to National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators. These reserves and resources were completed internally by the Company’s personnel, and were audited by Glenn R. Clark & Associates Limited (an independent geological and mining consulting firm). The reserves are not part of the resources. For details on the calculation of reserves and resources, please refer to the disclosure on the Company’s website.

Cautionary Note to U.S. investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This news release uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources.” We advise U.S. investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Cautionary Note to U.S. investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources

This news release uses the term “inferred resources.” We advise U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally minable.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors- The United States Securities and Exchange Commission permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. We use certain terms is press release, such as “measured,” “indicated,” and “inferred” ”resources,” that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20F, File No. 01-31380, which may be secured from us, or from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.sht.

EX-99.8

P.O. Box 370
KIRKLAND LAKE, ON, CANADA P2N 3J7

19 September, 2006 Symbol – TSX & AIM: KGI

PRESS RELEASE

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. reports that an application has been made to the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange for the block admission of 896,750 common shares issuable on the exercise of share purchase warrants. It is expected that admission will be effective on 25 September 2006. The shares will rank pari passu with the existing issued shares of the Company.

- 30 -

For further information, please contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	Investor Relations
President	Scott Koyich
Phone 1 705 567 5208	Phone 1 403 215 5979
Fax 1 705 568 6444	E-mail: info@klgold.com
E-mail: bhinchcliffe@klgold.com

Website- www.klgold.com

     Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange has reviewed or accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

EX-99.9

P.O. Box 370
KIRKLAND LAKE, ON, P2N 3J1

September 19th, 2006  Symbol – TSX & AIM: KGI

Latest Drilling from 5300 Level Continues to Intersect High Grade
Gold Mineralization - 1.02 Ounces of Gold per Ton Over 30.9 feet

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce an update on exploration drilling testing the new ore systems to the south of the No. 3 Shaft.

The Company has received assays for seven additional drill holes completed from new drill bays on the 5300 level cross cut. Multiple ore-grade intersections are present in all holes including an intersection of 1.02 ounces of gold per ton over a core length of 30.9 feet in drill hole 53-471. As drilling to the south continues, estimates on the size of these new ore bodies will be updated and reported on a regular basis.

“The intersection of 1.02 ounces per ton over 30.9 feet in drill hole 53-471 appears to correlate with the New South Zone 570 feet to the east. This indicates the substantial ore potential of this new sulphide ore body.” said Mike Sutton, Chief Geologist. “In addition, the multiple zones present in this area will quickly expand the current reserve and resource base.”

Highlights of the current results:

• The wide intersection in drill hole 53-471 appears to correlate with the New South Zone 570 feet to the east, with the New South Zone now exhibiting a more east- west strike in this area. (see figure #1)
   
• Drill hole 53-472 intersected 9 different mineralized zones from 164.1 to 418.9 feet with the best intersection being 9.20 ounces per ton over 4.7 feet on the Lower D North Hangingwall Zone. (see figure #2)
   
• Drill hole 53-468 intersected 20.2 ounces per ton over 2.0 feet on what is interpreted to be #6 Break. (see figure #2)
   
• Drilling thus far from the cross cut has covered a strike length of 800 feet with a vertical extent of 250 feet. Mineralization associated with the Lower D Zone/Lower D North and subsidiary mineralization has now been defined over a strike length of 2,000 feet. The newly designated #7 Break has been defined over a strike length of 400 feet with a vertical extent of 400 feet.

- 2 -

• Extending a distance from 1,100 to 2,000 feet south of the mine workings and from a north to south direction, at least 8 parallel and sub-parallel zones have been identified which include:

#6 Break

#7 Footwall Zone

#7 Break

Lower D North Footwall (FW) Zone

Lower D Zone

Lower D North

Lower D North Hangingwall (HW) Zone

New South Zone

Additional mineralized zones are present but require further drilling to prove continuity and are thus designated as New Zones.

The diagrams referred to in this release may be viewed at the Company’s website, www.klgold.com and will provide context to the above statements.

Figure #1 is a plan view showing some of the latest intersections south of the #3 shaft mine workings. (see figure 1). Figure #2 is a composite schematic section through the area encompassing these new results. (see figure 2).

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results. (Imperial values)

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (feet)	TO (feet)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (oz. per ton/feet)
53-472	#6 Break Incl. and #7 Break Lower D North FW Incl. Lower D North New New Lower D North HW Incl. New New	164.1 164.1 166.2 213.9 243.8 245.0 285.0 306.4 316.6 333.4 333.4 386.0 417.7	167.5 165.1 167.5 215.0 246.1 246.1 288.7 310.1 318.2 338.1 335.3 387.2 418.9	+12	100	4.30/3.4’ CL = 2.2’ TW, Uncut 3.07/3.4’ CL = 2.2’ TW, Cut 5.13/1.0’ CL = 0.7’ TW, VG 5.45/1.3’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG 0.84/1.1’ CL = 0.8’ TW 2.16/2.3’ CL = 1.7’ TW, Uncut 1.84/2.3’ CL = 1.7’ TW, Cut 4.18/1.1’ CL = 0.8’ TW VG, Tell 0.45/3.7’ CL = 0.6’ TW, VG 0.94/3.7’ CL = TW?, VG 1.07/1.6’ CL = TW?, VG 9.20/4.7’ CL = 3.3’ TW, Uncut 1.76/4.7’ CL = 3.3’ TW, Cut 21.92/1.9’ CL = 1.3’ TW, VG, Tell 0.55/1.2’ CL = TW? 0.84/1.2’ CL = TW?, VG,
53-471	#7 Break New South Incl.	236.9 692.8 704.0	238.1 723.7 706.5	0	100	15.80/1.2’ CL = 0.6’ TW, VG 1.02/30.9’ CL = 8.2’ TW, Uncut 0.94/30.9’ CL = 8.2’ TW, Cut 4.47/2.5’ CL = 0.7’ TW, VG

- 3 -

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (feet)	TO (feet)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (oz. per ton/feet)
53-464	#7 Footwall Lower D North HW	269.7 357.4	275.0 359.4	+17	131	0.52/5.3’ CL = 5.2’ TW, VG 1.15/2.0’ CL = 1.9’ TW, VG
53-467	#6 Break #7 Footwall New #7 Break Lower D North Lower D North HW New	326.5 410.0 427.0 440.5 523.0 717.0 782.0	330.0 412.0 428.0 442.0 524.0 720.0 783.8	+20	084	0.30/3.5’ CL = 2.1’ TW 0.25/2.0’ CL = 1.3’ TW 0.62/1.0’ CL = TW Unknown 0.88/1.5’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG 2.71/1.0’ CL = 0.5’ TW 3.54/3.0’ CL = 1.6’ TW 0.50/1.8’ CL = TW?
53-468	#6 Break #7 Footwall #7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North HW	353.8 444.5 455.2 507.0 789.7	355.8 447.8 456.3 510.0 790.7	+19	080	20.2/2.0’ CL = 1.1’ TW, VG 1.58/3.3’ CL = 2.0’ TW, VG 5.11/1.1’ CL = 0.5’ TW, VG 0.63/3.0’ CL = 1.7’ TW, VG 0.85/1.0’ CL = 0.5’ TW, VG
53-469	#7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North HW New New	353.1 363.5 456.3 472.0 820.0	354.1 364.5 457.3 479.0 826.0	+5	116	0.56/1.0’ CL = 0.9’ TW, VG 2.58/1.0’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG 15.48/1.0’ CL = 0.7’ TW, VG 0.30/7.0’ CL = TW? 0.77/6.0’ CL = TW?
53-470	New New	580.5 704.5	584.6 705.5	+35	122	0.23/4.1’ CL = TW? 0.58/1.0’ CL = TW?, VG, Tell

TW = True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 3.50 oz/ton

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results. (Metric values)

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (m)	TO (m)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (grams per tonne/m)
53-472	#6 Break Incl. and #7 Break Lower D North FW Incl. Lower D North New New Lower D North HW Incl.	50.0 50.0 50.7 65.2 74.3 74.7 86.9 93.4 96.5 101.6 101.6	51.1 50.3 51.1 65.5 75.0 75.0 88.0 94.5 97.0 103.1 102.2	+12	100	147.4/1.1m CL = 0.7m TW, Uncut 105.3/1.1m CL =0.7m TW, Cut 175.9/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 186.9/0.4m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 28.8/0.3m CL = 0.3m TW 74.1/0.7m CL = 0.5m TW, Uncut 63.1/0.7m CL = 0.5m TW, Cut 143.3/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG, 15.4/1.1m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 32.2/1.1m CL = TW?, VG 36.7/0.5m’ CL = TW?, VG 315.4/1.5m CL = 1.0m TW, Uncut 60.3/1.5m CL = 1.0m TW, Cut 751.5/0.6m CL =0.4mTW, VG

- 4 -

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (m)	TO (m)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (grams per tonne/m)
	New New	117.7 127.3	118.0 127.7			18.9/0.3m CL = TW? 28.8/0.4m CL = TW?, VG,
53-471	#7 Break New South Incl.	72.2 211.2 214.6	72.6 220.6 215.4	0	100	541.7/0.4m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 35.0/9.4m CL = 2.5m TW, Uncut 32.2/9.4m CL = 2.5m TW, Cut 153.3/0.8m CL = 0.2m TW, VG
53-464	#7 Footwall Lower D North HW	82.2 109.0	83.8 109.6	+17	131	17.8/1.6m CL = 1.6m TW, VG 39.4/0.6m CL = 0.6m TW, VG
53-467	#6 Break #7 Footwall New #7 Break Lower D North Lower D North HW New	99.5 125.0 130.2 134.3 159.5 218.6 238.4	100.6 125.6 130.5 134.8 159.8 219.5 239.0	+20	084	10.3/1.1m CL = 0.6m TW 8.6/0.6m CL = 0.4m TW 21.3/0.3m CL = TW Unknown 30.2/0.5m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 92.9/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW 121.4/0.9m CL = 0.5m TW 17.1/0.6m CL = TW?
53-468	#6 Break #7 Footwall #7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North HW	107.9 135.5 138.8 154.6 240.8	108.5 136.5 139.1 155.5 241.1	+19	080	692.6/0.6m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 54.2/1.0m CL = 0.6m TW, VG 175.2/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 21.6/0.9m CL = 0.5m TW, VG 29.1/0.3m = 0.2m TW, VG
53-469	#7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North HW New New	107.7 110.8 139.1 143.9 250.0	108.0 111.1 139.4 146.0 251.8	+5	116	19.2/0.3m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 88.5/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 530.7/0.3m = 0.2m TW, VG 10.3/2.1m CL = TW? 26.4/1.8m CL = TW?
53-470	New New	177.0 214.8	178.2 215.1	+35	122	7.9/1.2m CL = TW? 19.9/0.3m CL = TW?, VG, Tell

TW = True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 120 grams/tonne

About the Company

The Company purchased the Macassa Mine and the 1,500 ton per day mill along with four former producing gold properties – Kirkland Minerals, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore and Wright Hargreaves – in December 2001. These properties, which have historically produced some 22 million ounces of gold, extend over seven kilometres between the Macassa Mine on the east and Wright Hargreaves on the west and, for the first time, are being developed and explored under one owner. This camp is located in the Abitibi Southern Greenstone Belt of Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada.

- 5 -

The results of the Company’s underground diamond drilling program have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by the Company's geological staff (which includes a ‘qualified person’, Michael Sutton P.Geo., the Company’s Chief Geologist, for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, of the Canadian Securities Administrators).

The Company has implemented a quality assurance and control (QA/QC) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the best possible practices. The drill core is sawn in half with half of the core samples shipped to the Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, Ontario or to the Macassa mine laboratory for analysis. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification. Other QA/QC includes the insertion of blanks, and the regular re-assaying of pulps/rejects at alternate certified labs (Polymet, Accurassay). Gold analysis is conducted by fire assay using atomic absorption or gravimetric finish. The laboratory re-assays at least 10% of all samples and additional checks may be run on anomalous values.

The Company’s Kirkland Lake properties are the subject of a report prepared by Roland H. Ridler, B.A.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D.(Econ.Geol.), P.D., entitled Kirkland Lake Mineral Properties (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves dated November 30, 2001. The Company’s Macassa Mine Property is the subject of reserve and resource report prepared by Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng., entitled Review of Resources and Reserves of Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake, Ontario dated July 18, 2006. Both of these technical reports have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).

For further information, please contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	Scott Koyich
President	Investor Relations
Phone 1 705 567 5208	Phone 1 403 215 5979
Fax 1 705 568 6444	E-mail: info@klgold.com
E-mail: bhinchcliffe@klgold.com
Website- www.klgold.com
Chelsea Hayes
Pelham Public Relations
Phone 020 7743 6675
E-mail: chelsea.hayes@pelhampr.com

     Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange has reviewed and neither accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

EX-99.10

KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC.

PROXY CIRCULAR

(As at September 14, 2006 and in Canadian dollars except where indicated)

PERSONS MAKING THIS SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Proxy Circular (“Circular”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of Proxies (which term includes any ‘VIFs’, as that term is defined below under ‘Completion and Voting of Proxies –Unregistered Shareholders’, unless otherwise noted) by the management of Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of the shareholders of the Company (the “Meeting”) to be held at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting and at any adjournment thereof. It is expected the solicitation will be primarily by mail. Proxies may also be solicited personally by employees of the Company. The cost of solicitation will be borne by the Company.

COMPLETION AND VOTING OF PROXIES

Voting

Voting at the Meeting will be by a show of hands, each registered shareholder and each Proxyholder (representing a registered or unregistered shareholder) having one vote, unless a poll is required (if the number of shares represented by Proxies that are to be voted against a motion are greater than 5% of the votes that could be cast at the Meeting) or requested, whereupon each such shareholder and Proxyholder is entitled to one vote for each share held or represented, respectively. To approve a motion proposed at the Meeting a majority of greater than 50% of the votes cast will be required (an ‘ordinary resolution’) unless the motion requires a ‘special resolution’ in which case a majority of 66-2/3% of the votes cast will be required.

Appointment of Proxyholders

The persons named in the accompanying Proxy as Proxyholders are directors or officers of the Company.

A shareholder has the right to appoint a person (who need not be a shareholder) to attend and act on the shareholder’s behalf at the Meeting other than the persons named in the Proxy as Proxyholders. To exercise this right, the shareholder must strike out the names of the persons named in the Proxy as Proxyholders and insert the name of the shareholder’s nominee in the space provided or complete another Proxy.

A shareholder completing the enclosed Proxy may indicate the manner in which the persons named in the Proxy are to vote with respect to any matter by marking an ‘X’ in the appropriate space. On any poll required (for the reason described above) or requested, those persons will vote or withhold from voting the shares in respect of which they are appointed in accordance with the directions, if any, given in the Proxy provided such directions are certain.

If a shareholder wishes to confer a discretionary authority with respect to any matter, then the space should be left blank. In such instance, the Proxyholder, if nominated by management, intends to vote the shares represented by the Proxy in favour of the motion.

The enclosed Proxy, when properly signed, confers discretionary authority with respect to amendments or variations to the matters identified in the Notice of Meeting and with respect to other

matters which may be properly brought before the Meeting. At the time of printing this Circular, the management of the Company is not aware that any such amendments, variations or other matters are to be presented for action at the Meeting. If, however, other matters which are not now known to the management should properly come before the Meeting, the Proxies hereby solicited will be exercised on such matters in accordance with the best judgement of the nominees.

The Proxy must be dated and signed by the shareholder or the shareholder’s attorney authorized in writing. In the case of a corporation, the Proxy must be dated and executed under its corporate seal or signed by a duly authorized officer or attorney for the corporation.

The completed Proxy, together with the power of attorney or other authority, if any, under which it was signed or a notarially certified copy thereof, must be deposited with the Company’s transfer agent in accordance with the instructions and before the time set out in the Proxy. Proxies received after such time may be accepted or rejected by the Chair of the Meeting in the Chair’s discretion. Unregistered shareholders must deliver their completed Proxies in accordance with the instructions given by their financial institution or other intermediary that forwarded the Proxy to them.

It is not intended to use the Proxies for the purpose of voting on the Company’s audited financial statements for the most recently completed financial year, the directors’ reports nor the auditor’s report.

Registered Shareholders

Only shareholders registered as shareholders in the Company’s shareholder registry maintained by the Company’s registrar and transfer agent or duly appointed Proxyholders will be recognized, make motions or vote at the Meeting.

Unregistered Shareholders

Shareholders holding their shares of the Company through stockbrokers, intermediaries, trustees or other persons will not be recognized, make motions nor vote at the Meeting.

If shares of the Company are listed in an account statement provided to a shareholder by a stockbroker, those shares, in all likelihood, will not be registered in the shareholder’s name. Such shares will more likely be registered in the name of the stockbroker or a nominee or agent of that stockbroker and can only be voted through a duly completed Proxy given by the shareholder. Without specific instructions, stockbrokers and their agents and nominees are prohibited from voting shares for the stockbroker’s clients. Therefore, each unregistered shareholder should ensure that voting instructions are communicated to the appropriate party well in advance of the Meeting.

National Instrument 54-101 Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer of the Canadian securities administrators require stockbrokers and other intermediaries to seek voting instructions from unregistered shareholders in advance of shareholder meetings. Stockbrokers and other intermediaries have their own mailing procedures and provide their own return instructions to clients, which should be carefully followed by unregistered shareholders to ensure their shares are voted at the Meeting. The form requesting such voting instructions (a “VIF”) supplied to the unregistered shareholder by its stockbroker (or agent) is substantially similar to the Proxy provided directly to the registered shareholders by the Company, however, it is limited to instructing the registered shareholder (that is, the stockbroker or its nominee or agent) how to vote on behalf of the unregistered shareholder.

Most stockbrokers in Canada and the United States of America delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to a third party company (or, if the shareholder has so consented, allows the Company or its transfer agent to do so directly) which sends a machine-readable VIF to unregistered

2

shareholders and asks the shareholders to return the VIFs to them or provide instructions to them through the Internet or by telephone. The third party company (or the Company or its agent, if it has sent the VIF to the shareholder directly) then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of shares to be represented at the Meeting.

Although an unregistered shareholder may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting shares registered in the name of their stockbroker, the unregistered shareholder may attend the Meeting as Proxyholder for the stockbroker and vote the shares in that capacity. Unregistered shareholders wishing to attend the Meeting and indirectly vote their shares as their own Proxyholder, should enter their own names in the blank space on the VIF provided to them and return the VIF in accordance with the instructions provided on it. If an unregistered shareholder receives a VIF and does not wish to attend the Meeting as a Proxyholder, the VIF must be returned, or instructions respecting the voting of shares must be communicated, to the third party company (or the Company or its transfer agent) in advance of the Meeting to have the shares voted in accordance with the instructions on that VIF.

Shareholders with questions respecting the voting of shares held through a stockbroker or other financial intermediary should contact that stockbroker or other intermediary for assistance.

REVOCATION OF PROXIES

Shareholders have the power to revoke Proxies previously given by them. Revocation can be effected by an instrument in writing (which includes a Proxy bearing a later date) signed by a shareholder or the shareholder’s attorney authorized in writing and in the case of a corporation, executed under its corporate seal or signed by a duly authorized officer or attorney for the corporation, and either delivered to the registered office of the Company at Northwest Law Group (attn: Michael F. Provenzano), Suite 1880, 1055 West Georgia Street, Box 11122, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3P3, Canada any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, or deposited with the Chairman of the Meeting prior to the hour of commencement on the day of the Meeting.

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

None of the directors or executive officers of the Company, any person who has held such a position since the beginning of the last completed financial year of the Company, any proposed nominee for election as a director of the Company nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons, has any substantial or material interest, directly or indirectly, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting (other than the election of directors).

VOTING SHARES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

The Company has only one class of shares entitled to be voted at the Meeting, namely, common shares without par value. All issued shares are entitled to be voted at the Meeting and each has one non-cumulative vote. Only those common shareholders of record on September 14, 2006 will be entitled to vote at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. There were 52,928,388 common shares issued and outstanding as of that date.

The Company will prepare a list of shareholders as of the record date. Holders of shares of the Company named on that list will be entitled to vote the shares then registered in their name at the Meeting (unless prohibited from voting by applicable regulatory authorities on a particular matter to be considered at the Meeting) except to the extent that the holder has transferred ownership of any of the shares after the record

3

date and the transferee of those shares produces properly endorsed share certificates, or otherwise establishes that the transferee owns the shares, and demands at any time before the Meeting that the transferee’s name be included in the list of persons entitled to vote at the Meeting. In that case the transferee will be entitled to vote their shares at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, no one beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all outstanding shares of the Company which have the right to vote in all circumstances.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors of the Company presently consists of five directors, out of a minimum of three and a maximum of 15 directors. It is proposed to fix the number of directors for the following year at the same number. This requires the approval of the shareholders of the Company by an ordinary resolution, which approval will be sought at the Meeting.

The Company’s management proposes to nominate the persons named in the following table for election as directors of the Company to fill such positions. Each director elected will hold office until the next Annual Meeting or until the director’s successor is duly elected or appointed, unless the director’s office is earlier vacated in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws or the director becomes disqualified to act as a director.

The following information concerning the proposed nominees has been furnished by each of them.

Name, Province or State & Country of Residence & Present Position with the Company	Present Principal Occupation (1)	Director Since	Number of Shares (2)
BAYLEY, Brian E. (3) British Columbia, Canada Director	President and Chief Executive Officer, Quest Capital Corp. (publicly traded merchant banking company)	Since October 15, 1998	9,700
DOBSON, D. Harry W. Monte Carlo, Monaco Chairman of the Board of Directors	Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company; Self-employed merchant banker & venture capitalist	Since October 11, 2001	3,390,000
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A. New York, United States of America President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company	Since February 26, 2001	1,138,000
KOSTUIK, S. Paul (3) British Columbia, Canada Director	Professional Engineer; Self-employed mining consultant	Since February 26, 2001	33,500
MILTON, George A. (3) Kerry, Ireland Director	Retired Stock Broker	Since July 1, 2002	1,058,795

(1)	Includes occupations for preceding five years unless the director was elected at the previous Annual Meeting and was shown as a nominee for election as a director in the Circular for that meeting.
(2)	The approximate number of shares of the Company carrying the right to vote in all circumstances beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or direction is exercised by each proposed nominee. No director, together with the director’s

4

	associates and affiliates beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over more than 10% of the Company’s shares.
(3)	Member of Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. See Schedules ‘A’ and ‘B’ of the Company’s Annual Information Form for particulars of the Audit Committee’s members, its charter and related matters.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Company’s governing corporate legislation the Company is required to have an Audit Committee whose members are indicated above. The Company does not have an Executive Committee.

No proposed director:

(a)	is, as at the date of this Circular, or has been, within 10 years of the date of this Circular, a director or executive officer of any corporation (including the Company) that, while that person was acting in that capacity
	(i)	was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant corporation access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days,
	(ii)	was subject to an event that resulted, after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director or executive officer, in the corporation being the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant corporation access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, or
	(iii)	within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or
(b)	has, within the 10 years before the date of this Circular, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the proposed director,

other than as described below:

1.

PetroFalcon Corporation (TSX listed; Brian E. Bayley – director from November 28, 2001 to present) and Quest Ventures Ltd. (private company; Brian E. Bayley – director and officer from January 1997 to January 2005): On February 27, 2002, the British Columbia Securities Commission issued an order in response to a private placement by PetroFalcon of its shares to Quest which prevented the further use of certain exemptions under the Securities Act (British Columbia) by PetroFalcon and Quest until PetroFalcon’s shareholders approved the private placement. Approval of PetroFalcon’s shareholders was received on May 23, 2002 and the Commission reinstated the availability of the exemptions for both PetroFalcon and Quest shortly thereafter.

2.

Esperanza Silver Corp. (TSX Venture listed; Brian E. Bayley – director from December 14, 1999 to present): Esperanza became aware in early 2003 that it was subject to outstanding cease trading orders in Alberta (issued on September 17, 1998) and Québec (issued on August 12, 1997) from its failure (when neither Mr. Bayley nor any of the other current directors and officers of Esperanza were directors or officers of Esperanza) to file financial statements and pay filing fees within their prescribed times. Esperanza subsequently filed the financial statements and paid the

5

	filing fees and the Québec order was rescinded on May 16, 2003 and the Alberta order rescinded on August 1, 2003.
3.	American Natural Energy Corp. (TSX Venture listed; Brian E. Bayley – director from June 15, 2001 to present): American Natural was issued cease trade orders by the Québec, British Columbia and Manitoba Securities Commissions in June 2003 for failing to file financial statements and pay filing fees within their prescribed times. It subsequently filed the financial statements and paid the filing fees and the orders were rescinded in August 2003.
4.	Westate Energy Inc. (TSX Venture listed until March 1994; Brian E. Bayley – director and officer from December 1996 to October 1997): Westate was issued a cease trading order by the British Columbia Securities Commission in January 1994 for failing to file its financial statements within the prescribed time periods. Mr. Bayley was appointed a director and the corporate secretary of Westate subsequent thereto.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices of the Canadian securities administrators requires the Company to annually disclose certain information regarding its corporate governance practices. That information is disclosed below.

Mandate of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company has not adopted a written mandate or code setting out the requirements of applicable corporate and securities common and statute law which provide that the Board has responsibility for the stewardship of the Company. That stewardship includes responsibility for strategic planning, identification of the principal risks of the Company’s business and implementation of appropriate systems to manage these risks, succession planning (including appointing, training and monitoring senior management), communications with investors and the financial community and the integrity of the Company’s internal control and management information systems.

Strategic planning and risk identification by the Board is assisted by and based on information and recommendations of the senior management of the Company on a variety of matters including opportunities for the Company in various countries and project status.

The Board monitors the Company’s compliance with its timely disclosure obligations and reviews principal disclosure documents (such as prospectuses, offering memoranda, financial statements, Management’s Discussion & Analysis, annual reports and annual information forms) and certain members of the Board review secondary disclosure documents (such as press releases) prior to their distribution. The Board relies on its Audit Committee to annually review the systems of internal control and discuss such matters with the Company’s external auditor.

Independence of the Directors

A director is ‘independent’ if the director is free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director’s ability to act with the best interests of the Company, other than interests and relationships arising from shareholding. A majority of the Board of Directors of the Company is independent.

The following table describes whether the directors are independent and, if not independent, sets out the reasons:

6

Director	Independent	Reason why not Independent
BAYLEY, Brian E.	Yes	N/A
DOBSON, D. Harry W.	No	Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A.	No	President of the Company
KOSTUIK, S. Paul	Yes	N/A
MILTON, George A.	Yes	N/A

The Board of Directors of the Company facilitates its exercise of independent supervision over the Company’s management through regular meetings of the Board. The meetings are held both with and without members of the Company’s management being in attendance.

The Board does not hold regularly scheduled meetings without directors who are not independent and members of management being in attendance. When consideration of a matter affecting a non-independent director cannot be held at one of such meetings or if such meetings are not held, the non-independent directors recuse themselves from consideration of, and voting on, matters in which they may have an interest so that independent directors can have an open and candid discussion of the matter. Since the beginning of the Company’s last financial year, the independent members of the Board did not hold any meetings without the presence of non-independent directors or management.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors, D. Harry W. Dobson, is responsible for presiding over all meetings of the directors and shareholders of the Company. He is not an independent director, however, the independent directors either have significant experience as directors and officers of publicly traded companies (including senior companies) or as members of the financial investment community and, therefore, do not require the guidance of an independent Chairman of the Board in exercising their duties as directors.

Since the beginning of the Company’s last financial year, the Board of Directors held a total of five meetings. The attendance record of the directors at such meetings is as follows:

Director	Number of Meetings Attended
BAYLEY, Brian E.	5
DOBSON, D. Harry W.	5
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A.	5
KOSTUIK, S. Paul	4
MILTON, George A.	5

Other Directorships

The directors and nominees for election as directors of the Company are presently directors of other reporting issuers (public corporations), as follows:

7

Director or Nominee	Reporting Issuers
BAYLEY, Brian E.	American Natural Energy Corp.; Arapaho Capital Corp.; Cypress Hills Resource Corp.; Esperanza Silver Corp.; Eurasian Minerals Inc.; Greystar Resources Ltd.; Groundstar Resources Ltd.; Hatton Capital Corp.; Midway Gold Corp.; PetroFalcon Corporation; Quest Capital Corp.; Rockhaven Resources Ltd.; Sanu Resources Ltd., Torque Energy Inc.; and TransAtlantic Petroleum Corp.
DOBSON, D. Harry W.	Belvedere Resources Ltd., Borders and Southern Petroleum Plc., Brazauro Resources Corp., Mountain Province Diamonds Inc., Ovoca Resources Plc, Rambler Metals & Mining Plc, Suroco Energy Inc. and Western Uranium Corp.
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A.	Rambler Metals & Mining Plc, Rupert Resources Ltd. and Suroco Energy Inc.
KOSTUIK, S. Paul	N/A
MILTON, George A.	N/A

Descriptions of Roles

The Board of Directors of the Company has not established written descriptions of the positions of Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) or chairman of any of the committees of the Board as it feels they are unnecessary and would not improve the function and performance of the Board, CEO or committee. The role of chairman is delineated by the nature of the overall responsibilities of the Board (in the case of the Chairman of the Board) or the committee (in the case of a chairman of a committee).

The Board has not set limits on the objectives to be met by the CEO, but believes that such limits and objectives should depend upon the circumstances of each situation and that to formalize these matters would be restrictive and not productive.

Orientation and Continuing Education

The Board of Directors of the Company takes the following steps to ensure that all new directors receive orientation regarding the role of the Board, its committees and its directors, and the nature and operation of the Company.

The first step is to assess a new director’s set of skills and professional background. This allows the orientation to be customized to that director’s needs since different information regarding the nature and operations of the Company’s business will be necessary and relevant to each new director.

Once assessed, the second step is taken by one or more existing directors, who may be assisted by the Company’s management, to provide the new director with the appropriate orientation through a series of meetings, telephone calls and other correspondence.

To ensure the Board of Directors provides continuing information for its directors so they maintain the skill and knowledge necessary for them to meet their obligations as directors of the Company, there are technical presentations made from time to time at a meeting of the Board. The presentations can range from a review of the Company’s financial statements to various aspects of the Company’s business. The Board believes the discussion among the directors, management and outside experts at these meetings provides a valuable learning resource for directors without expertise in the subject matter being presented.

8

Ethical Business Conduct

As part of its responsibility for the stewardship of the Company, the Board of Directors seeks to foster a culture of ethical conduct by striving to ensure the Company carries out its business in line with high business and moral standards and applicable legal and financial requirements. In that regard, the Board

• has adopted a Code of Ethics setting out the guidelines for the conduct expected from directors, officers and employees of the Company. A copy of the Code has been filed on SEDAR (see ‘Additional Information’ below). Compliance with the Code is achieved as follows. Each director is responsible for ensuring that they individually comply with the terms of the Code, while the Board is responsible for ensuring that the directors, as a group, and all officers comply with the Code and the executive officers of the Company are responsible for ensuring compliance with the Code by employees. Since the beginning of the Company’s last financial year, it has not filed a Material Change Report relating to any conduct of a director or executive officer that constitutes a departure from the Code.
   
• has created an Insider Trading Policy which details when directors, officers and employees should and not engage in trading in the Company’s securities.
   
• has established a written ‘Whistleblower Policy’ which creates procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of complaints and concerns regarding the Company’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting procedures and obligations, without fear of retaliation of any kind. The Policy provides that if an employee has any information, complaints or concerns regarding such matters being questionable, incorrect, misleading or fraudulent they are urged under the Policy to present such information, complaints or concerns to the Audit Committee, without regard to the position of the persons responsible for the subject matter of the information, complaint or concern. Promptly following the receipt of any information, complaints and concerns submitted to it, the Audit Committee will investigate each matter and take appropriate corrective actions. The Audit Committee will retain as part of its records, any information, complaints or concerns received. Furthermore, it will keep a written record of all such reports or inquiries and make quarterly reports on any ongoing investigation which will include steps taken to satisfactorily address each complaint.
   
• encourages management to consult with legal and financial advisors to ensure the Company is meeting those requirements.
   
• is cognizant of the Company’s timely disclosure obligations and reviews material disclosure documents such as financial statements, Management’s Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) and press releases prior to their distribution.
   
• relies on its Audit Committee to annually review the systems of internal financial control and discuss such matters with the Company’s external auditor.
   
• actively monitors the Company’s compliance with the Board’s directives and ensures that all material transactions are thoroughly reviewed and authorized by the Board before being undertaken by management.

In addition, the Board must comply with the conflict of interest provisions of its governing corporate legislation and relevant securities regulatory instruments and stock exchange policies (which require that interested directors recuse themselves from the consideration of, and voting on, such matters), to ensure its directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or executive officer has a material interest.

9

Nomination of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company does not feel it is necessary to increase the number of directors on the Board at this time. When the Board considers it necessary to increase its size, it can also consider whether a Nominating Committee of directors, some or all of whom will be independent directors, needs to be formed to recommend appointees and assess directors on an ongoing basis.

Any new appointees or nominees to the Board of Directors must have a favourable track record in general business management, special expertise in areas of strategic interest to the Company, the ability to devote the time required and a willingness to serve as a director.

Compensation

To assist the Board of Directors of the Company in determining the appropriate level of compensation to pay the Chairman of the Board, directors, CEO and executive officers, the Board has recently established a Compensation Committee as described below under ‘Other Board Committees’.

The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors of the Company the appropriate compensation of the Company’s directors and the CEO. The Committee’s recommendations are reached primarily by comparison of the remuneration paid by the Company with the remuneration paid by other public companies that the Committee feels are similarly placed within the same business of the Company.

In addition, the Company’s CEO and directors are granted stock options under the Company’s Stock Option Plan. The Compensation Committee determines the terms of each stock option within the parameters set out in the Company’s Stock Option Plan and applicable stock exchange rules and policies. While not required by the Company’s governing corporate law, each director abstains from voting on any option to be granted to himself.

Since the beginning of the Company’s last financial year, no compensation consultant or advisor was retained to assist in determining compensation for any of the Company’s directors and officers.

Other Board Committees

The Board of Directors of the Company has established an Audit Committee as described in the next section. In addition to the Audit Committee, the Board has established the following committee:

Compensation Committee: The Compensation Committee consists of three directors, all of whom are independent directors (George A. Milton – Chairman, Brian E. Bayley and S. Paul Kostuik).

The Compensation Committee is responsible for the review of all compensation (including stock options) paid by the Company to the Board of Directors and senior management of the Company and any subsidiaries, to report to the Board of Directors on the results of those reviews and to make recommendations to the Board for adjustments to such compensation. The Committee is also responsible for the Report on Executive Compensation set out in the section ‘Executive Compensation’ below.

The policy used by the Committee in determining compensation is that the compensation should (i) reflect the Company’s current state of development, (ii) reflect the Company’s performance, (iii) reflect individual performance, (iv) in respect of the executives, align their interests with those of the shareholders, and (v) assist the Company in retaining key individuals. The main elements of the executive compensation consists of base remuneration and incentive stock options which rewards to executives for delivering value to the Company’s shareholders through measurable increases in the value of the Company’s common shares or asset base.

10

Assessments

The Board of Directors of the Company has not established any formal procedures for regularly assessing the performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors. Generally, those responsibilities have been carried out on an informal basis by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President. Furthermore, it is the view of the Board that, in light of its small size and the close and open relationship among its members, the formality of a committee would not be as effective as the current arrangement and is unnecessary.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Multilateral Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees (“MI 52-110”) of the Canadian securities administrators (other than of British Columbia in which MI 52-110 is not applicable) requires the Company’s Audit Committee to meet certain requirements. It also requires the Company to disclose certain information regarding the Audit Committee. That information has been disclosed in the Company’s Annual Information Form dated July 26, 2006 and which has been filed on SEDAR.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Unless otherwise noted the following information is for the Company’s last completed financial year (which ended April 30, 2006).

Employment Contracts

The Company and its President and CEO, Brian A. Hinchcliffe, are parties to a consulting agreement dated March 15, 2001 pursuant to which Mr. Hinchcliffe provides the services of a chief executive officer for the Company. Effective March 1, 2004 the remuneration under the agreement was increased from US$ 120,000 to US$ 225,000 per year. The agreement may be terminated upon two months notice. In addition to the remuneration payable under the contract, bonuses and stock options may be paid or granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

All of the Company’s employment and consulting contracts with its chief financial officer (“CFO”) and three highest paid executive officers, if they earned more than $150,000 per year, are verbal. These agreements provide for the remuneration of such officers, if applicable, as summarized below in the Compensation Summary. The agreements may be terminated at the election of such officers or the Company on reasonable notice.

In addition to the remuneration payable under the contracts, bonuses and stock options may be paid or granted to such officers in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Pension Plans

The Company does not have any pension plans.

Compensation of Directors

The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company does not receive any fee for acting as its chairman, however, each independent director receives an annual fee of $12,000 for acting as a director of the Company. In addition to the foregoing fee, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors receives an annual fee of $10,000 and each member of the Committee receives an annual fee of $5,000. The

11

Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors also receives an annual fee of $6,000 and each member of the Committee also receives an annual fee of $2,000.

Directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors separately remunerates any director undertaking services on behalf of the Company other than services ordinarily required of a director. The Company does not currently have any arrangements pursuant to which directors are remunerated by the Company or any of its subsidiaries for their services in their capacities as directors, consultants or experts other than stock options to purchase shares of the Company which are granted to the Company’s directors from time to time.

Other Remuneration

During the last financial year there was not any other remuneration paid or payable, directly or indirectly, by the Company and any of its subsidiaries pursuant to any existing plan or arrangement to its directors and, if they earned more than $150,000 per year, its three highest paid executive officers serving during or at the end of the last financial year.

Compensation Summary

The following table discloses the compensation paid by the Company during the previous three financial years to its CEO, CFO and, if they earned more than $150,000 per year, its three highest paid executive officers serving during or at the end of the last financial year:

Summary Compensation Table

Name & Principal Position	Year (ending April 30)	Annual Compensation			Long Term Compensation			All Other Comp- ensation ($)
		Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Other Annual Comp- ensation ($)	Awards		Payouts
					Securities Under Options & SARs (1) Granted (#)	Restricted Shares or Restricted Share Units (#)	LTIP (2) Payouts ($)
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A. CEO	2006 2005 2004	311,284 (4) 267,506 177,172	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
RODRIGUE, Robert G. CFO (3)	2006 2005 2004	105,286 89,479 –	0 0 –	0 0	0 35,000 –	0 0 –	0 0 –	0 0 –
HINCHCLIFFE, Robert P. Former CFO (3)	2006 2005 2004	– 112,318 124,693	– 0 0	– 0 0	– 0 50,000	– 0 0	– 0 0	– 0 0

(1) SAR (stock appreciation right) means a right, granted by the Company or any of its subsidiaries as compensation for services rendered or in connection with an office or employment, entitling the holder to receive a payment of cash or an issue or transfer of securities based wholly or partly on changes in the trading price of publicly traded shares. The Company has not granted any SARs. Amounts shown are in respect of stock options only.

12

(2)	LTIP (long-term incentive plan) means any plan providing compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance to occur over a period longer than one financial year, whether the performance is measured by reference to financial performance of the Company or an affiliate of the Company, the price for the Company’s securities or any other measure, but does not include stock option or SAR plans or plans for compensation through restricted shares or restricted share units. The Company does not have any LTIPs.
(3)	Robert G. Rodrigue replaced Robert P. Hinchcliffe as CFO on March 14, 2005. Prior thereto he was the Company’s Controller.
(4)	Includes payments made to adjust for a shortfall in payments in the 2005 financial year.
(5)	Amounts shown for both are for the entire financial year.

Stock Option Plan

The Board of Directors of the Company have established an incentive stock option plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to attract and motivate the directors, officers and employees of the Company (and any of its subsidiaries), employees of any management corporation and consultants to the Company (collectively the “Optionees”) and thereby advance the Company’s interests by providing them an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the Company through the exercise of stock options granted to them under the Plan.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (or the Compensation Committee, if any) may grant stock options to Optionees in consideration of them providing their services to the Company or a subsidiary. The number of shares subject to each option is determined by the Board of Directors within the guidelines established by the Plan. The options enable such persons to purchase common shares of the Company at a price fixed pursuant to such guidelines. The options are exercisable by the Optionee giving the Company notice and payment of the exercise price for the number of shares to be acquired.

The Plan authorizes the Board of Directors to grant stock options to the Optionees on the following terms:

1.	The number of shares subject to issuance pursuant to outstanding options, in the aggregate, could not initially exceed 3,500,000 shares (8.6% of the Company’s issued shares at the time number of shares reserved for options granted under the Plan was last increased) and, due to options being exercised, cannot currently exceed 2,500,500 shares (4.9% of the number of shares currently outstanding).
2.	The number of shares subject to issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the Plan by one Optionee cannot exceed 5% of the issued shares of the Company.
3.	Unless the Plan has been approved by disinterested shareholders (such approval has not been sought), options granted under the Plan, together with all of the Company’s previously established and outstanding stock options, stock option plans, employee stock purchase plans or any other compensation or incentive mechanisms involving the issuance or potential issuance of its shares, shall not result, at any time, in
	(a)	the number of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options granted to insiders exceeding 10% of the shares outstanding at the time of granting,
	(b)	the grant to insiders, within a one year period, of options to purchase that number of shares exceeding 10% of the outstanding shares, or
	(c)	the issuance to any one insider and such insider’s associates, within a one year period, of shares totalling in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares.
4.	The exercise price of the options cannot be set at less than the greater of $0.10 per share, the closing trading price of the Company’s shares on the day before the granting of the stock option and the

13

	volume weighted average trading price of the Company’s shares during the five trading days immediately preceding the date of granting the option. If the Optionee is subject to the tax laws of the United States of America and owns (determined in accordance with such laws) greater than 10% of the Company’s shares, the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the price established as aforesaid.
5.	The options may be exercisable for up to 10 years.
6.	The Board (or the Compensation Committee, if any) may impose additional vesting requirements and, subject to obtaining any required approval from the Exchange, may authorize all unvested options to vest immediately. If there is a ‘change of control’ of the Company due to a take-over bid being made for the Company or similar events, all unvested options, subject to obtaining any required approval from the Exchange, shall vest immediately.
7.	The options can only be exercised by the Optionee (to the extent they have already vested) for so long as the Optionee is a director, officer or employee of, or consultant to, the Company or any subsidiary or is an employee of the Company’s management corporation and within a period thereafter not exceeding the earlier of:
	(a)	the original expiry date;
	(b)	one year after ceasing to be a director, officer, employee or consultant at the request of the Board of Directors or for the benefit of another director or officer unless the Optionee is subject to the tax laws of the United States of America, in which case the option will terminate on the earlier of the 90th day and the third month after the Optionee ceased to be an officer or employee; or
	(c)	if the Optionee dies, within one year from the Optionee’s death.
	If the Optionee is terminated ‘for cause’, involuntarily removed or resigns (other than at the request of the Board of Directors or for the benefit of another director or officer) from any of such positions the option will terminate concurrently.
8.	The options are not assignable except to a wholly-owned holding company. If the option qualifies as an ‘incentive stock option’ under the United States Internal Revenue Code, the option is not assignable to a holding company.
9.	No financial assistance is available to Optionees under the Plan.
10.	Disinterested shareholder approval must be obtained prior to the reduction of the exercise price of options granted to insiders of the Company or the extension of the exercise period of any option.

Any amendments to the Plan or outstanding stock options are subject to the approval of the Exchange and, if required by the Exchange, of the shareholders of the Company, possibly with only ‘disinterested shareholders’ being entitled to vote. The amendment to an outstanding stock option will also require the consent of the Optionee.

No options have been granted under the Plan which are subject to shareholder approval.

The Plan does not permit stock options to be transformed into stock appreciation rights.

14

Stock Option Grants

The following table discloses the particulars of options to purchase common shares or SARs granted by the Company during the last financial year to its CEO, CFO and, if they earned more than $150,000 per year, its three highest paid executive officers serving during or at the end of the last financial year:

Option and SAR Grants
During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year

Name & Position	Securities Under Options & SARs (1) Granted (#)	Percentage of Total Options & SARs (1) Granted to Employees in Financial Year	Exercise or Base Price ($/Security)	Market Value of Securities Underlying Options & SARs (1) on the Date of Grant ($/Security)	Expiration Date
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A. CEO	0	–	–	–	–
RODRIGUE, Robert G. CFO	0	–	–	–	–

(1)	The Company has not granted any SARs. Amounts shown are in respect of stock options only.
(2)	Amounts shown are for the entire financial year.

Stock Option Exercises

The following table discloses the particulars of stock options exercised during the last financial year by the Company’s CEO, CFO and, if they earned more than $150,000 per year, its three highest paid executive officers serving during or at the end of the last financial year:

Aggregated Option and SAR Exercises
During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year and Financial Year End Option and SAR Values

Name & Position	Securities Acquired on Exercise (#)	Aggregate Value (1) Realized ($)	Unexercised Options & SARs (2) at Financial Year End Exercisable / Unexercisable (#)	Value (1) of Unexercised ‘in the Money’ (3) Options & SARs (2) at Financial Year End Exercisable / Unexercisable ($)
HINCHCLIFFE, Brian A. CEO	200,000	$912,400	0 / 0	– / –
RODRIGUE, Robert G. CFO (3)	17,500	$24,150	0 / 35,000	– / $69,825

15

(1)	Value is the product of the number of shares multiplied by the difference between the exercise price and the closing market price on the date of exercise, if the option has been exercised, or on the financial year end, if the option has not been exercised.
(2)	The Company has not granted any SARs. Amounts shown are in respect of stock options only.
(3)	Options are ‘in the money’ if the market price of the Company’s shares is greater than the exercise price of the options.
(4)	Amounts shown are for the entire financial year.

Composition of the Compensation Committee

The Board of Directors did not establish a Compensation Committee until after the end of its last financial year. Accordingly, the compensation of the Company’s senior management during the Company’s last financial year was determined by the Board of Directors. Of the Board of Directors, D. Harry W. Dobson, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Brian A. Hinchcliffe, President and CEO, were executive officers of the Company during the last financial year.

Report on Executive Compensation

The Board of Directors reports on such remuneration as follows:

During the Company’s last financial year the remuneration of two of its executive officers – Brian A. Hinchcliffe, President and Chief Executive Officer and Robert G. Rodrigue, Chief  Financial Officer – was not changed since it had been increased in the 2004 financial year for Mr. Hinchcliffe and the 2005 financial year for Mr. Rodrigue.

In determining the compensation of the Chief Financial Officer, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the President made use of surveys of compensation in the mining industry (in which surveys the Company had participated), surveys of Ontario and Quebec mining corporations as well as other mining corporations considered to be peers of the Company.

The primary factor in determining the remuneration of the two current executive officers and one former executive officer was the level of compensation necessary to attract and retain managers with the necessary experience and ability in their respective fields. Minor emphasis was given to the stock options held by these executive officers. There were not any bonuses paid or SARS, shares or share purchase warrants or rights issued to the two current executive officers and one former executive officer during the year.

The Company’s financial performance was not closely related to the remuneration paid to both executive officers as the Company is in the process of developing its business.

DATED this 15th day of September, 2006

(signed) D. Harry W. Dobson                       (signed) Brian A. Hinchcliffe
Director                                                              Director

(signed) Brian E. Bayley                            (signed) S. Paul Kostuik                              (signed) George A. Milton
Director                                                            Director                                                             Director

16

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common shares (being the percentage increase (or decrease) in the trading price of its common shares on a yearly basis) with the cumulative total shareholder return of the Standards & Poors / TSX Composite Index (formerly the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 Index) (assuming reinvestment of dividends) during the periods indicated. For comparison purposes it is assumed that $100 had been invested in the Company’s shares and in such index on April 30, 2002.

$ or %

			April 30th
	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Company	$100	$151.28	$205.13	$217.95	$445.65
	($1.95)	($2.95)	($4.00)	($4.25)	($8.69)
TSX Composite Index	$100	$85.95	$107.57	$122.26	$159.26
(formerly TSE 300 Index)	(7,663.39)	(6,586.07)	(8,243.97)	(9,369.30)	(12,204.17)

Note: The amounts shown in parentheses are the Company’s closing share price and the value of such index, respectively, on the dates indicated.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE
UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets out, as at the end of the Company’s last completed financial year, information regarding outstanding options, warrants and rights (other than those granted pro rata to all shareholders) granted by the Company under its equity compensation plans.

17

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category	Number (and percentage of outstanding shares) of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number (and percentage of outstanding shares) of shares remaining available for issuance under equity compensation plans (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders	474,500 (0.9%)	$2.99	2,500,500 (4.9%)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders	262,624 (0.5%) (2)	$1.50	–
Total	737,124 (1.4%)	$2.57	2,500,500 (4.9%)

(1)	Excluding the number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights shown in the second column.
(2)	Consists of stock options to purchase 225,000 common shares at $1.35 per share on or before October 3, 2006, 2,624 common shares at $1.60 per share on or before April 11, 2007and 35,000 common shares at $2.45 per share on or before June 7, 2007 granted before the establishment of the Company’s stock option plan.

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

None of the directors, executive officers or employees of the Company, persons who were directors, executive officers or employees of the Company at any time during the Company’s last completed financial year, proposed nominees for election as directors of the Company nor any of the associates of such persons are or have been indebted to the Company or any subsidiary at any time since the beginning of the Company’s last completed financial year. Furthermore, none of such persons were indebted to a third party during such period where their indebtedness was the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by the Company or any subsidiary.

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND INSIDERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

None of the directors or executive officers of the Company, any proposed nominee for election as a director of the Company, any person beneficially owning, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all outstanding shares of the Company nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the commencement of the Company’s last completed financial year or in any proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect the Company except as disclosed in the Company’s Management’s Discussion & Analysis for the last financial year, a copy of which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and which, upon request, the Company will promptly provide free of charge (see ‘Additional Information’ below).

REMUNERATION AND APPOINTMENT OF AN AUDITOR

The persons named in the enclosed Proxy will vote for the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, of Toronto, Ontario as the Company’s auditor to hold office until the next Annual

18

Meeting of the shareholders, at a remuneration to be fixed by the directors. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were appointed the Company’s auditor on December 6, 2001.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Pursuant to an agreement dated as of February 1, 1997 between the Company and Quest Management Corp. (“Management”) the Company pays $3,500 per month to Management in consideration of Management providing administrative services to the Company, including the services of the Company’s corporate secretary. In the 2006 financial year the total fees paid to Management for services performed under the agreement was $42,000.

Management is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quest Capital Corp. (“Capital”), the shares of which trade on the Toronto and American Stock Exchanges and the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. Their offices are located at Suite 300, 570 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia. A director of the Company, Brian E. Bayley of North Vancouver, British Columbia, is the President of both Management and Capital. A director of the Company during the last financial year, A. Murray Sinclair of Vancouver, British Columbia, is also a director of Management and the Managing Director of Capital. The Company’s Secretary, Sandra Lee, is the Secretary of both Management and Capital.

PARTICULARS OF OTHER MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

The management does not know of any other matters to come before the Meeting other than those referred to in the Notice of Meeting. Should any other matters properly come before the Meeting, the shares represented by the Proxies solicited hereby will be voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the persons voting the Proxies.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Shareholders may contact the Company at Suite 300, 570 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3P1 by mail, telecopier (1-604-681-4692), telephone (1-604-689-1428) or e-mail (slee@quest-mail.com) to request copies of the Company’s financial statements and MD&A.

Financial information for the Company’s most recently completed financial year is provided in its comparative financial statements and MD&A, copies of which are enclosed with this Circular and filed on SEDAR.

DATED this 15th day of September, 2006

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

(signed) SANDRA LEE
Secretary

EX-99.11

PACIFIC CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY
510 BURRARD ST, 2ND FLOOR
VANCOUVER, BC V6C 3B9
Phone: 604-689-9853
Fax: 604-689-8144

September 25, 2006

B.C. Securities Commission
Executive Director
701 W Georgia St., 9th Floor
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1L2

Dear Sirs\Mesdames:

RE:	KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC (the "Company")
	MAILING ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2006

We confirm that on the above date, the following material issued by the Company was forwarded by prepaid first class mail to all of the registered shareholders of the Company and to each of the Non Objecting Beneficial Owners of the Company that appeared on the list(s) provided by the Intermediaries or their agent(s). However, we have not mailed to shareholders in cases where on three consecutive occasions, documents have been returned undelivered by the Post Office.

• Information Circular
• Notice of Meeting
• Annual Financial Statements for the Year Ending 2006/04/30
• Management Discussion and Analysis
• Proxy*

We further confirm that the material was shipped on the above mentioned date to Intermediaries or their agent(s) that received the Company’s request for beneficial ownership information and responded.

We are providing this letter to you as agent for the Company in compliance with regulations under applicable legislation.

Yours truly,
PACIFIC CORPORATE TRUST COMPANY

"DALLAS CHUNG"

DALLAS CHUNG

cc: Toronto Stock Exchange	cc: KIRKLAND LAKE GOLD INC
cc: Alberta Securities Commission	cc: NORTHWEST LAW GROUP
cc: Ontario Securities Commission	cc: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS L
cc: US Securities and Exchange Commission

*Please note that for Non Objecting Beneficial Owners, a Voting Instruction Form was sent instead of a proxy.

EX-99.12

P.O. Box 370
KIRKLAND LAKE, ON, P2N 3J1

Symbol – TSX & AIM: KGI

October 3^rd, 2006

Drilling Below 5300 L Intersects 9.60 Ounces of Gold per Ton Over
10.7 Feet; Other Holes Return 3.43 Ounces of Gold per Ton Over 11.9
feet and 2.16 Ounces of Gold per Ton Over 18.5 Feet

Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce an update on exploration drilling testing the new ore systems to the south of the No. 3 Shaft.

The Company has received assays for seven additional drill holes completed from new drill bays on the 5300 level cross cut. Multiple zones of mineralization continue to be intersected in each hole. Drill hole 53-482, the first down hole drilled, has intersected two zones of significant mineralization including 24.67 ounces of gold per ton (“opt”) uncut or 1.63 (cut) over a core length of 2.4 feet and 9.60 opt uncut or 1.81 opt cut over a core length of 10.7 feet.

The 9.60 opt over 10.7 feet of core length represents the deepest significant intersection to date on new mineralization south of the mine workings.

“Up until this point, we have been concentrating our drilling at and slightly above the elevation of the 5300 cross cut” said Stewart Carmichael, Chief Exploration Geologist. “We believe the 9.60 ounce intersection correlates with the 1.11 ounce intersection in hole 50-740 giving potential dimensions of 575 feet of strike length and 280 feet in dip in this new mineralized system.”

Highlights of the current results:

• The 24.67 opt over 2.4’ of core length in drill hole 53-482 included an intersection of 58.80 opt over 1.0’ core length and correlates well with the newly designated #7 Break. The intersection is located 180’ west and 105’ below the 5300 level cross cut.

• The second intersection in 53-482 (9.60 opt over 10.7’ core length) included an intersection of 41.08 opt over 2.1’ of core characterised by both coarse visible gold and abundant telluride. This intersection is located 360 feet southwest and 235’ below the 5300 level cross cut.

• The second intersection in drill hole 53-482 represents the deepest mineralized ore-grade intersection to date on new mineralization to the south; at the -5505 elevation. A preliminary interpretation of this new zone indicates possible

- 2 -

alignment with previously released drill hole 50-740 (see release dated September 6^th, 2006) which, in addition to the 5.57 opt intersection over 50 feet of core length, reported an intersection further down the hole which assayed 1.11 opt over a core length of 4.7 feet. This intersection would be located 575 feet to the east and 280 feet up-dip from the 9.60 opt intersection in 53-482. Drilling is in progress to verify this interpretation.

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results. (Imperial values)

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (feet)	TO (feet)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (oz. per ton/feet)
53-482	New #7 Break FW #7 Break Incl. New Incl. and and	289.5 309.6 319.1 320.5 711.3 711.3 713.0 718.1	292.0 312.6 321.5 321.5 722.0 713.0 714.5 720.2	-18	115	0.95/2.5’ CL = ?? TW 4.22/3.0’ CL = 1.3’ TW 24.67/2.4’ CL = 1.2’ TW, Uncut 1.63/2.4’ CL = 1.2’ TW, Cut 58.80/1.0’ CL = 0.5’ TW, VG 9.60/10.7’ CL = ?? TW, Uncut 1.81/10.7’ CL = ?? TW, Cut 5.27/1.7’ CL = ?? TW, VG 4.44/1.5’ CL = ?? TW, VG 41.08/2.1’ CL = ?? TW, VG, Tell
53-473	#6 Break Incl. and #7 Break Incl. New Lower D North New New	342.4 344.4 351.9 381.6 381.6 416.8 484.5 520.0 575.9	354.3 346.4 353.3 383.8 382.6 419.0 489.3 524.0 582.8	+5	099	3.43/11.9’ CL = 6.5’ TW, Uncut 1.48/11.9’ CL = 6.5’ TW, Cut 4.84/2.0’ CL = 1.1’ TW, VG 18.20/1.4’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG 10.96/2.2’ CL = 1.7’ TW, Uncut 3.50/2.2’ CL = 1.7’ TW, Cut 19.92/1.0’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG 0.67/2.2’ CL = ?? TW 1.02/4.8’ CL = 2.6 TW 0.42/4.0’ CL = ?? TW 0.96/6.9’ CL = ?? TW
53-474	#7 Break FW Incl. #7 Break Lower D North HW	277.1 280.0 303.0 355.5	286.0 281.0 307.0 357.0	+16	127	2.74/8.9’ CL = 8.7’ TW, Uncut 1.61/8.9’ CL = 8.7TW, Cut 13.52/1.0’ CL = 1.0’ TW, VG 0.61/4.0’ CL = 3.8’ TW 0.72/1.5’ CL = 1.4’ TW
53-475	#7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North Lower D ?	204.5 270.5 376.2 633.0	205.5 276.3 377.9 634.5	0	105	2.04/1.0’ CL = 0.6’ TW 1.32/5.8’ CL = 3.3’ TW, VG 1.08/1.7’ CL = 1.0’ TW, VG 0.93/1.5’ CL = ?? TW, VG
53-476	Lower D North FW Lower D North Incl. and and Lower D North HW	409.0 463.5 466.0 470.0 473.1 679.1	413.0 482.0 468.0 472.0 474.2 681.5	+9	06	1.23/4.0’ CL = 1.6’ TW 2.16/18.5’ CL = 6.7’ TW, Uncut 1.41/18.5’ CL = 6.7’ TW, Cut 4.36/2.0’ CL = 0.7’ TW, VG 6.11/2.0’ CL = 0.7’ TW, VG 9.95/1.1’ CL = 0.4’ TW, VG 2.20/2.4’ CL = 1.2’ TW

- 3 -

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (feet)	TO (feet)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (oz. per ton/feet)
53-477	#7 Break FW #7 Break Lower D North HW Lower D ?	288.9 337.2 481.3 688.0	304.0 347.0 482.6 692.1	+28	099	0.31/15.1’ CL = 13.1’ TW, 0.76/9.8’ CL = 9.1’ TW, VG 0.57/1.3’ CL = 0.8’ TW 1.86/4.1’ CL = ?? TW, VG
53-478	Not Drilled
53-479	#6 Break #7 Break Lower D North FW	105.4 178.3 215.5	110.0 181.8 216.5	+54	115	0.78/4.6’ CL = 4.5’ TW, VG 1.08/3.5’ CL = 3.2’ TW, VG 9.13/1.0’ CL = 0.8’ TW, VG
53-480						Assays Pending
53-481						Assays Pending

TW = True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 3.50 oz/ton

The following table summarizes the latest drilling program results. (Metric values)

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (m)	TO (m)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (grams per tonne/m)
53-482	New #7 Break FW #7 Break Incl. New Incl. and and	88.3 94.4 97.3 97.7 216.9 216.9 217.4 218.9	89.0 95.3 98.0 98.0 220.1 217.4 217.8 219.6	-18	115	32.6/0.7m CL = ?? TW 144.7/0.9m CL = 0.4m TW 845.8/0.7m CL = 0.4m TW, Uncut 55.9/0.7m CL = 0.4m TW, Uncut 2,016.0/0.3m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 329.1/3.2m CL = ?? TW, Uncut 62.1/3.2m CL = ?? TW, Cut 180.7/0.5m CL = ?? TW, VG 152.2/0.4m CL = ?? TW, VG 1,408.5/0.7m CL = ?? TW, VG, Tell
53-473	#6 Break Incl. and #7 Break Incl. New Lower D North New New	104.4 105.0 107.3 116.3 116.3 127.1 147.7 158.5 175.6	108.0 105.6 107.7 117.0 116.6 127.7 149.2 159.8 177.7	+5	099	117.6/3.6m CL = 2.0m TW, Uncut 50.7/3.6m CL = 2.0m TW, Cut 165.9/0.6m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 624.0/0.4m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 375.8/0.7m CL = 0.5m TW, Uncut 120.0/0.7m CL = 0.5m TW, Cut 683.0/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 23.0/0.6m CL = ?? TW 35.0/1.5m CL = 0.8m TW 14.4/1.3m CL = ?? TW 32.9/2.1m CL = ?? TW

- 4 -

DRILL HOLE No.	VEIN	FROM (m)	TO (m)	HOLE DIP (degrees)	AZIMUTH (degrees)	ASSAY (grams per tonne/m)
53-474	#7 Break FW Incl. #7 Break Lower D North HW	84.5 85.4 92.4 108.4	87.2 85.7 93.6 108.8	+16	127	93.9/2.7m CL = 2.7m TW, Uncut 55.2/2.7m CL = 2.7m TW, Cut 463.5/0.3m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 20.9/1.2m CL = 1.2m TW 24.7/0.4m CL = 0.4m TW
53-475	#7 Break Lower D North FW Lower D North Lower D ?	62.3 82.5 114.7 193.0	62.7 84.2 115.2 193.4	0	105	69.9/0.4m CL = 0.2m TW 45.3/1.7m CL = 1.0m TW, VG 37.0/0.5m CL = 0.3m TW, VG 31.9/0.4m CL = ?? TW, VG
53-476	Lower D North FW Lower D North Incl. and and Lower D North HW	124.7 141.3 142.1 143.3 144.2 207.0	125.9 147.0 142.7 143.9 144.6 207.7	+9	06	42.2/1.2m CL = 0.5m TW 74.1/5.7m CL = 2.0m TW, Uncut 48.3/5.7m CL = 2.0m TW, Cut 149.5/0.6m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 209.5/0.6m CL = 0.2m TW, VG 341.1/0.4m CL = 0.1m TW, VG 75.4/0.7m CL = 0.4m TW
53-477	#7 Break FW #7 Break Lower D North HW Lower D ?	88.1 102.8 146.7 209.8	92.7 105.8 147.1 211.0	+28	099	10.6/4.6m CL = 4.0m TW, 26.1/3.0m CL = 2.8m TW, VG 19.5/0.4m CL = 0.2m TW 63.8/1.2m CL = ?? TW, VG
53-478	Not Drilled
53-479	#6 Break #7 Break Lower D North FW	32.1 54.4 65.7	33.5 55.4 66.0	+54	115	26.7/1.4m CL = 1.4m TW, VG 37.0/1.0m CL = 1.0m TW, VG 313.0/0.3m CL = 0.2m TW, VG
53-480						Assays Pending
53-481						Assays Pending

TW = True Width CL = Core Length VG = Visible Gold TELL = Tellurides CUT= cut to 120 grams/tonne

About the Company

The Company purchased the Macassa Mine and the 1,500 ton per day mill along with four former producing gold properties – Kirkland Minerals, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore and Wright Hargreaves – in December 2001. These properties, which have historically produced some 22 million ounces of gold, extend over seven kilometres between the Macassa Mine on the east and Wright Hargreaves on the west and, for the first time, are being developed and explored under one owner. This camp is located in the Abitibi Southern Greenstone Belt of Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada.

- 5 -

The results of the Company’s underground diamond drilling program have been reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by the Company's geological staff (which includes a ‘qualified person’, Michael Sutton P.Geo., the Company’s Chief Geologist, for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, of the Canadian Securities Administrators).

The Company has implemented a quality assurance and control (QA/QC) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the best possible practices. The drill core is sawn in half with half of the core samples shipped to the Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, Ontario or to the Macassa mine laboratory for analysis. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification. Other QA/QC includes the insertion of blanks, and the regular re-assaying of pulps/rejects at alternate certified labs (Polymet, Accurassay). Gold analysis is conducted by fire assay using atomic absorption or gravimetric finish. The laboratory re-assays at least 10% of all samples and additional checks may be run on anomalous values.

The Company’s Kirkland Lake properties are the subject of a report prepared by Roland H. Ridler, B.A.Sc.(Hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D.(Econ.Geol.), P.D., entitled Kirkland Lake Mineral Properties (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves dated November 30, 2001. The Company’s Macassa Mine Property is the subject of reserve and resource report prepared by Glenn R. Clark, P. Eng., entitled Review of Resources and Reserves of Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake, Ontario dated July 18, 2006. Both of these technical reports have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).

For further information, please contact:

Brian Hinchcliffe	Scott Koyich
President	Investor Relations
Phone 1 705 567 5208	Phone 1 403 215 5979
Fax 1 705 568 6444	E-mail: info@klgold.com
E-mail: bhinchcliffe@klgold.com
Website- www.klgold.com
Chelsea Hayes
Pelham Public Relations
Phone 020 7743 6675
E-mail: chelsea.hayes@pelhampr.com

     Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange
has reviewed and neither accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.