FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

6 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

2. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The FASB established a three-level hierarchy for disclosure based on the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value.  Level 1 inputs consist of valuations based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 inputs consist of valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an inactive market, or other observable inputs.  Level 3 inputs consist of valuations based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.

The following table presents financial instruments, other than long-term debt, that we measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012.  See Note 8 for a detailed discussion of our long-term debt.  We have chosen to not measure any of our other financial instruments at fair value as we believe their carrying value approximates their fair value.  We have classified the following assets in accordance with the fair value hierarchy set forth in the applicable standards.  In instances where the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset fall into more than one level of the hierarchy, we have classified them based on the lowest level input that is significant to the determination of the fair value.

March 31, 2013	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	188,354	$	-	$	-	$	188,354
Auction rate securities (ARS)		-		-		7,966		7,966
Other long-term investments		1,274		-		-		1,274
Total	$	189,628	$	-	$	7,966	$	197,594

September 30, 2012	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	178,459	$	-	$	-	$	178,459
Auction rate securities (ARS)		-		-		7,991		7,991
Other long-term investments		1,082		-		-		1,082
Total	$	179,541	$	-	$	7,991	$	187,532

Our cash and cash equivalents consist of various bank accounts used to support our operations and investments in institutional money-market funds which are traded in active markets.  The ARS and other long-term investments are included in other long-term assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  The fair value of our long-term ARS is determined through two discounted cash flow analyses, one using a discount rate based on a market index comprised of tax exempt variable rate demand obligations and one using a discount rate based on the LIBOR swap curve, adding a risk factor to reflect current liquidity issues in the ARS market.  Our other long-term investments represent the fair value of investments under the Cabot Microelectronics Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP), which is a nonqualified supplemental savings plan.  The fair value of the investments is determined through quoted market prices within actively traded markets.  Although the investments are allocated to individual participants and investment decisions are made solely by those participants, the SERP is a nonqualified plan.  Consequently, the Company owns the assets and the related offsetting liability for disbursement until such time a participant makes a qualifying withdrawal.  The long-term asset was adjusted to $1,274 in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 to reflect its fair value as of March 31, 2013.

We applied accounting standards regarding the classification and valuation of financial instruments to the valuation of our investment in ARS at March 31, 2013.  Our ARS investments at March 31, 2013 consisted of two tax exempt municipal debt securities with a total par value of $8,200.  The ARS market began to experience illiquidity in early 2008, and this illiquidity continues.  Despite this lack of liquidity, there have been no defaults of the underlying securities and interest income on these holdings continues to be received on scheduled interest payment dates.  Our ARS, when purchased, were generally issued by A-rated municipalities.  Although the credit ratings of both municipalities have been downgraded since our original investment, the ARS are credit enhanced and insured with bond insurance and currently carry a credit rating of AA- by Standard and Poors.

Since an active market for ARS does not currently exist, we determine the fair value of these investments using a Level 3 discounted cash flow analysis and also consider other factors such as the reduced liquidity in the ARS market and nature of the insurance backing.  Key inputs to our discounted cash flow model include projected cash flows from interest and principal payments and the weighted probabilities of improved liquidity or debt refinancing by the issuer.  We also incorporate certain Level 2 market indices into the discounted cash flow analysis, including published rates such as the LIBOR rate, the LIBOR swap curve and a municipal swap index published by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.  The following table presents a reconciliation of the activity in fiscal 2013 for fair value measurements using level 3 inputs:

Balance as of October 1, 2012	$	7,991
Net sales of ARS		(25	)
Balance as of March 31, 2013	$	7,966

Based on our fair value assessment, we determined that one ARS continues to be impaired as of March 31, 2013.  This security has a fair value of $3,016 (par value $3,250).  We assessed the impairment in accordance with the applicable standards and determined that the impairment was due to the lack of liquidity in the ARS market rather than to credit risk.  We have maintained the $234 temporary impairment that we previously recorded.  We believe that this ARS is not permanently impaired because in the event of default by the issuer, we expect the insurance provider would pay interest and principal following the original repayment schedule, and we do not intend to sell the security nor do we believe we will be required to sell the security before the value recovers, which may be at maturity.  We determined that the fair value of the other ARS was not impaired as of March 31, 2013.  In November 2011, the municipality that issued our impaired ARS filed for bankruptcy protection.  We considered this development, in light of the continued insurance backing, and have concluded the impairment we have maintained remains adequate and temporary.  See Note 6 for more information on these investments.