10-Q

U. S. SECURTIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

¨ Transition report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 333-95087

CENTERSTATE BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Florida	59-3606741
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1101 First Street South, Suite 202

Winter Haven, Florida 33880

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(863) 293-2600

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:     YES  x    NO  ¨

Check whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    YES  ¨    NO  x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common Equity, as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock, par value $.01 per share	11,181,220
(class)	Outstanding at March 31, 2007

CENTERSTATE BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

IN DEX

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
Condensed consolidated balance sheets - March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (unaudited)		2
Condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)		3
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows – three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)		4
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8
Item 3.	Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk	18
Item 4.	Controls and procedures	19
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	20
Item 1a.	Risk Factors	20
Item 2.	Unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	20
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	20
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders	20
Item 5.	Other Information	20
Item 6.	Exhibits	20
SIGNATURES		21
CERTIFICATIONS

1

Centerstate Banks of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

	As of March 31, 2007			As of December 31, 2006
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	41,433		$	40,385
Federal funds sold and money market accounts		58,821			79,636
Cash and cash equivalents		100,254			120,021
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		236,492			235,350
Loans		684,141			657,963
Less allowance for loan losses		(7,632	)		(7,355	)
Net Loans		676,509			650,608
Accrued interest receivable		5,607			5,035
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock		2,722			2,665
Bank premises and equipment, net		41,531			39,879
Deferred income taxes, net		1,636			1,898
Goodwill		9,863			9,863
Core deposit intangible		2,944			3,083
Bank owned life insurance		7,394			7,320
Other real estate owned		215			—
Prepaid expense and other assets		1,651			1,380
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,086,818		$	1,077,102
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Demand—non-interest bearing	$	202,840		$	223,602
Demand—interest bearing		114,636			110,627
Savings and money market accounts		161,784			147,334
Time deposits		410,378			411,243
Total deposits		889,638			892,806
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		63,536			52,792
Corporate debenture		10,000			10,000
Accrued interest payable		1,010			993
Accounts payables and accrued expenses		2,918			3,179
Total liabilities		967,102			959,770
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized     No shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; 11,181,220 and 11,129,020 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 respectively		112			111
Additional paid-in capital		87,554			86,989
Retained earnings		32,295			30,878
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(245	)		(646	)
Total stockholders’ equity		119,716			117,332
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	1,086,818		$	1,077,102

See notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Centerstate Banks of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars, except per share data)

	Three months ended
	Mar 31, 2007		Mar 31, 2006
Interest income:
Loans	$	13,009	$	9,617
Investment securities available for sale:
Taxable		2,480		1,940
Tax-exempt		295		6
Federal funds sold, money market accounts and other		736		628
		16,520		12,191
Interest expense:
Deposits		5,992		3,289
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		709		439
Corporate debenture		220		199
Other borrowed funds		1		—
		6,922		3,927
Net interest income		9,598		8,264
Provision for loan losses		282		240
Net interest income after loan loss provision		9,316		8,024
Other income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		953		748
Commissions from mortgage broker activities		52		85
Commissions on sale of mutual funds and annuities		80		270
Debit card and ATM fees		188		137
Loan related fees		75		79
BOLI income		74		65
Rental income		55		50
Other service charges and fees		63		61
		1,540		1,495
Other expenses:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits		4,655		3,876
Occupancy expense		914		768
Depreciation of premises and equipment		504		456
Supplies, stationary and printing		146		146
Marketing expenses		287		132
Data processing expense		280		252
Legal, auditing and other professional fees		196		131
Core deposit intangible (CDI) amortization		139		17
Postage and delivery		68		79
ATM related expenses		103		116
Bank regulatory expenses		98		58
Other expenses		683		559
Total other expenses		8,073		6,590
Income before provision for income taxes		2,783		2,929
Provision for income taxes		975		1,119
Net income	$	1,808	$	1,810
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.16	$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.16	$	0.17
Common shares used in the calculation of earnings per share:
Basic		11,146,978		10,508,874
Diluted		11,406,681		10,789,024

See notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Centerstate Banks of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2007			2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income	$	1,808		$	1,810
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		282			240
Depreciation of premises and equipment		504			456
Amortization of purchase accounting adjustments		130			13
Net amortization/accretion of investment securities		27			65
Net deferred loan origination fees		(38	)		56
Deferred income taxes		9			94
Stock based compensation expense		135			130
Bank owned life insurance income		(74	)		(65	)
Net cash from changes in:
Net changes in accrued interest receivable, prepaid expenses, and other assets		(843	)		(1,148	)
Net change in accrued interest payable, accrued expense, and other liabilities		(244	)		(327	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,696			1,324
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		(12,631	)		(3,283	)
Purchases of mortgage backed securities available for sale		(11,895	)		(23,534	)
Purchases of FHLB and FRB stock		(57	)		(695	)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale		17,000			29,200
Proceeds from pay-downs of mortgage backed securities available for sale		7,011			5,646
Increase in loans, net of repayments		(26,360	)		(30,230	)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(2,156	)		(3,061	)
Net cash from acquisition of Mid FL bank		—			17,853
Net cash used in investing activities		(29,088	)		(8,104	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(3,159	)		34,232
Net increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase		10,744			5,162
Net decrease in other borrowings		—			(1,000	)
Stock options exercised, including tax benefit		431			287
Dividends paid		(391	)		(368	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		7,625			38,313
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(19,767	)		31,533
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		120,021			94,926
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	100,254		$	126,459

4

Centerstate Banks of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

(continued)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2007		2006
Transfer of loan to other real estate owned	$	215	$	—
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	6,895	$	2,325
Income taxes	$	—	$	20

See notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

NOTE 1: Nature of Operations and basis of presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc. (the “Parent Company” or “CSFL”), and our wholly owned subsidiary banks and their wholly owned subsidiary, C. S. Processing. Our four subsidiary banks operate through 31 locations in eight Counties throughout Central Florida, providing traditional deposit and lending products and services to their commercial and retail customers.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods have been made. The results of operations of the three month period ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

NOTE 2: Common stock outstanding and earnings per share data

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods and the further dilution from stock options using the treasury method. There were 64,500 stock options that were anti dilutive at March 31, 2007. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the periods presented (dollars are in thousands, except per share data).

5

			For the three months ended March 31,
	2007					2006
	Earnings		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount		Earnings		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount
Basic EPS
Net earnings available to common stockholders	$	1,808	11,146,978	$	0.16	$	1,810	10,508,874	$	0.17
Effect of dilutive securities:
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options		—	259,703		—		—	280,150		—
Diluted EPS
Net earnings available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	1,808	11,406,681	$	0.16	$	1,810	10,789,024	$	0.17

NOTE 3: Comprehensive income

Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” certain transactions and other economic events that bypass our income statement must be displayed as other comprehensive income. Our comprehensive income consists of net earnings and unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, net of deferred income taxes.

The table below sets forth our comprehensive income for the periods indicated below (in thousands of dollars).

	Three months ended
	Mar 31, 2007		Mar 31, 2006
Net income	$	1,808	$	1,810
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period		401		(142	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		401		(142	)
Comprehensive income	$	2,209	$	1,668

NOTE 4: Subsequent acquisition of Valrico Bancorp, Inc.

On April 2, 2007, we acquired Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (“VBI”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Valrico State Bank, as previously announced. The $36.1 million purchase price was a combination of 65% stock and 35% cash. VBI is a one bank holding company operating through its subsidiary, Valrico State Bank (“VSB”). VSB opened for business in 1989 and operates through four banking locations in Hillsborough County, Florida. At December 31, 2006, VBI reported total consolidated assets of approximately $149.5 million, loans of $124.0 million, deposits of $119.7 million and stockholders’ equity of $15.9 million. VBI also reported consolidated net income of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. VSB will operate as a separate wholly owned subsidiary, similar to the Company’s other subsidiary banks.

6

NOTE 5: Effect of new pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This Statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its balance sheet, beginning with year end 2006, and to recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income beginning in 2007. Additionally, defined benefit plan assets and obligations are to be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end, starting in 2008. Adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2006, FASB issued Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment to FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instruments, clarifies which instruments are subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133, and establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets and other items. The new standard is effective for financial assets acquired or issued after the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement provides the following: 1) revised guidance on when a servicing asset and servicing liability should be recognized; 2) requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; 3) permits an entity to elect to measure servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur; 4) upon initial adoption, permits a onetime reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities for securities which are identified as offsetting the entity’s exposure to changes in the fair value of servicing assets or liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value; and 5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position and additional footnote disclosures. This Standard is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006 with the effects of initial adoption being reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. Adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company has determined that the adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force finalized Issue No. 06-5, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance—Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4 (Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance). This Issue requires that a policyholder consider contractual terms of a life insurance policy in determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract. It also requires that if the contract provides for a greater surrender value if all individual policies in a group are surrendered at the same time, that the surrender value be determined based on the assumption that policies will be surrendered on an individual basis. Lastly, the Issue discusses whether the cash surrender value should be discounted when the policyholder

7

is contractually limited in its ability to surrender a policy. This Issue is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of this Issue did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

Effect of newly issued but not yet effective accounting standards:

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not completed its evaluation of the impact of the adoption of this Statement.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Board’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not completed its evaluation of the impact of the adoption of this Statement.

In September 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force finalized Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. This Issue requires that a liability be recorded during the service period when a split-dollar life insurance agreement continues after participants’ employment or retirement. The required accrued liability will be based on either the post-employment benefit cost for the continuing life insurance or based on the future death benefit depending on the contractual terms of the underlying agreement. This Issue is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. Under the current agreements, adoption of this Issue will have no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPARISON OF BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 2007 AND DECEMBER 31, 2006

Overview

Total assets were $1,086,818,000 as of March 31, 2007, compared to $1,077,102,000 at December 31, 2006, an increase of $9,716,000 or 0.90%. The increase resulted from internally generated loan growth and investment growth funded primarily by an increase in retail repurchase agreements.

Federal funds sold and money market accounts

Federal funds sold and money market accounts were $58,821,000 at March 31, 2007 (approximately 5.4% of total assets) as compared to $79,636,000 at December 31, 2006 (approximately 7.4% of total assets). We use our available-for-sale securities portfolio, as well as federal funds sold and money market accounts for liquidity management and for investment yields. These accounts, as a group, will fluctuate as a function of loans outstanding.

8

Investment securities

Securities available-for-sale, consisting primarily of U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, were $236,492,000 at March 31, 2007 (approximately 22% of total assets) compared to $235,350,000 at December 31, 2006 (approximately 22% of total assets), an increase of $1,142,000 or 0.5%. These securities are carried at fair value. We classify our securities as “available-for-sale” to provide for greater flexibility to respond to changes in interest rates as well as future liquidity needs. We use our available-for-sale securities portfolio, as well as federal funds sold and money market accounts for liquidity management and for investment yields. These accounts, as a group, will fluctuate as a function of loans outstanding as discussed above, under the caption “Federal funds sold and money market accounts.”

Loans

Lending-related income is the most important component of our net interest income and is a major contributor to profitability. The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets, and it therefore generates the largest portion of revenues. The absolute volume of loans and the volume of loans as a percentage of earning assets is an important determinant of net interest margin as loans are expected to produce higher yields than securities and other earning assets. Average loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, were $669,005,000, or 69% of average earning assets, as compared to $531,895,000, or 66% of average earning assets, for the quarter ending March 31, 2006. Total loans, net of unearned fees and cost, at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $684,141,000 and $657,963,000, respectively, an increase of $26,178,000, or 4%. This represents a loan to total asset ratio of 63% and 61% and a loan to deposit ratio of 77% and 74%, at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The increase in loans during this period was due to normal business growth.

Total residential real estate loans totaled $185,820,000 or 27% of our total loans as of March 31, 2007. As with all of our loans, these are originated in our geographical market area in central Florida. We do not engage in sub-prime lending. As of this same date, our commercial real estate loans totaled $296,788,000, or 43% of our total loans. Construction, development, and land loans totaled $68,543,000, or 10% of our loans. As a group, all of our real estate collateralized loans represent approximately 80% of our total loans at March 31, 2007. The remaining 20% is comprised of commercial loans (11.5%) and consumer loans (8.5%).

Loan concentrations are considered to exist where there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities, which collectively could be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions and when the total of such amounts would exceed 25% of total capital. Due to the lack of diversified industry and the relative proximity of markets served, the Company has concentrations in geographic as well as in types of loans funded.

9

The following table sets forth information concerning the loan portfolio by collateral types as of the dates indicated (dollars are in thousands).

	March 31, 2007			Dec 31, 2006
Real estate loans
Residential	$	185,820		$	180,869
Commercial		296,788			291,536
Construction, development, land		68,543			60,950
Total real estate		551,151			533,355
Commercial		76,558			68,948
Other		57,418			56,684
Gross loans before		685,127			658,987
Unearned fees/costs		(986	)		(1,024	)
Total loans net of unearned fees		684,141			657,963
Allowance for loan losses		(7,632	)		(7,355	)
Total loans net of unearned fees and allowance for loan losses	$	676,509		$	650,608

Credit quality and allowance for loan losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings and decreased by loan charge-offs net of recoveries of prior period loan charge-offs. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes collection of the principal is unlikely.

The allowance consists of two components. The first component is an allocation for impaired loans, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 114. Impaired loans are those loans that management has estimated will not repay as agreed upon. Each of these loans is required to have a written analysis supporting the amount of specific allowance allocated to the particular loan, if any. That is to say, a loan may be impaired (i.e. not expected to repay as agreed), but may be sufficiently collateralized such that we expect to recover all principal and interest eventually, and therefore no specific allowance is warranted.

The second component is a general allowance on all of the Company’s loans other than those identified as impaired. We group these loans into five general categories with similar characteristics, then apply an adjusted loss factor to each group of loans to determine the total amount of this second component of our allowance for loan losses. The adjusted loss factor for each category of loans is a derivative of our historical loss factor for that category, adjusted for current internal and external environmental factors, as well as for certain loan grading factors.

10

In the table below we have shown the two components, as discussed above, of our allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

(amounts are in thousands of dollars)	Mar 31, 2007			Dec 31, 2006			Increase (decrease)
Impaired loans	$	5,237		$	4,986		$	251
Component 1 (specific allowance)		450			372			78
Specific allowance as percentage of impaired loans		8.6	%		7.5	%		1.1	%
Total loans other than impaired loans		678,904			652,977			25,927
Component 2 (general allowance)		7,182			6,983			199
General allowance as percentage of non impaired loans		1.06	%		1.07	%		(0.01	)%
Total loans		684,141			657,963			26,178
Total allowance for loan losses		7,632			7,355			277
Allowance for loan losses as percentage of total loans		1.12	%		1.12	%		—	%

As shown in the table above, our allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) as a percentage of total loans outstanding was 1.12% at March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006. Our ALLL increased by $277,000 during this three month period. Of this amount, $199,000 relates to an increase in our Component 2, or general allowance, as described and discussed above. This increase is primarily due to the growth in our loan portfolio. The remaining $78,000 increase is due to an increase in our Component 1, or specific allowance. This Component is the result of specific allowance analyses prepared for each of our impaired loans.

We are committed to the early recognition of problems and to maintaining a sufficient allowance. We believe our allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2007 was adequate. The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented, in thousands of dollars.

	Three month period end March 31,
	2007			2006
Allowance at beginning of period	$	7,355		$	6,491
Charge-offs
Commercial loans		—			(296	)
Real estate loans		—			—
Consumer loans		(27	)		(15	)
Total charge-offs		(27	)		(311	)
Recoveries
Commercial loans		1			2
Real estate loans		6			3
Consumer loans		15			23
Total recoveries		22			28
Net charge-offs		(5	)		(283	)
Provision for loan losses		282			240
Adjustment relating to Mid FL merger		—			647
Allowance at end of period	$	7,632		$	7,095

Nonperforming assets

Non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest. Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans plus other real estate owned (“OREO”) and repossessed assets other than real estate. We place loans on non-accrual status when they are past due 90 days and management believes the borrower’s financial condition, after giving

11

consideration to economic conditions and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful. When we place a loan on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected interest is reversed and charged against current income. Subsequent collections reduce the principal balance of the loan until the loan is returned to accrual status.

The following table sets forth information regarding the components of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated (in thousands of dollars).

	Mar. 31 2007			Dec. 31 2006
Non-accrual loans	$	1,196		$	448
Past due loans 90 days or more and still accruing interest		64			162
Total non-performing loans		1,260			610
Other real estate owned		215			—
Repossessed assets other than real estate		—			35
Total non-performing assets	$	1,475		$	645
Total non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans		0.18	%		0.09	%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		0.14	%		0.06	%
Allowance for loan losses	$	7,632		$	7,355
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans		606	%		1,206	%

We continually analyze our loan portfolio in an effort to recognize and resolve problem assets as quickly and efficiently as possible. As of March 31, 2007, we believe the allowance for loan losses was adequate. However, we recognize that many factors can adversely impact various segments of the market. Accordingly, there is no assurance that losses in excess of such allowance will not be incurred.

Bank premises and equipment

Bank premises and equipment was $41,531,000 at March 31, 2007 compared to $39,879,000 at December 31, 2006, an increase of $1,652,000 or 4%. This amount is the result of purchases and construction costs totaling $2,156,000 less $504,000 of depreciation expense. Most of these costs relate to the construction of branch offices in Osceola and Polk Counties.

Deposits

Total deposits were $889,638,000 at March 31, 2007, compared to $892,806,000 at December 31, 2006, a decrease of $3,168,000 or 0.4%. Deposit growth, especially in core deposits (i.e. non time deposit accounts) has been a challenge during this quarter. Core deposit growth is a primary focus for the rest of this year. Our subsidiary Presidents have initiated various incentive programs throughout their Banks as well as other marketing efforts targeted at deposit growth. We believe there are several forces causing this slow down in deposit growth, including the interest rate environment which may have enticed customers to shift from lower yielding accounts to higher yielding time deposits and the slow down in real estate activity in Florida, which translates into less transactions which equates to lower balances held in title company accounts and other real estate related accounts.

12

The table below sets forth our deposits by type and as a percentage to total deposits at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (amounts shown in the table are in thousands of dollars).

	Mar 31, 2007		% of total		Dec 31, 2006		% of total
Demand - non-interest bearing	$	202,840	23	%	$	223,602	25	%
Demand - interest bearing		114,636	13	%		110,627	12	%
Savings and money market accounts		161,784	18	%		147,334	17	%
Time deposits		410,378	46	%		411,243	46	%
Total deposits	$	889,638	100	%	$	892,806	100	%

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

Our subsidiary banks enter into borrowing arrangements with our retail business customers by agreements to repurchase (“securities sold under agreements to repurchase”) under which the banks pledge investment securities owned and under their control as collateral against the one-day borrowing arrangement. These short-term borrowings totaled $63,536,000 at March 31, 2007 compared to $52,792,000 at December 31, 2006, resulting in an increase of $10,744,000, or 20%.

Corporate debenture

In September 2003, we formed CenterState Banks of Florida Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 22, 2003, we issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $10,000,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 305 basis points). The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by us or the Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve, if then required. Related loan origination costs of $188,000 were capitalized and are being amortized to interest expense over a five year period ending September 2008. We have treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines, and the remainder as Tier 2 capital for federal regulatory purposes.

Stockholders’ equity

Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2007, was $119,716,000, or 11.0% of total assets, compared to $117,332,000, or 10.9% of total assets at December 31, 2006. The increase in stockholders’ equity was due to the following items:

$117,332,000	Total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2006
1,808,000	Net income during the period
(391,000)	Dividends declared and paid ($0.035 per share)
401,000	Net increase in market value of securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes
431,000	Employee stock options exercised
135,000	Employee stock option expense consistent with SFAS #123(R)
$119,716,000	Total stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2007

The federal bank regulatory agencies have established risk-based capital requirements for banks. These guidelines are intended to provide an additional measure of a bank’s capital adequacy by assigning weighted levels of risk to asset categories. Banks are also required to systematically maintain capital

13

against such “off- balance sheet” activities as loans sold with recourse, loan commitments, guarantees and standby letters of credit. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of capital by increasing the emphasis on common equity and restricting the amount of loan loss reserves and other forms of equity such as preferred stock that may be included in capital. As of March 31, 2007, each of our four subsidiary banks exceeded the minimum capital levels to be considered “well capitalized” under the terms of the guidelines.

Selected consolidated capital ratios at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the table below.

	Actual				Well capitalized				Excess
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount
March 31, 2007
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	124,786	16.5	%	$	75,815	> 10	%	$	48,971
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		117,154	15.5	%		45,489	> 6	%		71,665
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)		117,154	11.2	%		52,437	> 5	%		64,717
December 31, 2006
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	122,387	16.6	%	$	73,716	> 10	%	$	48,671
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)		115,032	15.6	%		44,230	> 6	%		70,802
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)		115,032	11.2	%		51,236	> 5	%		63,796

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006

Overview

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $1,808,000 or $0.16 per share basic and diluted, compared to $1,810,000 or $0.17 per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2006.

The return on average equity (“ROE”) and the return on average assets (“ROA”), calculated on an annualized basis, for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 was 6.17% and 0.69%, respectively, as compared to 7.46% and 0.84%, respectively, for the same period in 2006.

Net interest income/margin

Net interest income increased $1,334,000 or 16% to $9,598,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to $8,264,000 for the same period in 2006. The $1,334,000 increase was the result of a $4,329,000 increase in interest income less a $2,995,000 increase in interest expense.

Interest earning assets averaged $964,370,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $800,683,000 for the same period in 2006, an increase of $163,687,000, or 20%. The yield on average interest earning assets increased 0.78% to 6.95% (0.81% to 7.00% tax equivalent basis) during the three month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to 6.17% (6.19% tax equivalent basis) for the same period in 2006. The combined effects of the $163,687,000 increase in average interest earning assets and the 0.78% (0.81% tax equivalent basis) increase in yield on average interest earning assets resulted in the $4,329,000 increase in interest income between the two periods.

Interest bearing liabilities averaged $746,143,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $576,609,000 for the same period in 2006, an increase of $169,534,000, or 29%.

14

The cost of average interest bearing liabilities increased 1.00% to 3.76% during the three month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to 2.76% for the same period in 2006. The combined effects of the $169,534,000 increase in average interest bearing liabilities and the 1.00% increase in cost on average interest bearing liabilities resulted in the $2,995,000 increase in interest expense between the two periods.

The table below summarizes the analysis of changes in interest income and interest expense for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 on a tax equivalent basis (in thousands of dollars).

	Three months ended March 31,
	2007							2006
	Average Balance			Interest Inc / Exp		Average Rate		Average Balance			Interest Inc / Exp		Average Rate
Loans (1) (2) (9)	$	669,005		$	13,035	7.90	%	$	531,895		$	9,635	7.35	%
Securities- taxable (3) (9)		265,435			3,216	4.91	%		268,113			2,568	3.88	%
Securities- tax exempt (9)		29,930			402	5.45	%		675			9	5.41	%
Total earning assets		964,370			16,653	7.00	%		800,683			12,212	6.19	%
Allowance for loan losses		(7,423	)						(6,524	)
All other assets		104,594							80,120
Total assets	$	1,061,541						$	874,279
Deposits (4)		673,561			5,992	3.61	%		519,587			3,289	2.57	%
Borrowings (5)		62,582			710	4.60	%		47,022			439	3.79	%
Corporate debenture (6)		10,000			220	8.92	%		10,000			199	8.07	%
Total interest bearing
Liabilities		746,143			6,922	3.76	%		576,609			3,927	2.76	%
Demand deposits		192,945							195,670
Other liabilities		3,695							3,640
Stockholders’ equity		118,758							98,360
Total liabilities and
Stockholders’ equity	$	1,061,541						$	874,279
Net interest spread (tax equivalent basis) (7)						3.24	%						3.43	%
Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)				$	9,731						$	8,285
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis) (8)						4.09	%						4.20	%

Note 1: Loan balances are net of deferred origination fees and costs.

Note 2: Interest income on average loans includes loan fee recognition of $138,000 and $86,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Note 3: Includes securities available-for-sale, federal funds sold and money market and earnings on Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

Note 4: Includes interest bearing deposits only. Non-interest bearing checking accounts are included in the demand deposits listed above.

Note 5: Includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and federal funds purchased.

Note 6: Includes amortization of origination costs of $9,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Note 7: Represents the average rate earned on interest earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

Note 8: Represents net interest income divided by total interest earning assets.

15

Note 9: Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates to adjust tax exempt interest income on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.

Provision for loan losses

The provision for loan losses increased $42,000, or 18%, to $282,000 during the three month period ending March 31, 2007 compared to $240,000 for the comparable period in 2006. Our policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings, and is decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries on prior loan charge-offs. Therefore, the provision for loan losses (Income Statement effect) is a residual of management’s determination of allowance for loan losses (Balance Sheet approach). In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we consider those levels maintained by conditions of individual borrowers, the historical loan loss experience, the general economic environment, the overall portfolio composition, and other information. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision changes. See “credit quality and allowance for loan losses” regarding the allowance for loan losses for additional information.

Non-interest income

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $1,540,000 compared to $1,495,000 for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was the result of the following components listed in the table below (amounts listed are in thousands of dollars).

Three month period ending: (in thousands of dollars)	Mar 31, 2007		Mar 31, 2006		$ increase (decrease)			% increase (decrease)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	953	$	748	$	205		27.4	%
Commissions from mortgage broker activities		52		85		(33	)	(38.8	%)
Loan related fees		75		79		(4	)	(5.1	%)
Commissions from sale of mutual funds and annuities		80		270		(190	)	(70.4	%)
Rental income		55		50		5		10.0	%
Debit card and ATM fees		188		137		51		37.2	%
BOLI income		74		65		9		13.8	%
Other service charges and fees		63		61		2		3.3	%
Total non-interest income	$	1,540	$	1,495	$	45		3.0	%

The largest subcomponent included in “Service charges on deposit accounts” is NSF fees, which increased $212,000 to $660,000 in our first quarter of 2007, compared to $448,000 during the first quarter of 2006. This increase was related to: (1) an increase in fees charged to customers for NSF and overdrafts by one of our larger banks; (2) a more rigorous effort placed on collecting fees as opposed to waiving; and (3) a checking account marketing campaign initiated at one of our banks during the fourth quarter of 2006 which is designed to increase NSF and overdraft fees, as well as increase the number of checking accounts.

Commissions from the sale of mutual funds and annuities are dependent on market place forces including the successful efforts of our investment sales representatives. A large part of the commissions earned during the first quarter of last year was due to one large single transaction that occurred in February 2006.

Commissions from mortgage broker activities are also dependent on market place forces including supply and demand of single family residential property in our local markets.

16

We acquired CenterState Bank Mid Florida on March 31, 2006, as such, their non-interest income is included in our first quarter of 2007 (approximately $85,000), but not included in our first quarter of 2006.

Non-interest expense

Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased $1,483,000, or 22.5%, to $8,073,000, compared to $6,590,000 for the same period in 2006. Components of our non-interest expenses are listed in the table below. Amounts are in thousands of dollars.

Three month period ending: (in thousands of dollars)	Mar 31, 2007			Mar 31, 2006			$ increase (decrease)			% increase (decrease)
Employee salaries and wages	$	3,243		$	2,748		$	495		18.0	%
Employee incentive/bonus compensation		513			438			75		17.1	%
Employee stock option expense		135			130			5		3.8	%
Health insurance and other employee benefits		542			372			170		45.7	%.
Payroll taxes		331			289			42		14.5	%.
Other employee related expenses		170			147			23		15.6	%.
Incremental direct cost of loan origination		(279	)		(248	)		(31	)	12.5	%.
Total salaries, wages and employee benefits	$	4,655		$	3,876		$	779		20.1	%
Occupancy expense		914			768			146		19.0	%
Depreciation of premises and equipment		504			456			48		10.5	%
Supplies, stationary and printing		146			146			—		—	%
Marketing expenses		287			132			155		117.4	%
Data processing expense		280			252			28		11.1	%
Legal, auditing and other professional fees		196			131			65		49.6	%
Core deposit intangible (CDI) amortization		139			17			122		717.6	%
Postage and delivery		68			79			(11	)	(13.9	)%
ATM related expenses		103			116			(13	)	(11.2	)%
Bank regulatory related expenses		98			58			40		69.0	%
Other expenses		683			559			124		22.2	%
Total non-interest expense	$	8,073		$	6,590		$	1,483		22.5	%

Overall, the most significant component to consider when comparing these two quarters is the March 31, 2006 acquisition of CenterState Bank Mid FL. Their non-interest expense is included in the current quarter but not in the comparable quarter in 2006. Their total non-interest expense during the current quarter was $824,000. Excluding Mid FL, our net increase would adjust from $1,483,000 to $659,000, or from 22.5% to 10.0%.

Our largest non-interest expense is employee and employee related expenses. Total salaries, wages and employee benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2007 ($4,655,000) accounted for 58% of our total non-interest expense, compared to 59% for the same period last year. Looking at the table above, employee salaries and wages increased by 18.0% to $3,243,000 for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 (“current quarter”), compared to $2,748,000 for the same period last year. Our average FTEs for the current quarter was approximately 318 compared to 275 FTEs for the comparable quarter last year. Most of the FTE increase relates to the acquisition of Mid FL discussed above, as well as from opening new branches and general business growth.

Incremental direct cost of loan origination, represents direct incremental cost of originating loans for our portfolio (successful efforts) that are required to be capitalized and amortized to interest income over the life of the related loan pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 91. The amount that we capitalize is dependent on not just the cost, but the volume of loans successfully originated.

17

The increase in marketing expenses relates to the checking account marketing campaign currently in place at one of our banks. This campaign started during the fourth quarter of 2006.

The CDI amortization increase between the two quarters is due to the March 31, 2006 acquisition of CenterState Bank Mid FL.

We opened a temporary branch in September 2006 and another in October 2006. These two branches are operating out of temporary locations until the construction of their permanent facilities are completed. We also opened another branch in October 2006 and another in February 2007. Both of these two new branches opened in their newly constructed facilities (i.e. these two were not previously operating from temporary facilities). As discussed above, this activity also is responsible for adding additional FTEs along with the Mid FL acquisition. This branching activity, as well as the continual growth of our business, resulted in the increase in the remainder of our non-interest expenses.

Provision for income taxes

The income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $975,000 (an effective rate of 35.0%) compared to $1,119,000 (an effective rate of 38.2%) for the same period in 2006. The primary reason for the decrease in our effective tax rate was due to the increase in our tax exempt securities.

Liquidity

Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet anticipated customer demands for funds under credit commitments and deposit withdrawals at a reasonable cost and on a timely basis. We measure liquidity position by giving consideration to both on- and off-balance sheet sources of and demands for funds on a daily and weekly basis.

Each of our subsidiary banks regularly assesses the amount and likelihood of projected funding requirements through a review of factors such as historical deposit volatility and funding patterns, present and forecasted market and economic conditions, individual client funding needs, and existing and planned business activities. Each of our subsidiary bank’s asset/liability committee (ALCO) provides oversight to the liquidity management process and recommends guidelines, subject to board of director’s approval, and courses of action to address actual and projected liquidity needs.

Short term sources of funding and liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, net of federal requirements to maintain reserves against deposit liabilities; investment securities eligible for pledging to secure borrowings from customers pursuant to securities sold under repurchase agreements; loan repayments; deposits and certain interest rate-sensitive deposits; and borrowings under overnight federal fund lines available from correspondent banks. In addition to interest rate-sensitive deposits, the primary demand for liquidity is anticipated fundings under credit commitments to customers.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES: MARKET RISK

Market risk

We believe interest rate risk is the most significant market risk impacting us. Each of our subsidiary banks monitors and manages its interest rate risk using interest rate sensitivity “gap” analysis

18

to measure the impact of market interest rate changes on net interest income. See our 2006 annual report on Form 10-K for disclosure of the quantitative and qualitative information regarding the interest rate risk inherent in interest rate risk sensitive instruments as of December 31, 2006. There have been no changes in the assumptions used in monitoring interest rate risk as of March 31, 2007. The impact of other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange risk and equity price risk, is deemed immaterial. We do not maintain a portfolio of trading securities and do not intend to engage in such activities in the immediate future.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)) during the quarter covered by this report that have materially effected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

19

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

There has been no material changes in our risk factors from our disclosure in Item 7a of our December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K

Item 2. Unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

I tem 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1	The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer’s certification required under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2	The Chief Financial Officer’s certification required under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1	The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer’s certification required under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2	The Chief Financial Officer’s certification required under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

20

CENTERSTATE BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CENTERSTATE BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.

(Registrant)

Date:	May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ Ernest S. Pinner
			Ernest S. Pinner
			Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:	May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ James J. Antal
			James J. Antal
			Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

21

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

I, Ernest S. Pinner, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ Ernest S. Pinner
		Ernest S. Pinner, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

I, James J. Antal, certify, that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ James J. Antal
		James J. Antal, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ Ernest S. Pinner
		Ernest S. Pinner
		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2007	By:	/s/ James J. Antal
		James J. Antal
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer