XML 71 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Note 11. Fair Value Measurements
We use fair value to measure certain assets on a recurring basis, primarily securities available‑for‑sale; we have no liabilities being measured at fair value. For assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value, the fair value measurement criteria may or may not be met during a reporting period and such measurements are therefore considered “nonrecurring” for purposes of disclosing our fair value measurements. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to adjust carrying values for impaired loans and other real estate owned and also to record impairment on certain assets, such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles, and other long‑lived assets.
The following table presents information on the assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014:
 
 
Fair Value Measurements as of
 
 
June 30, 2014
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(In thousands)
Securities available‑for‑sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government agency and government‑sponsored enterprise
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
pass through securities
 
$
584,757

 
$

 
$
584,757

 
$

Government agency and government‑sponsored enterprise
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collateralized mortgage obligations
 
287,604

 

 
287,604

 

Covered private label CMOs
 
36,522

 

 

 
36,522

Other private label CMOs
 
14,288

 

 
14,288

 

Municipal securities
 
456,566

 

 
456,566

 

Corporate debt securities
 
109,391

 

 
109,391

 

Government‑sponsored enterprise debt securities
 
36,665

 

 
36,665

 

Other securities
 
26,322

 
516

 
25,806

 

Total
 
$
1,552,115

 
$
516

 
$
1,515,077

 
$
36,522


There were no transfers of assets either between Level 1 and Level 2 nor in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for assets measured on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
The following table presents information about quantitative inputs and assumptions used to determine the fair values provided by our third party pricing service for our Level 3 covered private label CMOs measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014:
 
 
Covered Private Label CMOs
Unobservable Inputs:
 
Range of Inputs
 
Weighted Average Input
Voluntary annual prepayment speeds
0% - 34.5%
 
5.6%
Annual default rates
0% - 39.6%
 
2.8%
Loss severity rates
0% - 64.0%
 
27.4%
Discount rates
0% - 8.6%
 
5.2%

The following table summarizes activity for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis that are categorized as Level 3 for the period indicated:
 
 
Covered Private Label CMOs (Level 3)
 
 
(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2013
 
$
37,904

Total realized in earnings
 
561

Total unrealized gain in comprehensive income
 
207

Net settlements
 
(2,150
)
Balance, June 30, 2014
 
$
36,522


The following tables present assets measured at fair value on a non‑recurring basis as of the date indicated and the gains and (losses) recognized on such assets for the period indicated:
 
Fair Value Measurement as of
 
Gain (Loss)
 
June 30, 2014
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2014
Measured on a Non‑Recurring Basis:
(In thousands)
Non‑PCI impaired loans
$
29,043

 
$

 
$
5,398

 
$
23,645

 
$
(7,671
)
 
$
(9,051
)
Other real estate owned
8,059

 

 
469

 
7,590

 
(482
)
 
(528
)
Total non-recurring
$
37,102

 
$

 
$
5,867

 
$
31,235

 
$
(8,153
)
 
$
(9,579
)

The following table presents the valuation methodology and unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2014:
Asset
 
Fair Value
(in 000’s)
 
Valuation Methodology
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
Weighted
Average
Non-PCI impaired loans
 
$
22,205

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rates
 
4.06% - 8.66%
 
6.70%
 
 
$
1,440

 
Appraisals
 
No discounts
 

 

OREO (one property)
 
$
7,590

 
Appraisals
 
Discount, including 8% for selling costs
 
8%
 
8%

ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate such fair values. Additionally, certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the applicable disclosure requirements.
The following tables present a summary of the carrying values and estimated fair values of certain financial instruments as of the dates indicated:
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
 
Carrying or
Contract
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
 
Amount
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
 
$
243,583

 
$
243,583

 
$
243,583

 
$

 
$

Interest‑earning deposits in financial institutions
 
119,782

 
119,782

 
119,782

 

 

Securities available‑for‑sale
 
1,552,115

 
1,552,115

 
516

 
1,515,077

 
36,522

Investment in FHLB stock
 
49,983

 
49,983

 

 
49,983

 

Loans and leases, net
 
11,107,956

 
11,232,882

 

 
5,398

 
11,227,484

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand, money market, interest checking,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
and savings deposits
 
5,738,178

 
5,738,178

 

 
5,738,178

 

Time deposits
 
5,929,619

 
5,919,083

 

 
5,919,083

 

Borrowings
 
4,596

 
4,606

 

 
4,606

 

Subordinated debentures
 
434,878

 
418,345

 

 
418,345

 


 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying or
Contract
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Amount
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$
96,424

 
$
96,424

 
$
96,424

 
$

 
$

Interest‑earning deposits in financial institutions
50,998

 
50,998

 
50,998

 

 

Securities available‑for‑sale
1,494,745

 
1,494,745

 
507

 
1,456,334

 
37,904

Investment in FHLB stock
27,939

 
27,939

 

 
27,939

 

Loans and leases, net
4,230,318

 
4,231,078

 

 
2,051

 
4,229,027

SBA loan servicing asset
807

 
807

 

 

 
807

Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand, money market, interest checking,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 and savings deposits
4,616,616

 
4,616,616

 

 
4,616,616

 

Time deposits
664,371

 
665,148

 

 
665,148

 

Borrowings
113,726

 
113,726

 
106,600

 
7,126

 

Subordinated debentures
132,645

 
132,498

 

 
132,498

 


The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to measure our assets recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement”) and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value (under ASC Topic 825).
Cash and due from banks. The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value because of the liquidity of these instruments.
Interest‑earning deposits in financial institutions. The carrying amount is assumed to be the fair value given the short‑term nature of these deposits.
Securities available‑for‑sale. Securities available‑for‑sale are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Unrealized gains and losses on available‑for‑sale securities are reported as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 5, Investment Securities, for further information on unrealized gains and losses on securities available‑for‑sale.
Fair value for securities categorized as Level 1, which are publicly traded securities, are based on readily available quoted prices. In determining the fair value of the securities categorized as Level 2, we obtain a report from a nationally recognized broker‑dealer detailing the fair value of each investment security we hold as of each reporting date. The broker‑dealer uses observable market information to value our securities, with the primary source being a nationally recognized pricing service. We review the market prices provided by the broker‑dealer for our securities for reasonableness based on our understanding of the marketplace and we consider any credit issues related to the securities. As we have not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided to us and they are based on observable market data, they have been categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Our covered private label CMOs are categorized as Level 3 due in part to the inactive market for such securities. There is a wide range of prices quoted for private label CMOs among independent third party pricing services and this range reflects the significant judgment being exercised over the assumptions and variables that determine the pricing of such securities. We consider this subjectivity to be a significant unobservable input and have concluded that the covered private label CMOs should be categorized as a Level 3 measured asset. Our fair value estimate was based on prices provided to us by a nationally recognized pricing service which we also use to determine the fair value of the majority of our securities portfolio. We determined the reasonableness of the fair values by reviewing assumptions at the individual security level about prepayment, default expectations, estimated severity loss factors, and discount rates, all of which are not directly observable in the market. Significant changes in default expectations, severity loss factors, or discount rates, which occur all together or in isolation, would result in different fair value measurements.
FHLB stock. Investments in FHLB stock are recorded at cost and measured for impairment quarterly. Ownership of FHLB stock is restricted to member banks and the securities do not have a readily determinable market value. Purchases and sales of these securities are at par value with the issuer. The fair value of investments in FHLB stock is equal to the carrying amount.
Non‑PCI impaired loans. Nonaccrual loans and performing restructured loans are considered impaired for reporting purposes and are measured and recorded at fair value on a non‑recurring basis. Non‑PCI nonaccrual loans with an unpaid principal balance over $250,000 and all performing restructured loans are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment, if any. Non‑PCI nonaccrual loans with an unpaid principal balance less than $250,000 are not individually assessed for impairment but are instead reserved for under our general reserve component.
To the extent a loan is collateral dependent, we measure such impaired loan based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of each loan’s collateral is generally based on estimated market prices from an independently prepared appraisal, which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidating such collateral; such valuation inputs result in a nonrecurring fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Level 2 measurement is based on appraisals obtained within the last 12 months and for which a charge‑off was recognized or a change in the specific valuation allowance was made during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
When adjustments are made to an appraised value to reflect various factors such as the age of the appraisal or known changes in the market or the collateral, such valuation inputs are considered unobservable and the fair value measurement is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. The impaired loans categorized as Level 3 also include unsecured loans and other secured loans whose fair values are based significantly on unobservable inputs such as the strength of a guarantor, including an SBA government guarantee, cash flows discounted at the effective loan rate, and management’s judgment.
The Non‑PCI impaired loan balances shown above as measured on a non-recurring basis represent those nonaccrual and restructured loans for which impairment was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The amounts shown as net losses include the impairment recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2014, for the loan balances shown. Of the $96.8 million of Non-PCI nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2014, $1.7 million were written down to their collateral fair values through charge‑offs during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Other real estate owned ("OREO"). The fair value of foreclosed real estate is generally based on estimated market prices from independently prepared current appraisals or negotiated sales prices with potential buyers, less estimated costs to sell; such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 2 measurement on a nonrecurring basis. As a matter of policy, appraisals are required annually and may be updated more frequently as circumstances require in the opinion of management. The Level 2 measurement for OREO is based on appraisals obtained within the last 12 months and for which a write‑down was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value as a result of known changes in the market or the collateral and there is no observable market price, such valuation inputs result in a fair value measurement that is categorized as a Level 3 measurement. To the extent a negotiated sales price or reduced listing price represents a significant discount to an observable market price, such valuation input would result in a fair value measurement that is also considered a Level 3 measurement. The OREO losses disclosed are write‑downs based on either a recent appraisal obtained after foreclosure or an accepted purchase offer by an independent third party received after foreclosure.
Deposits. Deposits are carried at historical cost. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest‑bearing demand deposits, interest checking, money market, and savings accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date and considered Level 2. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows and considered Level 2. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. No value has been separately assigned to the Company’s long‑term relationships with its deposit customers, such as a core deposit intangible.
Borrowings. Borrowings include overnight FHLB advances and other fixed‑rate term borrowings. Borrowings are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of overnight FHLB advances is equal to the carrying value and considered Level 1. The fair value of fixed‑rate borrowings is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity dates or call dates, if applicable, using estimated market discount rates that reflect current rates offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities and characteristics and are considered Level 2.
Subordinated debentures. Subordinated debentures are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of subordinated debentures with variable rates is determined using a market discount rate on the expected cash flows.
Commitments to extend credit. The majority of our commitments to extend credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans. Because these commitments are generally unassignable by either the borrower or us, they only have value to the borrower and us. The estimated fair value approximates the recorded deferred fee amounts and is excluded from the table above because it is not material.
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and are based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect income taxes or any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on what management believes to be conservative judgments regarding expected future cash flows, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimated fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Since the fair values have been estimated as of June 30, 2014, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be significantly different.