iShares Trust Correspondence 2007-0503 re: SEC call on 2007-0417
May
4,
2007
VIA
EDGAR Correspondence
Ms.
Sheila Stout, Esq.
Division
of Investment Management
Securities
and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
iShares
Trust
(Securities Act File No. 333-92935; and
Investment Company Act File No. 811-09729)
Dear
Ms.
Stout:
This
letter is in response to comments provided by the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to certain filings made by iShares
Trust, a Delaware business trust (the “Trust”), on behalf of certain of its
series (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”). The comments were
provided in a telephone conversation on April 17, 2007. For your convenience,
your comments are set out below in italicized text and each comment is followed
by our response.
Comments:
(A) The
staff requested that the Trust include in future fidelity bond filings a
statement showing the amount of the single insured bond that the Trust would
have provided and maintained had the Trust not been named as an insured under
the joint bond that was filed with the SEC.
Response:
In the
future, the Trust will include this information in the fidelity bond filings
pursuant to Rule 17g-1(g)(1).
2. Form
N-PX.
(A) The
Trust’s Form N-PX, filed on August 31, 2006, was not in compliance with Form
N-PX’s general instruction Item F(2)(a). Item
F(2)(a)
requires the registrant’s principal executive officer to sign its Form N-PX. The
Trust’s treasurer signed the August 31, 2006
filing.
Response:
The
Trust’s Form N-PX, filed on August 31, 2006, has been signed by the Trust’s
Principal Executive Officer, and was re-filed on May 4, 2007. In the future,
the
Trust’s Principal Executive Officer will sign its Form N-PX.
3. Annual
Report.
(A) The
staff noted that two Funds included in the filing had distributed a return
of
capital to their shareholders. The staff requested
that
the Trust describe why, at the time distributions were made by the two Funds
showing a return of capital in their annual reports,
it
was not known or believed that the distributions contained a return of
capital.
Response:
It was
not known or believed that the distributions contained a return of capital
because, at the time the distributions were made, Fund income was sufficient
to
make distributions that did not contain a return of capital. Expenses from
the
June distribution date through the July 31st fiscal year-end reduced
distributable income for the fiscal year. As a result, the distributions for
the
year represented a return of capital as calculated at the July 31st fiscal
year-end.
(B) The
staff suggests
that the Trust disclose the circumstances and effects of fair valuation in
the
Funds’ annual reports.
Response:
Beginning with annual reports dated March 31, 2007, the Trust will disclose
the
circumstances and effects of fair valuation in the Funds’ annual
reports.
* * *
Should
you have any questions or comments concerning the responses to your questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 415-597-2779.
Sincerely,
/s/
Robert E. Zivnuska
Robert
E.
Zivnuska, Esq.
Counsel