Form 10-Q
(Mark one) | |||
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the quarterly period ended July 29, 2012 | |||
OR | |||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the transition period from to |
North Carolina | 56-2169715 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
370 Knollwood Street, | 27103 |
Winston-Salem, North Carolina | (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | 3 | ||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 4 | ||
Item 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 4 | |
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND | ||
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 23 | ||
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 53 | |
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 53 | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | 53 | ||
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 53 | |
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 53 | |
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 54 | |
Item 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 54 | |
Item 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 54 | |
Item 5. | OTHER INFORMATION | 54 | |
Item 6. | EXHIBITS | 54 | |
SIGNATURES | 55 | ||
EXHIBIT INDEX | 56 |
2
As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, Krispy Kreme, the Company, we, us and our refer to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References to fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 mean the fiscal years ending February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012, respectively.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) that relate to our plans, objectives, estimates and goals. Statements expressing expectations regarding our future and projections relating to products, sales, revenues, expenditures, costs and earnings are typical of such statements, and are made under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future economic performance, considering the information currently available to management. These statements are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. The words believe, may, could, will, should, would, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, objective, seek, strive or similar words, or the negative of these words, identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to:
the quality of Company and franchise store operations;
our ability, and our dependence on the ability of our franchisees, to execute on our and their business plans;
our relationships with our franchisees;
our ability to implement our international growth strategy;
our ability to implement our new domestic small shop operating model;
political, economic, currency and other risks associated with our international operations;
the price and availability of raw materials needed to produce doughnut mixes and other ingredients, and the price of motor fuel;
our relationships with wholesale customers;
our ability to protect our trademarks and trade secrets;
changes in customer preferences and perceptions;
risks associated with competition;
risks related to the food service industry, including food safety and protection of personal information;
compliance with government regulations relating to food products and franchising;
increased costs or other effects of new government regulations relating to healthcare benefits; and
other factors discussed in Krispy Kremes periodic reports and other information filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2012 (the 2012 Form 10-K).
All such factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and may be beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors or to assess the impact of each such factor on the Company. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
We caution you that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the facts, results, performance or achievements we have anticipated in such forward-looking statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Page | ||
Index to Financial Statements | ||
Consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 | 5 | |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 | 6 | |
Consolidated balance sheet as of July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 | 7 | |
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 | 8 | |
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders equity for the six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 | 9 | |
Notes to financial statements | 10 |
4
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 102,115 | $ | 97,952 | $ | 210,611 | $ | 202,552 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation | ||||||||||||||||
expense shown below) | 85,657 | 85,697 | 174,348 | 172,680 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 4,770 | 4,930 | 11,228 | 10,574 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 2,399 | 2,087 | 4,881 | 4,025 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges and lease termination costs | 55 | 301 | 86 | 545 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 9,234 | 4,937 | 20,068 | 14,728 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | 61 | 56 | 88 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (420 | ) | (414 | ) | (818 | ) | (891 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income (losses) of equity method franchisees | (53 | ) | 12 | (103 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of interest in equity method franchisee | - | 6,198 | - | 6,198 | ||||||||||||
Other non-operating income and (expense), net | 79 | 86 | 157 | 172 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 8,901 | 10,875 | 19,392 | 20,311 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 3,972 | 2,036 | 8,437 | 2,301 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 4,929 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 10,955 | $ | 18,010 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.25 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 4,929 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 10,955 | $ | 18,010 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | - | (27 | ) | - | 57 | |||||||||||
Less income taxes | - | 10 | - | (23 | ) | |||||||||||
- | (17 | ) | - | 34 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge | (16 | ) | (183 | ) | (14 | ) | (381 | ) | ||||||||
Less income taxes | 6 | 73 | 5 | 151 | ||||||||||||
(10 | ) | (110 | ) | (9 | ) | (230 | ) | |||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss | (10 | ) | (127 | ) | (9 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 4,919 | $ | 8,712 | $ | 10,946 | $ | 17,814 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
6
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET
(Unaudited)
July 29, | January 29, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 41,002 | $ | 44,319 | ||||
Receivables | 22,376 | 21,616 | ||||||
Receivables from equity method franchisees | 756 | 655 | ||||||
Inventories | 15,704 | 16,497 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 17,723 | 10,540 | ||||||
Other current assets | 7,319 | 3,613 | ||||||
Total current assets | 104,880 | 97,240 | ||||||
Property and equipment | 75,628 | 75,466 | ||||||
Investments in equity method franchisees | - | - | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | 23,776 | 23,776 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 107,172 | 129,053 | ||||||
Other assets | 11,044 | 9,413 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 322,500 | $ | 334,948 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 2,181 | $ | 2,224 | ||||
Accounts payable | 11,901 | 10,494 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 25,833 | 28,800 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 39,915 | 41,518 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 24,283 | 25,369 | ||||||
Other long-term obligations | 23,247 | 18,935 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, no par value | 352,522 | 377,539 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (345 | ) | (336 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (117,122 | ) | (128,077 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity | 235,055 | 249,126 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity | $ | 322,500 | $ | 334,948 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
7
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,955 | $ | 18,010 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation expense | 4,881 | 4,025 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 7,524 | 128 | ||||||
Accrued rent expense | 257 | 315 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 389 | 213 | ||||||
Gain on sale of interest in equity method franchisee | - | (6,198 | ) | |||||
Share-based compensation | 2,148 | 1,806 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | (73 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 202 | 218 | ||||||
Equity in (income) losses of equity method franchisees | 103 | (3 | ) | |||||
Other | (1,258 | ) | 1,283 | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | (693 | ) | 199 | |||||
Inventories | 793 | (3,921 | ) | |||||
Other current and non-current assets | (1,968 | ) | (1,093 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (1,859 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||
Other long-term obligations | 1,592 | (1,540 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 22,993 | 12,692 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (5,233 | ) | (4,146 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment | 49 | 19 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of interest in equity method franchisee | - | 7,723 | ||||||
Escrow deposit recovery | - | 1,000 | ||||||
Other investing activities | (24 | ) | 13 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities | (5,208 | ) | 4,609 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (1,100 | ) | (7,846 | ) | ||||
Deferred financing costs | (11 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | - | 1,036 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | 9 | - | ||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (20,000 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Net cash used for financing activities | (21,102 | ) | (6,947 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (3,317 | ) | 10,354 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 44,319 | 21,970 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 41,002 | $ | 32,324 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
8
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||
Common | Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Comprehensive | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Income (Loss) | Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 29, 2012 | 68,092 | $ | 377,539 | $ | (336 | ) | $ | (128,077 | ) | $ | 249,126 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) for the six months | |||||||||||||||||||
ended July 29, 2012 | (9 | ) | 10,955 | 10,946 | |||||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred tax asset related to the | |||||||||||||||||||
expiration of unexercised stock warrants | - | (7,174 | ) | (7,174 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants | 1 | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 22 | 2,148 | 2,148 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (3,113 | ) | (20,000 | ) | (20,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at July 29, 2012 | 65,002 | $ | 352,522 | $ | (345 | ) | $ | (117,122 | ) | $ | 235,055 | ||||||||
Balance at January 30, 2011 | 67,527 | $ | 370,808 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (294,346 | ) | $ | 76,428 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) for the six months | |||||||||||||||||||
ended July 31, 2011 | (196 | ) | 18,010 | 17,814 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 397 | 1,036 | 1,036 | ||||||||||||||||
Cancelation of restricted shares | (8 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 28 | 1,806 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | (16 | ) | (125 | ) | (125 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at July 31, 2011 | 67,928 | $ | 373,525 | $ | (230 | ) | $ | (276,336 | ) | $ | 96,959 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
9
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Accounting Policies
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (KKDI) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) are engaged in the sale of doughnuts and complementary products through Company-owned stores. The Company also derives revenue from franchise and development fees and royalties from franchisees. Additionally, the Company sells doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut-making equipment to franchisees.
Significant Accounting Policies
BASIS OF PRESENTATION. The consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2012 Form 10-K. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, accordingly, do not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) with respect to annual financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Companys accounting practices described in the 2012 Form 10-K, but have not been audited. In managements opinion, the financial statements include all adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Companys results of operations for the periods presented. The consolidated balance sheet data as of January 29, 2012 were derived from the Companys audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION. The financial statements include the accounts of KKDI and its subsidiaries, the most significant of which is KKDIs principal operating subsidiary, Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation.
Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence but which the Company does not control, and whose financial statements are not otherwise required to be consolidated, are accounted for using the equity method. These entities typically are 25% to 35% owned and are hereinafter sometimes referred to as Equity Method Franchisees.
EARNINGS PER SHARE. The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, computed using the treasury stock method. Such potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the vesting of currently unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units.
The following table sets forth amounts used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Numerator: net income | $ | 4,929 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 10,955 | $ | 18,010 | ||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding | 67,461 | 68,900 | 68,511 | 68,827 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants | 1,488 | 2,080 | 1,635 | 1,868 | ||||||||
Restricted stock and restricted stock units | 483 | 726 | 514 | 743 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares | ||||||||||||
outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares | 69,432 | 71,706 | 70,660 | 71,438 |
The sum of the quarterly earnings per share amounts does not necessarily equal earnings per share for the year to date.
Stock options and warrants with respect to 4.3 million and 6.5 million shares for the three months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011, respectively, as well as 174,000 unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested restricted stock units for the three months ended July 29, 2012, have been excluded from the computation of the number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.
10
Stock options and warrants with respect to 3.3 million and 7.3 million shares, as well as 87,000 and 67,000 unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested restricted stock units, have been excluded from the computation of the number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share for the six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011, respectively, because their inclusion would be antidilutive.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) related to fair value measurements. The ASU clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013; such adoption had no effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting standards which require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders equity. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in addition to the consolidated statement of income.
Note 2 Segment Information
The Companys reportable segments are Company Stores, Domestic Franchise, International Franchise and KK Supply Chain. The Company Stores segment is comprised of the stores operated by the Company. These stores sell doughnuts and complementary products through both on-premises and wholesale sales channels, although some stores serve only one of these distribution channels. The Domestic Franchise and International Franchise segments consist of the Companys franchise operations. Under the terms of franchise agreements, domestic and international franchisees pay royalties and fees to the Company in return for the use of the Krispy Kreme name and ongoing brand and operational support. Expenses for these segments include costs to recruit new franchisees, to assist in store openings, to support franchisee operations and marketing efforts, as well as allocated corporate costs. The majority of the ingredients and materials used by Company stores are purchased from the KK Supply Chain segment, which supplies doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut making equipment to both Company and franchisee-owned stores.
All intercompany sales by the KK Supply Chain segment to the Company Stores segment are at prices intended to reflect an arms-length transfer price and are eliminated in consolidation. Operating income for the Company Stores segment does not include any profit earned by the KK Supply Chain segment on sales of doughnut mix and other items to the Company Stores segment; such profit is included in KK Supply Chain operating income.
11
The following table presents the results of operations of the Companys operating segments for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011. Segment operating income is consolidated operating income before unallocated general and administrative expenses and impairment charges and lease termination costs.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 69,338 | $ | 65,992 | $ | 142,679 | $ | 135,467 | ||||||||
Domestic Franchise | 2,430 | 2,349 | 5,063 | 4,718 | ||||||||||||
International Franchise | 5,781 | 5,352 | 11,808 | 10,988 | ||||||||||||
KK Supply Chain: | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 51,465 | 50,341 | 105,250 | 104,224 | ||||||||||||
Less intersegment sales elimination | (26,899 | ) | (26,082 | ) | (54,189 | ) | (52,845 | ) | ||||||||
External KK Supply Chain revenues | 24,566 | 24,259 | 51,061 | 51,379 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 102,115 | $ | 97,952 | $ | 210,611 | $ | 202,552 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 338 | $ | (1,049 | ) | $ | 3,286 | $ | 1,125 | |||||||
Domestic Franchise | 1,329 | 216 | 2,898 | 1,363 | ||||||||||||
International Franchise | 4,162 | 3,409 | 8,656 | 7,580 | ||||||||||||
KK Supply Chain | 8,392 | 7,745 | 16,869 | 16,087 | ||||||||||||
Total segment operating income | 14,221 | 10,321 | 31,709 | 26,155 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated general and administrative expenses | (4,932 | ) | (5,083 | ) | (11,555 | ) | (10,882 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment charges and lease termination costs | (55 | ) | (301 | ) | (86 | ) | (545 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 9,234 | $ | 4,937 | $ | 20,068 | $ | 14,728 | ||||||||
Depreciation expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 1,944 | $ | 1,689 | $ | 4,041 | $ | 3,226 | ||||||||
Domestic Franchise | 55 | 55 | 110 | 110 | ||||||||||||
International Franchise | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||
KK Supply Chain | 235 | 188 | 397 | 377 | ||||||||||||
Corporate administration | 162 | 153 | 327 | 308 | ||||||||||||
Total depreciation expense | $ | 2,399 | $ | 2,087 | $ | 4,881 | $ | 4,025 |
Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures is not presented as such information is not used in measuring segment performance or allocating resources among segments.
Note 3 Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon managements expectation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized for which payment has been deferred, or expenses which have been deducted in the Companys tax returns but which have not yet been recognized as an expense in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets generally represent tax deductions or credits that will be reflected in future tax returns for which the Company has already recorded a tax benefit in its consolidated financial statements.
The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the income tax benefits is more likely than not.
The Company had valuation allowances against deferred tax assets of $10.7 million at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012, representing the portion of such deferred tax assets which, as of such dates, management estimated would not be realized in future periods. Under GAAP, future realization of deferred tax assets is evaluated under a more likely than not standard. Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained valuation allowances on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Companys deferred income tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2009.
12
The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Companys pretax profit increased to $30.4 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Companys sale of its 30% interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (KK Mexico), the Companys franchisee in Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Companys deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Companys deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
The remaining valuation allowance of $10.7 million at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 represents the portion of the Companys deferred tax assets management estimates will not be realized in the future. Such assets are associated principally with state net operating loss and state credit carryforwards having relatively short carryforward periods which are forecasted to expire unused, as well as federal foreign tax credits and federal jobs credit carryforwards forecasted to expire unused.
The realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent on future events. While management believes its forecast of future taxable income is reasonable, actual results inevitably will vary from managements forecasts. Such variances could result in adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in future periods, and such adjustments could be material to the financial statements.
In fiscal 2008, the Company issued warrants to acquire shares of the Companys common stock at a price of $12.21 per share in connection with the settlement of certain litigation. Such warrants expired worthless in March 2012 and, accordingly, the Company will not receive any income tax deduction related to them. Deferred tax assets at January 29, 2012 included approximately $7.2 million related to these warrants. In accordance with GAAP, the write-off of this deferred tax asset was charged to common stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and reduced the Companys pool of windfall tax benefits.
Note 4 Receivables
The components of receivables are as follows:
July 29, | January 29, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||
Wholesale customers | $ | 9,804 | $ | 10,169 | ||||
Unaffiliated franchisees | 11,526 | 11,405 | ||||||
Other receivables | 995 | 1,015 | ||||||
Current portion of notes receivable | 212 | 185 | ||||||
22,537 | 22,774 | |||||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts: | ||||||||
Wholesale customers | (125 | ) | (349 | ) | ||||
Unaffiliated franchisees | (36 | ) | (809 | ) | ||||
(161 | ) | (1,158 | ) | |||||
$ | 22,376 | $ | 21,616 | |||||
Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees (Note 6): | ||||||||
Trade | $ | 756 | $ | 655 |
13
The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1,158 | $ | 1,334 | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | (14 | ) | 13 | |||||
Net recoveries (chargeoffs) | (983 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 161 | $ | 1,307 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables from Equity Method Franchisees: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | (59 | ) | - | |||||
Net recoveries (chargeoffs) | 59 | - | ||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
The Company also has notes receivable from franchisees which are summarized in the following table. These balances are included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. | ||||||||
July 29, | January 29, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Notes receivable: | ||||||||
Notes receivable from franchisees | $ | 586 | $ | 777 | ||||
Less portion due within one year included in receivables | (212 | ) | (185 | ) | ||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | (68 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
$ | 306 | $ | 524 | |||||
The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to notes receivable are summarized as follows: | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 68 | $ | 538 | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | - | (412 | ) | |||||
Net recoveries (chargeoffs) | - | (58 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 68 | $ | 68 |
In addition to the foregoing notes receivable, the Company had promissory notes totaling approximately $3.3 million at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 representing principally royalties and fees due to the Company which, as a result of doubt about their collection, the Company had not yet recorded as revenues. No payments were required to be made currently on any of these amounts. During the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $375,000 of previously unrecognized revenues related to KK Mexico which were received on May 5, 2011 in connection with the Companys sale of its 30% equity interest in the franchisee, as more fully described in Note 6. During the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company also reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 related to KK Mexico; such note also was paid in full on May 5, 2011.
14
Note 5 Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows:
July 29, | January 29, | |||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Raw materials | $ | 5,331 | $ | 5,306 | ||
Work in progress | 38 | 89 | ||||
Finished goods and purchased merchandise | 10,335 | 11,102 | ||||
$ | 15,704 | $ | 16,497 |
Note 6 Investments in Franchisees
As of July 29, 2012, the Company had investments in three franchisees. These investments have been made in the form of capital contributions and, in certain instances, loans evidenced by promissory notes. These investments are reflected as Investments in equity method franchisees in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Companys financial exposures related to franchisees in which the Company has an investment are summarized in the tables below.
July 29, 2012 | |||||||||||||
Company | Investment | ||||||||||||
Ownership | and | Loan | |||||||||||
Percentage | Advances | Receivables | Guarantees | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Kremeworks, LLC | 25.0 | % | $ | 900 | $ | 297 | $ | 593 | |||||
Kremeworks Canada, LP | 24.5 | % | - | 22 | - | ||||||||
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC | 35.3 | % | - | 437 | 1,789 | ||||||||
900 | 756 | $ | 2,382 | ||||||||||
Less: reserves and allowances | (900 | ) | - | ||||||||||
$ | - | $ | 756 | ||||||||||
January 29, 2012 | |||||||||||||
Company | Investment | ||||||||||||
Ownership | and | Loan | |||||||||||
Percentage | Advances | Receivables | Guarantees | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Kremeworks, LLC | 25.0 | % | $ | 900 | $ | 308 | $ | 739 | |||||
Kremeworks Canada, LP | 24.5 | % | - | 20 | - | ||||||||
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC | 35.3 | % | - | 327 | 1,946 | ||||||||
900 | 655 | $ | 2,685 | ||||||||||
Less: reserves and allowances | (900 | ) | - | ||||||||||
$ | - | $ | 655 |
The Company has guaranteed loans from third-party financial institutions on behalf of certain Equity Method Franchisees, primarily to assist the franchisees in obtaining third-party financing. The loans are collateralized by certain assets of the franchisee, generally the Krispy Kreme store and related equipment. The loan guarantee amounts represent the portion of the principal amount outstanding under the related loan that is subject to the Companys guarantee.
The Company has a 25% interest in Kremeworks, LLC (Kremeworks), and has guaranteed 20% of the outstanding principal balance of certain of Kremeworks bank indebtedness, which, as amended, matures in October 2012. The aggregate amount of such indebtedness was approximately $3.0 million at July 29, 2012.
15
Current liabilities at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 include accruals for potential payments under loan guarantees of approximately $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, related to Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC (KKSF). The underlying indebtedness related to approximately $1.6 million of the Companys KKSF guarantee exposure matured by its terms in October 2009. Such maturity has been extended on a month-to-month basis pursuant to an informal agreement between KKSF and the lender. There was no liability reflected in the financial statements for the guarantee of Kremeworks debt because the Company did not believe it was probable that the Company would be required to perform under that guarantee.
On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in KK Mexico to KK Mexicos majority shareholder. The Company received cash proceeds of approximately $7.7 million in exchange for its equity interest and, after deducting costs of the transaction, realized a gain of approximately $6.2 million on the disposition. After provision for payment of Mexican income taxes related to the sale of approximately $1.5 million, the Company reported an after tax gain on the disposition of approximately $4.7 million in the quarter ending July 31, 2011. The net after tax proceeds of the sale of approximately $6.2 million were used to prepay a portion of the outstanding balance of the 2011 Term Loan.
In connection with the Companys sale of its KK Mexico interest, KK Mexico paid approximately $765,000 of amounts due to the Company which were evidenced by promissory notes, relating principally to past due royalties and fees due to the Company. As a consequence of this payment, in the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 and recorded royalty and franchise fee income of approximately $280,000 and $95,000 respectively. The reserve had previously been established, and the royalties and fees had not previously been recognized as revenue, because of uncertainty surrounding the collection of these amounts.
Note 7 Shareholders Equity
Share-Based Compensation for Employees and Directors
On June 12, 2012, the Companys shareholders approved the Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2012 Plan). The 2012 Plan, the term of which expires on June 11, 2022, replaces the Companys 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, which expired on June 30, 2012. The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock awards, performance unit awards, performance share awards, stock appreciation rights, and phantom stock awards.
The 2012 Plan limits the issuance of shares of Company common stock under the 2012 Plan to approximately 3,550,000 shares. Any shares that are subject to options or stock appreciation rights awarded under the 2012 Plan will be counted against the 2012 Plan limit as one share for every one share granted, and any shares that are subject to 2012 Plan awards other than options or stock appreciation rights will be counted against this limit as one and thirty three-hundredths (1.33) shares for every one share granted. The 2012 Plan provides that options may be granted with exercise prices not less than the closing sale price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based payment (SBP) awards based on their fair values. The fair value of SBP awards for which employees and directors render the requisite service necessary for the award to vest is recognized over the related vesting period.
The aggregate cost of SBP awards charged to earnings for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 is set forth in the following table. The Company did not realize any excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units during any of the periods.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Costs charged to earnings related to: | ||||||||||||
Stock options | $ | 234 | $ | 395 | $ | 1,061 | $ | 770 | ||||
Restricted stock and restricted stock units | 537 | 518 | 1,087 | 1,036 | ||||||||
Total costs | $ | 771 | $ | 913 | $ | 2,148 | $ | 1,806 | ||||
Costs included in: | ||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses | $ | 357 | $ | 483 | $ | 727 | $ | 965 | ||||
General and administrative expenses | 414 | 430 | 1,421 | 841 | ||||||||
Total costs | $ | 771 | $ | 913 | $ | 2,148 | $ | 1,806 |
16
Repurchases of Common Stock
On March 27, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Companys common stock. The Companys lenders consented to such repurchases through June 30, 2013, subject to certain conditions, as described in Note 12 to the Companys consolidated financial statements included in the 2012 Form 10-K.
The Company generally permits holders of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards to satisfy their obligations to reimburse the Company for the minimum required statutory withholding taxes arising from the vesting of such awards by surrendering vested common shares in lieu of reimbursing the Company in cash.
The following table summarizes repurchases of common stock for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Common | Common | |||||||||
Shares | Stock | Shares | Stock | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Shares repurchased under share repurchase authorization | 2,858 | $ | 18,146 | - | $ | - | ||||
Shares surrendered in reimbursement for withholding taxes | - | - | 3 | 68 | ||||||
2,858 | $ | 18,146 | 3 | $ | 68 | |||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Common | Common | |||||||||
Shares | Stock | Shares | Stock | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Shares repurchased under share repurchase authorization | 3,113 | $ | 20,000 | - | $ | - | ||||
Shares surrendered in reimbursement for withholding taxes | - | - | 16 | 125 | ||||||
3,113 | $ | 20,000 | 16 | $ | 125 |
The Company completed the share repurchase during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, purchasing 2,858,000 shares at an average cost of $6.35. For the six months ended July 29, 2012, the Company purchased 3,113,000 shares at an average cost of $6.42 per share, for a total cost of $20 million.
17
Note 8 Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs
The components of impairment charges and lease termination costs are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Lease termination costs | 55 | 301 | 86 | 545 | ||||||||
Total impairment charges and lease termination costs | $ | 55 | $ | 301 | $ | 86 | $ | 545 |
The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Companys annual budgeting process. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values.
Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities are estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals and from settlements with landlords.
The transactions reflected in the accrual for lease termination costs are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 694 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 709 | $ | 1,995 | ||||||||
Provision for lease termination costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to previously recorded provisions resulting | ||||||||||||||||
from settlements with lessors and adjustments of previous estimates | 47 | 280 | 70 | 492 | ||||||||||||
Accretion of discount | 8 | 21 | 16 | 53 | ||||||||||||
Total provision | 55 | 301 | 86 | 545 | ||||||||||||
Payments on unexpired leases, including settlements with lessors | (70 | ) | (439 | ) | (116 | ) | (1,388 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 679 | $ | 1,152 | $ | 679 | $ | 1,152 |
Note 9 Fair Value Measurements
The accounting standards for fair value measurements define fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
18
The accounting standards for fair value measurements establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012.
July 29, 2012 | |||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||
401(k) mirror plan assets | $ | 1,601 | $ | - | $ | - | |||
Agricultural commodity futures contracts | 57 | - | - | ||||||
Interest rate derivative | - | 30 | - | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,658 | $ | 30 | $ | - | |||
January 29, 2012 | |||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||
401(k) mirror plan assets | $ | 1,039 | $ | - | $ | - | |||
Agricultural commodity futures contracts | 21 | - | - | ||||||
Interest rate derivative | - | 53 | - | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,060 | $ | 53 | $ | - |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
There were no nonrecurring fair value measurements recorded during the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011.
19
Fair Values of Financial Instruments at the Balance Sheet Dates
The carrying values and approximate fair values of certain financial instruments as of July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 were as follows:
July 29, 2012 | January 29, 2012 | |||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 41,002 | $ | 41,002 | $ | 44,319 | $ | 44,319 | ||||
Receivables | 22,376 | 22,376 | 21,616 | 21,616 | ||||||||
Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees | 756 | 756 | 655 | 655 | ||||||||
Agricultural commodity futures contracts | 57 | 57 | 21 | 21 | ||||||||
Interest rate derivatives | 30 | 30 | 53 | 53 | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | 11,901 | 11,901 | 10,494 | 10,494 | ||||||||
Long-term debt (including current maturities) | 26,464 | 26,464 | 27,593 | 27,593 |
The fair value of the term loan is estimated based on an indicative bid price. As such, the term loan is classified within Level 2, as defined under GAAP.
Note 10 Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its derivative instruments. The Company mitigates this risk of nonperformance by dealing with highly rated counterparties.
Additional disclosure about the fair value of derivative instruments is included in Note 9.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company is exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of ingredients of its products, of which flour, sugar and shortening are the most significant. In order to bring greater stability to the cost of ingredients, from time to time the Company purchases exchange-traded commodity futures contracts, and options on such contracts, for raw materials which are ingredients of its products or which are components of such ingredients, including wheat and soybean oil. The Company is also exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of gasoline used by its delivery vehicles. To mitigate the risk of fluctuations in the price of its gasoline purchases, the Company may purchase exchange-traded commodity futures contracts and options on such contracts. The difference between the cost, if any, and the fair value of commodity derivatives is reflected in earnings because the Company has not designated any of these instruments as hedges. Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transactions in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating commodity prices. The settlement of commodity derivative contracts is reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows as a cash flow from operating activities. At July 29, 2012, the Company had commodity derivatives with an aggregate contract volume of 30,000 bushels of wheat. Other than the requirement to meet minimum margin requirements with respect to the commodity derivatives, there are no collateral requirements related to such contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
All of the borrowings under the Companys secured credit facilities bear interest at variable rates based upon either the lenders prime rate, the Fed funds rate or LIBOR. The interest cost of the Companys debt may be affected by changes in these short-term interest rates and increases in those rates may adversely affect the Companys results of operations.
On March 3, 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate derivative contract having an aggregate notional principal amount of $17.5 million. The derivative contract entitles the Company to receive from the counterparty the excess, if any, of the three-month LIBOR rate over 3.00% for each of the calendar quarters in the period beginning April 2012 and ending December 2015. The Company is accounting for this derivative contract as a cash flow hedge.
20
Quantitative Summary of Derivative Positions and Their Effect on Results of Operations
The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012:
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
July 29, | January 29, | |||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Balance Sheet Location | 2012 | 2012 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Agricultural commodity futures contracts | Other current assets | $ | 57 | $ | 21 | |||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
July 29, | January 29, | |||||||
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge | Balance Sheet Location | 2012 | 2012 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Interest rate derivative | Other assets | $ | 30 | $ | 53 |
21
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011, was as follows:
Amount of Derivative Gain or (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized in Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging | Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) | July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||
Instruments | Recognized in Income | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Agricultural commodity
futures contracts |
Direct operating expenses | $ | 1,066 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | 1,117 | $ | (598 | ) | |||||
Gasoline commodity
futures contracts |
Direct operating expenses | - | (22 | ) | - | (9 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,066 | $ | (151 | ) | $ | 1,117 | $ | (607 | ) |
Amortization of Derivative Asset | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized in Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow | Location of Amortization of Derivative | July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||
Hedge | Asset Recognized in Income | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivative | Interest expense | $ | (7 | ) | $ | - | $ | (9 | ) | $ | - |
Amount
of Derivative Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow | Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) | July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
Hedge | Recognized in OCI | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivative | Change in fair value of derivative | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (183 | ) | $ | (14 | ) | $ | (381 | ) | |||||
Less - income tax effect | 6 | 73 | 5 | 151 | ||||||||||||||
Net change in amount recognized in OCI | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (110 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (230 | ) |
22
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
Comparability of Results of Operations
The Companys net income and earnings per share for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2013 are not comparable to the corresponding amounts for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012 as a result of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and the resulting increase in income tax expense in periods after the reversal. See Results of Operations - Three Months Ended July 29, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended July 31, 2011 - Provision for Income Taxes and Results of Operations - Six Months Ended July 29, 2012 Compared to Six Months Ended July 31, 2011 - Provision for Income Taxes below.
23
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth operating metrics for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in Same Store Sales (on-premises sales only): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company stores | 5.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 3.7 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Domestic Franchise stores | 6.7 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
International Franchise stores | (12.7 | ) | % | (3.1 | ) | % | (10.3 | ) | % | (3.7 | ) | % | ||||||||
International Franchise stores, in constant dollars(1) | (10.0 | ) | % | (11.7 | ) | % | (8.7 | ) | % | (10.7 | ) | % | ||||||||
Change in Same Store Customer Count - Company stores | ||||||||||||||||||||
(retail sales only) | 6.6 | % | (2.9 | ) | % | 3.8 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
Average guest check - Company stores (retail sales only) | $ | 7.43 | $ | 7.49 | $ | 7.27 | $ | 7.28 | ||||||||||||
Wholesale Metrics (Company stores only): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average weekly number of doors served: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants | 5,586 | 5,876 | 5,595 | 5,871 | ||||||||||||||||
Convenience stores | 4,470 | 4,846 | 4,535 | 4,996 | ||||||||||||||||
Average weekly sales per door: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants | $ | 322 | $ | 297 | $ | 319 | $ | 294 | ||||||||||||
Convenience stores | 246 | 227 | 247 | 221 | ||||||||||||||||
Systemwide Sales (in thousands):(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company stores | $ | 68,710 | $ | 65,476 | $ | 141,515 | $ | 134,503 | ||||||||||||
Domestic Franchise stores | 69,532 | 64,829 | 141,504 | 131,526 | ||||||||||||||||
International Franchise stores | 102,437 | 95,669 | 207,357 | 187,260 | ||||||||||||||||
International Franchise stores, in constant dollars(3) | 102,437 | 92,484 | 207,357 | 183,679 | ||||||||||||||||
Average Weekly Sales Per Store (in thousands):(4) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company stores: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Factory stores: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commissaries wholesale | $ | 179.9 | $ | 203.2 | $ | 180.9 | $ | 200.8 | ||||||||||||
Dual-channel stores: | ||||||||||||||||||||
On-premises | 30.4 | 28.9 | 32.9 | 31.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale | 45.6 | 46.7 | 45.5 | 46.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 76.0 | 75.6 | 78.4 | 78.5 | ||||||||||||||||
On-premises only stores | 32.9 | 30.1 | 34.2 | 32.0 | ||||||||||||||||
All factory stores | 68.5 | 67.8 | 70.5 | 69.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Satellite stores | 18.5 | 19.3 | 19.9 | 19.8 | ||||||||||||||||
All stores | 57.6 | 58.1 | 59.5 | 60.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Franchise stores: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Factory stores | $ | 46.7 | $ | 43.0 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 43.9 | ||||||||||||
Satellite stores | 16.6 | 15.3 | 17.3 | 15.0 | ||||||||||||||||
International Franchise stores: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Factory stores | $ | 39.8 | $ | 44.0 | $ | 40.6 | $ | 45.0 | ||||||||||||
Satellite stores | 11.1 | 11.0 | 11.4 | 10.4 |
24
(1) | Represents the change in International Franchise same store sales computed by reconverting franchise store sales in each foreign currency to U.S. dollars at a constant rate of exchange for each period. | |
(2) | Excludes sales among Company and franchise stores. | |
(3) | Represents International Franchise store sales computed by reconverting International Franchise store sales for the three and six months ended July 31, 2011 to U.S. dollars based upon the weighted average of the exchange rates prevailing in the three and six months ended July 29, 2012. | |
(4) | Includes sales between Company and franchise stores. | |
(5) | Metrics for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 include only stores open at the respective period end. |
The change in same store sales is computed by dividing the aggregate on-premises sales (including fundraising sales) during the current year period for all stores which had been open for more than 56 consecutive weeks during the current year (but only to the extent such sales occurred in the 57th or later week of each stores operation) by the aggregate on-premises sales of such stores for the comparable weeks in the preceding year. Once a store has been open for at least 57 consecutive weeks, its sales are included in the computation of same store sales for all subsequent periods. In the event a store is closed temporarily (for example, for remodeling) and has no sales during one or more weeks, such stores sales for the comparable weeks during the earlier or subsequent period are excluded from the same store sales computation. The change in same store customer count is similarly computed, but is based upon the number of retail transactions reported in the Companys point-of-sale system.
For wholesale sales, average weekly number of doors represents the average number of customer locations to which product deliveries were made during a week, and average weekly sales per door represents the average weekly sales to each such location.
Systemwide sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, include sales by both Company and franchise stores. The Company believes systemwide sales data are useful in assessing the overall performance of the Krispy Kreme brand and, ultimately, the performance of the Company. The Companys consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein include sales by Company stores, sales to franchisees by the KK Supply Chain business segment, and royalties and fees received from franchise stores based on their sales, but exclude sales by franchise stores to their customers.
The following table sets forth data about the number of systemwide stores as of July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011.
July 29, | July 31, | |||
2012 | 2011 | |||
Number of Stores Open At Period End: | ||||
Company stores: | ||||
Factory: | ||||
Commissaries | 7 | 6 | ||
Dual-channel stores | 36 | 35 | ||
On-premises only stores | 30 | 29 | ||
Satellite stores | 20 | 18 | ||
Total Company stores | 93 | 88 | ||
Domestic Franchise stores: | ||||
Factory stores | 101 | 103 | ||
Satellite stores | 40 | 45 | ||
Total Domestic Franchise stores | 141 | 148 | ||
International Franchise stores: | ||||
Factory stores | 118 | 111 | ||
Satellite stores | 359 | 322 | ||
Total International Franchise stores | 477 | 433 | ||
Total systemwide stores | 711 | 669 |
25
The following table sets forth data about the number of store operating weeks for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||
Store Operating Weeks: | ||||||||
Company stores: | ||||||||
Factory stores: | ||||||||
Commissaries | 91 | 78 | 182 | 156 | ||||
Dual-channel stores | 468 | 455 | 936 | 910 | ||||
On-premises only stores | 384 | 377 | 761 | 754 | ||||
Satellite stores | 260 | 226 | 520 | 425 | ||||
Domestic Franchise stores:(1) | ||||||||
Factory stores | 1,309 | 1,321 | 2,610 | 2,634 | ||||
Satellite stores | 520 | 542 | 1,039 | 1,063 | ||||
International Franchise stores:(1) | ||||||||
Factory stores | 1,323 | 1,157 | 2,623 | 2,302 | ||||
Satellite stores | 4,494 | 4,043 | 8,723 | 7,897 |
(1) | Metrics for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 include only stores open at the respective period end. |
The following table sets forth the types and locations of Company stores as of July 29, 2012.
Number of Company Stores | ||||||||
Factory | ||||||||
State | Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Total | ||||
Alabama | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
District of Columbia | - | 1 | - | 1 | ||||
Florida | 4 | - | - | 4 | ||||
Georgia | 6 | 4 | - | 10 | ||||
Indiana | 3 | 1 | - | 4 | ||||
Kansas | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
Kentucky | 3 | 1 | - | 4 | ||||
Louisiana | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Maryland | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||
Michigan | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
Mississippi | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Missouri | 4 | - | - | 4 | ||||
New York | - | - | 1 | 1 | ||||
North Carolina | 12 | 4 | - | 16 | ||||
Ohio | 6 | - | - | 6 | ||||
South Carolina | 3 | 3 | - | 6 | ||||
Tennessee | 9 | 3 | - | 12 | ||||
Texas | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
Virginia | 6 | 2 | - | 8 | ||||
West Virginia | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Total | 73 | 19 | 1 | 93 |
26
Changes in the number of Company stores during the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 are summarized in the table below.
Number of Company Stores | |||||||||
Factory | |||||||||
Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Total | ||||||
Three months ended July 29, 2012 | |||||||||
April 29, 2012 | 72 | 19 | 1 | 92 | |||||
Opened | 1 | - | - | 1 | |||||
Closed | - | - | - | - | |||||
July 29, 2012 | 73 | 19 | 1 | 93 | |||||
Six months ended July 29, 2012 | |||||||||
January 29, 2012 | 72 | 19 | 1 | 92 | |||||
Opened | 1 | - | - | 1 | |||||
Closed | - | - | - | - | |||||
July 29, 2012 | 73 | 19 | 1 | 93 | |||||
Three months ended July 31, 2011 | |||||||||
May 1, 2011 | 69 | 16 | 1 | 86 | |||||
Opened | - | 2 | - | 2 | |||||
Closed | - | - | - | - | |||||
Change in store type | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | ||||
July 31, 2011 | 70 | 17 | 1 | 88 | |||||
Six months ended July 31, 2011 | |||||||||
January 30, 2011 | 69 | 15 | 1 | 85 | |||||
Opened | - | 3 | - | 3 | |||||
Closed | - | - | - | - | |||||
Change in store type | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | ||||
July 31, 2011 | 70 | 17 | 1 | 88 |
27
The following table sets forth the types and locations of domestic franchise stores as of July 29, 2012.
Number of Domestic Franchise Stores | ||||||||
Factory | ||||||||
State | Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Total | ||||
Alabama | 5 | 3 | - | 8 | ||||
Arizona | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Arkansas | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||
California | 14 | 1 | 4 | 19 | ||||
Colorado | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||
Connecticut | 1 | - | 3 | 4 | ||||
Florida | 12 | 6 | 1 | 19 | ||||
Georgia | 6 | 4 | - | 10 | ||||
Hawaii | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Idaho | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Illinois | 4 | - | - | 4 | ||||
Iowa | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Louisiana | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
Mississippi | 2 | 1 | - | 3 | ||||
Missouri | 2 | 1 | - | 3 | ||||
Nebraska | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | ||||
Nevada | 3 | - | 2 | 5 | ||||
New Jersey | - | 1 | - | 1 | ||||
New Mexico | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | ||||
North Carolina | 7 | 1 | - | 8 | ||||
Oklahoma | 3 | - | - | 3 | ||||
Oregon | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||
Pennsylvania | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||||
South Carolina | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | ||||
Tennessee | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||
Texas | 7 | 2 | - | 9 | ||||
Utah | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||
Washington | 6 | - | - | 6 | ||||
Wisconsin | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | ||||
Total | 101 | 26 | 14 | 141 |
28
Changes in the number of domestic franchise stores during the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 are summarized in the table below.
Number of Domestic Franchise Stores | ||||||||||||
Factory | ||||||||||||
Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Total | |||||||||
Three months ended July 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||
April 29, 2012 | 102 | 26 | 14 | 142 | ||||||||
Opened | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
Closed | (1 | ) | - | - | (1 | ) | ||||||
July 29, 2012 | 101 | 26 | 14 | 141 | ||||||||
Six months ended July 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||
January 29, 2012 | 102 | 25 | 15 | 142 | ||||||||
Opened | 1 | 2 | - | 3 | ||||||||
Closed | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
July 29, 2012 | 101 | 26 | 14 | 141 | ||||||||
Three months ended July 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
May 1, 2011 | 101 | 19 | 25 | 145 | ||||||||
Opened | 2 | 3 | - | 5 | ||||||||
Closed | - | - | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
July 31, 2011 | 103 | 22 | 23 | 148 | ||||||||
Six months ended July 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
January 30, 2011 | 102 | 17 | 25 | 144 | ||||||||
Opened | 2 | 6 | 1 | 9 | ||||||||
Closed | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
July 31, 2011 | 103 | 22 | 23 | 148 |
29
The types and locations of international franchise stores as of July 29, 2012 are summarized in the table below.
Number of International Franchise Stores | ||||||||||||
Fiscal | ||||||||||||
Year First | Factory | |||||||||||
Country | Store Opened | Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Kiosks | Total | ||||||
Australia | 2004 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 19 | ||||||
Bahrain | 2009 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 2 | ||||||
Canada | 2002 | 4 | - | 2 | - | 6 | ||||||
China | 2010 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 3 | ||||||
Dominican Republic | 2011 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 2 | ||||||
Indonesia | 2007 | 3 | - | 3 | 6 | 12 | ||||||
Japan | 2007 | 16 | - | 21 | - | 37 | ||||||
Kuwait | 2007 | 3 | - | 5 | 10 | 18 | ||||||
Lebanon | 2009 | 2 | - | 6 | 1 | 9 | ||||||
Malaysia | 2010 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | ||||||
Mexico | 2004 | 7 | 1 | 24 | 45 | 77 | ||||||
Philippines | 2007 | 5 | 3 | 22 | 4 | 34 | ||||||
Puerto Rico | 2009 | 4 | - | - | - | 4 | ||||||
Qatar | 2008 | 2 | - | - | - | 2 | ||||||
Saudi Arabia | 2008 | 9 | - | 63 | 20 | 92 | ||||||
South Korea | 2005 | 33 | - | 27 | - | 60 | ||||||
Thailand | 2011 | 3 | 2 | - | - | 5 | ||||||
Turkey | 2010 | 1 | - | 9 | 4 | 14 | ||||||
United Arab Emirates | 2008 | 2 | - | 14 | 5 | 21 | ||||||
United Kingdom | 2004 | 13 | 3 | 27 | 9 | 52 | ||||||
Total | 118 | 11 | 234 | 114 | 477 |
30
Changes in the number of international franchise stores during the three and six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011 are summarized in the table below.
Number of International Franchise Stores | ||||||||||||||
Factory | ||||||||||||||
Stores | Hot Shops | Fresh Shops | Kiosks | Total | ||||||||||
Three months ended July 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
April 29, 2012 | 115 | 11 | 223 | 109 | 458 | |||||||||
Opened | 4 | - | 14 | 6 | 24 | |||||||||
Closed | - | - | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
Change in store type | (1 | ) | - | 1 | - | - | ||||||||
July 29, 2012 | 118 | 11 | 234 | 114 | 477 | |||||||||
Six months ended July 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
January 29, 2012 | 118 | 11 | 226 | 105 | 460 | |||||||||
Opened | 4 | - | 28 | 12 | 44 | |||||||||
Closed | (3 | ) | - | (14 | ) | (10 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||
Change in store type | (1 | ) | - | (6 | ) | 7 | - | |||||||
July 29, 2012 | 118 | 11 | 234 | 114 | 477 | |||||||||
Three months ended July 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
May 1, 2011 | 109 | 11 | 223 | 78 | 421 | |||||||||
Opened | 3 | - | 9 | 5 | 17 | |||||||||
Closed | (1 | ) | - | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||
July 31, 2011 | 111 | 11 | 229 | 82 | 433 | |||||||||
Six months ended July 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
January 30, 2011 | 106 | 11 | 222 | 78 | 417 | |||||||||
Opened | 7 | - | 16 | 10 | 33 | |||||||||
Closed | (2 | ) | - | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||
July 31, 2011 | 111 | 11 | 229 | 82 | 433 |
Three months ended July 29, 2012 compared to three months ended July 31, 2011
Overview
Total revenues rose by 4.3% to $102.1 million for the three months ended July 29, 2012 compared to $98.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2011.
Consolidated operating income increased to $9.2 million in the three months ended July 29, 2012 from $4.9 million in the three months ended July 31, 2011. Consolidated net income was $4.9 million in the three months ended July 29, 2012 compared to $8.8 million in the three months ended July 31, 2011. The Companys net income and earnings per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2013 are not comparable to the corresponding amounts for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 as a result of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and the resulting increase in income tax expense after the reversal; see Provision for Income Taxes below.
Revenues by business segment (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
31
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Revenues by business segment: | ||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 69,338 | $ | 65,992 | ||||||
Domestic Franchise | 2,430 | 2,349 | ||||||||
International Franchise | 5,781 | 5,352 | ||||||||
KK Supply Chain: | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 51,465 | 50,341 | ||||||||
Less - intersegment sales elimination | (26,899 | ) | (26,082 | ) | ||||||
External KK Supply Chain revenues | 24,566 | 24,259 | ||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 102,115 | $ | 97,952 | ||||||
Segment revenues as a percentage of total revenues: | ||||||||||
Company Stores | 67.9 | % | 67.4 | % | ||||||
Domestic Franchise | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||||
International Franchise | 5.7 | 5.5 | ||||||||
KK Supply Chain (external sales) | 24.1 | 24.8 | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Operating income (loss): | ||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 338 | $ | (1,049 | ) | |||||
Domestic Franchise | 1,329 | 216 | ||||||||
International Franchise | 4,162 | 3,409 | ||||||||
KK Supply Chain | 8,392 | 7,745 | ||||||||
Total segment operating income | 14,221 | 10,321 | ||||||||
Unallocated general and administrative expenses | (4,932 | ) | (5,083 | ) | ||||||
Impairment charges and lease termination costs | (55 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 9,234 | $ | 4,937 |
A discussion of the revenues and operating results of each of the Companys four business segments follows, together with a discussion of income statement line items not associated with specific segments.
32
Company Stores
The components of Company Stores revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
Percentage of Total Revenues | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
On-premises sales: | ||||||||||||||
Retail sales | $ | 29,062 | $ | 26,374 | 41.9 | % | 40.0 | % | ||||||
Fundraising sales | 2,651 | 2,569 | 3.8 | 3.9 | ||||||||||
Total on-premises sales | 31,713 | 28,943 | 45.7 | 43.9 | ||||||||||
Wholesale sales: | ||||||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants | 23,014 | 22,468 | 33.2 | 34.0 | ||||||||||
Convenience stores | 13,752 | 13,800 | 19.8 | 20.9 | ||||||||||
Other wholesale | 859 | 781 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Total wholesale sales | 37,625 | 37,049 | 54.3 | 56.1 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 69,338 | 65,992 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||
Food, beverage and packaging | 26,624 | 25,680 | 38.4 | 38.9 | ||||||||||
Shop labor | 12,743 | 12,484 | 18.4 | 18.9 | ||||||||||
Delivery labor | 5,876 | 5,797 | 8.5 | 8.8 | ||||||||||
Employee benefits | 5,093 | 4,567 | 7.3 | 6.9 | ||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 50,336 | 48,528 | 72.6 | 73.5 | ||||||||||
Vehicle costs(1) | 4,144 | 4,426 | 6.0 | 6.7 | ||||||||||
Occupancy(2) | 2,389 | 2,323 | 3.4 | 3.5 | ||||||||||
Utilities expense | 1,540 | 1,500 | 2.2 | 2.3 | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 1,944 | 1,689 | 2.8 | 2.6 | ||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,602 | 4,268 | 6.6 | 6.5 | ||||||||||
Total store level costs | 64,955 | 62,734 | 93.7 | 95.1 | ||||||||||
Store operating income | 4,383 | 3,258 | 6.3 | 4.9 | ||||||||||
Other segment operating costs(3) | 2,970 | 3,182 | 4.3 | 4.8 | ||||||||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 1,075 | 1,125 | 1.6 | 1.7 | ||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) | $ | 338 | $ | (1,049 | ) | 0.5 | % | (1.6 | ) | % |
(1) | Includes fuel, maintenance and repairs, rent, taxes and other costs of operating the delivery fleet, exclusive of depreciation. | |
(2) | Includes rent, property taxes, common area maintenance charges, insurance, building maintenance and other occupancy costs, exclusive of utilities and depreciation. | |
(3) | Includes marketing costs not charged to stores, segment management costs, wholesale selling expenses and support functions. |
A reconciliation of Company Stores segment sales from the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to the second quarter of fiscal 2013 follows:
On-Premises | Wholesale | Total | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Sales for the three months ended July 31, 2011 | $ | 28,943 | $ | 37,049 | $ | 65,992 | |||
Increase in sales at mature stores (open stores only) | 1,707 | 576 | 2,283 | ||||||
Increase in sales at stores opened in fiscal 2012 | 671 | - | 671 | ||||||
Sales at stores opened in fiscal 2013 | 392 | - | 392 | ||||||
Sales for the three months ended July 29, 2012 | $ | 31,713 | $ | 37,625 | $ | 69,338 |
Sales at Company Stores increased 5.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 from the second quarter of fiscal 2012 due to an increase in sales from existing stores and stores opened in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013.
33
The following table presents sales metrics for Company stores:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
On-premises: | ||||||||||
Change in same store sales | 5.4 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||
Change in same store customer count (retail sales only) | 6.6 | % | (2.9 | ) | % | |||||
Average guest check (retail sales only) | $ | 7.43 | $ | 7.49 | ||||||
Wholesale: | ||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants: | ||||||||||
Change in average weekly number of doors | (4.9 | ) | % | 3.2 | % | |||||
Change in average weekly sales per door | 8.4 | % | 12.9 | % | ||||||
Convenience stores: | ||||||||||
Change in average weekly number of doors | (7.8 | ) | % | (5.7 | ) | % | ||||
Change in average weekly sales per door | 8.4 | % | 10.2 | % |
On-premises sales
The components of the change in same store sales at Company stores are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Change in same store sales: | ||||||||
Retail pricing | 0.0 | % | 8.3 | % | ||||
Guest check average (exclusive of the effects of pricing) | (0.7 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||
Customer count | 5.9 | (2.6 | ) | |||||
Other | 0.2 | (0.5 | ) | |||||
Total | 5.4 | % | 2.5 | % |
On-premises sales increased 9.6% to $31.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 from $28.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase was driven by higher customer traffic. The Company is developing and implementing new and enhanced marketing programs designed to increase guest visit frequency.
The Company believes that the expected cannibalization and honeymoon effects of new stores in expansion markets adversely affected same store customer count in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Cannibalization effect means the tendency for new stores to become successful, in part or in whole, by shifting sales from existing stores in the same market. Honeymoon effect means the common pattern for many start-up restaurants in which a flurry of activity due to start-up publicity and natural curiosity is followed by a decline during which a steady repeat customer base develops.
Wholesale distribution
Sales to wholesale accounts increased 1.6% to $37.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 from $37.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Higher unit volumes accounted for the majority of the increase.
Sales to grocers and mass merchants increased 2.4% to $23.0 million, with an 8.4% increase in average weekly sales per door partially offset by a 4.9% decline in the average number of doors served. The Company believes that average weekly sales per door in the grocery/mass merchant channel have grown as a result of, among other things, improved customer service, introduction of additional price points, a redesign of product packaging to improve its shelf appeal, and the addition of new relatively higher volume doors. The decline in the average number of doors served in the grocery/mass merchant channel reflects store closures by a regional grocery store customer as well as the elimination of loose doughnut sales at another regional grocer, although the Company continues to sell packaged products to this customer. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 2% of sales to grocery/mass merchant customers for the three months ended July 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of package products.
Convenience store sales were unchanged at $13.8 million, reflecting an 8.4% increase in the average weekly sales per door, partially offset by a 7.8% decline in the average number of doors served. The decline in the average number of doors served in the convenience store channel reflects the Companys efforts to improve route management and route consolidation including the elimination of and reduction in the number of stops at relatively low volume doors. These actions are intended to increase average per door sales and reduce costs in the convenience store channel. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 80% of sales to convenience store customers for the three months ended July 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of sales of packaged products.
34
Costs and expenses
Total cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased by 0.9 percentage points from the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to 72.6% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.
The cost of food, beverage and packaging decreased by 0.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The cost of doughnut mixes, shortening and packaging declined slightly reflecting lower input costs at KK Supply Chain. The cost of sugar rose approximately 11% year-over-year in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. This cost increase was partially mitigated by changes in production equipment designed to reduce the consumption of sugar in the doughnut-making process.
KK Supply Chain has fixed the prices on substantially all of its major raw materials for the remainder of fiscal 2013. Except for sugar, the Company currently anticipates the cost of doughnut mix, shortening and other ingredients to be slightly lower for the balance of fiscal 2013 compared to the second half of fiscal 2012. The Company has entered into contracts covering substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for fiscal 2013 at average prices somewhat lower than its prices for the second half of fiscal 2012, but higher than its average price for fiscal 2012 as a whole. In addition, the Company has entered into contracts for substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015 at prices slightly higher than expected for fiscal 2013.
Shop labor as a percentage of revenues declined by 0.5 percentage points from the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to 18.4% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, principally due to higher revenues and improved labor cost management.
Vehicle costs as a percentage of revenues decreased from 6.7% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to 6.0% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, principally as a result of lower fuel costs due to a decrease in fuel prices and a reduction in mileage due to route rationalization.
Many segment operating costs are fixed or semi-fixed in nature and accordingly, segment profit margins are sensitive to changes in sales volumes.
The Company is self-insured for workers compensation, vehicle and general liability claims, but maintains stop-loss coverage for individual claims exceeding certain amounts. The Company provides for claims under these self-insured programs using actuarial methods as described in the 2012 Form 10-K, and periodically updates actuarial valuations of its self-insurance reserves. Such periodic actuarial valuations result in changes over time in the estimated amounts which ultimately will be paid for claims under these programs to reflect the Companys actual claims experience for each policy year as well as trends in claims experience over multiple years. Such claims, particularly workers compensation claims, often are paid over a number of years following the year in which the insured events occur, and the estimated ultimate cost of each years claims accordingly is adjusted over time as additional information becomes available. As a result of the Companys periodic update of its actuarial valuation, the Company recorded favorable adjustments to its self-insurance claims liabilities related to prior policy years of approximately $370,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and $500,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The $370,000 favorable adjustment recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 includes an unfavorable adjustment relating to workers compensation liability claims of approximately $20,000 included in employee benefits in the table above, a favorable adjustment relating to vehicle liability claims of approximately $210,000 included in vehicle costs, and a favorable adjustment relating to general liability claims of approximately $180,000 included in other operating costs. Substantially all of the $500,000 in favorable adjustments recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 relates to workers compensation liability claims.
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court rejected constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Act). Among other things, the Act requires businesses employing fifty or more full-time equivalent employees to offer health care benefits to those full-time employees beginning in January 2014, or be subject to an annual penalty. Those benefits must be provided under a health care plan which provides a certain minimum scope of health care services. The Act limits the portion of the cost of the benefits which the Company can require employees to pay.
The Company currently employs approximately 1,300 persons (approximately 35% of the Companys total number of employees) to whom the Company does not currently provide health care benefits but who could be entitled to receive health care benefits under the Act. The Company does not know the amount by which its costs will increase assuming the above provisions of the Act are implemented in January 2014 because, among other reasons, many of the specifics relating to implementation, including many of the specifics of the coverage required to be offered, are to be contained in regulations which have not yet been drafted. In addition, the Company does not know how many of the potentially newly-eligible employees will elect to obtain coverage under the Act.
35
However, based on information currently available to the Company and the Companys analyses to-date and its current cost estimates, management currently does not expect that the aggregate incremental cost of providing health care coverage prescribed by the Act will exceed its current costs by more than approximately $5 million annually. The Company currently believes its incremental costs will be less than such amount, and may be substantially less. Such estimate does not reflect any mitigating actions the Company might take in order to reduce the cost of the benefits required to be offered or reduce the number of employees subject to the new requirements. The Company is continuing to study and evaluate the requirements of the Act, and the Companys estimate of the additional cost of providing benefits mandated by the Act is expected to change as the Company gains additional information and makes decisions affecting its implementation of the Acts requirements.
Domestic Franchise
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Revenues: | ||||||
Royalties | $ | 2,321 | $ | 2,136 | ||
Development and franchise fees | - | 105 | ||||
Other | 109 | 108 | ||||
Total revenues | 2,430 | 2,349 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||
Segment operating expenses | 946 | 1,978 | ||||
Depreciation expense | 55 | 55 | ||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 100 | 100 | ||||
Total operating expenses | 1,101 | 2,133 | ||||
Segment operating income | $ | 1,329 | $ | 216 |
Domestic Franchise revenues increased 3.4% to $2.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 from $2.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase reflects higher domestic royalty revenues resulting from an increase in sales by domestic franchise stores from $65 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to $70 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Domestic Franchise same store sales rose 6.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.
Domestic Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new domestic franchisees, to assist in domestic store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of domestic franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. The decrease in Domestic Franchise operating expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012 reflects a provision of $820,000 recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 for payments under a lease guarantee associated with a franchisee whose franchise agreements the Company terminated during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, as well as a decrease in legal costs in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.
As of July 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories in the United States provide for the development of approximately 50 additional stores through fiscal 2018. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
36
International Franchise
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Revenues: | ||||||
Royalties | $ | 5,491 | $ | 5,129 | ||
Development and franchise fees | 290 | 223 | ||||
Total revenues | 5,781 | 5,352 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||
Segment operating expenses | 1,316 | 1,616 | ||||
Depreciation expense | 3 | 2 | ||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 300 | 325 | ||||
Total operating expenses | 1,619 | 1,943 | ||||
Segment operating income | $ | 4,162 | $ | 3,409 |
International Franchise royalties increased 7.1%, driven by an increase in sales by international franchise stores from $96 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to $102 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Changes in the rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the foreign currencies in which the Companys international franchisees do business decreased sales by international franchisees measured in U.S. dollars by approximately $3.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which negatively affected international royalty revenues by approximately $210,000.
International Franchise same store sales, measured on a constant currency basis to remove the effects of changing exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar (constant dollar same store sales), fell 10.0%. The decline in International Franchise same store sales reflects, among other things, waning honeymoon effects from the large number of new stores opened internationally in recent years and the cannibalization effects on initial stores in new markets of additional store openings in those markets.
Constant dollar same store sales in established markets increased 0.9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and fell 18.7% in new markets. Established markets means countries in which the first Krispy Kreme store opened before fiscal 2007. Sales at stores in established markets comprised approximately 50% of aggregate constant dollar same store sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2013. While the Company considers countries in which Krispy Kreme first opened before fiscal 2007 to be established markets, franchisees in those markets continue to develop their businesses; these franchisees opened 219 of the 555 international stores opened since the beginning of fiscal 2007.
International Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new international franchisees, to assist in international store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of international franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. International Franchise operating expenses decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 to $1.3 million compared to $1.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. International Franchise operating expenses reflect a decrease in legal fees associated with certain litigation and lower share-based compensation expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012.
International franchisees opened 24 stores and closed five stores in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As of July 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories outside the United States provide for the development of approximately 390 additional stores through fiscal 2019. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
37
KK Supply Chain
The components of KK Supply Chain revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues before intersegment sales elimination) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
Percentage of Total Revenues | ||||||||||||||
Before Intersegment | ||||||||||||||
Sales Elimination | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Doughnut mixes | $ | 16,617 | $ | 16,562 | 32.3 | % | 32.9 | % | ||||||
Other ingredients, packaging and supplies | 31,595 | 30,795 | 61.4 | 61.2 | ||||||||||
Equipment | 2,631 | 2,356 | 5.1 | 4.7 | ||||||||||
Fuel surcharge | 622 | 628 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Total revenues before intersegment sales elimination | 51,465 | 50,341 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||
Cost of goods produced and purchased | 35,854 | 34,379 | 69.7 | 68.3 | ||||||||||
(Gain) loss on agricultural derivatives | (1,066 | ) | 129 | (2.1 | ) | 0.3 | ||||||||
Inbound freight | 1,512 | 1,043 | 2.9 | 2.1 | ||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 36,300 | 35,551 | 70.5 | 70.6 | ||||||||||
Distribution costs | 3,422 | 3,720 | 6.6 | 7.4 | ||||||||||
Other segment operating costs | 2,816 | 2,862 | 5.5 | 5.7 | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 235 | 188 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 300 | 275 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||
Total operating costs | 43,073 | 42,596 | 83.7 | 84.6 | ||||||||||
Segment operating income | $ | 8,392 | $ | 7,745 | 16.3 | % | 15.4 | % |
KK Supply Chain revenues before intersegment sales elimination increased 2.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012.
Sales of doughnut mixes were flat year-over-year in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, reflecting higher unit volumes offset by lower selling prices resulting from a reduction in raw materials costs.
Sales of other ingredients, packaging and supplies, made principally to Company and Domestic Franchise stores, rose 2.6% year-over-year in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 due to higher selling prices of sugar and slightly higher unit volumes. While systemwide sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores rose in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the second quarter of the preceding fiscal year, a greater percentage of such sales was to on-premises customers compared to wholesale customers. On-premises sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores generate proportionately lower KK Supply Chain sales than do sales to wholesale customers. In addition, the Company outsourced distribution to its International Franchise stores in fiscal 2012, which resulted in a reduction in sales of non-mix products to those franchisees.
The Company utilizes a fuel surcharge program to recoup additional freight costs resulting from increases in fuel costs. Charges under the program are based upon the price of diesel fuel.
KK Supply Chain input costs increased to 69.7% of revenues in second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to 68.3% of revenues in the second quarter of the preceding fiscal year, principally as a result of an approximate 15% year-over-year increase in the cost of sugar. While the Company raised selling prices to recover higher sugar costs, the Company did not mark up such higher costs, which resulted in an increase in the overall cost of goods produced and purchased as a percentage of revenues.
Inbound freight increased 0.8 percentage points from the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to 2.9% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 as a result of outsourcing product distribution for stores east of the Mississippi to a third party provider beginning in fiscal 2012. These increased inbound freight costs were substantially offset by a reduction in distribution costs and other segment operating costs, which include segment management, purchasing, customer service and support, laboratory and quality control costs, and research and development expenses, associated with the outsourcing of product distribution.
38
Franchisees opened 24 stores and closed 6 stores in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. A substantial portion of KK Supply Chains revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
An increasing percentage of franchise store sales is attributable to sales by franchisees outside North America. The Company sells doughnut mixes and concentrates to its international franchisees. These franchisees purchase substantially all other ingredients, packaging and supplies from vendors approved by the Company. Accordingly, KK Supply Chain revenues are less correlated with sales by international franchisees than with sales by domestic franchisees.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased slightly to $4.8 million, or 4.7% of total revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $4.9 million, or 5.0% of total revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company is seeking to minimize general and administrative expenses in order to gain operating leverage as its revenues rise.
Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs
Impairment charges and lease termination costs were $55,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $301,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The components of these charges are set forth in the following table:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | $ | - | $ | - | ||
Lease termination costs | 55 | 301 | ||||
$ | 55 | $ | 301 |
The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Companys annual budgeting process. Impairment charges generally relate to Company stores expected to be closed or refranchised, as well as to stores management believes will not generate sufficient future cash flows to enable the Company to recover the carrying value of the stores assets, but which management has not yet decided to close. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. The fair values of these assets are estimated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, on independent appraisals and, in the case of assets the Company currently is negotiating to sell, based on the Companys negotiations with unrelated third-party buyers.
Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities were estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals and from settlements with landlords.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded lease termination charges of $55,000 and $301,000, respectively, principally reflecting a change in estimated sublease rentals and settlements with landlords on stores previously closed.
The Company intends to refranchise certain geographic markets, expected to consist principally of, but not necessarily limited to, markets outside the Companys traditional base in the Southeastern United States. The franchise rights and other assets in many of these markets were acquired by the Company in business combinations in prior years.
Since the beginning of fiscal 2009, the Company has refranchised a total of 11 stores and received consideration totaling $2.5 million in connection with those transactions. During this period, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling approximately $490,000 related to completed and anticipated refranchisings. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of refranchising any additional stores or markets or the amount of proceeds, if any, which might be received therefrom, including the amounts which might be realized from the sale of store assets and the execution of any related franchise agreements. Asset dispositions associated with future refranchisings could result in the recognition of impairment losses on the related assets.
39
Interest Expense
The components of interest expense are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Interest accruing on outstanding term loan indebtedness | $ | 176 | $ | 202 | ||
Letter of credit and unused revolver fees | 74 | 89 | ||||
Amortization of cost of interest rate derivatives | 7 | - | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 99 | 116 | ||||
Other | 64 | 7 | ||||
$ | 420 | $ | 414 |
Equity in Income (Losses) of Equity Method Franchisees
The Company recorded equity in the losses of equity method franchisees of $53,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to earnings of $12,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. This caption represents the Companys share of operating results of equity method franchisees which develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (KK Mexico), the Companys franchisee in Mexico, to KK Mexicos majority shareholder, as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein. The Companys equity in earnings of KK Mexico was approximately $70,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2011.
Gain on Sale of Interest in Equity Method Franchisee
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company realized a gain of approximately $6.2 million arising from the sale of the Companys investment in KK Mexico as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $4.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $2.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012.
The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the deferred tax assets is more likely than not. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Companys deferred tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 though fiscal 2009.
Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Companys pretax profit increased to $30.4 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Companys sale of its 30% interest in KK Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Companys deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Companys deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, representing the amount of deferred tax assets management believes is more likely than not to be realized.
While the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowances increased the Companys earnings by $139.6 million in fiscal 2012, the reversal has the effect of increasing the provision for income taxes, and therefore decreasing net income, beginning in fiscal 2013. This negative effect on earnings occurs because the reversal of the valuation allowances resulted in the recognition in fiscal 2012 of income tax benefits expected to be realized in later years. Absent the reversal of the valuation allowances, such tax benefits would have been recognized when realized in future periods upon the generation of taxable income. Accordingly, beginning in fiscal 2013, the Companys effective income tax rate, which in fiscal 2012 and earlier years bore little or no relationship to pretax income, more closely reflects the blended federal and state income tax rates in jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The reversal of the valuation allowance had no effect on the Companys cash payments for income taxes.
40
Because of the increase in the Companys effective income tax rate as described above, the Companys income tax expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 is not comparable to income tax expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, until such time as the Companys net operating loss carryforwards are exhausted or expire, GAAP income tax expense is expected to substantially exceed the amount of cash income taxes payable by the Company, which are expected to remain insignificant for the foreseeable future.
The portion of the income tax provision representing taxes estimated to be payable currently was approximately $680,000 and $2.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively, consisting principally of foreign withholding taxes related to royalties and franchise fees paid to the Company by international franchisees and, in fiscal 2012, $1.5 million of Mexican income taxes payable on the KK Mexico gain.
The Companys estimated effective income tax rate on GAAP ordinary income for fiscal 2013 is 45%. That estimate is subject to revision in subsequent quarters as additional information becomes available.
The following non-GAAP financial information and related reconciliation to GAAP measures are provided to assist the reader in understanding (1) the effect of the fiscal 2012 reversal of the valuation allowance on the Companys results of operations for fiscal 2013, and (2) the effect of the non-recurring gain on the sale of the interest in KK Mexico on the Companys results of operations for fiscal 2012. The non-GAAP information is intended to facilitate comparisons of fiscal 2013 results with the Companys results for fiscal 2012, and to illustrate the material difference between the Companys income tax expense and income taxes currently payable. Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common share reflect income tax expense only to the extent such expense is currently payable in cash and, in fiscal 2012, exclude the gain on the sale of the equity interest in KK Mexico. These non-GAAP performances measures are consistent with other measurements made by management in the operation of the business which do not consider income taxes except to the extent to which those taxes currently are payable, for example, capital allocation decisions and incentive compensation measurements that are made on a pretax basis.
Three Months Ended | |||||||
July 29, | July 31, | ||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 4,929 | $ | 8,839 | |||
Provision for deferred income taxes | 3,290 | 83 | |||||
Gain on sale of interest in KK Mexico | |||||||
(net of income taxes of $1,492) | - | (4,706 | ) | ||||
Adjusted net income | $ | 8,219 | $ | 4,216 | |||
Adjusted earnings per common share: | |||||||
Basic | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.06 | |||
Diluted | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.06 | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||
Basic | 67,461 | 68,900 | |||||
Diluted | 69,432 | 71,706 |
Six months ended July 29, 2012 compared to six months ended July 31, 2011
Overview
Total revenues rose by 4.0% to $210.6 million for the six months ended July 29, 2012 compared to $202.6 million for the six months ended July 31, 2011.
41
Consolidated operating income increased to $20.1 million in the six months ended July 29, 2012 from $14.7 million in the six months ended July 31, 2011. Consolidated net income was $11.0 million in the six months ended July 29, 2012 compared to $18.0 million in the six months ended July 31, 2011. The Companys net income and earnings per share for the six months ended July 29, 2012 are not comparable to the corresponding amounts for the six months ended July 31, 2011 as a result of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and the resulting increase in income tax expense after the reversal; see Provision for Income Taxes below.
Revenues by business segment (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
Six Months Ended | |||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Revenues by business segment: | |||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 142,679 | $ | 135,467 | |||||
Domestic Franchise | 5,063 | 4,718 | |||||||
International Franchise | 11,808 | 10,988 | |||||||
KK Supply Chain: | |||||||||
Total revenues | 105,250 | 104,224 | |||||||
Less - intersegment sales elimination | (54,189 | ) | (52,845 | ) | |||||
External KK Supply Chain revenues | 51,061 | 51,379 | |||||||
Total revenues | $ | 210,611 | $ | 202,552 | |||||
Segment revenues as a percentage of total revenues: | |||||||||
Company Stores | 67.7 | % | 66.9 | % | |||||
Domestic Franchise | 2.4 | 2.3 | |||||||
International Franchise | 5.6 | 5.4 | |||||||
KK Supply Chain (external sales) | 24.2 | 25.4 | |||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss): | |||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 3,286 | $ | 1,125 | |||||
Domestic Franchise | 2,898 | 1,363 | |||||||
International Franchise | 8,656 | 7,580 | |||||||
KK Supply Chain | 16,869 | 16,087 | |||||||
Total segment operating income | 31,709 | 26,155 | |||||||
Unallocated general and administrative expenses | (11,555 | ) | (10,882 | ) | |||||
Impairment charges and lease termination costs | (86 | ) | (545 | ) | |||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 20,068 | $ | 14,728 |
A discussion of the revenues and operating results of each of the Companys four business segments follows, together with a discussion of income statement line items not associated with specific segments.
42
Company Stores
The components of Company Stores revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
Percentage of Total Revenues | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||
On-premises sales: | ||||||||||||
Retail sales | $ | 59,658 | $ | 54,530 | 41.8 | % | 40.3 | % | ||||
Fundraising sales | 7,531 | 7,274 | 5.3 | 5.4 | ||||||||
Total on-premises sales | 67,189 | 61,804 | 47.1 | 45.6 | ||||||||
Wholesale sales: | ||||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants | 45,754 | 44,481 | 32.1 | 32.8 | ||||||||
Convenience stores | 28,074 | 27,679 | 19.7 | 20.4 | ||||||||
Other wholesale | 1,662 | 1,503 | 1.2 | 1.1 | ||||||||
Total wholesale sales | 75,490 | 73,663 | 52.9 | 54.4 | ||||||||
Total revenues | 142,679 | 135,467 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||
Food, beverage and packaging | 54,421 | 51,975 | 38.1 | 38.4 | ||||||||
Shop labor | 25,525 | 25,085 | 17.9 | 18.5 | ||||||||
Delivery labor | 11,783 | 11,651 | 8.3 | 8.6 | ||||||||
Employee benefits | 10,091 | 9,173 | 7.1 | 6.8 | ||||||||
Total cost of sales | 101,820 | 97,884 | 71.4 | 72.3 | ||||||||
Vehicle costs(1) | 8,630 | 8,807 | 6.0 | 6.5 | ||||||||
Occupancy(2) | 4,803 | 4,585 | 3.4 | 3.4 | ||||||||
Utilities expense | 2,954 | 2,839 | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||||||||
Depreciation expense | 4,041 | 3,226 | 2.8 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Other operating expenses | 9,364 | 8,812 | 6.6 | 6.5 | ||||||||
Total store level costs | 131,612 | 126,153 | 92.2 | 93.1 | ||||||||
Store operating income | 11,067 | 9,314 | 7.8 | 6.9 | ||||||||
Other segment operating costs(3) | 5,631 | 5,939 | 3.9 | 4.4 | ||||||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 2,150 | 2,250 | 1.5 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Segment operating income | $ | 3,286 | $ | 1,125 | 2.3 | % | 0.8 | % |
(1) | Includes fuel, maintenance and repairs, rent, taxes and other costs of operating the delivery fleet, exclusive of depreciation. | |
(2) | Includes rent, property taxes, common area maintenance charges, insurance, building maintenance and other occupancy costs, exclusive of utilities and depreciation. | |
(3) | Includes marketing costs not charged to stores, segment management costs, wholesale selling expenses and support functions. |
A reconciliation of Company Stores segment sales from the six months ended July 31, 2011 to the six months ended July 29, 2012 follows:
On-Premises | Wholesale | Total | ||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Sales for the six months ended July 31, 2011 | $ | 61,804 | $ | 73,663 | $ | 135,467 | ||
Increase in sales at mature stores (open stores only) | 2,380 | 1,827 | 4,207 | |||||
Increase in sales at stores opened in fiscal 2012 | 2,613 | - | 2,613 | |||||
Sales at stores opened in fiscal 2013 | 392 | - | 392 | |||||
Sales for the six months ended July 29, 2012 | $ | 67,189 | $ | 75,490 | $ | 142,679 |
Sales at Company Stores increased 5.3% in the first six months of fiscal 2013 from the first six months of fiscal 2012 due to an increase in sales from existing stores and stores opened in fiscal 2012 and 2013. Selling price increases in the on-premises and wholesale distribution channels accounted for approximately 2.4 percentage points of the increase in sales, exclusive of the effects of higher pricing on unit volumes; such effects are difficult to measure reliably. As with all consumer products, however, higher prices may negatively affect sales. The Company believes this phenomenon is more pronounced in the wholesale channel where competing products are merchandised alongside those of the Company.
43
The following table presents sales metrics for Company stores:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
On-premises: | ||||||||||
Change in same store sales | 3.7 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||
Change in same store customer count (retail sales only) | 3.8 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Average guest check (retail sales only) | $ | 7.27 | $ | 7.28 | ||||||
Wholesale: | ||||||||||
Grocery/mass merchants: | ||||||||||
Change in average weekly number of doors | (4.7 | ) | % | 4.9 | % | |||||
Change in average weekly sales per door | 8.5 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||
Convenience stores: | ||||||||||
Change in average weekly number of doors | (9.2 | ) | % | (1.9 | ) | % | ||||
Change in average weekly sales per door | 11.8 | % | 6.8 | % |
On-premises sales
The components of the change in same store sales at Company stores are as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Change in same store sales: | ||||||||
Retail pricing | 1.4 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
Guest check average (exclusive of the effects of pricing) | (1.2 | ) | (2.5 | ) | ||||
Customer count | 3.3 | 0.0 | ||||||
Other | 0.2 | (0.3 | ) | |||||
Total | 3.7 | % | 4.2 | % |
On-premises sales increased 8.7% to $67.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 from $61.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. The increase was principally driven by higher customer traffic. The Company is developing and implementing new and enhanced marketing programs designed to increase guest visit frequency. Additionally, approximately 1.4 percentage points of the sales increase reflects retail price increases implemented in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. On March 7, 2011, the Company implemented price increases at substantially all its stores designed to help offset the rising costs of doughnut mixes, other ingredients and fuel resulting from higher commodity prices. These price increases affected items comprising approximately 60% of on-premises sales, and the average price increase on these items was approximately 14%.
Higher customer traffic and retail price increases implemented in fiscal 2012 contributed to the improvement in same store sales, partially offset by coffee and doughnut promotional pricing which reduced the average guest check compared to last year. Also, the Company believes that the expected cannibalization and honeymoon effects of new stores in expansion markets adversely affected same store customer count in the first half of fiscal 2013.
Wholesale sales
Sales to wholesale accounts increased 2.5% to $75.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 from $73.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. Approximately 2.7% of the increase in wholesale sales is due to price increases. The Company began implementing price increases for some products offered in the wholesale channel late in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and substantially completed implementing the increases during the second quarter. Those price increases affected products comprising approximately 60% of wholesale sales, and the average price increase on those products was approximately 11%. The effects of higher selling prices was partially offset by lower unit volumes in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012.
44
Sales to grocers and mass merchants increased 2.9% to $45.8 million, with an 8.5% increase in average weekly sales per door, partially offset by a 4.7% decline in the average number of doors served. In addition to pricing, the Company believes that average weekly sales per door in the grocer/mass merchant channel have grown as a result of, among other things, improved customer service, introduction of additional price points, a redesign of product packaging to improve its shelf appeal and the addition of new relatively higher volume doors. The decline in the average number of doors served in the grocery/mass merchant channel reflects store closures by a regional grocery store customer as well as the decline reflects the elimination of loose doughnut sales at another regional grocer, although the Company continues to sell packaged products to this customer. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 2% of sales to grocery/mass merchant customers for the six months ended July 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of sales of packaged products.
Convenience store sales rose 1.4% to $28.1 million, reflecting an 11.8% increase in the average weekly sales per door, partially offset by a 9.2% decline in the average number of doors served. The decline in the average number of doors served in the convenience store channel reflects the Companys efforts to improve route management and route consolidation including the elimination of and reduction in the number of stops at relatively low volume doors. These actions are intended to increase average per door sales and reduce costs in the convenience store channel. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 80% of sales to convenience store customers for the six months ended July 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of sales of packaged products.
Costs and expenses
Total cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased by 0.9 percentage points from the first six months of fiscal 2012 to 71.4% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013.
The cost of food, beverage and packaging decreased by 0.3% in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012. The cost of doughnut mixes, shortening and packaging was relatively unchanged in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012. The cost of sugar rose approximately 16% year-over-year in the first six months of fiscal 2013. This cost increase was partially mitigated by higher selling prices and by changes in production equipment designed to reduce the consumption of sugar in the doughnut-making process.
KK Supply Chain has fixed the prices on substantially all of its major raw materials for the remainder of fiscal 2013. Except for sugar, the Company currently anticipates the cost of doughnut mix, shortening and other ingredients to be slightly lower for the balance of fiscal 2013 compared to the second half of fiscal 2012. The Company has entered into contracts covering substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for fiscal 2013 at average prices somewhat lower than its prices for the second half of fiscal 2012, but higher than its average price for fiscal 2012 as a whole. In addition, the Company has entered into contracts for substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015 at prices slightly higher than expected for fiscal 2013.
Shop labor as a percentage of revenues declined by 0.6 percentage points from the first six months of fiscal 2012 to 17.9% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013, principally due to higher revenues and improved labor cost management.
Vehicle costs as a percentage of revenues decreased from 6.5% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2012 to 6.0% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013, principally due to higher sales resulting from price increases and lower fuel costs due to a reduction in mileage due to route rationalization.
Many segment operating costs are fixed or semi-fixed in nature and accordingly, segment profit margins are sensitive to changes in sales volumes.
The Company is self-insured for workers compensation, vehicle and general liability claims, but maintains stop-loss coverage for individual claims exceeding certain amounts. The Company provides for claims under these self-insured programs using actuarial methods as described in the 2012 Form 10-K, and periodically updates actuarial valuations of its self-insurance reserves. Such periodic actuarial valuations result in changes over time in the estimated amounts which ultimately will be paid for claims under these programs to reflect the Companys actual claims experience for each policy year as well as trends in claims experience over multiple years. Such claims, particularly workers compensation claims, often are paid over a number of years following the year in which the insured events occur, and the estimated ultimate cost of each years claims accordingly is adjusted over time as additional information becomes available. As a result of the Companys periodic update of its actuarial valuation, the Company recorded favorable adjustments to its self-insurance claims liabilities related to prior policy years of approximately $370,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and $500,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The $370,000 favorable adjustment recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 includes an unfavorable adjustment relating to workers compensation liability claims of approximately $20,000 included in employee benefits in the table above, a favorable adjustment relating to vehicle liability claims of approximately $210,000 included in vehicle costs, and a favorable adjustment relating to general liability claims of approximately $180,000 included in other operating costs. Substantially all of the $500,000 in favorable adjustments recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 relates to workers compensation liability claims.
45
Depreciation expense increased in the first six months of fiscal 2013 to 2.8% of revenues from 2.4% in the first six months of fiscal 2012 due to capital expenditures including construction of new stores, store refurbishment efforts on existing stores and investments in information technology systems.
Domestic Franchise
Six Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Revenues: | ||||||
Royalties | $ | 4,758 | $ | 4,322 | ||
Development and franchise fees | 88 | 180 | ||||
Other | 217 | 216 | ||||
Total revenues | 5,063 | 4,718 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||
Segment operating expenses | 1,855 | 3,045 | ||||
Depreciation expense | 110 | 110 | ||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 200 | 200 | ||||
Total operating expenses | 2,165 | 3,355 | ||||
Segment operating income | $ | 2,898 | $ | 1,363 |
Domestic Franchise revenues increased 7.3% to $5.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 from $4.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. The increase reflects higher domestic royalty revenues resulting from an increase in sales by domestic franchise stores from approximately $132 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 to $142 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013. Domestic Franchise same store sales rose 6.2% in the first six months of fiscal 2013.
Domestic Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new domestic franchisees, to assist in domestic store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of domestic franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. The decrease in Domestic Franchise operating expenses in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012 reflects a provision of $820,000 recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 for payments under a lease guarantee associated with a franchisee whose franchise agreements the Company terminated during the second quarter, as well as a decrease in legal costs in the first six months of fiscal 2013.
Domestic franchisees opened three stores and closed four stores in the first six months of fiscal 2013. As of July 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories in the United States provide for the development of approximately 50 additional stores through fiscal 2018. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
46
International Franchise
Six Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Revenues: | ||||||
Royalties | $ | 11,233 | $ | 10,417 | ||
Development and franchise fees | 575 | 571 | ||||
Total revenues | 11,808 | 10,988 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||
Segment operating expenses | 2,546 | 2,754 | ||||
Depreciation expense | 6 | 4 | ||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 600 | 650 | ||||
Total operating expenses | 3,152 | 3,408 | ||||
Segment operating income | $ | 8,656 | $ | 7,580 |
International Franchise royalties rose 7.8% driven by an increase in sales by international franchise stores from $187 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 to $207 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013. Changes in the rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the foreign currencies in which the Companys international franchisees do business decreased sales by international franchisees measured in U.S. dollars by approximately $4.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012, which negatively affected international royalty revenues by approximately $240,000.
Royalties and franchise fees for the first six months of fiscal 2012 include approximately $280,000 and $95,000, respectively, of amounts relating to the Companys franchisee in Mexico which accrued in prior periods but which had not previously been reported as revenue because of uncertainty surrounding their collection. Such amounts were reported as revenue in recognition of the payment of such amounts to the Company on May 5, 2011, in connection with the Companys sale of its 30% equity interest in the franchisee as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein.
International Franchise same store sales, measured on a constant currency basis to remove the effects of changing exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar, fell 8.7%. The decline in International Franchise same store sales reflects, among other things, waning honeymoon effects from the large number of new stores opened internationally in recent years and the cannibalization effects on initial stores in new markets of additional store openings in those markets.
Constant dollar same store sales in established markets fell 0.2% in the first six months of fiscal 2013 and fell 15.3% in new markets. Sales at stores in established markets comprised approximately 48% of aggregate constant dollar same store sales for the first six months of fiscal 2013. While the Company considers countries in which Krispy Kreme first opened before fiscal 2007 to be established markets, franchisees in those markets continue to develop their business; these franchisees opened 219 of the 555 international stores opened since the beginning of fiscal 2007.
International Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new international franchisees, to assist in international store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of international franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. International Franchise operating expenses decreased in the first six months of fiscal 2013 to $2.5 million compared to $2.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. International Franchise operating expenses reflect decreases in legal fees associated with certain litigation and lower share-based compensation expense in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012. In addition, in the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded a credit of $391,000 to the bad debt provision principally related to the Mexican franchisee discussed above.
International franchisees opened 44 stores and closed 27 stores in the first six months of fiscal 2013. Management does not believe that the number of international closures experienced in the first half of fiscal 2013 is indicative of the number of closures that will be experienced in the second half of the year. As of July 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories outside the United States provide for the development of approximately 390 additional stores through fiscal 2019. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
47
KK Supply Chain
The components of KK Supply Chain revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues before intersegment sales elimination) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).
Percentage of Total Revenues | |||||||||||||
Before Intersegment | |||||||||||||
Sales Elimination | |||||||||||||
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
July 29, | July 31, | July 29, | July 31, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||
Doughnut mixes | $ | 35,824 | $ | 34,930 | 34.0 | % | 33.5 | % | |||||
Other ingredients, packaging and supplies | 64,245 | 63,651 | 61.0 | 61.1 | |||||||||
Equipment | 3,835 | 4,427 | 3.6 | 4.2 | |||||||||
Fuel surcharge | 1,346 | 1,216 | 1.3 | 1.2 | |||||||||
Total revenues before intersegment sales elimination | 105,250 | 104,224 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | |||||||||||||
Cost of goods produced and purchased | 72,820 | 71,160 | 69.2 | 68.3 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on agricultural derivatives | (1,117 | ) | 598 | (1.1 | ) | 0.6 | |||||||
Inbound freight | 2,978 | 2,096 | 2.8 | 2.0 | |||||||||
Total cost of sales | 74,681 | 73,854 | 71.0 | 70.9 | |||||||||
Distribution costs | 7,049 | 7,389 | 6.7 | 7.1 | |||||||||
Other segment operating costs | 5,654 | 5,967 | 5.4 | 5.7 | |||||||||
Depreciation expense | 397 | 377 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||
Allocated corporate overhead | 600 | 550 | 0.6 | 0.5 | |||||||||
Total operating costs | 88,381 | 88,137 | 84.0 | 84.6 | |||||||||
Segment operating income | $ | 16,869 | $ | 16,087 | 16.0 | % | 15.4 | % |
KK Supply Chain revenues before intersegment sales elimination increased 1.0% in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012.
Sales of doughnut mixes rose year-over-year in the first six months of fiscal 2013 reflecting higher unit volumes partially offset by lower selling prices resulting from a reduction in raw materials costs.
Sales of other ingredients, packaging and supplies, made principally to Company and Domestic Franchise stores, rose 0.9% year-over-year in the first six months of fiscal 2013 due to higher selling prices of sugar partially offset by lower unit volumes. While systemwide sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores rose in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of the preceding fiscal year, a greater percentage of such sales was to on-premises customers compared to wholesale customers. On-premises sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores generate proportionately lower KK Supply Chain sales than do sales to wholesale customers. In addition, the Company outsourced distribution to its International Franchise stores in fiscal 2012, which resulted in a reduction in sales of non-mix products to those franchisees.
The Company utilizes a fuel surcharge program to recoup additional freight costs resulting from increases in fuel costs. Charges under the program are based upon the price of diesel fuel.
KK Supply Chain input costs increased to 69.2% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to 68.3% of revenues in the first six months of the preceding fiscal year, principally as a result of an approximate 21% increase in the cost of sugar. While the Company raised selling prices to recover higher sugar costs, the Company did not mark up such higher costs, which resulted in an increase in the overall cost of goods produced and purchased as a percentage of revenues.
Inbound freight increased 0.8 percentage points from the first six months of fiscal 2012 to 2.8% of revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013 as a result of outsourcing product distribution for stores east of the Mississippi to a third party provider beginning in fiscal 2012. These increased inbound freight costs were substantially offset by a reduction in distribution costs and other segment operating costs, which include segment management, purchasing, customer service and support, laboratory and quality control costs, and research and development expenses, associated with the outsourcing of product distribution.
48
Franchisees opened 47 stores and closed 31 stores in the first six months of fiscal 2013. A substantial portion of KK Supply Chains revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees operations has a direct effect on the Companys revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
An increasing percentage of franchise store sales is attributable to sales by franchisees outside North America. The Company sells doughnut mixes and concentrates to its international franchisees. These franchisees purchase substantially all other ingredients, packaging and supplies from vendors approved by the Company. Accordingly, KK Supply Chain revenues are less correlated with sales by international franchisees than with sales by domestic franchisees.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased to $11.2 million, or 5.3% of total revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to $10.6 million or 5.2% of total revenues in the first six months of fiscal 2012. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2012 is due principally to an increase in share-based compensation as a result of a grant to an executive officer who attained retirement eligibility during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the resulting acceleration in the recognition of share-based compensation expense.
Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs
Impairment charges and lease termination costs were $86,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to $545,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | $ | - | $ | - | ||
Lease termination costs | 86 | 545 | ||||
$ | 86 | $ | 545 |
The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Companys annual budgeting process. Impairment charges generally relate to Company stores expected to be closed or refranchised, as well as to stores management believes will not generate sufficient future cash flows to enable the Company to recover the carrying value of the stores assets, but which management has not yet decided to close. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. The fair values of these assets are estimated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, on independent appraisals and, in the case of assets the Company currently is negotiating to sell, based on the Companys negotiations with unrelated third-party buyers
Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities were estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals and from settlements with landlords.
In the first six months of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded lease termination charges of $86,000 and $545,000, respectively, principally reflecting a change in estimated sublease rentals and settlements with landlords on stores previously closed.
The Company intends to refranchise certain geographic markets, expected to consist principally of, but not necessarily limited to, markets outside the Companys traditional base in the Southeastern United States. The franchise rights and other assets in many of these markets were acquired by the Company in business combinations in prior years.
49
Since the beginning of fiscal 2009, the Company has refranchised a total of 11 stores and received consideration totaling $2.5 million in connection with those transactions. During this period, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling approximately $490,000 related to completed and anticipated refranchisings. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of refranchising any additional stores or markets or the amount of proceeds, if any, which might be received therefrom, including the amounts which might be realized from the sale of store assets and the execution of any related franchise agreements. Asset dispositions associated with future refranchisings could result in the recognition of impairment losses on the related assets.
Interest Expense
The components of interest expense are as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Interest accruing on outstanding term loan indebtedness | $ | 363 | $ | 444 | ||
Letter of credit and unused revolver fees | 149 | 203 | ||||
Amortization of cost of interest rate derivatives | 9 | - | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 202 | 218 | ||||
Other | 95 | 26 | ||||
$ | 818 | $ | 891 |
Equity in Income (Losses) of Equity Method Franchisees
The Company recorded equity in the losses of equity method franchisees of $103,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to earnings of $3,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2012. This caption represents the Companys share of operating results of equity method franchisees which develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in KK Mexico, the Companys franchisee in Mexico, to KK Mexicos majority shareholder as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein. The Companys equity in earnings of KK Mexico was approximately $110,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2011.
Gain on Sale of Interest in Equity Method Franchisee
In the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company realized a gain of approximately $6.2 million arising from the sale of the Companys investment in KK Mexico as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $8.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared to $2.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the deferred tax assets is more likely than not. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Companys deferred tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 though fiscal 2009.
Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Companys pretax profit increased to $30.4 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Companys sale of its 30% interest in KK Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Companys deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Companys deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, representing the amount of deferred tax assets management believes is more likely than not to be realized.
50
While the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowances increased the Companys earnings by $139.6 million in fiscal 2012, the reversal has the effect of increasing the provision for income taxes, and therefore decreasing net income, beginning in fiscal 2013. This negative effect on earnings occurs because the reversal of the valuation allowances resulted in the recognition in fiscal 2012 of income tax benefits expected to be realized in later years. Absent the reversal of the valuation allowances, such tax benefits would have been recognized when realized in future periods upon the generation of taxable income. Accordingly, beginning in fiscal 2013, the Companys effective income tax rate, which in fiscal 2012 and earlier years bore little or no relationship to pretax income, more closely reflects the blended federal and state income tax rates in jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The reversal of the valuation allowance had no effect on the Companys cash payments for income taxes.
Because of the increase in the Companys effective income tax rate as described above, the Companys income tax expense in the first six months of fiscal 2013 is not comparable to income tax expense in the first six months of fiscal 2012. In addition, until such time as the Companys net operating loss carryforwards are exhausted or expire, GAAP income tax expense is expected to substantially exceed the amount of cash income taxes payable by the Company, which are expected to remain insignificant for the foreseeable future.
The portion of the income tax provision representing taxes estimated to be payable currently was approximately $910,000 and $2.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively, consisting principally of foreign withholding taxes related to royalties and franchise fees paid to the Company by international franchisees and, in fiscal 2012, $1.5 million of Mexican income taxes payable on the KK Mexico gain, partially offset by reversals of liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties due principally to the expiration of statutes of limitation.
The Companys estimated effective income tax rate on GAAP ordinary income for fiscal 2013 is 45%. That estimate is subject to revision in subsequent quarters as additional information becomes available.
The following non-GAAP financial information and related reconciliation to GAAP measures are provided to assist the reader in understanding (1) the effect of the fiscal 2012 reversal of the valuation allowance on the Companys results of operations for fiscal 2013, and (2) the effect of the non-recurring gain on the sale of the interest in KK Mexico on the Companys results of operations for fiscal 2012. The non-GAAP information is intended to facilitate comparisons of fiscal 2013 results with the Companys results for fiscal 2012, and to illustrate the material difference between the Companys income tax expense and income taxes currently payable. Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common share reflect income tax expense only to the extent such expense is currently payable in cash and, in fiscal 2012, exclude the gain on the sale of the equity interest in KK Mexico. These non-GAAP performances measures are consistent with other measurements made by management in the operation of the business which do not consider income taxes except to the extent to which those taxes currently are payable, for example, capital allocation decisions and incentive compensation measurements that are made on a pretax basis.
Six Months Ended | ||||||
July 29, | July 31, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 10,955 | $ | 18,010 | ||
Provision for deferred income taxes | 7,524 | 128 | ||||
Gain on sale of interest in KK Mexico | ||||||
(net of income taxes of $1,492) | - | (4,706 | ) | |||
Adjusted net income | $ | 18,479 | $ | 13,432 | ||
Adjusted earnings per common share: | ||||||
Basic | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.20 | ||
Diluted | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.19 | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||
Basic | 68,511 | 68,827 | ||||
Diluted | 70,660 | 71,438 |
51
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following table presents a summary of the Companys cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the first six months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012.
Six Months Ended | |||||||
July 29, | July 31, | ||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 22,993 | $ | 12,692 | |||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities | (5,208 | ) | 4,609 | ||||
Net cash used for financing activities | (21,102 | ) | (6,947 | ) | |||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (3,317 | ) | $ | 10,354 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.0 million and $12.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. Higher operating income accounted for a majority of the improvement. Cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of fiscal 2012 was adversely affected by a temporary increase in inventories associated with the outsourcing of distribution of doughnut mixes and other KK Supply Chain products for international and certain domestic stores to a third party vendor. In addition, payments on leases related to closed stores were approximately $1.3 million higher in the in the first six months of fiscal 2012 than in the first six months of fiscal 2013, principally due to settlements with landlords on terminated leases in the fiscal 2012 period. The balance in the change in cash flows from operating activities principally reflects normal fluctuations in working capital.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used for investing activities was $5.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 and compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $4.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
Cash used for capital expenditures increased to approximately $5.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013 from $4.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. The Company currently expects capital expenditures to range from $10 to $15 million in the second half of fiscal 2013. The Company intends to fund these capital expenditures from cash provided by operating activities, from existing cash balances and, to a lesser extent, through leases.
In the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company received proceeds of approximately $7.7 million from the sale of the Companys 30% equity interest in KK Mexico as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein.
In connection with the refinancing of the Companys Secured Credit Facilities in January 2011 as more fully described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2012 Form 10-K, the Company deposited into escrow $1.8 million related to properties with respect to which the Company agreed to furnish to the lenders certain documentation on or before January 31, 2012, with amounts to be released from escrow upon the Companys furnishing such documentation. In fiscal 2012, the entire $1.8 million was released from escrow, including $1.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used by financing activities was $21.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, compared to $6.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
During the first six months of fiscal 2013, the Company repaid approximately $1.1 million of scheduled principal amortization of outstanding term loan and capitalized lease indebtedness.
During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company repaid approximately $7.8 million of outstanding term loan and capitalized lease indebtedness, consisting of approximately $1.1 million of scheduled principal amortization, $6.2 million of prepayments from the sale of the Companys interest in KK Mexico as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein, and $520,000 of prepayments from the proceeds of the exercise of stock options.
52
On March 27, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Companys common stock. The Company completed the share repurchase during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, purchasing 3,113,000 shares in the first six months of fiscal 2013 at an average cost of $6.42 per share, for a total cost of $20 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) related to fair value measurements. The ASU clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013; such adoption had no effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting standards which require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders equity. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in addition to the consolidated statement of income.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
There have been no material changes from the disclosures in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in the 2012 Form 10-K.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of July 29, 2012, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management performed, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. The Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of July 29, 2012, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended July 29, 2012, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
There have been no material changes from the disclosures contained in Part 1, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in the 2012 Form 10-K.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the 2012 Form 10-K.
53
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Maximum Number | ||||||||||
(or Approximate | ||||||||||
Total Number of | Dollar Value) of | |||||||||
Shares (or units) | Shares (or Units) | |||||||||
Purchased as Part | that May Yet Be | |||||||||
Total Number of | of Publicly | Purchased Under | ||||||||
Shares (or units) | Average Price Paid | Announced Plans | the Plans or | |||||||
Purchased | per Share (or unit) | or Programs | Programs | |||||||
Period | (a)(1) | (b) | (c) | (d)(2) | ||||||
April 30, 2012 through May 27, 2012 | 1,257,622 | $ | 6.52 | 1,257,622 | $ | 9,944,000 | ||||
May 28, 2012 through June 24, 2012 | 1,496,137 | 6.21 | 1,496,137 | 652,000 | ||||||
June 25, 2012 through July 29, 2012 | 104,169 | 6.27 | 104,169 | - | ||||||
Total | 2,857,928 | $ | 6.35 | 2,857,928 | $ | - |
(1) | Due to the Companys incorporation in North Carolina, which does not recognize treasury shares, the shares repurchased are canceled at the time of repurchase. | ||
(2) | On March 27, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Companys common stock. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS.
The exhibits filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are set forth in the Exhibit Index on page 56 and are incorporated herein by reference.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. | |||
Date: September 7, 2012 | By: | /s/ Douglas R. Muir | |
Name: | Douglas R. Muir | ||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
55
Exhibit Index
3.1 | | Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010) | ||
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2008) | ||
10.1 | | Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 14, 2012)* | ||
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | ||
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | ||
32.1 | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.2 | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
101 | The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012, and July 31, 2011; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended July 29, 2012, and July 31, 2011; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the six months ended July 29, 2012 and July 31, 2011; and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements** |
* Executive compensation plan or agreement,
** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
Our SEC file number for documents filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is 001-16485
56
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, James H. Morgan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 7, 2012
/s/ James H. Morgan | ||
James H. Morgan | ||
Chief Executive Officer |
57
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Douglas R. Muir, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 7, 2012
/s/ Douglas R. Muir | ||
Douglas R. Muir | ||
Chief Financial Officer |
58
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, James H. Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ James H. Morgan | ||
James H. Morgan | ||
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: September 7, 2012
This certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
59
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, Douglas R. Muir, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Douglas R. Muir | ||
Douglas R. Muir | ||
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: September 7, 2012
This certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
60
Derivative (Effect of Derivative Instruments by Balance Sheet locations) (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jul. 29, 2012
|
Jan. 29, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Derivative [Line Items] | ||
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedge Asset at Fair Value | $ 30 | $ 53 |
Agricultural Commodity Futures Contracts [Member]
|
||
Derivative [Line Items] | ||
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments, Asset, at Fair Value | 57 | 21 |
Other Current Assets [Member] | Agricultural Commodity Futures Contracts [Member]
|
||
Derivative [Line Items] | ||
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments, Asset, at Fair Value | 57 | 21 |
Other Assets [Member]
|
||
Derivative [Line Items] | ||
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedge Asset at Fair Value | $ 30 | $ 53 |
Receivables (Doubtful accounts summary) (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jul. 29, 2012
|
Jul. 31, 2011
|
|
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items] | ||
Balance | $ 1,158 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | (73) | (399) |
Balance | 161 | |
Trade Accounts Receivable [Member]
|
||
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items] | ||
Balance | 1,158 | 1,334 |
Provision for doubtful accounts | (14) | 13 |
Net chargeoffs | (983) | (40) |
Balance | 161 | 1,307 |
Equity Method Franchisees Receivables [Member]
|
||
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items] | ||
Balance | 0 | 0 |
Provision for doubtful accounts | (59) | 0 |
Net chargeoffs | 59 | 0 |
Balance | 0 | 0 |
Notes Receivable [Member]
|
||
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items] | ||
Balance | 68 | 538 |
Provision for doubtful accounts | 0 | (412) |
Net chargeoffs | 0 | (58) |
Balance | $ 68 | $ 68 |
Fair Value Measurement (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul. 29, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block] |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, by Balance Sheet Grouping [Table Text Block] |
|
Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs (accrual for lease termination costs) (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jul. 29, 2012
|
Jul. 31, 2011
|
Jul. 29, 2012
|
Jul. 31, 2011
|
|
Impairment Charges And Lease Termination Costs Disclosure [Abstract] | ||||
Balance | $ 694 | $ 1,290 | $ 709 | $ 1,995 |
Adjustments to previously recorded provisions resulting from settlements with lessors and adjustments of previous estimates | 47 | 280 | 70 | 492 |
Accretion of discount | 8 | 21 | 16 | 53 |
Total provision | 55 | 301 | 86 | 545 |
Payments on unexpired leases, including settlements with lessors | (70) | (439) | (116) | (1,388) |
Balance | $ 679 | $ 1,152 | $ 679 | $ 1,152 |
Income taxes
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jul. 29, 2012
|
|
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block] | Note 3 — Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon management's expectation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized for which payment has been deferred, or expenses which have been deducted in the Company's tax returns but which have not yet been recognized as an expense in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets generally represent tax deductions or credits that will be reflected in future tax returns for which the Company has already recorded a tax benefit in its consolidated financial statements.
The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the income tax benefits is more likely than not.
The Company had valuation allowances against deferred tax assets of $10.7 million at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012, representing the portion of such deferred tax assets which, as of such dates, management estimated would not be realized in future periods. Under GAAP, future realization of deferred tax assets is evaluated under a “more likely than not” standard. Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained valuation allowances on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Company's deferred income tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2009.
The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Company's pretax profit increased to $30.4 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Company's sale of its 30% interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KK Mexico”), the Company's franchisee in Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Company's deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Company's deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
The remaining valuation allowance of $10.7 million at July 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 represents the portion of the Company's deferred tax assets management estimates will not be realized in the future. Such assets are associated principally with state net operating loss and state credit carryforwards having relatively short carryforward periods which are forecasted to expire unused, as well as federal foreign tax credits and federal jobs credit carryforwards forecasted to expire unused.
The realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent on future events. While management believes its forecast of future taxable income is reasonable, actual results inevitably will vary from management's forecasts. Such variances could result in adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in future periods, and such adjustments could be material to the financial statements.
In fiscal 2008, the Company issued warrants to acquire shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $12.21 per share in connection with the settlement of certain litigation. Such warrants expired worthless in March 2012 and, accordingly, the Company will not receive any income tax deduction related to them. Deferred tax assets at January 29, 2012 included approximately $7.2 million related to these warrants. In accordance with GAAP, the write-off of this deferred tax asset was charged to common stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and reduced the Company's pool of windfall tax benefits. |