10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________ 

Form 10-Q

(Mark one)
	þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended April 29, 2012
OR
	o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from                 to

Commission file number 001-16485
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina	56-2169715
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
370 Knollwood Street,	27103
Winston-Salem, North Carolina	(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(336) 725-2981

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  þ No  o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o	Accelerated filer  þ
Non-accelerated filer  o	Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o No  þ

Number of shares of Common Stock, no par value, outstanding as of May 25, 2012: 66,591,493.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		4
Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	4
Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	22
Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	41
Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	41
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		42
Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	42
Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS	42
Item 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	42
Item 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	43
Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	43
Item 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	43
Item 6.	EXHIBITS	43
SIGNATURES		44
EXHIBIT INDEX		45

2

     As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, “Krispy Kreme,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References to fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 mean the fiscal years ending February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012, respectively.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that relate to our plans, objectives, estimates and goals. Statements expressing expectations regarding our future and projections relating to products, sales, revenues, expenditures, costs and earnings are typical of such statements, and are made under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future economic performance, considering the information currently available to management. These statements are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “seek,” “strive” or similar words, or the negative of these words, identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to:

• the quality of Company and franchise store operations;
   
• our ability, and our dependence on the ability of our franchisees, to execute on our and their business plans;
   
• our relationships with our franchisees;
   
• our ability to implement our international growth strategy;
   
• our ability to implement our new domestic small shop operating model;
   
• political, economic, currency and other risks associated with our international operations;
   
• the price and availability of raw materials needed to produce doughnut mixes and other ingredients, and the price of motor fuel;
   
• our relationships with wholesale customers;
   
• our ability to protect our trademarks and trade secrets;
   
• changes in customer preferences and perceptions;
   
• risks associated with competition;
   
• risks related to the food service industry, including food safety and protection of personal information;
   
• compliance with government regulations relating to food products and franchising;
   
• increased costs or other effects of new government regulations relating to healthcare benefits; and
   
• other factors discussed in Krispy Kreme’s periodic reports and other information filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29,2012 (the “2012 Form 10-K”).

All such factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and may be beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors or to assess the impact of each such factor on the Company. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.

We caution you that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the facts, results, performance or achievements we have anticipated in such forward-looking statements except as required by the federal securities laws.

3

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

	Page
Index to Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011	5
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011	6
Consolidated balance sheet as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012	7
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011	8
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011	9
Notes to financial statements	10

4

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues	$	108,496		$	104,600
Operating expenses:
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation
expense shown below)		88,691			86,983
General and administrative expenses		6,458			5,644
Depreciation expense		2,482			1,938
Impairment charges and lease termination costs		31			244
Operating income		10,834			9,791
Interest income		27			45
Interest expense		(398	)		(477	)
Equity in losses of equity method franchisees		(50	)		(9	)
Other non-operating income and (expense), net		78			86
Income before income taxes		10,491			9,436
Provision for income taxes		4,465			265
Net income	$	6,026		$	9,171
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.09		$	0.13
Diluted	$	0.08		$	0.13

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	6,026		$	9,171
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-			84
Less income taxes		-			(33	)
		-			51
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge		2			(198	)
Less income taxes		(1	)		78
		1			(120	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		1			(69	)
Comprehensive income	$	6,027		$	9,102

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

6

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)

	April 29,			January 29,
	2012			2012
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,524		$	44,319
Receivables		21,665			21,616
Receivables from equity method franchisees		876			655
Inventories		15,909			16,497
Deferred income taxes		10,540			10,540
Other current assets		3,135			3,613
Total current assets		103,649			97,240
Property and equipment		74,515			75,466
Investments in equity method franchisees		-			-
Goodwill and other intangible assets		23,776			23,776
Deferred income taxes		117,644			129,053
Other assets		9,937			9,413
Total assets	$	329,521		$	334,948
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	2,195		$	2,224
Accounts payable		11,170			10,494
Accrued liabilities		23,990			28,800
Total current liabilities		37,355			41,518
Long-term debt, less current maturities		24,812			25,369
Other long-term obligations		19,843			18,935
Commitments and contingencies
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value		-			-
Common stock, no par value		369,897			377,539
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(335	)		(336	)
Accumulated deficit		(122,051	)		(128,077	)
Total shareholders’ equity		247,511			249,126
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	329,521		$	334,948

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

7

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	6,026		$	9,171
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense		2,482			1,938
Deferred income taxes		4,234			45
Accrued rent expense		114			184
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		229			145
Share-based compensation		1,377			893
Provision for doubtful accounts		48			(295	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		103			102
Equity in losses of equity method franchisees		50			9
Other		(67	)		(56	)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(261	)		(3,052	)
Inventories		588			(455	)
Other current and non-current assets		540			483
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(5,131	)		(3,013	)
Other long-term obligations		32			(1,033	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		10,364			5,066
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,317	)		(1,843	)
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment		41			-
Escrow deposit recovery		-			200
Other investing activities		(36	)		(9	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(1,312	)		(1,652	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt		(545	)		(626	)
Deferred financing costs		(11	)		-
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		9			-
Repurchase of common shares		(1,300	)		(57	)
Net cash used for financing activities		(1,847	)		(683	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,205			2,731
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		44,319			21,970
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	51,524		$	24,701

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

8

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)

						Accumulated
	Common					Other
	Shares		Common			Comprehensive			Accumulated
	Outstanding		Stock			Income (Loss)			Deficit			Total
	(In thousands)
Balance at January 29, 2012	68,092		$	377,539		$	(336	)	$	(128,077	)	$	249,126
Comprehensive income for the three months
ended April 29, 2012							1			6,026			6,027
Write-off of deferred tax asset related to the
expiration of unexercised stock warrants	-			(7,174	)								(7,174	)
Exercise of warrants	1			9									9
Share-based compensation	11			1,377									1,377
Repurchase of common shares	(255	)		(1,854	)								(1,854	)
Balance at April 29, 2012	67,849		$	369,897		$	(335	)	$	(122,051	)	$	247,511
Balance at January 30, 2011	67,527		$	370,808		$	(34	)	$	(294,346	)	$	76,428
Comprehensive income for the three months
ended May 1, 2011							(69	)		9,171			9,102
Cancelation of restricted shares	(1	)		-									-
Share-based compensation	13			893									893
Repurchase of common shares	(13	)		(57	)								(57	)
Balance at May 1, 2011	67,526		$	371,644		$	(103	)	$	(285,175	)	$	86,366

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

9

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Accounting Policies

     Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (“KKDI”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the sale of doughnuts and complementary products through Company-owned stores. The Company also derives revenue from franchise and development fees and royalties from franchisees. Additionally, the Company sells doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut-making equipment to franchisees.

Significant Accounting Policies

BASIS OF PRESENTATION. The consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, accordingly, do not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) with respect to annual financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Company’s accounting practices described in the 2012 Form 10-K, but have not been audited. In management’s opinion, the financial statements include all adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s results of operations for the periods presented. The consolidated balance sheet data as of January 29, 2012 were derived from the Company’s audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION. The financial statements include the accounts of KKDI and its subsidiaries, the most significant of which is KKDI’s principal operating subsidiary, Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation.

Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence but which the Company does not control, and whose financial statements are not otherwise required to be consolidated, are accounted for using the equity method. These entities typically are 25% to 35% owned and are hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Equity Method Franchisees.”

EARNINGS PER SHARE. The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, computed using the treasury stock method. Such potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the vesting of currently unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

The following table sets forth amounts used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Numerator: net income	$	6,026	$	9,171
Denominator:
Basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding		69,562		68,754
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants		1,781		1,655
Restricted stock and restricted stock units		545		760
Diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares
outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares		71,888		71,169

Stock options and warrants with respect to 2.3 million and 8.1 million shares for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively, as well as 134,000 unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested restricted stock units for the three months ended May 1, 2011, have been excluded from the computation of the number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.

10

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) related to fair value measurements. The ASU clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013; such adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting standards which require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in addition to the consolidated statement of income.

Note 2 — Segment Information

The Company’s reportable segments are Company Stores, Domestic Franchise, International Franchise and KK Supply Chain. The Company Stores segment is comprised of the stores operated by the Company. These stores sell doughnuts and complementary products through both on-premises and wholesale sales channels, although some stores serve only one of these distribution channels. The Domestic Franchise and International Franchise segments consist of the Company’s franchise operations. Under the terms of franchise agreements, domestic and international franchisees pay royalties and fees to the Company in return for the use of the Krispy Kreme name and ongoing brand and operational support. Expenses for these segments include costs to recruit new franchisees, to assist in store openings, to support franchisee operations and marketing efforts, as well as allocated corporate costs. The majority of the ingredients and materials used by Company stores are purchased from the KK Supply Chain segment, which supplies doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut making equipment to both Company and franchisee-owned stores.

All intercompany sales by the KK Supply Chain segment to the Company Stores segment are at prices intended to reflect an arms-length transfer price and are eliminated in consolidation. Operating income for the Company Stores segment does not include any profit earned by the KK Supply Chain segment on sales of doughnut mix and other items to the Company Stores segment; such profit is included in KK Supply Chain operating income.

The following table presents the results of operations of the Company’s operating segments for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011. Segment operating income is consolidated operating income before unallocated general and administrative expenses and impairment charges and lease termination costs.

11

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Company Stores	$	73,341		$	69,475
Domestic Franchise		2,633			2,369
International Franchise		6,027			5,636
KK Supply Chain:
Total revenues		53,785			53,883
Less – intersegment sales elimination		(27,290	)		(26,763	)
External KK Supply Chain revenues		26,495			27,120
Total revenues	$	108,496		$	104,600
Operating income:
Company Stores	$	2,948		$	2,174
Domestic Franchise		1,569			1,147
International Franchise		4,494			4,171
KK Supply Chain		8,477			8,342
Total segment operating income		17,488			15,834
Unallocated general and administrative expenses		(6,623	)		(5,799	)
Impairment charges and lease termination costs		(31	)		(244	)
Consolidated operating income	$	10,834		$	9,791
Depreciation expense:
Company Stores	$	2,097		$	1,537
Domestic Franchise		55			55
International Franchise		3			2
KK Supply Chain		162			189
Corporate administration		165			155
Total depreciation expense	$	2,482		$	1,938

     Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures is not presented as such information is not used in measuring segment performance or allocating resources among segments.

Note 3 — Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon management’s expectation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized for which payment has been deferred, or expenses which have been deducted in the Company’s tax returns but which have not yet been recognized as an expense in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets generally represent tax deductions or credits that will be reflected in future tax returns for which the Company has already recorded a tax benefit in its consolidated financial statements.

The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the income tax benefits is more likely than not.

The Company had valuation allowances against deferred tax assets of $10.7 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012, representing the portion of such deferred tax assets which, as of such dates, management estimated would not be realized in future periods. Under GAAP, future realization of deferred tax assets is evaluated under a “more likely than not” standard. Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained valuation allowances on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Company’s deferred income tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from of the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2009.

The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Company’s pretax profit increased to over $30 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Company’s sale of its 30% interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KK Mexico”), the Company’s franchisee in Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

12

     The remaining valuation allowance of $10.7 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 represents the portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets management estimates will not be realized in the future. Such assets are associated principally with state net operating loss and state credit carryforwards having relatively short carryforward periods which are forecasted to expire unused, as well as federal foreign tax credits and federal jobs credit carryforwards forecasted to expire unused.

The realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent on future events. While management believes its forecast of future taxable income is reasonable, actual results inevitably will vary from management’s forecasts. Such variances could result in adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in future periods, and such adjustments could be material to the financial statements.

In fiscal 2008, the Company issued warrants to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $12.21 per share in connection with the settlement of certain litigation. Such warrants expired worthless in March 2012 and, accordingly, the Company will not receive any income tax deduction related to them. Deferred tax assets at January 29, 2012 included approximately $7.2 million related to these warrants. In accordance with GAAP, the write-off of this deferred tax asset was charged to common stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and reduced the Company’s pool of windfall tax benefits.

Note 4 — Receivables

The components of receivables are as follows:

	April 29,			January 29,
	2012			2012
	(In thousands)
Receivables:
Wholesale customers	$	10,352		$	10,169
Unaffiliated franchisees		10,756			11,405
Other receivables		889			1,015
Current portion of notes receivable		198			185
		22,195			22,774
Less — allowance for doubtful accounts:
Wholesale customers		(216	)		(349	)
Unaffiliated franchisees		(314	)		(809	)
		(530	)		(1,158	)
	$	21,665		$	21,616
Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees (Note 6):
Trade	$	876		$	655

     The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,158		$	1,334
Provision for doubtful accounts		107			117
Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		(735	)		7
Balance at end of period	$	530		$	1,458
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables from Equity Method Franchisees:
Balance at beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Provision for doubtful accounts		(59	)		-
Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		59			-
Balance at end of period	$	-		$	-

13

     The Company also has notes receivable from franchisees which are summarized in the following table. These balances are included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

	April 29,			January 29,
	2012			2012
	(In thousands)
Notes receivable:
Notes receivable from franchisees	$	684		$	777
Less — portion due within one year included in receivables		(198	)		(185	)
Less — allowance for doubtful accounts		(68	)		(68	)
	$	418		$	524

The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to notes receivable are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
		(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	68	$	538
Provision for doubtful accounts		-		(412	)
Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		-		21
Balance at end of period	$	68	$	147

In addition to the foregoing notes receivable, the Company had promissory notes totaling approximately $3.3 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 representing payment obligations related to royalties and fees due to the Company which, as a result of doubt about their collection, the Company had not yet recorded as revenues. No payments were required to be made currently on any of these amounts. During the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $375,000 of previously unrecognized revenues related to KK Mexico which were received on May 5, 2011 in connection with the Company’s sale of its 30% equity interest in the franchisee, as more fully described in Note 6. During the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company also reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 related to KK Mexico; such note also was paid in full on May 5, 2011.

Note 5 — Inventories

The components of inventories are as follows:

	April 29,		January 29,
	2012		2012
	(In thousands)
Raw materials	$	5,339	$	5,306
Work in progress		187		89
Finished goods and purchased merchandise		10,383		11,102
	$	15,909	$	16,497

Note 6 — Investments in Franchisees

As of April 29, 2012, the Company had investments in three franchisees. These investments have been made in the form of capital contributions and, in certain instances, loans evidenced by promissory notes. These investments are reflected as “Investments in equity method franchisees” in the consolidated balance sheet.

14

     The Company’s financial exposures related to franchisees in which the Company has an investment are summarized in the tables below.

	April 29, 2012
	Company		Investment
	Ownership		and					Loan
	Percentage		Advances			Receivables		Guarantees
			(In thousands)
Kremeworks, LLC	25.0	%	$	900		$	417	$	686
Kremeworks Canada, LP	24.5	%		-			37		-
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC	35.3	%		-			422		1,868
				900			876	$	2,554
Less: reserves and allowances				(900	)		-
			$	-		$	876

	January 29, 2012
	Company		Investment
	Ownership		and					Loan
	Percentage		Advances			Receivables		Guarantees
			(In thousands)
Kremeworks, LLC	25.0	%	$	900		$	308	$	739
Kremeworks Canada, LP	24.5	%		-			20		-
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC	35.3	%		-			327		1,946
				900			655	$	2,685
Less: reserves and allowances				(900	)		-
			$	-		$	655

The Company has guaranteed loans from third-party financial institutions on behalf of certain Equity Method Franchisees, primarily to assist the franchisees in obtaining third-party financing. The loans are collateralized by certain assets of the franchisee, generally the Krispy Kreme store and related equipment. The loan guarantee amounts represent the portion of the principal amount outstanding under the related loan that is subject to the Company’s guarantee.

The Company has a 25% interest in Kremeworks, LLC (“Kremeworks”), and has guaranteed 20% of the outstanding principal balance of certain of Kremeworks’ bank indebtedness, which, as amended, matures in October 2012. The aggregate amount of such indebtedness was approximately $3.4 million at April 29, 2012.

Current liabilities include accruals of approximately $1.9 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 for potential payments under loan guarantees related to Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC (“KKSF”). The underlying indebtedness related to approximately $1.6 million of the Company’s KKSF guarantee exposure matured by its terms in October 2009. Such maturity has been extended on a month-to-month basis pursuant to an informal agreement between KKSF and the lender. There was no liability reflected in the financial statements for the guarantee of Kremeworks’ debt because the Company did not believe it was probable that the Company would be required to perform under that guarantee.

On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in KK Mexico, to KK Mexico’s majority shareholder. The Company received cash proceeds of approximately $7.7 million in exchange for its equity interest and, after deducting costs of the transaction, realized a gain of approximately $6.2 million on the disposition. After provision for payment of Mexican income taxes related to the sale of approximately $1.5 million, the Company reported an after tax gain on the disposition of approximately $4.7 million in the quarter ending July 31, 2011.

In connection with the Company’s sale of its KK Mexico interest, KK Mexico paid approximately $765,000 of amounts due to the Company which were evidenced by promissory notes, relating principally to past due royalties and fees due to the Company. As a consequence of this payment, in the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 and recorded royalty and franchise fee income of approximately $280,000 and $95,000, respectively. The reserve had previously been established, and the royalties and fees had not previously been recognized as revenue, because of uncertainty surrounding the collection of these amounts.

15

Note 7 — Shareholders’ Equity

Share-Based Compensation for Employees and Directors

     The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based payment (“SBP”) awards based on their fair values. The fair value of SBP awards for which employees and directors render the requisite service necessary for the award to vest is recognized over the related vesting period.

The aggregate cost of SBP awards charged to earnings for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 is set forth in the following table. The Company did not realize any excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units during any of the periods.

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Costs charged to earnings related to:
Stock options	$	827	$	375
Restricted stock and restricted stock units		550		518
Total costs	$	1,377	$	893
Costs included in:
Direct operating expenses	$	370	$	482
General and administrative expenses		1,007		411
Total costs	$	1,377	$	893

Repurchases of Common Stock

On March 27, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Company’s common stock. The Company’s lenders have consented to such repurchases through June 30, 2013, subject to certain conditions, as described in Note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the 2012 Form 10-K.

The Company generally permits holders of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards to satisfy their obligations to reimburse the Company for the minimum required statutory withholding taxes arising from the vesting of such awards by surrendering vested common shares in lieu of reimbursing the Company in cash.

16

The following table summarizes repurchases of common stock for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
		Common			Common
	Shares	Stock		Shares	Stock
Shares repurchased under share repurchase authorization	255	$	1,854	-	$	-
Shares surrendered in reimbursement for withholding taxes	-		-	13		57
	255	$	1,854	13	$	57

Through April 29, 2012, the Company repurchased 255,000 shares at an average cost of $7.27 per share, for a total cost of $1.9 million, of which approximately $1.3 million was settled prior to quarter end.

Note 8 — Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs

The components of impairment charges and lease termination costs are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Impairment of long-lived assets	$	-	$	-
Lease termination costs		31		244
Total impairment charges and lease termination costs	$	31	$	244

The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Company’s annual budgeting process. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values.

Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities are estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals and from settlements with landlords.

17

The transactions reflected in the accrual for lease termination costs are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	709		$	1,995
Provision for lease termination costs:
Adjustments to previously recorded provisions resulting
from settlements with lessors and adjustments of previous estimates		23			212
Accretion of discount		8			32
Total provision		31			244
Payments on unexpired leases, including settlements with
lessors		(46	)		(949	)
Balance at end of period	$	694		$	1,290

Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements

The accounting standards for fair value measurements define fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The accounting standards for fair value measurements establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.
   
• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
   
• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value measurement of the assets or liabilities. These include certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

18

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012.

	April 29, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets:
401(k) mirror plan assets	$	1,634	$	-	$	-
Agricultural commodity futures contracts		8		-		-
Interest rate derivative		-		53		-
Total assets	$	1,642	$	53	$	-

	January 29, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets:
401(k) mirror plan assets	$	1,039	$	-	$	-
Agricultural commodity futures contracts		21		-		-
Interest rate derivative		-		53		-
Total assets	$	1,060	$	53	$	-

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

There were no nonrecurring fair value measurements recorded during the three months ended April 29, 2012 or May 1, 2011.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments at the Balance Sheet Dates

The carrying values and approximate fair values of certain financial instruments as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 were as follows:

	April 29, 2012				January 29, 2012
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,524	$	51,524	$	44,319	$	44,319
Receivables		21,665		21,665		21,616		21,616
Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees		876		876		655		655
Agricultural commodity futures contracts		8		8		21		21
Interest rate derivatives		53		53		53		53
Liabilities:
Accounts payable		11,170		11,170		10,494		10,494
Long-term debt (including current maturities)		27,007		27,007		27,593		27,593

The carrying value and fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was $27.0 million at April 29, 2012 and $27.6 million at January 29, 2012. The fair value of the term loan is estimated based on an indicative bid price. As such, the term loan is classified within Level 2, as defined under GAAP.

Note 10 — Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.

19

     The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its derivative instruments. The Company mitigates this risk of nonperformance by dealing with highly rated counterparties.

Additional disclosure about the fair value of derivative instruments is included in Note 9.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company is exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of ingredients of its products, of which flour, sugar and shortening are the most significant. In order to bring greater stability to the cost of ingredients, from time to time the Company purchases exchange-traded commodity futures contracts, and options on such contracts, for raw materials which are ingredients of its products or which are components of such ingredients, including wheat and soybean oil. The Company is also exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of gasoline used by its delivery vehicles. To mitigate the risk of fluctuations in the price of its gasoline purchases, the Company may purchase exchange-traded commodity futures contracts and options on such contracts. The difference between the cost, if any, and the fair value of commodity derivatives is reflected in earnings because the Company has not designated any of these instruments as hedges. Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transactions in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating commodity prices. The settlement of commodity derivative contracts is reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows as a cash flow from operating activities. At April 29, 2012, the Company had commodity derivatives with an aggregate contract volume of 140,000 bushels of wheat. Other than the requirement to meet minimum margin requirements with respect to the commodity derivatives, there are no collateral requirements related to such contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

All of the borrowings under the Company’s secured credit facilities bear interest at variable rates based upon either the lenders’ prime rate, the Fed funds rate or LIBOR. The interest cost of the Company’s debt may be affected by changes in these short-term interest rates and increases in those rates may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

On March 3, 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate derivative contract having an aggregate notional principal amount of $17.5 million. The derivative contract entitles the Company to receive from the counterparty the excess, if any, of the three-month LIBOR rate over 3.00% for each of the calendar quarters in the period beginning April 2012 and ending December 2015. The Company is accounting for this derivative contract as a cash flow hedge.

Quantitative Summary of Derivative Positions and Their Effect on Results of Operations

The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012.

		Asset Derivatives
		Fair Value
		April 29,		January 29,
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Balance Sheet Location	2012		2012
		(In thousands)
Agricultural commodity futures contracts	Other current assets	$	8	$	21
		Asset Derivatives
		Fair Value
		April 29,		January 29,
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge	Balance Sheet Location	2012		2012
		(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative	Other assets	$	53	$	53

The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 was as follows.

20

		Amount of Derivative Gain or
		(Loss)
		Recognized in Income
		Three Months Ended
	Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) Recognized in	April 29,		May 1,
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Income	2012		2011
		(In thousands)
Agricultural commodity futures contracts	Direct operating expenses	$	51	$	(469	)
Gasoline commodity futures contracts	Direct operating expenses		-		13
Total		$	51	$	(456	)

		Amortization of Derivative Asset
		Recognized in Income
		Three Months Ended
	Location of Amortization of Derivative Asset	April 29,			May 1,
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge	Recognized in Income	2012			2011
		(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative	Interest expense	$	(2	)	$	-

		Amount of Derivative Gain or
		(Loss)
		Recognized in Income
		Three Months Ended
	Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) Recognized in	April 29,			May 1,
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge	OCI	2012			2011
		(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative	Change in fair value of derivative	$	2		$	(198	)
	Less - income tax effect		(1	)		78
	Net change in amount recognized in OCI	$	1		$	(120	)

21

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

Comparability of Results of Operations

The Company’s net income and earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 are not comparable to the corresponding amounts for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a result of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. See “Results of Operations — Three Months Ended April 29, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended May 1, 2011 — Provision for Income Taxes” below.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth operating metrics for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

22

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,				May 1,
	2012				2011
Change in Same Store Sales (on-premises sales only):
Company stores		2.1		%		5.8		%
Domestic Franchise stores		5.8		%		4.6		%
International Franchise stores		(7.9	)	%		(4.3	)	%
International Franchise stores, in constant dollars(1)		(7.4	)	%		(9.6	)	%
Change in Same Store Customer Count - Company stores (retail sales only)		1.3		%		2.9		%
Wholesale Metrics (Company stores only):
Average weekly number of doors served:
Grocers/mass merchants		5,603				5,866
Convenience stores		4,600				5,145
Average weekly sales per door:
Grocers/mass merchants	$	316			$	292
Convenience stores		248				216
Systemwide Sales (in thousands):(2)
Company stores	$	72,805			$	69,027
Domestic Franchise stores		71,972				66,697
International Franchise stores		104,920				91,591
International Franchise stores, in constant dollars(3)		104,920				91,144
Average Weekly Sales Per Store (in thousands):(4) (5)
Company stores:
Factory stores:
Commissaries — wholesale	$	181.9			$	198.5
Dual-channel stores:
On-premises		35.6				34.9
Wholesale		46.9				46.5
Total		82.5				81.4
On-premises only stores		35.1				34.3
All factory stores		72.5				72.6
Satellite stores		21.3				20.7
All stores		61.3				62.6
Domestic Franchise stores:
Factory stores	$	47.7			$	44.9
Satellite stores		18.0				14.3
International Franchise stores:
Factory stores	$	41.1			$	45.8
Satellite stores		11.7				9.8

23

(1)	Represents the change in International Franchise same store sales computed by reconverting franchise store sales in each foreign currency to U.S. dollars at a constant rate of exchange for each period.
(2)	Excludes sales among Company and franchise stores.
(3)	Represents International Franchise store sales computed by reconverting International Franchise store sales for the three months ended May 1, 2011 to U.S. dollars based upon the weighted average of the exchange rates prevailing in the three months ended April 29, 2012.
(4)	Includes sales between Company and franchise stores.
(5)	Metrics for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 include only stores open at the respective period end.

     The change in “same store sales” is computed by dividing the aggregate on-premises sales (including fundraising sales) during the current year period for all stores which had been open for more than 56 consecutive weeks during the current year (but only to the extent such sales occurred in the 57^th or later week of each store’s operation) by the aggregate on-premises sales of such stores for the comparable weeks in the preceding year. Once a store has been open for at least 57 consecutive weeks, its sales are included in the computation of same store sales for all subsequent periods. In the event a store is closed temporarily (for example, for remodeling) and has no sales during one or more weeks, such store’s sales for the comparable weeks during the earlier or subsequent period are excluded from the same store sales computation. The change in same store customer count is similarly computed, but is based upon the number of retail transactions reported in the Company’s point-of-sale system.

For wholesale sales, “average weekly number of doors” represents the average number of customer locations to which product deliveries were made during a week, and “average weekly sales per door” represents the average weekly sales to each such location.

Systemwide sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, include sales by both Company and franchise stores. The Company believes systemwide sales data are useful in assessing the overall performance of the Krispy Kreme brand and, ultimately, the performance of the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein include sales by Company stores, sales to franchisees by the KK Supply Chain business segment, and royalties and fees received from franchise stores based on their sales, but exclude sales by franchise stores to their customers.

The following table sets forth data about the number of systemwide stores as of April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

	April 29,	May 1,
	2012	2011
Number of Stores Open At Period End:
Company stores:
Factory:
Commissaries	7	6
Dual-channel stores	35	35
On-premises only stores	30	28
Satellite stores	20	17
Total Company stores	92	86
Domestic Franchise stores:
Factory stores	102	101
Satellite stores	40	44
Total Domestic Franchise stores	142	145
International Franchise stores:
Factory stores	115	109
Satellite stores	343	312
Total International Franchise stores	458	421
Total systemwide stores	692	652

24

     The following table sets forth data about the number of store operating weeks for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,	May 1,
	2012	2011
Store Operating Weeks:
Company stores:
Factory stores:
Commissaries	91	78
Dual-channel stores	455	455
On-premises only stores	390	364
Satellite stores	260	212
Domestic Franchise stores:(1)
Factory stores	1,314	1,313
Satellite stores	519	547
International Franchise stores:(1)
Factory stores	1,313	1,158
Satellite stores	4,268	3,906

(1) Metrics for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 include only stores open at the respective period end.

     The following table sets forth the types and locations of Company stores as of April 29, 2012.

	Number of Company Stores
	Factory
State	Stores	Hot Shops	Fresh Shops	Total
Alabama	3	-	-	3
District of Columbia	-	1	-	1
Florida	4	-	-	4
Georgia	6	4	-	10
Indiana	3	1	-	4
Kansas	3	-	-	3
Kentucky	3	1	-	4
Louisiana	1	-	-	1
Maryland	2	-	-	2
Michigan	3	-	-	3
Mississippi	1	-	-	1
Missouri	4	-	-	4
New York	-	-	1	1
North Carolina	12	4	-	16
Ohio	6	-	-	6
South Carolina	2	3	-	5
Tennessee	9	3	-	12
Texas	3	-	-	3
Virginia	6	2	-	8
West Virginia	1	-	-	1
Total	72	19	1	92

25

     Changes in the number of Company stores during the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are summarized in the table below.

	Number of Company Stores
	Factory
	Stores	Hot Shops	Fresh Shops	Total
Three months ended April 29, 2012
January 29, 2012	72	19	1	92
Opened	-	-	-	-
Closed	-	-	-	-
April 29, 2012	72	19	1	92
Three months ended May 1, 2011
January 30, 2011	69	15	1	85
Opened	-	1	-	1
Closed	-	-	-	-
May 1, 2011	69	16	1	86

26

     The following table sets forth the types and locations of domestic franchise stores as of April 29, 2012.

	Number of Domestic Franchise Stores
	Factory
State	Stores	Hot Shops	Fresh Shops	Total
Alabama	5	3	-	8
Arizona	1	-	-	1
Arkansas	2	-	-	2
California	14	1	4	19
Colorado	2	-	-	2
Connecticut	1	-	3	4
Florida	12	6	1	19
Georgia	6	4	-	10
Hawaii	1	-	-	1
Idaho	1	-	-	1
Illinois	4	-	-	4
Iowa	1	-	-	1
Louisiana	3	-	-	3
Mississippi	2	1	-	3
Missouri	2	1	-	3
Nebraska	1	-	1	2
Nevada	3	-	2	5
New Jersey	-	1	-	1
New Mexico	1	-	1	2
North Carolina	7	1	-	8
Oklahoma	3	-	-	3
Oregon	2	-	-	2
Pennsylvania	4	3	1	8
South Carolina	6	2	1	9
Tennessee	1	-	-	1
Texas	7	2	-	9
Utah	2	-	-	2
Washington	7	-	-	7
Wisconsin	1	1	-	2
Total	102	26	14	142

27

     Changes in the number of domestic franchise stores during the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are summarized in the table below.

	Number of Domestic Franchise Stores
	Factory
	Stores		Hot Shops		Fresh Shops		Total
Three months ended April 29, 2012
January 29, 2012	102		25		15		142
Opened	1		2		-		3
Closed	(1	)	(1	)	(1	)	(3	)
April 29, 2012	102		26		14		142
Three months ended May 1, 2011
January 30, 2011	102		17		25		144
Opened	-		3		1		4
Closed	(1	)	(1	)	(1	)	(3	)
May 1, 2011	101		19		25		145

28

     The types and locations of international franchise stores as of April 29, 2012 are summarized in the table below.

	Number of International Franchise Stores
	Fiscal
	Year First	Factory
Country	Store Opened	Stores	Hot Shops	Fresh Shops	Kiosks	Total
Australia	2004	5	1	7	6	19
Bahrain	2009	1	-	1	-	2
Canada	2002	4	-	1	-	5
China	2010	2	-	1	-	3
Dominican Republic	2011	1	-	1	-	2
Indonesia	2007	3	-	3	6	12
Japan	2007	16	-	21	-	37
Kuwait	2007	3	-	7	10	20
Lebanon	2009	2	-	6	1	9
Malaysia	2010	2	1	1	3	7
Mexico	2004	6	1	23	43	73
Philippines	2007	5	3	18	4	30
Puerto Rico	2009	4	-	-	-	4
Qatar	2008	2	-	-	-	2
Saudi Arabia	2008	9	-	59	20	88
South Korea	2005	33	-	25	-	58
Thailand	2011	2	2	-	-	4
Turkey	2010	1	-	10	3	14
United Arab Emirates	2008	2	-	14	4	20
United Kingdom	2004	12	3	25	9	49
Total		115	11	223	109	458

29

     Changes in the number of international franchise stores during the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are summarized in the table below.

	Number of International Franchise Stores
	Factory
	Stores		Hot Shops	Fresh Shops		Kiosks		Total
Three months ended April 29, 2012
January 29, 2012	118		11	226		105		460
Opened	-		-	14		6		20
Closed	(3	)	-	(10	)	(9	)	(22	)
Change in store type	-		-	(7	)	7		-
April 29, 2012	115		11	223		109		458
Three months ended May 1, 2011
January 30, 2011	106		11	222		78		417
Opened	4		-	7		5		16
Closed	(1	)	-	(6	)	(5	)	(12	)
May 1, 2011	109		11	223		78		421

Three months ended April 29, 2012 compared to three months ended May 1, 2011

Overview

Total revenues rose by 3.7% to $108.5 million for the three months ended April 29, 2012 compared to $104.6 million for the three months ended May 1, 2011.

Consolidated operating income increased to $10.8 million in the three months ended April 29, 2012 from $9.8 million in the three months ended May 1, 2011. Consolidated net income was $6.0 million in the three months ended April 29, 2012 compared to $9.2 million in the three months ended May 1, 2011. The Company’s net income and earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 are not comparable to the corresponding amounts for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a result of the reversal of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. See “Provision for Income Taxes” below.

Revenues by business segment (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).

30

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,				May 1,
	2012				2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues by business segment:
Company Stores	$	73,341			$	69,475
Domestic Franchise		2,633				2,369
International Franchise		6,027				5,636
KK Supply Chain:
Total revenues		53,785				53,883
Less - intersegment sales elimination		(27,290	)			(26,763	)
External KK Supply Chain revenues		26,495				27,120
Total revenues	$	108,496			$	104,600
Segment revenues as a percentage of total revenues:
Company Stores		67.6		%		66.4		%
Domestic Franchise		2.4				2.3
International Franchise		5.6				5.4
KK Supply Chain (external sales)		24.4				25.9
		100.0		%		100.0		%
Operating income (loss):
Company Stores	$	2,948			$	2,174
Domestic Franchise		1,569				1,147
International Franchise		4,494				4,171
KK Supply Chain		8,477				8,342
Total segment operating income		17,488				15,834
Unallocated general and administrative expenses		(6,623	)			(5,799	)
Impairment charges and lease termination costs		(31	)			(244	)
Consolidated operating income	$	10,834			$	9,791

     A discussion of the revenues and operating results of each of the Company’s four business segments follows, together with a discussion of income statement line items not associated with specific segments.

Company Stores

The components of Company Stores revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).

31

					Percentage of Total Revenues
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,		April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
On-premises sales:
Retail sales	$	30,596	$	28,156	41.7	%	40.5	%
Fundraising sales		4,880		4,705	6.7		6.8
Total on-premises sales		35,476		32,861	48.4		47.3
Wholesale sales:
Grocers/mass merchants		22,740		22,013	31.0		31.7
Convenience stores		14,322		13,879	19.5		20.0
Other wholesale		803		722	1.1		1.0
Total wholesale sales		37,865		36,614	51.6		52.7
Total revenues		73,341		69,475	100.0		100.0
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales:
Food, beverage and packaging		27,797		26,295	37.9		37.8
Shop labor		12,782		12,601	17.4		18.1
Delivery labor		5,907		5,854	8.1		8.4
Employee benefits		4,998		4,606	6.8		6.6
Total cost of sales		51,484		49,356	70.2		71.0
Vehicle costs(1)		4,486		4,381	6.1		6.3
Occupancy(2)		2,414		2,262	3.3		3.3
Utilities expense		1,414		1,339	1.9		1.9
Depreciation expense		2,097		1,537	2.9		2.2
Other operating expenses		4,762		4,544	6.5		6.5
Total store level costs		66,657		63,419	90.9		91.3
Store operating income		6,684		6,056	9.1		8.7
Other segment operating costs(3)		2,661		2,757	3.6		4.0
Allocated corporate overhead		1,075		1,125	1.5		1.6
Segment operating income	$	2,948	$	2,174	4.0	%	3.1	%

(1)	Includes fuel, maintenance and repairs, rent, taxes and other costs of operating the delivery fleet, exclusive of depreciation.
(2)	Includes rent, property taxes, common area maintenance charges, insurance, building maintenance and other occupancy costs, exclusive of utilities and depreciation.
(3)	Includes marketing costs not charged to stores, segment management costs, wholesale selling expenses and support functions.

     A reconciliation of Company Stores segment sales from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to the first quarter of fiscal 2013 follows:

	On-Premises		Wholesale		Total
	(In thousands)
Sales for the three months ended May 1, 2011	$	32,861	$	36,614	$	69,475
Increase in sales at mature stores (open stores only)		673		1,251		1,924
Increase in sales at stores opened in fiscal 2012		1,942		-		1,942
Sales for the three months ended April 29, 2012	$	35,476	$	37,865	$	73,341

Sales at Company Stores increased 5.6% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to an increase in sales from existing stores and stores opened in fiscal 2012. Selling price increases implemented in the first quarter last year in the on-premises and wholesale distribution channels accounted for approximately 4.4 percentage points of the increase in sales, exclusive of the effects of higher pricing on unit volumes; such effects are difficult to measure reliably. As with all consumer products, however, higher prices may negatively affect sales. The Company believes this phenomenon is more pronounced in the wholesale channel where competing products are merchandised alongside those of the Company.

32

     The following table presents sales metrics for Company stores:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
On-premises:
Change in same store sales	2.1		%	5.8	%
Change in same store customer count (retail sales only)	1.3		%	2.9	%
Wholesale:
Grocers/mass merchants:
Change in average weekly number of doors	(4.5	)	%	6.7	%
Change in average weekly sales per door	8.2		%	11.0	%
Convenience stores:
Change in average weekly number of doors	(10.6	)	%	1.9	%
Change in average weekly sales per door	14.8		%	3.8	%

On-premises sales

The components of the change in same store sales at Company stores are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
Change in same store sales:
Retail pricing	2.6		%	5.8		%
Guest check average (exclusive of the effects of pricing)	(1.7	)		(2.4	)
Customer count	1.1			2.4
Other	0.1			-
Total	2.1		%	5.8		%

On-premises sales increased 8.0% to $35.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $32.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Approximately 2.6 percentage points of the sales increase reflects retail price increases implemented in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. On March 7, 2011, the Company implemented price increases at substantially all its stores designed to help offset the rising costs of doughnut mixes, other ingredients and fuel resulting from higher commodity prices. These price increases affected items comprising approximately 60% of on-premises sales, and the average price increase on these items was approximately 14%. The Company currently does not expect to make any significant pricing changes for the balance of fiscal 2013.

Higher customer traffic and retail price increases implemented in fiscal 2012 contributed to the improvement in same store sales, partially offset by coffee and doughnut promotional pricing which reduced the average guest check compared to last year. Also, the Company believes that the expected cannibalization effect of new stores in expansion markets adversely affected same store customer count in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. “Cannibalization effect” means the tendency for new stores to become successful, in part or in whole, by “stealing” sales from existing stores in the same market.

Wholesale distribution

Sales to wholesale accounts increased 3.4% to $37.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $36.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Wholesale sales increased approximately 5.2% due to price increases. The Company began implementing price increases for some products offered in the wholesale channel late in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and substantially completed implementing the increases during the second quarter. Those price increases affected products comprising approximately 60% of wholesale sales, and the average price increase on those products was approximately 11%. The effects of higher selling prices was partially offset by lower unit volumes in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Sales to grocers and mass merchants increased 3.3% to $22.7 million, with an 8.2% increase in average weekly sales per door, partially offset by a 4.5% decline in the average number of doors served. In addition to pricing, the Company believes that average weekly sales per door in the grocer/mass merchant channel have grown as a result of, among other things, improved customer service, introduction of additional price points, a redesign of product packaging to improve its shelf appeal, and the addition of new relatively higher volume doors. The decline in the average number of doors served in the grocery/mass merchant channel reflects store closures by a regional grocery store customer. In addition, the decline reflects the elimination of loose doughnut sales at another regional grocer, although the Company continues to sell packaged products to this customer. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 2% of sales to grocery/mass merchant customers for the three months ended April 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of sales of packaged products.

33

     Convenience store sales rose 3.2% to $14.3 million, reflecting a 14.8% increase in the average weekly sales per door partially offset by a 10.6% decline in the average number of doors served. The decline in the average number of doors served in the convenience store channel in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 is principally the result of the Company’s efforts to improve route management and route consolidation including the elimination of and reduction in the number of stops at relatively low volume doors which is intended to increase sales, increase average per door sales and reduce costs in the convenience store channel. Sales of loose unpackaged products comprised approximately 80% of sales to convenience store customers for the three months ended April 29, 2012, with the balance comprised of sales of packaged products.

Costs and expenses

Total cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased by 0.8 percentage points from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to 70.2% of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

The cost of food, beverage and packaging increased slightly from 37.8% of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to 37.9% of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Except for sugar, the cost of doughnut mixes, other ingredients, packaging and supplies was relatively unchanged in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The unit cost of sugar rose approximately 20% year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. This cost increase was mitigated by higher selling prices and by changes in production equipment designed to reduce the consumption of sugar in the doughnut-making process.

Except for sugar, the Company currently anticipates the cost of doughnut mix, shortening and other ingredients to remain relatively flat for the balance of fiscal 2013 compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2012. Excluding sugar, the Company has fixed the prices of over half of its raw materials and ingredients for the remainder of fiscal 2013. The Company has entered into contracts covering substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for fiscal 2013 at average prices somewhat lower than its prices for the second half of fiscal 2012, but higher than its average price for fiscal 2012 as a whole. In addition, the Company has entered into contracts for substantially all of its estimated sugar requirements for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015 at prices slightly higher than expected for fiscal 2013.

Shop labor as a percentage of revenues declined by 0.7 percentage points from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to 17.4% of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, and delivery labor as a percentage of revenues declined by 0.3 percentage points from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to 8.1% of revenues, principally due to higher sales resulting from price increases.

Depreciation expenses increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to increased capital expenditures in fiscal 2012 including construction of new stores, store refurbishment efforts on existing stores and investments in information technology systems.

Domestic Franchise

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Royalties	$	2,437	$	2,186
Development and franchise fees		88		75
Other		108		108
Total revenues		2,633		2,369
Operating expenses:
Segment operating expenses		909		1,067
Depreciation expense		55		55
Allocated corporate overhead		100		100
Total operating expenses		1,064		1,222
Segment operating income	$	1,569	$	1,147

34

     Domestic Franchise revenues increased 11.1% to $2.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 from $2.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase reflects higher domestic royalty revenues resulting from an increase in sales by domestic franchise stores from $67 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to $72 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Domestic Franchise same store sales rose 5.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

Domestic Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new domestic franchisees, to assist in domestic store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of domestic franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. Domestic Franchise operating expenses declined in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 primarily due to a decrease in legal costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

Domestic franchisees opened three stores and closed three stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. As of April 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories in the United States provide for the development of approximately 50 additional stores through fiscal 2017. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees’ operations has a direct effect on the Company’s revenues, results of operations and cash flows.

International Franchise

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Royalties	$	5,742	$	5,288
Development and franchise fees		285		348
Total revenues		6,027		5,636
Operating expenses:
Segment operating expenses		1,230		1,138
Depreciation expense		3		2
Allocated corporate overhead		300		325
Total operating expenses		1,533		1,465
Segment operating income	$	4,494	$	4,171

International Franchise royalties increased 8.6%, driven by an increase in sales by international franchise stores from $92 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to $105 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Changes in the rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the foreign currencies in which the Company’s international franchisees do business, had no significant impact on international franchise store sales remeasured in U.S. dollars or royalty revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Royalties and franchise fees for the quarter ended May 1, 2011 include approximately $280,000 and $95,000, respectively, of amounts relating to the Company’s franchisee in Mexico which accrued in prior periods but which had not previously been reported as revenue because of uncertainty surrounding their collection. Such amounts were reported as revenue in recognition of the payment of such amounts to the Company on May 5, 2011, in connection with the Company’s sale of its 30% equity interest in the franchisee.

International Franchise same store sales, measured on a constant currency basis to remove the effects of changing exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar (“constant dollar same store sales”), fell 7.4%. The decline in International Franchise same store sales reflects, among other things, waning honeymoon effects from the large number of new stores opened internationally in recent years and the cannibalization effects on initial stores in new markets of additional store openings in those markets. “Honeymoon effect” means the common pattern for many start-up restaurants in which a flurry of activity due to start-up publicity and natural curiosity is followed by a decline during which a steady repeat customer base develops.

Constant dollar same store sales in established markets fell 1.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and fell 12.0% in new markets. “Established markets” means countries in which the first Krispy Kreme store opened before fiscal 2007. Sales at stores in established markets comprised approximately 46% of aggregate constant dollar same store sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2013. While the Company considers countries in which Krispy Kreme first opened before fiscal 2007 to be established markets, franchisees in those markets continue to develop their business; these franchisees opened 209 of the 531 international stores opened since the beginning of fiscal 2007.

35

     International Franchise operating expenses include costs to recruit new international franchisees, to assist in international store openings, and to monitor and aid in the performance of international franchise stores, as well as allocated corporate costs. International Franchise operating expenses were flat at $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012. International Franchise operating expenses reflect decreases in legal fees and share-based compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded a credit of $391,000 to the bad debt provision principally related to the Mexican franchisee discussed above.

International franchisees opened 20 stores and closed 22 stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Approximately half of the international store closures in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 occurred in three countries in the Middle East, and there remain 24 shops operating in those three countries. Management does not believe that the number of international closures experienced in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 is indicative of the number of closures that will be experienced in the second, third or fourth quarters of the year. As of April 29, 2012, existing development and franchise agreements for territories outside the United States provide for the development of approximately 280 additional stores through fiscal 2018, including an agreement to open stores in Moscow announced on April 23, 2012. On May 14, 2012, the Company signed its first development agreement with a franchisee in northern India pursuant to which the franchisee is expected to open 35 stores over the next five years. Royalty revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees’ operations has a direct effect on the Company’s revenues, results of operations and cash flows.

KK Supply Chain

The components of KK Supply Chain revenues and expenses (expressed in dollars and as a percentage of total revenues before intersegment sales elimination) are set forth in the table below (percentage amounts may not add to totals due to rounding).

						Percentage of Total Revenues
						Before Intersegment
						Sales Elimination
	Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,		April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Doughnut mixes	$	19,207		$	18,368	35.7		%	34.1	%
Other ingredients, packaging and supplies		32,650			32,856	60.7			61.0
Equipment		1,204			2,071	2.2			3.8
Fuel surcharge		724			588	1.3			1.1
Total revenues before intersegment sales elimination		53,785			53,883	100.0			100.0
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales:
Cost of goods produced and purchased		36,966			36,781	68.7			68.3
(Gain) loss on agricultural derivatives		(51	)		469	(0.1	)		0.9
Inbound freight		1,466			1,053	2.7			2.0
Total cost of sales		38,381			38,303	71.4			71.1
Distribution costs		3,627			3,669	6.7			6.8
Other segment operating costs		2,838			3,105	5.3			5.8
Depreciation expense		162			189	0.3			0.4
Allocated corporate overhead		300			275	0.6			0.5
Total operating costs		45,308			45,541	84.2			84.5
Segment operating income	$	8,477		$	8,342	15.8		%	15.5	%

Sales of doughnut mixes rose year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 due to higher sales of mixes to international franchisees. Higher unit volumes accounted for the majority of the increase. Mix sales to Company and Domestic Franchise stores also rose slightly, reflecting slightly higher selling prices partially offset by lower unit volumes.

36

     Sales of other ingredients, packaging and supplies are made principally to Company and Domestic Franchise stores. While systemwide sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores rose in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of the preceding fiscal year, a greater percentage of such sales was to on-premises customers compared to wholesale customers. On-premises sales at Company and Domestic Franchise stores generate proportionately lower KK Supply Chain sales than do sales to wholesale customers.

The Company utilizes a fuel surcharge program to recoup additional freight costs resulting from increases in fuel costs. Charges under the program are based upon the price of diesel fuel.

KK Supply Chain input costs were relatively unchanged in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of the preceding fiscal year with the exception of the cost of sugar which rose in excess of 20% year-over-year. While the Company raised selling prices to recover higher sugar costs, the Company did not markup such higher costs, which resulted in a slight increase in the overall cost of goods produced and purchased as a percentage of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Inbound freight increased 0.7 percentage points from the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to 2.7% of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 as a result of outsourcing product distribution for stores east of the Mississippi to a third party provider beginning in the second and third quarter of fiscal 2012. These increased costs in inbound freight were substantially offset by a reduction in distribution costs and other segment operating costs, which include segment management, purchasing, customer service and support, laboratory and quality control costs, and research and development expenses, associated with the outsourcing of product distribution.

Franchisees opened 23 stores and closed 25 stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. A substantial portion of KK Supply Chain’s revenues are directly related to sales by franchise stores and, accordingly, the success of franchisees’ operations has a direct effect on the Company’s revenues, results of operations and cash flows.

An increasing percentage of franchise store sales is attributable to sales by franchisees outside North America. The Company sells doughnut mixes and concentrates to its international franchisees. These franchisees purchase substantially all other ingredients, packaging and supplies from vendors approved by the Company. Accordingly, KK Supply Chain revenues are less correlated with sales by international franchisees than with sales by domestic franchisees.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased to $6.5 million, or 6.0% of total revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $5.6 million, or 5.4% of total revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 is due principally to an increase in share-based compensation as a result of a grant to an executive officer who attained retirement eligibility during the quarter and the resulting acceleration in the recognition of the shared-based compensation expense.

Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs

Impairment charges and lease termination costs were $31,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $244,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The components of these charges are set forth in the following table:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Impairment of long-lived assets	$	-	$	-
Lease termination costs		31		244
	$	31	$	244

The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Company’s annual budgeting process. Impairment charges generally relate to Company stores expected to be closed or refranchised, as well as to stores management believes will not generate sufficient future cash flows to enable the Company to recover the carrying value of the stores’ assets, but which management has not yet decided to close. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values. The fair values of these assets are estimated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, on independent appraisals and, in the case of assets the Company currently is negotiating to sell, based on the Company’s negotiations with unrelated third-party buyers.

37

     Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities were estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded lease termination charges of $31,000 and $244,000, respectively, principally reflecting a change in estimated sublease rentals and settlements with landlords on stores previously closed.

The Company intends to refranchise certain geographic markets, expected to consist principally of, but not necessarily limited to, markets outside the Company’s traditional base in the Southeastern United States. The franchise rights and other assets in many of these markets were acquired by the Company in business combinations in prior years.

Since the beginning of fiscal 2009, the Company has refranchised a total of 11 stores and received consideration totaling $2.5 million in connection with those transactions. During this period, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling approximately $490,000 related to completed and anticipated refranchisings. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of refranchising any additional stores or markets or the amount of proceeds, if any, which might be received therefrom, including the amounts which might be realized from the sale of store assets and the execution of any related franchise agreements. Refranchising could result in the recognition of additional impairment losses on the related assets.

Interest Expense

The components of interest expense are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Interest accruing on outstanding term loan indebtedness	$	187	$	242
Letter of credit and unused revolver fees		75		114
Amortization of cost of interest rate hedge		2		-
Amortization of deferred financing costs		103		102
Other		31		19
	$	398	$	477

The decrease in interest accruing on outstanding indebtedness and in letter of credit and unused revolver fees reflects the reduction in the principal outstanding under the Company’s term loan and a reduction in the lender’s interest margin due to a decrease in the Company’s leverage ratio.

Equity in Losses of Equity Method Franchisees

The Company recorded equity in the losses of equity method franchisees of $50,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $9,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This caption represents the Company’s share of operating results of equity method franchisees which develop and operate Krispy Kreme stores. On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KK Mexico”), the Company’s franchisee in Mexico, to KK Mexico’s majority shareholder, as more fully described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein. The Company’s equity in the earnings of KK Mexico was approximately $40,000 for the three months ended May 1, 2011.

38

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $4.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $265,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

     The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the deferred tax assets is more likely than not. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Company’s deferred tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 though fiscal 2009.

Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000 in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Company’s pretax profit increased to over $30 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Company’s sale of its 30% interest in KK Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, representing the amount of deferred tax assets management believes is more likely than not to be realized.

While the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowances increased the Company’s earnings by $139.6 million in fiscal 2012, the reversal has the effect of increasing the provision for income taxes, and therefore decreasing net income, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. This negative effect on earnings occurs because the reversal of the valuation allowances resulted in the recognition in fiscal 2012 of income tax benefits expected to be realized in later years. Absent the reversal of the valuation allowances, such tax benefits would have been recognized when realized in future periods upon the generation of taxable income. Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company’s effective income tax rate, which in fiscal 2012 and earlier years bore little or no relationship to pretax income, more closely reflects the blended federal and state income tax rates in jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The reversal of the valuation allowance had no effect on the Company’s cash payments for income taxes.

Because of the increase in the Company’s effective income tax rate as described above, the Company’s income tax expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 is not comparable to income tax expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, until such time as the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are exhausted or expire, GAAP income tax expense is expected to substantially exceed the amount of cash income taxes payable by the Company, which are expected to remain insignificant for the foreseeable future.

The portion of the income tax provision representing taxes estimated to be payable currently was approximately $230,000 and $220,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively, consisting principally of foreign withholding taxes related to royalties and franchise fees paid by international franchisees, partially offset by reversals of liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties due principally to the expiration of statutes of limitation.

The Company’s estimated effective income tax rate on GAAP ordinary income for fiscal 2013 is 45%; the reversal of accruals for uncertain tax positions related to issues associated with prior years reduced the effective income tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 to approximately 43%. Management’s estimate of the fiscal 2013 effective income tax rate is subject to revision in subsequent quarters as additional information becomes available.

The following non-GAAP financial information and related reconciliation to GAAP measures are provided to assist the reader in understanding the effect of the fiscal 2012 reversal of the valuation allowance on the Company’s results of operations for fiscal 2013, and to facilitate comparisons of fiscal 2013 results with the Company’s results for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, the non-GAAP financial information is intended to illustrate the material difference between the Company’s income tax expense and income taxes currently payable. Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common share reflect income tax expense only to the extent such expense is currently payable in cash. These non-GAAP performances measures are consistent with other measurements made by management in the operation of the business which do not consider income taxes except to the extent to which those taxes currently are payable, for example, capital allocation decisions and incentive compensation measurements that are made on a pretax basis.

39

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income, as reported	$	6,026	$	9,171
Provision for deferred income taxes		4,234		45
Adjusted net income	$	10,260	$	9,216
Adjusted earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.15	$	0.13
Diluted	$	0.14	$	0.13
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		69,562		68,754
Diluted		71,888		71,169

   Net Income

     The Company reported net income of $6.0 million for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and $9.2 million for the three months ended May 1, 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the first three months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012.

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	10,364		$	5,066
Net cash provided used for investing activities		(1,312	)		(1,652	)
Net cash used for financing activities		(1,847	)		(683	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	7,205		$	2,731

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.4 million and $5.1 million in the first three months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. Payments on leases related to closed stores were approximately $900,000 higher in the in the first three months of fiscal 2012 than in the first three months of fiscal 2013. The balance in the change in cash flows from operating activities principally reflects improved financial results and normal fluctuations in working capital.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Investing activities used $1.3 million and $1.7 million of cash flow in the first three months of fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Cash used for capital expenditures decreased to approximately $1.3 million in the first three months of fiscal 2013 from $1.8 million in the first three months of fiscal 2012. The Company currently expects capital expenditures to range from $18 million to $22 million in fiscal 2013. The Company intends to fund these capital expenditures from cash provided by operating activities, from existing cash balances and, to a lesser extent, through leases.

In connection with the refinancing of the Company’s Secured Credit Facilities in January 2011, as more fully as described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2012 Form 10-K, the Company deposited into escrow $1.8 million related to properties with respect to which the Company agreed to furnish to the lenders certain documentation on or before January 31, 2012, with amounts to be released from escrow upon the Company’s furnishing such documentation. In fiscal 2012, the entire $1.8 million was released from escrow, including $200,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

40

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

     Net cash used by financing activities was $1.8 million in the first three months of fiscal 2013, compared to $683,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2012.

During the first three months of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company repaid approximately $545,000 and $626,000, respectively, of scheduled principal amortization of outstanding term loan and capitalized lease indebtedness.

On March 27, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Company’s common stock. Through April 29, 2012, the Company repurchased 255,000 shares at an average cost of $7.27 per share, for a total cost of $1.9 million. Approximately $1.3 million of such repurchases were settled prior to quarter end.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) related to fair value measurements. The ASU clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013; such adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting standards which require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in addition to the consolidated statement of income.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes from the disclosures in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of April 29, 2012, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management performed, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of April 29, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended April 29, 2012, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

41

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

     There have been no material changes from the disclosures contained in Part 1, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings,” in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

					Maximum Number
					(or Approximate
				Total Number of	Dollar Value) of
				Shares (or units)	Shares (or Units)
				Purchased as Part	that May Yet Be
	Total Number of			of Publicly	Purchased Under
	Shares (or units)	Average Price Paid		Announced Plans	the Plans or
	Purchased	per Share (or unit)		or Programs	Programs
Period	(a)(1)	(b)		(c)	(d)(2)
January 30, 2012 through February 26, 2012	-		-	-		-
February 27, 2012 through March 25, 2012	-		-	-		-
March 26, 2012 through April 29, 2012	255,000	$	7.27	255,000	$	18,146,000

(1)	Due to the Company’s incorporation in North Carolina, which does not recognize treasury shares, the shares repurchased are canceled at the time of repurchase.
(2)	On March 27, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Company’s common stock.

42

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

     None.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

Item 6. EXHIBITS.

The exhibits filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are set forth in the Exhibit Index on page 45 and are incorporated herein by reference.

43

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
Date: June 1, 2012	By:	/s/ Douglas R. Muir
	Name:	Douglas R. Muir
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

44

Exhibit Index

3	.1	—	Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2010)
3	.2	—	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2008)
31	.1	—	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31	.2	—	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32	.1	—	Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	.2	—	Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101			The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011; and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as block text*

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

Our SEC file number for documents filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is 001-16485

45

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     I, James H. Morgan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 1, 2012

/s/ James H. Morgan

James H. Morgan

Chief Executive Officer

46 

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     I, Douglas R. Muir, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 1, 2012

/s/ Douglas R. Muir

Douglas R. Muir

Chief Financial Officer

47 

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, James H. Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James H. Morgan

James H. Morgan

Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 1, 2012

This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

48

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Douglas R. Muir, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas R. Muir

Douglas R. Muir

Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 1, 2012

This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

49

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 3 — Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon management's expectation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized for which payment has been deferred, or expenses which have been deducted in the Company's tax returns but which have not yet been recognized as an expense in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets generally represent tax deductions or credits that will be reflected in future tax returns for which the Company has already recorded a tax benefit in its consolidated financial statements.

The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets in accordance with GAAP, which provides that such valuation allowances shall be established unless realization of the income tax benefits is more likely than not.

The Company hadvaluation allowances against deferred tax assets of $10.7 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012,representing the portion of such deferred tax assets which, as of such dates, management estimated would not be realized in future periods. Under GAAP, future realization of deferred tax assets is evaluated under a “more likely than not” standard. Realization of net deferred tax assets generally is dependent on generation of taxable income in future periods. From fiscal 2005 until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company maintained valuation allowances on deferred tax assets equal to the entire excess of those assets over the Company's deferred income tax liabilities because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of those assets. Such uncertainty arose principally from of the substantial losses incurred by the Company from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2009.

The Company reported a pretax profit of $418,000in fiscal 2010 and $8.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, the Company's pretax profit increased to over $30 million, inclusive of a $6.2 million non-recurring gain on the Company's sale of its 30% interest in Krispy Kreme Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“KK Mexico”), the Company's franchisee in Mexico. After considering all relevant factors and objectively verifiable evidence having an impact on the likelihood of future realization of the Company's deferred tax assets, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 management concluded that it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of the Company's deferred tax assets will be realized in future years. Accordingly, the Company reversed $139.6 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, with an offsetting credit to the provision for income taxes, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

The remaining valuation allowance of $10.7 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 represents the portion of the Company's deferred tax assets management estimates will not be realized in the future. Such assets are associated principally with state net operating loss and state credit carryforwards having relatively short carryforward periods which are forecasted to expire unused, as well as federal foreign tax credits and federal jobs credit carryforwards forecasted to expire unused.

The realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent on future events. While management believes its forecast of future taxable income is reasonable, actual results inevitably will vary from management's forecasts. Such variances could result in adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in future periods, and such adjustments could be material to the financial statements.

In fiscal 2008, the Company issued warrants to acquire shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $12.21 per share in connection with the settlement of certain litigation. Such warrants expired worthless in March 2012 and, accordingly, the Company will not receive any income tax deduction related to them. Deferred tax assets at January 29, 2012 included approximately $7.2 million related to these warrants. In accordance with GAAP, the write-off of this deferred tax asset was charged to common stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and reduced the Company's pool of windfall tax benefits.

XML

Segment Information

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Segment Reporting Disclosure [Abstract]

Segment Reporting Disclosure Text Block

Note 2 — Segment Information

The Company's reportable segments are Company Stores, Domestic Franchise, International Franchise and KK Supply Chain. The Company Stores segment is comprised of the stores operated by the Company. These stores sell doughnuts and complementary products through both on-premises and wholesale sales channels, although some stores serve only one of these distribution channels. The Domestic Franchise and International Franchise segments consist of the Company's franchise operations. Under the terms of franchise agreements, domestic and international franchisees pay royalties and fees to the Company in return for the use of the Krispy Kreme name and ongoing brand and operational support. Expenses for these segments include costs to recruit new franchisees, to assist in store openings, to support franchisee operations and marketing efforts, as well as allocated corporate costs. The majority of the ingredients and materials used by Company stores are purchased from the KK Supply Chain segment, which supplies doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut making equipment to both Company and franchisee-owned stores.

All intercompany sales by the KK Supply Chain segment to the Company Stores segment are at prices intended to reflect an arms-length transfer price and are eliminated in consolidation. Operating income for the Company Stores segment does not include any profit earned by the KK Supply Chain segment on sales of doughnut mix and other items to the Company Stores segment; such profit is included in KK Supply Chain operating income.

The following table presents the results of operations of the Company's operating segments for the three months endedApril 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011. Segment operating income is consolidated operating income before unallocated general and administrative expenses and impairment charges and lease termination costs.

					Three Months Ended
					April 29,		May 1,
					2012		2011
					(In thousands)
Revenues:
	Company Stores				$	73,341	$	69,475
	Domestic Franchise					2,633		2,369
	International Franchise					6,027		5,636
	KK Supply Chain:
		Total revenues				53,785		53,883
		Less – intersegment sales elimination				(27,290)		(26,763)
			External KK Supply Chain revenues			26,495		27,120
				Total revenues	$	108,496	$	104,600
Operating income:
	Company Stores				$	2,948	$	2,174
	Domestic Franchise					1,569		1,147
	International Franchise					4,494		4,171
	KK Supply Chain					8,477		8,342
		Total segment operating income				17,488		15,834
	Unallocated general and administrative expenses					(6,623)		(5,799)
	Impairment charges and lease termination costs					(31)		(244)
		Consolidated operating income			$	10,834	$	9,791
Depreciation expense:
	Company Stores				$	2,097	$	1,537
	Domestic Franchise					55		55
	International Franchise					3		2
	KK Supply Chain					162		189
	Corporate administration					165		155
		Total depreciation expense			$	2,482	$	1,938

Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures is not presented as such information is not used in measuring segment performance or allocating resources among segments.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Revenues	$ 108,496	$ 104,600
Operating expenses:
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation expense shown below)	88,691	86,983
General and administrative expenses	6,458	5,644
Depreciation expense	2,482	1,938
Impairment charges and lease termination costs	31	244
Operating income	10,834	9,791
Interest income	27	45
Interest Expense	(398)	(477)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method franchisees	(50)	(9)
Other non-operating income and (expense), net	78	86
Income before income taxes	10,491	9,436
Provision for income taxes	4,465	265
Net income	$ 6,026	$ 9,171
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$ 0.09	$ 0.13
Diluted	$ 0.08	$ 0.13

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $) In Thousands	Total USD ($)	Common Shares Outstanding [Member]	Common Stock USD ($)	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) USD ($)	Accumulated Deficit USD ($)
Beginning Balance at Jan. 30, 2011	$ 76,428		$ 370,808	$ (34)	$ (294,346)
Beginning Balance at Jan. 30, 2011		67,527
Total comprehensive income	9,102			(69)	9,171
Cancelation of restricted shares			0
Cancelation of restricted shares		(1)
Exercise of warrants	0
Share-based compensation	893		893
Share-based compensation		13
Repurchase of common shares	(57)		(57)
Repurchase of common shares		(13)
Ending Balance at May. 01, 2011	86,366		371,644	(103)	(285,175)
Ending Balance at May. 01, 2011		67,526
Beginning Balance at Jan. 29, 2012	249,126		377,539	(336)	(128,077)
Beginning Balance at Jan. 29, 2012		68,092
Total comprehensive income	6,027			1	6,026
Write-off of deferred tax asset related to the expiration of unexercised stock warrants	(7,174)		(7,174)
Exercise of warrants	9		9
Exercise of warrants		1
Share-based compensation	1,377		1,377
Share-based compensation		11
Repurchase of common shares	(1,854)		(1,854)
Repurchase of common shares		(255)
Ending Balance at Apr. 29, 2012	$ 247,511		$ 369,897	$ (335)	$ (122,051)
Ending Balance at Apr. 29, 2012		67,849

XML

Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis Of Presentation And Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

Note 1 — Accounting Policies

Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (“KKDI”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the sale of doughnuts and complementary products through Company-owned stores. The Company also derives revenue from franchise and development fees and royalties from franchisees. Additionally, the Company sells doughnut mix, other ingredients and supplies and doughnut-making equipment to franchisees.

Significant Accounting Policies

BASIS OF PRESENTATION. The consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2012 Form 10-K. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, accordingly, do not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) with respect to annual financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Company's accounting practices described in the2012 Form 10-K, but have not been audited. In management's opinion, the financial statements include all adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company's results of operations for the periods presented. The consolidated balance sheet data as of January 29, 2012 were derived from the Company's audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION. The financial statements include the accounts of KKDI and its subsidiaries, the most significant of which is KKDI's principal operating subsidiary, Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation.

Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence but which the Company does not control, and whose financial statements are not otherwise required to be consolidated, are accounted for using the equity method. These entities typically are 25% to 35% owned and are hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Equity Method Franchisees.”

EARNINGS PER SHARE. The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, computed using the treasury stock method. Such potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the vesting of currently unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

The following table sets forth amounts used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

			Three Months Ended
			April 29,		May 1,
			2012		2011
			(In thousands)
Numerator: net income			$	6,026	$	9,171
Denominator:
	Basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding			69,562		68,754
	Effect of dilutive securities:
		Stock options and warrants		1,781		1,655
		Restricted stock and restricted stock units		545		760
	Diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares
		outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares		71,888		71,169

Stock options and warrants with respect to 2.3 million and 8.1 million shares for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively,as well as 134,000unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested restricted stock unitsfor the three months ended May 1, 2011, have been excluded from the computation of the number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) related to fair value measurements. The ASU clarifiessome existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The ASU also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level3)inputs. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013; such adoption had noeffect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting standards which require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity. The Company adopted the new standards in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in addition to the consolidated statement of income.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net income	$ 6,026	$ 9,171
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	0	84
Less income taxes	0	(33)
	0	51
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge	2	(198)
Less income taxes	(1)	78
	1	(120)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	1	(69)
Comprehensive income	$ 6,027	$ 9,102

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 25, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Apr. 29, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Registrant Name	KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS INC
Entity Central Index Key	0001100270
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--02-03
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Well Known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Common Stock Shares Outstanding		66,591,493
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012	Jan. 29, 2012
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 51,524	$ 44,319
Receivables	21,665	21,616
Receivables from equity method franchisees	876	655
Inventories	15,909	16,497
Deferred income taxes	10,540	10,540
Other current assets	3,135	3,613
Total current assets	103,649	97,240
Property and equipment	74,515	75,466
Investments in equity method franchisees	0	0
Goodwill and other intangible assets	23,776	23,776
Deferred income taxes	117,644	129,053
Other assets	9,937	9,413
Total assets	329,521	334,948
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt	2,195	2,224
Accounts payable	11,170	10,494
Accrued liabilities	23,990	28,800
Total current liabilities	37,355	41,518
Long-term debt, less current maturities	24,812	25,369
Other long-term obligations	19,843	18,935
Commitments and contingencies	0	0
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value	0	0
Common stock, no par value	369,897	377,539
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(335)	(336)
Accumulated deficit	(122,051)	(128,077)
Total shareholders equity	247,511	249,126
Total liabilities and shareholders equity	$ 329,521	$ 334,948

XML

Investment in Franchisees

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Equity Method Investments Disclosure [Abstract]

Equity Method Investments Disclosure Text Block

Note 6 — Investments in Franchisees

As of April 29, 2012, the Company had investments in three franchisees. These investments have been made in the form of capital contributions and, in certain instances, loans evidenced by promissory notes. These investments are reflected as “Investments in equity method franchisees” in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company's financial exposures related to franchisees in which the Company has an investment are summarized in the tables below.

	April 29, 2012
	Company	Investment
	Ownership	and				Loan
	Percentage	Advances		Receivables		Guarantees
		(In thousands)
Kremeworks, LLC	25.0%	$	900	$	417	$	686
Kremeworks Canada, LP	24.5%		-		37		-
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC	35.3%		-		422		1,868
			900		876	$	2,554
Less: reserves and allowances			(900)		-
		$	-	$	876
	January 29, 2012
	Company	Investment
	Ownership	and				Loan
	Percentage	Advances		Receivables		Guarantees
		(In thousands)
Kremeworks, LLC	25.0%	$	900	$	308	$	739
Kremeworks Canada, LP	24.5%		-		20		-
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC	35.3%		-		327		1,946
			900		655	$	2,685
Less: reserves and allowances			(900)		-
		$	-	$	655

The Company has guaranteed loans from third-party financial institutions on behalf of certain Equity Method Franchisees, primarily to assist the franchisees in obtaining third-party financing. The loans are collateralized by certain assets of the franchisee, generally the Krispy Kreme store and related equipment. The loan guarantee amounts represent the portion of the principal amount outstanding under the related loan that is subject to the Company's guarantee.

The Company has a 25% interest in Kremeworks, LLC (“Kremeworks”), and has guaranteed 20% of the outstanding principal balance of certain of Kremeworks' bank indebtedness, which, as amended, matures in October 2012. The aggregate amount of such indebtedness was approximately $3.4 million at April 29, 2012.

Current liabilities include accruals of approximately $1.9 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012for potential payments under loan guarantees related to Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC (“KKSF”). The underlying indebtedness related to approximately $1.6 million of the Company's KKSF guarantee exposure matured by its terms in October 2009. Such maturity has been extended on a month-to-month basis pursuant to an informal agreement between KKSF and the lender.There was no liability reflected in the financial statements for the guarantee of Kremeworks' debt because the Company did not believe it was probable that the Company would be required to perform under that guarantee.

On May 5, 2011, the Company sold its 30% equity interest in KK Mexico, to KK Mexico's majority shareholder. The Company received cash proceeds of approximately $7.7 million in exchange for its equity interest and, after deducting costs of the transaction, realized a gain of approximately $6.2 million on thedisposition. After provision for payment of Mexican income taxes related to the sale of approximately $1.5 million, the Company reported an after tax gain on the disposition of approximately $4.7 million in the quarter ending July 31, 2011.

In connection with the Company's sale of its KK Mexico interest, KK Mexico paid approximately $765,000 of amounts due to the Company which were evidenced by promissory notes, relating principally to past due royalties and fees due to the Company. As a consequence of this payment, in the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 and recorded royalty and franchise fee income of approximately $280,000 and $95,000,respectively. The reserve had previously been established, and the royalties and fees had not previously been recognized as revenue, because of uncertainty surrounding the collection of these amounts.

XML

Inventories

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

Inventory Disclosure Text Block

Note 5 — Inventories

The components of inventories are as follows:

	April 29,		January 29,
	2012		2012
	(In thousands)
Raw materials	$	5,339	$	5,306
Work in progress		187		89
Finished goods and purchased merchandise		10,383		11,102
	$	15,909	$	16,497

XML

Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures Text Block

Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements

The accounting standards for fair value measurements define fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The accounting standards for fair value measurements establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value measurement of the assets or liabilities. These include certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012.

		April 29, 2012
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
		(In thousands)
Assets:
	401(k) mirror plan assets	$	1,634	$	-	$	-
	Agricultural commodity futures contracts		8		-		-
	Interest rate derivative		-		53		-
	Total assets	$	1,642	$	53	$	-
		January 29, 2012
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
		(In thousands)
Assets:
	401(k) mirror plan assets	$	1,039	$	-	$	-
	Agricultural commodity futures contracts		21		-		-
	Interest rate derivative		-		53		-
	Total assets	$	1,060	$	53	$	-

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

There were no nonrecurring fair value measurements recorded during the three months ended April 29, 2012 or May 1, 2011.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments at the Balance Sheet Dates

The carrying values and approximate fair values of certain financial instruments as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012 were as follows:

		April 29, 2012				January 29, 2012
		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
		Value		Value		Value		Value
		(In thousands)
Assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,524	$	51,524	$	44,319	$	44,319
	Receivables		21,665		21,665		21,616		21,616
	Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees		876		876		655		655
	Agricultural commodity futures contracts		8		8		21		21
	Interest rate derivatives		53		53		53		53
Liabilities:
	Accounts payable		11,170		11,170		10,494		10,494
	Long-term debt (including current maturities)		27,007		27,007		27,593		27,593

The carrying value and fair value of the Company's long-term debt was $27.0 million at April 29, 2012and $27.6 million atJanuary 29, 2012. The fair value of the term loan is estimated based on an indicative bid price. As such, the term loan is classified within Level 2, as defined under GAAP.

XML

Shareholders' Equity

Apr. 29, 2012

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Share Based Payments And Repurchase Of Shares [Abstract]

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Share Based Payments And Repurchase Of Shares [Text Block]

Note 7 — Shareholders' Equity

Share-Based Compensation for Employees and Directors

The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based payment (“SBP”) awards based on their fair values. The fair value of SBP awards for which employees and directors render the requisite service necessary for the award to vest is recognized over the related vesting period.

The aggregate cost of SBP awards charged to earnings for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 is set forth in the following table. The Company did not realize any excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units during any of the periods.

			Three Months Ended
			April 29,		May 1,
			2012		2011
			(In thousands)
Costs charged to earnings related to:
	Stock options		$	827	$	375
	Restricted stock and restricted stock units			550		518
		Total costs	$	1,377	$	893
Costs included in:
	Direct operating expenses		$	370	$	482
	General and administrative expenses			1,007		411
		Total costs	$	1,377	$	893

Repurchases of Common Stock

On March 27, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20 million of the Company's common stock. The Company's lenders have consented to such repurchases through June 30, 2013, subject to certain conditions, as described in Note 12 to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in the 2012 Form 10-K.

The Company generally permits holders of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards to satisfy their obligations to reimburse the Company for the minimum required statutory withholding taxes arising from the vesting of such awards by surrendering vested common shares in lieu of reimbursing the Company in cash.

The following table summarizes repurchases of common stock for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,			May 1,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
		Common			Common
	Shares	Stock		Shares	Stock
Shares repurchased under share repurchase authorization	255	$	1,854	-	$	-
Shares surrendered in reimbursement for withholding taxes	-		-	13		57
	255	$	1,854	13	$	57

Through April 29, 2012, the Company repurchased 255,000 shares at an average cost of $7.27 per share, for a total cost of $1.9 million, of which approximately $1.3 million was settled prior to quarter end.

XML

Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Impairment Charges And Lease Termination Costs Disclosure [Abstract]

Impairment Charges And Lease Termination Costs Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 8 — Impairment Charges and Lease Termination Costs

The components of impairment charges and lease termination costs are as follows:

		Three Months Ended
		April 29,		May 1,
		2012		2011
		(In thousands)
Impairment of long-lived assets		$	-	$	-
Lease termination costs			31		244
	Total impairment charges and lease termination costs	$	31	$	244

The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These events and changes in circumstances include store closing and refranchising decisions, the effects of changing costs on current results of operations, observed trends in operating results, and evidence of changed circumstances observed as a part of periodic reforecasts of future operating results and as part of the Company's annual budgeting process. When the Company concludes that the carrying value of long-lived assets is not recoverable (based on future projected undiscounted cash flows), the Company records impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of those assets to their estimated fair values.

Lease termination costs represent the estimated fair value of liabilities related to unexpired leases, after reduction by the amount of accrued rent expense, if any, related to the leases, and are recorded when the lease contracts are terminated or, if earlier, the date on which the Company ceases use of the leased property. The fair value of these liabilities are estimated as the excess, if any, of the contractual payments required under the unexpired leases over the current market lease rates for the properties, discounted at a credit-adjusted risk-free rate over the remaining term of the leases. The provision for lease termination costs also includes adjustments to liabilities recorded in prior periods arising from changes in estimated sublease rentals and from settlements with landlords.

The transactions reflected in the accrual for lease termination costs are summarized as follows:

					Three Months Ended
					April 29,		May 1,
					2012		2011
				(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period				$	709	$	1,995
	Provision for lease termination costs:
		Adjustments to previously recorded provisions resulting
			from settlements with lessors and adjustments of previous estimates		23		212
		Accretion of discount			8		32
			Total provision		31		244
	Payments on unexpired leases, including settlements with
		lessors			(46)		(949)
Balance at end of period				$	694	$	1,290

XML

Derivative Instruments

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure Text Block

Note 10 — Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its derivative instruments. The Company mitigates this risk of nonperformance by dealing with highly rated counterparties.

Additional disclosure about the fair value of derivative instruments is included in Note 9.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company is exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of ingredients of its products, of which flour, sugar and shortening are the most significant. In order to bring greater stability to the cost of ingredients, from time to time the Company purchases exchange-traded commodity futures contracts, and options on such contracts, for raw materials which are ingredients of its products or which are components of such ingredients, including wheat and soybean oil. The Company is also exposed to the effects of commodity price fluctuations in the cost of gasoline used by its delivery vehicles. To mitigate the risk of fluctuations in the price of its gasoline purchases, the Company may purchase exchange-traded commodity futures contracts and options on such contracts. The difference between the cost, if any, and the fair value of commodity derivatives is reflected in earnings because the Company has not designated any of these instruments as hedges. Gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transactions in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating commodity prices. The settlement of commodity derivative contracts is reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows as a cash flow from operating activities. At April 29, 2012, the Company had commodity derivatives with an aggregate contract volume of 140,000 bushels of wheat. Other than the requirement to meet minimum margin requirements with respect to the commodity derivatives, there are no collateral requirements related to such contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

All of the borrowings under the Company's secured credit facilities bear interest at variable rates based upon either the lenders' prime rate, the Fed funds rate or LIBOR. The interest cost of the Company's debt may be affected by changes in these short-term interest rates and increases in those rates may adversely affect the Company's results of operations.

On March 3, 2011, the Company entered into an interest rate derivative contract having an aggregate notional principal amount of $17.5 million. The derivative contract entitles the Company to receive from the counterparty the excess, if any, of the three-month LIBOR rate over 3.00% for each of the calendar quarters in the period beginning April 2012 and ending December 2015. The Company is accounting for this derivative contract as a cash flow hedge.

Quantitative Summary of Derivative Positions and Their Effect on Results of Operations

The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheet as of April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012.

		Asset Derivatives
		Fair Value
		April 29,		January 29,
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Balance Sheet Location	2012		2012
		(In thousands)
Agricultural commodity futures contracts	Other current assets	$	8	$	21
		Asset Derivatives
		Fair Value
		April 29,		January 29,
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge	Balance Sheet Location	2012		2012
		(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative	Other assets	$	53	$	53

The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of income for the three months ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 was as follows.

			Amount of Derivative Gain or (Loss)
			Recognized in Income
			Three Months Ended
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income	April 29,			May 1,
					2012			2011
			(In thousands)
Agricultural commodity futures contracts		Direct operating expenses	$	51		$	(469)
Gasoline commodity futures contracts		Direct operating expenses		-			13
	Total		$	51		$	(456)
			Amortization of Derivative Asset
			Recognized in Income
			Three Months Ended
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge		Location of Amortization of Derivative Asset Recognized in Income	April 29,			May 1,
					2012			2011
			(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative		Interest expense	$	(2)		$	-
			Amount of Derivative Gain or (Loss)
			Recognized in Income
			Three Months Ended
Derivatives Designated as a Cash Flow Hedge		Location of Derivative Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI	April 29,			May 1,
					2012			2011
				(In thousands)
Interest rate derivative		Change in fair value of derivative	$	2		$	(198)
		Less - income tax effect		(1)			78
		Net change in amount recognized in OCI	$	1		$	(120)

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$ 6,026	$ 9,171
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense	2,482	1,938
Deferred income taxes	4,234	45
Accrued rent expense	114	184
Loss on disposal of property and equipment	229	145
Share-based compensation	1,377	893
Provision for doubtful accounts	48	(295)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	103	102
Equity in (income) losses of equity method franchisees	50	9
Other	(67)	(56)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Receivables	(261)	(3,052)
Inventories	588	(455)
Other current and non-current assets	540	483
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(5,131)	(3,013)
Other long-term obligations	32	(1,033)
Net cash provided by operating activities	10,364	5,066
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment	(1,317)	(1,843)
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment	41	0
Escrow deposit recovery	0	200
Other investing activities	(36)	(9)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities	(1,312)	(1,652)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt	(545)	(626)
Deferred financing costs	(11)	0
Proceeds from exercise of warrants	9	0
Repurchase of common shares	(1,300)	(57)
Net cash used for financing activities	(1,847)	(683)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	7,205	2,731
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	44,319	21,970
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 51,524	$ 24,701

XML

Receivables

3 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Receivables [Abstract]

Loans Notes Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure Text Block

Note 4 — Receivables

The components of receivables are as follows:

			April 29,		January 29,
			2012		2012
			(In thousands)
Receivables:
	Wholesale customers		$	10,352	$	10,169
	Unaffiliated franchisees			10,756		11,405
	Other receivables			889		1,015
	Current portion of notes receivable			198		185
				22,195		22,774
	Less — allowance for doubtful accounts:
		Wholesale customers		(216)		(349)
		Unaffiliated franchisees		(314)		(809)
				(530)		(1,158)
			$	21,665	$	21,616
Receivables from Equity Method Franchisees (Note 6):
	Trade		$	876	$	655

The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized as follows:

		Three Months Ended
		April 29,		May 1,
		2012		2011
		(In thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables:
	Balance at beginning of period	$	1,158	$	1,334
	Provision for doubtful accounts		107		117
	Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		(735)		7
	Balance at end of period	$	530	$	1,458
Allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables from Equity Method Franchisees:
	Balance at beginning of period	$	-	$	-
	Provision for doubtful accounts		(59)		-
	Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		59		-
	Balance at end of period	$	-	$	-

The Company also has notes receivable from franchisees which are summarized in the following table. These balances are included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

		April 29,		January 29,
		2012		2012
		(In thousands)
Notes receivable:
	Notes receivable from franchisees	$	684	$	777
	Less — portion due within one year included in receivables		(198)		(185)
	Less — allowance for doubtful accounts		(68)		(68)
		$	418	$	524

The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to notes receivable are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 29,		May 1,
	2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	68	$	538
Provision for doubtful accounts		-		(412)
Net recoveries (chargeoffs)		-		21
Balance at end of period	$	68	$	147

In addition to the foregoing notes receivable, the Company had promissory notes totaling approximately $3.3 million at April 29, 2012 and January 29, 2012representing payment obligations related to royalties and fees due to the Company which, as a result of doubt about their collection, the Company had not yet recorded as revenues. No payments were required to be made currently on any of these amounts. During the quarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $375,000 of previously unrecognized revenues related to KK Mexico which were received on May 5, 2011 in connection with the Company's sale of its 30% equity interest in the franchisee, as more fully described in Note 6.During thequarter ended May 1, 2011, the Company also reversed an allowance for doubtful notes receivable of $391,000 related to KK Mexico; such note also was paid in full on May 5, 2011.