QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

/x/
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2001

or

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to               

Commission file number 333-92047

Edison Mission Holdings Co.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	33-0826940 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California (Address of principal executive offices)	92612 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (949) 752-5588

See Table of Additional Registrants

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/  No / /

    Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of August 13, 2001: 100 shares (all shares held by an affiliate of the registrant).

Table of Additional Registrants

Name and Number	State of Incorporation or Organization	Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number	I.R.S. Employer Identification
Edison Mission Finance Co. 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California 949-752-5588	California	4991	33-0839202
Homer City Property Holdings, Inc. 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California 949-752-5588	California	4991	33-0851685
Mission Energy Westside, Inc. 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California 949-752-5588	California	4991	33-0550657
Chestnut Ridge Energy Company 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California 949-752-5588	California	4991	33-0826590
EME Homer City Generation L.P. 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700 Irvine, California 949-752-5588	Pennsylvania	4991	33-0826938

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item		Page
PART I—Financial Information
1.	Financial Statements	1
2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10
3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	17
PART II—Other Information
6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	41
	Signatures	42

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

			June 30, 2001		December 31, 2000
			(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	50,178	$	19,125
	Due from affiliates			55,512		84,166
	Fuel inventory			22,983		14,993
	Spare parts inventory			24,819		23,582
	Assets under price risk management			67,567		—
	Other current assets			677		2,758
		Total current assets		221,736		144,624
Property, Plant and Equipment				2,091,756		2,040,564
	Less accumulated depreciation			108,446		84,280
		Net property, plant and equipment		1,983,310		1,956,284
Other Assets
	Deferred financing charges, net			11,017		11,291
Total Assets			$	2,216,063	$	2,112,199
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Current Liabilities
	Accounts payable		$	5,651	$	16,479
	Accrued liabilities			26,079		32,200
	Interest payable			19,195		19,459
	Liabilities under price risk management			38,149		—
	Other current liabilities			—		469
		Total current liabilities		89,074		68,607
Long-Term Debt				1,062,000		1,012,000
Deferred Taxes				95,644		62,074
Benefit Plans				17,625		17,625
Total Liabilities				1,264,343		1,160,306
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
Shareholder's Equity
	Common stock, no par value; 10,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding			—		—
	Additional paid-in capital			910,456		925,609
	Retained earnings			25,758		26,284
	Accumulated other comprehensive income			15,506		—
Total Shareholder's Equity				951,720		951,893
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity			$	2,216,063	$	2,112,199

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands)

			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Operating Revenues from Marketing Affiliate
	Capacity revenues		$	15,564		$	11,756		$	27,578		$	21,829
	Energy revenues			90,211			91,256			206,603			178,800
	Income (loss) from price risk management			(80	)		—			31			—
		Total operating revenues		105,695			103,012			234,212			200,629
Operating Expenses
	Fuel			35,537			37,351			79,481			77,585
	Plant operations			24,853			27,171			43,073			46,727
	Depreciation			12,344			11,692			24,408			23,002
	Administrative and general			669			226			841			(1,045	)
		Total operating expenses		73,403			76,440			147,803			146,269
Operating Income				32,292			26,572			86,409			54,360
Other Income (Expense)
	Interest and other income (expense)			(1,407	)		797			(1,931	)		1,434
	Interest expense			(18,024	)		(18,964	)		(36,509	)		(37,855	)
		Total other income (expense)		(19,431	)		(18,167	)		(38,440	)		(36,421	)
Income before income taxes				12,861			8,405			47,969			17,939
Provision for income taxes				5,052			4,320			20,003			9,074
Net Income			$	7,809		$	4,085		$	27,966		$	8,865

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

			Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001		2000		2001			2000
			(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Net Income			$	7,809	$	4,085	$	27,966		$	8,865
Other comprehensive expense, net of tax:
	Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:
		Cumulative unrealized holding losses upon adoption of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $54,081		—		—		(61,811	)		—
		Other unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of income tax expense of $59,212 and $54,187 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		67,677		—		61,933			—
		Add: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of income tax expense of $4,971 and $13,460 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		5,682		—		15,384			—
Comprehensive Income			$	81,168	$	4,085	$	43,472		$	8,865

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
	Net income		$	27,966		$	8,865
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization		24,682			23,649
		Deferred tax provision		33,570			9,074
	Decrease (increase) in due from affiliates			28,654			(14,538	)
	Increase in inventory			(9,227	)		(8,692	)
	Decrease in other assets			2,081			137
	(Decrease) increase in accounts payable			(10,828	)		16,655
	Decrease in accrued liabilities			(6,121	)		(9,913	)
	(Decrease) increase in interest payable			(264	)		1,534
	Decrease in other liabilities			(469	)		—
	Increase in net assets under price risk management			(13,912	)		—
	Other, net			861			—
		Net cash provided by operating activities		76,993			26,771
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Capital contributions from parent			—			203
	Borrowings under long-term obligations			50,000			63,000
	Financing costs			—			(910	)
	Cash dividends to parent			(43,645	)		(9,951	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities		6,355			52,342
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Capital expenditures			(52,295	)		(78,543	)
		Net cash used in investing activities		(52,295	)		(78,543	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				31,053			570
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				19,125			44,511
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	50,178		$	45,081

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands)

Note 1. General

    We have made all adjustments, including recurring accruals, that are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

    Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2000, included in our 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2001. We follow the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of the change in accounting for derivatives (see Note 2). This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements.

    Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.

Note 2. Change in Accounting

    Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value unless they meet an exception. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

    Effective January 1, 2001, we recorded all derivatives at fair value unless the derivatives qualified for the normal sales and purchases exception. Our physical fuel contracts qualify under this exception. We did not use this exception for forward sales contracts from our Homer City plant due to the net settlement procedures used by our marketing affiliate with counterparties for the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001. Effective July 1, 2001, the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include forward sales contracts subject to net settlement procedures with counterparties. Accordingly, we intend to use the normal sales and purchases exception for our Homer City forward sales contracts commencing July 1, 2001 and plan to record a cumulative change in the accounting for derivatives during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

    For the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, forward sales contracts from our Homer City plant qualify for treatment under SFAS No. 133 as cash flow hedges with appropriate adjustments made to other comprehensive income. The cumulative effect on prior periods' net income resulting from the change in accounting for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 was not material. We recorded a $61.8 million, after tax, unrealized holding loss upon adoption of a change in accounting principle reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheet. We recorded a net loss of $146,000 and a net gain of $482,000 from the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The gain

5

(loss) is reflected in income (loss) from price risk management in the consolidated statement of operations.

Note 3. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2000	$	—	$	—
Current period change		15,506		15,506
Balance at June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)	$	15,506	$	15,506

    Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges at June 30, 2001 include forward sales contracts from our Homer City plant that did not meet the normal sales and purchases exception under SFAS No. 133 due to the net settlement procedures used by our marketing affiliate with counterparties. These gains arise from current forecasts of future electricity prices in these markets that are less than our contract prices. The Financial Accounting Standards Board cleared Statement 133 Implementation Issue Number C15, which extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include power sales contracts that are subject to netting of transactions from multiple contracts if the contract requires physical delivery and the quantity under the contract expected to be sold is within the normal course of business. Assuming these contracts meet the aforementioned criteria, the contracts will no longer be reported in the balance sheet at fair value, effective July 1, 2001.

Note 4. Commitments and Contingencies

Transition Contracts

    Our subsidiary, EME Homer City Generation L.P. (EME Homer City), has entered into separate transition contracts with Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) and New York State Electric & Gas Corporation (NYSEG), pursuant to which EME Homer City may exercise a put option to sell certain quantities of capacity to Penelec and NYSEG, and Penelec and NYSEG may exercise call options to purchase certain quantities of capacity. The terms of the NYSEG Transition Contract continue until December 31, 2001 and the Penelec Transition Contract expired on May 31, 2001. EME Homer City exercised its put options to sell 942 MW of capacity to Penelec for the full period from March 18, 1999 through May 31, 2001 under the Penelec Transition Contract for a price of $49.90/MW-day from March 18, 1999 through May 31, 1999, $59.90/MW-day through May 31, 2000, and $77.40/MW-day through May 31, 2001. EME Homer City has amended the NYSEG Transition Contract and sold 500 MW of capacity to NYSEG through May 31, 2000 for a price of $60.00/MW-day, 370 MW of capacity through September 30, 2000 for $72.17/MW-day, and 430 MW of capacity through December 31, 2001 for $72.17/MW-day.

6

Credit Support to Affiliates

    The Company has entered into a contract with a marketing affiliate for the sale of energy and capacity produced by the Homer City facilities, which are comprised of three coal-fired electric generating units located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and related facilities. This contract enables the marketing affiliate to engage in forward sales and hedging transactions to manage the Company's electricity price exposure. Net gains or losses on hedges by the marketing affiliate that are settled are recognized in the same manner as the hedged item. The Company receives the net transaction price on all contracts that are settled. In connection with these agreements, the Company has agreed to provide credit support in the form of guarantees. At June 30, 2001, the Company had executed guarantees totaling $178.4 million.

Ash Disposal Site

    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) regulations governing ash disposal sites require, among other things, groundwater assessments of landfills if existing groundwater monitoring indicates the possibility of degradation. The assessments could lead to the installation of additional monitoring wells and if degradation of the groundwater were discovered, the Company would be required to develop abatement plans, which may include the lining of unlined sites. To date, the Homer City facilities' ash disposal site has not shown any signs that would require abatement. Management does not believe that the costs of maintaining and abandoning the ash disposal site will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

Environmental Matters

    Prior to our purchase of the Homer City plant, the Environmental Protection Agency requested information from the prior owners of the plant concerning physical changes at the plant. We have been in informal voluntary discussions with the Environmental Protection Agency relating to these facilities, which may result in the payment of civil fines. There is no assurance that we will reach a satisfactory agreement or that these facilities will not be subject to proceedings in the future. Depending on the outcome of the proceedings, we could be required to invest in additional pollution control requirements, over and above the upgrades we are planning to install, and could be subject to fines and penalties. In May 2001, President Bush issued a directive for a 90-day review of new source review "interpretation and implementation" by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. President Bush also directed the Attorney General to review ongoing new source review legal actions to "ensure" they are "consistent with the Clean Air Act and its regulations." Both actions were recommendations detailed within the Bush Administration's "National Energy Policy Task Force Report."

Two Lick Creek Reservoir Deep Mine Discharges

    In connection with our purchase of the Homer City facilities on March 18, 1999, we acquired the Two Lick Creek Dam and Reservoir. Acid mine drainage discharges from the Penn Hill No. 2 and Dixon Run No. 3 inactive deep mines were being collected and partially treated on the reservoir property by Stanford Mining Company before being pumped off the property for additional treatment

7

at the nearby Chestnut Ridge Treatment Plant. The mining company filed for bankruptcy and operated the collection and treatment system until May 1999 when its assets were allegedly depleted.

    PADEP initially advised us that we were potentially liable for treating the two discharges solely because of our ownership of the property on which the discharges emanated. Without any admission of our liability, we voluntarily entered into a letter agreement to fund the operation of the collection and treatment system for an interim period until the agency completed its investigation of potentially liable parties and alternatives for permanent treatment of the discharges were evaluated. After examining property records, PADEP concluded that we are only responsible for treating the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. The agency has not completed its investigation of other potentially responsible parties, particularly mining companies that previously operated the two mines.

    A draft consent agreement that addresses remedial responsibilities for the two discharges has been prepared by PADEP. Under its terms, we are responsible for designing and implementing a permanent system to collect and treat the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. When the Dixon Run No. 3 treatment system becomes operational, we will discontinue our funding of the existing collection and treatment system. The state has provided funding to Blacklick Creek Watershed Association to develop and operate a collection and treatment system for the Penn Hill No. 2 discharge. The Watershed Association has started construction on the Penn Hill No. 2 system and expects it to be completed in September 2001.

    The current cost of operating the collection and treatment system is approximately $15,000 per month. We expect the costs of operation will be reduced by 30% to 40% after the Penn Hill No. 2 system construction is completed. We are evaluating options for permanent treatment of the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge, including a passive system involving wetlands treatment. The cost of a passive treatment system is estimated to be $1 million, but its operational costs are considerably less than those of a conventional chemical treatment system.

Plant Improvements

    Upon acquisition of the Homer City facilities, the Company began major plant improvements consisting primarily of a turnkey pollution control retrofit project. The estimated cost of this project is $270 million, of which $224 million has been incurred prior to June 30, 2001.

Coal Cleaning Agreement

    The Company has entered into a Coal Cleaning Agreement with Homer City Coal Processing Corp. to operate and maintain a coal-cleaning plant owned by EME Homer City. Under the terms of the agreement, which is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2002, the Company is obligated to reimburse Homer City Coal Processing Corp. for the actual costs incurred in the operations and maintenance of the coal cleaning plant, a fixed general and administrative service fee of $260,000 per year, and an operating fee that ranges from $0.20 to $0.35 per ton depending on the level of tonnage.

Interconnection Agreement

    Subsidiaries of the Company have entered into Interconnection Agreements with NYSEG and Penelec to provide interconnection services necessary to interconnect the Homer City Station with

8

NYSEG and Penelec's transmission systems. Unless an Interconnection Agreement is terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, it will terminate on a date mutually agreed to by EME Homer City, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the retirement date of the Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend such interconnection services to modifications, additions, upgrades or repowering of the Homer City units. EME Homer City is required to compensate NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG or Penelec's interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection with any modification, addition or upgrade to the Homer City units.

Note 5. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001		2000
	(Unaudited)
Cash paid for interest	$	43,118	$	39,582
Cash paid for income taxes		—		—

9

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
                OF OPERATIONS

    The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and projections about future events based on our knowledge of present facts and circumstances and our assumptions about future events. In this discussion, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "intends," "plans" and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. The information contained in this discussion is subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise indicated, the information presented in this section is with respect to Edison Mission Holdings Co. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

General

    We are a special-purpose California corporation formed on October 7, 1998 for the purpose of facilitating the financing of the acquisition and, through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquiring, making improvements to and operating our three coal-fired electric generating units and related facilities. EME Homer City, our indirect subsidiary, acquired the Homer City facilities on March 18, 1999 for a purchase price of approximately $1.8 billion. Although we were incorporated in 1998, we had no significant activity prior to the acquisition of the Homer City facilities.

    Edison Mission Energy is our parent company. Edison Mission Energy's ultimate parent company is Edison International, which also owns Southern California Edison, one of the largest electric utilities in the United States. Each of these companies is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has financial statements that are filed in accordance with rules enacted by the SEC. For more information regarding each of these companies, see their respective Forms 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and other periodic reports filed by them under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

    EME Homer City derives revenue from the sale of energy and capacity into the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland power market (PJM) and the New York independent system operator (NYISO) and from bilateral contracts with power marketers and load serving entities within PJM, NYISO and the surrounding markets. EME Homer City has entered into a contract with a marketing affiliate for the sale of energy and capacity produced by the Homer City facilities, which enables this marketing affiliate to engage in forward sales and hedging. EME Homer City pays the marketing affiliate fees of $0.02/MWh plus emission allowance fees. The net fees earned by the marketing affiliate were $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $1.3 million in the corresponding periods in 2000.

    EME Homer City believes there may also be opportunities to derive revenue from the sale of installed capacity and ancillary services. Under the terms of the Pennsylvania Electric Company and New York State Electric & Gas Transition Contracts, EME Homer City has elected to exercise several options to sell capacity. These contracts expire by December 31, 2001. EME Homer City also has the option to sell noncontracted capacity in PJM and NYISO.

Results of Operations

Operating Revenues

    Operating revenues increased $2.7 million and $33.6 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2000. Energy and capacity sales were made through a contract with a marketing affiliate. We generated 2,663 GWhr and 6,160 GWhr of electricity during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to generating 2,683 GWhr and 6,070 GWhr of electricity in the corresponding periods in

10

2000. The availability factor for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was 83.3%, compared to 79.3% for the corresponding period in 2000. The weighted average price for energy was $33.92/MWh during the second quarter of 2001, compared to $33.12/MWh for the same period in 2000. The weighted average price for energy was $33.64/MWh during the first six months of 2001, compared to $29.82/MWh for the same period in 2000. The increase in the weighted average price for energy is due to higher PJM market prices and higher hedge prices.

Operating Expenses

    Operating expenses consisted of expenses for fuel, plant operations, depreciation and amortization and administrative and general expenses. Fuel costs decreased $1.8 million for the second quarter ended June 30, 2001, compared to the corresponding period in 2000. Fuel costs increased $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to the same period in 2000. The change in fuel costs is due to changes in electrical generation and the price of fuel. The average price of coal per ton was $27.76 for the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to $28.71 for the same period in 2000. The average price decreased due to changes in the type of coal used in operations.

    Plant operations costs decreased $2.3 million and $3.7 million in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2000. Plant operations costs include labor and overhead, contract services, parts and supplies, and other administrative costs. Plant operations costs were lower in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001 than costs for the same periods in 2000 due to lower maintenance expenses.

    Depreciation and amortization increased $0.7 million and $1.4 million in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2000. Depreciation expense primarily relates to the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, which are being depreciated over 39 years from the date of acquisition.

    Administrative and general expenses were $0.7 million and $0.8 million in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and ($1.0) million for the same period in 2000. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we reduced our accrual for Pennsylvania state capital tax.

Other Income (Expense)

    Interest and other income (expense) decreased $2.2 million and $3.4 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods. The decrease was primarily due to losses related to removal of equipment in connection with completing our capital improvement program.

Provision for Income Taxes

    The effective income tax rate in the first six months of 2001 was 42% compared to a rate of 51% for the same period in 2000. The effective tax rates are higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

    At June 30, 2001, we had cash and cash equivalents of $50.2 million. We may use amounts available under our $50 million five-year revolving credit facility for general working capital purposes. All outstanding amounts under the $50 million five-year revolving credit facility will be repaid each year on the anniversary of the issuance of the $300 million aggregate principal amount of Series A senior secured bonds and $530 million aggregate principal amount of Series B senior secured bonds

11

that were issued on May 27, 1999. For the second quarter ended June 30, 2001, there were no outstanding amounts under the $50 million five-year revolving credit facility.

    Net cash flow provided by operating activities totaled $76.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $26.8 million for the corresponding period of the prior year. The increase of $50.1 million is a result of the increase in net income and the collection of receivables from our marketing affiliate.

    Net cash provided by financing activities decreased to $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to $52.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The decrease is primarily due to a dividend of $43.6 million paid to Edison Mission Energy, our parent company, for the six-month period June 30, 2001, compared to a dividend of $10 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2000.

    We intend to invest approximately $270 million for the environmental capital improvements to the Homer City units, including a selective catalytic reduction system on all three units and a flue gas desulfurization system on Unit 3, under a fixed price, turnkey engineering, procurement and construction contract. These improvements are scheduled to be installed by 2002. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2001 were $52.3 million, primarily related to the flue gas desulfurization system on Unit 3 and the selective catalytic reduction systems. The environmental improvements will enhance the economics of the Homer City units by reducing fuel costs, nitrogen oxide allowance purchases and sulfur dioxide allowance purchases. We expect to spend approximately $34 million for the final two quarters of 2001 on capital expenditures for environmental capital improvements to the Homer City facility. These capital expenditures are being financed through our $250 million five-year term loan facility.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

    We provide credit support for an affiliate that enters into various electric energy transactions, including futures and swap agreements. At June 30, 2001, we provided guarantees totaling $178.4 million as credit support for financial and energy contracts entered into by affiliates. These guarantees provide that we will perform the obligations of the affiliates in the event of nonperformance by them. We could be exposed to the risk of higher electric energy prices in the event of nonperformance by a counterparty. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by a counterparty nor the marketing affiliate.

    Our parent, Edison Mission Energy, has issued a Credit Support Guarantee, under which it must make up to $42 million in payments under specified conditions. The Credit Support Guarantee is available until December 31, 2001 as additional cash flow to supplement any shortfalls in cash from operations that may be used to pay our debt service obligations on the senior secured bonds and our other senior secured debt. We have an obligation under our bond financing to maintain a debt service reserve equal to the projected amount of debt service due in the next six months, which can be satisfied through cash, a letter of credit or a parent company guaranty. At June 30, 2001, we have provided a $35 million letter of credit to satisfy our debt service reserve obligation. We also have an obligation under our bank financing to have a debt service reserve account balance in an amount equal to six months of debt service that can be satisfied through cash, a letter of credit or a parent company guaranty. Edison Mission Energy has provided a $9 million guarantee to the lenders to support this obligation.

Market Risk Exposures

    Our primary market risk exposures arise from changes in electricity pool pricing and interest rates. We manage these risks by using derivative financial instruments in accordance with established policies and procedures.

12

Commodity Price Risk

    With the exception of revenue generated by the Pennsylvania Electric Company Transition Contract, which expired in May 2001, and the New York State Electric & Gas Transition Contract, which expires in December 2001, and from bilateral contracts for the sale of electricity with third-party load serving entities and power marketers, our revenues and results of operations are dependent upon prevailing market prices for energy, capacity, ancillary services in the PJM, NYISO and other competitive markets. Among the factors that influence the market prices for energy, capacity and ancillary services in PJM and NYISO are:

•

prevailing market prices for fuel oil, coal and natural gas and associated transportation costs;



•

the extent of additional supplies of capacity, energy and ancillary services from current competitors or new market entrants, including the development of new generation facilities that may be able to produce electricity at a lower cost;



•

transmission congestion in PJM and/or NYISO;



•

the extended operation of nuclear generating plants in PJM and NYISO beyond their presently expected dates of decommissioning;



•

weather conditions prevailing in PJM and NYISO from time to time; and



•

the possibility of a reduction in the projected rate of growth in electricity usage as a result of factors such as regional economic conditions and the implementation of conservation programs.

    Our risk management policy allows for the use of derivative financial instruments through our marketing affiliate to limit financial exposure to energy prices for non-trading purposes. Our marketing affiliate's risk management activities give rise to commodity price risk, which represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular commodity. Commodity price risks are actively monitored to ensure compliance with our risk management policies. Policies are in place that limit the amount of total net exposure we may enter into at any point in time. Procedures exist which allow for monitoring of all commitments and positions with daily reporting to senior management. Our marketing affiliate performs a "value at risk" analysis in our daily business to measure, monitor and control our overall market risk exposure. The use of value at risk allows management to aggregate overall risk, compare risk on a consistent basis and identify the drivers of the risk. Value at risk measures the worst expected loss over a given time interval, under normal market conditions, at a given confidence level. Given the inherent limitations of value at risk and relying on a single risk measurement tool, our marketing affiliate supplements this approach with industry "best practice" techniques, including the use of stress testing and worst-case scenario analysis, as well as stop limits and counterparty credit exposure limits.

Interest Rate Risk

    We have mitigated the risk of interest rate fluctuations by arranging for fixed rate financing for the majority of our project financings. Interest rate changes affect the borrowings under our working capital and capital improvement credit facilities that are utilized to fund cash needs of the Homer City facilities. We do not believe that interest rate fluctuations will have a materially adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

13

Environmental Matters or Regulations

    We are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the United States. We believe that as of the filing date of this report, we are in substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and that maintaining compliance with current requirements will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations. However, possible future developments, such as the promulgation of more stringent environmental laws and regulations, and future proceedings that may be taken by environmental authorities, could affect the costs and the manner in which we conduct our business and could cause us to make substantial additional capital expenditures. There is no assurance that we would be able to recover these increased costs from our customers or that our financial position and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected.

    Typically, environmental laws required a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction and operation of a project. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a proposed project as well as require extensive modifications to existing projects, which may involve significant capital expenditures.

    We expect that the implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the regulations and revised state implementation plans developed as a consequence of the Act will result in increased capital expenditures and operating expenses. We expect to spend approximately $34 million for the final two quarters of 2001 and $12 million in 2002 to install upgrades to the environmental controls at the Homer City plant to control sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions.

    On November 3, 1999, the United States Department of Justice filed suit against a number of electric utilities for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act's "new source review" requirements related to modifications of air emissions sources at electric generating stations located in the southern and midwestern regions of the United States. Several states have joined these lawsuits. In addition, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has also issued administrative notices of violation alleging similar violations at additional power plants owned by some of the same utilities named as defendants in the Department of Justice lawsuit, as well as other utilities, and also issued an administrative order to the Tennessee Valley Authority for similar violations at certain of its power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency has also issued requests for information pursuant to the Clean Air Act to numerous other electric utilities, including the prior owners of the Homer City plant, seeking to determine whether these utilities also engaged in activities that may have been in violation of the Clean Air Act's new source review requirements.

    To date, one utility, the Tampa Electric Company, has reached a formal agreement with the United States to resolve alleged new source review violations. Two other utilities, the Virginia Electric & Power Company and Cinergy Corp., have reached agreements in principle with the Environmental Protection Agency. In each case, the settling party has agreed to incur over $1 billion in expenditures over several years for the installation of additional pollution control, the retirement or repowering of coal-fired generating units, supplemental environmental projects and civil penalties. These agreements provide for a phased approach to achieving required emission reductions over the next 10 to 15 years. The settling utilities have also agreed to pay civil penalties ranging from $3.5 million to $8.5 million.

    Prior to our purchase of the Homer City plant, the Environmental Protection Agency requested information from the prior owners of the plant concerning physical changes at the plant. We have been in informal voluntary discussions with the Environmental Protection Agency relating to these facilities, which may result in the payment of civil fines. There is no assurance that we will reach a satisfactory agreement or that these facilities will not be subject to proceedings in the future. Depending on the outcome of the proceedings, we could be required to invest in additional pollution control requirements, over and above the upgrades we are planning to install, and could be subject to fines and penalties. In May 2001, President Bush issued a directive for a 90-day review of new source review

14

"interpretation and implementation" by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. President Bush also directed the Attorney General to review ongoing new source review legal actions to "ensure" they are "consistent with the Clean Air Act and its regulations." Both actions were recommendations detailed within the Bush Administration's "National Energy Policy Task Force Report."

    A new ambient air quality standard was adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency in July 1997 to address emissions of fine particulate matter. It is widely understood that attainment of the fine particulate matter standard may require reductions in nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides, although under the time schedule announced by the Environmental Protection Agency when the new standard was adopted, non-attainment areas were not to have been designated until 2002 and control measures to meet the standard were not to have been identified until 2005. In May 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Section 109(b)(l) of the Clean Air Act, the section of the Clean Air Act requiring the promulgation of national ambient air quality standards, as interpreted by the Environmental Protection Agency, was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Court of Appeals remanded both the fine particulate matter standard and the revised ozone standard to allow the EPA to determine whether it could articulate a constitutional application of Section 109(b)(l). On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court, in Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc., reversed the Circuit Court's judgment on this issue and remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals to dispose of any other preserved challenges to the particulate matter and ozone standards. Accordingly, as the final application of the revised particulate matter ambient air quality standard is potentially subject to further judicial proceedings, the impact of this standard on our facilities is uncertain at this time.

    On December 20, 2000, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a regulatory finding that it is "necessary and appropriate" to regulate emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal-fired power plants. The agency has added coal-fired power plants to the list of source categories under Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act for which "maximum available control technology" standards will be developed. Eventually, unless overturned or reconsidered, the Environmental Protection Agency will issue technology-based standards that will apply to every coal-fired unit owned by us or our affiliates in the United States. This section of the Clean Air Act provides only for technology-based standards, and does not permit market trading options. Until the standards are actually promulgated, the potential cost of these control technologies cannot be estimated, and we cannot evaluate the potential impact on the operations of our facilities.

    Since the adoption of the United Nations Framework on Climate Change in 1992, there has been worldwide attention with respect to greenhouse gas emissions. In December 1997, the Clinton Administration participated in the Kyoto, Japan negotiations, where the basis of a Climate Change treaty was formulated. Under the treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, the United States would be required, by 2008-2012, to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 7% from 1990 levels.

    The Kyoto Protocol has yet to be submitted to the U.S. Senate for ratification. In March 2001, the Bush administration announced that the United States would not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, but would instead offer an alternative. Various bills have been, and are expected to be, introduced in Congress to address some of these implementing guidelines and other aspects of climate change. Apart from the Kyoto Protocol, we may be impacted by future federal or state legislation relating to controlling greenhouse gas emissions.

    If we do become subject to limitations on emissions of carbon dioxide from our fossil fuel-fired electric generating plants, these requirements could have a significant economic impact on their operations.

    The Environmental Protection Agency proposed rules establishing standards for the location, design, construction and capacity of cooling water intake structures at new facilities, including steam

15

electric power plants. Under the terms of a consent decree entered into by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Whitman, these regulations must be adopted by November 9, 2001. The consent decree also requires the agency to propose similar regulations for existing facilities by February 28, 2002, and finalize those regulations by August 28, 2003. Until the final standards are promulgated, we cannot determine their impact on our facilities or estimate the potential cost of compliance.

    The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is also known as CERCLA, and similar state statutes, require the cleanup of sites from which there has been a release or threatened release of hazardous substances. As of the date of this report, we are unaware of any material liabilities under CERCLA or similar state statutes; however, there is no assurance that we will not incur CERCLA liability or similar state law liability in the future.

    In connection with our purchase of the Homer City facilities on March 18, 1999, we acquired the Two Lick Creek Dam and Reservoir. Acid mine drainage discharges from the Penn Hill No. 2 and Dixon Run No. 3 inactive deep mines were being collected and partially treated on the reservoir property by Stanford Mining Company before being pumped off the property for additional treatment at the nearby Chestnut Ridge Treatment Plant. The mining company filed for bankruptcy and operated the collection and treatment system until May 1999 when its assets were allegedly depleted.

    The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) initially advised us that we were potentially liable for treating the two discharges solely because of our ownership of the property on which the discharges emanated. Without any admission of our liability, we voluntarily entered into a Letter Agreement to fund the operation of the collection and treatment system for an interim period until the agency completed its investigation of potentially liable parties and alternatives for permanent treatment of the discharges were evaluated. After examining property records, PADEP concluded that we are only responsible for treating the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. The agency has not completed its investigation of other potentially responsible parties, particularly mining companies that previously operated the two mines.

    A draft consent agreement that addresses remedial responsibilities for the two discharges has been prepared by PADEP. Under its terms, we are responsible for designing and implementing a permanent system to collect and treat the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. When the Dixon Run No. 3 treatment system becomes operational, we will discontinue our funding of the existing collection and treatment system. The state has provided funding to Blacklick Creek Watershed Association to develop and operate a collection and treatment system for the Penn Hill No. 2 discharge. The Watershed Association has started construction on the Penn Hill No. 2 system and expects it to be completed in September 2001.

    The current cost of operating the collection and treatment system is approximately $15,000 per month. We expect the costs of operation will be reduced by 30% to 40% after the Penn Hill No. 2 system construction is completed. We are evaluating options for permanent treatment of the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge, including a passive system involving wetlands treatment. The cost of a passive treatment system is estimated to be $1 million, but its operational costs are considerably less than those of a conventional chemical treatment system.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133

    Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value unless they meet an exception. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, depending on the nature

16

of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

    Effective January 1, 2001, we recorded all derivatives at fair value unless the derivatives qualified for the normal sales and purchases exception. Our physical fuel contracts qualify under this exception. We did not use this exception for forward sales contracts from our Homer City plant due to the net settlement procedures used by our marketing affiliate with counterparties for the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001. Effective July 1, 2001, the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include forward sales contracts subject to net settlement procedures with counterparties. Accordingly, we intend to use the normal sales and purchases exception for our Homer City forward sales contracts commencing July 1, 2001 and plan to record a cumulative change in the accounting for derivatives during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

    For the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, forward sales contracts from our Homer City plant qualify for treatment under SFAS No. 133 as cash flow hedges with appropriate adjustments made to other comprehensive income. The cumulative effect on prior periods' net income resulting from the change in accounting for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 was not material. We recorded a $61.8 million, after tax, unrealized holding loss upon adoption of a change in accounting principle reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheet. We recorded a net loss of $146,000 and a net gain of $482,000 from the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The gain (loss) is reflected in income (loss) from price risk management in the consolidated statement of operations.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

    For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to "Market Risk Exposures" in Item 7. of Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. Management believes that at June 30, 2001, there has been no material change to this information.

17

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2001

NOTE

    The financial statements of Chestnut Ridge Energy Co. are provided under Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X as the shares of Chestnut Ridge Energy Co. represent a substantial portion of the collateral for Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s $830 million senior secured bonds.

18

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

			June 30, 2001			December 31, 2000
			(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
	Due from affiliate under tax sharing agreement		$	563		$	563
		Total current assets		563			563
Investment in EME Homer City Generation L.P.				221,890			194,846
Total Assets			$	222,453		$	195,409
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Other Taxes Payable			$	548		$	—
Deferred Taxes				6,772			4,074
Total Liabilities				7,320			4,074
Shareholder's Equity
	Common stock, $1 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding			—			—
	Additional paid-in-capital			200,396			200,194
	Retained earnings			(614	)		(8,859	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive income			15,351			—
Total Shareholder's Equity				215,133			191,335
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity			$	222,453		$	195,409

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

19

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001			2000			2001			2000
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Equity in income (loss) from EME Homer City Generation L.P.	$	(1,573	)	$	(5,263	)	$	9,825		$	(8,646	)
Capital taxes		648			203			(750	)		813
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2,221	)		(5,466	)		9,075			(9,459	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(356	)		1,903			830			1,490
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,865	)	$	(7,369	)	$	8,245		$	(10,949	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Net Income (Loss)			$	(1,865	)	$	(7,369	)	$	8,245		$	(10,949	)
Other comprehensive expense, net of tax:
	Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:
		Cumulative unrealized holding losses upon adoption of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $53,540		—			—			(61,193	)		—
		Other unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of income tax expense of $67,376 and $65,117 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		67,001			—			61,314			—
		Add: reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of income tax benefit of $685 and $1,854 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		5,625			—			15,230			—
Comprehensive Income (Loss)			$	70,761		$	(7,369	)	$	23,596		$	(10,949	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

21

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
	Net income (loss)		$	8,245		$	(10,949	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
		Deferred tax provision		830			1,150
		Equity in (income) loss from EME Homer City Generation L.P.		(9,825	)		8,646
	Decrease in due from affiliate under tax sharing agreement			—			339
	Decrease in due to affiliate			—			(184	)
	Increase in other taxes payable			548			—
		Net cash used in operating activities		(202	)		(998	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Cash contributions			202			923
	Cash dividends			—			75
		Net cash provided by financing activities		202			998
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Investment in EME Homer City Generation L.P.			—			—
		Net cash used in investing activities		—			—
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				—			—
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				—			—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	—		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

22

CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands)

Note 1. General

    We have made all adjustments, including recurring accruals, that are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

    The Company's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its Financial Statements as of December 31, 2000, included in Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2001. The Company follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of the change in accounting for derivatives (see Note 3). This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements.

Note 2. Investment in EME Homer City

    The Company owns a 99 percent limited partnership interest in EME Homer City Generation L.P. As a limited partner, the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in EME Homer City, and, in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, the Company accounts for its investment in EME Homer City under the equity method. Accordingly, the investment in EME Homer City was recorded at cost with adjustments made to the carrying amount of the investment to recognize the Company's share of the earnings, losses or distributions of EME Homer City after the date of the investment. The following table presents summarized financial information for EME Homer City for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001			2000			2001		2000
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Operating revenues	$	105,695		$	103,013		$	234,212	$	200,629
Operating income		32,962			26,799			87,252		55,246
Net income (loss)		(1,589	)		(5,316	)		9,924		(8,733	)

Note 3. Change in Accounting

    Effective January 1, 2001, the Company and its investee, EME Homer City, adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value unless they meet an exception. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

    Effective January 1, 2001, EME Homer City recorded all derivatives at fair value unless the derivatives qualified for the normal sales and purchases exception. EME Homer City's physical fuel contracts qualify under this exception. EME Homer City did not use this exception for forward sales

23

contracts due to the net settlement procedures used by its marketing affiliate with counterparties for the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001. Effective July 1, 2001, the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include forward sales contracts subject to net settlement procedures with counterparties. Accordingly, EME Homer City intends to use the normal sales and purchases exception for their forward sales contracts commencing July 1, 2001 and plans to record a cumulative change in the accounting for derivatives during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

    For the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, the forward sales contracts from EME Homer City qualify for treatment under SFAS No. 133 as cash flow hedges with appropriate adjustments made to other comprehensive income. The cumulative effect on prior periods' net income resulting from the change in accounting for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 was not material. The Company recorded a $61.2 million, after tax, unrealized holding loss upon adoption of a change in accounting principle from its share of the unrealized holding loss from EME Homer City and the impact of deferred Pennsylvania state taxes, which is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the balance sheet. EME Homer City recorded a net loss of $146,000 and a net gain of $482,000 from the ineffective portion of its cash flow hedges during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. Our share of the loss of $145,000 and the gain of $477,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, is reflected in equity in income (loss) from EME Homer City in the statement of operations.

Note 4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2000	$	—	$	—
Current period change		15,351		15,351
Balance at June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)	$	15,351	$	15,351

    Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges at June 30, 2001 include forward sales contracts from EME Homer City that did not meet the normal sales and purchases exception under SFAS No. 133 due to the net settlement procedures used by its marketing affiliate with counterparties. Commencing July 1, 2001, EME Homer City intends to use the normal sales and purchases exception for these contracts based on recent guidance provided by the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

24

Note 5. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001		2000
	(Unaudited)
Cash paid for interest	$	—	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes		—		—

25

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2001

NOTE

    The financial statements of EME Homer City Generation L.P. are provided under Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X as the partnership interests of EME Homer City Generation L.P. represent a substantial portion of the collateral for Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s $830 million senior secured bonds.

26

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

			June 30, 2001		December 31, 2000
			(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	50,178	$	19,116
	Due from affiliates			100,356		128,927
	Fuel inventory			22,983		14,993
	Spare parts inventory			24,819		23,582
	Assets under price risk management			67,567		—
	Other current assets			677		2,758
		Total current assets		266,580		189,376
Property, Plant and Equipment				2,091,356		2,040,165
	Less accumulated depreciation			108,437		84,273
		Net property, plant and equipment		1,982,919		1,955,892
Deferred Financing Charges, Net				11,017		11,291
Total Assets			$	2,260,516	$	2,156,559
Liabilities and Partners' Equity
Current Liabilities
	Accounts payable		$	5,651	$	16,479
	Accrued liabilities			25,525		32,195
	Interest payable			31,917		32,668
	Liabilities under price risk management			38,149		—
	Other current liabilities			—		469
		Total current liabilities		101,242		81,811
Long-Term Debt to Affiliate				1,839,798		1,801,167
Deferred Taxes				77,719		59,141
Benefit Plans				17,625		17,625
Total Liabilities				2,036,384		1,959,744
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4)
Partners' Equity				224,132		196,815
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity			$	2,260,516	$	2,156,559

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

27

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands)

			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Operating Revenues from Marketing Affiliate
	Capacity revenues		$	15,564		$	11,756		$	27,578		$	21,829
	Energy revenues			90,211			91,256			206,603			178,800
	Income (loss) from price risk management			(80	)		—			31			—
		Total operating revenues		105,695			103,012			234,212			200,629
Operating Expenses
	Fuel			35,537			37,350			79,481			77,585
	Plant operations			24,853			27,171			43,073			46,727
	Depreciation			12,343			11,692			24,406			23,000
	Administrative and general			—			—			—			(1,929	)
		Total operating expenses		72,733			76,213			146,960			145,383
Operating Income				32,962			26,799			87,252			55,246
Other Income (Expense)
	Interest and other income (expense)			(1,364	)		795			(1,889	)		1,491
	Interest expense from affiliate			(33,828	)		(35,017	)		(68,540	)		(69,784	)
		Total other income (expense)		(35,192	)		(34,222	)		(70,429	)		(68,293	)
Income (loss) before income taxes				(2,230	)		(7,423	)		16,823			(13,047	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes				(642	)		(2,106	)		6,899			(4,314	)
Net Income (Loss)			$	(1,588	)	$	(5,317	)	$	9,924		$	(8,733	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Net Income (Loss)			$	(1,588	)	$	(5,317	)	$	9,924		$	(8,733	)
Other comprehensive expense, net of tax:
	Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:
		Cumulative unrealized holding losses upon adoption of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $46,556		—			—			(69,337	)		—
		Other unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of income tax expense of $50,973 and $46,647 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		75,916			—			69,473			—
		Add: reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of income tax benefit of $4,279 and $11,587 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively		6,374			—			17,257			—
Comprehensive Income (Loss)			$	80,702		$	(5,317	)	$	27,317		$	(8,733	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

29

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY
(In thousands)

			Chestnut Ridge Energy Company			Mission Energy Westside Inc.			Total Partners' Equity
Balance at December 31, 1999			$	197,987		$	2,000		$	199,987
	Net loss			(3,141	)		(31	)		(3,172	)
Balance at December 31, 2000				194,846			1,969			196,815
	Net income			9,825			99			9,924
	Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:
		Cumulative unrealized holding losses upon adoption of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit of $46,556		(68,644	)		(693	)		(69,337	)
		Other unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of income tax expense of $46,647		68,778			695			69,473
		Add: reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of income tax benefit of $11,587		17,085			172			17,257
Balance at June 30, 2001 (unaudited)			$	221,890		$	2,242		$	224,132

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
	Net income (loss)		$	9,924		$	(8,733	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation		24,680			23,647
		Deferred tax provision (benefit)		18,578			(4,315	)
	Decrease (increase) in due from affiliates			28,571			(13,131	)
	Increase in inventory			(9,227	)		(8,692	)
	Decrease in other assets			2,081			137
	(Decrease) increase in accounts payable			(10,828	)		16,655
	Decrease in accrued liabilities			(6,670	)		(9,914	)
	(Decrease) increase in interest payable			(751	)		21,359
	Decrease in other liabilities			(469	)		—
	Increase in net assets under price risk management			(12,024	)		—
	Other, net			861			—
		Net cash provided by operating activities		44,726			17,013
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Borrowings under long-term obligations			50,000			63,010
	Repayments on debt obligations			(11,369	)		—
	Financing costs			—			(910	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities		38,631			62,100
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Capital expenditures			(52,295	)		(78,543	)
		Net cash used in investing activities		(52,295	)		(78,543	)
Net increase in cash				31,062			570
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				19,116			44,454
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	50,178		$	45,024

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

31

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands)

Note 1. General

    We have made all adjustments, including recurring accruals, that are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

    The Partnership's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its Financial Statements as of December 31, 2000, included in Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2001. The Partnership follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of the change in accounting for derivatives (see Note 2). This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements.

    Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.

Note 2. Change in Accounting

    Effective January 1, 2001, the Partnership adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value unless they meet an exception. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

    Effective January 1, 2001, the Partnership recorded all derivatives at fair value unless the derivatives qualified for the normal sales and purchases exception. The Partnership's physical fuel contracts qualify under this exception. The Partnership did not use this exception for its forward sales contracts due to the net settlement procedures used by its marketing affiliate with counterparties for the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001. Effective July 1, 2001, the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include forward sales contracts subject to net settlement procedures with counterparties. Accordingly, the Partnership intends to use the normal sales and purchases exception for its forward sales contracts commencing July 1, 2001 and plans to record a cumulative change in the accounting for derivatives during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

    For the period between January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, the forward sales contracts qualify for treatment under SFAS No. 133 as cash flow hedges with appropriate adjustments made to other comprehensive income. The cumulative effect on prior periods' net income resulting from the change in accounting for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 was not material. The Partnership recorded a $69.3 million, after tax, unrealized holding loss upon adoption of a change in accounting principle reflected in partners' equity in the balance sheet. The Partnership recorded a net loss of $146,000 and a net gain of $482,000 from the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges during the three months and six

32

months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The gain (loss) is reflected in income (loss) from price risk management in the statement of operations.

Note 3. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2000	$	—	$	—
Current period change		17,393		17,393
Balance at June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)	$	17,393	$	17,393

    Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges at June 30, 2001 include forward sales contracts that did not meet the normal sales and purchases exception under SFAS No. 133 due to the net settlement procedures used by the marketing affiliate with counterparties. These gains arise from current forecasts of future electricity prices in these markets that are less than our contract prices. The Financial Accounting Standards Board cleared Statement 133 Implementation Issue Number C15, which extended the normal sales and purchases exception to include power sales contracts that are subject to netting of transactions from multiple contracts if the contract requires physical delivery and the quantity under the contract expected to be sold is within the normal course of business. Assuming these contracts meet the aforementioned criteria, the contracts will no longer be reported in the balance sheet at fair value, effective July 1, 2001.

Note 4. Commitments and Contingencies

Transition Contracts

    EME Homer City has entered into separate transition contracts with Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) and New York State Electric & Gas Corporation (NYSEG), pursuant to which EME Homer City may exercise a put option to sell certain quantities of capacity to Penelec and NYSEG, and Penelec and NYSEG may exercise call options to purchase certain quantities of capacity. The terms of the NYSEG Transition Contract continue until December 31, 2001 and the Penelec Transition Contract expired on May 31, 2001. EME Homer City exercised its put options to sell 942 MW of capacity to Penelec for the full period from March 18, 1999 through May 31, 2001 under the Penelec Transition Contract for a price of $49.90/MW-day from March 18, 1999 through May 31, 1999, $59.90/MW-day through May 31, 2000, and $77.40/MW-day through May 31, 2001. EME Homer City has amended the NYSEG Transition Contract and sold 500 MW of capacity to NYSEG through May 31, 2000 for a price of $60.00/MW-day, 370 MW of capacity through September 30, 2000 for $72.17/MW-day, and 430 MW of capacity through December 31, 2001 for $72.17/MW-day.

33

Ash Disposal Site

    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) regulations governing ash disposal sites require, among other things, groundwater assessments of landfills if existing groundwater monitoring indicates the possibility of degradation. The assessments could lead to the installation of additional monitoring wells and if degradation of the groundwater were discovered, the Partnership would be required to develop abatement plans, which may include the lining of unlined sites. To date, the Homer City facilities' ash disposal site has not shown any signs that would require abatement. Management does not believe that the costs of maintaining and abandoning the ash disposal site will have a material impact on the Partnership's results of operations or financial position.

Environmental Matters

    Prior to our purchase of the Homer City plant, the Environmental Protection Agency requested information from the prior owners of the plant concerning physical changes at the plant. The Partnership has been in informal voluntary discussions with the Environmental Protection Agency relating to these facilities, which may result in the payment of civil fines. There is no assurance that it will reach a satisfactory agreement or that these facilities will not be subject to proceedings in the future. Depending on the outcome of the proceedings, the Partnership could be required to invest in additional pollution control requirements, over and above the upgrades it is planning to install, and could be subject to fines and penalties. In May 2001, President Bush issued a directive for a 90-day review of new source review "interpretation and implementation" by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. President Bush also directed the Attorney General to review ongoing new source review legal actions to "ensure" they are "consistent with the Clean Air Act and its regulations." Both actions were recommendations detailed within the Bush Administration's "National Energy Policy Task Force Report."

Two Lick Creek Reservoir Deep Mine Discharges

    In connection with the Partnership's purchase of the Homer City facilities on March 18, 1999, the Partnership acquired the Two Lick Creek Dam and Reservoir. Acid mine drainage discharges from the Penn Hill No. 2 and Dixon Run No. 3 inactive deep mines were being collected and partially treated on the reservoir property by Stanford Mining Company before being pumped off the property for additional treatment at the nearby Chestnut Ridge Treatment Plant. The mining company filed for bankruptcy and operated the collection and treatment system until May 1999 when its assets were allegedly depleted.

    PADEP initially advised the Partnership that it was potentially liable for treating the two discharges solely because of its ownership of the property on which the discharges emanated. Without any admission of its liability, the Partnership voluntarily entered into a letter agreement to fund the operation of the collection and treatment system for an interim period until the agency completed its investigation of potentially liable parties and alternatives for permanent treatment of the discharges were evaluated. After examining property records, PADEP concluded that the Partnership is only responsible for treating the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. The agency has not completed its investigation of other potentially responsible parties, particularly mining companies that previously operated the two mines.

34

    A draft consent agreement that addresses remedial responsibilities for the two discharges has been prepared by PADEP. Under its terms, the Partnership is responsible for designing and implementing a permanent system to collect and treat the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge. When the Dixon Run No. 3 treatment system becomes operational, the Partnership will discontinue its funding of the existing collection and treatment system. The state has provided funding to Blacklick Creek Watershed Association to develop and operate a collection and treatment system for the Penn Hill No. 2 discharge. The Watershed Association has started construction on the Penn Hill No. 2 system and expects it to be completed in September 2001.

    The current cost of operating the collection and treatment system is approximately $15,000 per month. The Partnership expects the costs of operation will be reduced by 30% to 40% after the Penn Hill No. 2 system construction is completed. The Partnership is evaluating options for permanent treatment of the Dixon Run No. 3 discharge, including a passive system involving wetlands treatment. The cost of a passive treatment system is estimated to be $1 million, but its operational costs are considerably less than those of a conventional chemical treatment system.

Plant Improvements

    Upon acquisition of the Homer City facilities, the Partnership began major plant improvements consisting primarily of a turnkey pollution control retrofit project. The estimated cost of this project is $270 million, of which $224 million has been incurred prior to June 30, 2001.

Coal Cleaning Agreement

    The Partnership has entered into a Coal Cleaning Agreement with Homer City Coal Processing Corp. to operate and maintain a coal cleaning plant owned by the Partnership. Under the terms of the agreement, which is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2002, the Partnership is obligated to reimburse Homer City Coal Processing Corp. for the actual costs incurred in the operations and maintenance of the coal cleaning plant, a fixed general and administrative service fee of $260,000 per year, and an operating fee that ranges from $0.20 to $0.35 per ton depending on the level of tonnage.

Interconnection Agreement

    The Partnership has entered into Interconnection Agreements with NYSEG and Penelec to provide interconnection services necessary to interconnect the Homer City Station with NYSEG and Penelec's transmission systems. Unless an Interconnection Agreement is terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, it will terminate on a date mutually agreed to by the Partnership, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the retirement date of the Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend such interconnection services to modifications, additions, upgrades or repowering of the Homer City units. The Partnership is required to compensate NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG or Penelec's interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection with any modification, addition or upgrade to the Homer City units.

Note 5. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001		2000
	(Unaudited)
Cash paid for interest	$	75,636	$	51,686
Cash paid for income taxes		—		—

35

EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2001

NOTE

    The financial statements of Edison Mission Finance Co. are provided under Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X as the shares of Edison Mission Finance Co. represent a substantial portion of the collateral for Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s $830 million senior secured bonds.

36

EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO.
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

			June 30, 2001		December 31, 2000
			(Unaudited)
	Assets
Current Assets
	Interest receivable—EME Homer City Generation L.P.		$	31,917	$	32,668
		Total current assets		31,917		32,668
Other Assets
	Loan receivable—EME Homer City Generation L.P.			1,839,798		1,801,167
	Deferred taxes			—		1,184
Total Assets			$	1,871,715	$	1,835,019
	Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Current Liabilities
	Due to affiliates		$	45,544	$	45,509
	Interest payable—Edison Mission Holdings Co.			19,195		19,459
		Total current liabilities		64,739		64,968
Other Liabilities
	Loan payable—Edison Mission Holdings Co.			1,062,000		1,012,000
	Deferred taxes			11,117		—
Total Liabilities				1,137,856		1,076,968
Shareholder's Equity
	Common stock, $1 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding			—		—
	Additional paid-in-capital			724,141		748,448
	Retained earnings			9,718		9,603
Total Shareholder's Equity				733,859		758,051
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity			$	1,871,715	$	1,835,019

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

37

EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001			2000			2001			2000
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Interest income from affiliate	$	36,651		$	36,876		$	74,015		$	72,632
Interest expense from affiliate		(20,846	)		(20,824	)		(41,983	)		(40,703	)
Net interest income		15,805			16,052			32,032			31,929
Operating expenses		(18	)		(17	)		(35	)		(33	)
Income before income taxes		15,787			16,035			31,997			31,896
Provision for income taxes		6,070			6,166			12,302			12,264
Net Income	$	9,717		$	9,869		$	19,695		$	19,632

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38

EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2001			2000
			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
	Net income		$	19,695		$	19,632
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Deferred tax provision			12,301			12,264
	Decrease in interest receivable—EME Homer City Generation L.P.			751			(21,359	)
	Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates			35			(217	)
	Increase (decrease) in interest payable—Edison Mission Holdings Co.			(264	)		1,534
		Net cash provided by operating activities		32,518			11,854
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Cash contribution			—			10
	Proceeds from subordinated loan—Edison Mission Holdings Co.			50,000			63,000
	Cash dividends			(43,887	)		(11,854	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities		6,113			51,156
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Increase in subordinated revolving loan receivable—EME Homer City Generation L.P.			(38,631	)		(63,010	)
		Net cash used in investing activities		(38,631	)		(63,010	)
Net increase in cash				—			—
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				—			—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	—		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

39

EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands)

Note 1. General

    We have made all adjustments, including recurring accruals, that are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

    The Company's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its Financial Statements as of December 31, 2000, included in Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2001. The Company follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes. This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements.

Note 2. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2001		2000
	(Unaudited)
Cash paid for interest	$	42,247	$	3,368
Cash paid for income taxes		—		—

40

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description
10.20.2	Amendment No. 2 to the Debt Service Reserve Guarantee, dated as of March 18, 2001, made by Edison Mission Energy in favor of United States Trust Company of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60.2 to Edison Mission Energy's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

    No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

41

SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Edison Mission Holdings Co. (Registrant)
Date: August 13, 2001	By:	/s/ KEVIN M. SMITH Kevin M. Smith Vice President and Director

42

QuickLinks

Table of Additional Registrants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION HOLDINGS CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands)
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2001
NOTE
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands)
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands)
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands)
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
CHESTNUT RIDGE ENERGY CO. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2001
NOTE
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (In thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands)
EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2001 NOTE
EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO. BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO. STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)
EDISON MISSION FINANCE CO. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands)
SIGNATURES