XML 17 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

 

Use of Estimates.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition.

 

The Company generates revenue from three sources: sale of game applications, sale of advertising provided with games, internet marketing sales with games on per click basis ($0.01 or $0.02 per click) by users. The Company recognizes revenue using four basic criteria that must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured, which is typically after receipt of payment and delivery. The Company has service agreements with Apple and Google, and the Company receives revenue on net basis, which is 70% and 60% of the revenue from sale of game applications and sale of advertising provided with games.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents.

 

The Company maintains cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts that currently do not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no cash equivalents except cash of $1,790 and $0, respectively.

 

Prepaid Consulting Fees.

 

Prepaid consulting fees consist of common stock issued to consultants for services that will be performed over the terms of the consulting agreements not to exceed 12 months. The value of the common stock issued for services was based on the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of issuance. The common stock issued to consultants is fully vested at the date of issuance. Prepaid consulting fees at December 31, 2015 was $1,384,137 and will be amortized to expense over the next 12 months.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

 

Under ASC 740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the significant components of the deferred tax assets are summarized below:

 

  2015  2014 
       
Deferred income tax assets:        
Net operation loss carryforwards  32,770,230   29,750,140 
Total deferred income tax assets  32,770,230   29,750,140 
Less: valuation allowance  (32,770,230)  (29,750,140)
Total deferred income tax asset $--  $-- 

  

The valuation allowance increased (decreased) by $3,020,090 and $(1,238,665) in 2015 and 2014 as a result of the Company generating additional net operating losses in 2015 and using net operating losses in 2014. The Company’s net operating loss carryforward of approximately $81,925,000 begin to expire in 2034.

 

Income tax expense reflected in the consolidated statements of income consist of the following for 2015 and 2014:

 

  2015  2014 
Current        
Federal $--  $-- 
State  --   -- 
   --   -- 
Deferred        
Federal  --   -- 
State  --   -- 
   --   -- 
         
Income tax expense $--  $-- 

 

The reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

 

  2015  2014 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
             
Federal statutory rates $(11,820,484)  34.0% $1,052,865   34.0%
State income taxes  (2,085,968)  6.0%  185,800   6.0%
Permanent differences  10,886,362   -31.3%  --   0.0%
Valuation allowance (Use of NOLs)  3,020,089   -8.7%  (1,238,665)  -40.0%
Effective rate $--   0.0% $--   0.0%

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2011.

 

The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and adjusts the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by the valuation allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is not judged to be more likely than not. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of its deferred tax assets, including its recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income or loss, the carryforward periods available to the Company for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.

 

Future changes in the unrecognized tax benefit will have no impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change significantly within the next twelve months. The Company will continue to classify income tax penalties and interest as part of general and administrative expense in its consolidated statements of operations. There were no interest or penalties accrued as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets groups to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds fair value of the asset group. At December 31, 2015, the Company evaluated its long-lived assets and determined that they had been impaired and took a charge to earnings of $4,478,142.

 

Net Income (Loss) Per Share.

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock, including any potential common shares outstanding during the period, when the potential shares are dilutive. Potential common shares consist primarily of incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock using the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share gives effect to common stock equivalents; however, potential common shares are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive, as they were during 2015 and 2014. During December 31, 2015 and 2014, the number of potential common shares excluded from diluted weighted-average number of outstanding shares was 0 and 0, respectively.

 

Stock-Based Compensation.

 

Options granted to consultants, independent representatives and other non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method as prescribed by ASC Topic 718, “Share-Based Payment.”

 

Derivative Financial Instruments.

 

The Company evaluates all of its agreements to determine if such instruments have derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s only derivative financial instrument was an embedded conversion feature associated with convertible debentures due to certain provisions that allow for a change in the conversion price.

  

Recent Pronouncements.

 

In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-01 (Subtopic 225-20), “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items.” ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of an extraordinary item from GAAP. As a result, an entity will no longer be required to segregate extraordinary items from the results of ordinary operations, to separately present an extraordinary item on its income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations or to disclose income taxes and earnings-per-share data applicable to an extraordinary item. However, ASU 2015-01 will still retain the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature and occur infrequently. ASU 2015-01 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted.

 

In February, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-02 provides guidance on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). ASU 2015-02 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted.

 

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805)”. Topic 805 requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, during the measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required to also record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.  In addition an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” The new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The guidance in ASU No. 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases (FAS 13). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.