EXHIBIT 99-2

For Immediate Release                                  Contact:  Tom Morton
February 10, 2005                                      ProLiance Energy
                                                       317-231-6833

               ProLiance Energy Officials Comment on Court Ruling

Officials from ProLiance Energy are reviewing the verdict reached today in its
litigation with Huntsville (Alabama) Utilities. Huntsville Utilities sued
ProLiance alleging breach of contract and other theories and ProLiance
countersued for breach of contract related to issues, which arose during the
winter of 2000-2001 when ProLiance furnished gas to the Alabama utility.

The litigation arose when natural gas prices spiked during the winter of
2000-2001. When Huntsville was unable to pay the higher gas prices, ProLiance
allowed them to modify their contract to spread the higher gas costs over time.
Huntsville later denied their gas utilities manager had authority to sign the
amendments, and filed suit against ProLiance. ProLiance countersued alleging
that Huntsville breached the contract.

Following a three week trial, a jury in the Northern District of Alabama found
in favor of Huntsville on many of the issues and awarded them compensatory
damages in the amount of $8.2 million and $25 million in punitive damages.
Although company attorneys believe it would be an incorrect result, the court
will likely be asked to treble the compensatory award.

ProLiance Energy President John Talley commented, "We are surprised and
disappointed in the verdict reached and believe it is not consistent with the
law or facts of the matter. ProLiance operated in accordance with our contract
with Huntsville Utilities and at the direction of the Huntsville Utilities Gas
Manager. ProLiance fulfilled all pricing and supply commitments under the
contract. ProLiance's counsel is reviewing the verdict with an appeal in mind
and is of the view that the record contains a number of errors which may support
reversal."

Talley added, "ProLiance Energy prides itself on consistently excellent customer
satisfaction rankings and a high customer retention rate. We continue to serve
the communities and businesses in the Huntsville area, as well as all our other
customers in the Midwest and Southeast. We do not believe the financial impact
of this decision, should it be upheld, will adversely affect ProLiance's ongoing
operations."

The company also does not believe that this situation creates any events of
default or noncompliance under its existing debt facility.

Officials with Vectren and Citizens Gas, co-owners of ProLiance, also expressed
support for ProLiance's position.

"We are extremely disappointed in the jury's verdict. Based upon our
understanding of the proceedings, we do not believe that the verdict is well
founded. ProLiance has a long track record of outstanding customer service to
its over 1,200 customers, and since its formation in 1996 has done an
outstanding job as a natural gas service provider. It has saved the customers of
Vectren and Citizens Gas in excess of $130 million," said Carl L. Chapman, chief
operating officer of Vectren.

"Citizens Gas also respectfully disagrees with the Huntsville verdict. Citizens
Gas considers ProLiance Energy a trusted business partner that has provided
substantial value to Citizens Gas customers during a period of volatile natural
gas prices," said Carey Lykins, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Citizens Gas & Coke Utility.

ProLiance Energy, LLC is a natural gas marketer headquartered in Indianapolis,
Indiana, with sales offices in Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and
Texas. ProLiance serves natural gas customers in 18 states in the midwest and
southeast. ProLiance is jointly owned by affiliates of Citizens Gas and Coke
Utility and Vectren Corporation.