SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 001-31625

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	33-0864902
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

4490 Von Karman Avenue	92660
Newport Beach, California	(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 833-3600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  ¨  No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  x  NO  ¨.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨                        Accelerated filer  x                    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨  No  x

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2007 was 1,000.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

INDEX

		Page No.
	PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	13
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	21
Item 2.	Properties	21
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	22
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	23
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	24
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	25
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	52
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	52
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	52
Item 9B.	Other Information	54
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	55
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	59
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	68
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	69
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	72
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	73
	Index to Financial Statements	80

i

PART I

Item 1.    Business

General

William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company”) are primarily engaged in the design, construction and sale of single family detached and attached homes in California, Arizona and Nevada. Since the founding of the Company’s predecessor in 1956, the Company and its joint ventures have sold over 68,000 homes. The Company conducts its homebuilding operations through five geographic regions (Southern California Coastal, Northern California, Inland Empire California, Arizona and Nevada). For 2006, approximately 62% of the home closings of the Company and its joint ventures were derived from its California operations. For the year ended December 31, 2006, on a consolidated basis the Company had revenues from home sales of $1.479 billion and delivered 2,887 homes, which includes $151.4 million of revenue and 347 delivered homes from consolidated joint ventures (see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”).

The Company designs, constructs and sells a wide range of homes designed to meet the specific needs of each of its markets, although it primarily emphasizes sales to the entry-level and move-up home buyer markets. At December 31, 2006, the Company marketed its homes through 53 sales locations in both its wholly-owned projects and projects being developed in consolidated joint ventures. In 2006, the average sales price for consolidated homes delivered was $512,200. Base sales prices for actively selling projects in 2006 ranged from $105,000 to $1,725,000.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company and its consolidated joint ventures owned approximately 13,288 lots and had options to purchase an additional 7,377 lots, substantially all of which are entitled. As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, “entitled” land has a development agreement and/or vesting tentative map, or a final recorded plat or map from the appropriate county or city government. Development agreements and vesting tentative maps generally provide for the right to develop the land in accordance with the provisions of the development agreement or vesting tentative map unless an issue arises concerning health, safety or general welfare. The Company’s sources of developed lots for its homebuilding operations are (1) development of master-planned communities, primarily through both consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures at the current time, and (2) purchase of smaller projects with shorter life cycles (merchant homebuilding). The Company estimates that its current inventory of lots owned and controlled is adequate to supply its homebuilding operations at current operating levels for approximately five years.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are general partners or members in joint ventures involved in the development and sale of residential projects. As described more fully in “Critical Accounting Policies— Variable Interest Entities” certain joint ventures have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. The financial statements of joint ventures in which the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary are not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). Income allocations and cash distributions to the Company from the unconsolidated joint ventures are based on predetermined formulas between the Company and its joint venture partners as specified in the applicable partnership or operating agreements. The Company generally receives, after partners’ priority returns and returns of partners’ capital, approximately 50% of the profits and cash flows from joint ventures. See Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the joint ventures whose financial statements have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. See Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the unconsolidated joint ventures. Based upon current estimates, substantially all future development and construction costs incurred by the joint ventures will be funded by the venture partners or from the proceeds of construction financing obtained by the joint ventures.

1

The Company will continue to utilize its current inventory of lots and future land acquisitions to conduct its operating strategy which consists of: (i) focusing on high growth core markets; (ii) maintaining conservative financial position and improving its credit profile; (iii) acquiring strong land positions through disciplined acquisition strategies; (iv) maintaining a low cost structure; and (v) leveraging an experienced management with significant equity ownership.

The Company had total consolidated revenues from operations of $1.492 billion, $1.856 billion and $1.822 billion for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Homes closed by the Company, including its joint ventures, were 2,887, 3,196 and 3,471 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Including its joint ventures, the Company’s dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed as of December 31, 2006, was $295.5 million, a 57% decrease over the $691.6 million as of December 31, 2005. The cancellation rate of buyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow was approximately 33% during 2006 and 16% during 2005.

The Company’s operations are dependent to a significant extent on debt financing and, to a lesser extent, on joint venture financing. The Company’s principal credit sources are its 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, 10 ³/4% Senior Notes, 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes, secured revolving credit facilities, seller-provided financing, and land banking transactions. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal amount of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes was $150.0 million, the outstanding principal amount of the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes was $247.2 million and the outstanding principal amount of the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes was $150.0 million. The secured revolving credit facilities are revolving lines of credit with a maximum commitment of $560.0 million at December 31, 2006. However, the credit facilities have limitations on the amounts that can be borrowed at any time based on assets which are included in the credit facilities and the specified borrowings permitted under borrowing base calculations. The secured revolving credit facilities are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal amount under the secured revolving credit facilities was $146.0 million. The Company’s mortgage subsidiary has two revolving credit facilities to fund its mortgage operations, of which an aggregate $59.4 million was outstanding at December 31, 2006. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition and Liquidity” and Note 6 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for more information relating to the revolving credit facilities of the Company and its mortgage subsidiary.

The ability of the Company to meet its obligations on its indebtedness will depend to a large degree on its future performance which in turn will be subject, in part, to factors beyond its control, such as prevailing economic conditions, mortgage and other interest rates, weather, the occurrence of events such as landslides, soil subsidence and earthquakes that are uninsurable, not economically insurable or not subject to effective indemnification agreements, availability of labor and homebuilding materials, changes in governmental laws and regulations, and the availability and cost of land for future development.

On May 18, 2006, General William Lyon announced the completion of a tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company not already owned by him for $109.00 net per share in cash. The shares tendered in the offer, together with the shares already owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, represented over 90% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

After receiving deliveries of a sufficient number of tendered shares to reach the 90% threshold, General Lyon and the two trusts contributed all the shares of the Company owned by them to WLH Acquisition Corp., a corporation owned by General Lyon and the two trusts. On July 25, 2006, WLH Acquisition Corp. was then merged with and into the Company under the “short-form” merger provisions of Delaware law, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock (except for shares owned by WLH Acquisition Corp. and by stockholders who properly exercise their appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law) was cancelled and converted into the right to receive $109.00 per share in cash, without interest, which is the same consideration that was paid for shares of the Company in the tender offer by General Lyon.

2

As a consequence of the merger, the Company’s equity now consists solely of 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding held by General Lyon and the two trusts.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 4490 Von Karman Avenue, Newport Beach, California 92660 and its telephone number is (949) 833-3600. The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 15, 1999.

The Company’s Markets

The Company is currently operating through five geographic regions: Southern California Coastal, Northern California, Inland Empire California, Arizona, and Nevada. Each of the regions has responsibility for the management of the Company’s homebuilding and development operations within its geographic boundaries.

The following table sets forth sales from real estate operations attributable to each of the Company’s homebuilding regions during the preceding three fiscal years:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
	(note 1)
Consolidated
Southern California Coastal Region(2)	$	530,151	$	621,610	$	469,333
Northern California Region(3)		232,101		531,390		669,529
Inland Empire California Region(4)		322,377		229,434		309,248
Arizona Region(5)		208,083		267,949		132,823
Nevada Region(6)		199,509		206,000		240,914
	$	1,492,221	$	1,856,383	$	1,821,847
Unconsolidated joint ventures
Nevada(6)	$	17,046	$	26,091		—
	$	17,046	$	26,091	$	—

(1) Effective January 1, 2006, the Company reorganized its operating divisions into geographic regions. Each region has a management team led by a regional president. The Southern California Coastal Region is divided into 3 operating divisions and the Northern California Region is divided into 2 operating divisions, each with a division manager and separate management team.

(2) Southern California Coastal Region consists of operations in the counties of Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura and San Diego.

(3) The Northern California Region consists of operations in Contra Costa, El Dorado, Santa Clara, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Placer, Monterey and Stanislaus counties.

(4) The Inland Empire California Region consists of operations in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

(5) The Arizona Region consists of operations in the Phoenix area.

(6) The Nevada Region consists of operations in Clark and Nye counties.

For financial information concerning segments, see the “Consolidated Financial Statements” and Note 1 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

LAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT

As of December 31, 2006, the Company and its consolidated joint ventures owned approximately 13,288 lots and had options to purchase an additional 7,377 lots, substantially all of which are entitled.

The Company estimates that its current inventory of lots owned and controlled is adequate to supply its homebuilding operations at current operating levels for approximately five years.

3

The Company uses a land acquisition team, which includes members of its senior management, to manage the risks associated with land ownership and development. It is the Company’s policy that land can be purchased or sold only with the prior approval of senior management and the board of directors. The Company’s land acquisition strategy has been to undertake projects with shorter life-cycles in order to reduce development and market risk while maintaining an inventory of owned lots sufficient for construction of homes over a two-year period. The Company’s strategy consists of the following elements:

• Completing due diligence prior to committing to acquire land;

• Reviewing the status of entitlements and other governmental processing to mitigate zoning and other development risk;

• Focusing on land as a component of a home’s cost structure, rather than on the land’s speculative value;

• Limiting land acquisition size to reduce investment levels in any one project where possible;

• Utilizing option, joint venture and other non-capital intensive structures to control land where feasible;

• Funding land acquisitions whenever possible with non-recourse seller financing;

• Employing centralized control of approval over all land transactions;

• Expanding homebuilding operations in the Southwest, particularly in the Company’s long established markets of California and Arizona and in Nevada, where it entered the market in 1995; and

• Diversifying with respect to geography, markets and product types.

Prior to committing to the acquisition of land, the Company conducts feasibility studies covering pertinent aspects of the proposed commitment. These studies may include a variety of elements from technical aspects such as title, zoning, soil and seismic characteristics, to marketing studies that review population and employment trends, schools, transportation access, buyer profiles, sales forecasts, projected profitability, cash requirements, and assessment of political risk and other factors. Prior to acquiring land, the Company considers assumptions concerning the needs of the targeted customer and determines whether the underlying land price enables the Company to meet those needs at an affordable price. Before purchasing land, the Company attempts to project the commencement of construction and sales over a reasonable time period. The Company utilizes outside architects and consultants, under close supervision, to help review acquisitions and design products.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company and two unaffiliated parties formed a series of limited liability companies for the purpose of acquiring three parcels of land totaling 236 acres in Irvine and Tustin, California (formerly part of the Tustin Marine Corps Air Station) and developing the land into 1,910 residential homesites. This unique acquisition is positioned to deliver homes in multiple product segments in what the Company believe is one of the highest demand and supply constrained markets in the country. As of December 31, 2005, the limited liability companies sold substantially all of the lots. The Company was required under certain specific conditions to purchase approximately one-half of the homesites and during the year ended December 31, 2005 the Company purchased 829 lots from the limited liability companies. Homebuilding activities began in 2005 and first deliveries began in 2006. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition and Liquidity” and Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for more information relating to this transaction.

The Company and an unaffiliated party formed a limited liability company for the purpose of acquiring and developing 885 acres of land in Pahrump, Nevada into approximately 2,500 lots for residential homesites. The company has a 50% direct interest in the limited liability company and will purchase approximately one-half of the developed lots. The limited liability company began developing the lots in 2004 and sold approximately 472 and 678 lots during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of which 209 and 488 lots were sold to the Company.

4

HOMEBUILDING AND MARKET STRATEGY

The Company currently has a wide variety of product lines which enables it to meet the specific needs of each of its markets. Although the Company primarily emphasizes sales to the entry-level and move-up home markets, it believes that this diversified product strategy enables it to best serve a wide range of buyers and adapt quickly to a variety of market conditions. In order to reduce exposure to local market conditions, the Company’s sales locations are geographically dispersed. At December 31, 2006, the Company and its joint ventures had 53 sales locations.

Because the decision as to which product to develop is based on the Company’s assessment of market conditions and the restrictions imposed by government regulations, homestyles and sizes vary from project to project. The Company’s attached housing ranges in size from 1,040 to 3,050 square feet, and the detached housing ranges from 1,123 to 5,491 square feet.

Due to the Company’s product and geographic diversification strategy, the prices of the Company’s homes also vary substantially. Base sales prices for the Company’s attached housing range from approximately $230,000 to $995,000 and base sales prices for detached housing range from approximately $105,000 to $1,725,000. On a consolidated basis, the average sales price of homes closed for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $512,200.

The Company generally standardizes and limits the number of home designs within any given product line. This standardization permits on-site mass production techniques and bulk purchasing of materials and components, thus enabling the Company to better control and sometimes reduce construction costs.

The Company contracts with a number of architects and other consultants who are involved in the design process of the Company’s homes. Designs are constrained by zoning requirements, building codes, energy efficiency laws and local architectural guidelines, among other factors. Engineering, landscaping, master-planning and environmental impact analysis work are subcontracted to independent firms which are familiar with local requirements.

Substantially all construction work is done by subcontractors with the Company acting as the general contractor. The Company manages subcontractor activities with on-site supervisory employees and management control systems. The Company does not have long-term contractual commitments with its subcontractors or suppliers. However, the Company generally has been able to obtain sufficient materials and subcontractors during times of material shortages. The Company believes its relationships with its suppliers and subcontractors are good.

5

Description of Projects and Communities Under Development

The Company’s homebuilding projects usually take two to five years to develop. The following table presents project information relating to each of the Company’s homebuilding regions as of December 31, 2006 and only includes projects with lots owned as of December 31, 2006, lots consolidated in accordance with Interpretation No. 46 as of December 31, 2006 or homes closed for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Project (County) Product	Year of First Delivery	Estimated Number of Homes at Completion(1)	Cumulative Units Closed as of December 31, 2006	Backlog at December 31, 2006(2)(3)	Lots Owned as of December 31, 2006	Homes Closed for the Year Ended December 31, 2006	Sales Price Range(5)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL REGION
ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION
Wholly-Owned:
Huntington Beach
Seacove at the Waterfront	2004	106	106	0	0	8	$	802,000 - 995,000
Irvine
Ambridge at Quail Hill	2004	128	128	0	0	8	$	500,000 - 570,000
Lombard Court	2005	150	150	0	0	81	$	445,000 - 633,000
Garland Park	2005	166	164	1	2	64	$	579,000 - 717,000
Tamarisk	2005	113	113	0	0	49	$	555,000 - 610,000
San Carlos	2007	152	0	13	20	0	$	408,000 - 566,000
Columbus Grove:
Lantana	2006	102	39	1	63	39	$	825,000 - 900,000
Kensington	2006	63	30	4	33	30	$	690,000 - 790,000
Tustin
Columbus Grove/Columbus Square:
Clarendon	2007	102	0	22	102	0	$	271,000 - 647,000
Astoria(6)	2007	102	0	6	98	0	$	925,000 - 1,000,000
Kensington II	2008	60	0	0	60	0	$	690,000 - 790,000
Cambridge Lane	2007	156	0	15	156	0	$	495,000 - 560,000
Ainsley Park	2008	84	0	0	84	0	$	625,000 - 725,000
Ciara(6)	2007	67	0	19	67	0	$	1,230,000 - 1,420,000
Verandas	2007	97	0	0	97	0	$	675,000 - 760,000
Ladera Ranch
Amarante	2005	53	53	0	0	9	$	965,000 - 1,060,000
Amarante II	2006	18	15	2	3	15	$	1,046,000 - 1,130,000
Bellataire	2005	52	48	3	4	5	$	1,220,000 - 1,260,000
Bellataire II	2006	23	22	0	1	22	$	1,180,000 - 1,220,000
San Clemente
Alora	2007	49	0	0	17	0	$	1,125,000 - 1,275,000
Mirador at Talega	2004	76	76	0	0	23	$	1,115,000 - 1,270,000
San Juan Capistrano
Floralisa	2005	80	54	2	26	44	$	1,310,000 - 1,410,000
Estrella Rosa	2006	40	22	10	18	22	$	1,675,000 - 1,725,000
TOTAL ORANGE COUNTY		2,039	1,020	98	851	419
LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Wholly-Owned:
Moorpark
Meridian Hills
Ashford	2006	113	4	5	109	4	$	850,000 - 975,000
Marquis	2007	135	0	11	135	0	$	890,000 - 1,080,000
Brighton (Affordable)	2008	17	0	0	17	0	$	105,000 - 272,000
Hawthorne
360 at South Bay(6)	2007	625	0	0	625	0	$	625,000 - 887,000
Los Angeles
Arboreta at Rainbird	2008	140	0	0	140	0	$	440,000 - 750,000
TOTAL LOS ANGELES		1,030	4	16	1,026	4
SAN DIEGO DIVISION
Wholly-Owned:
Promenade North, San Diego	2006	168	6	0	162	6	$	455,000 -520,000
Alcala at Del Sur, San Diego	2005	83	31	4	52	31	$	670,000 -773,000
Altair, Santee	2008	85	0	0	85	0	$	453,000 -513,000
Maybeck, San Diego	2006	120	5	5	115	5	$	695,000 -741,000
Sunset Cove, San Diego	2007	77	0	0	77	0	$	586,000 -601,000
Levanto, San Diego	2008	100	0	0	100	0	$	432,000 -540,000
Total Wholly-Owned:		633	42	9	591	42

6

Project (County) Product	Year of First Delivery	Estimated Number of Homes at Completion(1)	Cumulative Units Closed as of December 31, 2006	Backlog at December 31, 2006(2)(3)	Lots Owned as of December 31, 2006	Homes Closed for the Year Ended December 31, 2006	Sales Price Range(5)
Joint Ventures:
Ravenna, San Diego	2005	199	148	19	51	100	$	450,000 - 513,000
Amante, San Diego	2005	127	106	3	21	41	$	511,000 - 577,000
Treviso, San Diego	2005	186	102	4	84	67	$	390,000 - 505,000
Belleza at San Miguel Village, Chula Vista	2005	195	186	6	9	64	$	360,000 - 420,000
Total Joint Ventures:		707	542	32	165	272
TOTAL SAN DIEGO		1,340	584	41	756	314
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL REGION COMBINED TOTAL
Wholly-Owned		3,702	1,066	123	2,468	465
Joint Ventures		707	542	32	165	272
		4,409	1,608	155	2,633	737
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION
BAY AREA/CENTRAL VALLEY DIVISION
Wholly-Owned:
Contra Costa County
Seagate at Bayside, Hercules	2005	96	80	12	16	52	$	615,000 - 727,000
Wavecrest at Bayside, Hercules	2005	76	76	0	0	38	$	724,000 - 776,000
Rivergate Laurels, Antioch	2005	69	69	0	0	0	$	500,000 - 573,000
Rivergate II, Antioch	2006	98	35	3	63	35	$	498,000 - 608,000
Vista Del Mar, Pittsburgh
Vineyard(6)	2007	155	0	0	155	0	$	686,000 - 741,000
Victory(6)	2007	129	0	0	129	0	$	706,000 - 806,000
Estates Custom Lots	2008	9	0	0	9	0	$	144,000 - 400,000
San Joaquin County
Seasons, Stockton	2005	145	138	2	7	55	$	473,000 - 533,000
Santa Clara County
Baton Rouge, San Jose	2005	91	91	0	0	46	$	536,000 - 661,000
Stanislaus County
Falling Leaf, Modesto
Trails	2006	100	5	0	95	5	$	355,000 - 430,000
Groves	2006	131	9	1	122	9	$	330,000 - 390,000
Meadows	2006	83	7	0	76	7	$	461,000 - 526,000
Total Wholly-Owned		1,182	510	18	672	247
Joint Ventures:
Contra Costa County
Vista Del Mar, Pittsburgh
Villages	2007	102	0	5	102	0	$	303,000 - 497,000
Venue	2007	132	0	9	132	0	$	363,000 - 626,000
Total Joint Ventures:		234	0	14	234	0
TOTAL BAY AREA/CENTRAL VALLEY		1,416	510	32	906	247
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Wholly-Owned:
San Joaquin County
Ironwood II, Lathrop	2003	88	88	0	0	3	$	276,000 - 317,000
Ironwood III, Lathrop	2005	109	107	0	2	36	$	490,000 - 571,000
Placer County
Shady Lane at Whitney Ranch Rocklin	2006	96	21	1	75	21	$	455,000 - 465,000
Twin Oaks at Whitney Ranch Rocklin	2006	92	7	1	85	7	$	634,000 - 666,000
Sacramento County
Verona at Anatolia, Rancho Cordova	2005	79	46	0	33	37	$	450,000 - 525,000
Marquee at Fair Oaks	2007	190	0	0	190	0	$	386,000 - 478,000
Total Wholly-Owned:		654	269	2	385	104
Joint Ventures:
Sacramento County
Big Horn, Elk Grove
Plaza Walk	2005	106	53	3	53	32	$	361,000 - 421,000
Gallery Walk	2005	149	71	3	78	43	$	230,000 - 364,000
Total Joint Ventures		255	124	6	131	75
TOTAL SACRAMENTO		909	393	8	516	179

7

Project (County) Product	Year of First Delivery	Estimated Number of Homes at Completion(1)	Cumulative Units Closed as of December 31, 2006	Backlog at December 31, 2006(2)(3)	Lots Owned as of December 31, 2006	Homes Closed for the Year Ended December 31, 2006	Sales Price Range(5)
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION COMBINED TOTAL
Wholly-Owned		1,836	779	20	1,057	351
Joint Ventures		489	124	20	365	75
		2,325	903	40	1,422	426
INLAND EMPIRE CALIFORNIA REGION
Wholly-Owned:
Riverside County
Heartland, North Corona
Homestead	2005	109	109	0	0	65	$	578,000 - 665,000
Almont	2006	91	91	0	0	91	$	492,000 - 568,000
Parkside/Vander Stelt, Corona	2007	122	18	25	104	18	$	568,000 - 683,000
Kasbergen/Serafina, North Corona	2007	314	30	89	284	30	$	323,000 - 413,000
Bridle Creek, Corona	2003	274	200	6	74	28	$	698,000 - 886,000
Sequoia at Wolf Creek, Temecula	2005	125	97	7	28	83	$	392,000 - 438,000
Savannah at Harveston Ranch, Temecula	2005	162	76	13	86	76	$	334,000 - 386,000
San Bernardino County
The Peaks at Citrus Heights, Fontana	2005	150	134	7	16	62	$	597,000 - 680,000
Adelina, Fontana	2007	109	0	0	109	0	$	350,000 - 426,000
Rosabella, Fontana	2008	114	0	0	114	0	$	405,000 - 440,000
Amador, Rancho Cucamonga	2007	99	0	0	99	0	$	375,000 - 447,000
Vintner’s Grove, Rancho Cucamonga
Solera SFD	2007	78	0	0	78	0	$	535,000 - 625,000
Canela Triplex	2007	78	0	0	78	0	$	405,000 - 475,000
Chapman Heights, Yucaipa:
Braeburn	2005	113	65	2	48	46	$	569,000 - 609,000
Crofton	2005	140	90	7	50	70	$	443,000 - 473,000
Westland	2005	79	75	4	4	46	$	498,000 - 521,000
Vista Bella	2009	108	0	0	108	0	$	303,000 - 341,000
Redcort	2009	90	0	0	90	0	$	338,000 - 362,000
INLAND EMPIRE CALIFORNIA REGION TOTAL		2,355	985	160	1,370	615
ARIZONA REGION
Wholly-Owned:
Maricopa County
Gateway Crossing, Gilbert
Oakcrest	2003	236	236	0	0	1	$	252,000 - 320,000
Woodridge	2003	165	165	0	0	1	$	292,000 - 355,000
Sonoran Foothills, Phoenix
Desert Crown	2004	124	123	1	1	38	$	441,000 - 544,000
Desert Sierra	2004	212	211	0	1	90	$	249,000 - 307,000
Copper Canyon Ranch, Surprise
Rancho Vistas	2004	212	212	0	0	19	$	490,000 - 600,000
Sunset Point	2004	282	260	10	22	129	$	287,000 - 383,000
El Sendero Hills	2004	188	175	5	13	73	$	377,000 - 470,000
Talavera, Phoenix	2006	134	46	47	88	46	$	256,000 - 332,000
Coldwater Ranch	2008	368	0	0	368	0	$	194,000 - 262,000
Collin’s Creek, Phoenix	2007	126	0	0	126	0	$	237,000 - 245,000
Lehi Crossing, Mesa	2007	855	0	0	113	0
Rancho Mercado—Inn Suites Phoenix	2009	1,889	0	0	1,889	0	$	206,000 - 294,000
Lyon’s Gate, Gilbert:
Pride	2006	650	104	76	546	104	$	198,000 - 221,000
Savanna	2006	174	49	21	125	49	$	208,000 - 294,000
Sahara	2006	169	43	31	126	43	$	318,000 - 409,000
Acacia	2007	365	0	0	365	0	$	225,000 - 292,000
Future Products	2007	213	0	0	213	0
Total Wholly-Owned:		6,362	1,624	191	3,996	593
Joint Ventures:
Maricopa County
Hastings Property, Queen Creek	2009	823	0	0	823	0	$	159,000 - 417,000
Circle G at the Church Farm North	2009	1,745	0	0	1,745	0	$	156,000 - 484,000
Total Joint Ventures:		2,568	0	0	2,568	0
ARIZONA REGION TOTAL		8,930	1,624	191	6,564	593

8

Project (County) Product	Year of First Delivery	Estimated Number of Homes at Completion(1)	Cumulative Units Closed as of December 31, 2006	Backlog at December 31, 2006(2)(3)	Lots Owned as of December 31, 2006	Homes Closed for the Year Ended December 31, 2006	Sales Price Range(5)
NEVADA REGION
Wholly-Owned:
Clark County
Summerlin, Las Vegas
Granada	2004	144	144	0	0	39	$	446,000 - 511,000
The Lyon Collection	2005	79	74	5	5	41	$	624,000 - 659,000
Kingwood	2006	100	29	6	71	29	$	415,000 - 501,000
North Las Vegas
The Classics	2003	227	227	0	0	7	$	290,000 - 315,000
The Cottages	2004	360	271	4	89	62	$	232,000 - 262,000
La Tierra	2006	67	32	7	35	32	$	315,000 - 345,000
Tierra Este	2007	126	0	0	126	0	$	315,000 - 345,000
Carson Ranch, Las Vegas
West Series I	2005	71	67	0	4	25	$	395,000 - 430,000
West Series II	2005	59	29	10	30	28	$	456,000 - 511,000
East Series I	2007	103	30	3	73	30	$	405,000 - 440,000
East Series II	2007	58	0	0	58	0	$	470,000 - 518,000
West Park, Las Vegas
Villas	2006	191	17	9	174	17	$	320,000 - 355,000
Courtyards	2006	113	14	2	99	14	$	360,000 - 410,000
Mesa Canyon, Las Vegas	2008	49	0	0	49	0	$	430,000 - 467,000
The Lyon Estates, Las Vegas	2008	129	0	0	129	0	$	635,000 - 700,000
Mountain Falls, Pahrump:
Cascata	2005	147	135	1	12	81	$	216,000 - 238,000
Tramonto	2005	212	136	3	76	70	$	266,000 - 301,000
Tramonto Continuation	2010	91	0	0	91	0	$	274,000 - 307,000
Bella Sera	2005	129	69	4	60	41	$	322,000 - 362,000
Ancora	2007	118	0	6	118	0	$	206,000 - 228,000
NEVADA REGION TOTAL		2,573	1,274	60	1,299	516
GRAND TOTALS:
Wholly-Owned		16,828	5,728	554	10,190	2,540
Joint Ventures		3,764	666	52	3,098	347
		20,592	6,394	606	13,288	2,887

(1) The estimated number of homes to be built at completion is subject to change, and there can be no assurance that the Company will build these homes.

(2) Backlog consists of homes sold under sales contracts that have not yet closed, and there can be no assurance that closings of sold homes will occur.

(3) Of the total homes subject to pending sales contracts as of December 31, 2006, 554 represent homes completed or under construction and 52 represent homes not yet under construction.

(4) Lots owned as of December 31, 2006 include lots in backlog at December 31, 2006.

(5) Sales price range reflects base price only and excludes any lot premium, buyer incentive and buyer selected options, which vary from project to project.

(6) All or a portion of the lots in this project are not owned as of December 31, 2006. The Company consolidated the purchase price of the lots in accordance with certain related accounting pronouncements, and considers the lots owned at December 31, 2006.

9

Sales and Marketing

The management team responsible for a specific project develops marketing objectives, formulates pricing and sales strategies and develops advertising and public relations programs for approval of senior management. The Company makes extensive use of advertising and other promotional activities, including newspaper advertisements, brochures, television and radio commercials, direct mail and the placement of strategically located sign boards in the immediate areas of its developments. In addition, the Company markets all of its products through its website at www.lyonhomes.com. In general, the Company’s advertising emphasizes the Company’s strengths with respect to the quality and value of its products.

The Company normally builds, decorates, furnishes and landscapes three to eight model homes for each product line and maintains on-site sales offices, which typically are open seven days a week. Management believes that model homes play a particularly important role in the Company’s marketing efforts. Consequently, the Company expends a significant amount of effort in creating an attractive atmosphere at its model homes. Interior decorations vary among the Company’s models and are carefully selected based upon the lifestyles of targeted buyers. Structural changes in design from the model homes are not generally permitted, but home buyers may select various other optional construction and design amenities.

The Company employs in-house commissioned sales personnel or contracts with a third-party firm to sell its homes. In some cases, outside brokers are also involved in the selling of the Company’s homes. The Company typically engages its sales personnel on a long-term, rather than a project-by-project basis, which it believes results in a more motivated sales force with an extensive knowledge of the Company’s operating policies and products. Sales personnel are trained by the Company and attend weekly meetings to be updated on the availability of financing, construction schedules and marketing and advertising plans.

The Company strives to provide a high level of customer service during the sales process and after a home is sold. The participation of the sales representatives, on-site construction supervisors and the post-closing customer service personnel, working in a team effort, is intended to foster the Company’s reputation for quality and service, and ultimately lead to enhanced customer retention and referrals.

The Company’s homes are typically sold before or during construction through sales contracts which are usually accompanied by a small cash deposit. Such sales contracts are usually subject to certain contingencies such as the buyer’s ability to qualify for financing. The cancellation rate of buyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow at the Company and its joint ventures’ projects was approximately 33% during 2006. Cancellation rates are subject to a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control such as adverse economic conditions and increases in mortgage interest rates. The Company’s and its joint ventures’ inventory of completed and unsold homes was 136 homes as of December 31, 2006.

Warranty

The Company provides its homebuyers with a one-year limited warranty covering workmanship and materials. The Company also provides its homebuyers with a limited warranty that covers “construction defects,” as defined in the limited warranty agreement provided to each home buyer, for the length of its legal liability for such defects (which may be up to ten years in some circumstances), as determined by the law of the state in which the Company builds. The limited warranty covering construction defects is transferable to subsequent buyers not under direct contract with the Company and requires that homebuyers agree to the definitions and procedures set forth in the warranty, including the submission of unresolved construction-related disputes to binding arbitration. The Company began providing this limited warranty at the end of 2001.

In connection with the limited warranty covering construction defects, the Company obtained an insurance policy which expires on December 31, 2008, unless renewed. The Company has been informed by the insurance carrier that this insurance policy will respond to construction defect claims on homes that close during each

10

policy period for the duration of the Company’s legal liability and that the policy will respond to potential losses relating to construction, including soil subsidence. The insurance policy provides a single policy of insurance to the Company and the subcontractors enrolled in its insurance program. As a result, the Company is no longer required to obtain proof of insurance from these subcontractors nor be named as an additional insured under their individual insurance policies. The Company still requires that subcontractors not enrolled in the insurance program provide proof of insurance and name the Company as an additional insured under their insurance policy. Furthermore, the Company generally requires that its subcontractors provide the Company with an indemnity prior to receiving payment for their work.

There can be no assurance, however, that the terms and limitations of the limited warranty will be enforceable against the homebuyers, that the Company will be able to renew its insurance coverage or renew it at reasonable rates, that the Company will not be liable for damages, the cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible construction defects, soil subsidence or building-related claims or that claims will not arise out of uninsurable events not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with the Company’s subcontractors.

Sale of Lots and Land

In the ordinary course of business, the Company continually evaluates land sales and has sold, and expects that it will continue to sell, land as market and business conditions warrant. The Company may also sell both multiple lots to other builders (bulk sales) and improved individual lots for the construction of custom homes where the presence of such homes adds to the quality of the community. In addition, the Company may acquire sites with commercial, industrial and multi-family parcels which will generally be sold to third-party developers.

Customer Financing — William Lyon Financial Services

The Company seeks to assist its home buyers in obtaining financing by arranging with mortgage lenders to offer qualified buyers a variety of financing options. Substantially all home buyers utilize long-term mortgage financing to purchase a home and mortgage lenders will usually make loans only to qualified borrowers.

William Lyon Financial Services (formerly Duxford Financial, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary, began operations effective December 1, 1994 and is in operation to service the Company’s operating regions. The mortgage company operates as a mortgage broker/loan correspondent and originates conventional, FHA and VA loans.

Information Systems and Controls

The Company assigns a high priority to the development and maintenance of its budget and cost control systems and procedures. The Company’s regional offices are connected to corporate headquarters through a fully integrated accounting, financial and operational management information system. Through this system, management regularly evaluates the status of its projects in relation to budgets to determine the cause of any variances and, where appropriate, adjusts the Company’s operations to capitalize on favorable variances or to limit adverse financial impacts.

Regulation

The Company and its competitors are subject to various local, state and Federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including local regulation which imposes restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can ultimately be built within the boundaries of a particular project. The Company and its competitors may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future in the states in which it operates. Because the Company usually purchases land with entitlements, the Company believes that the moratoriums would adversely affect the Company only if they arose from unforeseen health, safety and welfare

11

issues such as insufficient water or sewage facilities. Local and state governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development fees for projects in their jurisdiction. However, these are normally locked-in when the Company receives entitlements.

The Company and its competitors are also subject to a variety of local, state and Federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment. The particular environmental laws which apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws may result in delays, may cause the Company and its competitors to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and may prohibit or severely restrict development in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas. The Company’s projects in California are especially susceptible to restrictive government regulations and environmental laws. However, environmental laws have not, to date, had a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

William Lyon Financial Services is subject to state licensing laws as a mortgage broker as well as Federal and state laws concerning real estate loans. Duxford Escrow, Inc. is licensed and subject to regulation under the California Escrow Law. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, William Lyon Homes, Inc., is licensed as a general building contractor in California, Arizona and Nevada. In addition, William Lyon Homes, Inc. holds a corporate real estate license under the California Real Estate Law.

Duxford Title Reinsurance Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, provides title reinsurance to unrelated title insurers directly issuing title policies on homes sold by the Company in California, Nevada and Arizona. In February 2005, Duxford Title Reinsurance Company was notified by its title insurers that as a result of current investigations by several state insurance regulators into the large number of captive reinsurance arrangements existing in the title insurance industry, the title insurers were suspending and/or terminating their current captive reinsurance agreements with Duxford Title Reinsurance Company pending final determination from the appropriate regulatory bodies as to their permissibility or necessary modification to assure compliance with applicable law. In April 2005, in response to a subpoena issued by the California Insurance Commissioner, the Company testified in connection with the Commissioner’s investigation of captive reinsurance arrangements, including testimony that in many instances, the Company pays for the title insurance being issued. The Company has not had any further communication to date from the California Insurance Commissioner or any other state insurance regulator about this matter and does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In November 2005, the Company was notified that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development had instituted a formal Federal investigation of the Company in connection with its participation in captive title reinsurance arrangements. The Company has fully cooperated with the Department in its investigation. Effective as of September 15, 2006, the Company and the Department entered into a Settlement Agreement in which each desired to avoid prolonged proceedings, any further expense of investigation and/or possible litigation and to finally resolve the matter. Based on the Company’s compliance with the Settlement Agreement and with the Company not admitting liability or wrongdoing, the Department agreed to terminate its investigation and to take no enforcement action and the Company agreed to make a settlement payment of $850,000.

Competition

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive, particularly in the low and medium-price range where the Company currently concentrates its activities. Although the Company is one of California’s largest homebuilders, the Company does not believe it has a significant market position in any geographic area which it serves due to the fragmented nature of the market. A number of the Company’s competitors have larger staffs, larger marketing organizations, and substantially greater financial resources than those of the Company. However, the Company believes that it competes effectively in its existing markets as a result of its product and geographic diversity, substantial development expertise, and its reputation as a low-cost producer of quality homes. Further, the Company sometimes gains a competitive advantage in locations where changing regulations make it difficult for competitors to obtain entitlements and/or government approvals which the Company has already obtained.

12

Corporate Organization and Personnel

Each of the Company’s operating regions has responsibility for the Company’s homebuilding and development operations within the geographical boundaries of that region.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company reorganized its operating divisions into geographic regions. Each region has a management team led by a regional president. Certain projects from the former San Diego division and the Southern California division were reorganized into the Inland Empire California Region. The remaining projects are part of the Southern California Coastal Region. The Southern California Coastal Region is divided into 3 operating divisions and the Northern California Region is divided into 2 operating divisions, each with a division manager and separate management team.

The Company’s executive officers and regional presidents average more than 25 years of experience in the homebuilding and development industries within California and the Southwest. The Company combines decentralized management in those aspects of its business where detailed knowledge of local market conditions is important (such as governmental processing, construction, land development and sales and marketing), with centralized management in those functions where the Company believes central control is required (such as approval of land acquisitions, financial, treasury, human resources and legal matters).

As of December 31, 2006, the Company employed 730 full-time and 9 part-time employees, including corporate staff, supervisory personnel of construction projects, maintenance crews to service completed projects, as well as persons engaged in administrative, finance and accounting, mortgage, engineering, land acquisition, golf course operations, sales and marketing activities.

The Company believes that its relations with its employees have been good. Some employees of the subcontractors which the Company utilizes are unionized, but none of the Company’s employees are union members. Although there have been temporary work stoppages in the building trades in the Company’s areas of operation, to date none has had any material impact upon the Company’s overall operations.

Available Information

The Company’s Internet address is http://www.lyonhomes.com. The Company makes available free of charge on or through its Internet website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after such material was electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

An investment in the Company entails the following risks and uncertainties. These risk factors should be carefully considered when evaluating any investment in the Company. Any of these risks and uncertainties could cause the actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements set forth herein, and could otherwise have a significant adverse impact on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations or on the price of the Company’s common stock.

Revenues may decrease and results of operations may be adversely affected as a result of declines in demand for housing and other changes in economic and business conditions.

The residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in general economic conditions such as levels of employment, consumer confidence and income, availability of financing for acquisitions, construction and permanent mortgages, interest rate levels, inflation, in-migration trends and demand for housing. For example, California, where many of the Company’s projects are located, underwent a significant recession in the early 1990s that affected demand for housing. Should current economic and business conditions decline, demand for housing could be further affected. An important segment of the Company’s

13

customer base consists of move-up buyers, who often purchase homes subject to contingencies related to the sale of their existing homes. The difficulties facing these buyers in selling their homes during recessionary periods may adversely affect home sales. Moreover, during such periods, the Company may need to reduce sales prices and offer greater incentives to buyers to compete for sales that may result in reduced margins. Increases in the rate of inflation could adversely affect gross margins by increasing costs and expenses. In times of high inflation, demand for housing may decline and the Company may be unable to recover increased costs through higher sales.

Interest rates and the unavailability of mortgage financing can adversely affect demand for housing.

In general, housing demand is negatively impacted by increases in interest rates and housing costs and the unavailability of mortgage financing. Most buyers finance their home purchases through third-party lenders providing mortgage financing. If mortgage interest rates increase and, consequently, the ability of prospective buyers to finance home purchases is reduced, home sales, gross margins and cash flow may also be adversely affected and the impact may be material. The Company’s homebuilding activities also depend upon the availability and costs of mortgage financing for buyers of homes owned by potential customers, as those customers (move-up buyers) often need to sell their existing residences before they purchase the Company’s homes. Any reduction of financing availability could adversely affect home sales.

Changes in federal income tax laws may also affect demand for new homes. Various proposals have been publicly discussed to limit mortgage interest deductions and to limit the exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence. Enactment of such proposals may have an adverse effect on the homebuilding industry in general. No meaningful prediction can be made as to whether any such proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the particular form such laws would take.

Financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by any decrease in the value of land inventory, as well as by the associated carrying costs.

The Company continuously acquires land for replacement and expansion of land inventory within the markets in which it builds. The risks inherent in purchasing and developing land increase as consumer demand for housing decreases. Thus, the Company may have bought and developed land on which homes cannot be profitably built and sold. The market value of land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. The Company employs measures to manage inventory risks which may not be successful. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, the Company may have to sell homes at significantly lower margins or at a loss. Further, the Company may be required to write-down the book value of certain real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and some of those write-downs could be material. Any material write-downs of assets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and earnings.

Adverse weather and geological conditions may increase costs, cause project delays and reduce consumer demand for housing, all of which would adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and prospects.

As a homebuilder, the Company is subject to numerous risks, many of which are beyond management’s control, including: adverse weather conditions such as droughts, floods, or wildfires, which could damage projects, cause delays in completion of projects, or reduce consumer demand for housing; shortages in labor or materials, which could delay project completion and cause increases in the prices for labor or materials, thereby affecting the Company’s sales and profitability; and landslides, soil subsidence, earthquakes and other geologic events, which could damage projects, cause delays in the completion of projects or reduce consumer demand for the Company’s projects. Many of the Company’s projects are located in California, which has experienced significant earthquake activity. In addition to directly damaging the Company’s projects, earthquakes or other

14

geologic events could damage roads and highways providing access to those projects, thereby adversely affecting the Company’s ability to market homes in those areas and possibly increasing the costs of completion.

There are some risks of loss for which the Company may be unable to purchase insurance coverage. For example, losses associated with landslides, earthquakes and other geologic events may not be insurable and other losses, such as those arising from terrorism, may not be economically insurable. A sizeable uninsured loss could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s business is geographically concentrated, and sales, results of operations, financial condition and business would be negatively impacted by a decline in regional economies.

The Company presently conducts all of its business in five geographical regions: Southern California, Northern California, Inland Empire California, Arizona and Nevada. Because the Company’s operations are concentrated in these geographic areas, a prolonged economic downturn in these markets could cause housing prices and sales to decline, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The Company may not be able to compete effectively against competitors in the homebuilding industry.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. Homebuilders compete for, among other things, desirable properties, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. The Company competes both with large homebuilding companies, some of which have greater financial, marketing and sales resources than the Company, and with smaller local builders. The consolidation of some homebuilding companies may create competitors that have greater financial, marketing and sales resources than the Company and thus are able to compete more effectively against the Company. In addition, there may be new entrants in the markets in which the Company currently conducts business. The Company also competes for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing.

The Company’s operating results are variable.

The Company has historically experienced, and in the future expects to continue to experience, variability in operating results on a quarterly and an annual basis. Factors expected to contribute to this variability include, among other things:

• the timing of land acquisitions and zoning and other regulatory approvals;

• the timing of home closings, land sales and level of sales;

• product mix;

• the ability to continue to acquire additional land or options thereon at acceptable terms;

• the condition of the real estate market and the general economy;

• delays in construction due to acts of God, adverse weather, reduced subcontractor availability, and strikes;

• changes in prevailing interests rates and the availability of mortgage financing; and

• costs of material and labor.

Many of the factors affecting the Company’s results are beyond the Company’s control and may be difficult to predict.

15

Difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital could result in increased costs and delays in completion of projects.

The homebuilding industry is capital intensive and requires significant up-front expenditures to acquire land and begin development. Land acquisition, development and construction activities may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of financing or the unwillingness of third parties to engage in joint ventures. Any difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital for planned development expenditures could cause project delays and any such delay could result in cost increases and may adversely affect the Company’s sales and future results of operations and cash flows.

The Company’s success depends on key executive officers and personnel.

The Company’s success is dependent upon the efforts and abilities of its executive officers and other key employees, many of whom have significant experience in the homebuilding industry and in the Company’s regional markets. In particular, the Company is dependent upon the services of General William Lyon and Wade H. Cable, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively, as well as the services of the regional presidents and division managers. On February 9, 2007, the Company announced the retirement of Wade H. Cable from the Company effective March 1, 2007. Accordingly, Douglas F. Bauer was appointed by the Board of Directors to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. The loss of the services of any of these executives or key personnel, for any reason, could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Construction defect, soil subsidence and other building-related claims may be asserted against the Company, and the Company may be subject to liability for such claims.

California law provides that consumers can seek redress for patent (i.e., observable) defects in new homes within three or four years (depending on the type of claim asserted) from when the defect is discovered or should have been discovered. If the defect is latent (i.e., non-observable), consumers must still seek redress within three or four years from the date when the defect is discovered or should have been discovered, but in no event later than ten years after the date of substantial completion of the work on the construction. Consumers purchasing homes in Arizona and Nevada may also be able to obtain redress under state laws for either patent or latent defects in their new homes. Although the Company has obtained insurance for construction defect and subsidence claims, the Company may still be liable for damages, the cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible claims, including claims that arise out of uninsurable events, such as landslides or earthquakes, or other circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with subcontractors.

Governmental laws and regulations may increase the Company’s expenses, limit the number of homes that the Company can build or delay completion of projects.

The Company is subject to numerous local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, development, building design, construction and similar matters which impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Projects that are not entitled may be subjected to periodic delays, changes in use, less intensive development or elimination of development in certain specific areas due to government regulations. The Company may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future in the states in which the Company operates. Local and state governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development fees for projects in their jurisdiction. Projects for which the Company has received land use and development entitlements or approvals may still require a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process and can also be impacted adversely by unforeseen health, safety, and welfare issues, which can further delay these projects or prevent their development. As a result, home sales could decline and costs increase, which could negatively affect the Company’s results of operations.

16

The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations, which may increase costs, limit the areas in which the Company can build homes and delay completion of projects.

The Company is also subject to a variety of local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the environment. The particular environmental laws which apply to any given homebuilding site vary according to the site’s location, its environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site, as well as adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, may cause the Company to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas, which could negatively affect the Company’s results of operations. Under various environmental laws, current or former owners of real estate, as well as certain other categories of parties, may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. In addition, in those cases where an endangered species is involved, environmental rules and regulations can result in the elimination of development in identified environmentally sensitive areas.

The Company’s results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected if it is not able to acquire desirable lots for residential buildout.

The Company’s future growth depends upon the Company’s ability to acquire attractive properties for development. There is increasing competition for desirable lots in all of the Company’s markets, particularly in California, as the number of properties available for residential development decreases. Shortages in available properties could cause the Company to incur additional costs to acquire such properties or could limit the number of future projects and the Company’s growth. The Company’s financial position, future results and prospects may be adversely affected if properties at desirable prices and locations are not continually available.

Utility shortages or price increases could have an adverse impact on operations.

In prior years, certain areas in northern and southern California have experienced power shortages, including mandatory periods without electrical power, as well as significant increases in utility costs. The Company may incur additional costs and may not be able to complete construction on a timely basis if such power shortages and utility rate increases continue. Furthermore, power shortages and rate increases may adversely affect the regional economies in which the Company operates, which may reduce demand for housing. The Company’s operations may be adversely impacted if further rate increases and/or power shortages occur.

The Company’s business and results of operations are dependent on the availability and skill of subcontractors.

Substantially all construction work is done by subcontractors with the Company acting as the general contractor. Accordingly, the timing and quality of construction depends on the availability and skill of the Company’s subcontractors. While the Company has been able to obtain sufficient materials and subcontractors during times of material shortages and believes that its relationships with suppliers and subcontractors are good, the Company does not have long-term contractual commitments with any subcontractors or suppliers. The inability to contract with skilled subcontractors at reasonable costs on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

An ownership change may have occurred with the result that the Company’s ability to use tax net operating loss carryforwards may have been severely limited and thus the Company may have liability for additional taxes.

On November 11, 1999, the Company implemented transfer restrictions with respect to shares of stock. In general, these transfer restrictions prohibited, without the prior approval of the Company’s board of directors, the direct or indirect sale, transfer, disposition, purchase or acquisition of any of the Company’s stock by or to any

17

holder who beneficially owned directly or through attribution 5% or more of the Company’s stock; or who, upon the direct or indirect sale, transfer, disposition, purchase or acquisition of any of the Company’s stock, would beneficially own directly or through attribution 5% or more of the Company’s stock. These transfer restrictions were intended to help reduce, but not eliminate, the risk of unfavorable ownership changes which could have severely limited the Company’s use of tax benefits from tax net operating loss carryforwards for use in offsetting taxable income. (See Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for more information on the Company’s income taxes). It is possible that the tax authorities could take the position that the transfer restrictions did not provide the intended effect or adequate remedies for tax purposes. Thus, transactions could have occurred that would severely limit the Company’s ability to have used the tax benefits associated with the net operating loss carryforwards. In that case, the Internal Revenue Service or state taxing authorities may seek payment from the Company of taxes that would otherwise have been payable by the Company, as well as penalties and interest. If the Company was required to make such payments, the Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected. Pursuant to the Company’s certificate of incorporation, the transfer restrictions terminated on November 11, 2002.

Neither the amount of the net operating loss carryforwards nor the amount of limitation on such carryforwards claimed by the Company have been audited or otherwise validated by the Internal Revenue Service, and it could challenge either amount that the Company has calculated. It is possible that legislation or regulations will be adopted that would limit the ability to use the tax benefits associated with the Company’s current tax net operating loss carryforwards.

Increased insurance costs and reduced insurance coverages may affect the Company’s results of operations and increase the potential exposure to liability.

Recently, lawsuits have been filed against builders asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential dwellings. Some of these lawsuits have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements against these builders. The Company’s insurance may not cover all of the claims, including personal injury claims, arising from the presence of mold or such coverage may become prohibitively expensive. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate insurance coverage, a material adverse effect on business, financial condition and results of operations could result if the Company is exposed to claims arising from the presence of mold.

The cost of insurance has risen, deductibles and retentions have increased and the availability of insurance has diminished. Significant increases in the cost of insurance coverage or significant limitations on coverage could have a material adverse effect on business, financial condition and results of operations from such increased costs or from liability for significant uninsurable or underinsured claims.

The Company’s level of indebtedness could adversely affect its financial condition and prevent it from fulfilling its obligations.

Subject to restrictions, the Company may incur substantial additional indebtedness. The Company’s high level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:

• the ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, land acquisition costs, building costs, other capital expenditures, or general corporate purposes, may be limited;

• the Company will need to use a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to pay interest and principal on its senior notes and other indebtedness, which will reduce the funds available for other purposes;

• the Company will have a higher level of indebtedness than competitors, which may put the Company at a competitive disadvantage and reduce the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or responding to, changing conditions in the industry, including increased competition;

18

• substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as security for the Company’s credit agreements and a default on the secured debt could result in foreclosure on the Company’s assets which could, under certain circumstances, limit or prohibit the ability to operate as a going concern; and

• the Company will be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse developments in the business.

The Company expects to obtain the money to pay expenses and to pay the principal and interest on the Company’s senior notes, and other obligations from cash flow from operations. The Company’s ability to meet expenses depends on future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors. The Company will not be able to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in the markets where the Company operates and pressure from competitors. The Company cannot be certain that the cash flow will be sufficient to allow it to pay principal and interest on debt, including the senior notes, support operations, and meet other obligations. If the Company does not have the resources, the Company may be required to refinance all or part of the existing debt, including the senior notes, sell assets or borrow more money. The Company may not be able to do so on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements, including the credit facilities and the senior note indentures, may restrict the Company from pursuing any of these alternatives.

The Company is the general partner in partnership joint ventures and may be liable for joint venture obligations.

Certain of the Company’s active joint ventures are organized as limited partnerships. The Company is the general partner in each of these and may serve as the general partner in future joint ventures. As a general partner, the Company may be liable for a joint venture’s liabilities and obligations should the joint venture fail or be unable to pay these liabilities or obligations. In addition, the Company has provided unsecured environmental indemnities to some of the lenders who provide loans to the partnerships. The Company has also provided a completion guarantee for a limited partnership under its credit facility. If the Company were required to satisfy such liabilities, obligations or completion guarantee, the results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Company’s senior notes are unsecured, and effectively subordinated to other secured indebtedness.

The Company’s credit facilities and construction loans are secured by liens on the real estate under development that is financed by those facilities or loans. If the Company becomes insolvent or is liquidated, or if payment under any secured indebtedness was accelerated, the holders of the Company’s secured indebtedness would be entitled to repayment from their collateral before those assets could be used to satisfy any unsecured claims, including claims under the Company’s senior notes or any guarantees of these notes. As a result, the senior notes will be effectively subordinated to the secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness, and the holders of the notes will likely recover ratably less than the secured creditors.

The guarantees of the Company’s senior notes by the Company’s subsidiaries may be avoidable as fraudulent transfers and any new guarantees may be avoidable as preferences.

The guarantees of the Company’s senior notes by the Company’s subsidiaries may be subject to review under U.S. bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent conveyance laws. Under these laws, if a court were to find that, at the time any subsidiary guarantor issued a guarantee of the notes:

• it issued the guarantee to delay, hinder or defraud present or future creditors; or

• it received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for issuing the guarantee at the time it issued the guarantee and:

• it was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of issuing the guarantee; or

19

• it was engaged, or about to engage, in a business or transaction for which its assets constituted unreasonably small capital to carry on its business; or

• it intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay as they mature;

then the court could avoid the obligations under the guarantee, subordinate the guarantee of the senior notes to that of the guarantor’s other debt, require holders of the senior notes to return amounts already paid under that guarantee, or take other action detrimental to holders of the senior notes and the guarantees of the senior notes.

The measures of insolvency for purposes of fraudulent transfer laws vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer had occurred. Generally, however, a person would be considered insolvent if, at the time it incurred the debt:

• the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or

• it could not pay its debts as they become due.

The Company cannot be sure what standard a court would use to determine whether or not a guarantor was solvent at the relevant time, or, regardless of the standard that the court uses, that the issuance of the guarantee would not be avoided or the guarantee would not be subordinated to the guarantors’ other debt. If such a case were to occur, the guarantee could also be subject to the claim that, since the guarantee was incurred for the benefit of the issuer of the senior notes, and only indirectly for the benefit of the guarantor, the obligations of the applicable guarantor were incurred for less than fair consideration.

In addition, if the Company is required to grant an additional subsidiary guarantee for the notes at a time in the future when the guarantor was insolvent, its guarantee may also be avoidable as a preference under U.S. bankruptcy law or comparable provisions of state law.

The indentures for the senior notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions, which may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and taking some corporate actions.

The indentures for the senior notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions. These restrictions limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries, among other things, to:

• incur additional indebtedness;

• pay dividends or make other distributions;

• make investments;

• sell assets;

• incur liens;

• enter into agreements restricting the Company’s subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;

• enter into transactions with affiliates; and

• consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Company’s other debt agreements contain additional restrictions. In addition, the Company may in the future enter into other agreements governing indebtedness which impose yet additional restrictions. These restrictions may adversely affect the Company’s ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to pursue available business opportunities. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default in respect of the related indebtedness. If a default occurs, the relevant lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together

20

with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against any collateral securing that indebtedness.

The Company may not be able to satisfy its obligations upon a change of control.

Upon the occurrence of a “change of control,” as defined in the senior notes indentures, each holder of the senior notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase the senior notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, to the date of purchase. The Company’s failure to purchase, or give notice of purchase of, the senior notes would be a default under the indenture, which could in turn be a default under the Company’s other indebtedness. In addition, a change of control may constitute an event of default under the Company’s credit facilities. A default under the Company’s credit facilities could result in an event of default under the indentures if the lenders accelerate the debt under the credit facilities.

If this event occurs, the Company may not have enough assets to satisfy all obligations under the indentures and any other indebtedness. In order to satisfy the obligations, the Company could seek to refinance the indebtedness under the senior notes and any other indebtedness or obtain a waiver from the holders of the indebtedness. The Company may not be able to obtain a waiver or refinance the indebtedness on acceptable terms.

In addition, the definition of change of control in the indentures governing the senior notes includes a phrase relating to the sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of “all or substantially all” of the assets of the Company and the restricted subsidiaries. Although there is a developing body of case law interpreting the phrase “substantially all,” there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of senior notes to require the Company to repurchase such notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the assets of the Company and the restricted subsidiaries may be uncertain.

Moreover, under the indentures governing the senior notes, the Company could engage in certain important corporate events, including acquisitions, refinancings or other recapitalizations or highly leveraged transactions, that would not constitute a change of control under the indentures and thus would not give rise to any repurchase rights, but which could increase the amount of indebtedness outstanding at such time or otherwise affect the Company’s capital structure or credit ratings or otherwise adversely affect holders of the senior notes. Any such transaction, however, would have to comply with the operating and financial restrictions contained in the indentures governing the senior notes.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

On June 8, 2006, the Company received a comment letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. The Company filed a response on August 18, 2006. As of March 1, 2007, the Company has not received any additional correspondence from the SEC pertaining to the letter. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these matters will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 2.    Properties

Headquarters

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at 4490 Von Karman Avenue, Newport Beach, California, which it leases from a trust of which William H. Lyon, a director of the Company, is the sole beneficiary. The Company leases or owns properties for its division offices and William Lyon Financial Services, but none of these properties is material to the operation of the Company’s business. For information about properties owned by the Company for use in its homebuilding activities, see Item 1.

21

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

Litigation Arising from General Lyon’s Tender Offer

As described above in Item 1—Business, on March 17, 2006, the Company’s principal stockholder commenced a tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to purchase all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock not already owned by him. Initially, the price offered in the Tender was $93 per share, but it has since been increased to $109 per share.

Two purported class action lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, purportedly on behalf of the public stockholders of the Company, challenging the Tender Offer and challenging related actions of the Company and the directors of the Company. Stephen L. Brown v. William Lyon Homes, et al., Civil Action No. 2015-N was filed on March 20, 2006, and Michael Crady, et al. v. General William Lyon, et al., Civil Action No. 2017-N was filed on March 21, 2006 (collectively, the “Delaware Complaints”). On March 21, 2006, plaintiff in the Brown action also filed a First Amended Complaint. The Delaware Complaints name the Company and the directors of the Company as defendants. These complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties owed to the plaintiffs in connection with the Tender Offer and other related corporate activities. The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Tender Offer and, among other things, to obtain attorneys’ fees and expenses related to the litigation.

On March 23, 2006, the Company announced that its Board had appointed a special committee of independent directors who are not members of the Company’s management or employed by the Company (the “Special Committee”) to consider the Tender Offer. The members of the Special Committee were Harold H. Greene, Lawrence M. Higby, and Dr. Arthur Laffer. The Company also announced that the Special Committee had retained Morgan Stanley & Co. as its financial advisor and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP as its legal counsel.

On March 24, 2006, the Delaware Chancery Court consolidated the Delaware Complaints into a single case entitled In re: William Lyon Homes Shareholder Litigation, Civil Action No. 2015-N (the “Consolidated Delaware Action”).

On April 10, 2006, the parties to the Consolidated Delaware Action executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), detailing a proposed settlement subject to the Delaware Chancery Court’s approval. Pursuant to the MOU, General Lyon increased his offer of $93 per share to $100 per share, extended the closing date of the offer to April 21, 2006, and, on April 11, 2006, filed an amended Schedule TO. Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Delaware Action have determined that the settlement is “fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of plaintiffs and the putative Class.” The Special Committee also determined that the price of $100 per share was fair to the shareholders, and recommended that the Company’s shareholders accept the revised Tender Offer and tender their shares. Thereafter, General Lyon also decided to further extend the closing date of the Tender Offer from April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006.

On April 23, 2006, Delaware Chancery Court conditionally certified a class in the Consolidated Delaware Action. The parties to the Consolidated Delaware Action agreed to a Stipulation of Settlement, and on August 9, 2006, the Delaware Chancery Court certified a class in the Consolidated Delaware Action, approved the settlement, and dismissed the Consolidated Delaware Action with prejudice as to all defendants and the class. On February 16, 2007, the matter was appealed to the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware.

A purported class action lawsuit challenging the Tender Offer was also filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange. On March 17, 2006, a complaint captioned Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. William Lyon Homes, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-CC-00047, was filed. On April 5, 2006, plaintiff in the Alaska Electrical action filed an Amended Complaint (the “California Action”). The complaint in the California Action names the Company and the directors of the Company as defendants and alleges, among other things, that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to the public stockholders. Plaintiff in the California Action also sought to enjoin the Tender Offer, and, among other things, to obtain attorneys’ fees and expenses related to the litigation.

22

On April 20, 2006, the California court denied the request of plaintiff in the California Action to enjoin the Tender Offer. Plaintiff filed a motion to certify a class in the California Action which was later taken off calendar, and the Company filed a motion to stay the California Action. On July 5, 2006, the California Court granted the Company’s motion to stay the California Action.

Other Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, most of which relate to routine litigation and some of which are covered by insurance. In the opinion of the Company’s management, none of the uninsured claims involves claims which are material and unreserved or will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

23

PART II

Item  5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s Common Stock was delisted from the NYSE in conjunction with the Tender Offer and Merger. The Company is now a privately held company. See Note 7 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock during the last three fiscal years and expects that for the foreseeable future it will follow a policy of retaining earnings in order to help finance its business. Payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon the earnings, capital requirements, general economic conditions and operating and financial condition of the Company, among other factors. However, the effect of the Company’s principal financing agreements currently prohibits the payment of dividends by the Company. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition and Liquidity” and Note 7 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

24

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain of the Company’s historical financial data. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements for such years, which are not included herein. The selected historical consolidated financial data set forth below are not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with the discussion under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere herein.

	As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(dollars in thousands)
	(note 3)
Statement of Income Data:
Operating revenue
Home sales	$	1,478,694		$	1,745,067		$	1,785,589		$	866,657		$	593,762
Lots, land and other sales		13,527			111,316			36,258			21,656			8,648
Management fees		—			—			—			9,490			10,892
		1,492,221			1,856,383			1,821,847			897,803			613,302
Operating costs
Cost of sales—homes		(1,160,614	)		(1,307,027	)		(1,327,057	)		(714,385	)		(504,330	)
Cost of sales—lots, land and other		(16,524	)		(44,774	)		(23,173	)		(13,269	)		(9,404	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets(1)		(39,895	)		(4,600	)		—			—			—
Sales and marketing		(72,349	)		(59,422	)		(58,792	)		(31,252	)		(22,862	)
General and administrative		(61,390	)		(90,045	)		(80,784	)		(50,315	)		(39,366	)
Other		(6,502	)		(2,450	)		(2,105	)		(1,834	)		(2,284	)
		(1,357,274	)		(1,508,318	)		(1,491,911	)		(811,055	)		(578,246	)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures		3,242			4,301			(699	)		31,236			27,748
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		(16,914	)		(37,571	)		(49,661	)		(429	)		—
Operating income		121,275			314,795			279,576			117,555			62,804
Financial advisory expenses		(3,165	)		(2,191	)		—			—			—
Other income, net		5,599			2,176			5,572			6,397			4,977
Income before provision for income taxes		123,709			314,780			285,148			123,952			67,781
Provision for income taxes		(48,931	)		(124,149	)		(113,499	)		(51,815	)		(18,270	)
Net income	$	74,778		$	190,631		$	171,649		$	72,137		$	49,511
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,732		$	52,369		$	96,074		$	24,137		$	16,694
Real estate inventories
Owned(1)		1,431,753			1,303,476			1,059,173			698,047			491,952
Not owned(4)		200,667			115,772			—			—			—
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		3,560			397			17,911			45,613			65,404
Total assets		1,878,595			1,691,002			1,274,562			839,715			617,581
Total debt		851,314			672,536			595,219			326,737			266,065
Minority interest		109,859			227,178			142,096			142,496			80,647
Stockholders’ equity		625,395			542,894			347,109			252,040			181,676
Operating Data (including unconsolidated joint ventures) (unaudited):
Number of net new home orders		2,202			3,321			3,371			3,443			2,607
Number of homes closed		2,887			3,196			3,471			2,804			2,522
Average sales price of homes closed	$	512		$	546		$	514		$	422		$	379
Cancellation rates		33	%		16	%		17	%		18	%		19	%
Backlog at end of period, number of homes(2)		606			1,291			1,166			1,266			627
Backlog at end of period, aggregate sales value(2)	$	295,505		$	691,627		$	623,578		$	595,180		$	259,123

(1) The Company accounts for its real estate inventories under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“Statement No. 144”). Statement No. 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on assets to be held and used by the Company when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of the assets. The estimation process used in determining the undiscounted cash flows of the assets is inherently uncertain because it involves estimates of future revenues and costs. As described more fully below in the section entitled “Real Estate Inventories and Cost of Sales”, estimates of revenues and costs are supported by the Company’s budgeting process. When an impairment loss is required for assets to be held and used by the Company, the related assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value.

25

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, include a non-cash charge of $39.9 million to record an impairment loss on real estate assets held by the Company at certain of its homebuilding projects. The impairment was primarily attributable to slower than anticipated home sales and lower than anticipated net revenue due to softening market conditions. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Accordingly, the related real estate assets were written-down to their estimated fair value. The non-cash charge is reflected in impairment loss on real estate assets in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a non-cash charge of $4.6 million to record an impairment loss related to a golf course in the Company’s San Diego Division. The impairment loss was primarily attributable to lower than expected cash flows and continued net operating losses since the golf course opened in 2002. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the assets carrying amount. Accordingly, the golf course asset was written-down to its estimated fair value. The non-cash charge had been previously reflected in other operating costs in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2005. However, such amount has been reclassified to loss on impairment of real estate assets to be consistent with the financial statement presentation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

(2) Backlog consists of homes sold under pending sales contracts that have not yet closed, some of which are subject to contingencies, including mortgage loan approval and the sale of existing homes by customers. There can be no assurance that homes sold under pending sales contracts will close. Of the total homes sold subject to pending sales contracts as of December 31, 2006, 554 represent homes completed or under construction and 52 represent homes not yet under construction. Backlog as of all dates is unaudited.

(3) In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as amended (“Interpretation No. 46”), which addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Under Interpretation No. 46, arrangements that are not controlled through voting or similar rights are accounted for as VIEs. An enterprise is required to consolidate a VIE if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Interpretation No. 46 applied immediately to arrangements created after January 31, 2003 and, with respect to arrangements created before February 1, 2003, the interpretation was applied to the Company as of January 1, 2004. The adoption of Interpretation No. 46 has not affected the Company’s consolidated net income. Prior period information has not been restated to conform to the presentation in the current period.

Under Interpretation No. 46, a VIE is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity through voting or similar rights, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to Interpretation No. 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE.

Based on the provisions of Interpretation No. 46, the Company has concluded that under certain circumstances when the Company (i) enters into option agreements for the purchase of land or lots from an entity and pays a non-refundable deposit, (ii) enters into land banking arrangements or (iii) enters into arrangements with a financial partner for the formation of joint ventures which engage in homebuilding and land development activities, a VIE may be created under condition (ii) (b) or (c) of the previous paragraph. The Company may be deemed to have provided subordinated financial support, which refers to variable interests that will absorb some or all of an entity’s expected losses if they occur. For each VIE created, the Company will compute expected losses and residual returns based on the probability of future cash flows as outlined in Interpretation No. 46. If the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, the assets, liabilities and operations of the VIE will be consolidated with the Company’s financial statements.

Based on the Company’s analysis of arrangements created after January 31, 2003, no VIEs had been created for the period from February 1, 2003 through December 31, 2004 with respect to option agreements as identified under clause (i) of the previous paragraph. At December 31, 2003, certain joint ventures and a land banking arrangement created after January 31, 2003 had been determined to be VIEs under Interpretation No. 46 in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of these joint ventures and land banking arrangement had been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the period then ended. Effective January 1, 2004, certain additional joint ventures and land banking arrangements created prior to February 1, 2003 had been determined to be VIEs under Interpretation No. 46 in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of all of these joint ventures and land banking arrangements had been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of January 1, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, certain joint ventures, lot option agreements and land banking arrangements have been determined to be VIEs under Interpretation No. 46 in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of all of these joint ventures, lot option agreements and land banking arrangements have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

26

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As used herein, “on a combined basis” means the total of operations in wholly-owned projects and in consolidated joint venture projects.

The Company is primarily engaged in the design, construction and sale of single family detached and attached homes in California, Arizona and Nevada. Since the founding of its predecessor in 1956, on a combined basis the Company has sold over 68,000 homes. The Company conducts its homebuilding operations through five geographic regions: Southern California Coastal, Northern California, Inland Empire California, Arizona and Nevada. For the year ended December 31, 2006, on a consolidated basis the Company had revenues from home sales of $1.479 billion and delivered 2,887 homes, which includes $151.4 million of revenue and 347 delivered homes from consolidated joint ventures. The Company believes that it is well positioned for long term growth in all of its markets. However, due to recent slow downs of new orders, increases in cancellation rates and increasing price competition, the Company anticipates a decline in deliveries and revenues in 2007 as compared to 2006. The Company presents information related to its unconsolidated joint ventures as such information represents an important aspect of the Company’s business as well as a substantial portion of its operating income.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are general partners or members in joint ventures involved in the development and sale of residential projects. As described more fully in “Critical Accounting Policies—Variable Interest Entities” certain joint ventures have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Because the Company already recognizes its proportionate share of joint venture earnings and losses under the equity method of accounting, the adoption of Interpretation No. 46 did not affect the Company’s consolidated net income. The financial statements of joint ventures in which the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary are not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). Income allocations and cash distributions to the Company from the unconsolidated joint ventures are based on predetermined formulas between the Company and its joint venture partners as specified in the applicable partnership or operating agreements. The Company generally receives, after partners’ priority returns and returns of partners’ capital, approximately 50% of the profits and cash flows from joint ventures. See Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the joint ventures whose financial statements have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. See Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the unconsolidated joint ventures. Based upon current estimates, substantially all future development and construction costs incurred by the joint ventures will be funded by the venture partners or from the proceeds of construction financing obtained by the joint ventures.

27

Results of Operations

Selected financial and operating information for the Company including its consolidated projects and unconsolidated joint ventures as of and for the periods presented is as follows:

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
	Wholly- Owned			Joint Ventures			Consolidated Total
Selected Financial Information (dollars in thousands)
Homes closed		2,540			347			2,887
Home sales revenue	$	1,327,297		$	151,397		$	1,478,694
Cost of sales		(1,052,657	)		(107,957	)		(1,160,614	)
Gross margin	$	274,640			43,440		$	318,080
Gross margin percentage		20.7	%		28.7	%		21.5	%
Number of homes closed
California		1,431			347			1,778
Arizona		593			—			593
Nevada		516			—			516
Total		2,540			347			2,887
Average sales price
California	$	646,900		$	436,300		$	605,800
Arizona		346,800			—			346,800
Nevada		379,700			—			379,700
Total	$	522,600		$	436,300		$	512,200
Number of net new home orders
California		1,111			291			1,402
Arizona		388			—			388
Nevada		412			—			412
Total		1,911			291			2,202
Average number of sales locations during period
California		28			6			34
Arizona		6			—			6
Nevada		12			—			12
Total		46			6			52

28

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
	Wholly- Owned		Joint Ventures		Consolidated Total
Backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period
California		303		52		355
Arizona		191		—		191
Nevada		60		—		60
Total		554		52		606
Dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period (dollars in thousands)
California	$	197,123	$	24,122	$	221,245
Arizona		51,852		—		51,852
Nevada		22,408		—		22,408
Total	$	271,383	$	24,122	$	295,505
Lots controlled at end of year
Owned lots
California		4,895		530		5,425
Arizona		3,996		2,568		6,564
Nevada		1,299		—		1,299
Total		10,190		3,098		13,288
Optioned lots(1)
California						2,872
Arizona						3,492
Nevada						1,013
Total						7,377
Total lots controlled
California						8,297
Arizona						10,056
Nevada						2,312
Total						20,665

29

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
	Wholly- Owned			Joint Ventures			Consolidated Total
Selected Financial Information (dollars in thousands)
Homes closed		2,508			688			3,196
Home sales revenue	$	1,338,208		$	406,859		$	1,745,067
Cost of sales		(1,012,761	)		(294,266	)		(1,307,027	)
Gross margin	$	325,447		$	112,593		$	438,040
Gross margin percentage		24.3	%		27.7	%		25.1	%
Number of homes closed
California		1,315			688			2,003
Arizona		628			—			628
Nevada		565			—			565
Total		2,508			688			3,196
Average sales price
California	$	707,400		$	591,400		$	667,600
Arizona		321,500			—			321,500
Nevada		364,600			—			364,600
Total	$	533,600		$	591,400		$	546,000
Number of net new home orders
California		1,566			566			2,132
Arizona		542			—			542
Nevada		647			—			647
Total		2,755			566			3,321
Average number of sales locations during period
California		20			8			28
Arizona		5			—			5
Nevada		8			—			8
Total		33			8			41

30

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
	Wholly- Owned		Joint Ventures		Consolidated Total
Backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period
California		608		123		731
Arizona		396		—		396
Nevada		164		—		164
Total		1,168		123		1,291
Dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period (dollars in thousands)
California	$	427,102	$	64,355	$	491,457
Arizona		141,132		—		141,132
Nevada		59,038		—		59,038
Total	$	627,272	$	64,355	$	691,627
Lots controlled at end of year
Owned lots
California		4,296		1,290		5,586
Arizona		3,627		822		4,449
Nevada		1,483		—		1,483
Total		9,406		2,112		11,518
Optioned lots(1)
California						4,650
Arizona						8,232
Nevada						2,189
Total						15,071
Total lots controlled
California						10,236
Arizona						12,681
Nevada						3,672
Total						26,589

31

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004
	Wholly- Owned			Joint Ventures			Consolidated Total
Selected Financial Information (dollars in thousands)
Homes closed		2,447			1,024			3,471
Home sales revenue	$	1,246,277		$	539,312		$	1,785,589
Cost of sales		(941,225	)		(385,832	)		(1,327,057	)
Gross margin	$	305,052		$	153,480		$	458,532
Gross margin percentage		24.5	%		28.5	%		25.7	%
Number of homes closed
California		1,312			1,024			2,336
Arizona		402			—			402
Nevada		733			—			733
Total		2,447			1,024			3,471
Average sales price
California	$	692,200		$	526,700		$	619,600
Arizona		241,800			—			241,800
Nevada		328,700			—			328,700
Total	$	509,300		$	526,700		$	514,400
Number of net new home orders
California		1,157			955			2,112
Arizona		677			—			677
Nevada		582			—			582
Total		2,416			955			3,371
Average number of sales locations during period
California		17			11			28
Arizona		6			—			6
Nevada		7			—			7
Total		30			11			41

32

	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004
	Wholly- Owned		Joint Ventures		Consolidated Total
Backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period
California		357		245		602
Arizona		482		—		482
Nevada		82		—		82
Total		921		245		1,166
Dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed at end of period (dollars in thousands)
California	$	292,298	$	160,280	$	452,578
Arizona		136,815		—		136,815
Nevada		34,185		—		34,185
Total	$	463,298	$	160,280	$	623,578
Lots controlled at end of year
Owned lots
California		2,702		1,445		4,147
Arizona		3,518		—		3,518
Nevada		1,193		—		1,193
Total		7,413		1,445		8,858
Optioned lots(1)
California						4,532
Arizona						3,960
Nevada						1,262
Total						9,754
Total lots controlled
California						8,679
Arizona						7,478
Nevada						2,455
Total						18,612

(1) Optioned lots may be purchased by the Company as consolidated projects or may be purchased by newly formed unconsolidated joint ventures.

During the last half of the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company began to experience slowing in new orders in many of its markets, increases in cancellation rates and increasing pricing pressures from several of its competitors who initiated aggressive incentive and discounting programs. This softening in the Company’s markets continued in 2006.

On a combined basis, the number of net new home orders for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased 33.7% to 2,202 homes from 3,321 homes for the year ended December 31, 2005. The number of homes closed on a combined basis for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased 9.7% to 2,887 homes from 3,196 homes for the year ended December 31, 2005. On a combined basis, the backlog of homes sold but not closed as of December 31, 2006 was 606 homes, down 53.1% from 1,291 homes as of December 31, 2005.

Homes in backlog are generally closed within three to six months. The dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed on a combined basis as of December 31, 2006 was $295.5 million, down 57.3% from $691.6 million as of December 31, 2005. The cancellation rate of buyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow at the Company’s projects was approximately 33% during 2006 and 16% during 2005; however, the cancellation rate from January 1, 2007 through February 25, 2007 has decreased to approximately 21%. The inventory of completed and unsold homes was 136 homes as of December 31, 2006.

The Company’s average number of sales locations increased to 52 for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 41 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company’s number of new home orders per average

33

sales location decreased from 82.2 for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 42.3 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

In general, housing demand is adversely affected by increases in interest rates and housing prices. Interest rates, the length of time that assets remain in inventory, and the proportion of inventory that is financed affect the Company’s interest cost. If the Company is unable to raise sales prices sufficiently to compensate for higher costs or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, affecting prospective buyers’ ability to adequately finance home purchases, the Company’s sales, gross margins and operating results may be adversely impacted.

Comparisons of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.492 billion, a decrease of $364.2 million, or 19.6% from consolidated operating revenue of $1.856 billion for the year ended December 31, 2005. Revenue from sales of wholly-owned homes decreased slightly to $1.327 billion in the 2006 period from $1.338 billion in the 2005 period. This decrease was comprised of (i) an increase of $17.0 million due to an increase in the number of wholly-owned homes closed to 2,540 in 2006 from 2,508 in 2005 and (ii) a decrease of $27.9 million due to a decrease in the average sales price of wholly-owned homes closed from $533,600 in the 2005 period to $522,600 in the 2006 period. Consolidated operating revenue includes revenue from sales of joint ventures due to the adoption of Interpretation No. 46. Revenue from sales of joint venture homes decreased $255.5 million, or 62.8%, to $151.4 million in the 2006 period from $406.9 million in the 2005 period. This decrease was comprised of (i) a decrease of $53.8 million due to a decrease in the average sales price of joint venture homes closed to $436,300 in the 2006 period from $591,400 in the 2005 period and (ii) a decrease of $201.7 million due to a decrease in the number of joint venture homes closed to 347 in 2006 from 688 in 2005. Revenue from sales of lots, land and other decreased to $13.5 million in the 2006 period from $111.3 million in the 2005 period, primarily due to the sale of a golf course in one of the Company’s markets in the 2006 period and other bulk sales of land in Nevada and Arizona compared to the bulk sale of land of $66.0 million in Arizona and of $45.3 million in California during the 2005 period. The decrease in the average sales price of units closed in wholly-owned projects and in joint venture projects was due to a change in product mix and the softening of sales in certain of the Company’s markets.

Total operating income decreased to $121.3 million in the 2006 period from $314.8 million in the 2005 period. The excess of revenue from sales of homes over the related cost of sales (gross margin) decreased by $119.9 million to $318.1 million in the 2006 period from $438.0 million in the 2005 period primarily due to a decrease in the number of homes closed to 2,887 in the 2006 period from 3,196 in the 2005 period and a decrease in gross margin percentage to 21.5% in the 2006 period from 25.1% in the 2005 period. The decrease in period-over-period gross margin percentage primarily reflects the close out of projects with higher average gross margin percentages in 2005, a shift in product mix and the decrease in average sales prices in certain of the Company’s markets. The excess of revenue from sales of lots, land and other over the related cost of sales (gross margin) decreased to $(3.0) million in the 2006 period from $66.5 million in the 2005 period primarily due to the bulk sale of land in certain of the Company’s markets in the 2005 period compared to the sale of a golf course in one of the Company’s markets in the 2006 period. In addition, costs of approximately $10.8 million were incurred related to the abandonment and write-off of project pre-acquisition costs and land option deposits for certain of the Company’s potential projects in the 2006 period.

Operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2006 included an impairment loss on real estate assets of $39.9 million compared to $4.6 million in the 2005 period. During the 2006 period the impairment was primarily attributable to slower than anticipated home sales and lower than anticipated net revenue due to softening market conditions. Accordingly, when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by real estate inventories are less than the carrying amount of such assets, the real estate assets are written-down to their estimated fair value. During the 2005 period, an impairment loss related to a golf course in San Diego, California was attributable to lower than expected cash flows and continued net operating losses since the golf course opened in 2002.

34

Sales and marketing expense increased by $12.9 million to $72.3 million in the 2006 period from $59.4 million in the 2005 period primarily due to (i) an increase of $7.5 million in advertising costs to $23.6 million in the 2006 period from $16.1 million in the 2005 period, (ii) an increase of $3.9 million in direct selling expenses to $39.6 million in the 2006 period from $35.7 million in the 2005 period, and (iii) an increase of $1.5 in sales office expense to $9.1 million in the 2006 period from $7.6 million in the 2005 period. The increase in advertising costs is attributable to the softening in the Company’s markets which began in 2005 and is continuing into 2006 which has caused the Company to aggressively increase its marketing efforts in order to compete in markets where the demand for homes has decreased significantly. The increase in direct selling expenses is caused by the increase in outside broker costs of $7.6 million to $19.5 million in the 2006 period from $11.9 million in the 2005 period, offset by a decrease in salesperson commission of $2.5 to $14.5 million in the 2006 period from $17.0 million in the 2005 period. General and administrative expenses decreased by $28.6 million to $61.4 million in the 2006 period from $90.0 million in the 2005 period, primarily as a result of a decrease of $31.3 million in bonus expense to $27.3 million, or approximately 18% of pre-tax, pre-bonus income, in the 2006 period from $58.5 million, or approximately, 16% of pre-tax, pre-bonus income in the 2005 period and an increase of $2.5 million in salaries and related benefits as a result of increased employee benefit costs in the 2006 period. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of home sales revenue was 9.0% in the 2006 period compared to 8.6% in the 2005 period. Other operating costs consist of losses realized by golf course operations at certain of the Company’s projects which increased to $6.5 million in the 2006 period compared to $2.5 million in the 2005 period. Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures decreased to $3.2 million in the 2006 period from $4.3 million in the 2005 period. Minority equity in income of consolidated entities decreased to $16.9 million in the 2006 period from $37.6 million in the 2005 period, primarily due to a decrease in the number of joint venture homes closed to 347 in the 2006 period from 688 in 2005.

The Company incurred financial advisory expenses of $3.2 million in the 2006 period due to the tender offer described below in “Tender Offer and Merger” The Company incurred financial advisory expenses of $2.2 million in the 2005 period due to a proposed transaction which was not completed.

Total interest incurred increased to $80.2 million in the 2006 period from $73.2 million in the 2005 period, primarily as a result of an increase in the average principal balance of debt outstanding and an increase in interest rates. All interest incurred was capitalized in the 2006 and 2005 periods.

The estimated overall effective tax rate for the year ending December 31, 2006 is 39.5%. During the year ended December 31, 2006, income tax benefits of $3.1 million related to stock option exercises were excluded from the results of operations and credited to additional paid-in capital. At December 31, 2006, the Company has unused recognized built-in losses in the amount of $19.4 million which are available to offset future taxable income and expire between 2009 and 2011. The utilization of these losses is limited to offset $3.9 million of taxable income per year; however, any unused losses in any year may be carried forward for utilization in future years through 2011. The Company’s ability to utilize the foregoing tax benefits will depend upon the amount of its future taxable income and may be further limited under certain circumstances.

Neither the amount of the unused recognized built-in loss carryforwards nor the amount of limitation on such carryforwards claimed by the Company has been audited or otherwise validated by the Internal Revenue Service, and it could challenge either amount that the Company has calculated. It is possible that legislation or regulations will be adopted that would limit the Company’s ability to use the tax benefits associated with the current tax loss carryforwards.

As a result of the factors outlined above, net income decreased to $74.8 million in the 2006 period from $190.6 million in the 2005 period.

Comparisons of Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

Consolidated operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $1.856 billion, an increase of $34.5 million, or 1.9%, from consolidated operating revenue of $1.822 billion for the year ended December 31,

35

2004. Revenue from sales of wholly-owned homes increased $91.9 million, or 7.4%, to $1.338 billion in the 2005 period from $1.246 billion in the 2004 period. This increase was comprised of (i) an increase of $31.0 million due to an increase in the number of wholly-owned homes closed to 2,508 in 2005 from 2,447 in 2004 and (ii) an increase of $60.9 million due to an increase in the average sales price of wholly-owned homes closed to $533,600 in the 2005 period from $509,300 in the 2004 period. Consolidated operating revenue includes revenue from sales of joint ventures due to the adoption of Interpretation No. 46. Revenue from sales of joint venture homes decreased $132.4 million, or 24.6%, to $406.9 million in the 2005 period from $539.3 million in the 2004 period. This decrease was comprised of (i) an increase of $44.5 million due to an increase in the average sales price of joint venture homes closed to $591,400 in the 2005 period from $526,700 in the 2004 period and (ii) a decrease of $176.9 million due to a decrease in the number of joint venture homes closed to 688 in 2005 from 1,024 in 2004. Revenue from sales of lots, land and other increased to $111.3 million in 2005 from $36.3 million in 2004 due to the bulk sale of land of $66.0 million in Arizona and of $45.3 million in California during 2005. The increase in the average sales price of units closed in wholly-owned and consolidated joint venture projects was primarily due to (i) price appreciation in certain markets and (ii) a change in product mix.

Total operating income increased to $314.8 million in the 2005 period from $279.6 million in the 2004 period. The excess of revenue from sales of homes over the related cost of sales (gross margin) decreased by $20.5 million to $438.0 million in the 2005 period from $458.5 million in the 2004 period primarily due to (i) a decrease in the number of joint venture homes closed to 688 in 2005 from 1,024 in 2004, (ii) a decrease in joint venture gross margin percentage to 27.7% in 2005 from 28.5% in 2004, (iii) offset by an increase in the average sales price of joint venture homes to $591,400 in 2005 from $526,700 in 2004, (iv) an increase in the number of wholly-owned homes closed to 2,508 in 2005 from 2,447 in 2004 and (v) an increase in the average sales price of wholly-owned homes closed to $533,600 in 2005 from $509,200 in 2004. The excess of revenue from sales of lots, land and other over the related cost of sales (gross margin) increased by $53.4 million to $66.5 million in 2005 from $13.1 million in 2004 primarily due to the bulk sale of land in Arizona and California during 2005.

Operating costs for the year ending December 31, 2005 includes an impairment loss of $4.6 million related to a golf course in San Diego, California. The impairment was attributable to lower than expected cash flows and continued net operating losses since the golf course opened in 2002.

Sales and marketing expense increased slightly to $59.4 million in the 2005 period from $58.8 million in the 2004 period primarily due to an increase in marketing fees paid to land sellers in certain of the communities in which the Company builds to $7.2 million in 2005 from $6.7 million in 2004. General and administrative expenses increased $9.2 million in the 2005 period to $90.0 million from $80.8 million in the 2004 period primarily as a result of an increase in bonus expense to $58.5 million, or approximately 16% of pre-tax, pre-bonus income, in the 2005 period from $54.1 million, or approximately 16% of pre-tax, pre-bonus income, in the 2004 period due to higher levels of pre-tax, pre-bonus income and an increase in salaries and benefits to $24.5 million in the 2005 period from $20.8 million in the 2004 period. Other operating costs consist of operating losses realized by golf course operations in certain of the Company’s divisions which increased $0.4 million to $2.5 million in the 2005 period from $2.1 million in the 2004 period. Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures increased to $4.3 million in the 2005 period from $(0.7) million in the 2004 period, primarily due to certain bulk sales of land by the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. Minority equity in income of consolidated entities decreased to $37.6 million in the 2005 period from $49.7 million in the 2004 period, primarily due to a decrease in the number of joint venture homes closed to 688 in 2005 from 1,024 in 2004.

The Company incurred financial advisory expenses of $2.2 million in the 2005 period with no comparable amount in the 2004 period due to a proposed transaction which was not completed.

Total interest incurred increased to $73.2 million in the 2005 period from $59.0 million in the 2004 period, primarily as a result of an increase in the prime interest rate from an average of 6.19% during 2005 compared to 4.34% during 2004 and as a result of an increase in the average principal balance of debt outstanding in the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period.

36

The estimated overall effective tax rate for the year ending December 31, 2005 is 39.4%. During the year ended December 31, 2005, income tax benefits of $2.0 million related to stock option exercises were excluded from the results of operations and credited to additional paid-in capital. At December 31, 2005, the Company has unused recognized built-in losses in the amount of $23.3 million which are available to offset future taxable income and expire between 2009 and 2011. The utilization of these losses is limited to offset $3.9 million of taxable income per year; however, any unused losses in any year may be carried forward for utilization in future years through 2011. The Company’s ability to utilize the foregoing tax benefits will depend upon the amount of its future taxable income and may be further limited under certain circumstances.

Neither the amount of the unused recognized built-in loss carryforwards nor the amount of limitation on such carryforwards claimed by the Company has been audited or otherwise validated by the Internal Revenue Service, and it could challenge either amount that the Company has calculated. It is possible that legislation or regulations will be adopted that would limit the Company’s ability to use the tax benefits associated with the current tax loss carryforwards.

As a result of the foregoing factors, net income increased to $190.6 million in the 2005 period from $171.6 million in the 2004 period.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

The Company provides for its ongoing cash requirements principally from internally generated funds from the sales of real estate, outside borrowings and by forming new joint ventures with venture partners that provide a substantial portion of the capital required for certain projects. The Company currently has outstanding 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012, 10 ³/4% Senior Notes due 2013 and 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014 and maintains secured revolving credit facilities (“Revolving Credit Facilities”). The Company has financed, and may in the future finance, certain projects and land acquisitions with construction loans secured by real estate inventories, seller-provided financing and land banking transactions. The Company believes that its current borrowing capacity and increases reasonably available to it, cash on hand and anticipated net cash flows from operations are and will be sufficient to meet its current and reasonably anticipated liquidity needs on both a near-term and long-term basis (and in any event for the next twelve months) for funds to build homes, run its day-to-day operations, acquire land and capital assets and fund its mortgage operations. There is no assurance, however, that future cash flows will be sufficient to meet the Company’s future capital needs. The amount and types of indebtedness that the Company may incur may be limited by the terms of the indentures and credit or other agreements governing the Company’s senior note obligations, revolving credit facilities and other indebtedness.

The ability of the Company to meet its obligations on its indebtedness will depend to a large degree on its future performance which in turn will be subject, in part, to factors beyond its control, such as prevailing economic conditions either nationally or in regions in which the Company operates, the outbreak of war or other hostilities involving the United States, mortgage and other interest rates, changes in prices of homebuilding materials, weather, the occurrence of events such as landslides, soil subsidence and earthquakes that are uninsurable, not economically insurable or not subject to effective indemnification agreements, availability of labor and homebuilding materials, changes in governmental laws and regulations, the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals and the opening of projects, and the availability and cost of land for future development. The Company cannot be certain that its cash flow will be sufficient to allow it to pay principal and interest on its debt, support its operations and meet its other obligations. If the Company is not able to meet those obligations, it may be required to refinance all or part of its existing debt, sell assets or borrow more money. The Company may not be able to do so on terms acceptable to it, if at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future indentures and credit or other agreements governing the Company’s senior note obligations, revolving credit facilities and other indebtedness may restrict the Company from pursuing any of these alternatives.

37

7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes

On November 22, 2004, the Company’s 100% owned subsidiary, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, (“California Lyon”) closed its offering of $150.0 million principal amount of 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes”). The notes were sold pursuant to Rule 144A. The notes were issued at par, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $148.5 million. California Lyon agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an offer to exchange the notes for publicly tradeable notes having substantially identical terms. On January 12, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared the registration statement effective and California Lyon commenced an offer to exchange any and all of its outstanding $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012, which are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, for a like amount of its new 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012, which are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the prospectus dated January 12, 2005. The exchange offer was completed for $146.5 million principal amount of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes on February 18, 2005. The remaining $3.5 million principal amount of the old notes remains outstanding. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material respects to those of the old notes, except for certain transfer restrictions, registration rights and liquidated damages provisions relating to the old notes. Interest on the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on December 15 and June 15 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $5.7 million.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes (“7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to December 15, 2008. Thereafter, the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before December 15, 2007, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.625% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes with a face value of $150.0 million had a fair value of approximately $127.9 million, based on quotes from industry sources.

10 ³/4% Senior Notes

California Lyon filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the sale of $250.0 million of 10 ³/4% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “10 ³/4% Senior Notes”) which became effective on March 12, 2003. The offering closed on March 17, 2003 and was fully subscribed and issued. The notes were issued at a price of 98.493% to the public, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $246.2 million. The purchase price reflected a discount to yield 11% under the effective interest method and the notes have been reflected net of the unamortized discount in the consolidated balance sheet. Interest on the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes, the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $13.4 million.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes (“10 ³/4% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to April 1, 2008. Thereafter, the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before April 1, 2006, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 110.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 10 ³/4% Senior Notes with a face value of $246.9 million had a fair value of approximately $240.0 million, based on quotes from industry sources.

38

7 ¹/2% Senior Notes

On February 6, 2004, California Lyon closed its offering of $150.0 million principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014 (the “7 ¹/2% Senior Notes”). The notes were sold pursuant to Rule 144A and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in reliance on Regulation S. The notes were issued at par, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $147.6 million. California Lyon agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an offer to exchange the notes for publicly tradeable notes having substantially identical terms. On July 16, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared the registration statement effective and California Lyon commenced an offer to exchange any and all of its outstanding $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014, which are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, for a like amount of its new 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014, which are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the prospectus dated July 16, 2004. The exchange offer was completed for the full principal amount of the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes on August 17, 2004. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material respects to those of the old notes, except for certain transfer restrictions, registration rights and liquidated damages provisions relating to the old notes. The new notes have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Interest on the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $5.6 million.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes (“7 ¹/2% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to February 15, 2009. Thereafter, the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before February 15, 2007, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.50% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes with a face value of $150.0 million had a fair value of $124.9 million, based on quotes from industry sources.

* * * * *

The 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes and the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) are senior unsecured obligations of California Lyon and are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (“Delaware Lyon”), which is the parent company of California Lyon, and all of Delaware Lyon’s existing and certain of its future restricted subsidiaries. The Senior Notes and the guarantees rank senior to all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ debt that is expressly subordinated to the Senior Notes and the guarantees, but are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ senior secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness.

Upon a change of control as described in the respective Indentures governing the Senior Notes (the “Senior Notes Indentures”), California Lyon will be required to offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

If the Company’s consolidated tangible net worth falls below $75.0 million for any two consecutive fiscal quarters, California Lyon will be required to make an offer to purchase up to 10% of each class of Senior Notes originally issued at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

California Lyon is 100% owned by Delaware Lyon. Each subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned by California Lyon or Delaware Lyon. All guarantees of the Senior Notes are full and unconditional and all guarantees are joint

39

and several. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Delaware Lyon or any guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.

The Senior Notes Indentures contain covenants that limit the ability of Delaware Lyon and its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase its stock; (iii) make investments; (iv) sell assets; (v) incur liens; (vi) enter into agreements restricting the ability of Delaware Lyon’s restricted subsidiaries (other than California Lyon) to pay dividends; (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates; and (viii) consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of Delaware Lyon’s and California Lyon’s assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications as described in the Senior Notes Indentures.

The foregoing summary is not a complete description of the Senior Notes and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Senior Notes Indentures.

The net proceeds of the offerings were used to repay amounts outstanding under revolving credit facilities and other indebtedness. The remaining proceeds were used to pay fees and commissions related to the offering and for other general corporate purposes.

At December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $233.7 million of secured indebtedness, (excluding approximately $70.4 million of secured indebtedness of consolidated entities) and approximately $305.8 million of additional secured indebtedness available to be borrowed under the Company’s credit facilities, as limited by the Company’s borrowing base formulas.

Revolving Credit Facilities

As of December 31, 2006, the Company has seven revolving credit facilities which have an aggregate maximum loan commitment of $560.0 million, (including one facility of $150.0 million, one of $100.0 million, one of $90.0 million, one of $70.0 million and three of $50.0 million each), and mature at various dates through 2008. The revolving credit facilities have similar characteristics. The Company may borrow amounts, subject to applicable borrowing base and concentration limitations, as defined. During the last year of the term of each facility, the commitment amount will decrease ratably until the commitment under each facility is reduced to zero by the final maturity date, as defined in each respective agreement.

Availability under each credit facility is subject not only to the maximum amount committed under the respective facility, but also to both various borrowing base and concentration limitations. The borrowing base limits lender advances to certain agreed percentages of asset value. The allowed percentage generally increases as the asset progresses from land under development to residence subject to contract of sale. Advances for each type of collateral become due in whole or in part, subject to possible re-borrowing, and/or the collateral becomes excluded from the borrowing base, after a specified period or earlier upon sale. Concentration limitations further restrict availability under the credit facilities. The effect of these borrowing base and concentration limitations essentially is to mandate minimum levels of the Company’s investment in a project, with higher percentages of investment required at earlier phases of a project, and with greater absolute dollar amounts of investment required as a project progresses. Each revolving credit facility is secured by deeds of trust on the real property and improvements thereon owned by the Company in the subdivision project(s) approved by the respective lender, as well as pledges of all net sale proceeds, related contracts and other ancillary property. Also, each credit facility includes financial covenants, which may limit the amount that may be borrowed thereunder. Outstanding advances bear interest at various rates, which approximate the prime rate. As of December 31, 2006, $146.0 million was outstanding under these credit facilities, with a weighted-average interest rate of 7.71%, and the undrawn availability was $305.8 million as limited by the borrowing base formulas. Interest on the revolving credit facilities is calculated on the average, outstanding daily balance and is paid following the end of each month. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company borrowed $1.263 billion and repaid $1.167 billion under these facilities. The maximum amount outstanding was $228.3 million and the weighted average

40

borrowings were $152.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. Interest incurred on the revolving credit facilities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $13.6 million. Delaware Lyon has guaranteed on an unsecured basis California Lyon’s obligations under certain of the revolving credit facilities and has provided an unsecured environmental indemnity in favor of the lender under the $90.0 million bank line of credit. The Company routinely makes borrowings under its revolving credit facilities in the ordinary course of business within the maximum aggregate loan commitment amounts to fund its operations, including its land acquisition and home building activities, and repays such borrowings, as required by the credit facilities, with the net proceeds from sales of the real property, including homes, which secure the applicable credit facility.

Under the revolving credit facilities, the Company is required to comply with a number of covenants, the most restrictive of which require Delaware Lyon to maintain:

Ø A tangible net worth, as defined, of $200.0 million, adjusted upwards quarterly by 50% of Delaware Lyon’s quarterly net income after June 30, 2004;

Ø A ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, each as defined, of less than 3.25 to 1; and

Ø Minimum liquidity, as defined, of at least $10.0 million.

As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.

Construction Notes Payable

At December 31, 2006, the Company had construction notes payable on certain consolidated entities amounting to $70.4 million. The construction notes have various maturity dates through 2008 and bear interest at rates ranging from prime plus 0.25% to prime plus 2.0% at December 31, 2006. Interest is calculated on the average daily balance and is paid following the end of each month or upon maturity of the note.

Seller Financing

At December 31, 2006, the Company had $28.3 million of notes payable outstanding related to land acquisitions for which seller financing was provided. The seller financing notes have various maturity dates through March 2008 and bear interest at rates ranging from 9.0% to 12.0% at December 31, 2006. Interest is calculated on the average principal balance outstanding and is accrued and paid when the financing is repaid.

Revolving Mortgage Warehouse Credit Facilities

The Company, through its mortgage subsidiary and one of its unconsolidated joint ventures, has entered into two revolving mortgage warehouse credit facilities with banks to fund its mortgage origination operations. The original credit facility, which matures in May 2007, provides for revolving loans of up to $30.0 million outstanding, $20.0 million of which is committed (lender obligated to lend if stated conditions are satisfied) and $10.0 million is not committed (lender advances are optional even if stated conditions are otherwise satisfied). The Company’s mortgage subsidiary and one of its unconsolidated joint ventures entered into an additional $50.0 million credit facility which matures in April 2007. The Company expects the maturities to be extended by the lender at each maturity date for an additional year. Mortgage loans are generally held for a short period of time and are typically sold to investors within 7 to 15 days following funding. The facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of each of the borrowers, including the mortgage loans held for sale, all rights of each of the borrowers with respect to contractual obligations of third party investors to purchase such mortgage loans, and all proceeds of sale of such mortgage loans. The facilities, which have LIBOR based pricing, also contain certain financial covenants requiring the borrowers to maintain minimum tangible net worth, leverage, profitability and liquidity. These facilities are non-recourse and are not guaranteed by the Company. At December 31, 2006 the outstanding balance under these facilities was $59.4 million.

41

Land Banking Arrangements

The Company enters into purchase agreements with various land sellers. In some instances, and as a method of acquiring land in staged takedowns, thereby minimizing the use of funds from the Company’s revolving credit facilities and other corporate financing sources and limiting the Company’s risk, the Company transfers the Company’s right in such purchase agreements to entities owned by third parties (“land banking arrangements”). These entities use equity contributions and/or incur debt to finance the acquisition and development of the lots. The entities grant the Company an option to acquire lots in staged takedowns. In consideration for this option, the Company makes a non-refundable deposit of 15% to 25% of the total purchase price. The Company is under no obligation to purchase the balance of the lots, but would forfeit remaining deposits and be subject to penalties if the lots were not purchased. The Company does not have legal title to these entities or their assets and has not guaranteed their liabilities. These land banking arrangements help the Company manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings. The use of these land banking arrangements is dependent on, among other things, the availability of capital to the option provider, general housing market conditions and geographic preferences. As described in Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, Interpretation No. 46, requires the consolidation of the assets, liabilities and operations of four of the Company’s land banking arrangements including, as of December 31, 2006, real estate inventories of $69.1 million, which are included in real estate inventories not owned in the accompanying balance sheet. The Company participates in one land banking arrangement, which is not a VIE in accordance with Interpretation No. 46, and is not consolidated as of December 31, 2006. The deposits related to the unconsolidated land banking arrangement have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In addition, the Company participates in another land banking arrangement, which is not a VIE in accordance with Interpretation No. 46, but is consolidated in accordance with SFAS No. 49, Accounting for Product Financing Arrangements, (“FAS 49”). Under the provisions of FAS 49, the Company has determined it is economically compelled, based on certain factors, to purchase the land in the land banking arrangement, and therefore, must record the remaining purchase price of the land of $131.6 million, which is included in real estate inventories not owned and liabilities from inventories not owned in the accompanying balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company and an unaffiliated party formed a limited liability company (the “LLC”) for the purpose of acquiring 222 acres in the city of Pittsburg, California and developing the land into 533 residential home sites. The LLC was determined to be a variable interest entity and is consolidated in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the LLC sold 284 lots to the Company for a purchase price of $43.3 million. The lots were acquired through two land banking arrangements which have been determined to be VIEs and are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in real estate inventories not owned. The lots will be purchased from the two consolidated land banking arrangements on staged take-downs through 2008. Information pertaining to the two consolidated land banking arrangements is included in the table below. The intercompany land sales and related profits have been eliminated in consolidation.

42

Summary information with respect to the Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated land banking arrangements is as follows as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	Consolidated		Unconsolidated
Total number of land banking projects		5		1
Total number of lots		1,077		323
Total purchase price	$	272,164	$	64,000
Balance of lots still under option and not purchased:
Number of lots		1,027		323
Purchase price	$	200,670	$	64,000
Forfeited deposits if lots are not purchased	$	50,820	$	3,922

Joint Venture Financing

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are general partners or members in joint ventures involved in the development and sale of residential projects. As described more fully in Critical Accounting Policies—Variable Interest Entities certain joint ventures have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Because the Company already recognizes its proportionate share of joint venture earnings and losses under the equity method of accounting, the adoption of Interpretation No. 46 did not affect the Company’s consolidated net income. The financial statements of joint ventures in which the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary are not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). Income allocations and cash distributions to the Company from the unconsolidated joint ventures are based on predetermined formulas between the Company and its joint venture partners as specified in the applicable partnership or operating agreements. The Company generally receives, after partners’ priority returns and returns of partners’ capital, approximately 50% of the profits and cash flows from joint ventures. See Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the joint ventures whose financial statements have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. See Note 5 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for condensed combined financial information for the unconsolidated joint ventures. Based upon current estimates, substantially all future development and construction costs incurred by the joint ventures will be funded by the venture partners or from the proceeds of construction financing obtained by the joint ventures.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company’s investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures was $3.6 million and the venture partners’ investment in such joint ventures was $1.7 million. As of December 31, 2006, these joint ventures had obtained financing from construction lenders which amounted to $38.6 million of outstanding indebtedness.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, California Lyon and two unaffiliated parties formed a series of limited liability companies (“Development LLCs”) for the purpose of acquiring three parcels of land totaling 236 acres in Irvine and Tustin, California (formerly part of the Tustin Marine Corps Air Station) and developing the land into 1,910 residential homesites. As of December 31, 2005, the Development LLCs sold substantially all of the lots. During the year ended December 31, 2005, California Lyon purchased 829 lots from the Development LLCs for a purchase price of $183.6 million, of which 267 lots were purchased through three land banking arrangements for a purchase price of $84.1 million (see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the Company’s land banking arrangements). California Lyon has a 12 ¹/2%

43

indirect, minority interest in the Development LLCs and during the year ended December 31, 2005 earned income of $9.8 million from the sale of lots by the Development LLCs, of which $5.2 million was deferred as a reduction to the cost basis of the lots purchased by California Lyon and will be recognized when homes are constructed on the lots and sold to third parties.

The Company is a member in an unconsolidated joint venture limited liability company formed for the purpose of acquiring and developing land in Pahrump, Nevada. At December 31, 2006, the unconsolidated joint venture had outstanding land acquisition and development debt of $36.8 million, of which the Company guaranteed $18.4 million.

Assessment District Bonds

In some jurisdictions in which the Company develops and constructs property, assessment district bonds are issued by municipalities to finance major infrastructure improvements and fees. Such financing has been an important part of financing master-planned communities due to the long-term nature of the financing, favorable interest rates when compared to the Company’s other sources of funds and the fact that the bonds are sold, administered and collected by the relevant government entity. As a landowner benefited by the improvements, the Company is responsible for the assessments on its land. When the Company’s homes or other properties are sold, the assessments are either prepaid or the buyers assume the responsibility for the related assessments. See Note 10 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Cash Flows — Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

Net cash used in operating activities decreased to $22.2 million in the 2006 period from $44.5 million in the 2005 period. The change was primarily as a result of (i) an increase in net changes in accrued expenses to a decrease of $112.7 million in the 2006 period from a decrease of $90.9 million in the 2005 period, (ii) decreased expenditures in real estate inventories owned to $147.8 million in the 2006 period from $232.2 million in the 2005 period, (iii) an increase in net changes in receivables to an increase of $24.0 million in the 2006 period from a decrease of $104.2 million in the 2005 period, (iv) a decrease in provision for income taxes to $48.9 million in the 2006 period from $124.1 million in the 2005 period, (v) impairment loss on real estate assets of $39.9 million in the 2006 period compared to $4.6 million in the 2005 period, and (vi) a decrease in net income to $74.8 million in the 2006 period from $190.6 million in the 2005 period. The decrease in real estate inventories is primarily attributable to a decrease in land acquisitions during the 2006 period. The softening in the Company’s markets which began in 2005 and continued in 2006 has decreased the amount of land acquisitions by the Company during the 2006 period. The increase in net changes in accrued expenses is primarily attributable to a net decrease in income taxes payable of $31.3 million during the 2006 period from a balance of $35.5 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to $4.2 million as of December 31, 2006 and a net decrease in accrued bonus expense of $32.3 million during the 2006 period, from a balance of $71.8 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to $39.4 million as of December 31, 2006. Comparatively, during the 2005 period, the net increase in income taxes payable was $4.5 million in the 2005 period, from a balance of $31.0 as of December 31, 2004 compared to a balance of $35.5 million as of December 31, 2005 and a net increase in accrued bonus expense of $12.2 million from a balance of $59.6 million as of December 31, 2004 compared to a balance of $71.8 million as of December 31, 2005. The changes identified above for the two periods in the year ending December 31, 2006 are recurring in nature and are attributable to the timing of bonus payments and estimated income tax payments made, offset by normal accruals for the period. The increase in net changes in receivables is attributable to a decrease in escrow proceeds receivable of $37.0 million during the 2006 period, from a balance of $84.3 million as of December 31, 2005 to a balance of $47.3 million as of December 31, 2006 compared to a net increase of $69.3 million during the 2005 period, from a balance of $15.0 million as of December 31, 2004 to a balance of $84.3 million as of December 31, 2005. The large balance as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was temporary in nature and primarily due to a significant number of homes closed in the last five days of the year of 192 in 2006 and 254 in 2005 where the homes had closed escrow but the Company had not yet received the funds from the escrow and title companies. The entire balance of escrow proceeds receivable at December 31, 2006 and

44

2005 was collected within the first few days of the following period. The remaining increase in the change in receivables is primarily attributable to a net increase in first trust deed mortgage notes receivables of $11.9 million during the 2006 period to $59.7 million as of December 31, 2006 from $47.8 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to a net increase of $33.2 million during the 2005 period to $47.8 million as of December 31, 2005 from $14.7 million as of December 31, 2004. This increase was also attributable to the significant number of homes closed in the last week of the year in 2006 and 2005 as described above. Substantially all of the balance of first trust deed mortgage notes receivables was collected in the first few days of January 2007 and 2006 when the loans were sold to third party investors. The successful issuance of the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes in 2003 and the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes and 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes in 2004, offset by the repayment of the 12 ¹/2% Senior Notes, provided the Company with increased financial resources. The risks inherent in purchasing and developing land increase as consumer demand for housing decreases. Thus, the Company may have bought and developed land on which it cannot profitably build and sell homes. The market value of land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, the Company may have to sell homes at significantly lower margins or at a loss.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities decreased to a use of $2.8 million in the 2006 period from a source of $16.5 million in the 2005 period. The change was primarily as a result of a decrease in net distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures from net distributions of $20.5 million in the 2005 period to no comparable amount in the 2006 period.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities decreased to a source of $11.3 million in the 2006 period from a use of $15.7 million in the 2005 period, primarily as a result of minority interest distributions of $147.0 million in the 2006 period compared to minority interest distributions of $76.7 million in the 2005 period, offset by an increase in net borrowings on notes payable to $157.9 million in the 2006 period from $60.7 million in the 2005 period.

Cash Flows — Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities changed from a source of $87.3 million in 2004 to a use of $44.5 million in 2005. The change was primarily as a result of (i) an increase in equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures from a loss of $0.7 million in 2004 to income of $4.3 million in 2005, (ii) an increase in distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures from none in 2004 to $2.7 million in 2005, (iii) a decrease in net changes in receivables from an increase of $9.2 million in 2004 to a decrease of $104.2 million in 2005 and (iv) increased net expenditures in real estate inventories from $195.3 million in 2004 to $232.2 million in 2005. The increase in net changes in receivables is attributable to a decrease in escrow proceeds receivable of $69.3 million during the 2005 period, from a balance of $15.0 million as of December 31, 2004 to a balance of $84.3 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to a net decrease of $20.7 million during the 2004 period, from a balance of $35.7 million as of December 31, 2003 to a balance of $15.0 million as of December 31, 2005. The large balance as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was temporary in nature and primarily due to a significant increase in the number of homes closed in the last five days of the year to in 2005 from 254 in 2004 where the homes had closed escrow but the Company had not yet received the funds from the escrow and title companies. The entire balance of escrow proceeds receivable at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was collected within the first few days of the following period. The successful issuance of the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes in 2003 and the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes and 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes in 2004, offset by the repayment of the 12 ¹/2% Senior Notes (as described in financing activities below), provided the Company with increased financial resources. The risks inherent in purchasing and developing land increase as consumer demand for housing decreases. Thus, the Company may have bought and developed land on which it cannot profitably build and sell homes. The market value of land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, the Company may have to sell homes at significantly lower margins or at a loss.

45

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities changed from a use of $17.1 million in 2004 to a source of $16.5 million in 2005. The change was primarily as a result of (i) a decrease in investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures from $9.4 million in 2004 to $1.4 million in 2005, (ii) an increase in distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures from $10.1 million in 2004 to $20.5 million in 2005 and (iii) a decrease in purchases of property and equipment from $17.8 million in 2004 to $2.6 million in 2005, due to the purchase of an aircraft in 2004.

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities decreased from a source of $1.7 million in 2004 to a use of $15.7 million in 2005. The change was primarily as a result of (i) an increase in net borrowings on notes payable from net principal payments of $127.4 million in 2004 to net borrowings of $60.7 million in 2005, (ii) the issuance of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes and the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes in 2004 with no issuance of senior notes in 2005, (iii) a decrease in net minority interest distributions from $86.8 million in 2004 to $76.7 million in 2005 and (iv) the repurchase of shares of common stock of $81.0 million in 2004 with no comparable amount in 2005.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company enters into certain off-balance sheet arrangements including joint venture financing, option agreements, land banking arrangements and variable interests in consolidated and unconsolidated entities. These arrangements are more fully described above and in Notes 2, 5 and 11 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Contractual Obligations

The Company’s contractual obligations consisted of the following at December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

			Payments due by period
Contractual obligations (note 1)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Revolving credit facilities	$	161,353	$	49,377	$	111,976	$	—	$	—
Construction notes payable		72,248		67,468		4,780		—		—
Seller financing		31,802		16,604		15,198		—		—
Mortgage Warehouse Credit Facility		61,046		61,046		—		—		—
7 5/8% Senior Notes		218,625		11,438		22,875		22,875		161,437
10 3/4% Senior Notes		417,969		26,875		53,750		53,750		283,594
7 1/2% Senior Notes		230,156		11,250		22,500		22,500		173,906
Operating leases		7,124		2,825		3,251		1,048		—
Purchase obligations:
Land purchases and option commitments		407,665		228,010		124,536		55,119		—
Project commitments		395,788		305,532		60,171		30,085		—
Total	$	2,003,776	$	780,425	$	419,037	$	185,377	$	618,937

(1) The summary of contractual obligations above includes interest on all interest-bearing obligations. Interest on all fixed rate interest-bearing obligations is based on the stated rate and is calculated to the stated maturity date. Interest on all variable rate interest bearing obligations is based on the rates effective as of December 31, 2006 and is calculated to the stated maturity date.

Inflation

The Company’s revenues and profitability may be affected by increased inflation rates and other general economic conditions. In periods of high inflation, demand for the Company’s homes may be reduced by increases in mortgage interest rates. Further, the Company’s profits will be affected by its ability to recover through higher sales prices increases in the costs of land, construction, labor and administrative expenses. The Company’s ability to raise prices at such times will depend upon demand and other competitive factors.

46

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and costs and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those which impact its most critical accounting policies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the following accounting policies are among the most important to a portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require among the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments:

Real Estate Inventories and Cost of Sales

Real estate inventories are carried at cost net of impairment losses, if any. Real estate inventories consist primarily of deposits, raw land, lots under development, homes under construction and completed homes of real estate projects. All direct and indirect land costs, offsite and onsite improvements and applicable interest and other carrying charges are capitalized to real estate projects during periods when the project is under development. Land, offsite costs and all other common costs are allocated to land parcels benefited based upon relative fair values before construction. Onsite construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and property taxes) are allocated to the individual homes within a phase based upon the relative sales value of the homes. The estimation process involved in determining relative fair values and sales values is inherently uncertain because it involves estimates of current market values for land parcels before construction as well as future sales values of individual homes within a phase. The Company’s estimate of future sales values is supported by the Company’s budgeting process. The estimate of future sales values is inherently uncertain because it requires estimates of current market conditions as well as future market events and conditions. Additionally, in determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel or individual home, the Company relies on project budgets that are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about construction schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is possible that actual results could differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including construction delays, increases in costs which have not yet been committed, or unforeseen issues encountered during construction that fall outside the scope of contracts obtained. While the actual results for a particular construction project are accurately reported over time, a variance between the budget and actual costs could result in the understatement or overstatement of costs and a related impact on gross margins in a specific reporting period. To reduce the potential for such distortion, the Company has set forth procedures which have been applied by the Company on a consistent basis, including assessing and revising project budgets on a monthly basis, obtaining commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred, reviewing the adequacy of warranty accruals and historical warranty claims experience, and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs. The variances between budget and actual amounts identified by the Company have historically not had a material impact on its consolidated results of operations. Management believes that the Company’s policies provide for reasonably dependable estimates to be used in the calculation and reporting of costs. The Company relieves its accumulated real estate inventories through cost of sales for the cost of homes sold, as described more fully below in the section entitled “Sales and Profit Recognition.”

Impairment of Real Estate Inventories

The Company accounts for its real estate inventories under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“Statement No. 144”). Statement No. 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on real estate inventories when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by real estate inventories are less than the carrying amount of such assets. The estimation process used in determining the undiscounted cash flows of the assets is inherently uncertain because it involves estimates of future revenues and costs. As described more fully above in the section entitled “Real Estate Inventories and Cost

47

of Sales”, estimates of revenues and costs are supported by the Company’s budgeting process. When an impairment loss is required for assets to be held and used by the Company, the related assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, include a non-cash charge of $39.9 million to record an impairment loss on real estate assets held by the Company at certain of its homebuilding projects. The impairment was primarily attributable to slower than anticipated home sales and lower than anticipated net revenue due to softening market conditions. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Accordingly, the related real estate assets were written-down to their estimated fair value. The non-cash charge is reflected in impairment loss on real estate assets in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a non-cash charge of $4.6 million to record an impairment loss related to a golf course in the Company’s San Diego Division. The impairment loss was primarily attributable to lower than expected cash flows and continued net operating losses since the golf course opened in 2002. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the assets carrying amount. Accordingly, the golf course asset was written-down to its estimated fair value. The non-cash charge had been previously reflected in other operating costs in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2005. However, such amount has been reclassified to loss on impairment of real estate assets to be consistent with the financial statement presentation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Fair value represents the amount at which an asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than a forced or liquidation sale. The estimation process involved in determining if assets have been impaired and in the determination of fair value is inherently uncertain because it requires estimates of current market yields as well as future events and conditions. Such future events and conditions include economic and market conditions, as well as the availability of suitable financing to fund development and construction activities. The realization of the Company’s real estate inventories is dependent upon future uncertain events and conditions and, accordingly, the actual timing and amounts realized by the Company may be materially different from their estimated fair values.

Sales and Profit Recognition

A sale is recorded and profit recognized when a sale is consummated, the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate, any receivables are not subject to future subordination, and the usual risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. When it is determined that the earnings process is not complete, profit is deferred for recognition in future periods. The profit recorded by the Company is based on the calculation of cost of sales which is dependent on the Company’s allocation of costs which is described in more detail above in the section entitled “Real Estate Inventories and Cost of Sales”.

Variable Interest Entities

Certain land purchase contracts and lot option contracts are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as amended (“Interpretation No. 46”). In addition, all joint ventures are reviewed and analyzed under Interpretation No. 46 to determine whether or not these arrangements are accounted for under the principles of Interpretation No. 46 or other accounting rules. Under Interpretation No. 46, a variable interest entity (“VIE”) is created when (i) the equity investment at risk in the entity is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) the entity’s equity holders as a group either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity through voting or similar rights, (b) are not

48

obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity if they occur or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE pursuant to Interpretation No. 46, the enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Expected losses and residual returns for VIEs are calculated based on the probability of estimated future cash flows as defined in Interpretation No. 46. Based on the provisions of Interpretation No. 46, whenever the Company enters into a land purchase contract or an option contract for land or lots with an entity and makes a non-refundable deposit, or enters into a joint venture, a VIE may be created and the arrangement is evaluated under Interpretation No. 46. In order to (i) evaluate whether the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties, (ii) calculate expected losses, expected residual returns and the probability of estimated future cash flows, and (iii) determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company must exercise significant judgment regarding the interpretation of the terms of the underlying agreements in light of Interpretation No. 46 and make assumptions regarding future events that may or may not occur. The terms of these agreements are subject to various interpretations and the assumptions used by the Company are inherently uncertain. The use by the Company of different interpretations and/or assumptions could affect the Company’s evaluation as to whether or not land purchase contracts, lot option contracts or joint ventures are VIEs and whether or not the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Related Party Transactions

See Item 13 and Note 10 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a description of the Company’s transactions with related parties.

Tender Offer and Merger

On March 17, 2006, General William Lyon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, announced that he commenced an offer to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock of William Lyon Homes not already owned by him for $93.00 per share in cash. The expiration date for the tender offer at the time of the offer was Thursday, April 13, 2006, unless the offer were extended.

The offer was subject to the non-waivable condition that there shall have been validly tendered and not withdrawn before the offer expires at least a majority of the outstanding shares not owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust, The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust or the officers and directors of William Lyon Homes immediately before the commencement of the offer. The offer was also subject to the receipt by General Lyon of the proceeds under his financing commitment from Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc. The offer was also subject to other terms and conditions as set forth in the tender offer materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and distributed to William Lyon Homes’ stockholders, and was initially subject to the further condition that sufficient shares were tendered in the offer such that the tendered shares, together with the shares already directly or indirectly owned by General Lyon and the trusts, would represent at least 90% of the shares outstanding upon expiration of the offer.

On March 23, 2006, the Company announced that its board of directors had formed a special committee of independent directors to consider the offer by General Lyon with the assistance of outside financial and legal advisors which the special committee retained. On April 10, 2006, General Lyon announced that he would amend his tender offer for all the outstanding shares of William Lyon Homes by increasing the offer price to $100 per share. The special committee determined that it would recommend that stockholders tender their shares in connection with the amended offer. General Lyon also extended his offer until Friday, April 21, 2006. General Lyon had also reached an agreement, subject to final court approval, to settle certain class action lawsuits that had been filed in Delaware on behalf of William Lyon Homes’ stockholders. As described below in Note 7 –

49

Commitments and Contingencies, the Delaware Chancery Court approved the settlement on August 9, 2006. Another class action lawsuit filed in California has been stayed by the California court.

On April 24, 2006, General Lyon announced that he was extending his tender offer for all outstanding shares of William Lyon Homes not owned by him through April 28, 2006, and that he would waive the 90% condition to the offer. On May 1, 2006, General Lyon announced that he was further extending the tender offer through May 12, 2006, and that he was further amending the tender offer by increasing the offer price to $109.00 per share. All other terms and conditions of the offer remain the same, as set forth in the tender offer materials disseminated by General Lyon.

On May 18, 2006, General Lyon announced the completion of his tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company not already owned by him for $109.00 net per share in cash. Computershare Trust Company of New York, the depositary for the offer, had advised General Lyon that an aggregate of 1,711,125 shares were tendered in the offer, including 310,652 shares that remained subject to guaranteed delivery procedures. The shares tendered in the offer, together with the shares already owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, represented over 90% of the outstanding shares of the Company, which would be sufficient to enable General Lyon to effect a short-form merger with the Company under Delaware law.

On July 26, 2006, General Lyon announced that on July 25, 2006, WLH Acquisition Corp., a corporation owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, was merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock (except for shares owned by WLH Acquisition Corp. and by stockholders who properly exercise their appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law) was cancelled and converted into the right to receive $109.00 per share in cash, without interest, which is the same consideration that was paid for shares of the Company in the tender offer by General Lyon. Shareholders of the Company as of the effective time of the merger were sent additional information by mail on the process for receiving the merger consideration or exercising their appraisal rights.

Prior to the completion of the merger, General Lyon and the two trusts contributed all the shares of the Company owned by them, which constituted more than 90% of the outstanding shares, to WLH Acquisition Corp. WLH Acquisition Corp. was then merged with and into the Company pursuant to the short-form merger provisions of Delaware law. Prior to the merger, the Company had cancelled and retired 1,275,000 shares of its common stock which had been repurchased and were being held in the treasury. After the merger, the Company’s equity consists of 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The Company will continue as a privately held company, wholly owned by General Lyon and the two trusts.

See “Part I—Item 3. Legal Proceedings” for information on certain lawsuits which have been filed relating to General Lyon’s proposal.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FAS 157 is not expected to materially affect how we determine fair value.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial

50

Statements, (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected financial statement misstatements should be considered in current year financial statements. SAB 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both balance sheet and income statement approaches and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relative quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation, among other things, creates a two step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. FIN 48 specifically prohibits the use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions, and it has expanded disclosure requirements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, in which the impact of adoption should be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company is evaluating the provisions of FIN 48 and has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 29, 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-05, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“EITF 04-05”). The scope of EITF 04-05 is limited to limited partnerships or similar entities (such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership) that are not variable interest entities under Interpretation No. 46 and provides a new framework for addressing when a general partner in a limited partnership, or managing member in the case of a limited liability company, controls the entity. Under EITF 04-05, the Company may be required to consolidate certain investments in which the Company holds a general partner or managing member interest. EITF 04-05 was effective after June 29, 2005 for new entities formed after such date and for existing entities for which the agreements are subsequently modified and was effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006 for all other entities. The adoption of EITF 04-05 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006. EITF 04-05 may require the consolidation of the assets, liabilities and operations of certain of the Company’s homebuilding and land development joint ventures. Since the Company already recognizes its proportionate share of joint venture earnings and losses under the equity method of accounting, the adoption of EITF 04-05 will not impact the Company’s consolidated net income.

Forward-Looking Statements

Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as some statements by the Company in periodic press releases and some oral statements by Company officials to securities analysts and stockholders during presentations about the Company are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Statements which are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or which include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, “hopes”, and similar expressions constitute forward- looking statements. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible future Company actions, which may be provided by management are also forward-looking statements as defined in the Act. Forward-looking statements are based upon expectations and projections about future events and are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties about, among other things, the Company, economic and market factors and the homebuilding industry.

Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. The principal factors that could cause the Company’s actual performance and

51

future events and actions to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, changes in general economic conditions either nationally or in regions in which the Company operates, terrorism or other hostilities involving the United States, whether an ownership change occurred which could, under certain circumstances, have resulted in the limitation of the Company’s ability to offset prior years’ taxable income with net operating losses, changes in home mortgage interest rates, changes in generally accepted accounting principles or interpretations of those principles, changes in prices of homebuilding materials, labor shortages, adverse weather conditions, the occurrence of events such as landslides, soil subsidence and earthquakes that are uninsurable, not economically insurable or not subject to effective indemnification agreements, changes in governmental laws and regulations, whether the Company is able to refinance the outstanding balances of its debt obligation at their maturity, the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals and the opening of projects and the availability and cost of land for future growth. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by the Company include, but are not limited to, those factors or conditions described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The Company’s past performance or past or present economic conditions in the Company’s housing markets are not indicative of future performance or conditions. Investors are urged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or changes to projections over time unless required by federal securities law.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to the Company’s floating rate debt with a total outstanding balance at December 31, 2006 of $265.6 million where the interest rate is variable based upon certain bank reference or prime rates. If interest rates were to increase by 10%, the estimated impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be no reduction to income before provision for income taxes based on amounts outstanding and rates in effect at December 31, 2006, but would increase capitalized interest by approximately $1.7 million which would be amortized to cost of sales as home closings occur.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The consolidated financial statements of William Lyon Homes and the reports of the independent registered public accounting firm, listed under Item 15, are submitted as a separate section of this report beginning on page 80 and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Although the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, there can be no assurance that such disclosure controls and procedures will always achieve their stated goals under all circumstances.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange

52

Act of 1934, as amended) that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f), and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Based on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, the Company’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.

The assessment by the Company’s management of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that is included herein.

53

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

William Lyon Homes

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that William Lyon Homes maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The management of William Lyon Homes is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that William Lyon Homes maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, William Lyon Homes maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of William Lyon Homes as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated March 2, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

March 2, 2007

Item 9B.    Other Information

None.

54

PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information Regarding the Directors of William Lyon Homes

The following table lists the Directors of the Company and provides their respective ages and current positions with the Company as of March 1, 2007. Each director holds office until the Company’s next Annual Meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Except as described below, there are no family relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer of William Lyon Homes. Biographical information for each Director is provided below.

Name	Age	Position
General William Lyon	83	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Douglas F. Bauer	45	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
William H. Lyon	33	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Douglas K. Ammerman (a, b, c)	55	Director
Wade H. Cable	58	Director
Richard E. Frankel	61	Director
Harold H. Greene (a, b, c)	67	Director
Lawrence M. Higby (a, b, c)	61	Director
Gary H. Hunt (a, b, c)	58	Director
Arthur B. Laffer (b, c)	66	Director
Alex Meruelo (a, b, c)	44	Director

(a) Member of the Audit Committee

(b) Member of the Compensation Committee

(c) Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

GENERAL WILLIAM LYON was elected director and Chairman of the Board of the former The Presley Companies in 1987 and has served the Company in that capacity since November 1999. General Lyon is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. General Lyon also serves as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the former William Lyon Homes, which sold substantially all of its assets to the Company in 1999 and subsequently changed its name to Corporate Enterprises, Inc. In recognition of his distinguished career in real estate development, General Lyon was elected to the California Building Industry Foundation Hall of Fame in 1985. General Lyon is a retired USAF Major General and was Chief of the Air Force Reserve from 1975 to 1979. General Lyon is a director of Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. and is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Commercial Bank of California.

DOUGLAS F. BAUER, President and Chief Operating Officer, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Mr. Bauer had served as Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Northern California Region President since his hire in January 1989. Effective on July 1, 2005, Mr. Bauer was appointed Executive Vice President. Effective on March 1, 2007, Mr. Bauer was appointed as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Prior experience includes seven years at Security Pacific National Bank in Los Angeles, California in various financial positions. Mr. Bauer has more than 20 years experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.

WILLIAM H. LYON, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, son of Chairman William Lyon, worked full time with the former William Lyon Homes from November 1997 through November 1999 as an assistant project manager, has been employed by the Company since November 1999 and has been a member of the board of directors since January 25, 2000. Since joining the Company, Mr. Lyon has been employed as an

55

assistant project manager and project manager and has participated in a training program designed to expose him to the many facets of real estate development. From February 2003 until February 2005, he served as the Company’s Director of Corporate Affairs. In February 2005, he was appointed Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company. Effective on March 1, 2007, Mr. Lyon was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Lyon received a dual B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Product Design from Stanford University in 1997.

DOUGLAS K. AMMERMAN was appointed to the Board of Directors on February 27, 2007. Mr. Ammerman’s business career includes almost three decades of service with KPMG, independent public accountants, until his retirement in 2002. He was the Managing Partner of the Orange County office and was the National Partner in Charge — Tax. He is a certified public accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Ammerman is a member of the Board of Directors of Fidelity National Financial (a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange), where he also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. He also is a member of the Board of Directors of Quicksilver (a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange), where he also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee, a member of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He also is a member of the Board of Directors of El Pollo Loco, where he also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Ammerman has served as a director of The Pacific Club for twelve years and is a past president. He also has served as a director of the UCI Foundation for fourteen years.

WADE H. CABLE served from 1985 to 1999 as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of the former The Presley Companies and has served as a director and President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since November 1999. Effective on March 1, 2007, Mr. Cable retired from the Company as President and Chief Operating Officer but remains as a member of the Board of Directors. Prior to joining The Presley Companies, he worked for thirteen years with Pacific Enterprises as a senior executive in various of its real estate operations, including two years as an Executive Vice President of Pacific Lighting Real Estate Group and four years as the President of Fredricks Development Company, a residential developer and homebuilder.

RICHARD E. FRANKEL has been associated with homebuilding entities for over 25 years, and joined the board of directors on January 25, 2000. From 1977 to 1997, he held key positions including Chief Financial Officer, Investment Division Manager, Vice Chairman and President of the former William Lyon Homes. Until December 31, 2005, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of William Lyon Financial Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. He is also a director of Commercial Bank of California.

HAROLD H. GREENE joined the board of directors on October 17, 2005. Mr. Greene is a 40-year veteran of the commercial and residential real estate lending industry. He most recently served as the Managing Director for Bank of America’s California Commercial Real Estate Division from 1998 to 2001 where he was responsible for lending to commercial real estate developers in California and managed an investment portfolio of approximately $2.6 billion. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Greene was the Executive Vice President of SeaFirst Bank in Seattle, Washington and prior to that he served as the Vice Chairman of MetroBank from 1989 to 1990 and in various positions, including Senior Vice President in charge of the Asset Based Finance Group, with Union Bank, where he worked for 27 years. Mr. Greene currently serves as a director of Gary’s and Company (men’s clothing retailer) and as a director and member of the audit committee of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (real estate investments). He also serves as a director and member of the audit committee of NNN Realty Advisors (real estate management).

LAWRENCE M. HIGBY was appointed to the Board of Directors on January 17, 2006 and has more than 30 years of corporate executive experience. As Chief Executive Officer of Apria Healthcare, the nation’s largest integrated home healthcare provider, Mr. Higby leads Apria’s strategic direction and oversees the company’s operations, marketing and sales strategies, government relations, clinical services, regulatory compliance, acquisitions, human resources, finance and information systems functions. In addition, Mr. Higby serves as a board member of the Automobile Club of Southern California, the Orange County Performing Arts Center, the South Coast Repertory, and the American Association for Homecare (AAHomecare) for which he is an active

56

member of its executive committee. Prior to joining Apria Healthcare in 1997, Mr. Higby served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Unocal’s 76 Products Company and Group Vice President of Unocal Corporation from 1994 to 1997. From 1986 to 1994, Mr. Higby held various positions with The Times Mirror Company. From 1974 through 1985, he held executive management positions in sales and marketing at various divisions of New York-based PepsiCo.

GARY H. HUNT joined the board of directors on October 17, 2005. He has more than three decades of experience in government, business, major land use planning and development, as well as governmental and political affairs. Since 2001, Mr. Hunt has been the Managing Partner of California Strategies, LLC, a strategic consulting firm, in Newport Beach, California with offices in Sacramento and Los Angeles. Formerly Executive Vice President and a member of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee of The Irvine Company, a real estate developer, for which Mr. Hunt worked for 24 years, Mr. Hunt’s career also includes staff and appointed positions with the California State Legislature, U.S. House of Representatives, California Governor Ronald Reagan, and President George W. Bush. He currently serves as Chairman of the California Bay Delta Authority. He also currently serves as a director of Glenair Inc., a manufacturer of electrical connector accessories and as Chairman of the Board of Advisors of Kennecott Land Company, a real estate land developer in Utah. He also serves as a director and member of the audit committee of NNN Realty Advisors (real estate management).

ARTHUR B. LAFFER joined the board of directors on October 17, 2005. He is the Founder and has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Laffer Associates, an economic research and financial consulting firm, in San Diego, California. Dr. Laffer has also been Chief Executive Officer of Laffer Advisers Inc., a broker-dealer, since 1981, and Chief Executive Officer of Laffer Investments, an investment money management firm, since 1999. Dr. Laffer has been a leader in the nation in providing economic research and global investment- research consulting services to real estate asset managers, pension funds, financial institutions, and top corporations. Commonly known as “The Father of Supply-Side Economics,” Dr. Laffer is a founding member of the U.S. Congressional Policy Advisory Board, served two terms as a member of President Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board, and helped shape public policy with his involvement in California’s Proposition 13, the groundbreaking California initiative that drastically cut state property taxes in 1978. Dr. Laffer is a member of the board of directors and chairman of the audit and compensation committees of OXiGENE, Inc. (biopharmaceuticals); a member of the board of directors of Veolia Environment (environmental management); and a member of the board of directors and a member of the audit and compensation committees of MPS Group, Inc. (business services provider).

ALEX MERUELO has invested extensively in residential and commercial real estate throughout Southern California since 1987, primarily in Hispanic neighborhoods. Mr. Meruelo currently is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Meruelo Enterprises, Inc., Cantamar Property Management, Inc. and La Pizza Loca, Inc. Mr. Meruelo currently owns and manages over 1,000 residential units and over 20 retail units and has overseen over 15 developments. Mr. Meruelo established La Pizza Loca, a fast food pizza restaurant, in 1986 and which now has over 50 franchised and company owned restaurants serving Latino communities throughout Southern California. Since 1999, Mr. Meruelo has focused his endeavors on the construction industry and, through Meruelo Enterprises, owns a number of established Southern California utility construction contractors including Herman Weissker, Inc., Doty Bros. Equipment Company and Tidwell Excavating. He has been a member of the board of directors since May 10, 2004. Mr. Meruelo is also a member of the board of directors and chairman of the audit committee of Commercial Bank of California.

Audit Committee. The Company has a standing Audit Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Harold H. Greene and consists of Messrs. Greene, Ammerman, Higby, Hunt and Meruelo. Mr. Ammerman’s appointment as a member of the Audit Committee was effective on February 27, 2007, the date he was appointed to the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that all committee members are independent and financially literate under the standards established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). The Board has determined that Mr. Greene is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

57

Information Regarding Executive Officers of William Lyon Homes

The executive officers of the Company are chosen annually by the Board of Directors and each holds office until his or her successor is chosen and qualified or until his or her death, resignation or removal. There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer of the Company, except for William Lyon and William H. Lyon, who are father and son. The following table lists the Company’s executive officers and provides their respective ages as of March 1, 2007 and their current positions.

Name	Age	Position
General William Lyon	83	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Douglas F. Bauer	45	President and Chief Operating Officer
William H. Lyon	33	Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Mary J. Connelly	55	Senior Vice President and Nevada Region President
W. Thomas Hickcox	54	Senior Vice President and Arizona Region President
Thomas J. Mitchell	46	Senior Vice President and Southern California Coastal Region President
Larry I. Smith	52	Senior Vice President and Inland Empire California Region President
Michael D. Grubbs	48	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
W. Douglass Harris	63	Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary
Richard S. Robinson	60	Senior Vice President — Finance
Cynthia E. Hardgrave	58	Vice President — Tax and Internal Audit

Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors, subject to rights, if any, under contracts of employment. See “Employment Contracts” in Part III, Item 11. Biographical information for General Lyon, Mr. Bauer and Mr. William H. Lyon is provided above. See “Information Regarding the Directors of William Lyon Homes”.

MARY J. CONNELLY, Senior Vice President and Nevada Region President, joined The Presley Companies in May 1995, after eight years’ association with Gateway Development, six of which were served as Managing Partner in Nevada. Ms. Connelly was Vice President — Finance for the Company’s San Diego Division from 1985 to 1987, and she has more than 20 years experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.

W. THOMAS HICKCOX, Senior Vice President and Arizona Region President, joined the Company in May 2000. Mr. Hickcox was previously President of Continental Homes in Phoenix, Arizona, with 16 years of service at that company. Mr. Hickcox has more than 20 years experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.

THOMAS J. MITCHELL, Senior Vice President and Southern California Coastal Region President, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Mr. Mitchell had served as a Project Manager, Vice President, and Division President since his hire in December 1988. Mr. Mitchell has more than 20 years experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.

LARRY I. SMITH, Senior Vice President and Inland Empire California Region President, joined The Presley Companies in May 1995 and has served the Company in that capacity since November 1999, after six years as Vice President and Southern California Division Manager of Coleman Homes, Inc. Previous experience includes ten years in sales and marketing executive positions and consulting activities with southern California real estate firms. Mr. Smith has more than 20 years experience in the real estate development and homebuilding industry.

MICHAEL D. GRUBBS, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Mr. Grubbs had served as

58

Vice President and Corporate Controller after his hire in December 1992. Mr. Grubbs has more than 20 years experience in residential real estate and homebuilding finance.

W. DOUGLASS HARRIS, Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary joined The Presley Companies in June 1992 and has served the Company in that capacity since November 1999. Mr. Harris has served as the Corporate Secretary of the Company since October 2002. Previously, Mr. Harris spent seven years with Shapell Industries, Inc., another major California homebuilder, as its Vice President and Corporate Controller. Mr. Harris has been involved with the real estate development and homebuilding industry for more than 30 years.

RICHARD S. ROBINSON, Senior Vice President — Finance, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Mr. Robinson had served since May 1997 as Senior Vice President, and as Vice President — Treasurer and other administrative positions at The William Lyon Company or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates since his hire in June 1979. His experience in residential real estate development and homebuilding finance totals more than 30 years.

CYNTHIA E. HARDGRAVE, Vice President — Tax and Internal Audit, joined the Company in 1999 when it acquired substantially all of the assets of the former William Lyon Homes, where Ms. Hardgrave had served in various tax management positions since her hire in July 1989. Ms. Hardgrave has more than 20 years experience in real estate tax and audit.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely upon a review of reports received by the Company during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2006 pursuant to Rule 16a-3(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, all reports required during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2006 on Form 3, Form 4 and Form 5 were timely filed by the Company’s directors, officers and 10% stockholders.

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that is applicable to all directors, employees, and officers of the Company. The Code of Ethics constitutes the Company’s “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Company’s “code of business conduct and ethics” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. The Company intends to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Ethics, or waivers of such provisions applicable to the Company’s directors and executive officers, on the Company’s website at www.lyonhomes.com.

The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.lyonhomes.com. In addition, printed copies of the Code of Ethics are available upon written request to Investor Relations, William Lyon Homes, 4490 Von Karman Avenue, Newport Beach, California 92660.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Attracting, retaining, and motivating well-qualified executives is essential to the success of any company. This is particularly the case with us, as our industry is highly competitive and is subject to market fluctuations beyond our control. In light of the highly competitive market for top executive talent in our industry, the goals of our compensation program are to provide significant rewards for successful performance, and to encourage retention of top executives who may have attractive opportunities at other companies. At the same time, we try to keep our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs at competitive levels when compared with other major homebuilders.

59

Our compensation decisions are made by the Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent outside members of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee receives recommendations from our senior executives and consults with outside independent compensation consultants, such as Kenneth R. Abel, Ph.D, as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee and its consultants also consider publicly-available information on the executive compensation of other major homebuilders. Members of our executive team are involved in the compensation process by assembling data to present to the Compensation Committee and by working with the outside independent compensation consultants to give them the information necessary to enable them to complete their reports.

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to reporting companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to each of the company’s chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated officers, except for compensation that is “performance based.” Since we no longer have a class of publicly-traded equity securities outstanding, we are no longer subject to Section 162(m), and therefore it is not a factor in our compensation decisions.

Elements Of Compensation

Salary

Our Compensation Committee generally reviews the base salary of our named executive officers annually. In view of our desire to reward performance and loyalty while keeping SG&A costs competitive, we do not regard salary as the principal component of the compensation of our named executive officers. We believe that the salaries of our named executive officers are very conservative when compared with the salaries paid by other major homebuilders to similar officers.

Bonuses

Near the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee sets objective performance criteria for the bonuses of named executive officers for that year. Although the Compensation Committee sets the objective performance criteria at the beginning of each year, in practice the objective performance criteria have been essentially the same for the past several years. We believe that the virtual uniformity of the objective performance criteria over the past several years has helped to reward productivity and loyalty by stabilizing the goalposts for bonuses over changing economic times. The objective performance criteria which the Compensation Committee has selected tie each named executive officer’s bonus directly to our consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income (or, in the case of a region president, to his region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income), thereby directly rewarding performance.

We believe that our bonus plan for our named executive officers is similar to the bonus plans at other major homebuilders. Application of the objective performance criteria can produce large bonuses in the event that we have (or our relevant region has) high pre-tax, pre-bonus income. We believe that large bonuses to our named executive officers are appropriate if we have (or our relevant region has) high pre-tax, pre-bonus income, particularly because in recent years we have not awarded any options or other equity compensation.

A named executive officer’s right to receive a bonus is conditioned on his being actively employed by us on the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. Bonuses for a particular year will be paid out over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus, and 25% paid one year later, again conditioned on continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. These provisions help insure the loyalty and continued service of our named executive officers.

Our Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase the bonus of a named executive officer in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, the pay levels of executives at other major homebuilders. In practice, the Compensation Committee has seldom exercised this discretion in recent years.

60

Deferred Compensation

As explained more fully below, our Executive Deferral Plan gives our named executive officers the opportunity to defer any whole percentage of their base salary and bonus, so long as the percentage does not exceed 20% and the amount deferred is not less that $10,000 annually. Deferred salary and bonuses are deemed to be invested in one or more hypothetical investment options, which will be individually chosen by each named executive officer from a list of investment alternatives. Each named executive officer’s deferred compensation account will be adjusted to reflect the investment performance of the selected investment, including any appreciation or depreciation. The hypothetical investment alternatives are for bookkeeping purposes only, and we are not obligated to invest the deferred compensation in the investment alternatives specified by the named executive officers. Rather, our obligation ultimately to pay the deferred compensation and earnings is one of our general, unsecured obligations to creditors.

We believe that the Executive Deferral Plan rewards performance and loyalty by giving our named executive officers a valuable tax and personal planning tool. Also, because our obligation ultimately to pay deferred compensation and earnings to a named executive officer is one of our unsecured general obligations to creditors, a named executive officer who participates in the Executive Deferral Plan has a compelling interest in our continued success.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the annual and long-term compensation during 2006 of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and the three additional most highly compensated executive officers whose annual salaries and bonuses exceeded $100,000 in total during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)(1)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(1)(2)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
General William Lyon Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	2006	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,529,730	$	—	$	—	$	5,529,730
Michael D. Grubbs Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	2006		225,000		—		—		—		754,955		—		6,600		986,555
Wade H. Cable Director(4)	2006		500,000		—		—		—		4,529,730		—		6,600		5,036,330
Douglas F. Bauer Director, President and Chief Operating Officer(4)	2006		275,000		—		—		—		1,542,893		—		6,600		1,824,493
Thomas J. Mitchell Senior Vice President and Southern California Coastal Region President	2006		225,000		—		—		—		1,605,000		—		6,600		1,836,600

(1) Includes amounts which the executive would have been entitled to be paid, but which at the election of the executive were deferred by payment into the Company’s 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plans.

(2) The 2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) provides that (i) the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO) are each eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the Company’s

61

consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income; (ii) the Executive Vice President (“EVP”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ¾ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income and 3% of the Northern California Region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the Region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses; and (iii) the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ½ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income. In addition, under the Plan, each Region President is eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses. Awards under the Plan will be paid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later. The amounts payable one year later are conditioned upon continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. All awards under the Plan will be prorated downward if the sum of all calculated awards under the Plan and the Company’s 2006 bonus plans for other officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries would exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income.

(3) Represents matching contributions made by the Company into each executive’s 401(k) plan account in an amount equal to 3% of each executive’s eligible earnings, up to the maximum permitted. Does not include perquisites or other personal benefits provided to the executive, since the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of such perquisites or other personal benefits provided to the executive is less than $10,000.

(4) During 2006 and until March 1, 2007, Wade H. Cable served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Effective on March 1, 2007, Mr. Cable retired as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company; however, he remains as a member of the Board of Directors. Upon Mr. Cable’ s retirement, Douglas F. Bauer was appointed to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. During 2006 and until March 1, 2007, Mr. Bauer served as Executive Vice President and Northern California Region President.

The Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) on February 28, 2006. The Plan provides that the (i) Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) are each eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income; (ii) the Executive Vice President (“EVP”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ¾ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income and 3% of the Northern California Region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the Region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses; and (iii) the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ½ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income. In addition, under the Plan, each Region President is eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the division’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the division of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses. All other participants under the Plan are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of a bonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income. In addition, the Company’s board of directors has approved a cash bonus plan applicable in 2006 for all of its full-time, salaried employees who are not included in the Company’s 2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan. All participants under this cash bonus plan are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of a bonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income.

On February 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the 2007 Cash Bonus Plan (including the 2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan) with terms substantially similar to those of the 2006 Plan. A description of the plan is filed as an exhibit to this report.

The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase the bonus of a named executive officer in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, the pay levels of executives at other major homebuilders

For the CEO, COO, EVP, CFO, division presidents, executives and managers, awards under bonus plans are paid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later. The deferred amounts would be forfeited in the event of termination for any reason except retirement, death or disability.

62

The Company has implemented deferred compensation plans that allow certain officers and employees to defer a portion of their total income (base salary and bonuses). The deferral amount can be up to 20% of total income with a minimum of $10,000 annually.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning each grant of an award to each of the Named Executive Officers in the year ended December 31, 2006:

		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($ / Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
Name	Grant Date	Threshold ($)(3)		Target ($)(1)(2)		Maximum ($)(3)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
General William Lyon	February 27, 2007	$	—	$	4,529,730	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Michael D. Grubbs	February 27, 2007		—		754,955		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Wade H. Cable	February 27, 2007		—		4,529,730		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Douglas F. Bauer	February 27, 2007		—		1,542,893		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Thomas J. Mitchell	February 27, 2007		—		1,605,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

(1) Includes amounts which the executive would have been entitled to be paid, but which at the election of the executive were deferred by payment into the Company’s 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plans.

(2) The 2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) provides that (i) the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO) are each eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income; (ii) the Executive Vice President (“EVP”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ¾ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income and 3% of the Northern California Region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the Region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses; and (iii) the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ½ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income. In addition, under the Plan, each Region President is eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses. Awards under the Plan will be paid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later. The amounts payable one year later are conditioned upon continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. All awards under the Plan will be prorated downward if the sum of all calculated awards under the Plan and the Company’s 2006 bonus plans for other officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries would exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase the bonus of a named executive officer in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, the pay levels of executives at other major homebuilders.

(3) There are no applicable thresholds or maximum awards under the Plan.

Options/SAR Grants in Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

No options were granted during 2006 to any director or Named Executive Officer.

On March 7, 2000, the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors unanimously voted to recommend for approval to the board of directors a proposed compensation package which included the William Lyon Homes 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). Subject to adoption and approval of the Stock Incentive Plan by the Company’s stockholders, on April 6, 2000, acting by unanimous written consent, the board of directors approved and adopted the Stock Incentive Plan. At the Company’s 2000 Annual Meeting on May 9, 2000, the stockholders adopted and approved the Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plan has been administered by the compensation committee, by a delegation of the board of directors.

63

On July 25, 2006, WLH Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”). Pursuant to the Merger, each outstanding share of Common Stock (other than the shares of Common Stock owned by WLH Acquisition Corp. and the Company) was converted into the right to receive $109.00 per share in cash. As a result of the Merger, the Company has terminated the Stock Incentive Plan and has terminated all offerings of the Company’s Common Stock thereunder.

Effective on May 9, 2000, the Company issued options under the Stock Incentive Plan to purchase a total of 627,500 shares of common stock at $8.6875 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company issued additional options under the Stock Incentive Plan to purchase 32,500 shares of common stock at an average price of $11.50 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2006. options were exercised to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.6875. During the year ended December 31, 2005, options were exercised to purchase 35,831 shares of common stock at a price of $8.6875. During the year ended December 31, 2004, options were exercised to purchase 92,964 shares, 6,666 shares and 4,166 shares of common stock at a price of $8.6875, $13.00 and $9.10, respectively. No options remained unexercised at the time the Stock Incentive Plan was terminated as described in the previous paragraph.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table sets forth information concerning all exercises of stock options and all vesting of stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 by each of the Named Executive Officers.

	Option Awards			Stock Awards
	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)(1)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)(2)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)
General William Lyon	—		—	—	—
Michael D. Grubbs	—		—	—	—
Wade H. Cable	50,000	$	5,013,125	—	—
Douglas F. Bauer	—		—	—	—
Thomas J. Mitchell	—		—	—	—

(1) All exercised options for each of the Named Executive Officers were granted on May 9, 2000 under the Stock Incentive Plan. The options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan vested one-third on May 9, 2001, one-third on May 9, 2002 and one-third on May 9, 2003. The exercise price of these options is $8.6875.

(2) The value realized is calculated by determining the difference between the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange at exercise and the exercise price.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning nonqualified deferred compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for each of the Named Executive Officers.

Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1)		Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)	Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)(2)
General William Lyon		—	—		—	—		—
Michael D. Grubbs	$	100,000	—	$	56,723	—	$	492,518
Wade H. Cable		2,288,550	—		770,704	—		6,908,447
Douglas F. Bauer		100,000	—		10,548	—		110,548
Thomas J. Mitchell		250,000	—		26,371	—		276,371

64

(1) Amounts shown as Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year are reported as compensation in the last completed fiscal year in the Summary Compensation Table above.

(2) Amounts shown as Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End include amounts shown as Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year and also include executive contributions in previous years amounting to $325,000 for Mr. Grubbs and $3,653,290 for Mr. Cable.

Executive Deferral Plan

Under the Executive Deferral Plan, the Company provides a select group of management and highly compensated employees of the Company and its affiliates the opportunity to enter into agreements for the deferral of a specified percentage of their compensation. The obligations of the Company under such agreements (the “Executive Deferral Obligations”) will be unsecured general obligations of the Company to pay the deferred compensation in the future in accordance with the terms of the Executive Deferral Plan and will rank pari passu with other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company from time to time outstanding.

To participate in the Executive Deferral Plan in a particular year, eligible employees must enroll in the Executive Deferral Plan and select the percentage of deferral before the beginning of that calendar year. The amount of compensation to be deferred by each participating employee (“Participant”) will be determined in accordance with the Executive Deferral Plan based on election by the Participant. Participants may elect to defer any whole percentage of their base salary and bonus, so long as such percentage does not exceed twenty percent (20%) annually, and the amount deferred is not less than $10,000. The Company may make discretionary contributions to the Executive Deferral Plan in addition to amounts deferred by Participants.

The Executive Deferral Obligations will be deemed invested in one or more hypothetical investment options, which will be individually chosen by each Participant from a list of hypothetical investment alternatives. Each Participant’s deferred compensation account will be adjusted to reflect the investment performance of the selected hypothetical investment, including any appreciation or depreciation. Gains or losses are posted to the Participant’s account at the end of every calendar quarter, or more frequently if determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The hypothetical investment alternatives are for bookkeeping purposes only, and the Company is not obligated actually to invest the deferred compensation in the investment alternatives specified by the Participants. The Company does not consider the investment returns on the hypothetical investment alternatives to be preferential, because the Company’s 401(k) plan, which covers a broad range of the Company’s employees, offers investment alternatives that are substantially similar to the hypothetical investment alternatives offered under the Executive Deferral Plan.

The Board of Directors of the Company is charged with the general administration of the Executive Deferral Plan and the Executive Deferral Obligations. However, to the extent permitted by regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, if the Company undergoes a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Executive Deferral Plan), the Executive Deferral Plan will be administered by a committee of the individuals who were members of the Company’s Board of Directors 90 days before the Change in Control, with any vacancy in such committee being filled by a person selected by the other members of the committee.

No trustee has been appointed having the authority to take action with respect to the Executive Deferral Obligations and each Participant will be responsible for acting independently with respect to, among other things, the giving of notices, responding to any requests for consents, waivers or amendments pertaining to the Executive Deferral Obligations, enforcing covenants and taking action upon a default. The Company will, however, establish a grantor (“rabbi”) trust as described below.

The Executive Deferral Obligations will be distributed by the Company in accordance with the terms of the Executive Deferral Plan and upon the following circumstances: upon a date selected by a Participant (the date

65

selected must be no earlier than the January 1 of the third calendar year after the election is made), termination of employment, death or disability, or upon the occurrence of certain hardship circumstances.

A Participant’s right or the right of any other person to the Executive Deferral Obligations cannot be assigned, transferred, anticipated or otherwise encumbered.

The Company has the right to amend or terminate the Executive Deferral Plan at any time without notice to or consent of any person. However, no such amendment or termination shall reduce (i) the amount credited to the Participant’s account; and (ii) the Participant’s vested percentage in the Company’s discretionary contributions and any deemed investment earnings, gains, losses and changes in value credited on such discretionary contributions. If the Executive Deferral Plan is terminated, benefits will be distributed at the same times and in the same manner as they would have been if the termination had not occurred. The Executive Deferral Plan may also be amended at any time, to the extent that in the opinion of the Company, the amendment is necessary to ensure that the Executive Deferral Plan will be characterized as a plan maintained for a select group of management or highly compensated employees as described in sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No such amendment shall be considered prejudicial to any interest of a Participant or a beneficiary designated by a Participant.

The Executive Deferral Obligations are not convertible into any other security of the Company. The Company is required to establish a grantor trust, of which the Company is the grantor, within the meaning of subpart E, part I, subchapter J, subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (commonly referred to as a “rabbi” trust). In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy or insolvency, Participants have no rights to any assets held by such grantor trust, except as general creditors of the Company. The amounts to be contributed to the grantor trust will be determined by the Company in its discretion.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements

Employees, including executive officers, enter into annual employment agreements which provide that their employment is at-will. The employment agreements with each of General William Lyon, Michael D. Grubbs and Thomas J. Mitchell provide for an annual salary effective January 1, 2007 of $1,000,000, $225,000 and $225,000 respectively. The employment agreement with Wade H. Cable provided for an annual salary of $500,000 effective January 1, 2007 until the date of his retirement on March 1, 2007. The employment agreement with Douglas F. Bauer provides for an annual salary of $275,000 effective January 1, 2007 and increasing to an annual salary of $500,000 effective on March 1, 2007 upon his promotion to President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Each employment agreement also provides for a monthly automobile allowance of $400, except for General William Lyon. The employment agreements do not provide for any severance or other payments on termination of employment, or in connection with a change in control of the Company.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with all of its directors and the Named Executive Officers, among others, to provide them with the maximum indemnification allowed under the Company’s certificate of incorporation and applicable law, including indemnification for all judgments and expenses incurred as the result of any lawsuit in which such person is named as a defendant by reason of being a director, officer or employee of the Company, to the maximum extent such indemnification is permitted by the laws of Delaware.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The members of the Company’s Compensation Committee are Douglas K. Ammerman, Harold H. Greene, Lawrence M. Higby, Gary H. Hunt, Arthur B. Laffer and Alex Meruelo. None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. None of the Company’s executive officers has ever served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served in either of those capacities for the Company.

66

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on that review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Compensation Committee

Arthur B. Laffer, Chairman

Harold H. Greene

Lawrence M. Higby

Gary H. Hunt

Alex Meruelo

Director Compensation

Outside directors receive an annual fee of $60,000 per year, payable $15,000 per calendar quarter, and $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person and $1,500 for each meeting attended via teleconference. In addition, the chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors receives a fee of $10,000 per year, payable $2,500 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, the chairperson of each other committee of the Board of Directors receives a fee of $7,500 per year, payable $1,875 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, and other committee members receive a fee of $2,000 per year, payable $500 per calendar quarter, per committee for service on committees of the Board of Directors.

During 2006 Messrs. Harold H. Greene, Lawrence M. Higby and Arthur B. Laffer served on a Special Committee of the Board of Directors appointed to evaluate a tender offer received from General William Lyon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Greene received a fee of $70,000 for his service as Chairman and Messrs. Higby and Laffer each received a fee of $60,000 for their service as members of the Special Committee. The Special Committee was disbanded upon the successful conclusion of the tender offer in July 2006.

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Richard E. Frankel	$	70,500	—	—	—	—	—	$	70,500
Harold H. Greene		154,500	—	—	—	—	—		154,500
Lawrence M. Higby		132,500	—	—	—	—	—		132,500
Gary H. Hunt		76,500	—	—	—	—	—		76,500
Arthur B. Laffer		137,500	—	—	—	—	—		137,500
Alex Meruelo		82,000	—	—	—	—	—		82,000

The Company has adopted the William Lyon Homes 2004 Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of December 28, 2004, pursuant to which each outside director may elect to defer payment of a portion or all of his annual compensation until his retirement date or a fixed payment date in the future at which time he would receive all deferred amounts and accumulated earnings thereon, if any, in a lump sum. No directors have currently elected to defer director compensation under the plan.

67

Under the Company’s Non-Qualified Retirement Plan for Outside Directors, each outside director is eligible to receive $2,000 per month beginning on the first day of the month following death, disability or retirement at age 72; or, in the case of an outside director who ceases participation in the plan prior to death, disability or retirement at age 72 but has completed at least ten years of service as a director, eligibility for benefit payments pursuant to the plan begins on the first day of the month following the latter of (a) the day on which such person attains the age of 65, or (b) the day on which such person’s service terminates after completing at least ten years of service as a director. The monthly payments will continue for the number of months that equals the number of months the outside director served as a director and are payable to the director’s beneficiary in the event of the director’s death. If a retired outside director receiving payments under the plan resumes his status as a director or becomes an employee, the payments under the plan are suspended during the period of such service.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information as to the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 1, 2007. The following table includes information for (a) each person or group that is known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (b) each of the directors and nominees of the Company, (c) each Named Executive Officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (d) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

	As of March 1, 2007
	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percentage of All Common Stock
General William Lyon(1)	664	(4)	66.4	%
The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust(2)	282		28.2	%
The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust(2)	54		5.4	%
William H. Lyon(1)	0	(3)	0.00	%
Douglas K. Ammerman(1)	0		0.00	%
Wade H. Cable(1)	0		0.00	%
Douglas F. Bauer(1)	0		0.00	%
Richard E. Frankel(1)	0		0.00	%
Harold H. Greene(1)	0		0.00	%
Lawrence M. Higby(1)	0		0.00	%
Gary H. Hunt(1)	0		0.00	%
Arthur B. Laffer(1)	0		0.00	%
Alex Meruelo(1)	0		0.00	%
Michael D. Grubbs(1)	0		0.00	%
Thomas J. Mitchell(1)	0		0.00	%
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)	664	(3)	66.4	%

(1) Stockholder is at the following mailing address: c/o William Lyon Homes, 4490 Von Karman Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92660

(2) Stockholder is at the following mailing address: c/o Richard M. Sherman, Jr., Esq., Irell & Manella LLP, 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660.

(3) Does not include 282 shares of common stock held by The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust or 54 shares of common stock held by The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, of each of which William H. Lyon is the sole beneficiary. William H. Lyon does not have or share, directly or indirectly, the power to vote or to direct the vote of these shares, and thus, William H. Lyon disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

(4) Includes 490 shares which are pledged as collateral in connection with a $267,000,000 credit facility obtained by General William Lyon in connection with the Tender Offer and Merger as described herein.

68

Except as otherwise indicated in the above notes, shares shown as beneficially owned are those as to which the named person possesses sole voting and investment power. However, under California law, personal property owned by a married person may be community property which either spouse may manage and control. The Company has no information as to whether any shares shown in this table are subject to California community property law.

As of December 31, 2006, we had no securities authorized for issuance under compensation plans.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Acquisition of Real Estate Projects from Entities Controlled by General William Lyon and/or William H. Lyon.

On October 26, 2000, the Company’s board of directors (with General William Lyon and William H. Lyon abstaining) approved the purchase of 579 lots for a total purchase price of $12,581,000 from an entity controlled by General William Lyon and William H. Lyon. The terms of the purchase agreement provide for an initial option payment of $1,000,000 and a rolling option takedown of the lots. In addition, one-half of the net profits in excess of six percent from the development are to be paid to the seller. Phase takedowns of approximately 20 lots each were anticipated to occur at two to three month intervals for each of several product types through September 2004. As of December 31, 2004, all lots were purchased under this agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2004, the Company purchased 92 lots under this agreement for a total purchase price of $1,984,000. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid $0, $1,949,000 and $1,689,000, respectively, for one-half of the net profits in excess of six percent from the development. This land acquisition qualified as an affiliate transaction under the Company’s 12 ¹/2% Senior Notes due July 1, 2003 Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994 (“Indenture”). Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, the Company determined that the land acquisition is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company with an unrelated person. The Company delivered to the Trustee under the Indenture a resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors set forth in an Officers’ Certificate certifying that the land acquisition is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company with an unrelated person and the land acquisition was approved by a majority of the disinterested members of the Company’s Board of Directors of the Company. Further, the Company delivered to the Trustee under the Indenture a determination of value by a real estate appraisal firm which is of regional standing in the region in which the subject property is located and is MAI certified.

Purchase of Land from Unconsolidated Joint Venture.

The Company purchased land for a total purchase price of $6,221,000, $116,773,000 and $33,655,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, from certain of the Company’s joint ventures.

Agreements with Entities Controlled by General William Lyon and William H. Lyon.

For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred reimbursable on-site labor costs of $133,000, $146,000 and $183,000, respectively, for providing customer service to real estate projects developed by entities controlled by General William Lyon and William H. Lyon, of which $1,000 and $32,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company earned fees of $98,000, $121,000 and $110,000, respectively, for tax and accounting services performed for entities controlled by General William Lyon and William H. Lyon during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, of which $92,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2005.

69

Rent Paid to a Trust of which William H. Lyon is the Sole Beneficiary.

For each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company incurred charges of $755,000 related to rent on the Company’s corporate office, from a trust of which William H. Lyon is the sole beneficiary.

Charges Incurred Related to the Charter and Use of Aircraft.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred charges of $172,000 related to the charter and use of aircraft owned by an affiliate of General William Lyon.

Effective September 1, 2004, the Company entered into an aircraft consulting and management agreement with an affiliate (the “Affiliate”) of William Lyon to operate and manage the Company’s aircraft which was placed in service effective as of September 1, 2004. The terms of the agreement provide that the Affiliate shall consult and render its advice and management services to the Company with respect to all functions necessary to the operation, maintenance and administration of the aircraft. The Company’s business plan for the aircraft includes (i) use by Company executives for traveling on Company business to the Company’s divisional offices and other destinations, (ii) charter service to outside third parties and (iii) charter service to General William Lyon personally. Charter services for outside third parties are contracted for at market rates. As compensation to the Affiliate for its management and consulting services under the agreement, the Company pays the Affiliate a fee equal to (i) the amount equal to 107% of compensation paid by the Affiliate for the pilots supplied pursuant to the agreement, (ii) $50 per operating hour for the aircraft and (iii) $9,000 per month for hangar rent. In addition, all maintenance work, inspections and repairs performed by the Affiliate on the aircraft are charged to the Company at the Affiliate’s published rates for maintenance, inspection and repairs in effect at the time such work is completed. The total compensation paid to the Affiliate under the agreement amounted to $1,488,000, $1,414,000 and $317,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Effective July 1, 2006, General William Lyon entered into a time sharing agreement (“the Agreement”) with the Company pertaining to his personal use of the aircraft. The agreement calls for General Lyon to reimburse the company for all costs incurred by the Company during his personal flights plus a surcharge on fuel consumption of two times the cost. Pursuant to the Agreement and the rates charged to General Lyon prior to the Agreement, the Company had earned revenue of $524,000, $457,000 and $187,000 for charter services provided to General William Lyon personally, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, of which $333,000 and $129,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Mortgage Loans.

In 2006, the Company offered home mortgage loans to its employees and directors through its mortgage company subsidiary, William Lyon Financial Services (formerly Duxford Financial, Inc.). These loans were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. These loans did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features and were sold to investors typically within 7 to 15 days.

Finder’s Fee Agreement.

The Company and Alex Meruelo are parties to an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Meruelo is eligible to receive a finder’s fee based upon the cash distributions received by a subsidiary of the Company from a joint venture development project relating to a portion of the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County, California. The joint venture development project resulted from Mr. Meruelo’s introduction of the Company to Woodman Development Company, LLC (“Woodman”) and the subsequent formation of East Garrison Partners I, LLC (“EGP”) as a joint venture between Woodman and Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC (“EGC”). The finder’s

70

fee will equal 5% of all net cash distributions distributed by EGP to EGC with respect to EGC’s existing 50% interest in EGP that are in excess of distributions with respect to certain deficit advances, deficit preferred returns, returns of capital and preferred returns on unreturned capital. The calculation of the finder’s fee will be based on net cash distributions received from EGP on land sales and will not be determined on the basis of any revenues, profits or distributions received from any affiliate of EGC for the construction and sale or leasing of residential or commercial buildings on such lots. Mr. Meruelo is not obligated to perform any services for EGC other than the introduction to Woodman. As of December 31, 2006, no amounts had been paid to Mr. Meruelo under this agreement.

Certain Family Relationships.

William H. Lyon, one of the Company’s directors and the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, is the son of General William Lyon. General William Lyon is the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer. In 2006, William H. Lyon received a base salary of $115,000 and a monthly car allowance of $400 from the Company, and earned a bonus of $177,445 under the terms of the Company’s 2006 Cash Bonus Plan. The bonus earned by William H. Lyon in 2006 is consistent with bonuses earned by other Company employees with similar responsibilities.

Terry A. Connelly, who is Senior Vice President and Director of Operations of the Company’s Nevada Region, is married to Mary J. Connelly, President of the Nevada Region. In 2006, Mr. Connelly received a base salary of $160,000 and a monthly car allowance of $400 from the Company, and earned a bonus of $206,370 under the terms of the Company’s 2006 Cash Bonus Plan. The bonus earned by Mr. Connelly in 2006 is consistent with the bonuses earned by other Company employees with similar responsibilities.

Jeffrey D. Frankel, who is a Project Manager in the Company’s Northern California Region, is the son of Richard E. Frankel, a director of the Company. In 2006, Mr. Frankel received a base salary of $105,000 and a monthly car allowance of $400 from the Company, and earned a bonus of $41,551 under the terms of the Company’s 2006 Cash Bonus Plan. The bonus earned by Mr. Frankel in 2006 is consistent with the bonuses earned by other Company employees with similar responsibilities.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that Douglas K. Ammerman, Harold H. Greene, Lawrence M. Higby, Gary H. Hunt, Arthur B. Laffer and Alex Meruelo are independent directors under standards established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The Company has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Meruelo and consists of Messrs. Meruelo, Ammerman, Greene, Higby, Hunt and Laffer. Mr. Ammerman’s appointment as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was effective on February 27, 2007, the date he was appointed to the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that all committee members are independent under standards established by the SEC and the NYSE.

Audit Committee.    The Company has a standing Audit Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Greene and consists of Messrs. Greene, Ammerman, Higby, Hunt and Meruelo. Mr. Ammerman’s appointment as a member of the Audit Committee was effective on February 27, 2007, the date he was appointed to the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that all committee members are independent and financially literate under the standards established by the SEC and the NYSE. The Board has determined that Mr. Greene is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

Compensation Committee.    The Company has a standing Compensation Committee, which, until February 27, 2007, was chaired by Mr. Laffer and consists of Messrs. Laffer, Ammerman, Greene, Higby, Hunt

71

and Meruelo. Effective on February 27, 2007, Mr. Hunt became Chairman of the Compensation Committee, replacing Mr. Laffer, who remains as a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Ammerman’s appointment as a member of the Compensation Committee was effective on February 27, 2007, the date he was appointed to the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that all committee members are independent under standards established by the SEC and the NYSE.

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The fees for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were:

Type of Fees	2006		2005
Audit Fees	$	1,086,000	$	1,027,000
Audit-Related Fees		94,000		202,000
Tax Fees		92,000		324,000
Total Fees	$	1,272,000	$	1,553,000

In the above table, in accordance with the definitions of the SEC, “Audit Fees” include fees for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, review of the unaudited financial statements included in its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters, consents, assistance with documents filed with the SEC, and accounting and reporting consultation in connection with the audit and /or quarterly reviews. “Audit Fees” also includes fees incurred in connection with the audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. “Tax Fees” include fees for tax compliance and tax planning. “Audit-Related Fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and includes fees for audits of separate financial statements of consolidated joint ventures.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures:    The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services, and other services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committee of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditors are engaged to perform it. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee authority to approve permitted services provided that the Chair reports any decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee considered the compatibility of the provision of other services by Ernst & Young LLP with the maintenance of Ernst & Young LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee approved all audit and non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in 2006.

72

PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)  Financial Statements

The following financial statements of the Company are included in a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on the page numbers specified below:

	Page
William Lyon Homes
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	81
Consolidated Balance Sheets	82
Consolidated Statements of Income	83
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	87

(2)  Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedules are omitted as the required information is not present, is not present in sufficient amounts, or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

(3)  Listing of Exhibits:

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1(2)	Certificate of Incorporation of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
3.2(1)	Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
3.3(38)	Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
3.4(38)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation.
3.5(2)	Bylaws of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
4.1(23)	Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.2(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.3(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.4(3)	Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.5(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).

73

Exhibit Number	Description
4.6(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.7(14)	Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.8(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.9(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
10.1(11)	Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004 between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and RFC Construction Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation.
10.2(34)	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004 between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and RFC Construction Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation.
10.3(4)	Master Loan Agreement dated as of August 31, 2000 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation (“Borrower”) and Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B., a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (“Lender”).
10.4(6)	Agreement for First Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of June 8, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.5(5)	Agreement for Second Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of July 23, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.6(5)	Agreement for Third Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of December 19, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.7(5)	Agreement for Fourth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of May 29, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.8(7)	Agreement for Fifth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Agreements, dated as of June 6, 2003, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.9(3)	Agreement for Sixth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Agreements, dated as of November 14, 2003, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.

74

Exhibit Number	Description
10.10(12)	Agreement for Seventh Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 6, 2004 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.11(25)	Agreement for Eighth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 14, 2005 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.12(37)	Agreement for Ninth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 31, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.13(4)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement (Borrowing Base Loan) by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, dated as of September 21, 2000.
10.14(17)	Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of September 18, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.
10.15(5)	Second Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of December 13, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.
10.16(3)	Third Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of January 26, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.
10.17(11)	Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated September 16, 2004 by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation.
10.18(27)	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2005, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and California Bank & Trust.
10.19(34)	Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated September 16, 2004 by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation.
10.20(7)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 1, 2003 between Duxford Financial, Inc., and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.21(10)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 1, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc., and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.22(32)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated June 29, 2006 by and between Duxford Financial, Inc. dba William Lyon Financial Services and/or Bayport Mortgage, L.P. and/or California Pacific Mortgage, L.P., as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.23(8)	Credit Agreement dated August 29, 2003 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.24(3)	Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.25(15)	First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 27, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.26(13)	Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.27(9)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2003, by and among Moffett Meadows Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and the other financial institutions named therein, as lenders.

75

Exhibit Number	Description
10.28(9)	Joinder Agreement to Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement, entered into as of March 25, 2003, by William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
10.29(10)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Bank One, NA, a national banking association.
10.30(15)	Modification Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA, a national banking association).
10.31(27)	Second Modification Agreement to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2005, between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA).
10.32(36)	Third Modification Agreement to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated October 23, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association.
10.33(18)	Form of Indemnity Agreement, between William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, and the directors and officers of William Lyon Homes.
10.34(18)	Property Management Agreement between Corporate Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation (Owner) and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation (Manager) dated and effective November 5, 1999.
10.35(18)	Warranty Service Agreement between Corporate Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation dated and effective November 5, 1999.
10.36(4)	Option Agreement and Escrow Instructions between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and Lathrop Investment, L.P., a California limited partnership, dated as of October 24, 2000.
10.37(19)	William Lyon Homes 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.
10.38(20)	Form of Stock Option Agreements.
10.39(20)	William Lyon Homes, Inc. 2000 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.40(26)	William Lyon Homes 2005 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.41(28)	Description of 2005 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.42(29)	Adjustment of Salary of Douglas F. Bauer.
10.43(38)	Description of 2006 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.44(38)	2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.45(38)	Description of 2007 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.46(38)	2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.47(20)	Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease – Net between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and a trust of which William H. Lyon is the sole beneficiary.
10.48(21)	William Lyon Homes Executive Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 11, 2002.
10.49(22)	William Lyon Homes Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 11, 2002.
10.50(5)	The Presley Companies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan for Outside Directors.
10.51(16)	William Lyon Homes 2004 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.52(16)	William Lyon Homes 2004 Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.53(3)	Underwriting Agreement dated as of March 12, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Warburg, LLC and Salomon Smith Barney Inc., as Underwriters.
10.54(3)	Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.55(3)	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 6, 2004 by and among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.

76

Exhibit Number	Description
10.56(13)	Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.57(14)	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 22, 2004 by and among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.58(30)	Summary of Director Compensation.
10.59(30)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Wachovia Financial Services, Inc, a North Carolina corporation, by and through its Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
10.60(35)	First Amendment to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated September 29, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
10.61(33)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and California National Bank.
10.62(31)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated as of March 8, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Comerica Bank.
12.1(38)	Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
21.1(38)	List of Subsidiaries of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
31.1(38)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2(38)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1(38)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2(38)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) filed January 5, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, and amendments thereto (SEC Registration No. 333-88569), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference

(5) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(6) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(7) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(8) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(9) Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-114691) filed July 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(10) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(11) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(12) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 18, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

77

(13) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 19, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(14) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 23, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(15) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-121346) filed December 16, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(16) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(17) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(18) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(19) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration No. 333-50232), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(20) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(21) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration No. 333-82448), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(22) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(23) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(24) Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-121346) filed January 10, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(25) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(26) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(27) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(28) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.

(29) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005.

(30) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(31) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(32) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(33) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(34) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 27, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(35) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(36) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(37) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(38) Filed herewith.

78

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	WILLIAM LYON HOMES
March 14, 2007	By:	/s/    MICHAEL D. GRUBBS
		Michael D. Grubbs
		Senior Vice President,
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/    WILLIAM LYON         William Lyon	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	March 14, 2007
/s/    DOUGLAS F. BAUER         Douglas F. Bauer	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer	March 14, 2007
/s/    WILLIAM H. LYON         William H. Lyon	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer	March 14, 2007
Douglas K. Ammerman	Director	March     , 2007
/s/    WADE H. CABLE         Wade H. Cable	Director	March 14, 2007
/S/    RICHARD E. FRANKEL         Richard E. Frankel	Director	March 14, 2007
/S/    HAROLD H. GREENE         Harold H. Greene	Director	March 14, 2007
Lawrence M. Higby	Director	March     , 2007
/S/    GARY H. HUNT         Gary H. Hunt	Director	March 14, 2007
/S/    ARTHUR B. LAFFER         Arthur B. Laffer	Director	March 14, 2007
/s/    ALEX MERUELO         Alex Meruelo	Director	March 14, 2007
/S/    MICHAEL D. GRUBBS         Michael D. Grubbs	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 14, 2007
/s/    W. DOUGLASS HARRIS         W. Douglass Harris	Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)	March 14, 2007

79

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
William Lyon Homes
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	81
Consolidated Balance Sheets	82
Consolidated Statements of Income	83
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	87

REQUIRED SCHEDULES

Schedules are omitted as the required information is not present, is not present in sufficient amounts, or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

80

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

William Lyon Homes

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of William Lyon Homes as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of William Lyon Homes at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of William Lyon Homes’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 2, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

March 2, 2007

81

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands except number of shares and par value per share)

	December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,732	$	52,369
Receivables — Note 3		119,491		143,481
Real estate inventories — Notes 2 and 4
Owned		1,431,753		1,303,476
Not owned		200,667		115,772
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures — Note 5		3,560		397
Property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation of $12,465 and $9,936 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively		16,828		18,553
Deferred loan costs		11,258		12,323
Goodwill — Note 1		5,896		5,896
Other assets — Note 2		50,410		38,735
	$	1,878,595	$	1,691,002
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	48,592	$	67,326
Accrued expenses		111,871		181,068
Liabilities from inventories not owned		131,564		—
Notes payable — Note 6		304,096		125,619
7 5/8% Senior Notes due December 15, 2012 — Note 6		150,000		150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes due April 1, 2013 — Note 6		247,218		246,917
7 1/2% Senior Notes due February 15, 2014 — Note 6		150,000		150,000
		1,143,341		920,930
Minority interest in consolidated entities — Note 2		109,859		227,178
Commitments and contingencies — Note 11
Stockholders’ equity — Note 8
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 3,000 shares authorized; 1,000 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 8,652,067 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005; 1,275,000 shares issued and held in treasury at December 31, 2005		—		86
Additional paid-in capital		43,213		35,404
Retained earnings		582,182		507,404
		625,395		542,894
	$	1,878,595	$	1,691,002

See accompanying notes.

82

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Operating revenue
Home sales	$	1,478,694		$	1,745,067		$	1,785,589
Lots, land and other sales		13,527			111,316			36,258
		1,492,221			1,856,383			1,821,847
Operating costs
Cost of sales — homes		(1,160,614	)		(1,307,027	)		(1,327,057	)
Cost of sales — lots, land and other		(16,524	)		(44,774	)		(23,173	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets — Note 1		(39,895	)		(4,600	)		—
Sales and marketing		(72,349	)		(59,422	)		(58,792	)
General and administrative		(61,390	)		(90,045	)		(80,784	)
Other — Note 1		(6,502	)		(2,450	)		(2,105	)
		(1,357,274	)		(1,508,318	)		(1,491,911	)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures — Note 5		3,242			4,301			(699	)
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities — Note 2		(16,914	)		(37,571	)		(49,661	)
Operating income		121,275			314,795			279,576
Financial advisory expenses — Note 7		(3,165	)		(2,191	)		—
Other income, net		5,599			2,176			5,572
Income before provision for income taxes		123,709			314,780			285,148
Provision for income taxes — Note 9		(48,931	)		(124,149	)		(113,499	)
Net income	$	74,778		$	190,631		$	171,649

See accompanying notes.

83

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings
	Shares		Amount								Total
Balance — December 31, 2003	9,787		$	98		$	106,818		$	145,124	$	252,040
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	104			1			4,420			—		4,421
Purchase of common stock	(1,275	)		(13	)		(80,988	)		—		(81,001	)
Net income for the year	—			—			—			171,649		171,649
Balance — December 31, 2004	8,616			86			30,250			316,773		347,109
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and related income tax benefit and other	36			—			5,154			—		5,154
Net income	—			—			—			190,631		190,631
Balance — December 31, 2005	8,652			86			35,404			507,404		542,894
Income tax benefit from unused recognized built-in losses — Note 9	—			—			4,229			—		4,229
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and related income tax benefit	50			1			3,493			—		3,494
Elimination of common stock upon merger of WLH Acquisition Corp with and into Company — Note 7	(8,702	)		(87	)		87			—		—
Surviving common stock upon merger of WLH Acquisition Corp with and into the Company — Note 7	1			—			—			—		—
Net income	—			—			—			74,778		74,778
Balance — December 31, 2006	1		$	—		$	43,213		$	582,182	$	625,395

See accompanying notes.

84

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Operating activities
Net income	$	74,778		$	190,631		$	171,649
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,529			2,092			1,327
Impairment loss on real estate assets		39,895			4,600			—
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		(3,242	)		(4,301	)		699
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures		2,599			2,708			—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		16,914			37,571			49,661
State income tax refund credited to additional paid-in capital		10			1,845			—
Federal income tax refund credited to additional paid-in capital		1,820			—			—
Provision for income taxes		48,931			124,149			113,499
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		23,990			(104,179	)		9,168
Real estate inventories - owned		(147,790	)		(232,240	)		(195,340	)
Real estate inventories - not owned		67,793			—			—
Deferred loan costs		1,065			1,659			(1,004	)
Other assets		(20,079	)		(6,173	)		(5,122	)
Accounts payable		(18,734	)		27,962			(2,612	)
Accrued expenses		(112,669	)		(90,858	)		(54,632	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(22,190	)		(44,534	)		87,293
Investing activities
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		(1,976	)		(1,379	)		(9,427	)
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures		—			20,486			10,126
Purchases of property and equipment		(804	)		(2,579	)		(17,768	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(2,780	)		16,528			(17,069	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable		2,139,789			1,855,452			1,768,933
Principal payments on notes payable		(1,981,937	)		(1,794,799	)		(1,896,365	)
Issuance of 7 5/8% Senior Notes		—			—			148,500
Issuance of 7 1/2% Senior Notes		—			—			147,563
Minority interest distributions, net		(146,953	)		(76,664	)		(86,849	)
Common stock issued for exercised options		434			312			932
Common stock purchased		—			—			(81,001	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		11,333			(15,699	)		1,713
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(13,637	)		(43,705	)		71,937
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year		52,369			96,074			24,137
Cash and cash equivalents — end of year	$	38,732		$	52,369		$	96,074

See accompanying notes.

85

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow and non-cash activities:
Issuance of notes payable for land acquisitions	$	20,625		$	11,686		$	—
Issuance of note payable to secure land option agreement	$	—		$	4,709		$	5,420
Net real estate inventories not owned	$	152,688		$	115,771			—
Consolidation of other assets and minority interest from variable interest entities	$	(8,404	)	$	8,404		$	—
Net liabilities from inventories not owned	$	(131,564	)	$	—		$	—
Net minority interests	$	(12,720	)	$	(124,175	)	$	—
Income tax benefit credited to additional paid-in capital in connection with stock option exercises and other	$	5,459		$	2,997		$	3,489
Net consolidation of assets and liabilities of previously unconsolidated joint ventures	$	—		$	—		$	113,440

See accompanying notes.

86

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Operations

William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company”) are primarily engaged in designing, constructing and selling single family detached and attached homes in California, Arizona and Nevada.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and certain joint ventures and other entities which have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary (see Note 2). Investments in joint ventures which have not been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). The accounting policies of the joint ventures are substantially the same as those of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Segment Information

The Company designs, constructs and sells a wide range of homes designed to meet the specific needs of each of its markets. For internal reporting purposes, the Company is organized into five geographic home building regions and its mortgage origination operation. Because each of the Company’s geographic home building regions has similar economic characteristics, housing products and class of prospective buyers, the geographic home building regions have been aggregated into a single home building segment. The Company’s mortgage origination operations did not meet the materiality thresholds which would require disclosure for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and accordingly, are not separately reported.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources primarily based on the operating income of individual home building projects. Operating income is defined by the Company as operating revenue less operating costs plus equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated joint ventures less minority equity in income of consolidated entities. Accordingly, operating income excludes certain expenses included in the determination of net income. Operating income from home building operations totaled $121.3 million, $314.8 million and $279.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Substantially all revenues are from external customers. There were no customers that contributed 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.

Real Estate Inventories and Related Indebtedness

Real estate inventories are carried at cost net of impairment losses, if any. Real estate inventories consist primarily of deposits, raw land, lots under development, homes under construction and completed homes of real estate projects. All direct and indirect land costs, offsite and onsite improvements and applicable interest and other carrying charges are capitalized to real estate projects during periods when the project is under development. Land, offsite costs and all other common costs are allocated to land parcels benefited based upon relative fair values before construction. Onsite construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and property taxes) are allocated to the individual homes within a phase based upon the relative sales value of the homes. The Company relieves its accumulated real estate inventories through cost of sales for the cost of homes sold. Selling expenses and other marketing costs are expensed in the period incurred. A provision

87

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

for warranty costs relating to the Company’s limited warranty plans is included in cost of sales and accrued expenses at the time the sale of a home is recorded. The Company generally reserves one percent of the sales price of its homes against the possibility of future charges relating to its one-year limited warranty and similar potential claims. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of homes under warranty, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability during the years ended December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Warranty liability, beginning of year	$	20,219		$	14,308		$	7,267
Warranty liability from consolidated entities as of January 1, 2004 — Note 2		—			—			1,664
Warranty provision during year		14,679			16,647			14,228
Warranty payments during year		(17,582	)		(16,294	)		(12,578	)
Warranty charges related to pre-existing warranties during year		6,048			5,558			3,727
Warranty liability, end of year	$	23,364		$	20,219		$	14,308

Interest incurred under the Revolving Credit Facilities, the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes, the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes and other notes payable, as more fully discussed in Note 6, is capitalized to qualifying real estate projects under development. Any additional interest charges related to real estate projects not under development are expensed in the period incurred.

The Company accounts for its real estate inventories under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“Statement No. 144”). Statement No. 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on real estate inventories when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by real estate inventories are less than the carrying amount of such assets. When an impairment loss is required for real estate inventories, the related assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value.

Fair value represents the amount at which an asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than a forced or liquidation sale. The estimation process involved in determining if assets have been impaired and in the determination of fair value is inherently uncertain because it requires estimates of current market yields as well as future events and conditions. Such future events and conditions include economic and market conditions, as well as the availability of suitable financing to fund development and construction activities. The realization of the Company’s real estate projects is dependent upon future uncertain events and conditions and, accordingly, the actual timing and amounts realized by the Company may be materially different from those estimated.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, include a non-cash charge of $39,895,000 to record an impairment loss on real estate assets held by the Company at certain of its homebuilding projects. The impairment was primarily attributable to slower than anticipated home sales and lower than anticipated net revenue due to softening market conditions. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Accordingly, the related real estate assets were written-down to their estimated fair value. The non-cash charge is reflected in impairment loss on real estate assets in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

88

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a non-cash charge of $4,600,000 to record an impairment loss related to a golf course in the Company’s San Diego Division. The impairment loss was primarily attributable to lower than expected cash flows and continued net operating losses since the golf course opened in 2002. As a result, the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated were determined to be less than the assets carrying amount. Accordingly, the golf course asset was written-down to its estimated fair value. The non-cash charge had been previously reflected in other operating costs in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2005. However, such amount has been reclassified to loss on impairment of real estate assets to be consistent with the financial statement presentation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to fifteen years. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of either their estimated useful lives or term of the lease. As more fully discussed in Note 9, the Company owns an aircraft which is being depreciated using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of fifteen years.

Deferred Loan Costs

Deferred loan costs are amortized over the term of the applicable loans using a method which approximates the level yield interest method.

Goodwill

The amount paid for business acquisitions over the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is reflected as goodwill, which is subject to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement No. 142”). Under Statement No. 142, goodwill is subject to impairment tests. The Company performed its annual impairment tests of goodwill as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and determined that there have been no indicators of impairment related to the Company’s goodwill.

Sales and Profit Recognition

A sale is recorded and profit recognized when a sale is consummated, the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate, any receivables are not subject to future subordination, and the usual risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate (“Statement No. 66”). When it is determined that the earnings process is not complete, profit is deferred for recognition in future periods.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Effective as of January 1, 1994, the Company completed a capital restructuring and quasi-reorganization. The quasi-reorganization resulted in the adjustment of assets and liabilities to estimated fair values and the elimination of an accumulated deficit effective January 1, 1994. Income tax benefits resulting from the utilization of net operating loss and other carryforwards existing at January 1, 1994 and temporary differences existing prior to or resulting from the quasi-reorganization are excluded from the results of operations and credited to additional paid-in capital.

89

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash investments, receivables, and deposits. The Company typically places its cash investments in investment grade short-term instruments. Deposits, included in other assets, are due from municipalities or utility companies and are generally collected from such entities through fees assessed to other developers.

For those instruments, as defined under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for which it is practical to estimate fair value, management has determined that the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2006, except for the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes, 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes and 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes as described in Note 6.

The Company is an issuer of, or subject to, financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business which exposes it to credit risks. These financial instruments include letters of credit and obligations in connection with assessment district bonds. These off-balance sheet financial instruments are described in more detail in Note 11.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents.

Management Fees

Management fees represent fees earned from unconsolidated joint ventures in accordance with joint venture and/or operating agreements. Effective January 1, 2004, upon consolidation of certain joint ventures in connection with interpretation No. 46 (See Note 2), management fees are eliminated with the related cost of sales.

Earnings Per Common Share

On July 25, 2006, WLH Acquisition Corp., a corporation owned by General William Lyon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, was merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation of the merger. Prior to the completion of the merger, General Lyon and the two trusts contributed all the shares of the Company owned by them, which constituted more than 90% of the outstanding shares, to WLH Acquisition Corp. WLH Acquisition Corp. was then merged with and into the Company pursuant to the short-form merger provisions of Delaware law. After the merger, the Company’s capital structure consisted of common stock, par value $.01 per share, 3,000 shares authorized, and 1,000 shares outstanding. The Company will continue as a privately held company, wholly owned by General Lyon and the two trusts. Because the Company is now a privately held company, no earnings per share information is presented. See Note 7 – Tender Offer and Merger for additional information.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and revenues and expenses for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

90

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“FAS 157”), FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FAS 157 is not expected to materially affect how we determine fair value.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected financial statement misstatements should be considered in current year financial statements. SAB 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both balance sheet and income statement approaches and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relative quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation, among other things, creates a two step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. FIN 48 specifically prohibits the use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions, and it has expanded disclosure requirements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, in which the impact of adoption should be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company is evaluating the provisions of FIN 48 and has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 29, 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-05, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“EITF 04-05”). The scope of EITF 04-05 is limited to limited partnerships or similar entities (such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership) that are not variable interest entities under Interpretation No. 46 and provides a new framework for addressing when a general partner in a limited partnership, or managing member in the case of a limited liability company, controls the entity. Under EITF 04-05, the Company may be required to consolidate certain investments in which the Company holds a general partner or managing member interest. EITF 04-05 is effective after June 29, 2005 for new entities formed after such date and for existing entities for which the agreements are subsequently modified and is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006 for all other entities. The adoption of EITF 04-05 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006.

Reclassifications

Certain balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation.

91

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2 — Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as amended (“Interpretation No. 46”) which addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Under Interpretation No. 46, arrangements that are not controlled through voting or similar rights are accounted for as VIEs. An enterprise is required to consolidate a VIE if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

Under Interpretation No. 46, a VIE is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity through voting or similar rights, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to Interpretation No. 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE.

Based on the provisions of Interpretation No. 46, the Company has concluded that under certain circumstances when the Company (i) enters into option agreements for the purchase of land or lots from an entity and pays a non-refundable deposit, (ii) enters into land banking arrangements (see Note 10) or (iii) enters into arrangements with a financial partner for the formation of joint ventures which engage in homebuilding and land development activities, a VIE may be created under condition (ii) (b) or (c) of the previous paragraph. The Company may be deemed to have provided subordinated financial support, which refers to variable interests that will absorb some or all of an entity’s expected losses if they occur. For each VIE created, the Company has computed expected losses and residual returns based on the probability of future cash flows as outlined in Interpretation No. 46. If the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, the assets, liabilities and operations of the VIE are consolidated with the Company’s financial statements.

At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, certain joint ventures, lot option agreements and land banking arrangements have been determined to be VIEs under Interpretation No. 46 in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of all of these joint ventures, lot option agreements and land banking arrangements have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company, specifically including information for the joint ventures, lot option arrangements and land banking arrangements consolidated under Interpretation No. 46, is presented below to allow investors to determine the nature of assets held and the operations of the consolidated entities. Investments in consolidated entities in the financial statements of wholly-owned entities presented below use the equity method of accounting. Consolidated real estate inventories-owned include land deposits under option agreements or land banking arrangements (see Note 11) of $34,517,000,000 and $77,956,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, the Company’s remaining total contractual obligations for land purchases and option commitments was approximately $407,665,000.

The joint ventures which have been determined to be VIEs are each engaged in homebuilding and land development activities. Certain of these joint ventures have not obtained construction financing from outside lenders, but are financing their activities through equity contributions from each of the joint venture partners. Creditors of these VIE’s have no recourse against the general credit of the Company. Income allocations and cash distributions to the Company are based on predetermined formulas between the Company and the joint venture partners as specified in the applicable partnership or operating agreements. The Company generally receives, after partners’ priority returns and return of partners’ capital, approximately 50% of the profits and cash flows from the joint ventures.

92

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET BY FORM OF OWNERSHIP

(in thousands)

	December 31, 2006
	Wholly- Owned		Variable Interest Entities Under Interpretation No. 46		Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,123	$	14,609	$	—		$	38,732
Receivables		118,260		1,231		—		$	119,491
Real estate inventories
Owned		1,248,735		183,018		—			1,431,753
Not owned		131,564		69,103		—			200,667
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		3,560		—		—			3,560
Investments in consolidated entities		76,833		—		(76,833	)		—
Other assets		84,392		—		—			84,392
Intercompany receivables		—		3,367		(3,367	)		—
	$	1,687,467	$	271,328	$	(80,200	)	$	1,878,595
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	146,286	$	14,177	$	—		$	160,463
Liabilities from inventories not owned		131,564		—		—			131,564
Notes payable		233,688		70,408		—			304,096
7 5/8% Senior Notes due December 15, 2012		150,000		—		—			150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes due April 1, 2013		247,218		—		—			247,218
7 1/2% Senior Notes due February 15, 2014		150,000		—		—			150,000
Intercompany payables		3,316		51		(3,367	)		—
Total liabilities		1,062,072		84,636		(3,367	)		1,143,341
Minority interest in consolidated entities		—		—		109,859			109,859
Owners’ capital
William Lyon Homes		—		76,833		(76,833	)		—
Others		—		109,859		(109,859	)		—
Stockholders’ equity		625,395		—		—			625,395
	$	1,687,467	$	271,328	$	(80,200	)	$	1,878,595

93

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET BY FORM OF OWNERSHIP

(in thousands)

	December 31, 2005
	Wholly- Owned		Variable Interest Entities Under Interpretation No. 46		Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,271	$	26,098	$	—		$	52,369
Receivables		128,074		15,407		—			143,481
Real estate inventories
Owned		1,119,127		184,349		—			1,303,476
Not owned		—		115,772		—			115,772
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		397		—		—			397
Investments in consolidated entities		88,197		—		(88,197	)		—
Other assets		67,103		8,404		—			75,507
Intercompany receivables		—		6,583		(6,583	)		—
	$	1,429,169	$	356,613	$	(94,780	)	$	1,691,002
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	223,306	$	25,088	$	—		$	248,394
Notes payable		109,469		16,150		—			125,619
7 5/8% Senior Notes due December 15, 2012		150,000		—		—			150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes due April 1, 2013		246,917		—		—			246,917
7 1/2% Senior Notes due February 15, 2014		150,000		—		—			150,000
Intercompany payables		6,583		—		(6,583	)		—
Total liabilities		886,275		41,238		(6,583	)		920,930
Minority interest in consolidated entities		—		—		227,178			227,178
Owners’ capital
William Lyon Homes		—		88,197		(88,197	)		—
Others		—		227,178		(227,178	)		—
Stockholders’ equity		542,894		—		—			542,894
	$	1,429,169	$	356,613	$	(94,780	)	$	1,691,002

94

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FORM OF OWNERSHIP

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31, 2006
	Wholly-Owned			Variable Interest Entities Under Interpretation No. 46			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Total
Operating revenue
Sales	$	1,289,338		$	202,883		$	—		$	1,492,221
Management fees		5,011			—			(5,011	)		—
		1,294,349			202,883			(5,011	)		1,492,221
Operating costs
Cost of sales		(1,022,443	)		(159,706	)		5,011			(1,177,138	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets		(39,895	)		—			—			(39,895	)
Sales and marketing		(64,073	)		(8,276	)		—			(72,349	)
General and administrative		(61,367	)		(23	)		—			(61,390	)
Other		(6,502	)		—			—			(6,502	)
		(1,194,280	)		(168,005	)		5,011			(1,357,274	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		3,242			—			—			3,242
Equity in income of consolidated entities		18,491			—			(18,491	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			(16,914	)		(16,914	)
Operating income		121,802			34,878			(35,405	)		121,275
Financial advisory expenses		(3,165	)		—			—			(3,165	)
Other income, net		5,072			527			—			5,599
Income before provision for income taxes		123,709			35,405			(35,405	)		123,709
Provision for income taxes		(48,931	)		—			—			(48,931	)
Net income	$	74,778		$	35,405		$	(35,405	)	$	74,778

95

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FORM OF OWNERSHIP

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31, 2005
	Wholly-Owned			Variable Interest Entities Under Interpretation No. 46			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Total
Operating revenue
Sales	$	1,449,524		$	406,859		$	—		$	1,856,383
Management fees		12,658			—			(12,658	)		—
		1,462,182			406,859			(12,658	)		1,856,383
Operating costs
Cost of sales		(1,057,535	)		(306,924	)		12,658			(1,351,801	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets		(4,600	)		—			—			(4,600	)
Sales and marketing		(46,480	)		(12,942	)		—			(59,422	)
General and administrative		(90,045	)		—			—			(90,045	)
Other		(2,450	)		—			—			(2,450	)
		(1,201,110	)		(319,866	)		12,658			(1,508,318	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		4,301			—			—			4,301
Equity in income of consolidated entities		50,009			—			(50,009	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			(37,571	)		(37,571	)
Operating income		315,382			86,993			(87,580	)		314,795
Financial advisory expenses		(2,191	)		—			—			(2,191	)
Other income, net		1,589			587			—			2,176
Income before provision for income taxes		314,780			87,580			(87,580	)		314,780
Provision for income taxes		(124,149	)		—			—			(124,149	)
Net income	$	190,631		$	87,580		$	(87,580	)	$	190,631

96

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME BY FORM OF OWNERSHIP

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31, 2004
				Consolidated Entities
	Wholly- Owned			Variable Interest Entities Under Interpretation No. 46			Joint Ventures Previously Consolidated			Elimination Entries			Consolidated Total
Operating revenue
Sales	$	1,282,535		$	539,312		$	33,655		$	(33,655	)	$	1,821,847
Management fees		16,188			—			—			(16,188	)		—
		1,298,723			539,312			33,655			(49,843	)		1,821,847
Operating costs
Cost of sales		(964,398	)		(402,020	)		(33,655	)		49,843			(1,350,230	)
Sales and marketing		(41,381	)		(17,411	)		—			—			(58,792	)
General and administrative		(80,784	)		—			—			—			(80,784	)
Other		(2,105	)		—			—			—			(2,105	)
		(1,088,668	)		(419,431	)		(33,655	)		49,843			(1,491,911	)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		(699	)		—			—			—			(699	)
Equity in income of consolidated entities		70,394			—			—			(70,394	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			—			(49,661	)		(49,661	)
Operating income		279,750			119,881			—			(120,055	)		279,576
Other income, net		5,398			174			—			—			5,572
Income before provision for income taxes		285,148			120,055			—			(120,055	)		285,148
Provision for income taxes		(113,499	)		—			—			—			(113,499	)
Net income	$	171,649		$	120,055		$	—		$	(120,055	)	$	171,649

97

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3 — Receivables

Receivables consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2006		2005
First trust deed mortgage notes receivable, pledged as collateral for revolving mortgage warehouse credit facility	$	59,734	$	47,816
Other receivables — primarily escrow proceeds		59,757		95,665
	$	119,491	$	143,481

Note 4 — Real Estate Inventories

Real estate inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Inventories owned:
Deposits	$	34,517	$	77,956
Land		676,274		520,884
Construction in progress		548,762		578,603
Completed inventory, including model homes		172,200		126,033
Total		1,431,753	$	1,303,476
Inventories not owned: (1)
Variable interest entities — lot options agreements	$	—	$	44,786
Variable interest entities — land banking arrangement		69,103		70,986
Other land options contracts		131,564		—
Total inventories not owned	$	200,667	$	115,772

(1) Includes the consolidation of certain lot option arrangements and land banking arrangements determined to be VIEs under Interpretation No. 46 in which the company is considered the primary beneficiary (See Note 2 above) and the consolidation of a certain land banking arrangement recorded as a product financing arrangement. Amounts are net of deposits.

98

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 5 — Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are general partners or members in joint ventures involved in the development and sale of residential projects. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company, all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries and certain joint ventures which have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary (see Note 2). The financial statements of joint ventures which have not been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary are not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). Condensed combined financial information of these unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:

CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

	December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	328	$	2,580
Receivables		309		3,253
Real estate inventories		40,913		31,279
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		2,048		—
Property and equipment		985		956
	$	44,583	$	38,068
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable	$	765	$	5,127
Notes payable		38,525		32,377
Advances from William Lyon Homes		1,825		181
		41,115		37,685
Owners’ Capital
William Lyon Homes		1,735		216
Others		1,733		167
		3,468		383
	$	44,583	$	38,068

99

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Operating revenue
Land sales	$	17,046		$	26,091		$	—
		17,046			26,091			—
Operating costs
Cost of sales — land		(13,315	)		(23,338	)		—
Sales and marketing		—			(342	)		—
General and administrative		—			(17	)		—
Other		(1,579	)		(1,380	)		(694	)
		(14,894	)		(25,077	)		(694	)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures		5,037			19,687			(705	)
Operating income (loss)		7,189			20,701			(1,399	)
Other income, net		384			—			—
Net income (loss)	$	7,573		$	20,701		$	(1,399	)
Allocation to owners
William Lyon Homes	$	3,786		$	10,350		$	(699	)
Others		3,787			10,351			(700	)
	$	7,573		$	20,701		$	(1,399	)

Income allocations and cash distributions to the Company are based on predetermined formulas between the Company and the joint venture partners as specified in the applicable partnership or operating agreements. The Company generally receives, after partners’ priority returns and return of partners’ capital, approximately 50% of the profits and cash flows from joint ventures.

Certain joint ventures have obtained financing from construction lenders which amounted to $38,525,000 at December 31, 2006. As common practice required by commercial lenders, all of the joint ventures that have obtained financing are obligated to repay loans to a level such that they do not exceed certain required loan-to-value or loan-to-cost ratios. Each lender has the right to test the ratios by appraising the property securing the loan at the time. Either a decrease in the value of the property securing the loan or an increase in the construction costs could trigger this pay down obligation. The term of the obligation corresponds with the term of the loan and is limited to the outstanding loan balance.

The Company is a member in an unconsolidated joint venture limited liability company formed for the purpose of acquiring and developing land in Nevada. At December 31, 2006, the unconsolidated joint venture had outstanding land acquisition and development debt of $36,775,000, of which the Company guaranteed $18,387,500. If the unconsolidated joint venture liability company were to default on its obligation to repay the debt, the Company would be obligated to pay one-half of the outstanding balance, together with one-half of the accrued but unpaid interest thereon. The current maturity date of the debt is June 30, 2007, but such maturity date may be extended under certain circumstances to June 30, 2008. The debt bears interest at prime plus 0.5% (8.75% at December 31, 2006) and is secured by the real estate inventories of the unconsolidated joint venture limited liability company in the book amount of $38,260,000 at December 31, 2006.

100

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, (“California Lyon”), and two unaffiliated parties formed a series of limited liability companies (“Development LLCs”) for the purpose of acquiring three parcels of land totaling 236 acres in Irvine and Tustin, California (formerly part of the Tustin Marine Corps Air Station) and developing the land into 1,910 residential homesites. As of December 31, 2005, the Development LLCs sold substantially all of the lots. During the year ended December 31, 2005, California Lyon purchased 829 lots from the Development LLCs for a purchase price of $183,626,000, of which 267 lots were purchased through three land banking arrangements for a purchase price of $84,085,000 (see Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company’s land banking arrangements). California Lyon has a 12 ¹/2% indirect, minority interest in the Development LLCs and during the year ended December 31, 2005 earned income of $9,843,000 from the sale of lots by the Development LLCs, of which $5,159,000 of income was deferred as a reduction to the cost basis of the lots purchased by California Lyon and will be recognized when homes are constructed on the lots and sold to third parties.

Note 6 — Notes Payable and Senior Notes

Notes payable and Senior Notes consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Notes payable:
Revolving credit facilities	$	145,990	$	49,967
Construction notes payable		70,408		16,150
Seller financing		28,339		11,686
Collateralized mortgage obligations under revolving mortgage warehouse credit facilities, secured by first trust deed mortgage notes receivable		59,359		47,816
		304,096		125,619
Senior Notes:
7 5/8% Senior Notes due December 15, 2012		150,000		150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes due April 1, 2013		247,218		246,917
7 1/2% Senior Notes due February 15, 2014		150,000		150,000
		547,218		546,917
	$	851,314	$	672,536

During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred and capitalized interest relating to the above debt of $80,173,000, $73,209,000 and $59,024,000, respectively.

Maturities of the notes payable and Senior Notes are as follows as of December 31, 2006:

Year Ended December 31,	(in thousands)
2007	$	177,149
2008		126,947
2009		—
2010		—
2011		—
Thereafter		547,218
	$	851,314

101

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes

On November 22, 2004, the Company’s 100% owned subsidiary, William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, (“California Lyon”) closed its offering of $150,000,000 principal amount of 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012 (the “7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes”). The notes were sold pursuant to Rule 144A. The notes were issued at par, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $148,500,000. California Lyon agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an offer to exchange the notes for publicly tradeable notes having substantially identical terms. On January 12, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared the registration statement effective and California Lyon commenced an offer to exchange any and all of its outstanding $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012, which are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, for a like amount of its new 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2012, which are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the prospectus dated January 12, 2005. The exchange offer was completed for $146,500,000 principal amount of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes on February 18, 2005. The remaining $3,500,000 principal amount of the old notes remains outstanding. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material respects to those of the old notes, except for certain transfer restrictions, registration rights and liquidated damages provisions relating to the old notes. Interest on the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on December 15 and June 15 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $5,700,000.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes (“7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to December 15, 2008. Thereafter, the 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before December 15, 2007, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.625% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes with a face value of $150,000,000 had a fair value of approximately $127,875,000 based on quotes from industry sources.

10 ³/4% Senior Notes

California Lyon filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the sale of $250,000,000 of Senior Notes due 2013 (the “10 ³/4% Senior Notes”) which became effective on March 12, 2003. The offering closed on March 17, 2003 and was fully subscribed and issued. The notes were issued at a price of 98.493% to the public, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $246,233,000. The purchase price reflected a discount to yield 11% under the effective interest method and the notes have been reflected net of the unamortized discount in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Interest on the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes, the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $13,400,000.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes (“10 ³/4% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to April 1, 2008. Thereafter, the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before April 1, 2006, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 110.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

102

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 10 ³/4% Senior Notes with a face value of $247,218,000 had a fair value of approximately $240,000,000 based on quotes from industry sources.

7 ¹/2% Senior Notes

On February 6, 2004, California Lyon closed its offering of $150,000,000 principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014 (the “7 ¹/2% Senior Notes”). The notes were sold pursuant to Rule 144A and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in reliance on Regulation S. The notes were issued at par, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $147,600,000. California Lyon agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an offer to exchange the notes for publicly tradeable notes having substantially identical terms. On July 16, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared the registration statement effective and California Lyon commenced an offer to exchange any and all of its outstanding $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014, which are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, for a like amount of its new 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes due 2014, which are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the prospectus dated July 16, 2004. The exchange offer was completed for the full principal amount of the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes on August 17, 2004. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material respects to those of the old notes, except for certain transfer restrictions, registration rights and liquidated damages provisions relating to the old notes. The new notes have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Interest on the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Based on the current outstanding principal amount of 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes the Company’s semi-annual interest payments are $5,600,000.

Except as set forth in the Indenture governing the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes (“7 ¹/2% Senior Notes Indenture”), the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to February 15, 2009. Thereafter, the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes will be redeemable at the option of California Lyon, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, on or before February 15, 2007, California Lyon may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes with the proceeds of qualified equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.50% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes with a face value of $150,000,000 had a fair value of approximately $124,875,000 based on quotes from industry sources.

* * * * *

The 7 ⁵/8% Senior Notes, the 10 ³/4% Senior Notes and the 7 ¹/2% Senior Notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) are senior unsecured obligations of California Lyon and are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (“Delaware Lyon”), which is the parent company of California Lyon, and all of Delaware Lyon’s existing and certain of its future restricted subsidiaries. The Senior Notes and the guarantees rank senior to all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ debt that is expressly subordinated to the Senior Notes and the guarantees, but are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ senior secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness.

Upon a change of control as described in the respective Indentures governing the Senior Notes (the “Senior Notes Indentures”), California Lyon will be required to offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

103

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

If the Company’s consolidated tangible net worth falls below $75.0 million for any two consecutive fiscal quarters, California Lyon will be required to make an offer to purchase up to 10% of each class of Senior Notes originally issued at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

California Lyon is 100% owned by Delaware Lyon. Each subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned by California Lyon or Delaware Lyon. All guarantees of the Senior Notes are full and unconditional and all guarantees are joint and several. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Delaware Lyon or any guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.

The Senior Notes Indentures contain covenants that limit the ability of Delaware Lyon and its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions; (iii) make investments; (iv) sell assets; (v) incur liens; (vi) enter into agreements restricting the ability of Delaware Lyon’s restricted subsidiaries (other than California Lyon) to pay dividends; (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates; and (viii) consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of Delaware Lyon’s and California Lyon’s assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications as described in the Senior Notes Indentures.

The foregoing summary is not a complete description of the Senior Notes and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Senior Notes Indentures.

The net proceeds of the offerings were used to repay amounts outstanding under revolving credit facilities and other indebtedness. The remaining proceeds were used to pay fees and commissions related to the offering and for other general corporate purposes.

At December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $233,688,000 million of secured indebtedness, (excluding approximately $70,408,000 million of secured indebtedness of consolidated entities) and approximately $305,779,000 million of additional secured indebtedness available to be borrowed under the Company’s credit facilities, as limited by the Company’s borrowing base formulas.

Supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company, specifically including information for California Lyon, the issuer of the Senior Notes, and Delaware Lyon and the guarantor subsidiaries is presented below. Investments in subsidiaries are presented using the equity method of accounting. Separate financial statements of California Lyon and the guarantor subsidiaries are not provided, as the consolidating financial information contained herein provides a more meaningful disclosure to allow investors to determine the nature of assets held and the operations of the combined groups.

104

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2006

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon		California Lyon		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	12,253	$	11,222	$	15,257	$	—		$	38,732
Receivables		—		56,084		62,174		1,233		—			119,491
Real estate inventories
Owned		—		1,246,889		1,846		183,018		—			1,431,753
Not owned		—		200,667		—		—		—			200,667
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		—		3,560		—		—		—			3,560
Property and equipment, net		—		2,493		14,335		—		—			16,828
Deferred loan costs		—		11,258		—		—		—			11,258
Goodwill		—		5,896		—		—		—			5,896
Other assets		—		47,724		2,686		—		—			50,410
Investments in subsidiaries		625,395		77,281		8,502		—		(711,178	)		—
Intercompany receivables		—		1,138		169,983		3,367		(174,488	)		—
	$	625,395	$	1,665,243	$	270,748	$	202,875	$	885,666		$	1,878,595
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	—	$	33,301	$	1,084	$	14,207	$	—		$	48,592
Accrued expenses		—		104,501		7,198		172		—			111,871
Liabilities from inventories not owned		—		131,564		—		—		—			131,564
Notes payable		—		174,329		59,359		70,408		—			304,096
7 5/8% Senior Notes		—		150,000		—		—		—			150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes		—		247,218		—		—		—			247,218
7 1/2% Senior Notes		—		150,000		—		—		—			150,000
Intercompany payables		—		173,299		1,138		51		(174,488	)		—
Total liabilities		—		1,164,212		68,779		84,838		(174,488	)		1,143,341
Minority interest in consolidated entities		—		—		—		—		109,859			109,859
Stockholders’ equity		625,395		501,031		201,969		118,037		(821,037	)		625,395
	$	625,395	$	1,665,243	$	270,748	$	202,875	$	885,666		$	1,878,595

105

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2005

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon		California Lyon		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	18,934	$	6,687	$	26,748	$	—		$	52,369
Receivables		—		75,505		52,567		15,409		—			143,481
Real estate inventories
Owned		—		1,111,144		2,090		190,242		—			1,303,476
Not owned		—		115,772		—		—		—			115,772
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		—		397		—		—		—			397
Property and equipment, net		—		2,128		16,425		—		—			18,553
Deferred loan costs		—		12,323		—		—		—			12,323
Goodwill		—		5,896		—		—		—			5,896
Other assets		—		36,472		2,263		—		—			38,735
Investments in subsidiaries		542,894		88,254		10,332		—		(641,480	)		—
Intercompany receivables		—		1,667		113,530		6,583		(121,780	)		—
	$	542,894	$	1,468,492	$	203,894	$	238,982	$	(763,260	)	$	1,691,002
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	—	$	46,184	$	756	$	20,386	$	—		$	67,326
Accrued expenses		—		169,884		6,250		4,934		—			181,068
Notes payable		—		61,653		47,816		16,150		—			125,619
7 5/8% Senior Notes		—		150,000		—		—		—			150,000
10 3/4% Senior Notes		—		246,917		—		—		—			246,917
7 1/2% Senior Notes		—		150,000		—		—		—			150,000
Intercompany payables		—		120,113		1,667		—		(121,780	)		—
Total liabilities		—		944,751		56,489		41,470		(121,780	)		920,930
Minority interest in consolidated entities		—		—		—		—		227,178			227,178
Stockholders’ equity		542,894		523,741		147,405		197,512		(868,658	)		542,894
	$	542,894	$	1,468,492	$	203,894	$	238,982	$	(763,260	)	$	1,691,002

106

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31, 2006

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon		California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating revenue
Sales	$	—	$	1,127,624		$	206,230		$	202,883		$	(44,516	)	$	1,492,221
Management fees		—		5,011			—			—			(5,011	)		—
		—	$	1,132,635			206,230			202,883			(49,527	)		1,492,221
Operating costs
Cost of sales		—		(927,090	)		(139,869	)		(159,706	)		49,527			(1,177,138	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets		—		(39,895	)		—			—			—			(39,895	)
Sales and marketing		—		(54,732	)		(9,341	)		(8,276	)		—			(72,349	)
General and administrative		—		(61,252	)		(115	)		(23	)		—			(61,390	)
Other		—		—			(6,502	)		—			—			(6,502	)
		—		(1,082,969	)		(155,827	)		(168,005	)		49,527			(1,357,274	)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures		—		4,032			(790	)		—			—			3,242
Income (loss) from subsidiaries		74,778		66,411			(40	)		—			(141,149	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—		—			—			—			(16,914	)		(16,914	)
Operating income		74,778		120,109			49,573			34,878			(158,063	)		121,275
Financial advisory expenses		—		(3,165	)		—			—			—			(3,165	)
Other income, net		—		777			4,265			557			—			5,599
Income before provision for income taxes		74,778		117,721			53,838			35,435			(158,063	)		123,709
Provision for income taxes		—		(48,921	)		—			(10	)		—			(48,931	)
Net income	$	74,778	$	68,800		$	53,838		$	35,425		$	(158,063	)	$	74,778

107

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31, 2005

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon		California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating revenue
Sales	$	—	$	1,246,082		$	203,442		$	406,859		$	—		$	1,856,383
Management fees		—		12,658			—			—			(12,658	)		—
		—		1,258,740			203,442			406,859			(12,658	)		1,856,383
Operating costs
Cost of sales		—		(908,897	)		(148,638	)		(306,924	)		12,658			(1,351,801	)
Impairment loss on real estate assets		—		—			(4,600	)		—			—			(4,600	)
Sales and marketing		—		(38,333	)		(8,147	)		(12,942	)		—			(59,422	)
General and administrative		—		(89,977	)		(68	)		—			—			(90,045	)
Other		—		—			(2,450	)		—			—			(2,450	)
		—		(1,037,207	)		(163,903	)		(319,866	)		12,658			(1,508,318	)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures		—		4,991			(690	)		—			—			4,301
Income (loss) from subsidiaries		190,631		87,255			(217	)		—			(277,669	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—		—			—			—			(37,571	)		(37,571	)
Operating income		190,631		313,779			38,632			86,993			(315,240	)		314,795
Financial advisory expenses		—		(2,191	)		—			—			—			(2,191	)
Other income, net		—		488			1,052			636			—			2,176
Income before provision for income taxes		190,631		312,076			39,684			87,629			(315,240	)		314,780
Provision for income taxes		—		(124,132	)		—			(17	)		—			(124,149	)
Net income	$	190,631	$	187,944		$	39,684		$	87,612		$	(315,240	)	$	190,631

108

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon		California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating revenue
Sales	$	—	$	1,219,155		$	97,035		$	539,312		$	(33,655	)	$	1,821,847
Management fees		—		16,188			—			—			(16,188	)		—
		—		1,235,343			97,035			539,312			(49,843	)		1,821,847
Operating costs
Cost of sales		—		(933,472	)		(64,581	)		(402,020	)		49,843			(1,350,230	)
Sales and marketing		—		(36,850	)		(4,531	)		(17,411	)		—			(58,792	)
General and administrative		—		(80,570	)		(214	)		—			—			(80,784	)
Other		—		—			(2,105	)		—			—			(2,105	)
		—		(1,050,892	)		(71,431	)		(419,431	)		49,843			(1,491,911	)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		—		(352	)		(347	)		—			—			(699	)
Income from subsidiaries		171,649		90,478			6,048			—			(268,175	)		—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—		—			—			—			(49,661	)		(49,661	)
Operating income		171,649		274,577			31,305			119,881			(317,836	)		279,576
Other income, net		—		270			3,497			1,805			—			5,572
Income before provision for income taxes		171,649		274,847			34,802			121,686			(317,836	)		285,148
Provision for income taxes		—		(112,919	)		—			(580	)		—			(113,499	)
Net income	$	171,649	$	161,928		$	34,802		$	121,106		$	(317,836	)	$	171,649

109

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2006

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon			California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor     Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating activities:
Net income	$	74,778		$	68,800		$	53,838		$	35,425		$	(158,063	)	$	74,778
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			881			1,648			—			—			2,529
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		—			(4,032	)		790			—			—			(3,242	)
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures		—			841			1,758			—			—			2,599
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			—			—			16,914			16,914
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		(74,778	)		(66,411	)		40			—			141,149			—
Impairment loss on real estate asset		—			39,895			—			—			—			39,895
State income tax refund credited to additional paid in capital		—			10			—			—			—			10
Federal income tax refund credited to additional paid in capital		—			1,820			—			—			—			1,820
Provision for income taxes		—			48,921			—			10			—			48,931
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		—			19,421			(9,607	)		14,176			—			23,990
Intercompany receivables/payables		—			—			(56,453	)		3,267			53,186			—
Real estate inventories owned		—			(153,824	)		(1,190	)		7,224			—			(147,790	)
Real estate inventories not owned		—			67,793			—			—			—			67,793
Deferred loan costs		—			1,065			—			—			—			1,065
Other assets		—			(19,656	)		(423	)		—			—			(20,079	)
Accounts payable		—			(12,883	)		328			(6,179	)		—			(18,734	)
Accrued expenses		—			(108,845	)		948			(4,772	)		—			(112,669	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		—			(116,204	)		(8,323	)		49,151			53,186			(22,190	)
Investing activities:
Net change in investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		—			(862	)		(1,114	)		—			—			(1,976	)
Purchases of property and equipment		—			(1,246	)		442			—			—			(804	)
Investments in subsidiaries		—			77,384			1,790			—			(79,174	)		—
Advances (to) from affiliates		(434	)		(45,084	)		—			—			45,518			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(434	)		30,192			1,118			—			(33,656	)		(2,780	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable		—			1,262,858			822,673			54,258			—			2,139,789
Principal payments on notes payable		—			(1,170,807	)		(811,130	)		—			—			(1,981,937	)
Minority interest distributions, net		—			(12,720	)		—			(134,233	)		—			(146,953	)
Common stock issued for exercised stock options		434			—			—			—			—			434
Advances (to) from affiliates		—			—			197			19,333			(19,530	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		434			79,331			11,740			(60,642	)		(19,530	)		11,333
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			(6,681	)		4,535			(11,491	)		—			(13,637	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		—			18,934			6,687			26,748			—			52,369
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	—		$	12,253		$	11,222		$	15,257		$	—		$	38,732

110

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2005

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon			California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor     Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating activities:
Net income	$	190,631		$	187,944		$	39,684		$	87,612		$	(315,240	)	$	190,631
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			527			1,565			—			—			2,092
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		—			(4,991	)		690			—			—			(4,301	)
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures		—			2,625			83			—			—			2,708
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			—			—			37,571			37,571
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		(190,631	)		(87,255	)		217			—			277,669			—
Impairment loss on real estate asset		—			—			4,600			—			—			4,600
State income tax refund credited to additional paid in capital		—			1,845			—			—			—			1,845
Provision for income taxes		—			124,132			—			17			—			124,149
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		—			(53,047	)		(41,206	)		(9,926	)		—			(104,179	)
Intercompany receivables/payables		—			4,600			(28,260	)		(7,915	)		31,575			—
Real estate inventories		—			(268,431	)		(1,213	)		37,404			—			(232,240	)
Deferred loan costs		—			1,659			—			—			—			1,659
Other assets		—			(5,412	)		(761	)		—			—			(6,173	)
Accounts payable		—			17,038			376			10,548			—			27,962
Accrued expenses		—			(88,450	)		2,279			(4,687	)		—			(90,858	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		—			(167,216	)		(21,946	)		113,053			31,575			(44,534	)
Investing activities:
Net change in investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		—			18,990			117			—			—			19,107
Purchases of property and equipment		—			(1,562	)		(1,017	)		—			—			(2,579	)
Investments in subsidiaries		—			76,304			841			—			(77,145	)		—
Advances (to) from affiliates		(312	)		(1,897	)		—			—			2,209			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(312	)		91,835			(59	)		—			(74,936	)		16,528
Financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable		—			1,131,835			723,617			—			—			1,855,452
Principal payments on notes payable		—			(1,094,940	)		(685,106	)		(14,753	)		—			(1,794,799	)
Minority interest distributions, net		—			—			—			(76,664	)		—			(76,664	)
Common stock issued for exercised stock options		312			—			—			—			—			312
Advances (to) from affiliates		—			—			(15,989	)		(27,372	)		43,361			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		312			36,895			22,522			(118,789	)		43,361			(15,699	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			(38,486	)		517			(5,736	)		—			(43,705	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		—			57,420			6,170			32,484			—			96,074
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	—		$	18,934		$	6,687		$	26,748		$	—		$	52,369

111

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

	Unconsolidated
	Delaware Lyon			California Lyon			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor     Subsidiaries			Eliminating Entries			Consolidated Company
Operating activities:
Net income	$	171,649		$	161,928		$	34,802		$	121,106		$	(317,836	)	$	171,649
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			444			883			—			—			1,327
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures		—			352			347			—			—			699
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(171,649	)		(90,478	)		(6,048	)		—			268,175			—
Minority equity in income of consolidated entities		—			—			—			—			49,661			49,661
Provision for income taxes		—			112,919			—			580			—			113,499
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		—			(243	)		9,852			(441	)		—			9,168
Intercompany receivables/payables		—			—			(20,040	)		1,332			18,708			—
Real estate inventories		—			(289,897	)		(673	)		95,230			—			(195,340	)
Deferred loan costs		—			(1,004	)		—			—			—			(1,004	)
Other assets		—			(4,790	)		(332	)		—			—			(5,122	)
Accounts payable		—			(1,489	)		(41	)		(1,082	)		—			(2,612	)
Accrued expenses		—			(60,010	)		62			5,316			—			(54,632	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		—			(172,268	)		18,812			222,041			18,708			87,293
Investing activities:
Net change in investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		—			1,046			(347	)		—			—			699
Purchases of property and equipment		—			(737	)		(17,031	)		—			—			(17,768	)
Investment in subsidiaries		—			51,729			(5,342	)		—			(46,387	)		—
Advances from (to) affiliates		80,069			(32,304	)		—			(26,304	)		(21,461	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		80,069			19,734			(22,720	)		(26,304	)		(67,848	)		(17,069	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable		—			1,339,500			429,433			—			—			1,768,933
Principal payments on notes payable		—			(1,381,024	)		(429,749	)		(85,592	)		—			(1,896,365	)
Issuance of 7 5/8% Senior Notes		—			148,500			—			—			—			148,500
Issuance of 7 1/2% Senior Notes		—			147,563			—			—			—			147,563
Minority interest (distributions) contributions, net		—			(58,269	)		—			(28,580	)		—			(86,849	)
Common stock issued for exercised options		932			—			—			—			—			932
Common stock purchased		(81,001	)		—			—			—			—			(81,001	)
Advances from (to) affiliates		—			—			6,187			(55,327	)		49,140			—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(80,069	)		196,270			5,871			(169,499	)		49,140			1,713
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			43,736			1,963			26,238			—			71,937
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		—			13,684			4,207			6,246			—			24,137
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	—		$	57,420		$	6,170		$	32,484		$	—		$	96,074

112

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Revolving Credit Facilities

As of December 31, 2006, the Company has seven revolving credit facilities which have an aggregate maximum loan commitment of $560.0 million, (including one facility of $150.0 million, one of $100.0 million, one of $90.0 million, one of $70.0 million and three of $50.0 million each), and mature at various dates through 2008. The revolving credit facilities have similar characteristics. The Company may borrow amounts, subject to applicable borrowing base and concentration limitations, as defined. During the last year of the term of each facility, the commitment amount will decrease ratably until the commitment under each facility is reduced to zero by the final maturity date, as defined in each respective agreement.

Availability under each credit facility is subject not only to the maximum amount committed under the respective facility, but also to both various borrowing base and concentration limitations. The borrowing base limits lender advances to certain agreed percentages of asset value. The allowed percentage generally increases as the asset progresses from land under development to residence subject to contract of sale. Advances for each type of collateral become due in whole or in part, subject to possible re-borrowing, and/or the collateral becomes excluded from the borrowing base, after a specified period or earlier upon sale. Concentration limitations further restrict availability under the credit facilities. The effect of these borrowing base and concentration limitations essentially is to mandate minimum levels of the Company’s investment in a project, with higher percentages of investment required at earlier phases of a project, and with greater absolute dollar amounts of investment required as a project progresses. Each revolving credit facility is secured by deeds of trust on the real property and improvements thereon owned by the Company in the subdivision project(s) approved by the respective lender, as well as pledges of all net sale proceeds, related contracts and other ancillary property. Also, each credit facility includes financial covenants, which may limit the amount that may be borrowed thereunder. Outstanding advances bear interest at various rates, which approximate the prime rate. As of December 31, 2006, $145,990,000 was outstanding under these credit facilities, with a weighted-average interest rate of 7.71%, and the undrawn availability was $305,779,000 as limited by the Company’s borrowing base formulas. Interest on the revolving credit facilities is calculated on the average, outstanding daily balance and is paid following the end of each month. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company borrowed $1,263,000,000 and repaid $1,167,000,000 under these facilities. The maximum amount outstanding was $228,281,000 and the weighted average borrowings were $152,549,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006. Interest incurred on the revolving credit facilities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $13,573,000. Delaware Lyon has guaranteed on an unsecured basis California Lyon’s obligations under certain of the revolving credit facilities and has provided an unsecured environmental indemnity in favor of the lender under the $90,000,000 bank line of credit. The Company routinely makes borrowings under its revolving credit facilities in the ordinary course of business within the maximum aggregate loan commitment amounts to fund its operations, including its land acquisition and home building activities, and repays such borrowings, as required by the credit facilities, with the net proceeds from sales of the real property, including homes, which secure the applicable credit facility.

Under the revolving credit facilities, we are required to comply with a number of covenants, the most restrictive of which require Delaware Lyon to maintain:

• A tangible net worth, as defined, of $200,000,000, adjusted upwards quarterly by 50% of Delaware Lyon’s quarterly net income after June 30, 2004,

• A ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, each as defined, of less than 3.25 to 1; and

• Minimum liquidity, as defined, of at least $10,000,000.

As of and for the period ending December 31, 2006, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.

These facilities include a number of other covenants with respect to such matters as the posting of cash or letters of credit in certain circumstances, the application or deposit of excess net sales proceeds, maintenance of

113

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

specified ratios, limitations on investments in joint ventures, maintenance of fixed charge coverages, stock ownership changes, and lot ownership.

As a common practice required by commercial lenders, the Company is obligated to repay loans to a level such that they do not exceed certain required loan-to-value or loan-to-cost ratios. Each lender has the right to test the ratios by appraising the property securing the loan at any time. Either a decrease in the value of the property securing the loan or an increase in the construction costs could trigger this pay down obligation. The term of the obligation corresponds with the term of the loan and is limited to the outstanding loan balance. The entire revolving credit facilities balance is subject to these obligations as of December 31, 2006.

Construction Notes Payable

At December 31, 2006, the Company had construction notes payable on certain consolidated entities amounting to $70,408,000. The construction notes have various maturity dates through 2008 and bear interest at rates ranging from prime plus 0.25% to prime plus 2.0% at December 31, 2006. Interest is calculated on the average daily balance and is paid following the end of each month.

Seller Financing

At December 31, 2006, the Company had $28,339,000 of notes payable outstanding related to land acquisitions for which seller financing was provided. The seller financing notes have various maturity dates through March 2008 and bear interest at rates ranging from 9.0% to 12.0% at December 31, 2006. Interest is calculated on the average principal balance outstanding and is accrued and paid when the financing is repaid.

Revolving Mortgage Warehouse Credit Facilities

The Company, through its mortgage subsidiary and one of its unconsolidated joint ventures, has entered into two revolving mortgage warehouse credit facilities with banks to fund its mortgage origination operations. The original credit facility, which matures in May 2007, provides for revolving loans of up to $30,000,000 outstanding, $20,000,000 of which is committed (lender obligated to lend if stated conditions are satisfied) and $10,000,000 of which is not committed (lender advances are optional even if stated conditions are otherwise satisfied). The Company’s mortgage subsidiary and one of its unconsolidated joint ventures entered into an additional $50,000,000 credit facility which matures in April 2007. The Company expects the maturities to be extended by the lender at each maturity date for an additional year. Mortgage loans are generally held for a short period of time and are typically sold to investors within 7 to 15 days following funding. The facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of each of the borrowers, including the mortgage loans held for sale, all rights of each of the borrowers with respect to contractual obligations of third party investors to purchase such mortgage loans, and all proceeds of sale of such mortgage loans. The facilities, which have LIBOR based pricing, also contain certain financial covenants requiring the borrowers to maintain minimum tangible net worth, leverage, profitability and liquidity. These facilities are non-recourse and are not guaranteed by the Company. At December 31, 2006 the outstanding balance under these facilities was $59,359,000.

Prime Interest Rates

The prime interest rates at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 8.25%, 7.25% and 5.25%, respectively. The weighted-average prime interest rates for each of the three years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 7.96%, 6.19% and 4.34%, respectively.

114

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 7 — Tender Offer and Merger

On March 17, 2006, General William Lyon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, announced that he commenced an offer to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock of William Lyon Homes not already owned by him for $93.00 per share in cash. The expiration date for the tender offer at the time of the offer was Thursday, April 13, 2006, unless the offer were extended.

The offer was subject to the non-waivable condition that there shall have been validly tendered and not withdrawn before the offer expires at least a majority of the outstanding shares not owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust, The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust or the officers and directors of William Lyon Homes immediately before the commencement of the offer. The offer was also subject to the receipt by General Lyon of the proceeds under his financing commitment from Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc. The offer was also subject to other terms and conditions as set forth in the tender offer materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and distributed to William Lyon Homes’ stockholders, and was initially subject to the further condition that sufficient shares were tendered in the offer such that the tendered shares, together with the shares already directly or indirectly owned by General Lyon and the trusts, would represent at least 90% of the shares outstanding upon expiration of the offer.

On March 23, 2006, the Company announced that its board of directors had formed a special committee of independent directors to consider the offer by General Lyon with the assistance of outside financial and legal advisors which the special committee retained. On April 10, 2006, General Lyon announced that he would amend his tender offer for all the outstanding shares of William Lyon Homes by increasing the offer price to $100.00 per share. The special committee determined that it would recommend that stockholders tender their shares in connection with the amended offer. General Lyon also extended his offer until Friday, April 21, 2006. General Lyon had also reached an agreement, subject to final court approval, to settle certain class action lawsuits that had been filed in Delaware on behalf of William Lyon Homes’ stockholders. As described below in Note 7 –Commitments and Contingencies, the Delaware Chancery Court approved the settlement on August 9, 2006. Another class action lawsuit filed in California has been stayed by the California court.

On April 24, 2006, General Lyon announced that he was extending his tender offer for all outstanding shares of William Lyon Homes not owned by him through April 28, 2006, and that he would waive the 90% condition to the offer. On May 1, 2006, General Lyon announced that he was further extending the tender offer through May 12, 2006, and that he was further amending the tender offer by increasing the offer price to $109.00 per share. All other terms and conditions of the offer remained the same, as set forth in the tender offer materials disseminated by General Lyon.

On May 18, 2006, General Lyon announced the completion of his tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company not already owned by him for $109.00 net per share in cash. Computershare Trust Company of New York, the depositary for the offer, had advised General Lyon that an aggregate of 1,711,125 shares were tendered in the offer, including 310,652 shares that remained subject to guaranteed delivery procedures. The shares tendered in the offer, together with the shares already owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, represented over 90% of the outstanding shares of the Company, which would be sufficient to enable General Lyon to effect a short-form merger with the Company under Delaware law.

On July 26, 2006, General Lyon announced that on July 25, 2006, WLH Acquisition Corp., a corporation owned by General Lyon, The William Harwell Lyon 1987 Trust and The William Harwell Lyon Separate Property Trust, was merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation of the merger. At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of the Company’s common

115

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

stock (except for shares owned by WLH Acquisition Corp. and by stockholders who properly exercise their appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law) was cancelled and converted into the right to receive $109.00 per share in cash, without interest, which is the same consideration that was paid for shares of the Company in the tender offer by General Lyon. Shareholders of the Company as of the effective time of the merger were sent additional information by mail on the process for receiving the merger consideration or exercising their appraisal rights.

Prior to the completion of the merger, General Lyon and the two trusts contributed all the shares of the Company owned by them, which constituted more than 90% of the outstanding shares, to WLH Acquisition Corp. WLH Acquisition Corp. was then merged with and into the Company pursuant to the short-form merger provisions of Delaware law. Prior to the merger, the Company had cancelled and retired 1,275,000 shares of its common stock which had been repurchased and were being held in the treasury. After the merger, the Company’s capital structure consists of common stock, par value $.01 per share, 3,000 shares authorized, and 1,000 shares outstanding. The Company will continue as a privately held company, wholly owned by General Lyon and the two trusts.

The Company has incurred approximately $3,165,000 in financial advisory expenses related to the tender offer which are reflected as financial advisory expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

See Note 11 for information on certain lawsuits which have been filed relating to the tender offer.

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity

Incentive Compensation Plans

The Company’s 2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) provides that (i) the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) are each eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the Company’s Consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income; (ii) the Executive Vice President (“EVP”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ¾ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income and 3% of the Northern California Region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the Region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses; and (iii) the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) is eligible to receive a bonus of ½ of 1% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income. In addition, under the Plan, each Region President is eligible to receive a bonus of 3% of the region’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, determined after allocation to the region of its allocable portion of corporate general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company’s board of directors has approved a cash bonus plan applicable in 2006 for all of its full-time, salaried employees who are not included in the Plan. All other participants under this cash bonus plan are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of a bonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income.

For the CEO, COO, EVP CFO, region presidents, executives and managers, awards under bonus plans are paid over two years with 75% paid following the determination of bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later. The deferred amounts would be forfeited in the event of termination for any reason except retirement, death or disability. All awards under the Plan will be prorated downward if the sum of all calculated awards under the Plan and the Company’s 2006 bonus plans for other officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries would exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax, pre-bonus income.

Executive Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company has implemented deferred compensation plans which allow certain officers and employees to defer a portion of total income (base salary and bonuses). The deferral amount can be up to 20% of total income

116

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

with a minimum of $10,000 annually. The Company must accrue the deferred compensation liability but cannot deduct such amounts for income tax purposes until actually paid to the employee.

Note 9 — Income Taxes

The following summarizes the provision for income taxes (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Current
Federal	$	(47,250	)	$	(103,314	)	$	(99,580	)
State		(12,285	)		(24,532	)		(22,391	)
		(59,535	)		(127,846	)		(121,971	)
Deferred
Federal		7,766			3,141			7,589
State		2,838			556			883
		10,604			3,697			8,472
	$	(48,931	)	$	(124,149	)	$	(113,499	)

Income taxes differ from the amounts computed by applying the applicable Federal statutory rates due to the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Provision for Federal income taxes at the statutory rate	$	(43,298	)	$	(110,173	)	$	(99,801	)
Provision for state income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefits		(6,111	)		(15,528	)		(14,011	)
Other		478			1,552			313
	$	(48,931	)	$	(124,149	)	$	(113,499	)

Temporary differences giving rise to deferred income taxes consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2006			2005
Deferred tax assets
Reserves deducted for financial reporting purposes not allowable for tax purposes	$	29,799		$	10,415
Compensation deductible for tax purposes when paid		6,175			10,893
State income tax provisions deductible when paid for Federal tax purposes		1,543			7,299
Effect of book/tax differences for joint ventures		1,181			1,860
		38,698			30,467
Deferred tax liabilities
Effect of book/tax differences for joint ventures		(6,034	)		(8,407	)
	$	32,664		$	22,060

117

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, income tax benefits of $3,059,000 and $1,990,000, respectively, related to stock option exercises were excluded from the results of operations and credited to additional paid-in capital. In addition, for the year ending December 31, 2006, utilization of built-in losses associated with transactions prior to the quasi-reorganization, including federal and state tax refunds received of $1,820,000 and $10,000, respectively, resulted in income tax benefits credited to additional paid-in capital of $4,229,000.

The estimated overall effective tax rate for the years ending December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are 39.5%, 39.4% and 39.8%, respectively. At December 31, 2006 the Company has unused recognized built-in losses in the amount of $19,414,000 which are available to offset future income and expire between 2009 and 2011. The utilization of these losses is limited to offset $3,883,000 of taxable income per year; however, any unused losses in any year may be carried forward for utilization in future years through 2011. The Company’s ability to utilize the foregoing tax benefits will depend upon the amount of its future taxable income and may be further limited under certain circumstances.

Note 10 — Related Party Transactions

On October 26, 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors (with General William Lyon and William H. Lyon abstaining) approved the purchase of 579 lots for a total purchase price of $12,581,000 from an entity controlled by William Lyon and William H. Lyon. The terms of the purchase agreement provide for an initial option payment of $1,000,000 and a rolling option takedown of the lots. In addition, one-half of the net profits in excess of six percent from the development are to be paid to the seller. Phase takedowns of approximately 20 lots each were anticipated to occur at two to three month intervals for each of several product types through September 2004. As of December 31, 2004, all lots were purchased under this agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2004 the Company purchased 92 lots under this agreement for a total purchase price of $1,984,000. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid $0, $1,949,000 and $1,689,000, respectively for one-half of the net profits in excess of six percent from the development. This land acquisition qualified as an affiliate transaction under the Company’s 12 ¹/2% Senior Notes due July 1, 2003 Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, as amended (the “Old Indenture”). Pursuant to the terms of the Old Indenture, the Company determined that the land acquisition is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company with an unrelated person. The Company delivered to the Trustee under the Old Indenture a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company set forth in an Officers’ Certificate certifying that the land acquisition is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company with an unrelated person and the land acquisition was approved by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. Further, the Company delivered to the Trustee under the Old Indenture a determination of value by a real estate appraisal firm which is of regional standing in the region in which the subject property is located and is MAI certified.

The Company purchased land for a total purchase price of $6,221,000, $116,773,000 and $33,655,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, from certain of its joint ventures.

For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred reimbursable on-site labor costs of $133,000, $146,000, $183,000, respectively, for providing customer service to real estate projects developed by entities controlled by William Lyon and William H. Lyon, of which $1,000 and $32,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company earned fees of $98,000, $121,000 and $110,000, respectively, for tax and accounting services performed for entities controlled by William Lyon and William H. Lyon during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, of which $92,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2005.

118

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

For each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred charges of $755,000, related to rent on its corporate office, from a trust of which William H. Lyon is the sole beneficiary.

During the years ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred charges of $172,000 related to the charter and use of aircraft owned by an affiliate of William Lyon.

Effective September 1, 2004, the Company entered into an aircraft consulting and management agreement with an affiliate (the “Affiliate”) of William Lyon to operate and manage the Company’s aircraft which was placed in service effective as of September 1, 2004. The terms of the agreement provide that the Affiliate shall consult and render its advice and management services to the Company with respect to all functions necessary to the operation, maintenance and administration of the aircraft. The Company’s business plan for the aircraft includes (i) use by Company executives for traveling on Company business to the Company’s divisional offices and other destinations, (ii) charter service to outside third parties and (iii) charter service to William Lyon personally. Charter services for outside third parties are contracted for at market rates. As compensation to the Affiliate for its management and consulting services under the agreement, the Company pays the Affiliate a fee equal to (i) the amount equal to 107% of compensation paid by the Affiliate for the pilots supplied pursuant to the agreement, (ii) $50 per operating hour for the aircraft and (iii) $9,000 per month for hangar rent. In addition, all maintenance work, inspections and repairs performed by the Affiliate on the aircraft are charged to the Company at the Affiliate’s published rates for maintenance, inspection and repairs in effect at the time such work is completed. The total compensation paid to the Affiliate under the agreement amounted to $1,488,000, $1,414,000 and $317,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Effective July 1, 2006, General William Lyon entered into a time sharing agreement (“the Agreement”) with the Company pertaining to his personal use of the aircraft. The agreement calls for General Lyon to reimburse the company for all costs incurred by the Company during his personal flights plus a surcharge on fuel consumption of two times the cost. Pursuant to the agreement and the rates charged to General Lyon prior to the agreement, the Company had earned revenue of $524,000, $457,000 and $187,000 for charter services provided to William Lyon personally, during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, of which $333,000 and $129,000 was due to the Company at December 31, 2006 and 2005.

On May 28, 2004 and June 18, 2004, William Lyon and his wife, Willa Dean Lyon, purchased two of the Company’s homes for a total purchase price of approximately $877,000. The purchase prices were based on the prices offered to third parties and no discounts were given. The homes were purchased for use as residences by certain family members.

On October 28, 2004, one of the Company’s directors, Michael L. Meyer, who has since resigned, purchased one of the Company’s homes for a total purchase price of approximately $835,000. The purchase price was based on the prices offered to third parties and no discounts were given.

The Company and one of the Company’s directors, Alex Meruelo, are parties to an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Meruelo is eligible to receive a finder’s fee based upon the cash distributions received by a subsidiary of the Company from a joint venture development project relating to a portion of the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County, California. The joint venture development project resulted from Mr. Meruelo’s introduction of the Company to Woodman Development Company, LLC (“Woodman”) and the subsequent formation of East Garrison Partners I, LLC (“EGP”) as a joint venture between Woodman and Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC (“EGC”). The finder’s fee will equal 5% of all net cash distributions distributed by EGP to EGC with respect to EGC’s existing 50% interest in EGP that are in excess of distributions with respect to certain deficit advances, deficit preferred returns, returns of capital and preferred returns on unreturned capital. The calculation of the finder’s fee will be based on net cash distributions received from EGP on land sales and will not be

119

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

determined on the basis of any revenues, profits or distributions received from any affiliate of EGC for the construction and sale or leasing of residential or commercial buildings on such lots. Mr. Meruelo is not obligated to perform any services for EGC other than the introduction to Woodman. As of December 31, 2006, no amounts had been paid to Mr. Meruelo under this agreement.

The Company offers home mortgage loans to its employees and directors through its mortgage company subsidiary, Duxford Financial, Inc. These loans are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. These loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features and are sold to investors typically within 7 to 15 days.

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies

The Company’s commitments and contingent liabilities include the usual obligations incurred by real estate developers in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Duxford Title Reinsurance Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, provides title reinsurance to unrelated title insurers directly issuing title policies on homes sold by the Company in California, Nevada and Arizona. In February 2005, Duxford Title Reinsurance Company was notified by its title insurers that as a result of current investigations by several state insurance regulators into the large number of captive reinsurance arrangements existing in the title insurance industry, the title insurers were suspending and/or terminating their current captive reinsurance agreements with Duxford Title Reinsurance Company pending final determination from the appropriate regulatory bodies as to their permissibility or necessary modification to assure compliance with applicable law. In April 2005, in response to a subpoena issued by the California Insurance Commissioner, the Company testified in connection with the Commissioner’s investigation of captive reinsurance arrangements, including testimony that in many instances, the Company pays for the title insurance being issued. The Company has not had any further communication to date from the California Insurance Commissioner or any other state insurance regulator about this matter and does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In November 2005, the Company was notified that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development had instituted a formal Federal investigation of the Company in connection with its participation in captive title reinsurance arrangements. The Company has fully cooperated with the Department in its investigation. Effective as of September 15, 2006, the Company and the Department entered into a Settlement Agreement in which each desired to avoid prolonged proceedings, any further expense of investigation and/or possible litigation and to finally resolve the matter. Based on the Company’s compliance with the Settlement Agreement and with the Company not admitting liability or wrongdoing, the Department agreed to terminate its investigation and to take no enforcement action and the Company agreed to make a settlement payment of $850,000.

Litigation Arising from General Lyon’s Tender Offer

As described above in Note 7—Tender Offer and Merger, on March 17, 2006, the Company’s principal stockholder commenced a tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to purchase all outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock not already owned by him. Initially, the price offered in the Tender was $93 per share, but it has since been increased to $109 per share.

Two purported class action lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, purportedly on behalf of the public stockholders of the Company, challenging the Tender Offer and challenging related actions of the Company and the directors of the Company. Stephen L. Brown v.

120

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

William Lyon Homes, et al., Civil Action No. 2015-N was filed on March 20, 2006, and Michael Crady, et al. v. General William Lyon, et al., Civil Action No. 2017-N was filed on March 21, 2006 (collectively, the “Delaware Complaints”). On March 21, 2006, plaintiff in the Brown action also filed a First Amended Complaint. The Delaware Complaints name the Company and the directors of the Company as defendants. These complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties owed to the plaintiffs in connection with the Tender Offer and other related corporate activities. The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Tender Offer and, among other things, to obtain attorneys’ fees and expenses related to the litigation.

On March 23, 2006, the Company announced that its Board had appointed a special committee of independent directors who are not members of the Company’s management or employed by the Company (the “Special Committee”) to consider the Tender Offer. The members of the Special Committee were Harold H. Greene, Lawrence M. Higby, and Dr. Arthur Laffer. The Company also announced that the Special Committee had retained Morgan Stanley & Co. as its financial advisor and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP as its legal counsel.

On March 24, 2006, the Delaware Chancery Court consolidated the Delaware Complaints into a single case entitled In re: William Lyon Homes Shareholder Litigation, Civil Action No. 2015-N (the “Consolidated Delaware Action”).

On April 10, 2006, the parties to the Consolidated Delaware Action executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), detailing a proposed settlement subject to the Delaware Chancery Court’s approval. Pursuant to the MOU, General Lyon increased his offer of $93 per share to $100 per share, extended the closing date of the offer to April 21, 2006, and, on April 11, 2006, filed an amended Schedule TO. Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Delaware Action have determined that the settlement is “fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of plaintiffs and the putative Class.” The Special Committee also determined that the price of $100 per share was fair to the shareholders, and recommended that the Company’s shareholders accept the revised Tender Offer and tender their shares. Thereafter, General Lyon also decided to further extend the closing date of the Tender Offer from April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006.

On April 23, 2006, Delaware Chancery Court conditionally certified a class in the Consolidated Delaware Action. The parties to the Consolidated Delaware Action agreed to a Stipulation of Settlement, and on August 9, 2006, the Delaware Chancery Court certified a class in the Consolidated Delaware Action, approved the settlement, and dismissed the Consolidated Delaware Action with prejudice as to all defendants and the class. On February 16, 2007, the matter was appealed to the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware.

A purported class action lawsuit challenging the Tender Offer was also filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange. On March 17, 2006, a complaint captioned Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. William Lyon Homes, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-CC-00047, was filed. On April 5, 2006, plaintiff in the Alaska Electrical action filed an Amended Complaint (the “California Action”). The complaint in the California Action names the Company and the directors of the Company as defendants and alleges, among other things, that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to the public stockholders. Plaintiff in the California Action also sought to enjoin the Tender Offer, and, among other things, to obtain attorneys’ fees and expenses related to the litigation.

On April 20, 2006, the California court denied the request of plaintiff in the California Action to enjoin the Tender Offer. Plaintiff filed a motion to certify a class in the California Action which was later taken off calendar, and the Company filed a motion to stay the California Action. On July 5, 2006, the California Court granted the Company’s motion to stay the California Action.

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits related to its normal business activities. In the opinion of management, disposition of the various lawsuits will have no material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

121

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Land Banking Arrangements

The Company enters into purchase agreements with various land sellers. In some instances, and as a method of acquiring land in staged takedowns, thereby minimizing the use of funds from the Company’s revolving credit facilities and other corporate financing sources and limiting the Company’s risk, the Company transfers the Company’s right in such purchase agreements to entities owned by third parties (“land banking arrangements”). These entities use equity contributions and/or incur debt to finance the acquisition and development of the lots. The entities grant the Company an option to acquire lots in staged takedowns. In consideration for this option, the Company makes a non-refundable deposit of 15% to 25% of the total purchase price. The Company is under no obligation to purchase the balance of the lots, but would forfeit remaining deposits and be subject to penalties if the lots were not purchased. The Company does not have legal title to these entities or their assets and has not guaranteed their liabilities. These land banking arrangements help the Company manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings. As described in Note 2, above, Interpretation No. 46, requires the consolidation of the assets, liabilities and operations of four of the Company’s land banking arrangements including, as of December 31, 2006, real estate inventories of $69,103,000, which are included in real estate inventories not owned in the accompanying balance sheet. The Company participates in one land banking arrangements, which is not a VIE in accordance with Interpretation No. 46, and is not consolidated as of December 31, 2006. The deposits related to the unconsolidated land banking arrangements has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In addition, the Company participates in another land banking arrangement, which is not a VIE in accordance with Interpretation No. 46, but is consolidated in accordance with SFAS No. 49, Accounting for Product Financing Arrangements, (“FAS 49”). Under the provisions of FAS 49, the Company has determined it is economically compelled, based on certain factors, to purchase the land in the land banking arrangement, and therefore, must record the remaining purchase price of the land of $131,564,000, which is included in real estate inventories not owned and liabilities from inventories not owned in the accompanying balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company and an unaffiliated party formed a limited liability company (the “LLC”) for the purpose of acquiring 222 acres in the city of Pittsburgh, California and developing the land into 533 residential home sites. The LLC was determined to be a variable interest entity and is consolidated in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the LLC sold 284 lots to the Company for a purchase price of $43,300,000. The lots were acquired through two land banking arrangements which have been determined to be VIEs and are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in real estate inventories not owned. The lots will be purchased from the two consolidated land banking arrangements on staged take-downs through 2008. Information pertaining to the two consolidated land banking arrangements is included in the table below. The intercompany land sales and related profits have been eliminated in consolidation.

122

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Summary information with respect to the Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated land banking arrangements is as follows as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	Consolidated		Unconsolidated
Total number of land banking projects		5		1
Total number of lots		1,077		323
Total purchase price	$	272,164	$	64,000
Balance of lots still under option and not purchased:
Number of lots		1,027		323
Purchase price	$	200,670	$	64,000
Forfeited deposits if lots are not purchased	$	50,820	$	3,922

In some jurisdictions in which the Company develops and constructs property, assessment district bonds are issued by municipalities to finance major infrastructure improvements. As a land owner benefited by these improvements, the Company is responsible for the assessments on its land. When properties are sold, the assessments are either prepaid or the buyers assume the responsibility for the related assessments. Assessment district bonds issued after May 21, 1992 are accounted for under the provisions of 91-10, “Accounting for Special Assessment and Tax Increment Financing Entities” issued by the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board on May 21, 1992, and recorded as liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, if the amounts are fixed and determinable.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company had $12,384,000 of outstanding irrevocable standby letters of credit to guarantee the Company’s financial obligations under certain land banking arrangements and other contractual arrangements in the normal course of business. The beneficiary may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. These letters of credit have a stated term of 12 months and have varying maturities throughout 2009, at which time the Company may be required to renew to coincide with the term of the respective arrangement.

The Company also had outstanding performance and surety bonds of $281,404,000 at December 31, 2006 related principally to its obligations for site improvements at various projects. The Company does not believe that draws upon these bonds, if any, will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company has provided unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders, joint venture partners and land sellers. In each case, the Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the guaranteed parties for damages related to environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners.

See Notes 5 and 6 for additional information relating to the Company’s guarantee arrangements.

123

WILLIAM LYON HOMES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 12 — Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Financial Information

Summarized unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is as follows (in thousands except per common share amounts):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2006			June 30, 2006			September 30, 2006			December 31, 2006
Sales	$	307,381		$	408,254		$	311,248		$	465,338
Cost of sales		(229,873	)		(315,993	)		(247,099	)		(388,073	)
Gross profit		77,508			92,261			64,149			77,265
Other income, costs and expenses, net		(34,386	)		(42,283	)		(46,382	)		(64,423	)
Income before provision for income taxes		43,122			49,978			17,767			12,842
Provision for income taxes		(16,908	)		(19,597	)		(7,265	)		(5,161	)
Net income	$	26,214		$	30,381		$	10,502		$	7,681
	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2005			June 30, 2005			September 30, 2005			December 31, 2005
Sales	$	246,682		$	407,489		$	376,331		$	825,881
Cost of sales		(176,795	)		(288,976	)		(279,063	)		(606,967	)
Gross profit		69,887			118,513			97,268			218,914
Other income, costs and expenses, net		(36,014	)		(45,621	)		(34,321	)		(73,846	)
Income before provision for income taxes		33,873			72,892			62,947			145,068
Provision for income taxes		(13,380	)		(28,792	)		(24,864	)		(57,113	)
Net income	$	20,493		$	44,100		$	38,083		$	87,955
	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2004			June 30, 2004			September 30, 2004			December 31, 2004
Sales	$	254,548		$	384,483		$	474,950		$	707,866
Cost of sales		(200,436	)		(296,654	)		(349,391	)		(503,749	)
Gross profit		54,112			87,829			125,559			204,117
Other income, costs and expenses, net		(28,361	)		(35,806	)		(51,349	)		(70,953	)
Income before provision for income taxes		25,751			52,023			74,210			133,164
Provision for income taxes		(10,342	)		(20,875	)		(29,273	)		(53,009	)
Net income	$	15,409		$	31,148		$	44,937		$	80,155

124

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1(2)	Certificate of Incorporation of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
3.2(1)	Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
3.3(38)	Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
3.4(38)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation.
3.5(2)	Bylaws of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
4.1(23)	Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.2(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.3(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of March 17, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.4(3)	Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.5(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.6(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of February 6, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.7(14)	Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including form of notes and guarantees).
4.8(15)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2004 between Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
4.9(24)	Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 2005 between The Ranch Golf Club, LLC, a California limited liability company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (supplementing the Indenture dated as of November 22, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, the Guarantors (as defined therein), and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee).
10.1(11)	Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004 between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and RFC Construction Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation.
10.2(34)	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004 between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and RFC Construction Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation.

Exhibit Number	Description
10.3(4)	Master Loan Agreement dated as of August 31, 2000 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation (“Borrower”) and Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B., a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (“Lender”).
10.4(6)	Agreement for First Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of June 8, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.5(5)	Agreement for Second Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of July 23, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.6(5)	Agreement for Third Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of December 19, 2001, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.7(5)	Agreement for Fourth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments, dated as of May 29, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.8(7)	Agreement for Fifth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Agreements, dated as of June 6, 2003, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.9(3)	Agreement for Sixth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Agreements, dated as of November 14, 2003, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States (formerly known as “Guaranty Federal Bank, F.S.B.”), as lender.
10.10(12)	Agreement for Seventh Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 6, 2004 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.11(25)	Agreement for Eighth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 14, 2005 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.12(37)	Agreement for Ninth Modification of Deeds of Trust and Other Loan Instruments dated as of October 31, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Guaranty Bank, a federal savings bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States, as lender.
10.13(4)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement (Borrowing Base Loan) by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, dated as of September 21, 2000.
10.14(17)	Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of September 18, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.
10.15(5)	Second Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of December 13, 2002, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.
10.16(3)	Third Agreement to Modify Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated as of January 26, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, as lender.

Exhibit Number	Description
10.17(11)	Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated September 16, 2004 by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation.
10.18(27)	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2005, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and California Bank & Trust.
10.19(34)	Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated September 16, 2004 by and between California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation.
10.20(7)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 1, 2003 between Duxford Financial, Inc., and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.21(10)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 1, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc., and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.22(32)	Mortgage Warehouse Loan and Security Agreement dated June 29, 2006 by and between Duxford Financial, Inc. dba William Lyon Financial Services and/or Bayport Mortgage, L.P. and/or California Pacific Mortgage, L.P., as Borrower and First Tennessee Bank as Lender.
10.23(8)	Credit Agreement dated August 29, 2003 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.24(3)	Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.25(15)	First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 27, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.26(13)	Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004 between Duxford Financial, Inc. and Bayport Mortgage, L.P. as Borrower and Guaranty Bank as Lender.
10.27(9)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2003, by and among Moffett Meadows Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as borrower, and California Bank & Trust, a California banking corporation, and the other financial institutions named therein, as lenders.
10.28(9)	Joinder Agreement to Reimbursement and Indemnity Agreement, entered into as of March 25, 2003, by William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
10.29(10)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Bank One, NA, a national banking association.
10.30(15)	Modification Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2004, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA, a national banking association).
10.31(27)	Second Modification Agreement to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2005, between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA).
10.32(36)	Third Modification Agreement to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated October 23, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association.
10.33(18)	Form of Indemnity Agreement, between William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, and the directors and officers of William Lyon Homes.
10.34(18)	Property Management Agreement between Corporate Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation (Owner) and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation (Manager) dated and effective November 5, 1999.
10.35(18)	Warranty Service Agreement between Corporate Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation and William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation dated and effective November 5, 1999.
10.36(4)	Option Agreement and Escrow Instructions between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and Lathrop Investment, L.P., a California limited partnership, dated as of October 24, 2000.
10.37(19)	William Lyon Homes 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

Exhibit Number	Description
10.38(20)	Form of Stock Option Agreements.
10.39(20)	William Lyon Homes, Inc. 2000 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.40(26)	William Lyon Homes 2005 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.41(28)	Description of 2005 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.42(29)	Adjustment of Salary of Douglas F. Bauer.
10.43(38)	Description of 2006 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.44(38)	2006 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.45(38)	Description of 2007 Cash Bonus Plan.
10.46(38)	2007 Senior Executive Bonus Plan.
10.47(20)	Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease – Net between William Lyon Homes, Inc. and a trust of which William H. Lyon is the sole beneficiary.
10.48(21)	William Lyon Homes Executive Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 11, 2002.
10.49(22)	William Lyon Homes Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 11, 2002.
10.50(5)	The Presley Companies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan for Outside Directors.
10.51(16)	William Lyon Homes 2004 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.52(16)	William Lyon Homes 2004 Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.53(3)	Underwriting Agreement dated as of March 12, 2003 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Warburg, LLC and Salomon Smith Barney Inc., as Underwriters.
10.54(3)	Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.55(3)	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 6, 2004 by and among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.56(13)	Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004 among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.57(14)	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 22, 2004 by and among William Lyon Homes, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein), and UBS Securities LLC, as Initial Purchaser.
10.58(30)	Summary of Director Compensation.
10.59(30)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006, by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Wachovia Financial Services, Inc, a North Carolina corporation, by and through its Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
10.60(35)	First Amendment to Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated September 29, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
10.61(33)	Borrowing Base Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and California National Bank.
10.62(31)	Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement dated as of March 8, 2006 by and between William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation, and Comerica Bank.
12.1(38)	Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
21.1(38)	List of Subsidiaries of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation.
31.1(38)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2(38)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1(38)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2(38)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K of William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) filed January 5, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, and amendments thereto (SEC Registration No. 333-88569), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference

(5) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(6) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(7) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(8) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(9) Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-114691) filed July 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(10) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(11) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(12) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 18, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(13) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 19, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(14) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 23, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(15) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-121346) filed December 16, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(16) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(17) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(18) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(19) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration No. 333-50232), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(20) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(21) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration No. 333-82448), and incorporated herein by this reference.

(22) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(23) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(24) Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-121346) filed January 10, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(25) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(26) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(27) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by this reference.

(28) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.

(29) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005.

(30) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(31) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(32) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(33) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(34) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 27, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(35) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(36) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(37) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(38) Filed herewith.