XML 28 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivatives
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivatives
10. Derivatives

In the normal course of operations, the Company enters into derivative contracts. These derivative contracts primarily consist of interest rate and foreign exchange swaps. The Company enters into derivative contracts to facilitate client transactions, hedge principal positions and facilitate hedging activities of affiliated companies.

Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or OTC. Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Company generally values exchange-traded derivatives using their closing prices. OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and options, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company does not designate any derivative contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. FASB guidance requires that an entity recognize all derivative contracts as either assets or liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. The fair value of all derivative contracts is recorded on a net-by-counterparty basis where a legal right to offset exists under an enforceable netting agreement. Derivative contracts are recorded as part of “Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” and “Payables to broker-dealers, clearing organizations, customers and related broker-dealers” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

The fair value of derivative contracts, computed in accordance with the Company’s netting policy, is set forth below (in thousands):

 

     September 30, 2013    December 31, 2012
     Assets    Liabilities    Assets    Liabilities

Interest rate swaps

     $ 467        $ —          $ 782        $ —    

Foreign exchange swaps

       134          1,472          —            338  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

     $   601        $   1,472        $   782        $   338  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

The notional amounts of the interest rate swap transactions at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $92.3 million and $361.8 million, respectively. These represent matched customer transactions settled through and guaranteed by a central clearing organization.

All of the Company’s foreign exchange swaps are with Cantor. The notional amounts of the foreign exchange swap transactions at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $181.3 million and $233.5 million, respectively.

The replacement cost of contracts in a gain position at September 30, 2013 was $601 thousand.

 

The change in fair value of derivative contracts is reported as part of “Principal transactions” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The table below summarizes gains and losses on derivative contracts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

Derivative contract

   2013     2012     2013     2012  

Interest rate swaps

   $ 9     $ 15     $ 22     $ 107   

Foreign exchange swaps

     (61     (31     (60     94   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gain (loss)

   $ (52   $ (16   $ (38   $ 201   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As described in Note 16—“Notes Payable, Collateralized and Short-Term Borrowings,” on July 29, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of $160.0 million principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (the “4.50% Convertible Notes”) containing an embedded conversion feature. The conversion feature meets the requirements to be accounted for as an equity instrument, and the Company classifies the conversion feature within “Additional paid-in capital” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. At the issuance of the 4.50% Convertible Notes, the embedded conversion feature was measured at approximately $19.0 million on a pre-tax basis ($16.1 million net of taxes and issuance costs) as the difference between the proceeds received and the fair value of a similar liability without the conversion feature and is not subsequently remeasured.

Also in connection with the issuance of the 4.50% Convertible Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions. The capped call transactions meet the requirements to be accounted for as equity instruments, and the Company classifies the capped call transactions within “Additional paid-in capital” in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The purchase price of the capped call transactions resulted in a decrease to “Additional paid-in capital” of $11.4 million on a pre-tax basis ($9.9 million on an after-tax basis) at the issuance of the 4.50% Convertible Notes, and such capped call transactions are not subsequently remeasured.