XML 24 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Jan. 01, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Teledyne and all wholly-owned and majority-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Fiscal Year
The Company operates on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year convention ending on the Sunday nearest to December 31. Fiscal year 2016 was a 52-week fiscal year and ended on January 1, 2017. Fiscal year 2015 was a 53-week fiscal year and ended on January 3, 2016. Fiscal year 2014 was a 52-week fiscal year and ended on December 28, 2014. References to the years 2016, 2015 and 2014 are intended to refer to the respective fiscal year unless otherwise noted.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to product returns and replacements, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, asset valuations, income taxes, warranty obligations, pension and other postretirement benefits, long-term contracts, environmental, workers compensation and general liability, employee benefits and other contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time, the results of which form the basis for making its judgments. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the estimates are reasonable.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income/(loss) (“AOCI”) for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016 (in millions):
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
Cash Flow Hedges and other
 
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
 
Total
Balances as of December 28, 2014
$
(90.6
)
 
$
(5.3
)
 
$
(227.3
)
 
$
(323.2
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(83.6
)
 
(8.2
)
 

 
(91.8
)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 
6.8

 
(5.0
)
 
1.8

Net other comprehensive loss
(83.6
)
 
(1.4
)
 
(5.0
)
 
(90.0
)
Balance as of January 3, 2016
(174.2
)
 
(6.7
)
 
(232.3
)
 
(413.2
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(24.6
)
 
1.8

 

 
(22.8
)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 
2.1

 
(17.3
)
 
(15.2
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
(24.6
)
 
3.9

 
(17.3
)
 
(38.0
)
Balance as of January 1, 2017
$
(198.8
)
 
$
(2.8
)
 
$
(249.6
)
 
$
(451.2
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The reclassification out of AOCI for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016, are as follows (in millions):
 
January 1, 2017
 
January 3, 2016
 
 
Amount reclassified from AOCI
 
Amount reclassified from AOCI
Financial Statement Presentation
Loss on cash hedges:
 
 
 
 
Loss recognized in income on derivatives
$
2.8

 
$
9.1

Cost of sales
Income tax impact
(0.7
)
 
(2.3
)
Income tax benefit
Total
$
2.1

 
$
6.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items:
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost
$
(6.1
)
 
$
(6.0
)
See Note 11
Amortization of net actuarial loss
27.2

 
34.0

See Note 11
Pension adjustments
(47.7
)
 
(36.0
)
See Note 11
Total before tax
(26.6
)
 
(8.0
)
 
Tax effect
9.3

 
3.0

 
Net of tax
$
(17.3
)
 
$
(5.0
)
 


Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the earnings process is substantially complete and all of the following criteria are met: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; 2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; 3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.
We determine the appropriate method by which we recognize revenue by analyzing the terms and conditions of our contracts or arrangements entered into with our customers. The majority of our revenue relates to product sales and is recognized upon shipment to the customer, at fixed or determinable prices and with a reasonable assurance of collection, passage of title to the customer and fulfillment of all significant obligations. Revenue is recognized net of estimated sales returns and other allowances. The Company does not offer substantial sales incentives and credits to customers. The remaining revenue is generally associated with long-term contracts to design, develop and manufacture highly engineered products used in commercial or defense applications. Such contracts are generally accounted for using contract accounting, percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method.
The Company’s standard terms of sale are FOB shipping point. For a small percentage of sales where title and risk of loss passes at destination point, and assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met, the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery to the customer. If any significant obligation to the customer with respect to a sales transaction remains following shipment, revenue recognition is deferred until such obligations have been fulfilled. In general, our revenue arrangements do not involve acceptance provisions based on customer specified acceptance criteria. In those circumstances when customer specified acceptance criteria exist, and if we cannot demonstrate that the product meets those specifications prior to the shipment, then revenue is deferred until customer acceptance is obtained.
We have a few contracts that require the Company to warehouse certain goods, for which revenue is recognized when all risks of loss are borne by the customer and all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
We also have a small number of multiple elements arrangements (i.e., free product, training, installation, additional parts, etc.). If contract accounting does not apply, we allocate the contract price among the deliverables based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value to each element in the arrangement. If objective and reliable evidence of fair value of any element is not available, we use our best estimate of selling price for purposes of allocating the total arrangement consideration among the elements. Also, extended or non-customary warranties do not represent a significant portion of our revenue; however when our revenue arrangements include an extended or non-customary warranty provision, the revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the extended warranty period.
For contracts that require substantial performance over a long time period (generally one or more years), revenue is recorded under the POC method. We record net revenue and an estimated profit as work on our contracts progresses. The POC method for these contracts is dependent on the nature of the contract or products provided. Depending on the contract, we may measure the extent of progress toward completion using the units-of-delivery method, cost-to-cost method or upon attainment of scheduled performance contract milestones which could be time, event or expense driven. For example, for cost-reimbursable contracts we use the cost-to-cost method to measure progress toward completion. Under the cost-to-cost method of accounting, we recognize revenue and an estimated profit as allowable costs are incurred based on the proportion that the incurred costs bear to total estimated costs. Another example, for contracts that require us to provide a substantial number of similar items, we record revenue and an estimated profit on a POC basis using units-of-delivery as the basis to measure progress toward completing the contract. Occasionally, it is appropriate to combine individual customer orders and treat them as one arrangement when the underlying agreement was reached with the customer for a single large project.
Accounting for contracts using the POC method requires management judgment relative to assessing risks, estimating contract revenue and cost, and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. Contract revenue may include estimated amounts not contractually agreed to by the customer, including price redetermination, cost or performance incentives (such as award and incentives fees), un-priced change orders, claims and requests for equitable adjustment. The POC method requires management’s judgment to make reasonably dependable cost estimates generally over a long time period. Since certain contracts extend over a long period of time, the impact of revisions in cost and revenue estimates during the progress of work may adjust the current period earnings on a cumulative catch-up basis. This method recognizes, in the current period, the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior quarters. Additionally, if the current contract estimate indicates a loss, a provision is made for the total anticipated loss in the period that it becomes evident. Contract cost and revenue estimates for significant contracts are generally reviewed and reassessed quarterly.
(dollars in millions)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Percent of revenue - POC Method
 
30.5
%
 
31.2
%
 
28.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Favorable changes in estimate
 
$
27.7

 
$
38.6

 
$
22.9

Unfavorable changes in estimate
 
(29.6
)
 
(35.5
)
 
(25.9
)
Net change - income/(expense)
 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
3.1

 
$
(3.0
)

We do not believe that any discrete event or adjustment to an individual contract within the aggregate changes in contract estimates for 2016, 2015 or 2014 was material to the consolidated statements of income for such annual periods.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling fees reimbursed by customers are classified as revenue while shipping and handling costs incurred by Teledyne are classified as cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Product Warranty Costs
Some of the Companys products are subject to standard warranties and the Company reserves for the estimated cost of product warranties on a product-specific basis. Facts and circumstances related to a product warranty matter and cost estimates to return, repair and/or replace the product are considered when establishing a product warranty reserve. The adequacy of the preexisting warranty liabilities is assessed regularly and the reserve is adjusted as necessary based on a review of historic warranty experience with respect to the applicable business or products, as well as the length and actual terms of the warranties, which are typically one year. The product warranty reserve is included in current accrued liabilities and long-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
 Warranty Reserve (in millions):
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Balance at beginning of year
$
17.1

 
$
18.5

 
$
17.3

Accruals for product warranties charged to expense
7.4

 
6.1

 
6.6

Cost of product warranty claims
(6.7
)
 
(7.7
)
 
(5.9
)
Acquisitions
0.6

 
0.2

 
0.5

Balance at end of period
$
18.4

 
$
17.1

 
$
18.5



Research and Development
Selling, general and administrative expenses include Company-funded research and development and bid and proposal costs which are expensed as incurred and were $167.7 million in 2016, $163.7 million in 2015 and $166.9 million in 2014.
Income Taxes
We compute the provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amount in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. In projecting future taxable income, we begin with historical results adjusted for the results of discontinued operations and incorporate assumptions about the amount of future state, federal and foreign pretax operating income adjusted for items that do not have tax consequences. The assumptions about future taxable income require significant judgment and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider three years of cumulative operating income. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition in order to be recognized in the financial statements. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within operations as income tax expense. As new information becomes available, the assessment of the recognition threshold and the measurement of the associated tax benefit of uncertain tax positions may result in financial statement recognition or derecognition.
Net Income Per Common Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed based on net earnings. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period was used in the calculation of basic earnings per share. This number of shares was increased by contingent shares that could be issued under various compensation plans as well as by the dilutive effect of stock options based on the treasury stock method in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts in millions, except per share data):
Net Income Per Common Share:
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Net income attributable to Teledyne
$
190.9

 
$
195.8

 
$
217.7

Basic earnings per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
34.6

 
35.3

 
37.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common share
$
5.52

 
$
5.55

 
$
5.87

Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
34.6

 
35.3

 
37.1

Effect of diluted securities
0.9

 
0.7

 
0.8

Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
35.5

 
36.0

 
37.9

 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
$
5.37

 
$
5.44

 
$
5.75


For 2016, 2015 and 2014 no stock options were excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
For 2016, 2015 and 2014, stock options to purchase 2.2 million, 2.4 million and 2.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, had exercise prices that were less than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the respective periods and are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
 In addition, no contingent shares of the Company’s common stock under the restricted stock or performance share compensation plans were excluded from fully diluted shares outstanding for 2016 or 2014. In 2015, 3,997 contingent shares of the Company’s common stock under the restricted stock or performance share compensation plans were excluded from fully diluted shares outstanding.
Accounts Receivable
Receivables are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.2 million at January 1, 2017, and $6.3 million at January 3, 2016. Expense recorded for the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.7 million, $0.9 million and $3.6 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established for losses expected to be incurred on accounts receivable balances. Judgment is required in the estimation of the allowance and is based upon specific identification, collection history and creditworthiness of the debtor. Trade credit is extended based upon evaluations of each customer’s ability to perform its obligations, which are updated periodically.
Cash
Cash totaled $98.6 million at January 1, 2017, of which $95.2 million was held by foreign subsidiaries of Teledyne.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, less progress payments. The majority of inventory values are valued on an average cost, or first-in, first-out method, while the remainder are stated at cost based on the last-in, first-out method. Costs include direct material, direct labor, applicable manufacturing and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Additionally, certain inventory costs are also reflective of the estimates used in applying the percentage-of-completion revenue recognition method.  Judgment is required when establishing reserves to reduce the carrying amount of inventory to market or net realizable value.  Inventory reserves are recorded when inventory is considered to be excess or obsolete based upon an analysis of actual on-hand quantities on a part-level basis to forecasted product demand and historical usage. 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is capitalized at cost. Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are determined using a combination of accelerated and straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of the various asset classes. Buildings and building improvements are depreciated over periods not exceeding 45 years, equipment over 5 to 18 years, computer hardware and software over 3 to 7 years and leasehold improvements over the shorter of the estimated remaining lives or lease terms. Significant improvements are capitalized while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment, including assets under capital leases, was $57.6 million in 2016, $58.3 million in 2015 and $62.3 million in 2014. Other income for 2016 included a gain of $17.9 million on the sale of a former operating facility in California.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Business acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition method by assigning the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values and the excess of the purchase price over the amounts assigned is recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but tested at least annually for impairment. The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill and other acquired intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each year, or more often as circumstances require. The two-step impairment test is used to first identify potential goodwill impairment and then measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. When it is determined that an impairment has occurred, an appropriate charge to operations is recorded. No impairment of goodwill was indicated in 2016, 2015 or 2014, based on the annual impairment test completed in the fourth quarter of each year. The Company recorded a $1.0 million asset impairment related to acquired intangible assets in 2016. The Company recorded a $0.5 million impairment to acquired intangible assets in 2015 and in 2014, the Company recorded a $0.7 million impairment to acquired intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets with finite lives are amortized and reflected in the segments operating income over their estimated useful lives.
We review intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of assets held for use based on a review of projected undiscounted cash flows. Impairment losses, where identified, are determined as the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified executive deferred compensation plan that provides supplemental retirement income benefits for a select group of management. This plan permits eligible employees to make salary and bonus deferrals that are 100% vested. We have an unsecured obligation to pay in the future the value of the deferred compensation adjusted to reflect the performance, whether positive or negative, of selected investment measurement options chosen by each participant during the deferral period. As of January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, $47.4 million and $43.9 million, respectively, is included in other long-term liabilities related to these deferred compensation liabilities. Additionally, the Company purchased life insurance policies on certain participants to potentially offset these unsecured obligations. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value as determined by the insurance carrier. The cash surrender value of these policies was $48.5 million and $47.9 million, as of January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, respectively, and are recorded in other non-current assets.
 Environmental
Costs that mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination or extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the safety or efficiency of property utilized in current operations are capitalized. Other costs that relate to current operations or an existing condition caused by past operations are expensed. Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable, which is generally not later than the completion of the feasibility study or the Companys recommendation of a remedy or commitment to an appropriate plan of action. The accruals are reviewed periodically and, as investigations and remediations proceed, adjustments are made as necessary. Accruals for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the effects of inflation, and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. The accruals are not reduced by possible recoveries from insurance carriers or other third parties, but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal Superfund sites or similar state-managed sites and an assessment of the likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites. The measurement of environmental liabilities by the Company is based on currently available facts, present laws and regulations, and current technology. Such estimates take into consideration the Company’s prior experience in site investigation and remediation, the data concerning cleanup costs available from other companies and regulatory authorities, and the professional judgment of the Company’s environmental personnel in consultation with outside environmental specialists, when necessary. The Company’s reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled $7.0 million and $8.7 million at January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Companys foreign entities accounts are generally measured using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these entities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at year-end. Revenues and expenses are translated at average month end rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Unrealized translation gains and losses arising from differences in exchange rates from period to period are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.
Hedging Activities/Derivative Instruments
Teledyne transacts business in various foreign currencies and has international sales and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting the Company to foreign currency risk. The Companys primary objective is to protect the United States dollar value of future cash flows and minimize the volatility of reported earnings. The Company utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the volatility of cash flows primarily related to forecasted revenue and expenses denominated in Canadian dollars for our Canadian companies. These contracts are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges.
The effectiveness of the cash flow hedge contracts, excluding time value, is assessed prospectively and retrospectively on a monthly basis using regression analysis, as well as using other timing and probability criteria. To receive hedge accounting treatment, all hedging relationships are formally documented at the inception of the hedges and must be highly effective in offsetting changes to future cash flows on hedged transactions. The effective portion of the cash flow hedge contracts gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these hedges is initially reported, net of tax, as a component of AOCI in stockholders’ equity until the underlying hedged item is reflected in our consolidated statements of income, at which time the effective amount in AOCI is reclassified to cost of sales in our consolidated statements of income. Net deferred losses recorded in AOCI, net of tax, for contracts that will mature in the next 12 months total $0.8 million. These losses are expected to be offset by anticipated gains in the value of the forecasted underlying hedged item.
In the event that the gains or losses in AOCI are deemed to be ineffective, the ineffective portion of gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value, if any, is reclassified to other income and expense. In the event that the underlying forecasted transactions do not occur, or it becomes remote that they will occur, within the defined hedge period, the gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges will be reclassified from AOCI to other income and expense. During the current reporting period, all forecasted transactions occurred and, therefore, there were no such gains or losses reclassified to other income and expense. As of January 1, 2017, Teledyne had foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges to buy Canadian dollars and to sell U.S. dollars totaling $56.8 million and these contracts had a negative fair value of $1.1 million. These foreign currency forward contracts have maturities ranging from March 2017 to February 2018.
In addition, the Company utilizes foreign currency forward contracts which are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes to mitigate foreign exchange rate risk associated with foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, including intercompany receivables and payables. As of January 1, 2017, Teledyne had foreign currency contracts of this type in the following pairs (in millions):
Contracts to Buy
 
Contracts to Sell
Currency
Amount
 
Currency
Amount
Canadian Dollars
C$
32.1

 
U.S. Dollars
US$
24.2

Euros
10.4

 
U.S. Dollars
US$
11.1

Great Britain Pounds
£
1.4

 
Australian Dollars
A$
2.4

Great Britain Pounds
£
41.3

 
U.S. Dollars
US$
52.0

Canadian Dollars
C$
15.9

 
Euros
10.6

U.S. Dollars
US$
0.9

 
Japanese Yen
¥
110.0

Singapore Dollars
S$
1.8

 
U.S. Dollars
US$
1.3


The above table includes non-designated hedges derived from terms contained in triggered or previously designated cash flow hedges. The gains and losses on these derivatives which are not designated as hedging instruments, are intended to, at a minimum, partially offset the transaction gains and losses recognized in earnings.
The Company entered into a short-term option contract to purchase £600.0 million in December 2016. This option was purchased to protect against increases in the U.S. dollar equivalent cost of the pending e2v acquisition from adverse currency movements. The option contract was not designated as a hedging instrument for accounting purposes.
All derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. As discussed below, the accounting for gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value depends on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Teledyne does not use foreign currency forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in millions):
 
 
2016
 
2015
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI (a)
 
$
2.3

 
$
(11.0
)
Net loss reclassified from AOCI into cost of sales (a)
 
$
(2.8
)
 
$
(9.1
)
Net foreign exchange gain (loss) recognized in other income and expense (b)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
0.5


(a)Effective portion
(b)Amount excluded from effectiveness testing
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges recognized in other income and expense for 2016 and 2015 was a loss of $9.6 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
The fair values of the Company’s derivative financial instruments are presented below. All fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 information as defined by the accounting standard hierarchy (in millions):
Asset/(Liability) Derivatives
Balance sheet location
 
January 1, 2017
 
January 3, 2016

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flow forward contracts
Accrued liabilities
 
$
(1.0
)
 
$
(4.7
)
Cash flow forward contracts
Other long-term liabilities
 
(0.1
)
 
(1.3
)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
(1.1
)
 
(6.0
)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
Non-designated forward contracts
Other current assets
 
6.4

 
0.2

Non-designated forward contracts
Accrued liabilities
 
(1.0
)
 
(6.0
)
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
5.4

 
(5.8
)
Total asset/(liability) derivatives
 
 
$
4.3

 
$
(11.8
)

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for federal, foreign and state income taxes were $24.6 million for 2016, which are net of $1.4 million in tax refunds. Cash payments for federal, foreign and state income taxes were $86.5 million for 2015, which are net of $4.8 million in tax refunds. Cash payments for federal, foreign and state income taxes were $72.7 million for 2014, which are net of $2.3 million in tax refunds. Cash payments for interest and credit facility fees totaled $23.6 million, $24.2 million and $17.6 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Fair Value Measurements
When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. The Company uses the following three levels of inputs in determining the fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, focusing on the most observable inputs when available:
Level 1-Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2-Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3-Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Related Party Transactions
The Company had no related party transactions that are required to be disclosed for all periods presented.
Recent Accounting Standards
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The ASU is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. Teledyne elected to adopt early this ASU in the third quarter of 2016, therefore Teledyne is required to report the material impacts of this standard as though the ASU had been adopted at the beginning of the fiscal year. Accordingly, Teledyne recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to net income of $8.5 million for 2016. Teledyne has elected to record forfeitures as they occur, which did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial results. The new guidance did not impact any periods prior to our 2016 fiscal year, as the changes were applied on a prospective basis.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance. The new standard, as subsequently amended, is effective for Teledyne for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new standard can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.
Under the new standard, an entity recognizes revenue when or as it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a good or service to the customer, either at a point in time or over time. Teledyne expects to recognize revenue over time on most of its contracts that are covered by contract accounting standards using cost inputs to measure progress toward completion of its performance obligations, which is similar to the POC cost-to-cost method currently used on certain of these contracts today.  The percentage of Teledyne revenue recognized using the POC method was 30.5%, 31.2% in 2015, and 28.7% in 2014. Depending on the contract, we currently measure the extent of progress toward completion using the units-of-delivery method, cost-to-cost method or upon attainment of scheduled performance contract milestones which could be time, event or expense driven.
While the Company is currently evaluating the expected impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements, related disclosures and the transition alternatives available, Teledyne will adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. Furthermore, Teledyne expects to determine the transition method and the effect of this standard on our consolidated financial statements in the second quarter of 2017.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new guidance will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, requiring application at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). Under the new guidance, investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical expedient will no longer be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. It is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adoption of the guidance, effective January 4, 2016, did not impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows but did impact the disclosures related to certain investments related to our domestic pension plan which are contained in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the computation of the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record a goodwill impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The new standard, will be effective for the Company prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We expect the adoption of this standard will reduce the complexity surrounding the evaluation of goodwill for impairment. The impact of this new standard for the Company will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests.