XML 57 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Investment Securities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Investment Securities [Abstract]  
Investment Securities
4. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Investment securities are summarized as follows:

 

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment debt securities are shown subsequently as of March 31, 2012 by expected maturity distribution for structured asset-backed collateralized debt obligations ("ABS CDOs") and by contractual maturity distribution for other debt securities. Actual maturities may differ from expected or contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties:

 

     Held-to-maturity      Available-for-sale  
(In thousands)   

Amortized cost

    

Estimated fair

value

    

Amortized cost

    

Estimated

fair

value

 

Due in one year or less

   $ 60,284       $ 60,756       $ 441,617       $ 414,938   

Due after one year through five years

     200,100         198,165         1,098,717         1,001,431   

Due after five years through ten years

     176,697         156,520         741,375         641,147   

Due after ten years

     403,468         313,038         1,591,250         984,788   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 840,549       $ 728,479       $ 3,872,959       $ 3,042,304   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following is a summary of the amount of gross unrealized losses for debt securities and the estimated fair value by length of time the securities have been in an unrealized loss position:

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, 64 and 72 held-to-maturity ("HTM") and 423 and 525 available-for-sale ("AFS") investment securities were in an unrealized loss position.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

We conduct a formal review of investment securities on a quarterly basis for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI"). We assess whether OTTI is present when the fair value of a debt security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, OTTI is considered to have occurred if (1) we intend to sell the security; (2) it is "more likely than not" we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis.

Credit-related OTTI is recognized in earnings while noncredit-related OTTI on securities not expected to be sold is recognized in OCI. Noncredit-related OTTI is based on other factors, including illiquidity. Presentation of OTTI is made in the statement of income on a gross basis with an offset for the amount of OTTI recognized in OCI. For securities classified as HTM, the amount of noncredit-related OTTI recognized in OCI is accreted to the credit-adjusted expected cash flow amounts of the securities over future periods.

Our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K describes in more detail our OTTI evaluation process. The following summarizes the conclusions from our OTTI evaluation for those security types that have significant gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2012:

OTTI – Asset-Backed Securities

Trust preferred securities – banks and insurance: These CDO securities are interests in variable rate pools of trust preferred securities related to banks and insurance companies ("collateral issuers"). They are rated by one or more Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ("NRSROs"), which are rating agencies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). They were purchased generally at par. The primary drivers that have given rise to the unrealized losses on CDOs with bank and insurance collateral are listed below:

 

  1) Market yield requirements for bank CDO securities remain very high. The credit crisis resulted in significant utilization of both the unique five-year deferral option each collateral issuer maintains during the life of the CDO and the ability of junior CDO bonds to defer the payment of current interest. The resulting increase in the rate of return demanded by the market for trust preferred CDOs remains dramatically higher than the effective interest rates. All structured product fair values, including bank CDOs, deteriorated significantly during the credit crisis, generally reaching a low in mid-2009. Prices for some structured products, other than bank CDOs, have since rebounded as the crucial unknowns related to value became resolved and as trading increased in these securities. Unlike these other structured products, CDO tranches backed by bank trust preferred securities continue to have unresolved questions surrounding collateral behavior, specifically including, but not limited to, the future number, size and timing of bank failures, and of allowed deferrals and subsequent resumption of payment of contractual interest.

 

  2) Structural features of the collateral make these CDO tranches difficult for market participants to model. The first feature unique to bank CDOs is the interest deferral feature previously discussed. During the credit crisis starting in 2008, certain banks within our CDO pools have exercised this prerogative. The extent to which these deferrals either transition to default or alternatively come current prior to the five-year deadline is extremely difficult for market participants to assess. Our CDO pools include banks which first exercised this deferral option in the second quarter of 2008. At March 31, 2012, 45 banks in our CDO pools had come current after a period of deferral, while 224 were deferring, but remained within the allowed deferral period.

A second structural feature that is difficult to model is the payment in kind ("PIK") feature which provides that upon reaching certain levels of collateral default or deferral, certain junior CDO tranches will not receive current interest but will instead have the interest amount that is unpaid be capitalized or deferred. The cash flow that would otherwise be paid to the junior CDO securities and the income notes is instead used to pay down the principal balance of the most senior CDO securities. If the current market yield required by market participants equaled the effective interest rate of a security, a market participant should be indifferent between receiving current interest and capitalizing and compounding interest for later payment. However, given the difference between current market rates and effective interest rates of the securities, market participants are not indifferent. The delay in payment caused by PIKing results in lower security fair values even if PIKing is projected to be fully cured. This feature is difficult to model and assess. It increases the risk premium the market applies to these securities.

 

  3) Ratings are generally below-investment-grade for even some of the most senior tranches. Rating agency opinions can vary significantly on a CDO tranche. The presence of a below-investment-grade rating by even a single rating agency will severely limit the pool of buyers, which causes greater illiquidity and therefore most likely a higher implicit discount rate/lower price with regard to that CDO tranche.

 

  4) There is a lack of consistent disclosure by each CDO's trustee of the identity of collateral issuers; in addition, complex structures make projecting tranche return profiles difficult for non-specialists in the product.

 

  5) At purchase, the expectation of cash flow variability was limited. As a result of the credit crisis, we have seen extreme variability of collateral performance both compared to expectations and between different pools.

Our ongoing review of these securities determined that OTTI should be recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Trust preferred securities – real estate investment trusts ("REITs"): These CDO securities are variable rate pools of trust preferred securities primarily related to REITs, and are rated by one or more NRSROs. They were purchased generally at par. Unrealized losses were caused mainly by severe deterioration in mortgage REITs and homebuilder credit in addition to the same factors previously discussed for banks and insurance CDOs. Based on our review, no OTTI for these securities was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Other asset-backed securities: Most of these CDO securities were purchased in 2009 from Lockhart at their carrying values and then adjusted to fair value. Certain of these CDOs consist of ABS CDOs (also known as diversified structured finance CDOs). Unrealized losses since acquisition were caused mainly by deterioration in collateral quality and widening of credit spreads for asset backed securities. Based on our review, no OTTI for these securities was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

OTTI – U.S. Government Agencies and Corporations

Small Business Administration ("SBA") Loan-Backed Securities: These securities were generally purchased at premiums with maturities from five to 25 years and have principal cash flows guaranteed by the SBA. Because the decline in fair value is not attributable to credit quality, no OTTI for these securities was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The following is a tabular rollforward of the total amount of credit-related OTTI, including amounts recognized in earnings:

To determine the credit component of OTTI for all security types, we utilize projected cash flows as the best estimate of fair value. These cash flows are credit adjusted using, among other things, assumptions for default probability assigned to each portion of performing collateral. The credit adjusted cash flows are discounted at a security specific coupon rate to identify any OTTI, and then at a market rate for valuation purposes.

For those securities with credit-related OTTI recognized in the statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, any amounts of noncredit-related OTTI recognized in OCI are related to AFS securities.

 

Nontaxable interest income on securities was $4.8 million and $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The following summarizes gains and losses, including OTTI, that were recognized in the statement of income:

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31, 2012     March 31, 2011  
(In thousands)    Gross gains      Gross losses     Gross gains      Gross losses  

Investment securities:

          

Held-to-maturity

   $ 49       $ —        $ 46       $ —     

Available-for-sale

     6,459         15,997        3,519         6,729   

Other noninterest-bearing investments:

          

Nonmarketable equity securities

     9,203         58        1,068         171   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
     15,711         16,055        4,633         6,900   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net losses

      $ (344      $ (2,267
     

 

 

      

 

 

 

Statement of income information:

          

Net impairment losses on investment securities

      $ (10,209      $ (3,105

Equity securities gains

        9,145           897   

Fixed income securities gains (losses), net

        720           (59
     

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net losses

      $ (344      $ (2,267
     

 

 

      

 

 

 

Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recognized using the specific identification method and recorded in noninterest income.

Securities with a carrying value of $1.2 billion at March 31, 2012 and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, advances, and for other purposes as required by law. Securities are also pledged as collateral for security repurchase agreements.