XML 62 R36.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our majority-owned, consolidated subsidiaries. Unconsolidated investments where we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the respective investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not included in the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and prevailing practices within the financial services industry. References to GAAP, including standards promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), are made according to sections of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events
We evaluated events that occurred between December 31, 2023 and the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, and determined that there were no material events that would require adjustments to our consolidated financial statements or significant disclosure in the accompanying Notes.
Variable Interest Entities
Variable Interest Entities
A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is consolidated when we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Current accounting guidance requires continuous analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. At the commencement of our involvement, and periodically thereafter, we consider our consolidation conclusions for all entities with which we are involved.
Statement of Cash Flows
Statement of Cash Flows
For purposes of presentation on the consolidated statements of cash flows, “cash and cash equivalents” are defined as those amounts included in “Cash and due from banks” on the consolidated balance sheets.
Fair Value Estimates
Fair Value Estimates
We measure many of our assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, we prioritize valuation inputs in accordance with a three-level hierarchy. We prioritize quoted prices in active markets and minimize reliance on unobservable inputs when possible. When observable market prices are not available, fair value is estimated using modeling techniques requiring professional judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value. We believe we use assumptions that market
participants would consider in pricing the asset or the liability. Changes in market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. See Note 3 for further information regarding the use of fair value estimates.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, a hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the use of observable inputs over unobservable inputs. This hierarchy uses the following three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access;
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less active markets, observable inputs other than quoted prices that are used in the valuation of an asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means; and
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined by pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is classified is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Market activity is presumed to be orderly in the absence of evidence of forced or disorderly sales. Applicable accounting guidance precludes the use of blockage factors or liquidity adjustments due to the quantity of securities held by an entity.
We measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis when fair value is the primary measure for accounting. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to measure certain assets, such as the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting and the recognition of impairment on assets. Fair value is also used when providing required disclosures for certain financial instruments.
Fair Value Policies and Procedures
We have various policies, processes, and controls in place to ensure that fair values are reasonably developed, reviewed, and approved for use. Our Securities Valuation Committee, comprised of executive management, reviews and approves on a quarterly basis the key components of fair value measurements, including critical valuation assumptions for Level 3 measurements. Our Model Risk Management Group conducts model validations, including internal models, and sets policies and procedures for revalidation, including the timing of revalidation.
Third-party Service Providers
We use a third-party pricing service to measure fair value for substantially all of our Level 2 AFS securities. Fair value measurements for other Level 2 AFS securities generally use inputs corroborated by market data and include standard discounted cash flow analyses.
For Level 2 securities, the third-party pricing service provides documentation on an ongoing basis that presents market data, including detailed pricing information and market reference data. The documentation includes benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data, including information from the vendor trading platform. We review, test, and validate this information on a regular basis.
The following describes the hierarchy designations, valuation methodologies and key inputs to measure fair value on a recurring basis for designated financial instruments:
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury, Agencies and Corporations — U.S. Treasury securities measured using quoted market prices are classified in Level 1. U.S. agency and corporate securities measured using observable market inputs are classified in Level 2.
Municipal Securities — Municipal securities are measured using observable market inputs and are classified in Level 2.
Other Debt Securities — Other debt securities are measured using quoted prices for similar securities and are classified in Level 2.
Trading
Trading securities are measured using observable market inputs and are classified in Level 1 and Level 2.
Bank-owned Life Insurance
BOLI is measured according to the CSV of the insurance policies. Nearly all policies are general account policies with CSVs based on our claims on the assets of the insurance companies. The insurance companies’ investments include predominantly fixed-income securities consisting of investment-grade corporate bonds and various types of mortgage instruments. Management regularly reviews its BOLI investment performance, including concentrations among insurance providers and classifies BOLI balances in Level 2.
Private Equity Investments
PEIs measured at fair value on a recurring basis are generally classified in Level 3 because related measurements include unobservable inputs. Key assumptions and considerations include current and projected financial performance, recent financing activities, economic and market conditions, market comparable companies, market liquidity, and other factors. The majority of these PEIs are held in our Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) and are early-stage venture investments. These investments are reviewed at least quarterly by the Securities Valuation Committee and whenever a new round of financing occurs. Some of these investments may be
measured using multiples of operating performance. The Equity Investments Committee reviews periodic financial information for these investments, including audited financial statements when available. On occasion, PEIs may become publicly traded and are measured in Level 1. Certain restrictions may apply for the redemption of these investments.
Agriculture Loan Servicing
We service agriculture loans approved and funded by Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“FAMC”), and provide this servicing under an agreement with FAMC for the loans it owns. The servicing assets are measured at fair value, which represents our projection of the present value of net future cash flows. Because related measurements include unobservable inputs, these assets are classified in Level 3.
Loans held for sale
We have elected the fair value option for certain commercial real estate loans that are intended for sale to a third-party conduit for securitization. These loans are measured at fair value using observable market prices for mortgage-backed securities with similar collateral. The value of the loans incorporates adjustments for differences between the securities and the value of the underlying loans due to credit quality, portfolio composition, and liquidity. Valuations of loans measured at fair value are generally classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy because their pricing is largely based on observable market inputs.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets
Invested assets in the deferred compensation plan consist of shares of registered investment companies. These mutual funds are valued using quoted market prices, which represents the net asset value (“NAV”) of shares held by the plan at the end of the period. As such, these assets are classified in Level 1.
Derivatives
Exchange-traded derivatives, including foreign currency exchange contracts, are generally classified in Level 1 because they are traded in active markets. Over-the-counter derivatives, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps and options, are generally classified in Level 2 as the related fair values are obtained from third-party services that utilize observable market inputs. Observable market inputs include yield curves, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, option volatility, counterparty credit risk, and other related data. Valuations include credit valuation adjustments (“CVAs”) to reflect nonperformance risk for both us and our counterparties. CVAs are determined generally by applying a credit spread to the total expected exposure (net of any collateral) of the derivative.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased
Securities sold, not yet purchased, are included in “Federal funds and other short-term borrowings” on the consolidated balance sheet, and are measured using quoted market prices and are generally classified in Level 1. If market prices for identical securities are not available, quoted prices for similar securities are used with the related balances classified in Level 2.
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Securities purchased under agreements to resell represent overnight and term agreements with the majority maturing within 30 days. These agreements are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at amounts at which the securities were acquired plus accrued interest. We, or in some instances third parties on our behalf, take possession of the underlying securities. The fair value of such securities is monitored throughout the contract term to ensure that asset values remain sufficient to protect against counterparty default. We are permitted by contract to sell or repledge certain securities that we accept as collateral for securities purchased under agreements to resell. If sold, our obligation to return the collateral is recorded as “securities sold, not yet purchased” and included as a liability in “Federal funds and other short-term borrowings” on the consolidated balance sheet.
Investment Securities
Investment Securities
We classify our investment securities according to their purpose and holding period. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are recognized using the specific identification method and recorded in noninterest income.
Held-to-maturity (“HTM”) debt securities are carried at amortized cost with purchase discounts or premiums accreted or amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the security. We have the intent and ability to hold such securities until maturity. For HTM securities, the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) is assessed consistent with the approach described in Note 6 for loans carried at amortized cost.
Available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities are measured at fair value and generally consist of debt securities held for investment. Unrealized gains and losses of AFS securities, after applicable taxes, are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). AFS securities in an unrealized loss position are formally reviewed on a quarterly basis for the presence of credit impairment. If we have the intent to sell an identified security, or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, we write the amortized cost down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date through earnings. If we have the intent and ability to hold the securities, they are analyzed to determine whether any impairment was attributable to credit-related factors. If a credit impairment is determined to exist, then we measure the amount of credit loss and recognize an allowance for the credit loss. In measuring the credit loss, we generally compare the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security to the amortized cost basis of the security. These cash flows are credit adjusted using, among other things, assumptions for default probability and loss severity. Certain other inputs, such as prepayment rate assumptions, are also utilized. In addition, certain internal models may be utilized. To determine the credit-related portion of impairment, we use the security-specific effective interest rate when estimating the present value of cash flows. If the present value of cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the security, then this amount is recorded as an allowance for credit loss, limited to the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis (i.e., the credit impairment cannot result in the security being carried at an amount lower than its fair value). The process, methodology, and factors considered to evaluate securities for impairment are described further in Note 5. See also Note 3 for further information regarding the measurement of our investment securities at fair value.
When a security is transferred from AFS to HTM, the difference between its amortized cost basis and fair value at the date of transfer is amortized as a yield adjustment through interest income, and the fair value at the date of transfer results in either a premium or discount to the amortized cost basis of the HTM securities. The amortization of unrealized losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) will offset the effect of the amortization of the premium or discount in interest income that is created by the transfer.
Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified as HTM, AFS, or trading. HTM securities, which management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at amortized cost. The amortized cost amounts represent the original cost of the investments, adjusted for related amortization or accretion of any purchase premiums or discounts, and for any impairment losses, including credit-related impairment. AFS securities are carried at fair value, and changes in fair value (unrealized gains and losses) are reported as net increases or decreases to AOCI, net of related taxes. Trading securities are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in current period earnings.
The carrying values of our securities do not include accrued interest receivables of $65 million and $75 million at December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively. These receivables are included in “Other assets” on the consolidated balance sheet. The purchase premiums for callable debt securities classified as HTM or AFS are amortized into interest income at an effective yield to the earliest call date. The purchase premiums and discounts for all other HTM and AFS securities are recorded as interest income over the contractual life of the security using the effective yield method. As principal prepayments are received on securities, a proportionate amount of the related premium or discount is recognized in income so that the effective yield on the remaining portion of the security continues unchanged.
Leases
Leases
All leases with lease terms greater than twelve months are reported as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. We include ROU assets for operating leases and finance leases in “Other assets,” and “Premises, equipment and software, net” on the consolidated balance sheet, respectively. The corresponding liabilities for those leases are included in “Other liabilities,” and “Long-term debt” on the consolidated balance sheet, respectively.
Loans
Loans
Loans are reported at their amortized cost basis, which includes the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized purchase premiums, discounts, and deferred loan fees and costs, which are amortized into interest income over the life of the loan using the interest method.
At the time of origination, we generally determine whether loans are held for investment or held for sale. We may subsequently change our intent for a loan or group of loans and reclassify them accordingly. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. A valuation allowance is recorded when cost exceeds fair value based on reviews at the time of reclassification and periodically thereafter. Associated gains and losses are calculated based on the difference between sales proceeds and carrying value, and are included in “Loan-related fees and income” on the consolidated statement of income.
We evaluate loans throughout their lives for indications of credit deterioration, which may impact the loan status, risk-grading, and potentially impact the accounting for that loan. Loan status categories include past due as to contractual payments, accruing or nonaccruing, and modified or restructured, including troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), which were no longer identified after the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, beginning January 1, 2023 as discussed in Note 2. Our accounting policies for loans and our estimation of the related ACL are described further in Note 6.
In the ordinary course of business, we may syndicate portions of loans or transfer portions of loans under participation agreements to manage credit risk and our portfolio concentration. We evaluate the loan participations to determine if they meet the appropriate accounting guidance to qualify as sales. Certain purchased loans require separate accounting procedures that are also described in Note 6.
We elect the fair value option for certain commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans that are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments, as described further in Note 3.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The ACL, which consists of the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments (“RULC”), represents our estimate of current expected credit losses related to the loan and lease portfolio and unfunded lending commitments as of the balance sheet date. The ACL for debt securities is estimated separately from loans. See Note 6 for further discussion of our estimation process for the ACL.
Other Noninterest-bearing Investments
Other Noninterest-bearing Investments
These investments include private equity investments (“PEIs”), venture capital securities, securities acquired for various debt and regulatory requirements, bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and certain other noninterest-bearing investments. See further discussion in Note 3.
Certain PEIs and venture capital securities are accounted for under the equity method when we are able to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. Equity investments in PEIs that do not give us significant influence are reported at fair value, unless there is not a readily determinable fair value. We have elected to measure PEIs without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer, referred to as the “measurement alternative.”
Periodic reviews are conducted for impairment by comparing carrying values with estimates of fair value. Changes in fair value, impairment losses, and gains and losses from sales are included in “Securities gains (losses), net” on the consolidated statement of income.
BOLI is accounted for at fair value based on the cash surrender values (“CSVs”) of the general account insurance policies.
Premises, Equipment, and Software
Premises, Equipment, and Software
Premises, equipment, and software are reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation, computed primarily on the straight-line method, is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the properties, generally 25 to 40 years for buildings, three to 10 years for furniture and equipment, and three to 10 years for software, including capitalized costs related to our technology initiatives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the respective leases (including any extension options that are reasonably certain to be exercised) or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Premises, equipment, and software are evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded at fair value at the time of its acquisition and is subsequently evaluated for impairment annually, or more frequently if conditions warrant.
Business Combinations
Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Upon initially obtaining control, we recognize 100% of all acquired assets and all assumed liabilities, regardless of the percentage owned. The assets and liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair values, with goodwill being recorded when such fair values are less than the cost of acquisition. Certain transaction and restructuring costs are expensed as incurred. Changes to estimated fair values from a business combination are recognized as an adjustment to goodwill over the measurement period, which cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date. Results of operations of acquired businesses are included on our statement of income from the date of acquisition.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) consists primarily of commercial and residential real estate acquired in partial or total satisfaction of loan obligations. Amounts are recorded initially at fair value (less estimated selling costs) based on recent property appraisals at the time of transfer and subsequently at the lower of cost or fair value (less estimated selling costs).
Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments such as swaps and purchased and sold options as an important tool in managing our asset and liability sensitivities to remain within our stated interest rate risk thresholds. Their use allows us to adjust and align our mix of fixed- and floating-rate assets and liabilities to manage interest income and expense volatility, the duration of our assets and liabilities, and other metrics, such as the economic value of equity, by synthetically converting variable-rate assets to fixed-rate, or synthetically converting variable-rate assets and liabilities to fixed rate, or synthetically converting fixed-rate assets and funding instruments to floating rates.
We also execute both interest rate and short-term foreign currency derivative instruments with our commercial banking customers to facilitate their risk management objectives. These derivatives are hedged by entering into offsetting derivatives with third parties such that we minimize our net risk exposure as a result of such transactions. We record all derivatives at fair value, and they are included in “Other assets” or “Other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet.
The accounting for the change in value of a derivative depends on whether or not the transaction has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges are reported and measured at fair value through earnings.
Derivatives Designated in Qualifying Hedging Relationships
Derivatives Designated in Qualifying Hedging Relationships
We apply hedge accounting to certain derivatives executed for risk management purposes, primarily interest rate risk. To qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and the hedging relationship must be formally documented. We primarily use regression analysis to assess the effectiveness of each hedging relationship, unless the hedge qualifies for other methods of assessing effectiveness (e.g., shortcut or critical terms match), both at inception and on an ongoing basis. We designate derivatives as fair value and cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Commitments and Letters of Credit
Commitments and Letters of Credit
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into loan commitments, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded. The credit risk associated with these commitments is evaluated in a manner similar to the ALLL. The RULC is presented separately on the consolidated balance sheet.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.
Share-based Compensation
Share-based Compensation
Share-based compensation generally includes grants of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and other awards to employees and nonemployee directors. We record compensation expense based on the grant-date value of the associated share-based awards.
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) and deferred tax liabilities (“DTLs”) are determined based on temporary differences between financial statement asset and liability amounts and their respective tax basis, and are measured using enacted tax laws and rates. The effect of a change in tax rates on DTAs and DTLs is recognized into income in the period that includes the enactment date. DTAs are recognized insofar that management deems it more likely than not that they will be realized. Unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions primarily relate to tax credits on technology initiatives.
Net Earnings Per Common Share
Net Earnings Per Common Share
Net earnings per common share is based on net earnings applicable to common shareholders, which is net of preferred stock dividends. Basic net earnings per common share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares during each year. Unvested share-based awards with rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of basic earnings per share. Diluted net earnings per common share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares during each year, including common stock equivalents. Stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, and stock warrants are converted to common stock equivalents using the more dilutive of the treasury stock method or the two-class method. Diluted net earnings per common share excludes common stock equivalents whose effect is antidilutive.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Estimates
We measure many of our assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, we prioritize valuation inputs in accordance with a three-level hierarchy. We prioritize quoted prices in active markets and minimize reliance on unobservable inputs when possible. When observable market prices are not available, fair value is estimated using modeling techniques requiring professional judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value. We believe we use assumptions that market
participants would consider in pricing the asset or the liability. Changes in market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. See Note 3 for further information regarding the use of fair value estimates.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, a hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the use of observable inputs over unobservable inputs. This hierarchy uses the following three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access;
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less active markets, observable inputs other than quoted prices that are used in the valuation of an asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means; and
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined by pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is classified is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Market activity is presumed to be orderly in the absence of evidence of forced or disorderly sales. Applicable accounting guidance precludes the use of blockage factors or liquidity adjustments due to the quantity of securities held by an entity.
We measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis when fair value is the primary measure for accounting. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to measure certain assets, such as the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting and the recognition of impairment on assets. Fair value is also used when providing required disclosures for certain financial instruments.
Fair Value Policies and Procedures
We have various policies, processes, and controls in place to ensure that fair values are reasonably developed, reviewed, and approved for use. Our Securities Valuation Committee, comprised of executive management, reviews and approves on a quarterly basis the key components of fair value measurements, including critical valuation assumptions for Level 3 measurements. Our Model Risk Management Group conducts model validations, including internal models, and sets policies and procedures for revalidation, including the timing of revalidation.
Third-party Service Providers
We use a third-party pricing service to measure fair value for substantially all of our Level 2 AFS securities. Fair value measurements for other Level 2 AFS securities generally use inputs corroborated by market data and include standard discounted cash flow analyses.
For Level 2 securities, the third-party pricing service provides documentation on an ongoing basis that presents market data, including detailed pricing information and market reference data. The documentation includes benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data, including information from the vendor trading platform. We review, test, and validate this information on a regular basis.
The following describes the hierarchy designations, valuation methodologies and key inputs to measure fair value on a recurring basis for designated financial instruments:
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury, Agencies and Corporations — U.S. Treasury securities measured using quoted market prices are classified in Level 1. U.S. agency and corporate securities measured using observable market inputs are classified in Level 2.
Municipal Securities — Municipal securities are measured using observable market inputs and are classified in Level 2.
Other Debt Securities — Other debt securities are measured using quoted prices for similar securities and are classified in Level 2.
Trading
Trading securities are measured using observable market inputs and are classified in Level 1 and Level 2.
Bank-owned Life Insurance
BOLI is measured according to the CSV of the insurance policies. Nearly all policies are general account policies with CSVs based on our claims on the assets of the insurance companies. The insurance companies’ investments include predominantly fixed-income securities consisting of investment-grade corporate bonds and various types of mortgage instruments. Management regularly reviews its BOLI investment performance, including concentrations among insurance providers and classifies BOLI balances in Level 2.
Private Equity Investments
PEIs measured at fair value on a recurring basis are generally classified in Level 3 because related measurements include unobservable inputs. Key assumptions and considerations include current and projected financial performance, recent financing activities, economic and market conditions, market comparable companies, market liquidity, and other factors. The majority of these PEIs are held in our Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) and are early-stage venture investments. These investments are reviewed at least quarterly by the Securities Valuation Committee and whenever a new round of financing occurs. Some of these investments may be
measured using multiples of operating performance. The Equity Investments Committee reviews periodic financial information for these investments, including audited financial statements when available. On occasion, PEIs may become publicly traded and are measured in Level 1. Certain restrictions may apply for the redemption of these investments.
Agriculture Loan Servicing
We service agriculture loans approved and funded by Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“FAMC”), and provide this servicing under an agreement with FAMC for the loans it owns. The servicing assets are measured at fair value, which represents our projection of the present value of net future cash flows. Because related measurements include unobservable inputs, these assets are classified in Level 3.
Loans held for sale
We have elected the fair value option for certain commercial real estate loans that are intended for sale to a third-party conduit for securitization. These loans are measured at fair value using observable market prices for mortgage-backed securities with similar collateral. The value of the loans incorporates adjustments for differences between the securities and the value of the underlying loans due to credit quality, portfolio composition, and liquidity. Valuations of loans measured at fair value are generally classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy because their pricing is largely based on observable market inputs.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets
Invested assets in the deferred compensation plan consist of shares of registered investment companies. These mutual funds are valued using quoted market prices, which represents the net asset value (“NAV”) of shares held by the plan at the end of the period. As such, these assets are classified in Level 1.
Derivatives
Exchange-traded derivatives, including foreign currency exchange contracts, are generally classified in Level 1 because they are traded in active markets. Over-the-counter derivatives, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps and options, are generally classified in Level 2 as the related fair values are obtained from third-party services that utilize observable market inputs. Observable market inputs include yield curves, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, option volatility, counterparty credit risk, and other related data. Valuations include credit valuation adjustments (“CVAs”) to reflect nonperformance risk for both us and our counterparties. CVAs are determined generally by applying a credit spread to the total expected exposure (net of any collateral) of the derivative.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased
Securities sold, not yet purchased, are included in “Federal funds and other short-term borrowings” on the consolidated balance sheet, and are measured using quoted market prices and are generally classified in Level 1. If market prices for identical securities are not available, quoted prices for similar securities are used with the related balances classified in Level 2.
Investment Securities, Impairment
Ongoing Policy
On a quarterly basis, we review our investment securities portfolio for the presence of impairment on an individual security basis. For AFS securities, when the fair value of a debt security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date, we assess for the presence of credit impairment. When determining if the fair value of an investment is less than the amortized cost basis, we have elected to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis of the investment. If we have the intent to sell an identified security, or if it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, we write the amortized cost down to the security’s fair value at the reporting date through earnings.
If we have the intent and ability to hold the securities, we determine whether there is any impairment attributable to credit-related factors. We analyze certain factors, primarily internal and external credit ratings, to determine if the decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis has resulted from a credit loss or other factors. If a credit impairment is determined to exist, then we measure the amount of credit loss and recognize an allowance for the credit loss. In measuring the credit loss, we generally compare the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security to the amortized cost basis of the security. These cash flows are credit adjusted using, among other things, assumptions for default probability and loss severity. Certain other inputs, such as prepayment rate assumptions, are also utilized. In addition, certain internal models may be utilized. To determine the credit-related portion of impairment, we use the security-specific effective interest rate when estimating the present value of cash flows. If the present value of cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the security, then this amount is recorded as an allowance for credit loss, limited to the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis (i.e., the credit impairment cannot result in the security being carried at an amount lower than its fair value). The assumptions used to estimate the expected cash flows depend on the particular asset class, structure, and credit rating of the security. Declines in fair value that are not recorded in the allowance are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Standard
Description
Effective date
Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters
Standards not yet adopted by the Bank as of December 31, 2023
ASU 2022-03,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions

This ASU clarifies that contractual restrictions prohibiting the sale of an equity security are not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security, and therefore, are not considered in measuring fair value. The amendments clarify that an entity cannot recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction as a separate unit of account. The amendments in this ASU also require additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions.


January 1, 2024
The requirements of this ASU are consistent with our current treatment of equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions and are not expected to impact the fair value measurements of these securities.

The overall effect of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.


ASU 2023-02,
Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)
This ASU expands the optional use of the proportional amortization method (“PAM”), previously limited to investments in low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) structures, to any eligible equity investments made primarily for the purpose of receiving income tax credit and other tax benefits when certain criteria are met. PAM results in the cost of the investment being amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received, with the amortization of the investment and the income tax credits being presented net on the consolidated statement of income as a component of income tax expense (benefit).

This ASU allows for an accounting policy election to apply PAM on a tax-credit-program-by-tax-credit-program basis. The ASU also includes additional disclosure requirements about equity investments accounted for using PAM.
January 1, 2024
We do not currently have any additional equity investments that are eligible for PAM under the provisions of this ASU.

The overall effect of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.


ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures
This ASU expands operating segment disclosures and requires all segment disclosures to be reported in both annual and interim periods. The new standard requires disclosure of the following:
Significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for reportable segments;
The title and position of the CODM as well as how the CODM uses the reported measure(s) of profit and loss to assess segment performance; and
“Other segment items” by reportable segment and a description of its composition.
Annual periods beginning January 1, 2024; Interim periods beginning January 1, 2025
The overall effect of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.


ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
This ASU expands tax disclosures to provide more information to better assess how an entity’s operations and related tax risks and tax planning and opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. The enhancements in this ASU require that an entity disaggregate income taxes paid and income (or loss) from continuing operations before tax expense (or benefit), and income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations.

The new standard requires disclosure of specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold.
January 1, 2025
We are evaluating the disclosure requirements. The overall effect of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.


    
Standards adopted by the Bank in 2023
ASU 2022-02,
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures

This ASU eliminated the recognition and measurement guidance on troubled debt restructurings for creditors that have adopted ASC 326 (“CECL”), and eliminated certain previously required TDR disclosures while expanding disclosures about loan modifications for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. The new standard also required public companies to present gross write-offs (on a year-to-date basis for interim-period disclosures) by year of origination in their vintage disclosures.    

January 1, 2023
We adopted the guidance in the new standard on January 1, 2023. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our financial statements.