UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                         Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨    Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x    Definitive Proxy Statement

¨    Definitive Additional Materials

¨    Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

ZIONS BANCORPORATION,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

 (Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): 

x    No fee required.

¨    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)    Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

(2)     Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

(3)    Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)    Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

(5)    Total fee paid:

¨    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)     Amount Previously Paid:

(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)    Filing Party:

(4)    Date Filed:

March 18, 2021

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to participate in the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. to be held on Friday, April 30, 2021, at 1 p.m. Mountain Daylight Time. For your convenience, we are pleased to inform you that the annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. You will be able to participate in the annual meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021. Details regarding how to participate in the meeting online and the business to be conducted at the annual meeting are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

We are furnishing our proxy materials to you over the internet as allowed by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, on or about March 19, 2021, we will send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or Notice, which will provide instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and annual report online. This is designed to reduce our printing and mailing costs and the environmental impact of our proxy materials. A paper copy of our proxy materials may be requested through one of the methods described in the Notice.

It is important that all shareholders participate in or be represented at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to participate in the meeting, please promptly submit your proxy by following the instructions found on the Notice. The prompt submission of proxies will save the Bank the expense of further requests, which might otherwise be necessary in order to ensure a quorum.

Shareholders, media representatives, analysts, and the public are welcome to listen to the annual meeting via the live webcast.

My CEO letter summarizing our financial results and strategy may be found in our Year in Review on our website at www.zionsbancorp.com. Thank you for your continued investment.

Sincerely,

Harris H. Simmons

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Quick Information

The following charts provide a summary of Zions Bancorporation's 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our corporate governance and executive compensation practices. Please read the entire Proxy Statement for detailed information prior to voting.

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Date and Time:     Friday, April 30, 2021

1 p.m., Mountain Daylight Time

Location:     We will host the annual meeting live via webcast. Any shareholder may participate in the annual         

meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021. If you were a shareholder     

or joint holder as of the Record Date, or you hold a valid proxy for the annual meeting, you can

vote at the annual meeting. A summary of the information you need to participate in the annual meeting online is provided below:

•Instructions on how to participate via the internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021;

•You will need your 16-Digit Control Number to enter the annual meeting; and

•Shareholders may vote and submit questions while participating in the annual meeting via the internet.

Record Date:     Feb. 25, 2021

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
Proposal	Voting Options	Board Recommendation	More Information
PROPOSAL 1 Election of Directors	FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN for each Director nominee	FOR each Nominee	Page 4
PROPOSAL 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN	FOR	Page 18
PROPOSAL 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation	FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN	FOR	Page 21

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

Common shareholders as of the Record Date are entitled to vote by using one of the following methods:

Prior to the Meeting

•Internet – Visit www.proxyvote.com and enter your 16-digit control number that appears on your proxy card, email notice, or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

•Mail– If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, fill out the proxy card and return it in the envelope provided to: Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717

•Mobile Device (tablet or smartphone) – scan the Quick Response Code that appears on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (may require free software)

i

•Telephone– call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the recorded instructions. You will need to enter your 16-digit control number that appears on your proxy card

During the Meeting

•Internet – To be admitted to the annual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021 and enter your 16-digit control number that appears on your proxy card, email notice, or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. You may vote during the annual meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting.

GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION SUMMARY

Board Composition, Leadership and Operations
Current Number of Directors	11
Director Independence	82%
Standing Board Committee Membership Independence (excluding Executive Committee)	100%
Independent Lead Director	Yes
Voting Standard	Majority, with plurality carve-out for contested elections
Frequency of Director Elections	Annual
Resignation Policy	Yes
Classified Board	No
Mandatory Retirement Age	Yes (Annual meeting following 72nd birthday)
Mandatory Retirement Tenure	No
Average Director Age	62
Average Director Tenure	9 years*
Gender Diversity on the Board	27%*
Racial/Ethnic Diversity on the Board	27%*
Directors Attending Fewer Than 75% of Meetings	None
Directors Overboarded per ISS or Glass Lewis Voting Guidelines	None
Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process	Yes
Independent Directors Meet Without Management Present	Yes
Number of Board Meetings Held in 2020	7 meetings and 3 optional update calls
Total Number of Board and Committee Meetings Held in 2020	34
Board Oversight of Bank Strategy and Risks	Yes
Shareholder Rights
One Share, One Vote Policy	Yes
Dual-Class Common Stock	No
Cumulative Voting	No
Vote Standard for Charter/By-Law Amendment	80% (Charter–certain provisions) / Majority (Bylaw)

ii

Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting	Yes (by shareholders owning not less than 51% of the votes entitled to be cast on the issue proposed at the meeting)
Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent	Yes
Board Authorized to Issue Blank-Check Preferred Stock	Yes; however, our capital plan, which may include preferred stock issuances, is regularly submitted to the OCC for review
Poison Pill	No
Proxy Access By-Law	Yes
Other Governance Practices
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies	Hedging prohibited; pledging restricted
Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines	Yes
Shares Pledged by Directors and Executive Officers	See page 58 for details
Material Related Party Transactions with Directors	No
Director Onboarding and Ongoing Education Program	Yes
Independent Auditor	Ernst & Young LLP
Codes of Conduct for Directors and Employees	Yes
Board Oversight of Corporate Culture	Yes
Board Oversight of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Matters	Yes
No-Harassment Policy	Yes
Political Contributions	Zions does not use corporate funds for election-related contributions to political candidates, candidate campaign committees, political parties or super PACs.
Corporate Responsibility Report	Available at www.zionsbancorporation.com
Compensation Practices
CEO Pay Ratio	67:1
Clawback Policy	Yes
Employment Agreements for Executive Officers	No
Repricing of Underwater Options	No
Excessive Perks	No
Pay-for-Performance	Yes
Frequency of Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote	Annual
Double-Trigger Change-in-Control Provisions	Yes
Compensation Consultant	McLagan

*Following the scheduled retirement of Director Heaney and anticipated election of Ms. Contreras-Sweet to the Board of Directors, the average director tenure following the annual meeting will be 7.5 years, gender diversity on the Board will be 36%, and racial/ethnic diversity on the Board will be 36%.

iii

Table of Contents
Quick Information	i
ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION	i
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE	i
VOTING INSTRUCTIONS	i
GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION SUMMARY	ii
Notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders	1
Solicitation and Voting Information	2
AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS	3
“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS	4
Proposal 1: Nomination and Election of Directors	4
DIRECTOR NOMINEES	5
BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE	8
Compensation of Directors	8
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS	9
DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE	9
Corporate Governance	10
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND POLICIES	10
BOARD INDEPENDENCE AND LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE	11
INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP AND LEAD DIRECTOR	12
BOARD COMMITTEES	13
BOARD INVOLVEMENT IN RISK OVERSIGHT	16
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	18
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE	19
Proposal 3: Advisory (Nonbinding) Vote Regarding 2020 Executive Compensation ("Say on Pay")	21
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANK	22
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	24
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	25
COMPENSATION OVERVIEW	27
COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR THE 2020 PERFORMANCE PERIOD	29
DECISION-MAKING ROLES AND PROCESS	36
OTHER COMPENSATION ELEMENTS	38
COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES	40

iv

Compensation Committee Report	41
Compensation Tables	42
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE	42
2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS	44
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2020	45
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2020	47
2020 PENSION BENEFITS	47
2020 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION	48
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL	48
CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE	52
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE METRICS	53
Other Matters	56
SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH	56
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES	57
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE	58
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	59
OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING	59
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING	59
COMMUNICATING WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS	61
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	61

v

One South Main Street, 11th Floor

Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109

Notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To the shareholders of Zions Bancorporation, N.A.:

The 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. will be held:

Date:    April 30, 2021

Time:    1 p.m., local time

Place:    We will host the annual meeting live via webcast. Any shareholder can participate in the annual meeting     

live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021. If you were a shareholder or joint holder as             

of the Record Date, or you hold a valid proxy for the annual meeting, you can vote at the annual meeting.     

A summary of the information you need to participate in the annual meeting online is provided below:

•Instructions on how to participate via the internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021;

•You will need your 16-Digit Control Number to enter the annual meeting; and

•Shareholders may vote and submit questions while participating in the annual meeting via the internet.

Purpose of the Annual Meeting:

1.To elect 11 directors for a one-year term (Proposal 1)

2.To ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2021 (Proposal 2)

3.To approve, on a nonbinding advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers with respect to the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020 (Proposal 3)

Record Date: Only shareholders of record on Feb. 25, 2021, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

Thomas E. Laursen

Corporate Secretary

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 18, 2021

1

One South Main Street, 11th Floor

Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109

PROXY STATEMENT

Solicitation and Voting Information

Your proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (referred to as the “Board”) of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (referred to as “Zions,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Bank”) for use at the Annual Meeting of our Shareholders to be held on Friday, April 30, 2021, at 1 p.m. Mountain Daylight Time via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ZION2021, as described on page 1.

In accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide our shareholders with access to our proxy materials over the internet rather than in paper form. Accordingly, on or about March 19, 2021, we will send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials rather than a printed copy of the materials to our shareholders of record as of Feb. 25, 2021, the record date for the annual meeting.

If you validly submit a proxy solicited by the Board, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted on the proposals in the manner you specify. If no contrary direction is given, your proxy will be voted as follows:

ØFOR the election of the 11 directors listed on page 4 to a one-year term of office (Proposal 1)

ØFOR ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021 (Proposal 2)

ØFOR approval, on a nonbinding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers identified in this Proxy Statement with respect to the year ended Dec. 31, 2020 (Proposal 3)

If you submit your proxy but indicate that you want to ABSTAIN with respect to any proposal, your shares will be counted for purposes of whether a quorum exists. An abstention will have no effect on the outcome of any proposal. You may REVOKE your proxy at any time before it is voted at the annual meeting by giving written notice to our Corporate Secretary, or by submitting a later dated proxy through the mail, internet, or telephone (in which case the later submitted proxy will be recorded and the earlier proxy revoked), or by voting via the internet during the annual meeting.

The only shares that may be voted at the annual meeting are the 163,633,564 common shares outstanding at the close of business on the record date. Each share is entitled to one vote.

Quorum. A quorum of our shares, which is a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the record date, must be present or represented by proxy before any action can be taken at the annual meeting. Further, in order for any shareholder proposal to be acted on at the meeting, the proposal will need to be validly presented at the annual meeting by a shareholder proponent.

Voting standard. On all matters other than the election of directors, the action will be approved if the number of shares validly voted “for” the action exceeds the number of shares validly voted “against” the action. The same majority vote standard also applies in the uncontested election of directors. In all elections of directors, each shareholder entitled to vote shall have the right to vote, in person or by proxy, each share owned by him or her for as many persons as there are directorships to be voted on. Each nominee in an uncontested election will be elected as director for a full term if, and only if, the nominee receives the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to that nominee (meaning the number of shares validly voted “for” the nominee exceeds the number of shares voted “against” that nominee). If a nominee fails to receive such a majority of votes, he or

2

she will be required by our corporate governance guidelines to promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the vote. The Board, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept the resignation. The Board must take action within 90 days following certification of the vote, unless the action would cause the Bank to fail to comply with any listing or legal requirement, in which event the Board will take action as promptly as is practicable while continuing to meet such requirements. The Board must publicly disclose whether they accepted or rejected the nominee's resignation and the reasons for the decision. At a contested election, the directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast (meaning the nominees with the greatest number of shares voted “for” shall be elected without regard to votes cast “against” any nominee). 

Voting by your broker. Please note that under the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, rules governing broker-dealers, brokers that have not received voting instructions from their customers 10 days prior to the annual meeting date may vote their customers’ shares in the brokers’ discretion on the proposal regarding the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2) because this is considered “discretionary” under NYSE rules. If your broker is an affiliate of the Bank, NYSE policy states that, in the absence of your specific voting instructions, your shares may be voted only in the same proportion as all other shares are voted with respect to each discretionary item. Under the NYSE rules, each other proposal is a “non-discretionary” item, which means that member brokers who have not received instructions from the beneficial owners of the Bank’s common stock do not have discretion to vote the shares of our common stock held by those beneficial owners on those proposals. This means that brokers may not vote your shares in the election of directors (Proposal 1), or on the proposal to approve the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers on a nonbinding advisory basis (Proposal 3), unless you provide specific instructions on how to vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of these proposals. We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. We will reimburse brokers and others who incur costs to send proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares held in a broker or nominee name. Our directors, officers, and employees may solicit proxies in person, by mail, or by telephone, but they will receive no extra compensation for doing so.

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, are available at www.zionsbancorporation.com/annualreport.

The Bank will provide without charge to each shareholder, on written request, a copy of the Bank's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Written requests for such information should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, Zions Bancorporation, One South Main Street, 11th Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109.

3

“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS

SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements or Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or Notice, addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies. We will household the Notice for addresses with multiple shareholders unless we receive contrary instructions from the affected shareholders. If you are an affected shareholder and no longer wish to participate in householding, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the Notice and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account, or the Bank if you hold registered shares. Such a notification to the Bank may be made by written request sent to Zions Bank, Corporate Trust Department, P.O. Box 30880, Salt Lake City, Utah 84130 or by calling 888-416-5176. Additionally, we will deliver promptly to any affected shareholder, upon his or her written or oral request made to the address or phone number in the preceding sentence, an additional copy of the Notice.

Proposal 1: Nomination and Election of Directors

The 11 persons listed below are nominated for election as directors for a one year term. The names, ages, and biographical information for each nominee to our Board immediately follow this proposal. If and when elected, the nominees will constitute our entire elected Board until their successors are elected and qualified. See page 14 of this Proxy Statement for a listing of the Board committee membership of each nominee.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the election of the 11 nominees for director listed below.

We will vote the proxies that we receive “FOR” the election of the nominees for director unless otherwise indicated on the proxies. If any of the nominees is unable or declines to serve, an event which management does not anticipate, proxies will then be voted for a nominee who will be designated by the present Board to fill such vacancy. If the votes cast “for” a nominee fail to constitute a majority of the votes cast with respect to that nominee, he or she will be elected to a term of office ending on the earlier of 90 days after the day on which we certify election results and the day on which a person is selected by the Board to fill the office held by such director. If the votes cast “for” a nominee do constitute a majority of the votes cast with respect to that nominee, he or she will be elected to a full one-year term.

4

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

	Principal Occupation, Directorships of Publicly Traded Companies During the Past Five Years, and Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills
Maria Contreras-Sweet Age 65 Director Nominee 2021	Since 2017, Ms. Contreras-Sweet has been managing member of both Contreras Sweet Companies, a marketing and research solutions company, and Rockway Equity Partners, a private equity firm. She served as 24th administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and as a member of former President Barack Obama’s cabinet from April 7, 2014, to Jan. 20, 2017. Previously, Ms. Contreras-Sweet was the founding executive chairwoman of ProAmerica Bank. She is a member of the boards of directors of publicly-traded companies Sempra Energy, where she serves on the audit, compensation, and special matters committees; TriNet Group, Inc., serving on their risk committee; and Regional Management Corporation, where she serves on the compensation and nominations and governance committees. She also serves on the board of the Bipartisan Policy Center. Ms. Contreras-Sweet possesses extensive knowledge of and executive experience in both the public and private sectors. Her strong understanding of banking, regulation and the financial services marketplace; extensive experience with small and medium-sized businesses; and her promotion of workplace diversity and equity will bring a valuable perspective to the Board.
Gary L. Crittenden Age 67 Director since 2016	Mr. Crittenden is a private investor and has been a nonemployee executive director of HGGC, LLC, a California-based middle market private equity firm, since January 2017. During the period of 2009 to January 2017, he served in various capacities at HGGC, including managing director, chairman and CEO. He is a member of the boards of directors of Primerica, where he chairs the audit committee and is a member of the compensation committee; Pluralsight, where he is lead director and chairs the nominating and governance committee; and Extra Space Storage, Inc., where he also chairs the nominating and governance committee and is a member of the audit committee. He previously served as chairman of Citi Holdings and as chief financial officer at Citigroup, American Express Company, Monsanto, Sears Roebuck, Melville Corporation and Filene’s Basement following a consulting career at Bain & Company. Mr. Crittenden brings substantial experience in banking and financial services, mergers and acquisitions, investment management, public markets, finance and accounting, risk management, and regulatory relations.
Suren K. Gupta Age 60 Director Since 2015	Mr. Gupta is executive vice president of Technology, Global Operations and Strategic Ventures at Allstate Insurance Company, where he has served since 2011. From 2003 to 2011, he served as executive vice president and group chief information officer, Home & Consumer Finance Group, at Wells Fargo & Company. Mr. Gupta’s deep experience in technology, operations, and business strategy adds depth to our Board’s knowledge about data, technology, and cybersecurity, areas of evolving and increasing risk to the financial services industry. He has held senior technology, operations, sales, marketing and strategic development roles at GMAC Residential, INTELSAT, a telecommunications company, and at Thomson Corp., an information company.

5

	Principal Occupation, Directorships of Publicly Traded Companies During the Past Five Years, and Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills
Claire A. Huang Age 58 Director Since 2021	Ms. Huang is the former Chief Marketing Officer of J.P.Morgan Chase and Company. Previous to that she held global head of marketing positions at Bank of America Merrill Lynch in Boston and Hong Kong. She was also head of Fidelity Investments’ marketing and strategy groups. Her financial services experience began at American Express. Earlier in her career, she developed her credentials as a turnaround and growth expert in consumer products companies beginning at Procter and Gamble. Ms. Huang contributes her expertise in marketing, digital, brand building and strategic planning.
Vivian S. Lee Age 54 Director since 2015	Dr. Lee is the president of Health Platforms at Verily Life Sciences (Alphabet), where she has served since 2018. She is also a senior lecturer at Harvard Medical School and author of The Long Fix: Solving America’s Health Care Crisis with Strategies that Work for Everyone. From 2011 to 2017, she was senior vice president of Health Sciences at the University of Utah, dean of the university’s School of Medicine, and CEO of University of Utah Health Care. From 2014 until 2015, Dr. Lee also served on the board of directors of Zions First National Bank. Dr. Lee brings a wealth of experience from health care and technology. In Utah, as a CEO of a $3.5 billion health system, she focused on streamlining processes and improving efficiency in the highly regulated and rapidly evolving health care industry. As a health technology executive at Verily, she brings expertise in consumer-facing digital technologies, data and analytics platforms, and employee health, including COVID-19 response and management.
Scott J. McLean Age 64 Director since 2018	Mr. McLean is president and chief operating officer, or COO, of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. He is a director of CenterPoint Energy. With over 40 years of banking experience, Mr. McLean has served in leadership positions for the Zions organization since 2002, including as CEO of its Amegy Bank affiliate prior to assuming his current position in 2014. Mr. McLean is active in the community, serving as a trustee of Southern Methodist University. He is a director emeritus and former chairman of the United Way of Greater Houston and a former trustee of Memorial Hermann Health System.
Edward F. Murphy Age 68 Director since 2014	Mr. Murphy is a former executive vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York where he served as the principal financial officer and was responsible for enterprise-wide operational risk management. He is also a former executive vice president of JP Morgan Chase Incorporated. Mr. Murphy is a certified public accountant who contributes significant expertise in accounting and financial reporting in the banking industry, as well as extensive experience in operational risk management and internal control processes. During his 21-year career at JP Morgan Chase, he held several senior leadership positions, including principal accounting officer, global director of internal audit, chief operating officer of Asia Pacific operations, and chief financial officer of the consumer and middle markets businesses.

6

	Principal Occupation, Directorships of Publicly Traded Companies During the Past Five Years, and Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills
Stephen D. Quinn Age 65 Director since 2002	Mr. Quinn is a former managing director and general partner of Goldman, Sachs & Co. He is the nonexecutive chairman and director of Group 1 Automotive, Inc., where he chairs the governance committee and is a member of the audit and compensation committees. He was a director of American Express Bank Ltd. prior to its sale in 2009. Mr. Quinn contributes financial and investment banking expertise to the Board. At Goldman Sachs, he specialized in corporate finance, spending two decades structuring mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financings, and other transactions for some of America’s best-known corporations.
Harris H. Simmons Age 66 Director since 1989	Mr. Simmons is chairman and chief executive officer, or CEO, of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. He was previously a director of Questar Corporation. Mr. Simmons’ more than 40 years of experience in banking and leadership of the Bank is invaluable to the Board. During his tenure as our president and then chairman and CEO, the Bank has grown from $3 billion in assets to its present $80 billion in assets. He is past chairman of the American Bankers Association.
Aaron B. Skonnard Age 48 Director since 2019	Mr. Skonnard is the co-founder, chairman of the board and CEO of Pluralsight, Inc., a publicly traded enterprise software-as-a-service company focused on teaching technology skills through its leading technology skills development platform used by 70% of the Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Skonnard is a founder and board member of the Silicon Slopes organization, a nonprofit designed to empower Utah’s startup and tech community. His contributions to the Board include his expertise in technology, understanding of issues and trends in information security, as well as his valuable perspective as an entrepreneur, chief executive officer of a publicly traded company, and philanthropist.
Barbara A. Yastine Age 61 Director since 2017	Ms. Yastine is the former chair and CEO of Ally Bank, a digital banking leader, serving in various capacities from May 2010 to June 2015. She has more than 30 years of management experience in financial services. She most recently served as a director and co-CEO of privately held Lebenthal Holdings, LLC from September 2015 to June 2016. She is an active investor in private companies and a director of Primerica, Inc., where she is the chair of the compensation committee and a member of the audit committee; as well as a director of AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd. serving on the audit, governance, and risk committees. Ms. Yastine's broad industry experience spans consumer and commercial banking, investment banking and capital markets, and asset and wealth management. Prior to her tenure at Ally Bank, she served in various executive roles at Citigroup and Credit Suisse First Boston for more than 17 years. In addition to industry knowledge, Ms. Yastine contributes her expertise in general management, digital and branding strategies, finance, strategic planning, compliance, and bank regulatory matters.

Directors Crittenden, Gupta, Lee, Murphy, Quinn, Simmons and Yastine were previously directors of Zions Bancorporation, the Bank’s former holding company, which merged into the Bank effective Sept. 30, 2018.

7

BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE

During 2020, our full Board held seven meetings and three optional calls to discuss the Bank's ongoing response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program. The nonmanagement directors met in confidential “executive sessions” five times, with our independent lead director presiding at each such executive session. All directors attended at least 75% of the total number of all Board and applicable committee meetings. All Board members also participated in last year’s virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of our directors are expected to attend the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, including the organizational meeting held in conjunction with the annual meeting, meetings of committees of which they serve as members, and our Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Board regularly schedules educational presentations during its meetings to stay current on market, regulatory and industry issues. In addition, our Board members periodically attend industry conferences, meetings with regulatory agencies, and training and educational sessions pertaining to their service on the Board and its committees.

The Board typically invites members of management, including our chief financial officer, or CFO; general counsel; chief risk officer, or CRO; chief credit officer; and chief audit executive to attend Board meetings and Board committee meetings (or portions thereof) to provide information relating to their areas of responsibility. Members of management do not attend executive sessions of the Board, except when requested by the Board.

Compensation of Directors

The Board establishes director compensation. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of outside consultants, periodically reviews the amount and composition of director compensation and makes recommendations to the Board.

Nonexecutive members of the Board receive an annual retainer, which is paid quarterly. The following table shows the current compensation structure for nonemployee directors. Directors who are full-time compensated employees of the Bank do not receive either the retainer or any other compensation for attendance at meetings of the Board or its committees.

Element of Compensation	Position		Amount
Annual cash retainer	All nonemployee directors		$	64,000
	Lead Director		$	35,000
	Audit Committee	Chair	$	15,000
		Member1	$	22,000
	Risk Oversight Committee	Chair	$	15,000
		Member1	$	17,000
		Special Technology Assignment	$	10,000
	Compensation Committee	Chair	$	10,000
		Member1	$	10,000
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	Chair	$	10,000
		Member1	$	10,000
Meeting fee			$	—
Restricted stock units2	All nonemployee directors		$	91,500

1.Includes committee chair

2.The number of restricted stock shares or units is determined by dividing $91,500 by the closing price of Zions Bancorporation common stock on the grant date and rounding to the nearest whole share.

8

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

We maintain a Deferred Compensation Plan for directors, pursuant to which a director may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his or her compensation until retirement or resignation from the Board. Amounts deferred are held in a rabbi trust and invested in either a guaranteed income investment fund or our common shares based upon the director’s election, subject to plan limitations. Settlement is made only in cash, unless in our sole discretion we determine to make a distribution in kind (or partly in kind and partly in cash), and is based on the current market value of the account.

DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)
Name(1)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(2)	Stock Awards ($)(3)(4)	Option Awards ($)(4)	Change in Pension Value and Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Jerry C. Atkin(6)	53,000	91,495	—	—	—	144,495
Gary L. Crittenden	106,000	91,495	—	—	—	197,495
Suren K. Gupta	91,000	91,495	—	—	—	182,495
J. David Heaney	106,000	91,495	—	—	13,000(5)	210,495
Claire A. Huang(7)	41,167	76,265				117,431
Vivian S. Lee	84,000	91,495	—	—	—	175,495
Edward F. Murphy	118,000	91,495	—	—	—	209,495
Stephen D. Quinn	131,000	91,495	—	—	—	222,495
Aaron B. Skonnard	74,000	91,495	—	—	—	165,495
Barbara A. Yastine	86,000	91,495	—	—	—	177,495

1.Harris H. Simmons, the Bank’s Chairman and CEO, and Scott J. McLean, the Bank’s President and COO, are not included in this table because they are employees of the Bank and thus receive no compensation as directors. Their compensation as employees of the Bank is shown in the Summary Compensation table on page 42.

2.Amounts earned include fees deferred by participating directors under the Zions Bancorporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.

3.Grants of 2,961 shares of restricted stock were made to each director effective May 1, 2020, under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which vested immediately on the date of grant. The fair market value on the date of grant was $30.90 per share. Ms. Huang was elected to the Board on July 1, 2020, and received a prorated grant of 2,343 shares of restricted stock, which vested immediately, with a fair market value of $32.55 per share.

4.The directors’ stock option awards outstanding as of Dec. 31, 2020, are set forth in the table below.

5.In 2020, Mr. Heaney served as a member of the advisory board of Zions Bancorporation, N.A.’s Amegy Bank division. His 2020 advisory board compensation is reported in the “All Other Compensation” column. Mr. Heaney reached retirement age as specified in the Bank's Corporate Governance Guidelines and therefore has not been nominated to stand for reelection at the 2021 annual meeting.

6.Mr. Atkin retired from the Board on July 1, 2020.

7.Ms. Huang was elected to the Board on July 1, 2020.

9

Name	Restricted Stock Awards Outstanding1	Stock Options Outstanding	Stock Options Expired in 2020
Jerry C. Atkin	—	—	—
Gary L. Crittenden	—	—	—
Suren K. Gupta	—	—	—
J. David Heaney	—	—	—
Claire A. Huang	—	—	—
Vivian S. Lee	—	—	—
Edward F. Murphy	—	—	—
Stephen D. Quinn	—	—	—
Aaron B. Skonnard	—	—	—
Barbara A. Yastine	—	—	—

1. As described above, all restricted stock awards are vested upon grant and accordingly no awards were outstanding at year-end.

Corporate Governance

We are committed to high standards of ethics and sound corporate governance, including oversight of the Bank’s affairs by a strong, qualified and independent board of directors. We regularly review and consider enhancements to our corporate governance guidelines and practices. See the "Governance and Compensation Summary" on page ii for a summary of our corporate governance practices.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND POLICIES

In addition to the elements of corporate governance reflected in our Board structure and responsibilities, we maintain a comprehensive set of corporate governance guidelines and policies. These are adopted and updated by the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and include the following:

•Corporate Governance Guidelines, which address our Board’s structure and responsibilities, including the Board’s role in management succession planning and the evaluation and compensation of executive officers;

•Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our officers and employees, including the CEO, president and COO, CFO, and controller;

•Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board;

•Related-Party Transactions Policy, which prohibits certain transactions between the Bank and its directors, executive officers, and 5% shareholders without necessary disclosure and approval or ratification;

•Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines, under which our executive officers and directors are expected to hold specified amounts of our common shares; and

•Policies prohibiting hedging and restricting pledging of Bank stock by directors or executive officers.

10

•Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy, which allows the Bank to, among other actions, recapture prior incentive compensation or cancel all or a portion of long-term incentive awards granted to an employee

These guidelines and policiesare posted on our website at www.zionsbancorporation.com and can be accessed by clicking on “Corporate Governance.” Our Board committee charters and information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors are also available on our website.

Corporate Responsibility: Environmental, Social and Governance Practices

In addition to our corporate governance practices, the Bank continues actively to support and serve its customers and communities by following principles that promote social and environmental responsibility, diversity, equity and inclusion. With oversight from the Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Bank published its latest Corporate Responsibility Report in the summer of 2020 to provide our shareholders and other stakeholders with greater transparency about the Bank's commitment to these principles. Some of the Bank's ESG-related actions during 2020, as more fully described in the report, included providing over 44,000 Paycheck Protection Program loans totaling $6.9 billion to small businesses and nonprofit organizations, making us the ninth largest provider of this form of financing in the nation during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic; bolstering environmental sustainability, including breaking ground on a new 400,000-square-foot technology and operations campus anticipated to achieve a Platinum LEED certification, with 75% of the building's power from on-site renewable solar energy; and continuing to use analytics, training and community outreach to attract and engage a diverse team as reflected by the membership of our Board, executives and other employees.

BOARD INDEPENDENCE AND LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Board continues to be strongly independent. The Board has determined that 9 of our 11 Board nominees are “independent” as defined by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the Board’s lead director, the chairpersons of each of the Board’s committees, and all of the members of the Board’s standing committees, other than the Executive Committee, are independent. As noted elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, members of management serving on the Board include Chairman and CEO Harris H. Simmons and President and COO Scott McLean.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director will be considered independent only if he or she: (i) is “independent” under Nasdaq rules, and (ii) does not have any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Each director is required to inform the chairperson of the Bank’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of any such direct or indirect relationship between the director and the Bank or its subsidiaries (such as where the director is a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has any relationship with the Bank or any of its subsidiaries) that could interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. In determining whether any such relationship in fact would interfere with a director’s exercise of independent judgment, the Board considers such factors as it deems appropriate, such as the relative magnitude of the relationship, the financial or other importance of the relationship to the director and the Bank and its subsidiaries, and whether the relationship was made in the ordinary course on arms-length terms for which substitute arrangements are readily available to the director and the Bank and its subsidiaries. Applying this definition, the Board has determined that all of our directors are independent except for Harris H. Simmons, who is the chairman and CEO of the Bank, and Scott J. McLean, president and COO of the Bank. In addition, members of the Board committees must meet all other independence and experience standards required by law or rules and regulations of governmental agencies or self-regulatory bodies.

11

Our Board considers its governance periodically and believes, at this time, that combining the roles of chairman and CEO is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Bank. In reaching this view, the Board took into consideration several factors. Our CEO, Harris H. Simmons, has over 40 years of experience with the Bank, including 30 years of service as our CEO. His knowledge, experience, and personality allow him to serve ably as both chairman and CEO. Combining the roles of chairman and CEO facilitates a single, focused structure to implement the Bank’s strategic initiatives and business plans.

At the same time, the Board feels that the current governance structure—which includes regular executive sessions each chaired by an independent lead director; meetings with the Bank’s external auditors, internal auditors, and other consultants; meetings with members of our management; and active Board and committee members—provides effective challenge and appropriate oversight of the Bank’s policies and business. The Board believes that separating the chairman and CEO positions would not strengthen the effectiveness of the Board.

This structure was affirmed by votes of the shareholders in 2010, and each of 2013-2017, and allows the Board discretion to select the person or persons most qualified to lead the Bank.

INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP AND LEAD DIRECTOR

Each member of the Board is charged with exercising independent judgment and critically evaluating management’s performance and decisions. In order to facilitate and support an active and independent board, and in keeping with our corporate governance philosophy and commitment to effective oversight, the Bank’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in the event the chairman of the Board is an executive officer of the Bank, an independent director selected solely by the Bank’s independent directors will serve as the “lead director.” The role of the lead director is to provide an independent counterbalance to our structure of a combined CEO/chairman role, by exercising the following duties:

•Presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the chairman of the Board is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

•Calling meetings of independent directors;

•Serving as a liaison between the chairman of the Board and the independent directors, including providing feedback to the chairman from the Board’s executive sessions and discussing with other directors any concerns they may have about the Bank and its performance, and relaying those concerns, where appropriate, to the full Board;

•Conducting calls with each Board member as part of the Board’s effectiveness review process;

•Consulting with the CEO regarding the concerns of the directors;

•Being available for consultation with the senior executives of the Bank as to any concerns any such executive might have;

•Communicating with shareholders upon request;

•Advising the chairman of the Board regarding, and approving, Board meeting schedules, agendas, and information provided to the Board; and

•Otherwise providing Board leadership when the chairman of the Board cannot or should not act in that role.

Further, our Board’s Audit, Compensation, Risk Oversight, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are composed entirely of independent directors. Our Executive Committee includes our CEO and five independent directors. All five of our standing committees are chaired by independent directors.

12

BOARD COMMITTEES

Our Board’s standing committees are:

•Executive Committee

•Audit Committee

•Risk Oversight Committee

•Compensation Committee

•Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Members of committees are appointed by the Board following recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and serve at the pleasure of the Board for such term as the Board determines. All committees other than the Executive Committee have written charters. The Executive Committee’s authority is incorporated in the Bank’s Bylaws. The current versions of the written committee charters are posted on our website at www.zionsbancorporation.com and can be accessed by clicking on the “Corporate Governance” link. Periodically, our general counsel (with the assistance of outside counsel and other advisors, as appropriate) reviews all committee charters in light of any changes in exchange listing rules, SEC regulations or other evidence of “best practices.” The results of the review and any recommended changes are discussed with the committees, which review their charters at least annually. The full Board then approves the charters, with any revisions it deems appropriate, based on the committees’ recommendations. In addition, each Board committee conducts an annual effectiveness review. All of the committee charters were reviewed and minor updates made as needed during 2020.

The Board appoints one member of each committee as its chairperson. Chair positions are rotated at the Board’s discretion. The committee calendars, meetings, and meeting agendas are set by the chairperson of the respective committee. As with full Board meetings, the CEO and other members of management are frequently invited to attend various committee meetings (or portions thereof) to provide information relating to their areas of responsibility. Members of management attend executive sessions only on invitation.

According to their charters, each of the Board’s committees has the authority to select, retain, terminate, and approve the fees of experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate, without seeking approval of the Board or management.

13

The following table provides membership information for each of the Board’s standing committees as of the record date of this Proxy Statement.

Name	Executive Committee	Audit Committee	Risk Oversight Committee	Compensation Committee	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Gary L. Crittenden	ü	ü			ü*
Suren K. Gupta			ü
J. David Heaney**	ü		ü*
Claire A. Huang		ü
Vivian S. Lee	ü			ü*
Scott J. McLean
Edward F. Murphy	ü	ü*	ü
Stephen D. Quinn, Lead Director	ü*	ü			ü
Harris H. Simmons	ü
Aaron Skonnard					ü
Barbara A. Yastine			ü	ü
* Committee Chair ** Mr. Heaney reached retirement age as specified in the Bank's Corporate Governance Guidelines and therefore has not been nominated to stand for reelection at the 2021 annual meeting.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Our Executive Committee had six members during 2020. The Executive Committee reviews projects or proposals that require prompt action from the Bank. Subject to certain exceptions, the Executive Committee is authorized to exercise all powers of the full Board with respect to such projects or proposals when it is not practical to delay action pending approval by the entire Board. The Executive Committee does not have authority to approve or adopt, or recommend to the shareholders, any action or matter expressly required by law to be submitted to the shareholders for approval; adopt, amend, or repeal the Restated Articles of Incorporation or Restated Bylaws of the Bank; or remove or indemnify directors. The chairman of the Executive Committee is an independent director and serves as the lead director. The Executive Committee did not have occasion to meet in 2020.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Our Audit Committee had four members and met 12 times during 2020. A written charter approved by the Board governs the Audit Committee. Each of its members is independent, determined as described in its committee charter. Information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee and its membership is set forth in its charter and highlighted in the “Report of the Audit Committee” included in this Proxy Statement. The Board has determined that Directors Edward F. Murphy, Gary L. Crittenden and Stephen D. Quinn are audit committee financial experts with experience and attributes in accordance with the rules of the SEC and Nasdaq’s listing standards.

14

RISK OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

Our Risk Oversight Committee had four members and met eight times during 2020. A written charter approved by the Board governs the Risk Oversight Committee. Each of its members is independent, determined as described in its committee charter. The Risk Oversight Committee serves to provide oversight of the Bank’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including the strategies, policies, procedures, and systems established by management to assess, understand, measure, monitor, and manage the Bank’s material risks. The Board has also determined that the experience and backgrounds of the members of the Risk Oversight Committee collectively satisfy the pertinent requirements under its committee charter and the Dodd-Frank Act that its members have experience in identifying, assessing, and managing the risks of large, complex, financial firms.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Our Compensation Committee had three members and met four times during 2020. Each of its members is independent, determined as described in its committee charter. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to discharge the Board’s responsibilities relating to the evaluation and compensation of our executives, including reviewing the Bank’s executive compensation arrangements with a view toward assuring proper balance of objectives, eliminating elements that could encourage unnecessary and excessive risks, and avoiding jeopardy to the safety and soundness of the Bank. The Compensation Committee considers the perspectives of shareholders, regulators, and outside consultants regarding executive compensation and produces reports, filings, and certifications related to compensation, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and other governmental agencies. The manner in which the Compensation Committee oversees and determines the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers is described in this Proxy Statement under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee during 2020 or as of the date of this Proxy Statement is or has been an officer or employee of the Bank, and no executive officer of the Bank served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of the Bank’s Compensation Committee or Board. None of the members of the Compensation Committee had a relationship that would require disclosure under the “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” caption of any of our filings with the SEC during the past three fiscal years, except as may be described under “Ordinary Course Loans” in this Proxy Statement.

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee had four members and met three times during 2020. Each of its members is independent, determined as described in its committee charter. The purpose of the committee is to identify and recommend individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and its committees and to assist the Board in oversight of the corporate governance principles of the Bank.

In identifying and recommending nominees for positions on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee places primary emphasis on the following criteria, which are set forth under “Candidates for Board Membership” in our Corporate Governance Guidelines:

•Personal qualities and characteristics, accomplishments, and professional reputation;

•Current knowledge and understanding of the communities in which we do business and in our industry or other industries relevant to our business;

•Ability and willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters;

•Fit of the individual’s skills and qualities with those of other directors and potential directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial, and responsive to the needs of the Bank;

•Diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, and experience;

•Ability and skill set required to chair committees of the Board; and

15

•Relevant and significant experience in public companies.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to these criteria. Its objective is to assemble a Board whose members collectively meet the criteria and possess the talents and characteristics necessary to enable the Board to fulfill its responsibilities effectively.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each nominee based on the nominee’s individual merits, taking into account our needs and the composition of the Board. Members of the committee discuss and evaluate possible candidates in detail and suggest individuals to explore in more depth. Once a candidate is identified whom the committee wants to seriously consider and move toward nomination, the matter is discussed with the Board. Thereafter, the chairperson of the committee or his or her designee enters into a discussion with that candidate to determine interest and availability.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers candidates recommended by shareholders. The policy adopted by the committee provides that nominees recommended by shareholders are given appropriate consideration in the same manner as other nominees. Shareholders who wish to submit director nominees for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should follow the process set forth in the Bank’s Bylaws. For more information on this process, see “Shareholder Proposals for 2022 Annual Meeting.”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees production of the Bank's Corporate Responsibility Report, which may be accessed at www.zionsbancorporation.com.

BOARD INVOLVEMENT IN RISK OVERSIGHT

Risk Management Philosophy and Framework

The Bank has developed a multifaceted and comprehensive approach to risk management. We recognize that risk is inherent in our business. To mitigate the inherent risk to a level that is considered safe and appropriate, we have established a risk management process and philosophy that encourage enterprise-wide involvement in understanding and managing risks so that we may align levels and types of risk that we undertake with our business strategies, Risk Management Framework, and the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders.

The Bank’s Risk Management Framework is a fundamental component of the Bank’s risk management process. The framework enables the Board and management to better assess, understand, measure, monitor, and manage the risks posed by the Bank’s business. The Risk Management Framework is organized into three lines of defense. The first line of defense rests with the business lines, which are closest to the Bank’s day-to-day activities, have the greatest understanding of key risks, and own and manage those risks. The second line of defense comprises the Bank’s enterprise risk management functions, which are charged with the oversight and monitoring of risks that have been taken by the business lines. Enterprise risk management includes, without limitation, the Bank’s Enterprise Risk Management Committee, which is responsible for adopting and implementing the Risk Management Framework and related procedures. The third line of defense rests with the internal audit function. Internal Audit performs reviews independent of the Bank’s business activities and provides the Board and senior management with independent and objective assurance on the overall effectiveness of governance, risk management, and internal controls. The Board’s Risk Oversight Committee reviews the Risk Management Framework at least annually and refers any recommended amendments to the Board for consideration and approval.

The Board oversees our overall risk management process, and monitors, reviews, and responds to reports and recommendations presented by its committees, management, internal and external auditors, legal counsel, and regulators. Through this ongoing oversight, the Board obtains an understanding of and provides significant input into how our management assesses, quantifies, and manages risk throughout the enterprise. The Board’s active involvement in risk oversight helps to hold management accountable for implementing the Bank’s Risk Management Framework, policies, and practices in a manner that does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

16

The financial services industry faces ongoing and increasing risks and threats associated with its reliance on digital technology to serve its customers. Over the past few years, the Board and its Risk Oversight Committee have spent significant time on overseeing management's efforts to address these growing cyber- and technology-related risks. Our Risk Management Framework includes cybersecurity and technology among our Level 1 risks receiving extensive Board and management oversight. The Bank continues to strengthen its infrastructure and staffing and enhance its comprehensive cybersecurity and technology controls. Improving our resiliency against cybersecurity threats remains a key focus for our Board and all levels of management. Among other actions, we have more clearly identified first-line roles, responsibilities and accountability, provided increased training for all employees, and continue to improve and enhance internal reporting to the Board and its respective committees, including the results of regularly-performed systems vulnerability scans and other controls testing. The Board periodically directs the Bank to engage independent consultants to review and provide guidance and perspective to the Board on further strengthening the Bank's cybersecurity and technology programs. In addition, the Bank engages consultants at both the strategic level and at the technology implementation level to assist it in better managing these risks.

Board Committee Risk Oversight

The Board oversees risk through actions of the full Board and the activities of its Risk Oversight, Audit, and Compensation Committees. Each of the committees regularly reports to the full Board.

Risk Oversight Committee.The Risk Oversight Committee reviews management’s assessment of the Bank’s aggregate enterprise-wide risk profile and the alignment of the risk profile with the Bank’s strategic plan, goals, and objectives. It reviews and oversees the operation of the Bank’s Risk Management Framework. It reviews and recommends the articulation of the Bank’s Risk Management Framework and the overall risk capacity and risk management limits. The Risk Oversight Committee assists the Board and its other committees with their risk related activities, including providing focused oversight of technology and cybersecurity risks. The Risk Oversight Committee coordinates with the Audit Committee and other committees of the Board with regard to areas of overlapping responsibility. The CRO reports directly to the Risk Oversight Committee and directly to the Bank’s CEO. The Risk Oversight Committee and the CEO jointly review the performance of the CRO and, when necessary, oversee the selection of his or her replacement.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee plays a key role in risk management through its oversight of management’s responsibility to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting. Among other responsibilities, the Audit Committee regularly reviews our earnings releases and annual and quarterly filings with the SEC, and, where appropriate, reviews other selected SEC filings and disclosures regarding financial matters. It also receives formal reports from the Bank’s chief audit executive, the CFO, corporate controller and our general counsel on material matters. The chief audit executive reports directly to the Audit Committee and administratively to the Bank’s CEO. The Audit Committee reviews the performance of the chief audit executive annually, determines that individual’s compensation and, when necessary, oversees the selection of his or her replacement.

Compensation Committee.The Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation programs and overall compensation arrangements, when appropriate, with external consultants and our senior risk officers, including our CRO, with a view to designing and awarding compensation in ways that align with our Risk Management Framework in discouraging unnecessary and excessive risk taking. As noted in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee also evaluates the compliance of our compensation arrangements with applicable laws and guidance or limitations issued by regulatory agencies.

17

Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Bank’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has reappointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Bank for the year ending Dec. 31, 2021. A resolution will be presented at the meeting to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of EY.

EY has audited the Bank’s financial statements each year since 2000. In accordance with SEC rules and EY policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of years an individual partner may provide audit services to the Bank. The Audit Committee was directly involved in the selection of the current lead audit partner for the Bank, who was designated commencing with the Bank’s 2020 audit.

Services provided to the Bank and its subsidiaries by EY in fiscal 2020 are described under “Fees paid to EY” below.

For the reasons described in the Report of the Audit Committee included following this proposal on page 19, the members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that continued retention of EY as the Bank’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Bank and its shareholders.

Representatives from EY are expected to be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Bank’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2021.

The affirmative vote of a majority of votes validly cast for or against the proposal will be required for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

FEES PAID TO EY

The Audit Committee reviews and approves the audit fees associated with the Bank’s retention of EY. Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by EY for the Bank with respect to the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, were:

($ approximate)	2020		2019
Audit	$	4,048,369	$	3,670,150
Audit-Related	617,550		1,353,870
Tax	290,549		275,000
All other	6,000		7,200
Total	$	4,962,468	$	5,306,220

Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees for the annual audit of the Bank’s consolidated financial statements, audits of subsidiary financial statements, and reviews of interim financial statements included in the Bank’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Audit fees also include fees for services closely related to the audit and that in many cases could only be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees include fees for accounting consultations, audits of employee benefit plans, and certain agreed-upon procedures and compliance engagements.

Tax Fees. Tax fees include fiduciary trust tax compliance and advisory services.

All Other Fees. All other fees billed by EY include miscellaneous fees.

18

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires its pre-approval of all services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, including non-audit services. In determining whether to pre-approve the provision by EY of a permissible non-audit service, the Audit Committee considers whether the provision of the service by EY could impair the independence of EY with respect to the Bank. As part of this process, the Audit Committee considers the facts and circumstances of the proposed engagement, including whether EY can provide the service more effectively and efficiently than other firms because of its familiarity with the Bank’s operations. The Audit Committee also considers the proposed engagement in light of any other non-audit services that EY provides to the Bank and the fees paid to EY for such services. The Audit Committee requires competitive bidding for non-audit services where it is warranted by the facts and circumstances of the proposed engagement. There were no EY services in 2020 or 2019 that were not approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not and will not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Bank filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Bank specifically incorporates this report by reference therein.

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, and financial reporting practices of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. For a discussion of the Audit Committee's meetings during 2020 and its role in the Bank's risk oversight, see pages 14 and 17. In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed the allowance for credit losses and related methodology and other selected accounting determinations such as accruals for legal and other loss contingencies. The Audit Committee discussed with Bank management and the external auditor changes in accounting rules or standards that could materially impact the Bank’s financial statements and the implementation of those rules or standards.

In discharging its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee no less frequently than annually reviews the external auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence in connection with the determination as to whether to retain the external auditor. In conducting its review for its 2021 recommendation to retain EY as the external auditor, the Audit Committee considered a number of factors, including the professional qualifications of the external auditor; the external auditor’s historical and more recent performance in connection with the Bank’s audit, including a review of auditor performance surveys completed by the Audit Committee and management and the external auditor's responses to the same; a review of fees and scope of services; results of the external auditor’s peer reviews and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) examinations; and an evaluation of the external auditor's independence, including obtaining a formal written statement describing all relationships between the external auditor and the Bank that might bear on such independence and discussing with the external auditor any relationships that may impact objectivity and independence.

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with management, the chief audit executive, and the external auditor the quality and adequacy of Zions Bancorporation, N.A.’s internal controls over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget, and staffing. The Audit Committee reviewed with both the external and internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope, and identification of audit risks. 

The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the external auditor all communications required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB, SEC, and others, and generally accepted auditing standards, and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the external auditor's audit of the financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the external auditor required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the external auditor's communications with the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee followed formal policies and procedures governing the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the Bank’s external auditor. The Audit Committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.

19

During 2020, the Audit Committee reviewed its charter and made minor updates. In addition, the Audit Committee held regular executive sessions without management and private meetings with members of management, regulators of the Bank, internal auditors, and external auditor, and performed other actions deemed necessary to discharge the Audit Committee’s responsibilities. The Audit Committee conducts periodic effectiveness self-evaluations for review with the Board that include a comparison of the performance of the Audit Committee with the requirements of its charter. The Audit Committee’s charter, which describes the Committee’s roles and responsibilities, is available on the Bank’s website at www.zionsbancorporation.com. See the description of the Audit Committee in this Proxy Statement under “Board Committees” and “Board Involvement in Risk Oversight” for further information about the Audit Committee’s composition and responsibilities.

As set forth in the Audit Committee charter, management of the Bank is responsible for the integrity of the Bank’s financial statements and reporting. Management is also responsible for maintaining an effective system of controls over appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles, compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations, policies and procedures, and ethical standards. The internal auditors are responsible for independently assessing such financial reporting principles, policies, and internal controls as well as monitoring management’s follow-up to any internal audit reports. The external auditors are responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of the Bank’s annual financial statements, reviews of the Bank’s quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of each Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, annually auditing the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and other procedures. The members of the Audit Committee are not full-time employees of the Bank and are not performing the functions of auditors or accountants. As such, it is not the duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee or its members to conduct “field work” or other types of auditing or accounting reviews or procedures or to set auditor independence standards.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and the report of management on internal control over financial reporting of Zions Bancorporation, N.A. as of and for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, with management and internal and external auditors. Relying on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Zions Bancorporation, N.A. audited financial statements and management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, for filing with the SEC.

Edward F. Murphy, Chairman

Gary L. Crittenden

Claire A. Huang

Stephen D. Quinn

20

Proposal 3: Advisory (Nonbinding) Vote Regarding 2020 Executive Compensation ("Say on Pay")

We are required under Section 14A(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide shareholders with the right to cast a nonbinding vote at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement according to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

Recommendation of the Board:

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on a nonbinding basis, the 2020 compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables, and related material.

The Board’s recommendation is based on its belief that our compensation programs operated in accordance with our compensation philosophy and resulted in the payment of an appropriate level of compensation to our named executive officers in 2020.

The Bank’s executive compensation program places heavy emphasis on performance-based compensation, particularly in the form of long-term incentives. In fact, all of our named executive officers, on average, have over two-thirds of their annual target direct compensation dependent upon performance-based incentives. Further, the Bank’s compensation philosophy subjects employee compensation to a clawback policy and other features designed to incentivize employees to manage the Bank’s risks carefully and avoid acts and practices that may expose the Bank to undue risk of short- or long-term financial loss, reputational damage or similar adverse impacts. These design features include, but are not limited to, risk-adjusted performance metrics, award caps, limitations on upside reward leverage, payout deferrals, multi-year performance and vesting periods, and the use of discretion by those responsible for overseeing the payout of the incentive compensation.

In order to further align compensation practices with shareholder interests, the named executive officers are expected to hold specified amounts of the Bank’s common stock under the Bank’s Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines while employed in such positions, further exposing them to risk of financial loss in the event of adverse impacts to the Bank.

As provided by Section 14A(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the shareholders’ vote with respect to executive compensation is advisory and will not be binding upon the Board. In addition, the shareholder vote may not be construed as overriding a decision by the Board, nor will it create or imply any additional fiduciary duty by the Board. Our Compensation Committee will, however, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considered the shareholder ratification at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2019. At our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 94% of voting shareholders approved the non-binding advisory resolution regarding compensation of our named executive officers.

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the 2020 compensation of named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

The affirmative vote of a majority of votes validly cast for or against the resolution will be required for approval of the proposal.

21

We have elected an annual frequency for our shareholders' say on pay vote. In reaching this decision, the Board considered the shareholders' non-binding frequency vote held most recently in 2020 that indicated shareholder preference for an annual non-binding vote on executive officer compensation.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANK

The following information is furnished with respect to certain of the executive officers of the Bank. Unless otherwise noted, the positions listed are those the officers hold with the Bank1 as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Individual 2	Principal Occupation During Past Five Years 1
Harris H. Simmons Age 66 Officer since 1981	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
James R. Abbott Age 47 Officer since 2009	Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
Bruce K. Alexander Age 68 Officer since 2000	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – Vectra Bank Colorado
A. Scott Anderson Age 74 Officer since 1997	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – Zions Bank
Paul E. Burdiss Age 55 Officer since 2015	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth J. Collins Age 55 Officer since 2018	Executive Vice President, Enterprise Portfolio Management. Prior to 2018, officer of Bank subsidiaries or divisions holding various positions
Eric Ellingsen Age 44 Officer Since 2021	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – California Bank & Trust. Prior to 2021, President and Chief Operating Officer of California Bank & Trust
Alan M. Forney Age 60 Officer since 2018	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – The Commerce Bank of Washington. Prior to 2018, officer of The Commerce Bank of Washington holding various positions, including chief lending officer
Olga Hoff Age 47 Officer since 2018	Executive Vice President, Retail Banking. Prior to 2018, officer of Bank subsidiaries or divisions holding various positions
Alexander J. Hume Age 47 Officer since 2006	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
Thomas E. Laursen Age 69 Officer since 2004	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

22

Individual 2	Principal Occupation During Past Five Years 1
Scott A. Law Age 55 Officer since 2019	Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Prior to 2019, Director of HR Shared Services
Scott J. McLean Age 64 Officer since 2006	President and Chief Operating Officer
Keith D. Maio Age 63 Officer since 2005	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer. From 2015-2020, Chief Banking Officer
Michael Morris Age 64 Officer since 2013	Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer
Rebecca K. Robinson Age 46 Officer since 2016	Executive Vice President and Director of Wealth Management. Prior to 2016, President of Zions Trust
Terry A. Shirey Age 49 Officer since 2017	Executive Vice President. President and CEO – Nevada State Bank. Prior to 2017, officer of Nevada State Bank holding various positions
Jennifer A. Smith Age 48 Officer since 2015	Executive Vice President and Chief Technology and Operations Officer
Steve D. Stephens Age 62 Officer since 2010	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – Amegy Bank
Randy R. Stewart Age 60 Officer since 2018	Executive Vice President, Enterprise Mortgage Lending. Prior to 2018, officer of Amegy Bank holding various positions
Mark R. Young Age 61 Officer since 2015	Executive Vice President. President and Chief Executive Officer – National Bank of Arizona

1.Many of the individuals held the same or similar position for Zions Bancorporation, the Bank’s former holding company, which merged with and into the Bank effective September 30, 2018.

2.Officers are appointed for indefinite terms of office and may be removed or replaced by the Board or by the supervising officer to whom the officer reports.

23

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, we provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and decision-making process for 2020 compensation paid or awarded to our named executive officers, or NEOs, and the factors we considered in making those decisions. All of the NEOs are, or were, members of our 2020 Executive Management Committee, or EMC, which is made up of our CEO and his senior leadership team. Compensation for members of the EMC is determined by the Compensation Committee (the Committee). The NEOs also include one former executive who retired but would have been among our three most highly compensated executives had he still been serving as an executive officer at the end of the fiscal year.

Our NEOs for 2020 are:

•Harris H. Simmons, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

•Paul E. Burdiss, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

•Scott J. McLean, President & Chief Operating Officer (COO)

•A. Scott Anderson, President and CEO of Zions Bank

•Keith D. Maio, Chief Risk Officer (CRO)

•Edward P. Schreiber, former Chief Risk Officer, retired October 2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	25	Compensation Committee Report	41
COMPENSATION OVERVIEW	27	SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE	42
COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR THE 2020 PERFORMANCE PERIOD	29	2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS	44
Base Salary	29	OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2020	45
Annual Cash Incentive	29	OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2020	47
Long-Term Incentives	32	2020 PENSION BENEFITS	47
DECISION-MAKING ROLES AND PROCESS	36	2020 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION	48
OTHER COMPENSATION ELEMENTS	38	POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL	48
COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES	40	CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE	52

24

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2020 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The 2020 results, summarized below, reflect the impact of the pandemic-induced recession on credit performance and interest rates, and the impact of federal government fiscal stimulus, including the SBA's Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). For additional information on the Bank’s 2020 performance, see the Bank’s 2020 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

•Average loans increased $4.7 billion, or 10%, from 2019, which includes $4.5 billion of PPP loans.

•Average total deposits grew $8.6 billion, or 16%, from 2019.

•Net interest income declined $56 million, or 2%, from 2019.

•Customer-related fee income increased $24 million, or 5%, from 2019; total noninterest income (including items such as dividends and securities gains or losses) increased $12 million, or 2%, from 2019.

•Adjusted noninterest expense, which excludes the effect of certain unusual items, most notably the pension termination expense in 2020, but does not exclude the $30 million one-time charitable contribution described in further detail in our 10-K, decreased $31 million, or 2%, from 2019. Adjusted further for the charitable contribution in 2020, adjusted noninterest expense declined $61 million, or 4%.

•The efficiency ratio of 59.4% was essentially unchanged compared to 59.5% in 2019; excluding the charitable contribution, the efficiency ratio would have been 58.3%.

•Net charge-offs were $105 million in 2020, compared to net charge-offs of $37 million in 2019.

•Adjusted Pre-Provision Net Revenue (pre tax)(“PPNR”) less Net Charge-offs (“NCOs”) declined $87 million, or 8%, from 2019. Adjusted for the previously noted charitable contribution, adjusted PPNR less NCOs declined $57 million, or 5%, from 2019.

•Diluted Earnings per Share declined $1.14, or 27%, from 2019, largely due to a sizable increase in the provision for loan and lease losses.

25

Some of the Bank’s key 2020 performance measures are highlighted in the following charts.

2020 PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT

1.The median of the relevant metric for the Zions custom peer group described later in this document under the section labeled "Peer Group"

2.Reported tax equivalent net interest income minus net loan charge-offs as a percentage of average earning assets

26

2020 COMPENSATION DECISIONS SUMMARY

The Compensation Committee awarded the Bank’s NEOs total compensation with respect to 2020 that the Committee believes is generally commensurate with the Bank’s and management's performance in 2020.

•No salary increases for NEOs, except for Mr. Maio resulting from his role change

•Approved 2020 annual cash incentive awards significantly below target and differentiated based on individual role, performance, and the unique 2020 operating environment

•Approved 2018-2020 Value Sharing Plan payouts above target based on exceeding goals

•Approved annual 2020 long-term incentive awards with greater than 50% of the grant delivered through performance-based awards in the form of long-term cash incentives and stock options

•Increased the short-term incentive target for Mr. Burdiss and long-term incentive targets for Messrs. Burdiss and McLean to better align with market

COMPENSATION OVERVIEW

ZIONS COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

Zions' Compensation Committee believes the most effective executive compensation program is one that emphasizes the alignment of executives’ interests with those of Bank shareholders. Specifically, our executive compensation programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:

•Attract and retain talented and experienced executives necessary to prudently manage shareholder capital in the highly competitive financial services industry;

•Motivate and reward executives whose knowledge, skills, and performance are critical to our success;

•Align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders by compensating our executives for managing our business to meet our long-term objectives, and reward performance greater than established targets;

•Support performance-based goals by linking significant percentages of CEO and senior executive compensation to performance, effectively using deferred pay, “clawbacks,” and performance conditions; and

•Pursue all compensation objectives in a manner that seeks to discourage risks that are unnecessary or excessive, or could jeopardize the safety and soundness of the Bank, including incorporating performance goals specifically tied to risk management.

The Bank’s compensation philosophy supports and reflects the Bank’s risk management culture. Zions’ 2020 compensation program for senior executives was designed to encourage management of risk and discourage inappropriate risk taking by granting a diverse portfolio of incentive compensation awards to our executives and other senior employees that are expected to reward desired behavior over time.

The Bank’s portfolio of awards is balanced between fixed and variable compensation, cash and equity-based compensation, and annual and long-term compensation. Compensation decisions for 2020 relied on discretion to account for other factors, such as effective risk management, compliance with controls and ethical duties, competition for top talent, market-based pay levels, and the need to attract, develop, grow, and retain the leadership team.

Risk mitigation is balanced with profitability and other performance objectives through features in the Bank’s compensation plans that expose our executives to loss of potential compensation value in the event of adverse financial results, adverse risk outcomes or other factors. This balancing of objectives and risk concerns has been furthered by other important design characteristics of our executive compensation arrangements.

27

Compensation Features and Governance

What We Do:	What We Don't Do:
Pay for Performance	No tax gross-ups for change-in-control payments
Require strong ownership and retention of equity	No “timing” of equity grants
Retain an independent compensation consultant	No hedging; restrictions on pledging
Maintain “double trigger” provisions for change-in-control scenarios	No repricing of stock option awards
Discourage excessive and unnecessary risk taking	No excessive perquisites
Maintain a clawback policy	No personal use of aircraft
Annual Say On Pay vote	No employment agreements for executive officers

2020 Target Total Direct Compensation

Our executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based compensation tied to Zions' financial performance, stock price and contributions to strategic initiatives. Approximately 81% of Mr. Simmons' target total compensation is performance-based and at risk, while the other NEOs have an average of 73% of their compensation performance-based and at risk.

Our NEOs’ total target direct compensation for 2020 consisted of the components described below:

1.2020 Target Compensation is computed as the sum of the following compensation elements: (i) 2020 base salary; (ii) 2020 target annual cash incentive (i.e., an estimate of the cash award for expected performance results achieved in 2020 and awarded/paid in February 2021); (iii) grant value of Value Sharing Plan units awarded in 2020; and (iv) combined grant value of restricted stock units and stock options granted in 2020.

Details on each compensation element and individual grant decisions are set forth below under the “Compensation Decisions for the 2020 Performance Period” section.

28

COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR THE 2020 PERFORMANCE PERIOD

COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Individual compensation decisions for all the NEOs are based upon a variety of factors including, but not limited to, operational performance, financial and risk management results, achievement of strategic objectives, individual performance, and the overall market environment.

Base Salary

The Committee targets the market median of the custom peer group (as described below) for the base salary for our executive officers. The Committee reviewed EMC compensation for 2020 but did not approve any base salary increases for the NEOs in March 2020, even as the broader employee population did receive salary increases. Typically, base salary increases consider the competitive market and recognize individual performance, experience, criticality of the position and market data.

Mr. Maio received a modest increase of 1.7% in October 2020 as he assumed the role of chief risk officer following the retirement of Mr. Schreiber.

Because his job responsibilities require his dual residency in both Texas and Utah, Mr. McLean’s 2019 and 2020 base salary listed below also includes a $34,000 adjustment for housing which is not considered in the determination of his incentive compensation targets or actual incentive compensation awards (which are based on a percentage of base salary as discussed below).

2020 Base Salary Increases
Name	2019 Base Salary		2020 Base Salary		% Increase
Harris H. Simmons	$	1,030,000	$	1,030,000	—%
Paul E. Burdiss	$	592,250	$	592,250	—%
Scott J. McLean	$	711,740	$	711,740	—%
A. Scott Anderson	$	592,765	$	592,765	—%
Keith D. Maio	$	540,750	$	550,000	1.7%
Edward P. Schreiber	$	539,000	$	539,000	—%

Annual Cash Incentive

In February 2020, the Committee established performance objectives and annual cash incentive targets and maximums for all EMC members for the 2020 performance year.

The target cash incentive structures were developed based on an independent analysis of peer compensation structures and target levels by position. As part of this review, the annual cash incentive target for Mr. Burdiss was increased from 90% to 100% of base salary. Maximum potential annual cash incentive amounts continued to be limited to 125% of target in order to discourage excessive and/or unnecessary risk taking.

29

The performance categories for each EMC member contained descriptions of key priorities for each executive to focus on during 2020. These focus areas and the relative weighting assigned to each category were established in the first quarter of 2020 and could be modified, if appropriate, during the course of the year. The performance categories and 2020 priorities for each NEO are set forth in the table below:

2020 Performance Categories	Harris Simmons	Paul Burdiss	Scott McLean	'A. Scott Anderson	Keith Maio	Edward Schreiber
Operating earnings	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Effective expense management	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Noninterest income generation	ü	–	ü	ü	–	–
Effective risk management	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Talent management and succession planning	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Promoting a culture of civic engagement	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Other priorities and needs, teamwork, etc.	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü

The overall cash incentive pool decreased for 2020 based largely on the decline in adjusted PPNR less net charge-offs and other financial results. In February 2021, the Committee assessed each EMC member’s performance against his or her preestablished quantitative and qualitative performance categories tailored to each EMC member at the recommendation of the CEO. Mr. Simmons did not make any recommendations regarding himself. The Bank also included an assessment of each NEO’s risk management effectiveness for consideration in the determination of each EMC member’s overall performance rating. Risk assessments include such items as credit quality, operational losses, risk appetite metrics, technology risk management, and quantitative consideration of issues management and compliance with the company's risk management strategic objectives and culture.

While the Bank believes this performance review process improves transparency and strengthens the alignment between pay and performance, the Committee continues to rely on discretion and the exercise of disciplined judgment in making its final award determinations so that individual contributions align properly with the organization’s financial and risk management results.

The Committee relied on its review and evaluation of the aforementioned factors to award the following cash incentives to the NEOs for the 2020 performance year:

2020 Annual Cash Incentive Award
Name	Target Cash Incentive		Actual Cash Incentive Award		% of Target Awarded
Harris H. Simmons	$	1,442,000	$	900,000	62%
Paul E. Burdiss	$	592,250	$	419,000	71%
Scott J. McLean	$	779,401	$	513,000	66%
A. Scott Anderson	$	444,574	$	327,000	74%
Keith D. Maio1	$	387,017	$	341,000	88%
Edward P. Schreiber1	$	303,188	$	227,500	75%
1.The cash incentive targets and actual awards for Messrs. Maio and Schreiber were pro-rated to account for the mid-year appointment of Mr. Maio to the role of Chief Risk Officer and Mr. Schreiber's retirement.

30

All of our NEOs received cash incentive awards that were well below target, based on overall bank performance in a challenging 2020 environment, despite strong individual performance. The Committee expressed some of the following comments in assessing Mr. Simmons’ accomplishments and performance during 2020:

Harris H. Simmons, Chairman & CEO

•Overall leadership of the Bank through the very disruptive and uncertain year

•Preservation of credit quality and risk mitigation results

•Overachieving on PPP

•Continued market segmentation and implementation of customer-centered strategies

•Leadership in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives

Mr. Simmons noted the following significant 2020 accomplishments in the assessment of each NEO’s performance during 2020:

Paul E. Burdiss, CFO

•Prudent management of bank liquidity during a period of unprecedented growth in deposits

•Evaluation of strategic investments and overall expense management

•Simplification and consolidation of processes

•Implementation and integration of strategic plan into affiliate and other internal plans

•Establishing better accessibility and consistency in financial reporting

Scott J. McLean, President & COO

•Increased focus and accountability for fee income lines of business

•Provided leadership for the enterprise core systems initiative

•Simplification initiatives designed to reduce cost, and improve oversight and discipline

•Leadership in building a stronger mortgage banking line of business

•Promotion of diversity efforts and other culture initiatives

•Implemented policies and work plans to quickly pivot to work from home

A. Scott Anderson, CEO – Zions Bank

•Implemented successful PPP program, resulting in the bank acquiring new clients

•Consolidation of back-office activities and creating consistent processes and products

•Reinforced a strong risk management culture at Zions Bank

•Developed talent through career planning management and promoting opportunities for women and minorities

Keith D. Maio, CRO

•Developed a pipeline of leaders, allowing for the reorganization of the retail, wealth management and mortgage banking organizations

•Sharpened our focus on small businesses, and on the bankers who serve them

•Demonstrated consistent leadership in managing risk

•Collaborated on corporate initiatives and drove project completion

Edward P. Schreiber, former CRO (Retired)

•Simplified and streamlined training policies programs

•Achieved strong credit and compliance results by reinforcing a strong credit risk culture

•Streamlined Risk Management processes and organization resulting in material cost savings without compromising the work product

31

Long-Term Incentives

Long-term incentive compensation has historically been an area of particular emphasis in our executive compensation program to promote the long-term perspective necessary for our continued success, including sustained strong profitability, and management and mitigation of risk. This emphasis is consistent with our executive compensation objective to align a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our long-term performance and the financial interests of our shareholders. Both equity awards and value sharing plan units subject executives to long-term risks faced by the Bank and its shareholders. These plans are also useful as a key retention element because payouts are dependent upon continued employment with the Bank. Overall, the target mix in 2020 (as a percentage of total target long-term incentive compensation) was 45% multi-year cash incentive units, or value sharing plan units, 44% restricted stock units, and 11% stock options. The actual compensation ultimately earned from these awards is highly dependent upon future stock price and financial performance. The following table summarizes the long-term awards granted in 2020:

2020 Long-Term Incentive Grants
Name	Value Sharing Plan		Stock Options1		Restricted Stock Units1		Total1
Harris H. Simmons	$	1,297,800	$	317,240	$	1,268,960	$	2,884,000
Paul E. Burdiss	$	552,071	$	134,951	$	539,803	$	1,226,825
Scott J. McLean	$	669,468	$	163,648	$	654,590	$	1,487,706
A. Scott Anderson	$	320,094	$	78,245	$	312,980	$	711,319
Keith D. Maio	$	270,342	$	65,431	$	261,723	$	597,496
Edward P. Schreiber	$	351,698	$	85,971	$	343,882	$	781,551
1. Amounts above represent rounded target values as of the date of grant, based on the Company’s stock price and the Black-Scholes value, and differ from the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table which are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Value Sharing Plans

The Bank’s multi-year cash incentive plans, referred to as value sharing plans, encourage participants to focus on long-term financial results for the business units they manage and provide an opportunity for executive officers and certain designated key employees to be rewarded for financial results greater than predetermined minimum performance thresholds over multi-year periods. A corporate-level value sharing plan is established each year for participants with enterprise-wide responsibilities, and corresponding value sharing plans are established for senior officers at each of our seven bank affiliates in order to more directly reward those participants for results that are within their markets and spheres of influence. Affiliate CEOs are typically granted units in both the corporate and affiliate-level plans. Value sharing plans are reviewed and updated each year to ensure alignment with the Bank’s business strategy, regulatory guidance and the external market.

The following sections outline the plan design highlights for the 2018-2020 Plans, the pay-outs for which were determined following the conclusion of the performance period on Dec. 31, 2020, and the 2020-2022 Plans, under which the NEOs were granted units during the first quarter of 2020.

32

2018-2020 Value Sharing Plans

The 2018-2020 value sharing plans measure financial performance in the categories below, with the indicated weights to be applied in determining award values. The table displays the achievement of each metric based on the goals and performance payout matrices. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviewed achievements holistically to understand the Company performance and used the discretionary portion of the plan to better align the final payout with the performance of the Bank over the performance period. Additional detail including the performance payout matrices are described in the 2019 Proxy Statement.

2018-2020 Value Sharing Plan			Weight	Zions Bancorp Achievement	Zions Bank Achievement
Absolute Metric1	Adjusted Pretax Pre-provision Net Revenue (PPNR)2		40%	118%	112%
Relative Metrics3	Adjusted Return on Tangible Assets (ROTA)4		20%	47%	47%
	Earnings Per Share Growth		20%	92%	92%
Discretion	Compensation Committee Discretion		20%	150%	127%
		Payout as a % of Target		105%	98%
1. Performance is measured at the affiliate bank level and evaluated relative to each affiliate bank’s internal “Plan”
2. Tax-equivalent revenue minus direct expense minus net charge-offs
3. Measured at the consolidated enterprise level and results are evaluated against those achieved by organizations in the custom peer group
4. Net income applicable to common shareholders divided by average tangible assets; where the loan loss provision is replaced by actual net charge-offs

The final settlement values are detailed in the chart below. Messrs. Simmons, Burdiss, McLean, Maio, and Schreiber had 100% of their awards in the Zions Bancorporation Value Sharing Plan. Mr. Anderson's award was split evenly between the Zions Bancorporation Plan and the Zions Bank Plan.

2018-2020 Value Sharing Plan – Final Settlement Values
Name	Value Sharing Plan	Target VSP		Achievement	Final Settlement
Harris H. Simmons	Zions Bancorporation	$	1,125,000	105%	$	1,181,250
Paul E. Burdiss	Zions Bancorporation	$	420,750	105%	$	441,788
Scott J. McLean	Zions Bancorporation	$	466,500	105%	$	489,825
A. Scott Anderson	Zions Bancorporation	$	167,700	105%	$	176,085
	Zions Bank	$	167,700	98%	$	164,900
Keith D. Maio	Zions Bancorporation	$	300,000	105%	$	315,000
Edward P. Schreiber	Zions Bancorporation	$	316,800	105%	$	332,640

2020-2022 Value Sharing Plans

In March 2020, the Committee established value sharing plans consisting of a corporate-level and seven affiliate-level plans covering the years 2020 through 2022. Unit awards to executives and other officers in the value sharing plans are granted by the Committee on a discretionary basis, reflecting the position and proportionate responsibility for overall corporate results of each executive officer in the Bank.

33

The 2020-22 plans incorporate meaningful design changes to encourage participants to focus on key drivers of long-term shareholder value, promote understanding and connection to performance, maintain alignment with affiliate and enterprise-wide performance, and focus on risk management outcomes for the entities they manage. The number of metrics was increased from three to five. The target value of each unit was established at $1.00 per unit and the maximum payout value for each unit was set to $1.50 per unit. The weightings were modified to give affiliate banks more emphasis on their absolute metrics (75/25) while the corporate plan is weighted evenly between absolute and relative metrics.

The 2020-2022 value sharing plans measure performance in the following categories, with the indicated weights to be applied in determining award values:

2020 - 2022 Value Sharing Plan Design		Corporate VSP Weight	Bank Affiliate VSP Weight
Absolute Metrics (Corporate/Bank Affiliate results)	PPNR Growth1	25.0%	37.5%
	Net Charge-Offs / Average Loans	15.0%	22.5%
	Efficient Capital Utilization2	10.0%	15.0%
Relative Metrics (Corporate results v. Peer Group)	Adjusted EPS Growth3	25.0%	12.5%
	Return on Tangible Assets3	25.0%	12.5%
1.PPNR = adjusted taxable-equivalent revenue less adjusted noninterest expense as disclosed in Zions' Annual Report on Form 10-K
2. Calculated as (Loan Credit Spread + Managed Core Fee Income) / Risk Weighted Assets and includes municipal held to maturity securities
3. Actual net-charged off loans and leases will be substituted for provision for loan losses in calculating relative EPS Growth and ROTA

The final ROTA and EPS Growth component payout values are calculated by taking a simple average of the ROTA and EPS growth component values for 2020, 2021, and 2022 compared to the companies in the custom peer group.

Risk-Adjusted Return on Tangible Assets			Adjusted EPS Growth
Rank v. Peers	Payout ($/unit)		Rank v. Peers	Payout ($/unit)
Max - 100th percentile	$	1.50	Max - 100th percentile	$	1.50
80th percentile	$	1.30	80th percentile	$	1.30
60th percentile	$	1.10	60th percentile	$	1.10
50th percentile	$	1.00	50th percentile	$	1.00
40th percentile	$	0.80	40th percentile	$	0.80
30th percentile	$	0.40	30th percentile	$	0.40
Below Threshold	$	—	Below Threshold	$	—

34

Performance for absolute metrics will be measured over a single three-year performance period with two of the measures (PPNR growth and efficient capital utilization) using 2019 as the baseline year. Failure to achieve threshold performance on either PPNR growth or net charge-offs to average loans will result in zero payout for all absolute metric-related components.

Risk-Adjusted PPNR Growth			Net Charge-Offs / Avg Loans			Efficient Capital Utilization
% of Plan	Payout ($/unit)		% of Plan	Payout ($/unit)		% of Plan	Payout ($/unit)
> 30% Growth	$	1.50	<= 0 bps	$	1.50	>=130%	$	1.50
27% Growth	$	1.35	10 bps	$	1.25	120%	$	1.33
23% Growth	$	1.15	15 bps	$	1.13	110%	$	1.16
20% Growth	$	1.00	20 bps	$	1.00	100%	$	1.00
15% Growth	$	0.75	30 bps	$	0.67	95%	$	0.75
10% Growth	$	0.50	40 bps	$	0.34	90%	$	0.50
<0% Growth	$	—	>50 bps	$	—	<80%	$	—

Stock Option Awards

In February 2020, the Committee also approved stock option awards for the Bank's NEOs. Generally, grants of stock options are influenced by a subjective evaluation of individual performance, the scope of the individual’s responsibilities and market data. Since stock options are forward-looking incentives, there is less year-over-year variance (at an individual level) in the value of the options granted to participants.

Additionally, these stock option grants were limited to less than 10% of each respective NEO’s total incentive compensation in order to discourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. Although option grants were previously a larger component of compensation, in recent years the Bank has skewed equity compensation toward restricted stock units. Generally, the Bank’s stock option awards have been granted with a seven-year term and ratable vesting over three years.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

In February 2020, the Committee also approved restricted stock unit awards for the Bank's NEOs. These grants were intended to focus senior executives on future performance and to better align executives' compensation to the interest of shareholders. Like the granting of stock options, the size of these grants is generally influenced by a subjective evaluation of individual performance, the scope of the individual’s responsibilities and market data. Since restricted stock unit awards are forward-looking incentives, there is less year-over-year variance (on an individual level) in the value of the awards granted to participants.

These awards will vest ratably, 25% per year for four years on the anniversary date of the grant. The Committee attached two-year post-vest holding restrictions on the restricted stock units awarded to Messrs. Simmons and McLean. These restrictions prohibit Messrs. Simmons and McLean from the sale, transfer, or other disposition of these shares for an additional two-year period following each vesting event.

35

DECISION-MAKING ROLES AND PROCESS

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Role of the Committee

The Compensation Committee makes decisions regarding the compensation of our executives. Specifically, the Committee has strategic and administrative responsibility for a broad range of issues. These include ensuring that we compensate executives and key management effectively and in a manner consistent with our stated compensation philosophy and objectives, Risk Management Framework, and the requirements of the applicable regulatory bodies. The Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, but are not limited to, the following:

•Reviewing and recommending to the full Board the compensation for the Bank’s CEO;

•Approving the compensation for the remaining NEOs, and other members of the EMC;

•Reviewing and approving the performance metrics and goals for all executive management compensation programs and evaluating performance at the end of each performance period; and

•Approving annual cash incentive award opportunities, equity award opportunities, and long-term cash award opportunities under the Bank’s value sharing plans.

In making compensation decisions, the Committee uses several resources and tools, including the services of McLagan, an independent executive compensation consulting firm with financial services industry expertise that was retained by, and reports to, the Committee. The Committee also considers summary analyses of total compensation delineating each compensation element, risk scorecards provided by our CRO, competitive benchmarking and other analyses as described below.

Role of the Independent Consultant

The Committee uses the services of an outside executive compensation consultant, McLagan, to provide guidance and advice to the Committee on all matters covered by its charter. McLagan advised the Committee on matters related to the executive officers' compensation and general compensation programs, including industry best practices.

This consultant was directly selected and engaged by the Committee to provide a broad set of services pertaining to the compensation of the Bank’s executives. Based on its review of relevant factors, the Committee assessed McLagan’s independence and concluded that no conflict of interest existed that would have prevented McLagan from independently advising the Committee during 2020.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The CEO annually reviews the performance of each of the other NEOs; additionally, a risk effectiveness assessment is completed by the CRO for the CEO, each of the NEOs and other executive officers of the Bank. Based on these evaluations, the CEO makes compensation recommendations to the Committee. In addition, the CEO and other members of the EMC also annually assess performance for other executive officers and make compensation recommendations to the Committee. Although the Committee considers these recommendations along with data provided by its other advisors, it retains full discretion to set all compensation for the Bank’s executive officers.

Additionally, the CEO, President, CFO, CRO, chief credit officer, and other select members of the Bank’s EMC serve on an internal Incentive Compensation Oversight Committee (ICOC). The ICOC reviews and evaluates all incentive compensation plans in which the participants include executive management and other employees that expose the organization to material inherent risks. The purpose of these reviews is to address the concern that the Bank’s incentive compensation plans not incent or pose excessive or unnecessary risks to the Bank.

36

PEER GROUP

In making compensation decisions, the Committee has historically compared major elements of total direct compensation against a custom peer group of comparable publicly traded commercial banking companies, which we refer to as the “custom peer group.” The Committee refers to this custom peer group for both compensation and performance-related benchmarking. Financial performance data is prepared either by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant or by the Bank, using publicly available data from the custom peer group members’ public filings and audited financial statements. Compensation data is generally prepared by the Committee’s independent compensation consultants, using proprietary compensation databases and publicly available data from proxy statements. The Bank’s consultant reviews any financial and/or compensation data that is prepared by the Bank and provided to the Committee.

The custom peer group consists of companies that the Committee believes are reasonably comparable in terms of size and scope of business to the Bank and against which the Committee believes the Bank competes for talent and shareholder investment. The following 17 companies were identified by the Committee as the 2020 custom peer group.

•Associated Banc-Corp	•Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
•BOK Financial Corporation	•KeyCorp
•Citizens Financial Group	•M&T Bank Corporation
•Comerica Incorporated	•People’s United Financial, Inc.
•East West Bancorp, Inc.	•Regions Financial Corporation
•First Horizon National Corp.	•Synovus Financial Corp.
•First Republic Bank	•Western Alliance Bancorp
•Fifth Third Bancorp	•WinTrust Financial, Inc.
•FNB Corp.

The Committee periodically reviews the custom peer group and considers changes deemed necessary to ensure that the nature and size of the organizations continues to be appropriate. In 2020 the Committee reviewed and decided to not change the custom peer group. As of September 2020, the Bank continued to rank close to the median of the custom peer group in asset size (49th percentile), total revenue (49th percentile), and market capitalization (45th percentile).

BENCHMARKING

The Bank’s goal is to provide a competitive total compensation package that will attract and retain executives with the ability and experience necessary to lead the Bank and deliver strong performance to its shareholders. Since the Bank competes nationally for executive talent, the Committee believes it is appropriate to generally target base salaries, annual cash compensation, and the grant value of long-term incentives to the market median (50th percentile) for similarly situated executives working at organizations in the custom peer group. While the benchmarking process provides valuable information regarding the competitive market, the Compensation Committee also assesses many other factors when setting pay levels. These factors include, but are not limited to: the executive’s tenure and performance, the performance of the Company, internal equity, historical compensation, and position scope of responsibilities.

When determining compensation mix and levels, the following items are considered:

•The most recent and prior years’ comparative proxy statement and survey data for similar jobs among the custom peer group;

•To reduce volatility and customize the data to Zions' asset size, regression analysis is used to benchmark base salary, target annual cash incentive, and total direct compensation; and

•The ability to conform to expectations and guidance issued by various regulatory authorities relating to upside leverage for incentive compensation plans and the mix of long-term incentive compensation (e.g., stock options, restricted stock units, or cash performance plans with multi-year vesting and/or performance periods) as a percentage of each EMC member’s total incentive compensation.

37

OTHER COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The NEOs are generally eligible for the same broad-based health and retirement benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of our full-time employees. Programs that provide different levels of benefits for executive officers are noted in the descriptions below:

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

We believe that providing competitive retirement security programs is an important factor in attracting and retaining highly qualified employees and executives. In accordance with this objective, we have continually reviewed and updated the design and structure of our retirement programs to maintain market competitiveness. All employees who are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the Bank’s Payshelter 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Eligibility and participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, Excess Benefit Program, Cash Balance Plan, and Supplemental Retirement Plan, each described below, are limited to highly compensated employees or “grandfathered” employees.

Payshelter 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The Payshelter 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan is a defined contribution plan qualified under provisions of Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan is a combination of a 401(k) plan and an employee stock ownership plan. The plan permits participants to contribute between 1% and 80% of their eligible earnings on a tax-deferred basis, up to a maximum of $19,500 ($26,000 for participants age 50 and over) in 2020. Employee contributions are always 100% vested. Vesting of employer matching contributions occurs upon contribution. We provide a matching contribution of up to 4.5% of compensation (up to the Internal Revenue Code limits).

The plan also has a profit sharing component in which contributions are based upon our performance according to a discretionary formula approved annually by the Board. In recent years, the formula has been based upon the achievement of varying levels of return on average shareholder common equity. In view of the Bank’s profit results in 2019, we made a profit sharing plan contribution in early 2020 equal to 2.25% of eligible compensation in 2019. Bank profit sharing contributions are invested in our common shares. Participants may diversify the Bank’s profit sharing contribution into any of the plan’s array of mutual funds after three years of service. Vesting of the Bank contributions is an incremental vesting schedule over five years. The maximum employer matching contribution and profit sharing contribution permitted under the plan are limited by Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under current regulations, compensation for the purpose of determining benefits in 2020 cannot exceed $285,000.

For selected executives, including Messrs. Simmons and Anderson, profit sharing contributions that cannot be provided due to the compensation limitation are restored in the Bank’s Excess Benefit Plan, which is described below.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified retirement plan that allows select highly compensated employees to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their bonus and incentive compensation. The company does not make any employer contributions to this plan. Under this plan, we have established a wide array of investment options that are maintained for the purposes of determining the amount of notional investment earnings to be credited to participants’ accounts. Generally, participants can elect the time and manner of distribution of their vested account balance, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

38

Excess Benefit Plan

On January 1, 2004, we segregated the employer-contributed executive management restoration benefit from the Deferred Compensation Plan and established the Excess Benefit Plan. The Excess Benefit Plan consists solely of employer contributions that restore benefits that are limited by tax-qualified plan limitations under our 401(k) plan. Messrs. Simmons and Anderson are the only NEOs grandfathered into this Plan.

Cash Balance Plan

Benefit accruals under our cash balance defined benefit retirement plan were frozen as of

Dec. 31, 2002. A group of certain eligible (grandfathered) employees continue to accrue earnings and interest credits to their cash balance accounts in the plan. Those grandfathered were over age 55 with at least 10 years of service at the time the plan was frozen. Of the 2020 NEOs, only Mr. Anderson was a grandfathered employee receiving earnings and interest credits in this plan. Mr. Simmons accrued interest credits only. None of the other NEOs has a benefit in this plan. The plan was terminated on Dec. 31, 2018, and during 2020 our obligations under the plan were settled with all participants through lump sum payments or annuities. Messrs. Anderson and Simmons received lump sum payments and the Summary Compensation Table reflects the difference between what the Company paid in 2020 to settle this benefit obligation and the amount reported in the Pension Table last year as the present value of the accumulated benefit at Dec. 31, 2019.

Supplemental Retirement Plan

From approximately 1978-1995, Zions Bancorporation and Zions First National Bank provided certain executives with individual non-qualified pension arrangements. These Supplemental Retirement Plans commit to make payments over ten years upon retirement at age 65 or older. Messrs. Simmons and Anderson are the only NEOs who have this arrangement, which will provide them $20,000 per year for 10 years beginning at retirement at age 65 or older. These amounts are reduced in the instance of early retirement.

PERQUISITES

From time to time, we provide NEOs as well as other executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation objective to better enable the Bank to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Committee believes that perquisites and other personal benefits generally should be modest and should have a demonstrative and significant benefit to the advancement of our business or to the efficiency of our executives in the performance of their jobs. The amount of perquisites for each NEO was less than $10,000 in 2020.

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

As disclosed in a Form 8-K filing on Oct. 28, 2020, the Bank entered into a consulting arrangement with Mr. Schreiber whereby Mr. Schreiber will provide consulting services to the Bank for the period from

Oct. 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. In consideration for such services, Mr. Schreiber will receive $67,375 per month, which is approximately equal to 50% of Mr. Schreiber’s average monthly target total compensation during the 12-month period prior to his retirement, including short- and long-term incentives.

39

COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES

The Bank’s full Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy, Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines, and Pledging, Speculative and Hedging Arrangements Policy are available for review under the “Corporate Governance” section of the Bank’s website at www.zionsbancorporation.com.

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICY

The Bank believes that incentive compensation offered to its employees should be subject to clawback in order to incentivize employees to manage the Bank’s risks carefully and avoid acts and practices that expose the Bank to undue risk of short- or long-term financial loss, reputational damage or similar adverse impacts, and to ensure that incentive compensation realized by employees fairly reflects the short- and long-term value of the services provided by the employees. The principal and ordinary means of subjecting incentive compensation to clawback is through compensation design features which expose our employees to loss of potential compensation in the event of such adverse impacts.

The Bank also believes that in extraordinary circumstances these design features and ownership requirements may not be sufficient to disincentivize undue risk-taking and ensure the fairness of realized compensation. To address such circumstances, the Bank's Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy gives the Bank the discretion to clawback incentive compensation awarded to any employee in the event of certain adverse impacts for which the employee is responsible.

SHARE OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION GUIDELINES

We maintain share ownership and retention guidelines. These guidelines call for our executive officers either to hold common shares with an aggregate value equal to a multiple of their salaries, ranging from one to five depending on their position, or to retain shares equal to one-half of the net shares acquired through equity grants until they meet the ownership thresholds established in the guidelines.

In addition, the Committee attached two-year post-vest holding restrictions on the common stock received under the restricted stock unit grants made to Messrs. Simmons and McLean in February 2020. These post-vest holding restrictions prohibit Messrs. Simmons and McLean from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of these shares for an additional two-year period following each vesting event.

ANTI-HEDGING AND RESTRICTED PLEDGING POLICY

The Company has a long-standing general policy on insider trading to guard against improper securities trading. Our Insider Trading Policy was amended in 2013 to prohibit hedging and to place certain restrictions on pledging of Bank stock by directors and executive officers. Under this policy, our directors and executive officers may pledge Bank stock only with the approval of the Bank CEO, CFO or General Counsel, based on certain conditions. The Compensation Committee reviews any pledging activities annually and may direct one or more pledgors to reduce their outstanding pledged positions if the Committee believes it is necessary or advisable to reduce risk. Pledged stock is not included in amounts held by directors and officers to meet the Bank’s stock ownership and retention guidelines.

ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

We account for share-based payments in accordance with the requirements of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 Compensation - Stock Compensation (or ASC 718). See Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Share-Based Compensation” and Note 19 “Share-based Compensation” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, each in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.

40

Compensation Committee Report

The following Report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not and will not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Bank filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Bank specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Compensation Committee of the Bank has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

This report was adopted March 1, 2021, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee

Vivian S. Lee, Chairperson

J. David Heaney

Barbara A. Yastine

41

Compensation Tables

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned for 2020, 2019, and 2018 by each of the NEOs, comprised of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our three other most highly compensated executive officers during the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, and one former executive who retired but would have been among our three most highly compensated executives had he still been serving as an executive officer at the end of the fiscal year.

Name and Principal Position(1)	Year	Salary ($)(2)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(3)	Option Awards ($)(4)	Nonequity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($)(5)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(6)(7)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Harris H. Simmons Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Zions Bancorporation	2020	1,030,000	900,000	1,268,979	309,491	1,181,250	27,357	78,339	(8)	4,795,416
	2019	1,030,000	1,080,000	1,061,711	317,094	561,600	63,547	71,241	(8)	4,185,193
	2018	1,036,154	1,350,000	919,002	274,897	529,338	29,652	42,986	(8)	4,182,029
Paul E. Burdiss Chief Financial Officer Zions Bancorporation	2020	592,250	419,000	539,811	131,656	441,788	—	26,030	(9)	2,150,535
	2019	592,250	476,000	485,194	121,239	268,125	—	19,475	(9)	1,962,283
	2018	585,519	560,000	485,196	121,340	262,792	—	4,725	(9)	2,019,572
Scott J. McLean President and Chief Operating Officer Zions Bancorporation	2020	711,740	513,000	531,753	159,648	489,825	—	19,338	(10)	2,425,304
	2019	711,740	603,500	479,487	141,582	303,225	—	31,149	(10)	2,270,683
	2018	704,148	710,000	415,660	124,442	343,506	—	15,822	(10)	2,313,578
A. Scott Anderson Chief Executive Officer Zions Bank	2020	592,765	327,000	267,652	76,333	340,990	142,444	41,774	(11)	1,788,958
	2019	592,765	367,200	269,691	76,966	200,020	39,994	42,407	(11)	1,589,043
	2018	575,500	432,000	249,084	72,005	261,862	13,071	31,156	(11)	1,634,678
Keith D. Maio Chief Risk Officer Zions Bancorporation	2020	542,885	341,000	236,653	67,060	315,000	—	19,125	(12)	1,521,723
Edward P. Schreiber Former Chief Risk Officer Zions Bancorporation	2020	414,615	227,500	294,082	83,872	332,640	—	205,801	(13)	1,558,510
	2019	539,000	348,500	352,360	100,553	202,020	—	19,638	(13)	1,562,071
	2018	548,942	410,000	354,701	100,636	233,359	—	15,850	(13)	1,663,488

1.The table reflects the position held by each NEO as of Dec. 31, 2020.

2.Mr. McLean’s 2018, 2019, and 2020 salary includes an adjustment for housing that became effective upon his promotion to president of Zions Bancorporation. This housing adjustment reflects the time worked in Salt Lake City, Utah for this role as well as the time worked in Houston, Texas to retain a key leadership role with Amegy Bank. The housing adjustment is more cost effective for the Bank compared to the alternative of securing corporate housing or utilizing hotels. Mr. Schreiber's salary reflects amounts earned prior to his retirement on Oct. 1, 2020.

3.Grant values of restricted stock units are displayed for grants made during the fiscal year. The aggregate grant date fair value of the awards made to the NEOs is estimated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the executive upon the actual vesting award may or may not be equal to the FASB ASC Topic 718 determined value. The 2019 and 2018 awards have been restated to reflect this treatment. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see “Note 19 – Share-Based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.

42

4.The amount reflected in the "Option Awards" column is the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards made to the NEOs, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The fair value of each grant is established on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The value ultimately realized by the executive upon the actual vesting of the exercise of the stock options may or may not be equal to the FASB ASC Topic 718 determined value. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see “Note 19 – Share-Based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report under Item 8 of the Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.

5.Value sharing plan amounts under the 2018-2020 plans were considered earned as of Dec. 31, 2020, and are reflected in the Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation column. More information about the determination of these payments is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis under the “Compensation Decisions for the 2020 Performance Period” section.

6.The net change in the accumulated present value of pension benefits for each NEO during 2020 was as follows: for Mr. Simmons, $27,357, and for Mr. Anderson, $142,444. The Cash Balance Pension Plan was terminated on Dec. 31, 2018, and during 2020 our obligations under the plan were settled with Messrs. Simmons and Anderson through lump sum payments. The table includes the difference between what the Company paid in 2020 to settle this benefit obligation and the amount reported in the Pension Table last year as the present value of the accumulated benefit at Dec. 31, 2019. The elevation of the actual payout to Mr. Anderson beyond the proxy value displayed last year is due to actuarial equivalence adjustments due to Minimum Required Distribution rules.

7.Amounts deferred by participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan are invested by the Bank in various investment vehicles at the direction of the participant. The Bank does not guarantee any rate of return on these investments. The array of investment vehicles includes publicly available mutual funds as well as publicly traded common and preferred share securities of the Bank. No above market or preferential earnings were credited on deferred compensation accounts in 2020.

8.All other compensation for Mr. Simmons consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $19,179 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $59,160 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan; (ii) for 2019, $19,869 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $51,372 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan; and (iii) for 2018, $15,792 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $27,194 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan.

9.All other compensation for Mr. Burdiss consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $26,030 for matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan; (ii) for 2019, $19,475 for matching and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan; and (iii) for 2018, $4,725 for profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan.

10.All other compensation for Mr. McLean consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $19,338 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan; (ii) for 2019, $20,282 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan; and (iii) for 2018, $15,822 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan.

11.All other compensation for Mr. Anderson consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $19,125 in matching and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $22,649 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan; (ii) for 2019, $19,475 in matching and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $22,932 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan; and (iii) for 2018, $15,725 in matching and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan and a $15,431 contribution to the non-qualified Excess Benefit Plan.

12.All other compensation for Mr. Maio consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $19,125 in matching and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan.

13.All other compensation for Mr. Schreiber consists of the following: (i) for 2020, $19,224 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank's tax-qualified defined contribution plan, and $186,577 for post-retirement consulting services from Oct. 1, 2020 through Dec. 31, 2020; (ii) for 2019, $19,638 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan; and (iii) for 2018, $15,850 in matching, true-up, and profit sharing contributions to the Bank’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan.

43

2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

In this table, we provide information concerning each grant to an NEO in the most recently completed fiscal year of restricted stock units, performance stock units, stock options, performance options, and value sharing plan units. Long-term compensation is discussed in greater detail in this Proxy Statement under the caption, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” In the last column, we report the grant date fair value of all awards made in 2020.

			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name	Grant Type	Equity Award Grant Date	Units Awarded (#)	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Stock or Stock Units (#)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Under-lying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Shares and Option Awards ($)
Harris H. Simmons	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	27,798	—	—	1,268,979
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	37,812	45.65	309,491
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	1,297,800	—	1,297,800	1,946,700	—	—	—	—
Paul E. Burdiss	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	11,825	—	—	539,811
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	16,085	45.65	131,656
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	552,071	—	552,071	828,106.5	—	—	—	—
Scott J. McLean	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	14,339	—	—	531,753
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	19,505	45.65	159,648
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	669,468	—	669,468	1,004,202	—	—	—	—
A. Scott Anderson	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	6,856	—	—	267,652
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	9,326	45.65	76,333
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	320,093	—	320,093	480,139.5	—	—	—	—
Keith D. Maio	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	5,733	—	—	223,811
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	7,799	45.65	63,835
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	267,671	—	267,671	401,507	—	—	—	—
	Restricted Stock Units1	10/1/2020	—	—	—	—	441	—	—	12,842
	Options2	10/1/2020	—	—	—	—	—	678	29.12	3,225
	Value Sharing Plan3	10/1/2020	2,671	—	2,671	4,007	—	—	—	—
Edward P. Schreiber	Restricted Stock Units1	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	7,533	—	—	294,082
	Options2	2/10/2020	—	—	—	—	—	10,247	45.65	83,872
	Value Sharing Plan3	2/10/2020	351,698	—	351,698	527,547	—	—	—	—

1.Restricted stock units were granted under the Zions Bancorporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The restricted stock units have provisions consistent with our typical structure, 25% vesting each year over four years. Upon retirement after attainment of age 60 or older with five or more years of total service with the Bank, the restricted stock units continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule. All unvested restricted stock units are forfeited upon a termination of employment for any other reason. During the vesting period, restricted stock units do not provide voting rights, but do have dividend equivalent rights. An additional two-year post-vest hold provision applies to the restricted stock units awarded to Messrs. Simmons and McLean. This provision prohibits Messrs. Simmons and McLean from the sale, transfer, or other disposition of these shares for an additional two-year period following each vesting event. The Company determines the fair value of RSUs considering these retirement provisions and holding requirements.

2.Stock options were granted under the Zions Bancorporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant and vest over three years. Upon a retirement after attainment of age 60 or older with five or more years of total service with the Bank, the options continue to vest according to the original vesting schedule. All unvested awards are forfeited upon a termination of employment for any other reason.

44

3.Units were granted under the 2020-2022 value sharing plans. Messrs. Simmons, Burdiss, McLean, Maio, and Schreiber participate in the Bancorporation Value Sharing Plan, while Mr. Anderson has half of his value sharing units in the Bancorporation Plan and half in the Value Sharing Plan of Zions Bank. Performance under these plans is based on an assessment of achievement by the Committee of various financial goals compared to predetermined thresholds over the time period from January 1, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2022. Performance in each subsequent year in the plan will be evaluated and the results of the three years averaged together. Value continues to be subject to a risk-based forfeiture clause and other possible reductions until the end of the plan on Dec. 31, 2022.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2020

The following table provides information concerning outstanding options, restricted shares, restricted stock units, and performance stock units as of the end of our most recently completed fiscal year. Each outstanding award is represented by a separate row that indicates the number of securities underlying the award.

For option awards, the table discloses the exercise price and the expiration date. For restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance stock units, the table provides the total number of shares that have not vested and the aggregate market value of shares that have not vested.

We computed the market value of the stock awards by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock at the end of the most recent fiscal year ($43.44) by the number of shares or units.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Unexercisable(1)	Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Harris H. Simmons	22,225	—	30.10	6/09/2021
	30,668	—	29.02	5/21/2022
	26,053	—	25.21	3/17/2023
	19,238	—	40.91	3/23/2024	4,693(3)	203,864
	15,616	7,808	51.23	3/22/2025	10,736(3)	466,372
	10,168	20,336	51.17	2/28/2026	18,600(3)	807,984
	—	37,812	45.65	2/9/2027	27,798(3)	1,207,545
	123,968	65,956			61,827	2,685,765
Paul E. Burdiss	19,961	—	20.99	2/11/2023
	10,530	—	44.55	2/23/2024	2,723	118,287
	6,337	3,169	55.68	2/22/2025	4,357	189,268
	3,887	7,776	51.17	2/28/2026	7,112	308,945
	—	16,085	45.65	2/9/2027	11,825	513,678
	40,715	27,030			26,017	1,130,178
Scott J. McLean
	10,590		44.55	2/23/2024	2,738(3)	118,939
	6,499	3,250	55.68	2/22/2025	4,468(3)	194,090
	4,540	9,080	51.17	2/28/2026	8,304(3)	360,726
	—	19,505	45.65	2/9/2027	14,339(3)	622,886
	21,629	31,835			29,849	1,296,641

45

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Unexercisable(1)	Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
A. Scott Anderson
	3,497	—	28.59	5/29/2021
	17,915	—	29.02	5/21/2022
	12,744	—	20.99	2/11/2023
	6,247	—	44.55	2/23/2024	1,615	70,156
	3,762	1,881	55.68	2/22/2025	2,586	112,336
	2,468	4,936	51.17	2/28/2026	4,514	196,088
	—	9,326	45.65	2/9/2027	6,578	285,748
	46,633	16,143			15,293	664,328
Keith Maio	5,077	—	29.02	5/21/22
	6,076	—	44.55	2/23/24	1,571	68,244
	3,866	1,933	55.68	2/22/25	2,658	115,464
	2,371	4,744	51.17	2/28/26	4,338	188,443
	—	7799	45.65	2/9/27	5,733	249,042
	—	678	29.12	9/30/27	441	19,157
	17,390	17,390			14,741	640,350
Edward P. Schreiber	9,482	—	28.59	5/29/2021
	11,738	—	29.02	5/21/2022
	14,061	—	25.21	3/17/2023
	8,733	—	44.55	2/23/2024	2,258	98,088
	5,256	2,628	55.68	2/22/2025	3,613	156,949
	3,224	6,449	51.17	2/28/2026	5,898	256,209
	—	10,247	45.65	2/9/2027	7,228	313,984
	52,494	19,324			18,997	825,230

1.All outstanding stock options vest 33% each year on the grant date anniversary and have a seven-year term.

2.All outstanding restricted shares and restricted stock units vest 25% each year on the grant date anniversary.

3.An additional two-year post-vest hold provision applies to the restricted stock units awarded to Messrs. Simmons and McLean in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. This provision prohibits them from trading these shares for an additional two-year period following each vesting event.

4.Based on closing market price on Dec. 31, 2020, of $43.44 per share.

46

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2020

The following table provides information concerning exercises of options and vesting of restricted stock during the most recently completed fiscal year for each of the NEOs on an aggregate basis. The table reports the number of securities for which the options were exercised, the aggregate dollar value realized upon exercise of options, the number of shares that have vested, and the aggregate dollar value realized upon vesting of shares.

	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
Harris H. Simmons	—	—	23,717	898,366
Paul E. Burdiss	—	—	12,179	538,654
Scott J. McLean	—	—	12,681	561,121
A. Scott Anderson	25,791	326,602	7,824	345,840
Keith D. Maio			7,091	313,988
Edward P. Schreiber	—	—	9,829	369,085

1.We computed the aggregate dollar amount realized upon vesting, according to the vesting schedule, by multiplying the number of shares by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date.

2020 PENSION BENEFITS

The following table provides information with respect to each plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement. This includes tax-qualified defined benefit plans and supplemental executive retirement plans, but does not include defined contribution plans (whether tax qualified or not).

Values reflect the actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefit under the plans, computed as of Dec. 31, 2020. In making such a calculation, we relied on interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Bank’s financial statements.

Name1	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service2	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)	Payments During Last Fiscal Year3
Harris H. Simmons	Cash Balance Pension Plan	21.46	—	744,717
	Excess Benefit Plan	21.46	444,761	—
	Supplemental Retirement Plan	N/A	182,879	—
A. Scott Anderson	Cash Balance Pension Plan	22.50	—	600,205
	Excess Benefit Plan	22.50	447,123	—
	Supplemental Retirement Plan	N/A	182,879	—

1.Messrs. Burdiss, McLean, Maio, and Schreiber are not eligible to participate in the Bank’s defined benefit retirement programs.

2.The service credits will remain constant in future years. Any future present value changes will only result from interest crediting.

3.The Cash Balance Pension Plan was terminated on Dec. 31, 2018, and during 2020 our obligations under the plan were settled with Messrs. Anderson and Simmons through lump sum payments. The elevation of the actual payout to Mr. Anderson beyond the proxy value displayed last year is due to actuarial equivalence adjustments due to minimum required distribution rules.

47

Information regarding the Excess Benefit Plan, and Supplemental Retirement Plan can be found under the heading “Retirement Benefits.”

2020 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table provides information with respect to each nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The amounts shown include compensation earned and deferred in prior years, and earnings on, or distributions of, such amounts.

The “Executive Contributions in Last FY” column indicates the aggregate amount contributed to such plans by each NEO during 2020.

The “Registrant Contributions in Last FY” column indicates our aggregate contributions on behalf of each NEO during 2020. Generally, these amounts reflect restoration benefits provided under the Bank’s Excess Benefit Plan. We also make matching contributions to the qualified 401(k) plan, but that plan is tax qualified and, therefore, we do not include our contributions to it in this table. We include our matching contributions to the tax qualified retirement plans in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

The “Aggregate Earnings in Last FY” column indicates the total dollar amount of the increase (or decrease) in the value of the account from investment returns accrued during 2020, including interest and dividends paid. We pay such amounts to compensate the executive for the deferral, and we do not consider payment of interest and other earnings at market rates to be compensation. We report such amounts as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table only to the extent such earnings were paid at above-market or preferential rates as defined by the SEC, and such amounts, if any, are shown in a footnote to that table.

The “Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions” column reports the aggregate dollar amount of all withdrawals by and distributions to the executive during our last fiscal year. Generally, neither the “Withdrawals/Distribution” column nor the “Aggregate Balance” column represents compensation with respect to our most recently completed fiscal year.

The “Aggregate Balance at Last FYE” column reports the total balance of the executive’s Deferred Compensation Plan and Excess Benefit Plan accounts as of Dec. 31, 2020.

Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)	Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)	Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last FY ($)
Harris H. Simmons	—	59,160	(35,544)	—	603,797
Paul E. Burdiss	—	—	—	—	—
Scott J. McLean	—	—	—	—	—
A. Scott Anderson	—	22,649	(102,817)	—	821,852
Keith D. Maio	—	—	—	—	—
Edward P. Schreiber	—	—	—	—	—

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

For competitive reasons and reasons described below, we believe it is important to protect key associates (including the NEOs) in the event of certain terminations of employment during a transition period following a change in control of the Bank. We entered into standard agreements due to financial services industry consolidation and because we wanted to minimize distractions to our executives caused by a rumored or actual change in control.

48

Further, if a change in control should occur, we want our executives to be focused on the business of the organization and the interests of shareholders. In addition, we believe it is important that our executives be able to react neutrally to a potential change in control and to minimize the influence of personal financial concerns. We believe our change in control agreements assist us in retaining executive talent and realizing the objectives described above.

The change in control agreements entered into with the NEOs generally provide for certain "double-trigger" change in control severance protections as follow: during the two-year period following a change in control of Zions Bancorporation, if the NEO's employment is terminated other than for "cause" or if the NEO resigns for "good reason," they would be paid accrued compensation and benefits, plus an amount equal to a three times multiple of base salary and average annual cash incentive award during the three years preceding the year in which the change in control occurs.

Our change in control agreements do not provide tax gross-up benefits. If any payment or distribution to or for the benefit of the executive would be subject to an excise payment required by Section 280(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, the total payment or distribution will be reduced to such extent required to not trigger the excise tax. The executive will determine which payments or benefits to reduce.

Our change in control agreements provide that equity awards only provide for accelerated vesting and exercisability after a change in control if the employment of the executive is terminated (i.e., only upon the occurrence of a “double trigger”). Additionally, executives will be entitled to pro rata payment of benefits available under the value sharing plans on a double trigger basis.

Our change in control agreements also provide that, commencing on the date of termination of his or her employment, the executive may not disclose any confidential information and, for one year following such date of termination, may not solicit or attempt to solicit away from the Bank any of its officers or employees.

The Potential Payments Upon a Change in Control table at the end of this section summarizes the estimated payments to be made under each contract, agreement, plan, or arrangement that provides for payments to an NEO at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment including by resignation, retirement, disability, or a constructive termination of an NEO, or change in control of the Bank or a change in the NEO’s responsibilities.

For purposes of quantitative disclosure in the following table, and in accordance with SEC regulations, we have assumed that the termination took place on the last business day of our most recently completed fiscal year, and that the price per share of our common shares is the closing market price as of that date, $43.44.

SEVERANCE

Our NEOs do not have employment agreements which guarantee them employment for any period of time. Therefore, we would provide post-termination payments of salary or severance to these NEOs only under the Bank’s broad-based severance policy in the event of a reduction-in-force or other applicable consideration pursuant to a change in control agreement (as described above).

Zions Bancorporation maintains severance guidelines for executive officers that generally provide four weeks' salary for each $20,000 in base salary (rounded to the nearest thousand) or two weeks’ pay for every year of completed service up to ten years and an additional week of pay for every year over ten years of service, whichever is greater up to a maximum of 52 weeks. A severance payment for an NEO, if any, is not enhanced over what any other employee would be due as a result of the termination occurrence. We pay such amounts in anticipation of unemployment and not as a reward for past service. Payment is triggered upon circumstances which may include, but are not limited to, a reduction-in-force, job elimination, consolidation, merger, or re-organization (other than a change in control). Severance is typically paid in biweekly installments but the Bank reserves the right to make such payments in a single lump-sum. Payment of severance is conditioned upon, among other things, a release of claims against us by the executive.

49

ACCELERATED VESTING OF LONG-TERM INCENTIVES

Presently, we have long-term incentive plan arrangements in place with our NEOs through value sharing plans and equity awards. Please also refer to the discussion of long-term incentives above under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

VALUE SHARING PLANS

NEOs received value sharing plan units in 2018, 2019, and 2020. These plans provide for a pro-rata payment at the completion of the three-year award period, if value is earned, in the event of a termination of employment due to death, disability, or retirement. The plans provide for the payment to be made upon completion of the award period. However, upon a change in control of the Bank, the pro-rata payment is to be made based on plan value determined at the higher of target or performance as of the end of the quarter prior to the change in control.

EQUITY AWARDS

The Bank has granted equity awards, consisting of stock options and restricted stock units, to executives, including the NEOs, in recent years. The provisions of equity awards vest and become exercisable upon the death or disability of the holder. Equity awards vest and become exercisable after a change in control if the executive is terminated by the Bank other than for cause or by the executive for good reason. In addition, the provisions of equity awards provide that, upon the executive’s retirement at age 60 or older with five or more years of service with the Bank, any unvested equity awards will continue to vest and become exercisable according to the original vesting schedule, subject to certain non-compete, non-disparagement and confidentiality conditions. Unvested equity awards are forfeited by the executive upon termination in circumstances not described above. Please refer to the section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information about our equity awards.

RETIREMENT PLANS

All of our NEOs are fully vested in their retirement benefits. Profit sharing contributions vest over five years. Retirement benefits are not enhanced based on circumstances regarding termination. However, upon a change in control, any unvested balance(s) would fully vest and these amounts are reflected in the table below. We report additional information regarding our retirement plans above under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2020 Pension Benefits Table,” and in the “2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.”

MISCELLANEOUS BENEFITS

Under the Bank’s change in control agreements, which are described above under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” the Bank is obligated to pay certain other benefits. These include continuation of medical and dental benefits under the change in control agreements for 36 months.

50

Potential Payments Upon a Change in Control
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination	Voluntary Termination ($)	Death or Disability ($)	For Cause Termination ($)	Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary Good Reason Termination (without Change in Control) ($)	Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary Good Reason Termination (with Change in Control) ($)
Harris H. Simmons
Severance	—	—	—	1,030,000(1)	7,416,000(2)(3)
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	—	—	—	233,604(7)
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	34,200(4)
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	57,024(5)
Paul E. Burdiss
Severance	—	—	—	592,250(1)	3,299,095(2)(3)
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	1,130,178(6)	—	—	1,216,419(7)
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	34,200(4)
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	34,344(5)
Scott J. McLean
Severance	—	—	—	711,740(1)	4,590,723(2)(3)
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	—	—	—	111,504(7)
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	34,200(4)
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	41,652(5)
A. Scott Anderson
Severance	—	—	—	592,765(1)	3,112,016(2)(3)
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	—	—	—	69,442(7)
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	34,200(4)
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	41,652(5)
Keith D. Maio
Severance	—	—	—	550,000(1)	2,887,500 (2)(3)
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	—	—	—	51,628(7)
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	34,200(4)
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	41,652(5)
Edward P. Schreiber(8)
Severance	—	—	—	N/A	N/A
Accelerated Vesting of Long-Term Incentives	—	—	—	—	N/A
Retirement Plans	—	—	—	—	N/A
Other Benefits	—	—	—	—	N/A

1.Zions Bancorporation maintains severance guidelines for executive officers up to a maximum of 52 weeks. A severance payment for an NEO, if any, is not enhanced over what any other employee would be due as a result of the termination occurrence.

2.Under the Bank’s change in control agreements, upon a change in control and termination by the Bank other than for cause or by the executive for good reason (i.e., a “double trigger”), severance for the NEO would consist of three times the sum of the individual’s salary at the time of the change in control plus the greater of: (i) the average annual cash incentive award paid to the executive for the three years preceding the change in control, or (ii) the individual’s current target cash incentive.

3.The Bank’s change in control agreements specify that if any payment or distribution to the executive would be subject to excise payment required by Section 280(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, the total payment or distribution will be reduced to such extent required to not trigger the excise tax. If a reduction is necessary, the executive may decide which element of pay should be reduced. We have assumed that the executive elects to reduce amounts attributable to the annual cash incentive. Accordingly, this figure reflects only the amount necessary (in addition to accelerated vesting of long term incentives, retirement plans and other benefits) to reach the excise tax limit for this executive, rather than the full value of the long-term incentives accelerated as a result of the change in control. The reported value of severance has been reduced for Mr. Burdiss in order to avoid the imposition of excise taxes.

51

4.Under the Bank’s change in control arrangements, each NEO would be entitled to receive an amount equal to the matching contribution the Bank would have contributed under the Bank’s 401(k) plan had they remained employed for three years and had the executive made the maximum elected deferral contribution. The Bank’s change in control agreements also provide for accelerated vesting of any unvested 401(k) plan balances. The reported amounts reflect the maximum employer contribution of 4% applied to the compensation limit ($285,000) imposed by Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code.

5.Under the Bank’s change in control agreements, each of the NEOs would be entitled to the continuation of medical and dental benefits for 36 months if terminated following a change in control of the Bank. This figure represents the aggregate cost of fulfilling that obligation.

6.The equity awards contain a provision that would accelerate vesting in the instance of death or disability. Messrs. Burdiss would receive an incremental benefit from this provision. These figures represent the potential value of this acceleration as of Dec. 31, 2020. Messrs. Simmons, McLean, Maio, Schreiber and Anderson would not receive an incremental benefit from the death or disability provision, because they have already met the retirement eligibility provision of these grants based on their age and service as of Dec. 31, 2020.

7.The Bank’s change in control arrangements, value sharing plan provisions, and equity award terms would give the NEOs certain benefits under change in control circumstances that they would not otherwise receive. The figures in the table represent the incremental increase in value of long-term incentives resulting from an assumed change in control as of Dec. 31, 2020. For value sharing plans, the incremental value results in instances where the target value of plan units exceeds the estimated value as of Dec. 31, 2020. For equity awards that are held by NEOs who were not age 60 or did not have five years’ service as of Dec. 31, 2020, the incremental value is based on, in the case of stock options, the difference between the price of our common stock on Dec. 31, 2020, and the exercise price of the unvested option or, in the case of restricted stock or restricted stock units, the price of our common stock on Dec. 31, 2020. For equity awards held by executives who had attained age 60 and five years of service as of Dec. 31, 2020, no incremental value is reflected, because the value of the award will be fully recognized regardless of whether a change in control occurs.

8.Mr. Schreiber retired October 2020 and is not eligible for severance or change in control benefits.

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information. For fiscal 2020, our last completed fiscal year:

•The annual total compensation of our median employee, excluding the CEO, of our Bank was $71,231; and

•The annual total compensation of Harris Simmons, our Chief Executive Officer, was $4,795,416.

Based on this information, the ratio for 2020 of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our median employee is 67 to 1.

We completed the following steps to identify our median employee and to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and CEO:

1.As of Dec. 31, 2020, our employee population consisted of 9,850 individuals, including any full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees employed on that date.

2.To find the annual total compensation of each of our employees, we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for fiscal 2020. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on Dec. 31, 2020, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time employees who did work for us the entire year.

3.After identifying the median employee, we added together all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.

4.With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

52

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE METRICS

For net earnings applicable to common shareholders, pre-provision net revenue and the efficiency ratio, the identified adjustments to reconcile from the applicable GAAP financial measures to the non-GAAP financial measures are included where applicable in financial results or in the balance sheet presented in accordance with GAAP. We consider these adjustments to be relevant to ongoing operating results and financial position.

We believe that excluding the amounts associated with these adjustments to present the non-GAAP financial measures provides a meaningful base for period-to-period and company-to-company comparisons, which will assist regulators, investors, and analysts in analyzing the operating results or the financial position of the Bank and in predicting future performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are used by management to assess the performance of the Bank’s business or its financial position for evaluating bank reporting segment performance, for presentations of the Bank’s performance to investors, and for other reasons as may be requested by investors and analysts. We further believe that presenting these non-GAAP financial measures will permit investors and analysts to assess our performance on the same basis as that applied by management.

Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders to evaluate a company, they have limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of results reported under GAAP.

53

The following table provides a reconciliation of noninterest expense (GAAP), taxable-equivalent net interest income (GAAP) and noninterest income (GAAP) to the efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) and pre-provision net revenue (non-GAAP).

Efficiency Ratio and Pretax, Pre-provision Net Revenue
$ in millions		2020		2019
Pre-provision Net Revenue (PPNR)
(a)	Total noninterest expense (GAAP)	1,704		1,742
	LESS adjustments:
	Severance costs	1		25
	Other real estate expense	1		(3)
	Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles			1
	Pension termination-related expense	28		—
	Restructuring costs	1		15
(b)	Total adjustments	31		38
(a-b)=(c)	Adjusted noninterest expense (non-GAAP)	1,673		1,704
(d)	Net interest income (GAAP)	2,216		2,272
(e)	Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments	27		26
(d+e)=(f)	Taxable-equivalent net interest income	2,243		2,298
(g)	Noninterest Income (GAAP)	574		562
(f+g)=(h)	Combined Revenue	2,817		2,860
	LESS adjustments:
	Fair value and nonhedge derivative (loss)	(6)		(9)
	Securities gains, net	7		3
(i)	Total adjustments	1		(6)
(h-i)=(j)	Adjusted taxable-equivalent revenue (non-GAAP)	2,816		2,866
(h-a)	Pre-provision net revenue (GAAP)	1,113		1,118
(j-c)	Adjusted Pre-provision Net Revenue (non-GAAP)	1,143		1,162
(c)/(j)	Efficiency Ratio (non-GAAP)	59.4	%	59.5	%

54

The following table presents a reconciliation of pretax pre-provision net income, noninterest income and total direct expense to the same performance measures on a non-GAAP basis after adjusting for the items specified. The adjusted measures are utilized in the value sharing plans.

Pretax Pre-provision Net Income, Noninterest Income and Total Direct Expense
$ in millions		2020	2019	2018
Net interest income (GAAP)		2,216	2,272	2,230
Fully taxable equivalent adjustments		27	26	22
Adjusted net interest income (non-GAAP)	a	2,243	2,298	2,252
Noninterest income (GAAP)	b	574	562	552
Adjustments:
Fair value and nonhedge derivative income (loss)		(6)	(9)	(1)
Equity securities gains, net		7	3	1
Total adjustments	c	1	(6)	—
Adjusted noninterest income (non-GAAP)	b-c=d	573	568	552
Adjusted revenue (non-GAAP)	a+d=e	2,816	2,866	2,804
Noninterest expense (GAAP)	f	1,704	1,742	1,679
Other real estate owned expenses		1	(3)	1
Severance costs		1	25	3
Restructuring costs		1	15	2
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles		—	1	1
Pension termination-related expense		28	—	—
Other adjustments (Charitable Contrib., Hurricane Harvey)		—	—	—
Debt extinguishment cost		—	—	—
Total adjustments	g	31	38	7
Adjusted noninterest expense (non-GAAP)	f-g=h	1,673	1,704	1,672
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles	i		1	1
Adjusted noninterest expense plus CDI amortization (non-GAAP)	h+i=j	1,673	1,705	1,673
Adjusted pretax pre-provision net income (non-GAAP)	e-j	1,143	1,161	1,131

55

Other Matters

SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH

Throughout the year, we meet regularly with investors both in person and virtually, and we actively seek their feedback on a wide variety of topics related to our performance, including business strategy, industry trends, capital management, governance, risk management, keys to core earnings growth, portfolio concentrations and compensation. We strive to be transparent and responsive to the varied interests of the investor community, which included a substantial augmentation to our disclosures regarding risks related to the pandemic, such as identifying and disclosing details about industries that we estimated to be most affected by the pandemic, as well as new disclosures regarding our Paycheck Protection Program loans. During 2020, we hosted in person our regular biennial Investor Day meeting in Salt Lake City, attended in person by more than 50 analysts and investors, with additional attendees joining the meeting by webcast.

As part of our outreach, we traveled in person (pre-pandemic) or virtually (during the pandemic) to see investors in 18 cities located in the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe, presented at seven investor conferences, hosted nearly 70 one-on-one interactions with shareholders and other institutional investors in their offices and held one-on-one or small group meetings with nearly 80 investors in investor conference settings. In total, we met with nearly 150 institutional investors from approximately 90 unique institutional investment firms, primarily those investing in or analyzing the common equity of the Bank. The feedback received from investors and analysts at these meetings and other events is presented formally and discussed regularly in management and Board meetings.

Based upon results of a survey completed by Institutional Investor in 2020, Zions was ranked #1 for the best overall investor relations program within the Mid Cap and Small Cap Banks segment, with votes coming from brokerage firms and institutional investors.

56

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES

Under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a beneficial owner of a security is any person who directly or indirectly has or shares voting power or investment power over such security. A beneficial owner under this definition need not enjoy the economic benefit of such securities.The following are the only shareholders known to the Bank deemed to be beneficial owners of 5% or more of the common stock of the Bank as of Feb. 25, 2021.

	Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name and Address	No. of Shares	% of Class
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355	18,626,089(1)	11.38%
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055	10,580,208(2)	6.46%
Invesco Ltd. 1555 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1800 Atlanta, GA 30309	10,469,723(3)	6.40%
Wellington Management Group LLP 280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210	8,520,272(4)	5.21%
1.Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. with the SEC on Feb. 10, 2021, which reported the following: sole voting power of 0 shares; shared voting power of 236,941 shares; sole dispositive power of 17,933,342 shares and shared dispositive power of 692,747 shares.
2. Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on Feb. 1, 2021, which reported the following: sole voting power of 9,387,737 shares; shared voting power of 0 shares; sole dispositive power of 10,580,208 shares and shared dispositive power of 0 shares.
3. Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Invesco Ltd. with the SEC on Feb. 12, 2021, which reported the following: sole voting power of 10,407,326 shares; shared voting power of 0 shares; sole dispositive power of 10,469,723 shares and shared dispositive power of 0 shares.
4. Based on a Schedule 13G filed by Wellington Management Group LLP with the SEC on Feb. 4, 2021, which reported the following: sole voting power of 0 shares; shared voting power of 8,329,044 shares; sole dispositive power of 0 shares and shared dispositive power of 8,520,272 shares.

57

The following table shows the beneficial ownership, as of Feb. 25, 2021, of the Bank’s shares by each of our directors, NEOs, and all directors and executive officers as a group. The information below includes, where applicable, shares underlying options and warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of Feb. 25, 2021.

			Perpetual Preferred Series*
Directors and Officers	Common Shares Beneficially Owned	% of Class	A1	G1	H1	J
A. Scott Anderson	133,675	*
Paul E. Burdiss	62,262	*
Gary L. Crittenden	12,177	*			16,230
Suren K. Gupta	16,116	*
J. David Heaney	78,617	*
Claire A. Huang	3,593	*
Vivian S. Lee	14,832	*
Keith D. Maio	55,595	*
Scott J. McLean	176,453	*
Edward F. Murphy	22,015	*
Stephen D. Quinn	193,507	*		200,000
Harris H. Simmons	1,512,946	*				412
Aaron B. Skonnard	8,647	*
Barbara A. Yastine	9,184	*
All directors and officers as a group (30 persons)2	2,839,527	1.73	2,886	200,000	16,230	412
* Less than one percent. Each of the directors, NEOs, and all directors and officers as a group, owns less than 1% of each class of the outstanding preferred shares except as follows: Mr. Quinn, as well as all directors and officers as a group , holds approximately 3.6% of the total outstanding Preferred Series G shares.
1.Number of depositary shares, each representing one-fortieth of one preferred share. Except under limited circumstances, the preferred shares are non-voting.
2. As of Dec. 31, 2020, of the total common shares owned by Harris H. Simmons, 647,964 common shares with a value in excess of $28 million as of that date were held in brokerage accounts, which may from time to time, together with other securities held in these accounts, have served as collateral for margin loans totaling $2.6 million. Of the total shares held by all directors and officers as a group, 696,145 common shares similarly served as collateral and may have been subject to pledge. Less than one-half of one percent of the total outstanding common shares of the Bank were subject to pledge by our directors and officers as a group as of December 31, 2020.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based solely on its review of such information, the Bank believes that for the period from January 1, 2020 through Dec. 31, 2020, its officers and directors were in compliance with all applicable filing requirements, except as follows: Mr. Burdiss filed one late report for a reportable transaction, Mr. Maio filed one late report for a reportable transaction due to a company oversight, and Ms. Huang filed one late report for a reportable transaction due to oversight by the Bank’s third-party deferred compensation plan administrator.

58

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Ordinary Course Loans

Certain directors and executive officers, corporations and other organizations associated with them, and members of their immediate families, were during 2020 and continue to be customers of and had banking transactions, including loans, with the Bank in the ordinary course of business. Such loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons unrelated to us.

These ordinary course transactions include extensions of credit to directors, executive officers and companies considered to be controlled by directors or officers that are subject to Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which governs a bank’s loans to insiders (“Reg O”). Such loans must meet certain standards and must be reported to or, in certain cases, approved by the board of directors of the bank making the extension of credit. At Feb. 25, 2021, the Bank had outstanding approximately $6 million in lending commitments with approximately $3.9 million in outstanding balances subject to Reg O. None of these loans involve more than the normal risk of collection or present other unfavorable features.

Related Party Transactions Policy

The Bank’s Related Party Transactions Policy requires the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to approve or ratify any transaction between the Bank and any executive officer, director, 5% or greater shareholder or certain family members of any of the foregoing that would need to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. The Related Party Transactions Policy provides that in determining whether to approve or ratify any related party transaction, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, among other things, the following factors: (i) whether the terms of the transaction are fair to the Bank and on the same basis as would apply if it did not involve a related party; (ii) whether the Bank has business reasons for entering into the transaction; (iii) whether the transaction would impair the independence of an outside director; and (iv) whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive officer of the Bank. During 2020, the Bank contracted with Pluralsight, Inc. to pay $603,000 to license and use Pluralsight's skills development platform. The transaction was negotiated on an arms-length basis on terms consistent with the market after consideration of similar, competing products. Pluralsight's platform was found best to meet the Bank's skills development needs. Director Skonnard is an executive officer and shareholder of Pluralsight. The terms of the transaction did not impair Mr. Skonnard's independence. The only other transactions occurring since January 1, 2020, for which disclosure is required under Item 404(a) are described above under “Ordinary Course Loans.”

OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING

Except as set forth in this Proxy Statement, management has no knowledge of any other business to come before the annual meeting. If, however, any other matters of which management is now unaware properly come before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the Proxy to vote the Proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

Shareholders who intend to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may do so by following the procedures described in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. To be eligible for such inclusion, shareholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary at One South Main Street, 11th Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109 at least 120 days before the release date of this Proxy Statement, or no later than November 19, 2021. Any such notice must also comply with the requirements of our Bylaws and will not be effective otherwise.

59

Pursuant to our Bylaws, business must be properly brought before an annual meeting in order to be considered by our shareholders. The Bylaws specify the procedure for shareholders to follow in order to bring shareholder nominations of persons for election to the Board and other business before a meeting of the shareholders. In accordance with our Bylaws, shareholder proposals, including any nomination by a shareholder for election as a director, must be received by our Corporate Secretary at One South Main Street, 11th Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109 at least 120 days but not more than 150 days before the anniversary of the date of this Proxy Statement, or no sooner than Oct. 19, 2021 and no later than Nov. 19, 2021 whether or not the shareholder seeks to include such proposal or nomination in our proxy materials for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Additionally, shareholders must meet certain eligibility requirements in order to submit nominations for persons for election as directors to be included in the Bank’s proxy materials. Further, any proposal submitted for the proxy materials will be subject to the rules of the SEC concerning shareholder proposals.

The notice of any proposal must contain the following items:

•Shareholder’s name, address, and share ownership of the Bank;

•Text of the proposal to be presented; and

•Brief written statement of the reasons why such shareholder favors the proposal and any material interest of such shareholder in the proposal.

The notice stating a desire to nominate any person for election as a director of the Bank must be submitted by an eligible holder of the Bank’s shares, and contain the following items:

•Shareholder’s name, address, and share ownership of the Bank;

•Name of the person to be nominated;

•Name, age, business address, residential address, and principal occupation or employment of the nominee;

•Nominee’s signed consent confirming that the nominee will serve as a director for the term for which he or she is standing for election if nominated and elected by the shareholders, consents to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee, will comply with the Bank’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Related-Party Transaction Policy, Stock Ownership Retention Guidelines and any other rule, regulation, policy or standard of conduct applicable to directors and will provide any information requested by the Bank or its subsidiaries or regulators;

•Number of shares of the Bank owned by the nominee;

•Description of all arrangements and understandings between the shareholder and nominee pursuant to which the nomination is to be made;

•Whether the nominee is eligible for consideration as an independent director; and

•Such other information concerning the nominee as would be required in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the nominee under the rules of the SEC.

This summary is provided for convenience and is not intended to modify or supplement the Bank’s Bylaws. A copy of our Bylaws specifying the eligibility and notice requirements will be furnished to any shareholder upon written request to our Corporate Secretary.

60

COMMUNICATING WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Management speaks for the Bank. Inquiries from shareholders should be referred to the CEO or other appropriate officers of the Bank. Shareholders are, however, welcome to communicate directly, and without the concurrence of the Board or CEO, with the lead director of the Board regarding any matter. Shareholders interested in communicating directly with the lead director may do so by writing care of the Corporate Secretary, Zions Bancorporation, One South Main Street, 11th Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84133-1109. All such communications are handled in accordance with the Bank’s Corporate Governance Guidelines approved by the Board. Under that process, our Corporate Secretary reviews and forwards to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of our Corporate Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board or committees thereof, or that the Corporate Secretary otherwise determines requires their attention. The Corporate Secretary may elect not to forward summaries or copies of communications that the Corporate Secretary believes are business solicitations, resumes, or are abusive, frivolous or similarly inappropriate. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence we receive that is addressed to members of the Board and request copies of any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters are brought to the attention of our Internal Audit department and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters. These procedures include processes for the confidential, anonymous submission by Bank employees of reports of alleged or suspected wrongdoing.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the statements. The forward-looking statements may include statements regarding the Bank’s future or expected financial performance or expectations regarding future levels of executive compensation, including payouts pursuant to long-term incentive compensation programs. The Bank undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Bank’s business, particularly those mentioned in the cautionary statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.

61

ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.

ONE SOUTH MAIN STREET, 11TH FLOOR - SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84133-1109

(801) 844-7637

www.zionsbancorporation.com