XML 1062 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value
9 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]    
Fair Value Measurements

11. Fair Value

 

The Company complies with the provisions of FASB ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), in measuring fair value and in disclosing fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. FASB ASC No. 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Subsequent Measurement (ASC 820-10-35), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10-35-3 also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.

 

ASC 820-10-35 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

 

Level 1 Inputs – Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for assets or liabilities identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2 Inputs – Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1. Level 2 inputs are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or in which little information is released publicly; (c) Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and (d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

 

Level 3 Inputs – Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability. These inputs should be used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable inputs should be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include internally generated data and assumptions being used to price the asset or liability.

 

When determining the fair value measurements for assets or liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets.

 

The following tables summarize the basis used to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:

 

Quoted Prices in Active

Significant

Significant

Markets for Identical

Other Observable

Unobservable

Items

Inputs

Inputs

Balance at September 30, 2012

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Common stock warrant liability

$

1,594,323

$

-

$

-

$

1,594,323

 

The following tables show reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances for liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (i.e. Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

Fair Value

Measurement Using

Significant

Common stock warrant liability

Unobservable Inputs

Beginning of period - January 1, 2012

$

5,320,990

Change in fair value of common stock warrants

(3,726,667)

Fair value of common stock warrant liability at September 30, 2012

$

1,594,323

 

The following summarizes the valuation technique for assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value:

 

Common stock warrant liability: For our level 3 securities, which represent common stock warrants, fair value is based on the Black-Scholes pricing model which is based, in part, upon unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.

 

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the provision of ASC 825-10-65, Financial Instruments, which requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. Although the estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in current market exchanges.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accrued interest receivable and payable, accounts payable and borrowings under line of credit: The carrying amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.

3. Fair Value Measurements

The Company complies with the provisions of FASB ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), in measuring fair value and in disclosing fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. FASB ASC No. 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures- Subsequent Measurement (ASC 820-10-35), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10-35-3 also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.

ASC 820-10-35 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1 Inputs – Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for assets or liabilities identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Inputs – Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1. Level 2 inputs are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or in which little information is released publicly; (c) Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and (d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs – Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability. These inputs should be used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable inputs should be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include internally generated data and assumptions being used to price the asset or liability.

When determining the fair value measurements for assets or liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets. Nevertheless, certain assets are not actively traded in observable markets and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive a fair value measurement.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company no longer held any trading securities - auction rate debt securities since they were repurchased in July, 2010 at par by the third-party lender holding the collateral under the Repurchase Agreement which resulted in a corresponding reduction in amounts outstanding and the extinguishment of the Credit Line Agreement.

 The following tables summarize the basis used to measure certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets:

                                                                         Basis of Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

    

Quoted Prices in Active

  

Significant

  

Significant

   

Markets for Identical

  

Other Observable

  

Unobservable

 

  

Items

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

Total

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

Common stock warrant liability

 

$

5,320,990 

 

$

 

$

 

$

5,320,990 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

Quoted Prices in Active

  

Significant

  

Significant

   

Markets for Identical

  

Other Observable

  

Unobservable

 

  

Items

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

Total

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

Available-for-sale securities -

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

       U.S. treasury securities

 

$

10,403,315 

 

$

10,403,315 

 

$

 

$

 

The following tables show reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (i.e. Level 3):

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Measurement Using

 

 

Significant

Common stock warrant liability

 

Unobservable Inputs

Beginning of period - January 1, 2011

 

$

Issuance of common stock warrants

 

8,768,143 

Change in fair value of common stock warrants

 

(3,447,153)

Fair value of common stock warrant liability at December 31, 2011

$

5,320,990 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Measurement Using

 

 

Significant

Trading securities - auction rate debt securities

 

Unobservable Inputs

Beginning of period - January 1, 2010

 

$

53,397,179 

Sale of trading securities for the year ended December 31, 2010

(59,375,001)

Net trading gain for the year ended December 31, 2010

5,977,822 

Fair value of trading securities - auction rate debt securities at December 31, 2010

$

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Measurement Using

 

 

Significant

Auction rate debt securities repurchase agreement

 

Unobservable Inputs

Beginning of period - January 1, 2010

 

$

5,977,822 

Change in fair value of auction rate debt securities repurchase agreement for the year ended December 31, 2010

(5,977,822)

Fair value of auction rate debt securities repurchase agreement at December 31, 2010

$

 

The following summarizes the valuation technique for assets measured and recorded at fair value:

Available-for-sale securities (Level 1): Available-for-sale securities represent U.S. treasury securities, where fair value is based on quoted market prices.  

Common stock warrant liability (Level 3):  For our common stock warrants, fair value is based on the Black-Scholes pricing model which is based, in part, upon unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.

Trading securities – auction rate debt securities and auction rate debt securities repurchase agreement (Level 3): The valuation of these auction rate debt securities and auction rate debt securities repurchase agreement is an estimate based upon factors specific to these securities, including duration, tax status (taxable or tax-exempt), credit quality, the existence of insurance wraps, and the composition of the underlying student loans (Federal Family Education Loan Program or private loans). Assumptions were made about future cash flows based upon interest rate formulas as described above. Also, the valuation included estimates of market data including yields or spreads of similar trading instruments, when available, or assumptions believed to be reasonable for non-observable inputs such as likelihood of redemption.  These securities were redeemed at par in July 2010.