-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, P4bWy/sbihWKWqNrImsgij55KNC43tyhS9mjrXqQ4sTxFs09XKau0LLCmfH5Kjhb MaSGcpLacrKNEXhB7BXSdw== 0000927016-02-005846.txt : 20021206 0000927016-02-005846.hdr.sgml : 20021206 20021206160157 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000927016-02-005846 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20021026 FILED AS OF DATE: 20021206 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SYCAMORE NETWORKS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001092367 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH APPARATUS [3661] IRS NUMBER: 043410558 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0731 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-27273 FILM NUMBER: 02851135 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 150 APOLLO DRIVE CITY: CHELMSFORD STATE: MA ZIP: 01824 BUSINESS PHONE: 9782502900 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 150 APOLLO DRIVE CITY: CHELMSORD STATE: MA ZIP: 01824 10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q DATED 10/26/02 FORM 10-Q DATED 10/26/02
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 
x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
        EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the quarterly period ended October 26, 2002
 
OR
 
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
        EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the transition period from                  to                 
 
Commission File Number 000-27273
 

 
SYCAMORE NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
04-3410558
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
220 Mill Road
Chelmsford, MA 01824
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
 
(978) 250-2900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
150 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  ¨.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨  No  ¨.
 
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of December 2, 2002 was 271,814,321.
 


Table of Contents
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
 
Index
Part I.    Financial Information
 
           
Page No.

Item 1.
  
Financial Statements
      
         
3
         
4
         
5
         
6
Item 2.
       
11
Item 3.
       
32
Item 4.
       
32
Part II.
       
33
Item 1.
       
33
Item 6.
       
34
    
35
    
36
    
38

2


Table of Contents
 
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value)
 
    
October 26,
2002

    
July 31,
2002

 
Assets
                 
Current assets:
                 
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
269,043
 
  
$
172,658
 
Short-term investments
  
 
382,634
 
  
 
509,350
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,684 at October 26, 2002
    and July 31, 2002
  
 
13,385
 
  
 
18,187
 
Inventories
  
 
12,042
 
  
 
12,940
 
Prepaids and other current assets
  
 
2,425
 
  
 
3,447
 
    


  


Total current assets
  
 
679,529
 
  
 
716,582
 
    


  


Property and equipment, net
  
 
27,707
 
  
 
32,696
 
Long-term investments
  
 
367,151
 
  
 
361,537
 
Other assets
  
 
5,370
 
  
 
7,760
 
    


  


Total assets
  
$
1,079,757
 
  
$
1,118,575
 
    


  


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                 
Current liabilities:
                 
Accounts payable
  
$
4,418
 
  
$
6,104
 
Accrued compensation
  
 
3,460
 
  
 
3,896
 
Accrued expenses
  
 
9,579
 
  
 
13,148
 
Accrued restructuring costs
  
 
33,505
 
  
 
48,167
 
Deferred revenue
  
 
2,740
 
  
 
4,978
 
Other current liabilities
  
 
2,797
 
  
 
3,759
 
    


  


Total current liabilities
  
 
56,499
 
  
 
80,052
 
    


  


Stockholders’ equity:
                 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
  
 
—  
 
  
 
—  
 
Common stock, $.001 par value; 2,500,000 shares authorized; 273,681 shares issued at
    October 26, 2002 and July 31, 2002
  
 
274
 
  
 
274
 
Additional paid-in capital
  
 
1,732,652
 
  
 
1,732,846
 
Accumulated deficit
  
 
(698,448
)
  
 
(681,086
)
Deferred compensation
  
 
(15,000
)
  
 
(17,910
)
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,612 and 1,933 shares held at October 26, 2002 and July 31, 2002, respectively
  
 
(215
)
  
 
(158
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  
 
3,995
 
  
 
4,557
 
    


  


Total stockholders’ equity
  
 
1,023,258
 
  
 
1,038,523
 
    


  


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  
$
1,079,757
 
  
$
1,118,575
 
    


  


 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
 

3


Table of Contents
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
    
Three Months Ended

 
    
October 26,
2002

    
October 27,
2001

 
Revenue:
                 
Product
  
$
2,848
 
  
$
15,774
 
Service
  
 
3,090
 
  
 
5,469
 
    


  


Total revenue
  
 
5,938
 
  
 
21,243
 
Cost of revenue:
                 
Product
  
 
4,301
 
  
 
114,273
 
Service
  
 
2,842
 
  
 
8,342
 
Stock compensation
  
 
356
 
  
 
517
 
    


  


Total cost of revenue
  
 
7,499
 
  
 
123,132
 
    


  


Gross loss
  
 
(1,561
)
  
 
(101,889
)
Operating expenses:
                 
Research and development (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $874 and $2,725)
  
 
13,927
 
  
 
36,515
 
Sales and marketing (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $612 and $2,467)
  
 
4,942
 
  
 
13,704
 
General and administrative (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $531 and $575)
  
 
1,658
 
  
 
3,190
 
Stock compensation
  
 
2,017
 
  
 
5,767
 
Restructuring charges and related asset impairments
  
 
—  
 
  
 
77,306
 
    


  


Total operating expenses
  
 
22,544
 
  
 
136,482
 
    


  


Loss from operations
  
 
(24,105
)
  
 
(238,371
)
Losses on investments
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(22,737
)
Interest and other income, net
  
 
6,743
 
  
 
13,173
 
    


  


Loss before income taxes
  
 
(17,362
)
  
 
(247,935
)
Provision for income taxes
  
 
—  
 
  
 
—  
 
    


  


Net loss
  
$
(17,362
)
  
$
(247,935
)
    


  


Basic and diluted net loss per share
  
$
(0.07
)
  
$
(1.00
)
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share
  
 
262,300
 
  
 
249,014
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
 

4


Table of Contents
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 
    
Three Months Ended

 
    
October 26,
2002

    
October 27,
2001

 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                 
Net loss
  
$
(17,362
)
  
$
(247,935
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
                 
Depreciation and amortization
  
 
5,579
 
  
 
12,349
 
Stock compensation
  
 
2,373
 
  
 
6,284
 
Restructuring charges and related asset impairments
  
 
—  
 
  
 
136,513
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                 
Accounts receivable
  
 
4,802
 
  
 
13,714
 
Inventories
  
 
898
 
  
 
(19,643
)
Prepaids and other current assets
  
 
1,022
 
  
 
487
 
Deferred revenue
  
 
(2,238
)
  
 
(222
)
Accounts payable
  
 
(1,686
)
  
 
(34,028
)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
  
 
(4,967
)
  
 
(1,305
)
Accrued restructuring costs
  
 
(14,662
)
  
 
39,092
 
    


  


Net cash used in operating activities
  
 
(26,241
)
  
 
(94,694
)
    


  


Cash flows from investing activities:
                 
Purchases of property and equipment
  
 
(590
)
  
 
(5,924
)
Purchases of investments
  
 
(165,700
)
  
 
(372,833
)
Maturities of investments
  
 
286,240
 
  
 
274,128
 
Decrease (increase) in other assets
  
 
2,390
 
  
 
(1,580
)
    


  


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
  
 
122,340
 
  
 
(106,209
)
    


  


Cash flows from financing activities:
                 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
  
 
369
 
  
 
364
 
Purchase of treasury stock
  
 
(83
)
  
 
(52
)
    


  


Net cash provided by financing activities
  
 
286
 
  
 
312
 
    


  


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  
 
96,385
 
  
 
(200,591
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
  
 
172,658
 
  
 
492,500
 
    


  


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  
$
269,043
 
  
$
291,909
 
    


  


 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
 
1.
 
Description of Business
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on February 17, 1998. The Company develops and markets intelligent optical networking products that enable telecommunications service providers to quickly and cost-effectively transform the capacity created by their fiber optic networks into usable bandwidth to deploy new services.
 
2.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying financial data as of October 26, 2002 and for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002.
 
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of financial position as of October 26, 2002, and results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001 have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended October 26, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
 
3.
 
Net Loss Per Share
 
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period less unvested restricted stock. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, if dilutive. Common equivalent shares are composed of unvested shares of restricted common stock and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding.
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):
 
    
Three Months Ended

 
    
October 26,
2002

    
October 27,
2001

 
Numerator:
                 
Net loss
  
$
(17,362
)
  
$
(247,935
)
    


  


Denominator:
                 
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
  
 
271,246
 
  
 
272,728
 
Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase
  
 
(8,946
)
  
 
(23,714
)
    


  


Shares used in per-share calculation – basic and diluted
  
 
262,300
 
  
 
249,014
 
    


  


Net loss per share:
                 
Basic and diluted
  
$
(0.07
)
  
$
(1.00
)
    


  


 

6


Table of Contents
 
Options to purchase 32.5 million and 18.1 million shares of common stock, at respective average exercise prices of $8.20 and $15.55, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.69 have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
 
4.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    
October 26,
2002

  
July 31,
2002

Raw materials
  
$
1,989
  
$
3,609
Work in process
  
 
2,309
  
 
964
Finished goods
  
 
7,744
  
 
8,367
    

  

    
$
12,042
  
$
12,940
    

  

 
5.
 
Comprehensive Loss
 
The components of comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended

 
    
October 26,
2002

    
October 27,
2001

 
Net loss
  
$
(17,362
)
  
$
(247,935
)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
  
 
(562
)
  
 
2,065
 
    


  


Comprehensive loss
  
$
(17,924
)
  
$
(245,870
)
    


  


 
6.
 
Restructuring Charges and Related Asset Impairments
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers negatively impacted the Company’s operating results in a progressive and increasingly severe manner. As a result, the Company undertook three separate business restructuring programs to reduce expenses and align its resources with long-term growth opportunities: the first in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 (the “fiscal 2001 restructuring”), the second in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 (the “first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring”), and the third in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 (the “fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring”). As a result of the combined activity under all of the restructuring actions, during fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a total net charge of $241.5 million, which was classified in the statement of operations as follows: cost of revenue - $91.7 million, operating expenses - $125.0 million, and non-operating expenses - $24.8 million. As of October 26, 2002, the Company had $33.5 million in accrued restructuring costs. Details regarding each of the restructuring programs are described below.

7


Table of Contents
 
Fiscal 2001 Restructuring:
 
The fiscal 2001 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 131 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products and overlapping feature sets. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $81.9 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $84.0 million relating to discontinued product lines, which was classified as cost of revenue. The fiscal 2001 restructuring program was substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2002. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a net $2.1 million credit to operating expenses due to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $15.1 million consist of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2007 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fiscal 2001 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
    
Original
Restructuring
Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash
Payments

  
Adjustments

  
Accrual
Balance at
July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
October 26,
2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
4,174
  
$
829
  
$
3,203
  
$
142
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
24,437
  
 
1,214
  
 
5,419
  
 
1,994
  
 
15,810
  
 
720
  
 
15,090
Inventory and asset write-downs
  
 
137,285
  
 
84,972
  
 
52,313
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
165,896
  
$
87,015
  
$
60,935
  
$
2,136
  
$
15,810
  
$
720
  
$
15,090
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

 
First Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
 
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 239 employees, consolidation of excess facilities and charges related to excess inventory and other asset impairments. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $77.3 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million classified as cost of revenue. In addition, the Company recorded charges totaling $22.7 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included $7.1 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $11.2 million related to the write-down of certain land, lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $6.0 million for potential legal matters, administrative expenses and professional fees in connection with the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventories due to a severe decline in the forecasted demand for the Company’s products and $53.1 million for asset impairments related to the Company’s vendor financing agreements and fixed assets that were abandoned by the Company.
 
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program was substantially completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded credits totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue due to changes in estimates, the majority of which related to favorable settlements with contract manufacturers for non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. In addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a net $1.7 million credit to operating expenses relating to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $6.5 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2005 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

8


Table of Contents
 
    
Original
Restructuring
Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash
Payments

  
Adjustments

  
Accrual
Balance at
July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
October 26,
2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
7,106
  
$
173
  
$
6,106
  
$
827
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
17,181
  
 
8,572
  
 
1,684
  
 
835
  
 
6,090
  
 
360
  
 
5,730
Inventory and asset write-downs
  
 
155,451
  
 
102,540
  
 
41,358
  
 
10,804
  
 
749
  
 
—  
  
 
749
Losses on investments
  
 
22,737
  
 
22,737
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
202,475
  
$
134,022
  
$
49,148
  
$
12,466
  
$
6,839
  
$
360
  
$
6,479
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

 
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
 
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 225 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products. This included discontinuing the development of the Company’s standalone transport products, including the SN 8000 Intelligent Optical Transport Node and the SN 10000 Intelligent Optical Transport System. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $51.5 million classified as operating expenses. In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $2.1 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included $8.7 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $5.6 million for lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $14.5 million relating to potential legal matters, contractual commitments, administrative expenses and professional fees related to the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $22.6 million of costs relating to asset impairments, which primarily included fixed assets that were disposed of, or abandoned, due to the rationalization of the Company’s product offerings and the consolidation of excess facilities.
 
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program is expected to be substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2003. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $11.9 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2006 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities. The projected future cash payments relating to workforce reductions will be substantially paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
    
Original
Restructuring
Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
October 26,
2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
8,713
  
$
814
  
$
2,059
  
$
5,840
  
$
4,426
  
$
1,414
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
20,132
  
 
—  
  
 
454
  
 
19,678
  
 
9,156
  
 
10,522
Asset write-downs
  
 
22,637
  
 
22,637
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
Losses on investments
  
 
2,108
  
 
2,108
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
53,590
  
$
25,559
  
$
2,513
  
$
25,518
  
$
13,582
  
$
11,936
    

  

  

  

  

  

 
7.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, which addresses the financial accounting and reporting for the disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods

9


Table of Contents
within those fiscal years. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, which addresses the accounting for disposal and exit activities, and supersedes EITF 94-3. SFAS No. 146 is required to be applied prospectively to disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Under SFAS No. 146, certain types of restructuring charges will be recorded as they are incurred over time, rather than being accrued at the time of management’s commitment to an exit plan as specified by EITF 94-3. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
8.
 
Litigation
 
Beginning on July 2, 2001, several purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and several of its officers and directors (the “Individual Defendants”) and the underwriters for the Company’s initial public offering on October 21, 1999. Some of the complaints also include the underwriters for the Company’s follow-on offering on March 14, 2000. The complaints were consolidated into a single action and an amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint was filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between October 21, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The amended complaint alleges violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, primarily based on the assertion that the Company’s lead underwriters, the Company and the other named defendants made material false and misleading statements in the Company’s Registration Statements and Prospectuses filed with the SEC in October 1999 and March 2000 because of the failure to disclose (a) the alleged solicitation and receipt of excessive and undisclosed commissions by the underwriters in connection with the allocation of shares of common stock to certain investors in the Company’s public offerings and (b) that certain of the underwriters allegedly had entered into agreements with investors whereby underwriters agreed to allocate the public offering shares in exchange for which the investors agreed to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The amended complaint alleges claims against the Company, several of the Company’s officers and directors and the underwriters under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act. It also alleges claims against the Company, the individual defendants and the underwriters under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The action against the Company is being coordinated with over three hundred other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. The actions seek damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002. An opposition to that motion was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and a reply brief was filed on behalf of the defendants. The fully briefed issues are now pending before the court and oral arguments were heard on November 1, 2002. On October 9, 2002, the court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice based upon Stipulations of Dismissal filed by the plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it are without merit and intends to defend against the complaints vigorously. The Company is not currently able to estimate the possibility of loss or range of loss, if any, relating to these claims.
 
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

10


Table of Contents
 
Item 2.
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Except for the historical information contained herein, we wish to caution you that certain matters discussed in this report constitute forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties discussed under the heading “Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results” contained in this Form 10-Q. The information discussed in this report should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and can be identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will,” and “would” or similar words.
 
Overview
 
We develop and market intelligent optical networking products that enable telecommunications service providers to quickly and cost-effectively transform the capacity created by their fiber optic networks into usable bandwidth to deploy new services. Our annual revenue increased from our inception in February 1998 to $374.7 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001. However, our revenue decreased to $65.2 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, representing a decrease of 83% compared to fiscal year 2001. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, our revenue was $5.9 million, a decrease of 72% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
 
Our rapid growth in revenue through the first half of fiscal year 2001 reflected a strong economic environment for telecommunications service providers, driven by strong capital markets and by changes in the regulatory environment, in particular those brought about by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. These factors enabled a significant number of new companies to enter the telecommunications services industry, typically referred to as emerging service providers. The entry of emerging service providers into the market also increased the competitive pressure on incumbent service providers that traditionally had offered telecommunications services, causing them to increase their capital expenditures above their historical levels during this period.
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue declined significantly due to unfavorable economic conditions caused by a rapid and significant decrease in capital spending by telecommunications service providers. Emerging service providers, which had been the early adopters of our technology, were no longer able to continue to fund aggressive deployments of equipment within their networks due to their inability to access the capital markets. Since then, many emerging service providers have experienced severe financial difficulties, and in many cases, have filed for bankruptcy protection, or have liquidated their assets and are no longer in business. This trend was compounded by decisions by incumbent service providers to slow their capital expenditures significantly, in part due to reduced competitive pressure from emerging service providers. In addition, many incumbent service providers have found their prospects for raising additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities to be greatly reduced, causing them to decrease capital expenditures to the minimum amount required to support their existing customer commitments. These conditions are currently impacting many of our current and prospective customers, and make any recovery in capital spending extremely difficult to forecast. As a result of these factors, our revenue decreased 83% in fiscal year 2002 compared to fiscal year 2001. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, our revenue was $5.9 million, a decrease of 72% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Our revenue has been, and continues to be, negatively impacted by these unfavorable economic conditions.
 
Currently we anticipate that the cost of revenue and the resulting gross margin will continue to be adversely affected by several factors, including reduced demand for our products, the effects of product volumes and manufacturing efficiencies, component limitations, the mix of products and services sold, increases in material and labor costs, loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred if we do not correctly anticipate product demand, competitive pricing, and possible exposure to excess and obsolete inventory charges. While we have taken actions to reduce our cost structure, we anticipate that we will continue to incur operating losses unless the overall economic environment improves and our revenue increases significantly compared to current levels. We have incurred substantial cumulative net losses to date totaling $698.4 million, which includes net restructuring and

11


Table of Contents
related asset impairment charges totaling $407.4 million. At this time, we cannot predict when, or if, the economic environment and the demand for our products will improve.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis, including those relating to bad debts, inventories, valuation of investments, warranty obligations, restructuring liabilities and asset impairments, litigation and other contingencies. Estimates are based on our historical experience and other assumptions that we consider reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.
 
We believe that the following critical accounting policies represent the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, because changes in such estimates can materially affect the amount of our reported net income or loss. When products are shipped to customers, we evaluate whether all of the fundamental criteria for revenue recognition have been met. The most significant judgments for revenue recognition typically involve whether there are any significant uncertainties regarding customer acceptance and whether collectibility can be considered reasonably assured. In addition, some of our transactions may involve the sales of systems and services under multiple element arrangements. While each individual transaction varies according to the terms of the purchase order or sales agreement, a typical multiple element arrangement may include some or all of the following components: product shipments, installation services, maintenance and training. The total sales price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component, generally the price charged for each component when sold separately. For the product portion, revenue is recognized upon shipment if there are no significant uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. If uncertainties regarding customer acceptance exist, revenue is recognized when such uncertainties are resolved. For installation services, revenue is typically recognized upon receipt of documentation from the customer that the services have been performed. For maintenance and training services, revenue is recognized when the services are performed. After customers have been invoiced, management evaluates the outstanding accounts receivable balances until they are collected, to determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts should be recorded. In the event of a sudden deterioration in a particular customer’s financial condition, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be required. We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized, based primarily on our historical experience. If actual warranty claims exceed the amounts accrued, additional warranty charges would be required which would reduce gross margins in future periods.
 
We continuously monitor our inventory balances and provisions are recorded for any differences between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value, based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We believe that the accounting estimates relating to the net realizable value of our inventories is a critical accounting estimate because it is based primarily on our estimate of future inventory demand and usage, which requires us to make significant assumptions about future sales and market conditions. While such assumptions may change significantly from period to period, the net realizable value of inventories is measured using the best information available as of the balance sheet date. To the extent that a severe decline in forecasted demand occurs, significant charges for excess inventory are likely to occur, such as the $102.4 million charge we recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Once inventory has been written down to its estimated net realizable value, its carrying value cannot be increased due to subsequent changes in demand forecasts. Accordingly, if inventory previously written down to its net realizable value is subsequently sold, we may realize improved gross profit margins on these transactions. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue relating to inventory charges that were originally recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. These credits related to favorable settlements of inventory purchase commitments with contract manufacturers, and to a lesser extent, sales of inventory that had been previously written down.

12


Table of Contents
 
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded charges for restructuring and related asset impairments totaling $422.0 million, including inventory related charges of $186.4 million. These restructuring activities required us to make numerous assumptions and estimates, including future revenue levels and product mix, the timing of and the amounts received for subleases of excess facilities, the fair values of impaired assets, the amounts of other than temporary impairments of strategic investments, and the potential legal matters, administrative expenses and professional fees associated with the restructuring activities. The estimates and assumptions relating to the restructuring activities are continually monitored and evaluated, and if these estimates and assumptions change, we may be required to record additional charges or credits against the reserves previously recorded for these restructuring activities. For example, during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits totaling $3.8 million to operating expenses, due to various changes in estimates relating to the restructuring charges that had been recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and the first quarter of fiscal 2002. These credits included decreases in the potential legal matters associated with the restructuring activities, partially offset by increases in the projected liabilities relating to facility consolidations. As of October 26, 2002, we had $17.9 million accrued as part of our restructuring liability relating to facility consolidations, based on our best estimate of the available sublease rates and terms at the present time. In the event that we are unsuccessful in subleasing any of the restructured facilities, we could incur additional restructuring charges and cash outflows in future periods totaling $6.2 million, which represents the amount of the assumed sublease recoveries that have been incorporated into the current estimate.
 
Results of Operations
 
Revenue
 
Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 72% to $5.9 million, compared to revenue of $21.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Product revenue declined 82% to $2.8 million, and service revenue declined 44% to $3.1 million, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in product revenue was due to the weak overall economic environment and continuing adverse conditions in the telecommunications industry, in particular the significant reductions in capital spending by our target customers. The decrease in service revenue was primarily due to the lower level of installation services associated with our product deployments. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, two international customers accounted for the majority of our revenue. For our current fiscal year ending July 31, 2003, we anticipate that revenue will continue to be highly concentrated in a relatively small number of customers and that international revenue will represent a relatively high percentage of total revenue.
 
Cost of Revenue
 
Total cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 94% to $7.5 million from $123.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 included stock compensation expense of $0.4 million, compared to $0.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2002 included an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase order commitments. Total cost of revenue was 126% of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, compared to 580% of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Excluding excess inventory charges and stock compensation expense, cost of revenue was 120% of total revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, compared to 95% of total revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue in both periods reflects the overall decline in revenue and resulting lower utilization of certain fixed manufacturing and customer support costs.
 
Cost of revenue for services for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased $5.5 million, or 66%, to $2.8 million, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002, due to the overall decrease in revenue and the reduction in customer support costs as a result of our restructuring programs.
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
Research and development expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 62% to $13.9 million from $36.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease was primarily due to reduced costs for project materials and a decrease in personnel related expenses due to our restructuring activities, which resulted in a consolidation of product offerings and more focused development efforts.

13


Table of Contents
 
Sales and Marketing Expenses
 
Sales and marketing expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 64% to $4.9 million from $13.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower personnel and related expenses due to our restructuring programs.
 
General and Administrative Expenses
 
General and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 48% to $1.7 million from $3.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower personnel and related expenses due to our restructuring programs.
 
Stock Compensation Expense
 
Total stock compensation expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 62% to $2.4 million from $6.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, $0.4 million of stock compensation expense was classified as cost of revenue and $2.0 million was classified as operating expenses. Stock compensation expense primarily resulted from the granting of stock options and restricted shares with exercise or sale prices which were deemed to be below fair market value. The decrease was primarily due to stock compensation expense for restricted stock and stock options relating to the acquisition of Sirocco Systems, Inc. which were fully amortized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Stock compensation expense also declined as result of personnel reductions from our restructuring activities. Stock compensation expense is expected to impact our reported results of operations through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
 
Restructuring Charges and Related Asset Impairments
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers negatively impacted our operating results in a progressive and increasingly severe manner. As a result, we undertook three separate business restructuring programs to reduce expenses and align our resources with long-term growth opportunities: the first in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 (the “fiscal 2001 restructuring”), the second in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 (the “first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring”), and the third in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 (the “fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring”). As a result of the combined activity under all of the restructuring actions, during fiscal 2002, we recorded a total net charge of $241.5 million, which was classified in the statement of operations as follows: cost of revenue – $91.7 million, operating expenses – $125.0 million, and non-operating expenses – $24.8 million. As of October 26, 2002, we had $33.5 million in accrued restructuring costs. Details regarding each of the restructuring programs are described below.
 
Fiscal 2001 Restructuring:
 
The fiscal 2001 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 131 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products and overlapping feature sets. As a result, we recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $81.9 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $84.0 million relating to discontinued product lines, which was classified as cost of revenue. The fiscal 2001 restructuring program was substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2002. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a net $2.1 million credit to operating expenses due to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $15.1 million consist of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2007 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fiscal 2001 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

14


Table of Contents
 
    
Original Restructuring Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash Payments

  
Adjustments

  
Accrual
Balance at July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at October 26, 2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
4,174
  
$
829
  
$
3,203
  
$
142
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
24,437
  
 
1,214
  
 
5,419
  
 
1,994
  
 
15,810
  
 
720
  
 
15,090
Inventory and asset write-downs
  
 
137,285
  
 
84,972
  
 
52,313
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
165,896
  
$
87,015
  
$
60,935
  
$
2,136
  
$
15,810
  
$
720
  
$
15,090
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

 
First Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
 
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 239 employees, consolidation of excess facilities and charges related to excess inventory and other asset impairments. As a result, we recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $77.3 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million classified as cost of revenue. In addition, we recorded charges totaling $22.7 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included $7.1 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $11.2 million related to the write-down of certain land, lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $6.0 million for potential legal matters, administrative expenses and professional fees in connection with the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventories due to a severe decline in the forecasted demand for our products and $53.1 million for asset impairments related to our vendor financing agreements and fixed assets that were abandoned by us.
 
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program was substantially completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue due to changes in estimates, the majority of which related to favorable settlements with contract manufacturers for non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. In addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a net $1.7 million credit to operating expenses relating to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $6.5 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2005 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
    
Original
Restructuring Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash
Payments

  
Adjustments

  
Accrual
Balance at July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
October 26, 2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
7,106
  
$
173
  
$
6,106
  
$
827
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
17,181
  
 
8,572
  
 
1,684
  
 
835
  
 
6,090
  
 
360
  
 
5,730
Inventory and asset write-downs
  
 
155,451
  
 
102,540
  
 
41,358
  
 
10,804
  
 
749
  
 
—  
  
 
749
Losses on investments
  
 
22,737
  
 
22,737
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
202,475
  
$
134,022
  
$
49,148
  
$
12,466
  
$
6,839
  
$
360
  
$
6,479
    

  

  

  

  

  

  

 
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
 
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 225 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products. This included discontinuing the development of our standalone transport products, including the SN 8000 Intelligent Optical Transport Node and the SN 10000 Intelligent Optical Transport System. As a result, we recorded

15


Table of Contents
 
restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $51.5 million classified as operating expenses. In addition, we recorded a charge of $2.1 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included $8.7 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $5.6 million for lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $14.5 million relating to potential legal matters, contractual commitments, administrative expenses and professional fees related to the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $22.6 million of costs relating to asset impairments, which primarily included fixed assets that were disposed of, or abandoned, due to the rationalization of our product offerings and the consolidation of excess facilities.
 
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program is expected to be substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2003. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $11.9 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2006 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities. The projected future cash payments relating to workforce reductions will be substantially paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
 
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
    
Original
Restructuring Charge

  
Non-cash
Charges

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
July 31,
2002

  
Cash
Payments

  
Accrual
Balance at
October 26,
2002

Workforce reduction
  
$
8,713
  
$
814
  
$
2,059
  
$
5,840
  
$
4,426
  
$
1,414
Facility consolidations and certain other costs
  
 
20,132
  
 
—  
  
 
454
  
 
19,678
  
 
9,156
  
 
10,522
Asset write-downs
  
 
22,637
  
 
22,637
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
Losses on investments
  
 
2,108
  
 
2,108
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
  
 
—  
    

  

  

  

  

  

Total
  
$
53,590
  
$
25,559
  
$
2,513
  
$
25,518
  
$
13,582
  
$
11,936
    

  

  

  

  

  

 
Interest and Other Income, Net
 
Interest and other income, net decreased to $6.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $13.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease was due to lower interest rates and invested cash balances during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
We did not provide for income taxes for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, or the first quarter of fiscal 2002, due to the net loss in each period. We did not record any tax benefits relating to these losses due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of these future tax benefits.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments were $1.02 billion at October 26, 2002. Included in this amount were cash and cash equivalents of $269.0 million, compared to $172.7 million at July 31, 2002. The increase in cash and cash equivalents for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was due to cash provided by investing activities of $122.3 million and cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million, offset by cash used in operating activities of $26.2 million.
 
Cash provided by investing activities of $122.3 million consisted primarily of net maturities of investments of $120.5 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million consisted primarily of proceeds from employee stock plan activity. Cash used in operating activities of $26.2 million consisted of the net loss for the period of $17.4 million, adjusted for non-cash charges totaling $8.0 million and changes to working capital totaling $16.8 million, the most significant component being a decrease in accrued restructuring costs of $14.7 million. Non-cash charges include depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges and related asset impairments, and stock compensation.

16


Table of Contents
 
As a result of the financial demands of major network deployments, service providers are continuing to request financing assistance from their suppliers. From time to time we have provided extended payment terms on trade receivables to certain key customers to assist them with their network deployment plans. In addition, we may provide or commit to extend additional credit or credit support, such as vendor financing, to our customers, as we consider appropriate in the course of our business. Our ability to provide customer financing is limited and depends on a number of factors, including our capital structure, the level of our available credit and our ability to factor commitments. The extension of financing to our customers will limit the capital that we have available for other uses.
 
Currently, our primary source of liquidity comes from our cash and cash equivalents and investments, which totaled $1.02 billion at October 26, 2002. Our investments are classified as available-for-sale and consist of securities that are readily convertible to cash, including certificates of deposits, commercial paper and government securities, with original maturities ranging from 90 days to three years. At October 26, 2002, $382.6 million of investments with maturities of less than one year were classified as short-term investments, and $367.2 million of investments with maturities of greater than one year were classified as long-term investments. At current revenue levels, we anticipate that some portion of our existing cash and cash equivalents and investments will continue to be consumed by operations. Our accounts receivable, while not considered a primary source of liquidity, represents a concentration of credit risk because the accounts receivable balance at any point in time typically consists of a relatively small number of customer account balances due within one year. At October 26, 2002, more than 90% of our accounts receivable balance was attributable to two international customers, including amounts due from one customer under an extended payment term arrangement. As of October 26, 2002, we do not have any outstanding debt or credit facilities, and do not anticipate entering into any debt or credit agreements in the foreseeable future. Our fixed commitments for cash expenditures consist primarily of payments under operating leases. At October 26, 2002, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are comprised as follows: $5.3 million for the remaining nine months of fiscal 2003, $6.5 million for fiscal 2004, $6.3 million for fiscal 2005, $3.7 million for fiscal 2006 and $6.0 million for fiscal 2007.
 
Based on our current plans and business conditions, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
 
Factors that May Affect Future Operating Results
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
Our business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions.
 
As a result of unfavorable economic conditions and a sudden and severe decline in the purchasing patterns of our customers, our revenue began to decline in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, and we have incurred significant operating losses since that time. Our net loss for fiscal 2002 was $379.7 million and for the three months ended October 26, 2002 was $17.4 million. Currently we expect to continue to incur operating losses unless revenue increases significantly above the current levels. The economic downturn and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers also has resulted in longer selling cycles with extended trial periods for new equipment purchases. While we have implemented restructuring and cost control programs to reduce our business expenses, our costs are largely based on the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of our expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed.
 
In addition to the economic downturn and the decline in capital spending by telecommunications service providers, the ongoing economic situation following the September 2001 terrorist acts and the related military actions appears to have added additional uncertainty to an already weak overall economic environment. Further acts of war or terrorism, or related effects such as disruptions in air transportation, enhanced security measures and political instability in certain foreign countries, may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Although the overall economy in the United States has shown some preliminary signs of recovery in recent months, the telecommunications equipment industry has remained severely depressed. Our business and results of operations have been and will continue to be seriously harmed if current economic conditions do not improve.

17


Table of Contents
 
We are entirely dependent on our line of intelligent optical networking products and our future revenue depends on their commercial success.
 
Our future revenue depends on the commercial success of our line of intelligent optical networking products. Since the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we have narrowed the scope of our product offerings, including discontinuing the development of our standalone transport products. As of October 26, 2002, our SN 3000 Optical Edge Switch, SN 16000 and SN 16000 SC Intelligent Optical Switches and Silvx Manager Network Management System are the primary focus of our current development efforts. To be successful, we believe that we must continually enhance the capabilities of our existing products, and successfully develop and introduce new products. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in:
 
 
*
 
forecasting evolving customer requirements;
 
 
*
 
completing the development, introduction or production manufacturing of new products; or
 
 
*
 
enhancing our existing products.
 
Failure of our current or future products to operate as expected could delay or prevent their adoption. If our target customers do not adopt, purchase and successfully deploy our current and future products, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
 
Our line of intelligent optical networking products enables the creation of a fundamentally different, more flexible and data-centric network architecture than those created by traditional SONET/SDH-based network equipment that has historically been used by incumbent service providers for optical networking. While we believe that our mesh-based architecture offers significant competitive advantages over traditional SONET/SDH-based equipment, we are directing our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service providers, many of which have made significant investments in SONET/SDH-based equipment. If we are unable to convince incumbent service providers to deploy our intelligent optical networking solutions and transition their networks toward more flexible, data-centric mesh architectures, our business and results of operations will be seriously harmed.
 
We expect that substantially all of our revenue will be generated from a limited number of customers, and our revenue is substantially dependent upon sales of products to these customers.
 
Currently we have a limited number of customers. For the three months ended October 26, 2002, two international customers accounted for the majority of the Company’s revenue. In any given quarter, a relatively small number of customers typically comprise a large percentage of total revenue, though the composition of these customers may vary from quarter to quarter. During fiscal 2002, Vodafone accounted for 45% of our revenue and NTT Communications accounted for 20% of our revenue. In fiscal 2001, Williams Communications accounted for 47% of our revenue and 360networks accounted for 11% of our revenue. In fiscal 2000, Williams accounted for 92% of our revenue.
 
Through fiscal 2001, a large percentage of our sales were made to emerging service providers such as Williams and 360networks. Many of these emerging service providers have experienced severe financial difficulties, causing them to dramatically reduce their capital expenditures, and in many cases, file for bankruptcy protection. As a result, we believe that sales to emerging service providers are likely to remain at reduced levels. To be successful, we will need to increase our sales to incumbent service providers, which typically have longer sales evaluation cycles and have also reduced their capital spending plans. In addition, we are focused on establishing successful relationships with a variety of distribution partners. We have entered into agreements with several distribution partners, some of which also sell products that compete with our products. We cannot be certain that we will be able to retain or attract distribution partners on a timely basis or at all, or that the distribution partners will devote adequate resources to selling our products. We have relatively limited experience in selling our products to incumbent service providers and distribution partners. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in increasing our sales to incumbent service providers and distribution partners.

18


Table of Contents
 
None of our customers are contractually committed to purchase any minimum quantities of products from us. We expect that in the foreseeable future a majority of our revenue will continue to depend on sales of our intelligent optical networking products to a limited number of customers. The rate at which our current and prospective customers purchase products from us will depend, in part, on their success in selling communications services based on these products to their own customers. Many incumbent service providers have recently announced reductions in their capital expenditure budgets, reduced their revenue forecasts, or announced restructurings. Any failure of current or prospective customers to purchase products from us for any reason, including any determination not to install our products in their networks or a downturn in their business, would seriously harm our financial condition or results of operations.
 
We expect gross margins to remain at reduced levels in the near term.
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our gross margins declined significantly compared to historical levels. After excluding the effect of special charges and stock compensation expense, our cost of revenue exceeded revenue during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. After excluding the effect of special charges and stock compensation expense, gross profit was 9% of revenue in fiscal 2002, as compared to 38% of revenue in fiscal 2001, and 47% of revenue in the first half of fiscal 2001, which represents the period immediately prior to the start of the current economic downturn. We currently anticipate that gross margins are likely to continue to be adversely affected by several factors, including:
 
 
*
 
reduced demand for our products;
 
 
*
 
the effects of product volumes and manufacturing efficiencies,
 
 
*
 
component limitations;
 
 
*
 
the mix of products and services sold;
 
 
*
 
increases in material and labor costs;
 
 
*
 
loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred if we do not correctly anticipate product demand;
 
 
*
 
competitive pricing; and
 
 
*
 
possible exposure to excess and obsolete inventory charges, such as the charge which occurred in the
         first quarter of fiscal 2002.
 
Current economic conditions combined with our limited operating history makes forecasting difficult.
 
Current economic conditions in the telecommunications industry, combined with our limited operating history, make it difficult to accurately forecast revenue. At the present time, our operating expenses are largely based on the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of these expenses are and will continue to be fixed. Our ability to sell products and the level of success, if any, we may achieve depend, among other things, upon the level of demand for intelligent optical networking products, which continues to be a rapidly evolving market. In addition, we continue to have limited visibility into the capital spending plans of our current and prospective customers, which increases the difficulty of forecasting our revenue or predicting any recovery in capital spending trends. We have directed our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service providers, many of which have historically financed their capital expenditures using significant amounts of debt. In recent periods, many of these incumbent service providers have come under increased scrutiny from credit rating agencies and investors due to their relatively high debt levels, which may limit their ability to make future equipment purchases. We expect that these conditions are likely to continue to limit our ability to forecast our revenue. If operating results are below the expectations of our investors and market analysts, this could cause declines in the price of our common stock.

19


Table of Contents
 
Our failure to generate sufficient revenue would prevent us from achieving profitability.
 
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue has declined considerably and we have incurred significant operating losses since that time. As of October 26, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $698.4 million. We cannot assure you that our revenue will increase or that we will generate sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain profitability. While we have implemented restructuring programs designed to decrease our business expenses, we will continue to have large fixed expenses and we expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, product development, customer support and service, administrative and other expenses. As a result, we will need to generate significantly higher revenue over the current levels in order to achieve and maintain profitability.
 
The unpredictability of our quarterly results may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
 
Our revenue and operating results have varied significantly from quarter to quarter. From the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 through the second quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue increased each quarter sequentially compared to the previous quarter. However, beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue declined due to a sudden and severe decline in the purchasing patterns of our customers, and as a result, we have incurred significant operating losses since that time. We believe that our revenue and operating results are likely to continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. The primary factors that may affect us include the following:
 
 
*
 
fluctuation in demand for intelligent optical networking products;
 
 
*
 
the timing and size of sales of our products;
 
 
*
 
capital spending constraints by our target customers;
 
 
*
 
the length and variability of the sales cycle for our products, which we believe is increasing in length, due to overall market conditions and our emphasis on selling to incumbent service providers;
 
 
*
 
the timing of recognizing revenue and deferred revenue;
 
 
*
 
new product introductions and enhancements by our competitors and ourselves;
 
 
*
 
changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors;
 
 
*
 
our ability to develop, introduce and ship new products and product enhancements that meet customer requirements in a timely manner;
 
 
*
 
delays or cancellations by customers;
 
 
*
 
our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole or limited source components;
 
 
*
 
increases in the prices of the components we purchase;
 
 
*
 
our ability to attain and maintain production volumes and quality levels for our products;
 
 
*
 
manufacturing lead times;
 
 
*
 
the timing and level of prototype expenses;
 
 
*
 
costs related to acquisitions of technology or businesses;
 
 
*
 
changes in accounting rules, such as any future requirement to record expenses for employee stock option grants made at fair value;

20


Table of Contents
 
 
*
 
actual events, circumstances, outcomes and amounts differing from judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in determining the values of certain assets, liabilities and other items reflected in our financial statements; and
 
 
*
 
general economic conditions as well as those specific to the telecommunications, Internet and related industries.
 
While we have implemented restructuring and cost control programs, we plan to continue to invest in our business, to continue to maintain a strong product development and customer support infrastructure that will enable us to move quickly when economic conditions improve. Our operating expenses are largely based on the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of our expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed. As a result, we currently expect to continue to incur operating losses unless revenue increases significantly above the current levels.
 
Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. You should not rely on our results for one quarter as any indication of our future performance. Occurrences of the foregoing factors are extremely difficult to predict. In addition, our ability to forecast our future business has been significantly impaired by the general economic downturn and the current market conditions affecting the telecommunications equipment industry. As a result, our future operating results may be below our expectations or those of public market analysts and investors, and our net sales may continue to decline or recover at a slower rate than anticipated by us or analysts and investors. In either event, the price of our common stock could decrease.
 
The long and variable sales cycles for our products may cause revenue and operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
 
A customer’s decision to purchase our intelligent optical networking products involves a significant commitment of its resources and a lengthy evaluation, testing and product qualification process. As a result, our sales cycle is lengthy and recently has increased in length, as we have directed our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service providers. Throughout the sales cycle, we spend considerable time and expense educating and providing information to prospective customers about the use and features of our products. Even after making a decision to purchase our products, we believe that most customers will deploy the products slowly and deliberately. Timing of deployment can vary widely and depends on the economic environment of our customers, the skills of our customers, the size of the network deployment and the complexity of our customers’ network environment. Historically, customers with complex networks have typically expanded their networks in large increments on a periodic basis. Accordingly, in the event that customer order activity increased, we could receive purchase orders for significant dollar amounts on an irregular and unpredictable basis. Because of our limited operating history and the nature of our business, we cannot predict these sales and deployment cycles. The long sales cycles, as well as our expectation that customers may tend to sporadically place large orders with short lead times, may cause our revenue and results of operations to vary significantly and unexpectedly from quarter to quarter.
 
Our products are complex and are deployed in complex environments and may have errors or defects that we find only after full deployment, which could seriously harm our business.
 
Our intelligent optical networking products are complex and are designed to be deployed in large and complex networks. Our customers may discover errors or defects in the hardware or the software, or the product may not operate as expected after it has been fully deployed. From time to time, there may be interruptions or delays in the deployment of our products due to product performance problems or post delivery obligations. If we are unable to fix errors or other problems, or if our customers experience interruptions or delays that cannot be promptly resolved, we could experience:
 
 
*
 
loss of or delay in revenue and loss of market share;
 
 
*
 
loss of customers;

21


Table of Contents
 
 
*
 
failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance;
 
 
*
 
diversion of development resources;
 
 
*
 
increased service and warranty costs;
 
 
*
 
delays in collecting accounts receivable;
 
 
*
 
legal actions by our customers; and
 
 
*
 
increased insurance costs,
 
any of which could seriously harm our financial condition or results of operations.
 
We may not be successful if our customer base does not grow.
 
Our future success will depend on our attracting additional customers. Due to the overall economic downturn in our industry and the financial difficulties experienced by emerging service providers and certain incumbent service providers, the number of potential customers for our products at the current time has been reduced. Our ability to attract new customers could also be adversely affected by:
 
 
*
 
customer unwillingness to implement our optical networking architecture;
 
 
*
 
difficulty in accurately forecasting evolving customer requirements;
 
 
*
 
any delays or difficulties that we may incur in completing the development, introduction and production manufacturing of our planned products or product enhancements;
 
 
*
 
new product introductions by our competitors;
 
 
*
 
any failure of our products to perform as expected; or
 
*       any difficulty we may incur in meeting customers’ delivery, installation or performance requirements.
 
Our business is subject to risks from international operations.
 
International sales represented 87% of total revenue in fiscal 2002, and more than 50% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, and we expect that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue. Doing business internationally requires significant management attention and financial resources to successfully develop direct and indirect sales channels and to support customers in international markets. While international sales currently represent a high percentage of total revenue, these sales are concentrated within a relatively small number of customers. We may not be able to maintain or expand international market demand for our products.
 
We have relatively limited experience in marketing, distributing and supporting our products internationally and to do so, we expect that we will need to develop versions of our products that comply with local standards. In addition, international operations are subject to other inherent risks, including:
 
 
*
 
greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods;
 
 
*
 
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations in compliance with local laws and customs;

22


Table of Contents
 
 
*
 
reliance on working with distribution partners for the resale of our products in certain markets and for certain types of product offerings, such as the integration of our products into third-party product offerings;
 
 
*
 
necessity to work with third parties in certain countries to perform installation and obtain customer acceptance, and the resulting impact on revenue recognition;
 
 
*
 
the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States;
 
 
*
 
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, including trade protection measures and import and licensing requirements;
 
 
*
 
certification requirements;
 
 
*
 
currency fluctuations;
 
 
*
 
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
 
 
*
 
potentially adverse tax consequences; and
 
 
*
 
political and economic instability, particularly in emerging markets.
 
We rely on single sources for supply of certain components and our business may be seriously harmed if our supply of any of these components or other components is disrupted.
 
We currently purchase several key components, including commercial digital signal processors, central processing units, field programmable gate arrays, switch fabric, and SONET transceivers, from single or limited sources. We purchase each of these components on a purchase order basis and have no long-term contracts for these components. Although we believe that there are alternative sources for each of these components, in the event of a disruption in supply, we may not be able to develop an alternate source in a timely manner or at favorable prices. Such a failure could hurt our ability to deliver our products to our customers and negatively affect our operating margins. In addition, our reliance on our suppliers exposes us to potential supplier production difficulties or quality variations. Any disruption in supply could seriously impact our revenue and results of operations.
 
Throughout the downturn in the telecommunications industry, the optical component industry has been downsizing manufacturing capacity while consolidating product lines from earlier acquisitions. Recently, one of our suppliers announced its intention to exit the market for optical components, and several of our other suppliers have announced reductions of their product offerings. These announcements, or similar decisions by other suppliers, could result in reduced competition and higher prices for the components we purchase. In addition, the loss of a source of supply for key components could require us to incur additional costs to redesign our products that use those components. If any of these events occurred, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
 
We depend upon contract manufacturers and any disruption in these relationships may cause us to fail to meet the demands of our customers and damage our customer relationships.
 
We have limited internal manufacturing capabilities. We rely on contract manufacturers to manufacture our products in accordance with our specifications and to fill orders on a timely basis. Currently, the majority of our products are produced under an agreement with Jabil Circuit, Inc., which provides comprehensive manufacturing services, including assembly, test, control and shipment to our customers, and procures material on our behalf. During the normal course of business, we may provide demand forecasts to our contract manufacturers up to six months prior to scheduled delivery of products to our customers. If we overestimate our requirements, the contract manufacturers may assess cancellation penalties or we may have excess inventory which could negatively impact our gross margins. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million due to a severe decline in our forecasted revenue. A portion of this charge was related to inventory purchase

23


Table of Contents
 
commitments. If we underestimate our requirements, the contract manufacturers may have inadequate inventory which could interrupt manufacturing of our products and result in delays in shipment to our customers and revenue recognition. We also could incur additional charges to manufacture our products to meet our customer deployment schedules.
 
We may not be able to manage our relationship with our contract manufacturers effectively, and such contract manufacturers may not meet our future requirements for timely delivery. Our contract manufacturers also build products for other companies, and we cannot assure you that they will always have sufficient quantities of inventory available to fill orders placed by our customers or that they will allocate their internal resources to fill these orders on a timely basis. In addition, our reliance on contract manufacturers limits our ability to control the manufacturing processes of our products, which exposes us to risks including the unpredictability of manufacturing yields and a reduced ability to control the quality of finished products.
 
The contract manufacturing industry is a highly competitive, capital-intensive business with relatively low profit margins. In addition, there have been a number of major acquisitions within the contract manufacturing industry in recent periods. While to date there has been no significant impact on our contract manufacturers, future acquisitions could potentially have an adverse effect on our working relationship with our contract manufacturers. For example, in the event of a major acquisition involving one of our contract manufacturers, difficulties could be encountered in the merger integration process that could negatively impact our working relationship. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming and could result in a significant interruption in the supply of our products. If we are required or choose to change contract manufacturers for any reason, we may lose revenue and damage our customer relationships.
 
If we do not respond rapidly to technological changes, our products could become obsolete.
 
The market for intelligent optical networking products continues to evolve, and has been characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and changes in customer requirements. We may be unable to respond quickly or effectively to these developments. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other difficulties that could delay or prevent our development, introduction or marketing of new products and enhancements. The introduction of new products by competitors, market acceptance of products based on new or alternative technologies or the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing or future products obsolete.
 
In developing our products, we have made, and will continue to make, assumptions about the standards that may be adopted by our customers and competitors. If the standards adopted are different from those which we have chosen to support, market acceptance of our products may be significantly reduced or delayed and our business will be seriously harmed. The introduction of products incorporating new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products obsolete.
 
In addition, in order to introduce products incorporating new technologies and new industry standards, we must be able to gain access to the latest technologies of our customers, our suppliers and other network vendors. Any failure to gain access to the latest technologies could impair the competitiveness of our products.
 
We will not retain customers or attract new customers if we do not anticipate and meet specific customer requirements or if our products do not interoperate with our customers’ existing networks.
 
Our current and prospective customers may require product features and capabilities that our current products do not have. To achieve market acceptance for our products, we must effectively and timely anticipate and adapt to customer requirements and offer products and services that meet customer demands. Our failure to develop products or offer services that satisfy customer requirements would seriously harm our ability to increase demand for our products.

24


Table of Contents
 
We intend to continue to invest in product and technology development. The development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process that requires the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and significant capital resources. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction, volume production or marketing of new products and enhancements. The introduction of new or enhanced products also requires that we manage the transition from older products in order to minimize disruption in customer ordering patterns and ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet anticipated customer demand. Our inability to effectively manage this transition would cause us to lose current and prospective customers.
 
Many of our customers utilize multiple protocol standards, and each of our customers may have different specification requirements to interface with their existing networks. Our customers’ networks contain multiple generations of products that have been added over time as these networks have grown and evolved. Specifically, incumbent service providers typically have less evolutionary networks that contain more generations of products. Our products must interoperate with all of the products within our customers’ networks as well as future products in order to meet our customers’ requirements. The requirement that we modify product design in order to achieve a sale may result in a longer sales cycle, increased research and development expense and reduced margins on our products. If our products do not interoperate with those of our customers’ networks, installations could be delayed or orders for our products could be cancelled. This would also seriously harm our reputation, all of which could seriously harm our business and prospects.
 
Our market is highly competitive, and our failure to compete successfully could adversely affect our market position.
 
Competition in the public network infrastructure market is intense. This market has historically been dominated by large companies, such as Nortel Networks, Lucent Technologies, Alcatel and Ciena Corporation. In addition, a number of smaller companies have either announced plans for new products or introduced new products to address the same network problems which our products address. Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater selling and marketing, technical, manufacturing, financial and other resources, including vendor-sponsored financing programs. Moreover, our competitors may foresee the course of market developments more accurately and could develop new technologies that compete with our products or even render our products obsolete.
 
In order to compete effectively, we must deliver products that:
 
 
*
 
provide extremely high network reliability;
 
 
*
 
scale easily and efficiently with minimum disruption to the network;
 
 
*
 
interoperate with existing network designs and equipment vendors;
 
 
*
 
reduce the complexity of the network by decreasing the need for overlapping equipment;
 
 
*
 
provide effective network management; and
 
 
*
 
provide a cost-effective solution for service providers.
 
In addition, we believe that knowledge of the infrastructure requirements applicable to service providers, experience in working with service providers to develop new services for their customers, and the ability to provide vendor-sponsored financing are important competitive factors in our market. We have a limited ability to provide vendor-sponsored financing and this may influence the purchasing decisions of prospective customers, who may decide to purchase products from one of our competitors who are able to provide more extensive financing programs. Furthermore, as we are increasingly directing our sales efforts towards incumbent service providers which typically have longer sales evaluation cycles, we believe that being able to demonstrate strong financial viability is becoming an increasingly important consideration to our customers in making their purchasing decisions.

25


Table of Contents
 
If we are unable to compete successfully against our current and future competitors, we could experience price reductions, order cancellations and reduced gross margins, any one of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
The industry in which we compete is subject to consolidation.
 
We believe that the industry in which we compete may enter into a consolidation phase. Recently, one of our larger competitors, Ciena Corporation, completed the acquisition of another company in our industry, ONI Systems. Over the past two years, the market valuations of the majority of companies in our industry have declined significantly, and most companies have experienced dramatic decreases in revenue due to decreased customer demand in general, a smaller customer base due to the financial difficulties impacting emerging service providers, reductions in capital expenditures by incumbent service providers, and other factors. We expect that the weakened financial position of many companies in our industry may cause acquisition activity to increase. We believe that industry consolidation may result in stronger competitors that are better able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. This could lead to more variability in operating results as we compete to be a single vendor solution and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
 
The intelligent optical networking market is evolving and our business will suffer if it does not develop as we expect.
 
The market for intelligent optical networking products continues to evolve. In recent periods, there has been a sharp decline in capital spending by our current and prospective customers. The market for our long-haul transport equipment has substantially diminished, and as a result, we made a strategic decision to discontinue the development of our standalone transport products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. We cannot assure you that a viable market for our products will develop or be sustainable. If this market does not develop, develops more slowly than we expect or is not sustained, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be seriously harmed.
 
Undetected software or hardware errors and problems arising from use of our products in conjunction with other vendors’ products could result in delays or loss of market acceptance of our products.
 
Networking products frequently contain undetected software or hardware errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. We expect that errors will be found from time to time in new or enhanced products after we begin commercial shipments. In addition, service providers typically use our products in conjunction with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. These problems may cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations problems. The occurrence of these problems could result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Defects, integration issues or other performance problems in our products could result in financial or other damages to our customers or could damage market acceptance for our products. Our customers could also seek damages for losses from us. A product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time consuming and costly.
 
Our failure to establish and maintain key customer relationships may result in delays in introducing new products or cause customers to forego purchasing our products.
 
Our future success will also depend upon our ability to develop and manage key customer relationships in order to introduce a variety of new products and product enhancements that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. Our failure to establish and maintain these customer relationships may adversely affect our ability to develop new products and product enhancements. In addition, we may experience delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the future. Material delays in introducing new products and enhancements or our inability to introduce competitive new products may cause customers to forego purchases of our products and purchase those of our competitors, which could seriously harm our business.

26


Table of Contents
 
The majority of our product sales to date have been to emerging service providers rather than incumbent service providers. We believe that it is important for us to increase our sales to incumbent service providers, including incumbent local exchange carriers such as the Regional Bell Operating Companies (“RBOCs”). Incumbent service providers typically have longer sales evaluation cycles than emerging service providers, and we have limited experience in selling our products to incumbent service providers. In addition, we are currently investing in product certification standards such as the OSMINE standard, which will be necessary for us to increase our sales to the RBOCs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we successfully completed certification with two OSMINE processes for the current releases of all of our switching products. While we have made a commitment to invest resources in obtaining these certification standards, there is no assurance that such efforts will enable us to increase our sales to incumbent service providers. Furthermore, while we received certification with our latest software releases, subsequent releases of software on our products may require further investment of resources and requests for OSMINE certification. Our assessment of future business opportunities will guide our decision to pursue future certifications, if necessary. Any failure to establish or maintain strong customer relationships including product certification standards could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
 
Our failure to continually improve our internal controls and systems, and retain needed personnel could adversely affect our results of operations.
 
Since inception, the scope of our operations has increased and we have grown our headcount substantially. However, beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our headcount levels have been reduced significantly, due primarily to our restructuring activities. At October 26, 2002, we had a total of 414 employees, which represents a reduction of approximately 60% from headcount levels immediately prior to the restructuring actions. Our initial growth, followed by more recent headcount reductions, has placed a significant strain on our management systems and resources. Our ability to successfully offer our products and services and implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and management process. We expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial, managerial and manufacturing controls and reporting systems, and will need to effectively manage our headcount levels worldwide. We may not be able to implement adequate control systems in an efficient and timely manner. In spite of recent economic conditions, competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, especially in the New England area where we are headquartered. Any failure to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs could adversely affect our results of operations.
 
We depend on our key personnel to manage our business effectively in a rapidly changing market, and if we are unable to retain our key employees, our ability to compete could be harmed.
 
We depend on the continued services of our executive officers and other key engineering, sales, marketing and support personnel, who have critical industry experience and relationships that we rely on to implement our business plan. None of our officers or key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies covering any of our employees. All of our key employees have been granted stock-based awards which are intended to represent an integral component of their compensation package. These stock-based awards may not provide the intended incentive to our employees if our stock price declines or experiences significant volatility. The loss of the services of any of our key employees, the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring qualified personnel could delay the development and introduction of, and negatively impact our ability to sell, our products.
 
If we become subject to unfair hiring, wrongful termination or other employment related claims, we could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves.
 
Companies in our industry, whose employees accept positions with competitors, frequently claim that their competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We cannot assure you that we will not become parties to claims of this kind or other claims relating to our employees, or that those claims will not result in material litigation. In

27


Table of Contents
response to changing business conditions, we have terminated approximately 600 employees since the third quarter of fiscal 2001, and as a result, we may face claims relating to their compensation and/or wrongful termination based on discrimination. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves or our employees against such claims, regardless of the merits of such actions. In addition, such claims could divert the attention of our management away from our operations.
 
We face certain litigation risks.
 
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. For additional information regarding certain of the lawsuits in which we are involved, see Part II, Item 1—“Legal Proceedings”.
 
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from third-party challenges.
 
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We also enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners and control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology.
 
Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed.
 
If necessary licenses of third-party technology are not available to us or are very expensive, the competitiveness of our products could be impaired.
 
From time to time we may be required to license technology from third parties to develop new products or product enhancements. We cannot assure you that third-party licenses will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop new products and product enhancements could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost, either of which could seriously harm the competitiveness of our products.
 
We could become subject to claims regarding intellectual property rights, which could seriously harm our business and require us to incur significant costs.
 
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Our industry in particular is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In the course of our business, we may receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in each case whether we must negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary technologies in our products.
 
Any parties asserting that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights would force us to defend ourselves and possibly our customers, manufacturers or suppliers against the alleged infringement. Regardless of their merit, these claims could result in costly litigation and subject us to the risk of significant liability for damages.

28


Table of Contents
 
These claims, again regardless of their merit, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve, would divert management time and attention and would put us at risk to:
 
 
*
 
stop selling, incorporating or using our products that use the challenged intellectual property;
 
 
*
 
obtain from the owner of the intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all;
 
 
*
 
redesign those products that use such technology; or
 
 
*
 
accept a return of products that use such technologies.
 
If we are forced to take any of the foregoing actions, our business may be seriously harmed.
 
Any acquisitions or strategic investments we make could disrupt our business and seriously harm our financial condition.
 
As part of our ongoing business development strategy, we consider acquisitions and strategic investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. We completed the acquisition of Sirocco Systems, Inc. in September 2000, and may consider making other acquisitions from time to time. In the event of an acquisition, we could:
 
 
*
 
issue stock that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership;
 
 
*
 
consume cash, which would reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes;
 
 
*
 
incur debt;
 
 
*
 
assume liabilities;
 
 
*
 
increase our ongoing operating expenses and level of fixed costs;
 
 
*
 
record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential periodic impairment charges;
 
 
*
 
incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets;
 
 
*
 
incur large and immediate write-offs; or
 
 
*
 
become subject to litigation.
 
Our ability to achieve the benefits of any acquisition, will also involve numerous risks, including:
 
 
*
 
problems combining the purchased operations, technologies or products;
 
 
*
 
unanticipated costs;
 
 
*
 
diversion of management’s attention from other business issues and opportunities;
 
 
*
 
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
 
 
*
 
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and
 
 
*
 
problems with integrating employees and potential loss of key employees.

29


Table of Contents
 
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in the future and any failure to do so could disrupt our business and seriously harm our financial condition.
 
As of October 26, 2002, we have made strategic investments in privately held companies totaling approximately $26.0 million, and we may decide to make additional investments in the future. In fiscal 2002, we recorded impairment losses of $24.8 million relating to these investments. These types of investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. We could lose our entire investment in certain or all of these companies.
 
Any extension of credit to our customers may subject us to credit risks and limit the capital that we have available for other uses.
 
We continue to receive requests for financing assistance from customers and potential customers and we expect these requests to continue. We believe the ability to offer financing assistance can be a competitive factor in obtaining business. From time to time we have provided extended payment terms on trade receivables to certain key customers to assist them with their network deployment plans. In addition, we may provide or commit to extend additional credit or credit support, such as vendor financing, to our customers as we consider appropriate in the course of our business. Such financing activities subject us to the credit risk of customers whom we finance. In addition, our ability to recognize revenue from financed sales will depend upon the relative financial condition of the specific customer, among other factors. Although we have programs in place to monitor the risk associated with vendor financing, we cannot assure you that such programs will be effective in reducing our risk of an impaired ability to pay on the part of a customer whom we have financed. We could experience losses due to customers failing to meet their financial obligations which could harm our business and materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, such as the losses that we incurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we experienced losses relating to our two existing vendor financing customers, as each of them experienced a significant deterioration in their financial condition. As a result, we determined that we were unlikely to realize any significant proceeds from these vendor financing agreements. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge for the assets related to these financing agreements, which consisted of the cost of the systems shipped to the vendor financing customers, and had been classified in other long-term assets.
 
Risks Related to the Securities Market
 
Our stock price may continue to be volatile.
 
Historically, the market for technology stocks has been extremely volatile. Our common stock has experienced, and may continue to experience, substantial price volatility. The following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly:
 
 
*
 
our loss of a major customer;
 
 
*
 
significant changes or slowdowns in the funding and spending patterns of our current and prospective customers;
 
 
*
 
the addition or departure of key personnel;
 
 
*
 
variations in our quarterly operating results;
 
 
*
 
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products or product enhancements;

30


Table of Contents
 
 
*
 
failure by us to meet product milestones;
 
 
*
 
acquisitions, distribution partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
 
 
*
 
variations between our actual results and the published expectations of analysts;
 
 
*
 
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
 
 
*
 
sales of our common stock or other securities in the future;
 
 
*
 
changes in market valuations of networking and telecommunications companies; and
 
 
*
 
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes.
 
In addition, the stock market in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against such companies.
 
There may be sales of a substantial amount of our common stock that could cause our stock price to fall, or increase the volatility of our stock price.
 
As of October 26, 2002, options to purchase a total of 32.5 million shares of our common stock were outstanding. While these options are subject to vesting schedules, a number of the shares underlying these options are freely tradable. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause our stock price to fall or increase the volatility of our stock price. In addition, sales of shares by our stockholders could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional stock.
 
Insiders own a substantial number of Sycamore shares and could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including changes of control.
 
As of October 26, 2002, our officers, directors and entities affiliated with them, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 40.3% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, if acting together, would be able to significantly influence matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions.
 
Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law may have anti-takeover effects that could prevent a change of control.
 
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, by-laws, and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders.

31


Table of Contents
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
 
The following discussion about our market risk involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
We maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in a variety of securities including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, money market funds and government debt securities. These available-for-sale investments are subject to interest rate risk and may fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percent from levels at October 26, 2002, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately $1.4 million. We have the ability to hold our fixed income investments until maturity, and therefore do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.
 
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
 
We operate primarily in the United States, and the majority of our sales since inception have been made in US dollars. However, our business has become increasingly global, with international revenue representing 87% of total revenue in fiscal 2002, and more than 50% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, and we expect that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue. Fluctuations in foreign currencies may have an impact on our financial results, although to date the impact has not been material. We are prepared to hedge against fluctuations in foreign currencies if the exposure is material, although we have not engaged in hedging activities to date.
 
Item 4.
 
Controls and Procedures
 
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that, as of the date the evaluation was conducted, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act.
 
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

32


Table of Contents
 
Part II. Other Information
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
Beginning on July 2, 2001, several purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and several of its officers and directors (the “Individual Defendants”) and the underwriters for the Company’s initial public offering on October 21, 1999. Some of the complaints also include the underwriters for the Company’s follow-on offering on March 14, 2000. The complaints were consolidated into a single action and an amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint was filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between October 21, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The amended complaint alleges violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, primarily based on the assertion that the Company’s lead underwriters, the Company and the other named defendants made material false and misleading statements in the Company’s Registration Statements and Prospectuses filed with the SEC in October 1999 and March 2000 because of the failure to disclose (a) the alleged solicitation and receipt of excessive and undisclosed commissions by the underwriters in connection with the allocation of shares of common stock to certain investors in the Company’s public offerings and (b) that certain of the underwriters allegedly had entered into agreements with investors whereby underwriters agreed to allocate the public offering shares in exchange for which the investors agreed to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The amended complaint alleges claims against the Company, several of the Company’s officers and directors and the underwriters under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act. It also alleges claims against the Company, the individual defendants and the underwriters under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The action against the Company is being coordinated with over three hundred other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. The actions seek damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002. An opposition to that motion was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and a reply brief was filed on behalf of the defendants. The fully briefed issues are now pending before the court and oral arguments were heard on November 1, 2002. On October 9, 2002, the court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice based upon Stipulations of Dismissal filed by the plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it are without merit and intends to defend against the complaints vigorously. The Company is not currently able to estimate the possibility of loss or range of loss, if any, relating to these claims.
 
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

33


Table of Contents
 
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
 
Exhibits:
 
(a) List of Exhibits
 
Number

 
Exhibit Description

3.1
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
3.2
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
3.3
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (3)
3.4
 
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2)
4.1
 
Specimen common stock certificate (1)
4.2
 
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, for provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and
By-Laws of the Registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock of the Company (2)(3)
10.1
 
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Paul W. Chisholm
99.1(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
99.1(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
(1)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-84635).
 
(2)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-30630).
 
(3)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 27, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2001.
 
(b) Reports on Form 8-K : None

34


Table of Contents
 
Signature
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
/s/    Frances M. Jewels       

Frances M. Jewels
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
Dated: December 6, 2002

35


Table of Contents
 
CERTIFICATIONS
 
I, Daniel E. Smith, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sycamore Networks, Inc.;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 
a)
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b)
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c)
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date: December 6, 2002
 
/s/ DANIEL E. SMITH

Daniel E. Smith
Chief Executive Officer

36


Table of Contents
I, Frances M. Jewels, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sycamore Networks, Inc.;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 
a)
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b)
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c)
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date: December 6, 2002
 
/s/ FRANCES M. JEWELS

Frances M. Jewels
Chief Financial Officer

37


Table of Contents
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Number

 
Exhibit Description

3.1
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
3.2
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
3.3
 
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (3)
3.4
 
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2)
4.1
 
Specimen common stock certificate (1)
4.2
 
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, for provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and
By-Laws of the Registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock of the Company (2)(3)
10.1
 
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Paul W. Chisholm
99.1(a)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
99.1(b)
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
(1)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-84635).
 
(2)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-30630).
 
(3)
 
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 27, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2001.

38
EX-10.1 3 dex101.htm INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 
EXHIBIT 10.1 – INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PAUL W. CHISHOLM
 
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 
This Agreement is made as of the 15th day of October 2002, by and between Sycamore Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation), and Paul Chisholm (“Indemnitee”), a director or officer of the Corporation.
 
WHEREAS, it is essential to the Corporation to retain and attract as directors and officers the most capable persons available, and
 
WHEREAS, the substantial increase in corporate litigation subjects directors and officers to expensive litigation risks at the same time that the availability of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance has been severely limited, and
 
WHEREAS, it is now and has always been the express policy of the Corporation to indemnify its directors and officers so as to provide them with the maximum possible protection permitted by law, and
 
WHEREAS, Indemnitee does not regard the protection available under the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and insurance as adequate in the present circumstances, and may not be willing to serve as a director or officer without adequate protection, and
 
WHEREAS, the Corporation desires Indemnitee to serve as a director or officer of the Corporation.
 
NOW THEREFORE, the Corporation and Indemnitee do hereby agree as follows:
 
1. Agreement to Serve. Indemnitee agrees to serve or continue to serve as a director or officer of the Corporation for so long as he is duly elected or appointed or until such time as he tenders his resignation in writing
 
2. Definitions. As used in this Agreement:
 
(a) The term “Proceeding” shall include any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Corporation or otherwise and whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or investigative nature, and any appeal therefrom.
 
(b) The term “Corporate Status” shall mean the status of a person who is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise.
 
(c) The term “Expenses” shall include, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and other disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with investigations, judicial or administrative proceedings or appeals, but shall not include the amount of judgments, fines or penalties against Indemnitee or amounts paid in settlement in connection with such matters.
 
(d) References to “other enterprise” shall include employee benefit plans; references to “fines” shall include any excise tax assessed with respect to any employee benefit plan; references to “serving at the request of the Corporation” shall include any service as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer, employee, or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be

-1-


deemed to have acted in a manner “not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation” as referred to in this Agreement.
 
3. Indemnification in Third-Party Proceedings. The Corporation shall indemnify Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Paragraph 3 if Indemnitee was or is a party to or threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any Proceeding including without limitation any Proceeding currently pending against the Corporation and/or any of its directors (other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason of his Corporate Status or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in connection therewith, against all Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding, if Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation and, with respect to of any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
 
4. Indemnification in Proceedings by or in the Right of the Corporation. The Corporation shall indemnify Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Paragraph 4 if Indemnitee is a party to or threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any Proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of his Corporate Status or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in connection therewith, against all Expenses and, to the extent permitted by law, amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding, if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, except that no indemnification shall be made under this Paragraph 4 in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which Indemnitee shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Corporation, unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of Delaware shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of such liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, Indemnitee is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such Expenses as the Court of Chancery shall deem proper.
 
5. Exceptions to Right of Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, except as set forth in Paragraph 10, the Corporation shall not indemnify the Indemnitee in connection with a Proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by the Indemnitee unless the initiation thereof was approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the Corporation shall not indemnify the Indemnitee to the extent the Indemnitee is reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, and in the event the Corporation makes any indemnification payments to the Indemnitee and the Indemnitee is subsequently reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, the Indemnitee shall promptly refund such indemnification payments to the Corporation to the extent of such insurance reimbursement.
 
6. Indemnification of Expenses of Successful Party. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any Proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith. Without limiting the foregoing, if any Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein is disposed of, on the merits or otherwise (including a disposition without prejudice), without (i) the disposition being adverse to the Indemnitee, (ii) an adjudication that the Indemnitee was liable to the Corporation, (iii) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the Indemnitee, (iv) an adjudication that the Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and (v) with respect to any criminal proceeding, an adjudication that the Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful, the Indemnitee shall be considered for the purposes hereof to have been wholly successful with respect thereto.
 
7. Notification and Defense of Claim. As a condition precedent to his right to be indemnified, the Indemnitee must notify the Corporation in writing as soon as practicable of any Proceeding for which indemnity will

-2-


or could be sought by him and provide the Corporation with a copy of any summons, citation, subpoena, complaint, indictment, information or other document relating to such Proceeding with which he is served. With respect to any Proceeding of which the Corporation is so notified, the Corporation will be entitled to participate therein at its own expense and/or to assume the defense thereof at its own expense, with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnitee. After notice from the Corporation to the Indemnitee of its election so to assume such defense, the Corporation shall not be liable to the Indemnitee for any legal or other expenses subsequently incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with such claim, other than as provided below in this Paragraph 7. The Indemnitee shall have the right to employ his own counsel in connection with such claim, but the fees and expenses of such counsel incurred after notice from the Corporation of its assumption of the defense thereof shall be at the expense of the Indemnitee unless (i) the employment of counsel by the Indemnitee has been authorized by the Corporation, (ii) counsel to the Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest or position on any significant issue between the Corporation and the Indemnitee in the conduct of the defense of such action or (iii) the Corporation shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of such action, in each of which cases the fees and expenses of counsel for the Indemnitee shall be at the expense of the Corporation, except as otherwise expressly provided by this Agreement. The Corporation shall not be entitled, without the consent of the Indemnitee, to assume the defense of any claim brought by or in the right of the Corporation or as to which counsel for the Indemnitee shall have reasonably made the conclusion provided for in clause (ii) above.
 
8. Advancement of Expenses. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 9 below, in the event that the Corporation does not assume the defense pursuant to Paragraph 7 of this Agreement of any Proceeding to which Indemnitee was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party by reason of his Corporate Status or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in connection therewith and of which the Corporation receives notice under this Agreement, any Expenses incurred by the Indemnitee in defending such Proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such matter; provided, however, that the payment of such Expenses incurred by the Indemnitee in advance of the final disposition of such matter shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay all amounts so advanced in the event that it shall ultimately be determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized in this Agreement. Such undertaking shall be accepted without reference to the financial ability of the Indemnitee to make repayment.
 
9. Procedure for Indemnification. In order to obtain indemnification or advancement of Expenses pursuant to Paragraphs 3, 4, 6 or 8 of this Agreement, Indemnitee shall submit to the Corporation a written request, including in such request such documentation and information as is reasonably available to Indemnitee and is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or advancement of Expenses. Any such indemnification or advancement of Expenses shall be made promptly, and in any event within 60 days after receipt by the Corporation of the written request of the Indemnitee, unless with respect to requests under Paragraphs 3, 4 or 8 the Corporation determines within such 60-day period that such Indemnitee did not meet the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Paragraph 3 or 4, as the case may be. Such determination shall be made in each instance by (a) a majority vote of the directors of the Corporation consisting of persons who are not at that time parties to the Proceeding (“disinterested directors”), whether or not a quorum, (b) a majority vote of a quorum of the outstanding shares of stock of all classes entitled to vote for directors, voting as a single class, which quorum shall consist of stockholders who are not at that time parties to the Proceeding, (c) independent legal counsel (who may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be regular legal counsel to the Corporation), or (d) a court of competent jurisdiction.
 
10. Remedies. The right to indemnification or advancement of Expenses as provided by this Agreement shall be enforceable by the Indemnitee in any court of competent jurisdiction if the Corporation denies such request, in whole or in part, or if no disposition thereof is made within the 60-day period referred to above in Paragraph 9. Unless otherwise required by law, the burden of proving that indemnification is not appropriate shall be on the Corporation. Neither the failure of the Corporation to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such action that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor an actual determination by the Corporation pursuant to Paragraph 9 that Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct. Indemnitee’s expenses (of the type described in the

-3-


definition of “Expenses” in Paragraph 2(c)) reasonably incurred in connection with successfully establishing his right to indemnification, in whole or in part, in any such Proceeding shall also be indemnified by the Corporation.
 
11. Partial Indemnification. If Indemnitee is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to indemnification by the Corporation for some or a portion of the Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with any Proceeding but not, however, for the total amount thereof, the Corporation shall nevertheless indemnify Indemnitee for the portion of such Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement to which Indemnitee is entitled.
 
12. Subrogation. In the event of any payment under this Agreement, the Corporation shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee, who shall execute all papers required and take all action necessary to secure such rights, including execution of such documents as are necessary to enable the Corporation to bring suit to enforce such rights.
 
13. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall continue until and terminate upon the later of (a) six years after the date that Indemnitee shall have ceased to serve as a director or officer of the Corporation or, at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise or (b) the final termination of all Proceedings pending on the date set forth in clause (a) in respect of which Indemnitee is granted rights of indemnification or advancement of Expenses hereunder and of any proceeding commenced by Indemnitee pursuant to Paragraph 10 of this Agreement relating thereto.
 
14. Indemnification Hereunder Not Exclusive. The indemnification and advancement of Expenses provided by this Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Indemnitee may be entitled under the Certification of Incorporation, the By-Laws, any agreement, any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, the General Corporation Law of Delaware, any other law (common or statutory), or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding office for the Corporation. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit the Corporation from purchasing and maintaining insurance, at its expense, to protect itself or the Indemnitee against any expense, liability or loss incurred by it or him in any such capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the Indemnitee would be indemnified against such expense, liability or loss under this Agreement; provided that the Corporation shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment of amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder if and to the extent that Indemnitee has otherwise actually received such payment under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise.
 
15. No Special Rights. Nothing herein shall confer upon Indemnitee any right to continue to serve as an officer or director of the Corporation for any period of time or at any particular rate of compensation.
 
16. Savings Clause. If this Agreement or any portion thereof shall be invalidated on any ground by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the Corporation shall nevertheless indemnify Indemnitee as to Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement with respect to any Proceeding to the full extent permitted by any applicable portion of this Agreement that shall not have been invalidated and to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
 
17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute the original.
 
18. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Corporation and its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the estate, heirs, executors, administrators and personal representatives of Indemnitee.
 
19. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction thereof.

-4-


 
20. Modification and Waiver. This Agreement may be amended from time to time to reflect changes in Delaware law or for other reasons. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision hereof nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
 
21. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given (i) when delivered by hand or (ii) if mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third day after the date on which it is so mailed:
 
(a) if to the Indemnitee, to:
 
(b) if to the Corporation, to:
 
 Sycamore Networks, Inc.
 220 Mill Road
 Chelmsford, MA 01824
 Attn: General Counsel
 
or to such other address as may have been furnished to Indemnitee by the Corporation or to the Corporation by Indemnitee, as the case may be.
 
22. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

-5-


 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
 
       
SYCAMORE NETWORKS, INC.
 
         
Attest:
     
By:
 
/s/  Daniel E. Smith        

By:
 
/s/  Melanie L. Wickens        

     
Name:
 
Daniel E. Smith
           
Title:
 
President and CEO
                 
                 
                 
       
 
INDEMNITEE:
                 
                 
       
/s/  Paul Chisholm        

           
Paul Chisholm

-6-
EX-99.1(A) 4 dex991a.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
EXHIBIT 99.1(a) - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 26, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel E. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.
 
/s/  Daniel E. Smith        

Daniel E. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
December 6, 2002
 
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EX-99.1(B) 5 dex991b.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
EXHIBIT 99.1(b) - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 26, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frances M. Jewels, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.
 
/s/  Frances M. Jewels        

Frances M. Jewels
Chief Financial Officer
December 6, 2002
 
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----