World Monitor Trust II- Series F

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller Reporting Company

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

For the Periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 and

For the Periods January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007

World Monitor Trust II (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized under the laws of Delaware on April 22, 1999. The Trust consists of three separate and distinct series (“Series”): Series D, E and F. Series D, E and F commenced trading operations on March 13, 2000, April 6, 2000 and March 1, 2000, respectively, and each Series will continue to exist until terminated pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII of the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement (the “Agreement”). The assets of each Series are segregated from those of the other Series, separately valued and independently managed. Each Series was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures, forward and options contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. The trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company.

Interests owned in one series of the Trust (Series D, E or F) were exchangeable, without any charge, for Interests of one or more other Series on a weekly basis as long as Limited Interests in those Series were being offered to the public. Series E and Series F are no longer offered to the public as those series substantially achieved their subscription maximums during June 2003 and July 2003, respectively. In addition, since July 2003, the offering of interests in Series D has been suspended. Accordingly, at this time, Interests may not be exchanged.

Redemptions are permitted on a weekly basis. Therefore, the financial statements for interim periods are as of the last valuation day in the last week of the period. Future redemptions will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods.

In the event that the estimated net asset value per Interest of a Series at the end of any business day, after adjustments for distributions and redemptions, declines by 50% or more since the commencement of trading activities or the first day of a fiscal year, the Series will automatically terminate.

Effective December 6, 2004, World Monitor Trust II Series F (“Series F”) contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) and received a Voting Membership Interest in the Company. The Company was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle. The investment in the Company is represented on Series F’s statements of financial condition at the net asset value as reported by the Company. The sole members of the Company are Series F and World Monitor Trust II Series D (“Series D”). Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Preferred” or the “Managing Owner”) is the Managing Owner of each of the Series and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Company. The Company engages in the speculative trading of futures, forwards and option contracts. The financial statements of the Company, including the condensed schedule of investments, are included in Section II of these financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Series F’s financial statements.

The statement of financial condition as of September 26, 2008, the statements of operations for the periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 (“Third Quarter 2008”), June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Third Quarter 2007”), January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 (“Year-To-Date 2008”) and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Year-To-Date 2007”), and the statements of changes in trust capital for Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007, are unaudited. In the opinion of Preferred, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to state fairly the financial position of Series F as of September 26, 2008 and the results of its operations for the Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007, Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007. The operating results for these interim periods may not be indicative of the results expected for a full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Series F’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The financial statements of Series F are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires the Managing Owner to make and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Series F has elected not to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows – Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale.”

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that Series F recognize in its financial statements, the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, Series F has elected an accounting policy to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense. Preferred as Managing Owner of Series F evaluated the impact of adopting FIN 48 on Series F’s financial statements. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on Series F, as Series F’s tax positions are based on established tax precedence for the tax treatment of investment partnerships as flow through tax entities.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS 157 requires use of a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels: quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1), inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (Level 2), and unobservable inputs for the asset or liability (Level 3). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.

The Trust adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact to the items required to be carried at fair value (investments) in these financial statements. $0 or 0.00% of Series F’s investments at September 26, 2008 are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 and $17,347,350 or 100.00% are classified as Level 3 using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157. $0 or 0.00% of Series F’s investments at December 31, 2007 are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 and $19,846,527 or 100.00% are classified as Level 3 using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157:

Investments classified as Level 3 under SFAS 157 represent Series F’s investment in the Company and are valued weekly at the net asset value as reported by the Company. The Company’s net asset value is determined based upon its management’s best estimate of the fair value of its underlying net assets, substantially all of which are investments valued using Level 1 and 2 inputs but include certain assets and liabilities where the inputs into the determination of fair value require management judgment or estimation. A table presenting the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the periods Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007 is provided in Note 5 of these financial statements. Of the $619,644 gain and $(1,561,053) loss for the periods Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007, respectively, reported on Level 3 investments in Note 5, $(294,310) and $(1,257,225), respectively, represent a change in unrealized loss allocated from the Company on Series F’s statements of operations.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarified the application of SFAS 157. FSP 157-3 demonstrated how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of this standard did not have an impact on Series F’s condensed financial statements.

The Trust adopted SFAS 159 during the first quarter of 2008, and it did not have a material effect on Series F’s financial statements, as Series F did not elect the fair value option for any eligible financial assets or liabilities.

Series F allocates profits and losses for both financial and tax reporting purposes to its Interest holders weekly on a pro rata basis based on each owner’s interests outstanding during the week. Distributions (other than redemptions of Interests) may be made at the sole discretion of the Managing Owner on a pro rata basis in accordance with the respective capital balances of the Interest holders. The Managing Owner has not made and does not presently intend to make any distributions.

Series F is allocated its proportionate share of the Company’s management fees on a pro rata basis based on Series F’s pro rata capital in the Company. Series F pays the Company’s trading advisor, Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Company’s Trading Advisor” or “Campbell”), a quarterly incentive fee of 22% of “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the Advisory Agreement). The incentive fee is accrued weekly and paid quarterly.

Series F reimburses the Managing Owner or its affiliates for services they perform for Series F which include, but are not limited to: brokerage services; accounting and financial management; registrar, transfer and assignment functions; investor communications, printing and other administrative services. However, to the extent that general and administrative expenses exceed 1.5% of Series F’s net asset value during the year (with a maximum of 0.5% attributable to other than legal and audit expenses) such amounts are borne by the Managing Owner and its affiliates.

General and administrative expenses did not exceed such limitations during Third Quarter 2008 or Year-To-Date 2008. Additionally, approximately $42,000 of previously borne expenses by Preferred were refunded to the Managing Owner for Third Quarter 2008. General and administrative expenses that exceeded such limitations were $0 during the Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007.

The expenses incurred by Series F for services performed by the Managing Owner and its affiliates for Series F were:

Expenses payable to the Managing Owner and its affiliates (which are included in Accrued expenses payable and Commissions and other transaction fees payable) as of September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $96,249 and $116,264, respectively.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series F invested a substantial portion of its assets in the Company. Series F’s investment in the Company represents approximately 74.59% and 73.27% of the net asset value of the Company at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The investment in the Company is subject to the Organization Agreement of the Company. The Company entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell to make the trading decisions for the Company.

The Company’s Trading Advisor manages approximately 100% of the assets of the Company pursuant to its Financial, Metal & Energy Large Portfolio. Series F records its proportionate share of each item of income and expense from the investment in the Company in the statement of operations.

Summarized information for Series F’s investment in the Company is as follows:

Series F may make additional contributions to, or redemptions from, the Company on a weekly basis.

Series F’s investment in the Company is subject to the market and credit risks of the futures contracts, options on futures contracts, forward currency contracts and other financial instruments held or sold short by the Company. Series F bears the risk of loss only to the extent of the market value of its investments and, in certain specific circumstances, distributions and redemptions received.

Series F has cash on deposit with a financial institution. In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of cash on deposit may be limited to account insurance or other protection afforded such deposits. The Managing Owner has established procedures to actively monitor market risk and minimize credit risk, although there can be no assurance that it will, in fact, succeed in doing so. The Interestholders bear the risk of loss only to the extent of the market value of their respective investments and, in certain specific circumstances, distributions and redemptions received.

Series F’s futures commission merchant, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to Series F all assets of Series F relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, such segregated assets totaled $0 and $0, respectively. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires Series F’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of Series F related to foreign futures trading which totaled $0 and $0 at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

The following information presents per Interest operating performance data and other supplemental financial data for the Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007, Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.


Per Interest Performance (for an Interest outstanding throughout the entire period)	Third Quarter						Year-To-Date
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net asset value per Interest at beginning of period	$	141.95		$	168.58		$	137.04		$	161.46

Net realized gain (loss) and change in net unrealized gain (loss) on commodity transactions^(1),⁽³⁾		(4.27	)		(23.60	)		5.88			(13.12	)
Interest income^(1),⁽³⁾		0.54			1.61			1.59			5.24
Expenses^(1),⁽³⁾		(3.80	)		(3.40	)		(10.09	)		(10.39	)

Net decrease for the period		(7.53	)		(25.39	)		(2.62	)		(18.27	)

Net asset value per Interest at end of period	$	134.42		$	143.19		$	134.42		$	143.19

Total Return⁽⁴⁾
Total return before incentive fees		(5.30	)%		(15.06	)%		(1.91	)%		(11.32	)%
Incentive fees		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%

Total return after incentive fees		(5.30	)%		(15.06	)%		(1.91	)%		(11.32	)%

Supplemental Data
Ratios to average net asset value:⁽³⁾
Net investment loss before incentive fees^(2),⁽⁵⁾		(9.33	)%		(4.75	)%		(8.26	)%		(4.40	)%
Incentive fees⁽⁴⁾		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%

Net investment loss after incentive fees		(9.33	)%		(4.75	)%		(8.26	)%		(4.40	)%

Interest income⁽⁵⁾		1.53	%		4.25	%		1.55	%		4.47	%

Incentive fees⁽⁴⁾		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Other expenses⁽⁵⁾		10.86	%		9.00	%		9.81	%		8.87	%

Total expenses		10.86	%		9.00	%		9.81	%		8.87	%

Total returns are calculated based on the change in value of an Interest during the period. An individual Interestholder’s total returns and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of redemptions.

For the Periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 and

For the Periods January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) is a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware on November 3, 2004 and commenced trading operations on December 6, 2004. The Company was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures contracts, options on futures contracts and forward currency contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Preferred” or the “Managing Member”) is the Managing Member of the Company. The Company currently consists of two members: World Monitor Trust – Series D (“Member D”) and World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Member F”) (collectively, the “Members”). Preferred is also the Managing Owner of each of the Members. Upon making the initial capital contribution, each Member received Voting Membership Interests.

Redemptions are permitted on a weekly basis. Therefore, the financial statements for interim period are as of the last valuation day in the last week of the period.

The Company is a Member managed limited liability company that is not registered in any capacity with, or subject directly to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) to make the trading decisions for the Company. The Trading Advisor manages approximately 100% of the assets of the Company pursuant to its Financial, Metal & Energy Large Portfolio.

The statement of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, as of September 26, 2008, the statements of operations for the periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 (“Third Quarter 2008”), June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Third Quarter 2007”), January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 (“Year-To-Date 2008”) and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Year-To-Date 2007”), and the statements of changes in trust capital for Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007, are unaudited. In the opinion of Preferred, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, which were of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position as of September 26, 2008 and the results of its operations for the Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007, Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007. The operating results for these interim periods may not be indicative of the results expected for a full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Member’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Commodity futures and foreign exchange transactions are reflected in the accompanying statement of financial condition on the trade date. Net unrealized gain or loss on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) is reflected in the financial statements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 39 – “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” The market value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is based upon the closing quotation on the various futures exchanges on which the contract is traded. The values which will be used by the Company for open forward and option positions will be provided by its administrator, who obtains market quotes from data vendors and third parties. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss during the current period is reported in the statement of operations. Realized gains and losses on transactions are recognized in the period in which the contracts are closed. Brokerage commissions include other trading fees and are charged to expense when incurred.

The Company has elected not to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows – Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale.”

Consistent with standard business practices in the normal course of business, the Company has provided general indemnifications to its Trading Advisor and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of the Company. The Company is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these general business indemnifications to be remote.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements, the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company has elected an accounting policy to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense. Preferred as Managing Member of the Company, evaluated the impact of adopting FIN 48 on the Company’s financial statements. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on the Company, as the Company’s tax position is based on established tax precedence for the tax treatment of investment partnerships as flow through tax entities.

The Company adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact to investments required to be carried at fair value in these financial statements. Of its fair value at September 26, 2008, $(189,345) or 25.70% of the investments are classified as Level 1, $(548,859) or 74.49% as Level 2 and $1,358 or (0.19)% as Level 3. Of its fair value at December 31, 2007, $166,985 or (51.10)% of the investments are classified as Level 1, $(516,614) or 158.09% as Level 2 and $22,846 or (6.99)% as Level 3. The Company considers prices for exchange traded commodity futures and options contracts to be based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The values of forwards, swaps, and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers who derive fair values for those assets from observable inputs (Level 2). Level 3 inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions that it believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops Level 3 inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, which may include indirect correlation to a market value, combinations of market values or the Company’s proprietary data. Level 3 inputs generally include information derived through extrapolation or interpolation of observable market data.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157:

The Company adopted SFAS 159 during the first quarter of 2008, and it did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements, as the Company did not elect the fair value option for any eligible financial assets or liabilities.

Cash represents amounts deposited with a bank and clearing brokers, a portion of which is restricted for purposes of meeting margin requirements, which typically range from 0% to 35% of the notional amounts of the derivatives traded. The Company receives interest on all cash balances held by the clearing brokers and bank at prevailing interest rates.

The Company is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed directly to the Members. The Company may be subject to other state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.

The Company accounts for subscriptions, allocations and redemptions on a per member capital account basis. The Company allocates profits and losses, prior to calculation of the incentive fee, for both financial and tax reporting purposes to its Members weekly on a pro rata basis based on each Member’s pro rata capital in the Company during the week.

Each Member is then charged with the applicable incentive fee. Distributions (other than redemptions of capital) may be made at the sole discretion of the Members on a pro rata basis in accordance with the Members’ respective capital balances. The Company has not and does not presently intend to make any distributions.

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the date of the statement of financial condition. Income and expense items denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in operations currently.

Under the WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. Organization Agreement, Preferred allocates administrative costs of the Company to the Members. Administrative costs include legal, audit, postage and other routine third party administrative costs.

The Company pays the Trading Advisor a management fee at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s Net Assets determined as of the close of business each Friday. The sum of the amounts determined each Friday will be paid monthly. For purposes of determining the management fee, any distributions, redemptions or reallocation of assets made as of the last Friday of each week shall be added back to the assets and there shall be no reduction for the weekly management fees calculated. Additionally, the Members of the Company accrue weekly to the Trading Advisor and pay quarterly an incentive fee of 22% (the “Incentive Fee”) of “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the Advisory Agreement).

The Company reimburses the Managing Member for services it performs for the Company, which include, but are not limited to: management, accounting, printing, and other administrative services.

The expenses incurred by the Company for services performed by the Managing Member for the Company were:

Expenses payable to the Managing Member and its affiliates as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $8,680, and $0, respectively which are included in accrued expenses on the condensed statement of financial condition.

There have been no differences between the tax basis and book basis of assets, liabilities or members’ capital since inception of the Company.

The Company deposits funds with a commodity broker subject to CFTC regulations and various exchange and commodity broker requirements. Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such commodity broker. The Company earns interest income on assets deposited with the commodity broker. The Company deposits funds with a prime broker. Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such prime broker. The Company earns interest income on assets deposited with its prime broker and funds deposited with JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nassau branch.

Investments in the Company are made subject to the terms of the Organization Agreement.

The Company is not required to make distributions, but could do so at the discretion of the Members. A Member can request and receive redemption of capital, subject to the terms in the Organization Agreement.

The Company is exposed to various types of risks associated with the derivative instruments and related markets in which it invests. These risks include, but are not limited to, risk of loss from fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments held (market risk) and the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the Company’s investment activities (credit risk).

Trading in futures and forward contracts (including foreign exchange) involves entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell a particular commodity at a specified date and price. The gross or face amount of the contracts, which is typically many times that of the Company’s net assets being traded, significantly exceeds the Company’s future cash requirements since the Company intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, the Company is generally subject only to the risk of loss arising from the change in the value of the contracts. As such, the Company considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the net unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with the Company’s commitments to purchase commodities is limited to the gross or face amount of the contract held. However, when the Company enters into a contractual commitment to sell commodities, it must make delivery of the underlying commodity at the contract price and then repurchase the contract at prevailing market prices or settle in cash. Since the repurchase price to which a commodity can rise is unlimited, entering into commitments to sell commodities exposes the Company to unlimited risk.

Market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including government programs and policies, political and economic events, the level and volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, the diversification effect among the derivative instruments the Company holds and the liquidity and inherent volatility of the markets in which the Company trades.

When entering into futures or forward contracts, the Company is exposed to credit risk that the counterparty to the contract will not meet its obligations. The counterparty for futures contracts traded on United States and most foreign futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, a clearinghouse is backed by its corporate members who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members (i.e., some foreign exchanges), it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. On the other hand, there is concentration risk on forward transactions entered into by the Company, as the Company’s forward broker is the sole counterparty.

The Company has entered into a master netting agreement with its forward broker and, as a result, when applicable, presents unrealized gains and losses on open forward positions as a net amount in the statements of financial condition. The amount at risk associated with counterparty non-performance of all of the Company’s contracts is the net unrealized gain included in the statements of financial condition; however, counterparty non-performance on only certain of the Company’s contracts may result in greater loss than non-performance on all of the Company’s contracts. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearing member or clearinghouse will meet its obligations to the Company.

Preferred attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring the Company and its Trading Advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies. Preferred monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement among the Company, Preferred and the Trading Advisor, the Company shall automatically terminate the Trading Agreement, if the net asset value allocated to the Trading Advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the effective date of the Advisory Agreement. The decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, subscriptions and redemptions.

The Company’s futures commission merchant, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by CFTC regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to the Company all assets of the Company relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, such segregated assets totaled $15,949,426 and $18,975,900, respectively, which are included in cash and cash equivalents. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires the Company’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of the Company related to foreign futures trading which totaled $(7,855) and $(15,058) at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

The following information presents the financial highlights of the Company for the Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007, Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

Total returns and ratios to average net asset value are calculated for Members’ capital taken as a whole. An individual Member’s total returns and ratios may vary from the above returns and ratios based on the timing of redemptions.

This report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ending September 26, 2008 (“Third Quarter 2008”) includes forward-looking statements that reflect the current expectations of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Managing Owner” or “Preferred”), the managing owner of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Registrant”), about the future results, performance, prospects and opportunities of Registrant. The Managing Owner has tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “should,” “estimate” or the negative of those terms or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to the Managing Owner and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, both known, such as those described in this Report, and unknown, that could cause Registrant’s actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the Federal securities laws, the Managing Owner undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risks, uncertainties or other factors described in this Report, as a result of new information, future events or changed circumstances or for any other reason after the date of this Report.

World Monitor Trust II (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized under the laws of Delaware on April 22, 1999. The Trust consists of three separate and distinct series (“Series”): Series D, Series E and Series F. Series D, E and F commenced trading operations on March 13, 2000, April 6, 2000 and March 1, 2000, respectively, and each Series will continue to exist until terminated pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII of the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”). The assets of each Series are segregated from those of the other Series, separately valued and independently managed. Each Series was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures, forwards and option contracts, and may, from time to time, engage in cash and forward transactions. The trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company. The Managing Owner serves as the managing owner of the Trust and each Series, including Registrant. Registrant was formed to engage in the speculative trading of commodity futures, forwards and option contracts. Registrant’s fiscal year for book and tax purposes ends on December 31.

Registrant is engaged solely in the business of commodity futures, forwards and options trading; therefore, presentation of industry segment information is not applicable.

Preferred has been the managing owner of Registrant since October 1, 2004. The term Managing Owner, as used herein, refers to Preferred.

The Managing Owner is required to maintain at least a 1% general interest in Registrant so long as it is acting as Registrant’s Managing Owner.

Effective December 6, 2004, the Registrant contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool, L.L.C. (the “Trading Vehicle”), a Delaware limited liability company, and received a voting membership interest in the Trading Vehicle. The Trading Vehicle was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle for its members. Registrant and Series D are the sole members of the Trading Vehicle. The Managing Owner is the managing owner of Registrant and Series D and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Trading Vehicle. The Trading Vehicle engages in the speculative trading of futures, forwards and option contracts. The financial statements of the Trading Vehicle, including the condensed schedules of investments, are included in Section II of Registrant’s financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Registrant’s financial statements.

The Trading Vehicle has its own independent commodity trading advisor that makes the Trading Vehicle’s trading decisions. The Trading Vehicle entered into an advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Campbell &

Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor” or “Campbell”) to make the trading decisions for the Trading Vehicle and, in turn, Registrant. Campbell trades 100% of the assets of the Trading Vehicle pursuant to Campbell’s Financial, Metal & Energy Large Portfolio. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for various reasons, including at the discretion of the Trading Vehicle. The Trading Vehicle has allocated 100% of the proceeds from the initial and continuous offering of Registrant to the Trading Advisor. Registrant accrues weekly and pays monthly a management fee through its investment in the Trading Vehicle equal to a weekly rate of approximately 0.038% (2% annually) of the assets allocated to the Trading Advisor. The Registrant also pays the Trading Advisor an incentive fee of 22% of New High Net Trading Profits (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) generated by the Trading Vehicle. Incentive fees will accrue weekly and be paid quarterly in arrears.

All references herein to Registrant’s relationship with the Trading Advisor shall, unless the context states otherwise, refer to Registrant’s relationship with the Trading Advisor through Registrant’s investment in the Trading Vehicle.

The Managing Owner and its affiliates have formed, and may continue to form, various entities to engage in the speculative trading of futures, forwards and option contracts that have certain of the same investment policies as Registrant.

Registrant does not currently, and does not intend in the future to, solicit the sale of additional Interests. As such, Registrant does not compete with other entities to attract new fund participants. However, to the extent that a Trading Advisor recommends similar or identical trades to Registrant and other accounts that it manages, Registrant may compete with those accounts, as well as with other market participants, for the execution of the same or similar trades.

Registrant has no employees. Management and administrative services for Registrant are performed by the Managing Owner or third parties pursuant to the Trust Agreement, as further discussed in Notes 3 and 4 to Registrant’s financial statements included in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“Registrant’s 2007 Annual Report”), which was filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of appropriate accounting rules and guidance. Applying these policies requires the Managing Owner to make judgments, estimates and assumptions in connection with the preparation of Registrant’s financial statements. Actual results may differ from the estimates used.

The Managing Owner has evaluated Registrant’s financial statements and related disclosures and has determined that the policies discussed below are critical accounting policies because they involve estimates, judgments and assumptions that are particularly complex, subjective or uncertain. For further discussion of Registrant’s significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to Registrant’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are included in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

The valuation of Registrant’s investments that are not traded on a United States or internationally recognized futures exchange is a critical accounting policy. The market values of futures (exchange traded) contracts is verified by Registrant’s administrator, which obtains valuation data from third party data providers such as Bloomberg, Reuters and or Super Derivatives and compares those prices with Registrant’s clearing broker. The market value of currency swap and forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 4 PM on the last business day of the reporting period. All values assigned by the administrator and confirmed by the Managing Owner are final and conclusive as to all of Registrant’s Unitholders.

As such, if actual results vary from estimates used, they are not anticipated to have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures.

Registrant records all investments at fair value in its financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of Trading Profits (Losses) in the Statements of Operations. The Registrant considers prices for

exchange traded commodity futures and options contracts to be based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). The values of forwards, swaps, and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker-dealers who derive fair values for those assets from observable inputs (Level 2). Level 3 inputs reflect the Registrant’s assumptions that it believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Registrant develops Level 3 inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, which may include indirect correlation to a market value, combinations of market values or the Registrant’s proprietary data. Level 3 inputs generally include information derived through extrapolation or interpolation of observable market data.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that Registrant recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, Registrant has elected an accounting policy to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense. The Managing Owner evaluated the impact of adopting FIN 48 on Registrant’s financial statements. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on Registrant, as Registrant’s tax positions are based on established tax precedence for the tax treatment of investment partnerships as flow through tax entities.

The Registrant adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact to the items required to be carried at fair value (investments) in the Registrant’s financial statements. $0 or 0.00% of the Registrant’s investments at September 26, 2008 are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 and $17,347,350 or 100.00% are classified as Level 3 using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157. $0 or 0.00% of the Registrant’s investments at December 31, 2007 are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 and $19,846,527 or 100.00% are classified as Level 3 using the fair value hierarchy of SFAS 157

Investments classified as Level 3 under SFAS 157 represent the Registrant’s investment in the Trading Vehicle and are valued weekly at the net asset value as reported by the Trading Vehicle. The Trading Vehicle’s net asset value is determined based upon its management’s best estimate of the fair value of its underlying net assets, substantially all of which are investments valued using Level 1 and 2 inputs but include certain assets and liabilities where the inputs into the determination of fair value require management judgment or estimation. A table presenting the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the periods January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007 is provided in Note 5 of the Registrant’s financial statements included in the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended September 26, 2008. Of the $619,644 gain and $(1,561,053) loss for the periods Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007, respectively, reported on Level 3 investments in Note 5, $(294,310) and $(1,257,225), respectively, represent a change in unrealized loss allocated from the Trading Vehicle on the Registrant’s statements of operations.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarified the application of FAS 157. FSP 157-3 demonstrated how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of this standard did not have an impact on the Registrant’s condensed financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, including an amendment of SFAS 115. This statement provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 with early adoption permitted. The Registrant adopted SFAS 159 during the first quarter of 2008, and it did not have a material effect on the Registrant’s financial statements, as the Registrant did not elect the fair value option for any eligible financial assets or liabilities.

Registrant commenced operations on March 1, 2000. Additional contributions were raised through the continuous offering of limited interests (“Limited Interests”) and general interests (“General Interests” and, together with the Limited Interests, “Interests”) of beneficial ownership in Registrant. Registrant’s Interests were offered until it substantially achieved its subscription maximum of $50,000,000 Limited Interests in July 2003.

For Third Quarter 2008, the period January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 (“Year-To-Date 2008”), the period June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Third Quarter 2007”), and the period January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007 (“Year-To-Date 2007”) there were no subscriptions of Limited Interests.

For Third Quarter 2008 and Third Quarter 2007 there were no subscriptions of General Interests. For Year-To-Date 2008 and Year-To-Date 2007 subscriptions of General Interests were $0 and $500 respectively.

Interests in Registrant may be redeemed on a weekly basis. Redemptions of Limited Interests for Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were $733,605 and $2,150,040 respectively. Redemptions of Limited Interests for Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were $2,092,524 and $5,304,258, respectively.

Redemptions of General Interests for Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were $6,049 and $21,587 respectively. Redemptions of General Interests for Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were $46,273 and $51,025, respectively.

Future redemptions will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods.

Limited Interests may no longer be exchanged for Limited Interests in World Monitor Trust II – Series D (“Series D”) or World Monitor Trust II – Series E (“Series E”), nor may Limited Interests in Series D or Series E be exchanged for Limited Interests in Registrant.

A significant portion of Registrant’s net assets invested in the Trading Vehicle was held in cash, which is used as margin for trading in commodities. In as much as the sole business of Registrant is to trade in commodities through its investment in the Trading Vehicle, Registrant continues to own (through its investment in the Trading Vehicle) such liquid assets to be used as margin. The clearing broker and bank credit the Trading Vehicle (and, in turn, Registrant, as a member of the Trading Vehicle) with interest income on 100% of its average daily equity maintained in its accounts with the clearing broker and bank during each month at competitive interest rates.

The commodities contracts may be subject to periods of illiquidity because of market conditions, regulatory considerations and other reasons. For example, commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in certain commodity futures contract prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract for a particular commodity has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in the commodity can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Commodity futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Such market conditions could prevent the Trading Vehicle (and, in turn, Registrant) from promptly liquidating its commodity futures positions.

Since Registrant’s business is to trade futures, forwards and option contracts (through its investment in the Trading Vehicle), its capital is at risk due to changes in the value of these contracts (market risk) or the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts (credit risk). Registrant’s exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors including the volatility of interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the liquidity of the markets in which the contracts are traded and the relationships among the contracts held. The inherent uncertainty of Registrant’s speculative trading as well as the development of drastic market occurrences could result in losses considerably beyond Registrant’s experience to date and could ultimately lead to a loss of all of substantially all of investors’ capital. The Managing Owner attempts to minimize these risks by requiring Registrant, the Trading Vehicle and the Trading Advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies, which include limiting margin amounts, trading only in liquid markets and permitting the use of stop loss provisions. For a further discussion of the credit and market risks associated with Registrant’s futures, forwards and option contracts, see Note 7 to Registrant’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Following is a market overview for Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007 and Third Quarter 2006:

Clearly, the financial crisis gripping the nation is resonating throughout all corners of the economy and the effects will be felt for some time to come. Consumers have already cut back spending dramatically but more retrenchment can be expected in response to worsening job and income prospects as well as the growing wealth destruction that has taken place in recent months. There is no longer any doubt that the economy is mired in a recession; the only question is how deep and long it will be. Economists are crossing their fingers that the downturn will be no worse than the last two mild recessions in 1990-91 and 2001. However, many believe that conditions will be at least as bad as they were during the worst post-war recessions, which occurred in 1980-81 and 1973-74. The credit crisis got worse with each passing day, despite huge Federal Reserve liquidity additions, a $700 billion bailout package and numerous other measures. The “broker dealer,” as once known, basically ceased to exist as Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and others changed structure to essentially become “banks”. The economic data flow in the US can only be described as feeble and promises to get even weaker. In the US, housing, employment and manufacturing data were all anemic throughout the third quarter of 2008 with many indications of worse to come.

A strengthening US dollar throughout the quarter added to demand for US Treasuries as well as flight-to-safety support. After seeing their largest monthly yield declines since February in the month of August, Treasury yields saw further erosion in September. The benchmark 10-Year Note saw its yield fall approximately 20 basis points during the quarter and the 2-Year yield dipped by roughly 70 basis points as the yield curve experienced a severe steepening. Central banks kept rates unchanged throughout the third quarter but in early October they collaboratively cut key rates in response to the global credit crisis. During the quarter, the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, European Central Bank and others injected huge amounts of liquidity into the markets.

Currencies: The Dollar Index, which measures the US unit against a basket of other currencies, ended the quarter up overall and up 3.7% for the year. Among the majors, the euro and pound were particularly weak in September as the UK and the Eurozone experienced severe economic problems to go along with a burgeoning credit crisis. The British pound slipped to a 2-year low against the US dollar as the UK suffered recessionary-like conditions, including a 12.4% year-to-date drop in housing prices. The euro scored an all-time high in July, but from the peak it was all downhill as the euro slumped badly in August and September to close out the quarter near $1.41. The yen suffered far less fallout from the global credit crisis. It showed particular strength against both the euro and pound while gaining modestly to the dollar. The Australian dollar was pressured versus the yen as carry trades were unwound. The New Zealand dollar experienced a similar fate.

Energies: Crude posted steep losses in September down more than 13% within the Dow Jones AIG Index and over 31% for the quarter. Crude was pummeled by intense selling, the ongoing feature throughout the period. In addition, a firming US dollar, a significant slowing in global demand and above-quota OPEC output weighed on sentiment, which more than offset the geopolitical events surrounding Iran, Nigeria, Russia, Venezuela and the Middle East. Combined gasoline, heating oil and jet fuel demand is down more than 7% compared to last September. Natural gas followed suit and ended the quarter much lower.

Agriculturals: With steady declines in both price and open interest during the month of September, as well as all of the third quarter, the agricultural futures markets were prime examples of the widespread deleveraging seen across all markets. The deterioration in values came despite occasional weather concerns, which typically are the impetus for late summer rallies. For the quarter, corn, soybeans, wheat and cotton saw high-to-low declines in value from 37% to 30%. Corn and wheat lost roughly $3.00 per bushel each and soybeans lost over $6.00. Cotton also dropped significantly. The longer-term implications of the recent price plunge will be played out first in farmers’ springtime planting decisions. In addition to the normal, net profit calculations, banking considerations will play a major role in next season’s production potential. Understandably, the ongoing tight credit markets will cause bankers to shy away from lending money to farmers wishing to grow high-input-cost crops, regardless of profit potential.

Indices: Global equities suffered from a total lack of confidence as related to the credit crisis, which got worse instead of better throughout the quarter, despite herculean efforts from central banks and various government agencies. US stocks were hit with massive fund liquidations, partially due to margin needs but also due to large redemption levels that picked up speed with each passing session. After managing very modest gains in August, despite a sharp month-end slide, all the major US indices were lower in September. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 and NASDAQ fell over 4%, 9% and 9% respectively for the quarter. Financial stocks, including banks, brokers and insurance companies were particularly weak, as were retail issues and energy stocks. The markets failed to react to the much-debated and delayed $700 billion Treasury “rescue” plan. US stocks were clearly hurt by the credit crisis in Europe.

Europe saw similar performance as their financial crisis was equally, if not more, dire than that in the US. The UK in particular has seen rigorous credit issues as the DJ Stoxx 600 lost approximately 12% during the third quarter due to staggering financial sector events. The German DAX, the French CAC and London’s FTSE all ended the quarter with losses. The Russian stock market was particularly weak, forcing trading halts on numerous occasions.

Asia posted the weakest equity performance of the three major regions during the quarter and it has subsequently experienced massive liquidation from international funds despite the fact that Japan and the region in general have less exposure to the global credit crisis. The Nikkei lost nearly 2,000 points and Korea’s Kospi fell over 14% throughout the period. Hong Kong was extremely weak and Shanghai extended a yearlong slide. Australian equities could not ward off the credit crisis and ended the quarter lower.

Metals: After a brief run in mid-July and a sell-off through the second week in of September, late quarter gains were not enough to offset losses as gold finished down over 5% for the period. Silver was down a hefty 29% for the third quarter. Base metals were sold heavily across the markets in September, to an even greater degree than in July and August, and all metals within the GSCI Commodity Index finished down for the quarter. Increasing exchange warehouse inventories as well as slowing global demand patterns weighted on metals. A firmer US dollar did not help the cause, neither did the general outflow of capital from commodities.

Softs and Livestock: Individual soft commodity fundamentals were similarly overwhelmed by capital outflows and fund liquidation pressures in September. Cocoa had managed gains in August but this was not the case in September. Sugar extended its August losses into September. Supplies hold ample and Brazilian sugar exports have accelerated. Coffee lost nearly 17% for the quarter.

Live hogs fell almost 4.5% and cattle 4.9%. Hogs were again hurt by increased slaughter levels and sluggish demand. Both markets saw slaughter increases related to higher feed costs and, like many agricultural commodities, were pressured by financing difficulties for farmers.

Throughout the third quarter of 2007, subprime/credit concerns dominated the global economy with some forecasting a recession as a result. Former Fed Chairman Greenspan said the risk of inflation has increased, although he still put the odds of a recession below 50%. The crisis, or at least the paranoia surrounding it, seemed to worsen with each passing day during most of the quarter. In reaction, the US Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) cut rates in August and September. In general, pundits and economists approved of the Fed’s stance but a few saw it as highly inflationary and some a bailout of Wall Street.

On the economic data front, already dismal housing numbers only got worse during the quarter. Both housing starts and building permits fell to their lowest levels since 1995. Both existing and new home sales plunged. Inventories remained burdensome.

On the inflation front, the producer price index fell each month during the third quarter. Falling food and energy prices kept wholesale inflation in check. For the most part, producers still seem to be absorbing higher commodity costs without passing them to the consumer. The more closely watched consumer price index, the measure of a basket of consumer goods, fell slightly overall.

The most troubling economic data number released in the quarter was the August employment report that showed nonfarm payrolls contract for the first time since August of 2003. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.6%.

Volatile durable goods orders fell sharply in August after a larger gain in July. Retail sales were up during the past year, but consumer confidence numbers tended to weaken in September. However, the latest report on consumer spending showed the largest gain in two years.

Outside of the US, at the start of the quarter, both the Bank of England and the European Central Bank were forecast to raise rates. But by the end of September, the picture had changed dramatically. The Bank of England was forced to deal with the Northern Rock crisis. The European Central Bank had been seen as hawkish in their views, but the US rate cuts and some evidence of a slowing economic landscape, particularly in Germany, has some market participants looking for the maintenance of current levels. In the UK, LIBOR rose at the close of the quarter as Northern Rock borrowed more from the Bank of England and other banks were caught in something of a credit squeeze. The Bank of England engaged in unprecedented measures to add liquidity to the financial markets. LIBOR’s volatility continued into the fourth quarter.

Currencies: After mixed trading patterns, albeit with a downside bias, for much of July through mid-August, the dollar fell to record levels against the euro and British pound sterling in September. Overall, the dollar declined against 13 of the 16 major currencies in September, sending the dollar index to all-time lows. The euro’s share of global foreign exchange reserves rose to a record high in September. The euro also gained on the yen in September, after losing some ground in August. It was a rocky month for the pound to the euro, trading nearly at a 30-month low. The pound grew slightly on the dollar in September, but lower then the 25-year high set in July.

The yen ended the month lower then in previous months. A change in prime ministers as the disgraced Mr. Abe stood down had virtually no impact. Carry trade has lessened, but forecasts of its demise have proven premature. Regarding rates, the Bank of Japan held rates steady during the quarter. China saw a record trade surplus in August. The Chinese yuan continued its decline, albeit very gradual to the US dollar. High yield currencies such as the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand dollars had a strong third quarter. All of these currencies attracted fund and carry trade demand during the quarter.

Energies: Crude oil entertained the global markets with a superior quarter, especially in the latter part of September. Prices very briefly traded below $70 in early August during the period of an overall commodity selling blitz, but it was essentially straight up from there. After touching an all time high in September, crude finished the quarter with a year to date gain of just over 17%. While political tensions were quiet in the third quarter, there seemed to be an increasing undercurrent toward quarter’s end. Nigerian unrest reasserted itself after a period of comparative calm. OPEC raised production at its most recent meeting but this drew limited reaction. Global demand, not surprisingly led by China, remains extremely buoyant. Weather/tropical storm factors had a minimal impact during the month.

Abundant supply and benign weather weighed on natural gas prices for much of the third quarter, but prices staged a solid rally in September and finished the quarter lessening its year-to-date loss to just over 16%. While there were no storms, there were enough precautionary shutdowns in September to turn the market around and the surge in crude aided sentiment. The potential for a La Niña weather pattern this winter could prove supportive in the fourth quarter, as this weather pattern typically leans to cold weather in the northeast. Despite being in the height of the hurricane season, there were no lasting supply interruptions to heating oil in the quarter. Reformulated gasoline prices ended the quarter lower. A lag in price relative to crude is the key reason prices at the pump have not risen in the face of surging crude. Overall supplies have been sufficient to meet demand.

Grains: Trepidation that wheat shortages might lead to tight supplies led to continued expansion in the third quarter, with an astounding 48% increase in the price of wheat. Behind the exploding wheat prices were the ongoing crop worries in Australia, the world’s largest exporter of wheat. Market participants worry that the high prices will have a spillover effect on the prices of other crops that can be planted on wheat acreage. Soybean prices similarly increased in the third quarter, up more than 25%. In addition to the supply side support, born of reduced acreage this past season at the hands of the agri-energy darling corn, the demand side of the equation has been equally influential, as overseas buying of beans, oil, and meal has been relentless. Global cotton consumption remains robust. Regarding the supply and demand equation, the financial allure to grow the crop may tempt farmers to plant additional acreage. Corn prices also rose dramatically in the third quarter. Supply and demand fundamentals indicated that the price fears created by the ethanol-induced glut of corn acreage may have subsided. As the price of competing crops wheat and beans moved sharply higher on the back of a demand-driven/supply-uncertain rally, corn prices rallied as it suddenly became a comparatively cheap substitute, especially as a feed grain.

Indices: It was a nervous and, at times, erratic trading quarter for US and global equities surrounding the credit crisis and subprime mortgage fallout. However, the US Fed’s aggressive move on September 18 was well received and helped end the quarter on a positive note for equities, despite weakness in some areas led by financials. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, the tech-heavy NASDAQ and the S&P 500 indices all finished higher for the quarter. For the most part, the third quarter had the major European bourses following the pattern of the US but with a slight trail and most finished lower on the quarter.

Equities soared in Asia, with the Hang Seng Index, Shanghai Composite, Kospi Index and Australian All Ordinaries setting record highs during the quarter. The Nikkei ended the quarter slightly below its second quarter close, due in large part to rate concerns, carry trade issues and political shifts.

Interest Rates: September proved an eventful month for US Treasuries as speculation abounded regarding what the Federal Reserve might, or might not, do. On September 18 the Fed voted to cut both the Fed Funds rate by 50 basis points to 4.75% and the discount rate by another 50 basis points to 5.25%. After the Fed move the yield curve showed significant steepening. The European Central Bank (“ECB”) held steady at the September meeting. While ECB President Jean Claude Trichet exhibited a somewhat “hawkish” rhetoric, the bank appears to many to be on hold through year-end, a change from a month ago when a rate increase appeared most probable. Market participants believe that the Bank of England (“BOE”), forced to deal with the Northern Rock crisis, may now be set to cut rates. LIBOR saw higher yields during September as Northern Rock borrowed more from the BOE and other banks were caught in something of a quarter-ending credit squeeze. There was no change by the Bank of Japan in September.

Metals: Gold was a stellar performer during the quarter. After being subject to margin selling as related to sub prime/credit concerns, Japanese carry trades and a general flight to quality, gold resumed its role as an alternative asset with vengeance. The plunge in the US dollar against other major currencies and a pattern of lower global interest rates increased demand for the metal. Gold now appears to have returned to its traditional role as a monetary asset to go along with strong physical demand. Jewelry demand is also solid, despite high price points. Gold for December delivery finished September up over 12% year to date within the Dow Jones AIG Index.

While gold achieved 27-year highs, silver remains below its high level from earlier this year. Overall physical demand has been and continues to hold buoyant. After stumbling in August, platinum staged an impressive rally through the end of the quarter. China’s appetite for platinum has been exceptionally strong, as evidenced by the latest customs statistics. Platinum jewelry sales continue to be strong, including an over 50% increase in jewelry buying through August versus 2006 in China. Other Asian nations showed a net increase of over 15%. Labor tensions in South Africa supported both palladium and platinum prices, but the former lacked the aggressive Chinese interest and also saw minimal jewelry off-take.

Among base metals, the third quarter proved volatile for copper prices. The general commodity selling blitz in August took its toll on the red metal, but prices came back with a vengeance in September. Strong global demand, led by China, paved the way along with a series of labor disputes in Chile, Mexico and Peru. Like copper, aluminum prices fell in August, but were not able to recover in September. Year to date, aluminum prices are down over 13%. Nickel also fell in August, but managed a small reversal in September. Spot nickel demand has been buoyant, particularly from the Far East outside of Japan. Overall, global stainless steel demand has been decent. Zinc prices fell throughout the third quarter and are now down over 25% for the year to date. Lead prices ended the quarter up sharply higher as buoyant global demand has resulted in a production deficit, the sixth consecutive annual deficit. Tin prices saw an eighteen-year high in July, but ended the third quarter slightly lower.

Softs: Sugar prices were volatile during the quarter, but ended slightly higher to reduce its year-to-date loss to just under 20%. Coffee had been losing ground all year until it woke up in September and eased its year-to-date loss to just over 8%. Cocoa rallied late in the quarter. Declining US warehouse inventories have been supportive, along with reports of “black pod” disease in West Africa. The lingering threat of political unrest in the Ivory Coast persists. Cattle prices fell during the quarter. Korea rejected a third shipment of US beef due to mad-cow disease concerns. Hog prices fell to seventeen-month lows in the third quarter. The market remains dependent on strong Asian demand but China has proven to buy less than expected, making hogs a rare market in that regard.

The most prominent economic development during the third quarter of 2006 was the suspension of the Federal Reserve’s (“Fed”) long running rate hike cycle, which ended at the August meeting and was followed by a further pause at the September meeting. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) statements from both

meetings were very similar, with an expectation of slower economic growth and of “a gradual moderation in inflationary pressures over time, partially as a reflection of lower energy prices.” The Fed also anticipates the cumulative effects of monetary tightening to restrain aggregate demand.

Pursuant to these events, U.S. interest rates steadily declined throughout the quarter, particularly in September. U.S. Treasuries were aided by flight to quality, as market participants seemed nervous about geopolitical events and asset reallocation factors during the quarter, some of which came from liquidation of commodity holdings. Treasury auctions met with solid success and featured strong foreign demand.

On the economic data front, the housing market was the focus. After weak numbers in July and August, September housing starts fell 6% to 1.665 million units, the weakest since April 2003, and are now down 19.8% over the last 12 months. Housing permits, which tends to be a more forward looking economic indicator, fell 2.3% to 1.722 million in August and are down 21.9% over the past year. The news on new home sales and existing home sales was similar. Median sales prices for existing homes fell 1.7% to $225,000 in August, the first drop in 11 years. Home builders are not optimistic with the National Association of Home Builders reporting the lowest levels of builder sentiment in 15 years.

Domestic inflation was tame throughout most of the period, even with crude oil and other industrial commodities jumping to historically high levels. The fact that commodity prices moderated, particularly oil and natural gas, at quarter’s end, adds to a fairly benign forward inflation outlook. The Fed continues to issue the required inflation concern statements, and the numbers remain above target on a year-on-year basis. However, rampant inflation seems unlikely in the U.S. on both a Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) and Producer Price Index (“PPI”) basis, the two most common measures of economic inflation.

Economic growth, as measured by Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”), was softer, as the second quarter release was revised downwards from 2.9% to 2.6%. Corporate profits remained healthy but were also lower during this quarter. The Consumer Confidence Index continued to show solid performance, with a reading of 104.5 in September versus 100.2 in August, as lower gasoline prices have helped consumers. While geopolitical and energy risks abound, the U.S. economy has consistently shown an ability to weather the worst of storms. The fact that the majority of the global economic community is doing well adds to the supportive landscape for the U.S.

On the foreign front, the overall picture remained constructive in the third quarter and looks reasonably strong across the board for Asia and Europe. China extended its ongoing growth with 11.3% GDP in the second quarter and some recent forecasts indicate that third and fourth quarter numbers might even be better. The Chinese yuan maintained its slow process of gains as it reached a high of 7.8965 to the U.S. dollar in September, the best level since the revaluation process was initiated. It is widely expected that the People Bank of China will gradually expand the trading band in coming months and at least gradually accelerate the revaluation process.

The Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) ended its “zero interest rate policy” in July with a rate hike to 0.25%. However, the Japanese economy is still expanding slowly, so no additional hikes are expected soon. The current situation surrounding North Korea has added to potential problems. Japanese equities saw a volatile quarter but in the end put in a strong performance, including a rise in the Nikkei to 16,127 at the end of the third quarter compared to 15,505 at the end of the second quarter. South Korea also saw its stock market and economy do well in the third quarter. The Kospi rose to 1,371 from 1,352 in August and 1,298 in July and was holding well as the North Korean nuclear situation remained in flux. The overall outlook for Asia as a whole appears quite positive. The coup in Thailand had virtually no impact on the Asian region’s economy or its currencies.

Australia also seems to be thriving with higher equity prices and an apparent end of their rate hike cycle after raising rates 25 basis points at the Reserve Bank’s August 2 meeting. With Canada doing well on the economic front, the Bank of Canada is similarly in pause mode. Meanwhile, the Bank of New Zealand indicated that they were finished raising rates in spite of risks to their currency.

In Europe, higher rates were noted as the European Central Bank (“ECB”) raised rates to the current 3.25%, and judging from the cautious language from ECB President Jean Claude Trichet, another increase could be in order before year-end. Eurozone economic data is mixed. The 10-year German Bund was yielding around 3.69% at quarter’s end compared to 3.90% to conclude the second quarter. The biggest surprise was a 25 basis point hike from the Bank of England (“BOE”) in August to 4.75% but that may well be the last for a while as U.K. economic numbers do not seem to justify additional moves in 2006. European equities put in a strong quarter with the DAX, CAC and FTSE near 5-year highs as October began.

Currencies: Uncertainty over interest rate policy in the four main industrial blocks affected currency moves in the third quarter, causing the U.S. dollar to trade unevenly against the euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. The ECB did not alter rates in August or September but the language from ECB President Jean Claude Trichet continued to exhibit a cautious tone. The U.S. dollar was pressured by a growing perception that the Fed has concluded the rate hike cycle after no action at the August and September FOMC meetings. The euro was also inhibited by ideas that the U.S. economy is slowing. Meanwhile, European data has been mixed, leading to weaker than expected German business confidence readings. Talk of higher European Union interest rates and increased taxation were cited as reasons for the weakness. The British pound showed some strength in the third quarter, after the BOE unexpectedly raised rates 25 basis points to 4.75% on August 3.

The Japanese yen weakened in early September, then firmed at mid-month, only to weaken again at month’s end. The prospect of very slow rate increases in Japan is a negative to the currency. The Japanese yen was briefly pressured by the coup in Thailand but this was short lived as the situation proved to be less unsettling than originally thought. After a brief halt, the Bank of Thailand told foreign currency dealers that they could resume normal trading of the Thai baht. Japan also saw a new Prime Minister in September as Shinzo Abe took over leadership of the ruling Liberal Party. He is expected to take a conservative view through year-end.

At the end of September, the Chinese yuan reached its highest level since last year’s revaluation. Australia raised rates by 25 points to 6.00% on August 2 but the accompanying statement indicated they were finished with increases for the year. Meanwhile the Bank of New Zealand indicated they were finished raising rates and warned that the New Zealand dollar might suffer as a result. The Canadian dollar maintained a firm tone throughout the third quarter although the Bank of Canada has indicated that it is finished raising rates for 2006.

Energies: The third quarter started with energy prices on an upswing as geopolitical factors, weather fears, concerns about the availability of reformulated gasoline and summer driving demand were all supportive. However, as the quarter developed, all of these concerned dissipated.

Geopolitical fears diminished, including the end of the Israel/Hezbollah crisis. Also, it became clear that there was not likely to be any interruption in Iranian supplies as Iran continues to stall negotiations on nuclear enrichment. Further, it appears that Russia, China and France will not support meaningful sanctions against Iran, leaving the U.S. on its own. With elections approaching in the U.S., the Bush administration is not likely to make any unilateral moves.

Underlying supply and demand fundamentals continue to lack any degree of physical tightness. OPEC maintained current production levels at its September 11 meeting, and recent rumors of an emergency meeting to consider production cuts in the face of the price decline, have proven premature. Moreover, increases in non-OPEC supplies, about 1.5 million barrels per day over last year, add to the bearish supply/demand scenario.

On the weather front, the hurricane season is nearly over, and preseason fears of numerous storms proved incorrect, as the season was one of the quietest in recent years.

On a year-to-date basis, following the third quarter sell-off, crude is down 9.23% within the DJ/AIG Index, unleaded gasoline has fallen 23.14%, heating oil showed a decline of 15.62% and natural gas plunged 67.47%.

Grains: Corn priced fluctuated during the quarter, peaking in early July and then falling off by quarter-end to match early springtime lows. During July, August and the first half of September, improved meteorological conditions across the Central United States erased problematic growing condition fears from the wheat market. As a result, values declined in the late summer to their lowest level since January 2005. Weather was an important factor for soybeans as well, and soybeans followed wheat’s price pattern closely in the third quarter, with soybean prices reaching their lowest level since February 2005. China is the main driver on the demand side. The ongoing improvements in the Chinese economy have resulted in a continued increase in the demand for poultry, beef and pork, by the rapidly expanding Chinese middle class. Similar to the pattern seen in the soybean market during the third quarter, the cotton market too, saw declining prices.

Indices: The third quarter proved to be a positive one for U.S. equities, as the Fed ended its string of 17 consecutive rate hikes and gave indications it was finished for the year and perhaps beyond. A pull back in energy prices and healthy consumer confidence and spending also lent support, while a solid run of earnings data and strength in big cap stocks was featured. Stocks were also aided by asset reallocation, including some out of commodities. In Europe, the third quarter proved even better than the U.S. The strength in U.S. equities was supportive along with some positive data, and the markets were able to shrug off rate hikes from the ECB and the

BOE. European equities showed gains in all three months of the quarter, particularly in August and September. Asian equities, particularly Japan, had a volatile third quarter before finishing with a positive tone. In the end, solid economic data for much of the region along with money flow led to higher prices.

Interest Rates: The Fed followed the August pause that ended a streak of 17 consecutive rate hikes to 5.25% by holding steady at the September meeting. The FOMC statement varied little from the August commentary, as the Fed said it expects lower economic growth to reduce inflationary pressures. Treasury yields moved directionally lower during the quarter and bonds benefited from flight to quality and asset reallocation during the third quarter.

In foreign markets, the BOJ, the BOE, the ECB and the Reserve Bank of Australia all raised rates by 25 basis points during the third quarter. The Bank of China raised its base lending rate to 6.12% from 5.85% on August 19, and could raise it again before year-end. China’s strong 11.3% second quarter GDP growth lends to this probability. Meanwhile, the Bank of Canada and the New Zealand Reserve Bank made no rate changes during the quarter and the minutes from both indicated no additional moves this year.

Metals: Gold prices rallied in the early part of the quarter and then sold off before ending the third quarter on a strong note. While gold is still up 10.9% for the year, the quarter’s softness came on the back of general commodity malaise, lower energy prices and the less hectic geopolitical landscape. Silver prices briefly decoupled from gold during the early part of the quarter, but ended up following the same path eventually. The slide in gold prices impacted copper, but there was enough trade support to limit the sell-off. Labor news was also supportive throughout the quarter. However, copper is headed for a production surplus due to high levels of Chilean output. Additionally, there are concerns on the demand side as Chinese consumption has declined in 2006 and the U.S. housing market is depressed, both of which are weighing on sentiment. Aluminum has also been hurt recently by excess production capacity and indications of lessened Chinese consumption, but overall global demand is solid. As for zinc, the price rally that occurred in first half of 2006 ended in the third quarter. However, the sell-off was limited as zinc’s fundamentals, featuring a huge production deficit, are strong. Nickel put in an exceptionally strong performance in the third quarter, gaining 127%. Demand remains strong in the face of tight inventories, and production and labor concerns.

Softs: Sugar rallied strongly in the first quarter of 2006, traded sideways for much of the second quarter of 2006 and tumbled almost 30% in the third quarter of 2006, leading to a year-to-date loss of 28.97%. The same general commodity weakness affecting many other markets, weighed on sugar as well. Additionally, a well-respected analyst predicted that India’s 2006-2007 sugar crop might reach 27 million tonnes, vastly ahead of 21 million tonnes this season. Since Brazil, Russia, China, Thailand and the Ukraine are also expecting abundant crops, the result will be significant global surplus, which will offset a decline in EU output to 16.5 million tonnes from 21.9 million this year. As for ethanol-related demand, it has waned of late. After rebounding in August following three negative months, coffee showed a mild loss in September, taking the year-to-date loss to 10.71%. Prospects for an excellent Brazilian crop and the above mentioned general commodity malaise still weigh on sentiment. Cocoa is faced with ample supplies and continued favorable crop prospects.

Due to the nature of Registrant’s trading activities, a period-to-period comparison of its trading results is not meaningful. However, a discussion of Registrant’s trading results for the major sectors in which Registrant traded for Third Quarter 2008, Third Quarter 2007 and Third Quarter 2006 are presented below.

Currencies: (–) This sector experienced the majority of its gains in the British pound, euro and Swiss franc. The largest losses were incurred in the Australian dollar, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar.

Energies: (–) This sector experienced gains in natural gas. Losses were experienced in brent crude, crude oil and gas oil.

Indices: (+) This sector experienced the majority of its overall gains in the Nikkei, Dow Jones Stoxx 50, NASDAQ 100 and the Taiwanese SIMEX. Losses were experienced in the CAC 40 and the Hang Seng.

Interest Rates: (–) This sector experienced a majority of its gains in US Treasury Notes, Australian bonds and Canadian bonds. Losses were seen in the Euribor, German bonds and the German Bund.

Metals: (+) This sector experienced gains in copper and zinc. Losses were incurred in gold.

Currencies: (–) The majority of losses were made in the U.S. dollar versus the Australian dollar, Japanese yen, and New Zealand dollar. The majority of gains were made in the U.S. dollar versus the Swiss franc and British pound.

Energies: (–) Losses were experienced in crude, gas oil and heating oil. Gains were made in gasoline and natural gas.

Indices: (–) Losses were made across the board, including CAC 40, DAX, DJ Stoxx 50, FTSE 100, Nikkei and S&P 500 indices.

Interest Rates: (–) The majority of losses were experienced in the German Bund, BOBL and Schatz, Euribor, Eurodollar and British Gilt. The majority of gains were experienced in Japanese Government Bonds.

Currencies: (+) Gains on short positions in the Swiss franc and the Japanese yen resulted in a gain for the third quarter of 2006.

Energies: (–) Long positions in crude oil, gas oil and heating oil contributed to the losses during the third quarter of 2006.

Indices: (+) Gains on long positions in the S&P 500, the IBEX 35 and Dow Jones STOXX 50 resulted in gains for the third quarter of 2006.

Interest Rates: (–) The interest rate sector was down for the third quarter in 2006. Short positions in the Eurodollar and the 2-year German Bond, and long and short positions in the German Bobl and Bund contributed to the losses for the third quarter.

Metals: (+) The metals sector was up in the third quarter due to long positions in copper.

The net asset value (“Net Asset Value”) per Interest as of September 26, 2008 was $134.42, a decrease of 1.91% from the December 31, 2007 Net Asset Value per Interest of $137.04 and a decrease of 5.30% from the June 27, 2008 Net Asset Value per Interest of $141.95. The Net Asset Value per Interest as of September 28, 2007 was $143.19, a decrease of 11.32% from the December 31, 2006 Net Asset Value per Interest of $161.46 and a decrease of 15.06% from the June 29, 2007 Net Asset Value per Interest of $168.58. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Registrant’s trading gains (losses) before commissions and related fees during Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were approximately $(559,000) and $806,000, respectively. Registrant’s trading losses before commissions and related fees during Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were approximately $(3,756,000) and $(1,999,000), respectively.

Registrant’s average net asset level decreased during Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 in comparison to Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 primarily due to the effect of redemptions and negative trading performance. Registrant’s average net assets decreased during Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 in comparison to Third Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006 primarily due to the effect of redemptions and negative trading performance.

Interest income is earned on the average daily equity maintained with the clearing broker and bank at competitive interest rates and, therefore, varies weekly according to interest rates, trading performance and redemptions. Interest income during Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 was approximately $71,000 and $217,000,

respectively, a decrease of approximately $184,000 and $698,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above and declining interest rates. Interest income during Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 was approximately $255,000 and $915,000, respectively, a decrease of approximately $143,000 and $315,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above.

Commissions are calculated on Registrant’s Net Asset Value at the end of each week and therefore, vary according to weekly trading performance and redemptions. Other transaction fees consist of National Futures Association, exchange and clearing fees as well as floor brokerage costs and give-up charges, which are based on the number of trades the Trading Advisor executes, as well as which exchange, clearing firm or bank on, or through, which the contract is traded. Commissions and other transaction fees during the Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were approximately $285,000 and $855,000, respectively, a decrease of approximately $87,000 and $417,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above. Commissions and other transaction fees during the Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were approximately $372,000 and $1,272,000, respectively, a decrease of approximately $103,000 and $301,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above.

Management fees are calculated on the net asset value of Registrant’s investment in the Trading Vehicle at the end of each week, and therefore, are affected by weekly trading performance and redemptions. Management fees during Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were approximately $92,000 and $276,000, respectively, a decrease of approximately $27,000 and $130,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above. Management fees during Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were approximately $119,000 and $406,000, respectively, a decrease of approximately $33,000 and $91,000, respectively, as compared to Third Quarter 2006 and Year-To-Date 2006, primarily due to a decrease in average net assets discussed above.

Incentive fees are based on the “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) generated by the Trading Advisor, are accrued weekly and are ultimately determined as of the close of business on the last Friday of each calendar quarter. Through September 26, 2008, the Trading Advisor maintained a loss carryforward of approximately $(6,081,000) based on the Registrant’s performance. No incentive fees were earned during Third Quarter 2008, Year-to-Date 2008, Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007.

General and administrative expenses during Third Quarter 2008 and Year-To-Date 2008 were approximately $83,000 and $245,000, respectively. General and administrative expenses during Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007 were approximately $49,000 and $137,000, respectively. These expenses include accounting, audit, tax, and legal fees, as well as printing and postage costs related to reports sent to limited owners and are before reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Owner on behalf of Registrant. To the extent that general and administrative expenses exceed 1.5% of Registrant’s Average Net Asset Value during the year (with a maximum of 0.50% attributable to other than legal and audit expenses), such amounts are borne by the Managing Owner and its affiliates. General and administrative expenses did not exceed such limitations during Third Quarter 2008 or Year-To-Date 2008. Additionally, approximately $42,000 of previously borne expenses by Preferred were refunded to the Managing Owner for Third Quarter 2008. General and administrative expenses that exceeded such limitations were $0 during the Third Quarter 2007 and Year-To-Date 2007.

Inflation has had no material impact on the operations or on the financial condition of Registrant from inception through September 26, 2008.

As of September 26, 2008, Registrant had not utilized special purpose entities to facilitate off-balance sheet financing arrangements and has no loan guarantee arrangements or off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind other than agreements entered into in the normal course of business, which may include indemnification provisions related to certain risks service providers, such as our accountants, undertake in performing services which are in the best interests of Registrant. While Registrant’s exposure under such indemnification provisions cannot be estimated, these general business indemnifications are not expected to have a material impact on Registrant’s financial position.

Registrant’s contractual obligations are with the Managing Owner and the Trading Vehicle and, as a result of its investment in the Trading Vehicle, with the Trading Advisor and the Trading Vehicle’s commodity broker. Management fees payable by Registrant to the Trading Advisor through its investment in the Trading Vehicle and to the Managing Owner are calculated as a fixed percentage of the Trading Vehicle’s and Registrant’s Net Asset Value, respectively. Incentive fees payable by the Registrant to the Trading Advisor are at a fixed rate, calculated as a percentage of the Registrant “New High Net Trading Profits”. As such, the Managing Owner cannot anticipate the amounts to be paid for future periods as Net Asset Values and “New High Net Trading Profits” are not known until a future date. Commissions payable to the Trading Vehicle’s commodity broker are based on a cost per executed trade and, as such, the Managing Owner cannot anticipate the amount that will be required under the brokerage agreement, as the level of executed trades are not known until a future date. These agreements are effective for one-year terms, renewable automatically for additional one-year terms unless terminated. Additionally, these agreements may be terminated by either party thereto for various reasons. For a further discussion of Registrant’s contractual obligations, see Notes 1 and 3 to Registrant’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are included in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Information regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is not required pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K.

Registrant’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Registrant in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Registrant’s management, including the Managing Owner’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and Director of Fund Administration (who, in these capacities, function as the Co-Chief Executive Officers and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer, respectively, of Registrant), as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Managing Owner recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

The Managing Owner’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of certain officers of the Managing Owner (including the Managing Owner’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and Director of Fund Administration), has evaluated the effectiveness of Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, the Managing Owner’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and Director of Fund Administration have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no changes in Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Exchange Act) during Third Quarter 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

There are no legal proceedings pending by or against Registrant or the Managing Owner, or to which Registrant or Managing Owner was a party during the period covered by this Report.

There have been no changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York		10573
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	World Monitor Trust II - Series F:

	Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of September 26, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007	5

	Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 and January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007	6

	Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Capital (Unaudited) for the Periods January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007	7

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

	WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.:

	Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of September 26, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007	17

	Condensed Schedules of Investments as of September 26, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007	18

	Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Periods June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007 and January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007	19

	Condensed Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital (Unaudited) for the Periods January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008 and January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007	20

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)	21

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	43

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	43

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		44

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	44

Item 1.A.	Risk Factors	44

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	44

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	44

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	44

Item 5.	Other Information	44

Item 6.	Exhibits:	44


	September 26, 2008		December 31, 2007
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	138,974	$	146,635
Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C., at fair value (99.98% and 99.86% of net asset value, respectively)		17,347,350		19,846,527
Redemptions receivable from WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.		151,688		36,997

Total assets	$	17,638,012	$	20,030,159

LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses	$	72,701	$	38,273
Commissions and other transaction fees payable		82,920		102,644
Redemptions payable		131,595		13,930

Total liabilities		287,216		154,847

TRUST CAPITAL (Net Asset Value)
Limited Interests (127,764.566 and 143,558.270 interests outstanding) at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively		17,174,301		19,673,857
Managing Owner Interests (1,313 and 1,470 interests outstanding) at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively		176,495		201,455

Total trust capital (Net Asset Value)		17,350,796		19,875,312

Total liabilities and trust capital	$	17,638,012	$	20,030,159


	For the Period June 28, 2008 to September 26, 2008			For the Period June 30, 2007 to September 28, 2007			For the Period January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008			For the Period January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007
NET LOSS FROM TRUST OPERATIONS:
REVENUES
Interest income	$	196		$	2,197		$	395		$	6,891

Total revenues		196			2,197			395			6,891

EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions		275,915			357,212			830,212			1,218,869
General and administrative		47,947			43,964			142,716			125,406

Total expenses		323,862			401,176			972,928			1,344,275

General and administrative expenses refunded to (borne by) the Managing Owner and its affiliates		42,192			0			0			0

Net expenses		366,054			401,176			972,928			1,344,275

NET LOSS FROM TRUST OPERATIONS		(365,858	)		(398,979	)		(972,533	)		(1,337,384	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.:
REVENUES
Realized		710,013			(3,044,708	)		1,100,267			(741,655	)
Change in unrealized		(1,269,449	)		(710,961	)		(294,310	)		(1,257,225	)
Interest income		70,463			252,765			216,748			908,018

Total revenues (losses)		(488,973	)		(3,502,904	)		1,022,705			(1,090,862	)

EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions and other transaction fees		8,784			14,693			24,640			52,835
Management fees		91,702			118,857			276,099			405,840
General and administrative		34,645			5,366			102,322			11,516

Total expenses		135,131			138,916			403,061			470,191

NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.		(624,104	)		(3,641,820	)		619,644			(1,561,053	)

NET LOSS	$	(989,962	)	$	(4,040,799	)	$	(352,889	)	$	(2,898,437	)

NET LOSS PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIMITED AND MANAGING OWNER INTEREST
Net loss per weighted average Limited and Managing Owner interest	$	($7.50	)	$	(25.46	)	$	($2.59	)	$	(16.60	)

Weighted average number of Limited and Managing Owner interests outstanding		131,946			158,683			136,416			174,604


	Interests		Limited Interests			Managing Owner Interests			Total
For the period January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008
Trust capital at December 31, 2007	145,028.270		$	19,673,857		$	201,455		$	19,875,312
Redemptions	(15,950.704	)		(2,150,040	)		(21,587	)		(2,171,627	)
Net loss for the period January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008				(349,516	)		(3,373	)		(352,889	)

Trust capital at September 26, 2008	129,077.566		$	17,174,301		$	176,495		$	17,350,796

For the period January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007
Trust capital at December 31, 2006	188,771.821		$	30,174,948		$	304,028		$	30,478,976
Additions	3.060			0			500			500
Redemptions	(33,554.744	)		(5,304,258	)		(51,025	)		(5,355,283	)
Net loss for the period January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007				(2,869,884	)		(28,553	)		(2,898,437	)

Trust capital at September 28, 2007	155,220.137		$	22,000,806		$	224,950		$	22,225,756


September 26, 2008	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C., at fair value	$	0	$	0	$	17,347,350	$	17,347,350

December 31, 2007	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C., at fair value	$	0	$	0	$	19,846,527	$	19,846,527


	Net Asset Value December 31, 2007		Gain*			Redemptions			Net Asset Value September 26, 2008
WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.	$	19,846,527	$	619,644		$	(3,118,821	)	$	17,347,350


	Net Asset Value December 31, 2006		Loss*			Redemptions			Net Asset Value September 28, 2007
WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.	$	30,437,482	$	(1,561,053	)	$	(6,686,631	)	$	22,189,798


	September 26, 2008					December 31, 2007
Futures Contracts	Fair Value as a % of Members’ Capital		Fair Value			Fair Value as a % of Members’ Capital		Fair Value
Futures contracts purchased:
Commodities	0.14	%	$	33,330		0.29	%	$	78,350
Interest rates	(0.34	)%		(80,336	)	0.27	%		73,667
Stock indices	0.01	%		2,041		0.32	%		86,318

Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts purchased	(0.19	)%		(44,965	)	0.88	%		238,335

Futures contracts sold:
Commodities	(0.04	)%		(9,371	)	(0.17	)%		(46,998	)
Interest rates	(0.58	)%		(135,760	)	(0.10	)%		(26,004	)
Stock indices	0.00	%		751		0.01	%		1,652

Net unrealized loss on futures contracts sold	(0.62	)%		(144,380	)	(0.26	)%		(71,350	)

Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts	(0.81	)%	$	(189,345	)	0.62	%	$	166,985

Forward Contracts
Forward contracts purchased:
Net unrealized loss on forward contracts purchased	(0.86	)%	$	(199,262	)	(2.42	)%	$	(654,992	)

Forward contracts sold:
Net unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts sold	(1.50	)%		(349,597	)	0.51	%		138,378

Net unrealized loss on forward contracts	(2.36	)%	$	(548,859	)	(1.91	)%	$	(516,614	)

Net unrealized loss on open contracts			$	(738,204	)			$	(349,629	)

Purchased Options on Forward Contracts
Fair value on options purchased	0.01	%	$	2,607		0.13	%	$	37,015

Commodity options owned, at fair value (premiums paid $6,002 and $52,945 at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)	0.01	%	$	2,607		0.13	%	$	37,015

Written Options on Forward Contracts
Fair value on options written	0.00	%	$	(1,249	)	(0.05	)%	$	(14,169	)


Commodity options written, at fair value (premiums received $3,846 and $29,814 at September 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)	0.00	%	$	(1,249	)	(0.05	)%	$	(14,169	)


	Members’ Capital
	Member D			Member F			Total
For the period January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008
Balances at December 31, 2007	$	7,240,815		$	19,846,527		$	27,087,342
Redemptions		(1,554,613	)		(3,118,821	)		(4,673,434	)
Net income for the period
January 1, 2008 to September 26, 2008		222,586			619,644			842,230

Balances at September 26, 2008	$	5,908,788		$	17,347,350		$	23,256,138

For the period January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007
Balances at December 31, 2006	$	13,237,677		$	30,437,482		$	43,675,159
Redemptions		(4,375,255	)		(6,686,631	)		(11,061,886	)
Net loss for the period
January 1, 2007 to September 28, 2007		(541,889	)		(1,561,053	)		(2,102,942	)

Balances at September 28, 2007	$	8,320,533		$	22,189,798		$	30,510,331


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
General and administrative		8,680		0		27,770		0

	$	8,680	$	0	$	27,770	$	0


	Third Quarter 2008				Year-To-Date 2008
	Member D		Member F		Member D		Member F
Total return⁽¹⁾	(3.41	)%	(3.41	)%	3.34	%	3.34	%

Total expenses⁽²⁾	(2.94	)%	(2.94	)%	(2.88	)%	(2.88	)%

Net investment loss^(2),⁽³⁾	(1.41	)%	(1.41	)%	(1.32	)%	(1.33	)%


	Third Quarter 2007				Year-To-Date 2007
	Member D		Member F		Member D		Member F
Total return⁽¹⁾	(13.65	)%	(13.65	)%	(6.88	)%	(6.88	)%

Total expenses⁽²⁾	(2.32	)%	(2.32	)%	(2.30	)%	(2.30	)%

Net investment income^(2),⁽³⁾	1.90	%	1.90	%	2.15	%	2.14	%


WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

By:	Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,
	its managing owner

	By:	/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer	Date: November 6, 2008
	Name:	Kenneth A. Shewer
	Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ David K. Spohr	Date: November 6, 2008
	Name:	David K. Spohr
	Title:	Senior Vice President and
		Director of Fund Administration
		(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)