XML 29 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Accounts Receivable, Net
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Receivables [Abstract]  
Accounts Receivable, Net Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable, net were as follows:
June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
Invoiced$695 $735 
Accrued(1)
219 217 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(68)(69)
Accounts receivable, net$846 $883 
_____________
(1)Accrued receivables include amounts to be invoiced in the subsequent quarter for current services provided.
The allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
20212020
Balance at December 31st
$69 $55 
Provision
Charge-offs(5)(2)
Recoveries and other(1)
— (1)
Balance at March 31st
$68 $60 
Provision
Charge-offs(2)(8)
Recoveries and other(1)
(1)
Balance at June 30th
$68 $60 
_____________
(1)Includes the impacts of foreign currency translation and adjustments to reserves necessary to reflect events of non-payment such as customer accommodations and contract terminations.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon customer payment history and current creditworthiness. The allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable is determined based on an assessment of past collection experience as well as consideration of current and future economic conditions and changes in our customer collection trends. Based on that assessment the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of gross accounts receivable was 7.4% at June 30, 2021 and 7.2% at December 31, 2020. The allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of gross accounts receivable remains at an elevated level as compared to historical levels primarily as a result of the macroeconomic and market disruption caused by COVID-19.
Accounts Receivable Sales Arrangements
Accounts receivable sales arrangements are utilized in the normal course of business as part of our cash and liquidity management. The accounts receivable sold are generally short-term trade receivables with payment due dates of less than 60 days. We have one facility in Europe that enables us to sell accounts receivable associated with our distributor network on an ongoing basis, without recourse. Under this arrangement, we sell our entire interest in the related accounts receivable for cash and no portion of the payment is held back or deferred by the purchaser.
Of the accounts receivable sold and derecognized from our balance sheet, $107 and $136 remained uncollected as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
Accounts receivable sales activity was as follows:
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2021202020212020
Accounts receivable sales(1)
$125 $14 $232 $67 
____________
(1)Losses on sales were not material. Customers may also enter into structured-payable arrangements that require us to sell our receivables from that customer to a third-party financial institution, which then makes payments to us to settle the customer's receivable. In these instances, we ensure the sale of the receivables are bankruptcy-remote and the payment made to us is without recourse. The activity associated with these arrangements is not reflected in this disclosure, as payments under these arrangements have not been material and these are customer directed arrangements.
Finance Receivables, Net
Finance receivables include sales-type leases and installment loans arising from the marketing of our equipment. These receivables are typically collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets.
Finance receivables, net were as follows:
 June 30,
2021
December 31,
2020
Gross receivables$3,640 $3,691 
Unearned income(390)(393)
Subtotal3,250 3,298 
Residual values— — 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(133)(133)
Finance receivables, net3,117 3,165 
Less: Billed portion of finance receivables, net89 99 
Less: Current portion of finance receivables not billed, net1,057 1,082 
Finance receivables due after one year, net$1,971 $1,984 
Finance Receivables – Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality
Our finance receivable portfolios are primarily in the U.S., Canada and EMEA. We generally establish customer credit limits and estimate the allowance for credit losses on a country or geographic basis. Customer credit limits are based upon an initial evaluation of the customer's credit quality and we adjust that limit accordingly based upon ongoing credit assessments of the customer, including payment history and changes in credit quality.
The allowance for credit losses is principally determined based on an assessment of origination year and past collection experience as well as consideration of current and future economic conditions and changes in our customer collection trends. Based on that assessment, the allowance for doubtful credit losses as a percentage of gross finance receivables (net of unearned income) was 4.1% at June 30, 2021 and 4.0% at December 31, 2020. In determining the level of reserve required, we had to critically assess current and forecasted economic conditions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure we objectively included those expected impacts in the determination of our reserve. Our assessment also included a review of current portfolio credit metrics and the level of write-offs incurred over the past year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The allowance for doubtful accounts and provision for credit losses represent estimates of the losses expected to be incurred from the Company's finance receivable portfolio. The level of the allowance is determined on a collective basis by applying projected loss rates to our different portfolios by country, which represent our portfolio segments. This is the level at which we develop and document our methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. These projected loss rates are primarily based upon historical loss experience adjusted for judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data including current and future economic conditions as well as delinquency trends, resolution rates, the aging of receivables, credit quality indicators and the financial health of specific customer classes or groups.
The allowance for doubtful finance receivables is inherently more difficult to estimate than the allowance for trade accounts receivable because the underlying lease portfolio has an average maturity, at any time, of approximately two to three years and contains past due billed amounts, as well as unbilled amounts. We consider all available information in our quarterly assessments of the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We believe our estimates, including any qualitative adjustments, are reasonable and have considered all reasonably available information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events and economic conditions. The identification of account-specific exposure is not a significant factor in establishing the allowance for doubtful finance receivables. Our policy and methodology used to establish our allowance for doubtful accounts has been consistently applied over all periods presented.
Our allowance for doubtful finance receivables is effectively determined by geography, the risk characteristics in our finance receivable portfolio segments will generally be consistent with the risk factors associated with the economies of the countries/regions included in those geographies. Since EMEA is comprised of various countries and regional economies, the risk profile within that portfolio segment is somewhat more diversified due to the varying economic conditions among and within the countries.
The bad debt provision of $2 for the second quarter 2021 included a reserve reduction of approximately $6 reflecting improvements in the macroeconomic environment as well as lower write-offs. Actual write-offs incurred to date have lagged expectations but remain in line with our original projections over the life of the lease portfolio and
are consistent with future expectations regarding our estimated impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite improvement in the global economy, economies continue to recover from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic including the cessation of government support as well as labor, interest rate and inflation risks and the potential for higher taxes. As a result of these uncertainties, we continue to consider various adverse macroeconomic scenarios in our models. Accordingly, our reserves as a percent of receivables have remained fairly consistent subsequent to the first quarter 2020 when we recorded a charge of approximately $60 to initially record expected losses from the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to monitor developments regarding the pandemic, including business reopenings and mitigating government support actions as well as future economic conditions, and as a result, our reserves may need to be updated in future periods.
The allowance for doubtful accounts as well as the related investment in finance receivables were as follows:
United StatesCanada
EMEA(1)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2020
$77 $15 $41 $133 
Provision
Charge-offs(2)— (1)(3)
Recoveries and other(2)
— (2)(1)
Balance at March 31, 2021$78 $16 $41 $135 
Provision(1)(3)
Charge-offs(3)(1)(1)(5)
Recoveries and other(3)
— — 
Balance at June 30, 2021$81 $15 $37 $133 
Finance receivables as of June 30, 2021 collectively evaluated for impairment (3)
$1,845 $283 $1,122 $3,250 
Balance at December 31, 2019
$59 $10 $20 $89 
Provision35 25 66 
Charge-offs(3)(1)(4)(8)
Recoveries and other(2)
— — (1)(1)
Balance at March 31, 2020$91 $15 $40 $146 
Provision— 
Charge-offs(5)(1)(2)(8)
Recoveries and other(3)
— — 
Balance at June 30, 2020$89 $16 $38 $143 
Finance receivables as of June 30, 2020 collectively evaluated for impairment(3)
$1,824 $289 $1,100 $3,213 
_____________
(1)Includes developing market countries.
(2)Includes the impacts of foreign currency translation and adjustments to reserves necessary to reflect events of non-payment such as customer accommodations and contract terminations.
(3)Total Finance receivables exclude the allowance for credit losses of $133 and $143 at June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
In the U.S., customers are further evaluated by class based on the type of lease origination. The primary categories are direct, which primarily includes leases originated directly with end customers through bundled lease arrangements, and indirect, which primarily includes leases originated through our XBS sales channel that utilizes a combination of internal and third party leasing in its lease arrangements with end customers. Indirect also includes lease financing to end-user customers who purchased equipment we sold to distributors or resellers.
We evaluate our customers based on the following credit quality indicators:
Low Credit Risk: This rating includes accounts with excellent to good business credit, asset quality and capacity to meet financial obligations. These customers are less susceptible to adverse effects due to shifts in economic conditions or changes in circumstance. The rating generally equates to a Standard & Poor's (S&P) rating of BBB- or better. Loss rates in this category in the normal course are generally less than 1%.
Average Credit Risk: This rating includes accounts with average credit risk that are more susceptible to loss in the event of adverse business or economic conditions. This rating generally equates to a BB S&P rating. Although we experience higher loss rates associated with this customer class, we believe the risk is somewhat mitigated by the fact that our leases are fairly well dispersed across a large and diverse customer base. In addition, the higher loss rates are largely offset by the higher rates of return we obtain with such leases. Loss rates in this category in the normal course are generally in the range of 2% to 5%.
High Credit Risk: This rating includes accounts that have marginal credit risk such that the customer’s ability to make repayment is impaired or may likely become impaired. We use numerous strategies to mitigate risk including higher rates of interest, prepayments, personal guarantees, etc. Accounts in this category include customers who were downgraded during the term of the lease from low and average credit risk evaluation when the lease was originated. Accordingly, there is a distinct possibility for a loss of principal and interest or customer default. The loss rates in this category in the normal course are generally in the range of 7% to 10%.
Credit quality indicators are updated at least annually, or more frequently to the extent required by economic conditions, and the credit quality of any given customer can change during the life of the portfolio.
Details about our finance receivables portfolio based on geography, origination year and credit quality indicators are as follows:
 June 30, 2021
 20212020201920182017PriorTotal
Finance
Receivables
United States (Direct)
Low Credit Risk$101 $142 $124 $94 $43 $12 $516 
Average Credit Risk42 45 73 36 15 215 
High Credit Risk41 81 36 20 190 
Total $184 $268 $233 $150 $67 $19 $921 
United States (Indirect)
Low Credit Risk$119 $166 $121 $60 $21 $$489 
Average Credit Risk107 115 94 48 18 384 
High Credit Risk16 18 — 51 
Total$242 $299 $224 $114 $41 $$924 
Canada
Low Credit Risk$21 $33 $29 $19 $$$110 
Average Credit Risk21 41 34 20 11 130 
High Credit Risk15 43 
Total$47 $89 $71 $47 $23 $$283 
EMEA(1)
Low Credit Risk$123 $170 $148 $102 $41 $12 $596 
Average Credit Risk94 137 122 74 29 463 
High Credit Risk10 19 17 10 63 
Total$227 $326 $287 $186 $75 $21 $1,122 
Total Finance Receivables
Low Credit Risk$364 $511 $422 $275 $111 $28 $1,711 
Average Credit Risk264 338 323 178 73 16 1,192 
High Credit Risk72 133 70 44 22 347 
Total$700 $982 $815 $497 $206 $50 $3,250 
 December 31, 2020
 20202019201820172016PriorTotal
Finance
Receivables
United States (Direct)
Low Credit Risk$164 $151 $128 $71 $32 $$550 
Average Credit Risk54 95 52 26 237 
High Credit Risk90 42 27 13 180 
Total $308 $288 $207 $110 $45 $$967 
United States (Indirect)
Low Credit Risk$193 $140 $79 $33 $$— $452 
Average Credit Risk129 124 71 31 — 363 
High Credit Risk19 — 41 
Total$341 $273 $159 $67 $16 $— $856 
Canada
Low Credit Risk$37 $34 $24 $10 $$$111 
Average Credit Risk46 39 26 17 135 
High Credit Risk18 10 10 10 — 51 
Total$101 $83 $60 $37 $14 $$297 
EMEA(1)
Low Credit Risk$197 $177 $131 $62 $20 $$591 
Average Credit Risk170 160 108 51 17 510 
High Credit Risk23 24 15 10 77 
Total$390 $361 $254 $123 $41 $$1,178 
Total Finance Receivables
Low Credit Risk$591 $502 $362 $176 $64 $$1,704 
Average Credit Risk399 418 257 125 39 1,245 
High Credit Risk150 85 61 36 13 349 
Total$1,140 $1,005 $680 $337 $116 $20 $3,298 
_____________
(1)Includes developing market countries.
The aging of our receivables portfolio is based upon the number of days an invoice is past due. Receivables that are more than 90 days past due are considered delinquent. Receivable losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of the receivable is confirmed and is generally based on individual credit evaluations, results of collection efforts and specific circumstances of the customer. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
We generally continue to maintain equipment on lease and provide services to customers that have invoices for finance receivables that are 90 days or more past due and, as a result of the bundled nature of billings, we also continue to accrue interest on those receivables. However, interest revenue for such billings is only recognized if collectability is deemed reasonably assured.
The aging of our billed finance receivables is as follows:
 June 30, 2021
 Current
31-90
Days
Past Due
>90 Days
Past Due
Total BilledUnbilled
Total
Finance
Receivables
>90 Days
and
Accruing
Direct $29 $$$42 $879 $921 $60 
Indirect20 27 897 924 — 
Total United States49 10 10 69 1,776 1,845 60 
Canada— 275 283 12 
EMEA(1)
11 15 1,107 1,122 17 
Total$66 $14 $12 $92 $3,158 $3,250 $89 
 December 31, 2020
 Current
31-90
Days
Past Due
>90 Days
Past Due
Total BilledUnbilled
Total
Finance
Receivables
>90 Days
and
Accruing
Direct$33 $$$48 $919 $967 $74 
Indirect21 28 828 856 — 
Total United States54 10 12 76 1,747 1,823 74 
Canada— 10 287 297 12 
EMEA(1)
12 17 1,161 1,178 23 
Total$74 $15 $14 $103 $3,195 $3,298 $109 
_____________
(1)Includes developing market countries
Secured Borrowings and Collateral
In July 2020, we sold $355 of U.S. based finance receivables to a consolidated special purpose entity (SPE), which funded the purchase through a secured loan agreement with a financial institution. As of June 30, 2021 the SPE holds $214 of total Finance receivables, net, which are included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as collateral for the secured loan agreement.
In December 2020, we sold $610 of U.S. based finance receivables to a consolidated SPE, which funded the purchase through a secured loan agreement with a financial institution. As of June 30, 2021 the SPE holds $485 of total Finance receivables, net, which are included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as collateral for the secured loan agreement.
Refer to Note 12 - Debt, for additional information related to this arrangement including the related secured loan agreement.