XML 34 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company leases its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. These operating leases expire at various dates through December 2034 and generally require the payment of real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and operating costs.

The minimum aggregate future obligations under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
 
2017
$
53,410

2018
45,202

2019
44,586

2020
54,206

2021
54,934

Thereafter
533,088

Total
$
785,426



Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $50.3 million, $47.9 million and $39.9 million, respectively. The Company has entered into sublease agreements with tenants of various properties previously vacated by the Company. The amounts paid to the Company by these sublease tenants was $1.3 million, $3.6 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $6.8 million, primarily related to operating leases. The letters of credit remain in effect until the Company fulfills its obligations under these leases or as such obligations expire under the terms of the letters of credit.

Purchase Commitments

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had long-term commitments for bandwidth usage and co-location with various networks and ISPs and for asset purchases for network equipment. Additionally, as of December 31, 2016, the Company had entered into purchase orders with various vendors. The minimum future commitments as of December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

 
Bandwidth and Co-location Commitments
 
Purchase Order Commitments
2017
$
105,451

 
$
137,642

2018
13,799

 
10,522

2019
6,368

 
1,827

2020
386

 
320

2021
193

 
320

Thereafter

 

Total
$
126,197

 
$
150,631



Legal Matters

The Company is party to various litigation matters that management considers routine and incidental to its business. Management does not expect the results of any of these routine actions to have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In 2016, the Company completed an internal investigation, with the assistance of outside counsel, relating to improper sales practices by a former employee. The internal investigation included a review of compliance with the requirements of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other applicable laws and regulations. In February 2015, the Company voluntarily contacted the Commission and Department of Justice to advise both agencies of this internal investigation. In June 2016, the Company signed a non-prosecution agreement with the Commission and agreed to disgorge $0.7 million to resolve this matter, including interest.

In July 2016, as part of the resolution of a patent infringement lawsuit filed by the Company against Limelight Networks, Inc. (“Limelight”) in 2006, the Company agreed to license to Limelight technology covered by certain of the Company’s patents.  The terms of the agreement require Limelight to pay the Company $54.0 million in 12 equal installments over three years, beginning in August 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received $9.0 million under this agreement, which was recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income, with $0.4 million recorded as interest income.

In November 2015, Limelight filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against the Company and XO Communications LLC (“XO”), alleging patent infringement by the two companies.  The complaint alleges that the Company and XO infringed six of Limelight’s content delivery patents. The complaint seeks to recover from the Company and XO monetary damages based upon lost revenue due to infringing technology used by the companies.  The Company has agreed to indemnify XO for damages it incurs in this matter. The Company has made counterclaims in the action against Limelight alleging that Limelight has infringed five of the Company’s content delivery patents, and the Company is seeking monetary damages based upon lost revenue due to the infringing technology used by Limelight.  The case is scheduled for trial in May 2017.  No provision with respect to this matter has been made in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be made.

Indemnification

The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally the Company's business partners, vendors or customers, in connection with its provision of its services. Generally, these obligations are limited to claims relating to infringement of a patent, copyright or other intellectual property right or the Company’s negligence, willful misconduct or violation of law. Subject to applicable statutes of limitation, the term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual from the time of execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company carries insurance that covers certain third party claims relating to its services and activities and that could limit the Company’s exposure in that respect.

The Company has agreed to indemnify each of its officers and directors during his or her lifetime for certain events or occurrences that happen by reason of the fact that the officer or director is or was or has agreed to serve as an officer or director of the Company. The Company has director and officer insurance policies that may limit its exposure and may enable the Company to recover a portion of certain future amounts paid.

To date, the Company has not encountered material costs as a result of such indemnification obligations and has not accrued any related liabilities in its financial statements. In assessing whether to establish an accrual, the Company considers such factors as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss.