10-Q 1 persistence_10q-063002.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended JUNE 30, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____ Commission file number 000-25857 ================================================================================ PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 94-3138935 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) of incorporation or organization) 1720 SOUTH AMPHLETT BLVD., THIRD FLOOR SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94402 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (650) 372-3600 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) NOT APPLICABLE (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) ================================================================================ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] As of July 31, 2002, there were 20,153,087 shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding. INDEX PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. SIGNATURES 2 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS) JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- (UNAUDITED) [1] ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 7,318 $ 7,411 Accounts receivable, net 3,594 4,106 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 524 656 ----------- ----------- Total current assets 11,436 12,173 Property and equipment, net 520 796 Purchased intangibles, net 425 722 Other assets 72 64 ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 12,453 $ 13,755 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 583 $ 1,070 Accrued compensation and related benefits 1,141 892 Other accrued liabilities 935 457 Deferred revenues 3,829 2,124 Current portion of long-term obligations 788 847 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities 7,276 5,390 Long-term obligations, net of current portion 191 421 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 7,467 5,811 ----------- ----------- Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock -- -- Common stock 64,112 64,036 Deferred stock compensation (65) (119) Notes receivable from stockholders (54) (54) Accumulated deficit (59,024) (55,930) Accumulated other comprehensive loss 17 11 ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity 4,986 7,944 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 12,453 $ 13,755 =========== ===========
[1] The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 has been extracted from the consolidated financial statements as of that date, and does not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 3 PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED ------------------------ ------------------------ JUN. 30, JUN. 30, JUN. 30, JUN. 30, 2002 2001 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- --------- (UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED) Revenues: Licenses $ 4,104 $ 2,538 $ 4,937 $ 4,669 Service 1,626 2,213 2,954 4,948 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenues 5,730 4,751 7,891 9,617 --------- --------- --------- --------- Cost of revenues: Licenses 75 1 102 6 Service 759 1,189 1,527 2,362 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total cost of revenues 834 1,190 1,629 2,368 --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross profit 4,896 3,561 6,262 7,249 --------- --------- --------- --------- Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 2,586 3,819 5,020 8,168 Research and development, 1,038 1,583 2,156 3,331 General and administrative 919 1,394 1,846 2,768 Amortization and impairment of purchased intangibles 142 2,458 354 3,177 Restructuring costs -- 688 -- 1,473 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total operating expenses 4,685 9,942 9,376 18,917 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income/(Loss) from operations 211 (6,381) (3,114) (11,668) Interest income 21 115 55 319 Interest and other expense (17) (18) (35) (45) --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income/(loss) $ 215 $ (6,285) $ (3,094) $(11,394) ========= ========= ========= ========= Basic net income/(loss) per share $ 0.01 $ (0.32) $ (0.15) $ (0.57) ========= ========= ========= ========= Diluted net income/(loss) per share $ 0.01 $ (0.32) $ (0.15) $ (0.57) ========= ========= ========= ========= Shares used in calculating basic net income/(loss) per share 20,153 19,916 20,121 19,854 ========= ========= ========= ========= Shares used in calculating diluted net income/(loss) per share 20,486 19,916 20,121 19,854 ========= ========= ========= ========= See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4 PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 2001 --------- --------- (UNAUDITED) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $ (3,094) $(11,394) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 688 1,090 Impairment of purchased intangibles -- 1,988 Amortization of deferred stock compensation 54 162 Loss on sale of fixed assets -- 154 Change in allowance for doubtful accounts 399 160 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 113 1,571 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 132 613 Accounts payable (487) (1,209) Accrued compensation and related benefits 249 (1,623) Other accrued liabilities 478 (548) Deferred revenues 1,705 (969) --------- --------- Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities 237 (10,005) --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Sale of short-term investments -- 2,846 Purchase of property and equipment (48) (36) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment -- 81 Purchased intangibles additions (45) -- Deposits and other (8) (6) --------- --------- Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities (101) 2,885 --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Sale of common stock, net of repurchases 76 270 Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders -- 40 Borrowing under capital lease obligations 12 -- Repayment of capital lease obligations (14) (26) Repayment of obligations incurred to acquire purchased intangibles (110) (205) Borrowing under loan agreement -- 122 Repayment under loan agreement (199) (154) --------- --------- Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities (235) 47 --------- --------- EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 6 (92) --------- --------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: Net decrease (93) (7,165) Beginning of period 7,411 14,103 --------- --------- End of period $ 7,318 $ 6,938 ========= ========= NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Release of compensatory stock arrangements $ -- $ 252 ========= ========= Property and equipment acquired by capital leases $ (22) $ -- ========= ========= Compensatory stock arrangements $ -- $ (53) ========= =========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 5 NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) 1. BUSINESS Persistence Software solves data access problems for distributed and real-time systems. Persistence solutions help deliver better business visibility for applications that require current information about customers, products and suppliers. Persistence is a leading provider of transaction application servers, data management products, and dynamic Web content acceleration servers -- software that processes transactions between users and back-end computer systems in electronic commerce systems. Persistence provides a suite of data management products that sit between existing databases - such as Oracle and DB/2 - and application servers - such as WebLogic and WebSphere. Developers can configure these products to structure and position business information with optimal efficiency, improving application server performance and simplifying application distribution while reducing database costs. 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this filing on Form 10-Q as of June 30, 2002 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2001 balance sheet was extracted from audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company's condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2002, its condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and its condensed consolidated cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows for any future interim or annual periods. 3. NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE Basic net income/(loss) per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding shares subject to repurchase). Diluted net income/(loss) per common share was the same as basic net income/(loss) per common share for all periods presented, except for the three months ended June 30, 2002, since the effect of any potentially dilutive securities is excluded as they are anti-dilutive because of the Company's net losses. Diluted net income per common share includes the dilutive affect of certain potentially dilutive securities, in accordance with FAS128 "Earnings per Share". The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income/(loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, JUNE 30, ----------------------- ------------------------ 2002 2001 2002 2001 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income/(loss) (numerator), basic and diluted $ 215 $ (6,284) $ (3,094) $(11,394) ========= ========= ========= ========= Shares (denominator): Weighted average common shares outstanding 20,153 19,946 20,121 19,892 Weighted average common shares outstanding subject to repurchase 0 (30) (0) (38) --------- --------- --------- --------- Shares used in computation, basic earnings per share 20,153 19,916 20,121 19,854 Common Stock equivalents related to employee stock options and warrants 333 0 0 0 --------- --------- --------- --------- Shares used in computation, diluted earnings per share 20,486 19,916 20,121 19,854 ========= ========= ========= ========= Basic net income/(loss) per share $ 0.01 $ (0.32) $ (0.15) $ (0.57) ========= ========= ========= ========= Diluted net income/(loss) per share $ 0.01 $ (0.32) $ (0.15) $ (0.57) ========= ========= ========= =========
6 The computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2002 excludes outstanding employee stock options to purchase 3,055,000 shares because the effect of these options were antidilutive. As of June 30, 2002 and 2001, the Company had securities outstanding which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future. Such outstanding securities consist of the following (in thousands): JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 2002 2001 ------------ ----------- Shares of common stock subject to repurchase 0 21 Outstanding options 3,388 1,972 Warrants 80 80 ------- ------- Total 3,468 2,073 ======= ======= 4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME For all periods presented, the Company had no comprehensive income items other than net income/(loss) and changes in the cumulative translation adjustment. 5. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS No. 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will rather be tested at least annually for impairment. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2002. The impact of adopting this standard was not material to our financial statements as the Company does not currently carry any goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives. In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale whether previously held and used or newly acquired, and broadened the presentation of discounted operations to include more disposal transactions. SFAS No. 144 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as of January 1, 2002 which did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities", which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of the Company's commitment to an exit plan. SFAS 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "expects," "future," "intends," "targeting," and similar expressions identify forward-looking 7 statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled "Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results" and those appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting forward-looking statements. OVERVIEW Persistence Software solves data access problems for distributed and real-time systems. Persistence solutions help deliver better business visibility for applications that require current information about customers, products and suppliers. Persistence provides a suite of data management products that sit between existing databases - such as Oracle and DB2 - and application servers - such as WebLogic and WebSphere. Developers can configure these products to structure and position business information with optimal efficiency, improving application server performance and simplifying application distribution while reducing database costs. By effectively managing enterprise data, users achieve the benefit of "business visibility" - the ability to manage their business in real time with data and applications where they need them, when they need them. By caching data, or moving information stored in back-end computer systems closer to users, our software dramatically reduces network traffic and data latency, resulting in both better application performance and faster transaction processing. Our EDGEXTEND data management infrastructure product for Sun Microsystems' full Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE, formerly known as Enterprise Java Beans or EJB) application servers offers a data architecture for IBM's WebSphere and BEA's WebLogic application servers to support highly distributed and transaction-oriented applications both within data centers and in remote locations. Our DIRECTALERT product is a proactive, personalized client caching and notification solution for zero latency applications which extends the reach of enterprise systems to small form-factor devices such as mobile phones, wireless PDAs, and digital set-top boxes. POWERTIER application servers support both C++ and J2EE standards to enable businesses to deploy sophisticated C++ or Java applications, which readily scale and accommodate rapidly increasing numbers of users. Our DYNAMAI Web content accelerator improves the speed and scalability of electronic commerce Web sites that rely heavily on dynamically generated content using technologies such as Java Server Pages and Active Server Pages. Our major customers include Cablevision, FedEx, Instinet, Intershop, Lucent, Motorola, Nokia and Salomon Smith Barney. Our revenues, which consist of software license revenues and service revenues, totaled $7.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, $9.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001, $19.4 million in 2001, $25.3 million in 2000 and $14.4 million in 1999. License revenues consist of licenses of our software products, which generally are priced based on the number of users or servers. Service revenues consist of professional services consulting, customer support and training. Because we only commenced selling application servers in 1997 and only commenced selling DYNAMAI in 2000 and EDGEXTEND and DIRECTALERT in 2002, we have a limited operating history in the application server and data management markets. We market our software and services primarily through our direct sales organizations in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Hong Kong. Revenues from licenses and services to customers outside the United States were $1.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, $4.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001, $7.4 million in 2001, $7.2 million in 2000 and $4.1 million in 1999. Our future success will depend, in part, on our successful development of international markets for our products. Historically, we have received a substantial portion of revenue from product sales to a limited number of customers. Sales of products to our top five customers accounted for 64% of our total revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2002, 51% of our total revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2001, 45% of total revenues in 2001, 40% of total revenues in 2000, 35% of total revenues in 1999, and 55% of total revenues in 1998. In addition, the identity of our top five customers has changed from year to year. In the future, it is likely that a relatively few large customers could continue to account for a relatively large proportion of our revenues. To date, we have sold our products primarily through our direct sales force, and we will need to continue to hire sales people, in particular those with expertise in channel sales, in order to meet our sales goals. In addition, our ability to achieve significant revenue growth will depend in large part on our success in establishing and leveraging relationships with OEM partners and other resellers. We recognize revenues in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," as amended by Statements of Position 98-4 and 98-9. Future implementation guidance relating to these standards or any future standards may result in unanticipated changes in our revenue recognition practices, and these changes could affect our future revenues and earnings. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulleting ("SAB") No. 101, 8 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements." SAB No. 101 provided guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in the financial statements. SAB No. 101 outlines basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies. The Company implemented SAB No. 101 in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2000. The provisions of SAB No. 101 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. We recognize license revenues upon shipment of the software if collection of the resulting receivable is probable, an agreement has been executed, the fee is fixed or determinable and vendor-specific objective evidence exists to allocate a portion of the total fee to any undelivered elements of the arrangement. Undelivered elements in these arrangements typically consist of services or additional software products. For sales made through distributors, revenue is recognized upon shipment. Distributors have no right of return. We recognize revenues from customer training, support and professional services as the services are performed. We generally recognize support revenues ratably over the term of the support contract. If support or professional services are included in an arrangement that includes a license agreement, amounts related to support or professional services are allocated based on vendor-specific objective evidence. Vendor-specific objective evidence for support and professional services is based on the price at which such elements are sold separately, or, when not sold separately, the price established by management having the relevant authority to make such decision. Arrangements that require significant modification or customization of software are recognized under the percentage of completion method. Since inception, we have incurred substantial research and development costs and have invested heavily in the expansion of our sales, marketing and professional services organizations to build an infrastructure to support our long-term growth strategy. We had 81 employees as of December 31, 2001 and 76 as of June 30, 2002, representing a decrease of 6%. In 2001, we have restructured operations (including a reduction in staff) and have experienced turnover in staff, which has resulted in an overall reduction in the number of employees. We have incurred net losses in each quarter from 1996 until March 2002, and had a modest profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. As of June 30, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $59.0 million. We are currently targeting that sales and marketing expenses, research and development expenses, and general and administrative expenses, will be below 2001 spending levels. We are currently targeting to achieve a modest net profit on a GAAP basis for the third and fourth quarters of 2002. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicative of future performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in early stages of development, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving markets. We may not maintain profitability in the future. Our success depends significantly upon broad market acceptance of our POWERTIER and our recently introduced EDGEXTEND products. Our performance will also depend on the level of capital spending in our target market of customers and on the growth and widespread adoption of the market for business-to-business electronic commerce over the Internet. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS (SECOND QUARTERS) ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 Revenues Our total revenues were $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 representing an increase of 21%. International revenues were $826,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 65%. The decrease was primarily due to a slowdown in both the European and Asian markets. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, Cablevision and Salomon Smith Barney accounted for 43% and 21% of total revenues, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, sales of products and services to our top five customers accounted for 75% of total revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2001, sales of products and services to our top five customers accounted for 63% of total revenues. License Revenues. License revenues consist of licenses of our software products, which generally are priced based on the number of users or servers. License revenues were $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing an increase of 62%. License revenues represented 72% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 53% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in software license revenues was primarily due to the recognition of license revenue for a major contract negotiated and signed in the first quarter of 2002. 9 Service Revenues. Service revenues consist of professional services consulting, customer support and training. Our service revenues were $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 27%. The decrease in service revenues was primarily due to several key consulting service contracts undertaken in 2001 that were not extended into 2002. Service revenues represented 28% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 47% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Cost of Revenues Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues consists of royalties, packaging, documentation and associated shipping costs. Our cost of license revenues was $75,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $1,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. As a percentage of license revenues, cost of license revenues were 2% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 0% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. This increase was largely due to increased royalty charges for technology licensed from a major vendor. Cost of Service Revenues. Cost of service revenues consists of personnel, contractors and other costs related to the provision of professional services, technical support and training. Our cost of service revenues was $759,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 36%. This decrease was primarily due to a significant reduction in our use of external consultants in 2002. As a percentage of service revenues, cost of service revenues were 47% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 54% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Cost of service revenues, as a percentage of service revenues may vary between periods due to our use of third party professional services. Operating Expenses Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, commissions and bonuses earned by sales and marketing personnel, travel, and marketing and promotional expenses. Our sales and marketing expenses were $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 32%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in staffing, marketing programs, personnel related costs, lower commissions and office space. Sales and marketing expenses represented 45% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 80% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting that 2002 sales and marketing expense levels will be below 2001 expense levels. Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for software developers, product managers and quality assurance personnel and payments to external software consultants. Our research and development expenses were $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 34%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in both employees and external contract staff. Research and development expenses represented 18% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 33% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting that 2002 research and development expense levels will be below 2001 expense levels. General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and related costs for our finance, general and administrative personnel as well as legal costs, bad debt write-offs and various costs associated with our status as a public company. Our general and administrative expenses were $919,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 34%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in personnel related costs and the termination of patent litigation and related legal fees and settlements. General and administrative expenses represented 16% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 29% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting that 2002 general and administrative expense levels will be below 2001 expense levels. Amortization of Purchased Intangibles. Amortization of purchased intangibles was $142,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 94%. Based on an evaluation of our purchased intangibles at June 30, 2001, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.0 million to write down the carrying value of these assets to their net realizable values, which reflected the expected economic benefits to be derived from the use of these assets. Interest and Other Income/(Expense). Interest and other income (expense) consists primarily of earnings on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances, offset by interest expense related to obligations under capital leases and other equipment related borrowings, and various miscellaneous state and foreign taxes and other expenses. Interest and other income (expense) was $4,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $97,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 96%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in our overall cash balances and a reduction in market interest rates. We expect that interest and other income (expense) will decrease as we continue to use the net proceeds from our initial public offering and may become a net expense for the remainder of 2002. 10 Stock-Based Compensation. Certain options granted and common stock issued in the past have been considered to be compensatory, as the estimated fair value for accounting purposes was greater than the stock price as determined by the Board of Directors on the date of grant or issuance. Total deferred stock compensation associated with equity transactions as of June 30, 2002 was $65,000, net of amortization. Deferred stock compensation is being amortized ratably over the vesting periods of these securities. Amortization expense, which is included in operating expenses, was $20,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $60,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2001. Provision for Income Taxes. Since inception, we have incurred net operating losses for federal and state tax purposes and have only recognized minimal tax provisions within our international subsidiaries. We have placed a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of these assets. We evaluate on a quarterly basis the recoverability of the net deferred tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance. If and when we determine that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation allowance will be reduced. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 Revenues Our total revenues were $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 representing a decrease of 18%. International revenues were $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 64%. The decrease was primarily due to a slowdown in both the European and Asian markets. In the six months ended June 30, 2002, sales to Cablevision accounted for 33% of total revenues and sales to Salomon Smith Barney accounted for 19% of total revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, sales to Salomon Smith Barney accounted for 18% of total revenues and sales to Intershop accounted for 9% of total revenues. License Revenues. License revenues consist of licenses of our software products, which generally are priced based on the number of users or servers. License revenues were $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing an increase of 6%. License revenues represented 63% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 49% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Service Revenues. Service revenues consist of professional services consulting, customer support and training. Our service revenues were $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 40%. The decrease in service revenues was primarily due to several large consulting service contracts undertaken in 2001 that were not extended into 2002. Service revenues represented 37 % of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 51% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Cost of Revenues Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues consists of royalties, packaging, documentation and associated shipping costs. Our cost of license revenues was $102,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. As a percentage of license revenues, cost of license revenues was 2% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 0.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. This increase was largely due to increased royalty charges. Cost of Service Revenues. Cost of service revenues consists of personnel and other costs related to professional services, technical support and training. Our cost of service revenues was $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 35%. This decrease was primarily due to a significant reduction in our use of third party consultants in 2002. As a percentage of service revenues, cost of service revenues were 52% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 48% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Operating Expenses Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and bonuses earned by sales and marketing personnel, travel and entertainment, and promotional expenses. Our sales and marketing expenses were $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 39%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in staffing, marketing programs, personnel related costs and lower commissions. Sales and marketing expenses represented 64% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 85% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting sales and marketing expense levels to be below comparable 2001 expense levels. 11 Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for software developers, product managers and quality assurance personnel and payments to outside software developers. Our research and development expenses were $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 35%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in both employees and external contract staff. Research and development expenses represented 27% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 35% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting research and development expense levels to be below comparable 2001 expense levels. General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and related costs for our finance, administrative and general management personnel as well as legal costs, bad debt write-offs and various costs associated with our status as a public company. Our general and administrative expenses were $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 33%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in staffing and a termination of patent litigation and the related legal fees and settlements. General and administrative expenses represented 23% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 29% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We are presently targeting general and administrative expense levels to be below comparable 2001 expense levels. Amortization and Impairment of Purchased Intangibles. Amortization of purchased intangibles was $354,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and amortization and impairment of purchased intangibles was $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Interest and Other Income/(Expense). Interest and other income/(expense) consists primarily of earnings on our cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment balances, offset by interest expense related to obligations under capital leases and other borrowings. Net interest income was $20,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $274,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing a decrease of 93%. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in our overall cash balances and a reduction in market interest rates. We expect that interest and other income (expense) will decrease as we continue to use the net proceeds from our initial public offering and may become a net expense for the remainder of 2002. Stock-Based Compensation. Certain options granted and common stock issued in the past have been considered to be compensatory, as the estimated fair value for accounting purposes was greater than the stock price as determined by the Board of Directors on the date of grant or issuance. Total deferred stock compensation associated with equity transactions as of June 30, 2002 was $65,000, net of amortization. Deferred stock compensation is being amortized ratably over the vesting periods of these securities. Amortization expense, which is included in operating expenses, was $54,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $162,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2001. Provision for Income Tax. Since inception, we have incurred net operating losses for federal and state tax purposes and have only recognized minimal tax provisions within our international subsidiaries. We have placed a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of these assets. We evaluate on a quarterly basis the recoverability of the net deferred tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance. If and when we determine that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation allowance will be reduced. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and may continue to fluctuate in the future, as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. These factors include: o our ability to close relatively large sales on schedule; o delays or deferrals of customer orders or deployments; o delays in shipment of scheduled software releases; 12 o shifts in demand for and market acceptance among our various products, including POWERTIER and our newest products, EDGEXTEND, DIRECTALERT and DYNAMAI; o the possible loss of sales people; o introduction of new products or services by us or our competitors; o annual or quarterly budget cycles of our customers or prospective customers; o the level of product and price competition in the application server and data management markets; o our lengthy sales cycle; o our success in maintaining our direct sales force and expanding our indirect distribution channels; o the mix of direct sales versus indirect distribution channel sales; o the mix of products and services licensed or sold; o the mix of domestic and international sales; and o our success in penetrating international markets and general economic conditions in these markets. The typical sales cycle of our products is long and unpredictable, and is affected by seasonal fluctuations as a result of our customers' fiscal year budgeting cycles and slow summer purchasing patterns in Europe. We typically receive a substantial portion of our orders in the last two weeks of each quarter because our customers often delay purchases of our products to the end of the quarter to gain price concessions. Because a substantial portion of our costs are relatively fixed and based on anticipated revenues, a failure to book an expected order in a given quarter would not be offset by a corresponding reduction in costs and could adversely affect our operating results. Our license revenues in the first quarter of 2002 were lower than those in the fourth quarter of 2001. In the future, we expect this trend to continue, with the fourth quarter of each year accounting for the greatest percentage of total revenues for the year and with an absolute decline in revenues from the fourth quarter to the first quarter of the next year. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Since inception, we have financed our business primarily through our initial public offering of common stock in June 1999, which totaled $34.1 million in aggregate net proceeds, and private sales of convertible preferred stock, which totaled $19.9 million in aggregate net proceeds. We have also financed our business through equipment related loans in the maximum principal amounts of $800,000 and $655,000 and various capitalized leases. As of June 30, 2002, we had $7.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and $4.2 million of working capital. Net cash provided by operating activities was $237,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and net cash used in operating activities was $10.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, cash provided by operating activities was attributable primarily to increases in deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities and depreciation and amortization, offset by net losses and a decrease in accounts payable. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash used in operating activities was attributable primarily to net operating losses and decreases in accounts payable and accrued compensation. Those uses were partially offset by depreciation and amortization, a write-down of purchased intangibles for impairment and a decrease in accounts receivable. Net cash used in investing activities was $123,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and net cash provided by investing activities was $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, net cash used in investing activities was attributable primarily to the purchase of fixed assets and intangibles. For the six months ended June 30, 2001, cash was provided by investing activities through the conversion of short-term investments into cash and cash equivalents and by the sale of surplus property and equipment. 13 Net cash used in financing activities was $213,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 primarily as a result of loan repayments partially offset by sales of common stock as a result of option exercises. Net cash provided by financing activities was $47,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We have credit facilities with Comerica Bank. Under these credit facilities, the Company has a $5.0 million revolving line of credit facility available through April 30, 2003, and an equipment term loan of $655,000. As of June 30, 2002 we had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit facility. As of June 30, 2002 we had $371,000 outstanding under the equipment term loan. We are required to make principal payments of $21,843 per month, plus interest at the bank's base rate plus 0.5% per annum payable in 30 monthly installments. The bank's credit facilities require the Company, among other things, to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $4 million for the quarter ending June 30, 2002, $4.5 million for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 and $5 million thereafter, and a minimum quick ratio (current assets not including inventory less current liabilities excluding deferred revenue) of 2 to 1. As of June 30, 2002, we were in compliance with our debt covenants. Borrowings under the facilities are collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Currently we have no material commitments for capital expenditures nor do we anticipate a material increase in capital expenditures and lease commitments. If we meet our targets with respect to revenues and accounts receivable collections, we are currently targeting that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures through at least June 30, 2003. If we experience difficulties in achieving our revenue targets, our cash and cash equivalents may not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs. Accordingly, our operating plans could be restricted and our business could be harmed. If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or to obtain a credit facility. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights, preferences and priveleges senior to holders of common stock, and the term of this debt could impose restrictions on our operations. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and we may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, our business could be harmed. ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS You should carefully consider the following risks in addition to the other information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The risks and uncertainties described below are intended to be the ones that are specific to our company or industry and that we deem to be material, but are not the only ones that we face. WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY IN THE APPLICATION SERVER AND DATA MANAGEMENT MARKETS. Because we only commenced selling application servers in 1997 and only commenced selling DYNAMAI in 2000 and EDGEXTEND and DIRECTALERT in 2002, we have a limited operating history in the application server and data management markets. We thus face the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in early stages of development, particularly companies in the rapidly changing software industry. These risks include: o the timing and magnitude of capital expenditures by our customers and prospective customers; o our dependence for revenue from our POWERTIER for C++ product, which was first introduced in 1997 and has achieved only limited market acceptance; o our dependence for revenue from our POWERTIER for J2EE product, which was first introduced in 1998 and has achieved only limited market acceptance; o our need to achieve market acceptance for our new product introductions, including DYNAMAI, DIRECTALERT and EDGEXTEND; o our need to expand our distribution capability through various sales channels, including a direct sales organization, original equipment manufacturers, third party distributors and systems integrators; o our unproven ability to anticipate and respond to technological and competitive developments in the rapidly changing market for application servers; o If we meet our targets with respect to revenues and accounts receivable collections, we are currently targeting that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures through at least June 30, 2003. If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or to obtain a credit facility. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock, and the term of this debt could impose restrictions on our operations. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and we may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, our business could be harmed. 14 o our unproven ability to compete in a highly competitive market; o uncertainty as to the growth rate and spending levels in the software infrastructure market; o our dependence on the Java programming language, commonly known as J2EE, becoming a widely accepted standard in the transactional application server market; and o our dependence upon key personnel. BECAUSE WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES AND NEGATIVE CASH FLOW, WE MAY NOT REMAIN PROFITABLE. We may not achieve our targeted revenues, and we may not be able to maintain profitability in the future. We have incurred net losses each year since 1996. In particular, we incurred losses of $3.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, $11.4 million in 2001, $16.7 million in 200 and, $11.3 million in 1999. As of June 30, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $59.0 million. While we are currently targeting lower sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expenses for 2002, as compared to 2001, we will still need to achieve our revenue targets for future growth. Because our product market is new and evolving, we cannot accurately predict either the future growth rate, if any, or the ultimate size of the market for our products. WE HAVE FINANCED OUR BUSINESS THROUGH THE SALE OF STOCK AND NOT THROUGH CASH GENERATED BY OUR OPERATIONS. Since inception, we have generally had negative cash flow from operations. To date, we have financed our business primarily through sales of common stock and convertible preferred stock and not through cash generated by our operations. We expect to have negative cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. WE MAY NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE. Based upon our current forecasts and estimates, including revenues and accounts receivable collections, we are targeting that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs through at least June 30, 2003. However, we may need to raise additional funds prior to that time. We face several risks in connection with this possible need to raise additional capital: o the issuance of additional securities could result in: o debt securities with rights senior to the common stock; o dilution to existing stockholders as a result of issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities; o debt securities with restrictive covenants that could restrict our ability to run our business as desired; or o securities issued on disadvantageous financial terms. o the failure to procure needed funding could result in: o a dramatic reduction in scope in our planned product development or marketing efforts; or o an inability to respond to competitive pressures or take advantage of market opportunities. If we are unable to obtain additional financing as and when needed and on acceptable terms, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which could jeopardize our business. 15 THE UNPREDICTABILITY OF OUR QUARTERLY RESULTS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK. Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. In prior years, we have often experienced an absolute decline in revenues from the fourth quarter to the first quarter of the next year. If our future quarterly operating results are below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. The factors that may cause fluctuations of our operating results include the following: o our ability to close relatively large sales on schedule; o delays or deferrals of customer orders or deployments; o delays in shipment of scheduled software releases; o shifts in demand for and market acceptance among our various products, including POWERTIER and our newer products, EDGEXTEND, DIRECTALERT, and DYNAMAI; o the possible loss of sales people; o introduction of new products or services by us or our competitors; o annual or quarterly budget cycles of our customers or prospective customers; o the level of product and price competition in the application server and data management markets; o our lengthy sales cycle; o our success in maintaining our direct sales force and expanding indirect distribution channels; o the mix of direct sales versus indirect distribution channel sales; o the mix of products and services licensed or sold; o the mix of domestic and international sales; and o our success in penetrating international markets and general economic conditions in these markets. We typically receive a substantial portion of our orders in the last two weeks of each fiscal quarter because our customers often delay purchases of our products to the end of the quarter to gain price concessions. Also, we tend to experience slower sales patterns in Europe in the third quarter. Because a substantial portion of our costs are relatively fixed and based on anticipated revenues, a failure to book an expected order in a given quarter would not be offset by a corresponding reduction in costs and could adversely affect our operating results. OUR SALES CYCLE IS LONG, UNPREDICTABLE AND SUBJECT TO SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONS, SO IT IS DIFFICULT TO FORECAST OUR REVENUES. Any delay in sales of our products or services could cause our quarterly revenues and operating results to fluctuate. The typical sales cycle of our products is long and unpredictable and requires both a significant capital investment decision by our customers and our education of potential customers regarding the use and benefits of our products. Our sales cycle is generally between three and nine months. A successful sales cycle typically includes presentations to both business and technical decision makers, as well as a limited pilot program to establish a technical fit. Our products typically are purchased as part of a significant enhancement to a customer's information technology system. The implementation of our products involves a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers. Accordingly, a purchase decision for a potential customer typically requires the approval of several senior decision makers. Our sales cycle is affected by the business conditions of each prospective customer, as well as the overall economic climate for technology-related capital expenditures. Due to the relative importance of many of our product sales, a lost or delayed sale could adversely affect our quarterly operating results. Our sales cycle is affected by seasonal fluctuations as a result of our customers' fiscal year budgeting cycles and slow summer purchasing patterns in Europe. 16 WE DEPEND ON A RELATIVELY SMALL NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS, AND THE LOSS OF ONE OR MORE OF THESE CUSTOMERS COULD RESULT IN A DECREASE IN OUR REVENUES. Historically, we have received a substantial portion of our revenues from product sales to a limited number of customers. In the six months ended June 30, 2002, sales of products and services to our top five customers accounted for 64% of total revenue with Cablevision and Salomon Smith Barney accounting for 33% and 19% of total revenues respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2001, sales of products and services to our top five customers accounted for 51% of total revenues with Salomon Smith Barney and Intershop accounted for 18% and 9% of total revenues respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2001, sales of products and services to Salomon Smith Barney accounted for 15% of total revenues, sales to Cablevision accounted for 11% of total revenues and sales to our top five customers accounted for 45% of total revenues. In the year ended December 31, 2000, sales of products and services to Salomon Smith Barney accounted for 16% of total revenues and sales to our top five customers accounted for 40% of total revenues. In the year ended December 31, 1999, sales of products and services to Cisco accounted for 13% of our total revenues, and sales of products and services to our top five customers accounted for 35% of total revenues. In addition, the identity of our top five customers has changed from year to year. If we lose a significant customer, or fail to increase product sales to an existing customer as planned, we may not be able to replace the lost revenues with sales to other customers. In addition, because our marketing strategy is to concentrate on selling products to industry leaders, any loss of a customer could harm our reputation within the industry and make it harder for us to sell our products to other companies in that industry. The loss of, or a reduction in sales to, one or more significant customers would likely result in a decrease in our revenues. WE DEPEND ON THE JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE, THE ENTERPRISE JAVABEANS STANDARD AND THE EMERGING MARKET FOR DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING, AND IF THESE TECHNOLOGIES FAIL TO GAIN ACCEPTANCE, OUR BUSINESS COULD SUFFER. We are focusing certain portions of our marketing efforts on our POWERTIER for J2EE application server and EDGEXTEND products, which are based on three relatively new technologies, which have not been widely adopted by a large number of companies. These three technologies are a distributed object computing architecture, Sun Microsystems' Java programming language and J2EE (formerly EJB). Distributed object computing combines the use of software modules, or objects, communicating across a computer network to software applications, such as our POWERTIER application server. J2EE is the Java programming standard for use in an application server. In 1998, we launched our POWERTIER for EJB product, which is a transactional application server that uses Java and conformed to the EJB standard. Sun Microsystems released the EJB standard in 1998, and thus far EJB has had limited market acceptance. Since our POWERTIER for J2EE product depends upon the specialized J2EE standard, we face a limited market compared to competitors who may offer application servers based on more widely accepted standards, including the Java programming language. We expect a material portion of our future revenues will come from sales of products based on the J2EE standard. Thus, our success depends significantly upon broad market acceptance of distributed object computing in general, and Java application servers in particular. If J2EE does not become a widespread programming standard for application servers, our revenues and business could suffer. IF WE DO NOT DELIVER PRODUCTS THAT MEET RAPIDLY CHANGING TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS AND CUSTOMER DEMANDS, WE WILL LOSE MARKET SHARE TO OUR COMPETITORS. The market for our products and services is characterized by rapid technological change, dynamic customer demands and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. Customer requirements for products can change rapidly as a result of innovation in software applications and hardware configurations and the emergence or adoption of new industry standards, including Internet technology standards. We may need to increase our research and development investment over our current targeted spending levels to maintain our technological leadership. Our future success depends on our ability to continue to enhance our current products and to continue to develop and introduce new products that keep pace with competitive product introductions and technological developments. For example, as Sun Microsystems introduces new J2EE specifications, we may need to introduce new versions of POWERTIER for J2EE designed to support these new specifications to remain competitive. If we do not bring enhancements and new versions of our products to market in a timely manner, our market share and revenues could decrease and our reputation could suffer. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to changes in technology and customer needs, or if there are any significant delays in product development or introduction, our revenues and business could suffer. Our EDGEXTEND for WebSphere product was released in March 2002 and our EDGEXTEND for WebLogic product was released in August 2002. Any delays in releasing future enhancements to these products or new products on a generally available basis may materially effect our future revenues. 17 WE ARE CURRENTLY TARGETING THAT A MATERIAL PORTION OF OUR REVENUES WILL BE DERIVED FROM SALES OF OUR NEWEST PRODUCT, EDGEXTEND, HOWEVER THERE ARE TECHNICAL AND MARKET RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW PRODUCTS. We are currently targeting that sales of our EDGEXTEND products will soon represent a material percentage of our revenues. New products, like EDGEXTEND, often contain errors or defects, particularly when first introduced. Any errors or defects could be serious or difficult to correct and could result in a delay of product adoption resulting in lost revenues or a delay in gaining market share, which could harm our revenues and reputation. In addition, market adoption is often slower for newer products, like EDGEXTEND, than for existing products. Because we are focusing our marketing and sales efforts on our newer EDGEXTEND data management product, any failure in market adoption of this product could affect our business. BECAUSE OUR DIRECT SALES TEAM IS CURRENTLY OUR MOST CRITICAL SALES CHANNEL, ANY FAILURE TO MAINTAIN AND TRAIN THIS TEAM MAY RESULT IN LOWER REVENUES. We must maintain a strong direct sales team to generate revenues. In the last several years, we have experienced significant turnover in our sales team, and in the third quarter of 2001, we implemented a reduction in force and substantially reorganized our sales team. In order to meet our future sales goals, we may need to hire more salespeople for both our domestic and international sales efforts. In the past, newly hired employees have required training and approximately six to nine months experience to achieve full productivity. Like many companies in the software industry, we are likely to continue to experience turnover in our sales force. As a result of our recent restructuring, a number of our sales people are relatively new and we may not meet our sales goals. In addition, our recently hired employees may not become productive, and we may not be able to hire enough qualified individuals in the future. BECAUSE OUR FUTURE REVENUE GOALS ARE BASED ON OUR DEVELOPMENT OF A STRONG SALES CHANNEL THROUGH OEM PARTNERS AND OTHER RESELLERS, ANY FAILURE TO DEVELOP THIS CHANNEL MAY RESULT IN LOWER REVENUES. To date, we have sold our products primarily through our direct sales force, but our ability to achieve targeted revenue growth will depend in large part on our success in establishing and leveraging relationships with OEM partners and third parties. It may be difficult for us to establish these relationships, and, even if we establish these relationships, we will then depend on the sales efforts of these third parties. In addition, because these relationships are nonexclusive, these third parties may choose to sell application servers, data management products or other alternative solutions offered by our competitors, and not our products. If we fail to successfully build our third-party distribution channels or if our third party partners do not perform as expected, our business could be harmed. BECAUSE OUR PRODUCTS ARE OFTEN INCORPORATED INTO ENTERPRISE-WIDE SYSTEM DEPLOYMENTS, ANY DELAYS IN THESE PROJECTS MAY RESULT IN LOWER REVENUES. Because our products are often incorporated into multi-million dollar enterprise projects, we depend on the successful and timely completion of these large projects to fully deploy our products and achieve our revenue goals. These enterprise projects often take many years to complete and can be delayed by a variety of factors, including general or industry-specific economic downturns, our customers' budget constraints, other customer-specific delays, problems with other system components or delays caused by the OEM or other third-party partners who may be managing the system deployment. If our customers cannot successfully implement large-scale deployments, or they determine for any reason that our products cannot accommodate large-scale deployments or that our products are not appropriate for widespread use, our business could suffer. In addition, if an OEM or other third-party partner fails to complete a project utilizing our product for a customer in a timely manner, our revenues or business reputation could suffer. BECAUSE WE COMPETE WITH SUN MICROSYSTEMS, WHO CONTROLS THE J2EE APPLICATION SERVER STANDARD, WE FACE THE RISK THAT THEY MAY DEVELOP THIS STANDARD TO FAVOR THEIR OWN PRODUCTS. Our success depends on achieving widespread market acceptance of our POWERTIER for J2EE application server. Because Sun Microsystems controls the J2EE standard, we need to maintain a good working relationship with Sun Microsystems if we decide to develop future versions of POWERTIER for J2EE, as well as additional products using J2EE, that will gain market acceptance. In March 1998, we entered into a license agreement with Sun Microsystems, pursuant to which we granted Sun Microsystems rights to manufacture and sell, by itself and not jointly with others, products under a number of our patents, and Sun Microsystems granted us rights to manufacture and sell, by ourselves and not jointly with others, products under a number of Sun Microsystems' patents. As a result, Sun Microsystems may develop and sell some competing products that would, in the absence of this license agreement, infringe our patents. Because Sun Microsystems controls the J2EE standard, it could develop the J2EE standard in a more proprietary way to favor a product offered by its subsidiary, i-Planet, or a third party, which could make it much harder for us to compete in the J2EE application server market. 18 MICROSOFT HAS ESTABLISHED A COMPETING APPLICATION SERVER STANDARD, WHICH COULD DIMINISH THE MARKET POTENTIAL FOR OUR PRODUCTS IF IT GAINS WIDESPREAD ACCEPTANCE. Microsoft has established a competing standard for distributed computing, .NET, which includes an application server product. If this standard gains widespread market acceptance over the J2EE or CORBA standards, on which our products are based, our business would suffer. Because of Microsoft's resources and commanding position with respect to other markets and technologies, Microsoft's entry into the application server market may cause our potential customers to delay or change purchasing decisions. We expect that Microsoft's presence in the application server market will increase competitive pressure in this market. WE FACE SIGNIFICANT COMPETITION FROM COMPANIES WITH GREATER RESOURCES THAN WE HAVE AND MAY FACE ADDITIONAL COMPETITION IN THE FUTURE. The markets for our products are intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market are: o performance, including scalability, integrity and availability; o ability to provide a complete software platform; o flexibility; o use of standards-based technology (e.g. J2EE); o ease of integration with customers' existing enterprise systems; o ease and speed of implementation; o quality of support and service; o security; o company reputation; and o price. Our competitors for POWERTIER include BEA Systems (WebLogic), Secant Technologies, IBM (WebSphere), Oracle (OAS) and i-Planet (Sun Microsystems). Many customers may not be willing to purchase our POWERTIER platform because they have already invested heavily in databases and other enterprise software components offered by these competing companies. Many of these competitors in the application server markets have preexisting customer relationships, longer operating histories, greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, greater name recognition and larger installed bases of customers than we do. In addition, some competitors offer products that are less complex than our POWERTIER products and require less customization to implement with potential customers' existing systems. Thus, potential customers engaged in simpler business-to-business e-commerce transactions may prefer these "plug-and-play" products to our more complex offerings. Moreover, there are other very large and established companies, including Microsoft, who offer alternative solutions and are thus indirect competitors. Further, many companies have already supported, or have announced their intention to support J2EE, and may compete against us in the future. These competitors and potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. In addition, in the POWERTIER for C++ market, potential customers may build their own custom application servers, so we effectively compete against our potential customers' internal information technology departments. The majority of our revenue in Q2 2002 came from sales of our POWERTIER products. We are targeting that future revenues will contain less revenue from our POWERTIER products and more from our EDGEXTEND and DIRECTALERT products. 19 In the DIRECTALERT market, alternative approaches are provided by a variety of sources, including the potential for internal development. Company vendors such as SpiritSoft, TIBCO, and IBM provide message-oriented middleware software which may evolve into competitive products. Vendors such as webMethods and Business Objects provide alternative architectures for business intelligence information. DIRECTALERT is based on licensed technology. If we are unable to take advantage of this technology, we may be unable to improve the product quickly enough to react to changing market conditions. In the EDGEXTEND market, similar technology is available from a variety of sources. Companies such as Versant, webGain and Excelon are middleware vendors that offer alternative data management solutions that directly target EDGEXTEND's market. In addition, many prospective customers may build their own custom solutions. In the DYNAMAI market, similar dynamic Web content acceleration technology is available from a variety of sources, including but not limited to internal development, application server vendors such as Oracle, electronic commerce software vendors such as Intershop and ATG, content delivery networks such as Akamai and epicRealm, and emerging software and hardware appliance vendors such as Chutney and Cachier, who are directly targeting DYNAMAI'S market. IF THE MARKET FOR INFRASTRUCTURE SOFTWARE FOR NETWORKS AND WEB-BASED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES DOES NOT DEVELOP AS WE CURRENTLY ENVISION, OUR BUSINESS MODEL COULD FAIL AND OUR REVENUES COULD DECLINE. Our performance and future success will depend on the growth and widespread adoption of the market for infrastructure software for networks and web-based products and services. If this market does not develop in the manner we currently envision, our business could be harmed. Moreover, critical issues concerning the commercial use of the Internet, including security, cost, accessibility and quality of network service, remain unresolved and may negatively affect the growth of the Internet as a platform for conducting various forms of electronic commerce. In addition, the Internet could lose its viability due to delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased activity or due to increased government regulation. OUR FAILURE TO MANAGE OUR RESOURCES COULD IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS. Achieving our planned revenue targets and other financial objectives will place significant demands on our management and other resources. Our ability to manage our resources effectively will require us to continue to develop and improve our operational, financial and other internal systems and controls, as well as our business development capabilities, and to train, motivate and manage our employees. If we are unable to manage our resources effectively, we may not be able to retain key personnel and the quality of our services and products may suffer. OUR BUSINESS COULD SUFFER IF WE CANNOT ATTRACT AND RETAIN THE SERVICES OF KEY EMPLOYEES. Our future success depends on the ability of our management to operate effectively, both individually and as a group. We are substantially dependent upon the continued service of our existing executive personnel, especially Christopher T. Keene, our Chief Executive Officer. We do not have a key person life insurance policy covering Mr. Keene or any other officer or key employee. Our success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled employees, particularly sales personnel and software engineers. There is significant competition for skilled employees, especially for people who have experience in both the software and Internet industries. We have experienced significant turnover among sales personnel in recent years, which makes retention more challenging, in particular as a result of our restructurings in 2001. If we are not successful in attracting and retaining these skilled employees, our sales and product development efforts would suffer. In addition, if one or more of our key employees resigns to join a competitor or to form a competing company, the loss of that employee and any resulting loss of existing or potential customers to a competitor could harm our business. If we lose any key personnel, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by those former employees. OUR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN DEFECTS OR ERRORS, AND SHIPMENTS OF OUR SOFTWARE MAY BE DELAYED. Complex software products often contain errors or defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released. Our products have in the past contained and may in the future contain errors and defects, which may be serious or difficult to correct and which may cause delays in subsequent product releases. Delays in shipment of scheduled software releases or serious defects or errors could result in lost revenues or a delay in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and reputation. 20 WE MAY BE SUED BY OUR CUSTOMERS FOR PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS AS A RESULT OF FAILURES IN THEIR CRITICAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Because our customers use our products for important business applications, errors, defects or other performance problems could result in financial or other damages to our customers. They could pursue claims for damages, which, if successful, could result in our having to make substantial payments. Although our purchase agreements typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability claims, existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial decisions could negate these limitation of liability provisions. A product liability claim brought against us, even if meritless, would likely be time consuming and costly for us to litigate or settle. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR REVENUES IS DERIVED FROM INTERNATIONAL SALES, WHICH COULD DECLINE AS A RESULT OF LEGAL, BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RISKS SPECIFIC TO INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS. Our future success will depend, in part, on our successful development of international markets for our products. Approximately 21% of our revenues came from sales of products and services outside of the United States for the six months ended June 30, 2002, and approximately 46% of our revenues came from sales of products and services outside of the United States for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Approximately 38% of our revenues came from sales of products and services outside of the United States during the year ended December 31, 2001, and approximately 28% of our revenues came from sales of products and services outside of the United States during the year ended December 31, 2000. We expect international revenues to continue to represent a significant portion of our total revenues although we have recently experienced a slowdown in both the European and Asian markets. To date, almost all of our international revenues have resulted from our direct sales efforts. In international markets, however, we expect that we will depend more heavily on third party distributors to sell our products in the future. The success of our international strategy will depend on our ability to develop and maintain productive relationships with these third parties. The failure to develop key international markets for our products could cause a reduction in our revenues. Additional risks related to our international expansion and operation include: o difficulties of staffing, funding and managing foreign operations; o future dependence on the sales efforts of our third party distributors to expand business; o longer payment cycles typically associated with international sales; o tariffs and other trade barriers; o failure to comply with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and changing regulations; o exposure to political instability, terrorism and economic downturns; o failure to localize our products for foreign markets; o restrictions under U.S. law on the export of technologies; o potentially adverse tax consequences; o reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries; and o currency fluctuations. The majority of our product sales outside the United States are denominated in U.S. dollars. We do not currently engage in any hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations as a result of our foreign operations. We are not currently ISO 9000 compliant, nor are we attempting to meet all foreign technical standards that may apply to our products. Our failure to develop our international sales channel as planned could cause a decline in our revenues. 21 IF WE DO NOT PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION MAY BE IMPAIRED. Our success depends on our ability to protect our proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products, and yet the measures we are taking to protect these rights may not be adequate. If we are not adequately protected, our competitors could use the intellectual property that we have developed to enhance their products and services, which could harm our business. We rely on a combination of patents, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology, but these legal means afford only limited protection. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources. WE MAY BE SUED FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. The software industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent litigation based on allegations of patent infringement and the violation of other intellectual property rights. As the number of entrants into our market increases, the possibility of an intellectual property claim against us grows. For example, we may be inadvertently infringing a patent of which we are unaware. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be a patent application now pending of which we are unaware, which will cause us to be infringing when it issues in the future. To address these patent infringement claims, we may have to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on disadvantageous commercial terms. Alternatively, we may be unable to obtain a necessary license. A successful claim of product infringement against us, and our failure to license the infringed or similar technology, would harm our business. In addition, any infringement claims, with or without merit, would be time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle and would divert management attention from administering our core business. FUTURE SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY DEPRESS OUR STOCK PRICE. If our current stockholders sell substantial amounts of common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, in the public market, the market price of our common stock could fall. In addition, these sales of common stock could impede our ability to raise funds at an advantageous price, or at all, through the sale of securities. As of June 30, 2002, we had approximately 20,153,087 shares of common stock outstanding. Virtually all of our shares, other than shares held by affiliates, are freely tradeable. In addition, shares held by affiliates are tradeable, subject to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144. OUR STOCK PRICE HAS BEEN, AND MAY CONTINUE TO BE, VOLATILE, AND WE HAVE RECEIVED A NOTICE FROM NASDAQ REGARDING THE POSSIBLE DELISTING OF OUR STOCK FROM THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET SYSTEM. Our common stock price has been and may continue to be highly volatile, and we expect that the market price of our common stock will continue to be subject to significant fluctuations, as a result of variations in our quarterly operating results and the overall volatility of the Nasdaq Stock Market. These fluctuations have been, and may continue to be, exaggerated because an active trading market has not developed for our stock. Thus, investors may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock at a desirable price, or at all. Furthermore, we have received a notice of potential delisting from the Nasdaq Stock Market as our stock has traded below $1.00 per share minimum requirement for a 30 day period. We have until September 3, 2002 to regain compliancy. Compliance will be achieved if our stock trades above $1.00 per share for ten consecutive days. If we cannot achieve compliance we expect to receive a formal delisting notice from Nasdaq Stock Market. We currently intend to seek a Nasdaq hearing for appeal if and when we receive such notice of delisting. The maintenance of our Nasdaq National Market System listing is very important to us. We intend to take appropriate actions, as necessary, including seeking shareholder approval for a reverse stock split in order to maintain our Nasdaq National Market System listing. If our efforts in this regard are unsuccessful, we currently intend to seek a listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, which is generally considered to be not as broad and efficient a market as the Nasdaq National Market. This lack of liquidity and visibility could further decrease the price of our common stock. In addition, delisting from the Nasdaq National Market could negatively impact our reputation and consequently our business. In addition, the market price of our common stock may rise or fall in the future as a result of many factors, such as: o variations in our quarterly results; o announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors; 22 o introductions of new products by us or our competitors; o acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or our competitors; o hiring or departure of key personnel; o the gain or loss of a significant customer or order; o changes in estimates of our financial performance or changes in recommendations by securities analysts; o market conditions and expectations regarding capital spending in the software industry and in our customers' industries; and o adoption of new accounting standards affecting the software industry. The market prices of the common stock of many companies in the software and Internet industries have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to these companies' operating performance. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company after a period of volatility in the market price of its stock. We may in the future be a target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources, which could harm our business. THE ANTITAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND UNDER DELAWARE LAW COULD DISCOURAGE A TAKEOVER. Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or other change in control that a stockholder may consider favorable. These provisions may also discourage proxy contests or make it more difficult for stockholders to take corporate action. These provisions include the following: o establishing a classified board in which only a portion of the total board members will be elected at each annual meeting; o authorizing the board to issue preferred stock; o prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; o limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders; o prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and o establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election of the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings. WE MAY ENGAGE IN FUTURE ACQUISITIONS THAT COULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS AND DILUTE OUR STOCKHOLDERS. As part of our business strategy, we expect to review acquisition prospects that we believe would be advantageous to the development of our business. While we have no current agreements or negotiations underway with respect to any major acquisitions of third-party technology, we may make acquisitions of businesses, products or technologies in the future. If we make any acquisitions, we could take any or all of the following actions, any of which could materially and adversely affect our financial results and the price of our common stock: o issue equity securities that would dilute existing stockholders' percentage ownership; o incur substantial debt; o assume contingent liabilities; or 23 o take substantial charges in connection with the impairment of goodwill and amortization of other intangible assets. Acquisitions also entail numerous risks, including: o difficulties in assimilating acquired operations, products and personnel with our pre-existing business; o unanticipated costs; o diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; o adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; o risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no prior experience; and o potential loss of key employees from either our preexisting business or the acquired organization. We may not be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could harm our business. WE HAVE NOT DESIGNATED ANY SPECIFIC USE FOR THE NET PROCEEDS OF THE COMPANY'S INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK, AND THUS MAY USE THE REMAINING NET PROCEEDS TO FUND GENERAL OPERATIONS, FOR ACQUISITIONS OR FOR OTHER CORPORATE PURPOSES. We have not designated any specific use for the net proceeds of our initial public offering of common stock. As a result, our management and board of directors have broad discretion in spending the remaining net proceeds of that offering. We currently expect to use the remaining net proceeds primarily for working capital and general corporate purposes, funding product development and funding our sales and marketing organization. In addition, we may use a portion of the remaining net proceeds for further development of our product lines through acquisitions of products, technologies and businesses. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. Interest Rate Sensitivity. Our operating results are sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly because our cash equivalents are invested in short-term investment accounts. If market interest rates had changed by approximately ten percent in the six months ending June 30, 2002, our financial results would have changed by approximately $4,000. Foreign Currency Fluctuations. We operate in several international locations using local currencies for the payment of employees and suppliers, however, we did not have any significant net balances that are due or payable in foreign currencies at June 30, 2002. A hypothetical ten percent change in foreign currency rates would have changed the results of operations by approximately $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. We do not hedge any of our foreign currency exposures. 24 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. The Company is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, though it may from time to time become a party to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. (d) Use of Proceeds Our registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-76867, for our initial public offering of common stock became effective on June 24, 1999. We registered and sold an aggregate of 3,450,000 shares of common stock under the registration statement at a per share price of $11.00. Our underwriters were BancBoston Robertson Stephens, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, and Soundview Technology Group. Offering proceeds, net of aggregate underwriting commissions and discounts of $2.7 million and other offering transaction expenses of $1.1 million, were $34.1 million. None of the underwriting commissions and discounts or other offering transaction expenses were direct or indirect payments to our directors, officers, or holders of 10% or more of our stock. From June 24, 1999 through June 30, 2002, we have used the net offering proceeds as follows: Working capital expenditures....................... $ 20.4 million Acquiring property and equipment................... 2.4 million 2.9 million Acquiring technologies............................. -------------- 25.7 million Repayment of equipment related loans............... 1.1 million Cash and cash equivalents.......................... 7.3 million -------------- $ 34.1 million ============== Each of the above amounts represents our best estimate of our use of the net proceeds. None of the net offering proceeds were paid directly or indirectly to our directors, officers, or holders of 10% or more of our stock. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. On June 6, 2002, we held our annual meeting of stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2001. The following summarizes the matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders: 1. The election of one (1) Class III director to serve until the Annual Meeting of the stockholders for the year ending December 31, 2004: BROKER NON- NOMINEE IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAIN VOTES ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- Christopher Keene 17,355,798 0 61,175 0 25 2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002. BROKER NON- IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAIN VOTES -------- ------- ------- ----- 17,331,306 79,842 5,825 0 ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. None. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a) EXHIBITS: 3.2 By-laws of Persistence Software as amended as of April 18, 2002. 99.1 CEO Certification, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 99.2 CFO Certification, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K: None. 26 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. PERSISTENCE SOFTWARE, INC. By: /s/ Christine Russell ------------------------- CHRISTINE RUSSELL CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER) Date: August 14, 2002 27 EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION --- ----------- 3.2 By-laws of Persistence Software as amended as of April 18, 2002. 99.1 CEO Certification, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 99.2 CFO Certification, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 28