Note 17. Retirement benefits

Woodward provides various benefits to eligible members of the Company, including contributions to various defined contribution plans, pension benefits associated with defined benefit plans, postretirement medical benefits and postretirement life insurance benefits. Eligibility requirements and benefit levels vary depending on employee location.

Defined contribution plans

Most of the Company’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the U.S. defined contribution plan. The U.S. defined contribution plan allows employees to defer part of their annual income for income tax purposes into their personal 401(k) accounts. The Company makes contributions to eligible employee accounts, which are also deferred for employee personal income tax purposes. Certain foreign employees are also eligible to participate in foreign plans.

Most of Woodward’s U.S. employees with at least two years of service receive an annual contribution of Woodward stock, equal to 5% of their eligible prior year wages, to their personal Woodward Retirement Savings Plan accounts. In the second quarter of fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, Woodward fulfilled its annual Woodward stock contribution obligation using shares held in treasury stock by issuing 259 shares of common stock for a total value of $12,574 in fiscal year 2015, 260 shares of common stock for a total value of $11,193 in fiscal year 2014, and 250 shares of common stock for a total value of $9,780 in fiscal year 2013. The Woodward Retirement Savings Plan (the “WRS Plan”) held 4,887 shares of Woodward stock as of September 30, 2015 and 5,176 shares as of September 30, 2014. The shares held in the WRS Plan participant in dividends and are considered issued and outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share. Accrued liabilities included obligations to contribute shares of Woodward common stock to the WRS Plan of $11,342 as of September 30, 2015 and $9,297 as of September 30, 2014.

The amount of expense associated with defined contribution plans was as follows:



		Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2013
Company costs	$	30,933	$	24,921	$	20,012

Defined benefit plans

Woodward has defined benefit plans that provide pension benefits for certain retired employees in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, a defined benefit pension plan for certain employees in California was amended. The amendment froze the benefits of certain members and resulted in a curtailment gain in the U.S, see additional discussion below. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, Woodward terminated it defined benefit pension plan in Switzerland due to workforce reductions related to the closure of Woodward’s Swiss facility in connection with the realignment of the renewable power business that occurred in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013. Woodward also provides other postretirement benefits to its employees including postretirement medical benefits and life insurance benefits. Postretirement medical benefits are provided to certain current and retired employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries in the United States and the United Kingdom. Life insurance benefits are provided to certain retirees in the United States under frozen plans, which are no longer available to current employees. A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of Woodward’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

In connection with the acquisition of the Duarte Business (see Note 4, Joint venture and business acquisitions), Woodward did not assume the Seller’s postretirement benefit obligations under the Duarte Business’ defined benefit pension plan as they existed at the time of closing of the transaction. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Woodward established a new defined benefit pension plan for the Duarte Business employees who were beneficiaries of the Seller’s defined benefit pension plan (the “Duarte Pension Plan”). Subsequently, Woodward and the Duarte Union agreed that, effective as of the close of business on July 31, 2013, the Duarte Pension Plan was amended to cease all future benefit accruals to current participants in the plan. In addition, the Duarte Pension Plan was frozen to new entrants as of July 31, 2013. Effective June 30, 2015, the Company froze and terminated the defined benefit pension plan for employees at its Duarte, California manufacturing facility. Cash payout of benefits will occur after regulatory approval of the plan termination. In exchange for the freeze and termination of the plan, which were agreed upon through negotiations with the applicable employee union, the employees were provided replacement benefits through full participation in the Woodward U.S. defined contribution plan. Woodward does not expect future cash payouts to the beneficiaries of the terminated plan to be significantly different from the approximately $95 liability reflected in Woodward’s statement of financial position as of September 30, 2015.

In addition to the Duarte Pension Plan, excluding the Woodward HRT Plan, the defined benefit plans in the United States were frozen in fiscal year 2007 and no additional employees may participate in the U.S. plans and no additional service costs will be incurred.

Pension plans

The actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of retirement pension benefits were as follows:



	2015		2014		2013
United States:
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
Discount rate	4.39	%	4.40	%	5.15	%
Rate of compensation increase	n/a		3.50		3.50
Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:
Discount rate	4.40		5.15		4.10
Rate of compensation increase	n/a		3.50		3.50
Long-term rate of return on plan assets	7.62		7.62		7.59
United Kingdom:
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
Discount rate	3.75	%	4.10	%	4.50	%
Rate of compensation increase	3.40		3.50		3.50
Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:
Discount rate	4.10		4.50		4.60
Rate of compensation increase	3.50		3.50		3.90
Long-term rate of return on plan assets	5.50		5.50		5.50
Japan:
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
Discount rate	0.97	%	1.10	%	1.25	%
Rate of compensation increase	2.00		2.00		2.00
Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:
Discount rate	1.10		1.25		1.50
Rate of compensation increase	2.00		2.00		2.00
Long-term rate of return on plan assets	3.00		3.00		2.80
Switzerland:
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligation at September 30:
Discount rate	n/a		n/a		2.25	%
Rate of compensation increase	n/a		n/a		2.00
Weighted-average assumptions to determine periodic benefit costs for years ended September 30:
Discount rate	n/a		2.25		1.75
Rate of compensation increase	n/a		2.00		2.00
Long-term rate of return on plan assets	n/a		2.25		1.75

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the retirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.

In the United States, prior to fiscal year 2015, Woodward used a bond portfolio matching analysis based on recently traded, non-callable bonds rated AA or better that have at least $50 million outstanding to determine the benefit obligations at year end. The discount rate used to determine periodic benefit costs for the years ended September 30, 2015 and prior were consistent with the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation as of the prior fiscal year end.

As of September 30, 2015, the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation at year end was based on a high-quality corporate bond yield curve matched with projected separate cash flows to settle the entire benefit obligations. The discount rate used to determine periodic service cost and interest costs of the overall benefit costs for the year ending September 30, 2016 will be based on spot rates derived from the same high-quality corporate bond yield curve used to determine the September 30, 2015 benefit obligation matched with separate cash flows for each future year.

In the United Kingdom and Japan, Woodward continues to use a high-quality corporate bond yield curve matched with separate cash flows to develop a single rate to determine the single rate equivalent to settle the entire benefit obligations in each jurisdiction. The discount rate used to determine periodic service cost and interest costs of the overall benefit costs for the year ending September 30, 2016 will be based on spot rates derived from the same high-quality corporate bond yield curve used to determine the September 30, 2015 benefit obligation matched with separate cash flows for each future year.

In Switzerland, Woodward used high quality swap rates plus a credit spread of 0.20% in fiscal year 2013 as high quality swaps are available in Switzerland at various durations and trade at higher volumes than bonds. Woodward’s assumed rate in Switzerland did not differ significantly from this benchmark. As of September 30, 2014 Woodward no longer sponsors a defined benefit plan is Switzerland.

Compensation increase assumptions, where applicable, are based upon historical experience and anticipated future management actions.

In determining the long-term rate of return on plan assets, Woodward assumes that the historical long-term compound growth rates of equity and fixed-income securities will predict the future returns of similar investments in the plan portfolio. Investment management and other fees paid out of the plan assets are factored into the determination of asset return assumptions.

Mortality assumptions are based on published mortality studies developed primarily based on past experience of the broad population and modified for projected longevity trends. The projected benefit obligations in the United States as of September 30, 2015 was based on the Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report projected back to 2007 using the SOA’s Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 (“MP-2014”) and projected forward using a custom projection scale based on MP-2014 with a 10-year convergence period and a long-term rate of 0.75%. As of September 30, 2014, mortality assumptions in the United States were based on the Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) Static 2014 tables. As of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, mortality assumptions in Japan were based on the Standard rates 2014 and Standard rates 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, mortality assumptions for the United Kingdom pension scheme were based on the Self-administered pension scheme (“SAPS”) S2 “all” tables with a projected 1.5% annual improvement rate.

Net periodic benefit costs consist of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:



	Year Ended September 30,
	United States						Other Countries						Total
	2015		2014		2013		2015		2014		2013		2015		2014		2013
Service cost	$	2,018	$	3,516	$	4,608	$	784	$	988	$	1,052	$	2,802	$	4,504	$	5,660
Interest cost		5,956		6,382		5,569		2,128		2,410		2,113		8,084		8,792		7,682
Expected return on plan assets		(10,647)		(9,813)		(8,183)		(3,032)		(3,070)		(2,610)		(13,679)		(12,883)		(10,793)
Amortization of:
Net (gains) losses		396		330		1,374		190		655		465		586		985		1,839
Net prior service (benefit) cost		383		97		75		-		(4)		(8)		383		93		67
Settlement costs		-		-		-		-		-		37		-		-		37
Curtailment (benefits)		-		(6,624)		-		-		(915)		-		-		(7,539)		-
Net periodic (benefit) cost	$	(1,894)	$	(6,112)	$	3,443	$	70	$	64	$	1,049	$	(1,824)	$	(6,048)	$	4,492

The curtailment gain in “United States” in the year ended September 30, 2014 pertained to amendments made to one of Woodward’s plans that resulted in a freeze to the benefits of certain U.S. employees in California.

The curtailment gain in “Other Countries” in the year ended September 30, 2014 pertained to workforce reductions related to the closure of Woodward’s Swiss facility in connection with the realignment of the renewable power business that occurred in the third quarter of fiscal year 2013.

Settlement costs were expensed in fiscal year 2013 as a result of normal attrition among participants in the Company's defined benefit plan in Switzerland.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the defined benefit pension plans:



	At or for the Year Ended September 30,
	United States				Other Countries				Total
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	137,740	$	126,532	$	63,535	$	63,891	$	201,275	$	190,423
Service cost		2,018		3,516		784		988		2,802		4,504
Interest cost		5,956		6,382		2,128		2,410		8,084		8,792
Net actuarial losses		4,206		12,446		2,715		3,015		6,921		15,461
Contribution by participants		28		-		23		91		51		91
Benefits paid		(4,078)		(3,732)		(2,424)		(2,318)		(6,502)		(6,050)
Amounts paid by Company for Pension Protection Fund levy		-		-		-		(13)		-		(13)
Plan amendments		-		3,355		-		-		-		3,355
Settlements		-		-		-		(1,985)		-		(1,985)
Curtailments		-		(10,759)		-		(1,499)		-		(12,258)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		-		-		(4,530)		(1,045)		(4,530)		(1,045)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	$	145,870	$	137,740	$	62,231	$	63,535	$	208,101	$	201,275

Changes in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	142,090	$	129,518	$	63,071	$	60,657	$	205,161	$	190,175
Actual return on plan assets		(2,535)		15,764		2,975		5,212		440		20,976
Contributions by the company		85		540		1,483		2,422		1,568		2,962
Contributions by plan participants		28		-		23		91		51		91
Benefits paid		(4,078)		(3,732)		(2,424)		(2,318)		(6,502)		(6,050)
Settlements		-		-		-		(1,985)		-		(1,985)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		-		-		(4,465)		(1,008)		(4,465)		(1,008)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	135,590	$	142,090	$	60,663	$	63,071	$	196,253	$	205,161
Net over/(under)funded status at end of year	$	(10,280)	$	4,350	$	(1,568)	$	(464)	$	(11,848)	$	3,886

At September 30, 2015, the Company’s defined benefit pension plans in the United Kingdom represented $52,295 of the total projected benefit obligation and in Japan represented $9,936 of the total projected benefit obligation. At September 30, 2015, the United Kingdom represented $50,033 of the total fair value of plan assets and Japan represented $10,630 of the total fair value of plan assets.

The accumulated benefit obligations of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans in the United States was $145,870 and in Other Countries was $59,742 at September 30, 2015, and in the United States was $137,423 and in Other Countries was $61,041 at September 30, 2014.



	Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets				Plans with accumulated benefit obligation less than plan assets
	At September 30,				At September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Projected benefit obligation	$	(198,165)	$	(25,955)	$	(9,936)	$	(175,320)
Accumulated benefit obligation		(196,694)		(25,955)		(8,918)		(172,509)
Fair value of plan assets		185,623		24,671		10,630		180,490

The following tables provide the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position and accumulated comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension plans:



	At or for the Year Ended September 30,
	United States				Other Countries				Total
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Amounts recognized in statement of financial position consist of:
Other non-current assets	$	-	$	5,634	$	694	$	-	$	694	$	5,634
Other non-current liabilities		(10,280)		(1,284)		(2,262)		(464)		(12,542)		(1,748)
Net over/(under)funded status at end of year	$	(10,280)	$	4,350	$	(1,568)	$	(464)	$	(11,848)	$	3,886

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
Unrecognized net prior service cost	$	4,241	$	4,624	$	-	$	-	$	4,241	$	4,624
Unrecognized net losses		26,861		9,867		13,618		11,902		40,479		21,769
Total amounts recognized		31,102		14,491		13,618		11,902		44,720		26,393
Deferred taxes		(11,890)		(5,527)		(4,817)		(4,131)		(16,707)		(9,658)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income	$	19,212	$	8,964	$	8,801	$	7,771	$	28,013	$	16,735

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:



	Year Ended September 30,
	United States				Other Countries				Total
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Net (gain) loss	$	17,390	$	(4,269)	$	2,771	$	(622)	$	20,161	$	(4,891)
Prior service cost		-		3,355		-		-		-	$	3,355
Loss due to settlement or curtailment arising during the period		-		6,624		-		915		-		7,539
Amortization of:
Net losses		(396)		(330)		(190)		(655)		(586)		(985)
Prior service benefit (cost)		(383)		(97)		-		4		(383)		(93)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		-		-		(865)		(107)		(865)		(107)
Total recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)	$	16,611	$	5,283	$	1,716	$	(465)	$	18,327	$	4,818

The amounts expected to be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and reported as a component of net periodic benefit cost during fiscal year 2016 are as follows:



	United States		Other Countries		Total
Prior service cost	$	383	$	-	$	383
Net actuarial losses		1,292		263		1,555

Pension benefit payments are made from the assets of the pension plans. Using foreign exchange rates as of September 30, 2015 and expected future service assumptions, it is anticipated that the future benefit payments will be as follows:



Year Ending September 30,	United States		Other Countries		Total
2016	$	5,140	$	2,214	$	7,354
2017		5,776		2,357		8,133
2018		6,401		2,364		8,765
2019		7,071		2,560		9,631
2020		7,614		2,467		10,081
2021 – 2025		44,971		13,900		58,871

Woodward expects its pension plan contributions in fiscal year 2016 will be $24 in the United States, $544 in the United Kingdom, and $251 in Japan.

Pension plan assets

The overall investment objective of the pension plan assets is to earn a rate of return over time which, when combined with Company contributions, satisfies the benefit obligations of the pension plans and maintains sufficient liquidity to pay benefits.

As the timing and nature of the plan obligations varies for each Company sponsored pension plan, investment strategies have been individually designed for each pension plan with a common focus on maintaining diversified investment portfolios that provide for long-term growth while minimizing the risk to principal associated with short-term market behavior. The strategy for each of the plans balances the requirements to generate returns, using investments expected to produce higher returns, such as equity securities, with the need to control risk within the pension plans using less volatile investment assets, such as debt securities. A strategy of more equity-oriented allocation is adopted for those plans which have a longer-term investment plan based on the timing of the associated benefit obligations.

A pension oversight committee is assigned by the Company to each pension plan. Among other responsibilities, each committee is responsible for all asset class allocation decisions. Asset class allocations, which are reviewed by the respective pension committee on at least an annual basis, are designed to meet or exceed certain market benchmarks which align with each plan’s investment objectives. In evaluating the asset allocation choices, consideration is given to the proper long-term level of risk for each plan, particularly with respect to the long-term nature of each plan’s liabilities, the impact of asset allocation on investment results and the corresponding impact on the volatility and magnitude of plan contributions and expense and the impact certain actuarial techniques may have on the plans’ recognition of investment experience. From time to time, the plans may move outside the prescribed asset class allocation in order to meet significant liabilities with respect to one or more individuals approaching retirement.

Risks associated with the plan assets include interest rate fluctuation risk, market fluctuation risk, risk of default by debt issuers and liquidity risk. To manage these risks, the assets are managed by established, professional investment firms and performance is evaluated regularly by the Company’s pension oversight committee against specific benchmarks and each plan’s investment objectives. Liability management and asset class diversification are central to the Company’s risk management approach and overall investment strategy.

The assets of the U.S. plans are invested in actively managed mutual funds. The assets of the plan in Japan and the plan in the United Kingdom are invested in actively managed pooled investment funds. Each individual mutual fund or pooled investment fund has been selected based on the investment strategy of the related plan, which mirrors a specific asset class within the associated target allocation. Pension plan assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014 do not include any direct investment in Woodward’s common stock.

The asset allocations are monitored and rebalanced regularly by investment managers assigned to the individual pension plans. The actual allocations of pension plan assets and target allocation ranges by asset class, are as follows:



	At September 30,
	2015				2014
	Percentage of Plan Assets	Target Allocation Ranges			Percentage of Plan Assets	Target Allocation Ranges
United States:
Asset Class
Equity Securities	58.2%	40.7%	-	80.7%	60.0%	40.7%	-	80.7%
Debt Securities	41.5%	29.3%	-	49.3%	39.8%	29.3%	-	49.3%
Other	0.3%	0.0%			0.2%	0.0%
	100.0%				100.0%
United Kingdom:
Asset Class
Equity Securities	36.0%	40.0%	-	70.0%	48.2%	40.0%	-	70.0%
Debt Securities	63.8%	35.0%	-	65.0%	51.7%	35.0%	-	65.0%
Other	0.2%	0.0%			0.1%	0.0%
	100.0%				100.0%
Japan:
Asset Class
Equity Securities	38.6%	36.0%	-	44.0%	40.7%	36.0%	-	44.0%
Debt Securities	60.4%	55.0%	-	63.0%	58.4%	55.0%	-	63.0%
Other	1.0%	0.0%	-	2.0%	0.9%	0.0%	-	2.0%
	100.0%				100.0%

Actual allocations to each asset class can vary from target allocations due to periodic market value fluctuations, investment strategy changes, and the timing of benefit payments and contributions.

The following table presents Woodward’s pension plan assets using the fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP as of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014.



	At September 30, 2015
	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
	United States		Other Countries		United States		Other Countries		United States		Other Countries		Total
Asset Category:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	467	$	201	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	668
Mutual funds:
U.S. corporate bond fund		56,210		-		-		-		-		-		56,210
U.S. equity large cap fund		47,517		-		-		-		-		-		47,517
International equity large cap growth fund		31,396		-		-		-		-		-		31,396
Pooled funds:
Japanese equity securities		-		-		-		2,116		-		-		2,116
International equity securities		-		-		-		1,982		-		-		1,982
Japanese fixed income securities		-		-		-		4,805		-		-		4,805
International fixed income securities		-		-		-		1,624		-		-		1,624
Index linked U.K. equity fund		-		-		-		8,687		-		-		8,687
Index linked international equity fund		-		-		-		9,336		-		-		9,336
Index linked U.K. corporate bonds fund		-		-		-		16,613		-		-		16,613
Index linked U.K. government securities fund		-		-		-		4,716		-		-		4,716
Index linked U.K. long-term government securities fund		-		-		-		10,583		-		-		10,583
Total assets	$	135,590	$	201	$	-	$	60,462	$	-	$	-	$	196,253

	At September 30, 2014
	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
	United States		Other Countries		United States		Other Countries		United States		Other Countries		Total
Asset Category:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	316	$	168	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	484
Mutual funds:
U.S. corporate bond fund		56,559		-		-		-		-		-		56,559
U.S. equity large cap fund		49,220		-		-		-		-		-		49,220
International equity large cap growth fund		35,995		-		-		-		-		-		35,995
Pooled funds:
Japanese equity securities		-		-		-		2,330		-		-		2,330
International equity securities		-		-		-		2,067		-		-		2,067
Japanese fixed income securities		-		-		-		4,676		-		-		4,676
International fixed income securities		-		-		-		1,638		-		-		1,638
Global target return equity/bond fund		-		-		-		12,327		-		-		12,327
Index linked U.K. equity fund		-		-		-		6,240		-		-		6,240
Index linked international equity fund		-		-		-		6,593		-		-		6,593
Index linked U.K. corporate bonds fund		-		-		-		16,897		-		-		16,897
Index linked U.K. government securities fund		-		-		-		4,566		-		-		4,566
Index linked U.K. long-term government securities fund		-		-		-		5,569		-		-		5,569
Total assets	$	142,090	$	168	$	-	$	62,903	$	-	$	-	$	205,161

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents held by the Company's pension plans are held on deposit with creditworthy financial institutions. The fair value of the cash and cash equivalents are based on the quoted market price of the respective currency in which the cash is maintained.

Pension assets invested in mutual funds: The assets of the Company’s U.S. pension plans are invested in various mutual funds which invest in both equity and debt securities. The fair value of the mutual funds is determined based on the quoted market price of each fund.

Pension assets invested in pooled funds: The assets of the Company’s Japan and United Kingdom pension plans are invested in pooled investment funds, which include both equity and debt securities. The assets of the United Kingdom pension plan are invested in index-linked pooled funds which aim to replicate the movements of an underlying market index to which the fund is linked. Fair value of the pooled funds is based on the net asset value of shares held by the plan as reported by the fund sponsors. All pooled funds held by plans outside of the United States are considered to be invested in international equity and debt securities. Although the underlying securities may be largely domestic to the plan holding the investment assets, the underlying assets are considered international from the perspective of the Company.

There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 assets in fiscal years 2015 or 2014.

Other postretirement benefit plans

Woodward provides other postretirement benefits to its employees including postretirement medical benefits and life insurance benefits. Postretirement medical benefits are provided to certain current and retired employees and their covered dependants and beneficiaries in the United States and the United Kingdom. Benefits include the option to elect company provided medical insurance coverage to age 65 and a Medicare supplemental plan after age 65. Life insurance benefits are provided to certain retirees in the United States under frozen plans which are no longer available to current employees. A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for Woodward’s other postretirement benefit plans.

The postretirement medical benefit plans, other than the plan assumed in an acquisition in fiscal year 2009, were frozen in fiscal year 2006 and no additional employees may participate in the plans. Generally, employees who had attained age 55 and had rendered 10 or more years of service before the plans were frozen were eligible for these postretirement medical benefits.

Certain participating retirees are required to contribute to the plans in order to maintain coverage. The plans provide postretirement medical benefits for approximately 850 retired employees and their covered dependents and beneficiaries and may provide future benefits to approximately 35 active employees and their covered dependents and beneficiaries, upon retirement, if the employees elect to participate. All the postretirement medical plans are fully insured for retirees who have attained age 65.

The actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit cost and plan obligations of postretirement benefits were as follows:



	2015		2014		2013
Weighted-average discount rate used to determine benefit obligation at September 30	4.01	%	4.40	%	5.14	%
Weighted-average discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended September 30	4.40		5.14		4.11

The discount rate assumption is intended to reflect the rate at which the postretirement benefits could be effectively settled based upon the assumed timing of the benefit payments.

In the United Kingdom, Woodward continues to use a high-quality corporate bond yield curve matched with separate cash flows to develop a single rate to determine the single rate equivalent to settle the entire benefit obligations. The discount rate used to determine periodic service cost and interest costs of the overall benefit costs for the year ending September 30, 2016 will be based on spot rates derived from the same high-quality corporate bond yield curve used to determine the September 30, 2015 benefit obligation matched with separate cash flows for each future year.

Mortality assumptions are based on published mortality studies developed primarily based on past experience of the broad population and modified for projected longevity trends. The projected benefit obligations in the United States as of September 30, 2015 was based on the SOA’s RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report projected back to 2007 using the SOA’s MP-2014 and projected forward using a custom projection scale based on MP-2014 with a 10-year convergence period and a long-term rate of 0.75%. As of September 30, 2014, mortality assumptions in the United States were based on the PPA Static 2014 tables. As of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, mortality assumptions for the United Kingdom pension scheme were based on the SAPS S2 “all” tables with a projected 1.5% annual improvement rate.

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates at September 30, were as follows:



	2015		2014
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year	7.00	%	7.00	%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline
(the ultimate trend rate)	5.00	%	5.00	%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate	2024		2023

Healthcare costs have generally trended upward in recent years, sometimes by amounts greater than 5%. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for postretirement medical plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:



	Change In Health Care Cost Trend Rate
	1% increase		1% decrease
Effect on projected fiscal year 2016 service and interest cost	$	130	$	(111)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at September 30, 2015		3,372		(2,949)

Net periodic benefit costs consist of the following components reflected as expense in Woodward’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:



	Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2013
Service cost	$	30	$	47	$	71
Interest cost		1,233		1,432		1,244
Amortization of:
Net gains		(73)		(200)		(68)
Net prior service benefit		(158)		(158)		(158)
Net periodic cost	$	1,032	$	1,121	$	1,089

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the postretirement benefits for the fiscal years ended September 30:



	Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014
Changes in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	29,225	$	28,996
Service cost		30		47
Interest cost		1,233		1,432
Premiums paid by plan participants		1,613		1,843
Net actuarial losses		6,705		1,145
Benefits paid		(3,848)		(4,243)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		(31)		5
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year	$	34,927	$	29,225
Changes in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	-	$	-
Contributions by the company		2,235		2,400
Premiums paid by plan participants		1,613		1,843
Benefits paid		(3,848)		(4,243)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	-	$	-
Funded status at end of year	$	(34,927)	$	(29,225)

The Company’s postretirement medical plan in the United Kingdom represents $486 of the total benefit obligation at September 30, 2015. The Company paid $15 in medical benefits to participants of the United Kingdom postretirement medical plan in fiscal year 2015.

The following tables provide the amounts recognized in the statement of financial position and accumulated comprehensive loss (income) for the postretirement plans:



	Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014
Amounts recognized in statement of financial position consist of:
Accrued liabilities	$	(2,481)	$	(2,262)
Other non-current liabilities		(32,446)		(26,963)
Funded status at end of year	$	(34,927)	$	(29,225)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) consist of:
Unrecognized net prior service benefit	$	(477)	$	(635)
Unrecognized net (gains) losses		3,745		(3,031)
Total amounts recognized		3,268		(3,666)
Deferred taxes		(1,267)		1,388
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)	$	2,001	$	(2,278)

Woodward pays plan benefits from its general funds; therefore, there are no segregated plan assets as of September 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014.

The accumulated benefit obligations of the Company’s postretirement plans were $34,927 at September 30, 2015 and $29,225 at September 30, 2014.

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:



	Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014
Net loss	$	6,705	$	1,145
Amortization of:
Net gains		73		200
Prior service benefit		158		159
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		(2)		3
Total recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	6,934	$	1,507

Using foreign currency exchange rates as of September 30, 2015 and expected future service, it is anticipated that the future Company contributions to pay benefits, excluding participate contributions, will be as follows:



Year Ending September 30,
2016	$	4,103
2017		4,086
2018		4,082
2019		4,097
2020		4,066
2021 – 2025		19,476

Multiemployer defined benefit plans

Woodward operates two multiemployer defined benefit plans for certain employees in the Netherlands and Japan. The amounts of contributions associated with the multiemployer plans were as follows:



		Year Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2013
Company contributions	$	600	$	728	$	797

The plan in the Netherlands is a quasi-mandatory plan that covers all of Woodward’s employees in the Netherlands and is part of the Dutch national pension system.

Woodward was notified by the Japanese plan administrator that the plan for its employees in Japan is being reorganized. Woodward has elected to remain in the reorganized plan and will incur no incremental cost for remaining in the reorganized plan. The Company may elect to withdraw from its multiemployer plan in Japan, although it has no plans to do so. If the Company elects to withdraw from the Japanese plan, it would incur an immaterial one-time contribution cost. Changes in Japanese regulations could trigger reorganization of or abolishment of the Japanese multiemployer plan, which could impact future funding levels.